ccx.layout 17-02.a.hh - San Francisco Study Center

Transcription

ccx.layout 17-02.a.hh - San Francisco Study Center
2
Insi de
Septembe
In s i de r 20 0 2
Number 1 7
Baldwin is back
3
Insi de
Chris Daly
Happy ending
to hotel fire tale
His record, ranking
as a supervisor
Francisco Study Center
by San
Published
All this plus much
more!
CANDIDATES
PHOTOS: CARL ANGEL
FA CE THE PEOPLE
At the Alliance for a Better District 6 candidates forum Aug. 13: Incumbent Chris Daly, James Leo Dunn, Garrett Jenkins, Roger Gordon, Malinka Moye, Robert Power.
Daly dodges barbs, opponents make their case
T
he election campaign train
is gathering steam as candidates avail themselves
of growing opportunities to
meet the voters.
The Alliance for a Better
District 6, ever active in Tenderloin voter education, organized a candidates forum Aug. 13
at the TL police station’s community room that packed the
house with a crowd of more
he’s a member.
Supervisor Chris Daly spoke,
as did candidates James Leo
Dunn, Roger Gordon, Garrett
Jenkins, Malinka Moye, Robert
Power, Burke Strunsky, and
Michael Sweet. People were
packed three deep in the aisles.
“My chief opponent is not
these folks sitting to the side
of me. It’s the apathy we’ve
experienced with several of the
were facing the people from
behind a bank of tables. “I hope
to engage those voters and bring
them out,” he said.
But the crowd that night
was anything but apathetic. Representatives from the alphabet
of heavyweight community
organizations were there:
NOMPC, SRO Collaborative,
SOMPAC, TNDC, TAC and
more. Unlike the sparsely attended forums of the 2000 campaign, now the activists are better organized and so are the
opposition candidates.
isteners were entertained:
L
like when James Leo Dunn,
replete in his three-piece suit
The police station community room was packed and
people had to watch through the window of an adjoining room.
than 200 and featured all the
supervisorial candidates except
Arthur Jackson, who was at the
Health Commission meeting –
voters of San Francisco,” said candidate Garrett Jenkins, seated at
the front of the room flanked by
his opponents. The candidates
topped by a hat with red feather, waved his Kombu seaweed,
declared himself “re-mineralized,” and said that while he
may not be “strong enough to
beat up Daly,” he’s certainly
strong enough to “scare him.”
Even some audience members
thought they were entertain-
ing: like the man sitting on the
floor in front who grumbled
loudly at whatever the candidates said.
The forum got under way
with each candidate given a
few minutes to make their pitch.
“Consensus building” was a keystone in many of their declared
strategies.
“This campaign for me is
about being a unifier, about
bringing people together, the different areas of our great district,” said candidate Burke
Strunsky, an assistant district
attorney.
Robert Northington Power,
a Libertarian, said: “I don’t
think there’s anything that anyone in D.C. or Sacramento can
do to help us; we have to do it
ourselves by building up our
community. I think that’s something the people in this room are
perfectly capable of doing.”
Malinka Moye, a novice on
the campaign circuit, said, “Man,
this is a mess down here, this is
a big mess, a big mess, and to
change it, it’s going to take a
whole lot of people.”
fter the candidates’ introA
ductions, moderator Steve
Conley, media rep of Alliance for
a Better District 6, asked the
candidates questions that had
been submitted by audience
members on 3-by-5 cards.
What are you going to do for
the residents of this district who
are tired of having this district
a dumping grounds of the city’s
homeless?
Moye, who said he’d been
“doing research” on the district, said: “Homelessness has
been accepted in San Francisco
a long, long time. They used
to sleep in front of City Hall….
What I’m going to do, I’m going
to show you the heart of these
homeless people.”
Power’s answer: “I’m a bit disturbed by the analogy. … What
we need for this district is for it
to be a dumping grounds for new
continued on page 4
by Karen Oberdorfer
Ceremony on Sixth Street: Baldwin Hotel is back
PHOTO: CARL ANGEL
by Phil Tracy
he ribbon-cutting ceremony
T
marking the reopening of the
Baldwin House Hotel on Aug.
16 was a special occasion for
a couple of reasons. It offered
the specter of two dozen hotel
tenants cheering their landlord, and it marked the quickest turnaround between an
SRO hotel fire and its return to
occupancy – 10 weeks.
The history of SRO hotels
that catch fire is not a happy one.
Six hotels located on Sixth
Street have succumbed to fire in
the last 15 years. Only the Baldwin reopened. In the same 15
years, the city has lost a total of
1,463 low-cost rooms as a result
of fire.
While conspiracists nudge
one another and insinuate that
landlords had the hotels torched
for the insurance, the usual
culprit is a hot plate. They are
illegal to use in hotel rooms, and
all but impossible for people on
low, fixed incomes to resist.
They short out the hotel’s old,
substandard wiring and light
up items that accidentally touch
them. Another culprit is people
who smoke in bed.
Once an SRO goes up in
flames, all the incentives run
opposite restoring it. It’s off
the tax rolls since it’s worthless. It can be torn down and
replaced with an office building.
And there’s not much money to
be made in providing housing
to low-income people in the
first place.
Which is what made the
Baldwin’s reopening all the
more unique.
The ceremony itself was a
modest affair. Sam Dodge, the
Central City SRO Collaborative program director, acted
as master of ceremonies. The
year-old collaborative works to
increase safety and improve
living conditions in the central city’s SROs. Ironically, it
had held a fire prevention and
survival workshop in the Baldwin the month before the June
blaze. It had also helped to
secure the city’s extensions of rent
vouchers for the Baldwin residents, allowing them to remain
in the city and get back their old
rooms once the hotel reopened.
Dodge said a few opening
words, then began introducing the other people standing
beside the ribbon: George
Smith from the mayor’s office
and Supervisor Chris Daly.
Antoinetta Stadlman, the collaborative’s tenant representa-
Landlord Mike Amin, left, prepares to cut the ribbon at the reopening of the Baldwin House Hotel.
tive for the Baldwin, was also introduced and praised for her tireless efforts on behalf of the
tenants. Stadlman was the only
tenant to remain in the hotel and
acted as go-between for the
tenants and the landlord.
The landlord, Mike Amin,
was the guest of honor and got
to cut the ribbon. A native of
India, Amin came to the United States and worked in the
hotel trade for 25 years. He
purchased the Baldwin five
years ago. After the ribbon cutting, Amin was asked why he
worked so hard to reopen his
hotel when so many other land-
lords had not bothered. “They
were homeless,” he said, referring to the Baldwin’s residents.
