STUDIES ON TITANIUM(IV) TUNGSTOSILICATE AND TITANIUM(IV
Transcription
STUDIES ON TITANIUM(IV) TUNGSTOSILICATE AND TITANIUM(IV
ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA, NO. 13, 2003 STUDIES ON TITANIUM(IV) TUNGSTOSILICATE AND TITANIUM(IV) TUNGSTOPHOSPHATE. II. SEPARATION AND ESTIMATION OF HEAVY METALS FROM AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS Z. M. Siddiqi* and D. Pathania Department of Applied Chemistry, Dr B.R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144011, India SUMMARY Binary and ternary separations of heavy metals, e.g. Zn2+–Bi3+, Mn –Pb2+, Cd2+–Pb2+, Mn2+–Bi3+–Mo6+, and Cr6+–Pb2+–Bi3+ on columns of titanium(IV) tungstosilicate and Zn2+–Ni2+, Mo6+–Pb2+, Hg2+–Pb2+, Zn2+–Cr6+–Bi3+, and Zn2+–Ni2+–Bi3+ on titanium(IV) tungstophosphate, have been demonstrated. The adsorption and elution of important metal ions such as Mo6+, Al3+, and As3+ on titanium(IV) tungstosilicate and Hg2+, Fe3+, and Cr6+ on titanium(IV) tungstophosphate have been studied. Titanium(IV) tungstosilicate and titanium(IV) tungstophosphate have been used for separation and estimation of Pb2+, Cr6+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Ni3+, Fe3+, and Cd2+ in diverse real water samples such as river water, hand pump water, and industrial effluents. 2+ INTRODUCTION Ground water and surface water have always been useful and unique sources of fresh water for domestic, industrial, and agricultural purposes. Because of rapid industrialization and urbanization the world is facing serious water pollution problems because of the harmful effects of heavy metals. Heavy metals concentrations in water and aquatic ecosystems have been analyzed worldwide [1–4]. Selective separation of metal ions present at very low levels in water is required for estimation and removal purposes. Modified ion-exchange resins have recently been used for selective separation of Fe2+ from Al 3+, Fe2+ from Hg2+, and Ag+ from other metal ions [5–7]. Inorganic ion exchangers have been shown to enable selective separation of metal ions from aquatic environments [8–10]. Selective binary separations of Cr6+from other metal ions on thin layers of - 172 - titanic silicate and of Hg2+ from Fe3+ on impregnated silica gel layers have been achieved [11,12]. In a more recent study in our laboratory, titanium (IV) tungstosilicate and titanium(IV) tungstophosphate have been shown to have promising characteristics as inorganic ion-exchange materials on the basis of distribution studies of many metals and the separation of metal ions from each other [13]. A variety of water samples from industrialized cities have been reported to be contaminated by heavy metals at concentrations above permissible levels [14]. This study, an extension of our previous work, deals with the adsorption, elution, separation, and estimation of metals, especially heavy metals, from different water samples. EXPERIMENTAL Reagents All reagents were of analytical grade. Stock solutions (1000 ppm) of individual elements were usually prepared in 2% HNO3 (high purity; E. Merck). Synthesis of Titanium(IV) Tungstosilicate (TiWSi) As reported elsewhere [13], an aqueous solution of tungstosilicic acid was added dropwise with constant stirring to an alcoholic solution of titanium (IV) chloride, in 1:1 molar proportion. After complete addition of the tungstosilicic acid the pH was adjusted to between 0 and 1 by addition of 0.1 M HNO3 solution (pH was measured with an Orion pH meter). The solution containing the precipitate was stirred for 1 h and then left overnight. The precipitates were then isolated by filtration, washed with distilled water, and dried overnight at 40°C in an oven. The material was converted to the H+ form by treatment with 0.1 M HNO3 for 24 h, washed with distilled water to remove excess acid, and finally dried at 40°C in an oven. Synthesis of Titanium(IV) Tungstophosphate (TiWP) The preparation of TiWP was also performed as described elsewhere [13]. An aqueous solution of tungstophosphoric acid was added dropwise with constant stirring to alcoholic solution of titanium(IV) chloride, in 1:1 molar proportion. When addition of tungstophosphoric acid was complete the pH was adjusted to between 0 and 1 by the addition - 173 - of 0.1 M HNO3 solution. The rest of the process was as described above for TiWSi. Study Area The study focused on the north of India. The state of Punjab is most developed state in the northern region of India. The Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Amritsar, Patiala, and Bathinda districts of this region were selected, because they are most industrialized in