Agricultural Expansion and Specialisation in Roman Britain: a multi
Transcription
Agricultural Expansion and Specialisation in Roman Britain: a multi
The Rural Settlement of Roman Britain Agricultural Expansion and Specialisation in Roman Britain: a multi-scaled approach to a complex phenomenon Martyn Allen University of Reading Agricultural expansion and specialisation Intensive farming regimes • Aim to increase output per area of land through: • increased labour • and/or adoption of technology • increased selectivity http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Florida_chicken_house.jpg Extensive farming regimes • Aim to increase output per capita through: • increased area of land • but without associated increase in labour or the adoption of technology http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/AGPC/doc/Counprof/montenegro/montenegro.htm Van der Veen and O’Connor (1998) Historical sources and agricultural expansion in Roman Britain • Evidence for expansion in Britain has traditionally been taken from classical sources • A burgeoning late Roman woollen industry is commonly cited http://factsanddetails.com/media/2/20120228 -pastore%20pavimento_della_basilica.jpg “The Studer was bred essentially for wool, and was the source of the extensive Romano-British wool industry in the later Roman period.” (Applebaum 1958, Agr. Hist. Rev. VI) • Diocletian’s Price Edict depicts two woollen products: Birrus Britannicus (a hooded woollen cloak) Tepete Britannicum (a woollen household rug) Big data and meaningful interpretation: Zooarchaeological synthesis and Roman Britain Military sites Urban centres Nucleated settlements Villas Rural settlements Iron Age sites • • Tends exist though considerable variation exists within the dataset How can these data help us understand economic structures and cultural landscapes? Variation in relative frequencies of domestic livestock from Roman-period sites in Britain (from King 1999, 179) Livestock husbandry http://www.earthtimes.org/newsimage/pigs130115.jpg Animal bone preservation and recovery distribution UK topsoil acidity (pH) data National trends in livestock frequency through time 60.0 Mean percentage 50.0 • Relative frequency of cattle and sheep/goats remains similar from the late Iron Age until the 2ndC AD • Cattle remains become significantly more common from the 2ndC AD through to the 4thC AD 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) ER (1st-2ndC AD) MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC AD) AD) cattle >100NISP cattle >200NISP cattle >400NISP ovicaprid >100NISP ovicaprid >200NISP ovicaprid >400NISP pig >100NISP pig >200NISP pig >400NISP No. assemblages >100 NISP = 689 No. assemblages >200 NISP = 516 No. assemblages >400 NISP = 334 © Ros Lorimer National trends in livestock frequency through time Mean percentage 60 70 Enclosed farms (n=118) 60 Mean percentage 70 50 40 30 20 50 40 30 20 10 10 0 0 LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1st C ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC mid 1stC AD) BC/AD) AD) AD) AD) LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1stC ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC mid 1stC AD) BC/AD) AD) AD) AD) 70 70 Complex farms (n=118) 50 60 Mean percentage Mean percentage 60 Roadside settlements (n=104) 40 30 20 10 Villas (n=66) 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1stC ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC mid 1stC AD) BC/AD) AD) AD) AD) LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1stC ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC mid 1stC AD) BC/AD) AD) AD) AD) Proportions of animal bone recovered by area of excavation from different site types 3.0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 villa sites 15 no. sites no. sites 20 10 5 0 roadside settlements no. sites no. sites bone density value: log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 bone density value: log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha) 10 2 1 field systems 8 no. sites no. sites vici settlements 3 complex farms 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 bone density value: log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha) 4 enclosed farms 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 bone density value: log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 3.0 6 4 2 0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 bone density value: log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha) 0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 bone density value: log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha) Evidence for increased movement of livestock Site of Owslebury, Hampshire (Collis 1970), produced a bone density value of 4.4 – the greatest of all farm sites • • Variation in cattle strontium values from Owslebury by phase (Minniti et al. 2014) Cattle introduced to the settlement from an increasing range of geographic sources over time Evidence