“They are my tenants.”
During his remarks, Chris
Daly suggested the Baldwin
Hotel fire could serve as a example for how any future SRO
Hotel fires could be handled.
“This is now a model, if there ever
is another fire again, “ he said.
But reality contradicts him.
First, the fire was small. In fact
there was fire damage in only two
rooms. All the other rooms suffered water damage, much easier to repair. Secondly, the
Baldwin had a strong tenant
leadership, which helped to
keep the residents banded
together during the 10 weeks they
were living in scattered hotels.
Finally, the Baldwin had Mike
Amin, who cared about his tenants, and what happened to
them. The chances of all those
considerations coming together again at the next SRO hotel
fire, and there surely will be a next
one, is remote.
Still, it was a success this
time and watching the tenants
toasting each other with champagne was a genuine pleasure.
There aren’t many happy endings on Sixth Street. ■
City Hall segue – mean motor scooter of a protest
by Phil Tracy
an Francisco prides itself
S
on being a city where things
get started first, particularly
things contentious. So it comes
as no surprise that the steps of
City Hall saw the first-ever
protest of the Segway motorized scooter on Monday, Aug.
26. It almost seemed our civic
duty.
Motorized scooters have
been around for about 10 years
now, offering their own distinctive contribution to noise pollution. The Segway scooter differs from all the others in two
ways. The wheels are aligned in
the manner of a chariot rather
than a skateboard. And it’s the
only scooter with a bill set to pass
the Legislature that would legalize its use on sidewalks.
As protests go, this one was
pretty perfunctory. It being the
last week in August, the press coverage was predictably heavy.
You could call a press conference
the last week of August to
announce you hate your mother-in-law and at least two TV
stations would send camera
crews. This protest netted three,
plus reporters for both dailies,
a couple of radio people and me.
All told, there were 20 protesters on the steps addressing
10 media people and some guy
in weird sunglasses who theoretically was the audience.
The first to speak was Bill
Price, president of the Senior
Action Network, which claims to
CENTRAL CITY
extra
PHOTO: CARL ANGEL
represent 150
organizations that
collectively have
a membership of
30,000 seniors.
After intoning a
lament for the
sanctity of city
streets,
Bill
reached for his
own personal best
in the field of
public inanity by
leading the assembled in a rousing Supervisor
chorus of “Stop
the Segway slaughter.”
Next up was Jeanne Lynch,
who hadn’t been slaughtered by
a Segway, as it happened, but had
been hit by a bike awhile back.
She testified to the long-lasting effect of encounters with
machines on city streets. “I’m still
recovering from my injuries,” she
told the man in the weird sunglasses.
After that, Supervisor Chris
Daly stood up and characterized
the Segway legislation as “dangerous” to seniors, children,
the disabled and the blind,
although something that can
attain a speed of up to 12 mph
and weighs up to 300 pounds,
depending on the weight of
its operator, could theoretically be dangerous to anyone. As
it happened, the supervisor
had a resolution opposing the
Segway legislation ready for
the Board of Supes. He confidently predicted the resolution would pass that day. In
walking human up a driveway. The city of
being was justi- Atlanta is reported to have
fied because the shelled out $9,000 apiece for 10
Segway, along of these things, which may sigwith human nal Atlanta’s determination to
beings,
was contest our city’s vaunted title
dynamically sta- as kook capital of America.
ble. I did not
So far, about half the states
make that last have legalized these new
statement up. machines, which is a tribute to
Just how Segway LLC’s lobbying prowess
dangerous the if nothing else. The battle is
Segway scooter is being carried forward here in Calremains a matter ifornia by state Sen. Tom TorChris Daly joins the Senior Action Network protest. of conjecture. A lakson, D-Martinez, who sits
San Francisco on the state Senate Transfact, it was sent to committee. Post Office spokesman claims his portation Committee and preAfter that they shuffled up agency is currently testing the sumably knows a reliable cama blind person and someone in device on the streets of San paign contributor when he sees
a motorized wheelchair (don’t Francisco, although no one I one. A version of the bill has
get me started) and then called know has seen one in action. He passed the Assembly and needs
it a day. An article made the bot- says, no problems — to date. The to clear the Senate again before
tom of the front page of the only reported accident so far going to our governor, whose willChronicle’s Bay Area section, involved an Atlanta, Ga., ingness to stand up to lobbyists
which pretty much counts for a “Progress Ambassador” (appar- who have nothing to offer but
home run publicity-wise.
ently what they’re calling cops a campaign contribution is legJust how much good it all did in Atlanta these days)who endary. We’ll provide updates
was another matter. The Senior injured his knee while going as they become available. ■
Action Network took exception to the Segway scooter after
a demonstration of the device
by the Segway people went
awry. The group’s executive
1106 MARKET STREET
director, Bob Livingston, plowed
CHURRASCARIA RESTAURANT (AT THE RENOIR HOTEL)
into a bunch of furniture while
PRESENT THIS AD TO YOUR SERVER
trying to operate it at an early
August meeting of the SAN
AND RECEIVE A 15% DISCOUNT ON
board. The board later voted to
BREAKFAST, LUNCH OR DINNER.
oppose the Segway bill, which
PH: (415) 626-6432
ingeniously defines anyone
FAX: (415) 626-6450
operating one of these things as
a pedestrian. A spokesman for
www.cafedobrasil.com
Segway explained this reinter15% DISCOUNT
pretation of the word for a
NORTH OF MARKET’S ONLY BRAZILIAN CUISINE
2
SEPTEMBER 2002
Board work:
Daly’s legislative portfolio
among top 4 – ordinance
success rate near bottom
C
pieces of legislation
District 6’s rookie supe has been busy
by Karen Oberdorfer
upervisor Chris Daly says his first big legislative
S
win was the passage in April 2001 of an ordinance
he sponsored that appropriated money for the
Department of Aging and Adult Services. In all it
means $3 million for the department’s Office of the
Aging.
It was at the newly elected supervisor’s second full board meeting that he introduced the ordinance, making good on a campaign pledge to
the Senior PAC slating $1 million for new senior services (home meal delivery, congregate meal sites, inhome care, and more) and $1 million for one-time
costs to get the whole shebang off the ground
(new equipment: copiers, computers,
and rent, utilities, and COLAs to
nonprofit contractors). The
third million is budgeted for
services this fiscal year.
“It’s been absolutely tremendous,” said
Jim Illig, president of
Coalition of Agencies Serving the Elderly. Daly was the
only supervisor
who had signed the
PAC pledge to step
up to the plate and
put his promise into
action right away, said
Illig.
