Monsieur Pierre-Jacques Henri

Transcription

-1-
Doctoral Degree - Université Paris-Saclay
Quality Manual
Version: September 2015
Contents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Index ...................................................................................................................................................... - 4 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................- 5 Context .................................................................................................................................................. - 6 Doctoral training ..................................................................................................................................- 8 4.1
Extracts from regulatory texts. ...................................................................................................- 8 4.2
Goals and challenges................................................................................................................... - 8 4.2.1 Goals ......................................................................................................................................- 9 4.2.2 Challenges of the transformation ...................................................................................... - 9 4.3
The participants in the doctoral training ............................................................................... - 13 4.4
Institutions involved and methods of intervention .............................................................. - 15 4.4.1 Categories of the institutions .......................................................................................... - 15 4.4.2 Methods of cooperation .................................................................................................. - 15 The doctoral schools ........................................................................................................................ - 18 5.1
The doctoral schools of the Université Paris-Saclay ............................................................. - 18 5.2
What is a doctoral school? ....................................................................................................... - 18 5.3
Main missions ........................................................................................................................... - 18 5.4
Governance and organization ................................................................................................. - 19 5.5
The responsibilities of the doctoral school council .............................................................. - 20 5.6
The responsibilities of the doctoral school management ................................................... - 20 5.7
Principle responsibilities of teaching assistants of the doctoral school ............................ - 21 5.8
Required resources .................................................................................................................. - 22 5.8.1 Personnel ........................................................................................................................... - 22 5.8.2 Operations ......................................................................................................................... - 23 The doctoral college ......................................................................................................................... - 24 6.1
What is the doctoral college? ................................................................................................... - 24 6.2
Management of the doctoral college ..................................................................................... - 24 6.2.1 The doctoral college council ............................................................................................ - 24 6.2.2 The director of the doctoral college ............................................................................... - 25 6.2.3 The staff of the doctoral college ..................................................................................... - 26 6.2.4 Other bodies associated with the management of the doctoral college. .................. - 26 Organization of the doctoral college .............................................................................................. - 27 7.1
Development of the doctoral policy of the site ..................................................................... - 28 7.1.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 28 7.1.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 28 7.1.3 Required resources .......................................................................................................... - 28 7.2
Management of the quality system ........................................................................................ - 29 7.2.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 29 7.2.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 29 7.2.3 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 30 7.3
Admission of the doctoral candidates .................................................................................... - 31 -
www.universite-paris-saclay.fr
Espace Technologique/Immeuble Discovery
Route de l’Orme aux Merisiers RD 128 / 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
-2-
8
9
7.3.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 31 7.3.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 31 7.3.3 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 31 7.4
Information system and digital work space .......................................................................... - 32 7.4.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 32 7.4.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 32 7.4.3 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 32 7.5
International .............................................................................................................................. - 33 7.5.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 33 7.5.2 Principle activities of the international team at the level of the doctoral college ..... - 33 7.5.3 Principle activities of the persons responsible for international exchanges ............. - 34 7.5.4 Principle activities of the representatives of the registration operator institutions. - 34 7.5.5 International hosting service of the registration operator institutions ...................... - 34 7.5.6 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 35 7.5.7 Resources required at the level of the institutions ....................................................... - 35 7.6
Collective doctoral training ...................................................................................................... - 36 7.6.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 36 7.6.2 Principle activities at the doctoral college level ............................................................. - 36 7.6.3 Principle activities of the doctoral training services in the training operator institutes- 37 7.6.4 Required resources within the registration operator institutions .............................. - 37 7.6.5 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 37 7.7
The professional life of the doctors, relationships with the socio-economic bodies
and corporations ...................................................................................................................... - 38 7.7.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 38 7.7.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 38 7.7.3 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 38 7.8
Communication and Facilitation ............................................................................................. - 39 7.8.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 39 7.8.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 39 7.8.3 Resources required at the doctoral college level .......................................................... - 39 7.9
Education ................................................................................................................................... - 40 7.9.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 40 7.9.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 40 7.9.3 Required resources within the registration operator institutions .............................. - 40 7.10 Document service ..................................................................................................................... - 41 7.10.1 Roles ................................................................................................................................... - 41 7.10.2 Principle activities ............................................................................................................. - 41 7.10.3 Required resources within the registration operator institutions .............................. - 41 Schedule of meetings ....................................................................................................................... - 42 Teams ................................................................................................................................................. - 43 9.1
Doctoral schools ....................................................................................................................... - 43 9.2
Doctoral college ........................................................................................................................ - 51 9.2.1 Doctoral college council ................................................................................................... - 51 9.2.2 Monitoring and quality system committee .................................................................... - 54 9.2.3 Management of the quality system ................................................................................ - 55 9.2.4 Information system and digital work space .................................................................. - 55 9.2.5 Collective doctoral training .............................................................................................. - 55 9.2.6 Professional life of the doctors, relationships with socio-economic groups ............. - 56 9.2.7 Communication, facilitation, campus life ....................................................................... - 57 9.2.8 International ...................................................................................................................... - 58 9.3
Functions channeled in the institutions ................................................................................. - 60 9.3.1 Education services ............................................................................................................ - 60 -
-3-
9.3.2 Document services ........................................................................................................... - 61 -
-4-
1 Index
2MIB, - 15 A&A, - 15 ABIES, - 15 academic council, - 6 accredited, - 12 associate
or
partner
institutions, - 13 Beneficiary, - 11 Biosigne, - 15 board ofdirectors, - 6 CBMS, - 15 Challenges, - 8 Channeled function, - 13 contributing to a doctoral
school, - 14 Coordinated function, - 13 coordination, - 5 coordination components, 5departments, - 6 DIF, - 12 diploma supplement, - 7 director of the doctoral
college, - 22 Doctoral candidate, - 11 doctoral college, - 12 -, - 21 doctoral college, - 5 Doctoral College, - 6 doctoral college council, - 21
doctoral college council in
limited session, - 22 doctoral college council in
plenary session, - 22 doctoral school council, - 17
-
doctoral
school
management, - 17 Doctoral training, - 7 -, - 11 documentary operator, - 12
EDMH, - 15 EDOM, - 15 EDSP, - 15 Employer institution of the
doctoral candidate, - 12 employing doctors, - 8 EOBE, - 15 Funding institution, - 12 Goals, - 7 Goals and challenges, - 7 Governance, - 16 Institution
housing
the
research unit, - 12 interdisciplinarity, - 8 Interfaces, - 15 international operator, - 12 ITFA, - 15 Management institution of
the research unit, - 12 Management
of
the
doctoral college, - 21 member council, - 6 member institutions, - 5 Member institutions, - 4 missions, - 4 -, - 7 operator of a doctoral
school, - 14 operator of the doctoral
college, - 14 oriented network, - 8 PHENIICS, - 15 -
PIF, - 15 Professional life, - 16 Professional training, - 11 quality approach, - 4 -, - 18 quality assurance approach,
-8registration institution, - 12
regulations, - 7 research excellence, - 8 responsibilities, - 4 Schools, - 5 SDSV, - 15 SdV, - 15 SEIF, - 15 Shared function, - 14 sharing, - 5 sharing and coordination, 4SHS, - 15 SMEMaG, - 15 SSMMH, - 15 staff of the doctoral college,
- 23 STIC, - 15 Supervisory institution of
the research unit, - 12 the doctoral school, - 12 the research unit, - 12 Thesis advisor, - 12 training operator, - 12 transferable skills, - 8 -
-5-
2 Introduction
The member institutions of the Université Paris-Saclay have undertaken the development of a
common doctoral section. This project will meet the shared goal of making the Université ParisSaclay's doctoral program a leading degree that contributes to the international reputation and
appeal of the university and that guarantees to the doctors of the Université Paris-Saclay an optimal
professional future in all of the professional sectors of doctors' activities.
The large number of concerned doctoral candidates, doctoral schools and institutions (members,
associates or partners of the Université Paris-Saclay) and the committed major restructuring work to
ensure a harmonized and effective operation that presents true challenge. This transformation can
only reach its objectives and maintain them over time with the clarity and transparency expected of
the partners and required for its guidance, control and monitoring, and only on the condition that it
takes a quality approach. It was decided that the ISO 9001 standard would be used for the
implementation, control and monitoring of the doctoral training activities within the Université
Paris-Saclay in order to clarify, for each of the participants, the missions and responsibilities of each
of them, so as to guarantee a consistency in practices, despite the variety of structures, and to
ensure true cohesion and convergence of all, using improvement activities as guidance.
Within this framework, the Doctoral Charter is the document that presents the doctoral training
policy of the Université Paris-Saclay, the Quality Manual (which is one of the prerequisites of the ISO
9001 standard), specifying its context and its organization. These documents are supplemented by
the collection of procedures that explain the implementation of the doctoral training policy.
The Quality Manual devotes significant place to understanding the context and the doctoral section
of the Université Paris-Saclay. It specifies the commitment of each of the participants in an activity
that is recognized to be complex and strategic and is subject to an advanced regulatory framework.
It presents the missions and the objectives regarding the doctoral training, the organization used
and the resources required to fulfill these missions and attain these objectives. It specifies, in
particular, the purpose of the resources used by the various institutions in the doctoral section after
its major restructuring.
-6-
3 Context
The creation of the Université Paris-Saclay is the result of a long cooperative process between the
associated entities of higher learning and research of the Paris-Saclay site.
The Université of Paris-Saclay brings together, in an original model, 19 autonomous institutions of
higher learning and research and of research bodies, the member institutions,, which each maintain
their identity, as well as their resources, and agree to coordinate their activities and to share certain
resources within the framework of a shared project, jointly defined and implemented.
Figure 1: Organization of the Université Paris-Saclay
The operational guidance of the Université Paris-Saclay rests on 3 types of coordination
components:

the Research coordination components, responsible for the coordination and development
of research in the scientific perimeter of the University;

the Training coordination components, responsible for coordination and development of
shared training proposals;

the doctoral college
The eight "Schools " are the training coordination
components, at the bachelors and masters level, and
training throughout life. They assemble 49 masters
degrees and almost 300 training programs within these
degrees.
-7-
The ten departments are the research coordination
components and encompasses 300 research units and
research programs, including 12 interdisciplinary research
institutions and 11 laboratories of excellence.
The Doctoral College is the coordination component of the
doctoral section; it encompasses 20 disciplinary or
thematic doctoral schools and ensures that the transverse
functions dedicated to doctoral training are in concert.
The Université Paris-Saclay is chaired by a president elected by the board of directors, who rely on
the council of the members of the academic council. He is assisted by vice-presidents and a
management committee composed of a dozen people responsible for the major functions:
research, promotion, training, international, campus life, communications, technology,
administration and resources.
The member council consists of the representatives of each of the member institutions of the
Université Paris-Saclay.
The academic council has 220 members, including 5 elected doctoral candidate representatives. It
has a consultative role, and for questions related to doctoral training, fulfills, at the level of the
ComUE Université Paris-Saclay, the missions that fall under the scientific council of an accredited
institution to grant the doctoral degree, according to the Article of 2006 regarding doctoral training.
-8-
4 Doctoral training
4.1 Extracts from regulatory texts.
The missions that are entrusted to the accredited institutions to grant the doctoral degree are
precisely defined at the national level and are subject to regulatory guidance, some extracts of
which are shown below (Article L612-7 of the French Education Code, whose conditions of
application are defined in Ministerial Order of August 7, 2006 regarding doctoral training and of the
circular of October 23, 2014 regarding the methods of formulating and granting national diplomas).
The doctoral training is a training in research and by research which includes, within
the framework of doctoral training, the individual or collective performance of original
scientific works. This doctoral training is organized in close relationship with the
laboratories or research teams whose quality is recognized through national periodic
evaluation. It takes into account the requirements of the national research and
innovation policy and includes an international outlook. It is represents a professional
research experience, sanctioned, after thesis defense, by the awarding of a doctoral
degree.
The doctoral training is organized within the framework of the doctoral schools. They
include personalized scientific supervision of the highest quality, as well as collective
training that includes teaching, seminars or internships intended to ensure the
scientific culture of the doctoral candidates, to prepare their professional development
and pursuit of their careers in the public sector as well as private sector and to
promote their international outlook.
The ministerial order responsible for higher education defines the conditions under
which an institution of higher learning may be accredited, for a limited period, to
organize doctoral training and to grant the doctoral degree following a periodic national
evaluation.
The doctoral diploma is granted after a thesis defense or the presentation of an
ensemble of original scientific works […]. The doctoral diploma is accompanied by the
grade of the institution that conferred it. In the case where a diploma is conferred by a
ComUE, the name of this ComUE is shown in the heading of the certificate and the
name of the institution in which the diploma has been prepared appears on the
diploma certificate; it confers the title of doctor. This title represents professional
research experience, which can be recognized in collective agreements.
The granting of the "diploma supplement " presenting the content of the training and
the acquired skills is mandatory. This document allows for better clarity of the training
and of the diplomas, in particular for the requirements of employers.
4.2 Goals and challenges
In addition to these national missions, the shared project of the Université Paris-Saclay includes its
-9-
own goals for the doctoral degree of the Université Paris-Saclay and the challenges that need to be
contextualized.
4.2.1 Goals
The doctoral degree of the Université of Paris-Saclay must be able to be measured in comparison
with doctorates of the world class research universities, among which the Université Paris-Saclay
wishes to be counted on an international level. All other things being equal, to have obtained a
doctoral degree from the Université Paris-Saclay should, over time, bring a distinctive, recognized
professional advantage to the doctors. This requires not only oversight of the quality of the doctoral
training (to be attractive to the best candidates, to monitor the quality of recruitment, supervision,
host research units and doctoral projects), but also ensure the visibility and the clarity of the
doctoral training activity of the Université of Paris-Saclay, measured against international criteria.
→
European Commission. (2011). Implement the Principles for Innovative Doctoral Training (PIFD) in
Europe,
→
European Universities Association (2006). The Salzburg principles for doctoral training & Ten basic
Principles,
These criteria, listed below, have been formalized in several publications of the works of the EUA
and are used by the European Commission as criteria for assessing European projects concerning
doctoral training.