terms of small-scale industry. Effluent of these industries enters the water system directly, because of a lack of a proper sewerage system, so monitoring of surface and ground water in these districts was therefore undertaken [14]. For this study water was sampled from different sources, e.g. rivers, hand pumps, and industrial effluents; details of the samples are given in Tables I and II. Sampling Surface and ground water samples were collected from different regions of the studied area. Standard methods of collection, preservation and analysis were adopted [15,16]. Polythene bottles of 500 mL capacity were used for collection of water samples. Bottles were soaked in 10% nitric acid solution for 24 hours and then rinsed with distilled water. Then bottles were dried at 103°C for two hours, cooled to room temperature, capped and labeled. All samples collected from sites were filtered and immediately preserved. Preservation was accomplished with 5 mL of HNO3 per 500 mL. Sample Preparation for Metal Analysis Water samples (250 mL) were digested with concentrated nitric acid and hydrochloric acid on a hot plate. When volume had been reduced to 10 mL the sample was transferred to a 50-mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume with double-distilled water. The pH was adjusted to ~6 by addition of dilute nitric acid, if required. Elution of Metal Ions TiWSi and TiWP (1 g) were supported on glass wool plugs in two different glass columns (30 cm × 2.7 cm diam.). Solutions of metal ions prepared from standard solutions of the metals (for atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) analysis) were circulated many times through the columns at a rate of 20 drops min–1 to ensure maximum exchange of metal ion on the ion-exchanger. Metal ions not adsorbed were washed from - 174 - Table I Separation and estimation of heavy metals from water samples on TiWSi Concn of Estimated Concn (M) metal in concn of metal Volume of of HNO3 Metal ions Details of sample separated water sample ion eluted eluent (mL) used as loaded (ppm) (ppm) eluent Lake water, near Cr6+ 1.40 0.60 100 0.1 Nakodar, Jalandhar Pb2+ 1.24 0.65 100 0.5 Handpump water, Zn2+ 1.00 0.25 100 0.1 Jalandhar Pb2+ 1.24 1.00 100 0.5 Industrial Zn2+ 1.71 0.62 100 0.1 effluent, Ludhiana Pb2+ 1.24 0.92 100 0.5 Ground water, Mn6+ 1.20 0.92 100 0.1 Amritsar Fe3+ 4.44 3.15 100 0.5 River water, near Ni3+ 1.24 0.45 100 0.1 Amritsar Fe3+ 4.44 4.10 100 0.5 Industrial Zn2+ 1.20 0.91 100 0.1 effluent, Amritsar Fe3+ 4.44 3.52 100 0.5 Metal industry Mn2+ 1.25 0.65 100 0.1 effluent, Patiala Fe3+ 3.03 2.65 100 0.5 Bein water, Ni3+ 1.20 0.68 100 0.1 Patiala Fe3+ 3.03 2.45 100 0.5 Industrial Zn2+ 1.44 0.46 100 0.1 effluent, Patiala Fe3+ 3.03 2.40 100 0.5 1.42 1.20 100 0.1 Tube well water Mn2+ 2.87 1.95 100 0.5 Bhatinda Fe3+ Handpump near 2+ Zn 0.66 0.21 100 0.1 thermal power Fe3+ 2.87 1.60 100 0.5 plant, Bhatinda the column and kept for analysis. Different concentrations of HNO3, as eluent, were then passed through the column and the effluent was collected as 10-mL fractions and tested for metals ions by AAS (Varian SpectrAA.20 Plus). The elution curves are reported in Figs 1 and 2. Binary Separations of Metal Ions TiWSi and TiWP in the H+ form (mesh size 50–100 µm; 1 g) were supported on glass wool plugs in separate glass columns (13 cm × 1.1 cm diam.). The columns were washed with distilled water and mixtures of the two metal ions to be separated were passed through the columns several times, at a flow rate of 20 drops min–1, until exchange of H+ on the ion- - 175 - Table II Separation and estimation of heavy metals from water samples on TiWP Details of sample Industrial effluent, Jalandhar Industrial effluent, Jalandhar Industrial effluent, Jalandhar Industrial effluent, Ludhiana Industrial effluent, Amritsar Canal water, Amritsar Handpump water, Patiala Concn of Estimated Concn (M) of Metal ions metal in water concn of metal Volume of HNO3 used separated sample loaded ion eluted eluent (mL) as eluent (ppm) (ppm) Zn2+ 1.00 0.62 100 0.1 Ni3+ 2.40 1.41 100 0.5 Zn2+ 1.00 0.92 100 0.1 Cr3+ 1.50 0.95 100 0.5 Zn2+ 1.00 0.72 100 0.1 Pb2+ 1.20 0.92 100 0.5 Zn2+ 1.71 0.96 100 0.1 Ni3+ 1.00 0.65 100 0.5 Zn2+ 1.20 1.00 100 0.1 Ni3+ 1.00 0.46 100 0.5 Zn2+ 1.20 0.85 100 0.1 Cd2+ 2.40 1.00 100 0.5 Zn2+ 0.66 0.41 100 0.1 Cd2+ 1.50 0.62 100 0.5 exchanger by metal ions was believed to be maximum. The columns were again washed with distilled water to remove un-exchanged metal ions. HNO3 at different concentrations was used to elute the metal ions from the exchanger, and the metals ions thus collected were determined by