Another piece of legislation that Daly regards as
important is his evictionthreats ordinance (011575),
which requires eviction
notices to be in writing
and filed with the rent
board. It also requires
that vacated units
be subject to
future use
restrictions.
Daly often cites tenant activist Ted Gullicksen,
office manager of the San Francisco Tenants
Union, about the ordinance: “ ‘One of the most important rent-control amendments in the last decade.’”
“It’s an excellent law dealing with a major
problem creating displacement in San Francisco,” said Gullicksen, in a phone interview. “It’s a very
good ordinance that controls what is, in fact, the
biggest cause of evictions in San Francisco.” The
ordinance also helps to keep rental properties
on the market and at lower rates. New property owners now must rent the apartments for three years
at the previous landlord’s rate structure. This in turn
makes the use of Ellis Act or owner move-ins by sellers less useful as a selling tool.
Daly’s not the most
prolifie lawmaker
on the Board of Supervisors, but he more
than holds his
own (see sidebar). He came
roaring onto the
board propelled
by 80% of the district vote. He
quickly clashed
with
Mayor
Brown, and his
stick-to-his-guns
radical politics made
Daly an
easy target
for reporters
who feel uncomfortable outside
the status quo.
Daly has been
so much in the
spotlight that everyone has an opinion
about him. So, instead of writing about his style, The Extra is
reporting on his substance: his record
as a supervisor. Relative to many of
his colleagues, Daly has been busy
in the past two years. With help from
his aides and the city’s Legistar software we counted 526 pieces of legislation in all.
“I’ve learned a great deal in
the first 21 months,” Daly says,
“I started off not being very
comfortable with how
things work [at City Hall].
I still don’t like it, but I’m
getting more used to it.”
Housing, homelessness, seniors and
tenant issues —
“those are issues
that I’ve taken
leadership in at
the Board of
continued on page 7
SEPTEMBER 2002
3
ILLUSTRATION: CARL ANGEL
hris Daly ranks No. 2, 3 or 4 among his board
colleagues in the amount of legislation put forth
since the district-elected Board of Supervisor took office
in January 2001. Daly leads the rookies on the
board in legislative output with 526 items.
There are two major types of legislation: ordinances
and resolutions. An ordinance is a law, and there are
relatively few of them. A resolution is most often a policy statement or a form of official citywide recognition, so there are many more resolutions than ordinances.
A supervisor either sponsors – originates – a piece
of regislation, or co-sponsors by signing on in support of a colleague’s legislation. Co-sponsorship is
the most popular way to go.
Gavin Newsom was the runaway No. 1 in all categories except resolutions sponsored, where he
shared the limelight with board President Tom Ammiano.
Mark Leno is ensconced as the solid No. 2
except in ordinances sponsored, where he tied
with Daly.
The rate of Daly’s success as a co-sponsor of both
resolutions and ordinances is a respectable 93% (resolutions) and 84% (ordinances). This compares
favorably with the majority of the board members.
High as Daly’s numbers are, the leader for resolutions
successfully co-sponsored was Matt Gonzalez; with
only about a fourth of Daly’s output, Gonzalez
weighed in at a whopping 97% pass rate. Newsom
led sponsored ordinances with 70%. Newsom’s
feat is all the more remarkable for his torrential
output – 177 ordinances co-sponsored, 107 more than
Leno and Daly, who are tied. The bottom feeders in
terms of quantity of co-sponsored legislation, such as
Gonzalez and Leland Yee, have the highest success
rates – but the difference between Daly’s rate of success and theirs is minuscule.
When it comes to solo sponsorship, Daly fares
fairly well in resolutions (78%). With ordinances, though
he is No. 4 in number sponsored, he’s next to last in
percentage passed with 15 out of 41. But maybe, in
a district heavily populated by the city’s poorest and
least powerful, that’s to be expected. Representing
such a constituency can call for taking stands not popular citywide.
And when your elected representative is ready
to go to jail advocating for a community cause – as
Daly did at Hastings – maybe that counts even
more.
– by Geoff Link
ORDINANCES
Sponsored/Passed
1. Newsom: 91/64
2. Leno: 73/40
3. Ammiano: 50/22
4. Daly: 41/15
5. Peskin: 38/26
6. Gonzalez: 25/10
7. McGoldrick: 23/13
7. Yee: 23/8
8. Hall: 18/7
9. Sandoval: 16/6
10. Maxwell: 14/8
Co-sponsored/Passed
1. Newsom: 177/168
2. Leno: 70/62
2. Daly: 70/59
3. Maxwell: 44/38
4. Peskin: 41/37
5. Sandoval: 39/30
6. McGoldrick: 29/38
7. Gonzalez: 31/24
8. Ammiano: 28/39
9. Hall: 16/14
10. Yee: 15/11
RESOLUTIONS
Sponsored/Passed
1. Newsom: 237/204
1. Ammiano: 237/204
2. Leno: 143/102
3. Yee: 123/103
4. Daly: 113/89
5. Maxwell: 109/99
5. Sandoval: 109/90
6. Peskin: 81/75
7. Hall: 76/63
8. Gonzalez: 61/44
9. McGoldrick: 34/28
Co-sponsored/Passed
1. Newsom: 613/580
2. Leno: 587/570
3. Daly: 302/282
4. Peskin: 244/232
5. Ammiano: 160/148
6. Maxwell: 154/142
7. McGoldrick: 153/144
8. Sandoval: 111/106
9. Hall: 108/99
10. Gonzalez: 81/79
11. Yee: 58/55
ORDINANCE SUCCESS RATE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Newsom: 70%
Peskin: 68
Maxwell: 57
McGoldrick: 56
Leno: 54
Ammiano: 44
7. Gonzales: 40
8. Hall: 39
9. Sandoval: 37
10. Daly: 36
11. Yee: 34
SOURCE: CITY CLERK LEGISTAR PROGRAM
CENTRAL CITY
extra
CAMPAIGN FORUM
Candidates: First they speak their mind, then they eat cake
ALL PHOTOS ON THESE PAGES: CARL ANGEL
continued from page 1
development.”
Roger Gordon: “You dump trash, not people.
But I hear what you’re saying. … But I’m not going to
try to run people out of town … except maybe YOU!”
Gordon said, pointing at the loud grumbler who had
been repeatedly asked to quiet down. The audience
clapped.
Daly said more services are needed: “District 6 has
more of a lot of things … and yes we have more services in this district. But I think there’s a fair argument to be made that we’re actually underserved by community-serving services.”
