Agricultural Expansion and Specialisation in Roman Britain: a multi

Transcription

Agricultural Expansion and Specialisation in Roman Britain: a multi
The Rural Settlement of Roman Britain
Agricultural Expansion and Specialisation
in Roman Britain:
a multi-scaled approach to a complex
phenomenon
Martyn Allen
University of Reading
Agricultural expansion and specialisation
Intensive farming regimes
• Aim to increase output per area of land
through:
• increased labour
• and/or adoption of technology
• increased selectivity
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Florida_chicken_house.jpg
Extensive farming regimes
• Aim to increase output per capita through:
• increased area of land
• but without associated increase in
labour or the adoption of technology
http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/AGPC/doc/Counprof/montenegro/montenegro.htm
Van der Veen and O’Connor (1998)
Historical sources and agricultural expansion in
Roman Britain
• Evidence for expansion in Britain has
traditionally been taken from classical
sources
• A burgeoning late Roman woollen
industry is commonly cited
http://factsanddetails.com/media/2/20120228
-pastore%20pavimento_della_basilica.jpg
“The Studer was bred essentially for wool, and
was the source of the extensive Romano-British
wool industry in the later Roman period.”
(Applebaum 1958, Agr. Hist. Rev. VI)
• Diocletian’s Price Edict depicts two
woollen products:
 Birrus Britannicus (a hooded
woollen cloak)
 Tepete Britannicum (a woollen
household rug)
Big data and meaningful interpretation:
Zooarchaeological synthesis and Roman Britain
Military sites
Urban centres
Nucleated
settlements
Villas
Rural settlements
Iron Age sites
•
•
Tends exist though considerable variation
exists within the dataset
How can these data help us understand
economic structures and cultural landscapes?
Variation in relative frequencies of domestic livestock from
Roman-period sites in Britain (from King 1999, 179)
Livestock husbandry
http://www.earthtimes.org/newsimage/pigs130115.jpg
Animal bone preservation and recovery distribution
UK topsoil acidity (pH) data
National trends in livestock frequency through time
60.0
Mean percentage
50.0
•
Relative frequency of cattle and
sheep/goats remains similar from
the late Iron Age until the 2ndC AD
•
Cattle remains become significantly
more common from the 2ndC AD
through to the 4thC AD
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
LIA (1st C BC-mid
1st C AD)
LIA/ER (1st C
BC/AD)
ER (1st-2ndC AD) MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC AD)
AD)
cattle >100NISP
cattle >200NISP
cattle >400NISP
ovicaprid >100NISP
ovicaprid >200NISP
ovicaprid >400NISP
pig >100NISP
pig >200NISP
pig >400NISP
No. assemblages >100 NISP = 689
No. assemblages >200 NISP = 516
No. assemblages >400 NISP = 334
© Ros Lorimer
National trends in livestock frequency through time
Mean percentage
60
70
Enclosed farms (n=118)
60
Mean percentage
70
50
40
30
20
50
40
30
20
10
10
0
0
LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1st C ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC
mid 1stC AD)
BC/AD)
AD)
AD)
AD)
LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1stC ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC
mid 1stC AD)
BC/AD)
AD)
AD)
AD)
70
70
Complex farms (n=118)
50
60
Mean percentage
Mean percentage
60
Roadside settlements (n=104)
40
30
20
10
Villas (n=66)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1stC ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC
mid 1stC AD)
BC/AD)
AD)
AD)
AD)
LIA (1stC BC- LIA/ER (1stC ER (1st-2ndC MR (2nd-3rdC LR (3rd-4thC
mid 1stC AD)
BC/AD)
AD)
AD)
AD)
Proportions of animal bone recovered by area of
excavation from different site types
3.0
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
villa sites
15
no. sites
no. sites
20
10
5
0
roadside settlements
no. sites
no. sites
bone density value:
log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
bone density value:
log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha)
10
2
1
field systems
8
no. sites
no. sites
vici settlements
3
complex farms
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
bone density value:
log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha)
4
enclosed farms
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
bone density value:
log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha)
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
3.0
6
4
2
0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
bone density value:
log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha)
0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
bone density value:
log10(no. bones / area excavation/ha)
Evidence for increased movement of livestock
Site of Owslebury, Hampshire (Collis 1970), produced a
bone density value of 4.4 – the greatest of all farm sites
•
•
Variation in cattle strontium values from
Owslebury by phase (Minniti et al. 2014)
Cattle introduced to the settlement from an increasing range
of geographic sources over time
Evidence for increasingly complex network of long distance
trade and exchange in Roman Britain
Regional variation in the relative
frequencies of primary livestock
Northern England (n=8)
North-East (n=81)
East Anglia (n=96)
West Midlands (n=9)
Central Belt (n=436)
South (n=252)
Wales and South-West (n=10)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Variation in major livestock frequencies on
