Morphology, Infraciliature and Ecology of a New Planktonic Ciliate
Transcription
Morphology, Infraciliature and Ecology of a New Planktonic Ciliate
E u r o p .J . P r o t i s t o l3. 1 , 3 8 9 - 3 9 5 ( 1 9 9 5 ) D e c e m b eIr5 , 1 , 9 9 5 European Journal of PROTISTOLOGY Morphology,Infraciliature and Ecologyof a New PlanktonicCiliate,Histiobalantium bodamicum n. sp. (Scuticociliatida: Histiobalantiidae) Karl-HeinzKrainer "Biolab Tullnerfeld", Laboratory for Applied Ecology, Königstetten, Austria HelgaMüller Universityof Konstanz,Limnologicallnstitute,Konstanz,Germany SUMMARY Histiobalantium bodamicum was first found in the pelagic zone of Lake Constance, Germany. Subsequendy further populations have been discovered in two dredged groundwater ponds in Styria and Carinthia (Austria). Its morphology and infraciliature were studied in live cells and in specimensimpregnated with protargol. Histiobalantium bodamicum measures40-60 x 35-45 pm, has usually a long-ellipsoid macronucleus,accompanied by several globular to lenticular micronuclei, and three contractile vacuoles. Somatic ciliation is interspersed with long tactile cilia. The huge buccal cavity contains a prominent, roughly inverted 3-shaped paroral kinety and three adoral membranelles M 1, M2, M 3 arranged closely and in parallel at the paroral's anterior end. The posterior segment of the paroral kinety is accompanied in close distance by a single-filed kinety (scutico-vestige).The adoral membranelles and the paroral kinety form an obruse angle. Membranelle 3 is composed of a single row of monokinetids. Abundance, seasonal population dynamics and vertical distribution of H. bodamicum in two Austrian dredged groundwater ponds and in Lake Constance are described. A synopsis of morphological and ecological data of the presently known speciesof the family Histiobalantiidae is Compiled. Introduction With the taxon described here, 5 speciesare presently assignedto the genus HistiobalantiumStokes. The family Histiobalantiidae De Puytorac & Corliss 1979 is monotypic and is defined by a huge buccal cavity, containing a lengthy paroral kinety composed of dikinetids and three adoral membranellesM1, M2, M3, plus a scutico-vestige[3]. Four speciesare facultatively psammophilic both in freshwater and marine habitats [6. 1,71-.The new species described here is characterizäd by having membranelle 3 located closely and in parallel to the two other membranelles M 1 and M 2. and bv its planktonic habitat. @ 1,995 by Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart Material and Methods All morphological investigations were carried our on a non-axenic stock culture of H. bodamicum originally isolated from "Überlinger See", the northwestern pari of Lake Constance (E9'10'; N47"45'). Ecological data were obtained from field samples from Lake Constance and from two Austrian groundwäter ponds. Lake Constance is a deep, meso-eutrophic, prealpine lake. Sampling, counting, and culturing o{ H. bodamicum from Lake Constance is described in detail by 'l7eisse Müller & [15]. The "Schwarzl-Badesee" is a mesotrophic dredged groundwater pond of about 0.08 km2, around 6 m deep, and situated closely south of Graz, Styria, Austria (E 15"30'; N46'50'). The "rü/eizelsdorferTeich" is an oligotrophic dredged groundwater pond of about 0.07 km2, 0932-4739-9 5-003 1-0389S3.50-0 390 . K.