Michael Sweet: “The person who wrote this question is absolutely right, we are a dumping ground in a
lot of respects. We need to spread it [homeless shelters
and low-income housing] out into all of the neighborhoods.”
But Strunsky wasn’t buying it: “You don’t solve a problem by moving it around – you solve it by approaching
it. … We should be proud of every part of our district.”
While candidates were talking up consensus building and whether or not to shuffle services around, an
emblematic vignette on the sidelines quietly occurred:
arlier in the forum Moye had declared that all
E
the talk of politicians was just that; so his final
pledge was succinct: “I’m not going to talk about it; I’m
District 6 voter in a wheelchair had positioned himA
self in the left aisle up front, close to the candidates.
Halfway through the two-hour forum he rolled to
the bathroom, leaving his jug of apple juice on a side
table. As the bathroom door shut behind him, a pallid
man with jittery hands, who was sitting toward the
back, scurried up to the apple juice jug. He unscrewed
the cap while whispering to everyone, but no one in particular, that he “only wanted a taste,” and poured
some juice into a Styrofoam cup. He rushed back to his
seat, leaving the jug’s cap off.
Next a woman in the back, who was reclining,
not sitting, in a wheelchair, maneuvered herself to the
temporarily vacated prime real estate near the juice at
the front of the room.
A minute later, our man returned from the bathroom to find his spot had been usurped and his apple
juice appeared to have been tampered with. He
pursed his lips, but the lack of surprise on his face said
that this District 6 resident endures a daily diet of
hassles. He and his competitor for the front aisle site
points, “We need leadership from downtown. I propose
that we get the business leaders to the neighborhood
and we say, ‘Look, we want sustainable economic
development on Sixth Street. I also believe we need to
put a check on the nonprofits.”
Power spoke of decreasing government intervention so that unencumbered market forces would solve
the district’s economic woes. He quoted ex-President
Clinton’s campaign catch phrase: “It’s the economy –
stupid.”
District 6 supervisorial candidates face a packed house and tell where they stand and what they offer voters in the Tenderloin.
He mentioned some alliances he’s forged, such as
tried to reach the candidates’ magic answer/pill/medicine of “consensus.” But in the end, after a whisper match, with: state Sen. John Burton, Assemblywoman Carole
the woman rolled out in a huff. Meanwhile, the show Migden and school board President Julie Wynn. “No,
I don’t get along with the mayor – fortunately he will
goes on.
be gone next year. But I can work with Tom [Ammiano],
gainst the consensus-theme backdrop, an occasional I can work with Gavin [ Newsom], I can work with John
verbal salvo was sent across enemy lines:
[Burton], I can work with people,” Daly said.
“So how do you choose [the supervisor]? I’d say ‘throw
In his opening statement, Daly said of his stint as
darts,’ but Chris is the biggest target here,” said Roger supervisor: “There’s been results – there’s been good
Gordon.
news.” He listed some wins: $2 million for senior
In his own defense Daly said, “Some may paint me services; improved quality of life in SRO hotels, includas divisive, but I’ve actually forged a lot of coalitions in ing a renter protection ordinance that bans eviction threats;
the last year and a half. I haven’t forged coalitions with and successful working relationships with diverse
downtown. Downtown hates me. They’re going to coalitions, he said, such as the Bicycle Coalition,
probably spend a whole lot of money to defame me, and which resulted in bicycle lanes on Howard Street.
that’s OK.”
He said he and his office helped save “working-class jobs,”
A
such as the laundry workers’ at Laguna Honda Hospital,
and reform the city’s Planning Commission, which is
in a state of emergency because the supes haven’t
agreed to Mayor Brown’s four nominees.
“And with a full term I’m going to build on these
wins. I will speak up at every turn for the folks who are
shied away from, for folks who are not heard, for
folks typically not invited to the table and I will make
sure that there are seats there…”
he moderator announced that Daly was turning 30
T
that day and someone brought out a cake the size
of a king-size pillow. The audience cheered, and cake
for all was promised at the end of the affair.
“Happy birthday, Mr. Supervisor,” said Jenkins
as he started his final statement. Then he made his own
going to show you, you’ll see it - that’s it.”
The next forum should be in a larger room, said
District 6 homeowner Jason Born, who is rehabbing an
old South of Market Edwardian. He said he thought the
forum was good, and he pronounced it successful. “It
allowed each candidate to express their views on what
they want to do for the district.” He hasn’t decided yet
who he will vote for, but he said he wouldn’t vote
for Daly and that two of the candidates impressed
him: Gordon and Sweet.
Tracy Baxter, a member of the Democratic County Central Committee, came to hear what the candidates
proposed. “While there are a number of good ideas coming from most of the candidates, I think that Chris Daly
is head and shoulders above the rest of them,” Baxter
said.
Baxter doesn’t live in District 6, but as a life-long
resident of San Francisco she’s had a front row seat to
shifts in the city. “I’ve watched the Tenderloin make this
transition from a place that very poor people could still
live out decent lives to a place where the very poor are
imperiled by other elements that live here.” That,
she said, affects all San Franciscans.
It was nightfall outside the Tenderloin police station, but the sidewalk was crowded with people eating
cake. ■
For information on the Alliance for a Better District
6 candidates’ debate scheduled for early September, log onto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/District6inSF
or call 820-1560.
Editor Geoff Link contributed to this report.
“What have you accomplished in the community that has changed or improved the lives of others?”
DALY
“In 1995 I co-founded a
nonprofit organization on
16th Street called the Mission
Agenda … an organization
that goes into residential
hotels, works with folks in various hotels to empower
them, build their leadership so they can take ownership over their own lives.
And once I got into office the
first thing I did was call up the
city attorney and asked him
to draft an ordinance to
ban the collection of visitor fees in residential hotels.
I’m very happy to report
that it is now illegal for any
hotel operator to collect visitor fees.”
CENTRAL CITY
extra
DUNN
“We’re fighting one
man and it’s Mohammed; we
need one man, George
Washington, to lead us back.
This is what I’ve been thinking about the whole year –
you know, I came up with this
housing,” he said, holding up
a model of a tetrahedron,
“incidentally, this is fireproof, this is all glass and
steel.”
JENKINS
“I’m proud of the efforts
that Jim Thompson and I
took to open up this police
station. And when they said
they weren’t going to have a
community room, which
we’re all present in tonight,
we went back and fought
for that … as well as the
day that we held hands
around Boeddeker Park
and told the drug dealers and
some of the folks out there
that we’re not going to put
up with it anymore. Today
you can walk out probably
two, three, in the morning
and have a conversation
right in front of Boeddeker
Park – I think that’s a hell of
an accomplishment.”