different settlement types in the central belt region
Enclosed farms
30
cattle
25
ovicaprid
20
15
10
5
number of assemblages n=56
number of assemblages n=54
30
25
15
10
5
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
Complex farms
30
cattle
ovicaprid
20
15
10
5
number of assemblages n=44
number of assemblages n=96
ovicaprid
20
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
25
cattle
0
0
30
Nucleated settlements
25
Villa settlements
cattle
ovicaprid
20
15
10
5
0
0
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
Variation in major livestock frequencies on
different settlement types in the southern region
Enclosed farms
Nucleated settlements
18
16
cattle
14
ovicaprid
12
10
8
6
4
2
number of assemblages n=56
number of assemblages n=54
18
12
10
8
6
4
2
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
Complex farms
18
16
cattle
14
ovicaprid
12
10
8
6
4
2
number of assemblages n=37
number of assemblages n=26
ovicaprid
14
0
0
18
cattle
16
16
14
Villa settlements
cattle
ovicaprid
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
relative frequency of major livestock (cattle, ovicaprid and pig)
Evidence for livestock production and breeding in the
Central Belt and South regions
percentage of assemblages
percentage of assemblages
40.0
Central belt sites
30.0
neonatal cattle
neonatal ovicaprid
20.0
neonatal pig
immature equid
10.0
immature chicken
0.0
villas (n=44)
complex farms enclosed farms roadside sett.
(n=96)
(n=54)
(n=56)
40.0
South sites
30.0
neonatal cattle
neonatal ovicaprid
20.0
neonatal pig
immature equid
10.0
immature chicken
0.0
villas (n=37)
complex farms enclosed farms roadside sett.
(n=26)
(n=54)
(n=40)
Regional trends in cattle slaughter through time
Central Belt sites
% mandible specimens
100.0
LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=23
LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=32
ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=22
MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=26
LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=39
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
neonatal
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
Southern sites
% mandible specimens
100.0
adult
elderly
LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=13
LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=15
ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=21
MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=14
LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=24
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
neonatal
•
•
•
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
Iron Age pattern includes numerous sites with a high kill-off of immature cattle
Roman period sites rarely demonstrate a high kill-off of immature cattle
Middle and Late Roman sites more commonly produce higher frequencies of adult and elderly cattle
% mandible specimens
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
% mandible specimens
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
% mandible specimens
Variation and specialisation in cattle husbandry
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Arkell's Land (Roman)
Prestatyn (Roman)
Droitwich, Old Bowling Green (3rd-4thC AD)
Dalton Parlours (3rd-4thC AD)
Wilcote (3rd-4thC AD)
South of Tunbridge lane, Bottisham (3rd-4thC AD)
Shiptonthorpe (3rd-4thC AD)
Watergate, West Marden (3rd-4thC AD)
Birdlip Quarry (3rd-4thC AD)
Batten Hanger, West Dean (3rd-4thC AD)
neonate
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
Brighton Hill South, Sites B/C and K (1st C BC/AD)
Heybridge, Elms Farm (1st C BC/AD)
Winnall Down/Easton Lane (1st C BC/AD)
Heybridge, Elms Farm (1st-2ndC AD)
The Ditches, North Cerney (1st C BC/AD)
Hacheston (3rd-4thC AD)
Braintree, excavations 1984-90 (Roman)
Camp Ground, Colne Fen, Earith (2nd-3rdC AD)
Gorhambury (1st-2ndC AD)
Nazeingbury (1st C BC/AD)
neonate
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
Marston Park, Marston Moretaine (LIA)
Icklingham, West Stow (LIA)
Bancroft villa (Roman)
Stanion Roman Villa (1st-2ndC AD)
Wilcote (1st-2ndC AD)
Higham Ferrers OA (3rd-4thC AD)
Marston Park, Marston Moretaine (1st-2ndC AD)
Cotswold Community (2nd-3rdC AD)
Meppershall Roman
Wattle Syke LR (3rd-4thC AD)
neonate
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
minimum sample = 20 specimens
National trends in sheep/goat slaughter through time
Central Belt sites
% mandible specimens
100.0
LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=26
LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=33
ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=21
MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=25
LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=38
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
neonatal
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
100.0
adult
elderly
LIA (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD) n=15
Southern sites
% mandible specimens
LIA/ER (1st C BC/AD) n=17
ER (1st-2ndC AD) n=21
80.0
MR (2nd-3rdC AD) n=14
LR (3rd-4thC AD) n=28
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
neonatal
•
•
•
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
Kill-off pattern for sheep/goat remain remarkably uniform throughout all phases
No trend towards greater frequencies of adult/elderly sheep
Little evidence for widespread wool industry in later period - is specialisation in sheep husbandry site specific?