A research of excellence, encouraging creativity, a critical approach, intellectual
independence and the taking of scientific risk, the goal of pushing the boundaries

A quality assurance approach applied to doctoral training, promoting transparent and clear
processes for admission, supervision, conferment of diplomas and professional life.

An encouraging, interdisciplinary research environment

An international outlook, through collaborative international research, international joint
doctoral theses, support for the international mobility of doctoral candidates, and support
for the establishment of networks

A meeting with the public or private employers of doctors, from industry to the services,
including non-governmental organizations, cultural institutions and organizations

The development of transferable skills, developed over the course of the doctoral training,
but used in numerous other contexts

An attractive institutional environment that offers doctoral candidates good working
conditions, encourages them to quickly assume scientific responsibilities and offers them
career growth opportunities
4.2.2 Challenges of the transformation
4.2.2.1
Doctoral training, personalized share
Doctoral training is primarily a training using the doctoral project, the performance of research
within a quality research team, with personalized supervision.
- 10 -
Through the recognized quality of the research units that will welcome the doctoral candidates, the
Université Paris-Saclay already has the essentials to reach these goals.

The first challenge of the transformation, in this area, is to make the criteria, the
requirements and the processes that allow for the assurance of quality recruitment,
supervision, monitoring of doctoral candidates and the final assessment, clear and visible,
within the framework of a quality approach. This has required formalizing these criteria,
requirements and procedures and disseminating them widely.

The second challenge is to collectively implement the procedures that are decided upon
collectively. One of the major changes is to put in place the same selection procedure for all
the doctoral candidates of the same doctoral school, whatever their means of financing. In
practical terms, this means the 2015 campaign by the implementation of selection
commissions (phase 1 selection of the file, phase 2 audition of the candidate(s) retained in
the file or the meeting) and in a competitive mode (systematic), or outside a competitive
mode (remains to be generalized for 2016). This change is necessary for the recognition of
the doctoral degree and is demanded by the national associations of doctoral degrees.
However, it requires however sizable resources, in terms of time for work consecrated to the
Juries or the credits necessary to make these Juries function properly.
4.2.2.2
Doctoral training, collective share
Collective training of doctoral candidates must include teaching, seminars or internships intended to
ensure the scientific culture of the doctoral candidates, to prepare their professional development
and their careers in the public sector as well as private sector and to promote their international
outlook.(Article L612-7 of the French Education Code).
a) Scientific culture and international outlook
Regarding the training intended to ensure the scientific culture of the doctoral candidates:

the challenge of restructuring is mainly to be able to offer training to all of the doctoral
candidates (half year doctoral cycles, summer schools, etc.) in which they work with
researchers at the highest international level and by which the doctoral candidates may
ensure their scientific culture, with an interdisciplinary and international outlook, and benefit
from scientific exchanges at the highest international level.

the challenge of restructuring is to also offer frameworks or activities, such as symposiums
of young researchers, that allow the doctoral candidates to develop transferable skills
(present their research under various forms, organize a symposium, act as editor of a
symposium, etc.) and to benefit from scientific exchanges with their equals.
To attain these goals, good coordination with the research departments, the research units and the
institutions (within the framework of their invited professors policy, for example), is essential. This
coordination is facilitated by the regulatory composition of the counsels of the doctoral schools.
On this point, for the institutions that already use them, before restructuring, doctoral schools
organized on a disciplinary or thematic basis, the restructuring does not lead to major changes,
except for the fact that the regrouping permits them to function by relying on an international
network of contacts that is larger and more complete and shares training.
On the other hand, for institutions that rely on a pluri-disciplinary on-site doctoral school for
- 11 -
doctoral training, the restructuring would have a major effect: the effects of doctoral candidates
being, until now, generally insufficient to conduct, in each scientific or thematic area, doctoral
seminar cycles or to participate in the organization of doctoral summer schools, symposiums of
young researchers or other initiatives of this type. Because of this, the doctoral schools don't deal
with this question, or very little. This may be left up to the research units or even not attended to at
all (in particular in the small units). In certain cases, the doctoral training proposals may mainly be
comprised of training modules at a master's level.
It is important to note that this component of collective training, operating on the basis of the
initiative of researchers who must pay or the participation of thematic schools and the organizing of
symposiums or doctoral days, require administrative appropriations at the doctoral school level,
and a strong coordination with the research units and the research departments.
b) Professional life
In terms of training that is intended as preparation for professional development or the pursuit of a
career by the doctoral candidates in the professional and private sector, both national and
international: the challenge for the Université Paris-Saclay is to make its doctoral program a true
asset for the careers of our doctors. This means:

To make students who wish to follow a doctoral degree and the doctoral candidates aware,
as soon as possible, of the groups of professions for which the doctoral degree is an asset.
To give them sufficient knowledge of the professional world they are destined for (the fields
to which they should aspire, the current professional standards and ethics rules of these
fields, the possible careers, employment structure and its changes). The following categories
of professions have been identified for which the doctoral degree may ultimately prepare
and for which it is wished a dedicated training path be established:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

researcher or (teacher-) researcher, in academia,
higher education teacher, teacher (-researcher),
researcher in a company, R&D, in the private sector,
support and guidance for research, innovation and development, for the promotion
of Spin-Offs,
entrepreneur in innovative fields,
steering research and innovation, managing innovative projects, steering innovative
structures,
advice, studies and expert assessment in firms and companies that provide
intellectual services, in international organizations, in local authorities and public
service, proactive or strategic expertise in a company,
scientific mediation, scientific communication and journalism, scientific publishing.
To make the doctoral candidates aware of the skills that will be useful or mandatory for
them, depending on their career plans, and of the numerous possibilities that they have to
develop them, while preparing their doctoral degree, in a way that will make them more
valuable. To also specify the minimum skills that are expected or required of them, at the
doctoral level, whether it be scientific and technical skills or transverse or transferable skills.
To clarify for those who employ the holders of doctoral degrees, the objectives and
requirements of the doctoral training and the skills developed by the doctoral candidates.
This question is a challenge in itself, in fact; the holder of a doctoral degree cannot in any
case be a "standardized product", since it is a training by the project, each

- 12 -
doctoral project being original. The training of each doctoral candidate is therefore unique.
This is what constitutes the main specificity of the doctoral degree and is precisely what
makes this training valuable for numerous contexts where the capacity for innovation,
adaptation, and strategy development are essential. But also outside academia, the doctoral
degree is not sufficiently recognized and the skills of those with doctoral degrees are poorly
understood. All the more so as the number trained doctors is low, in comparison to other
degrees, and fragmented because of the large number of institutions that grant the doctoral
degree (12,000 doctoral degrees per year in France, compared to 125,000 masters and
60,000 engineering or business degrees, from the same number of institutions). The ParisSaclay group will bring critical size, granting more visibility. An approach that showcases the
skills developed by the doctoral candidates for a defined professional objective is also
necessary to afford clarity, in concert with the relevant professional fields.

To ensure, at each step in the preparation for the doctoral degree, that the doctoral
candidate is formed by a professional research experience. To make employers know as well
that the students may be questioned about the opportunity to follow a doctoral degree, so
as to remove the prejudices regarding the doctoral degree that are still widely disseminated.

To reinforce the awareness of the participants of the doctoral training of the importance of
the question of professions, that it is the thesis advisors, the research teams, and more
generally all of the participants in the various institutions involved in the doctoral training,
but also and above all the associations of holders of doctoral degrees so that they
themselves promote their doctoral degree and thus contribute to making it a professional
advantage.
- 13 -
In this area, the diversity of the institutions engaged in the shared adventure of the Université ParisSaclay is an important benefit because its members, associates and partners

are themselves made up of possible professional careers for the doctors,

either contain in their institution mission or objectives the goal of preparing for well
identified professional careers that are closely linked to the relevant professional sector.
The main challenge of the transformation is to build, together, a complete training proposal, in
relationship with the sectors of employment, that no institution is currently able to offer on its own
and, in addition, to have all of the doctoral candidates of the Université Paris-Saclay benefit from the
expertise, the skills and the networks of each of its members and partners regarding professional
careers, for each category of professional career.
4.3 The participants in the doctoral training
The doctoral candidate is a researcher in the training phase. His doctoral training is organized by a
doctoral school, he is trained through the professional experience of research within a research unit
or a research team, recognized following a national evaluation.
Figure 2: The two components of the doctoral training, organization of the doctoral training on the one hand
and building professional research experience on the other
The doctoral candidate is the direct beneficiary of the activities of the doctoral college, the doctoral
schools and each of the participants in the doctoral training.
The participants in the doctoral training operate on several tiers, either to organize the doctoral
training or within the framework of building professional research experience. Their roles and
responsibilities are specified in the doctoral charter.
Since this document is intended to specify the methods used and the resources necessary for the
organization of the doctoral training, a chapter will be dedicated to each of the structures to which it
is dedicated. However, even if their role is essential to the doctoral training, this document does
- 14 -
not focus on specifying the organization or the missions of the research units or the research teams
and the other participants who goal is that the doctoral degree constitutes a professional research
experience.
The participants in the doctoral training are first of all,


the doctoral candidate firstly, who is the main participant in his doctoral training,
his thesis advisor, under whose responsibility and supervision the doctoral candidate performs his
work,
Other participants are the structures or the components of the institutions:



the doctoral college that ensures the coordination of activity for the doctoral training within the
Université Paris-Saclay
the doctoral school which organizes the doctoral training of the doctoral candidate, in close
relationship with the research unit
the research unit or research team, into which the doctoral candidate is fully integrated during the
preparation for his doctoral degree,
Others are the institutions, acting for the organization of the doctoral training as:




accredited institution to grant the doctoral degree (Université Paris- Saclay),
registration operator institution of the doctoral candidate, which is the institution where the degree is
prepared, this institution is also the documentary operator, responsible for the legal submission of the
thesis,
collective training operator institution,
international operator institution contributing to the international outlook of the doctoral candidates
Others, finally, are the institutions, acting for the creation of a professional research experience as:





The institution housing the research unit (providing the premises and the transverse services
related to hosting the research unit and its personnel, Defense and Security Official in case of ZRR)
Management institution of the research unit (management services, support for the promotion of
research, support for contractual activities, other transverse services related to the management of a
research unit)
Supervisory institution of the research unit (legal person who has the legal responsibility for the
research unit, which is the employer of the permanent employees of the unit, of the thesis advisor or
the supervisors, for which one of the missions is research, scientific publication, innovation and the
promotion of research, that contribute to the endowment for operations and investments of the unit)
Employer institution of the doctoral candidate (when he is a salaried employee, the institution
may be a member, associate or partner of the Université Paris-Saclay or another employer, individual
right to training or personal training account, HRD and other services connected with employer
responsibility)
Funding institution required for the optimum progress of the doctoral project (financing the doctoral
candidate, operating expenses, purchase of material, etc.)
In their domain of activity, and at each step of the doctoral training, the participants involved in the
organization of the doctoral training act firstly to ensure the quality of the doctoral training of the
candidates, and to ensure for the doctors of the Université Paris-Saclay an optimum profession life
in all of the professional sectors of the activities of doctors.
- 15 -
4.4 Institutions involved and methods of intervention
4.4.1 Categories of the institutions
The member institutions of the Université Paris-Saclay are the following:

12 institutions of higher education: CentraleSupelec, HEC, ENS Cachan, ENSTA,
Polytechnique, ENSAE, TelecomParisTech, Telecom Sud Paris, IOGS, AgroParisTech, UPSud and UVSQ,

7 research bodies: CNRS, CEA, IHES, INRA, INSERM, INRIA, ONERA.
The associate or partner institutions of the Université Paris-Saclay for doctoral training are the
following:

7 institutions of higher education: UEVE, ENSA-V, ESTACA, ENSIEE, TEM, Ecole Georges
Méliès, Ecole nationale du paysage de Versailles,

other institutions: Synchrotron Soleil, IRT SystemX, Génopôle d’Evry, Pôle de Compétitivité
Systematic, IFFSTAR, IRSTEA.
In terms of the doctoral training:
The Université Paris-Saclay is the accredited institution for granting the doctoral degree. Some
doctoral schools are subject to co-accreditation with another accredited institution.
Each of the partner institutions in the doctoral section of the Université Paris-Saclay may be