4
GORDON
“I got $750,000 to
improve businesses in the
first two blocks of Sixth
Street. I went to the Redevelopment Agency and said,
‘Look, you’ve got all this
money and you have all this
power; you’ve got to give
up eminent domain except
on Sixth Street, and you
have to make money available
to existing businesses and
don’t do the credit check, just
do the business check …
This is how you reconstruct
neighborhoods, bit by bit, the
city investing with people
willing to invest in their
neighborhoods, their communities, themselves.”
MOYE
“I want you guys to
know this is a community
about to blow for positive
change…people who really
want to say, ‘Look, you been
doing this for year in and year
in and year in and now I
got to elect somebody and the
same things are going to
happen?’ No, these people
want dramatic change quickly and I’ve done four years
of research on these people and I’m going to bring
that to you.”
SEPTEMBER 2002
POWER
“The thing that I think
that I’ve done that is the
most important to this district was getting on the ballot and offering an alternative. We have a terrible
problem in this city where
whenever we’re faced with
a problem of any nature
we say the solution must
be more government…”
SEPTEMBER 2002
STRUNSKY
SWEET
“I’ve never held an elective office, so my most
important accomplishment
to me is more of an individual, one-on-one basis,
being in my current job [as
assistant district attorney]. I
think some of the examples
are situations where I’ve
gone out to a residential
hotel and given somebody a
stay-away order and realized that that’s going to
help protect them from
someone. I think those kind
of moments are very important to me and I treasure
them greatly.”
“I currently serve as
the vice chair of the Rincon Point South Beach Citizen’s Advisory Committee
and in that position and
working with that committee
as I’ve done the last four
years, we’ve had a lot of
accomplishments in my
neighborhood that I’m
proud of -- all revolving
around securing financing
to fund programs that help
improve our neighborhood.”
5
Care Not Cash:
yes or no
SWEET Yes: It is becoming clear to me that the fact
that San Francisco is the only city in Northern California that’s giving the kind of cash grants,
$390 a month, that we are giving is encouraging
people to come to San Francisco. ... I don’t have a
problem with the city providing benefit to people not
as well off as I am, what I do have a problem with
is seeing that money going to uses that I don’t condone.
STRUNSKY Yes: I think it’s dangerous when you say
let’s make our programs worse or less appealing to
people so that we don’t attract people... [but] I think
the evidence is very clear and from what I do at work
every day that a lot of that money’s going to subsidize people’s substance abuse problems and that’s
an incredible burden on the system.
POWER No: I wholeheartedly support the idea of taking cash out of this system; however, I believe
there are some fatal flaws to the Care Not Cash plan
that will cause more pain than gain. I would prefer a much simpler, gradual decline of the cash payment over the course of five years and at the same
time that we’re taking the cash away from individuals
that the city supports, we should take the cash away
from the nonprofits that the city supports over
the same time frame.
MOYE No: Let me get down to the nitty-gritty of it;
take this money away from the people, it’s going to
hurt them, it’s going to hurt them hard.
GORDON Yes: Care Not Cash is not about saving
cash – it’s about fixing a system that’s broken...
the way we solve people’s problems today is not
working.
JENKINS Yes: I see what happens on the 1st and 15th
of every month…but I can tell you that, just as someone else [Gordon] has mentioned, that, just
because you receive a GA check doesn’t make you
a drug user. ... It’s sad that we have to compete on
the ballot for a solution to deal with this homeless
issue. This is something that could have been
dealt at the Board (of Supervisors level)...
DUNN No: Where does all this hardness come
from? This is a shadow we’re casting over the
homeless right now. They’re not all drug addicts,
they’re human, man, they’re our brothers, HELLO!
…it’s cruel.
DALY No: We have structural poverty, structural
unemployment…and I think in government we have
an obligation to take care of people. So I support
care, but do not support Care Not Cash. It’s poorly drafted and politically motivated.
CENTRAL CITY
extra
CAMPAIGN PROFILES
Karen Oberdorfer
ARTHUR JACKSON: Experienced city official
ability payments from the Navy supplemented by his work with Caritas. But, since
1998, he’s been a full-time community activist.
“It’s difficult at first, but you get used to it,” he says of the lower pay and the
long hours, but he’s driven: “Whatever needs to be done, I try to help out.”
Besides running for supervisor in 2000, Jenkins has run for two other positions, winning one: Municipal Utility District Ward 5. In the process, he says, he’s
garnered more recognition and citywide support.
He wants District 6 to become more inclusive. He’ll listen to all sides, he says,
and work with people with varying points of view. He praises Daly for bringing
attention to people who often are ignored, but Jenkins says that more groups
should be included in District 6’s purview. “I would open the door and bring more
underrepresented communities into the political process,” Jenkins says.
Safety on the streets is a pressing issue to Jenkins. “There are still too many
people in San Francisco that fear venturing outside the safety of their homes,”
he wrote in an e-mail interview. He wants more police on the streets; he ‘d like
a police substation at Market and Sixth. “When the dealers see a uniform
they walk away,” Jenkins elaborated in a phone interview. Jenkins says he supports the community courts and they need more staff.
With 85% of businesses in San Francisco being small, he said, they need more
incentives to stay and grow. “I’m always behind lessening taxes on small businesses
in San Francisco, especially everyday neighborhood services,” Jenkins says.
Cleaning up the streets is also a priority to Jenkins. But he wants more collaboration among the different cleaners. He suggests paying neighborhood people a stipend, say $50 a month, to maintain their own blocks.
Jenkins says that if more people had a stake in their living spaces as owners
the Tenderloin would change. “In 2000, I campaigned with the promise of developing community housing and land trusts. Since then, a city task force has been
created, and now that the idea of land trusts is acceptable. I will begin to
advocate for the conversion of nonprofit housing into land trusts for the residents who want to participate,” Jenkins wrote in an e-mail.
“I will continue to support community efforts to revitalize the neighborhood
through economic development and construction of more housing.”
Arthur Jackson, except for Chris Daly, has
the most experience as a hard-working city official
among the field of eight contenders.
Jackson is a member of the Health Commission,
has been its budget committee chairman and its president; and was president of the city Commission on
Aging and Adult Services.
He knows the public health system, from the
outside in. Born in Chicago, he is a dapper 55-yearold, has crystal-clear eyes, and says he’s healthier
than he has been in years. For 10 years he took medication to regulate an ailing kidney, suffered
through dialysis for 6 1/2 years when the meds
stopped working, and then in 2000 underwent a kidney transplant.
During the last 10 years, (except for two when he was so sick it was “scary,”
he said) Jackson, a Quaker, has sat on either of the two commissions.
