Psychological factors associated with skin
Transcription
Psychological factors associated with skin
Dermatology Times® Clinical Analysis for Today’s Skincare Specialists September 2015 | VOL. 36, NO. 09 | September 2015 Mind Matters Volume 36 No. 09 Psychological factors associated with skin disease are quantifiable Clinical Analysis for Today’s Skincare Specialists Most conditions that dermatologists see in their offices impact their patients psychologically. Similarly, psychiatric factors often are instrumental in the etiology and course of certain skin conditions, like skin picking (left) and prurigo nodularis (below). It behooves dermatologists to learn how to manage and when to refer these patients. Photos: Francisco Tausk, M.D. Cosmetic Ingredient facts and fallacies: What to know to educate patients Lisette Hilton | Staff Correspondent Parabens. Phthalates. Chemical fragrances. Sodium lauryl sulfate. These are among the behind-the-scenes ingredients in over-the-counter skincare and haircare products that have some of the big cosmetic companies chang- Finacea Foam This Issue has In entered the picture ® DermatologyTimes.com (azelaic acid) Foam,15% Foam 15% www.finaceafoam.com © 2015 Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ 07981. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, and Finacea are registered trademarks of Bayer. All rights reserved. PP-825-US-0378 September 2015 | THE TAKEAWAY | KELLY CORDORO, M.D., discusses screening labs, avoiding complacency, and the ABCDEs of melanoma in kids. SEE PAGE 86 Dermatology Times® Clinical Analysis for Today’s Skincare Specialists September 2015 Mind Matters Volume 36 No. 09 Psychological factors associated with skin disease are quantifiable Clinical Analysis for Today’s Skincare Specialists Most conditions that dermatologists see in their offices impact their patients psychologically. Similarly, psychiatric factors often are instrumental in the etiology and course of certain skin conditions, like skin picking (left) and prurigo nodularis (below). It behooves dermatologists to learn how to manage and when to refer these patients. Photos: Francisco Tausk, M.D. September 2015 | VOL. 36, NO. 09 | Cosmetic Ingredient facts and fallacies: What to know to educate patients Lisette Hilton | Staff Correspondent Parabens. Phthalates. Chemical fragrances. Sodium lauryl sulfate. These are among the behind-the-scenes ingredients in over-the-counter skincare and haircare products that have some of the big cosmetic companies changing the way they formulate moisturizers, soaps, shampoos and anti-aging products. But are these inactive ingredients bad or are they merely perceived to be bad because of misinformation or different “spins” on the truth? And are their substitutes any better? The science behind many of these controversies is often misrepresented, according to Adam Friedman, M.D., associate professor of dermatology, residency program director, and director of translational research at George Washington University, Washington, D.C. “You can easily find ways to demonstrate that these ingredients are toxic using the certain bench assays, but that doesn’t necessarily translate to the INGREDIENTS see page 52 Lisette Hilton | Staff Correspondent DermatologyTimes.com Ignoring the elephant in the room — the psychological aspects of skin disease —can prevent traditional treatments from working optimally or at all, according to Caroline S. Koblenzer, M.D., a trained psychoanalyst and retired clinical professor of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Koblenzer says it became clear to her soon after she started dermatology practice in 1966 that dermatology wasn’t answering the needs of many patients with skin conditions. “If you have patients with eczema who are not getting better, when medically speaking they should be getting better, one begins to ask questions,” Dr. Koblenzer says. Those questions, according to the dermatologist, attempt to uncover the ways in which psychological problems may be impacting the skin, or vice versa. PSYCHOLOGICAL CONNECTIONS Most conditions that dermatologists see in their offices impact their patients psychologically. In fact, some skin manifestations are almost entirely psychiatric, such as delusions of parasitosis, according to Richard D. Granstein, M.D., chairman of dermatology at Weill Cornell Medical College and president of the Association of Psychoneurocutaneous Medicine of North America (APMNA), which is the only organization in the United States that focuses on psychodermatology issues. “One could argue that there are skin conditions that have little impact on psychology. Warts on the hands may not affect psychological status unless very large, but warts on the genitals probably do. Also, because many skin diseases are visible, even if not contagious or life-threatening, they PSYCHODERMATOLOGY see page 31 In This Issue September 2015 VOL. 36, NO. 09 CLINICAL 18 Rosacea, the acne mimic Critical factors you need to know for accurate diagnosis and treatment COSMETIC 44 Female hair loss Three pathways and implications for treatment ONCOLOGY 61 Hh inhibitor therapy Benefits, side effects, and alternatives for drug resistance BUSINESS 72 How to fire a problem patient Expert recommendations for how to let go of problem patients safely, effectively, humanely | THE TAKEAWAY | KELLY CORDORO, M.D., discusses screening labs, avoiding complacency, and the ABCDEs of melanoma in kids. SEE PAGE 86 NEW! LOCKS IN MOISTURE 3X LONGER THAN DOVE BEAUTY BAR ® 1* SKIN MOISTURE IMPROVEMENT OVER TIME CeraVe® contains ceramides 1, 3, & 6-II to help lock in moisture 3x longer than Dove® and 6x longer than Cetaphil®1* CeraVe® Hydrating Cleanser Bar Dove® Sensitive Skin Unscented Beauty Bar Cetaphil® Daily Cleansing Bar 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HOURS AVAILABLE AT: *Data derived from a bio-instrumental study conducted in 15 female subjects using corneometry. Study was shown to increase moisture content. Measured against Dove® Sensitive Skin Unscented Beauty Bar and Cetaphil® Daily Cleansing Bar. REFERENCE: 1. Data on file. Valeant Consumer Products. Moisturization study. May 2014. CeraVe is a registered trademark of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., or its affiliates. MVE is a registered trademark of DFB Technology, Ltd. Patent No. 6,709,663. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Valeant Consumer Products, a division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America. ©2015 Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America SK/CVE/15/0016 04/15 www.CeraVe.com SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Insight & Opinion From Our Advisory Board Leaders Norman Levine, M.D., is a private practitioner in Tucson, Ariz. $ The tale of the 220 tube of clobetasol cream patient with a minimally steroid-responsive dermatosis, vitiligo, recently contacted me to complain that he could no longer afford the medication that I had prescribed for him. I was puzzled when he informed me that a 60-gram tube of clobetasol cream would now cost him $220, an amount that was far beyond his budget. The medication was no longer on his insurance plan’s formulary, presumably because it had become too expensive for them as well. At first I was highly doubtful and assumed that the dispensing pharmacy had mistakenly substituted a name-brand product for the generic version I had prescribed. A quick survey of several local pharmacies confirmed that all were pricing clobetasol above $200. A In this particular instance, I reluctantly substituted fluocinonide cream for the clobetasol, knowing that it was unlikely that he would re-pigment while on this therapy. To make matters worse, this new medication was now being sold for about $50.00 for a 60-gram tube. Six months prior, it was one of the $4 specials at several drugstore chains. This new economic reality strikes at the heart of the service we dermatologists provide for our patients. If we can no longer use medications that work best, we may revert to second-rate status medically and only marginally improve the lives of the people we treat. In a conversation with a recently trained colleague, he indicated that some of his fellow residents intend on not writing any prescriptions, but instead will provide only surgical and cosmetic care. The rationale for this decision is that it is simply too big of a hassle to fight with third party payers who are reluctant to allow expensive medications to be used by their insured customers. If this approach to practice becomes widespread our specialty will be reduced to a mere shadow of its former self. If dermatologists decide against treating skin conditions with effective prescription medications, who will be capable of treating complicated conditions? Individuals with far more knowledge than me have given several explanations including high costs of developing new drugs, problems with manufacturing and the lack of profit in producing ge- $ 850 Methotrexate tablets current yearly cost, compared to $20/year per 33-dose vial neric drugs as reasons for cost inflation. In addition, the Affordable Care Act has mandated that Medicare cannot negotiate lower prices for the medications that they provide. Therefore, drug manufacturers are free to increase prices to astronomical levels without any controls. This is probably what the 1880’s felt like when the robber barons were at the peak of their powers. What are we to do? I would strongly suggest that we do not give up on providing our patients with the highest quality of care, even when continuing the fight can be exasperating (I hate battling with third party payers over what they will or will not cover). SANITY-SAVING STRATEGIES There are several strategies which may help to preserve our sanity and our specialty. Absolutely avoid name-brand drugs whenever possible. Paying $2.25 per day for generic minocycline instead of at least $6 per day for some branded minocycline products can lead to real savings over many months of treatment. From another perspective, one often hears the rationale that if the third-party payer will cover such branded drugs, why shouldn’t we prescribe them? Those who make this argument fail to understand that we all pay higher insurance premiums when more expensive medications are used. We can utilize medications in more efficient ways: Triamcinolone cream remains a real bargain but is not particularly potent. However, when used under Saran occlusion or under wet wraps, it becomes as potent as clobetasol. Often a one-week use of occlusive dressings improves the dermatitis to the point where triamcinolone without the wraps will work quite well. Up until recently, methotrexate tablets at a dose of 15 mg per week cost about $300 per year, but now is at least $850 per year. However, if the medication can be provided as the solution for injection and ingested after being diluted in juice, there can be very substantial savings. A 20 ml vial of methotrexate, 25 mg per ml, costs less than $20. At a dose of 15 mg per week (0.6 ml), there are 33 doses in a single vial. Fluorouracil cream costs at least $230 for a 40-gram tube. The vials of fluorouracil for injection cost about $5 per vial. By placing the contents of one 50-mg vial into 30 ml of any emollient lotion, one gets approximately a 1.5% concentration, which works as well as the store-bought variety. If you want to be a very popular dermatologist, try giving this away to your patients who need it. Whatever strategies you employ to keep treatments affordable, please avoid the temptation to abandon this battle. Help give your patients the best opportunity to maximize the health of their skin. DT 3 4 EDITORIAL ADVISORY ® BOARD SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM content The Dermatology Times Editorial Advisory Board qualifies the editorial content of the magazine. Members review meeting programs; suggest story topics, special reports and sources; evaluate manuscripts; conduct interviews and roundtables; and counsel editors as questions arise. VP, CONTENT & STRATEGY GROUP CONTENT DIRECTOR Sara Michael Teresa A. McNulty CONTENT CHANNEL DIRECTOR Heather Onorati } [email protected] | (440) 826-2868 CONTENT MANAGING EDITOR Pamela Kreigh } [email protected] | (440) 891-2610 AESTHETIC CONTENT EDITOR Eliza Cabana } [email protected] | (440) 891-2671 CONTENT SPECIALIST COSMETIC COLUMNIST LASER & LIGHT DEVICES COLUMNIST LEGAL AFFAIRS COLUMNIST DIRECTOR, DESIGN & DIGITAL PRODUCTION ART DIRECTOR SENIOR PRODUCTION MANAGER Annamarie Iannetta } [email protected] | (440) 891-2606 Zoe Diana Draelos, M.D. Joely Kaufman, M.D. David J. Goldberg, M.D., J.D. Nancy Bitteker Lecia Landis Karen Lenzen } [email protected] | (218) 740-6371 sales & marketing EVP, MANAGING DIRECTOR VP, GROUP PUBLISHER Zoe Diana Draelos, M.D., Norman Levine, M.D., Ronald G. Wheeland, M.D., Elaine Siegfried, M.D., is consulting professor is a private practitioner is a private practitioner is professor of pediatrics of dermatology, in Tucson, Ariz. in Tucson, Ariz. & dermatology, Saint Louis Duke University School University Health Sciences of Medicine, Durham, N.C. Center, St. Louis, Mo. PUBLISHER Dr. Ranella Dr. David Dr. Roy Dr. Patti Dr. Tina Matarasso Hirsch Goldberg Geronemus Farris Alster New York, N.Y. New York, N.Y. New Orleans, La. Washington D.C. San Francisco, Calif. Boston, Mass. Ken Sylvia Amy Ammon } [email protected] | (732) 346-3089 NATIONAL ACCOUNT MANAGER Diane Kebabjian } [email protected] | (732) 346-3034 SALES MANAGER, CLASSIFIED/ DISPLAY ADVERTISING Tod McCloskey } [email protected] | (440) 891-2739 ACCOUNT MANAGER, CLASSIFIED/ DISPLAY ADVERTISING Karen Gerome } [email protected] | (440) 891-2670 ACCOUNT MANAGER, RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING Joanna Shippoli } [email protected] | 440-891-2615 LIST ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE Renee Schuster } [email protected] | (440) 891-2613 PERMISSIONS Maureen Cannon } [email protected] | (440) 891-2742 REPRINTS Dr. Seth Georgiann DeCenzo SUBSCRIPTION INQUIRIES [email protected] } Inquiries involving reprints should be directed to 877-652-5295 ext. 121 Outside US, UK, direct dial: 281-419-5725. ext. 121 } Including changes of address, should be directed to (877) 922-2022 or (218) 740-6477. UBM Advanstar CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EVP, LIFE SCIENCES EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT EVP, BUSINESS SYSTEMS EVP, HUMAN RESOURCES EVP, STRATEGY & BUS. DEV. SR VICE-PRESIDENT VP, GM PHARM/SCIENCE GROUP VP, LEGAL VP, MEDIA OPERATIONS Dr. Albert Dr. Philip Dr. Helen Dr. James Dr. Joel Yan Werschler Torok Spencer Schlessinger Philadelphia, Pa. Spokane, Wash. Medina, Ohio St. Petersburg, Fla. Omaha, Neb. Our Mission Dermatology Times is the only clinical news resource serving a readership of more than 14,000 dermatologists and other professionals focused on skincare. Through unbiased reporting, we strive to help practitioners put into perspective developments that affect their business. Our goal is to provide practical information that will help them to better understand clinical, regulatory and financial issues, as well as chart business growth. Let your voice be heard, contact us: [email protected] VP, TREASURER & CONTROLLER Joe Loggia Tom Ehardt Georgiann DeCenzo Chris DeMoulin Rebecca Evangelou Julie Molleston Mike Alic Tracy Harris Dave Esola Michael Bernstein Francis Heid Adele Hartwick UBM Americas CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Sally Shankland Brian Field Margaret Kohler UBM plc CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GROUP OPERATIONS DIRECTOR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHAIRMAN Tim Cobbold Andrew Crow Robert Gray Dame Helen Alexander Dermatology Times (Print: ISSN 0196-6197, Digital ISSN 2150-6523) is published monthly by UBM Medica 131 W. First St., Duluth, MN 55802-2065. Subscription rates: $95 for one year in the United States and Possessions; $140 for one year in Canada and Mexico; all other countries, $185 for one year. International pricing includes air-expedited service. Single copies (prepaid only): $10 in the United States, $ 15 in Canada and Mexico, $20 all other countries. Back issues, if available, are $20 in the United States and Possessions, $30 in Canada and Mexico, and $40 in all other countries. Include $6.50 per order plus $ 2 for additional copy for U.S. postage and handling.If shipping outside the United States, include an additional $10 per order plus $3 per additional copy. Periodicals postage paid at Duluth, MN 55806 and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Please send address changes to DERMATOLOGY TIMES, c/o PO Box 6013, Duluth, MN 55806-6013. Canadian G.S.T. number: R-124213133RT001.Publications Mail Agreement Number 40612608. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to IMEX Global Solutions, P.O. Box 25542, London, ON, N6C 6B2,Canada. Printed in the U.S.A. ©2015 Advanstar Communications Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including by photocopy, recording, or information storage and retrieval without permission in writing from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal/educational or personal use, or the internal/educational or personal use of specific clients is granted by Advanstar Communications Inc. for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Dr. Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400 fax 978-646-8700 or visit http://www.copyright.com online. For uses beyond those listed above, please direct your written request to Permission Dept. fax 440-756-5255 or email: [email protected]. UBM Medica provides certain customer contact data (such as customer’s name, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses) to third parties who wish to promote relevant products, services, and other opportunities that may be of interest to you. If you do not want UBM Medica to make your contact information available to third parties for marketing purposes, simply call toll-free 866-529-2922 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. CST and a customer service representative will assist you in removing your name from UBM Medica lists. Outside the U.S., please phone 218-740-6477. Dermatology Times does not verify any claims or other information appearing in any of the advertisements contained in the publication, and cannot take any responsibility for any losses or other damages incurred by readers in reliance on such content. Dermatology Times welcomes unsolicited articles, manuscripts, photographs, illustrations and other materials but cannot be held responsible for their safekeeping or return. Library Access Libraries offer online access to current and back issues of Dermatology Times through the EBSCO host databases. To subscribe, call toll-free 888-527-7008. Outside the U.S. call 218-740-6477. PRINTED IN U.S.A. TM DISCOVER THE BENEFITS OF THE PROMIUS PROMISE ™ A dedicated pharmacy and support service committed to helping patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne meet the requirements of treatment. The Promius Promise™ is here to help. B Facilitates no-cost shipping B Help for patients in navigating the treatment process B Applies $0 co-pay or money-saving rebates for eligible patients* *Call 1.888.959.7600 for eligibility requirements You can count on us to continuously explore new ways to help patients stay on track with treatment. We’re a pharmacy and support service that: B Provides an extensive patient toolkit B Reminds patients to schedule their next appointment if they wish us to do so We are available weekdays 8 AM – 11 PM EST and even on Saturdays 9 AM – 3 PM EST. GIVE YOUR PATIENTS ALL THE BENEFITS OF THE PROMIUS PROMISE.™ FIND OUT MORE TODAY. Call 1.888.959.7600 or fax prescriptions to: 1.855.345.6789. For e-prescriptions, select Direct Success Pharmacy at zip code 07727. For information about the iPLEDGE® program call 1.866.495.0654 or visit www.ipledgeprogram.com iPLEDGE® is a trademark owned by McKesson Specialty Arizona Inc. ©2015 Promius Pharma, LLC. All rights reserved. ZNT-0115-121 INTER 6 CTIVE ® SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Resources What’s your diagnosis? Photos: Image appears with permission from VisualDx. Logical Images Inc. An 8-year-old girl was brought in by her parents. They said she has had this enlarging “growth” on her leg for over one month, and they are worried it could be cancer. For more information on specialized areas of dermatology, related articles and business resources, go to: modernmedicine.com/ResourceCenters Stewardship of acne CHOOSE ONE: ATOPIC DERMATITIS TINEA CORPORIS IMPETIGO bit.ly/enlarginggrowth MULTIMEDIA LAST MONTH’S DIAGNOSIS: Screening labs, avoiding complacency, and the ABCDEs of pediatric melanoma Erythema Perstans Dyschromicum Part Three of our Takeaway discussion with Kelly Cordoro, M.D., professor of dermatology and pediatrics at the University of California in San Francisco, explores the complexities of navigating pediatric dermatological conditions. Listen to the audio: bit.ly/acnestewardship Current and emerging treatments for acne Learn more at: bit.ly/Augustdiagnosis bit.ly/ABCDEsofpediatricmelanoma Blog Why are some lip balms Are lasers and light devices overhyped? considered over the counter drugs? Laser roundtable panel members Barry DiBernardo, M.D., E. Victor Ross, M.D., Jill Waibel, M.D., and Renalto Saltz, M.D., share their expert advice at the Vegas Cosmetic Surgery 2014 meeting. Learn more: bit.ly/emergingtx Rosacea research and treatment bit.ly/advancedtechnologytoday Zoe Diane Draelos, M.D. Like us on Facebook and participate in the discussion http://bit.ly/lipbalmsoverthecounter facebook.com/DermatologyTimes Follow us on Twitter to receive the latest news and participate in the discussion @Biozantium Talk to #psoriasis patients about #Psoriatic #arthritis risks. #Dermatolgoy buff.ly/1L5vXR6 via @DermTimesNow @AscendDerm1 RT @#Melanoma on rise in #Latino population. Anyone can get #SkinCancer Everyone should get checked! @s_niha RT #Psoriasis in skin of color. What you need to know. buff.ly/1hjuTfR #Dermatology pic.twitter.com/ H7YcWJieie via @DermTimesNow #Skin barrier benefits of sunflower seed oil. http://buff.ly/1DCdPvP #Dermatology @NPF @DrDaisyBennett #Dermatologists have biggest influence when it comes to cosmetic medical procedures. @AADskin @ASDSnews @DermTimesNow bit. ly/1L5W7TY bit.ly/rosacearesearch Achieving Total Facial Rejuvenation with Submental Contouring, Current and Emerging Strategies (sponsored) twitter.com/DermTimesNow Dermatology Times App Dermatology Times is part of the ModernMedicine Network, a Web-based portal for health professionals offering best-in-class content and tools in a rewarding and easy-to-use environment for knowledge-sharing among members of our community. Get access to all the benefits Dermatology Times offers at your fingertips. The Dermatology Times app for iPad & iPhone is now free in the iTunes store. bit.ly/submentalcontouringrejuv ® Finacea Foam has entered the picture (azelaic acid) Foam,15% www.finaceafoam.com © 2015 Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ 07981. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, and Finacea are registered trademarks of Bayer. All rights reserved. PP-825-US-0349 September 2015 8 LEGAL ® EAGLE SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM David J. Goldberg, M.D., J.D. is director of Skin Laser and Surgery Specialists of New York and New Jersey; director of laser research, Mount Sinai School of Medicine; and adjunct professor of law, Fordham Law School. Moving to EMR and destroying written records: I just got sued r. Paper has practiced dermatology for 20 years. Last year, he began to implement an EMR system, and his staff began to destroy thousands of paper charts from the last two decades. Unfortunately, his staff shredded multiple records that had not yet been scanned. Several patients whose records were destroyed have requested copies. One such patient has now threatened to sue Dr. Paper for negligence. He saw the patient only one year ago. Does he have any liability? D SEVERAL ISSUES TO CONSIDER Standard medical malpractice is based on negligence. The analysis of negligence is based on four distinct elements: ➧ ➧ ➧ ➧ Duty Breach of duty Causation Damages Attorneys, expert witnesses and juries will always ask the same question: In his actions toward his patient, did Dr. Paper perform in accordance with reasonable duty? In most jurisdictions the standard question is: Did he perform his duty like any other reasonable physician? In some jurisdictions, the question is slightly different: Did the physician perform in a manner that would be expected by a reasonable patient? If Dr. Paper did not, he then has breached his duty. Breaching his duty will not necessarily cause him to lose a lawsuit (it may, however, be the precipitating factor in the lawsuit being filed). CAUSATION: CONNECTING THE DOTS For Dr. Paper to lose the lawsuit, there must be a connection between the breach of duty and damages. That element is known as causation. That is, was the breach the actual cause of the damages? Damages must have an economic value. Misdiagnosis, scars, infection and pigmentary changes may all have economic value. In the end, all four elements in the cause of action in negligence must be proved to the jury for Dr. Paper to lose the lawsuit. Just because there are scars, infection, or pigmentary changes does not mean there is also negligence. These may be complications that do not necessarily rise to the level of negligence. Misdiagnosis, on the other hand, if it leads to damages, may lead to a loss of the case based on negligence. Whether there is a breach in duty is often determined by a testifying expert witness. Testimony will be based on the medical literature, community norms, and meeting lectures. RETAINING RECORDS The second question is the more interesting one. The medical records have been destroyed and so are no longer available. It goes without saying that we need to keep all records that relate to our patients’ care, including notes, communications, diagnostic test results and medication records, for a variety of medical and ethical reasons. For how long do we need to keep the records? The first level of regulation is federal. Medicare’s Conditions of Participation (which requires hospitals to retain records for five years), applies only to facilities. However, Medicare managed-care program providers have the longest retention requirement under CMS regulations and must retain patient records for 10 years. HIPAA follows the Federal Statute of Limitations for civil penalties and so requires retention of a record for six years from the date of its creation or the date when it last was in effect, whichever is later. State requirements vary significantly. For example, physicians in New York must keep the records of adult patients for six years after the last visit and the records of minor patients until one year after the child’s 18th birthday. In Colorado, seven years is the adult standard and, for minors, the records should be kept until seven years after the child has reached 18. Texas also uses seven years as the adult standard and requires that the records of minors be kept until they are 21 or for seven years from the last date of treatment, whichever is longer. A physician who is closing a practice entirely (rather than one who is selling, under which terms the incoming physician becomes the custodian of the records and there is no time limit issue) must therefore check her own state’s regulations. Needless to say, irrespective of any limiting statutes, do not destroy medical records that relate to a civil, criminal or administrative proceeding if you know that the process is either pending or already ongoing but has not yet been resolved. The majority of dermatologists have been converting their written medical records to EMR records for a variety of reasons. The 2009 stimulus package allocated billions of dollars to physicians upon implementation of “meaningful use” of EMR. Dr. Paper has started down this road, but he must be careful that written records are not destroyed before they’re scanned. DT State Your Case. What scenarios keep you guessing? Pass them along in confidence to: [email protected] SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM COMMENTARY Step therapy stalls appropriate patient treatment GIL YOSIPOVITCH, M.D. | TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM T here has been a lot of discussion, here and nationwide, with the recent changes to health care in the United States, about strategies to keep the cost of prescription medicines down and the balance required to ensure quality health care. One such strategy, known as “step therapy” or “fail-first,” is used by payers to withhold coverage unless a healthcare provider prescribes medications in a predetermined order. Step-protocols typically require patients to fail on one or more generic drugs, then one or more payerpreferred branded therapies, before they can get a branded therapy not preferred by the payer. Policies of this sort are undermining the treatment of patients with psoriasis in Pennsylvania. The reasoning behind step-therapy policies is often based on financial, not medical, reasons. The requirements do not consider an individual’s medical situation or history. And there are few, if any, existing regulations that require insurers to prove the safety and efficacy of their step therapy policies. With this process, insurance companies are cutting down on costs but limiting patients’ ability to get effective and appropriate medications for their individual situation. In some cases, patients are required to try and fail numerous medications that may be inadequate for their particular situation. Patients may be required to take medications they previously tried without success, or that are contraindicated for them based on their medical history. As a result, step therapy policies can severely delay access to a therapy a doctor deems is best-suited for the patient. In the course of these delays, patients’ disease may worsen. For up to 20% of patients, step therapy can even result in not receiving treatment at all. As a dermatologist who treats many patients with sometimes severe psoriasis, I know that finding an effective medicine with an appropriate side effect profile for a given patient is no easy process. And yet, despite my years of medical training, my medical judgement and my relationship with my patient are being undermined with step therapy. failure and kidney disease. Although therapies called TNF inhibitors are inappropriate for someone with these health problems, his insurance company is pushing me to prescribe them for his psoriasis. It’s not surprising, then, that step therapy policies place a large administrative burden on physicians like me and other health care staff. We have to contact insurance companies to determine whether a prescribed medication will be covered or to file an appeal if the medication is denied. This burden, in turn, takes time away from patient care. STAMP OUT STEP THERAPY Step therapy policies can severely delay access to a therapy a doctor deems is bestsuited for the patient. Particularly frustrating is the requirement by some insurance companies that patients “step through” psoriasis medicines that have black box warnings — meaning they may cause potentially severe side effects, even including tuberculosis. As a physician, I have pledged first to “do no harm.” So how can I be required to prescribe these types of medicines to patients for whom they are inappropriate? For example, I have a patient with HIV and severe psoriasis. Given his dampened immune system, I would not prescribe an immune-suppressing medicine that could lead to severe infections. Yet his insurance company refuses to cover a newer, more appropriate oral therapy that lacks these potential side effects, despite my appeals. Or take my patient with chronic heart It’s time to do something about step therapy. Some states are working on legislation that seeks to regulate step therapy protocols and ensure they are safe for patients. Illinois, for example, is currently debating House Bill 3549, which would ensure step therapy programs are based on clinical guidelines developed by independent experts, guarantee that the exceptions process is transparent and accessible to patients and health care providers, and establish a framework for when it is medically appropriate to exempt patients from step therapy. Pennsylvania needs to consider similar legislature. Of course we should not be wasting our health care dollars. There has to be some regulation, or the system will be bankrupt. But final decisions should not be made by a representative of a regulatory agency who has not examined the patient and who does not understand his or her specific concerns. They should be made by the physicians who have the appropriate education, experience and knowledge. DT Disclosures: Gil Yosipovitch, M.D., is professor and chair, department of dermatology; director Temple Itch Center, Temple University Health System Read Dr. Norman Levine’s commentary on: Third party payer pain and sanity-saving strategies, PAGE 3 15 IRREGULAR SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Sarah Kasprowicz, M.D. is clinical assistant professor at the University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Medicine and a physician with NorthShore University HealthSystem. Tea tree oil uses and side effects ea tree oil is an essential oil that is obtained through steam distillation of the leaves of the native Australian coastal tree, Melaleuca alternifolia. M. alternifolia is an evergreen shrub with needle-like leaves that grows from 5 to 8 meters in height. Tea tree oil has been used in a wide variety of medicinal applications from coughs and colds to skin infections.1 Relevant to dermatology, tea tree oil can be found in over-the-counter soaps, astringents and shampoos and is typically added to these products for its antimicrobial properties. T (MRSA). One study compared treatment with mupirocin 2% nasal ointment, chlorhexidine 4% soap and silver sulfadiazine 1% cream versus a tea tree oil regimen that included a tea tree oil 10% cream and tea tree oil 5% body wash. infections such as bacterial and fungal conditions and molluscum, as well as inflammatory conditions such as acne. A common “home remedy” patients will often ask about is whether or not there is a role for tea tree oil in treating nail fungus. Tea tree oil has been shown to have activity against dermatophytes, in vitro.5 And, in some studies, it has been shown to be clinically effective in treating onychomycosis and interdigital tinea pedis as compared to placebo.6, 7 Topical tea tree oil has also been looked at for application in acne therapy. In one study, topical tea tree oil was shown to be superior to placebo in acne treatment.8 Another study compared tea tree oil with benzoyl peroxide and found them to be similarly effective, but tea tree oil was better tolerated by acne patients.9 Tea tree oil has also been shown to have antibacterial activity against MRSA. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT, MRSA FIGHTER There have been a number of papers describing the antiseptic properties of tea tree oil, which has potential antibacterial activity through disruption of bacterial membranes. 2 Terpin-4-ol is the component of tea tree oil that is thought to exhibit the anti-microbial activity. 3 Tea tree oil has also been shown to have antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two programs and both were shown to be effective against MRSA.4 Tea tree oil-containing products can be recommend to patients as adjunct treatments in MRSA therapy. FACTORS TO CONSIDER FUNGUS AND ACNE Studies are available that show promising application for various dermatologic Properties of tea tree oil ANTIMICROBIAL A number of studies have been performed and published that identify tea tree oil as an effective antiseptic agent. 1 2 ANTIFUNGAL Tea tree oil has been shown to be effective in treating onchomycosis and interdigital tinea pedis. IRRITANT Use with caution: tea tree oil can cause contact dermatitis. OTC preparations are not well controlled for concentration and purity. 3 GETTY IMAGES/IMAGEMORE CO, LTD. 16 ® BORDER It is often hard to identify the concentration and purity of tea tree oil in over-thecounter products so caution should be used in solely relying on these products for bacterial eradication. In addition, it is important to counsel patients that tea tree oil can be very irritating and a source of allergic contact dermatitis.10 It is thought that 1,8-cineole is likely the compound in tea tree oil that causes dermatitis. Because tea tree oil may have an irritant effect, it is also worth considering for the treatment of molluscum contagiosum.11 Patients should be counseled to use tea tree oil with caution given the rate of irritant and contact dermatitis. In addition, it should be used with caution in children and pregnant or breastfeeding women and tea tree oil is not for oral ingestion as oral poisoning in children and adults has been observed.3 DT For references go to bit.ly/Teatreepatients Your patients will feel softer, smoother skin after just one shower Introducing our mildest formula ever, using only our most gentle surfactants—mild enough for infants and your eczema patients Dove Sensitive Skin Body Wash is the ONLY body wash that includes: s Glycinatefor its mildness and excellent lathering ability with a clean rinse s DEFI* to preserve and replenish skin lipids, and s NutriumMoisture®, a unique blend of 100% skin-natural moisturizers that can be fully absorbed in the skin For the mildness and moisturization you want and the results your patients will love s Only Dove is proven to replenish stearic acid, a fatty acid that is easily removed during cleansing, at a 1-to-1 ratio *Directly Esterified Fatty Isethionate. © 2015 Unilever TOPICORT® (desoximetasone) Topical Spray, 0.25% Rx Only BRIEF SUMMARY 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE Topicort® Topical Spray is a corticosteroid indicated for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in patients 18 years of age or older. 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS None 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS 5.1 Effect on Endocrine System Topicort® Topical Spray is a topical corticosteroid that has been shown to suppress the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis. Systemic absorption of topical corticosteroids can produce reversible HPA axis suppression with the potential for glucocorticosteroid insufficiency. This may occur during treatment or upon withdrawal of the topical corticosteroid. In a study including 21 evaluable subjects 18 years of age or older with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, adrenal suppression was identified in 1 out of 12 subjects having involvement of 10-15% of body surface area (BSA) and 2 out of 9 subjects having involvement of >15% of BSA after treatment with Topicort® Topical Spray twice a day for 28 days. [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.2)] Because of the potential for systemic absorption, use of topical corticosteroids may require that patients be periodically evaluated for HPA axis suppression. Factors that predispose a patient using a topical corticosteroid to HPA axis suppression include the use of high potency steroids, larger treatment surface areas, prolonged use, use of occlusive dressings, altered skin barrier, liver failure and young age. An ACTH stimulation test may be helpful in evaluating patients for HPA axis suppression. If HPA axis suppression is documented, an attempt should be made to gradually withdraw the drug, to reduce the frequency of application, or to substitute a less potent steroid. Manifestations of adrenal insufficiency may require supplemental systemic corticosteroids. Recovery of HPA axis function is generally prompt and complete upon discontinuation of topical corticosteroids. Cushing’s syndrome, hyperglycemia, and unmasking of latent diabetes mellitus can also result from systemic absorption of topical corticosteroids. Use of more than one corticosteroid-containing product at the same time may increase the total systemic corticosteroid exposure. Pediatric patients may be more susceptible to systemic toxicity from use of topical corticosteroids. [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)] 5.2 Local Adverse Reactions with Topical Corticosteroids Local adverse reactions may be more likely to occur with occlusive use, prolonged use or use of higher potency corticosteroids. Reactions may include atrophy, striae, telangiectasias, burning, itching, irritation, dryness, folliculitis, acneiform eruptions, hypopigmentation, perioral dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, secondary infection, and miliaria. Some local adverse reactions may be irreversible. 5.3 Allergic Contact Dermatitis with Topical Corticosteroids Allergic contact dermatitis to any component of topical corticosteroids is usually diagnosed by a failure to heal rather than a clinical exacerbation. Clinical diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis can be confirmed by patch testing. 5.4 Concomitant Skin Infections Concomitant skin infections should be treated with an appropriate antimicrobial agent. If the infection persists, Topicort® Topical Spray should be discontinued until the infection has been adequately treated. 5.5 Flammable Contents Topicort® Topical Spray is flammable; keep away from heat or flame. ADVERSE REACTIONS 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. In randomized, multicenter, prospective vehicle-controlled clinical trials, subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the body applied Topicort® Topical Spray or vehicle spray twice daily for 4 weeks. A total of 149 subjects applied Topicort® Topical Spray. Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 1% of subjects treated with Topicort® Topical Spray were application site dryness (2.7%), application site irritation (2.7%) and application site pruritus (2.0%). Another less common adverse reaction (<1% but >0.1%) was folliculitis. Table 1. Number (%) of Subjects with Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥ 1% Number of Subjects with Adverse Reactions Topicort® Topical Spray, 0.25% b.i.d. (N = 149) Vehicle spray b.i.d. (N = 135) 13 (8.7%) 18 (13.3%) Application site dryness 4 (2.7%) 7 (5.2%) Application site irritation 4 (2.7%) 5 (3.7%) Application site pruritus 3 (2.0%) 5 (3.7%) 8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 8.1 Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects: Pregnancy Category C There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Topicort® Topical Spray should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic in laboratory animals when administered systemically at relatively low dosage levels. Desoximetasone has been shown to be teratogenic and embryotoxic in mice, rats, and rabbits when given by subcutaneous or dermal routes of administration at doses 3 to 30 times the human dose of Topicort® Topical Spray based on a body surface area comparison. 8.3 Nursing Mothers Systemically administered corticosteroids appear in human milk and could suppress growth, interfere with endogenous corticosteroid production, or cause other untoward effects. It is not known whether topical administration of corticosteroids could result in sufficient systemic absorption to produce detectable quantities in breast milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when Topicort® Topical Spray is administered to a nursing woman. If used during lactation, Topicort® Topical Spray should not be applied on the chest to avoid accidental ingestion by the infant. 8.4 Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of Topicort® Topical Spray in patients younger than 18 years of age have not been studied; therefore use in pediatric patients is not recommended. Because of a higher ratio of skin surface area to body mass, pediatric patients are at a greater risk than adults of HPA axis suppression and Cushing’s syndrome when they are treated with topical corticosteroids. They are therefore at greater risk of adrenal insufficiency during and/ or after withdrawal of treatment. Adverse effects including striae have been reported with inappropriate use of topical corticosteroids in infants and children. [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] HPA axis suppression, Cushing’s syndrome, linear growth retardation, delayed weight gain, and intracranial hypertension have been reported in children receiving topical corticosteroids. Manifestations of adrenal suppression in children include low plasma cortisol levels and absence of response to ACTH stimulation. Manifestations of intracranial hypertension include bulging fontanelles, headaches, and bilateral papilledema. [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] 8.5 Geriatric Use Clinical studies of Topicort® Topical Spray did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 years and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects. Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients. In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy. 10 OVERDOSAGE Topicort® Topical Spray can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to produce systemic effects. [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] 17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See FDA-approved patient labeling (Patient Information and Instructions for Use) Inform patients of the following: G (?1@45?9105/-@5;:-?05>1/@10.E@41<4E?5/5-: G ';<5/;>@® Topical Spray is for external use only. Avoid use on the face, axilla or groin. G ;:;@A?1@45?9105/-@5;:2;>-:E05?;>01>;@41>@4-:@4-@2;>C45/45@C-?<>1?/>5.10 G ;:;@.-:0-31;>;@41>C5?1/;B1>;>C>-<@41@>1-@10?75:?;-?@;.1;//8A?5B1 G %1<;>@-:E?53:?;28;/-8;>?E?@195/-0B1>?1>1-/@5;:?@;@41<4E?5/5-: G ;:;@A?1;@41>/;>@5/;?@1>;50/;:@-5:5:3<>;0A/@?C5@4';<5/;>@® Topical Spray without first consulting with the physician. G 5?/;:@5:A1@41>-<EC41:/;:@>;85?-/451B102:;59<>;B191:@5??11:C5@45:C117?/;:@-/@ the physician. G '45?9105/-@5;:5?flammable; avoid heat, flame, or smoking when applying this product. G 5?/->0@45?<>;0A/@0-E?-2@1>05?<1:?10.E<4->9-/5?@ Mfd. by: Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc., Brampton, Ontario, Canada L6T 1C1 Dist. by: TaroPharma® a division of Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Hawthorne, NY 10532 Revised: April 2013 AD100-0030 18 CLINICAL ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM OF SILVER-BASED 26 BENEFITS CLOSED DRESSINGS Advances in burn care for kids CHALLENGES 28 HERPES Ubiquitous and sometimes atypical, derms need to be on the lookout for HHV Rosacea, the acne mimic LISETTE HILTON | STAFF CORRESPONDENT QUICK READ Many patients have no idea that Nearly half of rosacea patients thought what they think is acne is really they had acne before being diagnosed, rosacea. Even some dermaaccording to a new patient survey. It’s tologists misdiagnose this a finding that doesn’t surprise dermatricky masquerader. tologist Doris Day, M.D., who practices in Manhattan, N.Y. Ohio, and Dermatology Times edito“When I tell patients they have rosarial advisory board member. cea, they still think of it as a form of acne “Rosacea is not just on the midface. and don’t understand how it can Often patients have rosacea on happen now, when they didn’t the scalp, chest and back,” 1/2 have it in the past as they Dr. Torok says. “These of rosacea were growing up. When a re not considered I mention they have common a reas for patients report feeling rosacea, I ask them if rosacea. Dermatolounattractive, 42% say gists might diagnose they know what rosathey’re embarrassed and the rosacea as folcea is and most of them 30% feel less confident liculitis or acne and don’t know. So, we’re not educating patients treat it with clindabecause of the skin properly on what they mycin and tretinoin, condition. have and what it means,” which, unfortunately, is Dr. Day says. “Patients canirritating and ineffective.” not wrap their minds around how something that looks like acne is CONSUMERS UNAWARE, UNLIKELY TO SEEK CARE not acne.” Even dermatologists misdiagnose In May 2015, Galderma Laboratories and rosacea, according to Helen M. Torok, the National Rosacea Society released M.D., medical director, Trillium Creek findings of a national survey1 reflectDermatology and Surgery, Medina, ing responses from 500 rosacea patients Quotable and 300 dermatologists, which found: Half of rosacea patients report feeling unattractive, 42% say they’re embarrassed and 30% feel less confident because of the skin condition. More than half of patients don’t feel comfortable talking to their physicians about these emotional challenges. And, while nearly half of doctors say they want hear about their patients’ feelings, only 12% of patients believe this to be true. There’s a lot that patients don’t understand about rosacea. Most don’t know about key rosacea triggers. Twentythree percent of patients try to cover up symptoms with cosmetics, but otherwise aren’t treating their symptoms. Nearly 30% say they aren’t doing anything to treat their rosacea; yet, 56% of doctors said they wish patients would more proactively manage rosacea. EDUCATION NEEDED, BUT DO DERMS HAVE TIME? Dr. Day says patients who think they have acne often try to treat the condition with over-the-counter acne products, many of which irritate rosacea. “We’re dealing with a condition ROSACEA see page 21 DTExtra Atypical presentations are something that we need to acutely keep in mind when contemplating diagnosis and appropriate therapy and management of affected individuals.” Warren R. Heymann, M.D. Camden, N.J. Discussing the ubiquitous quality of HHV SEE STORY PAGE 28 FOR THE FIRST TIME, people with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis can contribute directly to the future of research into these chronic, systemic autoimmune diseases through the National Psoriasis Foundation’s patient-centered research network called Citizen Pscientist. An online, interactive community, Citizen Pscientist allows people living with psoriasis to connect with researchers, share their data and get input from others in the community, and ultimately drive the direction of psoriatic disease research. Source: www.citizenpscientist.org SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY ROSACEA: Helping your patients with triggers and treatments from page 18 “When I tell patients they have rosacea, they still think of it as a form of acne and don’t understand how it can happen now, when they didn’t have it in the past as they were growing up.” that’s very common and is somewhat unpredictable,” Dr. Day says. Patients don’t always go to the dermatologist for their rosacea as their main complaint; rather, they might be in the office for other things and the dermatologist notices it. If the dermatologist brings up the rosacea and educates patients about what it is, providing information Doris Day, M.D. about triggers and treatment, it can be a lengthy discussion that can add to the office visit time, according to Dr. Day. nents of rosacea. Also I believe it helps redness component of the skin conNevertheless, Dr. Day initiates disdition, brimonidine topical gel (Mircontrol ocular rosacea, which I think cussions with her patients about rosavaso, Galderma) is the only drug that is is underdiagnosed and undertreated.” cea and anything else she sees that she FDA approved to reduce the redness of can treat. rosacea. AND DERMS NEED TO BE AWARE…. “I make sure to point out the posi“I have 14 different devices in my ofOne aspect of rosacea that might not tives in their skin, but I also pay attenfice. I can offer intense pulsed light be on dermatologists’ radar, action to areas where they could take betor pulse dye laser to reduce the cording to Dr. Torok, is that ter care to minimize risks of skin canredness. But those are not rosacea can present as Nearly cer and signs of aging and to optimize covered by insurance and only a flush, which is the 30% say they their skin health. I tell patients that I see have to be repeated over er y t hematotela naren’t doing anything what’s happening and these are the cortime. Some people may g iec t at ic subt y pe. to treat their rosacea; yet, rective steps I can take to help their skin have a tan or too much Treating these patients look its best. I think it is important for color and they aren’t with topical metroni56% of doctors said they patients to understand they have some candidates for the dedazole, topical iverwish patients would more control over rosacea,” says Dr. Day. vices,” says Dr. Day. mectin or an oral anproactively manage Trigger education is particularly imAnother drug, ivertibiotic doesn’t work as rosacea. portant, according to Dr. Torok. mectin (Soolantra, Galwell because there are no “The number one trigger for rosacea derma), is a new category papules or pustules to treat, of drug to treat roDr. Torok says, noting that “they are environmental—heat and exsacea, according to don’t have the inflammatory comtreme cold. Emotions, including More Dr. Day. ponent other than the flushing.” stress, are another big trigger. than 1/2 of “ We’v e h ad Exercising and lifestyle acThe best approach with these patopic a l mettivities trigger it. And taktients, according to Dr. Torok, is to patients don’t feel ing a lot of niacin in vitaronidazole first explain what triggers their rosacomfortable talking to their mins can aggravate roin different cea, including environmental factors physicians about these emotional sacea,” Dr. Torok says. concent raand stress. challenges. And, while nearly half “So, you have to ask: t ions a nd Lasers can eliminate the redness, ofWhat are you taking? I like metfering a more permanent solution. Briof doctors say they want hear monidine controls the flushing but is What are you doing? ron id a z ole about their patients’ feelings, temporary and must be reapplied, acWhat is your lifestyle? topica l, but only 12% of patients cording to Dr. Torok. DT What is your environthis is 1% iverbelieve this to be ment?” mectin cream, so it’s a brand new Disclosures: Dr. Torok has no relevant disclosures. true. Dr. Day is a consultant for Galderma. TODAY’S TREATMENTS drug for the breakNew rosacea treatments address the outs of rosacea,” Dr. Day different components of the skin consays. “Other things that we’ve had and References: 1. http://www.rosacea.org/press/national-surveydition, including redness, the breakstill use are Oracea (doxycycline, Galreveals-rosacea-sufferers-often-hide-behindouts and ocular rosacea. derma). I’ve been taking Oracea for a cosmetics-treating-condition While lasers and light therapies relong time, and I put my patients on it main the gold standard for treating the because I believe it helps all the compoP A T I E N T R E S O U R C E S ❯ Patients can learn more about rosacea using the following resources ❯ The National Rosacea Society http://www.rosacea.org. ❯ The American Academy of Dermatology’s web page for consumers with rosacea https://www. aad.org/dermatology-a-to-z/diseases-and-treatments/q---t/rosacea. ❯ Galderma Laboratories and the National Rosacea Society have launched the Break Up with Your Makeup campaign, which offers survey findings and information about rosacea treatment. http://breakupwithmakeup.com. 21 Simulated image based on locally advanced BCC patient at Week 24. Boxed Warning and Additional Important Safety Information Embryo-Fetal Toxicity <$5('21,650(&+$1,502)$&6,214,8('*(&$1 cause embryo-fetal death or severe birth defects when administered to a pregnant woman. Erivedge is embryotoxic, fetotoxic, and teratogenic in animals. Teratogenic effects included severe midline defects, missing digits, and other irreversible malformations < (4,);34(*1$1&;56$6752))(0$/(52)4(342'7&6,8( potential within 7 days prior to initiating Erivedge therapy. