amended PIS SMPH letterhead
Transcription
amended PIS SMPH letterhead
June 3, 2013 THE PHILIPPINE STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. Philippine Stock Exchange Plaza, Ayala Triangle, Ayala Avenue, Makati City, Philippines Attention: JANET A. ENCARNACION Head, Disclosure Department Gentlemen: We hereby submit to the Exchange the Preliminary Information Statement of SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. with the inclusion of the appraisal report prepared by CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. Thank you for your kind attention. Very truly yours, Teresa Cecilia H. Reyes Vice President-Finance COVER SHEET A S 0 9 4 - 0 0 0 0 8 8 SEC Registration Number S M P R I M E H O L D I N G S , I N C . A N D S U B S I DD I A R I E S (Company’s Full Name) M a l l o f C o r a M a l o n e l l A s W a y o f 1 0 , A s i a A r e n a c o r . i C o m p l a J A n n e x . W . D i e x , o k n o B r g y C B P - 1 A , P a s a y C i t y (Business Address: No. Street City/Town/Province) Mr. Jeffrey C. Lim (Contact Person) 1 2 3 1 Mont h Day B u i . l d i n g B l v d . , 7 6 , Z 1 3 0 0 831-1000 (Company Telephone Number) 2 0 - I S (Form Type) (Fiscal Year) 0 4 1 6 Mont h Day (Annual Meeting) (Secondary License Type, If Applicable) Dept. Requiring this Doc. Amended Articles Number/Section Total Amount of Borrowings Total No. of Stockholders Domestic Foreign To be accomplished by SEC Personnel concerned File Number LCU Document ID Cashier STAMPS Remarks: Please use BLACK ink for scanning purposes. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 20-IS INFORMATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE 1. Check the appropriate box: [ ] Preliminary Information Statement [ ] Definitive Information Statement 2. Name of Registrant as specified in its charter SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. 3. PHILIPPINES Province, country or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization 4. SEC Identification Number AS094-000088 5. BIR Tax Identification Code 003-058-789 6. Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1A, Pasay City, Philippines 1300 Address of principal office Postal Code 7. Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (632) 831-1000 8. July 10, 2013, 2:30 P.M., Function Room 3, SMX Convention Center, Seashell Lane, Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City Date, time and place of the meeting of security holders 9. Approximate date on which the Information Statement is first to be sent or given to security holders: June 19, 2013 10. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 8 and 12 of the Code or Sections 4 and 8 of the RSA (information on number of shares and amount of debt is applicable only to corporate registrants): Title of Each Class Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding or Amount of Debt Outstanding Common shares 11. 17,373,677,760 Are any or all of registrant's securities listed in a Stock Exchange? Yes __ ___ No _______ If yes, disclose the name of such Stock Exchange and the class of securities listed therein: Common Shares Philippine Stock Exchange 2 PART I. INFORMATION REQUIRED IN INFORMATION STATEMENT A. BUSINESS AND GENERAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. Date, Time And Place Of Meeting Of Security Holders The special stockholders’ meeting (the “Meeting”) of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (“SM Prime” or the “Corporation”) is scheduled to be held on July 10, 2013, 2:30 p.m. at the Function Room 3, SMX Convention Center, Seashell Lane, Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City. The complete mailing address of the principal office of the registrant is Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1A, 1300 Pasay City. The approximate date on which the Information Statement will be sent or given to the stockholders is on June 19, 2013. Statement that proxies are not solicited WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY. Voting Securities The record date for purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to vote is June 18, 2013. The total number of shares outstanding and entitled to vote in the stockholders’ meeting is 17,373,677,760 shares (net of 18,857,000 treasury shares). Stockholders are entitled to cumulative voting in the election of the board of directors, as provided by the Corporation Code. ITEM 2. Dissenters' Right of Appraisal A stockholder has the right to dissent and demand payment of the fair value of his shares in the following instances: (a) (b) (c) In case any amendment to the articles of incorporation has the effect of changing or restricting the rights of any stockholders or class of shares, or of authorizing preferences in any respect superior to those of outstanding shares of any shares of any class, or of extending or shortening the term of corporate existence. In case of sale, lease, exchange, transfer, mortgage, pledge or other disposition of all or substantially all of the corporate property and assets as provided in the Corporation Code; and, In case of merger or consolidation. A stockholder must have voted against the proposed corporate action in order to avail himself of the appraisal right. The procedure for the exercise by a dissenting stockholder of his appraisal right is as follows: (a) (b) (c) The dissenting stockholder shall make a written demand on the corporation within 30 days after the date on which the vote was taken for payment for the fair value of his shares. The failure of the stockholder to make the demand within the 30 day period shall be deemed a waiver on his appraisal right; If the proposed corporate action is implemented or effected, the corporation shall pay to such stockholder, upon surrender of corresponding certificate(s) of stock within 10 days after demanding payment for his shares (Sec. 86), the fair value thereof; and, Upon payment of the agreed or awarded price, the stockholder shall transfer his share to the corporation. During the Meeting, the merger of the Corporation with SM Land, Inc., discussed herein under Item 12, will be presented for approval by the stockholders. Any dissenting stockholder shall have the right to exercise its/his right of appraisal. 3 ITEM 3. Interest of Certain Persons in or Opposition to Matters to be Acted Upon There is no matter to be acted upon in which any Director or Executive Officer is involved or had a direct, indirect or substantial interest. Other than the nominal shares held by the Directors of SM Land, there are no directors/officer who will swap their shares for SM Prime shares. No Director has informed the Company of his opposition to any matter to be acted upon. B. CONTROL AND COMPENSATION INFORMATION ITEM 4. Voting Securities And Principal Holders Thereof (1) Number of Common Shares Outstanding The Company has 17,373,677,760 (net of 18,857,000 treasury shares) common shares outstanding as of April 230, 2013. Each share is entitled to one vote. All stockholders of record as at June 18, 2013 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Stockholders’ Meeting. (2) Manner of Voting Each share is entitled to one vote. Voting during the Meeting shall be by viva voce. (3) Security Ownership of Certain Record and Beneficial Owners as of April 30, 2013 The following are the owners of SM Prime’s common stock in excess of 5% of total outstanding shares: Title of Securities Common Name of Beneficial Owner and Relationship with Record Owner Name and Address of Record Owner and Relationship with Issuer SM Land, Inc. (Related Company)1 SM Land, Inc.2 Citizenship -do- SM Investments Corporation (SMIC) (Parent Company) 3 One Ecom Center, Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, CBP-1A, Pasay City SMIC4 PCD Nominee Corp. 5 MSE Bldg., Ayala Ave., Makati City PCD Participants5, 6 1.The Percent of Class (%) Filipino 7,116,954,491 (b) 40.96 Filipino 3,761,791,190 (b) 21.65 5,981,987,004 (r) 34.43 One Ecom Center, Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, CBP-1A, Pasay City -do- Amount and Nature of Direct Record/Beneficial Ownership (“r” or “b”) Filipino 2.80% Non Filipino 31.63% following are the individuals holding the direct beneficial ownership of SM Land, Inc.: Henry Sy, Sr., Felicidad T. Sy, Teresita T. Sy, Henry T. Sy, Jr., Hans T. Sy, Herbert T. Sy, Harley T. Sy and Elizabeth T. Sy - 4.00% each. 2. Henry Sy, Sr. and Henry Sy, Jr. are the Chairman and Vice Chairman/ President of SM Land, Inc., respectively. 3.The following are the individuals holding the direct beneficial ownership of SMIC: Henry Sy, Sr.1.88%, Felicidad T. Sy-6.47%, Henry T. Sy, J.r-7.51%, Hans T. Sy-8.47%, Herbert T. Sy-8.15%, Harley T. Sy-7.52%,, Teresita T. Sy-7.33% and Elizabeth Sy-6.00%. 4 4. Henry Sy, Sr. is the Chairman of SMIC and Teresita T. Sy and Henry Sy, Jr. are the Vice Chairmen of SMIC. 5.The PCD participants have the power to decide how their shares are to be voted. There are no other individual stockholders which own more than 5% of the Company. 6 The PCD is not related to the Company. (4) Security Ownership of Management as of April 30, 2013 Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Title of Name of Beneficial (D) Direct (I) Securities Owner of Common Stock Citizenship Indirect Common -do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do- Henry Sy, Sr. Jose L. Cuisia, Jr. Teresita T. Sy Henry T. Sy, Jr. Hans T. Sy Herbert T. Sy Elizabeth T. Sy Gregorio U. Kilayko Joselito H. Sibayan Jorge T. Mendiola Jeffrey C. Lim Christopher S. Bautista All directors and executive officers as a group Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino 14,782,893 (I) 497,661 (D&I) 1,352,902 (D) 15,652 (D) 15,652 (D) 485,128 (D) 2,033,110 (D) 12,500 (D) 1,875 (D) 1,000 (D) 50,000 (D) 37,500 (D) 19,285,873 Class of Securities Percent of Class Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Voting 0.11 There are no persons holding more than 5% of a class under a voting trust or any similar agreements as of balance sheet date. There are no existing or planned stock warrant offerings. There are no arrangements which may result in a change in control of the Company. There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the first quarter of the calendar year covered by this report. ITEM 5. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant (a) There will be no action to be taken during the Meeting with respect to the election of directors ITEM 6. Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers There will be no action to be taken during the Meeting with regard to: (a) the election of directors; (b) any bonus, profit sharing or other compensation plan, contract or arrangement in which any director, nominee for election as a director, or executive officer of the Corporation will participate; (c) any pension or retirement plan in which any such person will participate; or (d) the granting or extension to any such person of any option/s, warrant/s or right/s to purchase any securities. ITEM 7. Independent Public Accountants There will be no action relating to the election, approval or ratification of the Corporation's accountant that will be taken-up during the Meeting. ITEM 8. Compensation Plans There will be no action to be taken during the Meeting with respect to any plan pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation may be paid or distributed. 5 C. ISSUANCE AND EXCHANGE OF SECURITIES SM Prime intends to enter into several transactions that will involve the issuance of its shares of common stock as part of a reorganization (the “Reorganization”) that will be undertaken in order to consolidate the real estate holdings and interest of the real estate companies which are controlled by the SM Group. The Reorganization will involve a series of transactions that will effectively allow such companies to combine their real estate assets and interests into SM Prime. The Reorganization is undertaken to: Create an integrated real estate platform to further enhance the value of the SM Group’s real estate businesses New SM Prime will build on the strong track record of its component businesses, including being the number one shopping mall developer and operator in the Philippines based on GFA, a leading residential developer in the Philippines in terms of condominium units sold, and operating growing office, hotel and leisure segments. New SM Prime is expected to be one of the largest real estate companies listed in Southeast Asia and on the PSE in terms of market capitalization. New SM Prime’s increased free float adjusted market capitalization should translate into greater trading liquidity and increased weighting in regional indices. New SM Prime is expected to have a significant growth pipeline as underscored by its large and diversified land bank consisting of a pro-forma area of approximately 920 hectares of retail, commercial, and residential land in prime locations across the Philippines, which SM Prime believes will be among the largest in the country. In addition, SMIC has granted a non-binding right of first refusal to SM Prime to purchase additional land from SMIC to support further development initiatives. New SM Prime is expected to have a strong mix of recurring income from its mall and office operations, and profit from development activities from its residential operations. On a pro forma basis, taking into account the effects of the Exchange Offers and the Reorganization (as discussed in more detail in “Pro Forma Financial Information”), 73.6% of New SM Prime’s net income for 2012 was derived from recurring sources. SM Prime believes it will have the opportunity to accelerate its growth by participating in higher growth and higher-return development opportunities in the residential, commercial, hospitality and tourism sectors due to its fully integrated real estate platform. New SM Prime intends to leverage on the diverse skill sets of each of its component companies to extract optimal value across the real estate value chain. SM Prime believes it can maximize existing plots of its retail developments that may be underutilized or unutilized by adding residential, commercial and hospitality developments. SM Prime also believes it will have greater flexibility to undertake more large scale integrated mixed use developments such as the 60-hectare Mall of Asia (“MOA”) complex, which are typically built on a larger scale, have more efficient use of land and, in general, are expected by SM Prime to achieve higher overall rates of return and profit margins. New SM Prime intends to replicate the MOA complex’s successful development strategy in other parts of the Philippines. New SM Prime has begun this process with the development of a new mixed used development, the 30-hectare South Road property in Cebu, known as SM Seaside City. Simplify corporate structure and increase organizational efficiencies New SM Prime expects to benefit from an increase in organizational efficiencies and to extract synergies among the component companies. New SM Prime also expects to have access to a larger pool of managerial talent with a strong track record and experience across several real estate classes working together under one entity to focus on maximizing the potential synergies of the new company. New SM Prime expects to take a more coordinated approach and better utilize its resources. For example, future land acquisitions will be done at the New SM Prime level, with a more holistic view of developing mixed used developments instead of individual properties or projects. New SM Prime intends to better utilize the component companies land bank by increasing communication and coordination within the group. New SM Prime expects to benefit from the enlarged group structure by achieving economies of scale resulting in greater bargaining power 6 with its extensive supplier network. In addition, New SM Prime expects to be able to better leverage and further enhance the already strong ‘SM’ brand through a more coordinated brand management effort. Rationalization of the selling and general administrative functions is also expected to reap significant cost synergies for New SM Prime. Enhanced ability to capitalize on strong economic fundamentals of the Philippines’ property, consumer and tourism sectors The government of the Republic of the Philippines (the “Government”) is targeting GDP growth of approximately 7 – 8%, which will make the Philippines one of the fastest growing economies in the world. GDP per capita based on purchasing power parity is expected to grow at an average rate of 6.6% from 2013 to 2017 according to Economic Intelligence Unit (“EIU”). The Philippines has a favorable demographic profile, including the second largest population in Southeast Asia and the 12th largest population in the world. It has the lowest median age of 23.3 years and second largest population growth amongst the neighboring countries of Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand, according to CIA World Factbook. SM Prime believes that a growing, young and increasingly affluent Philippine population will help drive growth in its recurring income from mall operations as well as drive sales in the residential development segment. The Philippines is currently enjoying a low-interest rate environment. This is supported by the recent sovereign credit upgrade to investment grade status as well as a benign inflation outlook, which is expected to remain around 4% based on consumer price index until 2015, according to Global Insight. Commercial lending rates are also expected to remain low for the remainder of 2013, at a rate of approximately 6.8%, according to EIU. The continual improvement of mortgage financing terms, including the rate of interest as well as length of the loan term, combined with low household borrowing levels is expected to result in greater affordability of home ownership among the Filipino population. The housing need in the Philippines is expected to reach 5.7 million in 2016, at a CAGR of 32.9% between 2011 and 2016, according to the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (“HUDCC”). SM Prime believes that the favorable lending environment along with the expected housing need in the Philippines will provide a sustainable demand for the residential segment as well as allow it to borrow money on favorable terms to fund its future growth plans. OFW remittances and the strong BPO sector have been key components to the Philippine growth story. OFW remittances have remained strong in recent years, even during the recent global financial crisis. OFW remittances are expected to grow at a CAGR of 7% between 2013 and 2017 according to EIU. Strong OFW remittance is a key driver in the growth of the Philippine residential property market as OFWs tend to seek out property investments and provide housing for their families back home. By 2016, the Philippine IT-BPO and global in-house center industry is expected to grow to U.S.$25 billion in revenue from U.S.$$11 billion in 2011, representing a CAGR of 18%, according to the Business Processing Association of the Philippines. This growth in the BPO sector is expected to provide strong support for demand in the office segment, which New SM Prime plans to target with its E-Com and Cyber office developments. It is expected that the Philippines will experience an increase in tourist arrivals in the near future, something which is widely believed to be long overdue with the Philippines lagging behind neighbouring countries despite its strategic location and attractive tourist offerings. In response, the Government has committed a total of U.S.$700 million worth of infrastructure investments to support the tourism industry in 2013 and 2014. The Department of Public Works and Highways will be building roads in areas identified in the national tourism plan in order to improve the travel experience for tourists. As a result, tourist arrivals are forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 7% between 2013 and 2017 according to EIU. In addition, the Philippines’ growing per capita income bodes well for domestic tourism. This expected increase in foreign and domestic tourist arrivals in the Philippines should benefit the hospitality and tourism industries, sectors that New SM Prime will be acutely focused on with its hotels and leisure projects. 7 Further strengthen the balance sheet and provide enhanced capital raising flexibility SM Prime believes that it will be able to create a more financially sound and profitable company following the Reorganization. New SM Prime is expected to approximately double its existing asset base from P148.1 billion as of December 31, 2012 to P284.1 billion on a pro-forma basis. The new company is also expected to achieve a lower leverage ratio (net debt / equity) of 40.4% on a pro forma basis from the current 58% of SM Prime as of December 31, 2012. Cash flow is expected to strengthen under New SM Prime, with EBITDA increasing by 33% from P20.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012 to P27.5 billion on a pro forma basis. New SM Prime believes it will be able to achieve better financial economies of scale, allowing it to lower its borrowing costs and cost of capital due to its larger size, liquidity and asset diversification. Such lower borrowing costs and cost of capital should help New SM Prime to accelerate major organic and inorganic growth initiatives on more favorable terms than it could without the impact of the Reorganization. The key steps in the Reorganization are as follows: · On June 4, 2013, upon prior approval by its board of directors and stockholders, SM Land, as stockholder of SM Prime, will launch a tender offer to acquire up to 100% of the outstanding capital stock of SMDC and Highlands Prime by transferring all or part of its SM Prime shares to the tendering stockholders of SMDC and Highlands Prime, in exchange for the shares of stock of SMDC and Highlands Prime. Unless the tender offer period is extended by SM Land and such extension is approved by the SEC, the tender offer is expected to be settled on July 19, 2013, unless SM Land extends the exchange offer period upon approval by the PSEC. · The following stockholders of SMDC and Highlands Prime have undertaken to tender their respective SMDC and Highlands Prime shares of stock in exchange for SM Prime shares: Number of SMDC Shares Percentage of Ownership SMDC Stockholder Syntrix Holdings, Inc, Sy Family Sysmart Corp. Sybase Equity Investments Corp. SMIC Current Shareholding of SM Land 663,350,828 667,055,940 481,495,721 110,943,856 11,683,813 6,043,148,078 7.155% 7.190% 5.193% 1.197% .126% 65.182% TOTAL 7,977,678,236 86.048% Highlands Prime Stockholder Belle Corporation SMIC Sysmart Corp. SMDC Sy Family TOTAL Number of Highlands Prime Shares 804,557,877 453,675,866 396,495,101 337,911,101 27,040,000 Percentage of Ownership 35.818% 20.197% 17.651% 15.043% 1.205% 2,019,679,945 89.914% · Upon commencement of the tender offer, SMDC and Highlands Prime will initiate a voluntary delisting process with the PSE in accordance with the PSE Rules on Delisting. · On 31 May 2013, the Board of Directors and stockholders of SM Prime will conduct their respective meetings in order to approve the following: 8 1. The merger of SM Land and SM Prime (the “Merger”) pursuant to Title IX (Merger and Consolidation) of Batas Pambansa Blg. 68, otherwise known as the Corporation Code of the Philippines and its tax free character pursuant to Section 40 (C)(2) of the National Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with SM Prime as the surviving entity (the "New SM Prime"); 2. The Plan of Merger which will include the amendment of the articles of incorporation of SM Prime as the surviving entity of the Merger, in order to: (a) change its primary purpose to include the business of SM Land; and (b) increase its authorized capital stock from 20,000,000,000 to 40,000,000,000. 3. The issuance of equivalent amount of SM Prime shares of stock to SMIC, Mountain Bliss Resort & Development Corp. (“Mountain Bliss”) and the Sy Family in exchange for the latter’s shares in the following companies with their corresponding shareholding interest (the "Share for Share Swap"): NAME OF COMPANY TO BE ACQUIRED STOCK HOLDER NO. OF SHARES HELD PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP 1 Prime Metroestate, Inc. (formerly Pilipinas Makro Inc.) SMIC 271,297 10.00% 2 Rappel Holdings, Inc. SMIC 1,356,500 50.00% 3 4 Prime Central Limited Tagaytay Resort Development Corporation SMIC 1,085,196 (ownership of Panther (BVI) Ltd., a 100% subsidiary of Prime Central Limited in Prime Metroestate, Inc.) 40.00% indirect ownership in Prime Metroestate Inc. (100% ownership of Prime Central, Inc.) SMIC 139,999 33.33% Sy Family 175,001 41.67% 5 SM Hotels and Conventions Corporation SMIC 10,999,995 100.00% 6 SM Arena Complex Corporation SMIC 3,999,995 100.00% 7 Costa Del Hamilo Inc. Mountain Bliss 4,157,495 100.00% 4. The issuance of additional and equivalent amount of SM Prime shares of stock to SMIC in exchange for the following real estate properties ("Property for Share Swap"): 9 Properties/Developments Classification Taal Vista Hotel Land and Building Building Building Building Building Building Building Building Tagaytay Land Land Tagaytay North Edsa, QC Davao Radisson Cebu Hotel Pico Sands Hotel SMX Convention Center MoA Arena MoA Arena Annex Corporate Office Casino and Waste Treatment Plant Tagaytay EDSA West Water Park Inn Davao · Location Cebu Batangas Pasay Pasay Pasay Pasay Tagaytay Building GFA (sq. m.)/ Asset Type No. of Rooms** 47,707 Hospitality 261* 396* Hospitality 154* Hospitality 51,097 Hospitality 67,536 Hospitality 95,273 Commercial 46,883 Commercial 19,394 Commercial 132,992 2,910 204* Land Land Hospitality A vote of the stockholders owning at least two thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock of SM Prime is required for the above transactions to be approved. The following stockholders of SM Prime have undertaken to vote favorably to the above matters to be taken up during the special stockholders’ meeting to be conducted by SM Prime: SM Prime Stockholder Number of SM Prime Shares SM Land SMIC PCD Nominee Corporation (Foreign) Sysmart Corporation Sy Family Total 7,116,954,491 3,761,791,190 1,141,121,514 36,483,131 19,357,439 Percentage of Ownership 40.964% 21.652% 6.568% .210% 0.111% 12,075,035,663 69.506% The Merger, including the Plan of Merger, the Share for Share Swap and the Property for Share Swap will be presented for approval by the stockholders of SM Prime during the Meeting. Consequently, because SM Prime will not have enough authorized capital stock to cover the above issuances of shares of common stock, an increase in authorized capital stock (and the consequent amendment of SM Prime’s articles of incorporation) from Twenty Billion (20,000,000,0000) to (40,000,000,000) shares of common stock with a par value of One Peso shall additionally be presented for approval by the stockholders. · On May 30, 2013, the Board of Directors and stockholders of SM Land will conduct their respective meetings in order to approve the Merger; and · Subsequent to the approval by the stockholders of SM Prime, the application for approval on the Merger, Share for Share Swap and Property for Share Swap is expected to be filed with the Commission and the application for listing of the SM Prime shares of stock issued pursuant to the Merger, Share for Share Swap and Property for Share Swap shall be subsequently filed with the PSE. The completion of the Reorganization shall have the following effects: · SM Prime and SM Land shall become a single corporation, with SM Prime as the surviving corporation designated in the Plan of Merger. The separate existence of SM Prime and SM Land shall cease. The surviving entity SM Prime shall thereupon and thereafter possess all the rights, privileges, immunities and franchises of each of SM Prime and SM Land; and all property, real 10 or personal, and all receivables due on whatever account, including subscriptions to shares and other choses in action, and all and every interest of, or belonging to, or due to each of SM Prime and SM Land, shall be transferred to and vested in SM Prime without further act or deed; · In addition, SM Prime will effectively own the following real and personal properties of the SM Group: · At least 84% direct interest in SMDC · At least 89% direct interest in Highlands Prime · 10% direct interest and 90% indirect interest in Prime Metro Estate Inc. · 100% direct interest in SM Hotels and Conventions Corporation · 100% direct interest in SM Arena Complex Corporation · 100% direct interest in Costa Del Hamilo Inc. · 75% direct interest and 25% indirect interest (via SMDC) in Tagaytay Resort Development Corporation; and · The following real assets that were previously owned by SMIC: · Taal Vista Hotel · Radisson Cebu Hotel · Pico Sands Hotel · SMX Convention Center · MoA Arena · MoA Arena Annex · Corporate Office · Casino and Waste Water Treatment Plant · Tagaytay · EDSA West · Park Inn Davao 11 · 1 Post reorganization, the corporate structure and shareholdings of SM Prime, SM Land, SMDC, Highlands Prime and other real estate companies of the SM Group are as follows: 2 Assuming full acceptance rate of the tender offers; Companies - Prime Metro Estate Inc., Tagaytay Resort & Development Corporation, SM Hotels and Conventions Corporation, SM Arena Complex Corporation, Costa Del Hamilo Inc.; Assets - Taal Vista hotel, Radisson Cebu Hotel, MoA Arena, etc ITEM 9. Authorization or Issuance of Securities As discussed above, to cover all the issuances of shares of stock for the aforementioned transactions, the Corporation shall apply for an increase in authorized capital stock to P 40,000,000,000.00 comprising of 40,000,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of 1.00. SM Prime shall present to its stockholders for approval the issuance of shares of common stock for the following transactions to the following.: · · · 14,390,923,857 shares of common stock to stockholders of SM Land pursuant to the Merger; 707,957,409 shares of common stock in exchange for shares of stock in various real estate companies; 837,764,769 shares of common stock to SMIC in exchange for various real estate properties; Common stock stockholders are entitled to dividends but their right to exercise their pre-emptive right is denied under the Articles of Incorporation of SM Prime. There is no provision under the Articles of Incorporation and the By-laws of the Corporation that would delay, defer or prevent a change in control of SM Prime. 12 The terms of the issuance of the authorized capital stock that will remain after the issuances for the transactions described above shall be determined by the board of directors. ITEM 10. Modification or Exchange of Securities There is no action to be taken with respect to the modification of any class of securities of the Corporation, or the issuance or authorization for issuance of one class of securities of the Corporation in exchange for outstanding securities of another class. D. FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 11. Financial Statements The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are incorporated herein by reference. Brief Description Of The General Nature And Scope Of The Registrant’s Business And Its Subsidiaries SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (“SM Prime” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the Philippines on January 6, 1994 to develop, conduct, operate and maintain the business of modern commercial shopping centers and all businesses related thereto such as the conduct, operation and maintenance of shopping center spaces for rent, amusement centers, or cinema theaters within the compound of the shopping centers. Its main sources of revenues include rental income from leases in mall and food court, cinema ticket sales and amusement income from bowling and ice skating. Its registered office is and principal place of business is Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1A, Pasay City. The subsidiaries of the Company follow: Company First Asia Realty Development Corporation (FARDC) Premier Central, Inc. Consolidated Prime Dev. Corp. (CPDC) Premier Southern Corp. (PSC) San Lazaro Holdings Corporation First Leisure Ventures Group, Inc. (FLVGI) Southernpoint Properties Corp. (SPC) Mega Make Enterprises Limited (Mega Make) and Subsidiaries Affluent Capital Enterprises Limited (Affluent) and Subsidiaries SM Land (China) Limited (SM Land China) and Subsidiaries Springfield Global Enterprises Limited (Springfield) Date and Place of Incorporation September 7, 1987, Philippines March 16, 1998, Philippines March 25, 1998, Philippines April 7, 1998, Philippines March 7, 2001, Philippines March 28, 2007, Philippines June 10, 2008, Philippines July 6, 2007, British Virgin Islands March 20, 2006, British Virgin Islands August 9, 2006, Hong Kong September 6, 2007, British Virgin Islands 13 Percentage of Ownership Malls Owned 74.19 SM Megamall 100.00 SM City Clark 100.00 100.00 SM City Dasmarinas SM City Batangas and SM City Lipa 100.00 -na- 50.00 SM by the Bay 100.00 SM Lanang Premier 100.00 SM City Jinjiang 100.00 SM City Xiamen and SM City Chengdu 100.00 SM City Suzhou and SM City Chongqing 100.00 -na- As of May 17, 2013, the Company has forty seven SM Supermalls in the country and five SM Supermalls in China. All the malls are under SM Prime except for the eleven malls which are under the subsidiaries mentioned in the above table. The SM by the Bay is an expansion of the Mall of Asia shopping mall. FLVGI is accounted for as a subsidiary by virtue of control, as evidenced by the majority members of the BOD representing the Parent Company, SM Prime. SLHC owns the land where SM City San Lazaro is constructed. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation 2013 Financial and Operational Highlights (In Million Pesos, except for financial ratios and percentages) First Quarter 2013 % to Revenues 2012 % to Revenues Revenues 7,830 100% 7,035 100% 11% Operating Expenses 3,604 46% 3,242 46% 11% Operating Income 4,226 54% 3,793 54% 11% Net Income 2,790 36% 2,434 35% 15% EBITDA 5,339 68% 4,759 68% 12% Mar 31 2013 % to Total Assets Dec 31 2012 % Change Profit & Loss Data % to Total Assets % Change Balance Sheet Data Total Assets 159,669 100% 148,130 100% 8% Investment Properties 126,017 79% 124,087 84% 2% Total Debt 60,426 38% 52,239 35% 16% Net Debt 39,085 24% 39,952 27% -2% Total Stockholders' Equity 72,706 46% 69,944 47% 4% Financial Ratios Mar 31 2013 Dec 31 2012 Current Ratio 1.80 1.34 Debt to Equity 0.45 : 0.55 0.43 : 0.57 Net Debt to Equity 0.35 : 0.65 0.36 : 0.64 Mar 31 (annualized) 2013 2012 Return on Equity 0.16 0.15 Return on Investment Properties 0.10 0.10 Debt to EBITDA 2.83 2.62 10.17 8.68 Operating Income to Revenues 0.54 0.54 EBITDA Margin 0.68 0.68 Net Income to Revenues 0.36 0.35 Debt Service Coverage Ratio 3.61 4.86 EBITDA to Interest Expense 14 SM Prime Holdings, Inc., the country’s leading shopping mall developer and operator which currently owns forty six malls in the Philippines and five malls in China, posts 11% increase in gross revenues for the first quarter 2013 to = P 7.83 billion from = P 7.03 billion in the same period 2012. Rental revenues, accounting for 86% of total revenues, grew by 12% amounting to = P 6.73 billion from same period last year’s = P 6.03 billion. This is largely due to rentals from new SM Supermalls opened in 2011 and 2012, namely SM City Masinag, SM City Olongapo, SM City Consolacion, SM City San Fernando, SM City General Santos and SM Lanang Premier, with a total gross floor area of 527,000 square meters. Excluding the new malls and expansions, same-store rental growth is at 7%. In terms of gross revenues, the five malls in China contributed = P 0.69 billion in 2013 and = P 0.62 billion in 2012, or 9% of total consolidated revenues. Likewise, in terms of rental revenues, the China operations contributed 10% to SM Prime’s consolidated rental revenues. Gross revenues of the five malls in China increased 11% in 2013 compared to 2012 largely due to improved mall productivity and lease renewals for the first three malls opened namely SM Xiamen, SM Jinjiang and SM Chengdu. Average occupancy rate for the first three malls is now at 96%. For the first quarter 2013, cinema ticket sales increased 8% to = P 761 million from = P 703 million in the same period 2012 due to more blockbuster movies and fully operational digital cinemas which enable a simultaneous release nationwide. The major blockbusters shown in 2013 were “Sisterakas,” “One More Try,” “Jack, The Giant Slayer,” “Chinese Zodiac,” and “Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters.” In 2012, major blockbusters shown were “Unofficially Yours,” “Enteng ng Ina Mo,” “The Hunger Games,” “Underworld 4: Awakening” and “John Carter.” Amusement income and others likewise increased by 12% to = P 336 million in the first quarter of 2013 from = P 301 million in the same period 2012 mainly due to higher income from amusement rides. This account is mainly composed of amusement income from rides, bowling and ice skating operations including the SM Science Discovery Center and the SM Storyland. Operating expenses increased by 11% from = P 3.24 billion in 2012 to = P 3.60 billion in 2013 mainly due to new malls opened in 2012. Same-store growth in operating expenses is 4%. Likewise, income from operations posted 11% growth from = P 3.79 billion in 2012 to = P 4.23 billion in 2013. In terms of operating expenses, the five malls in China contributed = P 0.42 billion in 2013 and = P 0.39 billion in 2012, or 12% of SM Prime’s consolidated operating expenses. Income from operations in China went up by 15% from = P 0.23 billion in 2012 to = P 0.27 billion in 2013. Interest and dividend income decreased by 24% to = P 99 million in 2013 compared to = P 131 million in 2012 mainly due to lower average interest rates of temporary investments in the first quarter of 2013 compared to same period last year. Interest expense for the year likewise decreased by 4% to = P 525 million in 2013 from = P 548 million in 2012 despite new loans, due to the low interest rate environment. Net income for the first quarter 2013 increased by 15% at = P 2.79 billion from = P 2.43 billion in the same period last year. On a stand-alone basis, the net income of China operations increased to = P 171 million in 2013 compared to = P 145 million in 2012 for a 19% increase, while net income of the Philippine operations grew 14% at = P 2.62 billion in 2013 from = P 2.29 billion in 2012. On the balance sheet side, cash and cash equivalents significantly increased by 96% from = P 9.71 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P 19.07 billion as of March 31, 2013. This account includes proceeds from the $200 million loan availed last January 2013 which will be used to fund capital expenditures both in the Philippines and China. Investments held for trading likewise decreased by 40% from = P 759 million as of December 31, 2012 to = P 457 million as of March 31, 2013, respectively, due to pretermination of investment in corporate bonds with original maturity of 2016. Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by 9% from = P 1.44 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P 1.57 billion as of March 31, 2013, mainly due to prepaid taxes on investment properties and prepaid insurance. 15 Derivative assets increased by 26% from = P 110 million as of December 31, 2012 to = P 138 million as of March 31, 2013, mainly resulting from unrealized mark-to-market gains on interest rate and cross currency swaps. Other noncurrent assets increased by 13% from = P 4.13 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P 4.66 billion as of March 31, 2013. This account mainly consists of deposits to contractors and suppliers and advances and deposits paid for leased properties. Long-term debt increased by 16% from = P 51.44 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P 59.63 billion as of March 31, 2013, due to new loan availment amounting to $200 million, net of prepayments. Liability for purchased land decreased 14% from = P 1.21 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P 1.04 billion as of March 31, 2013, due to subsequent payments. The Company’s performance indicators are measured in terms of the following: (1) current ratio which measures the ratio of total current assets to total current liabilities; (2) debt to equity which measures the ratio of interest bearing liabilities to stockholders’ equity; (3) net debt to equity which measures the ratio of interest bearing liabilities net of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities to stockholders’ equity; (4) debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) which measures the ratio of annualized operating cash flows to loans payable, current portion of long-term debt and interest expense, excluding the portion of debt which are fully hedged by cash and cash equivalents and temporary investments; (5) return on equity (ROE) which measures the ratio of net income to capital provided by stockholders; (6) return on investment properties (ROI) which measures the ratio of net income to investment properties excluding shopping mall complex under construction; (7) earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); (8) debt to EBITDA which measures the ratio of EBITDA to total interest-bearing liabilities; (9) EBITDA to interest expense which measures the ratio of EBITDA to interest expense; (10) operating income to revenues which basically measures the gross profit ratio; (11) EBITDA margin which measures the ratio of EBITDA to gross revenues and (12) net income to revenues which measures the ratio of net income to gross revenues. The following discuss in detail the key performance indicators of the Company. The Company’s current ratio increased to 1.80:1 from 1.34:1 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, mainly due to proceeds from the $200 million loan still in cash and cash equivalents. Similarly, Interest-bearing debt to stockholders’ equity increased to 0.45:0.55 from 0.43:0.57 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, while net interest-bearing debt to stockholders’ equity slightly decreased to 0.35:0.65 from 0.36:0.64 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, due to the additional borrowings. Debt service coverage ratio decreased to 3.61:1 from 4.86:1 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to higher current portion of long-term debt in 2013 compared to 2012. In terms of profitability, ROE slightly improved to 16% from 15% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. EBITDA increased by 12% to = P 5.34 billion in 2013 from = P 4.76 billion in 2012. Debt to EBITDA increased to 2.83:1 from 2.62:1 as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to increase in long-term debt. While EBITDA to interest expense increased to 10.17:1 from 8.68:1 for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to higher EBITDA in 2013 compared to 2012. Consolidated operating income to revenues is healthy at 54% for the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. On a stand-alone basis, operating income margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 55% and 39% in 2013, compared to 55% and 38% in 2012, respectively. EBITDA margin remains strong at 68% for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. On a stand-alone basis, EBITDA margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 69% and 60% in 2013 and 69% and 57% in 2012, respectively. 16 Net income to revenues slightly improved at 36% from 35% for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. On a stand-alone basis, net income margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 37% and 25% in 2013 and 36% and 23% in 2012, respectively. The Company has no known direct or contingent financial obligation that is material to the Company, including any default or acceleration of an obligation. There were no contingent liabilities or assets in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company has no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations during the reporting year as of balance sheet date. There are no known trends, events, material changes, seasonal aspects or uncertainties that are expected to affect the company’s continuing operations. For the year 2013, the Company expects to incur capital expenditures of approximately P35 billion both for Philippines and China. This will be funded with internally generated funds and external borrowings. As of March 31, 2013, SM Prime has forty six Supermalls strategically located in the Philippines with a total gross floor area of 5.6 million square meters. Likewise, the Company also has five Supermalls located in the cities of Xiamen, Jinjiang, Chengdu, Suzhou, and Chongqing in China with a total gross floor area of 0.8 million square meters. For the rest of 2013, SM Prime is scheduled to launch SM Aura Premier in Taguig and SM City BF in Paranaque. SM Megamall, on the other hand, will be expanded with an additional 101,000 square meters. By year-end, SM Prime will have 48 malls in the Philippines and five in China with an estimated combined gross floor area of 6.9 million square meters. 2012 Financial and Operational Highlights (In Million Pesos, except for financial ratios and percentages) Twelve months ended Dec 31 % to % to 2011 Revenues Revenues 2012 % Change Profit & Loss Data Revenues Operating Expenses Operating Income Net Income EBITDA 30,72 6 13,99 5 16,73 1 10,53 0 20,68 7 Dec 31 2012 100% 26,897 100% 14% 46% 12,277 46% 14% 54% 14,620 54% 14% 34% 9,056 34% 16% 67% 18,450 69% 12% % to Total Assets Dec 31 2011 % to Total Assets % Change Balance Sheet Data Total Assets Investment Properties Total Debt Net Debt Total Stockholders' Equity 148,13 0 124,08 7 52,239 39,952 69,944 17 100% 128,324 100% 15% 84% 35% 27% 47% 107,836 40,893 29,913 63,774 84% 32% 23% 50% 15% 28% 34% 10% Dec 31 Financial Ratios Current Ratio Debt to Equity Net Debt to Equity Return on Equity Return on Investment Properties Debt to EBITDA EBITDA to Interest Expense Operating Income to Revenues EBITDA Margin Net Income to Revenues Debt Service Coverage Ratio 2012 1.34 0.43 : 0.57 0.36 : 0.64 0.16 0.11 2.53 9.42 0.54 0.67 0.34 3.61 2011 1.47 0.39 : 0.61 0.32 : 0.68 0.15 0.10 2.22 9.47 0.54 0.69 0.34 6.72 SM Prime Holdings, Inc., the country’s leading shopping mall developer and operator which currently owns forty six malls in the Philippines and five malls in China, posts 14% increase in gross revenues for the year 2012 to = P 30.73 billion from = P 26.90 billion in 2011. Rental revenues, accounting for 84% of total revenues, grew by 14% amounting to = P 25.90 billion from last year’s = P 22.76 billion. This is largely due to rentals from new SM Supermalls opened in 2011 and 2012, namely SM City Masinag, SM City Olongapo, SM City Consolacion, SM City San Fernando, SM City General Santos and SM Lanang Premier, with a total gross floor area of 527,000 square meters. Excluding the new malls and expansions, same-store rental growth is at 8%. In terms of gross revenues, the five malls in China contributed = P 2.54 billion in 2012 and = P 2.05 billion in 2011, or 8% of total consolidated revenues. Likewise, in terms of rental revenues, the China operations contributed 10% and 9% to SM Prime’s consolidated rental revenues in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Gross revenues of the five malls in China increased 24% in 2012 compared to 2011 largely due to improvements in the average occupancy rate, lease renewals and the opening of the SM Xiamen Lifestyle and SM Suzhou which added 182,000 square meters of gross floor area. SM City Chongqing, the fifth mall in China, opened in December 2012 with a gross floor area of 149,000 square meters. Average occupancy rate for the five malls is now at 92%. For the year 2012, cinema ticket sales increased 14% to = P 3.48 billion from = P 3.05 billion in 2011 due to more blockbuster movies both local and international, conversion of all screens to digital and roll-out of cinema turnstile system which made the cinema viewing experience more convenient for customers that altogether led to an increase in foot traffic. The major blockbusters shown in 2012 were “The Avengers,” “Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part II,” “The Amazing Spiderman,” “This Guy’s in Love with U Mare,” “The Mistress” and “Sisterakas”. In 2011, major films shown were “Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon,” “Praybeyt Benjamin,” “Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallow 2,” “No Other Woman” and “Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part I.” Amusement and other revenues likewise increased by 24% to = P 1.35 billion in 2012 from = P 1.09 billion in 2011 mainly due to higher income from amusement rides. This account is mainly composed of amusement income from rides, bowling and ice skating operations including the SM Science Discovery Center and the SM Storyland. Operating expenses increased by 14% from = P 12.28 billion in 2011 to = P 14.0 billion in 2012 mainly due to opening of new malls and increase in administrative expenses particularly, utilities and manpower expenses. Same-store growth in operating expenses is 8%. Likewise, income from operations posted a 14% growth from = P 14.62 billion in 2011 to = P 16.73 billion in 2012. In terms of operating expenses, the five malls in China contributed = P 1.25 billion in 2012 and = P 1.05 billion in 2011, or 9% of SM Prime’s consolidated operating expenses. Income from operations in China went up by 29% from = P 1.0 billion in 2011 to = P 1.29 billion in 2012. 18 Interest and dividend income increased by 12% to = P 406 million in 2012 compared to = P 361 million in 2011 mainly due to higher average balance of temporary investments in 2012 compared to last year. Interest expense for the year likewise increased by 13% to = P 2.20 billion in 2012 from = P 1.95 billion in 2011 due to new loan availments. Net income for the twelve months ended 2012 increased by 16% at = P 10.53 billion from last year’s = P 9.06 billion. On a stand-alone basis, the net income of China operations increased to = P 1.10 billion in 2012 compared to = P 0.89 billion in 2011 for a 24% increase, while net income of the Philippine operations grew 15% at = P 9.43 billion in 2012 from = P 8.17 billion in 2011. On the balance sheet side, cash and cash equivalents significantly increased by 17% from = P 8.29 billion to = P 9.71 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. This account includes the remaining proceeds from loans drawn in 2012 amounting to = P 7.5 billion which will be used for working capital and capital expenditure requirements. Investments held for trading decreased by 7% from = P 813 million to = P 759 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, due to maturity of investments in corporate bonds in March 2012. Receivables increased by 25% from = P 4.71 billion to = P 5.88 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, mainly due to increase in trade receivables. Likewise, prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by 13% from = P 1.28 billion to = P 1.44 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, mainly due to prepaid taxes on investment properties and advances to contractors. Investment properties increased by 15% from = P 107.84 billion to = P 124.09 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, because of ongoing new mall projects located in Taguig, Parañaque and Cebu City in the Philippines and Zibo and Tianjin in China. Expansions and renovations in SM Megamall, SM City Bacolod, SM City Sta. Rosa, SM City Clark and SM City Dasmariñas are also in progress. Derivative assets decreased by 5% from = P 116 million to = P 110 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, due to revaluation. On the other hand, derivative liabilities increased by 3% from = P 238 million to = P 244 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, mainly resulting from mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps used to hedge interest rate exposure on loans. Other noncurrent assets increased by 31% from = P 3.15 billion to = P 4.13 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. This account mainly consists of advances and deposits paid for leased properties. Deferred tax assets decreased by 25% from = P 254 million to = P 190 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, due to reversal of net unrealized foreign exchange losses recognized in prior year, while deferred tax liabilities increased by 2% from = P 1.26 billion to = P 1.28 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, due to net unrealized foreign exchange gains in 2012. As of December 31, 2012, loans payable consists of unsecured Philippine peso-denominated loans obtained from a bank amounting to = P 800 million for working capital. The increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities by 12% from = P 10.15 billion to = P 11.40 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, is mainly due to payables to mall contractors and suppliers and accrued operating expenses. Long-term debt increased by 26% from = P 40.89 billion to = P 51.44 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, due to new loan availments amounting to = P 7.5 billion and $115 million, net of prepayments. The increase in tenants’ deposits by 12% from = P 7.47 billion to = P 8.39 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, is due to the new malls and expansions which opened this year. On 19 the other hand, liability for purchased land decreased 22% from = P 1.55 billion to = P 1.21 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, due to subsequent payments. The Company’s performance indicators are measured in terms of the following: (1) current ratio which measures the ratio of total current assets to total current liabilities; (2) debt to equity which measures the ratio of interest bearing liabilities to stockholders’ equity; (3) net debt to equity which measures the ratio of interest bearing liabilities net of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities to stockholders’ equity; (4) debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) which measures the ratio of annualized operating cash flows to loans payable, current portion of long-term debt and interest expense, excluding the portion of debt which are fully hedged by cash and cash equivalents and temporary investments; (5) return on equity (ROE) which measures the ratio of net income to capital provided by stockholders; (6) return on investment properties (ROI) which measures the ratio of net income to investment properties excluding shopping mall complex under construction; (7) earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); (8) debt to EBITDA which measures the ratio of EBITDA to total interest-bearing liabilities; (9) EBITDA to interest expense which measures the ratio of EBITDA to interest expense; (10) operating income to revenues which basically measures the gross profit ratio; (11) EBITDA margin which measures the ratio of EBITDA to gross revenues and (12) net income to revenues which measures the ratio of net income to gross revenues. The following discuss in detail the key performance indicators of the Company. The Company’s current ratio decreased to 1.34:1 from 1.47:1 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, mainly attributable to loan payments due in 2012. Interest-bearing debt to stockholders’ equity increased to 0.43:0.57 from 0.39:0.61 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, similarly net interest-bearing debt to stockholders’ equity also increased to 0.36:0.64 from 0.32:0.68 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to the additional borrowings. Debt service coverage ratio decreased to 3.61:1 from 6.72:1 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to higher current portion of long-term debt and interest expense in 2012 compared to 2011. In terms of profitability, ROE slightly improved to 16% from 15% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. EBITDA increased by 12% to = P 20.69 billion in 2012 from = P 18.45 billion in 2011. Debt to EBITDA increased to 2.53:1 from 2.22:1 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to increase in long-term debt. While EBITDA to interest expense slightly decreased to 9.42:1 from 9.47:1 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to higher interest expense in 2012. Consolidated operating income to revenues is healthy at 54% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. On a stand-alone basis, operating income margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 55% and 51% in 2012, compared to 55% and 49% in 2011, respectively. EBITDA margin remains strong at 67% and 69% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. On a stand-alone basis, EBITDA margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 67% and 69% in 2012 and 68% and 72% in 2011, respectively. Net income to revenues is steady at 34% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. On a stand-alone basis, net income margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 33% and 43% in 2012 and 2011. The Company has no known direct or contingent financial obligation that is material to the Company, including any default or acceleration of an obligation. There were no contingent liabilities or assets in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company has no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations during the reporting year as of balance sheet date. There are no known trends, events, material changes, seasonal aspects or uncertainties that are expected to affect the company’s continuing operations. 20 For the year 2013, the Company expects to incur capital expenditures of approximately P35 billion both for Philippines and China. This will be funded with internally generated funds and external borrowings. As of December 31, 2012, SM Prime has forty six Supermalls strategically located in the Philippines with a total gross floor area of 5.6 million square meters. Likewise, the Company also has five Supermalls located in the cities of Xiamen, Jinjiang, Chengdu, Suzhou, and Chongqing in China with a total gross floor area of 0.8 million square meters. For 2013, SM Prime is scheduled to launch SM Aura Premier in Taguig and SM City Cauayan in Isabela. SM Megamall, on the other hand, will be expanded with an additional 100,000 square meters. By year-end, SM Prime will have 48 malls in the Philippines and five in China with an estimated combined gross floor area of 6.9 million square meters. Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure There were no significant changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure. The representatives of the Corporation’s independent public accountant, SGV & Co., are expected to be present during the Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions during the Meeting. ITEM 12. Merger with SM Land, Inc. One of the items for approval during the Meeting will be the merger between SM Prime and SM Land, wherein SM Land will be absorbed by SM Prime as the surviving corporation. Consistent with the Reorganization, the Merger is desirable and advantageous in order to consolidate the real estate holdings and interests in the real estate companies which are controlled by the SM Group. The Merger aims to: a. establish pre-eminent real estate company in the Philippines [and Southeast Asia] that is unparalleled in terms of size, scale and depth; b. create fully integrated real estate platform that could better enhance the value of the SM Group's real estate developments; c. enhanced ability to capitalize on strong economic fundamentals of the Philippines and Philippine property, consumer and tourism sectors; d. increase organizational efficiencies and extract synergies; and e. strengthen the balance sheet providing enhanced capital raising flexibility. As the surviving corporation, SM Prime shall possess all the rights, privileges, immunities and franchises of SM Land. Furthermore, all the assets and properties of SM Land, real or personal, tangible or intangible, and all receivables due on whatever account, including subscription to shares and choses in action, and all and every other interest of, belonging to, or due to SM Land shall be deemed transferred to and vested in SM Prime without further act or deed. Assets of SM Land include all shares of SMDC and Highlands Prime that will be acquired by SM Land pursuant to the STO as discussed in Section (C) (Issuance and Exchange of Securities). The Merger meets the requirements of the provisions of Section 40 (C)(2) of the NIRC on the nonrecognition of gain or loss in the exchange of properties and therefore, the transaction should not be subject to taxes in relation thereto. As discussed in Section (C) (Issuance and Exchange of Securities), the implementation of the Merger shall require the following amendments to the articles of incorporation of SM Prime: (i) 21 change in the primary purpose to include the business of SM Land; and (ii) increase in authorized capital stock from 20,000,000,000 to 40,000,000,000 to support the issuance of shares of stock to the current stockholders of SM Land in exchange for their issued and outstanding shares of stock in SM Land. There is no material difference in the rights of security holders before and after the Merger. Security holders, whether holders before or after the Merger, enjoy the same rights. The merger shall be presented to the stockholders of SM Prime and SM Land for approval. Upon the affirmative vote of stockholders owning at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock of both SM Prime and SM Land, the merger documents shall be submitted to the Commission for its approval. An application for listing shall be filed with the PSE for the SM Prime shares to be issued relative to the merger. Pursuant to the Plan of Merger, SM Prime shall issue new common shares in exchange for all the issued and outstanding stock of SM Land equivalent to the total net assets. Each of SM Prime and SM Land does not have dividends in arrears nor has it defaulted in principal or interest in respect of any security. Net Sales Revenues 2012 2011 Or Operating SM Prime SM Land SM Prime 30,726,309,357 26,897,455,051 4,131,493,005 3,767,687,426 10,529,954,990 9,055,995,525 Book Value Per Share SM Prime 2012 2011 Income From Operations 4.03 4.59 SM Land Continuing SM Land 2,876,141,389 2,559,428,614 Cash Dividends Declared Per Share SM Prime 2,011 1,766 SM Land 0.29 0.27 Long-Term Obligations SM Prime SM Land 51,438,822,603 40,892,608,729 1,834,750,000 1,893,500,000 Income Per Share From Continuing Operations SM Prime 34.37 181.2 0.606 0.521 SM Land 147 137 The merger shall be presented to the stockholders of SM Prime and SM Land for approval. Upon the affirmative vote of stockholders owning at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock of both SM Prime and SM Land, the merger documents shall be submiited to the Commission for its approval. Simultaneously, an application for listing shall be filed with the Exchange for the SM Prime shares to be issued relative to the merger. a)briefly describe the qualifications The Independent Fairness Opinion for the Share for Share Swap was rendered by Manabat Sanagustin & Co., CPAs. MS&Co is the local member firm of KPMG International. MS&Co. has over 10 years experience in providing business valuation and financial advisory services to both foreign and domestic companies. As a result of this experience, there is an existing team of competent professionals who possess significant valuation credentials and technical skills. The said team has successfully delivered valuation services, including fairness opinions, consistent with the guidelines of the Philippine Stock Exchange. The MS&Co. team is part of KPMG International’s Global Valuations Team. As needed, the local team can seek expertise and support from other KPMG member firms in the world. The engagement team working on Project Century has completed the following recent fairness opinion and/or valuation engagements: · Backdoor listing of a local company engaged in the infrastructure sector; · Additional listing of shares in line with a listed mining company’s debt-to-equity conversion transactions; · Acquisition by a Philippine electronics company of a company based in Europe; · Delisting of a Philippine investment bank; · IPO support for a company in its pre-listing application in the PSE which includes the preparation of a prospectus; 22 · Valuation in line with a hospital’s divestment initiative; The Independent Fairness Opinion for the Property for Share Swap was appraised by CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. CBRE was established in 1998 and has been prominent in the Philippine market since 1995 CBRE Philippines has become the leading real estate advisor in the country with the most comprehensive array of services in the industry including: real estate sales, leasing, tenant representation, office services, investment sales, property management, facilities management, asset management, project management, research & consulting, valuation services, and technical services. In the early part of 1999, CBRE Valuation and Advisory Services (VAS), a DTI-licensed and Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP)-accredited appraisal company, was incorporated to the operations of the Company. CBRE VAS provides comprehensive valuation services, which adopts and adheres to internationally-recognized standards of valuation. CBRE VAS maintains officers and staff who are duly licensed by the Professional Regulations Commission as Real Estate Appraisers, and with an average of 10 year experience in the field of Property and Machinery Appraisal. Since 1999, CBRE VAS has rendered appraisal/valuation services to corporations, banks, individuals for a variety of purpose including, mortgage & financing, insurance, estate partitioning, sale & purchases. We have been called in to render valuation reports for use in mergers & acquisitions, joint-venture agreement and court arbitration. b)describe the method of selection of such Appraiser/Valuator The independent Appraisers/Valuators were selected based on their accreditation credential with the PSE. KPMG was chosen based on the merit of (i) their competitive quote, (ii) market reputation as IFAs and (iii) the capabilities of their team and the available manpower to help meet the necessary deadlines for the delivery of their reports. MS&Co and CBRE Philippines was chosen based on the merit of (i) their competitive quote, (ii) market reputation as a property appraiser and (iii) the capabilities of their team and the available manpower to help meet the necessary deadlines for the delivery of their report. c)describe any material relationship between the outside party or its affiliates and SM or its affiliates which existed during the past two years or is mutually understood to be contemplated and any compensation received or to be received as a result of such relationship; The Chairman and CEO of MS&Co., Mr. Roberto G. Manabat, served as Board Advisor for Corporate Governance matters of SMIC. However, he resigned effective April 30, 2013 in order to avoid any perception of conflict under the valuation engagement. Mr. Manabat’s involvement was limited to corporate governance matters and did not involve strategic inputs specifically in the proposed merger and consolidation of SM Land, Inc. and SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Further, Mr. Manabat is not part of the valuation team preparing the valuation and fairness opinion reports for the tender offer and merger transactions. CBRE’s relationship with the Company and its Affiliates is professional in nature and it has not received any compensation as a result of this relationship for the past years. d) state whether SM or affiliate determined the amount of consideration to be paid or whether the outside party recommended the amount of consideration to be paid; and The amount of consideration to be paid is based on the quote provided, which SM determined to be reasonable. e) furnish a summary concerning such opinion or appraisal which shall include, but not limited to, the procedures followed; the findings and recommendations; the bases for and methods of arriving 23 at such findings and recommendations; instruction received from SM or affiliate; and any limitation imposed by SM or affiliate on the scope of the investigation. The purpose of the Appraisal was for CBRE Philippines to render an opinion of the market value of the real properties to be acquired based on a cut-off date of February 28, 2013. Hence, all relevant information provided to CBRE were assumed as of the valuation date. CBRE Philippines estimates that the combined Market Value of the real properties to be acquired is Php 16,336,413,000.00 as of February 28, 2013. CBRE made use of, among others, (i) land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans; (ii) details on ongoing projects or developments including completion status, selling prices, number of units for sale, inventory of developed and saleable units, land or floor area, and cost to complete; and (iii) market data. The methodologies used by CBRE to value the properties included (i) the Income Capitalization Approach and (ii) the Cost Approach. Considering the nature of the properties under study, CBRE adopted the Cost Approach and the Income Capitalization Approach to value the properties. CBRE Philippines relied to a considerable extent on information provided by SMIC such as the completion status of ongoing project or development including type or characteristics of units for sale , inventory of developed, saleable units, selling prices, and land or floor area. There are no Placeholder for material contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, negotiation or transaction during the past two fiscal years between SM Prime and SM Land relating to acquisition of securities; an election of directors; or a sale or other transfer of a material amount of assets. Upon the announcement of the merger, the high and low price of SM Prime will be finalized upon submission of the Definitive Information Statement. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters CASH DIVIDEND PER SHARE - P 0.29 in 2012, P 0.27 in 2011 and P 0.25 in 2010. 2011 2012 Stock Prices First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter P High 18.20 17.28 14.32 17.02 P Low 13.30 12.10 12.54 13.90 P High 11.76 12.18 13.20 13.84 P Low 9.96 10.90 10.94 11.50 The Company’s shares of stock is traded in the Philippine Stock Exchange. As of April 30, 2013, the closing price of the Company’s shares of stock is P19.00/share. For the two months ending April 30, 2013, stock prices of SM Prime were at a high of P20.30 and a low of P18.18. The number of stockholders of record as of April 30, 2013 was 2,479. Capital stock issued and outstanding as of April 30, 2013 was 17,373,677,760. As of December 31, 2012, there are no restrictions that would limit the ability of the Company to pay dividends to the common stockholders, except with respect to Note 17 of the consolidated financial statements. The top 20 stockholders as of April 30, 2013 are as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Name SM Land, Inc. PCD Nominee Corp. (Non-Filipino) SM Investments Corp. PCD Nominee Corp. (Filipino) Sysmart Corporation Shoemart, Inc. No. of Shares Held 7,082,905,741 5,495,831,588 3,761,443,402 899,354,978 36,483,131 34,048,750 24 % to Total 41 32 22 5 0 0 7. SM Prime Holdings, inc. (Treasury Shares) 8. Lucky Securities, Inc. 9. Philippine Air Force Educational Fund, Inc. 10. Southwood Mindanao Corporation 11. Elizabeth Sy 12. Regina Capital Dev. Corp. 13. Teresita Sy 14. Jose T. Tan &/or Pacita L. Tan 15. Senen Mendiola 16. Chen Zan Xing 17. Jose Recato Dy 18. Harley Sy 19. Edwin Francis L. Tan 20. Eric Ruben L. Tan 18,857,000 4,092,823 2,140,923 2,034,673 2,033,110 1,696,453 1,352,902 892,126 788,218 771,611 663,552 656,450 610,402 610,402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 There are no recent sales of unregistered or exempt securities for the last two (2) years, except for the 25% stock dividends declared on April 24, 2012 and distributed on June 20, 2012 which is an exempt transaction under SRC, Section 10.1(d). As discussed in Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements, the following securities were issued as exempt from the registration requirements of the SRC and therefore have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission: · On January 29, 2013, the Company obtained a US$200 million unsecured loan. The loan bears an interest rate based on London Inter-Bank Offered Rate plus spread, with a bullet maturity on January 29, 2018. The notes issued are considered as exempt security pursuant to Section 9.2 of R.A. No. 8799 (SRC). The Company has no registered debt securities. There are no existing or planned stock options. There are no registered securities subject to redemption or call. There are no existing or planned stock warrant offerings. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SM PRIME Office Chairman Vice Chairman and Independent Director Independent Director Independent Director Director and President Director Director Director Adviser to the Board of Directors Adviser to the Board of Directors Executive Vice President and Chief Finance Officer Senior Vice President – Legal and Corporate Affairs/ Compliance Officer/ Assistant Corporate Secretary Vice President – Market Research and Planning Vice President – Internal Audit Head Vice President – Information Technology Vice President – Finance (China Projects) Vice President – Finance Vice President – Legal Corporate Secretary/ Assistant Compliance Officer Name Henry Sy, Sr. Jose L. Cuisia, Jr. Gregorio U. Kilayko Joselito H. Sibayan Hans T. Sy Henry T. Sy, Jr. Herbert T. Sy Jorge T. Mendiola Teresita T. Sy Elizabeth T. Sy Citizenship Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Age 88 69 58 54 57 59 56 53 62 60 Jeffrey C. Lim Filipino 51 Corazon I. Morando Filipino 71 Ronald G. Tumao Christopher S. Bautista Kelsey Hartigan Y. Go Diana R. Dionisio Teresa Cecilia H. Reyes Edgar Ryan C. San Juan Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino 54 53 47 40 38 37 Emmanuel C. Paras Filipino 63 25 Board of Directors Henry Sy, Sr. has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of SM Prime since 1994. He is the founder of the SM Group and is currently Chairman of SM Land, Inc., SM Investments Corp., Highlands Prime, Inc. and SM Development Corp. He is likewise Chairman Emeritus of BDO Unibank, Inc. and Honorary Chairman of China Banking Corporation. He opened the first ShoeMart store in 1958 and has been at the forefront of SM Group’s diversification into the commercial centers, retail merchandising, financial services, and real estate development and tourism businesses. Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.* has served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of SM Prime since 1994. In 2011, he took his official diplomatic post as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the United States of America. He was the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Philippine American Life and General Insurance Company and is currently the Vice-Chairman of Philamlife since August 2009. Previously, he served as Governor of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas from 1990 to 1993 and Administrator of the Social Security System from 1986 to 1990. In May 2011, he was awarded the “Joseph Wharton Award for Lifetime Achievement” by the prestigious Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania for an outstanding career in the country’s banking and social security system. Gregorio U. Kilayko* is the former Chairman of ABN Amro’s banking operations in the Philippines. He was the founding head of ING Baring’s stockbrokerage and investment banking business in the Philippines and a Philippine Stock Exchange Governor in 1996 and 2000. He was a director of the demutualized Philippine Stock Exchange in 2003. He was elected as Independent Director in 2008. Joselito H. Sibayan* has spent the past 25 years of his career in investment banking. From 1987 to 1994, and after taking his MBA from University of California in Los Angeles (UCLA), he was in Head of International Fixed Income Sales at Deutsche Bank in New York and later moved to Natwest Markets to set up its International Fixed Income and Derivatives Sales/Trading operation. He then moved to London in 1995 to run Natwest Markets’ International Fixed Income Sales Team. He is currently the President and CEO of Mabuhay Capital Corporation (MC2), an independent financial advisory firm. Prior to forming MC2 in 2005, he was Vice Chairman, Investment Banking - Philippines and Country Manager for Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB). He put up CSFB's Manila representative office in 1998, which he later migrated to branch status. He was elected as an Independent Director in 2011. * Independent director – the Company has complied with the Guidelines set forth by Securities Regulation Code (SRC) Rule 38, as amended, regarding the Nomination and Election of Independent Director. The Company’s By-Laws incorporate the procedures for the nomination and election of independent director/s in accordance with the requirements of the said Rule. Hans T. Sy, President, has served as Director since 1994 and as President since 2004. He holds many key positions in the SM Group, among which are Adviser to the Board of SM Investments Corporation. He is Director and Chairman of China Banking Corporation, Director of Highlands Prime, Inc. and SM Land, Inc. He also holds board positions in several companies within the Group. He is a mechanical engineering graduate of De La Salle University. Henry T. Sy, Jr. has served as Director since 1994. He is responsible for the real estate acquisitions and development activities of the SM Group which include the identification, evaluation and negotiation for potential sites as well as the input of design ideas. At present, he is also Vice Chairman/ President of SM Land, Inc., Vice Chairman of SM Investments Corporation and SM Development Corporation, President of Highlands Prime, Inc., Director in BDO Unibank, Inc. and Chairman of Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club Inc. and President of The National Grid Corporation of the Philippines. He graduated with a management degree from De La Salle University. Herbert T. Sy has served as Director since 1994. He is an Adviser to the Board of SM Investments Corporation and is currently the Vice Chairman of Supervalue Inc., Super Shopping Market Inc. and Sanford Marketing Corporation and Director of SM Land, Inc. and China Banking Corporation. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in management from De La Salle University. He also holds board positions in several companies within the SM Group. 26 Jorge T. Mendiola was elected as Director in December 2012. He is currently the President of SM Department Store. He started his career with the SM Department Stores as a Special Assistant to the Senior Branch Manager in 1989 and rose to become the President in 2011. He is also the Vice Chairman for Advocacy of the Philippine Retailers Association. He took his Masters in Business Management from the Asian Institute of Management and has an A.B. Economics degree from Ateneo de Manila University. Teresita T. Sy has served as Adviser to the Board since May 2008. She was a Director from 1994 up to April 2008. She has worked with the Group for over 20 years and has varied experiences in retail merchandising, mall development and banking businesses. A graduate of Assumption College, she was actively involved in ShoeMart’s development. At present, she is Chairman of BDO Unibank, Inc., Vice Chairman of SM Investments Corporation and Director of SM Land, Inc. She also holds board positions in several companies within the SM Group. Elizabeth T. Sy was elected as Adviser to the Board in April 2012. She was a Senior Vice President for Marketing from 1994 up to April 2012. She is a Director of SM Development Corporation and SM Land, Inc., Co-Chairman of Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club Inc. and Adviser to the Board of SM Investments Corporation. She is also actively involved in the Group’s other tourism and leisure business endeavors, overseeing operations as well as other marketing and real estate activities. Members of the Board of Directors are given a standard per diem of P10,000 per Board meeting, except for the Chairman and Vice Chairman which are given P20,000 per Board meeting. Senior Management Jeffrey C. Lim is the Executive Vice President and the Chief Finance Officer. He is a Director of Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club Inc. and a member of the Management Board of the Asia Pacific Real Estate Association. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of the East. Prior to joining the Company, he worked for a multi-national company and SGV & Co. Corazon I. Morando is the Senior Vice President for Legal and Corporate Affairs/ Compliance Officer/ and Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Company and SM Investments Corporation, and Compliance Officer of SM Development Corporation. She is also Corporate Secretary of Highlands Prime, Inc and China Banking Corporation. She holds a Bachelor of Law degree from the University of the Philippines and took up graduate studies under the MBA-Senior Executive Program in the Ateneo de Manila University. She was formerly the Director of the Corporate and Legal Department of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Philippines. Ronald G. Tumao is the Vice President for Market Research & Planning. He graduated from De La Salle University with a degree in BSC - Management of Financial Institutions. He later took his MBA at the Ateneo Graduate School in Makati City. He has over 10 years of experience in banking and finance and more than 10 years of experience in brand management and consumer marketing. He is in charge of property acquisition for SM. He joined the Company in 2001. Christopher S. Bautista is the Vice President for Internal Audit (Chief Audit Executive). He was formerly the Chief Finance Officer of a large palm oil manufacturer based in Jakarta, Indonesia and was a partner (principal) for several years of an audit and management consulting firm based also in Jakarta. He started his professional career as staff auditor of SGV & Co. He joined the Company in 1998. Kelsey Hartigan Y. Go is the Vice-President for Information Technology. He holds a Bachelor's Degree in Electronics & Communications Engineering and a Masters of Science Degree in Computer Science, both from the De La Salle University, Manila. He was previously a professor of a university in the Philippines and was concurrently the Director of the Information Systems Center of the same university. He joined the Company in 1997. 27 Diana R. Dionisio is the Vice President for Finance (China Projects). She holds a Bachelor's degree in Accountancy from the University of Santo Tomas. Prior to joining the company, she was the accounting manager of a real property company. She started her professional career as staff auditor of SGV & Co. She joined the Company in 1999. Teresa Cecilia H. Reyes is the Vice President for Finance. Prior to her joining the Company in June 2004 as a Senior Manager in the Finance Group, she was an Associate Director in the business audit and advisory group of SGV & Co. She graduated from De La Salle University with degrees in Bachelor of Science in Accountancy and Bachelor of Arts in Economics and placed 16th in the 1997 Certified Public Accountants board examinations. Edgar Ryan C. San Juan is the Vice President for Legal. Prior to joining the Company in 2008, he was a Senior Associate Attorney at Puno and Puno Law Offices. He was also part of the Siguion Reyna Montecillo and Ongsiako Law Firm and the Bengson Law Firm, respectively. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the Ateneo de Manila University School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts in the Humanities degree with specialization in Political Economy from the University of Asia and the Pacific. Emmanuel C. Paras, is the Corporate Secretary and Assistant Compliance Officer of the Company and other companies in the SM Group. He is a Bachelor of Law graduate of the Ateneo de Manila and a partner of the SyCip Salazar Hernandez and Gatmaitan Law Offices. All the Directors and Executive Officers of the Company, except those otherwise stated, have held their positions since the Company started operations in 1994. The Directors of the Company are elected at the annual stockholders’ meeting to hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting and until their respective successors have been appointed or elected and qualified. The same set of directors will be nominated in the coming regular annual stockholders’ meeting. The Directors possess all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications provided for in the SRC and its Implementing Rules and Regulations. Nomination of Independent Directors shall be conducted by the Nomination Committee prior to the stockholders’ meeting. The Nomination Committee shall prepare a Final List of Candidates from those who have passed the Guidelines, Screening Policies and Parameters for nomination of independent directors and which list shall contain all the information about these nominees. Only nominees whose names appear on the Final List of Candidates shall be eligible for election as Independent Director. No other nomination shall be entertained after the Final List of Candidates shall have been prepared. No further nomination shall be entertained or allowed on the floor during the actual annual stockholders’ meeting. In case of resignation, disqualification or cessation of independent directorship and only after notice has been made with the Commission within five (5) days from such resignation, disqualification or cessation, the vacancy shall be filled by the vote of at least a majority of the remaining directors, if still constituting a quorum, upon the nomination of the Nomination Committee otherwise, said vacancies shall be filled by stockholders in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose. An Independent Director so elected to fill a vacancy shall serve only for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor in office. Aside from the Directors and Executive Officers enumerated above, there are no other employees expected to hold significant executive/officer position in the Company. The following are directorships held by Directors and Executive Officers in other reporting companies at least, in the last five years: Henry Sy, Sr. Name of Corporation Position SM Investments Corporation. ........................................... Highlands Prime, Inc. ........................................................ SM Development Corporation .......................................... China Banking Corporation.. ........................................... BDO Unibank, Inc... .......................................................... 28 Chairman Chairman Chairman Honorary Chairman Chairman Emeritus Jose L. Cuisia, Jr. Name of Corporation Position The Philippine American Life & General Insurance Company (Philamlife). ...................................................... BPI-Philam Assurance Co. (BPLAC). ................................ PHINMA Corporation. ....................................................... Holcim Philippines, Inc..... ................................................ Manila Water Company, Inc... .......................................... ICCP Holdings... ................................................................. Beacon Property Ventures... .............................................. Gregorio U. Kilayko Name of Corporation Vice Chairman Regular Director Regular Director Regular Director Independent Director Regular Director Regular Director Position Highlands Prime, Inc... ...................................................... Belle Corporation... ............................................................ Vantage Equities, Inc.... ...................................................... Joselito H. Sibayan Name of Corporation Independent Director Independent Director Independent Director Position Pitkin Petroleum PLC, UK.................................................. Hans T. Sy Name of Corporation Non-Executive Director Position China Banking Corporation ............................................. Highlands Prime, Inc. ........................................................ SM Investments Corporation. ........................................... Henry T. Sy, Jr. Name of Corporation Director/ Chairman of the Board and of Executive Committee Director Adviser to the Board Position SM Development Corporation .......................................... Highlands Prime, Inc... ...................................................... SM Investments Corporation.. .......................................... The National Grid Corporation of the Philippines.... ..... Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club Inc....................... BDO Unibank, Inc... .......................................................... Herbert T. Sy Name of Corporation Vice Chairman/ Chief Executive Officer Vice Chairman / President Vice Chairman President Chairman Director Position China Banking Corporation ............................................ SM Investments Corporation ........................................... Teresita T. Sy Name of Corporation Director Adviser to the Board Position BDO Unibank, Inc. ........................................................... SM Investments Corporation. ........................................... 29 Chairperson Director/ Vice Chairperson Elizabeth T. Sy Name of Corporation Position Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club Inc....................... SM Development Corporation .......................................... SM Investments Corporation... ......................................... Co-Chairman Director Adviser to the Board The members of the Audit and Risk Management Committee are: JOSE L. CUISIA, JR. Chairman (Independent Director) GREGORIO U. KILAYKO Member (Independent Director) JOSELITO H. SIBAYAN Member (Independent Director) JORGE T. MENDIOLA Member JOSE T. SIO Member SERAFIN U. SALVADOR Member CORAZON I. MORANDO Member The members of the Compensation Committee are: HANS T. SY GREGORIO U. KILAYKO JOSELITO H. SIBAYAN - Chairman Member (Independent Director) Member (Independent Director) The members of the Nomination Committee are: HERBERT T. SY JOSE L. CUISIA, JR. GREGORIO U. KILAYKO - Chairman Member (Independent Director) Member (Independent Director) Family Relationships Mr. Henry Sy, Sr. is the father of Teresita Sy, Elizabeth Sy, Henry Sy, Jr., Hans Sy, Herbert Sy and Harley Sy. All other directors and officers are not related either by consanguinity or affinity. Involvement in Legal Proceedings SM Prime is not aware of any of the following events having occurred during the past five years up to the date of this report that are material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of any director or any member of senior management of the Corporation: (a) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (b) any conviction by final judgment, including the nature of the offense, in a criminal proceeding, domestic or foreign, or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding, domestic or foreign, excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses; (c) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, domestic or foreign, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities, commodities or banking activities; and (d) being found by a domestic or foreign court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or comparable foreign body, or a domestic or foreign exchange or other organized trading market or self-regulatory organization, to have violated a securities or commodities law or regulation, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated. 30 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SM LAND Office Chairman Vice Chairman/President Director Director Director Director Director Treasurer Asst. Treasurer Chief Finance Officer Corporate Secretary Assistant Corporate Secretary Name Henry Sy, Sr. Henry T. Sy, Jr. Felicidad T. Sy Teresita T. Sy Hans T. Sy Elizabeth T. Sy Herbert T. Sy Harley T. Sy Grace F. Roque Gemma O. Cheng Corazon I. Morando Arthur A. Sy Citizenship Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Filipino Age 88 59 85 62 57 61 50 53 62 48 72 44 Board of Directors The Directors of the Company are elected at the annual stockholders’ meeting to hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting and until their respective successors have been appointed or elected and qualified. The following are the business experience/s of the Company’s Directors and Officers during the last five years: Henry Sy, Sr., is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of SM Land, Inc. He is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors of SMIC. He is the founder of the SM Group and is currently Chairman of SM Prime, SM Land, Inc., SM Development, and Highlands Prime Inc., among others. Mr. Sy opened the first ShoeMart store in 1958 and has since evolved into a dynamic group of companies with five lines of businesses - shopping malls, retail, financial services, real estate development and tourism, hotels and conventions. He is likewise Chairman Emeritus of BDO Universal Bank, Inc. and Honorary Chairman of China Banking Corporation. Felicidad T. Sy, Director. Mrs. Sy is the Chairperson of the Board of the Felicidad T. Sy Foundation, Inc. which is involved in religious and spiritual activities. She is also a member of the Board of Trustees of SM Foundation, Inc. which is the socio-civic arm of the SM Group of Companies. SM Foundation is actively involved in promoting its advocacies on education through free college scholarships and donation of school buildings; on health and wellness through medical missions nationwide and the rehabilitation of wellness centers for children and the elderly; and, on livelihood projects through the free training of farmers. Mrs. Sy is also a Papal awardee. Henry T. Sy, Jr., is the Vice Chairman and President of SM Land, Inc. He is also the Vice Chairman of SMIC, Vice Chairman – President of Highlands Prime, Inc., Vice Chairman of SM Development Corporation, Director of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and BDO Unibank, Inc. He is likewise the President of National Grid Corporation of the Philippines. He is responsible for the real estate acquisitions and development activities of the SM Group which include the identification, evaluation and negotiation for potential sites as well as the input of design ideas. He graduated with a Management degree from De La Salle University. Teresita T. Sy, Director. She is the Chairperson of BDO and was first elected to the Board in 1997. Concurrently, she serves as the Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and/or Director of various subsidiaries and affiliates of BDO such as BDO Private Bank, Inc., BDO Leasing & Finance, Inc., BDO Capital & Investment Corporation, BDO Foundation, Inc., Generali Pilipinas Holding Company, Inc., Generali Pilipinas Life Assurance Company, Inc., and Generali Pilipinas Insurance Co.,Inc. Ms. Sy is the Vice Chairperson of SM Investments. 31 Harley T. Sy, Director. He is the President of SMIC, Director of China Banking Corporation and other companies within the SM Group and Adviser to the Board of Directors of BDO Private Bank. He is the Executive Vice-president for Merchandising of SM Retail, Inc. He holds a degree in Bachelor of Science, Major in Finance from De La Salle University. Hans T. Sy, Director. He holds several key positions in the SM Group. He has served as President of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. since 2004, Adviser to the Board of SM Investments Corporation, and a Director of Highlands Prime and SM Keppel Land, Inc. He is Chairman of China Banking Corporation and Chairman of Tagaytay Highlands International Golf Club, Inc. He is a graduate of the De La Salle University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. Herbert T. Sy, Director. He is a Director of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. since 1994. He is an Adviser to the Board of SM Investments Corporation and is currently the President of Supervalue Inc., Super Shopping Market Inc. and Director of China Banking Corporation. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in management from De La Salle University. He also holds board positions in several companies within the SM Group. Elizabeth T. Sy, Director. She primarily oversees the SM Group's increasing involvement in the tourism and hospitality industry sector. She is the President of SM Hotels & Conventions Corp., Director of SM Development Corporation, Director of Banco De Oro Private Bank, Adviser to the Board of SM Investments Corporation, Adviser to the Board of SM Prime Holdings Corporation and Co-Chairman of Pico De Loro Beach & Country Club. SM Land, Inc. Executive Officers Corazon I. Morando, Corporate Secretary. She is the Senior Vice President, Corporate Legal Affairs, Compliance Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary of SMIC. She is also the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of China Banking Corporation and Corporate Secretary and Compliance Officer of Highlands Prime, Inc.; Senior Vice President - Corporate Legal Affairs, Assistant Corporate Secretary and Compliance Officer of SM Prime; and the Corporate Secretary of Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club, Inc. She holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of the Philippines and took up graduate studies under the MBA-Senior Executive Program in the Ateneo de Manila University. She was formerly Director of the Corporate and Legal Department of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Philippines. GEMA O. CHENG, Chief Financial Officer. She has 25 years of work experience in Banking and Finance, Investments, Insurance and Real Estate. She is currently the Senior Vice President for Finance for the Property Group of SM Investments. Prior to joining the SM Group of Companies, she was the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Malayan Group of Insurance Companies. She started her career with Citibank Manila. She is a graduate of the University of the Philippines and Harvard University, Cambridge. ITEM 13. Acquisition or Disposition of Property Describe briefly the general character and location of the property. Taal Vista Hotel Taal Vista is a 261 room hotel located in Tagaytay. The hotel is a short walk from the PAGCOR Casino. The hotel features a spa, outdoor pool, gym, restaurant and function rooms. In 2009, Taal Vista Hotel’s newly constructed east wing with 133 guest rooms (making it a total of 261 rooms) and a 1,000-seater ballroom became fully operational. In the same year, SMX, located at the MOA complex with a state of the art convention and exhibition facilities, commenced operation. It hosts major international and local conventions and exhibitions. It is a three-story 32 structure with a gross floor area of 46,647 sq. m. made up of two large exhibit floors which can be divided into multiple exhibition and function halls. Radisson Blu Hotel Cebu In the last quarter of 2010, SM Hotels launched the 400-room Radisson Blu Hotel in Cebu, the first hotel managed by Carlson International in the Asia-Pacific region to be classified under its “Blu” upscale hotel brand category. The property has been classified as a deluxe hotel category by the Department of Tourism and its facilities include an in-house spa, fitness center, business center, 800-sq. m. swimming pool, club lounge, two ballrooms and a number of smaller meeting rooms. The hotel is strategically located beside SM City Cebu and is adjacent to the international port area. Pico Sands Hotel The Pico Sands Hotel opened in July 2011. This hotel is a 154 room resort-type hotel in Hamilo Coast in Nasugbu, Batangas. The hotel has an outdoor pool, fitness center, spa, bar, restaurant and meeting and banquet facilities. Park Inn by Radisson In March 2013, the Park Inn by Radisson Davao opened an eight story, 204-room hotel located in Lanang, Davao City behind SM Lanang. The hotel has an outdoor swimming pool, gym, fitness center, meeting rooms and a 24-hour dining restaurant bar and grill. The Park Inn brand is one of the hotel brands under Carlson and is the largest mid-market brand for hotels under development in Europe. Condrad Hilton SM Hotels intends to open a Conrad Hilton near the MOA complex in 2016. This hotel is expected to be an eight-story hotel with 350 guest rooms. The hotel is expected to feature a swimming pool, business center, fitness club, spa, 24-hour dining restaurant, ballroom and other function and meeting spaces. SMX Convention Center Manila SMX Convention Center Manila, inaugurated in November 2007, is a three-storey structure with a gross floor area of 46,647 sq. m. with basement parking that can accommodate up to 400 cars and a leasable area of 21,000 sq. m. The building is made up of two large exhibit floors which can be divided into multiple exhibition and function halls. Meeting and break-out rooms are provided in support of trade and function requirements. The SM Hotels intends for SMX Convention Center to serve as a venue for major conferences, trade exhibitions and shows and similar activities in Metro Manila. SMX Convention Center Davao SMX Convention Center Davao, the sister facility of SMX Convention Center Manila, is located on the third level of SM City Lanang Mall, or Lanang Premier Mall, which was inaugurated September 28, 2012. The facility has a total floor area of 7,835 sq. m., with 5,240 sq. m. of function space, divisible into three rooms, and a 1,292 sq. m. pre-function lobby with a concierge counter. This mixed-use complex is integrated with a 204-room hotel and is located 2.4 kilometres from Davao International Airport. In addition, the SM Hotels is assessing the feasibility of establishing additional conference centers, in conjunction with the mid-market hotels, by using existing land bank situated around SM Prime’s existing malls. 33 SMX Convention Center Taguig SMX Convention Center Taguig is the third property under the SMX brand. Located inside the SM Aura Premier Mall, it has three function rooms and eight meeting rooms. The 6,358 sq. m. building is the first LEED-certified convention facility in the Philippines. SM Arena The SM Arena is a five-storey, first-class multipurpose venue for sporting events, concerts, entertainment shows, and other similar events. The arena has a seating capacity of approximately 16,000. It occupies approximately two hectares of land and has a gross floor area of approximately 64,000 sq. m. It is adjacent to the upcoming South Parking Building of the MOA and is right in front of the SMX Convention Center Manila. The SM Arena is connected to a large platform parking plaza and park that will be built in between the SMX Convention Center Manila and the arena itself. Provisions for two future office blocks are also included in the arena’s master plan. Megatrade Hall Megatrade Hall, located inside SM Megamall, offers 3,878 sq. m. of flexible hall space for various types of events. This space can also be divided into three different halls, depending on the type of event and client requirements. An additional 336 sq. m. conference center is also available for meetings, conferences, and seminars. Cebu Trade Hall Cebu Trade Hall, located inside SM City Cebu, offers 1,810 sq. m. of hall space that is also divisible into three halls. An additional 255 sq. m. conference center, that can be divisible into three meeting rooms, is also available for smaller functions. Mall of Asia Arena Annex (Carpark) MOA Arena Annex is an 11-storey building with total gross floor area of 95,273 sq. m. It is designed to serve the parking needs of MOA Arena with 1,469 parking slots from ground to 7th floor. While the 8th to 11th floor with approximately 30,000 sq. m. are leased out as office space. The current tenants are SM Affiliates occupying 16,000 sq. m. The remaining vacant spaces are scheduled to be occupied by two BPO companies by 2nd half of 2013. Casino Building Casino building is located along Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo Highway, within Barangays Mahabang Kahoy and Kaybagay, Tagaytay City with total gross floor area of19,394 sq. m. Its main tenant is Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. for a 25-year lease term ending on 2033. Tagaytay Lot Tagaytay lot is owned by Tagaytay Resort Development Corporation and is located at along Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo Highway, within Barangays Mahabang Kahoy and Kaybagay, Tagaytay City with total land area of 182,857 sq. m. As at December 31, 2012, 9,444 sq. m. of the total area is occupied by a casino building owned by SMIC. The remainder of the property is currently vacant. Edsa West Lot Edsa West lot is located at the corners of E. delos Santos / West Avenues / Bulacan Street, Brgy. Bungad, Diliman Quezon City with total land area of 2,910 sq. m. The lot is currently being developed by SM Land to build SM Cyberwest, a 15-storey office building designed for BPO, Savemore and retail / food shops. Corporate Office Buildings A to F Corporate Office buildings are composed of Buildings A to F with a total gross floor area of 46,883 sq. m. Buildings A to E are leased to SM Affiliates while Building F is leased to Teletech Customer Care Management Corp. 34 State the nature and amount of consideration to be paid or received An additional and equivalent amount of SM Prime shares of stock will be issued to SMIC in exchange for the above-stated properties. To the extent practicable, outline briefly the facts bearing upon the question of the fairness of the consideration. The amount of consideration to be paid is based on the quote provided, which SM determined to be reasonable. State the name and address of the transferor and the nature of any material relationship of such person SMIC directly owns 21.652 % of SM Prime as at April 30, 2013 ITEM 14. Restatement of Accounts There will be no action to be taken with respect to the restatement of any asset, capital, or surplus account of SM Prime. D. OTHER MATTERS ITEM 15. Action with Respect to Reports The following are the matters to be acted upon during the Special Stockholders’ Meeting: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The Merger, including the Plan of Merger (discussed under Item 9 AND Item 12) The Share for Share Swap (discussed under Item 9) The Property for Share Swap (discussed under Item 9 and Item 13) Issuance of additional shares in exchange for items 2 and 3 The increase in authorized capital stock (discussed under Item 9) Change in the primary purpose to a mixed-use real property developer Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation to effect items 5 and 6 ITEM 16. Amendment of Charter, By-Laws or Other Documents The articles of incorporation of SM Prime shall be amended to (a) change its primary purpose to include the business of SM Land; and (b) increase its authorized capital stock from 20,000,000,000 to 40,000,000,000. ITEM 17. Voting Procedures Methods by which votes will be counted All matters subject to vote, except in cases where the law provides otherwise, shall be decided by the plurality vote of stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereat, a quorum being present. Unless required by law, or demanded by a stockholder present in person or by proxy at any meeting, and entitled to vote thereat, the vote of any question need not be by ballot. Voting may be done by show of hands or by secret ballot. On a vote by ballot, each ballot shall not be signed by the stockholder voting, or in his name by his proxy if there be such proxy, and shall state the number of shares voted by him. The external auditor of the Company, SGV & Co., will validate the ballots when voting is done by secret ballot. Likewise, SGV & Co. will count the number of hands raised when voting by show of hands is done. 35 ITEM 18. Corporate Governance The Board of Directors, officers and staff have committed themselves to the principles and best practices contained in the Company’s Corporate Governance Manual, in the belief that good corporate governance is a necessary component of sound strategic business management. The Manual establishes the company's compliance system and plan of compliance. It states that compliance with the principles of good corporate governance starts with the Board of Directors. To this end, a director must act in a manner characterized by transparency, accountability and fairness. The Manual further enumerates the general responsibilities and specific duties and functions of the Board, as well as those of the Board Committees, Corporate Secretary, and the external and internal auditors. The Manual mandates the conduct of communication and training programs on corporate governance. It further provides for the rights of all stockholders and the protection of the interests of minority stockholders. The Manual likewise sets the penalties for non-compliance with its provisions. The Company also adopted policies to govern the acceptance of gifts, insider trading and placement of advertisements. The Company issued a policy to prohibit its directors, officers and employees from soliciting or accepting gifts in any form from any business partner, except for corporate giveaways, tokens or promotional items of nominal value. The Company also adopted guidelines to prohibit its directors, officers and employees from buying or selling shares of stock of the listed SM companies while in possession of material and confidential information. The Company further issued a policy to prohibit the placement of advertisements in publications that solicit for such ad placement prior to the release of the official results of an awarding process conducted by the publication and where an SM company or executive is one of the nominees vying for the award. This is to avoid any misconception that the Company influenced the award in any way through the payment for the advertisement. These rules supplement the existing corporate governance policies in the Manual on Corporate Governance and Code of Ethics. In accordance with the requirements of the SEC Revised Code of Corporate Governance, we have revised the SM Prime Manual on Corporate Governance to incorporate the additions and changes introduced in the new Code, among which are as follows, to wit: The Board of Directors (and not merely the Chairman of the Board) shall appoint the Compliance Officer. The Board shall have at least three independent directors or such number as will constitute not less than 30% of the members of the Board, but in no case less than three. The Board shall formulate and implement policies to ensure the integrity of related party transactions; and establish and maintain an alternative dispute resolution system to settle conflicts involving the Company. In addition to the qualifications for membership in the Board required in relevant laws, the Board may provide for additional qualifications. These may include practical understanding of the Company’s business, membership in good standing in relevant industry, business or professional organizations, and previous business experience. The absence of a director from a Board meeting due to illness, death in the immediate family, or serious accident exempts him from the rule that absence for more than 50% of all meetings of the Board is a ground for temporary disqualification. An independent director whose beneficial equity ownership in a Company or its subsidiaries and affiliates exceeds 2% of the subscribed capital stock is temporarily disqualified from being a director of the Company, until his beneficial equity ownership reverts to the 2% limit. The threshold was set at 10% in the old SEC Code. To make the Manual consistent with the By-Laws, we also revised the provision on disqualification as a director on grounds of engaging in a competing or antagonistic business. Likewise, the Audit and Risk Management Committee shall be chaired by an independent director. An additional qualification for the Corporate Secretary is that he must have a working knowledge of the operations of the company. The stockholders’ right to appoint a proxy is also expressly provided. 36 Manabat Sanagustin & Co., CPAs The KPMG Center, 9/F 6787 Ayala Avenue Makati City 1226, Metro Manila, Philippines Telephone Fax Internet E-Mail +63 (2) 885 7000 +63 (2) 894 1985 www.kpmg.com.ph [email protected] Branches · Subic · Cebu · Bacolod · Iloilo May 30, 2013 Audit and Risk Management Committee SM Investments Corporation Two E-Com Center, 15th Floor Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76 Zone 10 Pasay City, Philippines Attention: Jose T. Sio Executive Vice President and Chief Finance Officer Gentlemen: Subject: Valuation and Fairness Opinion Report on the Proposed Merger between SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and SM Land, Inc. 1 Introduction 1.1 Manabat Sanagustin & Co., CPAs (“MS&Co.” or the “Firm”) is pleased to submit this Valuation and Fairness Opinion Report (the “Report”) covering the proposed merger between SM Land, Inc. (“SM Land”) and SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (“SMPHI”), with SMPHI being the surviving entity. The merger is to be executed by way of a share-for-share swap transaction between SM Land and SMPHI. SMPHI will issue additional shares in exchange of a 100.0% equity stake in SM Land. Management shall be using a share-swap ratio of 368.979 SMPHI shares for every 1 share SM Land. At the end of this transaction, SM Prime shall be the 100.0% owner of SM Land. 1.2 This Report is submitted in accordance with the engagement letter of MS&Co. dated April 5, 2013 (the “Engagement Letter”). The Engagement Letter covers the Firm’s engagement with SMIC for the valuation of SM Land and SMPHI, as a going concern, as of March 31, 2013 (the agreed “Cut-off Date” or the “Valuation Date” or “3M2013”). 1.3 The Firm was engaged by SMIC to act as the independent financial advisor to the Audit and Risk Management Committee of SMIC in relation to the fairness of the share swap ratio to be used in this transaction. As such, the scope of MS&Co.’s work, and consequently, the Report does not contain and has no intention of forming any statement or opinion as to the operational or commercial merits or strategic rationale of the Transaction. 1.4 MS&Co.’s work did not include making comments on the commercial feasibility of the transaction nor was the Firm involved in any way with the conceptualization and execution of the transaction. No work was done insofar as the different aspects of the transaction are concerned. This Report is based on the financial information prepared and submitted by both SM Land and SMPHI and on information gathered from public sources. 1 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 These include annual and quarterly reports filed in the Philippine Stock Exchange (“PSE”), Bureau of Treasury, Damodaran Online, Factiva and various websites of comparable companies (“CoCos”). 1.5 MS&Co. did not conduct a financial due diligence on the information provided by either SM Land or SMPHI. It was assumed that all information furnished were complete, accurate and reflective of the good faith of the management teams of SM Land and SMPHI to describe its historical status and prospects as of the Cut-off Date from operating and financial points of view. 1.6 In order to assess the fairness of the share-swap ratio, MS&Co. conducted a valuation of both SM Land and SMPHI. The ranges of values of these two companies were then used as bases to determine the fairness of the SMIC management-determined share-swap ratio. MS&Co. considered four (4) valuation approaches, namely: the cost approach, the market approach, the income approach, and the sum of the parts approach. 1.6.1 There are no globally accepted rules or standards on the selection of the most appropriate valuation methodologies for a given valuation engagement. 1.6.2 The broad criteria for the selection of the methodologies are as follows: (i) consistency of the methodologies given the availability and quality of the data; (ii) appropriateness of the methodologies with the characteristics of the entity being valued; and (iii) applicability of the methodologies with the purpose of the valuation. These three (3) criteria were applied to the specific circumstances of this valuation engagement. 1.7 The following general activities were performed to prepare this Report: 1.7.1 Requested an initial set of information from SM Land and SMPHI management. Based on the initial set of assumptions and information received from SM Land and SMPHI, the Firm conducted interviews to clarify certain assumptions and information received in order to test check the reasonableness of the assumptions and underlying data. 1.7.2 Conducted research and retrieved relevant information from the PSE, Bureau of Treasury, Damodaran Online, Factiva and various websites of CoCos. 1.8 The opinion, analysis, and resulting observations were based solely on management representations and on publicly available financial information. It is not the independent financial advisor’s role to either evaluate or confirm how the transaction, to be executed by SM Land and SMPHI, will affect the shareholders, other than from a financial point of view. 1.9 The management of SMPHI and SM Land had executed their respective representation letters stating that the information submitted to us are materially accurate and complete, fair in the manner of its portrayal and therefore forms a reliable basis for the valuation. 2 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 2 Executive summary MS&Co. considered the Sum of the Parts Approach for the estimation of the fair range of market value for SM Land as of the valuation date. For SMPHI, MS&Co. considered the Cost approach, Market approach, in particular the EV/EBITDA, 60-day weighted average closing price, closing price as of March 27, 2013, and Income approach as the most appropriate valuation methodologies in establishing the fair range of values as of the Valuation Date. 2.1 The table below presents the valuation results of SM Land. Valuation results- SM Land Per share (PHP) Sum of the parts Minimum value Maximum value 6,753.33 8,315.53 Total (PHP'M) 263,393 324,322 Source: MS&Co. analysis The valuation approach used for SM Land is the Sum of the Parts Method (“SOTP”). Sum of the Parts was deemed as the most appropriate due to the following: 2.2 · Diversity of the companies operating under the umbrella of SM Land. · SM Land records its investments at cost and does not consolidate the operations of its subsidiaries to its books. Thus, the standalone financial statements of SM Land may not be able to capture the actual operation and status of its subsidiaries. The table below presents the valuation results of SMPHI. Valuation results - SMPHI Cost approach Incom e approach 7% grow th rate 6% grow th rate 5% grow th rate Market approach EV/EBITDA - w eighted average Closing price as of March 27, 2013 60-day volume-w eighted average share price Valuation range Per share (PhP) 19.39 24.22 22.38 20.62 Total (PHP'M) 336,888 420,820 388,790 358,231 18.33 318,525 19.10 331,837 18.68 324,466 18.33 to 24.22 318,525 to 420,820 Source: MS&Co. analysis · MS&Co. selected 5 methodologies to estimate the fair range of market values for SMPHI. These are the Cost approach, the Income approach, EV/EBITDA multiple, SMPHI’s market closing price as of the Valuation Date, and SMPHI’s 60-day weighted average volume price. · In contrast to SMDC, SMPHI generates recurring and stable rental and lease revenues. As such, MS&Co. selected the Income approach to estimate the fair range of values of SMPHI since SMPHI’s future cash flows may be estimated using historical financial figures. 3 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 2.3 · The Cost approach is applicable to SMPHI as the company also relies heavily on its real property assets to generate its revenues. Given that CBRE based the fair value of SMPHI’s malls primarily on discounted cashflows, the appraised values take into account the recurring revenues attributable to these properties. · EV/EBITDA was selected as one of the methodologies to estimate the fair range of market values for SMPHI. Some of the comparable companies researched over the course of the valuation work have materially different gearing ratios compared to SMPHI and apply different accounting treatments. As such, MS&Co. selected EV/EBITDA as an appropriate multiple to be used as it generally does not take into account differences in leverage, amortization and tax treatment. Further, MS&Co. used the closing price as of March 27, 2013 and the 60-day weighted average volume price as this is the traded market value of SMPHI as of the Valuation date. Given the above fair range of values, the estimated exchange ratio for the share-for-share swap transaction is 278.81 to 453.56 SMPHI shares for every 1 share of SM Land. Based on the management-determined share-swap ratio of 368.979 SMPHI shares for every share of SM Land, the planned exchange is fair from a financial point of view. 4 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3 Organization background and structure for SM Land, Inc. 3.1 Corporate information SM Land, Inc. (“SM Land”) was incorporated on March 10, 1960 and is engaged primarily in real estate development, investment in shares of stock of other companies, and in leasing and subleasing of properties. It currently derives income from dividends received from investments in the shares of SMDC, SMPHI, SMIC, Banco de Oro (“BDO”), Chinabank (“CBC”), Ayala Corporation, PLDT, Prime Media Holdings, and other companies. SM Land also earns rental income from lease agreements with third parties and related parties, including SMIC, SMPHI, SM Mart Inc. (“SM Mart”), Supervalue, Inc. (“SVI”), Super Shopping Market, Inc. (“SSMI”), and Sanford Marketing Corporation (“Sanford”). Ownership structure SM Land is closely held by the Sy Family and SMIC. Below is a summary of shareholdings, with respective percentage of ownership in SM Land as of 2013. SM Investments Corporation Sy Family 63.87% 36.13% SM Land, Inc. Source: SM Land, Inc. 2013 General Information Sheet 3.3 Financial performance and position MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of SM Land in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that SM Land is a real estate company, the asset base was likewise studied to understand the different asset groupings and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. 5 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial perform ance Audited Unaudited 2010 to 2012 PHP'M 2010 2011 2012 3M2013 % to revenue CAGR Revenue Dividend income 1,940.0 2,238.2 2,035.9 39.1 56.1% 2.4% Rent 1,224.4 1,431.2 1,971.6 497.1 41.1% 26.9% Amusement income 0.0% Others 88.5 98.3 123.9 37.8 2.8% 18.3% Total revenues 3,252.9 3,767.7 4,131.5 574.0 100.0% 12.7% Cost and expenses Cost of services (809.9) (809.5) (896.9) (241.3) (22.7%) 5.2% General and administrative expenses (320.0) (287.3) (253.0) (67.4) (7.9%) (11.1%) Total cost and expenses (1,129.9) (1,096.8) (1,149.9) (308.6) (30.6%) 0.9% Other incom e (expenses) Interest expense (156.1) (120.2) (97.0) (22.8) (3.4%) (21.2%) Interest income 71.2 93.0 108.7 18.2 2.4% 23.6% Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss) (52.7) 52.9 (0.0) 0.0 (0.1%) (97.9%) Impairment loss (0.1) Loss on sale of asset (15.2) (0.1%) Income from penalties 1.6 0.0% Gain on sale of investments in shares of stock 2,848.5 158.3 30.5% (76.4%) Others 5.0 3.5 9.8 0.9 0.2% 40.6% Total other income (expenses) 2,715.9 15.6 179.8 (3.9) 29.4% (74.3%) Income before income tax 4,838.9 2,686.5 3,161.5 261.4 98.9% (19.2%) Provision for (benefit from) income tax Current 18.9 36.1 236.7 67.4 2.4% 253.8% Deferred (29.0) 90.9 48.6 3.8 0.9% (46.5%) (10.1) 127.0 285.3 71.2 3.3% 124.6% Net incom e 4,848.9 2,559.4 2,876.1 190.2 95.5% -23.0% Sources: SM Land, Inc. 2011 and 2012 audited financial statements, March 31, 2013 unaudited financial statements; MS&Co. analysis 6 Sources: SM Land, Inc. 2012 audited financial statements; March 31, 2013 unaudited financial statements, SM Land, Inc. 2011 audited financial statements, MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial position PHP'M Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Available-for-sale investments -current portion Other current assets Total current assets Noncurrent Assets Available-for-sale investments -net of current portion Investments in shares of stock- at cost Property and equipment- net Investment properties- net Net pension asset Deferred tax assets-net Other non-current assets Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities and equity Current liabilities Accounts payable and other current liabilities Loans payable- current portion Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Loans payable- net of current portion Deposits from tenants and others Deferred tax liabilities- net Total non-current liabilities Equity Capital stock Additional paid-in-capital Other comprehensive income-net deferred tax Net uinrealized gain on available-for-sale investments Retained earnings Appropriated Unappropriated Total equity Total liabilities and equity Sources: 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 2013 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 2,660.3 2,344.2 3,659.4 424.0 9,087.9 999.1 2,341.2 3,466.2 496.6 7,303.2 616.0 2,701.8 5,756.5 521.0 9,595.3 727.5 2,745.6 6,308.2 379.6 10,161.0 3.2% 5.4% 9.3% 1.1% 18.9% (51.9%) 7.4% 25.4% 10.8% 2.8% 2,760.2 2,615.1 24,256.8 24,257.2 491.9 240.3 7,403.8 9,069.6 8.8 11.0 52.6 233.9 45.7 35,208.0 36,238.9 44,296.0 43,542.1 4,339.9 25,047.4 206.2 9,951.8 16.4 48.6 39,610.3 49,205.6 4,755.6 25,067.8 197.8 10,159.2 17.2 53.6 40,251.2 50,412.2 7.0% 53.8% 0.7% 19.3% 0.0% 0.2% 81.1% 25.4% 1.6% (35.3%) 15.9% 36.7% (54.4%) 6.1% 100.0% 5.4% 10,237.0 10,237.0 8,380.9 8,380.9 7,620.0 58.8 7,678.7 7,689.9 58.8 7,748.7 19.3% 0.0% 19.3% (13.7%) -13.4% 1,900.0 300.3 2,200.3 1,893.5 349.6 38.3 2,281.4 1,776.0 444.9 87.0 2,307.9 1,725.0 470.9 90.9 2,286.7 4.1% 0.8% 0.1% 5.0% (3.3%) 21.7% 2.4% 662.2 7,167.0 1,862.2 7,167.0 1,950.1 7,167.0 3.2% 15.7% 71.6% 0.0% 6,312.4 5,974.1 9,989.2 3,900.2 7,167.0 (4.1) 10,956.8 16.1% 25.8% 11,200.0 16,200.0 6,517.1 1,676.5 31,858.7 32,879.8 44,296.0 43,542.1 15,200.0 4,912.6 39,219.0 49,205.6 15,200.0 3,157.0 40,376.8 50,412.2 31.1% 9.5% 75.7% 16.5% (13.2%) 11.0% 100.0% 5.4% SM Land, Inc. 2011 and 2012 audited financial statements, March 31, 2013 unaudited financial statements; MS&Co. Analysis 7 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 4. Valuation of SM Land, Inc 4.1 Post-tender offer scenario SM Land is in the process of conducting a tender offer on SMDC and HPI. After the tender offer transactions, the shareholdings of SM Land shall be as follows: Summary of SM Land's holdings, post-tender offer Shares Ow ned by SM Land 5,314,876,492 9,271,204,239 2,246,244,622 900,000 2,999,300 204,000 SMPHI SMDC HPI ASSODECO Magenta SHDC Total outstanding shares 17,373,677,760 9,271,204,239 2,246,244,622 900,000 3,000,000 400,000 Ow nership 30.59% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.98% 51.00% Source: 2013 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis 4.2 Sum of the Parts Approach The valuation approach used for SM Land is the Sum of the Parts Method. Sum of the Parts was deemed as the most appropriate due to the following: · Diversity of the companies operating under the umbrella of SM Land. · SM Land records its investments at cost and does not consolidate the operations of its subsidiaries to its books. Thus, the standalone financial statements of SM Land may not be able to capture the actual operation and status of its subsidiaries. The operating companies under SM Land were first valued separately, using the appropriate valuation method/s. The separate values were then summed up to estimate the total intrinsic value of SM Land. Sum of the parts SM Land 30.59% 100.00% 100.00% SMPHI SMDC HPI 100.00% 99.98% ASSODECO Magenta 51.00% SHDC 100.00% Other Assets and Liabilities •Investment Properties •AFS investments •Investments in stocks •Others Source: 3M2013 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis · MS&Co. computed the values of the investments based on the most appropriate valuation method for each company. The valuation methods are as follows: 8 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 – The value of the investment in SMPHI is based on the Market approach and the Income approach because the future cash flows are the main driver of SMPHI’s value, and it can be estimated using historical financial trends. – EV/EBITDA was selected as one of the methodologies to estimate the fair range of market values for SMPHI. Some of the comparable companies researched over the course of the valuation work have materially different gearing ratios compared to SMPHI and apply different accounting treatments. As such, MS&Co. selected EV/EBITDA as an appropriate multiple to be used as it generally does not take into account differences in leverage, amortization and tax treatment. Further, MS&Co. used the closing price as of March 27, 2013 and the 60-day weighted average volume price as this is the traded market value of SMPHI as of the Valuation date. – The Cost approach was deemed most appropriate to estimate the fair value of SMDC because the company relies heavily on the sale of its inventory of real properties to generate its revenues. The value of SMDC is primarily driven by its asset base which primarily consists of raw land, condominium units for sale, and properties under development. – Under the Market approach, EV/EBITDA was selected as one of the appropriate multiples to estimate the fair range of market values for SMDC. EV/EBITDA multiple is generally not sensitive to differences in capital structures, depreciation and amortization policies, and tax treatments. In contrast, the P/E multiple will be sensitive to these differences. As such, MS&Co. considered the use of EV/EBITDA multiple instead of either the P/E or P/B multiples. The P/B multiple was not considered as an appropriate method to value SMDC because this multiple does not take into account the earnings potential of SMDC. Further, a large portion of SMDC’s assets is comprised of real properties which currently do not reflect the fair market values of the assets. – Actual observed market prices were also used and forms part of the range of values. The closing price as of March 27, 2013, the last trading day for the month, and the 60-day volume-weighted average prices from the Valuation Date were used. – For HPI, the Market approach was deemed most appropriate to estimate the company’s value, wherein the 60-day volume-weighted average prices from the Valuation Date were used. – The value of the investments in ASSODECO, Magenta, and SHDC are based on Cost approach. · All investment property assets recorded under the books of SM Land were adjusted to reflect the movement in fair market value as of the Cut-off Date. The fair market value was based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE. · The fair market values of AFS Investments and Investments in stocks of CBC, BDO, and SMIC are based on SM Land’s management computations. For the listed shares, the values were based on the stock exchange prices. For the PLDT shares owned by SM Land, the value was based on acquisition cost. 9 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 · The investments in ASSODECO, Magenta, and SHDC were valued using the Cost approach. The fair values of ASSODECO’s investment property and Magenta’s PPE were based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE. The following table summarizes the valuation approaches used to value the “parts” of SM Land: SOTP- SM Land fair range of values Minim um PHP'M Valuation basis Value Investm ent in subsidiaries and associates Investment in SMPHI Market approach 97,441.6 Investment in SMDC Market approach 62,757.2 Investment in HPI Market approach 5,045.0 Investments ASODECO Cost approach 300.4 Investments Magenta Cost approach 394.4 Investments SHDC Cost approach 3.6 Other assets Investment properties CBRE valuation 81,427.9 AFS Investments SM Land Management 11,063.9 Investments in stocks (CBC, BDO, SMIC) SM Land Management 10,873.2 Others Book value 4,121.3 Liabilities Total liabilities Book value 10,035.4 Sum of the parts 263,393.2 Numbers of shares outstanding 39,001,970 Valuation range (PHP per share) 6,753.33 Maxim um Valuation basis Income approach Cost approach Market approach Cost approach Cost approach Cost approach Value 128,735.2 91,289.8 6,147.5 300.4 394.4 3.6 CBRE valuation SM Land Management SM Land Management Book value Book value 81,427.9 11,063.9 10,873.2 4,121.3 10,035.4 324,321.9 39,001,970 8,315.53 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 10 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 4.1.1 Valuation of SM Prime Holdings Inc. After the tender offer by SM Land for HPI and SMDC shares (using SMPHI shares), SM Land shall own 30.59% of SMPHI. The value of the investment on SMPHI ranges between PHP97.4 billion and PHP128.7 billion, based on market approach and income, respectively. The table below presents the summary of values. Valuation range of SM Land's investm ent in SMPHI PHP'M Total equity value SM Land's ow nership percentage Valuation range Minim um value Basis Value Market approach 318,524.5 30.59% 97,442 Maxim um value Basis Value Income approach 420,819.7 30.59% 128,735 Source: 2012 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis Please refer to Section 6 of this report, for further details on the valuation of SMPHI. 4.1.2 Valuation of SM Development Corporation After the tender offer by SM Land for SMDC shares, SM Land shall own 100.0% of SMDC. The table below summarizes the range of values of SMDC. Valuation results - SMDC Cost approach Market approach EV / EBITDA - w eighted average Closing price as of March 27, 2013 60-day volume w eighted average share price Valuation range Per share (PHP) 9.85 6.77 8.47 8.22 6.77 to 9.85 Total (PHP'M) 91,290 62,757 78,527 76,228 62,757 to 91,290 Source: 2012 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis Cost Approach The following table summarizes the computation for SMDC net asset value per share as of the Valuation Date, using the Cost approach. 11 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Cost approach Am ounts in PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Adjustment to reflect fair value of properties 13-Mar-13 85,253 42,960 42,293 Fair value of available-for-sale securities Carrying value of available-for-sale securities Adjusted fair value of real estate properties Carrying value as of March 31, 2013 Condominium units for sale Land and development Investment properties Advances for project development 6,280 5,762 86,131 1,596 31,666 724 3,667 37,653 Adjusted NAV Number of shares outstanding NAV per share Source: 519 48,478 91,290 9,271,204,239 9.85 Unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2013; CBRE master property list; MS&Co. analysis Under the Cost approach, assets and liabilities with available fair market values are markedto-market. · All real estate assets recorded under the books of SMDC were adjusted to reflect the movement in fair market value. · The fair market value was based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE using various valuation methods, namely the market data approach and income approach. · According to management, only available-for-sale investments and held for trading investments are subject to market valuation. Listed shares classified as available-for – sale investments are stated at fair market value. For shares of Tagaytay Resort Dev’t. Corp. (“TRDC”), MS&Co. adjusted the value based on MS&Co. valuation. MS&Co. used the Cost approach in valuing TRDC. The table below presents the breakdown of available-for-sale investments. Available for sale investm ents Com pany Listed shares Highlands Prime, Inc. Belle Corporation Shang Properties, Inc. Export and Industry Bank, Inc.1 Keppel Philippines Holding, Inc. Picop Resources, Inc.2 Republic Glass Holdings Corporation Benguet Corporation Unlisted shares Tagaytay Resort Dev't. Corp. Total Note: Source: Carrying value as of 3M2013 (In PHP'M) Num ber of shares 770 4,193 652 2 15 8 54 2 337,911,101 735,553,561 189,550,548 7,829,000 3,035,836 40,000,000 19,216,512 88,919 66 5,762 105,000 Latest share price (In PHP) 2.28 5.70 3.44 0.26 5.05 0.21 2.80 17.70 5,565.70 FMV as of 3M2013 (In PHP'M) 770 4,193 652 2 15 8 54 2 584 6,280 (1) Latest available share price is as of May 8, 2009 (2) Latest available share price is as of May 26, 2008 Available-for-sale schedule as of March 31, 2013 provided by management; PSE; MS&Co. analysis 12 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 The table below presents the appraised values of properties excluded in determining fair market value of SMDC’s real properties. Adjustm ents to the approxim ate FMV as of 3M2013 Property Makati Home Depot 102 EDSA Realty Corp. Total Source: Appraised values (In PHP'M) 1,602 1,269 2,871 Details Classified under deposits account Classified under deposits account CBRE appraisal as of February 28, 2013; SMDC management The adjusted fair market value of SMDC’s real properties is shown below: Adjusted fair m arket value of real properties as of March 31, 2013 (In PHP'M) Approximate FMV as of 3M2103 Adjustments Adjusted FMV of real properties as of 3M2013 Source: 89,002 2,871 86,131 CBRE appraisal as of February 28, 2013; SMDC management; MS&Co. analysis Market approach or capitalized earnings approach In using the Market approach, MS&Co. gathered information relating to comparable publiclylisted companies operating in the same industry as SMDC. The CoCos were selected based on the nature of their business and the company structure. In addition to SMDC, there are 39 property companies listed in the PSE. Out of the 39, 20 companies are engaged in the sale of real estate. From the 20 companies, the list of comparable companies were evaluated and then chosen based on the following: · Majority (more than 50%) of the companies’ operating revenues should be derived from real estate sales · Suite of products should include affordable to mid-end residential units · Assets and operating revenues of the company should be relatively similar to SMDC’s asset and operating revenue levels After considering the criteria listed above, MS&Co. identified Filinvest Land, Inc. (“FLI”) and Vista Land and Lifescapes, Inc. (“VLL”) as comparable companies. The table below presents the summary of the CoCos selection process. 13 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMDC CoCos Selection Products include affordable to m idend residential units Yes Operating Total assets as of revenues as of Decem ber 31, Decem ber 31, 2012 2012 (In PHP) (In PHP) 21,578,437,825 80,197,847,563 Developm ent type Revenue m ix Mid-market residential units 100% real estate sales Affordable, midend and highend residential units VLI Affordable, midend and highend residential units Excluded Affordable, midCoCos end and high(18 com panies) end units 83.2% real estate sales Yes 10,575,688,000 81,927,264,000 99.9% real estate sales Yes 16,359,932,258 74,331,429,608 All CoCos derive majority of their operating revenues from real estate sales 14 out of the 17 CoCos sell affordable to mid-end residential units Entity nam e SMDC Selected CoCos FLI Note: Source: Range below SMDC's level: PHP15.3 million to PHP8.80 billion Range below SMDC's level PHP0.48 billion to PHP35.97 billion Range above SMDC's level: PHP25.37 billion to 49.0 billion Range above SMDC's level: PHP142.72 billion to PHP231.23 billion Operating revenues and asset figures were based on CoCos 2012 annual reports (latest available full-year financial information) SMDC and CoCos 2012 annual reports; CoCos websites Under the Market approach, MS&Co. considered the price-to-earnings (“P/E”) multiple, the price-to-book (“P/B”) multiple and the EV/EBITDA multiple in valuing SMDC. The respective earnings per share, book value per share and EBITDA of the CoCos were lifted from the Philippine Stock Exchange and quarterly reports as of March 31, 2013 of CoCos. The share prices used were based on the closing prices as of March 31, 2013. The calculation for SMDC’s value using the Market approach is shown on the table below. SMDC EPS, BVS and EBITDA per share Notes Earnings per share (PHP) Net income (In PHP'M) 1 Number of shares outstanding ('000) Earnings per share Book value per share Book value (In PHP'M) Number of shares outstanding ('000) Book value per share EBITDA per share EBITDA (In PHP'M) 2 Number of shares outstanding ('000) EBITDA per share Note: Source: 5,053 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 9,271,204 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.55 42,293 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 9,271,204 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 4.56 5,656 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 9,271,204 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.61 (1) LTM net income = December 2012 net income – March 2012 net income + March 2013 net income (2) LTM EBITDA = December 2012 EBITDA – March 2012 EBITDA + March 2013 EBITDA MS&Co. analysis 14 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Market approach - CoCos Range of values per share P/E (x) Earnings per share 0.55 Book value per share EBITDA per share Derived multiple (w eighted average) 11.61 Value per share (PHP) 6.33 Range of values Range of values per share, before adjustments Number of shares (in millions) 9,271 Range of values, before adjustments Less: Net debt (PHP'M) N/A Minority interest (PHP'M) N/A Preferred shares (PHP'M) N/A Equity value (PHP'M) 58,674 Number of shares (in millions) 9,271 Equity value per share (PHP) 6.33 Source: P/B (x) EV/EBITDA (x) 4.56 1.02 4.66 0.61 14.29 8.72 9,271 9,271 N/A N/A N/A 43,207 9,271 4.66 18,086 0 0 62,757 9,271 6.77 MS&Co. analysis Presented below are the share prices as of March 31, 2013 and its respective 30, 60 and 90 day volume-weighted average share price for SMDC. Market approach - VWAP Closing price as of March 27, 2013 Prior to valuation date 30-day volume w eighted average share price 60-day volume w eighted average share price 90- day volume w eighted average share price Source: Per share 8.47 8.30 8.22 7.85 PSE; Bloomberg 15 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 4.1.3 Valuation of Highlands Prime, Inc After the tender offer by SM Land for HPI shares, SM Land shall own 100.0% of HPI. The value the HPI investment based the market approach ranges from PHP5.0 billion to PHP12.0 billion. Valuation range of SM Land's investm ent in HPI PHP'M Total equity value SM Land's ow nership percentage Valuation range Source: Minim um value Basis Value Market approach 5,045.0 100.00% 5,045 Maxim um value Basis Value Market approach 6,147.5 100.00% 6,148 MS&Co. Analysis In using the Market approach, MS&Co. collated information relating to comparable publiclylisted companies operating in the same industry as HPI. The CoCos were selected based on the nature of their business and the company structure. In addition to HPI, there are 39 property companies listed in the PSE. Out of the 39, MS&Co. have identified 20 companies engaged in the sale of real estate. From the 20 companies, MS&Co. selected the comparables based on the following criteria: · Company’s product should include high-end residential units · Residential development projects are proximate with each other within a particular area · Majority of revenues should come from real estate sales · Total assets and revenues of the company should be relatively close to HPI’s asset and real estate sales levels After considering the criteria listed above, MS&Co. have identified Arthaland Corporation (“ALCO”), Anchor Land Holdings, Inc. (“ALHI”) and Primex Corporation (“PRMX”) as CoCos. The table below presents the summary of the CoCos selection process. 16 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 HPI CoCos selection Areas covered by Real estate sales for the Total assets level as residential of Decem ber 31, 2012 Operating revenue year ended Decem ber 31, 2012 (in PHP) (in PHP) m ix Entity nam e Developm ent type developm ent HPI High-end residential Tagaytay, Batangas 100% from real and leisure and Cavite estate sales 521,486,405 4,038,398,665 95.0% from real estate sales; 5.0 % from rental income & management fees 3,597,270,307 (6.90 times bigger than HPI) 13,321,353,770 (3.30 times bigger than HPI) 100% from real estate sales 1,453,263,809 (2.79 times bigger than HPI) 3,641,388,604 (0.90 times smaller than HPI) 11,605,430 (0.02 times smaller than HPI) 478,248,589 (0.12 times smaller than HPI) PHP0.3 billion to PHP32.3 billion PHP4.2 billion to PHP231.2 billion Selected CoCos Old Manila, Binonodo, Ermita, Paranaque, San Juan ALHI Mainly high-end residential and commercial ALCO Middle and high-end residential, Taguig commercial and leisure PRMX Malabon and High-end residential Antipolo Mix of low -end, Excluded middle, and high-end CoCos (17 residential, leisure, com panies) commercial, and industrial May be w ithin a certain area or spread across various locations 75.9% from real estate sales; 24.1% from rental income All CoCos derived majority (more than 50.0%) of their operating income from real estate sales Note: Operating revenues and asset figures were based on CoCos 2012 annual reports (latest available full-year financial information) Source: 2012 Annual Report of the 18 identified CoCos; MS&Co. analysis Under the Market approach, MS&Co. considered the P/E multiple, the P/B multiple and the EV/EBITDA multiple in valuing HPI. The respective earnings per share, book value per share and EBITDA of the CoCos were lifted from their respective financial statements. The share prices used were based on the closing prices as of 3M2013. MS&CO.’s calculation for HPI’s value using the Market approach is shown on the table below. HPI EPS, BVS and EBITDA per share Notes Earnings per share (PHP) Net income (in PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Earnings per share (PHP) Book value per share (PHP) Total equity (in PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Book value per share (PHP) EBITDA per share (PHP) EBITDA (in PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) EBITDA per share (PHP) Note: Source: 36 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 2,246,245 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.02 2,759 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 2,246,245 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 1.23 91 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 2,246,245 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.04 (1) LTM net income = December 2012 net income – March 2012 net income + March 2013 net income (2) LTM EBITDA = December 2012 EBITDA – March 2012 EBITDA + March 2013 EBITDA MS&Co. analysis 17 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Market approach - CoCos (HPI) Weighted average P/E (x) P/B (x) EV/EBITDA (x) Range of values per share Earnings per share Book value per share EBITDA per share Derived multiple Value per share (PHP/share) Range of values Number of shares ('000) Less: Net debt (PHP'M) Minority interest (PHP'M) Capital stock - preferred (PHP'M) Equity value (PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Equity value per share(PHP) 0.02 1.23 90.11 1.43 3.11 3.82 0.04 63.51 2.58 2,246,245 N/A N/A N/A 3,214 2,246,245 1.43 2,246,245 N/A N/A N/A 8,573 2,246,245 3.82 2,246,245 756 5,045 2,246,245 2.25 Source: Interim financial statements of HPI as of 3M 2013; Capital IQ; MS&Co. analysis Presented below are the share prices as of March 31, 2013 and its respective 30, 60 and 90 day volume-weighted average share price for HPI. Market approach - VWAP (HPI ) Closing price as of March 27, 2013 Prior to valuation date 30-day volume-w eighted average share price 60-day volume-w eighted average share price 90-day volume-w eighted average share price Share price 2.28 2.20 2.74 2.64 Source: Bloomberg; PSE 4.1.4 Valuation of ASSODECO As of March 31, 2013, SM Land owns 100.00% of ASSODECO. The total value of the investments in ASSODECO is PHP300.4 million. The summary of the fair value of ASSODECO is as follows: ASSODECO- Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Add: Adjustment to reflect the fair value of properties Adjusted NAV Percentage ow nership Total value of investm ent in ASSODECO 3M2013 221.0 311.1 (90.1) 390.6 300.4 100.0% 300.4 Source: 3M2013 ASSODECO Unaudited Statement of Financial Position; CBRE appraisal report; MS&Co. Analysis Assets and liabilities are based on the book values as presented in the unaudited March 31, 2013 statement of financial position. The upward adjustment is meant to adjust the book value of an investment property from PHP 191.4 million to its fair market value of PHP582.0 million. The fair market value is based on the valuation of CBRE using the income approach. 18 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 4.1.5 Valuation of Magenta As of March 31, 2013, SM Land owns 99.98% of Magenta. The value of the investment in Magenta is PHP394.4 million. The summary of the fair value of Magenta is as follows: Magenta- Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Add: Adjustment to reflect the fair value of properties Adjusted NAV Percentage ow nership Total value of investm ent in Magenta 3M2013 293.4 19.4 274.0 120.5 394.5 100.0% 394.4 Source: 3M2013 Magenta Unaudited Statement of Financial Position; CBRE appraisal report; MS&Co. Analysis Assets and liabilities are based on the book values as presented in the unaudited March 31, 2013 statement of financial position. The upward adjustment is meant to adjust the book value of an property plant and equipment from PHP276.7 million to its fair market value of PHP397.2 million. The fair market value is based on the valuation of CBRE using the cost approach. 4.1.6 Valuation of SHDC As of March 31, 2013, SM land owns 51.00% of SHDC. The total equity value of SHDC is PHP7.1 million and the total value of the investment in SHDC is PHP3.6 million. The summary of the fair value of SHDC is as follows: SHDC- Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities NAV Percentage ow nership Total value of investm ent in SHDC 3M2013 457.6 450.5 7.1 51.0% 3.6 Source: 3M2013 SHDC Unaudited Statement of Financial Position; MS&Co. Analysis Assets and liabilities are based on the book values as presented in the unaudited March 31, 2013 statement of financial position. 19 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 4.1.7 Other SM Land assets The summary of the fair value of other assets is as follows: Fair values of SM Land's properties PHP'M Investm ent properties AFS investm ents Ayala Corp. PLDT Prime Media Holdings Others Allow ance for impairment Total AFS investments Investm ents in stocks BDO CBC SMIC Total investments in stocks Others Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Other current assets Property and equipment- net Net pension asset Other non-current assets Total other assets Total Basis CBRE Valuation Fair value 81,427.9 Managament schedules Managament schedules Managament schedules Managament schedules 11,059.1 3.1 0.9 0.8 (0.1) 11,063.9 Managament schedules Managament schedules Managament schedules 6,750.3 3,688.5 434.4 10,873.2 Book value Book value Book value Book value Book value Book value 727.5 2,745.6 379.6 197.8 17.2 53.6 4,121.3 107,486.3 Source: CBRE appraisal report; 3M2013 Schedule of Investments; 3M2013 Schedule of AFS; MS&Co. Analysis The fair market values of investment properties are based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE, while the fair market values of AFS investments and investments in stocks of CBC, BDO, and SMIC are based on SM Land’s management computations. For the listed shares, the values were based on the stock exchange prices. For the PLDT shares owned by SM Land, the value was based on acquisition cost. The allowance for impairment pertaining to the AFS investments pertains to the cost of club shares in the books of SM Land but the certificates are not in the name of the company. 20 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 4.1.8 Sum of the parts summary The fair range of values for SM Land using the Sum of the parts approach is PHP263.4 billion and PHP324.4 billion or PHP6,753.33 and PHP8,316.29 per share. The summary is as follows: SOTP- SM Land fair range of values Minim um PHP'M Valuation basis Value Investm ent in subsidiaries and associates Investment in SMPHI Market approach 97,441.6 Investment in SMDC Market approach 62,757.2 Investment in HPI Market approach 5,045.0 Investments ASODECO Cost approach 300.4 Investments Magenta Cost approach 394.4 Investments SHDC Cost approach 3.6 Other assets Investment properties CBRE valuation 81,427.9 AFS Investments SM Land Management 11,063.9 Investments in stocks (CBC, BDO, SMIC) SM Land Management 10,873.2 Others Book value 4,121.3 Liabilities Total liabilities Book value 10,035.4 Sum of the parts 263,393.2 Numbers of shares outstanding 39,001,970 Valuation range (PHP per share) 6,753.33 Maxim um Valuation basis Income approach Cost approach Market approach Cost approach Cost approach Cost approach CBRE valuation SM Land Management SM Land Management Book value Book value Value 128,735.2 91,289.8 6,177.2 300.4 394.4 3.6 81,427.9 11,063.9 10,873.2 4,121.3 10,035.4 324,351.5 39,001,970 8,316.29 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 21 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 5 Organization background and structure of SM Prime Holdings Inc. 5.1 Corporate information SM Prime Holdings Inc. (“SMPHI”) is the leading developer and operator of shopping malls in the Philippines. SMPHI also operates malls in China. Its operations are mainly driven by rentals from tenants, sales of cinema tickets, income from amusement centers and others. SMPHI was incorporated in January 6, 1994, and is currently headquartered on Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1 A, Pasay City. SMPHI competes with local mall operators and other retailers such as Ayala Malls, Robinsons Malls, Puregold, and Shopwise. The advantage of SMPHI in this competitive industry rests upon its strategic locations, effective tenant mix, and long-standing brand. SMPHI has an extensive customer base; the revenue stream of the company is not reliant on one or a few clients. Major anchor tenants in the Philippines include SM Department Stores, SM Supermarkets, SM Hypermarkets, Ace Hardware, National Bookstore, KFC, Jollibee, Watsons (Philippines), Uniqlo, and Forever 21. Major anchor tenants in China include WalMart, SM Laiya Department Stores, Wanda Cinema, McDonald’s, KFC, and Watsons. Ownership structure The major shareholders of SMPHI are SM Land Inc., which has a 40.96% stake; PCD Nominee Corp., which has a 34.43% stake; and SM Investments Corp., which has a 21.65% stake in SMPHI. SMIC, through SM Land Inc., indirectly owns 27.4% of SMPHI resulting in an effective ownership of 49.1% SMPHI is a listed company in the Philippine Stock Exchange. As of March 31, 2013, 5.3 million shares, which represent a 30.5% of the total outstanding shares, are owned by the public. The diagram below summarizes the ownership structure of the SMPHI. Ownership Structure SM Investments Corp. 66.9% SM Land, Inc 21.65% PCD Nominee Corp. (Foreign and Filipino) 34.43% 40.96% Others 2.96% SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Source: SMPHI 2012 Annual report 22 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 5.2 Financial performance and position MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of SMPHI in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that SMPHI is a commercial leasing company, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of leasing income and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Consolidated statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'M Total revenues Operating expenses Income from operations Other income (charges)- net Income before income tax Incom e tax Current Deferred Total income tax Net incom e Source: 2010 23,716 (11,271) 12,445 (1,648) 10,797 Audited 2011 26,897 (12,277) 14,620 (2,400) 12,220 2012 30,726 (13,995) 16,731 (2,442) 14,289 Unaudited 3M2013 7,830 (3,604) 4,226 (445) 3,781 (2,450) (207) (2,657) 8,140 (2,932) 94 (2,838) 9,382 (3,313) (53) (3,367) 10,922 (902) 10 (891) 2,890 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 100.0% 13.8% -46.2% 11.4% 53.8% 16.0% -7.9% 21.8% 45.8% 15.0% -10.7% -0.2% -10.9% 16.3% -49.2% 12.6% 34.9% 15.8% SMPHI 2012 Annual report; SMPHI 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis 23 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 Consolidated statem ent of financial position PHP'M Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalent Short-term investments Investments held for trading Receivables Available-for-sale investments Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total Current Assets Noncurrent Assets Investment properties - net Derivative assets Deferred tax assets Other noncurrent assets Total Noncurrent Assets Total assets Liabilities and stockholders' equity Current liabilities Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities Current portion of long-term debt Income tax payable Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Long-term debt - net of current portion Tenants’ deposits Liability for purchased land - net of current portion tax liabilities Deferred Derivative liabilities Other noncurrent liabilities Total Noncurrent Liabilities Equity Capital stock Additional paid-in capital - net Cumulative translation adjustment Unrealized gain on AFS Retained earnings: Appropriated Unappropriated Treasury stock Non controlling interest Total equity Total liabilities and equity Source: Note: 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 2010 to 2012 3M2013 % of total CAGR 9,720 877 500 3,980 1,104 1,104 17,285 8,290 877 813 4,708 1,000 1,276 16,964 9,707 821 759 5,880 1,000 1,440 19,607 19,068 816 457 5,763 1,000 1,566 28,671 7.1% 0.7% 0.5% 3.7% 0.8% 1.0% 13.8% -0.1% -3.2% 23.2% 21.5% -4.8% 14.2% 6.5% 93,940 738 223 3,946 98,848 116,133 107,836 116 254 3,154 111,360 128,324 124,087 110 190 4,135 128,522 148,130 126,017 138 187 4,656 130,998 159,669 82.9% 0.3% 0.2% 2.9% 86.2% 14.9% -61.4% -7.6% 2.4% 14.0% 100.0% 12.9% 6,797 767 404 7,967 10,150 799 623 11,572 800 11,399 1,792 633 14,623 800 11,380 2,611 1,123 15,914 0.2% 7.2% 0.8% 0.4% 8.6% n/a 29.5% 52.9% 25.2% 35.5% 38,077 6,466 1,619 1,323 710 1,022 49,216 40,094 7,467 1,551 1,259 238 1,797 52,405 49,647 8,386 1,215 1,278 244 1,836 62,607 57,015 8,556 1,042 1,266 237 1,879 69,994 32.5% 5.7% 1.1% 1.0% 0.3% 1.2% 41.8% 14.2% 13.9% -13.4% -1.7% -41.3% 34.0% 12.8% 13,918 8,219 590 4 13,918 8,219 873 - 17,393 8,219 544 - 17,393 8,219 516 - 11.5% 6.3% 0.5% 0.0% 11.8% 0.0% -3.9% -100.0% 7,000 7,000 27,000 28,562 33,866 16,890 (101) (101) (101) 759 573 955 58,950 64,347 70,900 116,133 128,324 148,130 27,000 19,680 (101) 1,055 73,761 159,669 9.9% 20.8% -0.1% 0.6% 49.6% 96.4% -23.1% 0.0% 12.2% 9.7% 100.0% 12.9% SMPHI 2011 and 2012 Annual report; SMPHI 2011 Audited financial statements; SMPHI 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis Change in policy regarding allowance for doubtful accounts resulted in adjustments in the 2010 amounts 24 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 6 Valuation of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. 6.1 Cost Approach Under the Cost approach, assets and liabilities with available fair market values are markedto-market. · Operational malls in the Philippines and in China and other real estate properties recorded under the books of SMPHI were adjusted to reflect the movement in fair market value. The fair market value was based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE using various valuation methods, namely the cost, direct capitalization and discounted cash flow approaches. · Financial liabilities were adjusted to reflect the fair values represented in their 3M2013 interim financial statements as of the Cut-off date. · According to management and the 2012 audited financial statements, SMPHI is not involved in any pending critical litigation. SMPHI’s legal advisors represent that the company is not involved in any significant cases which may give rise to contingent liabilities. 25 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 6.1.1 The following table summarizes the computation for SMPHI net asset value per share as of the Valuation Date, using the Cost approach. Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Adjustment to reflect fair value of Philippine properties Fair value of Philippine malls Carrying value of Philippine malls Land Land use rights & leasehold improvements Building and improvements Other assets Fair value of other Philippine properties Carrying value of other Philippine properties 3M2013 159,669 85,908 73,761 286,826 (10,559) (865) (52,400) (8,019) (71,843) 214,983 13,141 (9,691) 3,450 Adjustment to reflect fair value of China properties Fair value of China malls Carrying value of China malls 54,642 (15,892) 38,750 Fair value of other China properties Carrying value of other China properties 19,324 (1,727) 17,597 Adjustment to reflect fair value of financial liabilities Fair value of financial liabilities Carrying value of financial liabilities Long-term debt Tenant's deposits Liability for purchased land Other non-current liabilities Adjusted NAV Adjusted minority interest Adjusted NAV attributable to SMPHI stockholders Number of shares outstanding NAV per share Note: Source: 6.2 (72,872) 59,626 8,556 1,042 1,439 70,663 (2,209) 346,332 (9,443) 336,888 17,374 19.39 Minority interest was deducted to reflect NAV attributable to SMPHI stockholders. Minority interest was adjusted to reflect fair value adjustments on property attributable to minority interests MS&Co. analysis Market approach or capitalized earnings approach In using the Market approach, MS&Co. collated information relating to comparable publiclylisted companies operating in the same industry as SMPHI. In searching for comparable companies for SMPHI, MS&Co initially focused on the listed retail real estate companies in the Philippines. To determine the comparability of the firms in the initial list of property companies in the PSE, the two criteria used were: (1) the revenue composition of the company and (2) the scale of the companies’ operations as compared to SMPHI. With regard to the revenue composition, MS&Co. analyzed the operations of each of the property companies in the PSE and determined the significant contributors to their revenues. 26 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 To be comparable with SMPHI, the firm’s revenues from shopping center operations or leasing of commercial spaces should be the largest contributor to its total revenues. From the 40 property-related companies in the PSE, only four companies were deemed comparable based on their revenue composition. After eliminating companies based on their revenue composition, the firms were then evaluated based on the scale of their operations. Companies which operate less than 10 malls were eliminated. Of the four, only Robinsons Land Corporation was able to meet this requirement with 32 malls as compared to the other companies with only one to five malls. Upon exhausting the companies in the Philippines, the Firm extended the search for comparable companies in the region. According to the Factiva database, there are three listed retail-oriented companies in the South East Asia and East Asia regions. These companies’ revenues are comprised of shopping center operations and leasing of commercial spaces and these companies have multiple shopping centers in their specific markets. Two of the companies, Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. and CapitaMalls Asia Ltd., have operations centered on high growth economies, Thailand and China. The other company, AEON Mall Co., Ltd., is focused on the Japanese region and was eliminated since its operations are primarily focused on the Japanese consumer market. The table below presents the summary of the CoCos selection process. CoCos selection Entity nam e SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Selected com panies Robinsons Land Corporation Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. CapitaMalls Asia Ltd. Excluded CoCos (3 com panies) Mall operations have the largest revenue contributions 100.0% Malls operated should be m ore than 10 51 Majority of revenues from grow ing econom ies Philippines, China 47.6% 78.4% 99.2% All CoCos have mall operations as their largest revenue contributor 32 21 101 Eliminated local CoCos have three and five malls/commercial centers. Philippines Thailand China, Malaysia, India Eliminated CoCo has virtually all of its revenues sourced from Japan Source: Companies 2012 annual reports Under the Market approach, the price-to-earnings (“P/E”) multiple, the price-to-book (“P/B”) multiple and the enterprise value-to-EBITDA (“EV/EBITDA”) multiple were considered in valuing SMPHI. The respective earnings per share, book value per share, EV and EBITDA of the CoCos were computed from the latest available financial statements of the CoCos. The share prices used were based on the closing prices as of March 31, 2013. 27 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 6.2.1 The calculations for SMPHI’s EPS, Book value per share and EBITDA per share is shown on the table below: SMPHI EPS, BVS and EBITDA per share Notes Earnings per share (PHP) Net income (In PHP'M) 1 Number of shares outstanding ('000) Earnings per share Book value per share Adjusted book value (In PHP'M) 2 Number of shares outstanding ('000) Book value per share EBITDA per share EBITDA (In PHP'M) 3 Number of shares outstanding ('000) EBITDA per share Note: Source: 6.2.2 11,279 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 17,373,678 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.65 72,706 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 17,373,678 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 4.18 20,632 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 17,373,678 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 1.19 (1) Annualized net income was computed by deducting 1Q12 net income and addition of 1Q13 net income (2) Minority interest was deducted to reflect book value attributable to SMPHI’s shareholders (3) Annualized EBITDA was computed by deducting 1Q12 EBITDA and addition of 1Q13 EBITDA March 31, 2013 unaudited FS; MS&Co. analysis The calculation for SMPHI’s value using the Market approach is shown on the table below. Market approach - CoCos Range of values per share Earnings per share Book value per share EBITDA per share Derived multiple Value per share (PHP) Range of values Range of values per share, before adjustments Number of shares ('000) Range of values, before adjustments Less: Net debt (PHP'M) Minority interest (PHP'M) Equity value (PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Equity value per share (PHP) Source: 6.2.3 Weighted average P/E (x) P/B (x) EV/EBITDA (x) 0.65 4.18 1.19 22.66 4.17 17.49 14.71 17.47 20.77 17,373,678 17,373,678 17,373,678 N/A N/A 255,605 17,373,678 14.71 N/A N/A 303,488 17,373,678 17.47 41,358 1,055 318,525 17,373,678 18.33 MS&Co. analysis Presented below are the share prices as March 31, 2013 and its respective 30, 60 and 90 day volume-weighted average share price for SMPHI. Market approach - VWAP Closing price as of March 27, 2013 Prior to valuation date 30-day volume-w eighted average share price 60-day volume-w eighted average share price 90- day volume-w eighted average share price Source: Share price 19.10 18.66 18.68 18.04 PSE; Bloomberg 28 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 6.3 Income approach In determining the DCF value of SMPHI, three (3) important variables were considered. These are: (a) the projected free cash flows to the firm, (b) the appropriate discount rate, and (c) the terminal value. 6.3.1 Projected free cash flow to the firm (“FCFF”) Projected FCFF is equivalent to the cash flows from operating (except interest income) and investing activities plus after-tax net interest expense of SMPHI from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018 (the “Forecast Period”). Projected FCFFs are discounted back to the Valuation Date at an acceptable discount rate to generate a value for the business. The business plans and the related financial projections of SMPHI were based on management’s assumptions reflecting conditions it expects would exist and the courses of action it expects to take during the Forecast Period. MS&Co. would like to highlight that the management of SMPHI is responsible for representations about their plans and expectations, and for disclosure of significant information that might affect the ultimate realization of the business plans and the projected results. There will usually be differences between the projected and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be material. Hence, while MS&Co. exercised its best judgment in evaluating the assumptions, MS&Co. cannot provide assurance on the realization of the financial projections. Given the uncertainties inherent in projecting financial performance, scenarios have been created to anticipate volatilities in SMPHI’s revenue streams. Same-store revenue growth of established malls has been estimated to be 7.0% which approximates the historical same-store growth rate of SMPHI. However, according to management, mature malls would have a same-store growth rate of 5.0% for terminal value computation purposes. These two growth estimates have been used as the aggressive and conservative bases, respectively, for the projection scenarios with regard to the established malls, since revenues from these properties comprise over 77% of SMPHI’s revenues over the projection period. An average growth rate of 6% was also utilized to represent a base case scenario for the revenue growth assumptions. Projected FCFF are discounted back to the present date at an acceptable discount rate to generate a fair range of values for the business. Below are the computations of the present value (“PV”) of SMPHI’s projected cash flows for the three scenarios. 