Mayor Frank Jordan first appointed him to the Health Commission in
1992, and during 1993-95 Jackson was its president. During the early ’90s,
while the AIDs crisis was exploding, he also served as budget committee chairman. Jackson’s term ended in 1996. Mayor Willie Brown appointed him to the
Commission on Aging and Adult Services in 1999, and in 2000 he became its president. Then, in 2001, Brown put him back on the Health Commission, where
he is today.
“I think I’ve been a good health commissioner because I’ve had 20 surgeries
so I really know the system,” said Jackson.
“We need someone who has knowledge of and background in how to do community service and civil service and come to the table with other people. ... It’s
not a place at this particular time for trainees,” he said.
District 6 is a hub of the city, Jackson says, yet there hasn’t been enough attention to its economic vitality. There isn’t enough emphasis on supporting businesses; for instance, the payroll tax is too high, he says, which does nothing to
encourage businesses to stay in the city.
“There’s lots of people in this district who don’t have jobs,” Jackson said. He’s
the co-chair of the welfare-to-work program, SF Works. “A paycheck empowers
a community,” he said.
Jackson wants to see more services for seniors, and one of his priorities is to
develop more congregate meal sites, giving seniors a place to meet others. He
is the board president of the board of directors at the Senior Center at O’Farrell and Turk and the center at Aquatic Park.
He said he will go out and talk to people (“shake 25,000 hands”) and
find out what his constituents want. “You’ve got to really address the issues of
everybody in your district,” he said.
On the other hand, he noted, if you walk down the street and ask people where
they can find services, most people wouldn’t know, so he would allocate
money for marketing, education and prevention. “We need to take every
opportunity to help people find what they’re looking for,” he said.
He applauds what TNDC, developer Art Evans and Mark Trotz of public housing have achieved. But, he said, “We could do more. Everyone deserves a place
to live. Everyone.”
MICHAEL SWEET: A “big picture” lawyer
Michael Sweet, 32, is a lawyer at a firm that deals
with civil litigation for businesses, yet he says his critics are incorrectly “trying to brand me as ‘big
business.’” He has a progressive bent, he says. For
instance, he says, he worked for Jerry Brown’s
presidential campaign in 1991-92 and the progressive
Proposition 217 in 1996 that aimed to direct
more tax revenues to schools and community
services.
Born in San Francisco and raised in the Bay Area,
he also has been vice chairman of the Rincon
Point South Beach citizens advisory board and Brannan Street Wharf Citizens Advisory Board to the Redevelopment Agency, is a member of Alliance for a Better District 6, and participated with the SoMa Leadership Council.
Sweet’s experience as a lawyer and community activist, he says, helps him
wield the “skill set to do the job well, and bring all parties to the table.”
Although he isn’t “big business,” he says the district does need a dose of economic activity to revive the streets. If the boarded-up storefronts were transformed
into thriving businesses there would be more foot traffic, he says, more little delis
and cafes to serve the increased work force, and more mom and pop neighborhoodserving businesses would sprout. Therefore, he is against an increase in the business tax, because that sends a negative message to businesses.
Projects that he would launch in the district would include improved
street cleaning, and address quality of life issues for everyone, including residents
in the SROs, shelters, apartments, condos, and single-family homes. He would
emphasize accountability for the resources set aside by the city for the homeless
to ensure those resources actually reach them.
He says the district gets the second smallest piece of the parks budget, and
he would try to change that. He also wants Bessie Carmichael Elementary in SoMa
to be rebuilt. “District 6 is poised to become the heart of the City,” says Sweet,
“and we need to leverage the opportunities like the Third Street rail, Mission
Bay, the work of TNDC, ECS, and the Transbay Terminal.”
He says that we “need a supervisor with a vision for the big picture,” who can
see District 6 as “the gem of the city, but for everyone.”
Sweet says he plans to continue lawyering if elected supervisor, but he
and his wife have a baby on the way, so he would cut back on his hours at the firm.■
GARRETT JENKINS: Full-time activist
Garrett Jenkins, 38, says he lives at ground
zero – at the Dalt Hotel on Turk near Mason. That
means he’s also been working in and around
ground zero for years.
To highlight his community work, Jenkins
has been the president of the North of Market
Planning Coalition Board of Directors and now
is NOMPC’s executive director. He was on the
Lower Eddy/Leavenworth Task Force, sits on the
board of San Francisco Tomorrow, volunteered
with Adopt-A-Block, and is chairman of the
San Francisco Neighborhood Alliance. Jenkins also ran for supervisor in 2000.
On weekends he works the for Caritas Management, an in-house management firm for
the nonprofit Mission Housing Development. This is his only paid position. Weekdays he’s an unpaid community activist. He is semi-retired, he said, getting dis-
Letters to the Editor
Right on, Ed!
Correcting a misconception
In the August Central City Extra, Ed
Bowers says in his interview with
Bob Labriola, “I don’t believe that
drugs should be illegal just because
some bullies in office say they should be.
If people want to get high, let them
choose their poison and self-medicate
for free.”
I just want to say, Right On, Ed!
The War on Drugs has been a cruel,
costly failure.
Starchild
Candidate for supervisor,
District 8
In your latest edition, in the article
re: Tenderloin secession by Ed Bowers, there is an error that many folks make,
and I think you should correct it. In the
fourth paragraph from the end, Bowers
says, “Most of my friends, especially
the whores and skilled ex-cons…have
felony arrest records longer than my arm
and cannot vote for anyone.”
This is a common misconception
believed by many, when the truth of the
matter is that once a person’s parole or
probation is completed, they may start
to vote again. It seems that parole and
probation officers do not tell this to
their clients, which is unjust.
Terrie Frye
CENTRAL CITY
extra
6
Central City Extra is published
monthly by San Francisco
Study Center Inc., a private nonprofit serving the community since 1972. The
Extra is published through grants from the
S.F. Hotel Tax Fund and the Richard and Rhoda
Goldman Fund. The contents are copyrighted
by the San Francisco Study Center, 1095 Market Street, Suite 602, San Francisco, CA
94103. Phone: 626-1650 Fax: 626-7276 Email:
centralcityextra@studycenter. org
Editor/Publisher: Geoffrey Link
Senior Writer/Editor: Marjorie Beggs
Reporters: KarenOberdorfer,
Tom Carter, Ed Bowers
Design and layout : Carl Angel,
Don McCartney
Artist/Photographer: Carl Angel
Contributors: William Roller, Adrian D.