for increasingly complex network of long distance trade and exchange in Roman Britain Regional variation in the relative frequencies of primary livestock Northern England (n=8) North-East (n=81) East Anglia (n=96) West Midlands (n=9) Central Belt (n=436) South (n=252) Wales and South-West (n=10) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Variation in major livestock frequencies on different settlement types in the central belt region Enclosed farms 30 cattle 25 ovicaprid 20 15 10 5 number of assemblages n=56 number of assemblages n=54 30 25 15 10 5 relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) Complex farms 30 cattle ovicaprid 20 15 10 5 number of assemblages n=44 number of assemblages n=96 ovicaprid 20 relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) 25 cattle 0 0 30 Nucleated settlements 25 Villa settlements cattle ovicaprid 20 15 10 5 0 0 relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) Variation in major livestock frequencies on different settlement types in the southern region Enclosed farms Nucleated settlements 18 16 cattle 14 ovicaprid 12 10 8 6 4 2 number of assemblages n=56 number of assemblages n=54 18 12 10 8 6 4 2 relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) Complex farms 18 16 cattle 14 ovicaprid 12 10 8 6 4 2 number of assemblages n=37 number of assemblages n=26 ovicaprid 14 0 0 18 cattle 16 16 14 Villa settlements cattle ovicaprid 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig) Evidence for livestock production and breeding in the Central Belt and South regions percentage of assemblages percentage of assemblages 40.0 Central belt sites 30.0 neonatal cattle neonatal ovicaprid 20.0 neonatal pig immature equid 10.0 immature chicken 0.0 villas (n=44) complex farms enclosed farms roadside sett. (n=96) (n=54) (n=56) 40.0 South sites 30.0 neonatal cattle neonatal ovicaprid 20.0 neonatal pig immature equid 10.0 immature chicken 0.0 villas (n=37) complex farms enclosed farms roadside sett. (n=26) (n=54) (n=40) Regional trends in cattle slaughter through time Central Belt sites % mandible specimens 100.0 LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=23 LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=32 ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=22 MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=26 LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=39 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 neonatal juvenile immature sub-adult Southern sites % mandible specimens 100.0 adult elderly LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=13 LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=15 ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=21 MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=14 LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=24 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 neonatal • • • juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly Iron Age pattern includes numerous sites with a high kill-off of immature cattle Roman period sites rarely demonstrate a high kill-off of immature cattle Middle and Late Roman sites more commonly produce higher frequencies of adult and elderly cattle % mandible specimens 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % mandible specimens 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % mandible specimens Variation and specialisation in cattle husbandry 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arkell's Land (Roman) Prestatyn (Roman) Droitwich, Old Bowling Green (3rd-4thC AD) Dalton Parlours (3rd-4thC AD) Wilcote (3rd-4thC AD) South of Tunbridge lane, Bottisham (3rd-4thC AD) Shiptonthorpe (3rd-4thC AD) Watergate, West Marden (3rd-4thC AD) Birdlip Quarry (3rd-4thC AD) Batten Hanger, West Dean (3rd-4thC AD) neonate juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly Brighton Hill South, Sites B/C and K (1st C BC/AD) Heybridge, Elms Farm (1st C BC/AD) Winnall Down/Easton Lane (1st C BC/AD) Heybridge, Elms Farm (1st-2ndC AD) The Ditches, North Cerney (1st C BC/AD) Hacheston (3rd-4thC AD) Braintree, excavations 1984-90 (Roman) Camp Ground, Colne Fen, Earith (2nd-3rdC AD) Gorhambury (1st-2ndC AD) Nazeingbury (1st C BC/AD) neonate juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly Marston Park, Marston Moretaine (LIA) Icklingham, West Stow (LIA) Bancroft villa (Roman) Stanion Roman Villa (1st-2ndC AD) Wilcote (1st-2ndC AD) Higham Ferrers OA (3rd-4thC AD) Marston Park, Marston Moretaine (1st-2ndC AD) Cotswold Community (2nd-3rdC AD) Meppershall Roman Wattle Syke LR (3rd-4thC AD) neonate juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly minimum sample = 20 specimens National trends in sheep/goat slaughter through time Central Belt sites % mandible specimens 100.0 LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=26 LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=33 ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=21 MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=25 LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=38 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 neonatal juvenile immature sub-adult 100.0 adult elderly LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=15 Southern sites % mandible specimens LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=17 ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=21 80.0 MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=14 LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=28 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 neonatal • • • juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly Kill-off pattern for sheep/goat remain remarkably uniform throughout all phases No trend towards greater frequencies of adult/elderly sheep Little evidence for widespread wool industry in later period - is specialisation in sheep husbandry site specific? % mandible specimens 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % mandible specimens 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % mandible specimens Variation and specialisation in sheep/goat husbandry 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Dunkirt Barn, Abbotts Ann (3rd-4thC AD) Neigh Bridge, Somerford Keynes (2nd-3rdC AD) Monkton (2nd-3rdC AD) Wattle Syke (1st-2ndC AD) Tolpuddle Ball (1st C BC/AD) Springhead, roadside settlement (2nd-3rdC AD) Springhead, roadside settlement (1st-2ndC AD) Manor Farm, Humberstone (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) Fishbourne Palace (1st-2ndC AD) Camp Ground, Colne Fen, Earith (2nd-3rdC AD) neonate juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly Grandford, March (Roman) Thruxton (3rd-4thC AD) Shepton Mallet, Fosse lane (Roman) Batten Hanger, West Dean (3rd-4thC AD) Shepton Mallet, Cannards Grave (Roman) Birdlip Quarry (3rd-4thC AD) Birdlip Quarry (2nd-3rdC AD) Row of Ashes Farm, Butcombe (1st C BC/AD) Sparsholt Roman villa (3rd-4thC AD) Braintree, excavations 1984-90 (Roman) neonate juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly Higham Ferrers OA (2nd-3rdC AD) Poundbury Farm (Roman) Great Dunmow (Roman) Higham Ferrers OA (3rd-4thC AD) Springhead, 1994 pipeline (1st-2ndC AD) Heybridge, Elms Farm (1st-2ndC AD) Barton Court Farm (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) Dalton Parlours (3rd-4thC AD) Suddern Farm, Middle Wallop (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) Grateley South, Grateley (1st-2ndC AD) neonate juvenile immature sub-adult adult elderly minimum sample = 20 specimens Arable expansion http://www.picklescott.org.uk/Pitchford1.jpg percentage of sites with corndriers Corndrying structures and arable farming 30.0 25.0 20.0 ‘simple’ Old Sleaford, Lincs. (Elsdon 1997) 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 2ndC AD (n=112) 3rdC AD (n=186) 4thC AD (n=171) villa complex farm enclosed farm nucleated settlement T-shaped and variants Leadenham Quarry, Lincs. (WYAS 2001) http://exarc.net/files/styles/large/pu blic/Fig.9%20Fox%20farm0001.jpg?w idth=600&height=750&iframe=true Reconstruction of a corndrying superstructure from Foxholes Farm, Hertfordshire circular ‘drying floors’ Great Casterton Villa, Rutland (Corder 1951) Later Roman corndryers inserted into existing structures Fishbourne Harbour, W. Sussex (Rudkin 1986) Halstock, Dorset (Lucas 1993) Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Late 1st century AD 17 sites Very few examples potentially date back to the end of the 1st C AD Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Early 2nd century AD 86 sites 2nd C AD increase in sites with corndrier with focus on Fens and Cotswolds Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Late 2nd century AD 115 sites 2nd C AD increase in sites with corndrier with focus on Fens and Cotswolds Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Early 3rd century AD 138 sites 3rd C AD sees the most widespread distribution of sites with corndriers Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Late 3rd century AD 153 sites 3rd C AD sees the most widespread distribution of sites with corndriers Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Early 4th century AD 175 sites Early 4th C AD sees a peak in the number of sites with corndriers, but the beginning of a contraction in their distribution Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Distribution and relative density of sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers Late 4th century AD 145 sites By the late 4th C AD, the distribution of sites is weighted towards the Hampshire downland and the upper Thames valley Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html Diversification in arable processing output • Arable processing buildings at southern end of farm at Grateley South • Archaeobotanical samples from three corndryers were predominantly hulled spelt wheat with very little barley • Another included quantities of sprouted grain from left hand flue and very few from the right • Spatial variation indicates