Collective training operator,
International operator,
Houser, manager or supervisor of the research units,
Employer of the doctoral candidates,
Financer of doctoral projects,
The institutes of higher learning members or associates of the ComUE are institutions for
preparation for the doctoral degree and, what is more:


Registration institutions,
Documentary operators.
4.4.2 Methods of cooperation
The doctoral training is organized by the doctoral schools of the Université Paris-Saclay with the
resources provided by the member, associate or partner institutions. Each function or service that
enters into the scope of the organization of the doctoral training of the Université Paris-Saclay is
- 16 -
therefore part of inter-institutional cooperation. This cooperation may take various forms,
Channeled function
Examples
Each institution may take on the function for only the
doctoral candidates that belong to the institution.
There is coordination by all, but remains limited to
exchanges of information and does not require
sharing of resources.
Registration,
legal
submission of theses,
Coordinated function
Examples
The function is fulfilled by linking together the activities
performed at several levels, in the institutions, in the
doctoral schools, at the doctoral college level. One part
of the resources is shared either at the level of the
doctoral schools, or at the doctoral college level. These
shared resources are devoted to the coordination and
performance of common actions.
Processing
of
joint
doctoral
degree
agreements, transverse
training
Shared function
Examples
Each institution contributes to a function or ensures a
service for all of the doctoral candidates of the
Université Paris-Saclay. The function is performed
either at the level of the Université of Paris-Saclay or by
an institution for the account of all of the partners. The
resources are shared at the level of the doctoral
college for the performance of the shared actions. The
resources provided by all of the partners may be
directly mobilized at the level of the Université ParisSaclay or even transferred to the institution that is
responsible for performing the activity for the account
of all of the partners.
Information
system,
communication
&
facilitation,
quality
process
- 17 -
Figure 3: The doctoral section, a necessary function in the network. Several institutions cooperate in the same
doctoral school. The same institution is a cooperator in several doctoral schools.
When a function, a service or a contribution of an institution is channeled, the resources made
available by the institution stay in the institution and are intended for the doctoral candidates of the
institution.
When a function, a service or a contribution of an institution is shared or coordinated, the methods
of cooperation are associated with the following names:

An operator institution of one doctoral school contributes to the operations of a doctoral school by
providing significant resources to this doctoral school, intended for all of the doctoral candidates of
the doctoral school. These resources are provided in the form of an operating budget, the working


time of the personnel dedicated to the management of the school or to teaching assistance. Each
operator institution is represented on the doctoral school council.
An institution contributing to a doctoral school , without being an operator, contributes to its operation
by providing resources intended for all of the doctoral candidates of the doctoral school and
determined on a prorata basis on the number of doctoral candidates belonging to the institution in the
doctoral school. These resources are mainly provided in the form of an operating budget.
An operator institution of the doctoral college contributes to its operations by providing resources
intended for all of the doctoral candidates of the Université Paris-Saclay. These resources are
provided in the form of an operating budget, the working time of the personnel dedicated to the
management and operations of the doctoral college and the services or functions that it fulfills.
- 18 -
5 The doctoral schools
5.1 The doctoral schools of the Université Paris-Saclay
The Université Paris-Saclay includes 20 doctoral schools. It is the administrative support for 17 of
them. The doctoral schools authorized to host doctoral candidates for their doctoral training by
accreditation by the Université Paris-Saclay are the following:




















ABIES - Agriculture, nutrition, biology, environment, health
A&A – Astronomy & Astrophysics in Ile de France
Biosigne Signaling and integrative networks in biology
CBMS - Cancer research, biology, medicine, health
EDMH - Hadamard doctoral school of mathematics
EDOM - Waves and matter
EDSP – Public Health
EOBE - Electrical, Optical, Biophysics and Engineering
Interfaces - Interfaces
ITFA - Therapeutic innovation, from basic to applied
2MIB - Chemical Sciences: Molecules, Matter, Instrumentation and Biosystems
PHENIICS - Particles, hadrons, energy and nucleate: instrumentation, imagery, cosmos and simulation
PIF - Physics at Ile de France
SDSV - Structure and dynamics of living systems
SEIF - Sciences of the environment at Ile-de-France
SHS - Human and social sciences
SMEMaG - Mechanical and energy sciences, matter and geosciences
STIC -Sciences and technologies of information and communication
SSMMH - Sports sciences, motor skills, the science of human movement
SdV - Plant sciences: from genes to the ecosystem
5.2 What is a doctoral school?
Doctoral schools are regulated by the decree of August 7, 2006 regarding doctoral training.
Doctoral schools organize the training of doctoral candidates and prepare them for professional
development or their pursuit of a career. They bring together research units and research teams
that have been acknowledged after a national evaluation. Subject to exceptions, a research team
only participates in a doctoral school.
5.3 Main missions
To fulfill their missions (as defined by the regulatory texts governing doctoral training), the doctoral
schools, individually or together, within the framework of the doctoral college, act in the following
areas:
o
Admission: the doctoral schools implement a policy of the choice of doctoral candidates
based on explicit public criteria; they organize, within the framework of the policy of the
institutions, the allocation of the funds entrusted to them, especially the doctoral contracts
of the institution;
- 19 -
o
Collective training: they organize the scientific and intellectual exchanges between doctoral
candidates, possibly within a college of doctoral schools of the institution or the site; they
propose training to the doctoral candidates that would be useful to their research project
and to their professional project as well as the training required for the acquisition of a
broader scientific culture. These trainings should not only prepare the doctors for a career
in research in the public sector, industry and the services, but, more generally, for any field
that requires the skills acquired during the doctoral training. They may be organized with the
cooperation of the other public and private bodies;
o
Quality: they ensure the quality of the support for the doctoral candidates by the research
units and research teams, ensuring compliance with the thesis charter and implement it.
They prepare the doctoral candidates and support their theses under optimal conditions;
o
Professional life of doctors and relationships with companies: defines a support system for
the professional development of doctors, both in public institutions and in the private
sector, established in relation with the bodies or associations that support the same
objective and include, when necessary, a statement of acquired skills; organize a monitoring
of the professional life of the doctors and, more generally, of all of the doctors that they
have hosted;
o
International: give a European and international outlook, especially within the framework of
cooperative activities conducted with institutions of higher learning or foreign research
centers, in particular by promoting international joint doctoral theses.
5.4 Governance and organization
A doctoral school is directed by a director, who implements the doctoral school program adopted by
the doctoral school council.
Figure 4: Governance of a doctoral school
The doctoral school council has 12 to 26 members. The composition of the council is regulated by
regulatory texts, and includes representatives of the research units and of the institutions, elected
- 20 -
representatives of doctoral candidates, representatives from socio-economic groups and outside
persons chosen for their scientific expertise.
To ensure the operations of the doctoral school, it may adopt an internal structure, in centers, and
mobilize people, managers or co-managers of the centers, mission heads, to implement, under the
direction of the director of the doctoral school, the action program of the doctoral school. In the
same way, the teaching assistance personnel of the doctoral school may be dedicated to the
assistance of all of the doctoral school or even of the centers.
5.5 The responsibilities of the doctoral school council
The doctoral school council meets at least three times per year.
It adopts the action program of the doctoral school and manages the affairs that fall under the
doctoral school, according to the texts regulating doctoral training:
o
Doctoral school program: the council rules on the assignment of the research units to the
doctoral school; on the management of the doctoral school; on the internal rules of the
doctoral school; and, more generally, on the action program of the doctoral school,
o
Admission: the council rules in limited session on the allocation of financing to be allocated
to the doctoral candidates registered in the institution; it rules on the admission criteria
suitable for the doctoral school,
o
Registration: It proposes those who should receive an exemption under the conditions of
the diploma required for registration to the doctoral degree; it rules on requests for
exemptions regarding the duration of the preparation for the doctoral degree and on the
maximum number of doctoral candidates supervised by the same thesis advisor; it
examines the requests for exemptions regarding the number of doctoral candidates
supervised by a thesis advisor,
o
Training: It rules on the training program of the doctoral school,
o
Defense: It rules on the exceptions regarding the composition of the thesis Juries,
o
Management of the quality system: It hears the annual activity report of the director of the
doctoral school on the implementation of the action program; it ensures annual monitoring
of all of the exemptions.
5.6 The responsibilities of the doctoral school management
The director of the doctoral school, and more generally, the management team (deputy directors,
mission heads, managers of centers), assisted by one or more teaching assistants, either within the
framework of the doctoral school, or within the framework of the doctoral college, assumes the
following responsibilities:
o
Doctoral school program: the director of the doctoral school prepares the action program
and organizes the council's deliberations; he debates the methods for implementing the
program (resources, budget) with the doctoral school council and presents this program to
the doctoral college council,
o
Admission: the director of the doctoral school, and more generally, the management team
organizes the admission of the doctoral candidates by a competitive exam or
- 21 -
outside of a competitive exam; consolidates the list of recipients of financing to present
them to the doctoral school council and other relevant bodies,
o
Registration: He proposes the registration of the doctoral candidates and ensures the advice
of the thesis advisor and the director of the research unit. Upon first registration, he makes
sure that the doctoral charter is signed and verifies that the scientific, material and financial
conditions have been met to guarantee the proper progress of the research works of the
candidate and the preparation of the thesis; he also ensures the implementation of an
individual monitoring of the doctoral candidate and his individual training plan. As of the
second year of the doctoral degree, he prepares the maintenance report on the individual
monitoring of the doctoral candidate, taking his recommendations into account,
o
Progress of the doctoral degree: He contributes to the implementation of the conditions
that will guarantee a quality doctoral environment. He organizes the examination of
requests for exemptions and the monitoring of them,
o
Collective training: the director of the doctoral school contributes, within the framework of
the doctoral college (for transverse training) and within the framework of the doctoral school
(for other training), to the implementation of the proposal of modules and collective training
paths for the doctoral candidates. He makes sure, at the first registration, that the doctoral
candidates create an individual training plan. He makes sure, at the following registrations,
that the doctoral candidates follow an adjusted training plan,
o
Defense: he rules on the rapporteurs and the composition of the thesis Juries and organizes
the defense procedures: he makes sure they run smoothly,
o
International: he informs the doctoral candidates of aids or support systems for
international opportunities; he contributes to the implementation of international joint
doctorate thesis agreements or other European and international cooperative efforts,
o
Facilitation: he organizes the facilitation of the doctoral school to support scientific
exchanges between doctoral candidates and with the scientific community,
o
Professional life of the doctors and relationships with corporations: the director of the
doctoral school contributes to the implementation of doctor career development systems in
the public and private sector; organizes, in concert with the services of the relevant
institutions, the monitoring of the professional life of the doctors,
o
Management of the quality system: He supplies information on the monitoring and
objectives indicators of the doctoral training. He organizes or contributes to the organization
of surveys of the doctoral candidates. Each year, he presents an activity report to the
doctoral school council and to other relevant bodies on the implementation of the doctoral
school program. He develops proposals for improvement actions.
5.7 Principle responsibilities of teaching assistants of the doctoral school
The teaching assistant of the doctoral school assumes the following responsibilities for all of the
doctoral candidates of a doctoral school, that is, when a doctoral school is structured by centers and
- 22 -
the assistant is assigned to a center, for all of the doctoral candidates of this center:

Welcome of and information for the doctoral candidates, contribute to the maintenance of
the web site of the doctoral school and other information sources (posted notices,
brochures, etc.)

Assistance for the educational management of the doctoral school
o
Information system: management of the database of the doctoral school (doctoral
candidates, supervisors and research units), either for all of the doctoral candidates
and research units of the ED, or for the doctoral candidates and research units of the
center to which the assistant is assigned.
o
Admission: assist in the logistic organization of the recruitment exams of the
doctoral candidates assigned to the doctoral school, either for all of the doctoral
school, or, if the ED organizes a Jury per center, for the center to which the assistant
is assigned.
o
Training: assist in the organization of training suitable for the doctoral school,
contribute to the coordination of planning, approval of doctoral candidate training,
either for all of the doctoral school, or for the center to which the assistant is
assigned.
o
Progress and defense: inform the doctoral candidates on the procedures to follow,
provide assistance for the management and handling of various requests for
exemptions,
o
International: reception of and information for foreign doctoral candidates,
assistance for the implementation of joint doctoral degree agreements, information
on the possibility of going abroad, etc.