Varnedoe, Diamond Dave, William Crain, Mark
Hedin, Stan Hutton, Sherry Barto, Phil Tracy,
John Burks, Jeremy Harness, Kurt Shuck, Anne
Marie Jordan, Lenny Limjoco
Editorial Advisory Committee: David
Baker, Michael Nulty, Debbie Larkin, Nicholas
Rosenberg, Brad Paul
Central City Extra is a member of the
San Francisco Neighborhood Newspaper Association
SEPTEMBER 2002
Rookie supe’s
2-year record
continued from page 3
Supervisors,” he says.
Some other ordinances and resolutions of note include the $250
million Affordable Housing Bond
that’s Prop. B on the November ballot because of passage of Daly’s Resolution 010839, which he says he
worked on with board President Tom
Ammiano and the San Francisco
Organizing Project. It will be used to
develop low-income housing and
help low- to moderate-income first-time
buyers with their down payment.
He also sponsored resolutions
that endorsed the development of
homeless shelters and housing strategies for homeless seniors. (020598).
But he hasn’t focused solely on elders; he also has introduced an ordinance
(which has not passed yet) that would
appropriate $176,000 to help fund the
Larkin Street Youth Center for the
Homeless Youth Emergency Services
Program. He sponsored a resolution
to support state Assembly Bill 2972,
which targets youth ages 18-24 for statefunded housing programs.
Daly sponsored a resolution that
urges the Department of Human
Services to develop a resource center for the homeless on Sixth Street,
like the one in the Mission, which has
shower facilities, phones, meals and
more.
Daly’s sleight of hand in the
budget process helped keep lowpaid laundry workers at Laguna
Honda employed this fiscal year. He
sponsored an ordinance that Ammiano, Matt Gonzalez, Jake McGoldrick,
Gerardo Sandoval and Mark Leno cosponsored that added about 25 cents
to monthly telephone bills for most
of San Francisco phone users. This
helped raise the funds for the workers to stay included in the city’s general fund.
Of Daly’s resolutions and ordinances were passed by the supes,
there are some general categories
that repeat:
• 8 resolutions or ordinances
that deal with environmental issues.
• 8 that deal with seniors.
• 12 with services for the poor and
homeless;
• 5 deal with SRO and rental
issues;
• 6 with affordable housing, not
including four targeted at housing for
the homeless;
• 11 had to do with children,
youth and families, no which including three specific to schools.
• 10 total focused on minorities,
women, LGBT and HIV and AIDS
issues.
Daly proposed 22 hearings to
discuss various budget issues for this
fiscal year, but only four of those
hearings were convened: Community Health Network, Department
of Environment, Department of
Human Services, and Department
of Children, Youth and Families.
All of the supervisors sponsored
many more resolutions than ordinances. Some resolutions sound
downright silly – and are. But many
that do, aren’t.
Oct.16 last year was Feral Cat
Day, because Daly sponsored a resolution commending the “good works
of the San Francisco Society of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and proclaiming Feral Cat Day in San Fran-
SEPTEMBER 2002
cisco.” An official commendation of
a community group’s good works,
such as the SPCA’s efforts to deal
with the problem of feral cats, means
the SPCA “can then use [the resolution]
in its fund-raising efforts and development,” Daly says.
Swords to Plowshares, Habitat
for Humanity, San Francisco Gay
Men’s Chorus, Asian and Pacific
Islander Business and Information Services, Golden Gate Lutheran Church
and its Drop-In Center, and University of California’s Women’s Health
Center also have been among the
recipients of Daly’s commendations.
He has also sponsored resolutions commending the good works of
individuals such as: Sister Bernie
Galvin “for her lifelong advocacy of
economic, religious and social justice”;
Bill Sorro, for his “service as tenant and community advocate, rank and
file trade union activist,” and senior and tenant advocate Maurice
Dopp. Of his 33 commendations,
15 were for individuals and more
than half of those were for housing and
homelessness activists.
In May, Daly sponsored a resolution
that Leno, Gonzalez, Aaron Peskin and
Sophie Maxwell co-sponsored, “urging” the Board of Directors of Hastings School of the Law not to build a
parking garage in the Tenderloin, and
instead erect a “community-supported mixed use development.”
This was one of many acts – including Daly’s arrest at a Hastings protest
– that helped bring down the garage
proposal.
Behind the scenes, “pushing buttons and pulling levers” can also get
the ball rolling. The recent groundbreaking to rebuild Bessie Carmichael
Elementary School wasn’t just an
outgrowth of Daly’s Resolution
010121, passed in February 2001,
but an effort that included meetings with concerned community
members, and helping to find funds
($800,000) for the effort, he says.
Getting legislation passed can
have a lasting impact on constituents,
but sometimes getting the issue heard
at all is a necessary first step, Daly says.
And that can have impact, too.
“Other than just passing legislation, I’m also able to frame the debate
on issues that have particular impact
for people in District 6,” Daly said.
Although some of his more radical ideas
may not make it all the way to the final
stop, in the process of “pushing the
envelope,” says Daly, a modified version may get there, at least.
For instance, Daly says he takes a
position to the left of Peskin and
Maxwell on the Finance Committee. He says for the bay fill project that
involves SFO runway expansion he has
“staked out the radical position” to eliminate all special assistance to the
expansion. Daly says Peskin was eventually able to use Daly’s position to help
pass a less extreme policy, but one that
had an impact nonetheless. Kind of
like a political version of good-cop,
bad-cop with Daly playing the latter
role.
While Daly concedes that supervisors who have been in City Hall
longer may have more legislation
on the books, he says that now that the
class of 2001 knows the ropes, it will
be fast catching up.
But they have to get re-elected first. ■
Laughs & lit, NO lingerie
FUTURES COLLABORATIVE
Now 50 Mason lessee wants to do a comedy club
by Marjorie Beggs
alk into 50 Mason someW
time this winter and
you’ll hear 40 people laughing their heads off (hopefully) or see them gazing raptly
(hopefully) at whoever’s at the
mike that night — maybe the
next Margaret Cho or Robin
Williams, Lawrence Ferlinghetti
or devorah major.
The storefront will become
an as yet unnamed comedy
club and poetry lounge,
announced attorney Joe Wood
at the Aug. 14 Tenderloin
Futures Collaborative meeting.
Pretty funny, huh?
by a Planning employee. Neighbors hollered again.
Many of the site “improvements” already were complete
when the Department of Building Inspection revoked Hunt’s
permit because King’s Court
would have violated the zoning moratorium on adult entertainment businesses closer than
1,000 feet.
Hunt appealed, but in February 2002 the Board of Permit
Appeals voted unanimously to
uphold the revocation. In
March, Wood told The Extra that
Hunt might argue against the
decision in Superior Court. He
didn’t.