-H. Krainerand H. Müller around 8 m deep,situated30 km south of Klagenfurt,Carinthia, Austria (E1,4",20'; N46', 30'). The samplesfrom the groundwater ponds were collectedfrom March 1992 through February 1,993.To estimatethe number of individuals in the dredgedgroundwaterponds, subsampleswere fixed in HgCl2after Stieve[16] and allowedto sedimentovernight. Countswere performedon microscopeslidesat 100fold magnification.All staining and morphometric proceduresfollowed the methodsdescribedin Foissner[8]. Results Histiobalantiwm bodamicum n. sp. Diagnosis.In vivo about 40-60 x 35-45 pm sized Histiobalantium with somatic tactile cilia and three contractile vacuoles. Macronucleus ellipsoid, several micronuclei. Buccal cavity with roughly inverted 3shaped paroral kinety and three adoral membranelles arranged closely and in parallel. Adoral membranelles and paroral kinety form an obtuse angle. Pelagic in freshwater lakes. Type location. Northwestern part ("Ueberlinger See") of Bodensee (Lake Constance, Germany; E9"10':N47'45'). Deriuatio nominis. "Lacus bodamicus" (latin) for Bodensee(Lake Constance). Type specimens. A holotype and a paratype of H. bodamicum as two slides of protargol impregnated cells have been deposited in the collection of microscope slides of the Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum in Linz (LI), Austria. Morphology (Figs. 1-15; Table 1). Body variable in outline, usually ovoid, otherwise globular or elliptical, sometimes lemon-shaped. Dorsal side hemispherical, ventral side flat. Huge buccal cavity occupying ventral surface, outline in transverse section hemispherical to trapezoid (Fig.6). Buccal cavity opens at surface in a longitudinal cleft, highly variable in width, contains prominent sail-like, hyaline paroral membrane (undulating membrane) and stiff, slowly moving adoral membranelles with 30 pm long cilia (Figs. 9, 12). Oral striae (cp. Dragesco [5]) weakly rccognizable only in living cells (arrows in Fig. 1 ). Macronucleus usually in left cell half near anterior end; in vivo long-elliptical and smooth in outline, in protargol impregnated specimens globular to cucumber-shaped, often with indentations and tapered ends; contains many globular to elliptical nucleoli of various size. Four to eight globular to lenticular micronuclei, closely attached to macronucleus usually at its dorsal side; in vivo hardly recognizable, only weakly stained by protargol. Three contractile vacuoles at dorsal side of cell, two subterminally at right anterior and posterior end, respectively and one at left side near posterior end of macronucleus; excretory pores not observed. Extrusomes sickle-shaped, about 3-4 pm long, distributed in variable number beneath cell surface; distinctly stained by protargol (Fig. 1a). Extruded organelles not observed. Cytoplasm of starving specimenscolourless, well-fed specimenswith yellow-greenish inclusions, 2-3 1tm in diameter, and bluegreen inclusions, 1,-2 pm in diameter. Feedson algae and, probablg bacteria; grows well if fed with the cryptomonadRbodomonas sp. [15]. Food is ingestedin Table 1. Morphometric characteristicsfrom Histiobalantium bodamicum (type population cultured in \7C medium according to Guillard & Lorenzen [10] on a diet of Rhodomonas sp.) SD Character" Cell, length Cell, width Macronucleus, length Macronucleus, width Micronuclei, number Micronucleus, diameter Buccal cavitS length Buccal cavity, width Membranelle 2, length Somatic kineties, number 48.6 36.1 2r.7 8.5 4.6 2.0 39.0 16.1 10.5 73.5 5.8 4.9 1..9 1,.4 1.9 0,0 4.8 J.a 2.0 2.6 5(lx CV Min Max J+.2 1.1..9 42 30 20 7 3 2 30 fl 55 37.5 25 tI 8 2 46 2l 1.3 77 24.4 3.8 2.0 3.6 0.0 23.1 rt.4 4.0 6.9 IJ.O 8.7 16.5 41.3 0.0 12.3 21.t 1.9.0 3.6 t) 70 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 " Data based on randomly selected,protargol impregnated and mounted specimens.Measurements in pm. Abbreviations: CV = coefficient of variation in "Ä, Max = maximum, Min = minimürl, n = number of investigated specimens,SD = standard deviation, Sd* = standard deviation of the mean, * = arithmetic mean. Fig. 1-5. Interphasic morphology of Histiobalantium bodamicum n. sp. (Fig. 1, 1 a, from life; Figs. 2- 5, protargol impregnation). - Fig. 1. Ventral view. Arrows mark oral striae. - Fig. 1a. Extrusome. -Fig.2.Infraciliature of dorsal side. Arrows mark distinct widening of two kineties at posterior end (cytopyge?). - Fig.3. Posterior polar view of infraciliature. - Fig.4 Infraciliature of ventral side. - Fig. 5. Anterior polar view of infraciliature. Bars = 10 pm. CY = cy16s1o-e; L = weakly stained line surrounding buccal cavity; }l4t,2,3 = adoral membranelles; MA = macronucleus; PK = paroral kinety; $\/ = posterior kinety regarded as scutico-vestige. Morphology of Histiobalantiumbodamicumn. sp. . 