Arctic IO by Analogy - Center for Integrated Operations in the
Transcription
Arctic IO by Analogy - Center for Integrated Operations in the
Arctic IO by Analogy 2013-09-05 Prelude to IO 2 2013-09-05 Different IO focus => Different Analytic Ecology Domestic IO is dominated by industrial efficiency, but arctic exploration drilling will probably be dominated by a need for operational effectiveness 3 2013-09-05 4 2013-09-05 NADGE NASAMS Well integrated 5 2013-09-05 Less well integrated 6 2013-09-05 Integration in progress? 7 2013-09-05 What creates disintegration - what drives integration? Governing a large number as though governing a small number is a matter of division into groups. Nød lærer naken kvinne å spinne While this solution worked, it was fundamentally flawed, creating the otherwise contradictory systemic anomaly, that, if left unchecked, might threaten the system itself. Ergo, those who refused the program, while a minority, would constitute an escalating probability of disaster. 8 2013-09-05 Necessity is the mother of invention Organizational patterns (static) Differentiation 9 Integration • Specialization • Standardization • Module (Unit, Component) • Liaison (Mediator) • Task • Chain of command 2013-09-05 10 2013-09-05 IO component model (static) Decision Support Command Mediator Information infrastructure Effector Sensor 11 2013-09-05 Connective promenade 12 2013-09-05 Comparison Matrix Air Defense Arctic Exploration Drilling Geographically distributed operation in physical environment √ √ Presence of threats to operations √ √ Threats are BVR, non-deterministic √ √ Threats needs detection, tracking, classification and prediction √ √ Performed by multinational joint task force √ √ Vital national interests at stake √ √ Operation subject to Fog and Friction √ √ High opex and capex √ √ 13 2013-09-05 Comparison Matrix Reloaded Air Defense Arctic Exploration Drilling Operational experience, maturity Very high Just beginning System and operations analysis Abundant Infancy? Physical environment Airspace, simple and homogeneous Air, sea, subsurface, complex Information and analysis availability Excellent Some Command and Control maturity Extreme Low Sensor suites development Yes More complex Sensor integration, COP in progress Mature Infancy Flexibility key to success Yes Yes Fog and Friction Yes Literaly 14 2013-09-05 Analogy Allegretto 15 2013-09-05 Fighter pilots vs Drillers, how to handle them? 16 2013-09-05 Design of air defense fighter vs ice-breaker • Agility • Range • Payload/Firepower • Speed • Acceleration 17 2013-09-05 Task Force Composition Fleet of fit for purpose vessels cooperating and composed according to the need of the moment • AAR • Escort /sweep by fighters • Mudmoving • Ground based mission support centre • Airborne command and control – sensors • Electronic warfare 18 2013-09-05 RAP vs «RIP» CAP vs «CIP» • Geometry of «manning the cap» similar to physical ice breaking. • Tradeoff between resource consumption, distances out and sectors to defend • Air defense systems maximize stamina by minimizing their alert state • Building a common operating picture and implementing a threat warning and alert system will be absolutely key to an environmentally acceptable footprint and cost effective operation • Situational awareness – will need much liasoning/mediation 19 2013-09-05 If flexibility is the key to arctic power then: • Flexibility is the key to airpower – it will also be the key to «arctic power»: • Must write and agree on doctrines and concepts of operations for − Ice management operations − Oil spill response operations − Command and control − etc • Large scale, synthetic and real training exercises will be required • Onshore mission support centre with good information infrastructure to help in planning and execution control, disruption management etc • Command and control will be «military style» mission tactics • Must develop «rules of engagement» 20 2013-09-05 Conclusion, Arctic IO should consider from IAD • Design and functions of the command and control system • Building and using a common operating picture • Mechanics and geometry of handling threat tracking and defensive measures • Threat warning level system and decision support, «fight or flight» • Fleet composition issues • Vessel design tradeoffs • Exercises • Training, selection and retention of personnell • Integrated operations planning • Doctrine, concepts of operations • Operating modes and modes of control 21 2013-09-05 Arctic IO by Analogy Arent Arntzen Lead Researcher [email protected] Tel: +4791559139 www.statoil.com 22 2013-09-05 Modes of operation and modes of control • Centralized control – decentralized execution • Close control – loose control – broadcast control 23 2013-09-05 Digital Battlefield vs Network Centric 24 2013-09-05 On the transient nature of arctic remoteness 25 2013-09-05 The Dowding Ice Management System 26 2013-09-05