Noranda/Falconbridge Sistemas de Informação
Transcription
Noranda/Falconbridge Sistemas de Informação
Non-magmatic versus Magmatic Fluids in the Genesis of Archean and Palaeoproterozoic Iron Oxide-Copper-Gold Systems of the Carajás Mineral Province (Brazil) ROBERTO P. XAVIER, Institute of Geosciences – University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil Lena V. S. Monteiro, Institute of Geosciences – University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil Carolina P. N. Moreto, Gustavo H. C. Melo, Erika S. B. Santiago Institute of Geosciences – University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil THE CARAJÁS MINERAL PROVINCE Carajás Mineral Province ~200.000 km2 Equator São Luis Craton Amazon Craton Guianas Shield Parnaíba Basin Central Brazil Shield Paraná Basin São Francisco Craton Craton Luís Alves Craton Rio da Plata THE CARAJÁS DOMAIN Intrusions Three events: •2.76 – 2.74 Ga •2.57 Ga •1.88 Ga Carajás Basin ~ 2.64 Ga Aguas Claras Formation 2.76 – 2.73 Ga Itacaiunas Supergroup volcanosedimentary sequence Modified from: Vasquez et al. (2008) Basement rocks : orthogneiss (~3.07 Ga) + granulites + felsic Intrusions (2.99 Ga to 2.84 Ga) THE CARAJÁS DOMAIN Bacajá Domain (Paleoproterozoic) Cu Diversity of mineral systems Cu - Au SYSTEMS Iron Oxide – Copper – Gold (IOCG): Neoarchean 2.68 Ga – 2.71 Ga and 2.57 Ga Paleoproterozoic 1.88 Ga – 1.90 Ga Cu-Au (W – Sn – Mo - Bi): Paleoproterozoic 1.88 Ga CARAJÁS Cu – Au SYSTEMS Deposit Tonnage Grades IOCG deposits Salobo 994 Mt 0.94% Cu, 0.52 g/t Au Sossego 355 Mt 1.1% Cu, 0.28 g/t Au Cristalino +300 Mt 1% Cu, 0.3 g/t Au Igarapé Bahia/Alemão 219 Mt 1.4% Cu, 0.86 g/t Au Alvo 118 170 Mt 1% Cu, 0.3 g/t Au Gameleira 100 Mt 0.77% Cu Cu-Au (W-Sn-Mo-Bi) deposits Breves 50 Mt 1.22% Cu, 0.75 g/t Au Estrela 30 Mt 0.5% Cu The CMP contains the world’s largest known concentration of high - tonnage IOCG deposits Resources of Cu-Au ore is over 2 billion tonnes THE CARAJÁS DOMAIN Bacajá Domain (Paleoproterozoic) Cu Iron Oxide Cu - Au SYSTEMS Structurally controlled by regional-scale E–W and W–NWstriking shear zones. Host rocks: volcano-sedimentary units of the Itacaiúnas Supergroup (ca 2.73−2.76 Ga), mafic and felsic intrusions (ca 2.74 Ga) and basement granitoids (ca 3.0−2.83 Ga). NEOARCHEAN CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS 2.71-2.68 Ga and 2.56 Ga: Na, Ca-Na (Act-Ab), magnetite-rich bodies, replaced by K (Bt – FK) and/or chlorite alteration. Cu-Au ore: breccias; e.g., Sequeirinho, Bacaba, Bacuri, Visconde. Na alteration (Albite) Na-Ca alteration Ca alteration (Apatite+ (Albite+ Actinolite) Actinolite) Monteiro et al. (2008) Fe oxide (magnetite) stage Cu-Au (chalcopyrite) Sequeirinho deposit NEOARCHEAN CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS Basement Rocks (gneiss) Distal Na-Ca: ACTINOLITE, hastingsite, scapolite, allanite, chalcopyrite Iron silicate – enrichment: grunerite, turmaline, almandine K alteration = Biotite Cu-Au ore Salobo deposit Melo (2014) Post-ore alteration = K alteration (Kf + hematite) NEOARCHEAN CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS Salobo deposit Melo (2014) Ore forms lenticular bodies; no breccias Cu-Au mineralization is disseminated and in seams NEOARCHEAN CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS Igarapé Bahia/Alemão deposit Mafic dikes (diabasediorite) (~2.6 Ga) Basalts + BIFs (~2.75 Ga) Breccia: main ore host Clastic sedimentary rocks: arenite, siltite, argillite turbidites Águas Claras Formation (2.64 Ga): siliciclastic rocks Steeply – dipping (75o) ore breccia VALE (2000) NEOARCHEAN CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS Igarapé Bahia/Alemão deposit Mineralization: Magnetite + chalcopyrite + bornite ± cobaltite ± molybdenite ± Au ± U and REE minerals PALEOPROTEROZOIC CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS 1.90- 1.87 Ga: K-alteration and chlorite predominant, calcic (chl-ep-cc) and hydrolitic (ser-hem). Cu-Au ore: crackle breccias, veins; e.g., Sossego and Alvo 118. Monteiro et al. (2008) Sossego deposit CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS Different crustal levels: vertical zoning of hydrothermal