Use of Coulometric Array HPLC in Metabolomics
Transcription
Use of Coulometric Array HPLC in Metabolomics
Use of Coulometric Array HPLC in Metabolomics Gurmil Gendeh,1 Ian Acworth,2 John Waraska,2 Paul Gamache,2 and Dennis Price2 Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA; 2ESA – A Dionex Company, Chelmsford, MA, USA 1 Introduction Experimental Metabolomics–as investigated for drug discovery–involves the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and LC-MS to assess dynamic responses of biological systems to compound exposure. Rapid analyses can determine changes in multivariate profiles of endogenous low-molecular weight metabolites in tissue or biofluids.1 NMR is primarily applicable to the measurement of high-level metabolites; LC-MS augments these capabilities to lower-level metabolites that are eluted and ionized under a given set of conditions. It is widely recognized, however, that no single analytical technique is capable of addressing the chemical diversity and concentration range of metabolites present in a biological system. Treatment and Sample Preparation Described herein is the use of HPLC with electrochemical coulometric array (EC-array) and MS detectors in parallel to facilitate the study of changes in redox-active small molecules associated with xenobioticinduced toxicity. Biological redox reactions are highly relevant to: Sprague-Dawley rats were fed Purina 5001 rodent laboratory chow and water ad libitum. They were given oral doses of xenobiotic compounds, including acetaminophen (APAP) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Urine was collected for 8 h periods and diluted 10-fold in water prior to the analysis of 5.0 or 20 µL volumes. Conditions HPLC Analytical Conditions Column: Shiseido CapCell Pak® C18 MG 3 µm, 7.5 cm × 4.6 mm i.d. Binary Gradient: • Metabolism (e.g., CYP450 oxidases, reductases) • Disease (e.g., atherosclerosis, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders)3 • Therapeutic action (e.g. antioxidants, bioreductive agents: adriamycin, quinones)3 • Toxicity (e.g., reactive species generation, covalent binding, oxidative stress)3–6 1.0% to 80% aqueous CH3CN (v/v) each containing 20 mM NH4OAc in 6 min, 2 min hold, and 2 min re-equilibration Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min. Postcolumn flow was split (4:1) between EC and electrospray MS detectors, respectively (Figure 1) This approach has the potential advantages of applicability to a mechanistically targeted subset of the metabolome. EC-Array: CoulArray® Electrochemical Detector, 8-channel (P/N 70-4325) EC Conditions: 0 to 840 mV vs. Pd, 120 mV increments MS: Agilent 1100 MSD (Palo Alto, CA) single quadrupole ES-MS operated in +/- scan mode (m/z 70–500)Sciex API365 (Concord, Ontario, CAN) triple quadrupole ES-MS/MS was used for neutral-loss scan experiments 2 Detection Data Processing Apparatus 800000 A. ES-MS Control B. EC-Array M3 M4 M1 µA API-MS or MS/MS Pump 300 mg/kg APAP 300 mg/kg APAP M2 Solvents M4 TIC 35 Passive Flow Split M3 TIC 0 HPLC pump and autosampler with CoulArray 8-channel detector. M2 EIC 152 Ion Abundance EC-array data were transferred to Pirouette® (Infometrix, Inc., Woodinville, WA) for chemometric analysis using a CoulArray Version 2.0 Software Utility (Pattern Recognition Setup Wizard). 0 840 mV 300 mg/kg APAP 600 mV 300 mg/kg APAP 600 mV Control Degasser To Waste Autosampler 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Minutes Coulometric Electrode Array 27252 27251 Figure 1. System schematic. Figure 2. A) LC-ES-MS positive TIC (70–500 m/z scan range) of urine from control and APAP-dosed animal and corresponding EIC (m/z 152) from dosed animal and B) Overlay of EC-array channel 6 (600 mV vs. Pd) of urine from control and APAP-dosed animals and channel 8 (840 mV vs. Pd) from dosed animal. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The combined use of MS and EC-array resulted in highly complementary detection for these rapid multivariate analyses. EC-array allowed pg sensitivity for detection of poorly ionized redox-active compounds (e.g., phenols, thiols, sulfides, arylamines), as previously reported.7 Two primary xenobiotic metabolite peaks were evident from the comparison of positive total ion chromatograms (TIC) of control (n = 20) and APAPdosed (n = 40) animals (M2, M3; Figure 2A). Extracted ion chromatograms (EIC, m/z 152, APAP + H) revealed an additional metabolite (M4, Figure 2B). EC-array data also clearly indicated detection of these three metabolites. An additional metabolite, not detected by MS, was also evident (M1, Figure 2B). The lack of MS response for this metabolite in positive ion mode may be attributed to either increased N-acidity or loss of the nitrogen group. Using the conditions described here, approximately 70 peak clusters of redox-active endogenous urinary metabolites were observed using electrochemical detection. Estimated on-column detection range was 50 pg to 1 mg for a single, 20 uL sample of urine diluted 10-fold. This corresponds to an estimated urinary concentration of 25 ng/mL to 500 ug/Ml. High and lower-level metabolites are shown in Figures 3A and 3B, respectively. of Coulometric HPLC Power in Metabolomics 2 Use Optimization of the Array Separation of 1-D Nano LC Analysis of Proteomics Samples Full Data Several Treatment Groups 300 15 1A-3 2A-3 3A-3 4A-3 1B-3 2B-3 3B-3 4B-3 E2 280 All 240 mV nA 5 0 Control 20 mg/kg APAP 300 mg/kg APAP Response 10 M1 (no MS) S) 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 Minutes 4.0 4.2 4.4 M4 M 1152 AP APAP M3 313, 232 APAP-M+S E1 151 E3 245 E4 484 0 Raw Data c5-6t1.33 80 APAP, 200 mg/kg (4A-3) c5-6t2.16 c5-6t3.00 27254 300× Figure 4. EC data from five each of controls, low- and high-dose APAP urines. Base peak m/z values are shown for possible endogenous marker (E1-4) and drug metabolite peaks (M1, M3 and M4). Peak M3 is attributed to both APAP-mercapturate (APAP-M) and APAP-sulfate (APAP-S). µA 0 840 mV 720 mV 600 mV 480 mV 360 mV 240 mV 120 mV 0 mV 0 c5-6t3.83 Variable 1 2 3 Minutes 4 5 27253 Figure 3. A) Eight-channel chromatogram from animal receiving a single 200 mg/kg (p.o.) dose of APAP (0–8 h collection) displayed at 100 µA full scale and B) Overlay of channel 3 from several treatment groups amplified 300-fold vs. (A) to demonstrate sensitive detection of endogenous metabolites. Conditions as described in Experimental section. These initial studies have utilized EC-array data primarily for quantitative and chemometric analyses while using the stored MS data primarily for subsequent qualitative and confirmatory characterization of specific interesting variables revealed. A software utility capable of retention time normalization, binning, concatenation, and formatting of data allowed rapid (e.g. < 2 min for 80 sample profiles) transfer of data for exploratory pattern recognition analysis. The widely reported APAP-sulfate (M3, m/z 232) and glucuronide metabolites (M2, m/z 328) along with unchanged APAP (M4, m/z 152) were evident based on chromatographic, voltammetric, and MS data (Figures 2 and 5). APAP-related hepatotoxicity is believed to be subsequent to CYP-450 oxidative metabolic activation to form reactive quinoneimine species with subsequent covalent binding and scavenger glutathione (GSH) depletion.5, 6 Constant neutral-loss scan of infused 10-fold diluted urine provided little evidence of APAP-SG. However, MS (Figure 5b) and EC-array voltammetric (Figure 5c) data demonstrated that peak M3 consisted of two major components (m/z 232, oxidation potential Eox 840 mV) and (m/z 313, Eox 600 mV) consistent with APAP-sulfate and APAP-mercapturate. Sulfate substitution of the phenol is expected to increase the oxidation potential while aromatic N-acetylcysteine is expected to retain the voltammetric profile of APAP. Thus, these voltammetric data further support the presence of these two metabolites assuggested by MS data. Furthermore, as APAP-mercapturate is a reported urinary endproduct of APAP metabolic activation, reactive quinoneimine species formation, and GSH conjugation, these data provide evidence of the oxidative pathway associated with the toxicity of this xenobiotic.5, 6 3 A APAP NH APAP-M NH OH OH Principal component analysis (PCA) was used as an exploratory approach to provide suggestions of sample outliers and to investigate individual and pattern associations between variables and between samples. PCA of EC-array data resulted in consistent differentiation of high-dose APAP (200 and 300 mg/kg, 0–8 h collection) from control, low-dose (20 mg/kg) APAP, and high-dose (200 mg/kg) ASA. This differentiation was observed both exclusive (Figure 6) and