Assistance for the financial management of the doctoral school;

Assistance for the facilitation of the doctoral school, doctoral school life

Assistance in the management of the doctoral school, preparation of councils and meetings
of the doctoral school (reservation of rooms for doctoral school councils, assistance in the
determination of dates, sending out meeting notices, agendas, minutes)

Assistance with conducting surveys, consolidation of indicators, investigation of ministerial
inquiries

Quality system: participate in committee meetings for the monitoring of the quality system
of the doctoral college.
5.8 Required resources
Estimating the contributions of the institutions in terms of payroll and operating budget for the
doctoral schools and the doctoral college is the subject of a separate memo.
5.8.1 Personnel
For the teaching assistance of the doctoral school, there must be continuity all year long in the
various locations where the doctoral candidates, the thesis advisors and the students who wish to
- 23 -
look into a doctoral degree, etc., are welcomed and receive information.
o
The organization of symposium days for the doctoral school, to assist in the preparation of
the councils, assist in conducting surveys, maintain the database involving "inclusive"
activities, for each doctoral school, independent of the number of doctoral candidates.
o
Logistical assistance for the organization of exams is related to the number of Juries
organized by the doctoral school, and indirectly to the number of doctoral candidates in the
doctoral school.
o
The processing of files and questions from each of the doctoral candidates, that is, this time,
directly related to the number of doctoral candidates in the doctoral school, is also required.
An estimate, based on feedback, leads to the estimation of the requirement for full time employees
dedicated to teaching assistance for about 200 doctoral candidates, in the case of a doctoral school
located on a single geographic site. When the doctoral school is located on several geographic sites,
ensuring the continuity and the coordination of the activities of the various sites will require more
teaching assistance.
The management team is devoted to the management of the doctoral school, actual time worked,
either directly related to the number of doctoral candidates (admission, annual monitoring, thesis
defense, international joint doctorate degrees, etc.) or required regardless of the number of
doctoral candidates (management committee meeting, doctoral school councils and doctorate
college council, management review, facilitation of the doctoral school, oversight, etc.) Time devoted
to the coordination requirements when the doctoral school is located in several geographic sites or
includes several centers is also required.
5.8.2 Operations
Types of operating expenses of a doctoral school:

The operation of the Juries for recruitment exams of doctoral candidates (reimbursement of
travel expenses of the Jury members, meals, possibly lodging),

Organization of doctoral school training, reimbursement of travel expenses, compensation
of service providers, assembling the thematic schools, sharing in doctorial expenses,

Organization of doctoral school days, expenses for running the doctoral school,

Purchase of software or IT equipment, printing and photocopying costs, stationery and
supplies required for the operations of the doctoral school,

Operations of the doctoral schools councils, office meetings (breaks, reimbursement of
travel expenses for external members, meal platters).
- 24 -
6 The doctoral college
6.1 What is the doctoral college?
The doctoral college is the coordination element of the Université Paris-Saclay, responsible for
organizing the doctoral policy within the framework of the policy of the site, particularly the sharing
of activities of the doctoral schools and for contributing to improving the attractiveness, visibility and
goals of the doctoral program of the Université Paris-Saclay. It brings together the people and
resources devoted to the coordination, management and oversight of activities, or to the
implementation of shared activities.
The doctoral college is the source for proposals for:




developing the doctoral policy of the site,
defining the shared objectives and priorities related to doctoral training,
developing innovative projects to attain the common objectives,
developing the processes and procedures to fulfill the missions handed down by the
ministerial authorities, implementing the doctoral policy of the site as defined by the
governance of the Université of Paris-Saclay, and carrying out the projects.
The doctoral college is also in charge of the following axes of coordination or sharing:








management and monitoring of the implementation of the doctoral policy of the site, within
the framework of a quality system (surveys),
oversight and regulatory assistance,
information systems,
selection of doctoral candidates,
collective doctoral training,
international,
communication and facilitation,
professional life of the doctors, relationships with socio-economic groups and corporations
for the promotion of the doctoral program of the Université Paris-Saclay.
The doctoral college oversees the monitoring and evaluation of the various doctoral trainings, the
associated structures (doctoral schools) and more generally, all of the actions for coordination and
sharing.
6.2 Management of the doctoral college
The doctoral college is directed by a director, assisted by a committee and the doctoral college
council.
6.2.1 The doctoral college council
The doctoral college council includes the following categories:
1. a representative from each institution Member or Associate of the Université Paris-Saclay,
designated by the heads of the cited institutions,
- 25 -
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
a delegate of the academic council designated by the president of this council,
a representative named by the President of the Université Paris-Saclay,
the directors of the doctoral schools accredited or co-accredited by the Université Paris-Saclay;
ten doctoral candidates elected by their peers,
a representative of the teaching assistance personnel attached to the doctoral College.
The representative of categories 1 to 3 may designate an alternate. In the case where the incumbent
member and his alternate are prevented from attending a meeting, the incumbent member may
give a power of attorney to another representative from categories 1 to 3. No representative may
hold more than two powers.
The representatives of category 4 name an alternate to ensure that each doctoral school is
represented at each meeting.
The election of the representatives of category 5 is done by a single ballot of the proportional list,
using direct voting, with distribution according to the greatest remainder method. Each list has ten
candidates and is composed alternatively of a candidate of each sex. Each candidate has an
alternate of the same sex. The term of the representatives of the doctoral candidates is one year. In
the case of withdrawal during a term, the following candidate (and his alternate), of the same sex as
that of the elected withdrawer, on the same list, then represents the doctoral candidates. The
election is done electronically.
The representative of category 6 is named by the President of the Université Paris-Saclay, on the
proposal of the directors of the electoral school among the personnel of the teaching assistants
attached to the doctoral College. An alternate is designated by the same process. The terms of the
incumbent member and the alternate are 5 years.
6.2.1.1
The doctoral college council in limited session
The doctoral college council meets 1 to 3 times a year, called by the director of the doctoral college,
in a session limited to the representative of categories 1 to 3.
It deliberates on the transparency of the processes, the use of resources, and the process that
ensures the connection with the institutions.
Each member of the council in limited session has one vote. The director of the doctoral college
facilitates the meeting without a vote. The associate or partner institutions of the doctoral schools
may attend the council in limited session without a vote.
6.2.1.2
The doctoral college council in plenary session
The doctoral college meets in plenary session a minimum of 6 times per year, called by the director
of the doctoral college.
It discusses the outlooks for the doctoral policy of the Université Paris-Saclay and, upon
implementing this doctoral policy, decides the actions to be taken in each of the areas of
coordination.
The director of the doctoral college may invite to a meeting of the doctoral college council any
person that he judges necessary, in the interest of the discussions provided on the agenda.
6.2.2 The director of the doctoral college
- 26 -
The director of the Doctoral College is named by the President of the Université Paris-Saclay, upon
the advice of the doctoral college. His term is for five years, renewable once.
The director of the doctoral college should be authorized to direct research and have held the
position of director or adjunct director of a doctoral school in the past. He cannot simultaneously
perform the functions of the director of the doctoral college and the director or adjunct director of
the doctoral school or the representative of the institution.
The director of the doctoral college executes the coordination and sharing policy developed by the
doctoral college council and approved by the doctoral college in limited session.
6.2.3 The staff of the doctoral college
The staff of the doctoral college is made up of the director of the doctoral college, the managers of
the shared projects and the facilitators of the coordination and sharing axes. The staff meets as
often as necessary. It organizes, on a daily basis, the coordination and sharing activities.
The facilitators of the axes of coordination and sharing and the managers of the shared projects are
named by the President of the Université Paris-Saclay, on the proposal of the director of the
doctoral college and upon the advice of the doctoral college council. They implement the actions
that are included in the framework of the missions of the doctoral college.
6.2.4 Other bodies associated with the management of the doctoral college.
The committee of the partners of the Paris Saclay area meets 1 to 2 times per year, debates and
contributes to the questions related to the professional life of the doctors, to the transverse doctoral
training in relation to employment opportunities and the promotion of the doctoral program of the
Université Paris-Saclay, through corporations and, more generally, socio-economic groups. This
committee brings together the representatives of corporations and local authorities that employ a
significant number of doctors of the Université Paris-Saclay, especially those of the Paris-Saclay area,
and the facilitators of the "professional life of the doctors", "transverse training" the
"communication and facilitation" axes and the director of the doctoral college.
The quality monitoring committee meets at least two times per year, before the management
reviews of the doctoral college council. It ensures the monitoring of the implementation of the
doctoral training policy within the framework of the quality system. It brings together all of the
personnel who implement, on a daily basis, the systems and procedures that are in place to ensure
the quality of the doctoral training: the teaching assistants of the doctoral schools, the staff of the
educational services and document services who work on the doctoral training, a quality
management consultant, the quality managers of the institutions, a group of facilitators of the
quality system, the manager of the "management of the quality system" axis and the director of the
doctoral college.
- 27 -
7 Organization of the doctoral college
The doctoral college is organized in coordination and sharing axes in relation to their principle
responsibilities, the activities of which are devoted to all of the doctoral candidates of the Université
Paris-Saclay, which correspond to all the permanent functions.
In addition, the project teams are responsible for one time projects or events within the scope of
each of the axes.
Figure 5: Coordination and sharing axis
- 28 -
7.1 Development of the doctoral policy of the site
This activity is under the responsibility of the director of the doctoral college. It is
performed primarily by management and the doctoral college council and by the
supervisory committee.
7.1.1 Roles
Development of a doctoral training policy of the site, definition of the missions, objectives and
priorities, under the control of the authorities and of the governance of the Université Paris-Saclay,
Relationships with ministerial authorities, indicator feedback; submission and monitoring of the
accreditation and evaluation files by HCERES; regulatory oversight and national and international
context oversight,
Relations with the presidency of the Université Paris-Saclay, the bodies of the Université Paris-Saclay,
the academic council and the council of members,
Projects, budgets and planning, implementation of partnership agreements between the operating
institutions of the doctoral college.




7.1.2 Principle activities





7.1.3
Preparation, facilitation and minutes of the doctoral college council,
Development of actions plans for the teams responsible for coordination and sharing activities and
for the project teams; Monitoring their activity,
Representation of the doctoral college with the bodies of the Université Paris-Saclay, and of the
ministerial authorities,
Consolidation of indicators and other information useful for management; Analysis and proposal for
decisions,
Preparation of partner agreements.
Required resources
Working time of the director of the doctoral college and a teaching assistant.
budget.
Related operating
- 29 -
7.2 Management of the quality system
Management and monitoring of the implementation of the doctoral policy of the
site, within the framework of a quality assurance system.
This activity is under the responsibility of the director of the doctoral college and is
organized by the manager of the quality system coordination axis.
It is implemented entirely at the doctoral college level. The manager of the axis and the director of
the doctoral college are assisted by a quality management consultant and by a group of quality
system facilitators. The system is managed in concert with the quality managers of the institutions.
It involves all of the personnel who implement, on a daily basis, the provisions that are in place to
ensure the quality of the doctoral training, working together on a quality monitoring committee.
7.2.1 Roles



Implementation of harmonized and transparent processes and procedures; Training and support of
the staff and of all of the participants in these procedures and processes, to ensure a professionalized
doctoral environment,
Implementation and monitoring of the mission and objectives indicators; Implementation of a
continual quality improvement system, distribution and sharing of information,
Organization and facilitation of the meetings of the doctoral college council and of the meetings of the
project teams or doctoral college coordination axes; Organization and facilitation of the meetings, with
the support teams of the institutions and the teaching assistants of the doctoral schools.
The continual quality improvement process for doctoral training is broken down into four main
steps:
Figure 6: Management of the implementation of the doctoral policy within the framework of a continual quality
improvement system
F - Forecast and plan the main provisions required for the implementation of doctoral training; this
- 30 -
step leads to the development of a doctoral policy of the site that defines the orientation and leads
to

projects to attain the objectives,

the definition of the missions and responsibilities,

the definition and the description of the process,

the development of a document reference system.
D - Deploy the provisions anticipated for the implementation of the doctoral training. This step
consists of implementing the operating policy and the rules defined in the document system, on
which all of the participants in the doctoral training may rely.
M - Manage the compliance and efficiency of the systems put in place, especially using
measurement and evaluation tools, measuring the level of satisfaction of those receiving the
doctoral training (the doctoral candidates). This step is mostly reflected

in a summary of surveys performed with the doctoral candidates,

a registry of significant facts,

a dashboard of procedure indicators and attainment of the objectives,

a summary of internal audits.
I - Improve the systems provided, after having analyzed the feedback and the results of the
measurement and evaluation. This step is reflected in the implementation of improvement actions
(corrective and preventative) to continue in the desired direction. It relies in a great part on a
management review, to which at least six meetings of the doctoral college council is devoted. It is
documented by a registry that monitors improvement actions.
7.2.3 Resources required at the doctoral college level
Working time of the manager of the axis, of the director of the doctoral college, of a quality
management consultant and of the group of facilitators of the quality system.
An operating budget for the facilitation of the meetings, for the production and distribution of
documents, for the implementation and monitoring of measurement and improvement tools,
especially the financing for conducting surveys.
- 31 -
7.3 Admission of the doctoral candidates
This activity is based on:
-
Coordination of everything at the doctoral college level, managed by the
director of the doctoral college, in connection with the doctoral college
council and the supervisory committee (general framework, breakdown of
funding between doctoral colleges, assessment/decision meetings),
-
Guidance for the examination process of the doctoral candidates by the
management of the doctoral schools, through exams or outside of exams,
-
A scientific policy by the financing institutions leading to the breakdown of
funding for the doctoral schools and the research units.
7.3.1 Roles




Definition of a shared policy for the admission of the doctoral candidates; distribution of selection
criteria, expectations and procedures,
Coordination of the management of the calls for projects and recruitment exams entrusted to the
doctoral colleges,
Oversight of the calls for projects and the financing possibilities, dissemination of information, sharing
of best practices and experiences for the assembly of projects,
Sharing of activities for the recruitment of candidates and for attractiveness (communication on the
AAP, existence of exhibitions, student information days).