% mandible specimens
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
% mandible specimens
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
% mandible specimens
Variation and specialisation in sheep/goat husbandry
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dunkirt Barn, Abbotts Ann (3rd-4thC AD)
Neigh Bridge, Somerford Keynes (2nd-3rdC AD)
Monkton (2nd-3rdC AD)
Wattle Syke (1st-2ndC AD)
Tolpuddle Ball (1st C BC/AD)
Springhead, roadside settlement (2nd-3rdC AD)
Springhead, roadside settlement (1st-2ndC AD)
Manor Farm, Humberstone (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD)
Fishbourne Palace (1st-2ndC AD)
Camp Ground, Colne Fen, Earith (2nd-3rdC AD)
neonate
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
Grandford, March (Roman)
Thruxton (3rd-4thC AD)
Shepton Mallet, Fosse lane (Roman)
Batten Hanger, West Dean (3rd-4thC AD)
Shepton Mallet, Cannards Grave (Roman)
Birdlip Quarry (3rd-4thC AD)
Birdlip Quarry (2nd-3rdC AD)
Row of Ashes Farm, Butcombe (1st C BC/AD)
Sparsholt Roman villa (3rd-4thC AD)
Braintree, excavations 1984-90 (Roman)
neonate
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
Higham Ferrers OA (2nd-3rdC AD)
Poundbury Farm (Roman)
Great Dunmow (Roman)
Higham Ferrers OA (3rd-4thC AD)
Springhead, 1994 pipeline (1st-2ndC AD)
Heybridge, Elms Farm (1st-2ndC AD)
Barton Court Farm (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD)
Dalton Parlours (3rd-4thC AD)
Suddern Farm, Middle Wallop (1st C BC-mid 1st C AD)
Grateley South, Grateley (1st-2ndC AD)
neonate
juvenile
immature
sub-adult
adult
elderly
minimum sample = 20 specimens
Arable expansion
http://www.picklescott.org.uk/Pitchford1.jpg
percentage of sites with corndriers
Corndrying structures and arable farming
30.0
25.0
20.0
‘simple’
Old Sleaford, Lincs. (Elsdon 1997)
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
2ndC AD (n=112)
3rdC AD (n=186)
4thC AD (n=171)
villa
complex farm
enclosed farm
nucleated settlement
T-shaped and variants
Leadenham Quarry, Lincs. (WYAS 2001)
http://exarc.net/files/styles/large/pu
blic/Fig.9%20Fox%20farm0001.jpg?w
idth=600&height=750&iframe=true
Reconstruction of a corndrying
superstructure from Foxholes
Farm, Hertfordshire
circular ‘drying floors’
Great Casterton Villa, Rutland (Corder 1951)
Later Roman corndryers inserted into existing structures
Fishbourne Harbour, W.
Sussex (Rudkin 1986)
Halstock, Dorset (Lucas 1993)
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Late 1st century AD
17 sites
Very few examples potentially date
back to the end of the 1st C AD
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Early 2nd century AD
86 sites
2nd C AD increase in sites with corndrier
with focus on Fens and Cotswolds
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Late 2nd century AD
115 sites
2nd C AD increase in sites with corndrier
with focus on Fens and Cotswolds
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Early 3rd century AD
138 sites
3rd C AD sees the most widespread
distribution of sites with corndriers
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Late 3rd century AD
153 sites
3rd C AD sees the most widespread
distribution of sites with corndriers
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Early 4th century AD
175 sites
Early 4th C AD sees a peak in the number
of sites with corndriers, but the beginning
of a contraction in their distribution
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Distribution and relative density of
sites with ‘monumental’ corndryers
Late 4th century AD
145 sites
By the late 4th C AD, the distribution of
sites is weighted towards the Hampshire
downland and the upper Thames valley
Reconstructed Romano-British ‘corndrier’ at Butser
http://www.butser.org.uk/iafrbgd_hcc.html
Diversification in arable
processing output
• Arable processing buildings at southern
end of farm at Grateley South
• Archaeobotanical samples from three
corndryers were predominantly hulled
spelt wheat with very little barley
• Another included quantities of
sprouted grain from left hand flue and
very few from the right
• Spatial variation indicates that the
corndriers were multifunction, i.e. one
flue producing grain for ale (malting)
and others for flour (grinding)
4thC AD phase
Grateley South, Hampshire
(Cunliffe and Poole 2008)
Production of beer for market:
Northfleet, Kent
Schematic view of 4thC AD villa complex at
Northfleet, Kent, depicting malting oven, granary,
and quayside evidence (Andrews et al. 2011, 223)
4thC AD malting oven at
Northfleet villa, Kent
(Andrews et al. 2011, 185)