inclusive (not shown) of xenobiotic metabolite variables (shaded areas in Figure 4 indicate some excluded variables). Possible endogenous marker peaks, indicated from eigenvector analysis, were also qualitatively characterized using the stored mass spectral and EC voltammetric data. Base peak m/z values for some of these peaks are indicated in Figure 4. Further structural characterization using MS/MS of potential endogenous and xenobiotic markers will be reported elsewhere. O O O APAP-S NH SCH2CHOOH NHCOCH3 B 7000 OSO3– TIC EIC 152 APAP EIC 232 APAP Sulfate EIC 313 APAP Mercapturate µA 0 2.25 50 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 Minutes 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25 High-Dose APAP 200 mg/kg ASA C Low-Dose APAP µA Controls 10 27256 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 Minutes 27255 Figure 5. A) Structures, B) Overlay of total ion and extracted ion chromatograms showing evidence of APAP sulfate and mercapturate metabolites of APAP, and C) EC-Array response across 0–840 mV cells showing evidence of two constituents with differing voltammetric response. Figure 6. PCA results of EC-Array data after exclusion of xenobiotic metabolite variables analyzed as described in Experimental. Each data point represents a different animal where A** = 200 mg/kg NAS; C*** = controls; APAP = acetaminophen-dosed animals with 20 (APAP20); 200 (200 APAP) or 300 (300 APAP) mg/kg APAP. of Coulometric HPLC Power in Metabolomics 4 Use Optimization of the Array Separation of 1-D Nano LC Analysis of Proteomics Samples Conclusion References • EC-Array augmented the metabolic profiling capabilities of LC electrospray-MS through parallel detection of condensed phaseneutral and nonpolar redox-active metabolites at pg to µg levels. • High-density multivariate data were rapidly acquired and transferred to pattern recognition analytical software and high-dose APAP samples were differentiated based on endogenous and xenobiotic redox metabolic profiles. • Stored MS and EC-Array data were subsequently used for effective characterization of specific endogenous and xenobiotic redox active components and evidence of oxidative metabolic activation associated with high-dose APAP was observed. • As many organic chemicals are thought to exert toxicity via redox processes, the acquired redox profiles may be particularly useful in drug discovery and development for tissue and regiospecific modeling, diagnostic marker identification, and mechanistic insight to xenobiotic-induced toxicity. 1. Holmes, E.; Shockor, J. P. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development 2000, 3(1), 72–78. 2. The Pharmaceutical Basis of Therapeutics Sixth Edition; Gilman, A.G., Goodman, L.S., Gilman, A., Eds.; Macmillan Publishing, NY, USA, 1980; pp 12–20. 3. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, Third Edition; Halliwell, B., Gutteridge, J.M.C., Eds.; Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 1999. 4. Eyer, P. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994 102, 123–132. 5. Yamamoto, K.; Sachiko, K.; Tajima, K.; Mizutani, T. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 20, 571–573. 6. Heitmeier, S.; Blaschke, G. J. Chromatogr., B 1999, 721, 93–108. 7. Gamache, P.; Meyer, D.; Granger, M.; Acworth, I. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 1717–1726. CoulArray is registered trademark of Dionex Corporation. Pak is a registered trademark of Shiseido Co. Ltd. Pirouette is a registered trademark of Infometric, Inc. All third party trademarks and registered trademarks are the properties of their respective owners. Passion. Power. Productivity. North America Dionex Corporation Europe Asia Pacific 1228 Titan Way P.O. Box 3603 Sunnyvale, CA 94088-3603 (408) 737-0700 Austria (43) 1 616 51 25 Benelux (31) 20 683 9768; (32) 3 353 4294 Denmark (45) 36 36 90 90 France (33) 1 39 30 01 10 Germany (49) 6126 991 0 Ireland (353) 1 644 0064 Italy (39) 02 51 62 1267 Sweden (46) 8 473 3380 Switzerland (41) 62 205 9966 United Kingdom (44) 1276 691722 Australia (61) 2 9420 5233 China (852) 2428 3282 India (91) 22 2764 2735 Japan (81) 6 6885 1213 Korea (82) 2 2653 2580 Singapore (65) 6289 1190 Taiwan (886) 2 8751 6655 U.S./Canada (847) 295-7500 South America Brazil (55) 11 3731 5140 www.dionex.com 5 LPN 2481-01 3/10 ©2010 Dionex Corporation