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during and after Erivedge therapy. Advise males of the potential risk of Erivedge exposure through semen and to use condoms with a pregnant partner or a female partner of reproductive potential. Advise pregnant women of the potential risks to a fetus E/@4=0108,70;,>409>=,9/108,70;,<>90<=:18,70 patients to contact their healthcare provider with a known or suspected pregnancy. Report pregnancies to Genentech at (888) 835-2555 Female Patients E/@4=0108,70=:1<0;<:/?.>4@0;:>09>4,7>:?=00110.>4@0 contraception during therapy with Erivedge and for 7 months after the final dose Male Patients E/@4=08,70=:1>30;:>09>4,7<4=6>:,908-<C::<10>?= if a female partner of reproductive potential is exposed >:<4@0/20/@4=08,70;,>409>=>:?=0.:9/:8=A4>3 a pregnant partner or a female partner of reproductive potential, even after a vasectomy, during therapy and for 3 months after the final dose of Erivedge Blood Donation E/@4=0;,>409>=9:>>:/:9,>0-7::/:<-7::/;<:/?.>= while receiving Erivedge and for 7 months after the final dose of Erivedge Semen Donation E)4=8:/024-4=;<0=09>49=0809>4=9:>69:A941>30 amount of vismodegib in semen can cause embryo-fetal 3,<8/@4=08,70;,>409>=9:>>:/:9,>0=0809/?<492 and for 3 months after the final dose of Erivedge For your patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma go with A PROVEN HEDGEHOG PATHWAY INHIBITOR ERIVEDGE: Oral, Once-Daily Dosing E Due to the nature of aBCC and its clinical factors (ie, lesion recurrence, location/size, and invasiveness) some patients may not be candidates for surgery or radiation1,2 E Erivedge is an oral treatment option dosed as a 150-mg capsule once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity3 Erivedge reduced lesions in patients with aBCC1,3 Objective response rates (ORR) by IR from ERIVANCE1,3* ORR (95% CI) Complete response Partial response Median duration of response (months) (95% CI) laBCC (n=63) mBCC (n=33) 43% (n=27) (30.5-56.0) 30% (n=10) (15.6-48.2) 21% (n=13) 22% (n=14) 0% 30% (n=10) 7.6 7.6 (5.7-9.7) (5.6-NE) Indication Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule is a hedgehog pathway inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adults with metastatic basal cell carcinoma, or with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma that has recurred following surgery or who are not candidates for surgery, and who are not candidates for radiation. *Patients received at least 1 dose of Erivedge with independent pathologist-confirmed diagnosis of BCC. Locally advanced BCC patients were considered responders if they did not experience progression and had ≥30% reduction in lesion size (sum of the longest diameter) from baseline in target lesions by radiography or in externally visible dimensions of target lesions (scar tissue was measured); or had complete resolution of ulceration in all target lesions. Complete response was objective response with no residual BCC on sampling biopsy. Partial response was objective response with presence of residual BCC on sampling biopsy. In the metastatic BCC cohort, response was assessed according to RECIST version 1.0. Complete response was disappearance of all target and nontarget lesions. Partial response was ≥30% decrease in SLD of target lesions from baseline. IR=Independent Review; laBCC=locally advanced BCC; mBCC=metastatic BCC; CI=confidence interval; NE=not estimable; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SLD=sum of the longest diameter. Lactation E":/,>,,<0,@,47,-70<02,</492>30;<0=09.0:1@4=8:/024- in human milk, the effects of the drug on the breastfed infant, or the effects of the drug on milk production. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants from Erivedge, advise a nursing woman that breastfeeding is not recommended during therapy with Erivedge and for 7 months after the final dose Adverse Reactions E'308:=>.:88:9,/@0<=0<0,.>4:9=H A0<08?=.70 spasms, alopecia, dysgeusia, weight loss, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, decreased appetite, constipation, arthralgias, vomiting, and ageusia E809:<<30,.,9:..?<49108,70=:1<0;<:/?.>4@0;:>09>4,7 Reversibility of amenorrhea is unknown. In clinical trials, a total of 3 of 10 premenopausal women developed amenorrhea while receiving Erivedge E'<0,>809>080<209>2<,/07,-:<,>:<C,-9:<8,74>40= observed in clinical trials were hyponatremia in 6 patients (4%), hypokalemia in 2 patients (1%), and azotemia in 3 patients (2%) +:?8,C<0;:<>=4/00110.>=>:>30,> :< www.fda.gov/medwatch. You may also report side effects to Genentech at (888) 835-2555. See what you can offer your patients with aBCC at Erivedge.com References: 1. &06?74.!42/09!%#<:0>,7N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2171-2179. 2. Walling HW, et al. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2004;23(3-4):389-402. 3. Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule Prescribing Information. Genentech, Inc. May 2015. Please see brief summary of Prescribing Information on following page for a complete discussion of the risks associated with Erivedge, including the BOXED WARNING. G 0909>0.3(&9.77<423>=<0=0<@0/ % $<49>0/49(& Table 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥ 10% of Advanced BCC Patients 1 All aBCC Patients (N = 138) ERIVEDGE® (vismodegib) capsule Initial U.S. Approval: 2012 This is a brief summary of information about ERIVEDGE. Before prescribing, please see full prescribing information. WARNING: EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY ERIVEDGE can cause embryo-fetal death or severe birth defects when administered to a pregnant woman. ERIVEDGE is embryotoxic, fetotoxic, and teratogenic in animals. Teratogenic effects included severe midline defects, missing digits, and other irreversible malformations. Verify the pregnancy status of females of reproductive potential within 7 days prior to initiating ERIVEDGE therapy. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during and after ERIVEDGE therapy. Advise males of the potential risk of ERIVEDGE exposure through semen and to use condoms with a pregnant partner or a female partner of reproductive potential. Advise pregnant women of the potential risks to a fetus. [See Warnings and Precautions (5.1, 5.3), Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)]. 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE ERIVEDGE capsule is indicated for the treatment of adults with metastatic basal cell carcinoma, or with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma that has recurred following surgery or who are not candidates for surgery, and who are not candidates for radiation. 2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION The recommended dose of ERIVEDGE is 150 mg taken orally once daily until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicity [see Clinical Studies (14)]. Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%) Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea Diarrhea Constipation Vomiting 42 (30.4%) 40 (29.0%) 29 (21.0%) 19 (13.8%) 1 (0.7%) 1 (0.7%) - - General disorders and administration site conditions Fatigue 55 (39.9%) 7 (5.1%) 1 (0.7%) Investigations Weight loss 62 (44.9%) 10 (7.2%) - Metabolism and nutrition disorders Decreased appetite Infertility Females Amenorrhea can occur in females of reproductive potential. Reversibility of amenorrhea is unknown [see Adverse Reactions (6)]. 35 (25.4%) 3 (2.2%) - 8.4 Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of ERIVEDGE capsule have not been established in pediatric patients. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Muscle spasms Arthralgias 99 (71.7%) 22 (15.9%) 5 (3.6%) 1 (0.7%) - Nervous system disorders Dysgeusia Ageusia 76 (55.1%) 15 (10.9%) - - Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Alopecia 88 (63.8%) - - 1 aBCC = Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma. 2 MedDRA = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. 3 Grading according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Amenorrhea: In clinical trials, a total of 3 of 10 pre-menopausal women developed amenorrhea while receiving ERIVEDGE [see Non-Clinical Toxicology (13.1)]. Laboratory Abnormalities: If a dose of ERIVEDGE is missed, do not make up that dose; resume dosing with the next scheduled dose. Treatment-emergent Grade 3 laboratory abnormalities observed in clinical trials were hyponatremia in 6 patients (4%), hypokalemia in 2 patients (1%), and azotemia in 3 patients (2%). CONTRAINDICATIONS None. 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS 5.1 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Based on its mechanism of action, ERIVEDGE can cause embryo-fetal death or severe birth defects when administered to a pregnant woman. In animal reproduction studies, vismodegib was embryotoxic, fetotoxic, and teratogenic at maternal exposures lower than the human exposures at the recommended dose of 150 mg/day. Verify the pregnancy status of females of reproductive potential within 7 days prior to initiating ERIVEDGE therapy. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during therapy with ERIVEDGE and for 7 months after the final dose. Advise male patients to use condoms, even after a vasectomy, to avoid potential drug exposure in pregnant partners and female partners of reproductive potential during therapy and for 3 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)]. 5.2 Blood Donation Advise patients not to donate blood or blood products while receiving ERIVEDGE and for 7 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. 5.3 Semen Donation Vismodegib is present in semen. It is not known if the amount of vismodegib in semen can cause embryo-fetal harm. Advise male patients not to donate semen during and for 3 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)]. 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. ERIVEDGE capsule was administered as monotherapy at doses ≥ 150 mg orally daily in four open-label, uncontrolled, dose-ranging or fixed single dose clinical trials enrolling a total of 138 patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The median age of these patients was 61 years (range 21 to 101), 100% were White (including Hispanics), and 64% were male. The median duration of treatment was approximately 10 months (305 days; range 0.7 to 36 months); 111 patients received ERIVEDGE for 6 months or longer. The most common adverse reactions (≥ 10%) were muscle spasms, alopecia, dysgeusia, weight loss, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, decreased appetite, constipation, arthralgias, vomiting, and ageusia (Table 1). 7 Males Vismodegib is present in semen [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. It is not known if the amount of vismodegib in semen can cause embryo-fetal harm. Advise male patients to use condoms, even after a vasectomy, to avoid drug exposure to pregnant partners and female partners of reproductive potential during therapy with and for 3 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. Advise males of the potential risk to an embryo or fetus if a female partner of reproductive potential is exposed to ERIVEDGE. Advise males not to donate semen during therapy with and for 3 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. MedDRA Preferred Term2 All Grades3 (%) ERIVEDGE may be taken with or without food. Swallow capsules whole. Do not open or crush capsules. 4 Specific Populations (8.1)]. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during therapy and for 7 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. DRUG INTERACTIONS In repeat-dose toxicology studies in rats, administration of oral vismodegib resulted in toxicities in bone and teeth. Effects on bone consisted of closure of the epiphyseal growth plate when oral vismodegib was administered for 26 weeks at ≥ 50 mg/kg/day (approximately ≥ 0.4 times the systemic exposure (AUC) in patients at the recommended human dose). Abnormalities in growing incisor teeth (including degeneration/necrosis of odontoblasts, formation of fluid-filled cysts in the dental pulp, ossification of the root canal, and hemorrhage resulting in breakage or loss of teeth) were observed after administration of oral vismodegib at ≥ 15 mg/kg/day (approximately ≥ 0.2 times the AUC in patients at the recommended human dose). 8.5 Geriatric Use Clinical studies of ERIVEDGE capsule did not include sufficient numbers of patients aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients. 8.6 Hepatic Impairment No dose adjustment is required in patients with hepatic impairment [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 8.7 Renal Impairment No dose adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions are not expected between vismodegib and a substrate, inducer or inhibitor of cytochrome 450 enzymes or an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) or between vismodegib and gastric pH elevating agents [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 10 8 17 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 8.1 Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on its mechanism of action and animal reproduction studies, ERIVEDGE can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)]. In animal reproduction studies, oral administration of vismodegib during organogenesis at doses below the recommended human dose resulted in embryotoxicity, fetotoxicity, and teratogenicity in rats [see Data]. There are no human data on the use of ERIVEDGE in pregnant women. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Report pregnancies to Genentech at 1-888-835-2555. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. Data Animal Data In an embryo-fetal developmental toxicity study, pregnant rats were administered vismodegib orally at doses of 10, 60, or 300 mg/kg/day during the period of organogenesis. Pre- and post-implantation loss were increased at doses of ≥ 60 mg/kg/day (approximately ≥ 2 times the systemic exposure (AUC) in patients at the recommended human dose), which included early resorption of 100% of the fetuses. A dose of 10 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.2 times the AUC in patients at the recommended dose) resulted in malformations (including missing and/or fused digits, open perineum and craniofacial anomalies) and retardations or variations (including dilated renal pelvis, dilated ureter, and incompletely or unossified sternal elements, centra of vertebrae, or proximal phalanges and claws). 8.2 Lactation No data are available regarding the presence of vismodegib in human milk, the effects of the drug on the breastfed infant, or the effects of the drug on milk production. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants from ERIVEDGE, advise a nursing woman that breastfeeding is not recommended during therapy with ERIVEDGE and for 7 months after the final dose. 8.3 Females and Males of Reproductive Potential Pregnancy Testing Verify the pregnancy status of females of reproductive potential within 7 days prior to initiating ERIVEDGE therapy. Contraception Females Based on its mechanism of action and animal data, ERIVEDGE can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Use in OVERDOSAGE There is no information on overdosage in humans. In clinical trials, ERIVEDGE capsule was administered at 540 mg orally once daily; exposure did not increase between 150 mg and 540 mg daily. PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See FDA-approved patient labeling (Medication Guide). Administration Instructions t "EWJTFQBUJFOUTUPTXBMMPX&3*7&%(&DBQTVMFTXIPMFBOEOPUUPDSVTI or open the capsules. Embryo-Fetal Toxicity t "EWJTFQSFHOBOUXPNFOPGUIFQPUFOUJBMSJTLUPBGFUVT<TFFWarnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]. t "EWJTFGFNBMFTPGSFQSPEVDUJWFQPUFOUJBMUPVTFFGGFDUJWFDPOUSBDFQUJPO during therapy with and for 7 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)]. t "EWJTF NBMFT FWFO UIPTF XJUI QSJPS WBTFDUPNZ UP VTF DPOEPNT to avoid potential drug exposure in both pregnant partners and female partners of reproductive potential during therapy with and for 3 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)]. t "EWJTFGFNBMFQBUJFOUTBOEGFNBMFQBSUOFSTPGNBMFQBUJFOUTUPDPOUBDU their healthcare provider with a known or suspected pregnancy. Report pregnancies to Genentech at 1-888-835-2555 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)]. Semen Donation t "EWJTF NBMFT OPU UP EPOBUF TFNFO EVSJOH UIFSBQZ XJUI BOE GPS months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. Lactation t "EWJTFXPNFOUIBUCSFBTUGFFEJOHJTOPUSFDPNNFOEFEEVSJOHUIFSBQZ with ERIVEDGE and for 7 months after the final dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.2)]. Blood Donation t "EWJTF QBUJFOUT OPU UP EPOBUF CMPPE PS CMPPE QSPEVDUT XIJMF UBLJOH ERIVEDGE and for 7 months after the final dose of ERIVEDGE. ERIVEDGE® [vismodegib] capsule Manufactured by: Patheon, Inc. Mississauga, Canada Distributed by: ERIVEDGE is a registered trademark Genentech USA, Inc. of Genentech, Inc. A Member of the Roche Group ©2015 Genentech, Inc. 1 DNA Way South San Francisco, CA 94080-4990 ERI/050115/0063 SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY Rosacea’s psychological impact BILL GILLETTE | STAFF CORRESPONDENT The results of a mult i-count r y s u r v e y a p p e a r t o c on f i r m t h e belief that rosacea — including facial erythema — negatively affects a person’s psychological and emotional wellbeing (Dermatology and Therapy). Researchers in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and Canada designed the survey to assess the impact of facial er y thema on subconscious perceptions and initial reactions of others and how these affect their resu lt i ng at t it udes. T he su r ve y also measured the impact of facial erythema on an individual’s emotional and psychological health. Participants were shown photos of people with and without facial erythema who were representative of the participants’ country or region. They were asked to accept or discard descriptive words shown next to each image — for example, trustworthy, relaxed, healthy, tired — with the speed of each response directly linked to the participant’s initial, subconscious perception of the face. According to the study, this provided quantitative and qualitative data that the researchers could analyze and interpret at various levels of complexity. In addition to a traditional questionnaire, all participants who had self-reported facial erythema during recruitment were asked to answer questions about how the condition affects their day-to-day life. WHAT RESEARCHERS FOUND Survey results showed that respondents strongly associated facial erythema with poor health and negative personality traits, with participants reporting negative impacts of rosacea emotionally, socially and in the workplace. Nearly 80% reported difficulty in controlling facial erythema; however, those with physician-diagnosed rosacea had significantly improved control compared with those whose rosacea was undiagnosed (39% versus 20%, respectively). “This survey shows that first impressions are a powerful driver of perception,” the authors write. “People suffering with facial erythema associated with rosacea not only have to man- age their own psychological barriers to cope with the disease but also deal with the prejudice and perceptions of others. Facial erythema tends to generate a negative first impression and has a negative impact on people both personally and professionally. The results highlight the need to treat t hose with facial erythema of rosacea from both a physiological and psychosocial perspective — treating not only t he physical sy mptoms, but a lso t he person experiencing the symptoms.” GET TO THE ROOT Dermatolog y Times asked Omaha, Neb., der matolog i st a nd E d itor ia l Adv isor y Board member Joel Schlessinger, M.D., to comment on this international survey. “Rosacea clea rly impacts the self-conf idence of i nd iv iduals,” he says. “The problem is that rosacea, as a disease, is so poorly characterized that our patients are not always treated in the correct way by dermatologists. Marketing has replaced medical information, and we now have a lo w er e x p e c t at ion for results that relies more on simply treating the effect of rosacea — the redness — rather than focusing on the cause. “In add it ion to t reat ments such as l a s er s a nd topic a l creams, it is even more important to find out the cause when possible,” Dr. Schlessinger adds. “ T h e t a k e -h o m e m e s s a g e i s t hat rosac ea i sn’t ju st a c overi t-u p p r o c e s s — i t r e q u i r e s a significant thought process on the part of the dermatologist in order to consider it fully addressed.” DT 25 26 CLINICAL ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Advances in burn care for kids LOUISE GAGNON | STAFF CORRESPONDENT The use of closed dressings for wounds has dramatically altered the wound care provided for injuries from burns in the pediatric setting, according to the Medical Director of the Burn Unit of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada. Speak ing at a pediatric wound care sy mposium in Toronto, Joel Fish, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., a plastic surgeon and associate professor in the Department of Surgery and Research Director for t he Div ision of Plastic Surgery at the University of Toronto in Toronto, notes that silverbased products and a closed dressing technique have advanced pediatric wound care such that fewer dressings are required and lengths of stay in hospital have decreased. “The way that the silver materials are now formulated, they bond to different materials allowing (the dressing) to remain active for a number of days and changes what we do in pediatric burns units,” says Dr. Fish. Dr. Fish explains that dressings such as the Aquacel® Ag are adherent and the outer dressing has no drainage, so patients can be sent home with the dressings on and are later able to soak off the dressings. Dr. Fish was involved with a retrospective case-matched comparison study where patients were treated w it h t he Aquacel Ag dressing for partial thickness wounds. Patients were matched to historical controls in terms of variables like age and affected body surface area. Scalds were source of most of the burns, w ith f lames and oil being the source of the balance of the burns. Investigators compared outcomes with the closed dressings to outcomes without closed dressings, looking at QUICK READ The use of closed dressings in pediatric wound care has shortened hospital stays, decreased dressing changes, and lessened the need for feeding tubes and pain medication. measures like the number of dressing changes, the need for surger y, the number of outpatient dressings, medication use related to pain relief for dressing changes, and the need for satellite anesthesia. There was a significant decrease in the use of anesthesia between patients with the Aquacel AG dressing and control subjects, as well as an increase in the number of procedures and dressing changes for control subjects. Duration of stays for inpatients was 9 days for patients who wore Aquacel AG closed dressings and 14 days for in-patients who did not wear closed dressings. Despite technolog y advances in dressings, clinicians cont inue to change dressings frequently and so put pediatric patients through unnecessary pain, according to Dr. Fish. “Unfortunately, we still hear about [practices] at pediatric hospitals in Ontario, of children going in for daily dressing changes,” says Dr. Fish. “We know that is well below the standard of care. It’s not appropriate to change a dressing daily on a child or even more often than daily for what is arguably a painful acute wound.” T he i nve s t ig at ion fou nd t h at patients who did not have a closed d res si ng appl ie d u nder went 14 dressings while those who wore the Aquacel AG dressing underwent 3 dressing changes. “That is a huge difference,” says Dr. Fish. “The multiplier effect of performing a dressing change in the population of pediatric burn patients in hospital is huge. Burn care dressings compared Duration