Evidence for malting and brewing
•
Cereal grains allowed to germinate and then dried to
halt germination, readying the grain for fermentation
•
174 sites with a combination of archaeobotanical
alongside associated structural remains found
•
101 sites with evidence for parched and germinated
grain but without structural features: possibly malting
waste, spoilt grain, or livestock fodder
60
structural and
archaeobotanical
evidence for malting
50
possible
archaeobotanical
evidence for malting
No. sites
40
30
20
10
0
1stC AD 2ndC AD 3rdC AD 4thC AD
Horticulture and cash crops
http://www.peoi.net/Courses/Coursesen/socfwk/Resources/barkan-fig05_x004.jpg
Sites with evidence for
bedding/horticultural trenches
16
14
12
No. sites
10
8
6
4
2
0
•
Apparent 2ndC AD peak in number of sites
with horticultural beds
•
Parallel gullies dug for horticultural production
•
Environmental assemblages are of variable use
- lack of waterlogged samples
Early Roman changes in land-use:
the Nene Valley and Cambridgeshire fens
Water
Newton
Godmanchester
Irchester
Land adjacent to Oundle Road, Peterborough
Business Park (Mackay 2002)
Vineyards in the Nene Valley
14
12
No. sites
10
Environmental evidence from
sites with horticultural trenches
•
Wollaston I, Northamptonshire (Brown et al. 2001)
•
Evidence for extensive area of regularly-spaced
trenches and post-holes in raised beds for support
(2nd-3rdC AD)
•
Pollen samples indicate the presence of grape
•
Lack of agricultural tools or wine-press equipment
8
6
4
2
0
*Grape Vitis vinifera pollen
http://www.vinetowinecircle.com/wp-content/gallery/engenetica-the-presence-of-ancient-vitis-silvestris-cultivars-iniberia/fig10.jpg
Flax cultivation?
•
•
•
•
89 sites with evidence for flax
Greatest density of sites with flax remains in the
central belt, less numbers on the south coast, in
the midlands and north-east
Flax cultivation suited to rotation with cereals or
legumes
Difficult to identify cultivation
– context
– frequency of remains
25
20
no. sites
15
10
5
0
Flax processing evidence
Old Shifford Farm, Standlake Site M., Oxon
• Pits produced a few waterlogged flax seeds
and numerous flax capsules in the lowest,
silted deposits – waste from retting?
Possible flax-retting pits
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/sean_quinn/cdun/knock.jpg
Early 20th century flax retting
Regional land-use patterns:
continuity and change
http://www.lucideastafrica.org/images/kenya_tanzania.jpg
Chalk downland and enclosed settlement
Cunliffe and Poole 2008
Collis 1970
Cunliffe and Poole 2000
South chalk downland –
continuity of enclosures and investment in farms
Perry 1986
Cunliffe and Poole 2008
Cunliffe and Poole 2008
Mockbeggar Lane
(Cotswold Archaeology 2001)
250m
Later Roman arable strip
fields in the chalk
downland river valleys
East Anton (Leucomagus?), Hampshire
Excavation at periphery of roadside
settlement revealed enclosure system
and up to 12 corn-drying ovens
Firth 2011
Middle Thames valley:
from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields
Brentford
Staines
Ashford Prison, Spelthorne (Carew et al. 2006)
Middle Thames valley:
from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields
Brentford
Staines
Roman complex settlement (laid out 1stC AD?)
Hengrove Farm, Staines (Poulton 2007)
Middle Thames valley:
from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields
late Iron Age/early
Roman settlement and
co-axial field-system
Brentford
Staines
Perry Oaks/Heathrow Terminal 5
(Lewis and Smith 2010)
Middle Thames valley:
from open settlement to complex farms and co-axial fields
Brentford
Staines
Kingsmead Quarry, Horton
(Chaffrey 2009)
Specialist farming and agricultural expansion:
a multi-scaled approach?
• The historical sources are a poor and one-sided indicator of agricultural practices
in Roman Britain, and are not equipped to deal with the regional and socioeconomic variation
• Farming communities must have dealt with and negotiated numerous factors
which impacted on their farming decisions (social, political, etc.)
• Decisions on agricultural practice are restricted by availability of local land and
labour, and by the social position of farmers
• Land-use patterns suggest major intra-regional variations occurred
• Zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical data demonstrate that patterns of
specialist activity and expansive regimes were socially, chronologically and
regionally varied
• Increasing cattle frequencies and shifting slaughter patterns may be more
reflective of a widespread social change, than they are of local economic choices