391 lfl2 J||3 MA 392 ' K.-H. Krainer and H. Müller $* tt Morphology of Histiobalantiumbodamicumn. sp. . 393 o ..o o-10 10-50 50-100 1oo-5o cells./l aa oo I t 'o 2 a rO '.o oO oa '.o oo e g4 oC) ill \_-/ IV V VI vtl vill IX X X I xll tl Fig. 16. Abundance(expressed as cells/l)and seasonalpopulation dynamicsof Histiobalantiumbodamicumn. sp.in two dredged groundwater ponds in Austria (solid circles = Teich"; "Schwarzl-Badesee", open circles = "'Weizelsdorfer seemap at top right of figure). toto by the huge buccal cavity; prior to ingesting, food cells causea lightning reaction of the ciliate when touching the tactile cilia. Movement floating with extended tactile and somatic cilia, interrupted by sudden, short jumps. Somaticcilia 11-13 pm long, narrowly spaced,interspersedwith 25 - 35 pm long, stiff tactile cilia (bristles), origin of which not recognizable in the infraciliary pattern of kinetids. About 70 kineties, composed of 50 - 60 monokinetids, abut at acute angles preorally, and extend posteriad in longitudinal, dense rows. Monokinetids at both poles loosely spaced.At dorsal side kineties show conspicuous widenings at various places (cytop y g e ? ;F i g s . 2 , 1 3 ) . Paroral kinety at right of buccal cavity, usually divided in two C-shaped segments,as a whole appearing as inverted 3-line; commences anteriorly at right end of adoral membranelleM 1, coursesposteriad along right wall of buccal cavitS in mid-region of cavity or just posterior slightly to distinctly curved out leftward ("hook"). Posteriormostpart coursesanteriad, increasing gradually in thickness. Posterior segment accompanied by a kinety of tightly spaced basal bodies, at "hook" and just posterior very near to paroral membrane, then increasing gradually in distance, forming a "thickened" posterior termination (scutico-vestige, cf. Discussion;Figs. 3,4,10,11). Buccal cavity entirely surrounded by wavy, weakly stained line, very likely the actual buccal opening (Fig. a). Adoral membranelles spacedclosely and in parallel in transversedirection at anterior end of buccal cavity form an angle of approximately 1.30-1.40' with paroral kinety. Anteriormost M 1 straight, composed of two tighdy packed rows of ciliated kinetosomes, M 2 composed of about 8-10 of kineties, posteriormost M3 a single, straight row of packed kinetosomes. No data available on resti n g c y s f sa n d c o n j u g a t i o n . Occurrence and Ecology (Fig. 16, Table 2) As yet found at type location and in two oligo- to mesotrophic dredged groundwater ponds (cf. Material and Methods). In Lake Constance, H. bodamicum was regularly observed s.ince1987 at the site of maximum depth (147 m) of "Uberlinger See", the northwestern part of the lake 113, 141. The vertical distribution o{ Table 2. Vertical distribution (cells per liter) of Histiobalantium bodamicum in Lake Constance on five occasions in 1989 (- = below detection limits) Depth Date: 18 April 0-8 m 8-20 m 30m 40m 50m 75m 1 0 0m 140 80 280 200 2 May 20 June 80 )+o 80 :' o 25 July 19 Sept. 580 1340 40 1240 2040 -_200 80 Fig. 6-15. Light micrographs of Histiobalantium bodamicum n. sp. (Figs. 6-9, from life, interference contrast; Figs. 10-15, protargol impregnation). - Figs. 6,T.lnterphasic specimensat transverse focus level showing huge buccal cavity, long tactile cilia (arrows), sail-like, hyaline paroral membrane and ellipsoid macronucleus. - Fig. 8. Specimen focused to the plane where sickle-shapedextrusomes are recognizable(arrow). - Fig. 9. Specimenat transversefocus level showing stiff cilia deriving from the membranelles (arrow). - Figs. 10, 11. Infraciliature of ventral side focused at two different planes. Arrows mark closely accompanying posterior kinety (scutico-vestige?).