Preparation of the calls for projects; dissemination of information; assistance for implementation,
monitoring and assessments,
Dissemination of information on funding possibilities,
At meetings of work groups: Collect and share best practices and information on inadequately utilized
financing methods, support for the establishment of projects.
Working time of the director of the doctoral college and a teaching assistant.
- 32 -
7.4 Information system and digital work space
-
This activity is under the responsibility of a coordination axis manager, comanaged by the director of information systems of the Université ParisSaclay and monitored by the director of the doctoral college.
It is implemented entirely at the level of the doctoral college. The manager of the axis is assisted by
a team of "mentors" responsible for supporting and training the users of the tools. The team works
in connection with all of the users of the information system and the other tools that are available:
teaching assistants of the doctoral college, directors and adjunct directors of the doctoral college,
the staff of the education services of the operating institutions of registration, document services,
managers of collective training of the operating training institutions.
7.4.1 Roles






Implementation of a common information system; training and support of the users of the information
system,
Making users aware of the quality of the data in regard to the system for monitoring the mission and
objectives indicators,
Interface between the other systems (web site, information systems of the institutions, librarian
database of STAR, STEP higher education),
Digital support for conducting surveys on the professional life of the doctors or the quality of the
training;
Implementation of electronic document management, digital tools for distance collaboration, digital
work space, networked or exchanged working tools; Training and support of users,
Implementation of access to digital systems for design, creation and distribution of paperless training
(MOOC or SPOC type) for training of the doctoral candidates or the thesis advisors.





Exchanges with the contact association (that develops the ADUM system) and with potential solution
providers,
Organizing the training: Implementation and facilitation of actions to support the users,
Participation in the meetings of the quality monitoring committee,
Meetings and exchanges with the group of the DSI of the institutions of the Université of Paris-Saclay,
Facilitation of a group to consider the actions to take, required improvements, changes and new
actions.
Operating budget for the annual license for the ADUM software, for support (participation in the
ADUM symposium), for training participants; for the development or purchase of software and
equipment; Working time, a manager of the axis, a team of 4 to 5 "mentors", with a profile of expert
teaching assistant, of the director of information systems of the Université Paris-Saclay, of a
teaching assistant.
- 33 -
7.5 International
-
Coordination of everything at the doctoral college level; it is under the
shared responsibility of a member of the department of international
relations of the Université Paris-Saclay, and under the director of the
doctoral college, the general framework of shared activities of
international outlook being defined by the doctoral college council,
-
Shared international exchanges led with the foreign partner institutions,
in the name of Université Paris-Saclay, by a group of managers of
international exchanges,
-
An intercession by the electoral colleges on the teaching methods,
applicable to only their doctoral candidates, international partnership
agreements on the doctoral degree,
-
An examination of the files by the representative of the registration
operator institutions, for the account of the doctoral candidates regarding
their institution;
-
International hosting services by the registration operator institutions.
7.5.1 Roles
Coordination of the international cooperation policy at the doctoral level in connection with the
institutions (individual joint doctoral thesis agreements, international partnership framework
agreements regarding joint doctoral degrees); sharing of activities, costs of translation,
Support for European and international mobility of the doctoral candidates; for example: support for
the implementation of European or international projects dedicated to mobility and to the
international exchange of doctoral candidates (doctoral candidate CoFund, Marie Curie Training
Networks),
Promotion of the doctoral program of the Université Paris-Saclay; maintenance and development of
relationships with foreign partners; coordination of activities for the sharing of efforts and resources
dedicated to these relationships at the doctoral level, for example hosting foreign delegations, sending
delegations from the Université Paris-Daclay abroad, costs of translation of communications brochures
or sample agreements into foreign languages.



7.5.2 Principle activities of the international team at the level of the doctoral college





Define the general framework of the actions for a European and international outlook of the
doctoral schools,
maintain and disseminate the lists of persons who examine the files for the joint doctoral degrees in
the registration operator institutions, the persons responsible for international exchanges; and the
persons responsible for joint doctoral degrees in the doctoral schools,
Give information to those persons who wish to enter into a joint doctoral degree agreement or a
specific international partnership devoted to doctoral candidates,
maintain a dashboard of the individual or framework agreement under negotiation and the
indicators related to the international joint doctoral thesis,
organize a periodic meeting (ten hours per month, more if necessary) to scan through the current
files, share difficulties and solutions, make day to day decisions. This meeting brings together the
- 34 -




people who examine the files in the registration operator institutions, the persons responsible for
international exchanges, and the persons responsible for joint doctoral degrees in the doctoral
schools,
coordination of the establishment of documents useful for the axis in several languages (models of
joint doctoral degrees, communication brochures),
organize the exchange of best practices and skills for setting up international projects devoted to the
doctoral candidates (CoFund, IRN Marie Curie),
Coordination of the representation of the doctoral program of Université Paris-Saclay in
international exhibitions that have been identified as attractive; promotion of the doctoral degree of
the Université Paris-Saclay internationally,
Coordination of international hosting activities of doctoral candidates organized by the dedicated
services of the institutional partners of Université Paris-Saclay.
7.5.3 Principle activities of the persons responsible for international exchanges
Each foreign partner university is in contact with a "doctoral" representative at the level of the
doctoral college, who is responsible for international exchanges. The manager of international
exchanges has a portfolio of foreign partner institutions in his charge:




When a difficulty arises or presents itself, he has an exchange on the subject of setting up the
international joint doctoral thesis agreement with the universities that he works with, for all of the
doctoral candidates of the Université Paris-Saclay,
He ensures the continuity and coherence of the positions held in the foreign partner institution,
maintains and shares satisfactory solutions made in the framework of prior negotiations with this
partner;
He maintains good relations with the partner; he develops a knowledge of the particulars of this
partner and a knowledge of the potential for support of the international partnerships or of the
mobility of the doctoral candidates accessible in the framework of this partnership,
He also ensures the promotion and development of relationships with the foreign partner
institution (entry of indicators in the information system chosen for this purpose, consolidation of all
of the agreements, communication of the calls for projects) etc.
7.5.4 Principle activities of the representatives of the registration operator
institutions



The representative of the institution that will be the registration operator of the doctoral candidate
will examine the file of the international joint doctoral thesis, and is responsible for the negotiations.
He prepares the text of the agreement and its successive revisions, he makes requests directly with
the participants (thesis advisor, unit director, director of the doctoral school, manager of
international exchanges) for details.
He ensures agreement between other internal participants in the Université Paris-Saclay, who may
be concerned, in various capacities, in the international agreement project (institution hosting the
research unit, institution employer of the doctoral candidate, if necessary, management supervisor
of the unit, etc.) And provide a copy of the agreement.
7.5.5 International hosting service of the registration operator institutions

The services responsible for the international hosting of the institutions have these main
responsibilities:

Assist in the preparation of the venue in France or the departure abroad of the doctoral candidate
(assistance for obtaining a visa, assistance for getting student lodging, information on mobility
assistance),
- 35 -


The information and assistance to the doctoral candidates for their administrative steps for entry
into France and their settlement,
Assistance in handling the documents for Visa renewal.
Figure 7: Internal organizational plan for implementation of the individual agreement for international joint
doctoral thesis, or conventions of application framework agreements for the joint doctoral diploma.
Working time of a member of the department of international relations, of the manager of the axis,
of the director of the doctoral college, of a teaching assistant, of about fifteen managers of
international exchanges.
Budget dedicated to funding translations, printing of international communication documents, for
international representation missions (fees for registration in international exhibitions,
transportation, lodging), for the purchase of software and equipment, for holding meetings.
7.5.7 Resources required at the level of the institutions
Working time of the staff of the relevant services prorated for the number of doctoral candidates
concerned.
If necessary, support budget for the entry and departure moves of the doctoral candidates.
- 36 -
7.6 Collective doctoral training
-
A coordination of everything at the doctoral college level, placed under the
responsibility of a manager of the coordination axis, with co-management
by the director of the doctoral college of the Université Paris-Saclay, the
general framework of the shared activities for collective training be
defined by the electoral college council.
-
The implementation of innovative training paths, under the responsibility
of a manager of the path, and a group of facilitators, intended for all of the
doctoral candidates of the Université Paris-Saclay.
-
In a manner channeled in the operating institutions of collective training,
the proposal, management and monitoring of collective training modules.
7.6.1 Roles
The decree regulating doctoral training specifies that over the course of their curriculum, the
doctoral candidates receive collective training. It is training that includes teaching, seminars or
internships intended to

ensure the scientific culture of the doctoral candidates,

prepare for professional life in the public as well as in the private sector,

promote their international outlook.
It is therefore the obligation of the doctoral schools to propose training modules to the doctoral
candidates. Among these trainings, those with a very transversal nature may be given outside of the
doctoral colleges by the operating institutions that conduct collective training.
In this area, the doctoral college has the following roles:




Development and distribution of the catalog of transverse collective training modules; Coordination of
the proposals of the various operating institutions that conduct collective training; Coordination of the
management of the training,
Shared organization of a clear and attractive transversal training path; Shared organization of
innovative training; Development of specific training programs dedicated to identified professional
projects,
Align activities that promote exchanges between doctoral candidates and the scientific community,
shared organization of doctorials or doctoral schools,
Coordination of the evaluations of the trainings in view of guiding the training proposal.
7.6.2 Principle activities at the doctoral college level



Organize and distribute the proposals for shared transverse doctoral training with the
operators of doctoral training services within Paris Saclay, relying on the ADUM,
Organize periodic meetings (around three times per year) with the managers of the
operators of doctoral training services within the institutions,
Organize and implement the methods (doctoral candidate portfolio, individual training path,
diploma supplement) that will allow the doctoral candidate to confirm the elements of his
- 37 -


doctoral training,
Prepare or manage calls for tender, the requests for financing (innovative training,
doctorials),
Coordinate the actions for the training of the doctoral college with those of the institutions
that offer training under a DIF (personal training right to 20h/year in the public sector) or a
CPF (personal training account of training of 24h/year in the private sector).
7.6.3 Principle activities of the doctoral training services in the training operator
institutes
The training operator services organize these trainings by mastering all of the steps of the
implementation.








Definition of the purpose of the training, of its length, its key target(s) and the potential
conditions for registration
Contracting with potential service providers (or designation of representatives)
Logistical organization (fixing dates, places making locations available, etc.)
Assuming the cost of the training
Advertising the training with the doctoral candidates, in particular using the ADUM
information system
Monitor the registrations and the participation of the registrants, compilation of absences or
withdrawal
Evaluation of training quality
Possibly provide statistics to the doctoral college upon request
7.6.4 Required resources within the registration operator institutions
The methods of training organized by the training operator institutions are intended primarily for
the doctoral candidates who belong to the institution, then, subject to available space, to all of the
doctoral candidates of the Université Paris-Saclay.
It should be noted that each institution in the public sector that employs the doctoral candidates
offers 20 hours of training per year to each doctoral candidate under the DIF (personal training
right) and 24 hours per year under the CPF (personal training account) if it is in the private sector,
whether by organizing its own trainings, or by financing them at a training operator institution. In
this case, the doctoral candidates will be considered "relevant" for the training operator.
Working time of a manager of the "transverse training" coordination axis, logistical assistance. An
operating budget for facilitating meetings (coffee breaks, documents, etc.), for the production and
distribution of documents, for financing the implementation of actions toward innovative training.
- 38 -
7.7 The professional life of the doctors, relationships with the socioeconomic bodies and corporations
This activity is the responsibility of a manager of a coordination axis, with comanagement by the director of the doctoral college of the Université Paris-Saclay,
in concert with a group of managers of the "professional life" mission, with the
doctoral candidate associations and the doctors, and in connection with the
committee of partners of the Paris Saclay cluster and with the associations of the
doctoral candidates and the doctors.
7.7.1 Roles



Coordination of the implementation and monitoring of the personalized training system of the
doctoral candidates on the basis of the definition of the professional project, of a plan for the
development of skills that take this professional project into account, of an individual training path that
supports the development of these skills and the monitoring of this system, especially using the
doctoral candidate portfolio,
Implementation of support systems dedicated to professional development: Organization of a network
of "alumni" doctors, monitoring the future of the doctors and of their careers, communication
regarding careers, doctors' forums,
Organization of a network of corporate ambassadors; implementation of exchanges with corporations
in the Paris Saclay technological cluster; exchanges with the socio-economic groups for the
improvement of the training dedicated to the professional project; promotion of the doctoral degree
with employers of doctors, in all of the socio-economic sectors.





Organization and facilitation of one to two meetings per year with the committee of the partners of the
Paris Sacaly cluster,
Organization, at a minimum, of one event of its own per year dedicated to professional life of the
doctors, in connection with the associations of the doctoral candidates (forums, etc.),
Conducting surveys on the future of the doctors, in connection with the doctors' associations,
Representation of the Université Paris-Saclay in the relevant forums and "employment" meetings,
Development of projects and actions for the recognition of the doctoral degree of the Université ParisSaclay (Alumni network, actions toward professional sectors, leaning towards a "job oriented" outlook
for the doctoral candidates, etc.).


