view this paper - ICADTS International Council on Alcohol, Drugs
Transcription
view this paper - ICADTS International Council on Alcohol, Drugs
Containers for Breath Samples for Alcohol Analysis W. KALOW, G. H. W. LUCAS and J. D. McCOLL Department of Pharmacology, This communication is concerned w ith an experience gained during the recent study in Toronto on Alcohol and Road Traffic, which involved the collection and the analysis for alcohol of approxim ately 2,500 breath samples taken from drivers of m otor cars. Since roughly 80% of th e samples w ere furnished voluntarily on the request of a Police Officer by drivers not involved in th a t accident (“nonaccident drivers”) b u t stopped at random near the scene of the motor car accident in question, the method of sampling was devised to minimize any inconvenience to “non-accident d riv ers” and to provide adequate protection against the loss of alcohol from the breath sample container. Since breath samples w ere to be collected from four or more “non accident drivers” for each “accident d riv er”, it was im perative to collect samples quickly; furtherm ore, it is evident th a t o n -the-spot analysis of so m any samples was impractical. The procedure adopted was to collect all breath samples as quickly as pos sible a t the scene of the accident, to num ber and record them, and to re tu rn them to the laboratory for analysis in a H arger D runkom eter or a G reenberg Alcometer. A few experim ents w ere conducted w ith ru b b er balloons as containers University of Toronto for gas samples containing alcohol vapour introduced by bubbling air at room tem perature through a solu tion of know n alcohol content. These experim ents soon proved th a t the loss of alcohol was so rapid from - the ru b b er bags as to ren d er them useless for the procedure as planned. A fter o n e-q u arter of an hour only one-half of the original concentration rem ained, w hether the sample was high or low in alcohol. Following sim ilar trials w ith other containers made from other materials, it became apparent th a t the loss of alcohol from gas samples enclosed in polyethylene bags was sufficiently low as to ren d er these suitable containers. Consequently such bags w ere employed for breath samples. *Polyethylene bags are sold in large quantities as containers for vegetables, meats, etc. They are thus cheap and in regular supply. The bags used w ere 5" x 3Vi" x 12%". The open end of the bag was folded around a plastic m outhpiece and affixed to it w ith a small ru bber band. The m outh piece was of plexiglas which could be sterilized and could be stoppered by a small cork. The bags th u s p re pared would hold about two litres of air. ^Supplied by Haugh-Gordon Ltd., 1162 D upont St., Toronto 4. 137 We tested these containers for vary ing tim e intervals up to 3 hours and 40 m inutes w ith initial alcohol con centrations corresponding to blood levels of 0.06, 0.09 and 0.10%. The ra te of loss of alcohol from these containers was such th a t approxi m ately one-half of the original am ount rem ained a t the end of four hours. F u rth e r investigations are being made on these containers to determ ine more specifically the loss of alcohol per hour from gaseous m ixtures. These bags w ere easy to inflate and w ere not under pressure w hen filled, a condition which minimized the loss of gases from them . It was necessary, however, since the gas was not under pressure, to feed samples from them into th e H arger D runkom eter by use of a vacuum pum p device. This con sisted of a w ater suction pum p fu r nished w ith a piece of ru b b e r tubing which was attached to the low er end of th e volum etric cylinder; a glass T-piece was inserted into this rubber tube, th e open end of which was fitted w ith a short piece of rubber tubing th a t could be closed by a screw clamp, thus perm itting a fine regulation of the vacuum . Samples for analysis in the G reenberg Alcom eter could be forced into the Alcom eter by squeezing th e bag. It is w orthy of m ention th a t this vacuum system was used to advantage in adjusting the gasometers quickly for a subsequent analysis. The resu lt of this investigation showed th a t the loss of alcohol vapour from ru b b er balloons can interfere seriously w ith alcohol tests unless the ru b b er balloons ax*e tested im m e diately after th e sampling. A test in the H arger D runkom eter can be con 138 ducted in two ways; the decolorization of perm anganate is correlated either w ith a volume of air or w ith an am ount of carbon dioxide. It m ust be pointed out th a t all our tests were based on th e correlation w ith a volume of air. No attem pt has been made in this study to learn w hether or not the loss of alcohol would interfere w ith a test based on a simultaneous determ ination of carbon dioxide. W hile polyethylene bags w ere used to advantage, it is not alleged that they make the best containers for b reath samples; fu rth er research may discover m aterials th a t are more suitable for containers.