29 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 Revenue growth at 7% Projected free cash flow s - SMPHI Apr. to Dec. 2013 PHP'M Net cash flow s from (used in) operating activities Income (loss) before income tax 12,579 Adjustments for: Depreciation and depletion 3,325 Interest expense 1,625 Interest income (337) Other adjustments 29 Net w orking capital changes 1,711 Taxes (3,355) Net cash flow s from (used in) operating 15,577 activities Capital expenditures (34,777) Projected FCFF (19,200) Period 0.75 WACC 7.0% Discount factor 0.9507 Discounted FCFF (from 3M12) (18,253) Source: 2014 17,887 2015 19,498 2016 21,560 2017 24,270 2018 27,938 Total 123,732 5,284 2,492 (170) 6,082 3,418 (122) 6,778 3,986 (133) 7,619 4,438 (137) 8,113 4,725 (138) 1,692 (4,152) 2,284 (4,573) 2,217 (5,099) 2,151 (5,682) 2,564 (6,539) 37,201 20,684 (1,038) 29 12,618 (29,400) 23,033 26,587 29,308 32,659 36,662 163,826 (27,091) (4,058) 1.75 (28,105) (1,517) 2.75 (28,829) 480 3.75 (22,411) 10,248 4.75 (22,988) 13,674 5.75 (164,200) (374) 0.8887 (3,607) 0.8307 (1,260) 0.7765 373 0.7259 7,439 0.6785 9,278 2014 2015 (6,030) MS&Co. analysis Revenue growth at 6% Projected free cash flow s - SMPHI Apr. to Dec. 2013 PHP'M Net cash flow s from (used in) operating activities Income (loss) before income tax 12,454 Adjustments for: Depreciation and depletion 3,325 Interest expense 1,625 Interest income (337) Other adjustments 29 Net w orking capital changes 1,648 Taxes (3,330) Net cash flow s from (used in) operating 15,414 activities Capital expenditures (34,777) Projected FCFF (19,363) Period 0.75 WACC 7.0% Discount factor 0.9507 Discounted FCFF (from 3M12) (18,407) Source: 17,612 19,059 2016 20,924 2017 23,407 2018 26,837 Total 120,293 5,284 2,492 (162) 6,082 3,418 (101) 6,778 3,991 (96) 7,619 4,458 (85) 8,113 4,760 (83) 1,621 (4,092) 2,197 (4,473) 2,124 (4,953) 2,047 (5,481) 2,448 (6,280) 37,201 20,744 (864) 29 12,085 (28,609) 22,756 26,182 28,768 31,965 35,794 160,880 (27,091) (4,335) 1.75 (28,105) (1,923) 2.75 (28,829) (60) 3.75 (22,411) 9,554 4.75 (22,988) 12,806 5.75 (164,200) (3,321) 0.8887 (3,853) 0.8307 (1,597) 0.7765 (47) 0.7259 6,935 0.6785 8,689 (8,280) MS&Co. analysis 30 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 Revenue growth at 5% Projected free cash flow s - SMPHI Apr. to Dec. 2013 PHP'M Net cash flow s from (used in) operating activities Income (loss) before income tax 12,329 Adjustments for: Depreciation and depletion 3,325 Interest expense 1,625 Interest income (337) Other adjustments 29 Net w orking capital changes 1,586 Taxes (3,305) Net cash flow s from (used in) operating 15,252 activities Capital expenditures (34,777) Projected FCFF (19,525) Period 0.75 WACC 7.0% Discount factor 0.9507 Discounted FCFF (from 3M12) (18,562) Source: 6.3.2 2014 17,335 2015 18,617 2016 20,298 2017 22,593 2018 25,800 Total 116,974 5,284 2,497 (153) 6,082 3,435 (87) 6,778 4,028 (85) 7,619 4,511 (85) 8,113 4,833 (83) 1,551 (4,031) 2,113 (4,372) 2,036 (4,808) 1,950 (5,290) 2,341 (6,037) 37,201 20,928 (831) 29 11,577 (27,844) 22,483 25,788 28,248 31,297 34,967 158,034 (27,091) (4,608) 1.75 (28,105) (2,317) 2.75 (28,829) (581) 3.75 (22,411) 8,887 4.75 (22,988) 11,979 5.75 (164,200) (6,166) 0.8887 (4,095) 0.8307 (1,925) 0.7765 (451) 0.7259 6,451 0.6785 8,128 (10,455) MS&Co. analysis Discount rate Determining an appropriate discount rate, which is reflective of both the general and specific risks of a company’s future income stream, is an important element of the Income approach or DCF methodology. The discount rate is also equated with the acceptable rate of return or “hurdle rate” of an investor for a specific investment opportunity taking into account the return on alternative investments and risk factor. For this Report, weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) was computed as the acceptable discount rate to be applied to the projected FCFF during the Forecast Period and the projected FCFF after the explicit Valuation Period. SMPHI’s after-tax cost of debt, pegged at 3.6%, pertains to the weighted average interest rate of SMPHI’s interest-bearing liabilities using March 31, 2013 interest rates. For variable rate loans, the market rate was provided by management. However, for the fixed rate loans, MS&Co. used the average lending rates of local universal banks for March 25, 2013 sourced from Business World. A tax rate was not used since SMPHI uses the Optional Standard Deduction offered by the BIR. As such, interest expense would not be deductible with regard to computing the income tax to be incurred. The table on the next page presents the computation for the after-tax cost of debt of SMPHI. 31 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 SMPHI Loan payables breakdow n as of March 31, 2013 PHP'M Parent PHP LOAN 1.2B PHILAM 2.0B MBTC 5.0B BDO CAP 2.0B BPI 1.0B LBP 1.0B LBP 1.0B MBTC 1.0B BPI 7.0B MBTC Rate Am ount Interest rate Weighted int. rate Fixed Fixed Fixed PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin Fixed Fixed PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin Fixed Fixed Fixed PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin Fixed Fixed 1,200 800 1,100 2,000 1,000 1,000 880 1,000 2,940 1,960 980 784 3,920 980 1,002 132 3,618 198 3,450 1,000 650 2,350 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 1.1% 3.3% 3.0% 12.4% 1.6% 0.9% 0.9% 6.2% 6.2% 3.7% 3.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 6.2% 6.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% MBTC ($150M) ING ($50M) LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread 204 204 204 204 204 1,224 816 4,488 1,428 5,100 408 1,020 6,120 2,040 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% Subsidiaries PHP LOAN 500M BPI PDSTF + margin 500 3.7% 0.0% 1,734 5.8% 0.2% 400 5.8% 0.0% 985 6.2% 0.1% 500 300 61,027 6.2% 6.2% 0.1% 0.0% 3.6% 5.0B MBTC 5.0B RCBC 7.5B MBTC USD LOAN 25M SMBC 30M HSBC 20M HSBC 270M SCB 50M SMBC RM B LOAN 350M ICBC 150M ICBC 250M ICBC Floating rate based on Central Bank of China Floating rate based on Central Bank of China Floating rate based on Central Bank of China Short-term PHP LOAN BPI Fixed BPI Fixed Total interest-bearing liabilities Source: SMPHI loan breakdown as of March 31, 2013; BSP loan interest rates during March 25, 2013 32 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 SMPHI’s cost of equity was computed using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”), which states that the Ke is based on the return generated from risk-free investments (“riskfree rate”) plus a premium for the risks associated with the business (“equity risk premium”). The risk-free rate (“rf”) represents the minimum return investors would expect from credit risk-free securities. The rf of 4.0% was considered in the valuation of SMPHI. This was based on the 10-year Philippine Treasury Bond reissued on February 2013, the nearest auction date to the Valuation Date for an issue of a 10-year treasury bond. The market risk premium (“RPm”) represents the excess return to compensate investors for taking a relatively riskier investment. MS&Co. assumed that 4.91% is the RPm, which is sourced from Aswath Damodaran in his paper “Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation, and Implications – The 2013 Edition. Damodaran utilizes several methodologies in determining the equity risk premium, which includes the survey approach, use of historical premiums and implied equity premiums. The beta factor represents the measure of risk of a particular asset relative to the risk of a portfolio of all risky assets, based on the perception that its share prices move in line with the “market.” Levered beta factors are always considered in the valuation of companies. Levered beta is the beta that takes into account the risk of SMPHI due to its capital structure and applicable tax rate. WACC computation for SMPHI MS&Co. used the unlevered beta of the real estate industry, specifically in the operations & services sector, in emerging markets from Aswath Damodaran MS&Co. relevered the beta to reflect the target capital structure of SMPHI using the company’s target debt and equity ratios. Relevered beta Form ula: Unlevered beta factor Tax rate Debt ratio Equity ratio Relevered beta Unlevered beta * [1 + (1 - tax rate) * (D/E)] 0.65 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 1.30 Source: Aswath Damodaran website, MS&Co. analysis The table below shows the computation of cost of equity using CAPM for SMPHI. Cost of equity ("Ke") Risk-free rate ("Rf") Total risk prem ium Relevered beta Ke = Rf + β*(Rm-Rf) Source: 4.0% 4.9% 1.30 10.4% Bureau of Treasury; Aswath Damodaran – Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications - The 2013 Edition; Aswath Damodaran website, MS&Co. analysis 33 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 After performing the procedure as stated above, below is the computed WACC for SMPHI. Weighted average cost of capital Debt-equity proportion WACC com putation 50.0% 3.6% 0.0% 3.6% 50.0% 100.0% 4.0% 4.9% 1.30 10.4% 7.0% Cost of debt Interest rate Less: Tax rate Cost of debt Cost of equity Risk free rate (Rf) Total risk premium (Rp) Beta (β) Cost of equity (Rf + β*Rp) Total / WACC Source: Bureau of Treasury, Aswath Damodaran website, MS&Co. analysis 6.3.3 Terminal value The terminal value of a business represents its potential earnings beyond the projection period. The terminal value is determined by capitalizing the estimated cash flows beyond the Forecast Periods. Terminal value and DCF value of SMPHI The computation of the terminal value and the related present value of SMPHI is presented in the table below: Enterprise value - SMPHI PHP'M Terminal value cash flow s = (FCFF - last projected year) WACC Less: Projected same-store grow th rate after 2018 PV of terminal value cash flow s Discount factor Present value of terminal value cash flow s Total discounted FCFF Enterprise value Source: 5% grow th 11,979 7.0% 5.0% 605,856 0.6785 411,098 (10,455) 400,644 6% grow th 12,806 7.0% 5.0% 647,686 0.6785 439,482 (8,280) 431,202 7% grow th 13,674 7.0% 5.0% 691,576 0.6785 469,263 (6,030) 463,232 SMPHI financial projections, MS&Co. analysis The total present values of projected FCFF in the 5%, 6%, and 7% revenue growth scenarios are PHP400.6 billion, PHP431.2 billion and PHP463.2 billion. This value represents the enterprise value of SMPHI as of the Valuation Date. In order to arrive at the equity value, certain adjustments such as deduction of long-term loans and preferred shares and addition of cash were made. After the aforementioned adjustments, the range of values of SMPHI using the Income Approach is PHP358.2 billion to PHP420.8 billion or equivalent to PHP20.62 to PHP24.22 per share. 34 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 Incom e approach - SMPHI PHP'M Enterprise value Less: Net debt Minority interest Preferred shares Equity value Number of outstanding shares Equity value per share Source: 5% grow th 400,644 41,358 1,055 358,231 17,374 20.62 6% grow th 431,202 41,358 1,055 388,790 17,374 22.38 7% grow th 463,232 41,358 1,055 420,820 17,374 24.22 MS&Co. analysis 35 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 7 Conclusion and Fairness Opinion MS&Co. considered the Sum of the Parts for SM Land and for SMPHI MS&Co. considered Cost approach, Market approach, in particular the EV/EBITDA, 30-day weighted average closing price, closing price as of March 27, 2013, and Income approach as the most appropriate valuation methodologies in establishing the fair range of values of SMPHI as of the Valuation Date. 7.1 The valuation results of SM Land are presented below. Valuation results- SM Land Per share (PHP) Sum of the parts Minimum value Maximum value Total (PHP'M) 6,753.33 8,315.53 263,393 324,322 Source: MS&Co. analysis 7.2 The valuation results of SMPHI are presented below. Valuation results - SMPHI Cost approach Incom e approach 7% grow th rate 6% grow th rate 5% grow th rate Market approach EV/EBITDA - w eighted average Closing price as of March 27, 2013 60-day volume-w eighted average share price Valuation range Per share (PhP) 19.39 24.22 22.38 20.62 Total (PHP'M) 336,888 420,820 388,790 358,231 18.33 318,525 19.10 331,837 18.68 324,466 18.33 to 24.22 318,525 to 420,820 Source: MS&Co. analysis 7.3 Given the above fair range of values, the estimated exchange ratio for the share-for-share swap transaction is 278.81 to 453.56SMPHI shares for every 1 share SM Land. Based on the share-swap ratio of 368.979 SMPHI shares for every share of SM Land, the planned exchange is fair from a financial point of view. 36 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 Appendix 1 – Overview of comparable companies SMDC Filinvest Land, Inc. (“FLI”) FLI was incorporated on November 24, 1989 and is primarily engaged in the development and sale of residential property, primarily housing units and subdivision lots. FLI real estate products includes socialized and affordable housing, medium-rise buildings, farm estates, industrial parks, resorts, membership clubs and condominiums. Source: Factiva Vista Land & Lifescapes, Inc. (“VLL”) VLL was incorporated on February 28, 2007 and is an investment holding company engaged in real estate development. VLL currently operates five business units namely Brittany, Crown Asia, Camella Homes, Communities Philippines, and Vista Residences, Inc. in a broad range of real estate market from low-cost to high-end. Source: Factiva, 2012 VLL annual report Overview of Com parable Com panies ("CoCos") Com pany Filinvest Land, Inc. Country Philippines Vista Land & Lifescapes, Inc. Philippines In PHP as of March 31, 2013 Assets (In PHP) Revenue (In PHP) 84,597,227,000 11,038,357,000 76,359,000,000 18,398,109,454 Derived m utiples P/E P/B EV/EBITDA 13.27 1.03 16.74 9.89 1.02 11.75 Revenues as of March 31, 2013 were computed as follows: December 2012 revenue – 1Q2012 revenue + 1Q2013 revenue Note: Source: FLI and VLL’s 2012 annual report, 1Q2012 financial statements, 1Q2013 financial statements, MS&Co. analysis HPI Anchor Land Holdings, Inc. Anchor Land Holdings, Inc. engages in acquiring, developing, selling, and leasing high-end residential condominiums and other real estate properties. The company was founded by Stephen Lee and Li Yi Chiang on July 29, 2004 and is headquartered in Makati, Philippines. The company was primarily organized for real estate development and marketing with a focus on high-end residential condominiums within the Manila area. Business operations started on November 25, 2005. Revenues are expected to come mainly from their existing high-end projects, specifically the Admiral Baysuites in Roxas Boulevard and the Anchor Skysuites in Binondo. Other current projects include the SoleMare Parksuites near the Mall of Asia complex, the Clairemont Hills in San Juan City, and the Oxford Parksuites in Binondo. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 Arthaland Corporation Arthaland Corporation was incorporated on August 10, 1994 and is primarily engaged in the property development of residential, commercial, leisure and industrial projects. Its first major development, Arya Residences, is the first residential high-rise in the Philippines to be registered with US Green Buildings Council’s Leadership. Arthaland has four subsidiaries also engaged in real estate development: Cazneau, Inc, Technopod, Inc., Urban Property Holdings, Inc. and Manchesterland Properties, Inc. Primex Corporation Primex Corp. engages in real estate development. Its activities include purchasing, leasing, or disposing of land and other real property and any interest therein. Its projects include two high-end residential projects: The Richdale in Antipolo City and Goldendale Village in Malabon. The company was incorporated and registered with the SEC on July 17, 1986 with the primary purpose of engaging in real estate development. Overview of Com parable Com panies ("CoCos") Com pany Country In PHP as of March 31, 2013 Assets Revenue Anchor Land Holdings, Inc. Philippines 14,469,555,077 4,131,022,873 13.71 3.34 17.90 Arthaland Corporation Philippines 4,289,609,717 2,133,937,691 3.05 0.78 3.88 Primex Corporation Philippines 478,248,589 15,296,981 1,309.84 2.37 800.41 P/E (X) Multiples P/B (X) EV/EBITDA (X) Note: (1) Revenue pertains to operating revenue, which includes real estate sales and if applicable, rental income, management fees and other items that can be classified as operating revenue (2) For valuation purposes, assets, revenue and other financials for Primex Corp. is for the calendar year ending December 31, 2012. Trailing 12month period ending 3M2013 was not used because the company didn’t recognize revenue during the first quarter of 2013. This will affect and distort the earnings and EBITDA of Primex and may not reflect the true earnings potential of the company Source: Factiva, Philippine Stock Exchange SMPHI Robinsons Land Corporation Robinsons Land Corporation is a Philippine listed company incorporated on 4 June 1980. It serves as the real estate investment arm of JG Summit Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The company is engaged in the business of selling, acquiring, constructing, developing, leasing, and disposing of real properties such as land, buildings, shopping malls, commercial centers and housing projects, hotels and other variants and mixed-used property projects. As of 2011, the company has four (4) whollyowned subsidiaries and ownership in two (2) joint ventures Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. engages in the investment and development of real estate properties. These properties include shopping centers, offices, hotels, residential buildings, water and recreational parks, and food centers. Segment 1 develops shopping centers, office buildings, and condominiums for rent, provides utility services, and operates play land and water theme parks in shopping centers. Segment 2 focuses on the sales of food and beverage in the shopping centres. Segment 3 engages in the business of hotels. The company was founded on June 17, 1980 and is headquartered in Bangkok, Thailand. 39 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30,2013 CapitaMalls Asia Ltd. CapitaMalls Asia Ltd. operates as an investment holding company which owns, develops and manages shopping malls. The company has an integrated shopping mall business model encompassing retail real estate investment, development, mall operations, asset management and fund management capabilities. Its shopping malls portfolio includes ION Orchard, Plaza Singapore, CapitaMall Xizhimen, CapitaMall Wangjing, Raffles City Beijing and Raffles City Shanghai. The company operates through three segments: Management Business, Investment Business and Others. The Management Business segment includes the provision of asset and project management, fund management and mall management services. The Investment Business segment includes investments in retail properties held directly through subsidiaries or through associates and jointly controlled entities. The Others segment includes corporate office and group treasury. CapitaMalls Asia was founded on October 12, 2004 and is headquartered in Hong Kong. Overview of Com parable Com panies ("CoCos") No. of shopping centers 32 In PHP as of March 31, 2013 Multiple Assets Revenue EV/EBITDA P/B 73,311,264,392 7,048,316,090 14.52 2.14 Com pany Robinsons Land Corporation Country Philippines P/E 23.55 Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. Thailand 21 101,051,654,897 29,312,499,499 20.92 7.63 30.03 CapitaMalls Asia Ltd. Hong Kong 101 331,665,626,400 12,688,466,471 14.93 1.21 14.26 Source: Factiva, Philippine Stock Exchange, Businessweek 40 Manabat Sanagustin & Co., CPAs The KPMG Center, 9/F 6787 Ayala Avenue Makati City 1226, Metro Manila, Philippines Telephone Fax Internet E-Mail +63 (2) 885 7000 +63 (2) 894 1985 www.kpmg.com.ph [email protected] Branches · Subic · Cebu · Bacolod · Iloilo May 30, 2013 Audit and Investment Risk Management Committee SM Investments Corporation Two E-Com Center, 15th Floor Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76 Zone 10 Pasay City, Philippines Attention: Jose T. Sio Executive Vice President and Chief Finance Officer Gentlemen: Subject: Valuation and Fairness Opinion Report on the Proposed Acquisition of SMIC properties and unlisted companies by SM Prime Holdings, Inc. 1 Introduction 1.1 Manabat Sanagustin & Co., CPAs (“MS&Co.” or the “Firm”) is pleased to submit this Valuation and Fairness Opinion Report (the “Report”) covering the acquisition by SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (“SMPHI”) of SM Hotels and Conventions, Corp. (“SM Hotels”), Prime Metroestate, Inc. (“Prime Metro”), Costa Del Hamilo, Inc. (“CDHI”), Tagaytay Resort and Development Corp. (“TRDC”) and SM Arena Complex Corp. (“SMACC”) via share-forshare swap and other properties owned by SMIC via property-for-share swap. 1.2 The following are the proposed share-for-share swap ratios for the transactions as proposed by SMIC management: x 23,969.04 shares of SMPHI for every 1 share of SM Hotels x 140.28 shares of SMPHI for every 1 share of Prime Metro x 37.60 shares of SMPHI for every 1 share of CDHI x 285.42 shares of SMPHI for every 1 share of TRDC x 53.04 shares of SMPHI for every 1 share of SMACC In addition, the proposed consideration for the SMIC properties to be acquired as listed under Section 4 of this report is 837,764,770 shares of SMPHI. At the end of this transaction SMPHI will be 100% owner of the target companies and properties. 1.3 For purposes of this Report, SM Hotels, Prime Metro, CDHI, TRDC, and SMACC will be collectively referred to as the “Target Companies”. 1.4 This Report is submitted in accordance with the engagement letter of Manabat Sanagustin and Co., CPAs (“MS&Co.”) dated April 5, 2013 (the “Engagement Letter”). The Engagement SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Letter covers our engagement with SMIC for the valuation of SMPHI and the Target Companies, as a going concern, as of March 31, 2013 (the agreed “Cut-off Date” or the “Valuation Date” or “3M2013”). 1.5 The Firm was engaged by SMIC to act as the independent financial advisor to the Audit and Risk Management Committee of SMIC in relation to the fairness of the share swap ratio to be used in this transaction. As such, the scope of MS&Co.’s work, and consequently, the Report does not contain and has no intention of forming any statement or opinion as to the operational or commercial merits or strategic rationale of the transaction. 1.6 MS&Co.’s work did not include making comments on the commercial feasibility of the transaction nor was the Firm involved in any way with the conceptualization and execution of the transaction. No work was done insofar as the different aspects of the transaction are concerned. This Report is based on the information financial information prepared and submitted by both HPI and SMPHI and on information gathered from public sources. These include annual and quarterly reports filed in the Philippine Stock Exchange (“PSE”), Bureau of Treasury, Damodaran Online, Factiva and various websites of comparable companies (“CoCos”). 1.7 MS&Co. did not conduct a financial due diligence on the information provided by either the Target Companies or SMPHI. It was assumed that all information furnished were complete, accurate and reflective of the good faith of the management teams of the Target Companies and SMPHI to describe its historical status and prospects as of the Cut-off Date from operating and financial points of view. 1.8 In order to assess the fairness of the share-swap ratio, MS&Co. conducted a valuation of both the Target Companies and SMPHI. The ranges of values of these two companies were then used as bases to determine the fairness of the SMIC management-determined share-swap ratio. MS&Co. considered three (3) valuation methodologies, namely: the cost approach, the market approach and the income approach. 1.8.1 There are no globally accepted rules or standards on the selection of the most appropriate valuation methodologies for a given valuation engagement. 1.8.2 The broad criteria for the selection of the methodologies are as follows: (i) consistency of the methodologies given the availability and quality of the data; (ii) appropriateness of the methodologies with the characteristics of the entity being valued; and (iii) applicability of the methodologies with the purpose of the valuation. These three (3) criteria were applied to the specific circumstances of this valuation engagement. 1.9 The following general activities were performed prepare this valuation and fairness opinion report: 1.9.1 Requested for an initial set of information from the Target Companies and SMPHI management. Based on the initial set of assumptions and information received from the Target Companies and SMPHI, the Firm conducted interviews to clarify certain assumptions and information received in order to test check the reasonableness of the assumptions and underlying data. 1.9.2 Conducted research and retrieved relevant information from the PSE, Bureau of Treasury, Damodaran Online, Factiva and various websites of comparable companies (“CoCos”). 1.10 The opinion, analysis, and resulting observations were based solely on management representations and on publicly available financial information. It is not the independent financial advisor’s role to either evaluate or confirm how the transaction, to be executed by SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SM Prime and the Target Companies, will affect the shareholders, other than from a financial point of view. 1.11 The management of the Target Companies and SMPHI had executed their respective representation letters stating that the information submitted were materially accurate and complete, fair in the manner of its portrayal and therefore forms a reliable basis for the valuation. 2 Executive summary 2.1 We are presenting below the valuation results of the Target Companies. Valuation results of the target com panies PHP Valuation Date SM Hotels and Conventions, Corp. March 31, 2013 Prime Metro Estate Corp. March 31, 2013 Costa del Hamilo, Inc. March 31, 2013 Tagaytay Resort and Development Corp. March 31, 2013 SM Arena Complex Corp. March 31, 2013 Total values of the com panies to be acquired by SMPHI Per Share (PHP) 461,337.29 2,635.45 735.38 5,565.70 1,034.23 Total (PHP) 1,153,343,213 7,149,969,000 3,057,348,442 1,753,196,723 413,693,822 13,527,551,199 Source: MS&Co. analysis x The companies under SM Hotels are the operating companies for the SMIC-owned hotel and resort properties included in the transaction. The Cost approach is deemed to be the most appropriate methodology in valuing SM Hotels since the value that can be derived from its prospective cashflows could not be ascertained. There are uncertainties inherent in the stability of the earnings of SM Hotels due to the relatively recent operations of some of its subsidiaries and the losses incurred in previous years. x TRDC and Prime Metro were valued using the Cost approach. Since both companies have limited operations and only act as property holding companies, MS&Co. deemed that the Cost approach would be an appropriate method of valuation. x The Cost approach was deemed appropriate to estimate the fair value of CDHI because the company relies heavily on the sale of its inventory of real properties and club shares to generate its revenues. The value of CDHI is primarily driven by its asset base which primarily consists of condominium units and club shares for sale. x Since SMACC has just started operations in 2012, it has yet to establish enough stability to be able to produce reliable financial projections supported by historical trends. As such, the Cost approach would be the most appropriate methodology in valuing SMACC. In addition, its assets still approximate their fair values given its relatively recent establishment as per management inquiry. Presented below are the fair values of the properties to be acquired by SMPHI SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMIC properties - appraised values PHP'M Taal Vista Hotel Radisson Cebu Hotel Pico Sands Hotel SMX Convention Center MoA Arena MoA Arena Annex Corporate Office Casino and Waste Water Treatment Plant (located at tagaytay lot ow ned by Tagaytay Resort Devt Corp) Tagaytay EDSA West Ongoing Project - Park Inn Davao Total Valuation used Cost Cost DCF Cost Cost Cost Cost Appraised value 2,014 2,375 704 1,608 3,369 1,673 895 DCF 861 2,034 209 594 16,336 Market data Market data Cost Source: CBRE Appraisal report as of February 28, 2013 2.2 We are presenting below the valuation results of SMPHI. Valuation results of SMPHI post-m erger as of March 31, 2013 PHP'M Sum of the parts SM Prime Holdings, Inc. SM Land, Inc. Less: Ow nership of SM Land in SMPHI Post-merger valuation of SMPHI Number of shares (in millions) Price per share Minim um Valuation approach Market approach Sum of the Parts Market approach Values 318,525 263,393 (97,442) 484,476 26,475 18.30 Maxim um Valuation approach Income approach Sum of the Parts Income approach Values 420,820 324,322 (128,735) 616,406 26,475 23.28 Source: MS&Co. analysis 2.3 x MS&Co. used the Sum of the Parts Method to value SMPHI due to the lack of information on SMPHI after its merger with SM Land. Post-merger SMPHI primarily consists of the value of SMPHI pre-merger and the value of SM Land after acquiring SMDC and HPI. x The value used for the pre-merger SMPHI was the value derived using the Income approach. Given the recurring nature of SMPHI’s revenue streams, the Income approach was deemed the most appropriate method of valuing the mall operations of SMPHI. x The valuation approach used for SM Land is the Sum of the Parts Method. Sum of the Parts was deemed as the most appropriate due to the following: (1) Diversity of the companies operating under the umbrella of SM Land; (2) Lack of information on SM Land, post tender offer; and (3) SM Land records its investments at cost and does not consolidate the operations of its subsidiaries to its books. Thus, the standalone financial statements of SM Land may not be able to capture the actual operation and status of its subsidiaries. Given the above fair range of values, the estimated ratio for the share-for-share swap transactions are as follows: x x x 19,814.35 to 25,210.09 shares of SMPHI for 1 share of SM Hotels; 113.19 to 144.02 shares of SMPHI for 1 share of Prime Metro; 31.58 to 40.19 shares of SMPHI for 1 share of CDHI; SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 x x 239.05 to 304.14 shares of SMPHI for 1 share of TRDC; 44.42 to 56.52 shares of SMPHI for 1 share of SMACC;; 2.4 In addition, given the above fair range of values, the estimated number of shares required to acquire the SMIC properties range from 701,645,738.36 to 892,714,579.12 SMPHI shares. 2.5 Based on the proposed share swap and property-for-share swap ratios indicated in Section 1.2 and the fair range of values as summarized in sections 2.1 to 2.4, the planned exchange is fair from a financial point of view. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3 Organization background and structure of the Target Companies 3.1 SM Hotels and Conventions Corp. (“SM Hotels”) SM Hotels, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SMIC, was established for the purpose of operating and maintaining the SM group’s hotels and conventions portfolio. As of the March 31, 2013 Cut-off Date, SMIC owns 99.8% of SM Hotels SM Hotels was incorporated on April 2, 2008 under its former name of SM Hotels and Entertainment Corporation. SM Hotels was later renamed as SM Hotels and Conventions Corp. in March 2010. its principal office at 10/F One E-com Center, Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City. Subsidiaries SM Hotels has six subsidiaries as presented below: SM Hotels Subsidiaries Com pany Inform ation Properties Operated Hotel Specialist (Manila) Inc. ("HSI Manila") Date of Incorporation Principal Office % direct ow nership of SM Hotels 10/24/2008 One E-com Center, Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City 99.80% Hotel Specialist (Tagaytay) Inc. ("HSI Tagaytay") Taal Vista Hotel 2/5/1998 Taal Vista Hotel, National Road, Brgy. Kaybagal, Tagaytay City 90.50% Hotel Specialist (Cebu) Inc. ("HSI Cebu") Radisson Blu Hotel Cebu 10/29/2008 Serging Osmena Blvd. cor. Juan Luna Avenue, Cebu City 99.80% Hotel Specialist (Pico de Loro) Inc. ("HSI Pico") Pico Sands Hotel 9/14/2010 Brgy. Papaya, Nasugbu, Batangas, Philippines 99.99% Hotel Specialist (Davao) Inc. ("HSI Davao") Park Inn by Radisson Davao 8/10/2012 SM City Lanang Complex, J.P. Laurel Avenue, Davao City 99.80% 7/23/2009 SMX Convention Center, Mall of Asia Complex, CBP-1A, Pasay City, Philippines 1300 99.80% SMX Convention Specialist Corp. ("SMX Convention") Note: SMX Convention Center SM Hotels General Information Sheet MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of SM Hotels in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that SM Hotels operates hotels and convention centers, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the different asset groupings and how it relates to value generation. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'000 Service income Cost of services Gross profit Taxes and licenses Salaries, w ages and other benefits Rental expense Professional fees Depreciation and amortization Communication, light and w ater Miscellaneous expenses Total operating expenses Income (loss) from operations Dividend income Interest income Foreign exchange gain Total other income Income before tax Income tax expense Total com prehensive incom e 2010 28,315 0 28,315 100 13,645 1,651 1,985 1,360 1,285 8,145 28,170 145 0 14 0 14 0 43 115 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 31,882 28,318 3,564 254 1,563 711 1,656 453 51 40 4,728 (1,164) 0 3,454 0 3,454 2,290 0 2,290 39,945 33,307 6,638 2,497 2,143 989 884 522 88 82 7,205 (567) 65,539 1,217 21 66,777 66,211 147 66,063 11,938 27,327 (15,389) (15,389) 242 242 (15,147) (15,147) 2010 to 2012 % to total CAGR 100.0% 18.8% 57.4% n/a 42.6% (51.6%) 2.5% 399.4% 19.5% (60.4%) 3.5% (22.6%) 4.8% (33.3%) 2.5% (38.1%) 1.6% (73.9%) 9.7% (90.0%) 44.1% (49.4%) (1.5%) n/a 54.7% n/a 4.6% 847.1% 0.0% n/a 59.4% 6914.4% 0.6 n/a 0.2% 84.3% 57.7% 2297.9% Source: SM Hotels 2011 to 2012 financial statements; SM Hotels 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis Statem ent of financial position Audited PHP'000 Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total current assets Investments in shares of stock Property and equipment - net Refundable deposit Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses Income tax payable Subscriptions payable Total current liabilities Deposits for future stock subscriptions Retirement liability Total non-current liabilities Equity Capital stock Deposits for future stock subscriptions Retained eamings: Total equity Total liabilities and equity 2010 2011 Unaudited 2012 708,660 80,691 559 789,911 864,241 4,688 160 869,089 1,658,999 73,031 48,963 17,269 144,362 38,535 2,275 128,834 195,600 979,061 984,060 4,577 5,056 0 0 983,637 989,116 1,112,472 1,184,716 557,790 557,790 1,099,750 1,073 1,100,823 8,309 15,116 8,309 15,116 1,099,750 1,099,750 1,736 1,110 1,101,486 1,100,860 250 137 387 1,658,999 250 250 2,427 68,490 2,677 68,740 1,112,472 1,184,716 3M2013 47,911 89,128 94 137,133 1,024,060 4,677 1,028,737 1,165,870 13,416 (2,186) 188 11,417 0 1,110 1,110 250 1,099,750 53,343 1,153,343 1,165,870 Source: SM Hotels 2011 to 2012 financial statements; SM Hotels 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis 2010 to 2012 % to total CAGR 17.8% 6.2% 1.2% 25.2% 74.4% 0.4% 0.0% 74.8% 100.0% (73.7%) 33.8% 101.7% (50.2%) 6.7% 3.9% (100.0%) 6.7% (15.5%) 11.9% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% 86.0% 0.1% 86.1% (83.5%) n/a n/a (83.5%) 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.0% 100.0% 0.0% n/a 2134.5% 1232.4% (15.5%) SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3.1.1 Financial information of Hotel Specialist (Manila), Inc. (“HSI Manila”) MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of HSI Manila in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'000 Interest incom e Total expenses Income from operations Income before income tax Net incom e (net loss) 2010 0 15 (14) (14) (14) Audited 2011 0 13 (13) (13) (13) 2012 0 20 (19) (19) (19) Unaudited 3M2013 0 7 (7) (7) (7) Source: HSI Manila 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Manila 2013 financial statements Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total current assets Noncurrent Assets Input VAT Total noncurrent assets Total Assets Liabilities and equity Current Liabilities Accrued expense Total liabilities Equity Capital stock Retained earnings Total equity Total Liabilities and Equity 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 30 30 26 26 22 22 50 188 0 238 0 0 30 0 0 26 0 0 22 238 10 10 19 19 35 35 70 70 63 (42) 20 30 63 (55) 7 26 63 (75) (12) 22 250 (82) 168 238 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 99.8% 99.8% -14.0% n/a n/a -14.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% -14.0% 87.0% 87.0% 86.5% 86.5% 242.2% -229.2% 13.0% 0.0% n/a n/a 100.0% -14.0% Source: HSI Manila 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Manila 2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis 3.1.2 Financial information of Hotel Specialist (Tagaytay), Inc. (“HSI Tagaytay”) MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of HSI Tagaytay in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that HSI Tagaytay operates hotels, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of HSI Tagaytay’s revenue streams and how it relates to value generation. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'000 Total revenues Total expenses Income before income tax Incom e Tax Current Deferred Net incom e Audited 2010 2011 2012 293,211 297,436 340,702 281,511 287,129 331,837 11,700 10,307 8,865 1,514 88 10,098 1,350 310 8,648 Unaudited 3M2013 109,416 92,910 16,506 2,050 (78) 6,893 16,506 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 100.0% 7.8% 96.6% 8.6% 3.4% -13.0% 0.5% 0.0% 16.4% n/a 2.8% -17.4% Source: HSI Tagaytay 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Tagaytay 2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Inventories Other current assets Total current assets Noncurrent Assets Hotel property and equipment Pension asset Deferred tax assets Other noncurrent assets Total Noncurrent Assets Total Assets Liabilities and Equity Current Liabilities Accounts payable and other current liabilities Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Deposit for future stock subscription Deferrred tax liability-net Total Noncurrent Liabilities Total liabilities Equity Capital stock Deposit for future subscription Retained earnings Appropriated Unapproriated Total equity Total Liabilites and Equity 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 134,579 16,630 6,620 23,155 180,985 88,617 22,617 7,228 11,008 129,470 75,794 28,506 7,128 12,643 124,071 52,632 42,258 3,668 12,878 111,436 36.7% 8.7% 2.7% 5.7% 53.8% -25.0% 30.9% 3.8% -26.1% -17.2% 110,504 283 1,008 18,935 130,730 311,715 94,124 1,734 699 14,248 110,805 240,275 115,689 1,770 9,521 126,980 251,051 115,083 11,291 126,374 237,810 40.2% 0.5% 0.2% 5.3% 46.2% 2.3% 150.2% -100.0% -29.1% -1.4% 100.0% -10.3% 163,861 163,861 63,953 63,953 92,370 92,370 63,090 63,090 38.7% 38.7% -24.9% -24.9% 117,680 117,680 281,541 137,500 137,500 201,453 137,500 467 137,967 230,337 63,090 49.9% 0.1% 50.0% 88.6% 8.1% n/a 8.3% -9.5% 12,500 - 12,500 - 12,500 - 12,500 137,500 4.7% 0.0% n/a 17,000 674 30,174 311,715 17,000 9,322 38,822 240,275 8,214 20,714 251,051 24,721 174,721 237,810 4.2% 2.5% 11.4% -100.0% 249.1% -17.1% 100.0% -10.3% Source: HSI Tagaytay 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Tagaytay 2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3.1.3 Financial information of Hotel Specialist (Cebu), Inc. (“HSI Cebu”) MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of HSI Cebu in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that HSI Cebu operates hotels, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of HSI Cebu’s revenue streams and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'000 Total revenues Total expenses Income from operations Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net Incom e (net loss) Audited Unaudited 2010 2011 2012 3M2013 54,620 361,171 532,115 165,490 191,207 546,189 585,812 161,812 (136,587) (185,018) (53,697) 3,677 (136,587) (185,018) (53,697) 3,677 808 (136,587) (185,018) (54,505) 3,677 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 100.0% 212.1% 203.8% 75.0% -103.8% n/a -103.8% n/a n/a -130.2% n/a Source: HSI Cebu 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Cebu 2013 financial statements Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Inventories Other current assets Total current assets Noncurrent Assets Hotel property and equipment Other noncurrent assets Total noncurrent assets Total Assets Liabilities and Equity Current Liabilities Accounts payable and other current liabilities Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Accrued pension liability Deposit for future stock subscription Total Noncurrent Liabilities Total Liabilities Equity Capital stock Deposit for future stock subscription Deficit Total equity Total Liabilities and Equity 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 715,646 12,786 7,394 16,713 752,539 16,082 24,247 8,777 26,423 75,528 24,376 37,978 14,080 22,207 98,641 64,134 46,379 4,088 58,849 173,450 23.6% 5.1% 1.9% 4.1% 34.8% -81.5% 72.3% 38.0% 15.3% -63.8% 347,336 59,124 406,460 1,158,999 308,671 76,739 385,409 460,937 262,307 68,309 330,616 429,258 248,236 35,221 283,457 456,908 52.7% 12.6% 65.2% -13.1% 7.5% -9.8% 100.0% -39.1% 670,414 670,414 157,371 157,371 173,965 173,965 204,169 204,169 44.2% 44.2% -49.1% -49.1% 649,750 649,750 1,320,164 649,750 649,750 807,121 6,231 649,750 655,981 829,946 204,169 0.5% 116.1% 116.6% 160.8% n/a n/a n/a -20.7% 250 (161,416) (161,166) 1,158,999 250 (346,434) (346,184) 460,937 250 (400,939) (400,689) 429,258 250 649,750 (397,261) 252,739 456,908 0.0% 0.0% -60.8% -60.8% n/a n/a 100.0% -39.1% Source: HSI Cebu 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Cebu 2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3.1.4 Financial information on Hotel Specialist (Pico de Loro), Inc. (“HSI Pico de Loro”) MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of HSI Pico de Loro in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that HSI Pico de Loro operates hotels, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of HSI Pico de Loro’s revenue streams and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'000 Total revenues Total expenses Income from operations Net incom e (net loss) Total com prehensive incom e (loss) Audited 2010 2011 6 32,330 829 56,776 (823) (24,446) (823) (24,446) (823) (24,446) 2012 84,366 95,843 (11,477) (11,477) (11,477) Unaudited 3M2013 25,036 23,755 1,281 1,281 1,281 2011 to 2012 % of total CAGR 100.0% 161.0% 144.6% 68.8% -44.6% -53.1% -44.6% -44.6% -53.1% -53.1% Source: HSI Pico de Loro 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Pico de Loro 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Inventories Other current assets Total currrent assets Noncurrent Assets Property and equipment Other noncurrent assets Total noncurrent assets Total Assets 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 2011 to 2012 % of total CAGR 4,182 4,182 32,711 7,110 2,814 5,837 48,472 31,478 11,030 3,331 1,125 46,963 44,921 33,948 3,196 7,765 89,829 36.5% 10.4% 3.5% 3.9% 54.2% -3.8% 55.1% 18.4% -80.7% -3.1% 4,182 39,035 3,426 42,461 90,933 32,431 5,799 38,230 85,194 30,295 2,710 33,006 122,835 40.5% 5.3% 45.8% -16.9% 69.3% -10.0% 100.0% -6.3% 16,202 16,202 20,946 20,946 58,300 58,300 21.2% 21.2% 29.3% 29.3% 16,202 995 995 21,940 58,300 0.6% 0.6% 21.8% n/a n/a 35.4% 5,000 95,000 (25,269) 74,731 90,933 5,000 95,000 (36,746) 63,254 85,194 5,000 95,000 (35,465) 64,535 122,835 5.7% 108.0% -35.5% 78.2% 0.0% 0.0% 45.4% -15.4% 100.0% -6.3% Liabilities and Equity Current Liabilities Accounts payable and other current liabilities 5 Total Current Liabilities 5 Noncurrent Liabilities Accrued pension liability Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabiliites 5 Equity Capital stock 5,000 Deposit for future stock subscription Deficit (823) Total equity 4,177 Total Liabilities and Equity 4,182 Source: HSI Pico de Loro 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Pico de Loro 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3.1.5 Financial information on Hotel Specialist (Davao), Inc. (“HSI Davao”) MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of HSI Davao in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that HSI Davao operates hotels, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of HSI Davao’s revenue streams and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance Audited PHP'000 Revenues Rooms Food and beverages Rent and other income Inerest income Total Revenues Expenses Operating Expenses Total expenses Income from operations Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net incom e (net loss) 2010 2011 - - - - Unaudited 2012 1 1 6,370 6,370 (6,369) (6,369) (6,369) 3M2013 4,898 1,804 235 6,937 20,382 20,382 (13,445) (13,445) (13,445) Source: HSI Davao 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Davao 3M2013 financial statements SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Other current assets Total current assets Noncurrent assets Softw are and licenses Other noncurrent assets Total noncurrent assets Total assets Audited 2010 2011 2012 1,921 879 2,800 Unaudited 3M2013 - - 25,010 1,846 12,777 39,633 - - 13 2,813 Liabilities and Equity Current Liabilities Accounts payables Other Payables Total Liabilities - - 4,029 154 4,183 16,181 Equity Capital stock Deposits for future subscriptions Retained earnings: Total equity Total Liabilities and Equity - - 250 4,750 (6,369) (1,369) 2,813 250 44,750 (19,814) 25,186 41,366 13 - 1,734 1,734 41,366 16,181 Source: HSI Davao 2012 audited financial statements; HSI Davao 3M2013 financial statements 3.1.6 Financial information on SMX Convention Specialist Corp. (“SMX Convention”) MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of SMX Convention in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that SMX Convention operates convention centers, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of SMX Convention’s revenue streams and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance Audited PHP'000 2010 2011 2012 Total Revenues 242,363 296,155 329,612 Total Expenses 237,783 241,832 274,269 Income before income tax 4,579 54,323 55,342 Incom e Tax Current 1,399 14,950 15,316 Deffered (49) (305) (263) Total provision for (benefit from) income tax 1,351 14,645 15,053 Net incom e Total com prehensive incom e 3,228 3,228 39,678 39,678 40,290 40,290 Unaudited 3M2013 78,430 59,464 18,967 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 100.0% 16.6% 87.7% 7.4% 5,690 5,690 3.4% -0.1% 3.4% 230.8% n/a 233.8% 13,277 13,277 9.0% 9.0% 253.3% 253.3% Source: SMX Convention 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; SMX Convention 3M2013 financial statements SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Prepayments and other assets Total current assets Noncurrent assets Property and equipment Net pension asset Deferred tax assets - net Other noncurrent assets - net Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities and Equity Current Liabilities Trade and other current liabilities Dividends payable Income tax payable Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Deposit for future subscription Deferred tax liabilities Tenants' deposits and others Total Noncurrent Liabilities Total Liabilities Equity Capital stock Retained earnings: Appropriated Unappropriated Deposit for future subscription Total equity Total Liabilities and Equity 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 187,992 25,912 12,092 225,996 123,491 31,596 13,802 168,889 201,121 42,904 12,338 256,363 159,113 40,910 18,415 218,438 66.4% 13.3% 5.1% 84.9% 3.4% 28.7% 1.0% 6.5% 45,564 783 49 46,395 272,391 36,819 1,163 354 38,336 207,226 25,901 1,658 617 28,175 284,538 31,058 2,772 33,830 252,268 14.5% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 15.1% -24.6% 45.5% 256.3% n/a -22.1% 100.0% 2.2% 189,188 189,188 82,590 1,756 84,346 118,552 42,991 2,825 164,368 79,673 8,515 88,188 50.3% 5.0% 0.6% 56.0% -20.8% n/a n/a -6.8% 79,750 79,750 268,938 79,750 79,750 164,096 79,750 79,750 244,118 497 30,137 30,634 118,822 31.9% 0.0% 0.0% 31.9% 87.9% 0.0% n/a n/a 0.0% -4.7% 250 250 250 250 0.1% 0.0% 3,000 202 3,452 272,391 3,000 39,880 43,130 207,226 40,170 40,420 284,538 53,446 79,750 133,446 252,268 0.8% 11.1% 12.1% -100.0% 1309.3% n/a 242.2% 100.0% 2.2% Source: SMX Convention 2011 to 2012 audited financial statements; SMX Convention 3M2013 financial statement SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3.2 Costa Del Hamilo Inc. (“CDHI”) 3.2.1 Organizational background and structure Costa Del Hamilo Inc. (“CDHI”) was incorporated on September 26, 2006 and is engaged primarily in real estate development. Its property assets and construction projects consist mainly of condominium buildings and macro-infrastructure located at Hamilo Coast in Nasugbu, Batangas. Income of CDHI is sourced from two components: sale of real estate properties and sale of Pico de Loro Beach and Country Club (“Pico de Loro”) club shares. Ownership CDHI is owned by MBRDC, with SMIC as its Ultimate Parent Company. The stockholders of CDHI and the corresponding ownership are presented below: SM Investments Corporation 100.0% Mountain Bliss Resort and Development Corp. 100.0 Costa Del Hamilo Inc. Source: General Information Sheet of Costa Del Hamilo Inc. as of 2012 3.2.2 Financial information MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of CDHI in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that CDHI is a real estate company, the asset base was likewise studied to understand the different asset groupings and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'M Revenue Real estate Club shares Total revenue Costs Real estate Club shares Total costs Gross profit Operating expenses Other incom e (charges) Income from forfeited deposits and others Interest expense Interest income Loss on retirement of property and equipment Rent income Foreign exchange gain (loss) - net Other income Total other income (charges) Income before tax Provision for income tax Current Deferred Net incom e 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 2010 to 2012 3M2013 % to revenue CAGR 1,012 321 1,332 740 105 845 370 71 441 46 12 58 82.5% 17.5% 100.0% (39.5%) (53.0%) (42.5%) (682) (193) (875) 457 (213) (409) (57) (465) 380 (263) (157) (38) (195) 247 (224) (18) (6) (24) 34 (44) (45.0%) (9.9%) (54.9%) 45.1% (32.6%) (52.1%) (55.7%) (52.8%) (26.5%) 2.6% 10 (112) 2 (0) (100) 144 21 (20) 10 0 11 129 40 (18) 11 (3) 2.0 (0) 32 55 (22) 3 (0) 3 (16) (26) 4.1% (4.9%) 1.2% (0.2%) 0.2% (0.0%) 0.0% 0.4% 12.8% 95.9% (60.1%) 117.4% 19.9% (38.5%) 6 3 9 135 6 19 25 104 8 1 8 47 1 (11) (10) (16) 0.9% 0.9% 1.8% 16.5% (59.7%) (4.3%) 11.0% (41.4%) Source: 2012 Financial Statements of CDHI (for 2012 and 2011); 2011 Financial Statements of CDHI (for 2010); Unaudited Financial Statements as of March 31, 2013; MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial position PHP'M Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Condominium units for sale Club shares for sale Land and development Property and equipment Pension asset Deferred tax assets Other assets Total assets Liabilities and equity Liabilities Loans payable Accounts payable and other liabilities Payable to related parties Deferred tax liabilities - net Total liabilities Equity Capital stock Deposit for future stock subscription Retained earnings Net income Total equity Total liabilities and equity 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 57 560 177 919 662 152 2 2 349 2,881 304 561 152 862 1,114 183 3 340 3,519 83 1,028 718 824 374 159 5 317 3,509 64 1,079 699 818 128 162 5 270 3,226 4.3% 21.6% 10.3% 26.6% 21.8% 5.0% 0.1% 0.0% 10.3% 21.2% 35.4% 101.3% (5.3%) (24.9%) 2.4% 65.9% (100.0%) (4.7%) 100.0% 10.4% 180 1,121 1,165 2,465 810 736 1,208 17 2,771 949 717 1,364 17 3,047 949 449 1,376 6 2,780 18.8% 26.7% 37.9% 0.3% 83.7% 129.6% (20.0%) 8.2% 11.2% 188 228 416 2,881 188 228 333 748 3,519 416 47 462 3,509 416 47 (16) 447 3,226 7.9% 2.2% 6.2% 0.0% 16.3% 48.9% (54.8%) 5.5% 100.0% 10.4% Source: 2012 Financial Statements of CDHI (for 2012 and 2011); 2011 Financial Statements of CDHI (for 2010); Unaudited Financial Statements as of March 31, 2013; MS&Co. analysis 3.3 Tagaytay Resort Development Corporation (“TRDC”) 3.3.1 Organizational background and structure TRDC was incorporated and registered with the SEC on August 29, 1988 and is engaged primarily in the purchase, lease, management and sale of land and other real properties. TRDC has an authorized capital stock of PHP100.0 million with par value of PHP100.0 per share. As of December 31, 2012, management has not started its commercial operations. The financial statements of TRDC have been prepared in accordance with the Philippine Financial Reporting Standards for Small and Medium-sized entities (PFRS for SMEs). Ownership structure As of 3M2013, TRDC has seven (7) stockholders owning the 420,000 subscribed shares. Illustrated below are TRDC’s stockholders and their relative holdings in the company in percentage. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMIC Teresita Sy SMDC 33.33 % 25.00% 10.42% TRDC Henry Sy, Jr. Hans Sy 0.00% 10.42% Herbert Sy Harley Sy 10.41% 10.42% Sources: TRDC 2013 General information sheet 3.3.2 Financial information MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of TRDC in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that TRDC is a real estate company, the asset base was likewise studied to understand the different asset groupings and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'000 2010 Interest income Expenses Taxes and licenses Professional fees Miscellaneous Total expenses Net loss Other comprehensive income Total com prehensive incom e (loss) Audited 2011 0 0 531 25 1 556 (556) (556) Unaudited 3M2013 2012 0 1,216 15 1 1,232 (1,232) (1,232) 0 1,216 15 1 1,231 (1,231) (1,231) 0 0 % to total n/a 51.4% n/a (22.5%)l n/a (12.3%)l 48.8% n/a 48.8% n/a n/a n/a 48.8% Source: TRDC Audited financial statements as of December 31, 2012 Statem ent of financial position PHP'000 2010 Current assets Cash in bank Non-current assets Investment properties Total assets Accounts payable and accrued expenses Total liabilities Capital stock Deficit Total equity Total liabilities and equity Sources: 58 79,745 79,803 38,785 38,785 42,000 (983) 41,017 79,803 Audited 2011 56 79,745 79,802 40,016 40,016 42,000 (2,214) 39,786 79,802 2012 58 77,959 78,017 39,462 39,462 42,000 (3,445) 38,555 78,017 Unaudited 3M2013 % to total CAGR 0.1% (0.1%) 99.9% 100.0% 49.8% 49.8% 53.0% (2.8%) 50.2% 100.0% (1.1%) (1.1%) 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 87.2% (3.0%) (1.1%) 58 77,959 78,017 39,462 39,462 42,000 (3,445) 38,555 78,017 TRDC Audited financial statements as of December 31, 2012, TRDC Unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2013 CAGR n/a (17.6%)l SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 3.4 Prime Metroestate Inc. 3.4.1 Organizational background and structure Formerly known as Pilipinas Makro, Inc., Prime Metroestate, Inc. (“Prime Metro”) was incorporated on June 1, 1995 and is engaged primarily in the acquiring of properties including but not limited to real estate for sale or for lease. The current nature of operations started in 2012 when it shifted from retailing activities which involved trading and selling of both food and non-food products. Prime Metro is 50.0%-owned by Rappel Holdings, Inc. (“Rappel”), 40% by Panther (BVI) Ltd., and 10% by SM Investments Corporation (“SMIC”). Through its ownership interest in Rappel, SMIC manages Prime Metro’s financial and operating policies and accordingly exercises control over Prime Metro. This, therefore, makes SMIC the Parent Company of Prime Metro. Prime Metro’s registered office and primary place of business is domiciled at 10th floor, One E-Com Center, Harbor Drive, Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Ownership structure The stockholders of Prime Metro and their corresponding ownership are presented in the diagram below: Panther (BVI) Ltd. SM Investments Corporation 100% Rappel Holdings, Inc. 40.0% 50.0% 10.0% Prime Metroestate, Inc. Source: General Information Sheet of Prime Metroestate, Inc. as of January 2013 3.4.2 Financial information MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of Prime Metro in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that Prime Metro is a real estate company, the asset base was likewise studied to understand the different asset groupings and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ents of financial perform ance PHP'M Revenue Rental income Sale of goods Total revenue Costs of sales and services Cost of services Cost of sales Total costs Gross profit Other operating expenses (incom e) Other operating expenses Other operating income Total operating expenses (income) Operating profit Finance incom e (cost) Finance income Finance cost Total finance income (cost) Profit before tax Tax expense Net incom e 2010 6,196 6,196 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 2010 to 2012 3M2013 % to revenue CAGR 196 2,799 2,995 169 168.7 33 33 35.5% 64.5% 100.0% (100.0%) (83.5%) - (115) (5,441) (2,504) (5,441) (2,619) 755 377 (94) (94) 75 (2) (2) 31 (19.8%) (57.1%) (77.0%) 23.0% (100.0%) (86.9%) (68.5%) (74.1%) (62.5%) 1,005 (660) 345 410 520 (291) 229 148 67 (93) (25) 100 8 (6) 2 29 24.5% (25.1%) (0.6%) 23.6% (50.6%) 39 39 449 130 319 47 (27) 20 167 50 118 64 64 164 43 121 17 17 45 12 34 13.4% (0.3%) 13.1% 36.7% 9.8% 27.9% 27.9% (39.5%) (42.4%) 27.0% (38.4%) Source: 2012 Financial Statements of Prime Metro (for 2012 and 2011); 2011 Financial Statements of Prime Metro (for 2010); Interim financial statements of Prime Metro as of March 31, 2013 (for 3M2013); MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ents of financial position PHP'M Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Merchandise inventories Other current assets Total current assets Non-current assets Investment properties - net Investment in a subsidiary Deferred tax assets Property and equipment - net Other non-current assets Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities and equity Current liabilities Trade and other payables Non-current liabilities Retirement benefit obligation Total liabilities Equity Capital stock Retained earnings Total equity Total liabilities and equity 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 3M2013 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 1,421 116 380 71 1,989 1,303 209 43 1,555 2,038 210 119 2,367 1,965 43 90 2,098 31.3% 3.5% 2.3% 1.5% 38.6% 19.7% 34.4% (100.0%) 29.9% 9.1% 1,410 43 9 2,099 50 3,611 5,600 3,364 43 11 25 3,443 4,998 2,386 43 21 2,450 4,817 2,684 43 21 2,749 4,847 47.3% 0.8% 0.1% 12.5% 0.6% 61.4% 30.1% 0.0% (100.0%) (100.0%) (34.9%) (17.6%) 100.0% (7.3%) 1,129 422 119 116 10.4% (67.5%) 12 1,141 422 119 116 0.1% 10.4% (100.0%) (67.6%) 2,713 1,746 4,459 5,600 2,713 1,863 4,576 4,998 2,713 1,984 4,697 4,817 2,713 2,018 4,731 4,847 53.0% 36.5% 89.6% 0.0% 6.6% 2.6% 100.0% (7.3%) Source: 2012 Financial Statements of Prime Metro (for 2012 and 2011); 2011 Financial Statements of Prime Metro (for 2010); Interim financial statements of Prime Metro as of March 31, 2013 (for 3M2013); MS&Co. analysis 3.5 SM Arena Complex Corporation (“SMACC”) 3.5.1 Corporate information SM Arena Complex Corporation (“SMACC”) was incorporated and registered with the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2012 and is engaged primarily in the management of the operations of Mall of Asia Arena, an entertainment and sporting events facility. SMACC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SM Investments Corporation. SMACC has an authorized and paid-up capital stock of PHP400.0 million with par value of PHP100.0 per share as of March 31, 2013 (the ‘Cut-off date”). As of the cut-off date, the Company has a total number of six (6) stockholders. Ownership structure As of March 31, 2013 (the “Cut-off date”) TRDC has six (6) stockholders owning the 4.0 million subscribed shares. SMIC holds 99.9% of SMACC’s stocks. The other five stockholders own one (1) share each. Illustrated below are SMACC’s stockholders. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMIC 99.99 % Jose Sio SMACC Edgar Tejerero Corazon Morando Ma. Ruby Cano Grace Roque Sources: SMACC 2013 General information sheet 3.5.2 Financial highlights MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of SMACC in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that SMACC operates the MOA Arena, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of SMACC’s revenue streams and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'M Total revenues Cost of sales Operating expenses Total cost and expenses Income from operations Interest and others Total other income (charges) Income before income tax and minority interest Income tax Income before minority interest Net incom e Unaudited 2012 689.3 484.8 190.1 674.9 14.4 4.3 18.7 (5.0) 13.7 13.7 Unaudited 3M2013 107.2 3.1 78.7 81.8 25.4 2.2 2.2 27.6 27.6 27.6 % to total 100.0% 70.3% 27.6% 97.9% 2.1% 0.0% 0.6% 2.7% (0.7%) 2.0% 2.0% Sources: SMACC Unaudited financial statements as of December 31, 2012, SMACC Unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2013; MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Statem ent of financial position PHP'M Cash and cash equivalents Accounts Receivables - Others Merchandise inventories Prepaid Expenses and other current assets Total Current Assets Property and equipment-net Total Noncurrent Assets Total Assets Accounts payable and other current liabilities Income tax payable Total Current Liabilities Tenants' deposits Total Noncurrent Liabilities Total Liabilities Capital stock Unappropriated Retained Earnings Total Stockholders' Equity Total Liabilities and Equity Unaudited 2012 99.7 368.6 2.3 38.7 509.3 300.7 300.7 810.0 Unaudited 3M2013 96.5 325.2 1.4 38.7 461.8 286.2 286.2 748.0 % to total 12.3% 45.5% 0.3% 4.8% 62.9% 37.1% 37.1% 387.1 5.0 392.1 4.2 4.2 396.3 400.0 13.7 413.7 810.0 302.6 302.6 4.2 4.2 306.8 400.0 41.3 441.3 748.0 47.8% 0.6% 48.4% 0.5% 0.5% 48.9% 49.4% 1.7% 51.1% 100.0% 100.0% Sources: SMACC Unaudited financial statements as of December 31, 2012, SMACC Unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2013 4 Valuation of Target Companies and properties owned by SMIC 4.1 Cost Approach Under the Cost approach, assets and liabilities with available fair market values are markedto-market. x The fair market values of the subject properties were based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE using various valuation methods, namely the cost, market data and discounted cash flow approaches. The following table summarizes the computation for the Target Companies’ net asset value using the Cost approach. Valuation results of the target com panies PHP Valuation Date SM Hotels and Conventions, Corp. March 31, 2013 Prime Metro Estate Corp. March 31, 2013 Costa del Hamilo, Inc. March 31, 2013 Tagaytay Resort and Development Corp. March 31, 2013 SM Arena Complex Corp. March 31, 2013 Total values of the com panies to be acquired by SMPHI Source: Per Share (PHP) 461,337.29 2,635.45 735.38 5,565.70 1,034.23 Total (PHP) 1,153,343,213 7,149,969,000 3,057,348,442 1,753,196,723 413,693,822 13,527,551,199 MS&Co. analysis SM Hotels The consolidated NAV of SM Hotels was no longer adjusted since the hotels being managed by this company’s subsidiaries are owned by SMIC and have already been appraised and SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 accounted for in this transaction. There were no appraisals conducted for the equipment and facilities owned by the SM Hotel Group. The stand-alone NAV of SM Hotels was used for the cost approach computation and no adjustments were made for the deficits in its subsidiaries’ financial statements. Despite the significant losses incurred by HSI Cebu, HSI Pico de Loro and HSI Davao during their first years of operation, these losses may not be indicative of the companies’ impairment and could be due to their recent establishment as they are still building their market base. Such losses may be recouped at a later period. Cost approach - SM Hotels PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Number of shares outstanding NAV per share Source: 3M2013 1,166 13 1,153 2,500 461,337.29 MS&Co. analysis; SM Hotels 3M2013 financial statements Prime Metro The investment properties recorded under the books of Prime Metro were adjusted to reflect their movement in fair market value. After the acquisition, Prime Metro would be wholly-owned by SMPHI through the acquisition of the 10% stake of SMIC and the shareholdings of two other companies, Panther Limited (BVI Co.) and Rappel Holdings, Inc, which own 40% and 50% of Prime Metro, respectively. SMPHI will acquire Panther Limited’s stake in Prime Metro through the acquisition of Panther Limited’s ultimate parent, Prime Central (BVI Co.). Presented below are the owners of the 40% stake in Prime Metro and their respective parent companies. Prime Central (BVI Co.) (Owns 100% of Galway) Galway Pacific Ltd. (BVI Co.) (Owns 100% of Celton) Celton Group Limited (BVI Co.) (Owns 100% of Panther) Panther Limited (BVI Co.) (Owns 1,085,200 shares of PMI) 40% Prime Metro 2,713,000 Cost approach - Prim e Metro PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Adjustment to reflect fair value of properties Fair value of Prime Metro properties Carrying value of Prime Metro properties Adjusted NAV Number of shares outstanding (in thousands) NAV per share Source: 3M2013 4,847 116 4,731 5,103 (2,684) 2,419 7,150 2,713 2,635.45 MS&Co, analysis; Prime Metro 3M2013 financial statements; CBRE appraisal report as of February 28, 2013 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 CDHI The land, condominium units, and club shares recorded under the books of CDHI were adjusted to reflect the movement in fair market value. Cost approach - CDHI PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Adjustment to reflect fair value of properties Fair value of CDHI properties Carrying value as of March 31, 2013 Land and development Condominium units for sale Clubshares 3M2013 3,509 3,047 462 4,230 (102) (699) (818) (1,620) Adjusted NAV Number of shares outstanding (in thousands) NAV per share Source: 2,611 3,073 4,158 739.17 MS&Co. analysis; CDHI 3M2013 audited financial statements; CBRE appraisal report as of February 28, 2013 TRDC The investment property recorded under the books of TRDC was adjusted to reflect their movement in fair market value. Cost approach - TRDC PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Adjustment to reflect fair value of properties Fair value of TRDC properties Carrying value of TRDC properties Adjusted NAV SMIC ow nership % NAV attributable to SMIC Number of shares outstanding ow ned by SMIC (in thousands) NAV per share Source: 3M2013 78 39 39 2,377 (78) MS&Co. analysis; TRDC 3M2013 financial statements; CBRE appraisal report as of February 28, 2013 2,299 2,338 75% 1,753 315 5,565.70 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMACC The NAV of SMACC was no longer adjusted since the facilities being managed by the company are owned by SMIC and have already been appraised and accounted for in this transaction. According to management, the company was just recently established and its assets still approximate their market values. Cost approach - SMACC PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Number of shares outstanding (in thousands) NAV per share Source: 3M2013 810 396 414 400 1,034.23 MS&Co. analysis; SMACC 3M2013 financial statements SMIC properties The breakdown of the fair market values for the real estate assets are as follows: SMIC properties - appraised values PHP'M Taal Vista Hotel Radisson Cebu Hotel Pico Sands Hotel SMX Convention Center MoA Arena MoA Arena Annex Corporate Office Casino and Waste Water Treatment Plant (located at tagaytay lot ow ned by Tagaytay Resort Devt Corp) Tagaytay EDSA West Ongoing Project - Park Inn Davao Total Source: CBRE appraisal report as of February 28, 2013 Valuation used Cost Cost DCF Cost Cost Cost Cost DCF Market data Market data Cost Appraised value 2,014 2,375 704 1,608 3,369 1,673 895 861 2,034 209 594 16,336 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 5 Organization background and structure of SM Prime Holdings Inc. 5.1 Corporate information SM Prime Holdings Inc. (“SMPHI”) is the leading developer and operator of shopping malls in the Philippines. SMPHI also operates malls in China. Its operations are mainly driven by rentals from tenants, sales of cinema tickets, income from amusement centers and others. SMPHI was incorporated in January 6, 1994, and is currently headquartered on Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1 A, Pasay City. SMPHI competes with local mall operators and other retailers such as Ayala Malls, Robinsons Malls, Puregold, and Shopwise. The advantage of SMPHI in this competitive industry rests upon its strategic locations, effective tenant mix, and long-standing brand. SMPHI has an extensive customer base; the revenue stream of the company is not reliant on one or a few clients. Major anchor tenants in the Philippines include SM Department Stores, SM Supermarkets, SM Hypermarkets, Ace Hardware, National Bookstore, KFC, Jollibee, Watsons (Philippines), Uniqlo, and Forever 21. Major anchor tenants in China include WalMart, SM Laiya Department Stores, Wanda Cinema, McDonald’s, KFC, and Watsons. Ownership structure The major shareholders of SMPHI are SM Land Inc., which has a 40.96% stake; PCD Nominee Corp., which has a 34.43% stake; and SM Investments Corp., which has a 21.65% stake in SMPHI. SMIC, through SM Land Inc., indirectly owns 27.4% of SMPHI resulting in an effective ownership of 49.1% SMPHI is a listed company in the Philippine Stock Exchange. As of March 31, 2013, 5.3 million shares, which represent a 30.5% of the total outstanding shares, are owned by the public. The diagram below summarizes the ownership structure of the SMPHI. Ownership Structure SM Investments Corp. 66.9% SM Land, Inc 21.65% PCD Nominee Corp. (Foreign and Filipino) 34.43% 40.96% SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Source: SMPHI 2012 Annual report Others 2.96% SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 5.2 Financial performance and position MS&Co. conducted an analysis of the historical financial performance of SMPHI in order to understand the value drivers of the company. The analysis includes historical revenue, cost and margin analysis. Given that SMPHI is a commercial leasing company, the revenues were likewise studied to understand the behaviour of leasing income and how it relates to value generation. The income statements and balance sheets are presented below. Consolidated statem ent of financial perform ance PHP'M Total revenues Operating expenses Income from operations Other income (charges)- net Income before income tax Incom e tax Current Deferred Total income tax Net incom e Source: 2010 23,716 (11,271) 12,445 (1,648) 10,797 Audited 2011 26,897 (12,277) 14,620 (2,400) 12,220 2012 30,726 (13,995) 16,731 (2,442) 14,289 Unaudited 3M2013 7,830 (3,604) 4,226 (445) 3,781 (2,450) (207) (2,657) 8,140 (2,932) 94 (2,838) 9,382 (3,313) (53) (3,367) 10,922 (902) 10 (891) 2,890 SMPHI 2012 Annual report; SMPHI 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis 2010 to 2012 % of total CAGR 100.0% 13.8% -46.2% 11.4% 53.8% 16.0% -7.9% 21.8% 45.8% 15.0% -10.7% -0.2% -10.9% 16.3% -49.2% 12.6% 34.9% 15.8% SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Consolidated statem ent of financial position PHP'M Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalent Short-term investments Investments held for trading Receivables Available-for-sale investments Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total Current Assets Noncurrent Assets Investment properties - net Derivative assets Deferred tax assets Other noncurrent assets Total Noncurrent Assets Total assets Liabilities and stockholders' equity Current liabilities Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities Current portion of long-term debt Income tax payable Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Long-term debt - net of current portion Tenants’ deposits Liability for purchased land - net of current Deferred tax liabilities Derivative liabilities Other noncurrent liabilities Total Noncurrent Liabilities Equity Capital stock Additional paid-in capital - net Cumulative translation adjustment Unrealized gain on AFS Retained earnings: Appropriated Unappropriated Treasury stock Non controlling interest Total equity Total liabilities and equity Source: Note: 2010 Audited 2011 2012 Unaudited 2010 to 2012 3M2013 % of total CAGR 9,720 877 500 3,980 1,104 1,104 17,285 8,290 877 813 4,708 1,000 1,276 16,964 9,707 821 759 5,880 1,000 1,440 19,607 19,068 816 457 5,763 1,000 1,566 28,671 7.1% 0.7% 0.5% 3.7% 0.8% 1.0% 13.8% -0.1% -3.2% 23.2% 21.5% -4.8% 14.2% 6.5% 93,940 738 223 3,946 98,848 116,133 107,836 116 254 3,154 111,360 128,324 124,087 110 190 4,135 128,522 148,130 126,017 138 187 4,656 130,998 159,669 82.9% 0.3% 0.2% 2.9% 86.2% 14.9% -61.4% -7.6% 2.4% 14.0% 100.0% 12.9% 6,797 767 404 7,967 10,150 799 623 11,572 800 11,399 1,792 633 14,623 800 11,380 2,611 1,123 15,914 0.2% 7.2% 0.8% 0.4% 8.6% n/a 29.5% 52.9% 25.2% 35.5% 38,077 6,466 1,619 1,323 710 1,022 49,216 40,094 7,467 1,551 1,259 238 1,797 52,405 49,647 8,386 1,215 1,278 244 1,836 62,607 57,015 8,556 1,042 1,266 237 1,879 69,994 32.5% 5.7% 1.1% 1.0% 0.3% 1.2% 41.8% 14.2% 13.9% -13.4% -1.7% -41.3% 34.0% 12.8% 13,918 8,219 590 4 13,918 8,219 873 - 17,393 8,219 544 - 17,393 8,219 516 - 11.5% 6.3% 0.5% 0.0% 11.8% 0.0% -3.9% -100.0% 7,000 7,000 27,000 28,562 33,866 16,890 (101) (101) (101) 759 573 955 58,950 64,347 70,900 116,133 128,324 148,130 27,000 19,680 (101) 1,055 73,761 159,669 9.9% 20.8% -0.1% 0.6% 49.6% 96.4% -23.1% 0.0% 12.2% 9.7% 100.0% 12.9% SMPHI 2011 and 2012 Annual report; SMPHI 2011 Audited financial statements; SMPHI 3M2013 financial statements; MS&Co. analysis Change in policy regarding allowance for doubtful accounts resulted in adjustments in the 2010 amounts SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6 Valuation of SMPHI Sum of the Parts Approach The approach used to value the post-merger SMPHI, is the Sum of the Parts Method. Sum of the Parts was deemed as the most appropriate approach due to the following: x Diversity of the companies operating under the umbrella of SMPHI, after the merging with SM Land. x Lack of information on SMPHI, post-merger. In determining the Sum of the Parts, we first determined the pre-merger value of SM Land and SMPHI. The value of SMPHI after the merger is the sum of the pre-merger values less SM Land’s investment in SMPHI shares. 6.1 Pre-merger valuation of SMPHI We are presenting below the valuation results of SMPHI. Valuation results - SMPHI Cost approach Incom e approach 7% grow th rate 6% grow th rate 5% grow th rate Market approach EV/EBITDA - w eighted average Closing price as of March 27, 2013 60-day volume-w eighted average share price Valuation range Per share (PhP) 19.39 24.22 22.38 20.62 Total (PHP'M) 336,888 420,820 388,790 358,231 18.33 318,525 19.10 331,837 18.78 326,278 18.33 to 24.22 318,525 to 420,820 Source: MS&Co. analysis 6.1.1 Income approach Under the Income approach of SMPHI, three (3) important variables were considered. These are: (a) the projected free cash flows to the firm, (b) the appropriate discount rate, and (c) the terminal value. Projected free cash flow to the firm (“FCFF”) Projected FCFF is equivalent to the cash flows from operating (except interest income) and investing activities plus after-tax net interest expense of SMPHI from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018 (the “Forecast Period”). Projected FCFFs are discounted back to the Valuation Date at an acceptable discount rate to generate a value for the business. The business plans and the related financial projections of SMPHI are based on the management’s assumptions reflecting conditions it expects would exist and the courses of action it expects to take during the Forecast Period. MS&Co. would like to highlight that the management of SMPHI is responsible for representations about their plans and expectations, and for disclosure of significant information that might affect the ultimate realization of the business plans and the projected results. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 There will usually be differences between the projected and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be material. Hence, while MS&Co. will exercise its best judgment in evaluating the assumptions, MS&Co. cannot provide assurance on the realization of the financial projections. Given the uncertainties inherent in projecting financial performance, scenarios have been created to anticipate volatilities in SMPHI’s revenue streams. Same-store revenue growth of established malls has been estimated to be 7.0% which approximates the historical same-store growth rate of SMPHI. However, according to management, mature malls would have a same-store growth rate of 5.0% for terminal value computation purposes. These two growth estimates have been used as the aggressive and conservative bases, respectively, for the projection scenarios with regard to the established malls, since revenues from these properties comprise over 77% of SMPHI’s revenues over the projection period. An average growth rate of 6% was also utilized to represent a base case scenario for the revenue growth assumptions. Projected FCFF are discounted back to the present date at an acceptable discount rate to generate a fair range of values for the business. Below are the computations of the present value (“PV”) of SMPHI’s projected cash flows for the three scenarios. Revenue growth at 7% Projected free cash flow s - SMPHI Apr. to Dec. 2013 PHP'M Net cash flow s from (used in) operating activities Income (loss) before income tax 12,579 Adjustments for: Depreciation and depletion 3,325 Interest expense 1,625 Interest income (337) Other adjustments 29 Net w orking capital changes 1,711 Taxes (3,355) Net cash flow s from (used in) operating 15,577 activities (34,777) Capital expenditures Projected FCFF (19,200) Period 0.75 WACC 7.0% Discount factor 0.9507 Discounted FCFF (from 3M12) (18,253) Source: MS&Co. analysis 2014 17,887 2015 19,498 2016 21,560 2017 24,270 2018 27,938 5,284 2,492 (170) 6,082 3,418 (122) 6,778 3,986 (133) 7,619 4,438 (137) 8,113 4,725 (138) 1,692 (4,152) 2,284 (4,573) 2,217 (5,099) 2,151 (5,682) 2,564 (6,539) Total 123,732 37,201 20,684 (1,038) 29 12,618 (29,400) 23,033 26,587 29,308 32,659 36,662 163,826 (27,091) (4,058) 1.75 (28,105) (1,517) 2.75 (28,829) 480 3.75 (22,411) 10,248 4.75 (22,988) 13,674 5.75 (164,200) (374) 0.8887 (3,607) 0.8307 (1,260) 0.7765 373 0.7259 7,439 0.6785 9,278 (6,030) SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Revenue growth at 6% Projected free cash flow s - SMPHI Apr. to Dec. 2013 PHP'M Net cash flow s from (used in) operating activities Income (loss) before income tax 12,454 Adjustments for: Depreciation and depletion 3,325 Interest expense 1,625 Interest income (337) Other adjustments 29 Net w orking capital changes 1,648 Taxes (3,330) Net cash flow s from (used in) operating 15,414 activities (34,777) Capital expenditures Projected FCFF (19,363) Period 0.75 WACC 7.0% Discount factor 0.9507 Discounted FCFF (from 3M12) (18,407) Source: 2014 17,612 2015 19,059 2016 20,924 2017 23,407 2018 26,837 5,284 2,492 (162) 6,082 3,418 (101) 6,778 3,991 (96) 7,619 4,458 (85) 8,113 4,760 (83) 1,621 (4,092) 2,197 (4,473) 2,124 (4,953) 2,047 (5,481) 2,448 (6,280) Total 120,293 37,201 20,744 (864) 29 12,085 (28,609) 22,756 26,182 28,768 31,965 35,794 160,880 (27,091) (4,335) 1.75 (28,105) (1,923) 2.75 (28,829) (60) 3.75 (22,411) 9,554 4.75 (22,988) 12,806 5.75 (164,200) (3,321) 0.8887 (3,853) 0.8307 (1,597) 0.7765 (47) 0.7259 6,935 0.6785 8,689 2014 2015 2016 (8,280) MS&Co. analysis Revenue growth at 5% Projected free cash flow s - SMPHI Apr. to Dec. 2013 PHP'M Net cash flow s from (used in) operating activities Income (loss) before income tax 12,329 Adjustments for: Depreciation and depletion 3,325 Interest expense 1,625 Interest income (337) Other adjustments 29 Net w orking capital changes 1,586 Taxes (3,305) Net cash flow s from (used in) operating 15,252 activities (34,777) Capital expenditures Projected FCFF (19,525) Period 0.75 WACC 7.0% Discount factor 0.9507 Discounted FCFF (from 3M12) (18,562) Source: 17,335 18,617 20,298 2017 22,593 2018 25,800 5,284 2,497 (153) 6,082 3,435 (87) 6,778 4,028 (85) 7,619 4,511 (85) 8,113 4,833 (83) 1,551 (4,031) 2,113 (4,372) 2,036 (4,808) 1,950 (5,290) 2,341 (6,037) Total 116,974 37,201 20,928 (831) 29 11,577 (27,844) 22,483 25,788 28,248 31,297 34,967 158,034 (27,091) (4,608) 1.75 (28,105) (2,317) 2.75 (28,829) (581) 3.75 (22,411) 8,887 4.75 (22,988) 11,979 5.75 (164,200) (6,166) 0.8887 (4,095) 0.8307 (1,925) 0.7765 (451) 0.7259 6,451 0.6785 8,128 MS&Co. analysis Discount rate Determining an appropriate discount rate, which is reflective of both the general and specific risks of a company’s future income stream, is an important element of the Income approach or DCF methodology. The discount rate is also equated with the acceptable rate of return or “hurdle rate” of an investor for a specific investment opportunity taking into account the return on alternative investments and risk factor. For this Report, weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) was computed as the acceptable discount rate to be applied to the projected FCFF during the Forecast Period and the projected FCFF after the explicit Valuation Period. SMPHI’s after-tax cost of debt, pegged at 3.6%, pertains to the weighted average interest rate of SMPHI’s interest-bearing liabilities using March 31, 2013 interest rates. For variable rate loans, the market rate was provided by management. However, for the fixed rate loans, (10,455) SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 MS&Co. used the average lending rates of local universal banks for March 25, 2013 sourced from Business World. A tax rate was not used since SMPHI is using the Optional Standard Deduction offered by the BIR. As such, interest expense would not be deductible with regard to computing the income tax to be incurred. The table on the next page presents the computation for the after-tax cost of debt of SMPHI. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMPHI Loan payables breakdow n as of March 31, 2013 PHP'M Parent PHP LOAN 1.2B PHILAM 2.0B MBTC 5.0B BDO CAP 2.0B BPI 1.0B LBP 1.0B LBP 1.0B MBTC 1.0B BPI 7.0B MBTC Rate Am ount Interest rate Weighted int. rate Fixed Fixed Fixed PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin Fixed Fixed PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin Fixed Fixed Fixed PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin PDSTF + margin Fixed Fixed 1,200 800 1,100 2,000 1,000 1,000 880 1,000 2,940 1,960 980 784 3,920 980 1,002 132 3,618 198 3,450 1,000 650 2,350 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 1.1% 3.3% 3.0% 12.4% 1.6% 0.9% 0.9% 6.2% 6.2% 3.7% 3.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 6.2% 6.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% MBTC ($150M) ING ($50M) LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread LIBOR + spread 204 204 204 204 204 1,224 816 4,488 1,428 5,100 408 1,020 6,120 2,040 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% Subsidiaries PHP LOAN 500M BPI PDSTF + margin 500 3.7% 0.0% 1,734 5.8% 0.2% 400 5.8% 0.0% 985 6.2% 0.1% 500 300 61,027 6.2% 6.2% 0.1% 0.0% 3.6% 5.0B MBTC 5.0B RCBC 7.5B MBTC USD LOAN 25M SMBC 30M HSBC 20M HSBC 270M SCB 50M SMBC RM B LOAN 350M ICBC 150M ICBC 250M ICBC Floating rate based on Central Bank of China Floating rate based on Central Bank of China Floating rate based on Central Bank of China Short-term PHP LOAN BPI Fixed BPI Fixed Total interest-bearing liabilities Source: SMPHI loan breakdown as of March 31, 2013; BSP loan interest rates during February 11-15, 2013 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMPHI’s cost of equity was computed using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”), which states that the Ke is based on the return generated from risk-free investments (“riskfree rate”) plus a premium for the risks associated with the business (“equity risk premium”). The risk-free rate (“rf”) represents the minimum return investors would expect from credit risk-free securities. The rf of 4.0% was considered in the valuation of SMPHI. This was based on the 10-year Philippine Treasury Bond reissued on February 2013, the nearest auction date to the Valuation Date for an issue of a 10-year treasury bond. The market risk premium (“RPm”) represents the excess return to compensate investors for taking a relatively riskier investment. MS&Co. assumed that 4.91% is the RPm, which is sourced from Aswath Damodaran in his paper “Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation, and Implications – The 2013 Edition. Damodaran utilizes several methodologies in determining the equity risk premium, which includes the survey approach, use of historical premiums and implied equity premiums. The beta factor represents the measure of risk of a particular asset relative to the risk of a portfolio of all risky assets, based on the perception that its share prices move in line with the “market.” Levered beta factors are always considered in the valuation of companies. Levered beta is the beta that takes into account the risk of SMPHI due to its capital structure and applicable tax rate. WACC computation for SMPHI MS&Co. used the unlevered beta of the real estate industry, specifically in the operations & services sector, in emerging markets from Aswath Damodaran MS&Co. relevered the beta to reflect the target capital structure of SMPHI using the company’s target debt and equity ratios. Relevered beta Form ula: Unlevered beta factor Tax rate Debt ratio Equity ratio Relevered beta Unlevered beta * [1 + (1 - tax rate) * (D/E)] 0.65 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 1.30 Source: Aswath Damodaran website, MS&Co. analysis The table below shows the computation of cost of equity using CAPM for SMPHI. Cost of equity ("Ke") Risk-free rate ("Rf") Total risk prem ium Relevered beta Ke = Rf + ȕ*(Rm-Rf) Source: 4.0% 4.9% 1.30 10.4% Bureau of Treasury; Aswath Damodaran – Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications - The 2013 Edition; Aswath Damodaran website, MS&Co. analysis After performing the procedure as stated above, below is the computed WACC for SMPHI. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Weighted average cost of capital Debt-equity proportion WACC com putation 50.0% 3.6% 0.0% 3.6% 50.0% 100.0% 4.0% 4.9% 1.30 10.4% 7.0% Cost of debt Interest rate Less: Tax rate Cost of debt Cost of equity Risk free rate (Rf) Total risk premium (Rp) Beta (ȕ) Cost of equity (Rf + ȕ*Rp) Total / WACC Source: Bureau of Treasury, Aswath Damodaran website, MS&Co. analysis Terminal value The terminal value of a business represents its potential earnings beyond the projection period. The terminal value is determined by capitalizing the estimated cash flows beyond the Forecast Periods. Terminal value and DCF value of SMPHI The computation of the terminal value and the related present value of SMPHI is presented in the table below: Enterprise value - SMPHI PHP'M Terminal value cash flow s = (FCFF - last projected year) WACC Less: Projected same-store grow th rate after 2018 PV of terminal value cash flow s Discount factor Present value of terminal value cash flow s Total discounted FCFF Enterprise value Source: 5% grow th 11,979 7.0% 5.0% 605,856 0.6785 411,098 (10,455) 400,644 6% grow th 12,806 7.0% 5.0% 647,686 0.6785 439,482 (8,280) 431,202 7% grow th 13,674 7.0% 5.0% 691,576 0.6785 469,263 (6,030) 463,232 SMPHI financial projections, MS&Co. analysis The total present values of projected FCFF in the 5%, 6%, and 7% revenue growth scenarios are PHP400.6 billion, PHP431.2 billion and PHP463.2 billion. This value represents the enterprise value of SMPHI as of the Valuation Date. In order to arrive at the equity value, certain adjustments such as deduction of long-term loans and preferred shares and addition of cash were made. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 After the aforementioned adjustments, the range of values of SMPHI using the Income Approach is PHP358.2 billion to PHP420.8 billion or equivalent to PHP20.62 to PHP24.22 per share. Incom e approach - SMPHI PHP'M Enterprise value Less: Net debt Minority interest Preferred shares Equity value Number of outstanding shares Equity value per share Source: 6.1.2 5% grow th 400,644 41,358 1,055 358,231 17,374 20.62 6% grow th 431,202 41,358 1,055 388,790 17,374 22.38 7% grow th 463,232 41,358 1,055 420,820 17,374 24.22 SMPHI financial projections, MS&Co. analysis Market approach In using the Market approach, MS&Co. collated information relating to comparable publiclylisted companies operating in the same industry as SMPHI. In searching for comparable companies for SMPHI, MS&Co initially focused on the listed retail real estate companies in the Philippines. To determine the comparability of the firms in the initial list of property companies in the PSE, the two criteria used were: (1) the revenue composition of the company and (2) the scale of the companies’ operations as compared to SMPHI. With regard to the revenue composition, MS&Co. analyzed the operations of each of the property companies in the PSE and determined the significant contributors to their revenues. To be comparable with SMPHI, the firm’s revenues from shopping center operations or leasing of commercial spaces should be the largest contributor to its total revenues. From the 40 property-related companies in the PSE, only four companies were deemed comparable based on their revenue composition. After eliminating companies based on their revenue composition, the firms were then evaluated based on the scale of their operations. Companies which operate less than 10 malls were eliminated. Of the four, only Robinsons Land Corporation was able to meet this requirement with 32 malls as compared to the other companies with only one to five malls. Upon exhausting the companies in the Philippines, the Firm extended the search for comparable companies in the region. According to the Factiva database, there are three listed retail-oriented companies in the South East Asia and East Asia regions. These companies’ revenues are comprised of shopping center operations and leasing of commercial spaces and these companies have multiple shopping centers in their specific markets. Two of the companies, Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. and CapitaMalls Asia Ltd., have operations centered on high growth economies, Thailand and China. The other company, AEON Mall Co., Ltd., is focused on the Japanese region and was eliminated since its operations are primarily focused on the Japanese consumer market. The table below presents the summary of the CoCos selection process. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 CoCos selection Entity nam e SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Selected com panies Robinsons Land Corporation Central Pattana Public Co. Ltd. CapitaMalls Asia Ltd. Excluded CoCos (3 com panies) Mall operations have the largest revenue contributions 100.0% Malls operated should be m ore than 10 51 Majority of revenues from grow ing econom ies Philippines, China 47.6% 78.4% 99.2% All CoCos have mall operations as their largest revenue contributor 32 21 101 Eliminated local CoCos have three and five malls/commercial centers. Philippines Thailand China, Malaysia, India Eliminated CoCo has virtually all of its revenues sourced from Japan Source: Companies 2012 annual reports Under the Market approach, the price-to-earnings (“P/E”) multiple, the price-to-book (“P/B”) multiple and the enterprise value-to-EBITDA (“EV/EBITDA”) multiple were considered in valuing SMPHI. The respective earnings per share, book value per share, EV and EBITDA of the CoCos were computed from the latest available financial statements of the CoCos. The share prices used were based on the closing prices as of March 31, 2013. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 The calculations for SMPHI’s EPS, Book value per share and EBITDA per share is shown on the table below: SMPHI EPS, BVS and EBITDA per share Notes Earnings per share (PHP) Net income (In PHP'M) 1 Number of shares outstanding ('000) Earnings per share Book value per share Adjusted book value (In PHP'M) 2 Number of shares outstanding ('000) Book value per share EBITDA per share EBITDA (In PHP'M) 3 Number of shares outstanding ('000) EBITDA per share Note: Source: 11,279 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 17,373,678 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.65 72,706 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 17,373,678 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 4.18 20,632 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 17,373,678 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 1.19 (1) Annualized net income was computed by deducting 1Q12 net income and addition of 1Q13 net income (2) Minority interest was deducted to reflect book value attributable to SMPHI’s shareholders (3) Annualized EBITDA was computed by deducting 1Q12 EBITDA and addition of 1Q13 EBITDA March 31, 2013 unaudited FS; MS&Co. analysis The calculation for SMPHI’s value using the Market approach is shown on the table below. Market approach - CoCos Range of values per share Earnings per share Book value per share EBITDA per share Derived multiple Value per share (PHP) Range of values Range of values per share, before adjustments Number of shares ('000) Range of values, before adjustments Less: Net debt (PHP'M) Minority interest (PHP'M) Equity value (PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Equity value per share (PHP) Source: Weighted average P/E (x) P/B (x) EV/EBITDA (x) 0.65 4.18 1.19 22.66 4.17 17.49 14.71 17.47 20.77 17,373,678 17,373,678 17,373,678 N/A N/A 255,605 17,373,678 14.71 N/A N/A 303,488 17,373,678 17.47 41,358 1,055 318,525 17,373,678 18.33 MS&Co. analysis Presented below are the share prices as March 31, 2013 and its respective 30, 60 and 90 day volume-weighted average share price (“VWAP”) for SMPHI. Market approach - VWAP Closing price as of March 27, 2013 Prior to valuation date 30-day volume-w eighted average share price 60-day volume-w eighted average share price 90- day volume-w eighted average share price Source: Philippine Stock Exchange; MS&Co. analysis Share price 19.10 18.66 18.68 18.04 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6.2 Pre-merger valuation of SM Land 6.2.1 Post-tender offer scenario SM Land is in the process of conducting a tender offer on SMDC and HPI. After the tender offer transactions, the shareholdings of SM Land shall be as follows: Sum m ary of SM Land's holdings, post-tender offer Shares Ow ned by SM Land 5,314,876,492 9,271,204,239 2,246,244,622 900,000 2,999,300 204,000 SMPHI SMDC HPI ASSODECO Magenta SHDC Total outstanding shares 17,373,677,760 9,271,204,239 2,246,244,622 900,000 3,000,000 400,000 Ow nership 30.59% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.98% 51.00% Source: 2013 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis 6.2.2 Sum of the Parts Approach The valuation approach used for SM Land is the Sum of the Parts Method. Sum of the Parts was deemed as the most appropriate due to the following: x Diversity of the companies operating under the umbrella of SM Land. x SM Land records its investments at cost and does not consolidate the operations of its subsidiaries to its books. Thus, the standalone financial statements of SM Land may not be able to capture the actual operation and status of its subsidiaries. The operating companies under SM Land were first valued separately, using the appropriate valuation method/s. The separate values were then summed up to estimate the total intrinsic value of SM Land. Sum of the parts SM Land 30.59% 100.00% 100.00% SMPHI SMDC HPI 100.00% 99.98% ASSODECO Magenta 51.00% SHDC 100.00% Other Assets and Liabilities •Investment Properties •AFS investments •Investments in stocks •Others Source: 3M2013 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis x MS&Co. computed the values of the investments based on the most appropriate valuation method for each company. The valuation methods are as follows: SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 o The value of the investment in SMPHI is based on the Market and Income approach because the future cash flows are the main driver of SMPHI’s value, and it can be estimated using historical financial trends. o EV/EBITDA was selected as one of the methodologies to estimate the fair range of market values for SMPHI. Some of the comparable companies researched over the course of the valuation work have materially different gearing ratios compared to SMPHI and apply different accounting treatments. As such, MS&Co. selected EV/EBITDA as an appropriate multiple to be used as it generally does not take into account differences in leverage, amortization and tax treatment. Further, MS&Co. used the closing price as of March 27, 2013 and the 60-day weighted average volume price as this is the traded market value of SMPHI as of the Valuation date. o The Market and Cost approach was deemed most appropriate to estimate the fair value of SMDC because the company relies heavily on the sale of its inventory of real properties to generate its revenues. The value of SMDC is primarily driven by its asset base which primarily consists of raw land, condominium units for sale, and properties under development. o EV/EBITDA was selected as one of the appropriate multiples to estimate the fair range of market values for SMDC. EV/EBITDA multiple is generally not sensitive to differences in capital structures, depreciation and amortization policies, and tax treatments. In contrast, the P/E multiple will be sensitive to these differences. As such, MS&Co. considered the use of EV/EBITDA multiple instead of either the P/E or P/B multiples. The P/B multiple was not considered as an appropriate method to value SMDC because this multiple does not take into account the earnings potential of SMDC. Further, a large portion of SMDC’s assets is comprised of real properties which currently do not reflect the fair market values of the assets. o Actual observed market prices were also used and forms part of the range of values. The closing price as of March 27, 2013, the last trading day for the month, and the 60-day volume-weighted average prices from the Valuation Date were used. o For HPI, the Market approach was deemed most appropriate to estimate the company’s value, wherein the 60-day volume-weighted average prices from the Valuation Date were used. o The value of the investments in ASSODECO, Magenta, and SHDC are based on Cost approach. x All investment property assets recorded under the books of SM Land were adjusted to reflect the movement in fair market value as of the Cut-off Date. The fair market value was based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE. x The fair market values of AFS Investments and Investments in stocks of CBC, BDO, and SMIC are based on SM Land’s management computations. For the listed shares, the values were based on the stock exchange prices. For the PLDT shares owned by SM Land, the value was based on acquisition cost. x The investments in ASSODECO, Magenta, and SHDC were valued using the Cost approach. The fair values of ASSODECO’s investment property and Magenta’s PPE were based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 The following table summarizes the valuation approaches used to value the “parts” of SM Land: SOTP- SM Land fair range of values Minim um PHP'M Valuation basis Value Investm ent in subsidiaries and associates Investment in SMPHI Market approach 97,441.6 Investment in SMDC Market approach 62,757.2 Investment in HPI Market approach 5,045.0 Investments ASODECO Cost approach 300.4 Investments Magenta Cost approach 394.4 Investments SHDC Cost approach 3.6 Other assets Investment properties CBRE valuation 81,427.9 AFS Investments SM Land Management 11,063.9 Investments in stocks (CBC, BDO, SMIC) SM Land Management 10,873.2 Others Book value 4,121.3 Liabilities Total liabilities Book value 10,035.4 Sum of the parts 263,393.2 Numbers of shares outstanding 39,001,970 Valuation range (PHP per share) 6,753.33 Maxim um Valuation basis Income approach Cost approach Market approach Cost approach Cost approach Cost approach CBRE valuation SM Land Management SM Land Management Book value Book value Value 128,735.2 91,289.8 6,147.5 300.4 394.4 3.6 81,427.9 11,063.9 10,873.2 4,121.3 10,035.4 324,321.9 39,001,970 8,315.53 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 6.2.3 Valuation of SM Prime Holdings Inc. After the tender offer by SM Land for HPI and SMDC shares (using SMPHI shares), SM Land shall own 30.59% of SMPHI. The value of the investment on SMPHI based on the Income approach is PHP109.6 billion and PHP128.7 billion, based on revenue growth rate assumptions of 5.0% and 7.0%, respectively. The table below presents the summary of values. Valuation range of SM Land's investm ent in SMPHI PHP'M Total equity value SM Land's ow nership percentage Valuation range Minim um value Basis Value Market approach 318,524.5 30.59% 97,442 Maxim um value Basis Value Income approach 420,819.7 30.59% 128,735 Source: 2012 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis Please refer to Section 6.1 of this report, for further details on the valuation of SMPHI. 6.2.4 Valuation of SM Development Corporation After the tender offer by SM Land for SMDC shares, SM Land shall own 100.0% of SMDC. The table below summarizes the range of values of SMDC. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Valuation results - SMDC Cost approach Market approach EV / EBITDA - w eighted average Closing price as of March 27, 2013 60-day volume w eighted average share price Valuation range Per share (PHP) 9.85 Total (PHP'M) 91,290 6.77 8.47 8.22 6.77 to 9.85 62,757 78,527 76,228 62,757 to 91,290 Source: 2012 schedule of Investments in Stocks; MS&Co. Analysis Cost Approach The following table summarizes the computation for SMDC net asset value per share as of the Valuation Date, using the Cost approach. Cost approach Am ounts in PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Adjustment to reflect fair value of properties Fair value of available-for-sale securities Carrying value of available-for-sale securities Adjusted fair value of real estate properties Carrying value as of March 31, 2013 Condominium units for sale Land and development Investment properties Advances for project development Adjusted NAV Number of shares outstanding NAV per share Source: 13-Mar-13 85,253 42,960 42,293 6,280 5,762 519 86,131 1,596 31,666 724 3,667 37,653 48,478 91,290 9,271,204,239 9.85 Unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2013; CBRE master property list; MS&Co. analysis Under the Cost approach, assets and liabilities with available fair market values are markedto-market. x All real estate assets recorded under the books of SMDC were adjusted to reflect the movement in fair market value. x The fair market value was based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE using various valuation methods, namely the market data approach and income approach. x According to management, only available-for-sale investments and held for trading investments are subject to market valuation. Listed shares classified as available-for – sale investments are stated at fair market value. For shares of Tagaytay Resort Dev’t. Corp. (“TRDC”), MS&Co. adjusted the value based on MS&Co. valuation. MS&Co. used the Cost approach in valuing TRDC. The table below presents the breakdown of available-for-sale investments. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Available for sale investm ents Com pany Listed shares Highlands Prime, Inc. Belle Corporation Shang Properties, Inc. Export and Industry Bank, Inc.1 Keppel Philippines Holding, Inc. Picop Resources, Inc.2 Republic Glass Holdings Corporation Benguet Corporation Unlisted shares Tagaytay Resort Dev't. Corp. Total Note: Source: Carrying value as of 3M2013 (In PHP'M) Num ber of shares 770 4,193 652 2 15 8 54 2 337,911,101 735,553,561 189,550,548 7,829,000 3,035,836 40,000,000 19,216,512 88,919 66 5,762 105,000 Latest share price (In PHP) 2.28 5.70 3.44 0.26 5.05 0.21 2.80 17.70 5,565.70 FMV as of 3M2013 (In PHP'M) 770 4,193 652 2 15 8 54 2 584 6,280 (1) Latest available share price is as of May 8, 2009 (2) Latest available share price is as of May 26, 2008 Available-for-sale schedule as of March 31, 2013 provided by management; PSE; MS&Co. analysis The table below presents the appraised values of properties excluded in determining fair market value of SMDC’s real properties. Adjustm ents to the approxim ate FMV as of 3M2013 Property Makati Home Depot 102 EDSA Realty Corp. Total Source: Appraised values (In PHP'M) 1,602 1,269 2,871 Details Classified under deposits account Classified under deposits account CBRE appraisal as of February 28, 2013; SMDC management The adjusted fair market value of SMDC’s real properties is shown below: Adjusted fair m arket value of real properties as of March 31, 2013 (In PHP'M) Approximate FMV as of 3M2103 Adjustments Adjusted FMV of real properties as of 3M2013 Source: 89,002 2,871 86,131 CBRE appraisal as of February 28, 2013; SMDC management; MS&Co. analysis Market approach or capitalized earnings approach In using the Market approach, MS&Co. gathered information relating to comparable publiclylisted companies operating in the same industry as SMDC. The CoCos were selected based on the nature of their business and the company structure. In addition to SMDC, there are 39 property companies listed in the PSE. Out of the 39, 20 companies are engaged in the sale of real estate. From the 20 companies, the list of comparable companies were evaluated and then chosen based on the following: x Majority (more than 50%) of the companies’ operating revenues should be derived from real estate sales x Suite of products should include affordable to mid-end residential units SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 x Assets and operating revenues of the company should be relatively similar to SMDC’s asset and operating revenue levels After considering the criteria listed above, MS&Co. identified Filinvest Land, Inc. (“FLI”) and Vista Land and Lifescapes, Inc. (“VLL”) as comparable companies. The table below presents the summary of the CoCos selection process. SMDC CoCos Selection Products include affordable to m idend residential units Yes Operating Total assets as of revenues as of Decem ber 31, Decem ber 31, 2012 2012 (In PHP) (In PHP) 21,578,437,825 80,197,847,563 Developm ent type Revenue m ix Mid-market residential units 100% real estate sales Affordable, midend and highend residential units Affordable, midVLI end and highend residential units Affordable, midExcluded end and highCoCos (18 com panies) end units 83.2% real estate sales Yes 10,575,688,000 81,927,264,000 99.9% real estate sales Yes 16,359,932,258 74,331,429,608 All CoCos derive majority of their operating revenues from real estate sales 14 out of the 17 CoCos sell affordable to mid-end residential units Entity nam e SMDC Selected FLI Note: Source: Range below SMDC's level: PHP15.3 million to PHP8.80 billion Range below SMDC's level PHP0.48 billion to PHP35.97 billion Range above SMDC's level: PHP25.37 billion to 49.0 billion Range above SMDC's level: PHP142.72 billion to PHP231.23 billion Operating revenues and asset figures were based on CoCos 2012 annual reports (latest available full-year financial information) SMDC and CoCos 2012 annual reports; CoCos websites Under the Market approach, MS&Co. considered the price-to-earnings (“P/E”) multiple, the price-to-book (“P/B”) multiple and the enterprise value-to-EBITDA (“EV/EBITDA”) multiple in valuing SMDC. The respective earnings per share, book value per share and EBITDA of the CoCos were lifted from the Philippine Stock Exchange and quarterly reports as of March 31, 2013 of CoCos. The share prices used were based on the closing prices as of March 31, 2013. The calculation for SMDC’s value using the Market approach is shown on the table below. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 SMDC EPS, BVS and EBITDA per share Notes Earnings per share (PHP) Net income (In PHP'M) 1 Number of shares outstanding ('000) Earnings per share Book value per share Book value (In PHP'M) Number of shares outstanding ('000) Book value per share EBITDA per share EBITDA (In PHP'M)2 Number of shares outstanding ('000) EBITDA per share Note: Source: 5,053 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 9,271,204 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.55 42,293 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 9,271,204 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 4.56 5,656 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 9,271,204 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.61 (1) LTM net income = December 2012 net income – March 2012 net income + March 2013 net income (2) LTM EBITDA = December 2012 EBITDA – March 2012 EBITDA + March 2013 EBITDA MS&Co. analysis Market approach - CoCos Range of values per share P/E (x) Earnings per share 0.55 Book value per share EBITDA per share Derived multiple (w eighted average) 11.61 Value per share (PHP) 6.33 Range of values Range of values per share, before adjustments Number of shares (in millions) 9,271 Range of values, before adjustments Less: Net debt (PHP'M) N/A Minority interest (PHP'M) N/A Preferred shares (PHP'M) N/A Equity value (PHP'M) 58,674 Number of shares (in millions) 9,271 Equity value per share (PHP) 6.33 Source: P/B (x) EV/EBITDA (x) 4.56 1.02 4.66 0.61 14.29 8.72 9,271 9,271 N/A N/A N/A 43,207 9,271 4.66 18,086 0 0 62,757 9,271 6.77 MS&Co. analysis Presented below are the share prices as of March 31, 2013 and its respective 30, 60 and 90 day volume-weighted average share price (“VWAP”) for SMDC. The VWAP computations were based on the closing price for the day and the total volume traded for the day. Market approach - VWAP Closing price as of March 27, 2013 Prior to valuation date 30-day volume w eighted average share price 60-day volume w eighted average share price 90- day volume w eighted average share price Source: PSE; MS&Co. analysis Per share 8.47 8.30 8.22 7.85 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6.2.5 Valuation of Highlands Prime, Inc After the tender offer by SM Land for HPI shares, SM Land shall own 100.0% of HPI. The value the HPI investment based on its 60-day volume-weighted average price is PHP5.5 billion. The table below summarizes the range of values for HPI. Valuation results (HPI) Per share (PHP) Market approach EV/ EBITDA - w eighted average Closing price as of March 27, 2013 60-day volume-w eighted average share price Valuation range Source: 2.25 2.28 2.74 2.25 to 2.74 Total (PHP'M) 5,045 5,121 6,148 5,045 to 6,148 MS&Co. Analysis In using the Market approach, MS&Co. collated information relating to comparable publiclylisted companies operating in the same industry as HPI. The CoCos were selected based on the nature of their business and the company structure. In addition to HPI, there are 39 property companies listed in the PSE. Out of the 39, MS&Co. have identified 20 companies engaged in the sale of real estate. From the 20 companies, MS&Co. selected the comparables based on the following criteria: x Company’s product should include high-end residential units x Residential development projects are proximate with each other within a particular area x Majority of revenues should come from real estate sales x Total assets and revenues of the company should be relatively close to HPI’s asset and real estate sales levels After considering the criteria listed above, MS&Co. have identified Arthaland Corporation (“ALCO”), Anchor Land Holdings, Inc. (“ALHI”) and Primex Corporation (“PRMX”) as CoCos. The table below presents the summary of the CoCos selection process. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 HPI CoCos selection Real estate sales for the Total assets level as Areas covered by of Decem ber 31, 2012 residential Operating revenue year ended Decem ber 31, 2012 (in PHP) m ix Entity nam e Developm ent type developm ent (in PHP) HPI High-end residential Tagaytay, Batangas 100% from real and leisure and Cavite estate sales 521,486,405 4,038,398,665 95.0% from real estate sales; 5.0 % from rental income & management fees 3,597,270,307 (6.90 times bigger than HPI) 13,321,353,770 (3.30 times bigger than HPI) 100% from real estate sales 1,453,263,809 (2.79 times bigger than HPI) 3,641,388,604 (0.90 times smaller than HPI) 11,605,430 (0.02 times smaller than HPI) 478,248,589 (0.12 times smaller than HPI) PHP0.3 billion to PHP32.3 billion PHP4.2 billion to PHP231.2 billion Selected CoCos Old Manila, Binonodo, Ermita, Paranaque, San Juan ALHI Mainly high-end residential and commercial ALCO Middle and high-end residential, Taguig commercial and leisure PRMX High-end residential Mix of low -end, middle, and high-end Excluded CoCos (17 residential, leisure, com panies) commercial, and industrial Malabon and Antipolo May be w ithin a certain area or spread across various locations 75.9% from real estate sales; 24.1% from rental income All CoCos derived majority (more than 50.0%) of their operating income from real estate sales Note: Operating revenues and asset figures were based on CoCos 2012 annual reports (latest available full-year financial information) Source: 2012 Annual Report of the 18 identified CoCos; MS&Co. analysis Under the Market approach, MS&Co. considered the price-to-earnings (“P/E”) multiple, the price-to-book (“P/B”) multiple and the Enterprise value-to-EBITDA (“EV/EBITDA”) multiple in valuing HPI. The respective earnings per share, book value per share and EBITDA of the CoCos were lifted from their respective financial statements. The share prices used were based on the closing prices as of 3M2013. MS&CO.’s calculation for HPI’s value using the Market approach is shown on the table below. HPI EPS, BVS and EBITDA per share Notes Earnings per share (PHP) Net income (in PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Earnings per share (PHP) Book value per share (PHP) Total equity (in PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Book value per share (PHP) EBITDA per share (PHP) EBITDA (in PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) EBITDA per share (PHP) Note: Source: 36 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 2,246,245 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.02 2,759 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 2,246,245 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 1.23 91 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 2,246,245 March 31, 2013 unaudited FS 0.04 (1) LTM net income = December 2012 net income – March 2012 net income + March 2013 net income (2) LTM EBITDA = December 2012 EBITDA – March 2012 EBITDA + March 2013 EBITDA MS&Co. analysis SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 Market approach - CoCos (HPI) Weighted average P/E (x) P/B (x) EV/EBITDA (x) Range of values per share Earnings per share Book value per share EBITDA per share Derived multiple Value per share (PHP/share) Range of values Number of shares ('000) Less: Net debt (PHP'M) Minority interest (PHP'M) Capital stock - preferred (PHP'M) Equity value (PHP'M) Number of shares ('000) Equity value per share(PHP) 0.02 1.23 90.11 1.43 3.11 3.82 0.04 63.51 2.58 2,246,245 N/A N/A N/A 3,214 2,246,245 1.43 2,246,245 N/A N/A N/A 8,573 2,246,245 3.82 2,246,245 756 5,045 2,246,245 2.25 Source: Interim financial statements of HPI as of 3M 2013; Capital IQ; MS&Co. analysis Presented below are the share prices as of March 31, 2013 and its respective 30, 60 and 90 day volume-weighted average share price (“VWAP”) for HPI. The VWAP computations were based on the closing price for the day and the total volume traded for the day. Market approach - VWAP (HPI ) Closing price as of March 27, 2013 Prior to valuation date 30-day volume-w eighted average share price 60-day volume-w eighted average share price 90-day volume-w eighted average share price 6.2.6 Share price 2.28 2.20 2.75 2.64 Valuation of ASSODECO As of March 31, 2013, SM Land owns 100.00% of ASSODECO. The total value of the investments in ASSODECO is PHP300.4 million. The summary of the fair value of ASSODECO is as follows: ASSODECO- Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Add: Adjustment to reflect the fair value of properties Adjusted NAV Percentage ow nership Total value of investm ent in ASSODECO 3M2013 221.0 311.1 (90.1) 390.6 300.4 100.0% 300.4 Source: 3M2013 ASSODECO Unaudited Statement of Financial Position; CBRE appraisal report; MS&Co. Analysis Assets and liabilities are based on the book values as presented in the unaudited March 31, 2013 statement of financial position. The upward adjustment is meant to adjust the book value of an investment property from PHP 191.4 million to its fair market value of PHP582.0 million. The fair market value is based on the valuation of CBRE using the income approach. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6.2.7 Valuation of Magenta As of March 31, 2013, SM Land owns 99.98% of Magenta. The value of the investment in Magenta is PHP394.4 million. The summary of the fair value of Magenta is as follows: Magenta- Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities Unadjusted NAV Add: Adjustment to reflect the fair value of properties Adjusted NAV Percentage ow nership Total value of investm ent in Magenta 3M2013 293.4 19.4 274.0 120.5 394.5 100.0% 394.4 Source: 3M2013 Magenta Unaudited Statement of Financial Position; CBRE appraisal report; MS&Co. Analysis Assets and liabilities are based on the book values as presented in the unaudited March 31, 2013 statement of financial position. The upward adjustment is meant to adjust the book value of an property plant and equipment from PHP276.7 million to its fair market value of PHP397.2 million. The fair market value is based on the valuation of CBRE using the cost approach. 6.2.8 Valuation of SHDC As of March 31, 2013, SM land owns 51.00% of SHDC. The total equity value of SHDC is PHP7.1 million and the total value of the investment in SHDC is PHP3.6 million. The summary of the fair value of SHDC is as follows: SHDC- Cost approach PHP'M Total assets Total liabilities NAV Percentage ow nership Total value of investm ent in SHDC 3M2013 457.6 450.5 7.1 51.0% 3.6 Source: 3M2013 SHDC Unaudited Statement of Financial Position; MS&Co. Analysis Assets and liabilities are based on the book values as presented in the unaudited March 31, 2013 statement of financial position. SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6.2.9 Other SM Land assets The summary of the fair value of other assets is as follows: Fair values of SM Land's properties PHP'M Investm ent properties AFS investm ents Ayala Corp. PLDT Prime Media Holdings Others Allow ance for impairment Total AFS investments Investm ents in stocks BDO CBC SMIC Total investments in stocks Others Cash and cash equivalents Receivables Other current assets Property and equipment- net Net pension asset Other non-current assets Total other assets Total Basis CBRE Valuation Fair value 81,427.9 Managament schedules Managament schedules Managament schedules Managament schedules 11,059.1 3.1 0.9 0.8 (0.1) 11,063.9 Managament schedules Managament schedules Managament schedules 6,750.3 3,688.5 434.4 10,873.2 Book value Book value Book value Book value Book value Book value 727.5 2,745.6 379.6 197.8 17.2 53.6 4,121.3 107,486.3 Source: CBRE appraisal report; 3M2013 Schedule of Investments; 3M2013 Schedule of AFS; MS&Co. Analysis The fair market values of investment properties are based on the appraisal reports prepared by CBRE, while the fair market values of AFS investments and investments in stocks of CBC, BDO, and SMIC are based on SM Land’s management computations. For the listed shares, the values were based on the stock exchange prices. For the PLDT shares owned by SM Land, the value was based on acquisition cost. The allowance for impairment pertaining to the AFS investments pertains to the cost of club shares in the books of SM Land but the certificates are not in the name of the company. 52 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6.2.10 Sum of the parts summary The fair range of values for SM Land using the SOTP approach is PHP263.4 billion and PHP324.3 billion or PHP6,753.33 and PHP8,315.53 per share. The summary is as follows: SOTP- SM Land fair range of values Minim um PHP'M Valuation basis Value Investm ent in subsidiaries and associates Investment in SMPHI Market approach 97,441.6 Investment in SMDC Market approach 62,757.2 Investment in HPI Market approach 5,045.0 Investments ASODECO Cost approach 300.4 Investments Magenta Cost approach 394.4 Investments SHDC Cost approach 3.6 Other assets Investment properties CBRE valuation 81,427.9 AFS Investments SM Land Management 11,063.9 Investments in stocks (CBC, BDO, SMIC) SM Land Management 10,873.2 Others Book value 4,121.3 Liabilities Total liabilities Book value 10,035.4 Sum of the parts 263,393.2 Numbers of shares outstanding 39,001,970 Valuation range (PHP per share) 6,753.33 Maxim um Valuation basis Income approach Cost approach Market approach Cost approach Cost approach Cost approach CBRE valuation SM Land Management SM Land Management Book value Book value Value 128,735.2 91,289.8 6,147.5 300.4 394.4 3.6 81,427.9 11,063.9 10,873.2 4,121.3 10,035.4 324,321.9 39,001,970 8,315.53 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 53 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 6.3 Post-merger valuation of SMPHI The value of SMPHI after the merger with SM Land is the sum of the pre-merger value of SMPHI and pre-merger value of SM Land, less the remaining investment of SM Land in SMPHI. Deducting the investment in SMPHI shall avoid double counting, since this represents reciprocal holdings. Post-merger structure of SMPHI SM Land’s SMPHI investment SM Land in SMPHI Source: MS&Co. Analysis The table below presents the post-merger value of SMPHI. Valuation results of SMPHI post-m erger as of March 31, 2013 PHP'M Sum of the parts SM Prime Holdings, Inc. SM Land, Inc. Less: Ow nership of SM Land in SMPHI Post-merger valuation of SMPHI Number of shares (in millions) Price per share Minim um Valuation approach Market approach Sum of the Parts Market approach Values 318,525 263,393 (97,442) 484,476 26,475 18.30 Maxim um Valuation approach Income approach Sum of the Parts Income approach Values 420,820 324,322 (128,735) 616,406 26,475 23.28 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 54 SM Investments Corporation Fairness Opinion Report May 30, 2013 7 Conclusion and Fairness Opinion 7.1 The fair range of values for SM Land using the SOTP approach is PHP275.9 billion and PHP355.0 billion or PHP14,147.20 and PHP18,206.56 per share. The summary is as follows: Valuation results of the target com panies PHP Valuation Date SM Hotels and Conventions, Corp. March 31, 2013 Prime Metro Estate Corp. March 31, 2013 Costa del Hamilo, Inc. March 31, 2013 Tagaytay Resort and Development Corp. March 31, 2013 SM Arena Complex Corp. March 31, 2013 Total values of the com panies to be acquired by SMPHI Per Share (PHP) 461,337.29 2,635.45 735.38 5,565.70 1,034.23 Total (PHP) 1,153,343,213 7,149,969,000 3,057,348,442 1,753,196,723 413,693,822 13,527,551,199 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 7.2 Presented below are the fair values of the SMIC properties included in the transaction SMIC properties - appraised values PHP'M Taal Vista Hotel Radisson Cebu Hotel Pico Sands Hotel SMX Convention Center MoA Arena MoA Arena Annex Corporate Office Casino and Waste Water Treatment Plant (located at tagaytay lot ow ned by Tagaytay Resort Devt Corp) Tagaytay EDSA West Ongoing Project - Park Inn Davao Total Valuation used Cost Cost DCF Cost Cost Cost Cost Appraised value 2,014 2,375 704 1,608 3,369 1,673 895 DCF 861 2,034 209 594 16,336 Market data Market data Cost Source: CBRE appraisal report as of February 28, 2013 7.3 Presented below are the valuation results of SMPHI. Valuation results of SMPHI post-m erger as of March 31, 2013 PHP'M Sum of the parts SM Prime Holdings, Inc. SM Land, Inc. Less: Ow nership of SM Land in SMPHI Post-merger valuation of SMPHI Number of shares (in millions) Price per share Minim um Valuation approach Market approach Sum of the Parts Market approach Values 318,525 263,393 (97,442) 484,476 26,475 18.30 Maxim um Valuation approach Income approach Sum of the Parts Income approach Values 420,820 324,322 (128,735) 616,406 26,475 23.28 Source: MS&Co. Analysis 7.4 Given the above fair range of values, the estimated ratio for the share-for-share swap transactions are as follows: 55 Presented to: SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations As of: 28 February 2013 SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION 10th Floor One E-Com Center Harbour Drive, Mall of Asia Complex Pasay City, Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: Ms. Ruby LL. Cano Senior Vice President - Controllership -------------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of eighteen (18) assets at various Philippine locations, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with SM Prime Holdings, Inc.'s proposed acquisition of certain real property assets and companies owned by SM Investments Corporation. The property appraised consists of land, buildings, other land improvements and building machinery & equipment. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into three (3) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; Development Properties; and Land (portion with investment). Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; Development Properties are properties which are still in development phase and not yet completed; while Land (portion with investment) pertains to large tracts of land with a section having a completed development and a section still vacant. The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Office, Hospitality and Convention Center while the Development Properties are sub-categorized as Office. We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value Valuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Office Hospitality Convention Center PhP2,568,000,000 6,548,093,000 4,977,320,000 -----------------------PhP14,093,413,000 Total for Investment Properties Development Properties Office PhP209,000,000 Land (portion with investment) PhP2,034,000,000 -----------------------PhP16,336,413,000 =========== TOTAL The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land and cost approach for improved properties. Income approach, both Direct Capitalization Method and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, was likewise adopted for income generating properties. Briefly describing the valuation methods used, the Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution, which holds that an informed buyer would not pay more for a given property than the cost of buying an equally desirable alternative. The methodology of the Cost Approach is a set of procedures that estimate the current reproduction cost of the improvements, then deducting accrued depreciation from all sources, and adding the value of the land. The Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. The Income Approach is based on the premise that the value of a property is directly related to the income it generates. This approach converts anticipated future gains to present worth by projecting reasonable income and expenses for the subject property. The Income Capitalization Approach is considered appropriate for valuing investment properties, as it mirrors the analysis of typical investors. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 Under the Income Approach, we have adopted both the Direct Capitalization Method and the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, briefly described below. In Direct Capitalization Method, a one year net operating income forecast is divided by an overall rate. All parameters of a typical investor return expectations are represented either explicitly or implicitly in either income forecast or the capitalization rate. These expectations include current operating income and cash flow, income growth, the security of that income and equity build up through amortization. The direct capitalization rate, as the ratio of income to value, serves as a proxy for investor return assumptions. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, on the other hand, is a form of analysis that allows an investor or owner to make an assessment of the longterm return that is likely to be derived from a property with a combination of rental and capital growth over an assumed investment horizon. In undertaking this analysis, a wide range of assumptions are made including base rental, rental growth, statutory and operating expenses, and sale price and disposal of the property at the end of the investment period. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility or investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City, Philippines As of: 28 February 2013 TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. 10/F Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building Coral Way corner J.W. Diokno Boulevard Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: Ms. Ruby LL. Cano Senior Vice President - Controllership -------------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for certain real estate property located in Tagaytay City, Philippines, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with SM Prime Holdings, Inc.'s proposed acquisition of certain real property assets and companies owned by SM Investments Corporation. The property appraised consists of land only. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. Part of the land is actually improved. The improvements, however, are owned by the tenant and were valued under a separate cover. For purposes of this report, the subject land is categorized as “Land (portion with investment)”. We confirm that we have inspected the site in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Land (portion with investment) - PhP2,377,000,000 =========== The value reflected herein is as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach since the property covers land only. Briefly describing the valuation method used, the Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. TAGAYTAY RESORT & DEVELOPMENT CORP. Tagaytay City 28 February 2013 Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations As of: 28 February 2013 SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. 10/F Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building Coral Way corner J.W. Diokno Boulevard Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: Ms. Teresa Cecilia H. Reyes Vice President - Finance -------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of seventy (70) assets at various Philippine and China locations, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with the proposed merger of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and SM Land, Inc. The property appraised consists of land, leasehold rights on land, buildings, other land improvements and building machinery & equipment. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into three (3) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; Development Properties; and Rawland. Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; Development Properties are properties which are still in development phase and not yet completed; while Rawland pertains to vacant lots (land bank). The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Retail while the Development Properties are subcategorized as Retail and Residential. We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. For the leasehold rights on the land, our valuation wishes to establish the Leasehold Value or Lessee’s Interest, which is defined to mean as “the estimated value of a leasehold interest, that is, right to the use, enjoinment and profit existing by virtue of the rights granted under a lease instrument. The value of the leasehold interest is the present (discounted) worth of the rent savings when the contractual rent at the time of the appraisal is less than the current market rent.” 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases Valuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3.0 Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Retail PhP341,468,369,000 Development Properties Retail Residential PhP17,320,771,000 2,003,100,000 -----------------------PhP19,323,871,000 Total for Development Properties Rawland TOTAL 16,196,200,000 ------------------------PhP376,988,440,000 ============ The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land and cost approach for improved properties. Income approach, both Direct Capitalization Method and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, was likewise adopted for income generating properties. Briefly describing the valuation methods used, the Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution, which holds that an informed buyer would not pay more for a given property than the cost of buying an equally desirable alternative. The methodology of the Cost Approach is a set of procedures that estimate the current reproduction cost of the improvements, then deducting accrued depreciation from all sources, and adding the value of the land. The Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. The Income Approach is based on the premise that the value of a property is directly related to the income it generates. This approach converts anticipated future gains to present worth by projecting reasonable income and expenses for the subject property. The Income Capitalization Approach is considered appropriate for valuing investment properties, as it mirrors the analysis of typical investors. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 Under the Income Approach, we have adopted both the Direct Capitalization Method and the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, briefly described below. In Direct Capitalization Method, a one year net operating income forecast is divided by an overall rate. All parameters of a typical investor return expectations are represented either explicitly or implicitly in either income forecast or the capitalization rate. These expectations include current operating income and cash flow, income growth, the security of that income and equity build up through amortization. The direct capitalization rate, as the ratio of income to value, serves as a proxy for investor return assumptions. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, on the other hand, is a form of analysis that allows an investor or owner to make an assessment of the longterm return that is likely to be derived from a property with a combination of rental and capital growth over an assumed investment horizon. In undertaking this analysis, a wide range of assumptions are made including base rental, rental growth, statutory and operating expenses, and sale price and disposal of the property at the end of the investment period. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. Wherever possible, we have personally inspected the properties covered by this valuation. However, due to the nature of ongoing construction and condominium projects partly completed or under completion, we were not able to conduct full detailed inspection of building or unit interiors. In accordance with the International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC), our valuations were based on all relevant documents necessary to arrive at our opinion of value. We have relied to a considerable extent on information provided to us such as building plans, completion status of ongoing project or development including type or characteristics of units for sale, inventory of developed, saleable units, land or floor area. It is our opinion however that although the valuation is limited, the results are reliable and credible for its intended purpose and use. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Various Philippine and China locations 28 February 2013 For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 11 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations As of: 28 February 2013 SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 SM LAND, INC. 10th Floor One E-Com Center Harbour Drive, Mall of Asia Complex Pasay City, Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: MS. GEMA ONG CHENG Senior Vice President – Finance SM Investments Corporation Thru: Mr. Gil C. Somblingo Senior Asst. Vice President – Controllership/SM Land -------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of thirty (30) assets at various Philippine locations, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with the proposed merger of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and SM Land, Inc. The property appraised consists of land, leasehold rights on land, buildings, other land improvements and building machinery & equipment. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into four (4) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; Development Properties; Land (portion with investment); and Rawland. Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; Development Properties are properties which are still in development phase and not yet completed; Land (portion with investment) are large tracts of land with a section having a completed development and a section still vacant; while Rawland pertains to vacant lots (land bank). The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Retail, Office, Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 Industrial and Ferry/Breakwater while the Development Properties are sub-categorized as Office, Hospitality and Ferry/Breakwater. We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. For the leasehold rights on the land, our valuation wishes to establish the Leasehold Value or Lessee’s Interest, which is defined to mean as “the estimated value of a leasehold interest, that is, right to the use, enjoinment and profit existing by virtue of the rights granted under a ;lease instrument. The value of the leasehold interest is the present (discounted) worth of the rent savings when the contractual rent at the time of the appraisal is less than the current market rent.” 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Retail PhP11,674,436,000 Office 8,081,014,000 Industrial 2,659,703,000 Ferry/Breakwater 86,697,000 -----------------------Total for Investment Properties PhP22,501,850,000 Development Properties Office Hospitality Ferry/Breakwater PhP540,877,000 395,000,000 35,555,000 --------------------PhP971,432,000 Total for Development Properties Land (portion with investment) PhP58,772,000,000 Rawland PhP161,800,000 ----------------------PhP82,407,082,000 =========== TOTAL The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land and cost approach for improved properties. Income approach, both Direct Capitalization Method and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, was likewise adopted for income generating properties. Briefly describing the valuation methods used, the Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution, which holds that an informed buyer would not pay more for a given property than the cost of buying an equally desirable alternative. The methodology of the Cost Approach is a set of procedures that estimate the current reproduction cost of the improvements, then deducting accrued depreciation from all sources, and adding the value of the land. The Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. The Income Approach is based on the premise that the value of a property is directly related to the income it generates. This approach converts anticipated future gains to present worth by projecting reasonable income and expenses for the subject property. The Income Capitalization Approach is considered appropriate for valuing investment properties, as it mirrors the analysis of typical investors. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 Under the Income Approach, we have adopted both the Direct Capitalization Method and the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, briefly described below. In Direct Capitalization Method, a one year net operating income forecast is divided by an overall rate. All parameters of a typical investor return expectations are represented either explicitly or implicitly in either income forecast or the capitalization rate. These expectations include current operating income and cash flow, income growth, the security of that income and equity build up through amortization. The direct capitalization rate, as the ratio of income to value, serves as a proxy for investor return assumptions. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, on the other hand, is a form of analysis that allows an investor or owner to make an assessment of the longterm return that is likely to be derived from a property with a combination of rental and capital growth over an assumed investment horizon. In undertaking this analysis, a wide range of assumptions are made including base rental, rental growth, statutory and operating expenses, and sale price and disposal of the property at the end of the investment period. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. Wherever possible, we have personally inspected the properties covered by this valuation. However, due to the nature of ongoing construction and condominium projects partly completed or under completion, we were not able to conduct full detailed inspection of building or unit interiors. In accordance with the International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC), our valuations were based on all relevant documents necessary to arrive at our opinion of value. We have relied to a considerable extent on information provided to us such as building plans, completion status of ongoing project or development including type or characteristics of units for sale, inventory of developed, saleable units, land or floor area. It is our opinion however that although the valuation is limited, the results are reliable and credible for its intended purpose and use. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM LAND, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 11 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: SM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Various Philippine locations As of: 28 February 2013 SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 SM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 10th Floor One E-Com Center Harbour Drive, Mall of Asia Complex Pasay City, Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: MS. GEMA ONG CHENG Senior Vice President – Finance SM Investments Corporation Thru: Mr. Joel T. Ong Vice President - Controllership -----------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of sixty-three (63) assets at various Philippine locations, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with SM Land's proposed acquisition of a 100% stake in SM Development Corporation. The property appraised consists of land and condominium projects. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into three (3) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; Development Properties; and Rawland. Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; Development Properties are properties which are still in development phase and not yet completed; while Rawland pertains to vacant lots (land bank). The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Residential while the Development Properties are also sub-categorized as Residential. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaValuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 formaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Residential PhP3,949,937,000 Development Properties Residential 44,295,975,000 Rawland 43,053,930,000 ----------------------PhP91,299,842,000 =========== TOTAL The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land and condominium projects. Income approach (Residual Method) was likewise adopted for some vacant lots. Briefly describing the valuation methods used, the Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. The Income Approach is based on the premise that the value of a property is directly related to the income it generates. This approach converts anticipated future gains to present worth by projecting reasonable income and expenses for the subject property. The Income Capitalization Approach is considered appropriate for valuing investment properties, as it mirrors the analysis of typical investors. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. Wherever possible, we have personally inspected the properties covered by this valuation. However, due to the nature of ongoing construction and condominium projects partly completed or under completion, we were not able to conduct full detailed inspection of building or unit interiors. In accordance with the International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC), our valuations were based on all relevant documents necessary to arrive at our opinion of value. We have relied to a considerable extent on information provided to us such as building plans, completion status of ongoing project or development including type or characteristics of units for sale, inventory of developed, saleable units, land or floor area. It is our opinion however that although the valuation is limited, the results are reliable and credible for its intended purpose and use. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. SM DEVELOPMENT CORP. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations As of: 28 February 2013 PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION 10th Floor One E-Com Center Harbour Drive, Mall of Asia Complex Pasay City, Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: MS. GEMA ONG CHENG Senior Vice President – Finance SM Investments Corporation Thru: Mr. Gil C. Somblingo Senior Asst. Vice President – Project Audit Group ------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of fifteen (15) assets at various Philippine locations, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with SM Prime Holdings, Inc.'s proposed acquisition of certain real property assets and companies owned by SM Investments Corporation. The property appraised consists of land, buildings and other land improvements. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into two (2) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; and Rawland. Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; while Rawland pertains to vacant lots (land bank). The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Retail. We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde Valuation & Advisory Services foam Page 3 insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Retail PhP4,563,000,000 Rawland 540,446,000 ---------------------PhP5,103,446,000 =========== TOTAL The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land and cost approach for improved properties. Briefly describing the valuation methods used, the Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution, which holds that an informed buyer would not pay more for a given property than the cost of buying an equally desirable alternative. The methodology of the Cost Approach is a set of procedures that estimate the current reproduction cost of the improvements, then deducting accrued depreciation from all sources, and adding the value of the land. The Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. PRIME METRO ESTATE CORPORATION Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas Philippines As of: 28 February 2013 COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. 10th Floor One E-Com Center Harbour Drive, Mall of Asia Complex Pasay City, Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: MS. GEMA ONG CHENG Senior Vice President – Finance SM Investments Corporation Thru: MS. EVANGELINE R. ENDAY Assistant Vice President --------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of fifteen (15) assets in Nasugbu, Batangas, Philippines, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with SM Prime Holdings, Inc.'s proposed acquisition of certain real property assets and companies owned by SM Investments Corporation. The property appraised consists of land, condominium projects and clubshares. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into two (2) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; and Rawland. Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; while Rawland pertains to vacant lots (land bank). The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Residential, Hospitality and Clubshares. We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of Valuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Residential Hospitality Clubshares PhP1,515,227,000 51,976,000 1,823,050,000 ---------------------PhP3,390,253,000 Total for Investment Properties Rawland 840,143,000 ---------------------PhP4,230,396,000 =========== TOTAL The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land, condominium projects and clubshares. Briefly describing the valuation method used, the Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COSTA DEL HAMILO, INC. Nasugbu, Batangas 28 February 2013 Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. Presented to: HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations As of: 28 February 2013 HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 15 March 2013 HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. 10th Floor One E-Com Center Harbour Drive, Mall of Asia Complex Pasay City, Metropolitan Manila, Philippines Attention: MS. GEMA ONG CHENG Senior Vice President – Finance SM Investments Corporation Thru: MR. ROEL B. PARIAN Vice President - Finance ------------------------------------------------Gentlemen: Re: Appraisal of Property --------------------------------- 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Instructions In fulfilment of our agreement as outlined in the Letter of Engagement dated 15 February 2013, we are pleased to submit herewith our Executive Summary Report on the opinion of Market Value for those certain real estate properties consisting of twenty-seven (27) assets at various Philippine locations, appraised as of 28 February 2013 (the “valuation date”). The appraisal has been prepared in connection with SM Land's proposed acquisition of a 100% stake in Highlands Prime. The property appraised consists of land, building and condominium units. All other assets not mentioned above are excluded in this report. The various sites, subject of this engagement, are segregated into three (3) main categories, namely: Investment Properties; Development Properties; and Rawland. Investment Properties are properties with completed developments; Development Properties are properties which are still in development phase and not yet completed; while Rawland pertains to vacant lots (land bank). The Investment properties are further sub-categorized as Residential while the Development Properties are also further sub-categorized as Residential. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 1 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 We confirm that we have inspected the sites on various dates in March 2013. The inspection date differs from the valuation date, following your instructions. We therefore need to assume that no material change has occurred between inspection date and the valuation date. The Valuers supervising this appraisal exercise are Messrs. Wenceslao D. Fuentes, Jr., Jacqueline T. Guerta, Rogel P. Cayamanda and Jesus Constance M. Castro. Their relevant qualification and experience, together with the appraisers involved are attached in the Individual Profiles Section of this Executive Summary Report. 1.2 Definition of Terms The appraisal is made on the basis of Market Value which is defined under IVS 2011 as “the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.” Our valuation has been made on the assumption that the owner sells the Property on the open market without the benefit of a deferred terms contract, leaseback, joint venture, management agreement or any similar arrangement which would affect the value of the Property. 1.3 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions This valuation is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The valuation is based on the condition of the economy and the purchasing power of the Philippine Peso as of the effective date of valuation. Legal descriptions, including leases, information, maps, signed or unsigned surveys, estimates and opinions furnished or made available to the appraiser and contained in this study were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy and legality of such items furnished can be assumed by the appraiser. This valuation assumes no responsibility for the validity of legal matters affecting the property. The ownership history reported in this valuation is based on the appraiser’s research of public records, which are assumed to be accurate and complete. It is not the intent of the valuation to offer a legal opinion of title. It is further assumed that the property has good title, responsible ownership and competent Valuation & Advisory Services Page 2 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 management. Any liens or encumbrances which may now exist have been disregarded. Any maps or plot plans reproduced and included in the report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationship. They are not necessarily measured surveys or measured maps, and we will not be responsible for topographic or surveying errors. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. No liability will be assumed for soil conditions, bearing capacity of the subsoil or for engineering matters related to proposed or existing structures. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable Philippine environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. When the study contains a valuation relating to an estate in land that is less than the whole fee simple estate, the value reported for such estate relates to a fractional interest only in the real estate involved, and the value of this fractional interest plus the value of all other fractional interests may or may not equal the value of the entire fee simple estate which is considered the whole. We assume that the fee simple interest is marketable and in compliance with the applicable laws of the Philippines. When the valuation report contains an allocation of the total valuation between land and building improvements, such allocation applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building cannot be used in conjunction with any other valuation/appraisal and will be invalid if so used. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations have been complied with, unless a nonconformity is stated, defined and considered in the study. It is also assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from the Philippine government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this study is based. No information was furnished to the appraiser regarding the presence of Radon seepage in the subject site or that it has ever been used as, or part of, a sanitary landfill or toxic waste dump. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous materials, and gases and other noxious emissions that may or may not be present on the property, were not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials or gases affecting the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect Valuation & Advisory Services Page 3 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 such substances. The presence of asbestos building materials, ureaformaldehyde foam insulation, poly-chlorinated biphenyl filled transformers, aluminum based electrical wiring, or other elements of potentially hazardous materials not currently recommended by the Uniform Building Codes may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. Information provided by informed local sources, such as government agencies, financial institutions, Realtors, buyers, seller and others, was weighed in the light in which it was supplied and checked by secondary means; however, no responsibility is assumed for possible misinformation. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. This report may not be used by anyone except the client, and then only with proper qualification. All copies will originate at CB Richard Ellis Philippines Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this valuation, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. This report shall not be conveyed in whole or in part to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author. This applies particularly to written conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he or she is connected. The delivery and acceptance of this report completes this assignment. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 4 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 1.4 Confidentiality and Disclaimer This report and valuation shall be used only in its entirety and no part shall be used without the whole report. It may not be used for any purposes other than the intended purpose mentioned above. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of copying or publication. All copies will originate from CB Richard Ellis Philippines, Inc. and will be signed and dated as such. Neither the whole nor any part of the report or any reference to our name, our valuation and our report may be included in any document, circular or statement nor published without our prior written consent to the form and context in which it may appear. The liability of CB Richard Ellis Phils., Inc. and its directors and employees is limited to the addressee of this report only. No accountability, obligation or liability to any third party is accepted. In the event we are subject to any liability in connection with this engagement, regardless of legal theory advanced, such liability will be limited to the amount of fees we received for this engagement. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 5 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 2.0 VALUER’S CERTIFICATION We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct and no important facts have been withheld or overlooked. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, the approval of a loan, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the International Valuation Standards (IVS) as set out by IVSC. We certify that our knowledge and experience are sufficient to allow us to competently complete this valuation. We made a personal inspection of the subject property, and no significant professional assistance was provided by anyone in the report preparation. That the Value of the subject property, appraised as of 28 February 2013, amounts to that specified in the pertinent sections of this Report. CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. ___________________________________ ______________________________ WENCESLAO D. FUENTES, JR., CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 422 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 04/15/2014 PTR No. 3685230 - 01/15/2013; Makati City JACQUELINE T. GUERTA, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Registration No. 949 Date Issued and Validity: 07/19/2011 - 05/04/2014 PTR No. 3199334 - 01/17/2012; Makati City _____________________________ ____________________________________ ROGEL P. CAYAMANDA, CPV® Associate Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 392 Date Issued and Validity: 04/08/2011 - 11/23/2014 PTR No. 3199329 - 01/17/2012; Makati City JESUS CONSTANCE M. CASTRO, CPV® Senior Manager Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 423 Date Issued and Validity: 04/14/2011 - 12/22/2014 PTR No. 3685228 - 01/15/2013; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 6 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Premised on the foregoing, the market value of the property is estimated as under: Market Value Investment Properties Residential PhP190,930,000 Development Properties Residential PhP3,671,560,000 Rawland PhP16,493,879,000 ----------------------PhP20,356,369,000 =========== TOTAL The values reflected herein are as of 28 February 2013, the (“valuation date”). This valuation report is provided subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and disclaimers detailed throughout this report which are made in conjunction with those included within the Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations & Disclaimers section located at Section 1.3 of this Summary report. Reliance on this report and extension of our liability is conditioned upon the reader’s acknowledgement and understanding of these statements. This valuation is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed and for no other purpose. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may use or rely on the whole or any part of the content of this valuation. The valuer has no pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property. Assumptions, Disclaimers, Limitations & Qualifications Prepared by : CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILS., INC. _________________________ RAFAEL J. CENZON, CPV® Director Licensed Real Estate Appraiser PRC Reg. No. 213 Date Issued and Validity: 02/13/2011 - 03/11/2014 PTR No. 3199327 - 01/17/2012; Makati City Valuation & Advisory Services Page 7 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 4.0 VALUATION RATIONALE The appraisal service shall report the market value of the properties. 4.1 Appraisal Methodology In arriving at our opinion of market value, appraised as of 28 February 2013, we have considered relevant general economic factors and conditions. A variety of approaches have been considered with regards to the nature and scale of the various properties. The determination of the appropriate approach for a given property is based on the quality and quantity of data available, particularly its relevance to the property under appraisement. If more than one valuation approach is utilized, the resulting values are reconciled or one value is recommended to produce a final value conclusion. For this engagement, we have adopted the Market Data Approach for vacant land and condominium units and cost approach for improved properties. Briefly describing the valuation methods used, the Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution, which holds that an informed buyer would not pay more for a given property than the cost of buying an equally desirable alternative. The methodology of the Cost Approach is a set of procedures that estimate the current reproduction cost of the improvements, then deducting accrued depreciation from all sources, and adding the value of the land. The Market Data (or Direct Sales Comparison) Approach is a method of comparing prices paid for comparable properties sold in the market against the subject property. The weight given to this approach is dependent on the availability of recent confirmed sales of properties considered comparable to the property under appraisement. These sold properties are compared to the subject in key units of comparison. Appropriate adjustments are made for differences between the subject and the comparables, resulting in adjusted sales values for each of the comparables. These adjusted values are then reconciled for a value conclusion by the Sales Comparison Approach. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 8 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 5.0 GENERAL VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS Land details including land titles, lot areas, lot plans and survey plans were based on information furnished us. Wherever possible, we have personally inspected the properties covered by this valuation. However, due to the nature of ongoing construction and condominium projects partly completed or under completion, we were not able to conduct full detailed inspection of building or unit interiors. In accordance with the International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC), our valuations were based on all relevant documents necessary to arrive at our opinion of value. We have relied to a considerable extent on information provided to us such as building plans, completion status of ongoing project or development including type or characteristics of units for sale, inventory of developed, saleable units, land or floor area. It is our opinion however that although the valuation is limited, the results are reliable and credible for its intended purpose and use. In some cases, two or three approaches to value were considered in our valuation, as one or more may be applicable to the subject property/assets. In some situations, elements of two or three approaches may be combined to reach a value conclusion. However, our recommended opinion of value is based on the approach we deemed to be the most appropriate to use. In valuing vast tract or large parcels of land comprising of several lots presently utilized or intended to be utilized for a common type of property development, valuation of the land is as a whole or for the entirety of the land, considering the highest and best use. In our valuation of Condominium and Subdivision projects, we relied considerably on selling prices furnished to us by the client. We have investigated these selling prices and have adopted the same as the average selling prices in our valuation. Our valuation is based on the total market value of these saleable units as of valuation date. Provisions for cost to complete of projects under construction and cost of sale however were deducted from the property value. All on-going condominium and subdivision projects were assumed to be completed as planned. When the property involves improvements erected on land under lease in which the lessor or land owner is a related Company, land was valued in fee simple in favour of the lessor or land owner. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 9 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. HIGHLANDS PRIME, INC. Various Philippine locations 28 February 2013 For land considered for prospective development, as an alternative valuation method to Direct Sales Comparison Approach, we have likewise considered the Land Residual Method. In our analysis and in the development of the recommended value of the site, reference was heavily relied either on an anticipated development scheme according to the concept presented to us or a predominant development plan based on our findings gathered during our inspection. However, when the value by Land Residual Method was arrived at using a concept presented to us, no further study to determine the feasibility nor investigation for legal permissibility for such a concept was conducted. Likewise, in the absence of a full feasibility study, no provision for possible synergy with other property development of the client was considered in the valuation. Valuation Date is 28 February 2013. All relevant information provided to us such as selling prices and number of unsold units/lots for condominium and subdivision projects and rent rolls for income generating assets among others, were assumed as of the valuation date. Valuation & Advisory Services Page 10 CB RICHARD ELLIS PHILIPPINES, INC. COVER SHEET A S 0 9 4 - 0 0 0 0 8 8 SEC Registration Number S M P R I M E H O L D I N G S , I N C . A N D S U B S I DD I A R I E S (Company’s Full Name) M a l l , o f C o r a l . , M a l l Z o n e A s i a W a y o f 1 0 , A r e n a c o r . A s i a A n n e x J . W . D i o k n o C o m p l e x , C B P - 1 A , B u i l d i n g P a s a y B l v d B r g y . C i t y 7 6 1 3 0 0 (Business Address: No. Street City/Town/Province) Mr. Jeffrey C. Lim 831-1000 (Contact Person) (Company Telephone Number) 0 3 3 1 Month Day 1 7 - Q (Form Type) Month (Fiscal Year) Day (Annual Meeting) (Secondary License Type, If Applicable) Dept. Requiring this Doc. Amended Articles Number/Section Total Amount of Borrowings Total No. of Stockholders Domestic Foreign To be accomplished by SEC Personnel concerned File Number LCU Document ID Cashier STAMPS Remarks: Please use BLACK ink for scanning purposes. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SRC RULE 17(2)(b) THEREUNDER 1. For the quarterly period ended MARCH 31, 2013 2. SEC Identification Number AS0940000-88 3. BIR Tax Identification No. 003-058-789 4. Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. 5. PHILIPPINES Province, Country or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization 6. (SEC Use Only) Industry Classification Code: 7. Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1A, Pasay City 1300 Address of principal office Postal Code 8. ( 632) 831-1000 ________ Registrant's telephone number, including area code 9. __________________________________________ Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report. 10. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 4 and 8 of the SRC Title of Each Class CAPITAL STOCK, P 1 PAR VALUE Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding and Amount of Debt Outstanding 17,373,677,760 11. Are any or all of these securities listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange. Yes [X] No [ ] 12. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (a) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 11 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) and SRC Rule 11(a)-1 thereunder and Sections 26 and 141 of The Corporation Code of the Philippines during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); Yes [X] No [ ] (b) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] ǡ Ǥ &RQVROLGDWHG)LQDQFLDO6WDWHPHQWV 0DUFKDQG'HFHPEHU DQG7KUHH0RQWKV(QGHG0DUFKDQG SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 6, 20, 22 and 23) Short-term investments (Notes 7, 20, 22 and 23) Investments held for trading (Notes 8, 20, 22 and 23) Receivables (Notes 9, 20, 22 and 23) Available-for-sale investments (Notes 10, 20, 22 and 23) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 11) Total Current Assets Noncurrent Assets Investment properties - net (Notes 12 and 20) Derivative assets (Notes 22 and 23) Deferred tax assets (Note 18) Other noncurrent assets (Note 13) Total Noncurrent Assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities Loans payable (Notes 14, 22 and 23) Accounts payable and other current liabilities (Notes 15, 20, 22 and 23) Current portion of long-term debt (Notes 16, 20, 22 and 23) Income tax payable Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Long-term debt - net of current portion (Notes 16, 20, 22 and 23) Tenants’ deposits (Notes 21, 22 and 23) Liability for purchased land - net of current portion Deferred tax liabilities (Note 18) Derivative liabilities (Notes 22 and 23) Other noncurrent liabilities (Notes 12, 20, 22 and 23) Total Noncurrent Liabilities Equity Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent Capital stock (Notes 17 and 24) Additional paid-in capital - net (Note 17) Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 17) Retained earnings (Note 17): Appropriated Unappropriated Treasury stock (Notes 17 and 24) Total Equity Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent (Note 22) Non-controlling Interests (Note 17) Total Stockholders’ Equity See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) December 31, 2012 (Audited) P =19,067,990,992 816,000,000 457,335,307 5,763,218,412 1,000,000,000 1,566,130,723 28,670,675,434 = P9,706,857,361 821,000,000 759,300,343 5,880,081,880 1,000,000,000 1,440,189,139 19,607,428,723 124,087,439,798 126,016,836,866 109,978,821 138,453,670 190,463,028 187,135,958 4,134,582,818 4,656,023,197 128,522,464,465 130,998,449,691 P148,129,893,188 P =159,669,125,125 = P =800,000,000 = P800,000,000 11,379,624,231 2,611,101,353 1,123,474,226 15,914,199,810 11,398,520,838 1,791,703,848 632,900,873 14,623,125,559 57,014,784,008 8,555,929,087 1,041,570,404 1,265,932,906 236,996,850 1,878,660,112 69,993,873,367 49,647,118,755 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,278,194,418 244,330,399 1,836,373,166 62,607,021,612 17,392,534,760 8,219,067,298 515,624,547 17,392,534,760 8,219,067,298 544,146,167 27,000,000,000 19,680,474,032 (101,474,705) 27,000,000,000 16,890,136,797 (101,474,705) 69,944,410,317 72,706,225,932 955,335,700 1,054,826,016 70,899,746,017 73,761,051,948 P148,129,893,188 P =159,669,125,125 = SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Three Months Ended March 31 2012 2013 REVENUE Rent (Notes 12, 20 and 21) Cinema ticket sales Amusement income and others COSTS AND EXPENSES Depreciation and amortization (Note 12) Administrative (Notes 19, 20 and 21) Business taxes and licenses Film rentals Management fees (Note 20) Rent (Note 21) Insurance Others INCOME FROM OPERATIONS OTHER INCOME (CHARGES) - Net Interest expense (Notes 14, 16, 20 and 23) Interest and dividend income (Notes 6, 7, 8, 10 and 20) Others - net (Notes 8, 13, 16 and 23) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAX (Note 18) Current Deferred NET INCOME Attributable to Equity holders of the parent (Note 24) Non-controlling interests (Notes 2 and 17) Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Share (Note 24) See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. P =6,733,166,810 760,985,046 335,996,144 7,830,148,000 = P6,031,051,208 702,995,400 300,910,656 7,034,957,264 1,113,037,415 846,257,085 487,815,444 408,114,998 227,906,285 221,722,330 72,317,453 227,250,938 3,604,421,948 965,467,766 841,311,184 457,044,503 376,973,735 218,023,064 162,549,657 55,964,608 164,356,938 3,241,691,455 4,225,726,052 3,793,265,809 (525,160,262) 99,269,070 (18,724,554) (444,615,746) 3,781,110,306 901,697,307 (10,414,552) 891,282,755 (548,142,801) 131,095,258 (37,314,449) (454,361,992) 3,338,903,817 787,906,058 18,280,390 806,186,448 P =2,889,827,551 = P2,532,717,369 P =2,790,337,235 99,490,316 P =2,889,827,551 = P2,433,869,469 98,847,900 = P2,532,717,369 P =0.161 = P0.140 SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Three Months Ended March 31 2012 2013 NET INCOME OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS - Net Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 17) Foreign currency differences of subsidiaries Net fair value changes on cash flow hedges (see Note 23) Total Other Comprehensive Loss TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Attributable to Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests (Notes 2 and 17) See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. P =2,889,827,551 (6,771,761) (21,749,859) (28,521,620) = P2,532,717,369 (104,268,826) – (104,268,826) P =2,861,305,931 = P2,428,448,543 P =2,761,815,615 99,490,316 P =2,861,305,931 = P2,329,600,643 98,847,900 = P2,428,448,543 P = 17,392,534,760 = P13,917,800,067 – = P13,917,800,067 At March 31, 2013 At January 1, 2012 Total comprehensive income At March 31, 2012 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. P = 17,392,534,760 – At January 1, 2013 Total comprehensive income Capital Stock (Notes 17 and 24) = P8,219,067,298 = P8,219,067,298 – P = 8,219,067,298 = P768,390,036 = P872,658,862 (104,268,826) P = 515,624,547 P = 544,146,167 (28,521,620) Adjustment (Note 17) Capital - Net (Note 17) P = 8,219,067,298 – Cumulative Translation Additional Paid-in = P7,000,000,000 = P7,000,000,000 – P = 27,000,000,000 P = 27,000,000,000 – = P36,299,479,445 = P33,865,609,976 2,433,869,469 P = 19,680,474,032 P = 16,890,136,797 2,790,337,235 Appropriated Unappropriated (Note 17) (Note 17) Retained Earnings Equity Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent Total (P =101,474,705) = P66,103,262,141 (P =101,474,705) = P63,773,661,498 – 2,329,600,643 (P = 101,474,705) P = 72,706,225,932 (P = 101,474,705) P = 69,944,410,317 – 2,761,815,615 Treasury Stock (Notes 17 and 24) SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY = P671,992,323 = P573,144,423 98,847,900 P = 1,054,826,016 P = 955,335,700 99,490,316 Interests (Note 17) Non-controlling = P66,775,254,464 = P64,346,805,921 2,428,448,543 P = 73,761,051,948 P = 70,899,746,017 2,861,305,931 Total SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Three Months Ended March 31 2012 2013 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Income before income tax and non-controlling interests Adjustments for: Depreciation and amortization (Note 12) Interest expense (Notes 14, 16, 20 and 23) Interest and dividend income (Notes 6, 7, 8, 10 and 20) Unrealized mark-to-market loss (gain) on derivatives (Note 21) Unrealized foreign exchange gain - net Mark-to-market gain on investments held for trading (Note 8) Mark-to-market gain on derivatives (Note 23) Operating income before working capital changes Decrease (increase) in: Receivables Prepaid expenses and other current assets Increase (decrease) in: Accounts payable and other current liabilities Tenants’ deposits Cash generated from operations Income taxes paid Net cash provided by operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Decrease (increase) in: Investment properties (Note 12) Other noncurrent assets (Note 13) Investments held for trading Interest and dividend received Net cash used in investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from availment of loans (Notes 14, 16 and 20) Payments of: Loans (Notes 16 and 20) Interest Payments to unwinding of interest rate swaps Net cash provided by financing activities EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. P =3,781,110,306 = P3,338,903,817 1,113,037,415 525,160,262 (99,269,070) (31,558,257) 2,069,546 657,000 – 5,291,207,202 965,467,766 548,142,801 (131,095,258) 44,724,681 8,424,118 1,396,500 1,114,580 4,777,079,005 128,478,054 (126,043,568) 309,367,621 (521,308,492) (77,351,041) 171,892,499 5,388,183,146 (409,617,243) 4,978,565,903 (674,313,010) 201,251,284 4,092,076,408 (385,670,837) 3,706,405,571 (3,261,540,668) (527,277,225) 299,914,286 84,746,173 (3,404,157,434) (4,622,337,748) 19,359,540 56,137,107 100,405,970 (4,446,435,131) 9,151,125,000 10,356,250,000 (894,583,967) (466,855,444) – 7,789,685,589 (1,039,692,935) (373,337,781) (4,287,500) 8,938,931,784 (2,960,427) 9,361,133,631 9,706,857,361 P =19,067,990,992 5,730,737 8,204,632,961 8,290,216,039 = P16,494,849,000 SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Corporate Information SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (SMPH or the Parent Company) was incorporated in the Philippines and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on January 6, 1994. The Parent Company and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “the Company”) develop, conduct, operate and maintain the business of modern commercial shopping centers and all businesses related thereto, such as the conduct, operation and maintenance of shopping center spaces for rent, amusement centers, or cinema theaters within the compound of the shopping centers. Its main sources of revenue include rent income from leases in mall and food court, cinema ticket sales and amusement income from bowling, ice skating and others. The Parent Company’s shares of stock are publicly traded in the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). The Parent Company is 21.65% and 40.96% directly-owned by SM Investments Corporation (SMIC) and SM Land, Inc. (SM Land), respectively. SM Land is a 66.89% owned subsidiary of SMIC. SMIC, the ultimate parent company, is a Philippine corporation which listed its common shares with the PSE in 2005. The registered office and principal place of business of the Parent Company is Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1A, Pasay City 1300. 2. Basis of Preparation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments, investments held for trading and available-for-sale (AFS) investments which have been measured at fair value. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Philippine peso, which is the Parent Company’s functional and presentation currency under Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS). All values are rounded to the nearest peso, except when otherwise indicated. Statement of Compliance The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with PFRS. PFRS includes statements named PFRS, Philippine Accounting Standards (PAS) and Philippine Interpretations from the International Financial Reporting and Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) issued by the Financial Reporting Standards Council (FRSC). Changes in Accounting Policies and Disclosures The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year, except for the following amended PFRS and PAS which the Company has adopted during the year: PFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. -2 PFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. PFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. PFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. PFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. PAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements - Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), became effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012. PAS 19, Employee Benefits (Revised), became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. PAS 27, Separate Financial Statements (as revised in 2011), became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (as revised in 2011), became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Philippine Interpretation IFRIC 20, Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The standards that have been adopted are deemed to have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Future Changes in Accounting Policies Standards and Interpretations The Company did not early adopt the following standards and Philippine Interpretations that have been approved but are not yet effective. The Company will adopt these standards and interpretations on their effective dates. PFRS 9, Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. PFRS 9 reflects the first phase of the work on the replacement of PAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and applies to classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities as defined in PAS 39. Work on impairment of financial instruments and hedge accounting is still ongoing, with a view to replacing PAS 39 in its entirety. PFRS 9 requires all financial assets to be measured at fair value at initial recognition. A debt financial asset may, if the fair value option (FVO) is not invoked, be subsequently measured at amortized cost if it is held within a business model that has the objective to hold the assets to collect the contractual cash flows and its contractual terms give rise, on specified dates, to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding. All other debt instruments are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. All equity financial assets are measured at fair value either through other comprehensive income or profit or loss. Equity financial assets held for trading must be measured at fair value through profit or loss. For FVO liabilities, the amount of change in the fair value of a liability that is attributable to -3- changes in credit risk must be presented in other comprehensive income. The remainder of the change in fair value is presented in profit or loss, unless presentation of the fair value change in respect of the liability’s credit risk in other comprehensive income would create or enlarge an accounting mismatch in profit or loss. All other PAS 39 classification and measurement requirements for financial liabilities have been carried forward into PFRS 9, including the embedded derivative separation rules and the criteria for using the FVO. The Company made an evaluation of the impact of the adoption of the standard and decided not to early adopt PFRS 9 for the 2012 reporting ahead of its effectivity date on January 1, 2015. Therefore, the consolidated financial statements as at March 31, 2013 do not reflect the impact of this new standard. The adoption of the first phase of PFRS 9 will have an effect on the classification and measurement of the Company’s financial assets but will potentially have no impact on the classification and measurement of financial liabilities. PAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. These amendments to PAS 32 clarify the meaning of “currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off” and also clarify the application of the PAS 32 offsetting criteria to settlement systems (such as central clearing house systems) which apply gross settlement mechanisms that are not simultaneous. The amendments to PAS 32 are to be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements. Philippine Interpretation IFRIC 15, Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, covers accounting for revenue and associated expenses by entities that undertake the construction of real estate directly or through subcontractors. The interpretation requires that revenue on construction of real estate be recognized only upon completion, except when such contract qualifies as construction contract to be accounted for under PAS 11, Construction Contracts, or involves rendering of services in which case revenue is recognized based on stage of completion. Contracts involving provision of services with the construction materials and where the risks and reward of ownership are transferred to the buyer on a continuous basis will also be accounted for based on stage of completion. The SEC and the FRSC have deferred the effectivity of this interpretation until the final Revenue standard is issued by International Accounting Standards Board and an evaluation of the requirements of the final Revenue standard against the practices of the Philippine real estate industry is completed. This interpretation will have no impact on the consolidated financial statements. Improvements to PFRSs The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and are applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted. PFRS 1, First-time Adoption of PFRS - Borrowing Costs, clarifies that, upon adoption of PFRS, an entity that capitalized borrowing costs in accordance with its previous generally accepted accounting principles, may carry forward, without any adjustment, the amount previously capitalized in its opening statement of financial position at the date of transition. Subsequent to the adoption of PFRS, borrowing costs are recognized in accordance with PAS 23, Borrowing Costs. The amendment does not apply to the Company as it is not a firsttime adopter of PFRS. -4 PAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements - Clarification of the Requirements for Comparative Information, clarifies the requirements for comparative information that are disclosed voluntarily and those that are mandatory due to retrospective application of an accounting policy, or retrospective restatement or reclassification of items in the financial statements. An entity must include comparative information in the related notes to the financial statements when it voluntarily provides comparative information beyond the minimum required comparative period. The additional comparative period does not need to contain a complete set of financial statements. On the other hand, supporting notes for the third balance sheet (mandatory when there is a retrospective application of an accounting policy, or retrospective restatement or reclassification of items in the financial statements) are not required. The amendments affect disclosures only and have no impact on the Company’s financial position or performance. PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment - Classification of Servicing Equipment, clarifies that spare parts, stand-by equipment and servicing equipment should be recognized as property, plant and equipment when they meet the definition of property, plant and equipment and should be recognized as inventory if otherwise. The Company does not expect this amendment to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements. PAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation - Tax Effect of Distribution to Holders of Equity Instruments, clarifies that income taxes relating to distributions to equity holders and to transaction costs of an equity transaction are accounted for in accordance with PAS 12. The Company does not expect this amendment to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements. PAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting - Interim Financial Reporting and Segment Information for Total Assets and Liabilities, clarifies that the total assets and liabilities for a particular reportable segment need to be disclosed only when the amounts are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker and there has been a material change from the amount disclosed in the entity’s previous annual financial statements for that reportable segment. The amendment affects disclosures only and has no impact on the Company’s financial position or performance. Basis of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent Company and the following subsidiaries: Company First Asia Realty Development Corporation Premier Central, Inc. Consolidated Prime Dev. Corp. Premier Southern Corp. San Lazaro Holdings Corporation Southernpoint Properties Corp. (SPC) First Leisure Ventures Group Inc. (FLVGI) Affluent Capital Enterprises Limited (Affluent) and Subsidiaries Mega Make Enterprises Limited (Mega Make) and Subsidiaries Springfield Global Enterprises Limited SM Land (China) Limited (SM Land China) and Subsidiaries Country of Incorporation Philippines - do - do - do - do - do - do British Virgin Islands (BVI) Percentage of Ownership 2011 2012 74.19 74.19 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 - do - do- 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Hong Kong 100.00 100.00 SM Malls Owned SM Megamall SM City Clark SM City Dasmariñas SM City Batangas and SM City Lipa – SM Lanang Premier SM by the Bay SM City Xiamen and SM City Chengdu SM City Jinjiang – SM City Suzhou and SM City Chongqing FLVGI is accounted for as a subsidiary by virtue of control, as evidenced by the majority members of the BOD representing the Parent Company. -5- The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting year as the Parent Company, using consistent accounting policies. All intracompany balances, transactions, income and expenses resulting from intracompany transactions are eliminated in full. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Company obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction. If the Company loses control over a subsidiary, it: Derecognizes the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary; Derecognizes the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest; Derecognizes the cumulative translation differences recorded in equity; Recognizes the fair value of the consideration received; Recognizes the fair value of any investment retained; Recognizes any surplus or deficit in profit or loss; Reclassifies the parent’s share of components previously recognized in other comprehensive income to profit or loss or retained earnings, as appropriate. Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets not held by the Company and are presented separately in the consolidated statements of income and within stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets, separately from equity attributable to equity holders of the parent. 3. Significant Accounting Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities, and the disclosures of contingent liabilities, at balance sheet date. However, uncertainty about the assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability affected in the future. Judgments In the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies, management has made the following judgments, apart from those involving estimates and assumptions, which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Operating Lease Commitments - Company as Lessor. The Company has entered into commercial property leases on its investment property portfolio. The Company has determined, based on an evaluation of the terms and conditions of the arrangements, that it retains all the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the properties and thus accounts for the contracts as operating leases. Rent income amounted to = P6,733 million and = P6,031 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (see Note 21). -6- Operating Lease Commitments - Company as Lessee. The Company has entered into various lease agreements as a lessee. Management has determined that all the significant risks and benefits of ownership of the properties, which the Company leases under operating lease arrangements, remain with the lessor. Accordingly, the leases were accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense amounted to = P222 million and = P163 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (see Note 21). Estimates and Assumptions The key estimates and assumptions that may have significant risks of causing material adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below. Estimation of Allowance for Impairment Losses on Receivables. The Company maintains an allowance for impairment losses at a level considered adequate to provide for potential uncollectible receivables. The level of allowance is evaluated by the Company on the basis of factors that affect the collectability of the accounts. These factors include, but are not limited to, the length of the Company’s relationship with the customers, average age of accounts and collection experience. The Company performs a regular review of the age and status of these accounts, designed to identify accounts with objective evidence of impairment and provide the appropriate allowance for impairment losses. The amount and timing of recorded expenses for any period would differ if the Company made different judgments or utilized different methodologies. An increase in allowance for impairment losses would increase the recorded costs and expenses and decrease current assets. The carrying value of receivables amounted to = P5,763 million and = P5,880 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (see Note 9). Impairment of AFS Investments. The Company treats AFS investments as impaired when there has been a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value below its cost or whether other objective evidence of impairment exists. The determination of what is ‘significant’ or ‘prolonged’ requires judgment. The Company treats ‘significant’ generally as 20% or more of the original cost of investment, and ‘prolonged’ as period longer than 12 months. In addition, the Company evaluates other factors, including normal volatility in share price for quoted equities and future cash flows and the discount factors for unquoted equities. The carrying value of AFS investments amounted to = P1,000 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (see Note 10). Estimation of Useful Lives of Investment Properties. The useful life of each of the Company’s investment property is estimated based on the period over which the asset is expected to be available for use. Such estimation is based on a collective assessment of industry practice, internal technical evaluation and experience with similar assets. The estimated useful life of each asset is reviewed periodically and updated if expectations differ from previous estimates due to physical wear and tear, technical or commercial obsolescence and legal or other limitations on the use of the asset. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in the amounts and timing of recorded expenses brought about by changes in the factors mentioned above. A reduction in the estimated useful life of any investment property would increase the recorded costs and expenses and decrease investment properties. There were no changes in the estimated useful lives of investment properties in 2013 and 2012. -7- Impairment of Nonfinancial Assets. The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is an indication that investment properties may be impaired. The recoverable amount of the investment properties is the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. When the carrying amounts of the investment properties exceed their recoverable amounts, the investment properties are considered impaired and are written down to their recoverable amounts. The net book value of investment properties amounted to P =126,017 million and = P124,087 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (see Note 12). Realizability of Deferred Tax Assets. The Company’s assessment on the recognition of deferred tax assets on deductible temporary differences is based on the projected taxable income in the succeeding periods. This projection is based on the Company’s past and future results of operations. Deferred tax assets amounted to = P187 million and = P190 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (see Note 18). Pension Cost. The determination of the Company’s obligation and cost of pension benefits is dependent on the selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note 19 and include, among others, the discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets and salary increase rate. In accordance with PFRS, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore, generally affect the recognized expense and recorded obligation in such future periods. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities. The Company carries certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. Determining the fair value of financial assets and liabilities requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgment. The significant components of fair value measurement were determined using verifiable objective evidence (i.e., foreign exchange rates, interest rates, volatility rates). However, the amount of changes in fair value would differ if the Company utilized different valuation methodologies and assumptions. Any changes in the fair value of these financial assets and liabilities would affect profit and loss and other comprehensive income. The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial assets and liabilities are discussed in Note 23. Contingencies. The Company has various legal claims. The Company’s estimates of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims have been developed in consultation with in-house as well as outside counsel handling the prosecution and defense of the cases and are based upon an analysis of potential results. The Company currently does not believe these legal claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position and results of operations. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in the estimates or in the effectiveness of strategies relating to these proceedings. No provisions were made in relation to these claims. -8- 4. Summary of Significant Accounting and Financial Reporting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash includes cash on hand and in banks. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of three months or less from dates of acquisitions and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. Financial Instruments - Initial Recognition and Subsequent Measurement Date of Recognition. The Company recognizes a financial instrument in the consolidated balance sheets when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. In the case of a regular way purchase or sale of financial assets, recognition and derecognition, as applicable, is done using settlement date accounting. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within the period generally established by regulation or convention in the market place. Derivatives are recognized on a trade date basis. Initial Recognition of Financial Instruments. Financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value, which is the fair value of the consideration given (in case of an asset) or received (in case of a liability). The initial measurement of financial instruments, except for those categorized as at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL), includes transaction costs. The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: financial assets and financial liabilities at FVPL, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity (HTM) investments, AFS investments and other financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the instruments are acquired and whether they are quoted in an active market. Management determines the classification at initial recognition and, where allowed and appropriate, reevaluates this classification at every balance sheet date. Determination of Fair Value. The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets at the balance sheet date is based on their quoted market price or dealer price quotations (bid price for long positions and ask price for short positions), without any deduction for transaction costs. When current bid and asking prices are not available, the price of the most recent transaction provides evidence of the current fair value as long as there has not been a significant change in economic circumstances since the time of the transaction. For all other financial instruments not listed in an active market, the fair value is determined by using appropriate valuation techniques. Valuation techniques include net present value techniques, comparison to similar instruments for which market observable prices exist, options pricing models, and other relevant valuation models. Day 1 Difference. Where the transaction price in a non-active market is different from the fair value based on other observable current market transactions in the same instrument or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable market, the Company recognizes the difference between the transaction price and fair value (a ‘Day 1’ difference) in the consolidated statements of income unless it qualifies for recognition as some other type of asset. In cases where unobservable data is used, the difference between the transaction price and model value is only recognized in the consolidated statements of income only when the inputs become observable or when the instrument is derecognized. For each transaction, the Company determines the appropriate method of recognizing the ‘Day 1’ difference amount. -9- Financial Assets and Liabilities at FVPL. Financial assets and liabilities at FVPL include financial assets and liabilities held for trading and financial assets and liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVPL. Financial assets and liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivatives, including any separated derivatives, are also classified under financial assets or liabilities at FVPL, unless these are designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge or financial guarantee contracts. Gains or losses on investments held for trading are included in the consolidated statements of income under the “Others - net” account. Interest income on investments held for trading is included in the consolidated statements of income under the “Interest and dividend income” account. Instruments under this category are classified as current assets/liabilities if these are hold primarily for the purpose of trading or expected to be realized/settled within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets/liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities may be designated by management at initial recognition as at FVPL when any of the following criteria is met: the designation eliminates or significantly reduces the inconsistent treatment that would otherwise arise from measuring the assets and liabilities or recognizing gains or losses on a different basis; or the assets and liabilities are part of a group of financial assets, financial liabilities or both which are managed and their performance are evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy; or the financial instrument contains an embedded derivative, unless the embedded derivative does not significantly modify the cash flows or it is clear, with little or no analysis, that it would not be separately recorded. Classified as financial assets at FVPL are the Company’s investments held for trading and derivative assets. The aggregate carrying values of financial assets under this category amounted to = P596 million and = P869 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Included under financial liabilities at FVPL are the Company’s derivative liabilities. The carrying values of financial liabilities at FVPL amounted to P =237 million and = P244 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (see Note 23). Loans and Receivables. Loans and receivables are nonderivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are not entered into with the intention of immediate or short-term resale and are not designated as AFS investments or financial assets at FVPL. Loans and receivables are included in current assets if maturity is within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets. After initial measurement, loans and receivables are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less allowance for impairment. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the loans and receivables are derecognized and impaired, as well as through the amortization process. - 10 - Classified under this category are the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and receivables. The aggregate carrying values of financial assets under this category amounted to = P25,647 million and = P16,408 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (see Note 23). HTM Investments. HTM investments are quoted nonderivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities for which the Company’s management has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Where the Company sells other than an insignificant amount of HTM investments, the entire category would be tainted and reclassified as AFS investments. After initial measurement, these investments are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less impairment in value. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the HTM investments are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process. Assets under this category are classified as current assets if maturity is within 12 months from balance sheet date and as noncurrent assets if maturity date is more than 12 months from balance sheet date. The Company has no financial assets under this category as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. AFS Investments. AFS investments are nonderivative financial assets that are designated in this category or are not classified in any of the other categories. They are purchased and held indefinitely, and may be sold in response to liquidity requirements or changes in market conditions. Subsequent to initial recognition, AFS investments are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of such assets are reported as unrealized gain or loss on AFS investments recognized as other comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income until the investment is derecognized or the investment is determined to be impaired. On derecognition or impairment, the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in consolidated statements of comprehensive income is transferred to the consolidated statements of income. Assets under this category are classified as current assets if management intends to sell these financial assets within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets. Classified under this category are the Company’s investments in corporate notes. The carrying values of financial assets classified under this category amounted to = P1,000 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (see Note 23). Other Financial Liabilities. This category pertains to financial liabilities that are not held for trading or not designated as at FVPL upon the inception of the liability. These include liabilities arising from operations or borrowings. Other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value and are subsequently carried at amortized cost, taking into account the impact of applying the effective interest method of amortization (or accretion) for any related premium, discount and any directly attributable transaction costs. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the liabilities are derecognized, as well as through the amortization process. Other financial liabilities are classified as current liabilities if settlement is within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent liabilities. - 11 - Classified under this category are the Company’s loans payable, accounts payable and other current liabilities, long-term debt, tenants’ deposits, liability for purchased land and other noncurrent liabilities (except for taxes payables and other payables covered by other accounting standards). The aggregate carrying values of financial liabilities under this category amounted to = P82,630 million and = P74,311 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (see Note 23). Classification of Financial Instruments Between Debt and Equity A financial instrument is classified as debt if it provides for a contractual obligation to: deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially unfavorable to the Company; or satisfy the obligation other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of own equity shares. If the Company does not have an unconditional right to avoid delivering cash or another financial asset to settle its contractual obligation, the obligation meets the definition of a financial liability. The components of issued financial instruments that contain both liability and equity elements are accounted for separately, with the equity component being assigned the residual amount after deducting from the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined as the fair value of the liability component on the date of issue. Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs are deducted against long-term debt and are amortized over the terms of the related borrowings using the effective interest method. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as long-term currency swaps, foreign currency call options, non-deliverable forwards, foreign currency range options, interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps to hedge the risks associated with foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations (see Note 23). Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value on the date on which the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value. Derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities when the fair value is negative. Any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value on derivatives during the period that do not qualify for hedge accounting are taken directly in the consolidated statements of income under “Others - net” account. For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as: (1) fair value hedges when hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized financial asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment (except for foreign-currency risk); or (2) cash flow hedges when hedging to variability in cash flows that is either attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized financial asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction or the foreigncurrency risk in an unrecognized firm commitment; or (3) hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation. - 12 - At the inception of a hedge relationship, the Company formally designates and documents the hedge relationship to which the Company wishes to apply hedge accounting and the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation includes identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the entity will assess the effectiveness of changes in the hedging instrument’s fair value in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk. Such hedges are expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows and are assessed on an ongoing basis to determine that they actually have been highly effective throughout the financial reporting periods for which they were designated. Hedges which meet the strict criteria for hedge accounting are accounted for as follows: Fair value hedges The change in the fair value of a hedging derivative is recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The change in the fair value of a hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is recorded as part of the carrying value of the hedged item and is also recognized in the consolidated statements of income under “Others - net” account (see note 23). The fair value for financial instruments traded in active markets at the end of the reporting period is based on their quoted market price or dealer price quotations (bid price for long positions and ask price for short positions), without any deduction for transaction costs. When current bid and asking prices are not available, the price of the most recent transaction provides evidence of the current fair value as long as there has not been a significant change in economic circumstances since the time of the transaction. For all other financial instruments not listed in an active market, the fair value is determined by using appropriate valuation techniques. Valuation techniques include net present value techniques, comparison to similar instruments for which market observable prices exist, option pricing models, and other relevant valuation models. When an unrecognized firm commitment is designated as hedged item, the subsequent cumulative change in the fair value of the firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk is recognized as financial asset or liability with a corresponding gain or loss recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument are also recognized the consolidated statements of income. Cash flow hedges The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized directly in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income under “Cumulative translation adjustment” account, while any ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of income under “Other - net” account (see note 23). Amounts taken to comprehensive income are transferred to the consolidated statements of income when the hedged transaction affects the consolidated statements of income, such as when the hedged financial income or financial expense is recognized or when a forecast sale occurs. When the hedged item is the cost of a non-financial asset or non-financial liability, the amounts taken to other comprehensive income are transferred to the initial carrying amount of the non-financial asset or liability. - 13 - If the forecast transaction or firm commitment is no longer expected to occur, amounts previously recognized in the other comprehensive income are transferred to the consolidated statements of income. If the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised without replacement or rollover, or if its designation as a hedge is revoked amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income remain in other comprehensive income until the forecast transaction or firm commitment occurs. Embedded Derivative. An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid instrument that also includes a nonderivative host contract with the effect that some of the cash flows of the hybrid instrument vary in a way similar to a stand-alone derivative. An embedded derivative is separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative if all of the following conditions are met: a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract; b) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative; and c) the hybrid instrument is not recognized at FVPL. The Company assesses whether embedded derivatives are required to be separated from the host contracts when the Company becomes a party to the contract. Subsequent reassessment is prohibited unless there is a change in the terms of the contract that significantly modifies the cash flows that otherwise would be required under the contract, in which case reassessment is required. The Company determines whether a modification to cash flows is significant by considering the extent to which the expected future cash flows associated with the embedded derivative, the host contract or both have changed and whether the change is significant relative to the previously expected cash flow on the contract. Derecognition of Financial Assets and Liabilities Financial Assets. A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognized when: the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; the Company retains the rights to receive cash flows from the asset, but has assumed an obligation to pay them in full without material delay to a third party under a “pass-through” arrangement; or the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset and either (a) has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset. When the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset and has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, nor transferred control of the asset, the asset is recognized to the extent of the Company’s continuing involvement in the asset. Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of original carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of consideration the Company could be required to repay. Financial Liabilities. A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expired. - 14 - When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the consolidated statements of income. Impairment of Financial Assets The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired, if and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred loss event) and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or a group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Objective evidence of impairment may include indications that the borrower or a group of borrowers is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization and where observable data indicate that there is measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults. Financial Assets Carried at Amortized Cost. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on financial assets carried at amortized cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate (i.e., the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition). The carrying amount of the asset shall be reduced through the use of an allowance account. The amount of the loss shall be recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The Company first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If it is determined that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, the asset is included in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and that group of financial assets is collectively assessed for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognized are not included in a collective assessment of impairment. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance account. The amount of the reversal is recognized in the consolidated statements of income under “Provision for (reversal of) impairment losses” account, to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortized cost at reversal date. Interest income continues to be accrued on the reduced carrying amount based on the original effective interest rate of the asset. Assets together with the associated allowance are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future recovery and all collateral, if any, has been realized or has been transferred to the Company. If a future write-off is later recovered, the recovery is recognized in the consolidated statements of income under “Others - net” account. Financial Assets Carried at Cost. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred in an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value because its fair value cannot be reliably measured, or on a derivative asset that is linked to and must be settled by delivery of such an unquoted equity instrument, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash - 15 - flows discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset. AFS Investments. In the case of equity instruments classified as AFS investments, evidence of impairment would include a significant or prolonged decline in fair value of investments below its cost. Where there is evidence of impairment, the cumulative loss - measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in the consolidated statements of income - is removed from the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and recognized in the consolidated statements of income. Impairment losses on equity investments are not reversed through the consolidated statements of income. Increases in fair value after impairment are recognized directly in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. In the case of debt instruments classified as AFS investments, impairment is assessed based on the same criteria as financial assets carried at amortized cost. Future interest income is based on the reduced carrying amount of the asset and is accrued based on the rate of interest used to discount future cash flows for the purpose of measuring impairment loss. Such accrual is recorded as part of “Interest and dividend income” account in the consolidated statements of income. If, in subsequent year, the fair value of a debt instrument increased and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized in the consolidated statements of income, the impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated statements of income. Offsetting Financial Instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the consolidated balance sheets if, and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. This is not generally the case with master netting agreements, where the related assets and liabilities are presented gross in the consolidated balance sheets. Business Combinations Business combinations involving entities or businesses under common control are business combinations in which all of the combining entities or businesses are ultimately controlled by the same party or parties both before and after the business combination, and that control is not transitory. Business combinations under common control are accounted for similar to pooling of interest method. In applying the pooling of interest method, the assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity of the acquired companies for the reporting period in which the common control business combinations occur and for the comparative periods presented, are included in the consolidated financial statements at their carrying amounts as if the combinations had occurred from the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements, regardless of the actual date of the combination. The excess of the cost of business combinations over the net carrying amounts of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired companies is considered as equity adjustment from business combinations, included under “Additional paid-in capital - net” account in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. Acquisition of Non-controlling Interests Changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions (i.e., transactions with owners in their capacity as owners). In such circumstances, the carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests shall be adjusted to reflect the changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the - 16 - consideration paid shall be recognized directly in stockholders’ equity and included under “Additional paid-in capital - net” account in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets are expenses paid in advance and recorded as assets before they are utilized. Investment Properties Investment properties represent land and land use rights, buildings, structures, equipment and improvements of the shopping malls and shopping mall complex under construction. Investment properties, except land and shopping mall complex under construction, are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs, less accumulated depreciation and amortization and accumulated impairment in value, if any. The carrying amount includes the cost of replacing part of an existing investment property at the time that cost is incurred if the recognition criteria are met, and excludes the costs of day-to-day servicing of an investment property. Land is stated at cost less any impairment in value. Shopping mall complex under construction is stated at cost and includes the cost of land, construction costs, property and equipment, and other direct costs. Cost also includes interest on borrowed funds incurred during the construction period, provided that the carrying amount does not exceed the amount realizable from the use or sale of the asset. Depreciation and amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: Land use rights Buildings and improvements Building equipment, furniture and others 40-60 years 35 years 3-15 years The residual values, useful lives and method of depreciation and amortization of the assets are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at each financial year-end. Shopping mall complex under construction is not depreciated until such time that the relevant assets are completed and put into operational use. When each major inspection is performed, the cost is recognized in the carrying amount of the investment properties as a replacement, if the recognition criteria are met. Investment property is derecognized when either it has been disposed or when it is permanently withdrawn from use and no future economic benefit is expected from its disposal. Any gains or losses on the retirement or disposal of an investment property are recognized in the consolidated statements of income in the year of retirement or disposal. Investment in Associate Investment in associate is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. An associate is an entity in which the Company has significant influence and which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture. - 17 - Under the equity method, investment in an associate is carried in the consolidated balance sheets at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Company’s share in net assets of the associate. Goodwill relating to an associate is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is not amortized. After application of the equity method, the Company determines whether it is necessary to recognize any additional impairment loss with respect to the Company’s net investment in the associate. The consolidated statements of income reflect the share in the results of operations of the associate. Where there has been a change recognized directly in the equity of the associate, the Company recognizes its share in any changes and discloses this, when applicable, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Profits and losses resulting from transactions between the Company and the associate are eliminated to the extent of the interest in the associate. The Company discontinues the use of equity method from the date when it ceases to have significant influence over an associate and accounts for the investment in accordance with PAS 39, from that date, provided the associate does not become a subsidiary or a joint venture as defined in PAS 31. When the Company’s interest in an investment in associate is reduced to zero, additional losses are provided only to the extent that the Company has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate to satisfy obligations of the investee that the Company has guaranteed or otherwise committed. If the associate subsequently reports profits, the Company resumes recognizing its share of the profits if it equals the share of net losses not recognized. The financial statements of the associate are prepared for the same reporting period as the Parent Company. The accounting policies of the associate conform to those used by the Company for like transactions and events in similar circumstances. Impairment of Nonfinancial Assets The carrying value of investment properties and other nonfinancial assets is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, and if the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash-generating units are written down to their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount of investment properties and other nonfinancial assets is the greater of fair value less costs to sell or value in use. The fair value less costs to sell is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset in an arm’s length transaction less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset. An assessment is made at each balance sheet date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation and amortization, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in profit or loss. After such a reversal, the depreciation and amortization charges are adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life. - 18 - Capital Stock Capital stock is measured at par value for all shares issued. When shares are sold at a premium, the difference between the proceeds and the par value is credited to “Additional paid-in capital net” account. Retained Earnings Retained earnings represent accumulated earnings, net of dividends declared. Treasury Stock Own equity instruments which are acquired (treasury shares) are deducted from stockholders’ equity and accounted for at cost. No gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of income on the purchase, sale, issuance or cancellation of the Company’s own equity instruments. Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the Company and the amount of the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received, excluding discounts and sales taxes. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognized: Rent. Revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term or based on the terms of the lease, as applicable. Cinema Ticket Sales, Amusement Income and Other Revenue. Revenue is recognized upon receipt of cash from the customer which coincides with the rendering of services. Interest. Revenue is recognized as the interest accrues, taking into account the effective yield on the asset. Dividend. Revenue is recognized when the right to receive the payment is established. Management Fees Management fees are recognized as expense in accordance with the terms of the management contracts. Costs and Expenses Operating and interest expenses are recognized as incurred. Pension Cost The Parent Company is a participant in the SM Corporate and Management Companies Employer Retirement Plan. The plan is a funded, noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan administered by a Board of Trustees covering all regular full-time employees. The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plan is determined using the projected unit credit method. This method reflects service rendered by employees to the date of valuation and incorporates assumptions concerning the employees’ projected salaries. Pension cost includes current service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of unrecognized past service costs, recognition of actuarial gains (losses) and effect of any curtailments or settlements. Past service cost is amortized over a period until the benefits become vested. The portion of the actuarial gains and losses is recognized when it exceeds the “corridor” (10% of the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation or fair value of the plan assets) at the previous balance sheet date, divided by the expected average remaining working lives of active plan members. - 19 - The amount recognized as net pension asset or liability is the net of the present value of the defined benefit obligation at balance sheet date, plus any actuarial gains (less any actuarial losses) not recognized minus past service cost not yet recognized minus the fair value of plan assets at balance sheet date out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. Foreign Currency-denominated Transactions Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency rate at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are restated at the functional currency rate of exchange at balance sheet date. All differences are taken to the consolidated statements of income. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined. Foreign Currency Translations The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Philippine peso at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date and their respective statements of income are translated at the weighted average rates for the year. The exchange differences arising on the translation are included in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity under “Cumulative translation adjustment” account. On disposal of a foreign entity, the deferred cumulative amount of exchange differences recognized in stockholders’ equity relating to that particular foreign operation is recognized in profit or loss. Leases The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date of whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset. Company as Lessor. Leases where the Company does not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Rent income from operating leases are recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the lease term or based on the terms of the lease, as applicable. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognized over the lease term on the same basis as rent income. Contingent rents are recognized as revenue in the period in which they are earned. Company as Lessee. Leases which do not transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as expense in the consolidated statements of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Associated costs, such as maintenance and insurance, are expensed as incurred. Provisions Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense. Where the Company expects a provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the receipt of the reimbursement is virtually certain. - 20 - Borrowing Costs Borrowing costs are generally expensed as incurred. Borrowing costs are capitalized if they are directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset. Capitalization of borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in progress and expenditures and borrowing costs are being incurred. Borrowing costs are capitalized until the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized. Borrowing costs include interest charges and other costs incurred in connection with the borrowing of funds used to finance the shopping mall complex. Taxes Current Tax. Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at balance sheet date. Deferred Tax. Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except for those that are stated under the standard. Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax assets to be utilized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at balance sheet date. Deferred tax relating to items recognized outside profit or loss is recognized outside profit or loss. Deferred tax items are recognized in correlation to the underlying transaction either in other comprehensive income or directly in stockholders’ equity. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority. Sales Tax. Revenue, expenses and assets are recognized net of the amount of sales tax, except: where the sales tax incurred on a purchase of assets or services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the sales tax is recognized as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and receivables and payables that are stated with the amount of sales tax included. The net amount of sales tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” or “Accounts payable and other current liabilities” accounts in the consolidated balance sheets. - 21 - Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) Basic/diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income for the year by the weighted average number of issued and outstanding shares of stock during the year, with retroactive adjustments for any stock dividends declared. Geographical Segment The Company’s business of shopping mall development and operations is organized and managed separately according to geographical areas where the Company operates, namely the Philippines and China. This is the basis upon which the Company reports its primary segment information presented in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements. Contingencies Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. They are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote. Contingent assets are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements but are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements when an inflow of economic benefits is probable. Events after the Reporting Date Post year-end events that provide additional information about the Company’s financial position at balance sheet date (adjusting events) are reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Post year-end events that are not adjusting events are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements when material. 5. Segment Information For management purposes, operating segment is monitored through geographical location as the Company’s risks and rates of return are affected predominantly by differences in economic and political environments where they operate. Each geographical area is organized and managed separately and viewed as a distinct strategic business unit that caters to different markets. As at March 31, 2013, the Company owns forty-six (46) shopping malls in the Philippines and five shopping malls in China. Management monitors the operating results of its business units separately for the purpose of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Segment performance is evaluated based on operating profit or loss and is measured consistently with operating profit or loss in the consolidated financial statements. Inter-segment Transactions Transfer prices between geographical segments are set on an arm’s length basis similar to transactions with related parties. Such transfers are eliminated in consolidation. - 22 - Geographical Segment Data Philippines China 2013 Eliminations Consolidated (In Thousands) Revenue P =7,143,279 P =686,869 P =– P =7,830,148 Segment results: Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net income P =3,515,441 797,060 P =2,718,381 P =265,669 94,222 P =171,447 P =– – P =– P =3,781,110 891,282 P =2,889,828 Net income attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests P =2,618,891 99,490 P =171,447 – P =– – P =2,790,338 99,490 Segment profit P =3,958,480 P =267,246 P =– P =4,225,726 Segment assets P =145,647,541 P =28,614,538 (P =14,592,954) P =159,669,125 P =79,051,230 P =21,407,551 (P =14,550,707) P =85,908,074 P =970,663 2,523,358 P =142,374 738,183 (Forward) Segment liabilities Other information: Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures Philippines P =– – P =1,113,037 3,261,541 2012 China Eliminations Consolidated (In Thousands) Revenue = P6,416,103 = P618,854 = P– = P7,034,957 Segment results: Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net income = P3,114,861 726,681 = P2,388,180 = P224,043 79,506 = P144,537 = P– – = P– = P3,338,904 806,187 = P2,532,717 Net income attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests = P2,289,331 98,848 = P144,538 – = P– – = P2,433,869 98,848 Segment profit = P3,560,052 = P233,214 = P– = P3,793,266 = P845,347 3,990,731 = P120,121 348,154 = P– – = P965,468 4,338,885 Other information: Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no revenue transactions with a single external customer which accounted for 10% or more of the consolidated revenue from external customer. - 23 - 6. Cash and Cash Equivalents This account consists of: Cash on hand and in banks (see Note 20) Temporary investments (see Note 20) March 31, 2013 P =1,200,593,357 17,867,397,635 P =19,067,990,992 December 31, 2012 = P608,689,838 9,098,167,523 = P9,706,857,361 Cash in banks earn interest at the respective bank deposit rates. Temporary investments are made for varying periods of up to three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Company, and earn interest at the respective temporary investment rates. Interest income earned from cash in banks and temporary investments amounted to = P65 million and = P96 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 7. Short-term Investments This account pertains to a time deposit with Banco de Oro Unibank, Inc. (BDO) amounting to = P816 million and = P821 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, with fixed interest rate of 3.24%. Such deposit is intended to meet short-term cash requirements and may be preterminated anytime by the Company. Interest income earned from short-term investments amounted to = P7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. 8. Investments Held for Trading This account consists of investments in Philippine government and corporate bonds amounting to = P457 million and = P759 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, with yields ranging from 4.90% to 8.64% in 2013 and 2012. These Philippine peso-denominated and U.S. dollar-denominated investments have various maturities ranging from 2014 to 2017. Investments held for trading have mark-to-market loss amounting to = P1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the amounts of which are included under “Others - net” account in the consolidated statements of income. Cumulative unrealized mark-to-market gain amounted to = P23 million and = P25 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Interest income earned from investments held for trading amounted to = P10 million and = P11 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. - 24 - 9. Receivables This account consists of: Rent: Third parties Related parties (see Note 20) Advances to suppliers Advances to related parties (see Note 20) Receivable from a co-investor Accrued interest (see Note 20) Others March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 P =2,071,737,635 1,636,728,613 672,205,375 531,152,457 245,380,282 61,645,969 544,368,081 P =5,763,218,412 = P2,259,198,897 1,885,424,402 636,116,922 471,660,550 246,078,722 47,123,072 334,479,315 = P5,880,081,880 Rent receivables generally have terms of 30-90 days. Receivable from a co-investor represents the consideration receivable by Tennant Range Corporation (TRC), a BVI subsidiary holding company of SM Land China, in connection with the agreement with a third party (see Note 13). Advances to suppliers, accrued interest and other receivables are normally collected throughout the financial year. The aging analysis of receivables follows: Neither past due nor impaired Past due but not impaired: 91-120 days Over 120 days March 31, 2013 P =5,641,743,405 December 31, 2012 = P5,803,169,481 61,142,349 60,332,658 P =5,763,218,412 25,227,376 51,685,023 = P5,880,081,880 Receivables are assessed by the Company’s management as not impaired, good and collectible. 10. Available-for-Sale Investments This account consists of investments in corporate notes issued by BDO amounting to = P1,000 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 with fixed interest rate of 6.80% (see Note 20). Investments in corporate notes are intended to meet short-term cash requirements. Interest income earned from AFS investments amounted to = P17 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. There were no movements in the net unrealized gain on AFS investments for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. - 25 - 11. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets This account consists of: Prepaid expenses Input taxes Advances to contractors (see Note 12) Others March 31, 2013 P =842,689,899 279,017,621 272,021,734 172,401,469 P =1,566,130,723 December 31, 2012 = P505,182,400 455,205,277 294,261,122 185,540,340 = P1,440,189,139 Prepaid expenses mainly consist of prepayments for insurance and real property taxes. 12. Investment Properties This account consists of: Cost Balance at beginning of period Additions Transfers/Reclassifications Translation adjustments Balance at end of period Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization Balance at beginning of period Depreciation and amortization Translation adjustments Balance at end of period Net Book Value Shopping Mall Complex Under Construction Land and Land Use Rights Buildings and Improvements P =26,323,231,387 192,368,995 – (8,741,244) 26,506,859,138 P =92,842,697,696 181,156,490 863,982,917 (42,865,251) 93,844,971,852 P =20,813,411,298 156,033,121 (696,883,293) (5,131,949) 20,267,429,177 P =15,245,333,081 2,580,163,164 (167,099,624) (14,749,676) 17,643,646,945 P =155,224,673,462 3,109,721,770 – (71,488,120) 158,262,907,112 483,922,654 16,085,948 (622,403) 499,386,199 P =26,007,472,939 20,207,557,966 692,407,935 (1,682,360) 20,898,283,541 P =72,946,688,311 10,445,753,044 404,543,532 (1,896,070) 10,848,400,506 P =9,419,028,671 – – – – P =17,643,646,945 31,137,233,664 1,113,037,415 (4,200,833) 32,246,070,246 P =126,016,836,866 Land and Land Use Rights Cost Balance at beginning of period Additions Transfers Translation adjustments Balance at end of period Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization Balance at beginning of period Depreciation and amortization Translation adjustments Balance at end of period Net Book Value March 31, 2013 Building Equipment, Furniture and Others Buildings and Improvements December 31, 2012 Building Equipment, Furniture and Others Shopping Mall Complex Under Construction Total Total = P22,402,878,158 3,821,792,513 258,453,905 (159,893,189) 26,323,231,387 = P80,235,045,499 5,526,303,910 7,692,439,017 (611,090,730) 92,842,697,696 = P16,950,695,663 2,672,922,112 1,261,365,355 (71,571,832) 20,813,411,298 = P15,546,814,568 9,131,389,005 (9,212,258,277) (220,612,215) 15,245,333,081 = P135,135,433,888 21,152,407,540 – (1,063,167,966) 155,224,673,462 437,595,529 56,559,550 (10,232,425) 483,922,654 = P25,839,308,733 17,718,731,839 2,565,080,499 (76,254,372) 20,207,557,966 = P72,635,139,730 9,142,890,393 1,334,001,550 (31,138,899) 10,445,753,044 = P10,367,658,254 – – – – = P15,245,333,081 27,299,217,761 3,955,641,599 (117,625,696) 31,137,233,664 = P124,087,439,798 Included under “Land” account are the 212,119 square meters of real estate properties with a carrying value of = P445 million and = P447 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and a fair value of = P13,531 million as at August 2007, planned for residential development in accordance with the cooperative contracts entered into by Mega Make and Affluent with Grand China International Limited (Grand China) and Oriental Land Development - 26 - Limited (Oriental Land) on March 15, 2007. The value of these real estate properties were not part of the consideration amounting to = P10,827 million paid by the Parent Company to Grand China and Oriental Land. Accordingly, the assets were recorded at their carrying values under “Investment properties - net” account and a corresponding liability equivalent to the same amount, which is shown as part of “Other noncurrent liabilities” account in the consolidated balance sheets. Portions of investment properties located in China with carrying value of = P4,217 million and = P4,852 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and estimated fair value of = P10,843 million and = P10,874 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were mortgaged as collaterals to secure the domestic borrowings in China (see Note 16). Rent income from investment properties amounted to = P6,733 million and = P6,031 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Direct operating expenses from investment properties that generated rent income amounted to = P3,604 million and = P3,242 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The fair value of investment properties amounted to = P218,071 million as at July 31, 2010 as determined by an independent appraiser who holds a recognized and relevant professional qualification. The valuation of investment properties was based on market values using income approach. The fair value represents the amount at which the assets can be exchanged between a knowledgeable, willing seller and a knowledgeable, willing buyer in an arm’s length transaction at the date of valuation, in accordance with International Valuation Standards as set out by the International Valuation Standards Committee. Below are the significant assumptions used in the valuation: Discount rate Capitalization rate Average growth rate 11.75% 8.00% 6.00% While fair value of the investment properties was not determined as at March 31, 2013, the Company’s management believes that there were no conditions present in 2013 and 2012 that would significantly reduce the fair value of the investment properties from that determined in 2010. The Company’s management believes that the carrying values of the newly opened malls after the date of the valuation approximate their fair values. In 2013, shopping mall complex under construction mainly pertains to costs incurred for the development of SM Aura Premier, SM City BF Parañaque, SM Seaside City Cebu, SM City Cauayan, SM Tianjin and SM Zibo and the ongoing expansions and renovations of SM City Bacolod, SM City Sta. Rosa, SM City Clark, SM City Dasmariñas, SM City Lipa, SM Megamall and SM Mall of Asia. In 2012, shopping mall complex under construction mainly pertains to costs incurred for the development of SM Aura Premier, SM City BF Parañaque, SM Seaside City Cebu, SM Tianjin and SM Zibo, and the ongoing expansions and renovations of SM City Bacolod, SM City Clark, SM City Dasmariñas, SM City Sta. Rosa and SM Megamall. - 27 - Shopping mall complex under construction includes cost of land amounting to = P1,630 million and = P1,615 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Construction contracts with various contractors related to the construction of the above-mentioned projects amounted to = P48,177 million and = P53,965 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, inclusive of overhead, cost of labor and materials and all other costs necessary for the proper execution of the works. The outstanding contracts are valued at = P12,104 million and = P14,393 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Interest capitalized to shopping mall complex under construction amounted to = P9 million and = P114 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Capitalization rates used were 5.99% and 6.13% as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. 13. Other Noncurrent Assets This account consists of: Bonds and deposits Investment in associate Others March 31, 2013 P =2,987,632,250 251,343,795 1,417,047,152 P =4,656,023,197 December 31, 2012 = P2,519,247,536 252,059,209 1,363,276,073 = P4,134,582,818 Bonds and deposits mainly consist of deposits to contractors and suppliers to be applied throughout construction and advances and deposits paid for leased properties to be applied at the last term of the lease. On April 10, 2012, TRC entered into Memorandum of Agreement with Trendlink Holdings Limited (THL), a third party, wherein Fei Hua Real Estate Company (FHREC), a 100% subsidiary of TRC, issued new shares to THL equivalent to 50% equity interest. In addition, THL undertakes to pay TRC amounting to = P22 million (¥3 million) for the difference between cash invested and 50% equity of FHREC and = P224 million (¥34 million) representing the difference between the current market value and cost of the investment properties of FHREC. FHREC was incorporated in China. TRC is a wholly owned subsidiary of SM Land China. As at March 31, 2013, TRC owns 50% equity interest in FHREC. Management assessed that the Company lost control over FHREC by virtue of agreement with the shareholders of THL. Consequently, FHREC became an associate of the Company. Gain on dilution of equity interest over FHREC as a result of issuance of new shares to THL, included under “Others - net” account in the consolidated statements of income, amounted to = P224 million in 2012. As at March 31, 2013, the aggregated assets and liabilities of FHREC amounted to = P1,256 million and = P562 million, respectively. - 28 - 14. Loans Payable This account consists of unsecured Philippine peso-denominated loans obtained from a bank amounting to = P800 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. These loans will mature in October 2013 with interest rate of 3.25% in 2013 and 3.75% in 2012. Interest expense incurred from loans payable amounted to = P7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. 15. Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities This account consists of: Trade Accrued utilities expense Accrued operating expenses: Third parties Related parties (see Note 20) Liability for purchased land Taxes payable Accrued interest (see Notes 16 and 20) Others March 31, 2013 P =4,246,903,294 1,654,958,075 December 31, 2012 = P5,863,568,314 830,320,247 2,121,692,671 2,875,747,386 121,321,472 109,422,102 1,313,471,783 1,341,720,408 316,453,310 211,887,019 312,103,146 378,870,029 519,589,895 560,115,918 P11,398,520,838 P =11,379,624,231 = Trade payables primarily consist of liabilities to suppliers and contractors, which are noninterestbearing and are normally settled within a 30-day term. Accrued operating expenses mainly pertain to accrued administrative expenses such as security and janitorial, accrued management fees and rent payables which are normally settled throughout the financial year. Liability for purchased land, taxes, accrued interest and other payables are expected to be settled throughout the financial year. 16. Long-term Debt This account consists of: Parent Company U.S. dollar-denominated loans: Five-year term loans Five-year term syndicated loans Five-year, three-year and two-year bilateral loans Other U.S. dollar loans (Forward) March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 P =10,844,329,048 7,959,673,978 1,016,465,569 3,420,617,730 = P10,896,961,563 – 1,021,242,099 2,438,112,216 - 29 - Philippine peso-denominated loans: Five-year and ten-year fixed and floating rate notes Five-year, seven-year and ten-year corporate notes Five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed and floating rate notes Five-year floating rate notes Five-year and ten-year corporate notes Five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes Other bank loans Subsidiaries China yuan renminbi-denominated loans: Five-year loan Three-year loan Five-year loan Philippine peso-denominated loans Five-year bilateral loan Less current portion March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 7,395,512,561 6,631,441,639 7,442,919,136 6,823,838,758 4,917,485,262 4,873,048,801 1,092,376,167 795,504,488 7,061,947,547 4,966,460,223 4,920,827,931 1,092,151,201 795,341,665 7,159,490,419 1,734,427,200 984,852,153 400,100,820 1,871,134,000 1,111,112,318 401,239,650 498,102,398 59,625,885,361 2,611,101,353 P =57,014,784,008 497,991,424 51,438,822,603 1,791,703,848 = P49,647,118,755 Parent Company U.S. Dollar-denominated Five-Year Term Loans This represents a US$270 million and US$145 unsecured loan obtained as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, from a US$270 million facility. The loans bear interest rates based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on March 21, 2016 (see Notes 22 and 23). U.S. Dollar-denominated Five-Year Syndicated Loan This represents a US$200 million unsecured loan obtained on January 29, 2013. The loan bears an interest rate based on London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus spread, with a bullet maturity on January 29, 2018 (see Notes 22 and 23). U.S. Dollar-denominated Five-Year, Three-Year and Two-Year Bilateral Loans The US$75 million unsecured loans were obtained in November 2008. The loans bear interest rates based on LIBOR plus spread, with bullet maturities ranging from two to five years. The Company prepaid the US$20 million and the US$30 million unsecured loans on June 1, 2009 and November 30, 2010, with original maturity dates of November 19, 2010 and November 28, 2011, respectively. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P4 million in 2010 (see Notes 22 and 23). The remaining balance of US$25 million will mature on November 20, 2013. Other U.S. Dollar Loans This account consists of the following: US$10 million and US$25 million, out of US$50 million five-year bilateral unsecured loan, obtained on December 7, 2012 and January 15, 2013, respectively. The loan bears interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on August 30, 2017 (see Note 22). US$30 million and a US$20 million five-year bilateral unsecured loan drawn on November 30, 2010 and April 15, 2011, respectively. The loans bear interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on November 30, 2015 (see Notes 22 and 23). - 30 US$20 million three-year bilateral unsecured loan drawn on July 13, 2010. The loan bears interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on January 14, 2013. The loan was prepaid on January 13, 2012. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P25 million in 2012 (see Notes 22 and 23). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year and Ten-Year Floating and Fixed Rate Notes This represents a five-year and ten-year floating and fixed rate notes obtained on June 19, 2012 amounting to = P3,450 million and = P1,000 million for the floating and = P680 million and = P2,370 million for the fixed, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on Philippine Dealing System Treasury Fixing (PDST-F) plus margin for the floating and 6.22% and 6.81% for the five-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2017 and 2022, respectively. The Company prepaid a portion of fixed rate notes amounting to = P50 million on March 19, 2013, the related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P0.4 million (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year, Seven-Year and Ten-Year Corporate Notes This represents a five-year floating and five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes amounting to = P3,000 million, = P1,134 million, = P52 million and = P814 million, respectively, out of = P7,000 million facility obtained on December 20, 2010. The remaining = P2,000 million floating rate note was obtained on June 13, 2011. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin for the five-year floating and 5.79%, 5.89% and 6.65% for the five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2015, 2017 and 2020, respectively. The Company prepaid a portion of fixed rate notes amounting to = P196 million on March 20, 2013, the related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P2 million (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year, Seven-Year and Ten-Year Fixed and Floating Rate Notes This represents a five-year floating, five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes obtained on January 12, 2012 amounting to = P200 million, = P1,012 million, = P133 million, and = P3,655 million, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin for the five-year floating and 5.86%, 5.97% and 6.10% for the five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2017, 2019 and 2022, respectively (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year Floating Rate Notes This represents five-year floating rate notes obtained on March 18, 2011 and June 17, 2011 amounting to = P4,000 million and = P1,000 million, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin and will mature on March 19, 2016 and June 18, 2016, respectively (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year and Ten-Year Corporate Notes This represents a five-year floating and fixed rate and ten-year fixed rate notes obtained on April 14, 2009 amounting to = P200 million, = P3,700 million and = P1,100 million, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin for the five-year floating and 8.4% and 10.1% for the five-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2014 and 2019, respectively. The Company prepaid the = P200 million and = P3,700 million loans on April 15, 2012, with original maturity date of April 15, 2014. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P17 million in 2012 (see Note 22). - 31 - Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year, Seven-Year and Ten-Year Fixed Rate Notes This represents a five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes obtained on June 17, 2008 amounting to = P1,000 million, = P1,200 million and = P800 million, respectively. The loans bear fixed interest rates of 9.31%, 9.60% and 9.85%, respectively, and will mature on June 17, 2013, 2015 and 2018, respectively. The loans amounting to = P1,000 million and = P1,200 were prepaid on June 17, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P5 million and = P4 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Notes 22 and 23). Other Bank Loans This account consists of the following: Five-year loan obtained on June 29, 2010 amounting to = P1,000 million and will mature on June 29, 2015. The loan carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). Five-year inverse floating rate notes obtained on June 23, 2010 amounting to = P1,000 million. The loans bear an interest rate based on agreed fixed rate less PDST-F and will mature on June 23, 2015. The Company prepaid = P100 million on March 25, 2013, the related balance of unamortized debt issuance cost charged to expense amounted to = P0.8 million June 23, 2015 (see Notes 22 and 23). Five-year bullet loan obtained on January 13, 2010 amounting to = P1,000 million and will mature on January 13, 2015. The loan carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). Five-year bullet loan obtained on November 3, 2009 amounting to = P1,000 million and will mature on November 3, 2014. The loan carries interest based on PDST-F plus on agreed margin (see Note 22). Five-year bullet loans obtained on October 16, 2009 amounting to = P2,000 million. The loan bears an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin and will mature on October 16, 2014 (see Note 22). Ten-year bullet fixed rate loan obtained on August 16, 2006 amounting to = P1,200 million. The loan carries a fixed interest rate of 9.75% and will mature on August 16, 2016 (see Note 22). All the above Philippine peso-denominated loans of the Parent Company are unsecured. Subsidiaries China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Five-Year Loan This represents a five-year loan obtained on August 26, 2009 amounting to ¥350 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. The loan is payable in semi-annual installments until 2014. The loan has a floating rate with an annual re-pricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 10%. The loan carries an interest rate of 5.76% in 2013 and 2012 (see Note 22). - 32 - China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Three-Year Loan This represents a three-year loan obtained on March 28, 2011 amounting to ¥187 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. Partial drawdown totaling ¥169 million was made as at December 31, 2012. The loan has a floating rate with an annual re-pricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 5% and will mature on March 27, 2014. The loan bears interest rate of 6.20% in 2013 and 2012, respectively (see Note 22). China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Five-Year Loan This represents a five-year loan obtained on August 27, 2010 amounting to ¥150 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. Partial drawdown totaling ¥61 million was made as at December 31, 2012. The loan is payable in 2015. The loan has a floating rate with an annual repricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 10%. The loan carries an interest rate of 5.76% in 2013 and 2012 (see Note 22). China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Eight-Year Loan This represents an eight-year loan obtained on December 28, 2005 amounting to ¥155 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. The loan is payable in annual installments with two years grace period until December 2012. The loan has a floating rate with an annual re-pricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 10%. The loan bears interest rate of 6.35% in 2012 and 2011 (see Note 22). The China yuan renminbi-denominated loans are secured by investment properties in China (see Note 12). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year Bilateral Loans This account consists of the following: Five-year term loan obtained on September 28, 2007 and November 6, 2007 amounting to = P250 million to finance the construction of a project called “SM by the Bay.” The loan is payable in equal quarterly installments of = P16 million starting December 2008 up to September 2012 and carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). Five-year term loan obtained on October 24, 2011 amounting to = P500 million and will mature on October 24, 2016. The loan carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). All the above Philippine peso-denominated loans of the subsidiaries are unsecured. The re-pricing frequencies of floating rate loans range from three to six months. The loan agreements provide certain restrictions and requirements principally with respect to maintenance of required financial ratios (i.e., current ratio of not less than 1.00:1.00, debt to equity ratio of not more than 0.70:0.30 and debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.10:1.00) and material change in ownership or control. As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company is in compliance with the terms of its loan covenants. - 33 - Debt Issuance Costs The movements in unamortized debt issuance costs are as follows: Balance at beginning of period Additions Amortization Balance at end of period March 31, 2013 P =407,413,365 230,315,373 (36,193,926) P =601,534,812 December 31, 2012 = P457,844,346 112,637,407 (163,068,388) = P407,413,365 Amortization of debt issuance costs is recognized in the consolidated statements of income under “Others - net” account. Repayment Schedule Repayments of long-term debt are scheduled as follows: Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 to 2022 Amount = P1,425,982,514 5,716,256,839 11,244,680,820 17,648,500,000 6,606,900,000 17,585,100,000 = P60,227,420,173 17. Stockholders’ Equity Capital Stock The Company has an authorized capital stock of 20,000,000,000 shares with a par value of = P1 a share. The movements of the capital stock of the Company are as follows: Number of shares at beginning of period Issuance during the year through stock dividends Number of shares at end of period March 31, 2013 17,392,534,760 – 17,392,534,760 December 31, 2012 13,917,800,067 3,474,734,693 17,392,534,760 On April 24, 2012, the BOD and stockholders approved the declaration of stock dividends equivalent to 25% based on the par value per share in favor of stockholders of record as at May 24, 2012, payable on or before June 20, 2012. Accordingly, retained earnings amounting to = P3,474 million were transferred to capital stock. - 34 - The following summarizes the information on the Company's registration of securities under the Securities Regulation Code: Date of SEC Approval/ Notification to SEC March 15, 1994 April 22, 1994 May 29, 2007 May 20, 2008 October 14, 2010 Authorized Shares 10,000,000,000 – 10,000,000,000 – – No. of Shares Issued – 6,369,378,049 – 912,897,212 569,608,700 Issue/Offer Price = P– 5.35 – 11.86 11.50 The Company declared stock dividends in 2012, 2007, 1996 and 1995. The total number of shareholders is 2,479 and 2,493 as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Additional Paid-in Capital On April 15, 2009, the Parent Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired additional 24,376,743 FARDC shares, which is equivalent to 19.82% of the total outstanding common stock of FARDC. The acquisition of such non-controlling interests amounting to = P3,384 million is accounted for as an equity transaction. Accordingly, the carrying amounts of SMPH’s investment and the share of non-controlling interests were adjusted to reflect the changes in their relative interests in FARDC. The difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests were adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid was recognized directly in equity and attributed to the owners of the parent, and is shown as part of “Additional paid-in capital - net” account in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. International Placement of Shares On October 14, 2010, the Parent Company has undergone an international placement of its shares to raise capital to finance strategic expansion programs in the Philippines and in China as well as for general working capital. In connection with the international placement of its shares, the Parent Company engaged into a Placement Agreement with SM Land (the Selling Shareholder) and CLSA Limited and Macquarie Capital (Singapore) Pte. Limited (the “Joint Bookrunners”) on October 14, 2010. As stated in the Placement Agreement, SM Land shall sell its 570 million SMPH Common Shares (the “Sale Shares”) with a par value of = P1 per share at = P11.50 (Offer Price) per share to the Joint Bookrunners, or to investors that the Joint Bookrunners may procure outside the Philippines (the “International Placement”). Contemporaneous with the signing of the Placement Agreement, the Parent Company likewise entered into a Subscription Agreement with SM Land. As stated in the Subscription Agreement, SM Land will not directly receive any proceeds from the International Placement, but instead SM Land has conditionally agreed to subscribe for, and the Parent Company has conditionally agreed to issue, out of its authorized but unissued capital stock, new SMPH common shares in an amount equal to the aggregate number of the Sale Shares sold by SM Land in the International Placement at a subscription price of = P11.50 per share, which is equal to the Offer Price of the Sale Shares. SM Land was able to sell through the Joint Bookrunners the total Sale Shares of 570 million SMPH common shares. Likewise, SM Land subscribed for and the Parent Company issued to SM Land the same number of new SMPH common shares. The proceeds of = P6,414 million, net of transaction costs capitalized, add up to the capital of the Parent Company. - 35 - Cumulative Translation Adjustment The tax effects relating to each component of other comprehensive income are as follows: Net fair value gains (losses) on cash flow hedges Foreign currency differences of subsidiaries Number of shares at end of period March 31, 2013 (P =21,749,859) (6,771,761) (P =28,521,620) March 31, 2012 (P =104,268,826) – (P =104,268,826) Retained Earnings On April 24, 2012 and March 22, 2002, the BOD approved the appropriation of retained earnings amounting to = P20,000 million and = P7,000 million, respectively, for future corporate expansion programs. As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of retained earnings appropriated for the continuous corporate and mall expansions amounted to = P27,000 million. As at March 31, 2013, included in shopping mall complex under construction are SM Aura Premier, SM City BF Parañaque, SM Seaside City Cebu, SM City Cauayan, SM Tianjin and SM Zibo and the ongoing expansions and renovations of SM City Bacolod, SM City Sta. Rosa, SM City Clark, SM City Dasmariñas, SM City Lipa, SM Megamall and SM Mall of Asia. Over the next three years, the Company expects to incur = P88,000 million for its capital expenditures in the Philippines and China. The retained earnings account is restricted for the payment of dividends to the extent of = P8,642 million and = P7,895 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, representing the cost of shares held in treasury (P =101 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012) and accumulated equity in net earnings of the subsidiaries totaling = P8,541 million and = P7,794 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The accumulated equity in net earnings of the subsidiaries is not available for dividend distribution until such time that the Parent Company receives the dividends from the subsidiaries. Treasury Stock Treasury stock, totaling 18,857,000 shares, is stated at acquisition cost. 18. Income Tax The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: Deferred tax assets Unrealized foreign exchange losses and others Deferred tax liabilities Undepreciated capitalized interest, unrealized foreign exchange gains and others March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 P =187,135,958 = P190,463,028 P =1,265,932,906 = P1,278,194,418 On November 26, 2008, the Bureau of Internal Revenue issued Revenue Regulations No. 16-2008 which implemented the provisions of Republic Act No. 9504 on optional standard deduction (OSD). This regulation allowed both individual and corporate tax payers to use OSD in - 36 - computing their taxable income. For corporations, they may elect a standard deduction in an amount equivalent to 40% of gross income, as provided by law, in lieu of the itemized allowed deductions. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company, opted to use OSD in computing their taxable income. The reconciliation of statutory tax rate to effective tax rates are as follows: Statutory tax rate Income tax effects of: Interest income subjected to final tax and dividend income exempt from income tax Change in enacted tax rates and others Effective tax rates 2013 30.0% 2012 30.0% (0.8) (5.6) 23.6% (1.2) (4.7) 24.1% 19. Pension Cost The Company is a participant in SM Corporate Management Companies Employer Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan) covering all regular full-time employees. The Retirement Plan is in the form of a trust administered by a trustee bank. The following tables summarize the components of the Company’s pension plan as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: Net Pension Cost Current service cost Net interest on net defined benefit liability Net pension cost 2013 P =2,009,905 105,116 P =2,115,021 2012 = P7,242,901 387,728 = P7,630,629 Actual return on plan assets P =3,518,558 = P11,817,977 Net Pension Asset Defined benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets Net pension asset 2013 P =147,322,136 (104,228,496) P =43,093,640 2012 = P133,914,030 (97,021,049) = P36,892,981 - 37 - The changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Current service cost Interest cost on benefit obligation Benefits paid Actuarial loss - changes in actuarial assumptions Actuarial gain - experience Balance at end of year 2013 P =133,914,030 2,009,905 2,045,537 – 9,972,437 (619,773) P =147,322,136 2012 = P83,590,852 7,242,901 5,893,155 (223,533) 39,889,748 (2,479,093) = P133,914,030 2013 P =97,021,049 1,940,421 – 3,688,888 1,578,138 P =104,228,496 2012 = P70,979,267 5,505,427 (223,533) 14,447,338 6,312,550 = P97,021,049 The changes in the fair value of plan assets are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Interest income Benefits paid Contributions Remeasurement gain Balance at end of year The Company expects to contribute = P15 million to its defined benefit pension plan in 2013. The carrying amounts and fair values of the plan assets as at December 31, 2012 are as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Investments in: Debt and other securities Common trust funds Equity securities Government securities Other financial assets Carrying Amount = P5,903,287 Fair Value = P5,903,287 10,670,837 38,332,750 3,193,021 38,181,958 739,196 = P97,021,049 10,670,837 38,332,750 3,193,021 38,181,958 739,196 = P97,021,049 The plan assets consist of the following: Cash and cash equivalents includes regular savings and time deposits; Investments in debt and other securities consists of short-term and long-term corporate loans, notes and bonds which bear interest ranging from 5.45% to 8.46% and have maturities ranging from 2014 to 2022; Investments in common trust funds pertain to unit investment trust fund; Investments in equity securities consist of listed and unlisted equity securities; Investments in government securities consist of retail treasury bonds which bear interest ranging from 5.00% to 11.14% and have maturities ranging from 2013 to 2037; and Other financial assets include accrued interest income on cash deposits and debt securities held by the Retirement Plan. - 38 - As at and for the year ended December 31, 2012, the following table summarizes the outstanding balances and transactions of the Retirement Plan with BDO, an affiliate: Cash and cash equivalents Interest income on cash and cash equivalents Investments in common trust funds Gains from investments in common trust funds Amount = P5,903,287 83,291 38,332,750 8,555,366 The principal assumptions used in determining pension obligations for the Company’s plan are shown below: Discount rate Expected rate of return on plan assets Future salary increases 2013 6.1% 6.0% 11.0% 2012 6.1% 6.0% 11.0% The overall expected rate of return on plan assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period within which the obligation is to be settled. The amounts for the period ended March 31, 2013 and previous three years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are as follows: Defined benefit obligation Plan assets Deficit (excess plan assets) Experience adjustments on plan liabilities Experience adjustment on plan assets 2013 P =147,322,136 104,228,496 43,093,640 (619,773) 1,578,138 2012 = P133,914,030 97,021,049 36,892,981 (2,479,093) 6,312,550 2011 = P83,590,852 70,979,267 12,611,585 2010 = P54,108,736 54,135,272 (26,536) 18,221,688 142,650 (5,496,062) 4,272,897 20. Related Party Transactions Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party in making financial and operating decisions and the parties are subject to common control. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities. Affiliates SM Laiya/FHREC 2013 P =– 2012 – 2013 2,142,429 2012 1,892,987 – 2013 2012 – 2013 – 2012 – 2013 – 2012 – 2013 P =2,142,429 2012 1,892,987 Rent Rent Accrued Advances Advances Rent Expense Payables Management Made to Related (see (see Management Receivables Fees During the Parties (see Note 9) Note 21) Note 15) Fees (see Note 15) Period (see Note 9) (In Thousands) P =– P =12,364 P =4,557 P =– P =– P =– P =– – 11,512 4,579 – – – – 1,626,531 – – – – – – 1,885,424 – – – – – – – 52,012 12,208 – – – – – 46,613 16,847 – – – – – – – 227,906 92,657 – – – – – 218,023 99,895 – – – – – – – 60,831 531,152 – 471,661 471,661 – – – – P =1,626,531 P =64,376 P =16,765 P =227,906 P =92,657 P =60,831 P =531,152 1,885,424 58,125 21,426 218,023 99,895 471,661 471,661 P =3,339 4,623 75,571 108,492 – – – – – – P =78,910 113,115 P =– 7,294 52,784 26,386 – – – – – – P =52,784 33,680 P =– 14,663 – – – – – – – – P =– 14,663 P =– P =– 12,382 – – 14,488,502 – 5,258,955 – – – – – – – – – – – – P =– P =14,488,502 12,382 5,258,955 P =– 299,957 – – – – – – – – P =– 299,957 P =– – 1,000,000 1,000,000 – – – – – – P =1,000,000 1,000,000 There have been no guarantees/collaterals provided or received for any related party receivables or payables. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has not recorded any impairment of receivables relating to amounts owed by related parties. This assessment is undertaken each financial year through examining the financial position of the related party and the market in which the related party operates. The above transactions with related parties are made at terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions. As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, outstanding balances at year-end are unsecured, noninterest-bearing, generally settled within 30 to 90 days and settlement occurs in cash except cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, AFS investments and long-term debt. For the terms and conditions of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, AFS investments and longterm debt, please refer to Notes 6, 7, 8, 10 and 16, respectively. P =– – 816,000 821,000 – – – – – – P =816,000 821,000 P =– 697,900 – – – – – – – – P =– 697,900 Accrued Accrued Interest Interest Investments Cash Long-term Receivable Payables and Cash Short-term Held for AFS Debt (see Interest (see Equivalents Investments (see Interest Trading Investments Note 9) Expense Note 15) (see Note 6) (see Note 7) (see Note 8) (see Note 10) Note 16) Income Affiliate refers to an entity that is neither a parent, subsidiary, nor an associate, with stockholders common to the SM Group or under common control. Affiliate Affiliates SM Management Group Affiliates Parent Relationship Year SM Retail Group and SM Banking Group SM Land SMIC Related Party Rent Income (see Note 21) The significant related party transactions entered into by the Company with its ultimate parent company and affiliates and the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements with respect to such transactions follow: - 39 - - 40 - Below are the nature of the transactions with related parties: SMIC The Company leases land and maintains certain investments held for trading and long-term debt. The lease of land is for a period of 50 years, renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties. The Company pays a minimum fixed amount or a certain percentage of its gross rent income, whichever is higher. SM Retail Group and SM Banking Group The Company leases out its mall spaces and maintains certain bank accounts, short-term investments, investments held for trading and AFS investments. SM Land The Company leases land where one of its malls is located for a period of 50 years, renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties. The Company pays a minimum fixed amount or a certain percentage of its gross rent income, whichever is higher. SM Management Group The Company pays management fees to its affiliates, Shopping Center Management Corporation, West Avenue Theaters Corporation and Family Entertainment Center, Inc. for managing the operations of the malls. SM China Companies In 2012, SM City Xiamen entered into an offshore loan agreement with SM Laiya (SM Department Store in China). The loan is unsecured and bears an interest rate of 5.6%. As of March 31, 2013, interest amounting to = P2.7 million was collected. Also, SM China Companies provide noninterest-bearing cash advances to FHREC, an associate. The SM China Companies entered into land development contracts with Grand China and Oriental Land to jointly develop certain sites in the cities of Jinjiang, Chengdu and Xiamen, with areas of 158,727 square meters, 19,952 square meters and 33,440 square meters, respectively, as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Under the terms of the contracts, the SM China Companies will provide the land use rights while Grand China and Oriental Land will fund the development expenses, among others. Key Management Compensation The total compensation paid to key management personnel of the Company amounted to = P10 million and = P8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. No special benefits are paid to management personnel other than the usual monthly salaries and government mandated bonuses. 21. Lease Agreements The Company’s lease agreements with its tenants are generally granted for a term of one year, with the exception of some of the larger tenants operating nationally, which are granted initial lease terms of five years, renewable on an annual basis thereafter. Upon inception of the lease agreement, tenants are required to pay certain amounts of deposits. Tenants likewise pay either a fixed monthly rent, which is calculated with reference to a fixed sum per square meter of area leased, or pay rent on a percentage rental basis, which comprises a basic monthly amount and a percentage of gross sales or a minimum set amount, whichever is higher. - 41 - Rent income amounted to = P6,733 million and = P6,031 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company also leases certain parcels of land where some of its malls are situated or constructed. The terms of the lease are for periods ranging from 15 to 50 years, renewable for the same period under the same terms and conditions. Rent payments are generally computed based on a certain percentage of the Company’s gross rent income or a certain fixed amount, whichever is higher. The minimum lease payables under the noncancellable operating leases as at March 31, 2013 and December 31. 2012 are as follows: Within one year After one year but not more than five years After five years December 31, March 31, 2012 2013 = P530,659,607 P =532,091,819 2,252,319,501 2,267,131,512 26,548,199,613 26,707,806,776 P29,490,785,884 P =29,347,422,944 = Rent expense included under “Costs and expenses” account in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P222 million and = P163 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 22. Financial Risk Management Objectives and Policies The Company’s principal financial instruments, other than derivatives, comprise of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, accrued interest and other receivables, AFS investments and bank loans. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to finance the Company’s operations. The Company has various other financial assets and liabilities such as rent receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its operations. The Company also enters into derivative transactions, principally interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps, foreign currency call options, non-deliverable forwards and foreign currency range options. The purpose is to manage the interest rate and currency risks arising from the Company’s operations and its sources of finance (see Note 23). The main risks arising from the Company’s financial instruments are interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s BOD and management review and agree on the policies for managing each of these risks as summarized below. Interest Rate Risk The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to its financial instruments with floating interest and/or fixed interest rates. Fixed rate financial instruments are subject to fair value interest rate risk while floating rate financial instruments are subject to cash flow interest rate risk. Re-pricing of floating rate financial instruments is done every three to six months. Interest on fixed rate financial instruments is fixed until maturity of the instrument. The details of financial instruments that are exposed to interest rate risk are disclosed in Notes 6, 8, 10 and 16. - 42 - The Company’s policy is to manage its interest cost using a mix of fixed and floating rate debts. To manage this mix in a cost-efficient manner, the Company enters into interest rate swaps, in which the Company agrees to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. These swaps are designated to economically hedge underlying debt obligations. As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, after taking into account the effect of interest rate swaps, approximately 52% and 45%, respectively, of the Company’s long-term borrowings excluding China yuan renminbi-denominated loans, are at a fixed rate of interest (see Note 23). Floating Rate U.S. dollar-denominated fiveyear term loans Interest rate U.S. dollar-denominated fiveyear term loans Interest rate U.S. dollar-denominated bilateral loans Interest rate Other U.S. dollar loans Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated floating rate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated five-year bilateral loans Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate China yuan renminbidenominated loans Interest rate Fixed Rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated fixed rate notes Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate $– $50,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– $– P =50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P =44,500,000 PDST-F+margin% P =– P =3,008,980,000 PDST-F+margin% ¥210,000,000 5.76%–6.20% $25,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– P =50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P =96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% P =– P =8,980,000 PDST-F+margin% ¥203,905,956 5.76%–6.20% ¥60,900,000 5.76% P =2,862,080,000 PDST-F+margin% P =– P =96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% P =4,800,000,000 PDST-F+margin% $– $– $– $– P =78,000,000 5.86%-6.81% P =– $– P =30,000,000 6.22%-6.81% P =– P =78,000,000 5.86%-6.81% P =– P =968,000,000 5.79%–6.65% 3-<4 Years $– P =18,000,000 5.79%–6.65% 2-<3 Years P =18,000,000 5.79%–6.65% 1-<2 Years P =– $– $– $– $270,000,000 LIBOR+spread P =78,000,000 5.86%-6.81% P =1,200,000,000 9.75% P =8,000,000 6.65% 4-<5 Years March 31, 2013 ¥– P =500,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P =– P =4,846,500,000 PDST-F+margin% Interest Rate Risk Table The Company’s long-term debt, presented by maturity profile, are as follows: - 43 - ¥– P =– P =– P =3,514,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P =– $35,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– $– $– P =1,656,900,000 5.86%-6.81% P =– P =8,000,000 6.65% 5-<6 Years ¥– P =– P =– P =950,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P =– $– $– $200,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– P =6,631,100,000 5.86%-9.85% P =– P =1,844,000,000 6.65%–10.11% >6 Years – (P =601,534,812) P =60,227,420,173 (13,207,823) (1,897,602) (60,581,003) (23,255,972) (47,382,270) (3,534,431) (200,326,022) 3,119,380,173 5,880,040,000 500,000,000 9,548,000,000 4,900,000,000 3,468,000,000 1,020,000,000 8,160,000,000 (171,670,952) (4,884,629) 1,200,000,000 11,016,000,000 (57,867,886) (P =16,926,222) 8,552,000,000 P =2,864,000,000 Total Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs P =59,625,885,361 3,119,380,173 5,866,832,177 498,102,398 9,487,418,997 4,876,744,028 3,420,617,730 1,016,465,569 7,959,673,978 10,844,329,048 1,195,115,371 8,494,132,114 P =2,847,073,778 Carrying Value Floating Rate U.S. dollar-denominated fiveyear term loans Interest rate U.S. dollar-denominated bilateral loans Interest rate Other U.S. dollar loans Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated floating rate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated five-year bilateral loans Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate China yuan renminbidenominated loans Interest rate Fixed Rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated fixed rate notes Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate $50,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– = P50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– = P3,010,000,000 PDST-F+margin% ¥375,168,446 5.76%–6.20% = P50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– = P10,000,000 PDST-F+margin% ¥77,476,000 5.76%–6.20% ¥60,900,000 5.76% = P2,960,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– = P96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% = P4,800,000,000 PDST-F+margin% $– $– $25,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– $– = P78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P– $– = P78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P– = P78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P– = P1,097,300,000 5.79%–6.65% 3-<4 Years $– = P20,000,000 5.79%–6.65% 2-<3 Years = P20,000,000 5.79%–6.65% 1-<2 Years ¥– = P500,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– = P4,846,500,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– $– $– $270,000,000 LIBOR+spread = P78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P1,200,000,000 9.75% = P8,660,000 5.79%–6.65% 4-<5 Years December 31, 2012 - 44 - ¥– = P– = P– = P3,514,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– $10,000,000 LIBOR+spread $– $– = P1,685,900,000 5.86%-6.81% = P– = P57,485,000 5.89%–6.65% 5-<6 Years ¥– = P– = P– = P950,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P– $– $– $– = P6,650,100,000 5.86%-9.85% = P– = P1,856,555,000 5.89%–10.11% >6 Years – (P =407,413,365) = P51,846,235,968 (15,322,281) (2,008,576) (64,381,639) (25,829,459) (24,887,784) (5,007,901) 3,383,485,968 5,980,000,000 500,000,000 9,600,000,000 4,900,000,000 2,463,000,000 1,026,250,000 (186,538,437) (5,187,300) 1,200,000,000 11,083,500,000 (60,069,406) (P =18,180,582) 8,650,000,000 = P3,060,000,000 Total Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs = P51,438,822,603 3,383,485,968 5,964,677,719 497,991,424 9,535,618,361 4,874,170,541 2,438,112,216 1,021,242,099 10,896,961,563 1,194,812,700 8,589,930,594 = P3,041,819,418 Carrying Value - 45 - Interest Rate Risk Sensitivity Analysis The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in interest rates, with all other variables held constant, of the Company’s income before income tax. The impact on the Company’s stockholders’ equity, due to changes in fair value of AFS investments, is immaterial. 2013 2012 Increase (Decrease) in Basis Points 100 50 (100) (50) 100 50 (100) (50) Effect on Income Before Income Tax (P =67,826,972) (33,913,486) 67,826,972 33,913,486 (P =41,005,451) (20,502,725) 41,005,451 20,502,725 Fixed rate debts, although subject to fair value interest rate risk, are not included in the sensitivity analysis as these are carried at amortized costs. The assumed movement in basis points for interest rate sensitivity analysis is based on the currently observable market environment, showing a significantly higher volatility as in prior years. Foreign Currency Risk Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. To manage its foreign currency risk, stabilize cash flows and improve investment and cash flow planning, the Company enters into foreign currency swap contracts, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency call options, nondeliverable forwards and foreign currency range options aimed at reducing and/or managing the adverse impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on financial performance and cash flows (see Note 23). The Company’s foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities amounted to = P15,315 million (US$375 million) and = P15,741 million (US$386 million), respectively, as at March 31, 2013, and = P14,581 million (US$355 million) and = P14,909 million (US$363 million), respectively, as at December 31, 2012. In translating the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities to peso amounts, the exchange rates used were = P40.80 to US$1.00 and P =41.05 to US$1.00, the Philippine peso to U.S. dollar exchange rate as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in = P/US$ exchange rate, with all other variables held constant, of the Company’s income before income tax (due to changes in the fair value of monetary assets and liabilities, including the impact of derivative instruments). There is no impact on the Company’s stockholders’ equity. 2013 Appreciation (Depreciation) of = P P =1.50 1.00 (1.50) (1.00) Effect on Income before Income Tax P =3,914,137 2,609,425 (3,914,137) (2,609,425) - 46 - 2012 Effect on Income before Income Tax = P43,424,277 28,949,518 (43,424,277) (28,949,518) Appreciation (Depreciation) of = P = P1.50 1.00 (1.50) (1.00) Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a financial loss. It is the Company’s policy that all prospective tenants are subject to screening procedures. In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Company’s exposure to bad debts is not significant. Given the Company’s diverse base of tenants, it is not exposed to large concentrations of credit risk. With respect to credit risk arising from the other financial assets of the Company, which comprise of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, AFS investments and certain derivative instruments, the Company’s exposure to credit risk arises from the default of the counterparty, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments are disclosed in Note 23. Since the Company trades only with recognized third parties, there is no requirement for collateral. Credit Quality of Financial Assets The credit quality of financial assets is determined by the Company using high quality and standard quality as internal credit ratings. High Quality. Pertains to financial assets with counterparties who are not expected by the Company to default in settling its obligations, thus credit risk exposure is minimal. This normally includes large prime financial institutions, companies and government agencies. Standard Quality. Other financial assets not belonging to high quality financial assets are included in this category. The credit quality of the Company’s financial assets is as follows: March 31, 2013 Neither Past Due nor Impaired Past Due High Standard but not Quality Quality Impaired Loans and Receivables Cash and cash equivalents* Short-term investments Receivables from: Rent Accrued interest Advances to suppliers and others Financial Assets at FVPL Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS Investments Corporate notes Total P = 18,948,475,987 816,000,000 P =– – P =– – P = 18,948,475,987 816,000,000 – 61,645,969 – 3,586,991,241 – 1,993,106,195 121,475,007 – – 3,708,466,248 61,645,969 1,993,106,195 457,335,307 138,453,670 – – – – 457,335,307 138,453,670 1,000,000,000 P = 21,421,910,933 – P = 5,580,097,436 – P = 121,475,007 1,000,000,000 P = 27,123,483,376 * Excluding cash on hand amounting to = P 120 million. - 47 - December 31, 2012 Neither Past Due nor Impaired Past Due High Standard but not Quality Quality Impaired Loans and Receivables Cash and cash equivalents* Short-term investments Receivables from: Rent Accrued interest Advances to suppliers and others Financial Assets at FVPL Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS Investments Corporate notes Total = P9,663,575,278 821,000,000 = P– – = P– – = P9,663,575,278 821,000,000 – 47,123,072 – 4,067,710,900 – 1,688,335,509 76,912,399 – – 4,144,623,299 47,123,072 1,688,335,509 759,300,343 109,978,821 – – – – 759,300,343 109,978,821 1,000,000,000 = P12,400,977,514 – = P5,756,046,409 – = P76,912,399 1,000,000,000 = P18,233,936,322 * Excluding cash on hand amounting to = P 43 million. Liquidity Risk The Company seeks to manage its liquidity profile to be able to finance its capital expenditures and service its maturing debts. The Company’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through evaluation of projected and actual cash flow information. Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Company may encounter difficulties in raising funds to meet commitments from financial instruments or that a market for derivatives may not exist in some circumstance. The Company’s financial assets, which have maturity of less than 12 months and used to meet its short-term liquidity needs, are cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and investments held for trading amounting to = P19,068 million, = P816 million and = P457 million, respectively, as at March 31, 2013, and = P9,707 million, = P821 million and = P759 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2012. Also included in the Company’s financial assets used to meet its short-term liquidity needs are current AFS investments amounting to = P1,000 million as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The table below summarizes the maturity profile of the Company’s financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted payments: Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities* Long-term debt (including current portion) Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps Tenants’ deposits Liability for purchased land Other noncurrent liabilities* Less than 12 Months P = 800,000,000 March 31, 2013 More than 2 to 5 Years 5 Years P =– P =– Total P = 800,000,000 11,167,737,213 – – 11,167,737,213 3,249,634,073 47,430,834,292 19,404,139,646 70,084,608,011 – – – – P = 15,217,371,286 236,996,850 8,555,929,087 1,041,570,404 1,439,390,067 P = 58,704,720,700 – – – – P =0 236,996,850 8,555,929,087 1,041,570,404 1,439,390,067 P = 93,326,231,632 * Excluding nonfinancial liabilities included in “Accounts payable and other current liabilities” and “Other noncurrent liabilities” accounts amounting to = P 212 million and = P 439 million, respectively. - 48 - Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities* Long-term debt (including current portion) Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps Tenants’ deposits Liability for purchased land Other noncurrent liabilities* December 31, 2012 More than 2 to 5 Years 5 Years = P– = P– Less than 12 Months = P800,000,000 Total = P800,000,000 11,082,067,528 – – 11,082,067,528 3,565,265,400 46,540,835,301 11,485,043,650 61,591,144,351 17,428,372 – – – = P15,464,761,300 51,987,472 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,389,211,697 = P57,583,039,344 14,046,843 – – – = P11,499,090,493 83,462,687 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,389,211,697 = P84,546,891,137 * Excluding nonfinancial liabilities included in “Accounts payable and other current liabilities” and “Other noncurrent liabilities” accounts amounting to = P 316 million and = P 447 million, respectively. Capital Management Capital includes equity attributable to equity holders of the parent. The primary objective of the Company’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support its business and maximize shareholder value. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, in the light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, payoff existing debts, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. The Company monitors capital using gearing ratio, which is interest-bearing debt divided by total capital plus interest-bearing debt and net interest-bearing debt divided by total capital plus net interest-bearing debt. Interest-bearing debt includes all short-term and long-term debt while net interest-bearing debt includes all short-term and long-term debt net of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading and AFS investments. As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s gearing ratios are as follows: Interest-bearing Debt to Total Capital plus Interest-bearing Debt Loans payable Current portion of long-term debt Long-term debt - net of current portion Total interest-bearing debt (a) Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent Total interest-bearing debt and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent (b) Gearing ratio (a/b) March 31, 2013 P =800,000,000 2,611,101,353 57,014,784,008 60,425,885,361 December 31, 2012 = P800,000,000 1,791,703,848 49,647,118,755 52,238,822,603 72,706,225,932 69,944,410,317 P122,183,232,920 P =133,132,111,293 = 45% 43% - 49 - Net Interest-bearing Debt to Total Capital plus Net Interest-bearing Debt March 31, 2013 P =800,000,000 2,611,101,353 57,014,784,008 December 31, 2012 = P800,000,000 1,791,703,848 49,647,118,755 35% 36% Loans payable Current portion of long-term debt Long-term debt - net of current portion Less cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading and AFS investments (21,341,326,300) (12,287,157,704) Total net interest-bearing debt (a) 39,951,664,899 39,084,559,061 Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent 69,944,410,316 72,706,225,932 Total net interest-bearing debt and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent (b) P109,896,075,215 P =111,790,784,993 = Gearing ratio (a/b) 23. Financial Instruments Carrying Values The table below presents a comparison of the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments by category: March 31, 2013 Carrying Amount Fair Value Financial Assets Loans and receivables: Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Receivables from: Rent Accrued interest Advances to suppliers and others Financial assets at FVPL: Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS investments Corporate notes December 31, 2012 Carrying Amount Fair Value P = 19,067,990,992 816,000,000 P = 19,067,990,992 816,000,000 = P9,706,857,361 821,000,000 = P9,706,857,361 821,000,000 3,708,466,248 61,645,969 1,993,106,195 25,647,209,404 3,708,466,248 61,645,969 1,993,106,195 25,647,209,404 4,144,623,299 47,123,072 1,688,335,509 16,407,939,241 4,144,623,299 47,123,072 1,688,335,509 16,407,939,241 457,335,307 138,453,670 595,788,977 457,335,307 138,453,670 595,788,977 759,300,343 109,978,821 869,279,164 759,300,343 109,978,821 869,279,164 1,000,000,000 P = 27,242,998,381 1,000,000,000 P = 27,242,998,381 1,000,000,000 = P18,277,218,405 1,000,000,000 = P18,277,218,405 - 50 - March 31, 2013 Carrying Amount Fair Value Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities at FVPL Derivative liabilities Other financial liabilities: Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities* Long-term debt (including current portion) Tenants’ deposits Liability for purchased land Other noncurrent liabilities* December 31, 2012 Carrying Amount Fair Value P = 236,996,850 P = 236,996,850 = P244,330,399 = P244,330,399 800,000,000 800,000,000 800,000,000 800,000,000 11,167,737,213 11,167,737,213 11,082,067,528 11,082,067,528 59,625,885,361 8,555,929,087 1,041,570,404 1,439,390,067 82,630,512,132 P = 82,867,508,982 62,293,365,055 8,200,406,031 998,290,208 1,379,579,338 84,839,377,845 P = 85,076,374,695 51,438,822,603 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,389,211,697 74,311,106,702 = P74,555,437,101 53,227,448,393 7,976,094,815 1,155,345,530 1,321,268,336 75,562,224,602 = P75,806,555,001 * Excluding nonfinancial liabilities included in “Accounts payable and other current liabilities” and “Other noncurrent liabilities” accounts amounting to = P 212 million and = P 439 million, respectively, as at March 31, 2013, and = P 316 million and = P 447 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2012. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate such value: Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments. The carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. Receivables. The net carrying value approximates the fair value due to the short-term maturities of the receivables. Investments Held for Trading. The fair values are based on quoted market prices of the instruments at balance sheet date. AFS Investments. The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organized financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business at balance sheet date. For investments where there is no active market, the fair value is based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at prevailing interest rates. Discount rate used was 4.74% as at December 31, 2012. Derivative Instruments. The fair values are based on quotes obtained from counterparties. Loans Payable, Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities. The carrying values approximate the fair values due to the short-term maturities of these liabilities. Long-term Debt. Fair value is based on the following: Debt Type Fixed Rate Loans Fair Value Assumptions Estimated fair value is based on the discounted value of future cash flows using the applicable rates for similar types of loans. Discount rates used range from 1.40% to 4.55% as at March 31, 2013, and 1.52% to 5.35% as at December 31, 2012. - 51 - Debt Type Variable Rate Loans Fair Value Assumptions For variable rate loans that re-price every 3 months, the face value approximates the fair value because of the recent and regular repricing based on current market rates. For variable rate loans that re-price every 6 months, the fair value is determined by discounting the principal amount plus the next interest payment using the prevailing market rate from the period up to the next re-pricing date. Discount rates used range from 1.76% to 6.46% as at March 31, 2013, and 1.73% to 5.91% as at December 31, 2012. Tenants’ Deposits, Liability for Purchased Land and Other Noncurrent Liabilities. The estimated fair values are based on the discounted value of future cash flows using the applicable rates for similar types of loans. Discount rates used range from 1.86% to 3.60% as at March 31, 2013, and 1.99% to 4.06% as at December 31, 2012. Fair Value Hierarchy The Company uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2: Those involving inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); and, Level 3: Those with inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). The following table shows the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value as at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 based on Levels 1 and 2: 2013 Level 1 Financial Assets Financial assets at FVPL: Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS investments Corporate notes Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities at FVPL Derivative liabilities P = 457,335,307 – 457,335,307 Level 2 P =– 138,453,670 138,453,670 – 1,000,000,000 P = 457,335,307 P = 1,138,453,670 P =– P = 236,996,850 2012 Level 1 = P759,300,343 – 759,300,343 Level 2 = P– 109,978,821 109,978,821 – 1,000,000,000 = P759,300,343 = P1,109,978,821 = P– = P244,330,399 During the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. There are no financial instruments classified under Level 3. Derivative Financial Instruments To address the Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates arising primarily from its long-term floating rate debt obligations and to manage its foreign currency risk, the Company entered into various derivative transactions such as interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency call options, non-deliverable forwards and foreign currency range options. - 52 - Cross Currency Swaps (CCS). In 2013, the Parent Company entered into cross currency swap transactions to hedge both the foreign currency and interest rate exposure on the Group’s foreign currency denominated term loan facilities arranged by Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong), Ltd. for a total principal amount of US$200 million. Such loans bear an annual interest of 6month LIBOR plus spread and will mature on January 29, 2018. The Table below provides the details of the Parent Company’s outstanding cross currency swaps as of March 31, 2013: Counterparty Notional Amount Receive Leg (interest rate) Pay Leg (interest rate) USD:PHP rate used Maturity Date Market valuation gain or loss as of March 31, 2013 Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. $150,000,000.00 3.70% 6 Mos Libor + 1.70% 40.67 January 29, 2018 = P4,144,277.61 ING Bank, NV-Manila $50,000,000.00 3.70% 6 Mos Libor + 1.70% 40.67 January 29, 2018 = P (105,863.00) Under these agreements, the Parent Company effectively receives at inception = P8,134 million and pays US$200 million notional amount. Every interest payment date, the Parent Company will receive variable interest based on the US$200 million notional and will pay fixed interest based on the = P8,134 million notional amount up to January 29, 2018. At maturity date, the Parent Company will receive US$200 million notional amount and pay = P8,134 million notional amount. The US$ receipts from the CCS correspond to 100% of the expected interest and principal payment due on the hedged loan. With this, the variability in the cash flows of the CCS is expectedly to partially offset the variability in cash flows of the hedged loan due to changes in = P/US$ exchange rate and 6-month LIBOR plus spread. Effectively, the CCS transformed 100% of the floating interest US dollar-denominated loan into fixed interest Philippine peso-denominated loan (see Note 16). The effective portion of the change in fair values of these cross currency swaps amounting to = P22 million for the period ended March 31, 2013 was taken to equity under other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the hedge is nil as the hedging relationship is 100% effective. The table below shows information on the Company’s interest rate swaps presented by maturity profile. March 31, 2013 <1 Year >1-<2 Years >2-<5 Years Floating-Fixed Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $145,000,000 $145,000,000 $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%–3.28% 2.91%–3.28% 2.91%–3.28% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $30,000,000 $30,000,000 $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% 3.53% 3.53% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $20,000,000 $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% 3.18% $– Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate (Forward) $25,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 4.10% $– $– - 53 March 31, 2013 <1 Year >1-<2 Years >2-<5 Years Fixed-Floating Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate P =970,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F P =960,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F P =950,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate P =970,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% P =960,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% P =950,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% December 31, 2012 <1 Year >1-<2 Years >2-<5 Years Floating-Fixed Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%–3.28% $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%–3.28% $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%–3.28% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% $– Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $25,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 4.10% $– $– Fixed-Floating Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate = P970,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F = P960,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F = P950,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate = P970,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% = P960,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% = P950,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% Interest Rate Swaps (IRS). In 2011, the Parent Company entered into floating to fixed US$ interest rate swap agreements with aggregate notional amount of US$145 million. Under the agreements, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated term loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to March 21, 2015 (see Note 16). As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the floating to fixed interest rate swaps have aggregate negative fair value of = P152 million and = P158 million, respectively. The Parent Company also entered into US$ interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of US$20 million in 2011. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated five-year bilateral unsecured loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to November 30, 2014 (see Note 16). As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the floating to fixed interest rate swaps has negative fair value of = P16 million and = P17 million, respectively. In 2010, the Parent Company entered into the following interest rate swap agreements: A US$ interest rate swap agreement with nominal amount of US$30 million. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated five-year bilateral unsecured loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to November 30, 2015 (see Note 16). As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the - 54 - floating to fixed interest rate swap has a negative fair value of = P47 million and = P48 million, respectively. Two Philippine peso interest rate swap agreements with notional amount of = P1,000 million each, with amortization of = P10 million every anniversary. The combined net cash flows of the two swaps effectively converts the Philippine peso-denominated five-year inverse floating rate notes into floating rate notes with quarterly payment intervals up to June 2015 (see Note 16). As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these swaps have positive fair values of = P134 million and = P110 million, respectively. A US$ interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of US$20 million. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated three-year bilateral unsecured loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to January 14, 2013 (see Note 16). As at December 31, 2011, the floating to fixed interest rate swap has a negative fair value of = P3 million. In January 2012, the interest rate swap agreement was preterminated as a result of the prepayment of the underlying loan. Fair value changes from the preterminated swap recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P1 million loss in 2012. In 2009, the Parent Company entered into US$ interest rate swap agreements with notional amount of US$25 million. Under these agreements, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated five-year bilateral loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to November 2013 (see Note 16). As at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the floating to fixed interest rate swap has a negative fair value of = P22 million. Non-deliverable Forwards. In 2013 and 2012, the Parent Company entered into sell = P and buy US$ forward contracts. It also entered into sell US$ and buy = P forward contracts with the same aggregate notional amount. Net fair value changes from the settled forward contracts recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P10 million gain and = P7 million gain in March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Fair Value Changes on Derivatives The net movements in fair value of all derivative instruments are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Net changes in fair value during the year Less fair value of settled derivatives Balance at end of year March 31, 2013 (P =134,351,578) 66,442,086 (30,633,688) (P =98,543,180) December 31, 2012 (P =122,361,246) 24,406,448 (36,396,780) (P =134,351,578) In 2013, the net changes in fair value amounting to = P66 million comprise of interest paid amounting to = P21 million, which is included under “Interest expense” account in the consolidated statements of income and net mark-to-market gain on derivatives amounting to = P45 million, which is included under “Others - net” account in the consolidated statements of income. In 2012, the net changes in fair value amounting to = P24 million comprise of interest paid amounting to = P27 million, which is included under “Interest expense” account in the consolidated statements of income and net mark-to-market gain on derivatives amounting to = P51 million, which is included under “Others - net” account in the consolidated statements of income. - 55 - The reconciliation of the amounts of derivative assets and liabilities recognized in the consolidated balance sheets follows: Derivative assets Derivative liabilities March 31, 2013 P =138,453,670 (236,996,850) (P =98,543,180) December 31, 2012 = P109,978,821 (244,330,399) (P =134,351,578) 24. Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Share Computation Basic/diluted EPS is computed as follows: Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent (a) Common shares issued at beginning of year * Stocks dividends (see Note 17)* Common shares issued at end of year Less treasury stock (see Note 17) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (b) Earnings per share (a/b) *Retroactively adjusted for stock dividends declared 2013 2012 P =2,790,337,235 = P2,433,869,469 17,373,677,760 – 17,373,677,760 18,857,000 13,917,800,067 3,455,877,693 17,373,677,760 18,857,000 17,354,820,760 17,354,820,760 P =0.161 = P0.140 SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL RATIOS - KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AS OF MARCH 31, 2013 AND 2012 i. ii. Mar 31 2013 Mar 31 2012 1.80 1.96 Debt-to-equity ratio Total interest-bearing liabilities Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent + Total interest-bearing liabilities 0.45 : 0.55 0.43 : 0.57 Net debt-to-equity ratio Total interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents and investment securities Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent + Total interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents and investment securities 0.35 : 0.65 0.32 : 0.68 2.20 2.14 Mar 31 2013 Mar 31 2012 3.61 4.86 10.17 8.68 2.83 2.62 0.16 0.15 0.10 0.10 Current ratio Total current assets Total current liabilities iii. Asset to equity ratio Total assets Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent (Annualized) Debt service coverage ratio Operating cash flows Total loans payable, current portion of long-term debt and interest expense (excluding the portion of debt which are fully hedged by cash and cash equivalents and temporary investments) iv. Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to interest expense EBITDA Interest expense Debt to EBITDA Total interest-bearing liabilities EBITDA v. Return on equity Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent Total average equity attributable to equity holders of the parent Return on investment properties Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent Total average investment properties (excluding shopping mall complex under construction) Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation 2013 Financial and Operational Highlights (In Million Pesos, except for financial ratios and percentages) First Quarter 2013 % to Revenues 2012 % to Revenues Revenues 7,830 100% 7,035 100% 11% Operating Expenses 3,604 46% 3,242 46% 11% % Change Profit & Loss Data Operating Income 4,226 54% 3,793 54% 11% Net Income 2,790 36% 2,434 35% 15% EBITDA 5,339 68% 4,759 68% 12% Mar 31 2013 % to Total Assets Dec 31 2012 % to Total Assets % Change Balance Sheet Data Total Assets 159,669 100% 148,130 100% 8% Investment Properties 126,017 79% 124,087 84% 2% Total Debt 60,426 38% 52,239 35% 16% Net Debt 39,085 24% 39,952 27% -2% Total Stockholders' Equity 72,706 46% 69,944 47% 4% Financial Ratios Current Ratio Mar 31 2013 Dec 31 2012 1.80 1.34 Debt to Equity 0.45 : 0.55 0.43 : 0.57 Net Debt to Equity 0.35 : 0.65 0.36 : 0.64 Mar 31 (annualized) 2013 2012 Return on Equity 0.16 0.15 Return on Investment Properties 0.10 0.10 Debt to EBITDA 2.83 2.62 EBITDA to Interest Expense 10.17 8.68 Operating Income to Revenues 0.54 0.54 EBITDA Margin 0.68 0.68 Net Income to Revenues 0.36 0.35 Debt Service Coverage Ratio 3.61 4.86 SM Prime Holdings, Inc., the country’s leading shopping mall developer and operator which currently owns forty six malls in the Philippines and five malls in China, posts 11% increase in gross revenues for the first quarter 2013 to = P7.83 billion from = P7.03 billion in the same period 2012. Rental revenues, accounting for 86% of total revenues, grew by 12% amounting to = P6.73 billion from same period last year’s = P6.03 billion. This is largely due to rentals from new SM Supermalls opened in 2011 and 2012, namely SM City Masinag, SM City Olongapo, SM City Consolacion, SM City San Fernando, SM City General Santos and SM Lanang Premier, with a total gross floor area of 527,000 square meters. Excluding the new malls and expansions, same-store rental growth is at 7%. In terms of gross revenues, the five malls in China contributed = P0.69 billion in 2013 and = P0.62 billion in 2012, or 9% of total consolidated revenues. Likewise, in terms of rental revenues, the China operations contributed 10% to SM Prime’s consolidated rental revenues. Gross revenues of the five malls in China increased 11% in 2013 compared to 2012 largely due to improved mall productivity and lease renewals for the first three malls opened namely SM Xiamen, SM Jinjiang and SM Chengdu. Average occupancy rate for the first three malls is now at 96%. For the first quarter 2013, cinema ticket sales increased 8% to = P761 million from = P703 million in the same period 2012 due to more blockbuster movies and fully operational digital cinemas which enable a simultaneous release nationwide. The major blockbusters shown in 2013 were “Sisterakas,” “One More Try,” “Jack, The Giant Slayer,” “Chinese Zodiac,” and “Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters.” In 2012, major blockbusters shown were “Unofficially Yours,” “Enteng ng Ina Mo,” “The Hunger Games,” “Underworld 4: Awakening” and “John Carter.” Amusement income and others likewise increased by 12% to = P 336 million in the first quarter of 2013 from = P301 million in the same period 2012 mainly due to higher income from amusement rides. This account is mainly composed of amusement income from rides, bowling and ice skating operations including the SM Science Discovery Center and the SM Storyland. Operating expenses increased by 11% from = P3.24 billion in 2012 to = P 3.60 billion in 2013 mainly due to new malls opened in 2012. Same-store growth in operating expenses is 4%. Likewise, income from operations posted 11% growth from = P3.79 billion in 2012 to = P4.23 billion in 2013. In terms of operating expenses, the five malls in China contributed = P0.42 billion in 2013 and = P0.39 billion in 2012, or 12% of SM Prime’s consolidated operating expenses. Income from operations in China went up by 15% from = P0.23 billion in 2012 to = P0.27 billion in 2013. Interest and dividend income decreased by 24% to = P99 million in 2013 compared to = P131 million in 2012 mainly due to lower average interest rates of temporary investments in the first quarter of 2013 compared to same period last year. Interest expense for the year likewise decreased by 4% to = P525 million in 2013 from = P548 million in 2012 despite new loans, due to the low interest rate environment. Net income for the first quarter 2013 increased by 15% at = P2.79 billion from = P2.43 billion in the same period last year. On a stand-alone basis, the net income of China operations increased to = P171 million in 2013 compared to = P145 million in 2012 for a 19% increase, while net income of the Philippine operations grew 14% at = P2.62 billion in 2013 from P =2.29 billion in 2012. On the balance sheet side, cash and cash equivalents significantly increased by 96% from = P9.71 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P19.07 billion as of March 31, 2013. This account includes proceeds from the $200 million loan availed last January 2013 which will be used to fund capital expenditures both in the Philippines and China. Investments held for trading likewise decreased by 40% from = P759 million as of December 31, 2012 to = P457 million as of March 31, 2013, respectively, due to pretermination of investment in corporate bonds with original maturity of 2016. Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by 9% from = P1.44 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P1.57 billion as of March 31, 2013, mainly due to prepaid taxes on investment properties and prepaid insurance. Derivative assets increased by 26% from = P110 million as of December 31, 2012 to = P138 million as of March 31, 2013, mainly resulting from unrealized mark-to-market gains on interest rate and cross currency swaps. Other noncurrent assets increased by 13% from = P4.13 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P4.66 billion as of March 31, 2013. This account mainly consists of deposits to contractors and suppliers and advances and deposits paid for leased properties. Long-term debt increased by 16% from = P51.44 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P59.63 billion as of March 31, 2013, due to new loan availment amounting to $200 million, net of prepayments. Liability for purchased land decreased 14% from = P1.21 billion as of December 31, 2012 to = P1.04 billion as of March 31, 2013, due to subsequent payments. The Company’s performance indicators are measured in terms of the following: (1) current ratio which measures the ratio of total current assets to total current liabilities; (2) debt to equity which measures the ratio of interest bearing liabilities to stockholders’ equity; (3) net debt to equity which measures the ratio of interest bearing liabilities net of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities to stockholders’ equity; (4) debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) which measures the ratio of annualized operating cash flows to loans payable, current portion of long-term debt and interest expense, excluding the portion of debt which are fully hedged by cash and cash equivalents and temporary investments; (5) return on equity (ROE) which measures the ratio of net income to capital provided by stockholders; (6) return on investment properties (ROI) which measures the ratio of net income to investment properties excluding shopping mall complex under construction; (7) earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); (8) debt to EBITDA which measures the ratio of EBITDA to total interest-bearing liabilities; (9) EBITDA to interest expense which measures the ratio of EBITDA to interest expense; (10) operating income to revenues which basically measures the gross profit ratio; (11) EBITDA margin which measures the ratio of EBITDA to gross revenues and (12) net income to revenues which measures the ratio of net income to gross revenues. The following discuss in detail the key performance indicators of the Company. The Company’s current ratio increased to 1.80:1 from 1.34:1 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, mainly due to proceeds from the $200 million loan still in cash and cash equivalents. Similarly, Interest-bearing debt to stockholders’ equity increased to 0.45:0.55 from 0.43:0.57 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, while net interest-bearing debt to stockholders’ equity slightly decreased to 0.35:0.65 from 0.36:0.64 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, due to the additional borrowings. Debt service coverage ratio decreased to 3.61:1 from 4.86:1 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to higher current portion of long-term debt in 2013 compared to 2012. In terms of profitability, ROE slightly improved to 16% from 15% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. EBITDA increased by 12% to = P5.34 billion in 2013 from = P4.76 billion in 2012. Debt to EBITDA increased to 2.83:1 from 2.62:1 as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to increase in long-term debt. While EBITDA to interest expense increased to 10.17:1 from 8.68:1 for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to higher EBITDA in 2013 compared to 2012. Consolidated operating income to revenues is healthy at 54% for the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. On a stand-alone basis, operating income margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 55% and 39% in 2013, compared to 55% and 38% in 2012, respectively. EBITDA margin remains strong at 68% for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. On a stand-alone basis, EBITDA margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 69% and 60% in 2013 and 69% and 57% in 2012, respectively. Net income to revenues slightly improved at 36% from 35% for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. On a stand-alone basis, net income margin of the Philippines and China operations is at 37% and 25% in 2013 and 36% and 23% in 2012, respectively. The Company has no known direct or contingent financial obligation that is material to the Company, including any default or acceleration of an obligation. There were no contingent liabilities or assets in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company has no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations during the reporting year as of balance sheet date. There are no known trends, events, material changes, seasonal aspects or uncertainties that are expected to affect the company’s continuing operations. For the year 2013, the Company expects to incur capital expenditures of approximately P35 billion both for Philippines and China. This will be funded with internally generated funds and external borrowings. As of March 31, 2013, SM Prime has forty six Supermalls strategically located in the Philippines with a total gross floor area of 5.6 million square meters. Likewise, the Company also has five Supermalls located in the cities of Xiamen, Jinjiang, Chengdu, Suzhou, and Chongqing in China with a total gross floor area of 0.8 million square meters. For the rest of 2013, SM Prime is scheduled to launch SM Aura Premier in Taguig and SM City BF in Paranaque. SM Megamall, on the other hand, will be expanded with an additional 101,000 square meters. By year-end, SM Prime will have 48 malls in the Philippines and five in China with an estimated combined gross floor area of 6.9 million square meters. ^DWZ/D,K>/E'^͕/E͘ '/E'K&ZEdZ/s> ^K&DZ,ϯϭ͕ϮϬϭϯ D>> ^DEKZd,^ ^D^d͘D^ ^DD'D>> ^Dh ^D^Khd,D>> ^DKKZ ^D&/Zs/t ^D/>K/>K ^DDE/> ^DWDWE' ^D^hd ^DsK ^D'zEKZK ^D/hdE ^D>hE ^D'h/K ^DDZ/>K ^D^DZ/E^ ^DdE'^ ^D^E>ZK ^Ds>Eh> ^DDK>/EK ^D^d͘ZK^ ^D>Z< ^DD>>K&^/ ^DW^/' ^D>/W ^DK>K ^Ddzdz ^DDhEd/E>hW ^DDZ/</E ^DZK^>^ ^D>/t' ^DE' ^D>^W/H^ ^DZK^Z/K ^DdZ> ^D^EW>K ^D>D ^DEKs>/,^ ^DD^/E' ^DK>KE'WK ^DKE^K>/KE ^D^E&ZEEK ^D'EZ>^EdK^ >E ϯϮϵ͕Ϭϭϳ͕ϯϱϲ ϱϱ͕Ϯϭϯ͕ϯϭϳ ϯϮϰ͕ϲϵϭ͕ϲϬϵ ϭϲϬ͕ϯϳϵ͕ϵϵϮ ϭϮϮ͕ϲϬϳ͕ϲϭϰ ϴϮ͕ϱϵϵ͕ϰϯϴ ϭϳϵ͕Ϭϵϴ͕ϭϱϵ ϴϰ͕Ϯϴϰ͕ϱϭϴ ϵϬ͕ϵϱϬ͕ϱϵϰ ϭϭϲ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϭϳϯ ϱϰ͕ϳϮϮ͕ϬϬϲ ϲϵ͕ϰϮϰ͕ϲϭϱ ϯϮ͕ϰϵϮ͕ϱϭϴ ϱϳ͕ϮϮϮ͕Ϭϰϭ ϯϴ͕ϵϱϲ͕ϯϬϵ ϲϱ͕ϰϱϴ͕ϰϬϮ ϲϰ͕ϵϯϬ͕ϳϭϭ ϴϵ͕ϯϴϱ͕ϮϬϱ ϱϭ͕ϭϰϵ͕ϱϵϰ ϴϵ͕Ϭϲϳ͕ϰϲϯ ϯϰ͕ϱϭϰ͕ϲϯϬ ϯϯ͕ϯϬϲ͕ϮϬϬ ϲϮ͕ϭϯϴ͕ϲϭϳ ϲϵ͕Ϭϰϲ͕Ϭϲϴ ϯϬϮ͕Ϭϲϰ͕ϰϯϯ Ϯϯ͕ϱϵϭ͕ϱϴϰ ϱϭ͕ϴϰϴ͕Ϯϳϯ ϱϭ͕ϳϵϴ͕ϮϬϵ ϰϲ͕ϵϰϳ͕ϰϯϯ Ϯϵ͕ϱϳϲ͕ϮϱϮ ϱϳ͕ϵϵϵ͕Ϯϭϯ ϯϳ͕ϮϮϯ͕ϰϵϮ ϯϳ͕ϴϳϲ͕ϰϰϲ ϯϲ͕ϳϯϯ͕ϴϬϴ Ϯϯ͕ϲϵϭ͕ϳϯϮ ϯϮ͕ϵϳϳ͕ϵϯϮ ϯϴ͕ϴϮϱ͕ϰϳϲ Ϯϵ͕ϰϲϰ͕ϰϳϬ ϰϳ͕ϲϯϮ͕ϰϱϱ Ϯϳ͕ϭϮϮ͕ϴϭϭ ϯϴ͕Ϭϲϵ͕ϵϭϮ Ϯϭ͕ϲϯϱ͕ϳϭϮ Ϯϱ͕Ϯϳϲ͕Ϭϳϰ ϭϰ͕ϱϵϯ͕ϭϭϵ ϰϯ͕ϴϵϯ͕ϰϵϮ hZZEd Ϯϳϵ͕ϳϲϴ͕ϱϰϰ ϱϰ͕ϵϯϮ͕ϱϭϭ Ϯϴϰ͕ϴϭϮ͕ϴϮϯ ϭϱϮ͕ϳϳϲ͕ϲϮϲ ϭϭϴ͕Ϭϯϵ͕ϰϰϬ ϳϱ͕ϴϱϳ͕ϴϱϯ ϭϲϯ͕ϲϰϭ͕ϵϲϲ ϴϬ͕ϰϬϴ͕ϴϯϮ ϴϲ͕ϲϰϱ͕ϱϲϯ ϭϬϳ͕ϯϬϮ͕Ϯϳϴ ϱϯ͕ϱϵϮ͕ϵϲϮ ϲϴ͕Ϯϰϱ͕Ϭϴϲ ϯϭ͕ϴϱϳ͕ϴϲϱ ϱϲ͕ϯϵϳ͕ϯϭϱ ϯϴ͕ϳϯϯ͕ϳϮϮ ϲϯ͕Ϭϲϴ͕ϰϲϵ ϲϯ͕ϴϰϮ͕ϴϰϰ ϴϬ͕ϵϴϳ͕ϵϯϲ ϰϴ͕ϵϭϴ͕ϱϯϳ ϴϰ͕ϳϴϳ͕ϯϳϲ ϯϯ͕ϬϬϲ͕ϴϱϯ ϯϮ͕ϲϬϬ͕ϱϰϮ ϱϵ͕Ϭϱϭ͕ϭϱϮ ϲϯ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϵϱϲ Ϯϳϯ͕ϭϵϰ͕ϰϲϮ Ϯϭ͕Ϭϲϭ͕ϯϮϯ ϱϭ͕ϯϴϱ͕Ϭϴϯ ϰϵ͕ϴϵϮ͕ϯϳϬ ϰϱ͕ϳϮϱ͕ϵϵϮ Ϯϵ͕ϰϲϬ͕ϰϭϭ ϱϲ͕ϳϯϵ͕ϳϲϲ ϯϱ͕ϵϵϰ͕ϱϯϲ ϯϳ͕Ϭϭϯ͕ϲϯϴ ϯϱ͕ϯϯϬ͕ϲϰϰ ϮϮ͕ϵϵϳ͕ϲϯϬ ϯϬ͕ϵϱϬ͕Ϭϭϱ ϯϴ͕ϰϲϴ͕ϲϮϱ Ϯϴ͕ϳϴϯ͕Ϯϴϵ ϰϲ͕ϱϵϮ͕ϴϲϯ Ϯϲ͕ϯϳϲ͕ϱϵϱ ϯϲ͕ϱϮϳ͕ϲϰϵ ϮϬ͕ϴϴϰ͕ϭϮϰ Ϯϯ͕ϰϵϵ͕Ϭϲϳ ϭϯ͕Ϭϯϯ͕ϯϬϴ ϯϵ͕ϲϴϰ͕ϳϵϱ KǀĞƌϯϬĚĂLJƐ ϰϵ͕Ϯϰϴ͕ϴϭϮ ϮϴϬ͕ϴϬϳ ϯϵ͕ϴϳϴ͕ϳϴϲ ϳ͕ϲϬϯ͕ϯϲϳ ϰ͕ϱϲϴ͕ϭϳϰ ϲ͕ϳϰϭ͕ϱϴϱ ϭϱ͕ϰϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ ϯ͕ϴϳϱ͕ϲϴϳ ϰ͕ϯϬϱ͕ϬϯϮ ϴ͕ϳϵϳ͕ϴϵϱ ϭ͕ϭϮϵ͕Ϭϰϰ ϭ͕ϭϳϵ͕ϱϮϵ ϲϯϰ͕ϲϱϰ ϴϮϰ͕ϳϮϳ ϮϮϮ͕ϱϴϳ Ϯ͕ϯϴϵ͕ϵϯϯ ϭ͕Ϭϴϳ͕ϴϲϳ ϴ͕ϯϵϳ͕Ϯϲϴ Ϯ͕Ϯϯϭ͕Ϭϱϳ ϰ͕ϮϴϬ͕Ϭϴϳ ϭ͕ϱϬϳ͕ϳϳϳ ϳϬϱ͕ϲϱϴ ϯ͕Ϭϴϳ͕ϰϲϱ ϱ͕ϵϰϱ͕ϭϭϭ Ϯϴ͕ϴϲϵ͕ϵϳϮ Ϯ͕ϱϯϬ͕Ϯϲϭ ϰϲϯ͕ϭϵϬ ϭ͕ϵϬϱ͕ϴϯϵ ϭ͕ϮϮϭ͕ϰϰϮ ϭϭϱ͕ϴϰϮ ϭ͕Ϯϱϵ͕ϰϰϲ ϭ͕ϮϮϴ͕ϵϱϲ ϴϲϮ͕ϴϬϴ ϭ͕ϰϬϯ͕ϭϲϰ ϲϵϰ͕ϭϬϮ Ϯ͕ϬϮϳ͕ϵϭϳ ϯϱϲ͕ϴϱϮ ϲϴϭ͕ϭϴϭ ϭ͕Ϭϯϵ͕ϱϵϮ ϳϰϲ͕Ϯϭϱ ϭ͕ϱϰϮ͕Ϯϲϰ ϳϱϭ͕ϱϴϴ ϭ͕ϳϳϳ͕ϬϬϴ ϭ͕ϱϱϵ͕ϴϭϮ ϰ͕ϮϬϴ͕ϲϵϳ D>> EtD>>^ ^DDZ<dD>> ^DZ/H^ ^Dzd,z ^D^sDKZE'd,E ^D^sDKZW>/d ^D,zWZDZ<d^hd ^D,/ED>>^ >E ϭϰϭ͕ϮϮϯ͕ϴϱϱ hZZEd ϭϯϬ͕ϭϳϴ͕ϭϬϯ KǀĞƌϯϬĚĂLJƐ ϭϭ͕Ϭϰϱ͕ϳϱϮ ϮϮ͕ϰϬϬ͕ϯϰϭ ϯϮ͕ϭϳϱ͕ϳϮϯ ϲ͕ϰϱϳ͕ϮϬϲ ϰ͕ϴϭϲ͕ϯϰϳ ϴ͕ϵϱϯ͕Ϭϵϳ ϭϭϲ͕ϴϰϬ͕ϭϵϵ ϯ͕ϳϬϴ͕ϰϲϲ͕Ϯϰϴ ϭϮ͕ϯϯϲ͕ϴϬϱ Ϯϯ͕Ϭϱϭ͕ϲϭϱ ϲ͕Ϯϱϲ͕Ϯϰϱ ϰ͕ϲϱϮ͕Ϯϭϯ ϳ͕Ϯϱϭ͕ϯϳϵ Ϯϱ͕ϴϭϳ͕ϮϰϬ ϯ͕ϯϱϱ͕ϱϭϳ͕ϴϯϮ ϭϬ͕Ϭϲϯ͕ϱϯϱ ϵ͕ϭϮϰ͕ϭϬϴ ϮϬϬ͕ϵϲϭ ϭϲϰ͕ϭϯϰ ϭ͕ϳϬϭ͕ϳϭϵ ϵϭ͕ϬϮϮ͕ϵϲϬ ϯϱϮ͕ϵϰϴ͕ϰϭϲ SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Regulation Code, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. Registrant Date: May 10, 2013 JEFFREY C. LIM Executive Vice-President SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co. 6760 Ayala Avenue 1226 Makati City Philippines Phone: (632) 891 0307 Fax: (632) 819 0872 www.sgv.com.ph BOA/PRC Reg. No. 0001, December 28, 2012, valid until December 31, 2015 SEC Accreditation No. 0012-FR-3 (Group A), November 15, 2012, valid until November 16, 2015 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT The Stockholders and the Board of Directors SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd. Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10 CBP-1A, Pasay City 1300 We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated statements of income, statements of comprehensive income, statements of changes in stockholders equity and statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Managements Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entitys preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entitys internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. *SGVMG200157* A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited -2- Opinion In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and their financial performance and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards. SYCIP GORRES VELAYO & CO. Belinda T. Beng Hui Partner CPA Certificate No. 88823 SEC Accreditation No. 0943-A (Group A), March 18, 2010, valid until March 17, 2013 Tax Identification No. 153-978-243 BIR Accreditation No. 08-001998-78-2012, June 19, 2012, valid until June 18, 2015 PTR No. 3669663, January 2, 2013, Makati City February 18, 2013 *SGVMG200157* SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31 ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 6, 20, 22 and 23) Short-term investments (Notes 7, 20, 22 and 23) Investments held for trading (Notes 8, 20, 22 and 23) Receivables (Notes 9, 20, 22 and 23) Available-for-sale investments (Notes 10, 20, 22 and 23) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 11) Total Current Assets Noncurrent Assets Investment properties - net (Notes 12 and 20) Derivative assets (Notes 22 and 23) Deferred tax assets (Note 18) Other noncurrent assets (Note 13) Total Noncurrent Assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY Current Liabilities Loans payable (Notes 14, 22 and 23) Accounts payable and other current liabilities (Notes 15, 20, 22 and 23) Current portion of long-term debt (Notes 16, 20, 22 and 23) Income tax payable Total Current Liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities Long-term debt - net of current portion (Notes 16, 20, 22 and 23) Tenants deposits (Notes 21, 22 and 23) Liability for purchased land - net of current portion Deferred tax liabilities (Note 18) Derivative liabilities (Notes 22 and 23) Other noncurrent liabilities (Notes 12, 20, 22 and 23) Total Noncurrent Liabilities Equity Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent Capital stock (Notes 17 and 24) Additional paid-in capital - net (Note 17) Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 17) Retained earnings (Note 17): Appropriated Unappropriated Treasury stock (Notes 17 and 24) Total Equity Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent (Note 22) Non-controlling Interests (Note 17) Total Stockholders Equity 2012 2011 =9,706,857,361 P 821,000,000 759,300,343 5,880,081,880 1,000,000,000 1,440,189,139 19,607,428,723 = P8,290,216,039 876,800,000 812,953,412 4,708,033,726 1,000,000,000 1,276,452,460 16,964,455,637 107,836,216,127 124,087,439,798 115,618,680 109,978,821 254,132,999 190,463,028 3,153,887,932 4,134,582,818 111,359,855,738 128,522,464,465 P128,324,311,375 =148,129,893,188 = P =800,000,000 P = P 11,398,520,838 1,791,703,848 632,900,873 14,623,125,559 10,150,278,123 799,086,409 623,013,182 11,572,377,714 49,647,118,755 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,278,194,418 244,330,399 1,836,373,166 62,607,021,612 40,093,522,320 7,467,302,387 1,551,018,812 1,258,514,789 237,979,926 1,796,789,506 52,405,127,740 17,392,534,760 8,219,067,298 544,146,167 13,917,800,067 8,219,067,298 872,658,862 27,000,000,000 16,890,136,797 (101,474,705) 7,000,000,000 33,865,609,976 (101,474,705) 63,773,661,498 69,944,410,317 573,144,423 955,335,700 64,346,805,921 70,899,746,017 P128,324,311,375 =148,129,893,188 = P See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. *SGVMG200157* SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 2012 REVENUE Rent (Notes 12, 20 and 21) Cinema ticket sales Amusement income and others COSTS AND EXPENSES Depreciation and amortization (Note 12) Administrative (Notes 19, 20 and 21) Film rentals Business taxes and licenses Management fees (Note 20) Rent (Note 21) Insurance Others INCOME FROM OPERATIONS OTHER INCOME (CHARGES) - Net Interest expense (Notes 14, 16, 20 and 23) Interest and dividend income (Notes 6, 7, 8, 10 and 20) Others - net (Notes 8, 13, 16 and 23) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAX (Note 18) Current Deferred NET INCOME Attributable to Equity holders of the parent (Note 24) Non-controlling interests (Notes 2 and 17) Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Share (Note 24) Years Ended December 31 2011 2010 P = 25,902,081,684 3,477,261,663 1,346,966,010 30,726,309,357 = P22,759,402,156 3,051,716,588 1,086,336,307 26,897,455,051 = P19,992,948,925 2,764,775,099 958,207,627 23,715,931,651 3,955,641,599 3,886,571,608 1,877,504,253 1,760,649,386 860,534,994 801,810,102 247,640,906 604,797,438 13,995,150,286 3,829,971,166 3,228,409,525 1,650,121,989 1,510,242,916 794,923,211 589,134,834 201,918,532 472,774,273 12,277,496,446 3,501,183,977 3,206,359,610 1,494,236,340 1,326,394,330 647,342,667 503,533,075 216,230,268 376,101,148 11,271,381,415 16,731,159,071 14,619,958,605 12,444,550,236 (2,195,557,761) 406,214,974 (653,110,383) (2,442,453,170) (1,948,257,322) 361,227,330 (812,537,877) (2,399,567,869) (1,746,215,754) 251,102,302 (152,588,284) (1,647,701,736) 14,288,705,901 12,220,390,736 10,796,848,500 3,313,221,804 53,337,830 3,366,559,634 2,932,357,842 (94,188,973) 2,838,168,869 2,449,966,767 206,748,328 2,656,715,095 P = 10,922,146,267 = P9,382,221,867 = P8,140,133,405 P = 10,529,954,990 392,191,277 P = 10,922,146,267 = P9,055,995,525 326,226,342 = P9,382,221,867 = P7,856,348,789 283,784,616 = P8,140,133,405 P = 0.606 = P0.521 = P0.464 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. *SGVMG200157* SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 2012 NET INCOME OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Net Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 17) Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments net of tax (Notes 10 and 17) TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Attributable to Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests (Notes 2 and 17) P = 10,922,146,267 Years Ended December 31 2011 = P9,382,221,867 2010 = P8,140,133,405 (328,512,695) 282,958,497 (91,770,374) (328,512,695) (3,745,323) 279,213,174 1,230,084 (90,540,290) P = 10,593,633,572 = P9,661,435,041 = P8,049,593,115 P = 10,201,442,295 392,191,277 P = 10,593,633,572 = P9,335,208,699 326,226,342 = P9,661,435,041 = P7,765,808,499 283,784,616 = P8,049,593,115 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. *SGVMG200157* P = 17,392,534,760 = P13,917,800,067 = P13,917,800,067 = P13,348,191,367 569,608,700 = P13,917,800,067 At December 31, 2012 At January 1, 2011 Total comprehensive income Cash dividends - = P0.27 a share Dividends of a subsidiary At December 31, 2011 At January 1, 2010 Total comprehensive income Additional issuance of shares Cash dividends - = P0.25 a share Dividends of a subsidiary At December 31, 2010 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. P = 13,917,800,067 3,474,734,693 At January 1, 2012 Total comprehensive income Appropriation Cash dividends - = P0.29 a share Stock dividends - 25% Dividends of a subsidiary Capital Stock (Notes 17 and 24) = P8,219,067,298 = P2,375,440,999 5,843,626,299 = P8,219,067,298 = P8,219,067,298 P = 8,219,067,298 = P589,700,365 = P681,470,739 (91,770,374) = P872,658,862 = P589,700,365 282,958,497 P = 544,146,167 P = 872,658,862 (328,512,695) Adjustment (Note 17) Capital - Net (Note 17) P = 8,219,067,298 Cumulative Translation Additional Paid-in = P3,745,323 = P2,515,239 1,230,084 = P = P3,745,323 (3,745,323) P = P = Investments (Notes 10 and 17) Unrealized Gain on Availablefor-Sale = P7,000,000,000 = P7,000,000,000 = P7,000,000,000 = P7,000,000,000 P = 27,000,000,000 P = 7,000,000,000 20,000,000,000 = P28,562,329,066 = P24,043,028,119 7,856,348,789 (3,337,047,842) = P33,865,609,976 = P28,562,329,066 9,055,995,525 (3,752,714,615) P = 16,890,136,797 P = 33,865,609,976 10,529,954,990 (20,000,000,000) (4,030,693,476) (3,474,734,693) Appropriated Unappropriated (Note 17) (Note 17) Retained Earnings Equity Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent Total (P =101,474,705) (P =101,474,705) (P =101,474,705) (P =101,474,705) = P58,191,167,414 = P758,715,232 = P681,128,328 283,784,616 (206,197,712) = P573,144,423 = P758,715,232 326,226,342 (511,797,151) P = 955,335,700 P = 573,144,423 392,191,277 (10,000,000) Interests (Note 17) Non-controlling Total = P58,949,882,646 = P48,030,300,086 8,049,593,115 6,413,234,999 (3,337,047,842) (206,197,712) = P64,346,805,921 = P58,949,882,646 9,661,435,041 (3,752,714,615) (511,797,151) P = 70,899,746,017 P = 64,346,805,921 10,593,633,572 (4,030,693,476) (10,000,000) *SGVMG200157* = P47,349,171,758 7,765,808,499 6,413,234,999 (3,337,047,842) = P63,773,661,498 = P58,191,167,414 9,335,208,699 (3,752,714,615) (P =101,474,705) P = 69,944,410,317 = 63,773,661,498 (P =101,474,705) P 10,201,442,295 (4,030,693,476) Treasury Stock (Notes 17 and 24) SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 2012 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Income before income tax and non-controlling interests P = 14,288,705,901 Adjustments for: Depreciation and amortization (Note 12) 3,955,641,599 Interest expense (Notes 14, 16, 20 and 23) 2,195,557,761 Interest and dividend income (Notes 6, 7, 8, 10 and 20) (406,214,974) Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain) - net (100,497,563) Mark-to-market loss (gain) on derivatives (Note 23) 16,277,832 Mark-to-market loss (gain) on investments held for trading (Note 8) 706,500 Operating income before working capital changes 19,950,177,056 Increase in: Receivables (1,196,584,369) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (165,253,383) Increase in: Accounts payable and other current liabilities 816,102,704 Tenants deposits 952,539,475 Cash generated from operations 20,356,981,483 Income taxes paid (3,274,142,314) Net cash provided by operating activities 17,082,839,169 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Decrease (increase) in: Investment properties (Note 12) (21,114,932,036) Other noncurrent assets (Note 13) (1,013,987,073) Investments held for trading 38,508,319 Available-for-sale investments Interest and dividend received 404,648,011 Net cash used in investing activities (21,685,762,779) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from availment of loans (Notes 14, 16 and 20) 19,066,750,000 Payments of: Loans (Notes 16 and 20) (6,673,225,943) Dividends (4,040,693,476) Interest (2,308,977,632) Payments to unwinding of interest rate swaps (4,287,500) Proceeds from additional issuance of shares (Note 17) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 6,039,565,449 EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (20,000,517) NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,416,641,322 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 8,290,216,039 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END P = 9,706,857,361 OF YEAR Years Ended December 31 2011 2010 = P12,220,390,736 = P10,796,848,500 3,829,971,166 1,948,257,322 3,501,183,977 1,746,215,754 (361,227,330) 120,523,863 226,901,219 (251,102,302) (84,810,032) (29,839,113) (13,439,353) 17,971,377,623 (14,231,667) 15,664,265,117 (706,117,333) (165,159,468) (515,862,483) (295,988,909) 3,093,279,729 981,080,452 21,174,461,003 (2,711,823,417) 18,462,637,586 870,437,601 762,974,229 16,485,825,555 (2,572,575,448) 13,913,250,107 (16,550,283,823) 854,989,275 (299,379,882) 100,000,000 348,964,295 (15,545,710,135) (11,221,050,968) (1,299,686,629) (99,638,981) 239,534,893 (12,380,841,685) 15,894,082,275 14,224,724,000 (14,142,267,058) (4,006,411,766) (2,028,628,142) (76,220,800) (4,359,445,491) (10,338,573,989) (3,543,245,554) (2,355,255,672) 6,413,234,999 4,400,883,784 13,015,795 (40,644) (1,429,502,245) 5,933,251,562 9,719,718,284 3,786,466,722 = P8,290,216,039 = P9,719,718,284 See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. *SGVMG200157* SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Corporate Information SM Prime Holdings, Inc. (SMPH or the Parent Company) was incorporated in the Philippines and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on January 6, 1994. The Parent Company and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the Company) develop, conduct, operate and maintain the business of modern commercial shopping centers and all businesses related thereto, such as the conduct, operation and maintenance of shopping center spaces for rent, amusement centers, or cinema theaters within the compound of the shopping centers. Its main sources of revenue include rent income from leases in mall and food court, cinema ticket sales and amusement income from bowling, ice skating and others. The Parent Companys shares of stock are publicly traded in the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). The Parent Company is 21.65% and 40.96% directly-owned by SM Investments Corporation (SMIC) and SM Land, Inc. (SM Land), respectively. SM Land is a 66.89% owned subsidiary of SMIC. SMIC, the ultimate parent company, is a Philippine corporation which listed its common shares with the PSE in 2005. The registered office and principal place of business of the Parent Company is Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd., Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10, CBP-1A, Pasay City 1300. The accompanying consolidated financial statements were approved and authorized for issue in accordance with a resolution by the Board of Directors (BOD) on February 18, 2013. 