of hospital stay Dressing changes With silver-based closed dressings 9 days 3 With traditional dressings 14 days 14 Indeed, more dressing changes means more supplies, more medication to provide pain relief, more nursing staff on site, and adverse events like inadequate bowel function due to morphine intake, explains Dr. Fish. Even once discharged from hospital, those patients who underwent the closed dressing technique required fewer dressing changes, notes Dr. Fish. “The way that the silver materials are now formulated, they bond to different materials allowing (the dressing) to remain active for a number of days and changes what we do in pediatric burns units.” Joel Fish, M.D., F.R.C.P.C. University of Toronto, Toronto One of the most significant outcomes, if not the most significant, is that length of stay was decreased with the closed dressing technique, and that change in practice has sustained this outcome, stresses Dr. Fish. Another outcome is that patients who underwent the closed dressing technique experienced less weight loss than their counterparts who did not have that technique administered, and they required fewer feeding tubes. Even though there has been a steady climb in the number of admissions to the burn unit at the Hospital for Sick Kids, the direct cost of caring for a patient has fallen because of the implementation of the closed dressing technique. DT Dr. Fish has no relevant disclosures. Pure Hydration. Pure Genius. Quench dehydrated skin for a supple, smooth complexion and all day moisture retention Various molecular forms of hyaluronic acid penetrate skin and lock in moisture while a powerful system of antioxidants, peptides and humectants work synergistically to help skin appear brighter, firmer and rejuvenated. Featuring an exclusive mineral complex to help reduce irritation, control oil and support healthy collagen production. For more information visit topixpharm.com or call 800-445-2595. Partners in advancing the commitment to healthy, beautiful skin 28 CLINICAL ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM The challenge of atypical herpes presentations ILYA PETROU, M.D. | STAFF CORRESPONDENT AAD meeting, San Francisco – Human herpes viruses are ubiquitous pathogens among humans that can establish latent infections in their host and reactivate to produce recurrent disease. This scenario is particularly true in immunocompromised patients. Each virus is associated with a set of typical clinical signs and symptoms; however, atypical presentations are common and recognizing the atypical presentations of these viruses is key to arriving at a timely diagnosis and appropriate therapy in affected patients. “Most of us can become infected at some point with any of the human herpes viruses throughout our lifetime. They can manifest in different ways, depending on the clinical circumstance and, especially, on the degree of immunosuppression one may have. It’s the atypical presentations of these herpes infections that we have to keep in the forefront and be wary of in our patients,” says Warren R. Heymann, M.D., Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics and Head of the Division of Dermatology at the Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, N.J. QUICK READ Human herpes viruses are ubiquitous and they should be kept in mind for atypical presentations in immunocompromised hosts. “Atypical presentations are something that we need to acutely keep in mind when contemplating diagnosis and appropriate therapy and management of affected individuals. The astute clinician must be wary of these atypical presentations, such as an unusual ulcer recalcitrant to standard therapy,” Dr. Heymann says. Sometimes atypical presentations of herpes simplex can look verrucous or can be chronic, according to Dr. Heymann, making them suspicious of another disease process or infection, such as HPV infection. The keys to clinical diagnosis in those circumstances might be to look carefully at the border to see if the lesion is scalloped or not. Dr. Heymann says that atypical presentations have to be at the forefront of lesions that are not healing in immune compromised hosts, which can be seen in HSV-1 infections, as well as in cytomegalovirus infections in terms of perianal ulcerative lesions. Epstein-Barr virus infection is Clinicians need to thoroughly follow up on any unusual lump or bump that might be an atypical presentation of an associated lymphoproliferative malignancy in either a post-transplant patient or other immune compromised host. ATYPICAL PRESENTATIONS Of the over 100 herpes viruses that exist, humans are most commonly affected by the human herpes viruses 1 to 8. The typical clinical presentations of these viruses are readily recognized by experienced clinicians and well documented in the literature, but the atypical presentations that these viruses may cause, particularly in the immunocompromised host, can sometimes be challenging to quickly recognize and accurately diagnose in the clinical setting. seen acutely in mononucleosis but it is also being increasingly implicated in the association with Lipschütz ulcers. Furthermore, the virus is also increasingly being linked to many different disorders including several lymphomas (other than Burkitt’s lymphoma) such as hydroa vacciniforme-type associated lymphomas as well as lymphomas linked to hypersensitivity from mosquito bites. Dr. Heymann emphasizes that clinicians need to thoroughly follow up on any unusual lump or bump that might be an atypical presentation of an associated lymphoproliferative malignancy in either a post-transplant patient or other immune compromised host. “It is sometimes easy not to think of HHV infections in these scenarios because of the atypical presentations. No one is going to miss grouped vesicles on an erythematous base. However, it would be easy to miss a non-healing chronic ulcer and not think about HHV infection. Similarly, it’s easy to not think about the potential role of the EpsteinBarr virus if you have an atypical nodule that may be a lymphoma in the elderly. It is important that we get into the habit and mindset of thinking about these viruses when they are atypical and in the right context,” says Dr. Heymann. EVOLVING THERAPIES New and evolving therapies are slowly making headway in the management of HHV infections, Dr. Heymann says, witnessed by the drop in frequency of varicella zoster virus infections. According to Dr. Heymann, the ongoing research for potential vaccines for the Epstein-Barr virus would be especially important going forward in immunosuppressed patients to potentially prevent the subsequent lymphomas that can occur. Most recently, the roseola virus is increasingly being associated with its potential role in DRESS syndrome, a drug reaction in part characterized by eosinophilia and systemic symptoms or drug-induced hypersensitivity. “There is a lot going on in terms of the recognition of atypical presentations of these viruses in immune-compromised patients, their disease associations as well as potential therapeutic measures. We have to be aware of these changes on the horizon that may alter our approach to patients who are at risk of complications, especially lymphoproliferative complications,” Dr. Heymann says. Dr. Heymann advises that clinicians should consider performing appropriate laboratory tests in these settings, which could include biopsy as well as viral culture and serologies because there may be certain circumstances when treating the viral infection may be of immediate benefit to the patient. DT Dr. Heymann has no relevant disclosures Want more? We’ve got it. Just go mobile. Our mobile app for iPad® brings you expanded content for a tabletoptimized reading experience. Enhanced video viewing, interactive data, easy navigation—this app is its own thing. And you’re going to love it. Download the app now: dermatologytimes.com/gomobile Clinical Analysis for Today’s Skincare Specialists iPad is a registered trademark of Apple Inc. 30 CLINICAL ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Teledermatology helps patients help themselves BILL GILLETTE | STAFF CORRESPONDENT Telemedicine, the remote delivery and follow-up of medical services and clinical data via telecommunications technology, is as widely practiced in dermatology as it is in any medical discipline— indeed, teledermatology has become a term unto its own. As noted by the American Telemedicine Association, “Teledermatology is one of the most active applications of telemedicine rendered in the United States. Dermatology is particularly suited to the use of advanced communication technologies and the internet for delivery of care. By using advanced communication technologies, dermatologists are able to widen their reach to patients in a cost-effective manner.” Dermatologist Iltefat Hamzavi, M.D., can testify to that. As a physician at Hamzavi Dermatology and affiliate Dermatology Specialist Group in Michigan, Dr. Hamzavi has made a specialty of treating adolescents with acne—and one of his most effective tools is teledermatology. ter compliance—and if there’s no compliance, there are no results.” Dr. Hamzavi says he never uses teledermatology for the first visit—that’s always done face-to-face. But for follow-ups, he says, teledermatology is very effective. “At least with this particular demographic, the adolescent acne patient, teledermatology allows for carrying out a treatment plan pretty much on their own time,” Dr. Hamzavi says. “Young people these days, more so than older generations, are very comfortable with communicating and interacting online—some even prefer it.” That’s especially true for more introverted or self-conscious young acne patients, who may feel more free to communicate their concerns, ask questions, have their acne scars assessed and track their treatment—things they might feel less comfortable about in a face-to-face visit. An area of compliance that Dr. Hamzavi has found problematic—and for which teledermatology is no magic bullet—is the taking of the acne drug isotretinoin. Because it is a fat-soluble “Dermatology is particularly suited to the use of advanced communication technologies and the internet for delivery of care.” American Telemedicine Association A MATCH FOR TEEN PATIENTS “The value of teledermatology, especially in its use with adolescent acne patients, is that it allows them to do what they have to do in terms of compliance on their own schedule, and gives the physician a non-intrusive means by which to communicate with the patient to ensure compliance,” Dr. Hamzavi tells Dermatology Times. “With teledermatology, young people feel more at ease, they feel more like they’re on their own turf, and don’t have to take time away from work or school to meet with their doctor. I’ve found that this connection allows for bet- medication, guidelines call for isotretinoin to be taken along with a high-fat meal, which isn’t particularly healthy and can be an obstacle to compliance for some patients. Dr. Hamzavi suggests the use of isotretinoin-Lidose, which enhances absorption, but also says the problem can be handled simply by suggesting the patient take the isotreinoin with a glass of milk or some French fries. As for the role of teledermatology, Dr. Hamzavi emphasized that there are no studies to show that it may be the wave of the future for improving compliance— though he is considering taking up such a study. Studies have shown, however, that satisfaction is high with teledermatology as compared with office-based visits. NOT JUST FOR YOUNG PATIENTS “I am a proponent of teledermatology,” says Helen M. Torok, M.D., Trillium Creek Dermatology in Medina, Ohio. “I use it to interact with patients when they call and have an urgent problem. We exchange pictures and diagnoses, and I often will call in prescriptions based on what was viewed on the text message. We use our patient portals in a similar manner.” Patients love it, she says—and not just young patients. “Some of my patients are off in Florida in the winter or on vacation, and they are enthralled with the ease, efficiency and connection to their dermatologist—they literally have their skin doc in their pocket!” Dr. Torok says. “I find that patients in the 39to 50-year-old range really love it, use it and appreciate it more than teenagers.” UNBIASED REGULATIONS NEEDED Omaha, Neb., dermatologist Joel Schlessinger, M.D., says that while he’s intrigued by teledermatology and the opportunities it may offer, the dermatologic community needs to proceed thoughtfully before jumping on the bandwagon. “For now, there are many unanswered questions and concerns,” he says. “One such concern is the ownership of teledermatology and promulgation of rules governing it by the same individuals. While ownership implies having a stake in the game, it also could lead to a lack of governance and preferential status for those companies with representatives on the boards and in study groups.” Dr. Schlessinger says he thinks teledermatology will become more popular—“and even essential”—in the years ahead. “But we want to have a strong basis in fair and unbiased regulations,” he says. “Additionally, given the huge importance that dermatology could have in this area, our specialty should drive the discussion and offer constructive advice to marshal the process through and assist with patient safety considerations.” DT Disclosures: Dr. Hamzavi is an advisor for and has an ownership interest in MyDerm Portal SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY 31 PSYCHODERMATOLOGY: A link revealed between emotion and condition from page 1 have a special ability to interfere with interpersonal relationships,” Dr. Granstein says. Another example of the mind-skin association is trichotillomania. This is a condition in which patients will pull out their hair, either with or without their conscious awareness. If patients could stop pulling their hair out, they certainly would, Dr. Koblenzer says. “Patients feel ashamed and humiliated by their inability to control the action, and embarrassed by the appearance. It became clear to me that there was more to this than met the eye,” she says. “The skin problems that we see are a psychological defense against the patients recognizing that there are emotional problems. I’m not suggesting that this is so in every patient, by any means, but certainly so in those patients who do not respond to treatment as one would anticipate.” ECZEMA AND EMOTIONS Dr. Koblenzer coauthored a study on the topic of eczema and emotions in 1988, in the Archives of Dermatology. She found that there was a lack of therapeutic response in a proportion of children with intractable eczema. The authors demonstrated that this ongoing lack of response could be attributed to dysfunctional parent-child relationships, which affected the physical and emotional development of the child. Dr. Koblenzer illustrated cases of infantile eczema in which aggressive dermatologic measures were combined with a psychological approach, and that this helped the parents to recognize and deal with their conflict. “Rapid and sustained improvement in skin, emotional development, and social adjustment resulted,” Dr. Koblenzer wrote. stress but appears to be precipitated or exacerbated by stress. The proportion of patients reporting emotional triggers varies with the disease, ranging from approximately 50% (acne) to greater than 90% (rosacea, alopecia areata, neurotic excoriations, and lichen simplex) and may be 100% for pat ients w it h hy perhidrosis. St ress ma nagement, rela x at ion techniques, benzodiazepines, and PSYCHODERMATOLOGY see page 32 SAVE UP TO $4,800 WITH FREE MTI PRODUCT INCENTIVES MTI’s premiere line of chairs, tables and accessories are perfect for dermatologists looking to enhance their practice and patient satisfaction. These include the 430 Series Procedure Table , which allows for maximum patient comfort and support. Enhance your office with the 302 Side Chair or the SG Series Hand-Operated Pneumatic Chair. Illuminate your work with the Lumerus LED Exam Light or the Clarus 4 LED Exam Light, and complete your décor with an MTC Series Mobile Treatment Cabinet. Contact us today to see how MTI’s products will enhance your office. Call: (800) 924-4655 Click: www.mti.net/derm Email: [email protected] STRESS AND SKIN DISEASE Psychiatric factors often are instrumental in the etiology and course of skin conditions, according to a study by Mohammad Jafferany, M.D., a dermatologist and psychiatrist and adjunct assistant professor in psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Central Michigan University, Saginaw, Mich. “The skin disease is not caused by For promotion terms and conditions, visit www.mti.net/MTI-Forms.aspx Strength in patient care.™ (800) 924.4655 | [email protected] | mti.net/derm 32 CLINICAL ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Figure 1 Degrees of skin picking span normal to psychotic behavior. A teenager picking acne lesions might be regarded as normal, but patients who deform their appearance by skin picking and develop significant hyperpigmentation and scarring are not behaving normally. Photos: Francisco Tausk, M.D. PSYCHODERMATOLOGY: One-third of patients have significant emotional problems from page 31 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been found useful in these disorders,” according to the study published in 2007 in the Primary Care Companion in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. Francisco Tausk, M.D., professor of dermatology and psychiatry, department of dermatology University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, and former APMNA president, said studies have suggested that about one third of patients who come to dermatology clinics have significant emotional problems associated with their skin conditions. “The problem is that, as dermatologists, we don’t address that issue. Some of the problems stem from the fact that diseases like psoriasis or eczema are very visible and therefore significantly impact your sense of being, social interactions, intimacy, etc. That’s one aspect of these diseases — that psychological problems stem from skin disease,” Dr. Tausk says. “The other side of the coin is represented by skin diseases that are the product of psy- Spreading the Knowledge “Patients feel ashamed and humiliated by their inability to control the action, and embarrassed by the appearance. It became clear to me that there was more to this than met the eye.” Caroline S. Koblenzer, M.D. Retired clinical professor of dermatology, University of Pennsylvania; former APMNA president chiatric illness; the most common example is skin picking.” There are degrees of skin picking, according to Dr. Tausk, spanning normal to psychotic behavior. A teenager picking acne lesions might be regarded as normal. But patients who deform their appearance by skin picking and develop significant hyperpigmentation and scarring are not behaving normally. People with impulse control disorder who pick their skin know they’re doing it but can’t stop, he says. “These patients may spend up to six hours a day in front of the mirror using their fingers or a number of instruments such as tweezers,” Dr. Tausk says. At the far end of the spectrum are patients that have no awareness that they’re picking their skin. “They deny this emphatically. They come with numerous ulcerations on their skin, sometimes extending to most of the body surface, Dr. Tausk says. “Then, there are patients that suffer from delusions, and have the PSYCHODERMATOLOGY see page 35 Made up of dermatologists, psychiatrists, psychologists and allied health professionals, the Association of Psychoneurocutaneous Medicine of North America (APMNA) is dedicated to promoting the awareness of psyche and skin interaction and the role of psychoneuroimmunology in skin diseases, according to the Association’s website. Dermatologists who visit the site will find research on the topic, news about upcoming meetings, member information and more. For more information, go to http://apmna.org. Help your patients with facial erythema of rosacea experience... Not an actual patient. Individual results may vary. Results are simulated to show a 2-grade improvement of erythema. At hour 12 on day 29, 22% of subjects using Mirvaso Gel experienced a 2-grade improvement of erythema compared with 9% of subjects using the vehicle gel.* RAPID AND SUSTAINED ERYTHEMA REDUCTION BROUGHT TO YOU BY M I R V A S O® ( b r i m o n i d i n e ) T O P I C A L G E L , 0 . 3 3 %† t The first and only FDA-approved topical treatment specifically developed and indicated for the facial erythema of rosacea1 t Fast results that last up to 12 hours1 t The most commonly reported adverse events in controlled clinical studies included erythema (4%), flushing (2%), skin-burning sensation (2%), and contact dermatitis (1%)2 Important Safety Information Indication: Mirvaso® (brimonidine) topical gel, 0.33% is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist indicated for the topical treatment of persistent (nontransient) facial erythema of rosacea in adults 18 years of age or older. Adverse Events: In clinical trials, the most common adverse reactions (≥1%) included erythema, flushing, skin-burning sensation, and contact dermatitis. Warnings/Precautions: Mirvaso Gel should be used with caution in patients with depression, cerebral or coronary insufficiency, Raynaud’s phenomenon, orthostatic hypotension, thromboangiitis obliterans, scleroderma, or Sjögren’s syndrome. Alpha-2 adrenergic agents can lower blood pressure. Mirvaso Gel should be used with caution in patients with severe or unstable or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease. Serious adverse reactions following accidental ingestion of Mirvaso Gel by children have been reported. Keep Mirvaso Gel out of the reach of children. Not for oral, ophthalmic, or intravaginal use. You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088. Please see brief summary of full Prescribing Information on the following page. See for yourself. Visit www.mirvaso.com/hcp. *Phase 3 clinical studies of 553 subjects 18 and older. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to either Mirvaso Gel or vehicle for 29 days. Subjects and clinicians were asked to grade the improvement they saw at 30 minutes and hours 3, 6, 9, and 12 following application. † Each gram of gel contains 5 mg of brimonidine tartrate equivalent to 3.3 mg of brimonidine free base. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ® Mirvaso (Brimonidine) Topical Gel, 0.33%* *Each gram of gel contains 5 mg of brimonidine tartrate, equivalent to 3.3 mg of brimonidine free base BRIEF SUMMARY This summary contains important information about MIRVASO (Mer-VAY-Soe) Gel. It is not meant to take the place of the full Prescribing Information. Read this information carefully before you prescribe MIRVASO Gel. For full Prescribing Information and Patient Information please see package insert. WHAT IS MIRVASO GEL? MIRVASO (brimonidine) Topical Gel, 0.33% is a prescription medicine that is used on the skin (topical) to treat facial redness due to rosacea that does not go away (persistent). WHO IS MIRVASO GEL FOR? MIRVASO Gel is for use in adults ages 18 years and older. WHAT WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS SHOULD I BE AWARE OF? MIRVASO Gel should be used with caution in patients that: B B B B B B B B B have depression have heart or blood vessel problems have dizziness or blood pressure problems have problems with blood circulation or have had a stroke have dry mouth or Sjögren’s Syndrome have skin tightening or Scleroderma have Raynaud’s phenomenon have irritated skin or open sores are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. It is not known if MIRVASO Gel will harm an unborn baby. B are breastfeeding. It is not known if MIRVASO Gel passes into breast milk. You and your female patient should decide if she will use MIRVASO Gel or breastfeed. She should not do both. Ask your patient about all the medicines they take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, skin products, vitamins and herbal supplements. Using MIRVASO Gel with certain other medicines may affect each other and can cause serious side effects. Keep MIRVASO Gel out of the reach of children. If anyone, especially a child, accidentally swallows MIRVASO Gel, they may have serious side effects and need to be treated in a hospital. Get medical help right away if you, your patient, a child, or anyone else swallows MIRVASO Gel and has any of these symptoms: MIRVASO Gel can lower blood pressure in people with certain heart or blood vessel problems. See “What warnings and precautions should I be aware of?” These are not all of the possible side effects of MIRVASO Gel. Remind your patients to call you for medical advice about side effects. You are also encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088. HOW SHOULD MIRVASO GEL BE APPLIED? B Remind your patients to use MIRVASO Gel exactly as you instruct them. They should not use more MIRVASO Gel than prescribed. B Patients should not apply MIRVASO Gel to irritated skin or open wounds. B Important: MIRVASO Gel is for use on the face only. Patients should not use MIRVASO Gel in their eyes, mouth, or vagina. They should also avoid contact with the lips and eyes. B Instruct your patients to see the detailed Instructions for Use that come with MIRVASO Gel for information about how to apply MIRVASO Gel correctly. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE USE OF MIRVASO GEL Remind your patients not to use MIRVASO Gel for a condition for which it was not prescribed and to not give MIRVASO Gel to other people, even if they have the same symptoms. It may harm them. WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN MIRVASO GEL? Active Ingredient: brimonidine tartrate Inactive Ingredients: carbomer homopolymer type B, glycerin, methylparaben, phenoxyethanol, propylene glycol, purified water, sodium hydroxide, titanium dioxide. WHERE SHOULD I GO FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MIRVASO GEL? B Go to www.mirvaso.com or call 1-866-735-4137 GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P. Fort Worth, Texas 76177 USA Revised: August, 2013 HCP B Lack of energy, trouble breathing or stops breathing, a slow heart beat, confusion, sweating, restlessness, muscle spasms or twitching. WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS OF MIRVASO GEL? The most common side effects of using MIRVASO Gel include: B redness, flushing, burning sensation of the skin, skin irritation Skin redness and flushing may happen about 3 to 4 hours after applying MIRVASO Gel. Ask your patients to tell you if they get skin redness and flushing that is uncomfortable. References: 1. Fowler J Jr, Jackson JM, Moore A, et al; Brimonidine Phase III Study Group. Efficacy and safety of once-daily topical brimonidine tartrate gel 0.5% for the treatment of moderate to severe facial erythema of rosacea: results of two randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pivotal studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(6):650-656. 