-Fig. t2.Infraciliature of ventral side focused to plane where the stiff cilia of the membranelles are recognizable (arrows). - Fig. 13. Infraciliature of dorsal side showing distinct widening of somatic kineties at posterior end (arrows). -Fig. 14. Specimen focused to plane where protargol-affine rods (extrusomes?)are recognizable. - Fig. 15. Specimen focused to plane where macronucleus is recognizable. Bars = 10 pm. 394 . K.-H. Krainer and H. Müller Table 3. Compilation of morphological characters and habitats of previously described speciesof Histiobalantium Stokes. Dash means no data Species Cell, length (pm) Tactile cilia (bristles) Contr. vac. Macronucleus Micronuclei number Biotopes, records Author malus 1 3 5- 1 5 0 yes multiple 2 parts 1l freswater,sediment (vicinity of Hamburg, Außenalster, FRG, = locus classicus) [ 11 ] 1 3 0- 2 5 0 yes multiple 2 parts 2-t0 freshwater sediment s (Etang de Cazeaux, France; Yaounde, Camerun) [5, 6l 2 parts variable number freshwater sediments (puddles, ditches in region of ClermontFerrand, France) tel single 2 pats 9 microbenthos, low salinity lagoons of Caspian Sea (Azerbaijan) U,2l multiple 2 parts 1.-2 freshwater sediments(vicinity of Hamburg, FRG) t 11 l 2 parts 3-7 freshwater sediments (Fontainebleau, France; Cotonou, Benin) 16,71 marine sediments (Kiel Bight, FRG = locus classicus) [12] 150-230 100 70-95 yes 5 5 * 1 0 5 yes marrnum mtnor 8 0- 1 6 0 yes single 2 parts 75-1"00 yes single 2 parts 1-3 marine sediments (Roscoff, France) t4l 60-1.02 yes multiple (five) single 2 freshwater sediment (Lake Ontario at Burlington, Canada) l17l 40-55 3-4 single z freshwater sediments (Lake Ontario at Burlington, Canada) [171 3 single 4-9 freshwater, pelagic zone (Lake Constance, FRG; dredged groundwater ponds, Austria) this study bodamicum 40-50 yes H. bodamicwmatthis stationwas investigatedon 5 occasionsin 1989 (Table2). Numbers exceeding1000 cells/l were recorded in the uppermost 20 m of the water column in summerand autumn. In contrast'cell concentrationsin 100 m depth were below detection limits. Maximum abundanceof 6,400cells/literwasrecorded in the 0-8 m depth interval on the 4th of July 1989. For further ecolofical data on H. bodamicumof the locus classicuspopulation see detailed study by Müller & S(eisse[15]. The seasonaldynamicsof the populationsin the Styrand the Carinthian "'$Teizelsian "Schwarzl-Badesee" dorfer Teich" are shown in Fig. 16. The species appearedin low numbers(10-320 cells/l)throughout the year (exceptJune,August and September)in both ponds.Maximä were observedin May L992(240 cellsll in "s7eizelsdorferTeich") and in February 1'993(320 cells/l in "schwarzl Badesee"),near the bottom of the ponds (in 7 m depth and 5 m depth, respectively). Discussion Histiobalantiwm bodamicwm has the typical characteristics of the family Histiobalantiidae as defined by Corliss [3], i.e. a conspicuousbuccal cavity containing a prominent paroral kinety and three adoral membranelles, representing the tetrahymenal organization. However, it differs in the compositon of the posterior termination of the paroral kinety (or segment C, regarded as scutico-vestige; [9]). In H. natans and H. maius, the scutico-vestigeconsists of a lengthy field of four rows of kineties [5 , 7 , 9]. However, in H. boda.micum a scutico-vestige is not clearly obvious. Possibly, the single-filed kinety which accompanies the posterior segment of the paroral kinety is a scutico-vestige(Figs. 3, 4). The origin of this kinety has been followed during stomatogenesis:In some later stages, distinct scutico-fields appear at the terminations of the newly developing paroral kineties. In very late Morphology of Histiobalantiumbodamicumn. sp. . 395 2 AgamahevF. G. (1983):The ciliatesof the CaspianSea. Leningrad(in Russianwith Englishsummary). 