2. Basis of Preparation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments, investments held for trading and available-for-sale (AFS) investments which have been measured at fair value. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Philippine peso, which is the Parent Companys functional and presentation currency under Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS). All values are rounded to the nearest peso, except when otherwise indicated. Statement of Compliance The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with PFRS. PFRS includes statements named PFRS, Philippine Accounting Standards (PAS) and Philippine Interpretations from the International Financial Reporting and Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) issued by the Financial Reporting Standards Council (FRSC). Changes in Accounting Policies and Disclosures The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year, except for the following amended PFRS and PAS which the Company has adopted during the year: § PFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures (Amendments) - Transfers of Financial Assets, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011. *SGVMG200157* -2- § PAS 12, Income Taxes (Amendments) - Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets, became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012. The standards that have been adopted are deemed to have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Future Changes in Accounting Policies Standards and Interpretations The Company did not early adopt the following standards and Philippine Interpretations that have been approved but are not yet effective. The Company will adopt these standards and interpretations on their effective dates. § PFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The amendments require an entity to disclose information about rights of set-off and related arrangements (such as collateral agreements). The new disclosures are required for all recognized financial instruments that are set-off in accordance with PAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation. These disclosures also apply to recognized financial instruments that are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are set-off in accordance with PAS 32. The amendments require entities to disclose, in a tabular format unless another format is more appropriate, the following minimum quantitative information. This is presented separately for financial assets and financial liabilities recognized at the end of the reporting period: (a) The gross amounts of those recognized financial assets and recognized financial liabilities; (b) The amounts that are set-off in accordance with the criteria in PAS 32 when determining the net amounts presented in the statement of financial position; (c) The net amounts presented in the statement of financial position; (d) The amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that are not otherwise included in (b) above, including: i. Amounts related to recognized financial instruments that do not meet some or all of the offsetting criteria in PAS 32; and ii. Amounts related to financial collateral (including cash collateral); and (e) The net amount after deducting the amounts in (d) from the amounts in (c) above. The amendments to PFRS 7 are to be applied retrospectively. The amendments affect disclosures only and have no impact on the Companys financial position or performance. § PFRS 9, Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. PFRS 9 reflects the first phase of the work on the replacement of PAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and applies to classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities as defined in PAS 39. Work on impairment of financial instruments and hedge accounting is still ongoing, with a view to replacing PAS 39 in its entirety. PFRS 9 requires all financial assets to be measured at fair value at initial recognition. A debt financial asset may, if the fair value *SGVMC215040* -3- option (FVO) is not invoked, be subsequently measured at amortized cost if it is held within a business model that has the objective to hold the assets to collect the contractual cash flows and its contractual terms give rise, on specified dates, to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding. All other debt instruments are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. All equity financial assets are measured at fair value either through other comprehensive income or profit or loss. Equity financial assets held for trading must be measured at fair value through profit or loss. For FVO liabilities, the amount of change in the fair value of a liability that is attributable to changes in credit risk must be presented in other comprehensive income. The remainder of the change in fair value is presented in profit or loss, unless presentation of the fair value change in respect of the liabilitys credit risk in other comprehensive income would create or enlarge an accounting mismatch in profit or loss. All other PAS 39 classification and measurement requirements for financial liabilities have been carried forward into PFRS 9, including the embedded derivative separation rules and the criteria for using the FVO. The Company made an evaluation of the impact of the adoption of the standard and decided not to early adopt PFRS 9 for the 2012 reporting ahead of its effectivity date on January 1, 2015. Therefore, the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2012 do not reflect the impact of this new standard. The adoption of the first phase of PFRS 9 will have an effect on the classification and measurement of the Companys financial assets but will potentially have no impact on the classification and measurement of financial liabilities. § PFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This standard replaces the portion of PAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, that addresses the accounting for consolidated financial statements. It also includes the issues raised in Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC)-12 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities. PFRS 10 establishes a single control model that applies to all entities including special purpose entities. The changes introduced by PFRS 10 will require management to exercise significant judgment to determine which entities are controlled, and therefore, are required to be consolidated by a parent, compared with the requirements that were in PAS 27. Based on the reassessment of control following the provisions of this new standard as at December 31, 2012, the adoption of PFRS 10 will have no impact on the consolidated financial statements. § PFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This standard replaces PAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures, and SIC-13 Jointly-controlled Entities - Non-monetary Contributions by Venturers, and removes the option to account for jointly controlled entities (JCEs) using proportionate consolidation. Instead, JCEs that meet the definition of a joint venture must be accounted for using the equity method. Based on the Companys reassessment, this standard will have no impact on its consolidated financial statements. § PFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This standard includes all of the disclosures that were previously in PAS 27 related to consolidated financial statements, as well as all of the disclosures that were previously included in PAS 31 and PAS 28, Investments in Associates. These disclosures relate to an entitys interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured entities. A number of new disclosures are also required. The adoption of PFRS 12 will affect disclosures only and have no impact on the Companys financial position or performance. *SGVMC215040* -4- § PFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This standard establishes a single source of guidance under PFRS for all fair value measurements. PFRS 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather provides guidance on how to measure fair value under PFRS when fair value is required or permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its financial position and performance. § PAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements - Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012. The amendments to PAS 1 change the grouping of items presented in OCI. Items that could be reclassified (or recycled) to profit or loss at a future point in time (for example, upon derecognition or settlement) would be presented separately from items that will never be reclassified. The amendments affect presentation only and have no impact on the Companys financial position or performance. § PAS 19, Employee Benefits (Revised), will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Amendments range from fundamental changes such as removing the corridor mechanism and the concept of expected returns on plan assets to simple clarifications and re-wording. The revised standard also requires new disclosures such as, among others, a sensitivity analysis for each significant actuarial assumption, information on asset-liability matching strategies, duration of the defined benefit obligation, and disaggregation of plan assets by nature and risk. Once effective, the Company has to apply the amendments retroactively to the earliest period presented. This revised standard will have no material impact on the Companys financial position or performance. § PAS 27, Separate Financial Statements (as revised in 2011), will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. As a consequence of the new PFRS 10 and PFRS 12, what remains of PAS 27 is limited to accounting for subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities, and associates in separate financial statements. The Company does not expect this revised standard to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements. § PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (as revised in 2011), will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. As a consequence of the new PFRS 11 and PFRS 12, PAS 28 has been renamed PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, and describes the application of the equity method to investments in joint ventures in addition to associates. The Company does not expect this revised standard to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements. § PAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. These amendments to PAS 32 clarify the meaning of currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off and also clarify the application of the PAS 32 offsetting criteria to settlement systems (such as central clearing house systems) which apply gross settlement mechanisms that are not simultaneous. The amendments to PAS 32 are to be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements. § Philippine Interpretation IFRIC 15, Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, covers accounting for revenue and associated expenses by entities that undertake the construction of real estate directly or through subcontractors. The interpretation requires that revenue on construction of real estate be recognized only upon completion, except when such contract qualifies as construction contract to be accounted for under PAS 11, Construction Contracts, *SGVMC215040* -5- or involves rendering of services in which case revenue is recognized based on stage of completion. Contracts involving provision of services with the construction materials and where the risks and reward of ownership are transferred to the buyer on a continuous basis will also be accounted for based on stage of completion. The SEC and the FRSC have deferred the effectivity of this interpretation until the final Revenue standard is issued by International Accounting Standards Board and an evaluation of the requirements of the final Revenue standard against the practices of the Philippine real estate industry is completed. This interpretation will have no impact on the consolidated financial statements. § Philippine Interpretation IFRIC 20, Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine, will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This interpretation applies to waste removal costs that are incurred in surface mining activity during the production phase of the mine (production stripping costs) and provides guidance on the recognition of production stripping costs as an asset and measurement of the stripping activity asset. This interpretation will have no impact on the consolidated financial statements. Improvements to PFRSs The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and are applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted. § PFRS 1, First-time Adoption of PFRS - Borrowing Costs, clarifies that, upon adoption of PFRS, an entity that capitalized borrowing costs in accordance with its previous generally accepted accounting principles, may carry forward, without any adjustment, the amount previously capitalized in its opening statement of financial position at the date of transition. Subsequent to the adoption of PFRS, borrowing costs are recognized in accordance with PAS 23, Borrowing Costs. The amendment does not apply to the Company as it is not a firsttime adopter of PFRS. § PAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements - Clarification of the Requirements for Comparative Information, clarifies the requirements for comparative information that are disclosed voluntarily and those that are mandatory due to retrospective application of an accounting policy, or retrospective restatement or reclassification of items in the financial statements. An entity must include comparative information in the related notes to the financial statements when it voluntarily provides comparative information beyond the minimum required comparative period. The additional comparative period does not need to contain a complete set of financial statements. On the other hand, supporting notes for the third balance sheet (mandatory when there is a retrospective application of an accounting policy, or retrospective restatement or reclassification of items in the financial statements) are not required. The amendments affect disclosures only and have no impact on the Companys financial position or performance. § PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment - Classification of Servicing Equipment, clarifies that spare parts, stand-by equipment and servicing equipment should be recognized as property, plant and equipment when they meet the definition of property, plant and equipment and should be recognized as inventory if otherwise. The Company does not expect this amendment to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements. § PAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation - Tax Effect of Distribution to Holders of Equity Instruments, clarifies that income taxes relating to distributions to equity holders and to transaction costs of an equity transaction are accounted for in accordance with PAS 12. The Company does not expect this amendment to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements. *SGVMC215040* -6- § PAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting - Interim Financial Reporting and Segment Information for Total Assets and Liabilities, clarifies that the total assets and liabilities for a particular reportable segment need to be disclosed only when the amounts are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker and there has been a material change from the amount disclosed in the entitys previous annual financial statements for that reportable segment. The amendment affects disclosures only and has no impact on the Companys financial position or performance. Basis of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent Company and the following subsidiaries: Company First Asia Realty Development Corporation Premier Central, Inc. Consolidated Prime Dev. Corp. Premier Southern Corp. San Lazaro Holdings Corporation Southernpoint Properties Corp. (SPC) First Leisure Ventures Group Inc. (FLVGI) Affluent Capital Enterprises Limited (Affluent) and Subsidiaries Mega Make Enterprises Limited (Mega Make) and Subsidiaries Springfield Global Enterprises Limited SM Land (China) Limited (SM Land China) and Subsidiaries Country of Incorporation Philippines - do - do - do - do - do - do British Virgin Islands (BVI) Percentage of Ownership 2011 2012 74.19 74.19 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 - do - do- 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Hong Kong 100.00 100.00 SM Malls Owned SM Megamall SM City Clark SM City Dasmariñas SM City Batangas and SM City Lipa SM Lanang Premier SM by the Bay SM City Xiamen and SM City Chengdu SM City Jinjiang SM City Suzhou and SM City Chongqing FLVGI is accounted for as a subsidiary by virtue of control, as evidenced by the majority members of the BOD representing the Parent Company. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting year as the Parent Company, using consistent accounting policies. All intracompany balances, transactions, income and expenses resulting from intracompany transactions are eliminated in full. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Company obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction. If the Company loses control over a subsidiary, it: § Derecognizes the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary; § Derecognizes the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest; § Derecognizes the cumulative translation differences recorded in equity; § Recognizes the fair value of the consideration received; § Recognizes the fair value of any investment retained; § Recognizes any surplus or deficit in profit or loss; § Reclassifies the parents share of components previously recognized in other comprehensive income to profit or loss or retained earnings, as appropriate. *SGVMC215040* -7- Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets not held by the Company and are presented separately in the consolidated statements of income and within stockholders equity in the consolidated balance sheets, separately from equity attributable to equity holders of the parent. 3. Significant Accounting Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities, and the disclosures of contingent liabilities, at balance sheet date. However, uncertainty about the assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability affected in the future. Judgments In the process of applying the Companys accounting policies, management has made the following judgments, apart from those involving estimates and assumptions, which have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Operating Lease Commitments - Company as Lessor. The Company has entered into commercial property leases on its investment property portfolio. The Company has determined, based on an evaluation of the terms and conditions of the arrangements, that it retains all the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the properties and thus accounts for the contracts as operating leases. Rent income amounted to = P25,902 million, = P22,759 million and = P19,993 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively (see Note 21). Operating Lease Commitments - Company as Lessee. The Company has entered into various lease agreements as a lessee. Management has determined that all the significant risks and benefits of ownership of the properties, which the Company leases under operating lease arrangements, remain with the lessor. Accordingly, the leases were accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense amounted to = P802 million, = P589 million and = P504 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively (see Note 21). Estimates and Assumptions The key estimates and assumptions that may have significant risks of causing material adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below. Estimation of Allowance for Impairment Losses on Receivables. The Company maintains an allowance for impairment losses at a level considered adequate to provide for potential uncollectible receivables. The level of allowance is evaluated by the Company on the basis of factors that affect the collectability of the accounts. These factors include, but are not limited to, the length of the Companys relationship with the customers, average age of accounts and collection experience. The Company performs a regular review of the age and status of these accounts, designed to identify accounts with objective evidence of impairment and provide the appropriate allowance for impairment losses. The amount and timing of recorded expenses for any period would differ if the Company made different judgments or utilized different methodologies. An increase in allowance for impairment losses would increase the recorded costs and expenses and decrease current assets. *SGVMC215040* -8- The carrying value of receivables amounted to = P5,880 million and = P4,708 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 9). Impairment of AFS Investments. The Company treats AFS investments as impaired when there has been a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value below its cost or whether other objective evidence of impairment exists. The determination of what is significant or prolonged requires judgment. The Company treats significant generally as 20% or more of the original cost of investment, and prolonged as period longer than 12 months. In addition, the Company evaluates other factors, including normal volatility in share price for quoted equities and future cash flows and the discount factors for unquoted equities. The carrying value of AFS investments amounted to = P1,000 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 (see Note 10). Estimation of Useful Lives of Investment Properties. The useful life of each of the Companys investment property is estimated based on the period over which the asset is expected to be available for use. Such estimation is based on a collective assessment of industry practice, internal technical evaluation and experience with similar assets. The estimated useful life of each asset is reviewed periodically and updated if expectations differ from previous estimates due to physical wear and tear, technical or commercial obsolescence and legal or other limitations on the use of the asset. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in the amounts and timing of recorded expenses brought about by changes in the factors mentioned above. A reduction in the estimated useful life of any investment property would increase the recorded costs and expenses and decrease investment properties. There were no changes in the estimated useful lives of investment properties in 2012 and 2011. Impairment of Nonfinancial Assets. The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is an indication that investment properties may be impaired. The recoverable amount of the investment properties is the higher of the assets fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. When the carrying amounts of the investment properties exceed their recoverable amounts, the investment properties are considered impaired and are written down to their recoverable amounts. The net book value of investment properties amounted to = P124,087 million and = P107,836 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 12). Realizability of Deferred Tax Assets. The Companys assessment on the recognition of deferred tax assets on deductible temporary differences is based on the projected taxable income in the succeeding periods. This projection is based on the Companys past and future results of operations. Deferred tax assets amounted to = P190 million and = P254 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 18). Pension Cost. The determination of the Companys obligation and cost of pension benefits is dependent on the selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note 19 and include, among others, the discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets and salary increase rate. In accordance with PFRS, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore, generally affect the recognized expense and recorded obligation in such future periods. *SGVMC215040* -9- Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities. The Company carries certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. Determining the fair value of financial assets and liabilities requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgment. The significant components of fair value measurement were determined using verifiable objective evidence (i.e., foreign exchange rates, interest rates, volatility rates). However, the amount of changes in fair value would differ if the Company utilized different valuation methodologies and assumptions. Any changes in the fair value of these financial assets and liabilities would affect profit and loss and other comprehensive income. The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial assets and liabilities are discussed in Note 23. Contingencies. The Company has various legal claims. The Companys estimates of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims have been developed in consultation with in-house as well as outside counsel handling the prosecution and defense of the cases and are based upon an analysis of potential results. The Company currently does not believe these legal claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position and results of operations. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in the estimates or in the effectiveness of strategies relating to these proceedings. No provisions were made in relation to these claims. 4. Summary of Significant Accounting and Financial Reporting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash includes cash on hand and in banks. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of three months or less from dates of acquisitions and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. Financial Instruments - Initial Recognition and Subsequent Measurement Date of Recognition. The Company recognizes a financial instrument in the consolidated balance sheets when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. In the case of a regular way purchase or sale of financial assets, recognition and derecognition, as applicable, is done using settlement date accounting. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within the period generally established by regulation or convention in the market place. Derivatives are recognized on a trade date basis. Initial Recognition of Financial Instruments. Financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value, which is the fair value of the consideration given (in case of an asset) or received (in case of a liability). The initial measurement of financial instruments, except for those categorized as at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL), includes transaction costs. The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: financial assets and financial liabilities at FVPL, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity (HTM) investments, AFS investments and other financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the instruments are acquired and whether they are quoted in an active market. Management determines the classification at initial recognition and, where allowed and appropriate, reevaluates this classification at every balance sheet date. *SGVMC215040* - 10 - Determination of Fair Value. The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets at the balance sheet date is based on their quoted market price or dealer price quotations (bid price for long positions and ask price for short positions), without any deduction for transaction costs. When current bid and asking prices are not available, the price of the most recent transaction provides evidence of the current fair value as long as there has not been a significant change in economic circumstances since the time of the transaction. For all other financial instruments not listed in an active market, the fair value is determined by using appropriate valuation techniques. Valuation techniques include net present value techniques, comparison to similar instruments for which market observable prices exist, options pricing models, and other relevant valuation models. Day 1 Difference. Where the transaction price in a non-active market is different from the fair value based on other observable current market transactions in the same instrument or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable market, the Company recognizes the difference between the transaction price and fair value (a Day 1 difference) in the consolidated statements of income unless it qualifies for recognition as some other type of asset. In cases where unobservable data is used, the difference between the transaction price and model value is only recognized in the consolidated statements of income only when the inputs become observable or when the instrument is derecognized. For each transaction, the Company determines the appropriate method of recognizing the Day 1 difference amount. Financial Assets and Liabilities at FVPL. Financial assets and liabilities at FVPL include financial assets and liabilities held for trading and financial assets and liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at FVPL. Financial assets and liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivatives, including any separated derivatives, are also classified under financial assets or liabilities at FVPL, unless these are designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge or financial guarantee contracts. Gains or losses on investments held for trading are included in the consolidated statements of income under the Others - net account. Interest income on investments held for trading is included in the consolidated statements of income under the Interest and dividend income account. Instruments under this category are classified as current assets/liabilities if these are hold primarily for the purpose of trading or expected to be realized/settled within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets/liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities may be designated by management at initial recognition as at FVPL when any of the following criteria is met: § the designation eliminates or significantly reduces the inconsistent treatment that would otherwise arise from measuring the assets and liabilities or recognizing gains or losses on a different basis; or § the assets and liabilities are part of a group of financial assets, financial liabilities or both which are managed and their performance are evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy; or § the financial instrument contains an embedded derivative, unless the embedded derivative does not significantly modify the cash flows or it is clear, with little or no analysis, that it would not be separately recorded. *SGVMC215040* - 11 - Classified as financial assets at FVPL are the Companys investments held for trading and derivative assets. The aggregate carrying values of financial assets under this category amounted to = P869 million and = P929 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Included under financial liabilities at FVPL are the Companys derivative liabilities. The carrying values of financial liabilities at FVPL amounted to = P244 million and = P238 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 23). Loans and Receivables. Loans and receivables are nonderivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are not entered into with the intention of immediate or short-term resale and are not designated as AFS investments or financial assets at FVPL. Loans and receivables are included in current assets if maturity is within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets. After initial measurement, loans and receivables are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less allowance for impairment. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the loans and receivables are derecognized and impaired, as well as through the amortization process. Classified under this category are the Companys cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and receivables. The aggregate carrying values of financial assets under this category amounted to = P16,408 million and P =13,875 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 23). HTM Investments. HTM investments are quoted nonderivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities for which the Companys management has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Where the Company sells other than an insignificant amount of HTM investments, the entire category would be tainted and reclassified as AFS investments. After initial measurement, these investments are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less impairment in value. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the HTM investments are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process. Assets under this category are classified as current assets if maturity is within 12 months from balance sheet date and as noncurrent assets if maturity date is more than 12 months from balance sheet date. The Company has no financial assets under this category as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. AFS Investments. AFS investments are nonderivative financial assets that are designated in this category or are not classified in any of the other categories. They are purchased and held indefinitely, and may be sold in response to liquidity requirements or changes in market conditions. Subsequent to initial recognition, AFS investments are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of such assets are reported as unrealized gain or loss on AFS investments recognized as other comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income until the investment is derecognized or the investment is determined to be impaired. On derecognition or impairment, the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in consolidated statements of comprehensive income is transferred to the consolidated statements of income. Assets under this category are classified as current assets if management intends to sell these financial assets within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets. *SGVMC215040* - 12 - Classified under this category are the Companys investments in corporate notes. The carrying values of financial assets classified under this category amounted to P =1,000 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 (see Note 23). Other Financial Liabilities. This category pertains to financial liabilities that are not held for trading or not designated as at FVPL upon the inception of the liability. These include liabilities arising from operations or borrowings. Other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value and are subsequently carried at amortized cost, taking into account the impact of applying the effective interest method of amortization (or accretion) for any related premium, discount and any directly attributable transaction costs. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the liabilities are derecognized, as well as through the amortization process. Other financial liabilities are classified as current liabilities if settlement is within 12 months from balance sheet date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent liabilities. Classified under this category are the Companys loans payable, accounts payable and other current liabilities, long-term debt, tenants deposits, liability for purchased land and other noncurrent liabilities (except for taxes payables and other payables covered by other accounting standards). The aggregate carrying values of financial liabilities under this category amounted to = P74,311 million and P =61,180 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 23). Classification of Financial Instruments Between Debt and Equity A financial instrument is classified as debt if it provides for a contractual obligation to: § deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; § exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially unfavorable to the Company; or § satisfy the obligation other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of own equity shares. If the Company does not have an unconditional right to avoid delivering cash or another financial asset to settle its contractual obligation, the obligation meets the definition of a financial liability. The components of issued financial instruments that contain both liability and equity elements are accounted for separately, with the equity component being assigned the residual amount after deducting from the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined as the fair value of the liability component on the date of issue. Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs are deducted against long-term debt and are amortized over the terms of the related borrowings using the effective interest method. *SGVMC215040* - 13 - Derivative Financial Instruments The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as long-term currency swaps, foreign currency call options, non-deliverable forwards, foreign currency range options, interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps to hedge the risks associated with foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations (see Note 23). Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value on the date on which the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value. Derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities when the fair value is negative. The Companys derivative instruments provide economic hedges under the Companys policies but are not designated as accounting hedges. Embedded Derivative. An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid instrument that also includes a nonderivative host contract with the effect that some of the cash flows of the hybrid instrument vary in a way similar to a stand-alone derivative. An embedded derivative is separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative if all of the following conditions are met: a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract; b) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative; and c) the hybrid instrument is not recognized at FVPL. The Company assesses whether embedded derivatives are required to be separated from the host contracts when the Company becomes a party to the contract. Subsequent reassessment is prohibited unless there is a change in the terms of the contract that significantly modifies the cash flows that otherwise would be required under the contract, in which case reassessment is required. The Company determines whether a modification to cash flows is significant by considering the extent to which the expected future cash flows associated with the embedded derivative, the host contract or both have changed and whether the change is significant relative to the previously expected cash flow on the contract. Derecognition of Financial Assets and Liabilities Financial Assets. A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognized when: § the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; § the Company retains the rights to receive cash flows from the asset, but has assumed an obligation to pay them in full without material delay to a third party under a pass-through arrangement; or § the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset and either (a) has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset. When the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset and has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, nor transferred control of the asset, the asset is recognized to the extent of the Companys continuing involvement in the asset. Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of original carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of consideration the Company could be required to repay. *SGVMC215040* - 14 - Financial Liabilities. A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expired. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the consolidated statements of income. Impairment of Financial Assets The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired, if and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred loss event) and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or a group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Objective evidence of impairment may include indications that the borrower or a group of borrowers is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization and where observable data indicate that there is measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults. Financial Assets Carried at Amortized Cost. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on financial assets carried at amortized cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial assets original effective interest rate (i.e., the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition). The carrying amount of the asset shall be reduced through the use of an allowance account. The amount of the loss shall be recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The Company first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If it is determined that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, the asset is included in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and that group of financial assets is collectively assessed for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognized are not included in a collective assessment of impairment. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance account. The amount of the reversal is recognized in the consolidated statements of income under Provision for (reversal of) impairment losses account, to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortized cost at reversal date. Interest income continues to be accrued on the reduced carrying amount based on the original effective interest rate of the asset. Assets together with the associated allowance are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future recovery and all collateral, if any, has been realized or has been transferred to the Company. If a future write-off is later recovered, the recovery is recognized in the consolidated statements of income under Others - net account. *SGVMC215040* - 15 - Financial Assets Carried at Cost. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred in an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value because its fair value cannot be reliably measured, or on a derivative asset that is linked to and must be settled by delivery of such an unquoted equity instrument, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset. AFS Investments. In the case of equity instruments classified as AFS investments, evidence of impairment would include a significant or prolonged decline in fair value of investments below its cost. Where there is evidence of impairment, the cumulative loss - measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in the consolidated statements of income - is removed from the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and recognized in the consolidated statements of income. Impairment losses on equity investments are not reversed through the consolidated statements of income. Increases in fair value after impairment are recognized directly in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. In the case of debt instruments classified as AFS investments, impairment is assessed based on the same criteria as financial assets carried at amortized cost. Future interest income is based on the reduced carrying amount of the asset and is accrued based on the rate of interest used to discount future cash flows for the purpose of measuring impairment loss. Such accrual is recorded as part of Interest and dividend income account in the consolidated statements of income. If, in subsequent year, the fair value of a debt instrument increased and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized in the consolidated statements of income, the impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated statements of income. Offsetting Financial Instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the consolidated balance sheets if, and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. This is not generally the case with master netting agreements, where the related assets and liabilities are presented gross in the consolidated balance sheets. Business Combinations Business combinations involving entities or businesses under common control are business combinations in which all of the combining entities or businesses are ultimately controlled by the same party or parties both before and after the business combination, and that control is not transitory. Business combinations under common control are accounted for similar to pooling of interest method. In applying the pooling of interest method, the assets, liabilities and stockholders equity of the acquired companies for the reporting period in which the common control business combinations occur and for the comparative periods presented, are included in the consolidated financial statements at their carrying amounts as if the combinations had occurred from the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements, regardless of the actual date of the combination. The excess of the cost of business combinations over the net carrying amounts of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired companies is considered as equity adjustment from business combinations, included under Additional paid-in capital - net account in the stockholders equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. *SGVMC215040* - 16 - Acquisition of Non-controlling Interests Changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions (i.e., transactions with owners in their capacity as owners). In such circumstances, the carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests shall be adjusted to reflect the changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid shall be recognized directly in stockholders equity and included under Additional paid-in capital - net account in the stockholders equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets are expenses paid in advance and recorded as assets before they are utilized. Investment Properties Investment properties represent land and land use rights, buildings, structures, equipment and improvements of the shopping malls and shopping mall complex under construction. Investment properties, except land and shopping mall complex under construction, are measured initially at cost, including transaction costs, less accumulated depreciation and amortization and accumulated impairment in value, if any. The carrying amount includes the cost of replacing part of an existing investment property at the time that cost is incurred if the recognition criteria are met, and excludes the costs of day-to-day servicing of an investment property. Land is stated at cost less any impairment in value. Shopping mall complex under construction is stated at cost and includes the cost of land, construction costs, property and equipment, and other direct costs. Cost also includes interest on borrowed funds incurred during the construction period, provided that the carrying amount does not exceed the amount realizable from the use or sale of the asset. Depreciation and amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: Land use rights Buildings and improvements Building equipment, furniture and others 40-60 years 35 years 3-15 years The residual values, useful lives and method of depreciation and amortization of the assets are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at each financial year-end. Shopping mall complex under construction is not depreciated until such time that the relevant assets are completed and put into operational use. When each major inspection is performed, the cost is recognized in the carrying amount of the investment properties as a replacement, if the recognition criteria are met. Investment property is derecognized when either it has been disposed or when it is permanently withdrawn from use and no future economic benefit is expected from its disposal. Any gains or losses on the retirement or disposal of an investment property are recognized in the consolidated statements of income in the year of retirement or disposal. *SGVMC215040* - 17 - Investment in Associate Investment in associate is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. An associate is an entity in which the Company has significant influence and which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture. Under the equity method, investment in an associate is carried in the consolidated balance sheets at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Companys share in net assets of the associate. Goodwill relating to an associate is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is not amortized. After application of the equity method, the Company determines whether it is necessary to recognize any additional impairment loss with respect to the Companys net investment in the associate. The consolidated statements of income reflect the share in the results of operations of the associate. Where there has been a change recognized directly in the equity of the associate, the Company recognizes its share in any changes and discloses this, when applicable, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Profits and losses resulting from transactions between the Company and the associate are eliminated to the extent of the interest in the associate. The Company discontinues the use of equity method from the date when it ceases to have significant influence over an associate and accounts for the investment in accordance with PAS 39, from that date, provided the associate does not become a subsidiary or a joint venture as defined in PAS 31. When the Companys interest in an investment in associate is reduced to zero, additional losses are provided only to the extent that the Company has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate to satisfy obligations of the investee that the Company has guaranteed or otherwise committed. If the associate subsequently reports profits, the Company resumes recognizing its share of the profits if it equals the share of net losses not recognized. The financial statements of the associate are prepared for the same reporting period as the Parent Company. The accounting policies of the associate conform to those used by the Company for like transactions and events in similar circumstances. Impairment of Nonfinancial Assets The carrying value of investment properties and other nonfinancial assets is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, and if the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash-generating units are written down to their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount of investment properties and other nonfinancial assets is the greater of fair value less costs to sell or value in use. The fair value less costs to sell is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset in an arms length transaction less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset. An assessment is made at each balance sheet date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the assets recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying *SGVMC215040* - 18 - amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation and amortization, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in profit or loss. After such a reversal, the depreciation and amortization charges are adjusted in future periods to allocate the assets revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life. Capital Stock Capital stock is measured at par value for all shares issued. When shares are sold at a premium, the difference between the proceeds and the par value is credited to Additional paid-in capital net account. Retained Earnings Retained earnings represent accumulated earnings, net of dividends declared. Treasury Stock Own equity instruments which are acquired (treasury shares) are deducted from stockholders equity and accounted for at cost. No gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of income on the purchase, sale, issuance or cancellation of the Companys own equity instruments. Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the Company and the amount of the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received, excluding discounts and sales taxes. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognized: Rent. Revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term or based on the terms of the lease, as applicable. Cinema Ticket Sales, Amusement Income and Other Revenue. Revenue is recognized upon receipt of cash from the customer which coincides with the rendering of services. Interest. Revenue is recognized as the interest accrues, taking into account the effective yield on the asset. Dividend. Revenue is recognized when the right to receive the payment is established. Management Fees Management fees are recognized as expense in accordance with the terms of the management contracts. Costs and Expenses Operating and interest expenses are recognized as incurred. Pension Cost The Parent Company is a participant in the SM Corporate and Management Companies Employer Retirement Plan. The plan is a funded, noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan administered by a Board of Trustees covering all regular full-time employees. The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plan is determined using the projected unit credit method. This method reflects service rendered by employees to the date of valuation and incorporates assumptions concerning the employees projected salaries. Pension cost includes current service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of unrecognized past service costs, recognition of actuarial gains (losses) and effect of any curtailments or *SGVMC215040* - 19 - settlements. Past service cost is amortized over a period until the benefits become vested. The portion of the actuarial gains and losses is recognized when it exceeds the corridor (10% of the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation or fair value of the plan assets) at the previous balance sheet date, divided by the expected average remaining working lives of active plan members. The amount recognized as net pension asset or liability is the net of the present value of the defined benefit obligation at balance sheet date, plus any actuarial gains (less any actuarial losses) not recognized minus past service cost not yet recognized minus the fair value of plan assets at balance sheet date out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. Foreign Currency-denominated Transactions Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency rate at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are restated at the functional currency rate of exchange at balance sheet date. All differences are taken to the consolidated statements of income. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined. Foreign Currency Translations The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Philippine peso at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date and their respective statements of income are translated at the weighted average rates for the year. The exchange differences arising on the translation are included in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity under Cumulative translation adjustment account. On disposal of a foreign entity, the deferred cumulative amount of exchange differences recognized in stockholders equity relating to that particular foreign operation is recognized in profit or loss. Leases The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date of whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset. Company as Lessor. Leases where the Company does not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Rent income from operating leases are recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the lease term or based on the terms of the lease, as applicable. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognized over the lease term on the same basis as rent income. Contingent rents are recognized as revenue in the period in which they are earned. Company as Lessee. Leases which do not transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as expense in the consolidated statements of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Associated costs, such as maintenance and insurance, are expensed as incurred. Provisions Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market *SGVMC215040* - 20 - assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense. Where the Company expects a provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the receipt of the reimbursement is virtually certain. Borrowing Costs Borrowing costs are generally expensed as incurred. Borrowing costs are capitalized if they are directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset. Capitalization of borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in progress and expenditures and borrowing costs are being incurred. Borrowing costs are capitalized until the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized. Borrowing costs include interest charges and other costs incurred in connection with the borrowing of funds used to finance the shopping mall complex. Taxes Current Tax. Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at balance sheet date. Deferred Tax. Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except for those that are stated under the standard. Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax assets to be utilized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at balance sheet date. Deferred tax relating to items recognized outside profit or loss is recognized outside profit or loss. Deferred tax items are recognized in correlation to the underlying transaction either in other comprehensive income or directly in stockholders equity. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority. *SGVMC215040* - 21 - Sales Tax. Revenue, expenses and assets are recognized net of the amount of sales tax, except: § where the sales tax incurred on a purchase of assets or services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the sales tax is recognized as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and § receivables and payables that are stated with the amount of sales tax included. The net amount of sales tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of Prepaid expenses and other current assets or Accounts payable and other current liabilities accounts in the consolidated balance sheets. Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) Basic/diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income for the year by the weighted average number of issued and outstanding shares of stock during the year, with retroactive adjustments for any stock dividends declared. Geographical Segment The Companys business of shopping mall development and operations is organized and managed separately according to geographical areas where the Company operates, namely the Philippines and China. This is the basis upon which the Company reports its primary segment information presented in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements. Contingencies Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. They are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote. Contingent assets are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements but are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements when an inflow of economic benefits is probable. Events after the Reporting Date Post year-end events that provide additional information about the Companys financial position at balance sheet date (adjusting events) are reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Post year-end events that are not adjusting events are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements when material. 5. Segment Information For management purposes, operating segment is monitored through geographical location as the Companys risks and rates of return are affected predominantly by differences in economic and political environments where they operate. Each geographical area is organized and managed separately and viewed as a distinct strategic business unit that caters to different markets. As at December 31, 2012, the Company owns forty-six (46) shopping malls in the Philippines and five shopping malls in China. Management monitors the operating results of its business units separately for the purpose of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Segment performance is evaluated based on operating profit or loss and is measured consistently with operating profit or loss in the consolidated financial statements. *SGVMC215040* - 22 - Inter-segment Transactions Transfer prices between geographical segments are set on an arms length basis similar to transactions with related parties. Such transfers are eliminated in consolidation. Geographical Segment Data Philippines China 2012 Eliminations Consolidated (In Thousands) Revenue P =28,189,308 P =2,537,001 P = P =30,726,309 Segment results: Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net income =12,874,530 P 3,055,659 =9,818,871 P =1,414,176 P 310,901 =1,103,275 P P = = P =14,288,706 P 3,366,560 =10,922,146 P =9,426,680 P 392,191 =1,103,275 P P = =10,529,955 P 392,191 Segment profit P =15,441,507 P =1,289,652 P = P =16,731,159 Segment assets P =134,054,768 P =27,915,625 (P =13,840,500) P =148,129,893 P =70,155,088 P =20,873,312 (P =13,798,253) P =77,230,147 P3,496,435 = 16,275,265 =459,207 P 4,839,667 Net income attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests Segment liabilities Other information: Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures Philippines P = P3,955,642 = 21,114,932 2011 China Eliminations Consolidated (In Thousands) Revenue = P24,850,809 = P2,046,646 = P = P26,897,455 Segment results: Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net income = P11,107,990 2,614,818 = P8,493,172 = P1,112,401 223,351 = P889,050 = P = P = P12,220,391 2,838,169 = P9,382,222 = P8,166,946 326,226 = P889,050 = P = P9,055,996 326,226 Segment profit = P13,620,404 = P999,555 = P = P14,619,959 Segment assets = P114,376,213 = P23,894,033 (P =9,945,935) = P128,324,311 = P56,254,710 = P17,626,483 (P =9,903,688) = P63,977,505 = P3,365,603 13,657,420 = P464,368 2,892,864 Net income attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests Segment liabilities Other information: Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures = P = P3,829,971 16,550,284 *SGVMC215040* - 23 - Philippines 2010 China Eliminations Consolidated (In Thousands) Revenue = P22,303,583 = P1,412,349 = P = P23,715,932 Segment results: Income before income tax Provision for income tax Net income = P10,269,711 2,558,041 = P7,711,670 = P527,137 98,674 = P428,463 = P = P = P10,796,848 2,656,715 = P8,140,133 = P7,427,885 283,785 = P428,463 = P = P7,856,348 283,785 Segment profit = P11,859,018 = P585,532 = P = P12,444,550 Segment assets = P105,595,830 = P20,898,769 (P =10,361,155) = P116,133,444 = P53,896,588 = P15,803,227 (P =10,318,908) = P59,380,907 = P3,088,745 8,540,941 = P412,439 2,680,110 Net income attributable to: Equity holders of the parent Non-controlling interests Segment liabilities Other information: Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures = P = P3,501,184 11,221,051 For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, there were no revenue transactions with a single external customer which accounted for 10% or more of the consolidated revenue from external customer. 6. Cash and Cash Equivalents This account consists of: Cash on hand and in banks (see Note 20) Temporary investments (see Note 20) 2012 P =608,689,838 9,098,167,523 P =9,706,857,361 2011 =2,029,711,118 P 6,260,504,921 =8,290,216,039 P Cash in banks earn interest at the respective bank deposit rates. Temporary investments are made for varying periods of up to three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Company, and earn interest at the respective temporary investment rates. Interest income earned from cash in banks and temporary investments amounted to = P268 million, = P208 million and P =127 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 7. Short-term Investments This account pertains to a time deposit with Banco de Oro Unibank, Inc. (BDO) amounting to = P821 million and P =877 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, with fixed interest rate of 3.24%. Such deposit is intended to meet short-term cash requirements and may be preterminated anytime by the Company. *SGVMC215040* - 24 - Interest income earned from short-term investments amounted to P =27 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and = P28 million each for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. 8. Investments Held for Trading This account consists of investments in Philippine government and corporate bonds amounting to = P759 million and P =813 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, with yields ranging from 4.90% to 8.64% in 2012 and 3.18% to 12.29% in 2011. These Philippine pesodenominated and U.S. dollar-denominated investments have various maturities ranging from 2014 to 2017. Investments held for trading have mark-to-market loss amounting to = P1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and mark-to-market gain amounting to = P13 million and P =14 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the amounts of which are included under Others - net account in the consolidated statements of income. Cumulative unrealized mark-tomarket gain amounted to P =25 million and = P28 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest income earned from investments held for trading amounted to = P43 million, = P42 million and = P13 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 9. Receivables This account consists of: Rent: Third parties Related parties (see Note 20) Advances to suppliers Advances to related parties (see Note 20) Receivable from a co-investor Accrued interest (see Note 20) Others 2012 2011 P =2,259,198,897 1,885,424,402 636,116,922 471,660,550 246,078,722 47,123,072 334,479,315 P =5,880,081,880 =2,202,631,655 P 1,587,324,781 578,440,037 45,556,109 294,081,144 =4,708,033,726 P Rent receivables generally have terms of 30-90 days. Receivable from a co-investor represents the consideration receivable by Tennant Range Corporation (TRC), a BVI subsidiary holding company of SM Land China, in connection with the agreement with a third party (see Note 13). Advances to suppliers, accrued interest and other receivables are normally collected throughout the financial year. *SGVMC215040* - 25 - The aging analysis of receivables follows: Neither past due nor impaired Past due but not impaired: 91-120 days Over 120 days 2012 P =5,803,169,481 2011 =4,611,021,460 P 25,227,376 51,685,023 P =5,880,081,880 28,964,032 68,048,234 =4,708,033,726 P Receivables are assessed by the Companys management as not impaired, good and collectible. 10. Available-for-Sale Investments This account consists of investments in corporate notes issued by BDO amounting to = P1,000 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 with fixed interest rate of 6.80% (see Note 20). Investments in corporate notes are intended to meet short-term cash requirements. Interest income earned from AFS investments amounted to P =68 million each for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. The movements in net unrealized gain on AFS investments are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Loss due to changes in fair value of AFS investments Balance at end of year 2012 P = P = 2011 =3,745,323 P (3,745,323) = P 11. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets This account consists of: Prepaid expenses Input taxes Advances to contractors (see Note 12) Others 2012 P =505,182,400 455,205,277 294,261,122 185,540,340 P =1,440,189,139 2011 =366,033,201 P 591,293,627 151,283,101 167,842,531 =1,276,452,460 P Prepaid expenses mainly consist of prepayments for insurance and real property taxes. *SGVMC215040* - 26 - 12. Investment Properties This account consists of: Cost Balance at beginning of year Additions Transfers Translation adjustments Balance at end of year Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization Balance at beginning of year Depreciation and amortization Translation adjustments Balance at end of year Net Book Value Cost Balance at beginning of year Additions Transfers Translation adjustments Balance at end of year Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization Balance at beginning of year Depreciation and amortization Translation adjustments Balance at end of year Net Book Value 2012 Building Equipment, Furniture and Others Shopping Mall Complex Under Construction Land and Land Use Rights Buildings and Improvements = 22,402,878,158 P 3,821,792,513 258,453,905 (159,893,189) 26,323,231,387 = 80,235,045,499 P 5,526,303,910 7,692,439,017 (611,090,730) 92,842,697,696 = 16,950,695,663 P 2,672,922,112 1,261,365,355 (71,571,832) 20,813,411,298 = 15,546,814,568 P 9,131,389,005 (9,212,258,277) (220,612,215) 15,245,333,081 = 135,135,433,888 P 21,152,407,540 (1,063,167,966) 155,224,673,462 437,595,529 56,559,550 (10,232,425) 483,922,654 = 25,839,308,733 P 17,718,731,839 2,565,080,499 (76,254,372) 20,207,557,966 = 72,635,139,730 P 9,142,890,393 1,334,001,550 (31,138,899) 10,445,753,044 = 10,367,658,254 P = 15,245,333,081 P 27,299,217,761 3,955,641,599 (117,625,696) 31,137,233,664 = 124,087,439,798 P Land and Land Use Rights Buildings and Improvements 2011 Building Equipment, Furniture and Others = P19,524,757,159 2,093,747,242 631,214,391 153,159,366 22,402,878,158 = P72,278,698,603 1,625,733,325 5,942,660,350 387,953,221 80,235,045,499 = P15,707,347,346 626,763,170 552,191,221 64,393,926 16,950,695,663 401,895,611 27,969,238 7,730,680 437,595,529 = P21,965,282,629 15,111,732,471 2,547,427,337 59,572,031 17,718,731,839 = P62,516,313,660 7,873,969,685 1,254,574,591 14,346,117 9,142,890,393 = P7,807,805,270 Total Shopping Mall Complex Under Construction = P9,817,096,213 12,669,351,155 (7,126,065,962) 186,433,162 15,546,814,568 P =15,546,814,568 Total = P117,327,899,321 17,015,594,892 791,939,675 135,135,433,888 23,387,597,767 3,829,971,166 81,648,828 27,299,217,761 = P107,836,216,127 Included under Land account are the 212,119 square meters of real estate properties with a carrying value of = P447 million and = P474 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and a fair value of = P13,531 million as at August 2007, planned for residential development in accordance with the cooperative contracts entered into by Mega Make and Affluent with Grand China International Limited (Grand China) and Oriental Land Development Limited (Oriental Land) on March 15, 2007. The value of these real estate properties were not part of the consideration amounting to = P10,827 million paid by the Parent Company to Grand China and Oriental Land. Accordingly, the assets were recorded at their carrying values under Investment properties - net account and a corresponding liability equivalent to the same amount, which is shown as part of Other noncurrent liabilities account in the consolidated balance sheets. Portions of investment properties located in China with carrying value of = P4,852 million and = P3,896 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and estimated fair value of = P10,874 million and = P13,541 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were mortgaged as collaterals to secure the domestic borrowings in China (see Note 16). *SGVMC215040* - 27 - Rent income from investment properties amounted to P =25,902 million, P =22,759 million and = P19,993 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Direct operating expenses from investment properties that generated rent income amounted to = P13,995 million, = P12,277 million and P =11,271 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The fair value of investment properties amounted to = P218,071 million as at July 31, 2010 as determined by an independent appraiser who holds a recognized and relevant professional qualification. The valuation of investment properties was based on market values using income approach. The fair value represents the amount at which the assets can be exchanged between a knowledgeable, willing seller and a knowledgeable, willing buyer in an arms length transaction at the date of valuation, in accordance with International Valuation Standards as set out by the International Valuation Standards Committee. Below are the significant assumptions used in the valuation: Discount rate Capitalization rate Average growth rate 11.75% 8.00% 6.00% While fair value of the investment properties was not determined as at December 31, 2012, the Companys management believes that there were no conditions present in 2012 and 2011 that would significantly reduce the fair value of the investment properties from that determined in 2010. The Companys management believes that the carrying values of the newly opened malls after the date of the valuation approximate their fair values. In 2012, shopping mall complex under construction mainly pertains to costs incurred for the development of SM Aura Premier, SM City BF Parañaque, SM Seaside City Cebu, SM Tianjin and SM Zibo, and the ongoing expansions and renovations of SM City Bacolod, SM City Clark, SM City Dasmariñas, SM City Sta. Rosa and SM Megamall. In 2011, shopping mall complex under construction mainly pertains to costs incurred for the development of SM Aura Premier, SM City Consolacion Cebu, SM City General Santos, SM City Olongapo, SM City San Fernando, SM Lanang Premier, SM City Chongqing, SM Tianjin and SM Zibo. Shopping mall complex under construction includes cost of land amounting to P =1,615 million and = P1,575 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Construction contracts with various contractors related to the construction of the above-mentioned projects amounted to = P53,965 million and = P39,240 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, inclusive of overhead, cost of labor and materials and all other costs necessary for the proper execution of the works. The outstanding contracts are valued at = P14,393 million and = P10,268 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest capitalized to shopping mall complex under construction amounted to = P114 million and = P54 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Capitalization rates used were 6.13% and 5.71% as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. *SGVMC215040* - 28 - 13. Other Noncurrent Assets This account consists of: Bonds and deposits Investment in associate Others 2012 P =2,519,247,536 252,059,209 1,363,276,073 P =4,134,582,818 2011 =2,609,489,374 P 544,398,558 =3,153,887,932 P Bonds and deposits mainly consist of deposits to contractors and suppliers to be applied throughout construction and advances and deposits paid for leased properties to be applied at the last term of the lease. On April 10, 2012, TRC entered into Memorandum of Agreement with Trendlink Holdings Limited (THL), a third party, wherein Fei Hua Real Estate Company (FHREC), a 100% subsidiary of TRC, issued new shares to THL equivalent to 50% equity interest. In addition, THL undertakes to pay TRC amounting to P =22 million (¥3 million) for the difference between cash invested and 50% equity of FHREC and = P224 million (¥34 million) representing the difference between the current market value and cost of the investment properties of FHREC. FHREC was incorporated in China. TRC is a wholly owned subsidiary of SM Land China. As at December 31, 2012, TRC owns 50% equity interest in FHREC. Management assessed that the Company lost control over FHREC by virtue of agreement with the shareholders of THL. Consequently, FHREC became an associate of the Company. Gain on dilution of equity interest over FHREC as a result of issuance of new shares to THL, included under Others - net account in the consolidated statements of income, amounted to = P224 million in 2012. As at December 31, 2012, the aggregated assets and liabilities of FHREC amounted to = P1,034 million and P =560 million, respectively. 14. Loans Payable This account consists of unsecured Philippine peso-denominated loans obtained from a bank amounting to = P800 million as at December 31, 2012. These loans bear interest rate of 3.25% and will mature in 2013. Interest expense incurred from loans payable amounted to = P1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. 15. Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities This account consists of: Trade Accrued utilities expense Accrued operating expenses: Third parties Related parties (see Note 20) 2012 P =5,863,568,314 830,320,247 2011 =4,914,654,211 P 737,207,458 2,121,692,671 121,321,472 2,155,500,940 102,408,081 (Forward) *SGVMC215040* - 29 - Liability for purchased land Taxes payable Accrued interest (see Notes 16 and 20) Others 2011 2012 =1,304,436,777 P =1,313,471,783 P 203,919,456 316,453,310 314,938,946 312,103,146 417,212,254 519,589,895 P10,150,278,123 P =11,398,520,838 = Trade payables primarily consist of liabilities to suppliers and contractors, which are noninterestbearing and are normally settled within a 30-day term. Accrued operating expenses mainly pertain to accrued administrative expenses such as security and janitorial, accrued management fees and rent payables which are normally settled throughout the financial year. Liability for purchased land, taxes, accrued interest and other payables are expected to be settled throughout the financial year. 16. Long-term Debt This account consists of: 2012 Parent Company U.S. dollar-denominated loans: Five-year term loans P =10,896,961,563 Five-year, three-year and two-year bilateral loans 1,021,242,099 Other U.S. dollar loans 2,438,112,216 Philippine peso-denominated loans: Five-year and ten-year fixed and floating rate notes 7,442,919,136 Five-year, seven-year and ten-year corporate notes 6,823,838,758 Five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed and floating rate notes 4,966,460,223 Five-year floating rate notes 4,920,827,931 Five-year and ten-year corporate notes 1,092,151,201 Five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes 795,341,665 Other bank loans 7,159,490,419 Subsidiaries China yuan renminbi-denominated loans: Five-year loan 1,871,134,000 Three-year loan 1,111,112,318 Five-year loan 401,239,650 Eight-year loan Philippine peso-denominated loans Five-year bilateral loan 497,991,424 51,438,822,603 Less current portion 1,791,703,848 P =49,647,118,755 2011 =6,101,532,979 P 1,084,929,299 3,030,778,585 6,884,170,665 4,962,413,247 4,960,399,612 1,985,674,872 7,161,770,104 2,177,495,800 1,299,441,045 422,323,230 277,388,000 544,291,291 40,892,608,729 799,086,409 =40,093,522,320 P *SGVMC215040* - 30 - Parent Company U.S. Dollar-denominated Five-Year Term Loans This represents a US$270 million and US$145 unsecured loan obtained as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, from a US$270 million facility. The loans bear interest rates based on London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus spread, with a bullet maturity on March 21, 2016 (see Notes 22 and 23). U.S. Dollar-denominated Five-Year, Three-Year and Two-Year Bilateral Loans The US$75 million unsecured loans were obtained in November 2008. The loans bear interest rates based on LIBOR plus spread, with bullet maturities ranging from two to five years. The Company prepaid the US$20 million and the US$30 million unsecured loans on June 1, 2009 and November 30, 2010, with original maturity dates of November 19, 2010 and November 28, 2011, respectively. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P4 million in 2010 (see Notes 22 and 23). The remaining balance of US$25 million will mature on November 20, 2013. Other U.S. Dollar Loans This account consists of the following: § US$10 million out of US$50 million five-year bilateral unsecured loan obtained on December 7, 2012. The loan bears interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on August 30, 2017 (see Note 22). § US$30 million and a US$20 million five-year bilateral unsecured loan drawn on November 30, 2010 and April 15, 2011, respectively. The loans bear interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on November 30, 2015 (see Notes 22 and 23). § US$20 million three-year bilateral unsecured loan drawn on July 13, 2010. The loan bears interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on January 14, 2013. The loan was prepaid on January 13, 2012. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P25 million in 2012 (see Notes 22 and 23). § US$20 million three-year bilateral unsecured loan obtained on October 15, 2009. The loan bears interest rate based on LIBOR plus spread, with a bullet maturity on October 15, 2012. The loan was prepaid on April 15, 2011 and the related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P2 million in 2011 (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year and Ten-Year Floating and Fixed Rate Notes This represents a five-year and ten-year floating and fixed rate notes obtained on June 19, 2012 amounting to = P3,450 million and P =1,000 million for the floating and P =680 million and = P2,370 million for the fixed, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on Philippine Dealing System Treasury Fixing (PDST-F) plus margin for the floating and 6.22% and 6.81% for the five-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2017 and 2022, respectively (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year, Seven-Year and Ten-Year Corporate Notes This represents a five-year floating and five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes amounting to = P3,000 million, = P1,134 million, = P52 million and P =814 million, respectively, out of = P7,000 million facility obtained on December 20, 2010. The remaining P =2,000 million floating rate note was obtained on June 13, 2011. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin for the five-year floating and 5.79%, 5.89% and 6.65% for the five-year, seven-year and *SGVMC215040* - 31 - ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2015, 2017 and 2020, respectively (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year, Seven-Year and Ten-Year Fixed and Floating Rate Notes This represents a five-year floating, five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes obtained on January 12, 2012 amounting to = P200 million, = P1,012 million, P =133 million, and P =3,655 million, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin for the five-year floating and 5.86%, 5.97% and 6.10% for the five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2017, 2019 and 2022, respectively (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year Floating Rate Notes This represents five-year floating rate notes obtained on March 18, 2011 and June 17, 2011 amounting to = P4,000 million and P =1,000 million, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin and will mature on March 19, 2016 and June 18, 2016, respectively (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year and Ten-Year Corporate Notes This represents a five-year floating and fixed rate and ten-year fixed rate notes obtained on April 14, 2009 amounting to = P200 million, = P3,700 million and = P1,100 million, respectively. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus margin for the five-year floating and 8.4% and 10.1% for the five-year and ten-year fixed, respectively. The loans have bullet maturities in 2014 and 2019, respectively. The Company prepaid the = P200 million and = P3,700 million loans on April 15, 2012, with original maturity date of April 15, 2014. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to P =17 million in 2012 (see Note 22). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year, Seven-Year and Ten-Year Fixed Rate Notes This represents a five-year, seven-year and ten-year fixed rate notes obtained on June 17, 2008 amounting to = P1,000 million, = P1,200 million and = P800 million, respectively. The loans bear fixed interest rates of 9.31%, 9.60% and 9.85%, respectively, and will mature on June 17, 2013, 2015 and 2018, respectively. The loans amounting to P =1,000 million and = P1,200 were prepaid on June 17, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P5 million and = P4 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Notes 22 and 23). Other Bank Loans This account consists of the following: § Five-year loan obtained on June 29, 2010 amounting to P =1,000 million and will mature on June 29, 2015. The loan carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). § Five-year inverse floating rate notes obtained on June 23, 2010 amounting to = P1,000 million. The loans bear an interest rate based on agreed fixed rate less PDST-F and will mature on June 23, 2015 (see Notes 22 and 23). § Five-year bullet loan obtained on January 13, 2010 amounting to = P1,000 million and will mature on January 13, 2015. The loan carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). § Five-year bullet loan obtained on November 3, 2009 amounting to = P1,000 million and will mature on November 3, 2014. The loan carries interest based on PDST-F plus on agreed margin (see Note 22). *SGVMC215040* - 32 - § Five-year bullet loans obtained on October 16, 2009 amounting to = P2,000 million and = P830 million. The loans bear an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin and will mature on October 16, 2014 and October 16, 2012, respectively. The Company prepaid the = P830 million loan on April 13, 2011, the related unamortized debt issuance costs charged to expense amounted to = P2 million in 2011 (see Note 22). § Four-year bullet loan obtained on April 15, 2009 amounting to = P750 million and will mature on April 15, 2013. The loan carries an interest rate based on Philippine Reference Rate (PHIREF) plus margin. The loan was prepaid on October 17, 2011, the related balance of unamortized debt issuance cost charged to expense amounted to P =3 million in 2011 (see Notes 22 and 23). § Five-year bullet loan obtained on March 3, 2008 amounting to = P1,000 million and will mature on March 3, 2013. The loan carries a fixed interest rate of 7.18%. The loan was prepaid on March 3, 2011, the related balance of unamortized debt issuance cost charged to expense amounted to = P3 million in 2011 (see Note 22). § Ten-year bullet fixed rate loan obtained on August 16, 2006 amounting to = P1,200 million. The loan carries a fixed interest rate of 9.75% and will mature on August 16, 2016 (see Note 22). All the above Philippine peso-denominated loans of the Parent Company are unsecured. Subsidiaries China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Five-Year Loan This represents a five-year loan obtained on August 26, 2009 amounting to ¥350 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. The loan is payable in semi-annual installments until 2014. The loan has a floating rate with an annual re-pricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 10%. The loan carries an interest rate of 5.76% and 6.21% in 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 22). China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Three-Year Loan This represents a three-year loan obtained on March 28, 2011 amounting to ¥250 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. Partial drawdown totaling ¥169 million was made as at December 31, 2012. The loan has a floating rate with an annual re-pricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 5% and will mature on March 27, 2014. The loan bears interest rate of 6.20% and 6.65% in 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 22). China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Five-Year Loan This represents a five-year loan obtained on August 27, 2010 amounting to ¥150 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. Partial drawdown totaling ¥61 million was made as at December 31, 2012. The loan is payable in 2015. The loan has a floating rate with an annual repricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 10%. The loan carries an interest rate of 5.76% and 6.20% in 2012 and 2011, respectively (see Note 22). China Yuan Renminbi-denominated Eight-Year Loan This represents an eight-year loan obtained on December 28, 2005 amounting to ¥155 million to finance the construction of shopping malls. The loan is payable in annual installments with two years grace period until December 2012. The loan has a floating rate with an annual re-pricing at prevailing rate dictated by Central Bank of China less 10%. The loan bears interest rate of 6.35% in 2012 and 2011 (see Note 22). *SGVMC215040* - 33 - The China yuan renminbi-denominated loans are secured by investment properties in China (see Note 12). Philippine Peso-denominated Five-Year Bilateral Loans This account consists of the following: § Five-year term loan obtained on September 28, 2007 and November 6, 2007 amounting to = P250 million to finance the construction of a project called SM by the Bay. The loan is payable in equal quarterly installments of = P16 million starting December 2008 up to September 2012 and carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). § Five-year term loan obtained on October 24, 2011 amounting to = P500 million and will mature on October 24, 2016. The loan carries an interest rate based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin (see Note 22). All the above Philippine peso-denominated loans of the subsidiaries are unsecured. The re-pricing frequencies of floating rate loans range from three to six months. The loan agreements provide certain restrictions and requirements principally with respect to maintenance of required financial ratios (i.e., current ratio of not less than 1.00:1.00, debt to equity ratio of not more than 0.70:0.30 and debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.10:1.00) and material change in ownership or control. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company is in compliance with the terms of its loan covenants. Debt Issuance Costs The movements in unamortized debt issuance costs are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Additions Amortization Balance at end of year 2012 P =457,844,346 112,637,407 (163,068,388) P =407,413,365 2011 =263,713,789 P 393,909,193 (199,778,636) =457,844,346 P Amortization of debt issuance costs is recognized in the consolidated statements of income under Others - net account. Repayment Schedule Repayments of long-term debt are scheduled as follows: Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 to 2022 Amount =1,791,703,848 P 5,726,792,470 11,486,039,650 17,717,160,000 5,667,885,000 9,456,655,000 =51,846,235,968 P *SGVMC215040* - 34 - 17. Stockholders Equity Capital Stock The Company has an authorized capital stock of 20,000,000,000 shares with a par value of P =1 a share. The movements of the capital stock of the Company are as follows: Number of shares at beginning of year Issuance during the year through stock dividends Number of shares at end of year 2012 13,917,800,067 3,474,734,693 17,392,534,760 2011 13,917,800,067 13,917,800,067 On April 24, 2012, the BOD and stockholders approved the declaration of stock dividends equivalent to 25% based on the par value per share in favor of stockholders of record as at May 24, 2012, payable on or before June 20, 2012. Accordingly, retained earnings amounting to = P3,474 million were transferred to capital stock. The following summarizes the information on the Company's registration of securities under the Securities Regulation Code: Date of SEC Approval/ Notification to SEC March 15, 1994 April 22, 1994 May 29, 2007 May 20, 2008 October 14, 2010 Authorized Shares 10,000,000,000 10,000,000,000 No. of Shares Issued 6,369,378,049 912,897,212 569,608,700 Issue/Offer Price = P 5.35 11.86 11.50 The Company declared stock dividends in 2012, 2007, 1996 and 1995. The total number of shareholders is 2,493 and 2,567 as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Additional Paid-in Capital On April 15, 2009, the Parent Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired additional 24,376,743 FARDC shares, which is equivalent to 19.82% of the total outstanding common stock of FARDC. The acquisition of such non-controlling interests amounting to P =3,384 million is accounted for as an equity transaction. Accordingly, the carrying amounts of SMPHs investment and the share of non-controlling interests were adjusted to reflect the changes in their relative interests in FARDC. The difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests were adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid was recognized directly in equity and attributed to the owners of the parent, and is shown as part of Additional paid-in capital - net account in the stockholders equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. International Placement of Shares On October 14, 2010, the Parent Company has undergone an international placement of its shares to raise capital to finance strategic expansion programs in the Philippines and in China as well as for general working capital. In connection with the international placement of its shares, the Parent Company engaged into a Placement Agreement with SM Land (the Selling Shareholder) and CLSA Limited and Macquarie Capital (Singapore) Pte. Limited (the Joint Bookrunners) on October 14, 2010. As stated in the Placement Agreement, SM Land shall sell its 570 million SMPH Common Shares (the Sale Shares) with a par value of P =1 per share at P =11.50 (Offer Price) per share to the Joint Bookrunners, or to investors that the Joint Bookrunners may procure outside the Philippines (the International Placement). *SGVMC215040* - 35 - Contemporaneous with the signing of the Placement Agreement, the Parent Company likewise entered into a Subscription Agreement with SM Land. As stated in the Subscription Agreement, SM Land will not directly receive any proceeds from the International Placement, but instead SM Land has conditionally agreed to subscribe for, and the Parent Company has conditionally agreed to issue, out of its authorized but unissued capital stock, new SMPH common shares in an amount equal to the aggregate number of the Sale Shares sold by SM Land in the International Placement at a subscription price of = P11.50 per share, which is equal to the Offer Price of the Sale Shares. SM Land was able to sell through the Joint Bookrunners the total Sale Shares of 570 million SMPH common shares. Likewise, SM Land subscribed for and the Parent Company issued to SM Land the same number of new SMPH common shares. The proceeds of = P6,414 million, net of transaction costs capitalized, add up to the capital of the Parent Company. Cumulative Translation Adjustment and Unrealized Loss on Available-for-Sale Investments The tax effects relating to each component of other comprehensive income are as follows: 2011 2012 Before Tax Amount Tax Benefit Net-of-tax Amount (P = 328,512,695) P282,958,497 P = (P = 328,512,695) = = P = P282,958,497 (P = 328,512,695) (4,161,471) P278,797,026 P = (P = 328,512,695) = Before Tax Amount Cumulative translation adjustment Unrealized loss on AFS investments Tax Benefit Net-of-tax Amount 416,148 = P416,148 (3,745,323) = P279,213,174 Retained Earnings On April 24, 2012 and March 22, 2002, the BOD approved the appropriation of retained earnings amounting to = P20,000 million and P =7,000 million, respectively, for future corporate expansion programs. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the amount of retained earnings appropriated for the continuous corporate and mall expansions amounted to P =27,000 million and P =7,000 million, respectively. As at December 31, 2012, included in shopping mall complex under construction are SM Aura Premier, SM City BF Parañaque, SM Seaside City Cebu, SM Tianjin and SM Zibo, and the ongoing expansions and renovations of SM City Bacolod, SM City Clark, SM City Dasmariñas, SM City Sta. Rosa and SM Megamall. Over the next five years, the Company expects to incur around = P25,000 million to = P35,000 million for its capital expenditures. The retained earnings account is restricted for the payment of dividends to the extent of = P7,895 million and = P5,214 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, representing the cost of shares held in treasury (P =101 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011) and accumulated equity in net earnings of the subsidiaries totaling = P7,794 million and = P5,113 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The accumulated equity in net earnings of the subsidiaries is not available for dividend distribution until such time that the Parent Company receives the dividends from the subsidiaries. Treasury Stock Treasury stock, totaling 18,857,000 shares, is stated at acquisition cost. *SGVMC215040* - 36 - 18. Income Tax The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: 2012 2011 Deferred tax assets Unrealized foreign exchange losses and others P =190,463,028 =254,132,999 P Deferred tax liabilities Undepreciated capitalized interest, unrealized foreign exchange gains and others P =1,278,194,418 = P1,258,514,789 On November 26, 2008, the Bureau of Internal Revenue issued Revenue Regulations No. 16-2008 which implemented the provisions of Republic Act No. 9504 on optional standard deduction (OSD). This regulation allowed both individual and corporate tax payers to use OSD in computing their taxable income. For corporations, they may elect a standard deduction in an amount equivalent to 40% of gross income, as provided by law, in lieu of the itemized allowed deductions. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company, except SPC and FLVGI in 2010, opted to use OSD in computing their taxable income. The reconciliation of statutory tax rate to effective tax rates are as follows: Statutory tax rate Income tax effects of: Interest income subjected to final tax and dividend income exempt from income tax Change in enacted tax rates and others Effective tax rates 2012 30.0% 2011 30.0% 2010 30.0% (0.9) (5.5) 23.6% (0.9) (5.9) 23.2% (0.7) (4.7) 24.6% 19. Pension Cost The Company is a participant in SM Corporate Management Companies Employer Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan) covering all regular full-time employees. The Retirement Plan is in the form of a trust administered by a trustee bank. The following tables summarize the components of the Companys pension plan: Net Pension Cost Current service cost Interest cost on benefit obligation Expected return on plan assets Net actuarial loss recognized Effect on asset limit Net pension cost Actual return on plan assets 2012 P7,242,901 = 5,893,155 (4,685,470) 934,979 =9,385,565 P P =11,817,977 2011 = P4,987,201 4,290,823 (3,606,172) 398,518 = P6,070,370 2010 = P2,904,989 3,690,383 (2,282,117) 5,811,580 1,950 = P10,126,785 = P4,908,807 = P8,559,473 *SGVMC215040* - 37 - Net Pension Asset 2011 = P83,590,852 (70,979,267) 12,611,585 (35,473,482) (P =22,861,897) 2012 =133,914,030 P (97,021,049) 36,892,981 (64,816,651) (P =27,923,670) Defined benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets Unfunded obligation Unrecognized net actuarial losses Net pension asset The changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Current service cost Interest cost on benefit obligation Benefits paid Actuarial losses on obligation Transfer to the plan Balance at end of year 2012 =83,590,852 P 7,242,901 5,893,155 (223,533) 37,410,655 =133,914,030 P 2011 = P54,108,736 4,987,201 4,290,823 20,204,092 = P83,590,852 2010 = P32,745,187 2,904,989 3,690,383 (72,195) 11,796,920 3,043,452 = P54,108,736 2011 = P54,135,272 3,606,172 11,935,188 1,302,635 = P70,979,267 2010 = P30,494,754 2,282,117 (72,195) 12,109,788 6,277,356 3,043,452 = P54,135,272 The changes in the fair value of plan assets are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Expected return on plan assets Benefits paid Contributions Actuarial gains Transfer to the plan Balance at end of year 2012 =70,979,267 P 4,685,470 (223,533) 14,447,338 7,132,507 =97,021,049 P The Company expects to contribute P =15 million to its defined benefit pension plan in 2013. The carrying amounts and fair values of the plan assets as at December 31, 2012 are as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Investments in: Debt and other securities Common trust funds Equity securities Government securities Other financial assets Carrying Amount =5,903,287 P Fair Value =5,903,287 P 10,670,837 38,332,750 3,193,021 38,181,958 739,196 =97,021,049 P 10,670,837 38,332,750 3,193,021 38,181,958 739,196 =97,021,049 P The plan assets consist of the following: § Cash and cash equivalents includes regular savings and time deposits; § Investments in debt and other securities consists of short-term and long-term corporate loans, notes and bonds which bear interest ranging from 5.45% to 8.46% and have maturities ranging from 2014 to 2022; *SGVMC215040* - 38 - § Investments in common trust funds pertain to unit investment trust fund; § Investments in equity securities consist of listed and unlisted equity securities; § Investments in government securities consist of retail treasury bonds which bear interest ranging from 5.00% to 11.14% and have maturities ranging from 2013 to 2037; and § Other financial assets include accrued interest income on cash deposits and debt securities held by the Retirement Plan. As at and for the year ended December 31, 2012, the following table summarizes the outstanding balances and transactions of the Retirement Plan with BDO, an affiliate: Amount =5,903,287 P 83,291 38,332,750 8,555,366 Cash and cash equivalents Interest income on cash and cash equivalents Investments in common trust funds Gains from investments in common trust funds The principal assumptions used in determining pension obligations for the Companys plan are shown below: Discount rate Expected rate of return on plan assets Future salary increases 2011 7.1% 6.0% 10.0% 2012 6.1% 6.0% 11.0% 2010 7.9% 6.0% 11.0% The overall expected rate of return on plan assets is determined based on the market prices prevailing on that date, applicable to the period within which the obligation is to be settled. The amounts for the current and previous four years are as follows: Defined benefit obligation Plan assets Deficit (excess plan assets) Experience adjustments on plan liabilities Experience adjustment on plan assets 2012 P = 133,914,030 97,021,049 36,892,981 (2,479,093) 7,132,507 2011 = P83,590,852 70,979,267 12,611,585 2010 = P54,108,736 54,135,272 (26,536) 2009 = P32,745,187 30,494,754 2,250,433 18,221,688 1,302,635 (5,496,062) 6,277,356 9,761,099 1,836,326 2008 = P18,098,581 15,807,447 2,291,134 (1,426,249) (1,197,299) 20. Related Party Transactions Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party in making financial and operating decisions and the parties are subject to common control. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities. *SGVMC215040* Related Party Affiliate Affiliates Affiliates SM Land SM Management Group SM Laiya/FHREC 2012 P = 2011 2010 2012 8,440,077 2011 7,279,897 2010 6,664,015 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2012 2012 P = 8,440,077 2011 7,279,897 2010 6,664,015 Accrued Accrued Cash Rent Rent Accrued Advances Advances Interest Interest Investments Long-term Rent Expense Payables Management Made to Related Receivable Payables and Cash Short-term Held for AFS Debt (see Management (see Interest (see Equivalents Investments (see (see Receivables Fees During the Parties Interest Trading Investments (see Note 9) Note 9) Note 15) Note 16) (see Note 9) Note 21) Note 15) (see Note 15) (see Note 6) (see Note 7) (see Note 8) (see Note 10) Fees Year Income Expense (In Thousands) P = 4,579 P = P = P = P = P = 18,493 P = 7,294 P =16,944 P = P = P = P = 299,957 P = P = P = P = 48,732 45,273 4,579 16,594 7,295 58,678 12,382 355,458 697,900 41,744 205,628 1,885,424 301,775 26,386 5,258,955 821,000 1,000,000 1,587,325 284,437 34,000 6,791 4,190,969 876,800 1,000,000 215,305 42,813 201,526 16,847 181,083 13,514 163,605 860,535 99,895 794,923 84,314 647,343 471,661 471,661 P = 1,885,424 P = 250,258 P = 21,426 P = 860,535 P = 99,895 P = 471,661 P = 471,661 P = 320,268 P = 33,680 P = 16,944 P = P = 5,258,955 P = 821,000 P = 299,957 P = 1,000,000 P = 1,587,325 226,356 18,093 794,923 84,314 301,031 41,295 65,469 12,382 4,190,969 876,800 355,458 1,000,000 697,900 205,349 647,343 215,305 248,441 *SGVMC215040* There have been no guarantees/collaterals provided or received for any related party receivables or payables. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company has not recorded any impairment of receivables relating to amounts owed by related parties. This assessment is undertaken each financial year through examining the financial position of the related party and the market in which the related party operates. The above transactions with related parties are made at terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms length transactions. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, outstanding balances at year-end are unsecured, noninterest-bearing, generally settled within 30 to 90 days and settlement occurs in cash except cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, AFS investments and long-term debt. For the terms and conditions of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, AFS investments and long-term debt, please refer to Notes 6, 7, 8, 10 and 16, respectively. Affiliate refers to an entity that is neither a parent, subsidiary, nor an associate, with stockholders common to the SM Group or under common control. Affiliates Parent Relationship Year SM Retail Group and SM Banking Group SMIC Rent Income (see Note 21) The significant related party transactions entered into by the Company with its ultimate parent company and affiliates and the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements with respect to such transactions follow: - 39 - - 40 - Below are the nature of the transactions with related parties: SMIC The Company leases land and maintains certain investments held for trading and long-term debt. The lease of land is for a period of 50 years, renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties. The Company pays a minimum fixed amount or a certain percentage of its gross rent income, whichever is higher. SM Retail Group and SM Banking Group The Company leases out its mall spaces and maintains certain bank accounts, short-term investments, investments held for trading and AFS investments. SM Land The Company leases land where one of its malls is located for a period of 50 years, renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties. The Company pays a minimum fixed amount or a certain percentage of its gross rent income, whichever is higher. SM Management Group The Company pays management fees to its affiliates, Shopping Center Management Corporation, West Avenue Theaters Corporation and Family Entertainment Center, Inc. for managing the operations of the malls. SM China Companies In 2012, SM City Xiamen entered into an offshore loan agreement with SM Laiya (SM Department Store in China). The loan is unsecured and bears an interest rate of 5.6% with maturity in March 2013. Also, SM China Companies provide noninterest-bearing cash advances to FHREC, an associate. The SM China Companies entered into land development contracts with Grand China and Oriental Land to jointly develop certain sites in the cities of Jinjiang, Chengdu and Xiamen, with areas of 158,727 square meters, 19,952 square meters and 33,440 square meters, respectively, as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. Under the terms of the contracts, the SM China Companies will provide the land use rights while Grand China and Oriental Land will fund the development expenses, among others. Key Management Compensation The total compensation paid to key management personnel of the Company amounted to = P36 million, = P32 million and = P28 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No special benefits are paid to management personnel other than the usual monthly salaries and government mandated bonuses. 21. Lease Agreements The Companys lease agreements with its tenants are generally granted for a term of one year, with the exception of some of the larger tenants operating nationally, which are granted initial lease terms of five years, renewable on an annual basis thereafter. Upon inception of the lease agreement, tenants are required to pay certain amounts of deposits. Tenants likewise pay either a fixed monthly rent, which is calculated with reference to a fixed sum per square meter of area leased, or pay rent on a percentage rental basis, which comprises a basic monthly amount and a percentage of gross sales or a minimum set amount, whichever is higher. *SGVMC215040* - 41 - Rent income amounted to = P25,902 million, = P22,759 million and = P19,993 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company also leases certain parcels of land where some of its malls are situated or constructed. The terms of the lease are for periods ranging from 15 to 50 years, renewable for the same period under the same terms and conditions. Rent payments are generally computed based on a certain percentage of the Companys gross rent income or a certain fixed amount, whichever is higher. The minimum lease payables under the noncancellable operating leases as at December 31 are as follows: Within one year After one year but not more than five years After five years 2011 2012 =524,651,330 P P =530,659,607 2,198,070,538 2,252,319,501 26,707,806,776 27,292,715,346 P30,015,437,214 P =29,490,785,884 = Rent expense included under Costs and expenses account in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P802 million, = P589 million and P =504 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 22. Financial Risk Management Objectives and Policies The Companys principal financial instruments, other than derivatives, comprise of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, accrued interest and other receivables, AFS investments and bank loans. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to finance the Companys operations. The Company has various other financial assets and liabilities such as rent receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its operations. The Company also enters into derivative transactions, principally interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps, foreign currency call options, non-deliverable forwards and foreign currency range options. The purpose is to manage the interest rate and currency risks arising from the Companys operations and its sources of finance (see Note 23). The main risks arising from the Companys financial instruments are interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Companys BOD and management review and agree on the policies for managing each of these risks as summarized below. Interest Rate Risk The Companys exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to its financial instruments with floating interest and/or fixed interest rates. Fixed rate financial instruments are subject to fair value interest rate risk while floating rate financial instruments are subject to cash flow interest rate risk. Re-pricing of floating rate financial instruments is done every three to six months. Interest on fixed rate financial instruments is fixed until maturity of the instrument. The details of financial instruments that are exposed to interest rate risk are disclosed in Notes 6, 8, 10 and 16. *SGVMC215040* - 42 - The Companys policy is to manage its interest cost using a mix of fixed and floating rate debts. To manage this mix in a cost-efficient manner, the Company enters into interest rate swaps, in which the Company agrees to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. These swaps are designated to economically hedge underlying debt obligations. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, after taking into account the effect of interest rate swaps, approximately 45% and 55%, respectively, of the Companys long-term borrowings excluding China yuan renminbi-denominated loans, are at a fixed rate of interest (see Note 23). *SGVMC215040* Floating Rate U.S. dollar-denominated fiveyear term loans Interest rate U.S. dollar-denominated bilateral loans Interest rate Other U.S. dollar loans Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated floating rate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated five-year bilateral loans Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate China yuan renminbidenominated loans Interest rate Fixed Rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated fixed rate notes Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate $50,000,000 LIBOR+spread $ P = 50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P = 96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% P = = 3,010,000,000 P PDST-F+margin% ¥375,168,446 5.76%6.20% P = 50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P = 96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% P = = 10,000,000 P PDST-F+margin% ¥77,476,000 5.76%6.20% ¥60,900,000 5.76% = 2,960,000,000 P PDST-F+margin% P = P = 96,500,000 PDST-F+margin% P = 4,800,000,000 PDST-F+margin% $ $ $25,000,000 LIBOR+spread $ $ P = 78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P $ P = 78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P P = 78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = P P = 1,097,300,000 5.79%6.65% 3-<4 Years $ P = 20,000,000 5.79%6.65% 2-<3 Years P = 20,000,000 5.79%6.65% 1-<2 Years P = $ $ $270,000,000 LIBOR+spread P = 78,500,000 5.86%-6.81% = 1,200,000,000 P 9.75% P = 8,660,000 5.79%6.65% 4-<5 Years 2012 ¥ P = 500,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P P = 4,846,500,000 PDST-F+margin% Interest Rate Risk Table The Companys long-term debt, presented by maturity profile, are as follows: - 43 - ¥ = P P = P = 3,514,000,000 PDST-F+margin% P = $10,000,000 LIBOR+spread $ $ P = 1,685,900,000 5.86%-6.81% = P P = 57,485,000 5.89%6.65% 5-<6 Years ¥ = P P = P = 950,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P $ $ $ P = 6,650,100,000 5.86%-9.85% = P P = 1,856,555,000 5.89%10.11% >6 Years (P = 407,413,365) = 51,846,235,968 P = 51,438,822,603 P 3,383,485,968 5,964,677,719 497,991,424 9,535,618,361 4,874,170,541 2,438,112,216 1,021,242,099 10,896,961,563 1,194,812,700 8,589,930,594 P = 3,041,819,418 Carrying Value *SGVMG200157* (15,322,281) (2,008,576) (64,381,639) (25,829,459) (24,887,784) (5,007,901) 3,383,485,968 5,980,000,000 500,000,000 9,600,000,000 4,900,000,000 2,463,000,000 1,026,250,000 (186,538,437) (5,187,300) 1,200,000,000 11,083,500,000 (60,069,406) (P = 18,180,582) 8,650,000,000 P = 3,060,000,000 Total Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs Floating Rate U.S. dollar-denominated fiveyear term loans Interest rate U.S. dollar-denominated bilateral loans Interest rate Other U.S. dollar loans Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated five-year floating rate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated five-year bilateral loans Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate China yuan renminbidenominated loans Interest rate Fixed Rate Philippine peso-denominated corporate notes Interest rate Philippine peso-denominated fixed rate notes Interest rate Other bank loans Interest rate = P = P3,010,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P50,300,000 PDST-F+margin% = P50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P = P10,000,000 PHIREF+margin% ¥77,476,000 6.20%6.65% = P50,300,000 PDST-F+margin% = P50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P46,875,000 PDST-F+margin% = P10,000,000 PDST-F+margin% ¥88,738,000 6.20%6.65% $ ¥375,168,446 6.20%6.65% = P50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P248,800,000 PDST-F+margin% $ $ $25,000,000 LIBOR+spread $20,000,000 LIBOR+spread $ $ = P990,000 9.60% = P $ = P990,000 9.60% = P = P990,000 9.60% = P = P3,697,800,000 5.79%8.40% 3-<4 Years $ = P25,550,000 5.79%8.40% 2-<3 Years = P25,550,000 5.79%8.40% 1-<2 Years ¥60,900,000 6.20%6.65% = P2,960,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P = P50,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P4,800,000,000 PDST-F+margin% $50,000,000 LIBOR+spread $ $ = P1,194,060,000 9.60% = P = P1,097,300,000 5.79%6.65% 4-<5 Years 2011 - 44 - ¥ = P500,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P = P4,800,000,000 PDST-F+margin% = P $ $ $145,000,000 LIBOR+spread = P1,200,000,000 9.75% = P = P8,660,000 5.89%6.65% 5-<6 Years ¥ = P = P = P = P $ $ $ = P800,000,000 9.85% = P = P1,914,040,000 5.89%10.11% >6 Years (P = 457,844,346) = P41,350,453,075 = P40,892,608,729 4,176,648,075 5,968,097,420 544,291,291 4,962,413,247 5,115,548,745 3,030,778,585 1,084,929,299 6,101,532,979 1,193,672,684 1,985,674,872 = P6,729,021,532 Carrying Value *SGVMC215040* (21,902,580) (2,583,709) (37,586,753) (33,851,255) (38,021,415) (11,070,701) (255,267,021) (6,327,316) (11,355,128) (P = 39,878,468) 4,176,648,075 5,990,000,000 546,875,000 5,000,000,000 5,149,400,000 3,068,800,000 1,096,000,000 6,356,800,000 1,200,000,000 1,997,030,000 = P6,768,900,000 Total Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs - 45 - Interest Rate Risk Sensitivity Analysis The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in interest rates, with all other variables held constant, of the Companys income before income tax. The impact on the Companys stockholders equity, due to changes in fair value of AFS investments, is immaterial. 2012 2011 Increase (Decrease) in Basis Points 100 50 (100) (50) 100 50 (100) (50) Effect on Income Before Income Tax (P =67,360,623) (33,680,312) 67,360,623 33,680,312 (P =47,083,030) (23,541,515) 47,083,030 23,541,515 Fixed rate debts, although subject to fair value interest rate risk, are not included in the sensitivity analysis as these are carried at amortized costs. The assumed movement in basis points for interest rate sensitivity analysis is based on the currently observable market environment, showing a significantly higher volatility as in prior years. Foreign Currency Risk Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. To manage its foreign currency risk, stabilize cash flows and improve investment and cash flow planning, the Company enters into foreign currency swap contracts, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency call options, nondeliverable forwards and foreign currency range options aimed at reducing and/or managing the adverse impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on financial performance and cash flows (see Note 23). The Companys foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities amounted to = P14,581 million (US$355 million) and P =14,909 million (US$363 million), respectively, as at December 31, 2012, and = P10,350 million (US$236 million) and P =10,808 million (US$246 million), respectively, as at December 31, 2011. In translating the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities to peso amounts, the exchange rates used were = P41.05 to US$1.00 and = P43.84 to US$1.00, the Philippine peso to U.S. dollar exchange rate as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in P =/US$ exchange rate, with all other variables held constant, of the Companys income before income tax (due to changes in the fair value of monetary assets and liabilities, including the impact of derivative instruments). There is no impact on the Companys stockholders equity. 2012 Appreciation (Depreciation) of = P P =1.50 1.00 (1.50) (1.00) Effect on Income before Income Tax P =2,987,744 1,991,830 (2,987,744) (1,991,830) *SGVMC215040* - 46 - 2011 Effect on Income before Income Tax =3,910,844 P 2,607,229 (3,910,844) (2,607,229) Appreciation (Depreciation) of = P =1.50 P 1.00 (1.50) (1.00) Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a financial loss. It is the Companys policy that all prospective tenants are subject to screening procedures. In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Companys exposure to bad debts is not significant. Given the Companys diverse base of tenants, it is not exposed to large concentrations of credit risk. With respect to credit risk arising from the other financial assets of the Company, which comprise of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading, AFS investments and certain derivative instruments, the Companys exposure to credit risk arises from the default of the counterparty, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments are disclosed in Note 23. Since the Company trades only with recognized third parties, there is no requirement for collateral. Credit Quality of Financial Assets The credit quality of financial assets is determined by the Company using high quality and standard quality as internal credit ratings. High Quality. Pertains to financial assets with counterparties who are not expected by the Company to default in settling its obligations, thus credit risk exposure is minimal. This normally includes large prime financial institutions, companies and government agencies. Standard Quality. Other financial assets not belonging to high quality financial assets are included in this category. As at December 31, the credit quality of the Companys financial assets is as follows: 2012 Neither Past Due nor Impaired High Standard Quality Quality Loans and Receivables Cash and cash equivalents* Short-term investments Receivables from: Rent Accrued interest Advances to suppliers and others Financial Assets at FVPL Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS Investments Corporate notes Past Due but not Impaired Total P =9,663,575,278 821,000,000 P = P = P =9,663,575,278 821,000,000 47,123,072 4,067,710,900 1,688,335,509 76,912,399 4,144,623,299 47,123,072 1,688,335,509 759,300,343 109,978,821 759,300,343 109,978,821 1,000,000,000 P =12,400,977,514 P =5,756,046,409 P =76,912,399 1,000,000,000 P =18,233,936,322 * Excluding cash on hand amounting to = P 43 million. *SGVMC215040* - 47 2011 Neither Past Due nor Impaired High Standard Quality Quality Loans and Receivables Cash and cash equivalents* Short-term investments Receivables from: Rent Accrued interest Advances to suppliers and others Financial Assets at FVPL Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS Investments Corporate notes Past Due but not Impaired Total = P8,252,825,018 876,800,000 = P = P = P8,252,825,018 876,800,000 45,556,109 3,692,944,170 872,521,181 97,012,266 3,789,956,436 45,556,109 872,521,181 812,953,412 115,618,680 812,953,412 115,618,680 1,000,000,000 = P11,103,753,219 = P4,565,465,351 = P97,012,266 1,000,000,000 = P15,766,230,836 * Excluding cash on hand amounting to = P 37 million. Liquidity Risk The Company seeks to manage its liquidity profile to be able to finance its capital expenditures and service its maturing debts. The Companys objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through evaluation of projected and actual cash flow information. Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Company may encounter difficulties in raising funds to meet commitments from financial instruments or that a market for derivatives may not exist in some circumstance. The Companys financial assets, which have maturity of less than 12 months and used to meet its short-term liquidity needs, are cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and investments held for trading amounting to = P9,707 million, = P821 million and P =759 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2012, and = P8,290 million, = P877 million and = P813 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2011. Also included in the Companys financial assets used to meet its short-term liquidity needs are current AFS investments amounting to = P1,000 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. The table below summarizes the maturity profile of the Companys financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted payments: 2012 Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities* Long-term debt (including current portion) Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps Tenants deposits Liability for purchased land Other noncurrent liabilities* Less than 12 Months P =800,000,000 2 to 5 Years P = More than 5 Years P = Total P =800,000,000 11,082,067,528 11,082,067,528 3,565,265,400 46,540,835,301 11,485,043,650 61,591,144,351 17,428,372 P =15,464,761,300 51,987,472 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,389,211,697 P =57,583,039,344 14,046,843 P =11,499,090,493 83,462,687 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,389,211,697 P =84,546,891,137 * Excluding nonfinancial liabilities included in Accounts payable and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities accounts amounting to = P 316 million and = P447 million, respectively. *SGVMC215040* - 48 2011 Accounts payable and other current liabilities* Long-term debt (including current portion) Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps Tenants deposits Liability for purchased land Other noncurrent liabilities* Less than 12 Months 2 to 5 Years More than 5 Years Total = P9,946,358,667 = P = P = P9,946,358,667 2,619,975,153 43,266,421,430 3,277,656,190 49,164,052,773 415,077,453 = P12,981,411,273 58,758,533 7,467,302,387 1,551,018,812 1,322,411,095 = P53,665,912,257 = P3,277,656,190 473,835,986 7,467,302,387 1,551,018,812 1,322,411,095 = P69,924,979,720 * Excluding nonfinancial liabilities included in Accounts payable and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities accounts amounting to = P 204 million and = P474 million, respectively. Capital Management Capital includes equity attributable to equity holders of the parent. The primary objective of the Companys capital management is to ensure that it maintains a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support its business and maximize shareholder value. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, in the light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, payoff existing debts, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. The Company monitors capital using gearing ratio, which is interest-bearing debt divided by total capital plus interest-bearing debt and net interest-bearing debt divided by total capital plus net interest-bearing debt. Interest-bearing debt includes all short-term and long-term debt while net interest-bearing debt includes all short-term and long-term debt net of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading and AFS investments. As at December 31, the Companys gearing ratios are as follows: Interest-bearing Debt to Total Capital plus Interest-bearing Debt Loans payable Current portion of long-term debt Long-term debt - net of current portion Total interest-bearing debt (a) Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent Total interest-bearing debt and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent (b) Gearing ratio (a/b) 2012 P =800,000,000 1,791,703,848 49,647,118,755 52,238,822,603 2011 = P 799,086,409 40,093,522,320 40,892,608,729 69,944,410,317 63,773,661,498 P104,666,270,227 P =122,183,232,920 = 43% 39% *SGVMC215040* - 49 - Net Interest-bearing Debt to Total Capital plus Net Interest-bearing Debt 2011 2012 Loans payable = P P =800,000,000 Current portion of long-term debt 799,086,409 1,791,703,848 Long-term debt - net of current portion 40,093,522,320 49,647,118,755 Less cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, investments held for trading and AFS investments (12,287,157,704) (10,979,969,451) Total net interest-bearing debt (a) 29,912,639,278 39,951,664,899 Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent 63,773,661,498 69,944,410,317 Total net interest-bearing debt and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent (b) P93,686,300,776 P =109,896,075,216 = Gearing ratio (a/b) 32% 36% 23. Financial Instruments The table below presents a comparison of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys financial instruments by category and by class as at December 31: 2011 2012 Financial Assets Loans and receivables: Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Receivables from: Rent Accrued interest Advances to suppliers and others Financial assets at FVPL: Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS investments Corporate notes Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities at FVPL Derivative liabilities Other financial liabilities: Loans payable Accounts payable and other current liabilities* Long-term debt (including current portion) Tenants deposits Liability for purchased land Other noncurrent liabilities* Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value P =9,706,857,361 821,000,000 P =9,706,857,361 821,000,000 = P8,290,216,039 876,800,000 = P8,290,216,039 876,800,000 4,144,623,299 47,123,072 1,688,335,509 16,407,939,241 4,144,623,299 47,123,072 1,688,335,509 16,407,939,241 3,789,956,436 45,556,109 872,521,181 13,875,049,765 3,789,956,436 45,556,109 872,521,181 13,875,049,765 759,300,343 109,978,821 869,279,164 759,300,343 109,978,821 869,279,164 812,953,412 115,618,680 928,572,092 812,953,412 115,618,680 928,572,092 1,000,000,000 P =18,277,218,405 1,000,000,000 P =18,277,218,405 1,000,000,000 = P15,803,621,857 1,000,000,000 = P15,803,621,857 P =244,330,399 P =244,330,399 = P237,979,926 = P237,979,926 800,000,000 800,000,000 11,082,067,528 11,082,067,528 9,946,358,667 9,946,358,667 51,438,822,603 8,386,248,204 1,214,756,670 1,389,211,697 74,311,106,702 P =74,555,437,101 53,227,448,393 7,976,094,815 1,155,345,530 1,321,268,336 75,562,224,602 P =75,806,555,001 40,892,608,729 7,467,302,387 1,551,018,812 1,322,411,095 61,179,699,690 = P61,417,679,616 42,561,503,623 7,285,378,046 1,520,654,214 1,296,521,995 62,610,416,545 = P62,848,396,471 Carrying Amount * Excluding nonfinancial liabilities included in Accounts payable and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities accounts amounting to = P 316 million and = P447 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2012, and = P204 million and = P474 million, respectively, as at December 31, 2011. *SGVMC215040* - 50 - The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate such value: Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments. The carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. Receivables. The net carrying value approximates the fair value due to the short-term maturities of the receivables. Investments Held for Trading. The fair values are based on quoted market prices of the instruments at balance sheet date. AFS Investments. The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organized financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business at balance sheet date. For investments where there is no active market, the fair value is based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at prevailing interest rates. Discount rate used was 4.74% and 6.21% as at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Derivative Instruments. The fair values are based on quotes obtained from counterparties. Loans Payable, Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities. The carrying values approximate the fair values due to the short-term maturities of these liabilities. Long-term Debt. Fair value is based on the following: Debt Type Fixed Rate Loans Fair Value Assumptions Estimated fair value is based on the discounted value of future cash flows using the applicable rates for similar types of loans. Discount rates used range from 1.52% to 5.35% as at December 31, 2012, and 2.67% to 6.36% as at December 31, 2011. Variable Rate Loans For variable rate loans that re-price every 3 months, the face value approximates the fair value because of the recent and regular repricing based on current market rates. For variable rate loans that re-price every 6 months, the fair value is determined by discounting the principal amount plus the next interest payment using the prevailing market rate from the period up to the next re-pricing date. Discount rates used range from 1.73% to 5.91% as at December 31, 2012, and 1.98% to 6.32% as at December 31, 2011. Tenants Deposits, Liability for Purchased Land and Other Noncurrent Liabilities. The estimated fair values are based on the discounted value of future cash flows using the applicable rates for similar types of loans. Discount rates used range from 1.99% to 4.06% as at December 31, 2012, and 2.97% to 3.67% as at December 31, 2011. Fair Value Hierarchy The Company uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2: Those involving inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); and, *SGVMC215040* - 51 - Level 3: Those with inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). The following table shows the Companys financial instruments carried at fair value as at December 31 based on Levels 1 and 2: 2012 Level 1 Financial Assets Financial assets at FVPL: Investments held for trading Corporate and government bonds Derivative assets AFS investments Corporate notes P =759,300,343 759,300,343 P = 109,978,821 109,978,821 1,000,000,000 P =759,300,343 P =1,109,978,821 Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities at FVPL Derivative liabilities P = 2011 Level 1 Level 2 = P812,953,412 812,953,412 Level 2 = P 115,618,680 115,618,680 1,000,000,000 = P812,953,412 = P1,115,618,680 = P P =244,330,399 = P237,979,926 During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. There are no financial instruments classified under Level 3. Derivative Financial Instruments To address the Companys exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates arising primarily from its long-term floating rate debt obligations and to manage its foreign currency risk, the Company entered into various derivative transactions such as interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency call options, non-deliverable forwards and foreign currency range options. The table below shows information on the Companys interest rate swaps presented by maturity profile. 2012 <1 Year >1-<2 Years >2-<5 Years Floating-Fixed Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $145,000,000 $145,000,000 $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%3.28% 2.91%3.28% 2.91%3.28% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $30,000,000 $30,000,000 $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% 3.53% 3.53% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $20,000,000 $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% 3.18% $ Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $25,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 4.10% $ $ Fixed-Floating Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate P = 970,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F P = 960,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F P = 950,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate P = 970,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% P = 960,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% P = 950,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% *SGVMC215040* - 52 2011 <1 Year >1-<2 Years >2-<5 Years Floating-Fixed Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%3.28% $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%3.28% $145,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 2.91%3.28% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% $30,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.53% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.18% Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $25,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 4.10% $25,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 4.10% $ Outstanding notional amount Receive-floating rate Pay-fixed rate $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.41% $20,000,000 6 months LIBOR+margin% 3.41% $ Fixed-Floating Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate = P980,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F = P970,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F = P960,000,000 5.44% 3MPDST-F Outstanding notional amount Receive-fixed rate Pay-floating rate = P980,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% = P970,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% = P960,000,000 7.36% 3MPDST-F+margin% Interest Rate Swaps. In 2011, the Parent Company entered into floating to fixed US$ interest rate swap agreements with aggregate notional amount of US$145 million. Under the agreements, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated term loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to March 21, 2015 (see Note 16). As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the floating to fixed interest rate swaps have aggregate negative fair value of = P158 million and P =142 million, respectively. The Parent Company also entered into US$ interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of US$20 million in 2011. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated five-year bilateral unsecured loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to November 30, 2014 (see Note 16). As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the floating to fixed interest rate swaps has negative fair value of = P17 million and = P15 million, respectively. In 2010, the Parent Company entered into the following interest rate swap agreements: § A US$ interest rate swap agreement with nominal amount of US$30 million. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated five-year bilateral unsecured loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to November 30, 2015 (see Note 16). As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the floating to fixed interest rate swap has a negative fair value of = P48 million and positive fair value of = P38 million, respectively. § Two Philippine peso interest rate swap agreements with notional amount of = P1,000 million each, with amortization of = P10 million every anniversary. The combined net cash flows of the two swaps effectively converts the Philippine peso-denominated five-year inverse floating rate notes into floating rate notes with quarterly payment intervals up to June 2015 (see Note 16). As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, these swaps have positive fair values of = P110 million and = P116 million, respectively. *SGVMC215040* - 53 - § A US$ interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of US$40 million. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated three-year club loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to October 28, 2012 (see Note 16). On May 9, 2011 and July 28, 2011, the interest rate swap agreement was preterminated as a result of the prepayment of the underlying loan. Fair value changes from the preterminated swap recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P4 million loss in 2011. § A US$ interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of US$20 million. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated three-year bilateral unsecured loan into fixed rate loan with semi-annual payment intervals up to January 14, 2013 (see Note 16). As at December 31, 2011, the floating to fixed interest rate swap has a negative fair value of = P3 million. In January 2012, the interest rate swap agreement was preterminated as a result of the prepayment of the underlying loan. Fair value changes from the preterminated swap recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P1 million loss in 2012. In 2009, the Parent Company entered into US$ interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of US$145 million. Under these agreements, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate US$30 million two-year bilateral loan, US$90 million three-year term loan and US$25 million five-year bilateral loan into fixed rate loans with semi-annual payment intervals up to November 2011, May 2012 and November 2013, respectively (see Note 16). The Parent Company preterminated the US$30 million swap on November 30, 2010 and the US$90 million swap on May 16, 2011. Fair value changes from the preterminated swaps recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to P =9 million loss in 2011 and = P6 million gain in 2010. As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the outstanding US$25 million floating to fixed interest rate swaps have negative fair values of = P22 million and P =40 million, respectively. Also in 2009, the Parent Company entered into Philippine peso interest rate swap agreement with notional amount of = P750 million. Under the agreement, the Parent Company effectively converts the floating rate Philippine peso-denominated four-year bullet term loan into fixed rate loan with quarterly payment intervals up to April 2013 (see Note 16). On October 17, 2011, the interest rate swap was preterminated as a result of the prepayment of the underlying loan. Negative fair value from the preterminated swap recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P14 million in 2011. In 2008, the Parent Company entered into Philippine peso interest swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of P =1,000 million with repayment of P =5 million every anniversary. Under these agreements, the Parent Company effectively swaps the fixed rate Philippine pesodenominated five-year syndicated fixed rate notes into floating rate loans based on PDST-F plus an agreed margin with quarterly payment intervals up to June 2013 (see Note 16). On March 14, 2011, the interest rate swap was preterminated as a result of the prepayment of the underlying loan. Fair value changes from the preterminated swap recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to = P27 million loss in 2011. Foreign Currency Options. In 2010, the Parent Company simultaneously entered into two plain vanilla long call currency options and two plain vanilla short put currency options with notional amounts of US$5 million each. The Parent Company combines the long call option and the short put option such that the net effect of the two options will be similar to that of a foreign currency range option. If the spot rate is above the strike rate of the long call option, the Parent Company, on a net-settlement basis, will buy US$ and sell = P at the strike rate of the long call option based on *SGVMC215040* - 54 - the notional amount. On the other hand, if the spot rate is below the lower strike rate of the short put option, the Parent Company, on a net-settlement basis, will buy US$ and sell = P at the strike rate of the short put option based on the notional amount. However, should the spot rate fall within the range of the two strike rates, there will be no settlement between parties as both options would be unfavorable. The average strike rates of the long call and short put currency options are = P47.41 to US$1.00 and = P47.36 to US$1.00, respectively. As at December 31, 2010, there are no outstanding currency options as these matured during the year. Net fair value changes from these option contracts recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to P =0.8 million gain in 2010. Non-deliverable Forwards. In 2012 and 2011, the Parent Company entered into sell = P and buy US$ forward contracts. It also entered into sell US$ and buy = P forward contracts with the same aggregate notional amount. Net fair value changes from the settled forward contracts recognized in the consolidated statements of income amounted to P =67 million gain, P =480 million gain and = P165 million gain in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Fair Value Changes on Derivatives The net movements in fair value of all derivative instruments are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Net changes in fair value during the year Less fair value of settled derivatives Balance at end of year 2012 (P =122,361,246) 24,406,448 (36,396,780) (P =134,351,578) 2011 P28,319,173 = 236,485,791 (387,166,210) (P =122,361,246) In 2012, the net changes in fair value amounting to P =24 million comprise of interest paid amounting to = P27 million, which is included under Interest expense account in the consolidated statements of income and net mark-to-market gain on derivatives amounting to P =51 million, which is included under Others - net account in the consolidated statements of income. In 2011, the net changes in fair value amounting to = P236 million comprise of interest paid amounting to = P22 million, which is included under Interest expense account in the consolidated statements of income and net mark-to-market gain on derivatives amounting to = P258 million, which is included under Others - net account in the consolidated statements of income. The reconciliation of the amounts of derivative assets and liabilities recognized in the consolidated balance sheets follows: Derivative assets Derivative liabilities 2012 P =109,978,821 (244,330,399) (P =134,351,578) 2011 P115,618,680 = (237,979,926) (P =122,361,246) *SGVMC215040* - 55 - 24. Basic/Diluted Earnings Per Share Computation Basic/diluted EPS is computed as follows: Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent (a) Common shares issued at beginning of year Stocks dividends (see Note 17)* Weighted average number of shares issued in equity placement (see Note 17) Common shares issued at end of year Less treasury stock (see Note 17) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (b) 2012 2011 2010 P =10,529,954,990 = P9,055,995,525 = P7,856,348,789 13,917,800,067 3,474,734,693 13,917,800,067 3,474,734,693 13,348,191,367 3,474,734,693 17,392,534,760 18,857,000 17,392,534,760 18,857,000 118,668,479 16,941,594,539 18,857,000 17,373,677,760 17,373,677,760 16,922,737,539 P =0.606 = P0.521 = P0.464 Earnings per share (a/b) * Retroactively adjusted for stock dividends declared. 25. Events after the Reporting Date On January 7, 2013, the Company has entered into a joint venture with Waltermart Mall Group of Companies (Waltermart). Waltermart is engaged in the business of shopping mall operations. Waltermart currently operates 17 shopping centers across Metro Manila, North and South Luzon. As at February 18, 2013, the final terms and conditions of the joint venture are still subject to due diligence and discussion. *SGVMC215040* SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co. 6760 Ayala Avenue 1226 Makati City Philippines Phone: (632) 891 0307 Fax: (632) 819 0872 www.sgv.com.ph BOA/PRC Reg. No. 0001, December 28, 2012, valid until December 31, 2015 SEC Accreditation No. 0012-FR-3 (Group A), November 15, 2012, valid until November 16, 2015 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES The Stockholders and the Board of Directors SM Prime Holdings, Inc. Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd. Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76, Zone 10 CBP-1A, Pasay City 1300 We have audited in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing, the consolidated financial statements of SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, included in this Form 17-A, and have issued our report thereon dated February 18, 2013. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed in the Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Schedules are the responsibility of the Companys management. These schedules are presented for purposes of complying with Securities Regulation Code Rule 68, As Amended (2011) and are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly state, in all material respects, the information required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. SYCIP GORRES VELAYO & CO. Belinda T. Beng Hui Partner CPA Certificate No. 88823 SEC Accreditation No. 0943-A (Group A), March 18, 2010, valid until March 17, 2013 Tax Identification No. 153-978-243 BIR Accreditation No. 08-001998-78-2012, June 19, 2012, valid until June 18, 2015 PTR No. 3669663, January 2, 2013, Makati City February 18, 2013 *SGVMG200157* A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES DECEMBER 31, 2012 Annex 68 - E A. Financial Assets B. Amounts Receivable from Directors, Officers, Employees, Related Parties and Principal Stockholders (Other than Related Parties) C. Amounts Receivable from Related Parties which are Eliminated during the Consolidation of Financial Statements Attached Not applicable Attached D. Intangible Assets and Other Assets Not applicable E. Long-term Debt Not applicable F. Indebtedness to Related Parties (Long-term Loans from Related Companies) Not applicable G. Guarantees of Securities of Other Issuers Not applicable H. Capital stock Attached Additional Components i) Reconciliation of Retained Earnings Available for Dividend Declaration Attached ii) List of Philippine Financial Reporting Standards effective as at December 31, 2012 Attached iii) Map of Relationships of the Companies within the Group Attached iv) Financial Ratios - Key Performance Indicators Attached Schedule A. Financial Assets Name of Issuing Entity and Association of Each Issue Loans and Receivables Temporary investments: Banco de Oro (BDO) China Construction Bank Industrial Commercial Bank of China Bank of China China Industrial Bank BDO Others Short-term investments - BDO Financial Assets at FVPL Investments held for trading: SM Investments Corporation Bond Retail Treasury Bond Bureau of Treasury RTB Energy Development Corp. Ayala Corporation Travellers International Hotel Derivative assets Available-for-sale Investments BDO Tier 2 Number of Shares or Principal Amount of Bonds and Notes =4,731,006,237 P Rmb302,526,350 241,980,000 11,800,000 1,500,000 $100,000 =687,949,149 P $20,000,000 = P300,000,000 150,000,000 50,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 $5,000,000 = P109,978,821 = P1,000,000,000 Amount Shown in the Balance Sheet Income Received and Accrued =4,731,006,237 P 1,993,194,857 1,594,285,230 77,744,300 9,882,750 4,105,000 687,949,149 821,000,000 9,919,167,523 =295,446,777 P 299,957,143 160,407,000 54,656,250 10,746,090 4,680,110 228,853,750 109,978,821 869,279,164 43,068,197 1,000,000,000 = P11,788,446,687 67,700,000 = P406,214,974 Common Title of Issue Schedule H. Capital Stock 20,000,000,000 Number of Shares Authorized Name and Designation of Debtor SM China Companies First Leisure Ventures Group Inc. Consolidated Prime Dev. Corp. First Asia Realty Development Corporation Premier Central, Inc. Premier Southern Corp. Southernpoint Properties Corp. 17,373,677,760 Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding as Shown Under Related Balance Sheet Caption Amounts Collected (P =2,923,051) (30,000,524) (42,902,996) (132,639) (212,521) (500) (P =76,172,231) Number of Shares Reserved for Options, Warrants, Conversion and Other Rights Balance at Beginning of Period Additions = P9,899,447,701 = P3,893,997,072 52,777,256 760,406 34,300,000 68,833,475 148,448,185 11,831,804 7,577,011 2,110,402 = P9,986,524,957 = P4,133,558,355 12,056,350,326 Number of Shares Held by Related Parties Amounts Written Off = P = P 19,285,873 Directors, Officers and Employees Current Not Current = P = P13,790,521,722 23,537,138 60,230,479 148,448,185 11,699,165 7,364,490 2,109,902 = P = P14,043,911,081 Schedule C. Amounts Receivable from Related Parties which are Eliminated during the Consolidation of Financial Statements 5,298,041,561 Others Balance at End of Period = P13,790,521,722 23,537,138 60,230,479 148,448,185 11,699,165 7,364,490 2,109,902 = P14,043,911,081 SM Prime Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Mall of Asia Arena Annex Building, Coral Way cor. J.W. Diokno Blvd. Mall of Asia Complex, Brgy. 76 Zone 10, CBP-1A, Pasay City 1300 Retained Earnings Available for Dividend Declaration December 31, 2012 Unappropriated retained earnings as at January 1, 2012 Less: Non-actual/unrealized income, net of applicable tax: Unrealized mark-to-market gain on investments held for trading Unrealized marked-to-market gain on derivatives Less: Treasury stock = P28,752,904,582 (P =10,198,013) (17,628,179) (101,474,705) (129,300,897) Unappropriated retained earnings as at January 1, 2012, as adjusted to available for dividend distribution Net income closed to retained earnings in 2012 Less non-actual/unrealized income, net of applicable tax: Unrealized foreign exchange gain (net of exchange difference attributable to cash and cash equivalents) Net income actually earned in 2012 Less: Appropriations in 2012 Cash dividends declared in 2012 Stock dividends declared in 2012 28,623,603,685 7,843,471,395 (69,733,781) 7,773,737,614 36,397,341,299 (20,000,000,000) (4,030,693,476) (3,474,734,693) (27,505,428,169) Retained earnings as at December 31, 2012 available for dividend declaration P =8,891,913,130 SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS Effective as at December 31, 2012 Adopted Not Adopted Not Applicable Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements Conceptual Framework Phase A: Objectives and qualitative characteristics я PFRSs Practice Statement Management Commentary я Philippine Financial Reporting Standards First-time Adoption of Philippine Financial Reporting Standards я Amendments to PFRS 1 and PAS 27: Cost of an Investment in a Subsidiary, Jointly Controlled Entity or Associate я я Amendments to PFRS 1: Additional Exemptions for First-time Adopters я я Amendment to PFRS 1: Limited Exemption from Comparative PFRS 7 Disclosures for First-time Adopters я я Amendments to PFRS 1: Severe Hyperinflation and Removal of Fixed Date for First-time Adopters я я Amendments to PFRS 1: Government Loans я я Share-based Payment я я Amendments to PFRS 2: Vesting Conditions and Cancellations я я Amendments to PFRS 2: Group Cash-settled Share-based Payment Transactions я я я PFRS 1 (Revised) PFRS 2 PFRS 3 (Revised) Business Combinations PFRS 4 Insurance Contracts я я Amendments to PAS 39 and PFRS 4: Financial Guarantee Contracts я я PFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations я я PFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources я я PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS Effective as at December 31, 2012 PFRS 7 Adopted Not Adopted Not Applicable Financial Instruments: Disclosures я Amendments to PAS 39 and PFRS 7: Reclassification of Financial Assets я Amendments to PAS 39 and PFRS 7: Reclassification of Financial Assets Effective Date and Transition я Amendments to PFRS 7: Improving Disclosures about Financial Instruments я Amendments to PFRS 7: Disclosures Transfers of Financial Assets я Amendments to PFRS 7: Disclosures Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Not early adopted Amendments to PFRS 7: Mandatory Effective Date of PFRS 9 and Transition Disclosures Not early adopted PFRS 8 Operating Segments PFRS 9 Financial Instruments Not early adopted Amendments to PFRS 9: Mandatory Effective Date of PFRS 9 and Transition Disclosures Not early adopted PFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements Not early adopted PFRS 11 Joint Arrangements Not early adopted PFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities Not early adopted PFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement Not early adopted я Philippine Accounting Standards PAS 1 (Revised) Presentation of Financial Statements я Amendment to PAS 1: Capital Disclosures я Amendments to PAS 32 and PAS 1: Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation я Amendments to PAS 1: Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income Not early adopted PAS 2 Inventories я я PAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows я PAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors я PAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period я PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS Effective as at December 31, 2012 Adopted Not Adopted Not Applicable PAS 11 Construction Contracts я я PAS 12 Income Taxes я Amendment to PAS 12 - Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets я PAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment я я PAS 17 Leases я PAS 18 Revenue я PAS 19 Employee Benefits я Amendments to PAS 19: Actuarial Gains and Losses, Group Plans and Disclosures я PAS 19 (Amended) Employee Benefits PAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance я я PAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates я Amendment: Net Investment in a Foreign Operation я я я Not early adopted PAS 23 (Revised) Borrowing Costs PAS 24 (Revised) Related Party Disclosures PAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans я я PAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements я PAS 27 (Amended) Separate Financial Statements PAS 28 Investments in Associates PAS 28 (Amended) Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures PAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies я я PAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures я я Not early adopted я Not early adopted PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS Effective as at December 31, 2012 PAS 32 Adopted Not Adopted Not Applicable Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation я Amendments to PAS 32 and PAS 1: Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation я Amendment to PAS 32: Classification of Rights Issues я Amendments to PAS 32: Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Not early adopted PAS 33 Earnings per Share я PAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting я PAS 36 Impairment of Assets я PAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets я PAS 38 Intangible Assets я я PAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement я Amendments to PAS 39: Transition and Initial Recognition of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities я Amendments to PAS 39: Cash Flow Hedge Accounting of Forecast Intragroup Transactions я Amendments to PAS 39: The Fair Value Option я Amendments to PAS 39 and PFRS 4: Financial Guarantee Contracts я Amendments to PAS 39 and PFRS 7: Reclassification of Financial Assets я Amendments to PAS 39 and PFRS 7: Reclassification of Financial Assets Effective Date and Transition я Amendments to Philippine Interpretation IFRIC9 and PAS 39: Embedded Derivatives я Amendment to PAS 39: Eligible Hedged Items я PAS 40 Investment Property я PAS 41 Agriculture я я PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS Effective as at December 31, 2012 Philippine Interpretations Adopted Not Adopted Not Applicable IFRIC 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities я я IFRIC 2 Members' Share in Co-operative Entities and Similar Instruments я я IFRIC 4 Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease я IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds я я Liabilities arising from Participating in a Specific Market - Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment я я Applying the Restatement Approach under PAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies я я IFRIC 8 Scope of PFRS 2 я я IFRIC 9 Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives я Amendments to Philippine Interpretation IFRIC9 and PAS 39: Embedded Derivatives я IFRIC 10 Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment я IFRIC 11 PFRS 2- Group and Treasury Share Transactions я IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements я я IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes я я IFRIC 14 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction я я Amendments to Philippine Interpretations IFRIC- 14, Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement я я IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation я я IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners я я IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers я я IFRIC 19 Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments я я IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine IFRIC 6 IFRIC 7 Not early adopted PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS Effective as at December 31, 2012 Adopted Not Adopted Not Applicable SIC-7 Introduction of the Euro я я SIC-10 Government Assistance - No Specific Relation to Operating Activities я я SIC-12 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities я я Amendment to SIC - 12: Scope of SIC 12 я я SIC-13 Jointly Controlled Entities - Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers я я SIC-15 Operating Leases - Incentives я SIC-25 Income Taxes - Changes in the Tax Status of an Entity or its Shareholders я я SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease я SIC-29 Service Concession Arrangements: Disclosures. я я SIC-31 Revenue - Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services я я SIC-32 Intangible Assets - Web Site Costs я я Subsidiaries of SMIC Subsidiary Premier Southern Corp. (100%) San Lazaro Holdings Corporation (100%) Intercontinental Development Corp. (97.5%) ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞŽĨ ^D/^ƵďƐŝĚŝĂƌLJ First Asia Realty Development Corporation (74.2%) Multi-Realty Development Corporation (90.9%) Associates Consolidated Prime Dev. Corp. (100%) SM Hotels and Conventions Corp. (100%) Note: % Refers to Effective Ownership SMIC Legend: Premier Central, Inc. (100%) SM Retail Inc. (100%) SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES MAP OF RELATIONSHIPS OF THE COMPANIES WITHIN THE GROUP As of December 31, 2012 First Leisure Ventures Group Inc. (50%) SM Prime Holdings, Inc. 21.65% SM Development Corp. (43.7%) SM Land Inc. (66.9%) - 113 - Southernpoint Properties Corp. (100%) 40.96% Affluent Capital Enterprises Limited and Subsidiaries (100%) SM Land (China) Limited and Subsidiaries Springfield Global Enterprises Limited (100%) Henfels Investments Corp. (99.0%) Primebridge Holdings, Inc. (98.2%) Mountain Bliss Resort and Development Corp. (100%) Tagaytay Resorts Development Corp. (44.3%) Atlas Consolidated Mining and Development Corporation (29.1%) Highlands Prime Inc. (26.8%) Sodexo Motivation Solutions Philippines, Inc. (40.0%) China Banking Corp. (20.3%) Mega Make Enterprises Limited and Subsidiaries (100%) BDO Unibank Inc. (47.0%) SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION Bellevue Properties Inc. (62%) ĞůůĞ ŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶ ;ϭϳ͘ϲйͿ SM Commercial Properties, Inc. (59%) Asia Pacific College (51.8%) Rappel Holdings Inc. (100%) SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL RATIOS - KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011 2012 i. ii. Current ratio Total current assets Total current liabilities 1.34 1.47 Debt to equity ratio Total interest-bearing liabilities Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent + Total interest-bearing liabilities 0.43 : 0.57 0.39 : 0.61 Net debt to equity ratio Total interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents and investment securities Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent + Total interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents and investment securities 0.36 : 0.64 0.32 : 0.68 3.61 6.72 2.12 2.01 9.42 9.47 Debt to EBITDA Total interest-bearing liabilities EBITDA 2.53 2.22 Return on equity Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent Total average equity attributable to equity holders of the parent 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.10 Debt service coverage ratio Operating cashflows Total loans payable, current portion of long-term debt and interest expense (excluding the portion of debt which are fully hedged by cash and cash equivalents and temporary investments) iii. Asset to equity ratio Total assets Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent iv. v. 2011 Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to interest expense EBITDA Interest expense Return on investment properties Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent Total average investment properties (excluding shopping mall complex under construction) INDEX TO EXHIBITS Form 17-A No. (3) Page No. Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession * Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures * (8) Voting Trust Agreement * (9) Material Contracts * (10) Annual Report to Security Holders, Form 11-Q or Quarterly Report to Security Holders * (13) Letter re Change in Certifying Accountant * (16) Report Furnished to Security Holders * (18) Subsidiaries of the Registrant * (19) Published Report Regarding Matters Submitted to Vote of Security Holders * (20) Consent of Experts and Independent Counsel * (21) Power of Attorney * (22) Additional Exhibits Account Update 115 (5) _______ * These Exhibits are either not applicable to the Company or require no answer.