2. Mirvaso [package insert]. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. Fort Worth, TX; 2013. Mirvaso and Galderma are registered trademarks. ©201 Galderma Laboratories, L.P. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. 14501 N. Freeway Fort Worth, TX 76177 MIR-164B Printed in USA 0/1 SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY Figure 2. Acne excoriée is a form of skin picking in which patients with acne cannot stop picking and squeezing acne lesions. Photos: Francisco Tausk, M.D. PSYCHODERMATOLOGY: Stress is a quantifiable component from page 32 conviction that they have parasites coming out of their skin (called delusions of parasitosis). In many of these cases, cutaneous treatments don’t help enough or at all. Therapies vary considerably depending on the level of insight into the self-harming behavior. “If the patient has conscience that they’re producing their own disease, then it’s much easier to treat, usually with the addition of cognitive behavioral or psychotherapy. If patients adamantly deny their role in the selfinjurious behavior — they say they wake up in the morning and there’s a hole in their face — then they need antipsychotics,” Dr. Tausk says. “The problem is that these patients will never go to a psychiatrist because they insist that they don’t have any psychological problems. Since you cannot refer them to a psychiatrist, it behooves the dermatologist to start treatment. So, the dermatologist has to have knowledge of basic psychotropic treatments to be able to get the patient started. Once the delusion improves, those patients can be then referred to a psychiatrist.” ARE DERMATOLOGISTS PREPARED? I n a s t u d y D r. J a f f e r a n y a n d colleagues published in July 2010 in the International Journal of Derma- tology, researchers assessed the level of training in, and awareness and attitude about, psychocutaneous disorders among dermatologists. A mail-in survey was sent to all members of Washington State Dermatology Society. They were asked to provide information on demographic Studies have suggested that about one third of patients who come to dermatology clinics have significant emotional problems associated with their skin conditions. Francisco Tausk, M.D. U n i v e r s i t y o f R o c h e s t e r, R o c h e s t e r, N Y; former APMNA president variables; level of training, skills, and degree of comfort in managing psychodermatologic disorders; referral patterns, knowledge of patient and family resources on psychodermatology; and interest in continuing medical education on psychocutaneous disorders, according to the study’s abstract. One hundred and t wo dermat olo g i s t s r e s p onde d . O f t ho s e, 18% reported a clear understandi ng of ps y c hoder m atolog y a nd 42% of the respondents reported being ver y comfor table in diagnosing and treating psychocutaneous disorders. About 90% of those responding were not aware of any patient or family resources on psychodermatology. Nearly 40% expressed interest in attending any kind of continuing medical education activity on psychodermatologic disorders, according to the study. Dr. Koblenzer’s nearly 50 years in practice have focused on caring for patients with a psychological aspect to their skin disorder. In the United States, Dr. Koblenzer is a rare breed. The former APMNA president says that the American health system leaves little room for talking with patients about their psychological health. Exploring possible psycholog ica l PSYCHODERMATOLOGY see page 36 35 36 CLINICAL ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM PSYCHODERMATOLOGY: Are dermatologists prepared to help these patients? from page 35 ties to skin disease in patient care, research and education have not taken hold in the United States. There is the APMNA, but growing its membership and getting dermatologists and others to attend meetings has been a challenge, she says. “This is something that I think is inefficient in our system. The Europeans have really taken [psychodermatology] seriously. When the British formed a society similar to the APMNA, within one year, they had 100 mem- Other Resources Psychodermatology: A Guide to Understanding Common Psychocutaneous Disorders, by Mohammad Jafferany, M.D. This review focuses on classifying and describing treatment recommendations for psychocutaneous disorders, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, acne excoriée, hyperhidrosis, urticaria, herpes, dermatitis artefacta, delusions of parasitosis, trichotillomania and others. [Jafferany M. Psychodermatology: a guide to understanding common psychocutaneous disorders. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(3):203-13.] Psycho-cutaneous Disease, published in 1987 by Grune & Stratton and written by Caroline S. Koblenzer, M.D. This book, which is written from a psychoanalytic perspective, is available through Amazon in paperback. Clinical Management in Psychodermatology, published in 2009 by Springer, authored by Wolfgang Harth, Uwe Gieler, Daniel Kusnir and Francisco A. Tausk. bers. The APMNA, after more than 10 years, still has only about 15 or 20 members. There is a very different attitude in this country. The Scandinavians have been very active and many of the European countries have produced real research. I would have to say that up until now we have not. Anything that I have written, and I have published 80-some papers, have all been really observational rather than strictly scientific,” Dr. Koblenzer says. Dermatologists who promote psychodermatology battle the mental health stigma. Mental health is not a popular topic, even among most dermatologists, according to Dr. Tausk. He recalls organizing a course for residents on the basics of psychodermatology some 10 years ago. Residents could attend for free. It was the day before the American Academy of Dermatology meeting, and at the same location of the meeting. “Finally, I canceled it. … only three people signed up,” he says. “This disinterest in the topic is not the same in other countries. For example, we organized a symposium on psychodermatology the day before the World Congress in 2008 in Buenos Aires, and we had more than 200 people there.” Dermatology residencies don’t prepare U.S. dermatologists in the area of psychodermatolog y, according to Dr. Jafferany. Dr. Jafferany, executive secretary of APMNA, says the association is working on getting a psychodermatology curriculum in dermatology residency programs. “Some dermatologists are trying to treat these patients, but, obviously, you have to have training or knowledge or be able to recognize psychiatric complements in these patients. Cream, ointments and dermatologic medications do not help these people,” Dr. Jafferany says. One way to learn more, according to Dr. Jafferany, is through the APMNA. Launched in 1989, the APMNA holds its annual meeting the day before and at the location of the American Academy of Dermatology each year. APMNA’s objectives are to promote the awareness of psychocutaneous medicine; hold meetings, seminars and symposia on psychodermatology; facilitate the introduction of psychodermatol- ogy curriculum into dermatology and psychiatry residency programs; and provide support to patients and parents on psycho-dermatological disorders. Interested dermatologists can attend meetings (held every other year) in Europe by the European Society of Dermatology and Psychiatry. MAKING PSYCHE PART OF PRACTICE Dermatologists’ awareness that dermatology and psychiatry are interwoven is an important first step, according to these experts. Other steps are for dermatologists to learn more about how to manage and when to refer these patients by attending meetings and reading journal articles. A greater awareness about psycho-dermatology and acceptance in the specialty could lead to more widespread learning in residencies. “Many physicians, including myself, when presented with a patient with skin disease will often focus quite narrowly on the skin findings alone” Dr. Granstein says. “However, I think one should always keep in mind how that skin disease affects the ability of the patient to relate to others and, more generally, how that skin disease might affect the patient’s psychological well-being.” DT REFERENCES Koblenzer CS, Koblenzer PJ. Chronic intractable atopic eczema. Its occurrence as a physical sign of impaired parent-child relationships and psychologic developmental arrest: improvement through parent insight and education. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(11):1673-7. Review Jafferany M. Psychodermatology: a guide to understanding common psychocutaneous disorders. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(3):203-13 Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Psychodermatology: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Jun;34(6):1030-46. Review. Jafferany M, Vander Stoep A, Dumitrescu A, Hornung RL. The knowledge, awareness, and practice patterns of dermatologists toward psychocutaneous disorders: results of a survey study. Int J Dermatol. 2010 Jul;49(7):784-9. Comments? Give Dermatology Times your feedback by contacting us at [email protected]. 42 CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY Using psychological assessments Expert offers insight on tools to supplement skin disease diagnosis, management BILL GILLETTE | STAFF CORRESPONDENT Why should dermatologists worry about psychological assessment tools in their practice? Pamela Schell Werschler, Psy.D., M.S.N., A.R.N.P., D.N.C., answered this question in her presentation, “Survey of Assessment Tools in Dermatologic Practice,” at the recent inaugural Aesthetic + Medical Dermatology Symposia, held in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, in May. According to Dr. Werschler, a psychologist and nurse practitioner specializing in dermatology at Werschler Aesthetics, Spokane, Wash., “Dermatological diseases often co-exist along with conditions such as major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, body dysmorphic disorder and a plethora of other psychiatric illnesses.” She notes that a recent study of 114 people with dermatological disorders showed that 39 — nearly 35% — reported depression. By comparison, only about 7% of adults in the U.S. general population report depression, according to National Institute of Mental Health statistics. “This isn’t surprising,” Dr. Werschler says. “How do acne, alopecia areata, eczema, HSV breakouts, hyperhidrosis, lupus, melasma, nail fungus, pruritis, psoriasis, rosacea, scarring, skin cancer, sexually transmitted diseases, urticaria, warts and don’t forget age-related changes — how do they make any of us feel?” She says there’s an extensive list of psychiatric diagnoses dermatologists are likely see in combination with their patients’ dermatological condition. These disorders include obsessive-compulsive, body dysmorphic, trichotillomania “Dermatological diseases often co-exist along with conditions such as major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, body dysmorphic disorder and a plethora of other psychiatric illnesses.” Pamela Schell Werschler, Psy.D. Spokane, Wash. SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM (hair-pulling), excoriation (picking at the skin), substance/medication-induced obsessive-compulsive behavior, avoidant/restrictive food intake, anorexia nervosa, bulimia, binge eating, gender dysphoria, generalized anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder — the list goes on and on. symptoms of BDD in cosmetic settings. Scores of 40 or higher indicate a BDD diagnosis. The scale can be repeated during treatment and used as a measure of outcome. It is free to use but should be cited if used. CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY “It’s important to treat the patient in a holistic manner, including how they may feel about their diagnosis,” Dr. Werschler says in summary. “And a crucial part of doing this is to employ appropriate psychological assessment tools.” DT ASSESSMENT TOOLS The crux of the presentation was Dr. Werschler’s discussion of the most useful psychological assessment tools. For patients with depressive symptoms, she recommends: ➧ The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) (Beck, Steer, Ball, & Ranieri, 1996) — Appropriate for patients ages 13 to 80, it’s the most widely used clinically administered instrument for the assessment of depression. ➧ BDI-Fast Screen for Medical Patients (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 2000) — Contains just seven questions; also appropriate for patients ages 13 to 80. ➧ Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-Rev ised (HAM-D) (Warren, 1994) — With 21 questions, it’s designed for adults and is used to rate the severity of their depression by probing mood, feelings of guilt, suicide ideation, insomnia, agitation or retardation, anxiety, weight loss and somatic symptoms. ➧ Children’s Depression Inventory-2 (CDI-2) (Kovacks, 2004) — Appropriate for ages seven to 17, the short version uses 12 questions, takes 5 to 10 minutes to administer and focuses on emotional and functional symptoms. PROCEDURE-SPECIFIC TOOLS Dr. Werschler also recommends these dermatologic- and cosmetic-procedurespecific assessment tools: ➧ Dermatolog y Life Qualit y Index (DLQI) (Finlay & Kahn, 1992) — A selfreporting questionnaire frequently used in research to assess the potential impact of dermatological disorders, medications and devices on patients’ quality of life. ➧ The Cosmetic Procedure Screening Scale (COPS) (Veale et al., 2012) — For the aesthetic provider, the most concerning diagnosis is body dysmorphic disorder. COPS is a self-reporting scale designed to screen for Harness the power The power of Obagi is backed by science, resulting in clinically proven products that can transform the look of your patients’ skin. For more information, call 1.800.636.7546 today. ®/TMs are trademarks of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., or its affiliates. Any other product or brand names and logos are the property of their respective owners. Distributed by OMP, Inc. ©2015 Obagi Medical, a division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC. DM/OBG/14/0096(1)c(2) 04/15 www.obagi.com 43 44 COSMETIC ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM REJUVENATION DEVICES 47 FACIAL Experts weigh in on their favorite techniques and technologies INGREDIENTS 57 CONTROVERSIAL Downloadable patient data sheet may help you steer the conversation Three patterns of female hair loss Medical management involves prolonging anagen phase, reversing matrix reduction MEG BARBOR | STAFF CORRESPONDENT Female pattern hair loss includes three pathways of hair miniaturization based on the age of onset. Proper medical management may slow thinning or, in some cases, regrow hair, according to research presented by Vera Price, M.D., at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology (San Francisco, Calif., 2015). The three varieties of female hair miniaturization, characterized by shor ten i ng of t he a nagen phase (shorter hair) and matrix reduction (thinner hair), are androgenetic alopecia (AGA), female pattern hair loss (FPHL) and senescent alopecia (SA). “All three conditions result in miniaturization of the hair follicle without significant inf lammation, and on biopsy all three conditions show this. The clinical information (age of onset) is needed to correctly diagnose whether the biopsy represents SA, AGA, or FPHL,” Dr. Price says. She is a professor in the department of dermatology at the University of California, San Francisco. “All three conditions result in miniaturization of the hair follicle without significant inflammation, and on biopsy all three conditions show this.” Vera Price, M.D. FEMALE HAIR LOSS see page 48 University of California, San Francisco Quotable ANDROGENETIC ALOPECIA Androgenetic alopecia is characterized by common hereditary thinning induced by androgens in genetically susceptible women (and men). Onset occurs after puberty, and by age 50 up to 50% of women (and men) have been affected by AGA. All patients being evaluated for hair loss should have a complete blood count (CBC), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), ferritin, and vitamin D-25OH checked. “It saves time if the patient can bring these results to the first visit, and any positive tests should be dealt with appropriately,” Dr. Price says. At the first visit, female patients should also be checked for menstrual irregularities, infertility, hirsutism, severe cystic acne, galactorrhoea and virilization. If any of these conditions are present, then levels of testosterone (T), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and prolactin should be evaluated. If any of these levels are DTExtra “It is not a substitute for a facelift, but it is painless, has no downtime or side effects and can provide 30% to 40% skin tightening in all skin types, safely.” Min-Wei Christine Lee, M.D. Walnut Creek, Calif. On using Elixis in patients with mild to moderate facial skin laxity SEE STORY PAGE 47 A NEW WEBSITE LAUNCHED by Israeli medical-device firm Lumenis claims to provide information about the latest energy-based skincare treatments for common skin conditions such as pigmentation, hair removal and rejuvenation. AesthetiPedia is a user-friendly, informative and patientoriented site that offers information on the latest Lumenis device technologies. Practitioners can refer patients to the site to learn more about available treatments. Read more:bit.ly/aesthetipedia VALCHLOR® (mechlorethamine) gel is an alkylating drug indicated for the topical treatment of Stage IA and IB mycosis fungoides–type cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MF-CTCL) in patients who have received prior skin-directed therapy WHEN IT’S TIME TO MANAGE THE CHALLENGES OF STAGE IA AND IB MF-CTCL VALCHLOR IS ON IT The first and only FDA-approved topical formulation of mechlorethamine (commonly known as nitrogen mustard) Proven efficacy in a 12-month study 1 Once-daily gel (special handling and disposal procedures should be followed) Dependable formulation manufactured with consistent quality and potency Comprehensive resources provided by VALCHLOR Support ™ For more information, including how to prescribe, visit www.valchlor.com or call 1-855-4-VALCHLOR (1-855-482-5245). DOSING AND APPLICATION VALCHLOR is for topical dermatologic use only. Apply a thin film of gel once daily to affected areas of the skin. VALCHLOR is a cytotoxic drug and special handling and disposal procedures should be followed during use. Caregivers must wear disposable nitrile gloves when applying VALCHLOR. Patients and caregivers must wash hands thoroughly after handling or applying VALCHLOR. IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION CONTRAINDICATIONS VALCHLOR is contraindicated in patients with known severe hypersensitivity to mechlorethamine. Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, have occurred with topical formulations of mechlorethamine. WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Mucosal or eye injury: Exposure of mucous membranes to mechlorethamine such as the oral mucosa or nasal mucosa causes pain, redness, and ulceration, which may be severe. Exposure of the eyes causes pain, burns, inflammation, photophobia, and blurred vision. Blindness and severe irreversible anterior eye injury may occur. Should eye exposure or mucosal contact occur, immediately irrigate for at least 15 minutes with copious amounts of water, followed by immediate medical consultation Secondary exposure: Avoid direct skin contact with VALCHLOR in individuals other than the patients due to risk of dermatitis, mucosal injury, and secondary cancers Dermatitis: Dermatitis may be moderately severe or severe. Monitor patients for redness, swelling, inflammation, itchiness, blisters, ulceration, and secondary skin infections. Stop treatment with VALCHLOR or reduce dose frequency Non-melanoma skin cancer: Monitor patients during and after treatment with VALCHLOR Embryo-fetal toxicity: Women should avoid becoming pregnant while using VALCHLOR due to the potential hazard to the fetus. For nursing mothers, discontinue use of VALCHLOR or nursing Flammable gel: VALCHLOR is an alcohol-based gel. Avoid fire, flame, and smoking until the gel has dried ADVERSE REACTIONS The most common adverse reactions (≥5%) were dermatitis (56%), pruritus (20%), bacterial skin infection (11%), skin ulceration or blistering (6%), and skin hyperpigmentation (5%). These reactions may be moderately severe or severe. Elderly patients aged 65 and older may be more susceptible. Depending on severity, treatment reduction, suspension, or discontinuation may be required. To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., at 1-855-4-VALCHLOR (1-855-482-5245) or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or visit www.fda.gov/medwatch. Please see Brief Summary of Prescribing Information on adjacent page. REFERENCE: 1. VALCHLOR [package insert]. South San Francisco, CA: Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.; 2013. VALCHLOR®and VALCHLOR Support™ are trademarks of Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. © 2014 Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. All rights reserved. VAL-00130 0814 A great idea finally gels VALCHLOR® (mechlorethamine) gel, 0.016% For Topical Dermatological Use Only *#-01-++-,*5#.-/1#"721,#-20 "3#/0##!1'-,0 VALCHLOR N=128 % of patients ModeratelyAny Grade Severe or Severe BRIEF SUMMARY OF FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION This brief summary does not include all the information needed to use VALCHLOR safely and effectively. See Full Prescribing Information for VALCHLOR. 6 VALCHLOR is an alkylating drug indicated for the topical treatment of Stage IA and IB mycosis fungoides-type cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in patients who have received prior skin-directed therapy. 6 The use of VALCHLOR is contraindicated in patients with known severe hypersensitivity to mechlorethamine. Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, have occurred with topical formulations of mechlorethamine. 6 >> Mucosal or Eye Injury Exposure of the eyes to mechlorethamine causes pain, burns, inflammation, photophobia, and blurred vision. Blindness and severe irreversible anterior eye injury may occur. Advise patients that if eye exposure occurs, (1) immediately irrigate for at least 15 minutes with copious amounts of water, normal saline, or a balanced salt ophthalmic irrigating solution and (2) obtain immediate medical care (including ophthalmologic consultation). Exposure of mucous membranes such as the oral mucosa or nasal mucosa causes pain, redness, and ulceration, which may be severe. Should mucosal contact occur, immediately irrigate for at least 15 minutes with copious amounts of water, followed by immediate medical consultation. >> Secondary Exposure to VALCHLOR Avoid direct skin contact with VALCHLOR in individuals other than the patient. Risks of secondary exposure include dermatitis, mucosal injury, and secondary cancers. Follow recommended application instructions to prevent secondary exposure. #/+1'1'0 The most common adverse reaction was dermatitis, which occurred in 56% of the patients. Dermatitis was moderately severe or severe in 23% of patients. Monitor patients for redness, swelling, inflammation, itchiness, blisters, ulceration, and secondary skin infections. The face, genitalia, anus, and intertriginous skin are at increased risk of dermatitis. Follow dose modification instructions for dermatitis. -,#*,-+)',,!#/ Four percent (4%, 11/255) of patients developed a non-melanoma skin cancer during the clinical trial or during one year of post-treatment follow-up: 2% (3/128) of patients receiving VALCHLOR and 6% (8/127) of patients receiving the mechlorethamine ointment comparator. Some of these non-melanoma skin cancers occurred in patients who had received prior therapies known to cause nonmelanoma skin cancer. Monitor patients for non-melanoma skin cancers during and after treatment with VALCHLOR. Non-melanoma skin cancer may occur on any area of the skin, including untreated areas. + /5-$#1*-4'!'15 Based on its mechanism of action, case reports in humans, and findings in animals, VALCHLOR can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. There are case reports of children born with malformations in pregnant women systemically administered mechlorethamine. Mechlorethamine was teratogenic and embryo-lethal after a single subcutaneous administration to animals. Advise women to avoid becoming pregnant while using VALCHLOR. If this drug is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus. *++ *##* Alcohol-based products, including VALCHLOR, are flammable. Follow recommended application instructions. 6 In a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled trial, VALCHLOR 0.016% (equivalent to 0.02% mechlorethamine HCl) was compared to an Aquaphor®-based mechlorethamine HCl 0.02% ointment (Comparator). The maximum duration of treatment was 12 months. Sixty-three percent (63%) of patients in the VALCHLOR arm and 67% in the comparator arm completed 12 months of treatment. Comparator N=127 % of patients ModeratelyAny Grade Severe or Severe Dermatitis 56 23 58 17 Pruritus Bacterial skin infection Skin ulceration or blistering Skin hyperpigmentation 20 11 6 5 4 2 3 0 16 9 5 7 2 2 2 0 In the clinical trial, moderately-severe to severe skin-related adverse events were managed with treatment reduction, suspension, or discontinuation. Discontinuations due to adverse reactions occurred in 22% of patients treated with VALCHLOR and 18% of patients treated with the comparator. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of the discontinuations for adverse reactions occurred within the first 90 days of treatment. Temporary treatment suspension occurred in 34% of patients treated with VALCHLOR and 20% of patients treated with the comparator. Reductions in dosing frequency occurred in 23% of patients treated with VALCHLOR and 12% of patients treated with the comparator. Reductions in hemoglobin, neutrophil count, or platelet count occurred in 13% of patients treated with VALCHLOR and 17% treated with Comparator. 