Working time of an axis manager, of a group of at least 5 mission managers for "relationships with the
socio-economic groups",
An operating budget to participate in "doctors" surveys, to finance registration in forums, and the costs
of missions, to organize "doctors' employment" events of their own.
- 39 -
7.8
Communication and Facilitation
This activity is the joint responsibility of a member of the communication
department of the Université Paris-Saclay and the director of the doctoral college,
in connection with a group of the "communication, facilitation" mission, with the
associations of the doctoral candidates and the doctors.
7.8.1 Roles






Implementation of the communication content that allows each one to be ambassador for all of the
doctoral schools (sharing of communication supports and their presentation, depending on the
audience; Training the ambassadors,
Implementation of joint or harmonized communication supports (web sites, sets of brochures, posters;
banners, letterhead, etc.) sharing efforts and resources,
Coordination of the efforts of people to increase the communication "area"; coordination of the
presence of the ambassadors at exhibitions and forums; sharing of costs for registering in these
exhibitions or forums,
Support for the development of a doctoral community within Université Paris-Saclay; support for the
"campus life" associations and projects of the doctoral candidates,
Organization, along with the doctoral candidates, of joint events likely to support the development of
campus life, to give visibility and appeal to the doctoral diploma (doctoral graduation ceremony, My
thesis in 180 seconds, orientation Weekend; Galas, etc.); sharing of costs and the joint search for
financial support,
Development of a common communication strategy for each: public audience, students, students of
the "grandes écoles", employers of doctors, internationally, nationally.





Organization of representation at exhibitions (CIFRE Forum, Phd Talent, RUE, Masters Day),
setting up participant groups, distribution of information on communication supports and
preparation for the exhibitions,
Design of communication supports (web site, sets of brochures, posters; banners,
letterhead, etc.), presentation depending on the audience, working with the service
providers,
Making well designed content available to the ambassadors (power point presentation);
Training the ambassadors,
Organization, along with the associations of the doctoral candidates, of facilitation projects,
training; (First Day Back or orientation weekend, Doctorials, MT180, IDI school, Graduation
ceremony),
Search for financial support, budgetary monitoring of actions.
Operating budget dedicated to internally organized events; Budget dedicated to participation in
exhibitions; Communication budget (printing brochures, etc.) .
Working time of the communications department, of the director of the doctoral college, logistical
assistance, of a manager of the "communication supports" division, a manager of the "events"
communication division.
- 40 -
7.9 Education
This activity is performed by the services dedicated to the registration operator
institutions and is intended uniquely for the doctoral candidates whose institution
carries out the registrations.
7.9.1 Roles
The education services are responsible for the registration of all of the administrative systems
related to the support of the doctoral degree. It ensures the transmission between the doctoral
school and the decision making body (the head of the registration operator institution or another
person delegated by the delegation of the president of the Université Paris-Saclay). It ensures the
legality of the registration and support actions. It also ensures the hosting and orientation missions
of the students who are candidates for a doctorate, and contributes to attentiveness to the doctoral
candidates by requesting administrative information.

Welcome of and information for doctoral candidates, for the education procedure
(registration, support)

Organization of meetings dedicated to registrations

Verification of registration files

Produce student cards, showing they are in the thesis preparation stage

Gather registration rights

Verification of support files, and the management of the authorization of support

Management of the rapporteur nomination letters, Jury nominations

Delivery of support certifications

Permanent archiving of documents that require it (GED), especially all of those that concern
the signature of one of the heads of the institution of the Université Paris-Saclay.

Working time for the staff, on a prorated basis of the number of concerned doctoral
students.
- 41 -
7.10 Document service
This activity is performed by the services dedicated to the documentary operator
institutions, who are the registration operators. It is intended only for the doctoral
candidates for which the institution carries out the registrations.
7.10.1 Roles
The document services are responsible for the legal electronic submission of the theses, and all of
the administrative steps related to this submission. They work in concert with the doctoral school
and the education service. They ensure the legality of the actions for the submission of the theses,
of conformity of the distribution of the theses to given authorizations, of the adherence to the metadata of the diploma registered in the database of the librarian agency of the higher institution.
They also ensure the training mission of the doctoral candidates for the use of the bibliographic and
bibliometric tools, awareness of respect for copyright law and anti-plagiarism techniques.

Welcome of and information for the doctoral candidates,

Organization of meetings dedicated to the legal submission of theses,

Verification of data,

Legal submission of the theses,

Management of distribution authorizations.

Working time of the staff on a prorata basis of the number of concerned doctoral
candidates.
- 42 -
8 Schedule of meetings
Doctoral college councils:






October: Doctoral college council in plenary session: beginning of the academic year of the doctoral
college; calendar for the school year, presentations of projects and activities of each of the project
teams,
November: doctoral college council in plenary session following a meeting in limited session:
framework and opening of admissions operations; provisional allocation of doctoral contracts of the
institutions by the doctoral college,
February: doctoral college council in plenary session: Management review, statement of indicators
and surveys, monitoring of ongoing projects, discussion on outlooks and projects, especially in terms
of training,
March: doctoral college council in plenary session: definition of the calls for new projects, surveys and
studies,
June: doctoral college council in plenary session following a meeting in limited session: meeting of the
completion of doctoral contract testing, choice of doctoral candidates,
July: doctoral college council in plenary session following a meeting in limited session: management
review, budget statement and projection, outlooks, decisions on the projects and actions for the
upcoming year.
Committee of the partners of the Paris Saclay cluster: January: statement and preparation of events
related to professional life, exchanges on doctoral training, preparation of the management review
of the doctoral college council
Transverse training axis:



March: Definition of the specification sheet for transverse training and other training,
June: approval of the content of the training catalog; discussions on training budgets (statement and
projects); opening of the operations for the distribution of the catalog,
September: discussions on the training projects to be developed.
Quality monitoring committees:


January: feedback, discussions, preparation of the management review of the doctoral college council,
July: consideration of the decisions and the projects of the doctoral college council, decisions on
implementation.
International: One meeting per month, the fourth Friday of each month, from 10:00 to 12:00
Information system: A meeting every two months, the fourth Friday of the month, from 14:00 to
16:00
Communication & Facilitation: A meeting every two months, the third Friday of the month, from
14:00 to 16:00
- 43 -
9 Teams
9.1 Doctoral schools
Agriculture, food,
biology, environment,
health (ABIES)
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
PERY
Alexandre
[email protected]
Director
AGROPARISTECH
VASSILEVA
Irina
[email protected]
Adjunct director
AGROPARISTECH
FIERS
Corinne
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
AGROPARISTECH
CHEVALLIER
Odile
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
AGROPARISTECH
PONSONNET
Sylvie
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
AGROPARISTECH
Astronomy &
astrophysics at
Ile de France
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
Lebourlot
Jacques
[email protected]
Director
Paris Diderot
Plancy
Jacqueline
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
Observer
Pineau des
Forêts
Guillaume
[email protected]
Adjunct director
Paris Saclay (UPSud)
Duret
Florence
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPMC
Mei
Simona
[email protected]
Adjunct director
SPC (Paris Diderot)
Szopa
Cyril
[email protected]
Adjunct director
Paris saclay (UVSQ)
Thuillot
William
[email protected]
Adjunct director
PSL (Observer)
- 44 -
Signaling and integrative
networks in biology
(BIOSIGNE)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
SCHUMACHER
Michael
[email protected]
Director
INSERM
NUSSE
Oliver
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
VERNIER
Philippe
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CNRS
SURDI
Laurent
[email protected]
ED assistant
UPSud
Cancer research, biology,
medicine, health (CBMS)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
SCHLUMBERGER
Martin
[email protected]
ED director
UPSud
LIPINSKI
Marc
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
DAUTRY
François
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ENS Cachan
CYRILLE
Brigitte
[email protected]
ED assistant
UPSud
Hadamard doctoral
school of mathematics
(EDMH)
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
PAULIN
Frédéric
[email protected]
EDMH Director
UPSud
CERF
Raphaël
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ENS Paris
DESOLNEUX
Agnès
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
CNRS
GIOVANGIGLI
Vincent
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CNRS
JEAN
Frédéric
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ENSTA PARISTECH
LAGOUTIERE
Frédéric
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
MOULINES
Erick
[email protected]
Adjunct director
TELECOM PARISTECH
SECHERRE
Vincent
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UVSQ
VERVISH
Valérie
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
FCS-FMJH
RENAULT
Aurélie
[email protected] Webmaster
CNRS-FMJH
LAVIGNE
Valérie
[email protected],
Teaching assistant ½, IHESUPSUD teaching center
??
??
??
Teaching assistant ¼ X center Ecole Polytechnique
UPSud
- 45 -
Waves and matter
(EDOM)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
GREFFET
Jean-Jacques
[email protected]
Director
IOGS
BENREDJEM
Djamel
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
CHARRON
Eric
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
PERFETTI
Luca
[email protected]
Adjunct director
POLYTECHNIQUE
BASSET
Martine
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
Public Health (EDSP)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
BOUYER
Jean
[email protected]
ED Director
INSERM
ANKRI
Joel
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UVSQ
BASTUJI-GARIN
Sylvie
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPEC
MEYER
Laurence
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPSud
BOURGEOIS
Audrey
[email protected]
ED assistant
UPSud
Electrical, Optical,
Biophysics and
Engineering (EOBE)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
CASSAN
Eric
[email protected]
ED Director
UPSud
BOUCHOULE
Sophie
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
CNRS
CANVA
Michael
[email protected]
Adjunct director
IOGS
DESSANTE
Philippe
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CENTRALESUPELEC
GINEFRI
Jean-Christophe
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
MAZALEYRAT
Frédéric
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ENS Cachan
STEPHEN
Laurence
[email protected]
ED assistant
UPSud
- 46 -
INTERFACES
Interdisciplinary approaches: Basics,
applications and innovations
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
HACHE
François
[email protected]
Director
CNRS
DUMONT
Yves
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UVSQ
FAY
Gilles
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
CENTRALESUPELEC
MOUSSEAU
Vincent
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
CENTRALESUPELEC
TAPUS
Adriana
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
ENSTA
LEMARECHAL
Audrey
[email protected]
Assistant
POLYTECHNIQUE
BARONNET
Fabrice
[email protected]
Training Assistant
POLYTECHNIQUE
LHOPITAL
Catherine
[email protected]
Assistant
CENTRALESUPELEC
SCAFARTO
Chrystelle
[email protected]
Assistant
UVSQ
[email protected]
Assistant
POLYTECHNIQUE
FULLENWARTH Emmanuel
Therapeutic innovation:
from basic to applied
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
POUS
Christian
[email protected]
Director
UPSud
ONGERI
Sandrine
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPSud
VAN-TILBEURGH
Herman
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
LANDRY
Lucie
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
Chemical Sciences: Molecules,
Matter, Instrumentation and
Biosystems
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
COLBEAU-JUSTIN
Christophe
ELIOT
Eric
[email protected]
[email protected]
ED Director
UPSud
FLOQUET
Sébastien
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CEA
Adjunct director
GAIGEOT
Marie-Pierre
UVSQ
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
GANDON
UEVE
Vincent
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
CNRS
RUELLO
Corinne
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
DELAHAYE
Véronique
[email protected]
Assistant
UVSQ
- 47 -
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
KHAN
Elias
[email protected]
ED Director
UPSud
CAVALIER
Fabien
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CNRS
DELIOT
Frédéric
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CEA
FLEURET
Frédéric
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CNRS
LOEFFEL
Sylvie
[email protected]
ED assistant
CNRS
Physics at
Ile de France
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
BERROIR
Jean Marc
[email protected]
Director
PSL
LEDEZ
Laura
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
PSL
HARE
Jean
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPMC
YASSINE
Nadine
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
UPMC
HENON
Sylvie
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
SPC
TAÏEB
Joëlle
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
SPC
MONTAMBAUX
Gilles
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
HOARAU
Sabine
[email protected]
Teaching assistant
Paris saclay
(CNRS)
Paris saclay
(UPSud)
Structure and
dynamics of
living systems
(SDSV)
Name
First name Email
position
Institution
CAPY
Pierre
[email protected]
ED Director
CNRS
GONNET
Florence
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UEVE
MIGNOTTE
Bernard
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UVSQ
PERNODET
Jean-luc
[email protected]
UPSUD
DURET
Fanny
[email protected]
FOURNIE
Véronique
[email protected]
LE GUYADER
Rozenn
[email protected]
LE BIHAN
Sandrine
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ED Management and
Communication
Manager
Communication
assistant
ED assistant
UVSQ
UEVE
INRA
INRA
- 48 -
Sciences of the environment at
Ile-de-France (SEIF)
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
LE TREUT
Hervé
[email protected]
Director
CNRS
PICON
Laurence
[email protected]
BOUSQUET
Philippe
[email protected]
Touchon
Laurence
[email protected]
Adjunct director, thesis
committee
Adjunct Director,
training
Teaching assistant
UPMC
UVSQ
UPMC
Human and social
sciences (SHS)
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
CHARREIREPETIT
Sandra
[email protected]
Director
UPSud
KEMPF
Hubert
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ENS Cachan
SAULNIERCASSIA
Emmanuelle [email protected]
Adjunct Director
UVSQ
DURAND
Jean-Pierre
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UEVE
CHOMETTE
Maryse
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
DURET
Fanny
[email protected]
Assistant
UVSQ
ROSE
Christine
[email protected]
Assistant
ENS Cachan
FOURNIE
Véronique
[email protected]
Assistant
UEVE
BOURSIER
Marie-Emma [email protected]
VERGE
Thibaud
[email protected]
RIBONI
Alessandro
[email protected] International relations
POLYTECHNIQUE
CAHOUR
Béatrice
[email protected] Transverse training
CNRS
GODELIER
Eric
[email protected]
Publication and promotion
POLYTECHNIQUE
VENDRYES
Thomas
[email protected]
Joint half year cycles
ENS Cachan
POTHIER
Jacques
[email protected]
Co-manager of a Center
UVSQ
HEGE
Ulrich
[email protected]
HEC
BERNABE
Boris
[email protected]
UPSud
Relationships with
corporations
Communication, Information,
Survey indicators and
development
UVSQ
ENSAE
- 49 -
Mechanical and energy
sciences, matter and
geosciences (SMEMAG)
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
GOYEAU
Benoit
[email protected]
ED Director
CENTRALESUPELEC
HUBERT
Olivier
[email protected]
Adjunct director
ENS Cachan
QUIDELLEUR
Xavier
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UPSud
ROSE
Christine
[email protected]
Assistant
ENS Cachan
HO
Thi kim ngan
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
LHOPITAL
Catherine
Habibou
Assistant
International and
corporate relations
CENTRALESUPELEC
MAITOURNAM
[email protected]
[email protected]
ENSTA
Sciences and technologies
of information and
communication (STIC)
Name
First name
Email
position
Institution
BIDOIT
Nicole
[email protected]
ED director
UPSud
BARTH
Dominique
[email protected]
Adjunct director
UVSQ
KLAUDEL
Hanna
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UEVE
LAMNABHILAGARRIGUE
Françoise
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
CNRS
SIBILLE
Alain
[email protected]
Adjunct director
TELECOM PARISTECH
VILNAT
Anne
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPSud
VAN DER
HOEVEN
Joris
[email protected]
Adjunct director
CNRS
VEQUE
Véronique
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPsud
DRUETTA
Stéphanie
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
BATALIE
Anne
[email protected]
Assistant
CENTRALESUPELEC
GLAS
Isabelle
[email protected]
Communication
UPSud
Sports sciences, motor
skills, the science of human
movement (SSMH)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
LE SCANFF
Christine
[email protected]
ED director
DRU
Vincent
[email protected]
Adjunct director
DURING
Bertrand
[email protected]
Adjunct director
RICHOUX
Marie-Pierre
[email protected]
ED assistant
UPSud
Université Paris-Ouest
Nanterre (P10)
Université Paris
Descartes (P5)
UPSud
- 50 -
Plant sciences: from genes
to the ecosystem
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
SHYKOFF
Jacqui
[email protected]
ED director
UPSud
DELARUE
Marianne
[email protected]
Adjunct Director
UPSud
FOURNIER
Martine
[email protected]
Assistant
UPSud
GRATIAS-WEIL
Ariane
[email protected]
International relations
UPSud
- 51 -
9.2 Doctoral college
9.2.1
Doctoral college council
Entity
Management of the doctoral
college
Representative of the
administrative and technical
staff
Name
First name
e-mail
POMMIER
Sylvie
[email protected]
PORLON
Cristina
[email protected]
Representatives of
the institutions
Name
First name
e-mail
Ecole Polytechnique
BELUS
Alexandra
[email protected]
ENSTA ParisTech
CECCARELLI
Elena
[email protected]
U-PSUD
Bruno
[email protected]
AGRO PARISTECH
BOST
DUVAUXPONTER
Christine
[email protected]
Centrale-Supelec
DOAN
Bich-Lien
[email protected]
HEC Paris
HEGE
Ulrich
[email protected]
UVSQ
COHEN
Monique
[email protected]
ENS CACHAN
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
TELECOM PARISTECH
SIBILLE
Alain
[email protected]
UEVE
BOSI
Stefano
[email protected]
ENSAE
RICHET
Arnaud
[email protected]
IOGS
GREFFET
Jean-Jacques
[email protected]
Telecom Sud Paris
DEFUDE
Bruno
[email protected]
INSERM
BOUYER
Jean
[email protected]
CEA
ETIENVRE
Anne-isabelle
[email protected]
INRA
MONNET
Véronique
[email protected]
IRT SYSTEM X
INRIA
BERTHOMIEUX
Gaelle
AUGER
Anne
[email protected]
[email protected]
ENSA-V
BOURSIN
Séverine
[email protected]
ESTACA
?
?
?
CNRS
SYSTEMATIC
?
?
?
?
?
?
SOLEIL
?
?
?
IHES
?
?
?
ONERA
?
?
?
Tenure holders
Name
Doctoral school
First name
e-mail
ED 2MIB
COLBEAU-JUSTIN
Christophe
[email protected]
ED A&A
PINEAU DES FORETS Guillaume
[email protected]
- 52 -
ED ABIES
PERY
Alexandre
[email protected]
ED BIOSIGNE
SCHUMACHER
Michael
[email protected]
ED CBMS
SCHLUMBERGER
Martin
[email protected]
ED EOBE
CASSAN
Eric
[email protected]
ED Interface
HACHE
Francois
[email protected]
ED ITFA
POUS
Christian
[email protected]
ED MH
PAULIN
Frederic
[email protected]
ED OM
GREFFET
Jean-Jacques
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
ED PIF
KHAN
MONTAMBAUX
Elias
Gilles
[email protected]
[email protected]
ED SDSV
CAPY
Pierre
[email protected]
ED SHS
ED SEIF
CHARREIRE PETIT
BOUSQUET
Sandra
Philippe
[email protected]
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
GOYEAU
Benoit
[email protected]
ED SP
BOUYER
Jean
[email protected]
ED SSMMH
LE-SCANFF
Christine
[email protected]
ED STIC
BIDOIT
Nicole
[email protected]
ED SDV
SHYKOFF
Jacqui
[email protected]
Potential alternates
Name
Doctoral school
First name
e-mail
ED 2MIB
ELIOT
Eric
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
FLOQUET
Sébastien
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
GAIGEOT
Marie-Pierre
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
GANDON
Vincent
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
ED A&A
ED ABIES
LEBOURLOT
VASSILEVA
Jacques
Irina
[email protected]
[email protected]
ED BIOSIGNE
NUSSE
Oliver
[email protected]
ED BIOSIGNE
VERNIER
Philippe
[email protected]
ED CBMS
LIPINSKI
Marc
[email protected]
ED CBMS
DAUTRY
François
[email protected]
ED EOBE
BOUCHOULE
Sophie
[email protected]
ED EOBE
CANVA
Michael
[email protected]
ED EOBE
DESSANTE
Philippe
[email protected]
ED EOBE
GINEFRI
Jean-Christophe
[email protected]
ED EOBE
MAZALEYRAT
Frédéric
[email protected]
ED Interface
DUMONT
Yves
[email protected]
ED Interface
FAY
Gilles
[email protected]
ED Interface
MOUSSEAU
Vincent
[email protected]
ED Interface
TAPUS
Adriana
[email protected]
ED ITFA
ONGERI
Sandrine
[email protected]
ED ITFA
VAN-TILBEURGH
Herman
[email protected]
ED MH
CERF
Raphaël
[email protected]
ED MH
DESOLNEUX
Agnès
[email protected]
ED MH
GIOVANGIGLI
Vincent
[email protected]
ED MH
JEAN
Frédéric
[email protected]
ED MH
LAGOUTIERE
Frédéric
[email protected]
ED MH
MOULINES
Erick
[email protected]
- 53 -
ED MH
SECHERRE
Vincent
[email protected]
ED OM
BENREDJEM
Djamel
[email protected]
ED OM
CHARRON
Eric
[email protected]
ED OM
PERFETTI
Luca