alteration 1.90- 1.87 Ga: Shallow Ig. Bahia/ Alemão level IOCG systems emplaced after exhumation of the Neoarchean IOCG systems formed under brittle regime. Salobo 2.71-2.68 Ga: structuraIy- controlled, emplaced at deep levels. Monteiro et al. (2008), Xavier et al. (2012) CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS: fluid regimes Neoarchean IOCGs Paleoproterozoic IOCGs Torresi et al. (2012) Highly saline aqueous fluids (35 to 70 wt% NaCl eq.) Carvalho (2009) low salinity (< 6 wt% NaCl eq.) CO2-rich low to moderate salinity (5 up to 30 wt% NaCl eq.) aqueous fluid CARAJÁS IOCG SYSTEMS: fluid regimes Neoarchean Paleoproterozoic Sequeirinho deposit Paleoproterozoic Sossego deposit Neoarchean Pista deposit Involvement of multiple fluid types = mixing? Carvalho 2009; Torresi et al., 2012 ORIGIN OF IOCG ORE FLUIDS, METALS AND SULPHUR? Skirrow (2011) CARAJÁS IOCG FLUID SOURCES: Hydrogen and oxygen isotope compositions Deepseated/magmatic component Participation of externallyderived (nonmagmatic) fluids: Alvo 118 Meteoric? Seawater? Monteiro et al. (2008) Basinal? CARAJÁS IOCG FLUID SOURCES: boron isotopes Boron is predominantly of non-magmatic origin Lighter boron isotopes (-8 to 11‰) → light boron from felsic intrusive and volcanic host rocks. XAVIER et al. (2008) IGARAPÉ BAHIA VS. BREVES TOURMALINES: δ11B - δD COMPOSITIONS Igarapé Bahia = heavier than expected for magmatic-derived fluid Breves = mostly consistent with magma-derived brines XAVIER et al. (2013) δDH2O values calculated at 400°C using the tourmaline-H2O fractionation factor of Kotzer et al. (1993) CARAJÁS IOCG FLUIDS: Cl-Na-Br SYSTEMATICS Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic IOCGs: Paleoproterozoic Evaporative brines (bittern fluids) modified by fluid-rock reactions + magmatic fluid. Xavier et al (2009) CARAJÁS IOCG FLUID SOURCES: sulphur isotopes Paleoproterozoic Neoarchean Neoarchean Heavier sulphur than expected for a magmatic source Surface-derived meteoric fluids could have introduced SO42Thermochemical reduction of sulphate might then have produced isotopically heavy H2S Sulphur from leaching of igneous sulphides Monteiro et al. 2008; Pestilho 2011; Torresi et al. 2012 In Situ MULTIPLE SULPHUR ISOTOPE ANALYSES Salobo Sossego 1,2 5,6 3,4 10 9 19 18 17 16 15 7,8 13 14 1,2 3,4 5,6 9,10 7,8 CAMECA IMS 1280 ion microprobe – UWA (Australia) Sossego mantle SULPHUR ISOTOPES AND THE MIF FACTOR Neoarchean Neoarchean Neoarchean Paleoproterozoic mantle Santiago et al. in prep. Neoarchean IOCGs non-zero Δ33S V-CDT values mass independent fractionation (MIF) = sulphur of the exogenic sulphur cycle. Paleoproterozoic IOCGs also show mass independent fractionation (MIF) inherited from Archean sulphur. CONCLUDING REMARKS Carajás IOCGs have formed by multiple episodes of fluid circulation and hydrothermal alteration in the Neoarchean (2.71–2.68 Ga and 2.56 Ga) and Palaeoproterozoic (1.90– 1.87 Ga). Neoarchean IOCGs tend to be deeper systems than the Palaeoproterozoic IOCGs. Neoarchean IOCG mineralisation (2.71–2.68 Ga and 2.56 Ga) show no overlap in time with any significant magmatism recorded in Carajás. Neoarchean IOCGs: closure of the Carajás Basin and deep-seated circulation of non-magmatic brines, metal leaching from the country rocks and Cu-Au mineralisation along regional structures via fluid mixing (e.g., meteoric, magmatic). CONCLUDING REMARKS Palaeoproterozoic deposits (1.90–1.87 Ga) display a temporal link with 1.88 Ga A-type granite magmatism. Paleoproterozoic IOCGs: 1.88 Ga A-type granitic magmatism could have acted as source of heat to move and mix non-magmatic brines with other fluid types (e.g. magmatic, meteoric). High T & high salinity enhance metal transport presence of evaporites is one of the key elements in well endowed provinces. Mixing of different fluid sources is a critical attribute to the genesis of the IOCG systems worldwide.
Similar documents
A Comparison of Fluid Origins and Compositions in Iron Oxide
Significance to IOCG deposits Did we analyze the wrong brines in all of the Carajas deposits? How about Ernest Henry, Osborne, SWAN and Eloise? Are ore fluids that form IOCGs less Cu-rich than o...
More information