AAS. Metal ion solutions for AAS were either concentrated or diluted, as required, to ensure concentrations were within the limits appropriate for AAS analysis. The separation curves for the heavy metal ions are shown in Figs 3 and 4. Ternary Separations of Metal Ions The method employed was the same as for binary separations except that mixtures of three metal ions were passed through the TiWSi and TiWP columns. The elution curves are shown in Figs 5 and 6. Separation and Estimation of Metal Ions in Water Samples TiWSi or TiWP (1 g) were supported on glass wool in 1.1 cm i.d. glass columns. Water samples containing mixtures of metal ions were passed through the columns slowly (20 drops min–1) and recycled many times to the adsorption of the metal ions. The columns were then washed with distilled - 176 - Fig. 1 Elution patterns of metal ions on TiWSi - 177 - Fig. 2 Elution patterns of metal ions on TiWP - 178 - Fig. 3 Binary separation curves of metal ions on TiWSi - 179 - Fig. 4 Binary separation curves of metal ions on TiWP - 180 - Fig. 5 Ternary separation curves of metal ions on TiWSi - 181 - Fig. 6 Ternary separation curves of metal ions on TiWP water to remove unadsorbed metal ions. The metal ions adsorbed on the exchangers were then eluted with different concentrations of HNO3. The collected effluent was tested for the metals of interest by means of AAS. The results are listed in Tables I and II. - 182 - RESULT AND DISCUSSION Figs 1 and 2 show the elution patterns obtained for Al 3+, Mo6+, and As3+ on TiWSi and for Hg2+, Cr6+, and Fe3+ on TiWP. These results can be used for estimation and recovery of these toxic metals in aqueous media. Figs 3–6 show binary and ternary separation patterns achieved on TiWSi and TiWP as column materials. These patterns show that Pb2+, Bi3+, and Mo6+ were eluted from TiWSi columns with 0.5 M, 1.0 M and 1.5 M HNO3, respectively. From this it can be inferred that Pb2+ and Bi3+ can be selectively separated from metals ions which can be eluted with 0.1 M HNO3 before elution of Pb2+ and Bi3+ by use of TiWSi. Pb2+ and Bi3+ were eluted from TiWP columns with 0.5 M and 1 M HNO3 whereas elution of other heavy metals was achieved with a lower concentration of HNO3 (0.1 M). Table I shows the utility of TiWSi as column material for selective separation of Pb2+ and Fe3+ from different water samples, probably because of the higher distribution coefficient, Kd, of Pb2+ (as shown by its elution by higher concentrations of HNO3) and Fe3+, as reported elsewhere [13]. Table II shows the usefulness of TiWP for selective separation of Zn2+, which has a low Kd value (and thus eluted by less concentrated HHO3) from other heavy metals (eluted with 0.5 M HNO3) [13]. Other metal ions, because of their reported presence in the water samples at much lower concentrations [14], could not affect separation and estimation of the metals reported in Tables I and II. These separations and estimations were performed at pH ≈ 6; this should be considered at the time of sample preparation. The results reported in Tables I and II are the averages from five replicate analyses. Standard deviations were between 0.005 and 0.01. REFERENCES [1] K.K. Turekian, The Oceans, Streams and Atmosphere, Springer, Berlin, 1969, p. 468 [2] H. Org and K. Johansson, Air Soil Pollut., 47, 427 (1989) [3] D.C. Runnel, T.A. Shepherd, and E.A. Angino, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 2316 (1992) [4] R. Gadh, S.N. Tondon, R.P. Mathur, and O.V. Singh, Sci. Total Environ., 136, 229 (1993) [5] S.A. Nabi, E. Laiq, and A. Islam, Acta Chromatogr., 11, 118 (2001) - 183 - [6] S.A. Nabi, M.D. Khan, and A. Islam, Acta Chromatogr., 11, 130 (2001) [7] S.A. Nabi and A.M.I. Khan, Acta Chromatogr., 12, 129 (2002) [8] S.A. Nabi, Z.M. Siddiqi, and R.A.K. Rao, Sep. Sci. Technol., 17, 1681 (1983) [9] S.A. Nabi and Z.M. Siddiqi, Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn, 58, 724 (1985) [10] S.A. Nabi, Z.M. Siddiqi, and R.A.K Rao, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 58, 2380 (1985) [11] V. Ghoulipour and S.W. Husain, Acta Chromatogr., 12, 170 (2002) [12] A. Mohammad, M. Ajmal, and S. Anwar, Acta Chromatogr., 9, 113 (1999) [13] Z.M. Siddiqi and D. Pathania, J. Chromatogr. A, 987, 147 (2003) [14] Z.M. Siddiqi and D. Pathania, Indian J. Environ. Prot., 22, 201 (2002) [15] APHA, Standard Methods for Determination of Water and Waste Water, American Public Health Association, 1998 [16] Anon., Environmental Problem of the River Rhine, The Council of Experts on Environmental Affairs (FRG), Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1976, p. 258 - 184 -