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
CAVALIER
Fabien
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
DELIOT
Frédéric
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
FLEURET
Frédéric
[email protected]
ED PIF
ED SDSV
BERROIR
GONNET
Jean-Marc
Florence
[email protected]
[email protected]
ED SDSV
MIGNOTTE
Bernard
[email protected]
ED SDSV
PERNODET
Jean-luc
[email protected]
ED SEIF
LETREUT
Hervé
[email protected]
ED SHS
ED SHS
DURAN
KEMPF
Patrice
Hubert
[email protected]
[email protected]
ED SHS
SAULNIER-CASSIA
Emmanuelle
[email protected]
ED SHS
DURAND
Jean-Pierre
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
HUBERT
Olivier
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
QUIDELLEUR
Xavier
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
MAITOURNAM
Habibou
[email protected]
ED SP
ANKRI
Joel
[email protected]
ED SP
BASTUJI-GARIN
Sylvie
[email protected]
ED SP
MEYER
Laurence
[email protected]
ED SSMMH
DRU
Vincent
[email protected]
ED SSMMH
DURING
Bertrand
[email protected]
ED STIC
BARTH
Dominique
[email protected]
ED STIC
KLAUDEL
Hanna
[email protected]
ED STIC
LAMNABHI-LAGARRIGUE
Françoise
[email protected]
ED STIC
SIBILLE
Alain
[email protected]
ED STIC
VILNAT
Anne
[email protected]
ED STIC
VAN DER HOEVEN
Joris
[email protected]
ED STIC
VEQUE
Véronique
[email protected]
ED SDV
DELARUE
Marianne
[email protected]
Elected doctoral candidates
Name
First name
email
Area
Institution
- 54 -
Permanent guests
Name
First name
e-mail
President
Directeur General of
the FCS
BLOCH
GIlles
[email protected]
CHAPPERT
DUFOURGERGAM
Claude
Elisabeth
[email protected]
[email protected]
Research
International
Relations
LEBOEUF
Patricio
[email protected]
HUSSON
Martine
[email protected]
Value creation
GOHAR
Pierre
[email protected]
Communication
ABASSE
Leya
[email protected]
Training
9.2.2 Monitoring and quality system committee
Doctoral school Name
First name
e-mail
ED 2MIB
RUELLO
Corinne
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
DELAHAYE
Véronique
[email protected]
ED A&A
Plancy
Jacqueline
[email protected]
ED ABIES
FIERS
Corinne
[email protected]
ED ABIES
CHEVALLIER
Odile
[email protected]
ED ABIES
PONSONNET
Sylvie
[email protected]
ED BIOSIGNE
SURDI
Laurent
[email protected]
ED CBMS
CYRILLE
Brigitte
[email protected]
ED EOBE
STEPHEN
Laurence
[email protected]
ED Interface
LEMARECHAL
Audrey
[email protected]
ED Interface
BARONNET
Fabrice
[email protected]
ED Interface
LHOPITAL
Catherine
[email protected]
ED Interface
SCAFARTO
Chrystelle
[email protected]
ED Interface
FULLENWARTH Emmanuel
[email protected]
ED ITFA
LANDRY
Lucie
[email protected]
ED MH
VERVISH
Valérie
[email protected]
ED MH
LAVIGNE
Valérie
[email protected]
ED OM
BASSET
Martine
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
LOEFFEL
Sylvie
[email protected]
ED PIF
HOARAU
Sabine
[email protected]
ED SDSV
DURET
Fanny
[email protected]
ED SDSV
FOURNIE
Véronique
[email protected]
ED SDSV
LE GUYADER
Rozenn
[email protected]
ED SDSV
LE BIHAN
Sandrine
[email protected]
ED SEIF
Touchon
Laurence
[email protected]
ED SHS
CHOMETTE
Maryse
[email protected]
ED SHS
DURET
Fanny
[email protected]
ED SHS
ROSE
Christine
[email protected]
ED SHS
FOURNIE
Véronique
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
ROSE
Christine
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
HO
Thi kim ngan
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
LHOPITAL
Catherine
[email protected]
- 55 -
ED SP
BOURGEOIS
Audrey
[email protected]
ED SSMMH
RICHOUX
Marie-Pierre
[email protected]
ED STIC
DRUETTA
Stéphanie
[email protected]
ED STIC
BATALIE
Anne
[email protected]
ED SDV
FOURNIER
Martine
[email protected]
To be completed (all the education assistants or from other services)
Name
LAVIGNE
First name
email
position
Institution
Valérie
[email protected]
Secretariat
department of
Mathematics of
Orsay
UPSud
9.2.3 Management of the quality system
Role
First name Name
e-mail
Institution
Management
Sylvie
POMMIER
[email protected]
Paris Saclay
quality axis
Sylvie
ROYER
[email protected]
UPSud
Secretariat
Cristina
PORLON
[email protected]
Paris Saclay
Quality consultant
Jean Loic
MONTAIGNE
[email protected]
UPSud (PAST)
Facilitation
Fabienne
GOLDFARB
[email protected]
UPSud
Facilitation
Sylvie
THIERY
[email protected]
UVSQ
Facilitation
Christine
DUVAUX PONTER
[email protected]
AGRO PARISTECH
Facilitation
Irina
VASSILEVA
[email protected]
AGRO PARISTECH
Facilitation
Valérie
LAVIGNE
valé[email protected]
UPSud
Facilitation
Matras
KADIATOU
[email protected]
FCS
Facilitation
Valérie
LAVIGNE
[email protected]
UPSud
9.2.4 Information system and digital work space
Role
First name Name
Management
Bruno
Secretariat
Cristina
Management
Sylvie
doctoral college
Director
of
information
François
systems
Facilitation
Nicole
Adum mentor
Audrey
Adum Mentor
Fabrice
e-mail
Institution
BOST
PORLON
[email protected]
[email protected]
UPSud
Paris Saclay
POMMIER
[email protected]
Paris Saclay
De
CASTELBAJAC
[email protected]
Paris Saclay
BIDOIT
LEMARECHAL
BARONNET
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
UPSud
Polytechnique
Polytechnique
9.2.5 Collective doctoral training
- 56 -
Role
Comanagement
of the axis
coManagement
Teaching
Assistance
Facilitation
Name
First name
e-mail
Institution
DAGUET
Marie
[email protected]
U-Psud
POMMIER
Sylvie
[email protected]
Paris Saclay
DON
Sandrine
[email protected]
U-PSud
KEBAILI
Nouari
[email protected]
U-Psud
Facilitation
THIERY
Sylvie
[email protected]
UVSQ
Facilitation
SIBILLE
Alain
[email protected]
ED STIC
Facilitation
ELIOT
Eric
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
Facilitation
VAN TILBEURGH
Herman
[email protected]
ED ITFA
Facilitation
VERVISH
Valérie
[email protected]
ED MH
Facilitation
DELIOT
Frédéric
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
Facilitation
CAHOUR
Béatrice
[email protected]
ED SHS
Facilitation
KLAUDEL
Hanna
[email protected]
ED STIC
Doctoral training operator
institutions
Ecole Polytechnique
Name
BARONNET
First name
Fabrice
e-mail
[email protected]
ENSTA ParisTech
CECCARELLI
Elena
[email protected]
U-PSUD
BOST
Bruno
[email protected]
AGRO PARISTECH
VASSILEVA
Irina
[email protected]
Centrale-Supelec
DOAN
Bich-Lien
[email protected]
HEC Paris
HEGE
Ulrich
[email protected]
UVSQ
DURET
Fanny
[email protected]
ENS CACHAN
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
TELECOM PARISTECH
BAZIZ
Marianna
[email protected]
UEVE
TORTAJADA
Jeanine
[email protected]
ENSAE
RICHET
Arnaud
[email protected]
IOGS
GREFFET
Jean-Jacques
[email protected]
TELECOM SUD PARIS
DEFUDE
Bruno
[email protected]
INSERM
BOUYER
Jean
[email protected]
CEA
ZIMMERMANN
Jean-Luc
[email protected]
INRA
IRT SYSTEM X
MONNET
BERTHOMIEUX
Véronique
Gaelle
[email protected]
[email protected]
To be completed (doctoral candidates or associations of doctors who are declared in the GTS)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
LEBASTARD
Laura
[email protected]
Doctorante
UPSUd
9.2.6 Professional life of the doctors, relationships with socio-economic groups
- 57 -
Quality
Name
First name
e-mail
Institution
Manager
Management
doctoral college
Teaching
assistant
Facilitation
BELUS
Alexandra
Ecole Polytechnique
POMMIER
Sylvie
[email protected]
[email protected]
PORLON
Cristina
[email protected]
Paris Saclay
SIBILLE
Alain
[email protected]
TELECOM PARISTECH
Facilitation
FIONI
Laura
[email protected]
Ecole Polytechnique
Facilitation
KEBAILI
Nouari
[email protected]
U-Psud
Doctoral
schools
ED 2MIB
Paris Saclay
Name
First name
e-mail
Institution
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
CNRS
ED ABIES
VASSILEVA
Irina
[email protected]
AGROPARISTECH
ED MH
VERVISH
Valérie
[email protected]
FCS-FMJH
ED OM
GREFFET
Jean-Jacques
[email protected]
IOGS
ED PHENIICS KHAN
Elias
[email protected]
UPSud
ED SHS
BOURSIER
Marie-Emma
[email protected]
UVSQ
ED SMEMAG
MAITOURNAM
Habibou
[email protected]
ENSTA
ED STIC
VEQUE
Véronique
[email protected]
UPSud
Corporation or
Name
partner
First name
e-mail
Title
MOVEO
LEVI-MILLER
Damaris
[email protected]
Management of the Skills
Plan on the Mov'eo area
SAFRAN TECH
SAFRAN
Université
SNCF
REY
PROVENDIER
AUBOURG
AKNIN
Christian
Get his new e-mail
Valérie
idem
ROCHE
?
Patrice
(see prog
RUE)
Scientific director
To be completed (doctoral candidates or doctoral associations that are declared in the GTs)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
9.2.7 Communication, facilitation, campus life
To be completed
Entity
First name
Name
e-mail
Management
Leya
ABASSE
[email protected]
- 58 -
Management
Sylvie
POMMIER
[email protected]
Secretariat
Cristina
PORLON
[email protected]
Facilitation
Anna
Da COSTA
[email protected]
Facilitation
Julie
BERNEDE
[email protected]
UVSQ
Fanny
DURET
[email protected]
UPSud
Brigitte
BOURDON
[email protected]
UPSud
Emmanuelle
LOUIS
[email protected]
ED 2MIB
Véronique
DELAHAYE
[email protected]
ED BIOSIGNES
Laurent
SURDI
[email protected]
ED CBMS
Brigitte
CYRILLE
[email protected]
ED MH
Aurélie
RENAULT
[email protected]
ED SP
Audrey
BOURGEOIS
[email protected]
ED STIC
GLAS
Isabelle
[email protected]
ED SDV
Fanny
DURET
[email protected]
To be completed (doctoral candidates or doctors associations that are declared in the GTs)
Name
First name
email
position
Institution
9.2.8 International
Operating as
Name
First name
e-mail
Manager of International axis
HUSSON
Martine
[email protected]
Management doctoral college
POMMIER
Sylvie
[email protected]
Doctoral college assistant
PORLON
Cristina
[email protected]
Persons responsible for examining the joint doctorate degree files in the registration operator
institutions
Registration operator
institutions
Ecole Polytechnique
Name
First name
e-mail
LEMARECHAL
Audrey
[email protected]
ENSTA ParisTech
BRANGER
Nathalie
[email protected]
U-PSUD
DREUX
Catherine
[email protected]
AGRO PARISTECH
VASSILEVA
Irina
[email protected]
CentraleSupelec
COPLO
Emmanuelle
[email protected]
HEC Paris
Dauvergne
Françoise
[email protected]
UVSQ
THIERY
Sylvie
[email protected]
ENS CACHAN
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
TELECOM PARISTECH
SIBILLE
Alain
[email protected]
UEVE
TORTAJADA
Jeanine
[email protected]
ENSAE
Richet
Arnaud
[email protected]
IOGS
Tourmente
Cathel
[email protected]
Telecom Sud Paris
Defude
Bruno
[email protected]
- 59 -
Persons responsible for international "joint doctoral degree" questions in the doctoral schools
Doctoral Schools
Name
First name
e-mail
ED 2MIB
LERAY
Isabelle
[email protected]
ED A&A
LEBOURLOT
Jacques
[email protected]
ED ABIES
VASSILEVA
Irina
[email protected]
ED BIOSIGNES
NÜSSE
Oliver
[email protected]
ED CBMS
SCHLUMBERGER
martin
[email protected]
ED EOBE
CASSAN
eric
[email protected]
ED Interface
HACHE
francois
[email protected]
ED ITFA
ONGERI
Sandrine
[email protected]
ED MH
VERVISH
Valerie
[email protected]
ED OM
GREFFET
Jean-Jacques
[email protected]
ED PHENIICS
KHAN
Elias
[email protected]
ED PIF
BERROIR
Jean-Marc
[email protected]
ED SDSV
CAPY
Pierre
[email protected]
ED SEIF
LETREUT
Hervé
[email protected]
ED SHS
RIBONI
Alessandro
[email protected]
ED SMEMAG
MAITOURNAM
Habibou
[email protected]
ED SP
BOUYER
Jean
[email protected]
ED SSMMH
LE-SCANFF
christine
[email protected]
ED STIC
VAN DER HOEVEN
Joris
[email protected]
ED SdV
SHYKOFF
Jacqui
[email protected]
Manager of international exchanges To be completed
Partners portfolio
Brazil: UFSC,
Recife ?? others to
be added
Brazil: USP, UnB,
UFABC, UFRJ,
Unicamp
Brazil
Spanish speaking
South America
(Mexico, Chili,
Argentina, etc.)
Algeria
Tunisia or Morocco??
Name
First name e-mail
Employer institution
Naviner
JeanFrançois
[email protected]
IMT/Télécom
Paristech
ABOU
KANDIL
Hisham
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
[email protected]
Paris Tech (special
case: contact in
Brazil, advice but
does not handle joint
doctoral degree
agreements)
BARBICHON
Claude
?
?
BENNACER
Rachid
DEFUDE
Bruno
Morocco
?
?
Israel
?
?
UVSQ ???
[email protected]
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
Telecom Sud Paris
If not Bruno
Defude?
Polytechnique or
central ???
Who?
- 60 -
Turkey
United Arab
Emirates, Saudi
Arabia
Sub-Sarahan Africa
Singapore: NUS and
NTU, SUTD
Vietnam, India,
South Korea
Japan
Germany: TUM.
Italy: PolytechnicoMilan.
China: university to
be specified??
China (universities to
be specified??),
United States,
Canada, Australia
Spanish speaking
South America
(Mexico, Chili,
Argentina)
Eastern Europe,
Russia, Ukraine
Northern Europe
(Norway, Sweden,
Denmark, Finland,
Estonia, Lithuania,
Latvia
Southern Europe
(Spain, Italy,
Portugal, Greece)
Switzerland,
Germany
Great Britain, Ireland
Europe (specify
area??? Marie
Curie)
Zone ??
9.3
?
Polytechnique? or
CNRS office?
Who?
?
DELACOURTCéline
GOLLAIN
[email protected]
UVSQ
?
?
FIORINA
Jocelyn
[email protected] Centrale Supelec
?
?
???
UPSud
NAKATANI
Keitaro
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
ZOLVER
Marc
[email protected]
Centrale Supelec
DREUX
Catherine
[email protected]
UPSud
?
?
BRANGER
Nathalie
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
JEAN-JOSEPH
GODAUX
UPSud
[email protected]
Ensta Paristech
Gwladys
[email protected]
Agro Paris tech
Marine
[email protected]
Agro Paris tech
Functions channeled in the institutions
9.3.1 Education services
Manager of education services (who have access to ADUM institution to be completed)
Name of the institution
Name
First name
e-mail
AGRO PARISTECH
FIERS
Corinne
[email protected]
- 61 -
AGRO PARISTECH
PONSONNET
Sylvie
[email protected]
AGRO PARISTECH
CHEVALLIER
Odile
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
ROSE
Christine
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
GARUS
Sophie
[email protected]
UVSQ
THIERY
Sylvie
[email protected]
Polytechnique
LEMARECHAL
Audrey
[email protected]
Telecom SudParis
GUY
Véronique
[email protected]
9.3.2 Library services
Position
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR
correspondent
STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR
correspondent
STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
STAR
correspondent
STEP
correspondent
STAR and STEP
correspondent
Training
Institution
Name, First Name
Email
yes
UPSud
Mireille BRENEL
[email protected]
yes
UVSQ
Laurine CHÂTEAU
[email protected]
yes
UVSQ
Fabienne Drugeon
[email protected]
UEVE
Maud SOVERINI
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
Carole CRESPIN FABRE
[email protected]
ENS Cachan
Sophie GARUS
[email protected]
ENSAE
Sylvie d'Argouges
[email protected]
Anne VIDAL
[email protected]
Corinne LE ROUX
[email protected]
Véronique GUY
[email protected]
Christine JOST
[email protected]
IOGS
Marie-Laure EDWARDS
[email protected]
CentraleSupelec
Mélanie CATT
[email protected]
ENSTA Paristech
Sophie CHOUAF
[email protected]
AGROPARISTECH Jonga Dequeant
[email protected]
HEC
Lydie TOURNAIRE
[email protected]
HEC
Françoise DAUVERGNE
[email protected]
Polytechnique
Denis ROURA
[email protected]
yes
TELECOM
PARISTECH
TELECOM
SUDPARIS
TELECOM
SUDPARIS
TELECOM
SUDPARIS

Monsieur Pierre-Jacques Henri

Transcription

Similar documents

Vaiva ZUZEVIČIŪTĖ, Ilona TANDZEGOLSKIENĖ

Literature Review in Research Preparation

Brochure CampusFrance étudier en France

the university of agricultural sciences and veterinary medicine

CARE main body - University of East Anglia

Serving with Honors - Department of Romance Language

TRANSFERABLE SKILLS IN DOCTORAL TRAINING

pdf-Dokument - Universität Bonn

Doctor of Education in Sports Management

Annual - Université Laval

08 - Rohrbasser - Electrophorese capillaire_projet PHARMELP