PHOTO: CARL ANGEL
Is there new life for the old barber college at 50 Mason St.?
Then why weren’t Collaborative members all smiles –
especially after Wood told them
that he and lessee Joel Hunt
“tried to find a use that will
allow us to use the [already
completed] improvements without offending neighborhood
sensibilities”?
Back in May 2001, Hunt
began remodeling the old
Moler Barber College site for its
planned reincarnation as King’s
Court, a retail lingerie shop
with live models.
The community reared up
in protest and filed a complaint
with the Planning Department,
which issued a stop-work order
in June. But in December, Hunt
began work again, this time
with a permit erroneously issued
Wood said the comedy club
would be open 4 p.m. to midnight, six days a week. Five
booths, 40 bar stools and a $7
cover charge. They’ll serve fingerfood and drinks — beer
and wine, Hunt said, if he can
get a Type 42 liquor license.
Comedy notwithstanding,
Collaborative members grilled
Wood with serious questions.
“Why do you think a comedy
club will work here?” asked
Steve Conley, media rep for
Alliance for a Better District
Six.
Wood cited nearby public
transportation and a successful comedy club at Mason and
Geary that pulled ’em in for
years.
“In the ’60s there used to be
lots of clubs in the city with a political bent, and we’d like to see that
again,” Wood added. “Also,
Mr. Hunt is being realistic — he
wants to defray the cost of buildout.” In March, Wood estimated that Hunt had spent $50,000
before his permit was axed.
“You might be better off
diversifying,” Conley said. “Have
you considered other kinds of
entertainment, like music?”
Wood said they weren’t
averse to the idea, but that
they’d start with comedy.
“There’s the problem of noise
with music,” he said. “Even the
tamest bands can make a lot
of noise.”
“I have one reservation,”
said Michael Nulty, Tenant
Associations Coalition program
director. “If you get your beer
and wine license, will the club
be for adults only?”
Wood said that because the
club will serve food, under-21s
can come in, though a bouncer will check IDs at the door.
TNDC board member John
Burkitt said that as a resident [of
the nearby Dalt], he was glad to
hear about the “doorman” and
hoped he would help keep the
area from being “an open toilet.”
Burkitt also threw Wood
some support for the liquor
license — “it may be essential to
this kind of venture” — and
wished him luck. “I know you
were ganged up on at City Hall,”
he added, referring to the permit revocation.
Wood looked grateful:
“That’s wonderful to hear. . .”
Conley wasn’t so generous
about the liquor license. “I
strongly think that businesses are
missing the point — there are
other ways to have fun without beer and wine.”
The mood lifted when one
Collaborative member asked
the obvious question: “I hope you
have no plans for beautiful
NAME THAT ’TOON
Da Mayor auctioning his suit and hat to the homeless
CENTRAL CITY
extra
young women to remove their
clothes while reading poetry?”
“Certainly not,” Wood
responded, seriously.
He said he’d send all Collaborative members a letter
asking for their support.
U.N. Plaza plan:
$1 million at stake
effort, she said.
“This isn’t meant to be a new
plan,” PioRoda said, “but would
be used to update and supplement earlier plans, such as Tenderloin 2000. It would be another resource for the community.”
Nulty asked about project
funding. A proposal is in the
works, PioRoda said.
“I have reservations about
this,” Nulty said. “It seems politically motivated, perhaps connected with Gordon’s campaign. [District 6 candidate
Roger Gordon is the former
director of Urban Solutions.] You
should have gone to the authors
of Tenderloin 2000 first
[NOMPC], instead of coming to
the Collaborative.”
PioRoda didn’t respond,
and no other Collaborative
members picked up Nulty’s
gauntlet.
But St. Anthony’s Foundation board member Robin
Polastri noted that everyone
could help Urban Solutions
better if PioRoda could be more
specific about what she wanted
from them.
She said she’d be in touch.
Besides yuks and verse, the
Collaborative heard an update
on the U.N. Plaza renovation project from Richard Allman, member of the Plaza Working
Group.
The biggest concern, Allman
said, is “how to make it more useable as a neighborhood
resource, as well as a citywide
resource.” There’s $1 million for
the initial upgrade plan, he
said, but “so far, our plan looks
like a $10 million plan.” The $1
million, a grant from the federal
Department of Transportation,
must be spent by next year,
and other funds haven’t been
identified yet.
Allman emphasized, as he
has at previous meetings, that
there’s “100% support for keeping the Farmers Markets — it’s
the plaza’s largest asset.”
Show of support
The plaza is for the people, he added, and the plans will for Stephanie Salter
With seconds remaining in
reflect that. “We’re not trying to
drive off anyone who’s using the meeting, Collaborative
it now, but to open it up to Chair Glenda Hope asked members to blitz Chronicle poobahs
more people.”
with e-mails, protesting the canSolutions has no answers cellation of writer Stephanie
Also on the agenda, Maris- Salter’s column. Salter has writsa PioRoda from Urban Solutions, ten several editorials shaming
which provides services to small Hastings for its plan to erect
businesses, asked Collabora- a parking garage over the objective members to help her organ- tions of the community, and
ization launch a new project. It has a large following among
will collect previously published caring liberals throughout the
studies of the Tenderloin and city.
identify what still needs to be
“She’s been our friend,”
researched. Interns from Hast- Hope said. “Now it’s time for us
ings College of the Law’s Civil to be hers.” ■
Justice Clinic will help in the
We have a winner
Denise D’Anne, a neighborhood
activist well known for her droll wit, wins
The Extra’s Name That Toon Contest
with the caption that accompanies the
cartoon.
What could be funnier than Da Mayor
offering up his sartorial splendor for the
benefit of the homeless hoi polloi?
D’Anne, active in the Senior Action Network, PRIDE at Work and Alliance for a Better District 6, among many others, retired
in 1999 after 25 years at the Department of Human Services. She
also ran for supervisor in 1998 and 2000.
D’Anne will receive a framed copy of Carl Angel’s cartoon and a complimentary dinner for two at Café do Brasil.
Michael Wise’s submission deserves
honorable mention: “My fellow San Franciscans: ‘Ask not …(what?) …(ahem)… want
not!’ Thank you very much.” Wise is editor and publisher of the respected mental
health consumer quarterly, Voices at Bay. He
is on the board of Spiritmenders and puts
out a monthly calendar of consumer activities for S.F. Mental Health.
Wise will receive a framed copy of
the cartoon with his caption.
Thanks to all who entered the contest. And stay tooned. ■
SEPTEMBER 2002