6 No drug interaction studies have been performed with VALCHLOR. Systemic exposure has not been observed with topical administration of VALCHLOR; therefore, systemic drug interactions are not likely. 6 >> Pregnancy /#%,,!51#%-/5 '0)2++/5 Mechlorethamine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. There are case reports of children born with malformations to pregnant women systemically administered mechlorethamine. Mechlorethamine was teratogenic in animals after a single subcutaneous administration. If this drug is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to a fetus. ,'+*1 Mechlorethamine caused fetal malformations in the rat and ferret when given as single subcutaneous injections of 1 mg/kg. Other findings in animals included embryolethality and growth retardation when administered as a single subcutaneous injection. 2/0',%-1&#/0 It is not known if mechlorethamine is excreted in human milk. Due to the potential for topical or systemic exposure to VALCHLOR through exposure to the mother’s skin, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. #"'1/'!0# Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. #/'1/'!0# A total of 79 patients age 65 and older (31% of the clinical trial population) were treated with either VALCHLOR or the comparator in the clinical trial. Forty-four percent (44%) of patients age 65 or older treated with VALCHLOR achieved a Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) response compared to 66% of patients below the age of 65. Seventy percent (70%) of patients age 65 and older experienced cutaneous adverse reactions and 38% discontinued treatment due to adverse reactions, compared to 58% and 14% in patients below the age of 65, respectively. Similar differences in discontinuation rates between age subgroups were observed in the comparator group. Manufactured for: Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA © 2014 Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. All rights reserved. The body system associated with the most frequent adverse reactions was skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. The most common adverse reactions (occurring in at least 5% of the patients) are shown in Table 1. VAL-00133 0814 SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY What’s new in facial rejuvenation Experts weigh in on their favorite techniques and technologies LISETTE HILTON | STAFF CORRESPONDENT From single devices that perform a spectrum of rejuvenation procedures, to older devices that are re-emerging, to new combinations using tried-andtrue technologies, dermatologists are at the forefront of what’s new and exciting in facial rejuvenation. Two dermatologists weigh in with their favorites. MICRONEEDLING Tina S. Alster, M.D., director, Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery and clinical professor of dermatology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, said she is a laser user and abuser, but her top pick is no laser at all. It’s micro-needling, which she says is affordable, and is an effective wrinkle reducer. “I’m using microneedling every day to minimize perioral rhytides and large pores. I’m seeing impres- tion, which will kickstart the woundhealing cascade,” Dr. Alster says. “Until you see how these devices work in your hands, keep the treatment confined within cosmetic units. When treating the perioral region, use the nasolabial folds as your lateral border and treat very lightly over the vermillion border.” More experienced dermatologists can venture beyond the cosmetic units, without having to worry as much about discoloration as with laser treatment. When using microneedling on the face to treat large pores, Dr. Alster avoids the nasal bridge. “The skin in that area is much thinner and more prone to bruising,” she says. COMBINATION APPROACH Dr. Alster often combines microneedling to treat stubborn wrinkles on the upper lip with light fractionated resur- “Unlike lasers that produce heat during treatment, the microneedling device produces micro injuries in the skin without heat; thereby, stimulating new collagen production without risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.” Tina Alster, M.D. Washington, DC sive results—similar to those that are achieved with fractionated laser treatment. Unlike lasers that produce heat during treatment, the microneedling device produces micro injuries in the skin without heat; thereby, stimulating new collagen production without risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation,” Dr. Alster says. Dr. Alster recommends that dermatologists who don’t have much or any experience with microneedling use it initially on small areas, such as on patients’ upper lips, until they get comfortable using the devices. “You want to produce pinpoint bleeding indicating dermal penetra- facing on the rest of the face. For the task, Dr. Alster says she uses the Clear + Brilliant (Solta Medical). Posttreatment healing is typically a couple of days of skin redness. “I instruct patients to ice the treatment areas for the remainder of the day after the procedure. I recommend the use of a soothing balm that contains small amounts of hydrocortisone under a medical barrier cream and a non-chemical (physical) sunscreen. Patients should apply the creams at least four times a day for the first couple of days after treatment,” she says. Dr. Alster says she likes the Clear + Brilliant because, even though it’s not as effective as the deeper lasers on wrinkles and scars, it offers a relatively easy postoperative recovery and it’s less expensive for patients. “It’s the one laser that my physician extenders perform. That being the case, the patients save a little bit of money and still get a very nice cosmetic outcome,” Dr. Alster says. THREE LASERS IN ONE PLATFORM Min-Wei Christine Lee, M.D., a dermatologist and cosmetic dermatologic surgeon who practices Walnut Creek, Calif., spoke at this year’s American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) annual meeting on Emerging Lasers and Aesthetic Technology. Dr. Lee’s Min-Wei Christine favorite emerging techLee, M.D. nologies for facial rejuvenation? The Fotona SP Dynamis and Elixis. Fotona SP Dynamis Pro (Fotona) is based on an intraoral technology used for years in dentistry. It was later discovered that what dentists were doing to treat the inside of the mouth had a skin tightening effect on the outer face. Today, the combination intraoral and outer laser procedure for skin rejuvenation is called Fotona 4D, using the SP Dynamis Pro, according to Dr. Lee. “Fotona SP Dynamis is like having 20 different lasers in a dermatology practice, because it has so many different applications,” says Dr. Lee, who helped develop the procedure and is a consultant and researcher for the company that makes it. “The reason it can effectively perform so many different applications is because of [the platform’s] longer pulse durations and higher energy than other devices, as well as the unique application of wavelengths.” FOUR-STEP INTRAORAL PROCEDURE Step 1: The intraoral procedure using the Erbium PS03 smooth mode. This is a unique nonablative fractional erbium with a long pulse duration of 250 milliseconds, according to Dr. Lee. The FACIAL REJUVENATION see page 58 47 48 COSMETIC ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Extensive patchy alopecia areata Photo: Vera Price, M.D. Androgenetic alopecia in an 18-year-old girl Photo: Vera Price, M.D. FEMALE HAIR LOSS: Treatment tips that improve patient satisfaction from page 44 abnormal, it does not mean the woman is necessarily susceptible to AGA since women with androgenetic alopecia typically have normal values for all of these tests. “But an abnormal test might indicate how the doctor might proceed to look for the cause of the hair loss,” she says. “The term ‘female pattern hair loss’ is gaining popularity as a less committal term when the role of androgens is less clear-cut and other hormonal and non-hormonal factors may play a role,” Dr. Price says. Age of onset is typically between the ages of 45 and 55 and is characterized by a change in hair growth parameters pre- or postmenopause, but the pathogenetic understanding of FPHL is incomplete. SENESCENT ALOPECIA Senescent alopecia (SA) is characterized by age-related hair thinning in women in their 60s, 70s and older, and is histologically similar to AGA, but differs in hormonal activity and gene expression. In AGA, hair growth cycle genes are differentially expressed, whereas in SA, systemic senescent/aging genes are differentially expressed, suggesting that AGA and SA are two distinct disorders. MANAGING MINIATURIZATION AGA, FPHL and SA all present different mechanisms for a shared final pathway of follicular downsizing or miniaturization. Medical management of these conditions involves methods of prolonging the anagen phase and reversing matrix reduction. Minoxidil is appropriate for all three conditions and works to stimulate hair regrowth. The 2% solution should be applied twice daily, and the 5% foam is effective once daily. Both formulations (solution and foam) should be applied directly to the scalp, not the hair, according to Dr. Price. “The 5% foam is slightly more effective than the 2% solution, and is easy to apply if the hair thinning is extensive, but more difficult to apply when the thinning is mild,” she notes. Androgen blockage through the use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (such as finasteride) can be used to retard thinning in patients with AGA and can be safely used in conjunction with minoxidil, but does not stimulate regrowth on its own. Finasteride is not effective in treating SA, and is not recommended for use in patients over the age of 60. Androgen blockade has the potential to feminize a male fetus, so the use of oral contraceptives is essential during the use of finasteride in women who are or may become pregnant; an oral contraceptive that will not aggravate thinning (least androgenic) should be used in conjunction with androgen blockage. The use of androgen receptor inhibitors (anti-androgens) such as spironolactone competitively blocks androgen receptors and may retard thinning in patients with AGA, but more evidence-based studies are needed to show regrowth, she says. Finally, estrogen, which acts indirectly as an anti-androgenic agent, may retard progression in women with AGA. This is demonstrated in pregnant women with AGA who often note an increase in hair volume due to elevated estrogen levels. However, there are currently no studies demonstrating the use of estrogen for hair regrowth. “Medical management of female pattern hair loss requires agents that prolong anagen and reverse matrix reduction,” says Dr. Price. Further studies are needed, but the use of minoxidil, androgen blockage, estrogen, or an approved combination of these deliveries might improve patient satisfaction associated with female pattern hair loss. DT Dr. Price has no relevant disclosures. When first-line therapy is either inappropriate or ineffective in managing mild-to-moderate eczema, itc HELP BREAK THE ECZEMA CYCLE h -Helps manage the progression of mild-to-moderate flares1 - Significantly reduces pruritus and clears the visible signs and symptoms of eczema2* - ELIDEL is available in 30g, 60g, and 100g tubes2 Not an actual patient. Image for representation only. - ELIDEL is not indicated for use in children less than 2 years of age or for long-term use (see Boxed Warning below) ELIDEL (pimecrolimus) Cream 1% is indicated as second-line therapy for the short-term and non-continuous chronic treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in non-immunocompromised adults and children 2 years of age and older, who have failed to respond adequately to other topical prescription treatments or when those treatments are not advisable. ELIDEL Cream is not indicated for use in children less than 2 years of age. WARNING: Long-term Safety of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors Has Not Been Established. Although a causal relationship has not been established, rare cases of malignancy (e.g., skin and lymphoma) have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including ELIDEL Cream. Therefore: @439/3:4:8143-9+72:8+4,945/)'1)'1)/3+:7/3/3./(/9478 including ELIDEL Cream, in any age group should be avoided, and application limited to areas of involvement with atopic dermatitis. @7+'2/8349/3*/)'9+*,47:8+/3)./1*7+31+88 than 2 years of age. IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION ELIDEL Cream is contraindicated in individuals with a history of hypersensitivity to pimecrolimus or any of the components of the cream. Patients should be reevaluated by their healthcare provider if signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis do not improve within 6 weeks. Treatment should be discontinued upon resolution of signs and symptoms (e.g., itch, rash and redness) for atopic dermatitis. Before commencing treatment with ELIDEL Cream, bacterial or viral infections at treatment sites should be resolved. The most common adverse events seen in clinical studies included application-site burning, headache, pharyngitis, nasopharyngitis, cough, influenza, pyrexia, and viral infection. The most common local adverse event seen in clinical studies was application-site burning, which occurred in 8% to 26% of patients treated with ELIDEL Cream. In clinical studies, skin papillomas or warts were observed in 1% of ELIDEL patients. If patients have lymphadenopathy that is unresolved or of unclear etiology, discontinuation should be considered. ELIDEL Cream should not be used with occlusive dressings. ELIDEL Cream should not be applied to areas of active cutaneous infections. During the course of treatment, patients should minimize or avoid natural or artificial sunlight exposure, even while ELIDEL Cream is not on the skin. The potential effects of ELIDEL on skin response to ultraviolet damage are unknown. *In an investigator’s global assessment, 57% of Elidel-treated patients had mild-to-no pruritus vs 34% with vehicle; 35% of ELIDEL-treated patients were rated clear or almost clear at Day 43 vs 18% with vehicle. Pooled results from two 6-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies investigating the efficacy and safety of ELIDEL in pediatric patients with predominantly moderate atopic dermatitis (n=403). References: 1. Data on file, Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC. 2. Elidel Cream Package Insert. Bridgewater, NJ: Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC; 2010. Please see Brief Summary of full Prescribing Information on following pages. ELIDEL is a registered trademark of Meda Pharma S.A.R.L. and is used under license by Valeant. Except as otherwise indicated, all product names, slogans and other marks are trademarks of the Valeant family of companies. © 2014 Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC DM/ELD/14/0015 BRIEF SUMMARY (see package insert for Full Prescribing Information) ® (pimecrolimus) Cream 1% Elidel FOR DERMATOLOGIC USE ONLY. NOT FOR OPHTHALMIC USE. Rx Only. See WARNINGS and boxed WARNING concerning long-term safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors. CONTRAINDICATIONS ELIDEL (pimecrolimus) Cream 1% is contraindicated in individuals with a history of hypersensitivity to pimecrolimus or any of the components of the cream. WARNINGS WARNING Long-term Safety of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors Has Not Been Established Although a causal relationship has not been established, rare cases of malignancy (e.g., skin and lymphoma) have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including ELIDEL Cream. Therefore: G ;:@5:A;A?8;:3@1>9A?1;2@;<5/-8/-8/5:1A>5:5:45.5@;>?5:/8A05:3>1-95: any age group should be avoided, and application limited to areas of involvement with atopic dermatitis. G >1-95?:;@5:05/-@102;>A?15:/4580>1:81??@4-:E1->?;2-31 Prolonged systemic use of calcineurin inhibitors for sustained immunosuppression in animal studies and transplant patients following systemic administration has been associated with an increased risk of infections, lymphomas, and skin malignancies. These risks are associated with the intensity and duration of immunosuppression. Based on this information and the mechanism of action, there is a concern about a potential risk with the use of topical calcineurin inhibitors, including ELIDEL Cream. While a causal relationship has not been established, rare cases of skin malignancy and lymphoma have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including ELIDEL Cream. Therefore: G >1-9?4;A80:;@.1A?105:599A:;/;9<>;95?10-0A8@?-:0/4580>1: G 2 ?53:? -:0 ?E9<@;9? ;2 -@;<5/ 01>9-@5@5? 0; :;@ 59<>;B1 C5@45: C117? <-@51:@? should be re-examined by their healthcare provider and their diagnosis be confirmed (see PRECAUTIONS). G &41?-21@E;2>1-94-?:;@.11:[email protected]?410.1E;:0;:1E1->;2:;:/;:@5:A;A? use. (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, WARNINGS, boxed WARNING, PRECAUTIONS, INDICATIONS AND USAGE, and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.) PRECAUTIONS General: The use of ELIDEL Cream should be avoided on malignant or pre-malignant skin conditions. Malignant or pre-malignant skin conditions, such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), can present as dermatitis. ELIDEL Cream should not be used in patients with Netherton’s Syndrome or other skin diseases where there is the potential for increased systemic absorption of pimecrolimus. The safety of ELIDEL Cream has not been established in patients with generalized erythroderma. The use of ELIDEL Cream may cause local symptoms such as skin burning (burning sensation, stinging, soreness) or pruritus. Localized symptoms are most common during the first few days of ELIDEL Cream application and typically improve as the lesions of atopic dermatitis resolve (see ADVERSE REACTIONS). Bacterial and Viral Skin Infections: Before commencing treatment with ELIDEL Cream, bacterial or viral infections at treatment sites should be resolved. Studies have not evaluated the safety and efficacy of ELIDEL Cream in the treatment of clinically infected atopic dermatitis. While patients with atopic dermatitis are predisposed to superficial skin infections including eczema herpeticum (Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption), treatment with ELIDEL Cream may be independently associated with an increased risk of varicella zoster virus infection (chicken pox or shingles), herpes simplex virus infection, or eczema herpeticum. In clinical studies, 15/1,544 (1%) cases of skin papilloma (warts) were observed in patients using ELIDEL Cream. The youngest patient was age 2 and the oldest was age 12. In cases where there is worsening of skin papillomas or they do not respond to conventional therapy, discontinuation of ELIDEL Cream should be considered until complete resolution of the warts is achieved. Patients with Lymphadenopathy: In clinical studies, 14/1,544 (0.9%) cases of lymphadenopathy were reported while using ELIDEL Cream. These cases of lymphadenopathy were usually related to infections and noted to resolve upon appropriate antibiotic therapy. Of these 14 cases, the majority had either a clear etiology or were known to resolve. Patients who receive ELIDEL Cream and who develop lymphadenopathy should have the etiology of their lymphadenopathy investigated. In the absence of a clear etiology for the lymphadenopathy, or in the presence of acute infectious mononucleosis, ELIDEL Cream should be discontinued. Patients who develop lymphadenopathy should be monitored to ensure that the lymphadenopathy resolves. Sun Exposure: During the course of treatment, it is prudent for patients to minimize or avoid natural or artificial sunlight exposure, even while ELIDEL is not on the skin. The potential effects of ELIDEL Cream on skin response to ultraviolet damage are not known. Immunocompromised Patients: The safety and efficacy of ELIDEL Cream in immunocompromised patients have not been studied. Information for Patients (See Medication Guide.) Drug Interactions: Potential interactions between ELIDEL and other drugs, including immunizations, have not been systematically evaluated. Due to low blood levels of pimecrolimus detected in some patients after topical application, systemic drug interactions are not expected, but cannot be ruled out. The concomitant administration of known CYP3A family of inhibitors in patients with widespread and/or erythrodermic disease should be done with caution. Some examples of such drugs are erythromycin, itraconazole, ketoconazole, fluconazole, calcium channel blockers and cimetidine. Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility: In a 2-year rat dermal carcinogenicity study using ELIDEL Cream, a statistically significant increase in the incidence of follicular cell adenoma of the thyroid was noted in low, mid and high dose male animals compared to vehicle and saline control male animals. Follicular cell adenoma of the thyroid was noted in the dermal rat carcinogenicity study at the lowest dose of 2 mg/kg/day [0.2% pimecrolimus cream; 1.5× the Maximum Recommended Human Dose (MRHD) based on AUC comparisons]. No increase in the incidence of follicular cell adenoma of the thyroid C-?:;@105:@41;>-8/->/5:;31:5/5@E?@A0E5:9-81>-@?A<@; 93730-EI $ based on AUC comparisons). However, oral studies may not reflect continuous exposure or the same metabolic profile as by the dermal route. In a mouse dermal carcinogenicity study using pimecrolimus in an ethanolic solution, no increase in incidence of neoplasms was observed in the skin or other organs up to the highest dose of 4 mg/kg/day (0.32% pimecrolimus in ethanol) 27x MRHD based on AUC comparisons. However, lymphoproliferative changes (including lymphoma) were noted in a 13 week repeat dose dermal toxicity study conducted in mice using pimecrolimus in an ethanolic solution at a dose of 25 mg/kg/day (47x MRHD based on AUC comparisons). No lymphoproliferative changes were noted in this study at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day (17x MRHD based on AUC comparison). However, the latency time to lymphoma formation was shortened to 8 weeks after dermal administration of pimecrolimus dissolved in ethanol at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day (179-217x MRHD based on AUC comparisons). In a mouse oral (gavage) carcinogenicity study, a statistically significant increase in the incidence of lymphoma was noted in high dose male and female animals compared to vehicle control male and female animals. Lymphomas were noted in the oral mouse carcinogenicity study at a dose of 45 mg/kg/day (258-340x MRHD based on AUC comparisons). No drugrelated tumors were noted in the mouse oral carcinogenicity study at a dose of 15 mg/kg/day D $.-?10;:'/;9<->5?;:?:-:;>-83-B-31>-@/->/5:;31:5/5@E?@A0E a statistically significant increase in the incidence of benign thymoma was noted in 10 mg/kg/day pimecrolimus treated male and female animals compared to vehicle control treated male and female animals. In addition, a significant increase in the incidence of benign thymoma was noted in another oral (gavage) rat carcinogenicity study in 5 mg/kg/day pimecrolimus treated male animals compared to vehicle control treated male animals. No drug-related tumors were noted in the rat based on AUC comparisons) and at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day for female animals (21x MRHD based on AUC comparisons). In a 52-week dermal photo-carcinogenicity study, the median time to onset of skin tumor formation was decreased in hairless mice following chronic topical dosing with concurrent exposure to UV radiation (40 weeks of treatment followed by 12 weeks of observation) with the ELIDEL Cream vehicle alone. No additional effect on tumor development beyond the vehicle effect was noted with the addition of the active ingredient, pimecrolimus, to the vehicle cream. A 39-week oral monkey toxicology study was conducted with pimecrolimus doses of 15, 45 and 120 mg/kg/day. A dose dependent increase in expression of immunosuppressive-related lymphoproliferative disorder (IRLD) associated with lymphocryptovirus (a monkey strain of virus related to human Epstein Barr virus) was observed. IRLD in monkeys mirrors what has been noted in human transplant patients after chronic systemic immunosuppressive therapy, post transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), after treatment with chronic systemic immunosuppressive therapy. Both IRLD and PTLD can progress to lymphoma, which is dependent on the dose and duration of systemic immunosuppressive therapy. A dose dependent increase in opportunistic infections (a signal of systemic immunosuppression) was also noted in this monkey study. An oral fertility and embryofetal developmental study in rats revealed estrus cycle disturbances, post-implantation loss and reduction in litter size at the 45 mg/kg/day dose (38× MRHD based on AUC comparisons). No effect on fertility in female rats was noted at 10 mg/kg/day (12× MRHD based on AUC comparisons). No effect on fertility in male rats was noted at 45 mg/kg/day (23× MRHD based on AUC comparisons), which was the highest dose tested in this study (see full Prescribing Information for additional Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis and Impairment of Fertility data). Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects Pregnancy Category C: There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of topically administered pimecrolimus in pregnant women. The experience with ELIDEL Cream when used by pregnant women is too limited to permit assessment of the safety of its use during pregnancy. Pimecrolimus was transferred across the placenta in oral rat and rabbit embryofetal developmental studies. There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this drug should be used only if clearly needed during pregnancy. Nursing Mothers: It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from pimecrolimus, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. Pediatric Use: ELIDEL Cream is not indicated for use in children less than 2 years of age. The long-term safety and effects of ELIDEL Cream on the developing immune system are unknown (see WARNINGS, boxed WARNING, and INDICATIONS AND USAGE). Three Phase 3 pediatric studies were conducted involving 1,114 patients 2-17 years of -31&C;?@A051?C1>1C117>-:0;95F10B145/81/;:@>;8810?@A051?C5@4-C117;<1: label phase and one was a vehicle-controlled (up to 1 year) safety study with the option for ?1=A1:@5-8@;<5/-8/;>@5/;?