that the corndriers were multifunction, i.e. one flue producing grain for ale (malting) and others for flour (grinding) 4thC AD phase Grateley South, Hampshire (Cunliffe and Poole 2008) Production of beer for market: Northfleet, Kent Schematic view of 4thC AD villa complex at Northfleet, Kent, depicting malting oven, granary, and quayside evidence (Andrews et al. 2011, 223) 4thC AD malting oven at Northfleet villa, Kent (Andrews et al. 2011, 185) Evidence for malting and brewing • Cereal grains allowed to germinate and then dried to halt germination, readying the grain for fermentation • 174 sites with a combination of archaeobotanical alongside associated structural remains found • 101 sites with evidence for parched and germinated grain but without structural features: possibly malting waste, spoilt grain, or livestock fodder 60 structural and archaeobotanical evidence for malting 50 possible archaeobotanical evidence for malting No. sites 40 30 20 10 0 1stC AD 2ndC AD 3rdC AD 4thC AD Horticulture and cash crops http://www.peoi.net/Courses/Coursesen/socfwk/Resources/barkan-fig05_x004.jpg Sites with evidence for bedding/horticultural trenches 16 14 12 No. sites 10 8 6 4 2 0 • Apparent 2ndC AD peak in number of sites with horticultural beds • Parallel gullies dug for horticultural production • Environmental assemblages are of variable use - lack of waterlogged samples Early Roman changes in land-use: the Nene Valley and Cambridgeshire fens Water Newton Godmanchester Irchester Land adjacent to Oundle Road, Peterborough Business Park (Mackay 2002) Vineyards in the Nene Valley 14 12 No. sites 10 Environmental evidence from sites with horticultural trenches • Wollaston I, Northamptonshire (Brown et al. 2001) • Evidence for extensive area of regularly-spaced trenches and post-holes in raised beds for support (2nd-3rdC AD) • Pollen samples indicate the presence of grape • Lack of agricultural tools or wine-press equipment 8 6 4 2 0 *Grape Vitis vinifera pollen http://www.vinetowinecircle.com/wp-content/gallery/engenetica-the-presence-of-ancient-vitis-silvestris-cultivars-iniberia/fig10.jpg Flax cultivation? • • • • 89 sites with evidence for flax Greatest density of sites with flax remains in the central belt, less numbers on the south coast, in the midlands and north-east Flax cultivation suited to rotation with cereals or legumes Difficult to identify cultivation – context – frequency of remains 25 20 no. sites 15 10 5 0 Flax processing evidence Old Shifford Farm, Standlake Site M., Oxon • Pits produced a few waterlogged flax seeds and numerous flax capsules in the lowest, silted deposits – waste from retting? Possible flax-retting pits http://homepage.ntlworld.com/sean_quinn/cdun/knock.jpg Early 20th century flax retting Regional land-use patterns: continuity and change http://www.lucideastafrica.org/images/kenya_tanzania.jpg Chalk downland and enclosed settlement Cunliffe and Poole 2008 Collis 1970 Cunliffe and Poole 2000 South chalk downland – continuity of enclosures and investment in farms Perry 1986 Cunliffe and Poole 2008 Cunliffe and Poole 2008 Mockbeggar Lane (Cotswold Archaeology 2001) 250m Later Roman arable strip fields in the chalk downland river valleys East Anton (Leucomagus?), Hampshire Excavation at periphery of roadside settlement revealed enclosure system and up to 12 corn-drying ovens Firth 2011 Middle Thames valley: from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields Brentford Staines Ashford Prison, Spelthorne (Carew et al. 2006) Middle Thames valley: from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields Brentford Staines Roman complex settlement (laid out 1stC AD?) Hengrove Farm, Staines (Poulton 2007) Middle Thames valley: from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields late Iron Age/early Roman settlement and co-axial field-system Brentford Staines Perry Oaks/Heathrow Terminal 5 (Lewis and Smith 2010) Middle Thames valley: from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields Brentford Staines Kingsmead Quarry, Horton (Chaffrey 2009) Specialist farming and agricultural expansion: a multi-scaled approach? • The historical sources are a poor and one-sided indicator of agricultural practices in Roman Britain, and are not equipped to deal with the regional and socioeconomic variation • Farming communities must have dealt with and negotiated numerous factors which impacted on their farming decisions (social, political, etc.) • Decisions on agricultural practice are restricted by availability of local land and labour, and by the social position of farmers • Land-use patterns suggest major intra-regional variations occurred • Zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical data demonstrate that patterns of specialist activity and expansive regimes were socially, chronologically and regionally varied • Increasing cattle frequencies and shifting slaughter patterns may be more reflective of a widespread social change, than they are of local economic choices