3 CorlissJ. O. (t9791:The ciliatedprotozoa.Characterization, classificationand guideto the literature.2nd ed.PerBamonPress,Oxford, New York. 4 DragescoJ. $9601 Cili6s m6sopsammiques littoraux. Syst6matique, morphologie,6cologie.Trav.Stn.biol. Roscoff,122,1-356. 5 DragescoJ. $968): Les genresPleuronemaDujardin, Schizocalyptranov. gen. et Histiobalantium Stokes(CiIi6s HolotrichesHym6nostomes).Protistologica,4, 85t06. 5 DragescoJ. et Dragesco-Kern6is A. (1986):Cili6slibresde I'Afrique intertropicale.Introductionä la connaissance et ä l'6tude descili6s.Faunetropicale,26, "1.-559. 7 Dragesc<iJ. et Iftode F. (1972\ Histiobalantium natans (Clap. & Lachm., 1858): morphologie, infraciliature, morphogenöse(holotricheHymenostomatida).Protistologica,8,'W. 347-352. 8 Foissner (1991,):Basiclight and scanningelectronmicroscopicmethodsfor taxonomicstudiesof ciliatedprotozoa.Europ.J. Protistol.,27,313-330. 9 GroliöreC-A. (1973):Descriptionde quelquesespöces de cili6s hymenostomesdes genres Satbrophilus Corliss, '1.786, t960, Cyclidium O. F. Mueller, Histiobalantium Stokes,1886.J. Protozool.,20,369-376. 10 Guillard R. R. L. and LorenzenC.1.0.972): Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllide C. J. Phycol., 8, 10-'J.4. 11 Kahl A. (t93L): UrtiereoderProtozoaI: I7impertiereoder Ciliata (Infusoria).2. Holotricha außerden im 1. Teil behandeltenProstomata. TierweltDt1, 21, 181-398. 12 Kahl A. (1935):UrtiereoderProtozoaI: \Timpertiereoder Acknowledgements Ciliata (Infusoria).4. Peritrichaund Chonotricha.Tierwelt Dtl., 30, 651-886. 'Sfe wish to thank Prof. Dr. D. G. Müller, Konstanz,who 13 Müller H. (1989): The relative importanceof different provided laboratory facilitieswhere H. bodamicwmcultures ciliate taxa in the pelagicfood web of Lake Consrance. 'We could be maintainedfor more than two years. also reMicrob. Ecol.,18, 261-273. ceived support from "Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"14 Müller H., SchöneA., Pinto-CoelhoR. M., SchweizerA., 'Weisse within SFB248 "Cvclins.of Matter in Lake Constance". and T. (1991): Seasonalsuccession of ciliatesin Lake Constance.Microb. Ecol., 21, 1t9-138. 15 Müller H. and WeisseT. (1994):Laboratoryand field observationson the scuticociliateHistiobalantium from the pelagiczoneof Lake Constance,FRG. J. PlanktonRes., References 16,39r-401. 16 RomeisB. (1967):MikroskopischeTechnik.Oldenburg, München. 1 AgamalievF.G. (1972):Ciliatesfrom microbenthosof the islandsof Apseronskijand Bakinskijarchipelagosof the 17 Wilbert N. (1986): Ciliaten aus dem Interstitialdes Ontario Sees.Acta Protozool.25. 379-396. CaspianSea.Acta Protozool.,10, 1,-27. stages, remnants of these scutico-fields remain intact. 'We assumethat these remnants are the origin of the single-filed kinety. The most important infraciliary feature of H. bodamicum is the spatial relation of the adoral membranelles to each other and to the paroral kinety. In contrast to H. bodamicum. alI other known species have membranelles M 1 and M 2 in an acute angle to the paroral kinety, and their M 3 is located roughly at right-angles to M 2, thus forming a more or less distinct triangle 15,7, 9, 171.Histiob alantiwm bodamicum is the first member of the genus having adoral membranelle M 3 shifted closely and in parallel to the two others, and in which the adoral membranelles form an obtuse angle with the paroral kinety. From this point of view, H. bodamicumiswell separatedfrom the other species.However, only considering the in vivo-aspects, the new species is very similar to H. natans and H. minor with respect to size, number of contractile vacuoles and freshwater habitat. It can only be differentiated by the nuclear apparatusand presence/absence of tactile cilia. Table 3 lists the most important morphological characters and the habitats of the Histiobalantium-species described to date. Up to now, H. bodamicum is the only planktonic species of the genus H isti o b alantium. Key words: Histiobalantium bodamicumn. sp. - Morphology - Infraciliature- Ecology Karl-HeinzKrainer,Wienerstrasse 45, A-3433Königstetten, Austria