@1>;50A?1"2@41?1<-@51:@?C1>1E1->?;2-31: the short-term studies, 11% of ELIDEL patients did not complete these studies and 1.5% of ELIDEL patients discontinued due to adverse events. In the one-year study, 32% of ELIDEL patients did not complete this study and 3% of ELIDEL patients discontinued due to adverse events. Most discontinuations were due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect. The most common local adverse event in the short-term studies of ELIDEL Cream in pediatric patients ages 2-17 was application site burning (10% vs. 13% vehicle); the incidence in the long-term study was 9% ELIDEL vs. 7% vehicle (see ADVERSE REACTIONS). Adverse events that were more frequent (>5%) in patients treated with ELIDEL Cream compared to vehicle C1>141-0-/41 B?5:@41?4;>@@1>9@>5-8!-?;<4->E:35@5?B? 5:KA1:F- (13% vs. 4%), pharyngitis (8% vs. 3%), viral infection (7% vs. 1%), pyrexia (13% vs. 5%), /;A34 B? -:041-0-/41B? C1>15:/>1-?10;B1>B145/815:@41 E1-> safety study (see ADVERSE REACTIONS). In 843 patients ages 2-17 years treated with ELIDEL Cream, 9 (0.8%) developed eczema herpeticum (5 on ELIDEL Cream alone and 4 on ELIDEL Cream used in sequence with corticosteroids). In 211 patients on vehicle alone, there were no cases of eczema herpeticum. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Two Phase 3 studies were conducted involving 436 infants age 3 months-23 months. One 6-week randomized vehicle-controlled study with a 20-week open-label phase and one safety study, up to one year, were conducted. In the 6-week study, 11% of ELIDEL and 48% of vehicle patients did not complete this study; no patient in either group discontinued due to adverse events. Infants on ELIDEL Cream had an increased incidence of some adverse events compared to vehicle. In the 6-week vehicle-controlled study these adverse events included pyrexia (32% vs. 13% vehicle), URI (24% vs. 14%), nasopharyngitis (15% vs. 8%), gastroenteritis (7% vs. 3%), otitis media (4% vs. 0%), and diarrhea (8% vs. 0%). In the open-label phase of the study, for infants who switched to ELIDEL Cream from vehicle, the incidence of the above-cited adverse events approached or equaled the incidence of those patients who remained on ELIDEL Cream. In the 6 month safety data, 16% of ELIDEL and 35% of vehicle patients discontinued early and 1.5% of ELIDEL and 0% of vehicle patients discontinued due to adverse events. Infants on ELIDEL Cream had a greater incidence of some adverse events as compared to vehicle. These included pyrexia (30% vs. 20%), URI (21% vs. 17%), cough (15% vs. 9%), hypersensitivity (8% vs. 2%), teething (27% vs. 22%), vomiting (9% vs. 4%), rhinitis (13% vs. 9%), viral rash (4% vs. 0%), rhinorrhea (4% vs. 0%), and wheezing (4% vs. 0%). Geriatric Use: Nine (9) patients ≥65 years old received ELIDEL Cream in Phase 3 studies. Clinical studies of ELIDEL did not include sufficient numbers of patients aged 65 and over to assess efficacy and safety. ADVERSE REACTIONS No phototoxicity and no photoallergenicity were detected in clinical studies with 24 and 33 normal volunteers, respectively. In human dermal safety studies, ELIDEL (pimecrolimus) Cream 1% did not induce contact sensitization or cumulative irritation. In a one-year safety study in pediatric patients age 2-17 years old involving sequential use of ELIDEL Cream and a topical corticosteroid, 43% of ELIDEL patients and 68% of vehicle patients used corticosteroids during the study. Corticosteroids were used for more than 7 days by 34% of ELIDEL patients and 54% of vehicle patients. An increased incidence of impetigo, skin infection, superinfection (infected atopic dermatitis), rhinitis, and urticaria were found in the patients that had used ELIDEL Cream and topical corticosteroid sequentially as compared to ELIDEL Cream alone. In 3 randomized, double-blind vehicle-controlled pediatric studies and one active-controlled adult study, 843 and 328 patients respectively, were treated with ELIDEL Cream. In these clinical trials, 48 (4%) of the 1,171 ELIDEL patients and 13 (3%) of 408 vehicle-treated patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Discontinuations for AEs were primarily due to application site reactions, and cutaneous infections. The most common application site reaction was application site burning, which occurred in 8%-26% of patients treated with ELIDEL Cream. The following table depicts the incidence of adverse events pooled across the 2 identically designed 6-week studies with their open label extensions and the 1-year safety study for pediatric patients ages 2-17. Data from the adult active-controlled study is also included in this table. Adverse events are listed regardless of relationship to study drug. Two cases of septic arthritis have been reported in infants less than one year of age in clinical trials conducted with ELIDEL Cream (n = 2,443). Causality has not been established. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events ( ≥1%) Pediatric Pediatric Patients* Patients* Vehicle-Controlled Open-Label (20 (6 Weeks) (1 Year) Weeks) Elidel Elidel Elidel Elidel Elidel Cream Cream Cream Cream Cream (N=267) (N=136) (N=335) (N=272) (N=75) % % % % % At Least 1 AE 68 71 72 85 75 Infections and Infestations Upper Respiratory 14 13 19 5 8 Tract Infection NOS Nasopharyngitis 10 7 20 27 21 Skin Infection NOS 3 5 5 2 4 Influenza 3 1 7 13 4 Ear Infection NOS 3 5 5 2 4 Otitis Media 2 1 3 3 5 Impetigo 2 2 4 4 5 Bacterial Infection 2 2 1 1 0 Folliculitis 1 1 1 2 4 Sinusitis 1 1 3 2 1 Pneumonia NOS 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 8 3 Pharyngitis NOS Pharyngitis 1 2 3 0 <1 Streptococcal Molluscum 1 0 1 2 0 Contagiosum Staphylococcal <1 4 2 0 <1 Infection Bronchitis NOS <1 2 1 11 8 Herpes Simplex <1 0 1 3 3 Tonsillitis NOS <1 0 1 6 0 Viral Infection NOS 1 1 <1 7 1 Gastroenteritis NOS 0 2 1 7 3 Chickenpox 1 0 1 3 4 Skin Papilloma <1 0 1 3 <1 Tonsillitis Acute NOS 0 0 0 3 0 Pediatric Patients* Vehicle-Controlled *Ages 2-17 years Adult Active Comparator (1 Year) Elidel Cream (N=328) % 78 4 8 6 10 6 1 2 2 6 1 <1 1 0 0 1 2 4 1 0 2 <1 0 0 Upper Respiratory Tract <1 0 1 Infection Viral NOS Herpes Simplex 0 0 <1 Dermatitis Bronchitis Acute NOS 0 0 0 Eye Infection NOS 0 0 0 General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions Application Site 10 13 2 Burning Pyrexia 8 9 12 Application Site 3 5 2 Reaction NOS Application Site 3 6 1 Irritation Influenza Like Illness <1 0 1 Application Site <1 0 0 Erythema Application Site 1 2 1 Pruritus Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders Cough 12 8 9 Nasal Congestion 3 2 2 Rhinorrhea 2 1 1 Asthma Aggravated 2 2 4 Sinus Congestion 1 1 1 Rhinitis <1 0 2 Wheezing <1 1 1 Asthma NOS 1 1 3 Epistaxis 0 1 0 Dyspnea NOS 0 0 0 Gastrointestinal Disorders Abdominal Pain Upper 4 4 3 Sore Throat 3 4 5 Vomiting NOS 3 4 4 Diarrhea NOS 1 1 1 Nausea <1 2 1 Abdominal Pain NOS <1 1 2 Toothache <1 1 1 Constipation <1 0 1 Loose Stools 0 1 1 Reproductive System and Breast Disorders Dysmenorrhea 1 0 2 Eye Disorders Conjunctivitis NEC 1 1 2 Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Urticaria 1 0 <1 Acne NOS 0 1 <1 Immune System Disorders Hypersensitivity NOS 4 4 5 Injury and Poisoning 1 1 <1 Accident NOS Laceration 1 1 2 Musculoskeletal, Connective Tissue and Bone Disorders Back Pain <1 2 <1 Arthralgias 0 0 <1 Ear and Labyrinth Disorders Earache 1 1 0 Nervous System Disorders Headache 14 9 11 2 0 <1 2 0 1 2 1 0 <1 0 <1 9 7 26 13 5 1 3 3 15 <1 4 6 2 3 2 2 0 2 2 0 6 16 2 <1 1 <1 4 1 4 3 2 11 1 1 1 <1 7 <1 3 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 <1 1 6 8 7 8 4 4 3 4 <1 7 5 8 5 7 4 1 <1 <1 <1 4 1 2 2 <1 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 4 3 <1 2 <1 <1 1 2 5 1 3 <1 <1 1 <1 0 0 <1 1 0 1 2 2 3 3 0 25 16 7 *Ages 2-17 years POST-MARKETING EVENTS The following adverse reactions have been reported in patients using ELIDEL Cream. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. General: Anaphylactic reactions, ocular irritation after application of the cream to the eye lids or near the eyes, angioneurotic edema, facial edema, skin flushing associated with alcohol use, skin discoloration Hematology/Oncology: Lymphomas, basal cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma OVERDOSAGE There has been no experience of overdose with ELIDEL (pimecrolimus) Cream 1%. If oral ingestion occurs, medical advice should be sought. Manufactured by: Novartis Pharma Produktions GmbH Wehr, Germany Distributed by: Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, LLC. Bridgewater, NJ 08807 REV. 02/2014 (based on #2079799 06/11) DM/ELD/14/0010(1) 52 COSMETIC ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM INGREDIENTS: Human, animal studies not widely performed from page 1 human body,” Dr. Friedman says. Fears surrounding parabens and phthalates, for example, are derived from cell line studies, he says. And to compare the impact of these ingredients on a single cell type to the complexity of the human system—especially the skin, which is extraordinarily complex—is fuzzy math. “A lot of what’s in the media about these different ingredients, causing consumers to be so concerned, is based on in vitro or cell-based assays, rather than human studies, of which there are very few,” Dr. Friedman says. “A lot of what’s in the media about these different ingredients...is based on in vitro or cell-based assays, rather than human studies, of which there are very few.” Adam Friedman, M.D. Washington, D.C. risk of breast cancer. Furthermore, reported paraben exposure and tissue levels did not correlate with tumor location, estrogen, or any attribute of breast cancer, so it is difficult to say this TAKE PARABENS, FOR EXAMPLE is anything more than a hypothesis at Do a Google search on parabens, this point.” which, according to the FDA, are the Dr. Friedman says it’s easy for commost widely used preservatives in cospanies with an agenda to promote metics and personal care products paraben-free skin and hair care prodsuch as soap, shampoo, conditioner ucts to twist the findings. But promotand moisturizers, and you’ll get a mix ing parabens as cancer-causing is more of educational and scary articles. propaganda than truth, he says. Parabens are preservatives that exWhile some consumer groups push tend product shelf-life and prevent for paraben-free products for genbacterial and fungal growth. Comeral safety, they admit there’s a lot we mon parabens are methylparaben, don’t know. The Environmental Workethylparaben, propylparaben and ing Group (EWG) posted an article on butylparaben. its website, Cosmetics, Parabens, It’s not always the product and Cancer: What Are the that’s unsafe, but rather Facts? The lead paragraph the way it’s used, acstates: “If you’re concording to one expert. fused about the poten“Parabens are very tial link between pararesources that discuss effective preservatives bens and cancer, you’re paraben when used at the apnot alone. The ev isafety. propriate levels — the dence is inconclusive levels that have the toxand professional opinbit.ly/parabenfallacies icology data that shows ions vary widely about they are safe,” says Laura whether there is, in fact, a Goodman, M.S., senior scienconnection.” tist, P&G Skin Care Scientific ComStill, consumer demand is fueling munications. the need for alternatives. Enter compaMuch of the concern comes from nies like Made from Earth, which proresearch that found parabens within duces and sells organic skin care prodsamples of breast cancer tumors. ucts online. “The hypothesis was these chemi“When we can, we don’t put [chemcals can act like estrogen in the body, ical] preservatives in our products,” and, because estrogen fuels certain says Stergios Bekas, operations, Made breast cancers, exposure could infrom Earth. “Vitamin E actually serves crease tumor development and proas a good natural preservative. … neem gression,” Dr. Friedman says. “That oil is a great natural preservative and sounds kind of linear and makes sense. citric acid, which comes from citrus However, these studies were unable to fruit, is a great natural preservative, show a causative role [or] demonstrate as well.” a conclusive connection between But even these ingredients could be paraben exposure and an increased construed as harmful. Ingesting even Facts & Fallacies small doses of neem oil, which is used externally as a traditional medicine in India, causes toxic effects, including seizures and renal failure, according to a Nov. 2013 paper in the Journal of the Association of Physicians in India.1 In the cases where the natural preservatives wouldn’t prevent bacterial growth, Made from Earth uses tetrasodium EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), which is a salt-based preservative, according to Mr. Bekas. “Our customers say, ‘Why do you use a preservative when we want products to be totally organic?’ There are some ingredients that if you don’t preserve them bacteria will grow…. That’s just the way it is. We would rather sell these products because they’re great for you and preserve them in the right way, as opposed to not preserve them and have them grow harmful bacteria,” Mr. Bekas says. Jacquelyn Levin, D.O., a dermatologist in Laguna Niguel, Calif., says personally she uses some products containing parabens as preservatives in product formulations. Parabens, she says, do a good job of preventing bacterial and microbial growth. “… that is sort of the catch 22. Some of the other preservatives out there are a bit more difficult to formulate with,” Dr. Levin says, adding that we don’t know whether alternative preservatives are safer than parabens. “However, we have to respect that many of our patients may be concerned with the risk of using products with parabens and its good practice to be able to offer alternatives,” she adds. PHTHALATES Phthalates are actually not preservatives. They’re meant to alter the feel of products. Used predominately in nail polishes, shampoos and soaps, INGREDIENTS see page 54 PROVEN SOLUTIONS FOR COMPROMISED SKIN AVEENO® delivers proven solutions to nourish, soothe and restore healthy skin and hair that meet our highest standards for safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction. AVEENO® Oat contains vital nutrients, fatty acids and lipids naturally found in healthy skin. No single natural ingredient has more clinical data and a longer history of proven results for compromised skin. Trusted by Dermatologists for over 60 years. ©Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. 2015 54 COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY DERMATOLOGY ® SEPTEMBER 2015 2015 ⁄⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM .COM INGREDIENTS: Inactives not always what they seem from page 52 phthalates make materials more pliable, according to Dr. Friedman. Some fea r t hat topic a l products containing phthalates can disrupt hormones and, if women use phthalates when pregnant, it could affect the fetus, Dr. Friedman says. While the there’s not enough evidence to substantiate the claims, according to the FDA, many manufacturers have eliminated phthalates. INACTIVES NOT ALWAYS WHAT THEY SEEM Ingredients in skin care aren’t always what they seem, and a lot of science goes into creating elegant formulations that are effective and safe. One example: silicone. “People hear the word silicone and they immediately think that there’s like a barrier that you’re putting on the skin that doesn’t allow it to breathe…. That’s really not the case with silicone technology today,” Ms. Goodman says. Silicone used in some beauty products is a feel enhancer—it gives products a smooth, velvety feel. P&G uses silicone molecules that vary in size and are spherically shaped. The shape of the molecules helps it roll across the skin and fill different skin textures and lines, better. “The silicone that dermatologists use to inject are very different than what we use on a topical product,” Ms. Goodman says. The silicone ingredient is meant to sit on top of the skin but can help deliver ingredients into the skin. Silicone has been safely used in skin care products for some time, Ms. Goodman says. But it’s important that manufacturers that use silicone and other ingredients purchase high-quality ingredients. “We have very high quality standards. I can’t guarantee that every manufacturer out there does that,” Ms. Goodman says. “... we don’t use ingredients that haven’t passed safety and toxicology evaluations… and they have to have published information on them.” An example of an inactive ingredient that benefits the skin, according to Dr. Levin, would be ceramides, which have been shown to be lacking not only in mature skin but also in atopic skin. “People with psoriasis are also lacking certain ceramides,” Dr. Levin says. “And what ceramides have been shown to do is that they actually help strengthen the skin and make it less susceptible to irritation and also help skin keep its own water and hydration naturally. They’re included in moisturizers and cleansers.” On the other side of the good-bad spectrum, you have microbeads. Microbeads are a big topic—more because of the potential environmental impact. They don’t dissolve, according to Ms. Goodman. In response to that concern, P&G has identified alternative technologies that are biodegradable. P&G has begun to use sodium bicarbonate crystals to help scrub the skin. “Sodium bicarbonate is baking soda but it’s not the same form as the baking soda you have in your kitchen. We have a crystalized form that actually dissolves as you use it. We don’t want consumers to be over exfoliating; that’s one of the reasons it dissolves, but then, also being that it dissolves, it’s also biodegradable,” Ms. Goodman says. FRAGRANCES Fragrances are considered to be trade secrets, so their ingredients are mysteries to consumers, according to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. Fragrances might contain allergens and sensitizers, phthalates, neurotoxins and synthetic musks, according to SafeCosmetics.org.2 The potential concerns around chemical fragrances are easy to address if patients are willing to use fragrance-free products. But consumers like products with fragrance, according to Diane Foster, a consultant who works with leading skin care companies. “A lot of times, companies are forced to include fragrance, because when they test the product, people come back to them and say they want fragrances,” Ms. Foster says. “However, good substantial, well-known companies have a panel of [chemical] fragrances that they have tested in the most sensitive skin known to mankind and found them not to be irritants.” And some companies, including Johnson & Johnson, are eliminating At a glance ingredient resources } OTC for physicians and patients bit.ly/docsandpatients product } Prohibited ingredients bit.ly/prohibitedproducts consumers } What are reading? bit.ly/whatconsumersread about preservatives } Talking with patients bit.ly/patientsandparabens and fallacies about } Facts paraben safety bit.ly/parabenfactsfallacies evidence around } The nanotechnology bit.ly/evidencearoundnano & Johnson’s } Johnson commitment to consumers bit.ly/JohnsonJohnsoncommitment perceived harmful ingredients in their fragrances. A not her option in fragrances: essential oils, says Mr. Bekas. “Essential oils come from the actual fruit. We use a lot of citrus oils, like orange essential oils, grapefruit essential oils. They’re a lot more expensive [because] they pretty much come from crushing a bunch of oranges down and making it a fine oil as opposed to a synthetic oil… that comes from the lab,” Mr. Bekas says. Mary P. Lupo, M.D., clinical professor of dermatology, Tulane University, New Orleans, La., says she prefers products with natural oils, like lavender, for a light fragrance because those give patients few problems. But even natural fragrances are INGREDIENTS see page 57 TREATING INFLAMMATORY LESIONS OF ROSACEA CAN BE TOUGH… PRESCRIBE A TOUGH TOPICAL SOOLANTRA® (ivermectin) CREAM, 1%—POWERFUL AND RAPID RESULTS FROM A ONCE-DAILY TOPICAL1,2*† . –20.5 (–64.9%) mean inflammatory lesion count reduction at week 122*† . Better efficacy from once-daily Soolantra Cream, 1% vs twice-daily metronidazole 0.75% cream as early as 3 weeks3‡ . Specifically formulated for patients with inflammatory lesions of rosacea—Cetaphil® Moisturizing Cream was the basis for the vehicle2 w ww.s o o lant r a.c o m/hcp Important Safety Information Indication: SOOLANTRA® (ivermectin) Cream, 1% is indicated for the treatment of inflammatory lesions of rosacea. Adverse Events: In clinical trials with SOOLANTRA® Cream, the most common adverse reactions (incidence ≤1%) included skin burning sensation and skin irritation. Warnings/Precautions: Not for oral, ophthalmic, or intravaginal use. You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088. Please see brief summary of Prescribing Information on adjacent page. * The efficacy and safety of SOOLANTRA® Cream, 1% once daily was evaluated in subjects aged ≥18 years in 2 identically designed phase 3 clinical trials (N=1371). Final results were comparable between the 2 studies, with the least favorable results presented here. † A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 12-week, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study assessing the efficacy and safety of SOOLANTRA® Cream, 1% once daily in 683 subjects with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea (Investigator Global Assessment [IGA] score of 3 or 4). ‡ An investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOOLANTRA® Cream, 1% once daily with metronidazole 0.75% cream twice daily in 962 subjects with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea (IGA score of 3 or 4) over a 16-week treatment period. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT SOOLANTRA® (ivermectin) Cream, 1% BRIEF SUMMARY This summary contains important information about SOOLANTRA (soo lan’ trah) Cream. Read this information carefully before you prescribe SOOLANTRA Cream. For full Prescribing Information and Patient Information please see the package insert. WHAT IS SOOLANTRA CREAM? SOOLANTRA Cream is a topical prescription medicine indicated for the treatment of the inflammatory lesions of rosacea. WHO IS SOOLANTRA CREAM FOR? SOOLANTRA Cream is indicated for people with inflammatory lesions of rosacea. It is not known if SOOLANTRA Cream is safe and effective for children. Advise your patients to not use SOOLANTRA Cream for a condition for which it was not prescribed and remind them to not give SOOLANTRA Cream to other people, even if they have the same symptoms as it may harm them. WHAT SHOULD I ASK MY PATIENTS BEFORE PRESCRIBING SOOLANTRA CREAM? Before you prescribe SOOLANTRA Cream, ask your patients if they: SOOLANTRA Cream is supplied in a child-resistant capped tube. >!223)1+)17/<35)66(2:1217,)',-/(5)6-67%17'%3%1(7:-67 '2817)5'/2'.:-6)!2%92-(63-//-1+(2127648))=)7,)78&):,-/) opening or closing. >!2'/26)+)17/<35)66(2:1217,)',-/(5)6-67%17'%3%1(7:-67 clockwise. WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN SOOLANTRA CREAM? Active ingredient: ivermectin. Inactive ingredients: carbomer copolymer type B, cetyl alcohol, citric acid monohydrate, dimethicone, edetate disodium, glycerin, isopropyl palmitate, methylparaben, oleyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, polyoxyl 20 cetostearyl ether, propylene glycol, propylparaben, purified water, sodium hydroxide, sorbitan monostearate, and stearyl alcohol. WHERE SHOULD I GO FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SOOLANTRA CREAM? >!,-65-)* 800%5<6800%5-=)67,)0267-03257%17-1*250%7-21 about SOOLANTRA Cream. For full Prescribing Information and Patient Information please see the package insert. >272www.soolantra.com or call 1-866-735-4137 >,%9)%1<27,)50)(-'%/'21(-7-216 >%5)35)+1%17253/%11-1+72&)'20)35)+1%177-6127.12:1-* SOOLANTRA Cream can harm an unborn baby. >%5)&5)%67*))(-1+253/%172&5)%67*))(7-6127.12:1-* SOOLANTRA Cream passes into breast milk and if it can harm a baby. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners. GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P., Fort Worth, Texas 76177 USA Revised: December 2014 WHAT ARE THE MOST COMMON SIDE EFFECTS OF SOOLANTRA CREAM? The most commonly reported side effects when using SOOLANTRA Cream include skin burning sensation and skin irritation. Remind your patients to tell you if they have any side effect that bothers them or that does not go away. These are not all of the possible side effects of SOOLANTRA Cream. For more information, see the full Prescribing Information. You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA at www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088. You may also contact GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P. AT 1-866-735-4137. HOW SHOULD PATIENTS USE SOOLANTRA CREAM? > !5)%0-6*2586)217,)*%')21/<%1(6,28/(127&)86)(-1 the eyes, mouth, or vagina. > !5)%06,28/(&)%33/-)(727,)%**)'7)(%5)%62*7,)*%') once a day. APPLYING SOOLANTRA CREAM: >3)%6-=)(%028172* !5)%06,28/(&)%33/-)(72)%', area of the face (forehead, chin, nose, each cheek) that is affected. Avoid contact with the lips and eyes. References: 1. Stein Gold L, Kircik L, Fowler J, et al; Ivermectin Phase III Study Group. Efficacy and safety of ivermectin 1% cream in treatment of papulopustular rosacea: results of two randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pivotal studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13(3):316-323. 2. Data on file. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. 3. Taieb A, Ortonne JP, Ruzicka T, et al; Ivermectin Phase III Study Group. Superiority of ivermectin 1% cream over metronidazole 0.75% cream in treating inflammatory lesions of rosacea: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1103-1110. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2015 Galderma Laboratories, L.P. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. 14501 N. Freeway, Fort Worth, TX 76177 SOL-255 Printed in USA 06/15 SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Patient data sheet download http://bit.ly/Parabensforpatients COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY INGREDIENTS: ‘Natural’, ‘organic’ don’t mean ‘safe’ from page 54 not irritant-free. And the term “unscented” can be misleading, as a masking fragrance might be used in a product, according to Dr. Lupo. “We tend to like to see ‘non-comedogenic,’ and ‘fragrance-free’ to help guide our patients,” Dr. Lupo says. ORGANIC...NATURAL...WHAT? Use of the terms organic and natural mean different things to different people and different cosmetic companies. The FDA does not define or regulate these terms. “Having one natural ingredient doesn’t make it a natural product,” Ms. Foster says. Dr. Lupo says “natural” does not mean low allergenicity or more effectiveness. “It simply means, in most cases, that the active ingredient is found in nature (a plant, usually),” she says. It’s not so much what natural and organic mean, but, rather, what they imply. “There is this overall trend that what’s good in your diet can easily be translated to skin care, and that includes organic or natural skin care lines, non-GMO, which stands for genetically modified, as well as gluten free,” Dr. Friedman says. The idea, he says, is that anything that is synthetic is not good. But that doesn’t make sense, according to Dr. Friedman. “Antioxidants, which most of these skin care lines have, are highly unstable as well as have difficulty penetrating the skin. They need ingredients to stabilize them and surfactants to help them get to where they need to go. And what about preserving them from bacterial contamination? Some skin care lines that follow the paleo diet mentality are pretty much throwing chopped fruit and proteins into a jar. That’s not going to last more than a couple of days before it gets colonized with bacteria or fungi,” Dr. Friedman says. The biology of the gastrointestinal tract is different than that of the skin, Dr. Friedman says. Though the cell types are somewhat similar, the, architecture and immune environment are different. “While there is no question [there is] a skin-gut connection with respect Graphic courtesy of the Personal Care Products Council. Sources: www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/ProductsIngredients/Ingredients/ucm128042.htm to health, it’s really a poor comparison when considering interactions with topically applied or ingested materials,” he says. That’s what makes the topical gluten-free fad curious, according to Dr. Friedman. In cosmetics, Triticum vulgare (wheat) gluten can be found in mascaras and skin and hair care products. Gluten functions as a binder or a hair and skin conditioning agent. It may appear as hydrolyzed wheat gluten, Triticum vulgare (wheat) gluten, and Triticum vulgare (wheat) gluten extract on the label, all of which are huge wheat proteins. These can’t get through even an impaired skin barrier. And there have actually been studies in celiac patients who used a shampoo with wheat gluten extract, according to Dr. Friedman. “So unless the consumer is eating the product, the likelihood of gluten sensitivity or inducing a flair of celiac disease is next to none,” he says. To assume natural and organic equal safety in skin care is unfortunate, Dr. Friedman says. “There are toxic substances on the planet that are ‘organic.’ Aflatoxin, which is derived from fungi found on peanuts, is the most carcinogenic material on the planet. Anthrax is organic. … bloodroot, an ingredient found in online mole and skin tag removal creams is an extraordinary escharotic agent. It burns right through your skin like acid,” says Dr. Friedman, who wrote a paper on the topic, published June 2012 in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. Poison ivy is natural, but people definitely don’t want to apply it to the skin, Dr. Levin says. The dermatologist says she tries to steer patients away from products with tea tree oil. “I know it has antimicrobial benefits and it has a really nice cooling sensation on the skin, however there is a really high incidence of irritant in patients that use tea tree oil,” Dr. Levin says. ” TACKLING THE TOPIC (WITH PATIENTS) Talking with patients about the safety of controversial skin care ingredients can be a long, losing battle, if patients who are saturated with online information, INGREDIENTS see page 58 57 58 COSMETIC ® DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM INGREDIENTS: Dermatologists need tools to help educate patients from page 57 according to Dr. Friedman. “What would be useful is a centralized database or website, where a physician could easily download a factsheet with the evidence laid out in plain English, and say these are the facts, these are the studies…,” Dr. Friedman says. “I think we as dermatologists need the right tools because it’s a he-said, shesaid kind of conversation.” Dr. Levin says she looks for OTC skin and hair care companies that go the extra mile and do studies showing that the products are gentle or have extra skin and hair benefits. These studies should include studies on atopic skin or even mature skin, she says, noting that “There are many companies out there that do that. Dove, for example, Cetaphil, CeraVe are companies that have done that kind of work.” Dermatologists, in general, should feel at ease with having patients use researched products from credible, established companies, Dr. Friedman says. “Beyond the risk for allergic contact dermatitis, my feeling is [these ingredients] are safe,” Dr. Friedman says. DT references online bit.ly/otcingredients FACIAL REJUVENATION: Technique talk around various devices from page 47 intraoral laser can be used on the skin, as well, she says. “It can actually cause heating of the oral mucosa without any injury or burning,” Dr. Lee says. “This should never be attempted with another erbium system because it would cause severe burns.” Step 2: When applied to the skin’s surface, the Frac3 nonablative fractional Nd:YAG in the SP Dynamis platform cleans debris from the pores, helps to shrink the sebaceous glands, kills propionibacterium acnes, or P. acnes and makes skin smoother, according to Dr. Lee. Step 3: The Piano mode Nd:YAG is the only Nd:YAG laser on the market that has long pulse durations of 6 seconds, which results in deep volumetric bulk heating and skin tightening, according to Dr. Lee. Step 4: This step involves an ablative erbium laser. The one that is part of the Fotona SP Dynamis allows dermatologists the versatility of changing settings—from light, superficial ablation to fully ablative with thermal coag. Because of the ability to customize, dermatologists can use the Fotona 4D procedure on anybody, any skin type and at any age, according to Dr. Lee. She adds that there are no contraindications. EXILIS FOR SKIN TIGHTENING, LIFTING Exilis (BTL Aesthetics) is a focused, continuous monopolar radiofrequency (RF) device, which has face and body applicators, according to Dr. Lee. “It provides uniform volumetric deep bulk heating (reaches a depth of 2.5 cm), resulting in skin tightening,” she says. Exilis has controlled contact cooling and real-time temperature monitoring, impedance intelligence and energy flow control, which measures impedance and temperature of the tissue and adjusts current accordingly, according to Dr. Lee. “This eliminates the chance of over treatment, while providing uniform energy delivery at optimal levels,” Dr. Lee says. “RF energy is color blind, making it safe for treating all skin types.” Researchers reported in September 2014 in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology on 24 females who received two treatments with bilateral monopolar RF to the mid and lower face. Their assessments revealed a 35% reduction in skin laxity, 42% reduction in fine lines and wrinkles and 33% decreased appearance of photo damage. At three months post-treatment, 92% of the women showed at least mild skin laxity improvement. Ultrasound testing in 12 women showed a 19% improvement in skin density, and histology showed a notable increase in dermal collagen and elastin fibers in two women. They found no significant adverse events.1 The ideal Elixis candidate, according to Dr. Lee, is a patient who has mild to moderate facial skin laxity. “It is not a substitute for a facelift, but it is painless, has no downtime or side effects and can provide 30% to 40% skin tightening in all skin types, safely,” she says. “Patients with severe skin laxity would not be good candidates. These patients would not do well with any laser procedure, they would require surgery.” An advantage of the Elixis, compared to Thermage (Valeant) and Ultherapy (Ulthera), is that it does not require expensive consumables, according to Dr. Lee. Dr. Alster, however, who says she used Elixis and offers Thermage and other skin tighteners in her practice, favors Ulthera micro-focused ultrasound for skin lifting and tightening. “I routinely recommend Ulthera because I think it provides optimal noninvasive lifting due to its deep penetration and focused tissue effect. It can be used alone to tighten the jawline and lift the brow, but I often use it in conjunction with other treatments, including the Fraxel Clear + Brilliant and/or microneedling in order to minimize rhytides in the same treatment session,” Dr. Alster says. DT Disclosures: Dr. Lee has served as consultant and investigator to: Lumenis, Cutera, Syneron, Iridex, Solta, Ulthera, Cynosure, Fotona, BTL Dr. Alster is a consultant to Merz. References: 1. Mcdaniel D, Weiss R, Weiss M, Mazur C, Griffen C. Two-treatment protocol for skin laxity using 90-Watt dynamic monopolar radiofrequency device with real-time impedance intelligence monitoring. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13(9):1112-7. SMASH AT THE SITE OF INFECTION1 *For the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail(s) due to Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. NEW LARGER JUBLIA allows some patients to have clearer toenails grow back. Individual results may vary. INDICATION JUBLIA (efinaconazole) topical solution, 10% is indicated for the topical treatment of onychomycosis (tinea unguium) of the toenail(s) due to Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. 8 mL size Rx Only IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION 7 JUBLIA is for topical use only and is not for oral, ophthalmic, or intravaginal use. 7 Patients should be instructed to contact their health care professional if a reaction suggesting sensitivity or severe irritation occurs. 7 The most common adverse reactions (incidence >1%) were (vs vehicle): ingrown toenail (2.3% vs 0.7%), application-site dermatitis (2.2% vs 0.2%), application-site vesicles (1.6% vs 0%), and application-site pain (1.1% vs 0.2%). 7 JUBLIA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus, and should be used with caution in nursing women. The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. Please see Brief Summary of full Prescribing Information on the adjacent page. Reference: 1. JUBLIA [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC; 2015. Find out more by visiting www.JubliaRx.com. ®/TMs are trademarks of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. or its affiliates. Any other product or brand names and logos are the property of their respective owners. © 2015 Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC DM/JUB/15/0069(1) * BRIEF SUMMARY OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION This Brief Summary does not include all the information needed to use JUBLIA safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for JUBLIA. JUBLIA® (efinaconazole) topical solution, 10% For topical use Initial U.S. Approval: 2014 INDICATIONS AND USAGE JUBLIA (efinaconazole) topical solution, 10% is an azole antifungal indicated for the topical treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail(s) due to Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION Apply JUBLIA to affected toenails once daily for 48 weeks, using the integrated flow-through brush applicator. When applying JUBLIA, ensure the toenail, the toenail folds, toenail bed, hyponychium, and the undersurface of the toenail plate, are completely covered. JUBLIA is for topical use only and not for oral, ophthalmic, or intravaginal use. CONTRAINDICATIONS None. ADVERSE REACTIONS Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. In two clinical trials, 1227 subjects were treated with JUBLIA, 1161 for at least 24 weeks and 780 for 48 weeks. Adverse reactions reported within 48 weeks of treatment and in at least 1% of subjects treated with JUBLIA and those reported in subjects treated with the vehicle are presented in Table 1. Table 1: Adverse Reactions Reported by at Least 1% of Subjects Treated for up to 48 Weeks Adverse Event, n (%) JUBLIA N = 1227 Vehicle N = 413 Ingrown toenail 28 (2.3%) 3 (0.7%) Application site dermatitis 27 (2.2%) 1 (0.2%) Application site vesicles 20 (1.6%) 0 (0.0%) Application site pain 13 (1.1%) 1 (0.2%) DRUG INTERACTIONS In vitro studies have shown that JUBLIA, at therapeutic concentrations, neither inhibits nor induces cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. Subcutaneous doses of 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day efinaconazole were administered during the period of organogenesis (gestational days 6-19) to pregnant female rabbits. In the presence of maternal toxicity, there was no embryofetal toxicity or malformations at 10 mg/kg/day (154 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons). In a pre- and post-natal development study in rats, subcutaneous doses of 1, 5 and 25 mg/kg/day efinaconazole were administered from the beginning of organogenesis (gestation day 6) through the end of lactation (lactation day 20). In the presence of maternal toxicity, embryofetal toxicity (increased prenatal pup mortality, reduced live litter sizes and increased postnatal pup mortality) was noted at 25 mg/kg/day. No embryofetal toxicity was noted at 5 mg/kg/day (17 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons). No effects on postnatal development were noted at 25 mg/kg/day (89 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons). Nursing Mothers It is not known whether efinaconazole is excreted in human milk. After repeated subcutaneous administration, efinaconazole was detected in milk of nursing rats. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when JUBLIA is administered to nursing women. Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of JUBLIA in pediatric subjects have not been established. Geriatric Use Of the total number of subjects in clinical trials of JUBLIA, 11.3% were 65 and over, while none were 75 and over. No overall differences in safety and effectiveness were observed between these subjects and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and the younger subjects, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out. NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility A 2-year dermal carcinogenicity study in mice was conducted with daily topical administration of 3%, 10% and 30% efinaconazole solution. Severe irritation was noted at the treatment site in all dose groups, which was attributed to the vehicle and confounded the interpretation of skin effects by efinaconazole. The high dose group was terminated at week 34 due to severe skin reactions. No drug-related neoplasms were noted at doses up to 10% efinaconazole solution (248 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons). Efinaconazole revealed no evidence of mutagenic or clastogenic potential based on the results of two in vitro genotoxicity tests (Ames assay and Chinese hamster lung cell chromosome aberration assay) and one in vivo genotoxicity test (mouse peripheral reticulocyte micronucleus assay). No effects on fertility were observed in male and female rats that were administered subcutaneous doses up to 25 mg/kg/day efinaconazole (279 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons) prior to and during early pregnancy. Efinaconazole delayed the estrous cycle in females at 25 mg/kg/day but not at 5 mg/kg/day (56 times MRHD based on AUC comparisons). PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See FDA-Approved Patient Labeling (Patient Information). USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C There are no adequate and well-controlled studies with JUBLIA in pregnant women. JUBLIA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Systemic embryofetal development studies were conducted in rats and rabbits. Subcutaneous doses of 2, 10 and 50 mg/kg/day efinaconazole were administered during the period of organogenesis (gestational days 6-16) to pregnant female rats. In the presence of maternal toxicity, embryofetal toxicity (increased embryofetal deaths, decreased number of live fetuses, and placental effects) was noted at 50 mg/kg/day [559 times the Maximum Recommended Human Dose (MRHD) based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) comparisons]. No embryofetal toxicity was noted at 10 mg/kg/day (112 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons). No malformations were observed at 50 mg/kg/day (559 times the MRHD based on AUC comparisons). Manufactured for: Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 USA Manufactured by: Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Shizuoka, Japan Product of Japan U.S. Patents 8,039,494; 7,214,506 Based on 9391902 DM/JUB/15/0076 Issued: 02/2015 CUTANEOUS ONCOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM 64 Strategies for drug resistance, combination NMSC CHALLENGES txs, adjuvant and post-op radiation THERAPY 66 AT-HOME Patient selection is critical; compliance is key Advances in treating NMSC Hh inhibitors proving to be effective alternative to surgery, radiotherapy LOUISE GAGNON | STAFF CORRESPONDENT With medical treatment now available, clinicians have less invasive therapies to manage metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or locally advanced BCC. “We now have medical therapy which is quite effective,” says David Hogg, M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)., an attending physician at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center in Toronto. “About 90% of basal cancers will respond to the hedgehog inhibitor vismodegib (Erivedge, Genentech/Roche). The drug is used for locally advanced carcinoma and metastatic melanoma.” Metastatic BCC has a median survival of eight to 14 months and a fiveyear survival rate of just 10%, and BCC is regarded as incurable when it has metastasized. “BCC was strictly managed by surgeons or dermatologists,” Dr. Hogg says. “Most of the time it is still managed through surgery or dermatological excision. Other modalities used are cryo- QUICK READ Advances in research have led to the emergence of medical therapies for BCCs, and more research is needed to develop systemic therapies to treat SCCs. therapy, freezing, or electrocautery.” The five-year cure rate for modalities like surgical excision, curettage and cautery, cryosurgery, and Mohs micrographic surgery are very high at 95% and greater. Previously, when surger y could not be performed or when it would result in a significant deformity, other options such as radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, chemotherapy, and topical therapy would be considered, according to Dr. Hogg. He is professor of medicine at the University of Toronto in Toronto, Canada. In some instances, he says, radiotherapy would be a less attractive option, in cases where the maximum safe DTExtra On July 24, 2015, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sonidegib (Odomzo) to treat patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after it has recurred following surgery or radiation therapy. Sonidegib has also been approved for patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma who are not candidates for surgery or radiation therapy. It is a once daily oral that inhibits the Hedgehog pathway. This agent may offer new hope for many patients who, until now, have had very few treatment options. dose of radiation to the region had been reached, or when there was the risk of organ damage (such as blindness). HH SIGNALLING PATHWAY Research has shown that abnormal activation of the Hedgehog signalling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of all BCCs; in 90% of cases this activation arises from mutations of the Patched (PTCH) gene. Inhibitors of the Hedgehog pathway typically result in dramatic tumor responses, with shrinkage of the malignant tissue and healing of ulcerative lesions. Tumors that are very large and cannot be removed surgically or are located near critical areas, such as around the eye, are suitable for medical therapy like vismodegib, Dr. Hogg explains. “If they are near critical areas like the face, the tumor may involve the eye or cranial nerves, and can’t be dealt with easily surgically,” he says. ADVANCES see page 62 Quotable There are four main groups of patients who warrant evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy based on their risk for recurrence.” Jean Y. Tang, M.D., Ph.D. Stanford University School of Medicine OncoTherapy Network: bit.ly/sonidegibapproved on radiotherapy to prevent relapse SEE STORY PAGE 64 61 62 CUTANEOUS ® ONCOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM ADVANCES: Addressing side effects and drug resistance from page 61 Patients who are being considered for medical therapy like vismodegib will have their cases discussed by a tumor board to discuss the suitability of the therapy for the patient, explains Dr. Hogg. When vismodegib therapy is initiated, patients should be monitored regularly, being seen about every 28 days. “The patients have to be managed by a team including surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and pathologists,” says Dr. Hogg. Patients who have Gorlin syndrome, a rare hereditary condition that predisposes individuals to develop multiple BCCs, are good candidates for medical therapy like vismodegib. Investigators have observed that hand and foot pits, which are pathognomonic signs of the basal-cell nevus syndrome, were eliminated within a month of vismodegib therapy. BENEFITS, SIDE EFFECTS A major benefit of vismodegib is that most patients will respond to the therapy, but a disadvantage is that drug resistance to the therapy does develop. “It takes about 16 to 18 months (for drug resistance to develop) in locally advanced cases and about nine months (for drug resistance to develop) in metastatic cases,” Dr. Hogg notes. Some of the toxicities associated with vismodegib include hair loss, unpleasant taste in the mouth, and leg cramps, Dr. Hogg says; but no dose-limiting or grade 5 events have been observed with vismodegib. Complete responses, however, are not often seen even in advanced disease, and do not occur in metastatic cases. ALTERNATIVES TO AVOID DRUG RESISTANCE To address the issue of drug resis- Epidemiology of BCC Louise Gagnon BASAL CELL CARCINOMA (BCC) is the most common cancer in the world, with about a third of individuals developing a BCC at one point in their lifetime, according to David Hogg, M.D., professor of medicine at the University of Toronto in Toronto, Canada. The incidence is unfortunately increasing, with the overall incidence significantly rising across the globe by about 3 to 10% annually1. Squamous cell carcinomas represent about 20%, and BCCs represent 80% of non-melanoma skin cancers. The development of BCC is strongly linked to exposure to ultraviolet radiation, with the UV exposure resulting in cumulative DNA damage and gene mutations. The rising incidence of BCCs has also been attributed to increased longevity. Interestingly, it has been observed that BCCs vary with geography: research suggests that the closer that Caucasians live to the equator, the greater the risk of developing BCCs2. BCCs typically appear on sun-exposed sites like the face, scalp, ears, hands, and trunk, with the majority appearing on the head and neck, Dr. Hogg says. In general, BCC incidence increases with rising socioeconomic class. However, patients who develop complex, large or metastatic BCCs may have a lower socioeconomic status and be more isolated socially than members of the general population3. DT REFERENCES 1 Ruben AI, Chen EH, Ratner D. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(21):2262-29. 2 Diepen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146 Suppl 61:1-6. 3 Robinson JK, Altman JS, Rademaker AW. Socioeconomic status and attitudes of 51 patients with giant basal and squamous cell carcinoma and paired controls. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(4):428-31. tance with vismodegib, investigators have looked at alternative approaches such as the use of the anti-fungal agent itraconazole, which has shown anti-BCC activity in animal models. A phase 2 study where 19 patients received itraconazole, and 10 patients vehicle, the active therapy demonstrated activity in humans: administration of itraconazole decreased cellproliferation by 45%, Hedgehog pathway activity by 65%, and tumor area by 24%1. “It is still early days,” Dr. Hogg says. “The other drug that has been flagged is arsenic trioxide.” Indeed, itraconazole and arsenic trioxide (Trisenox, Cephalon) may be useful in combination to overcome resistance to systemic treatment with Hedgehog inhibitors like vismodegib. Other emerging Hedgehog inhibitors to treat locally advanced BCC or metastatic BCC include sonidegib, which was recently approved by theFDA to treat advanced BCC after it has recurred following surgery or radiation therapy. Similar drugs are being explored in phase 1 studies to treat locally advanced and metastatic BCC. IN NEED OF BETTER SCC THERAPIES Squamous cell carcinoma, a relatively common tumor, is usually managed by simple surgical excision, but complex presentations of squamous cell carcinoma do occur, which are unresectable locally or metastatic disease, Dr. Hogg notes. “We need better systemic treatment for this disease,” says Dr. Hogg. “Many patients (who have complex cases of SCC) are old with co-morbid conditions and many have immunosuppression. They don’t tolerate chemotherapy very well.” Research into genetic targets is required to find better systemic treatments for complex presentations of SCC. “The only target that has come up thus far is the EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) pathway,” says Dr. Hogg. Dr. Hogg sits on advisory boards for BMS, Merck, Roche, and GSK. DT 1 Kim DJ, Kim J, Spaunhurst K, et al. Openlabel, exploratory phase II trial of oral itraconazole for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(8):745-51. Go to enstilarcomingsoon.com LEO, the LEO Lion Design, and Enstilar are registered trademarks of LEO Pharma A/S. Copyright 2015 LEO Pharma Inc. 3428-EN-15-314 March 2015 Printed in USA 64 CUTANEOUS ® ONCOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Managing challenging NMSC cases CHERYL GUTTMAN KRADER | STAFF CORRESPONDENT QUICK READ Most patients with non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) can be successfully treated with surgery alone, but not all. In an educational session at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, speakers addressed management for some of the more challenging NMSC cases represented by patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and patients at high risk for recurrence. Ongoing research is trying to identify strategies for overcoming resistance of advanced basal cell carcinoma to targeted therapy with a Hedgehog inhibitor. High level evidence to support adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk non-melanoma skin cancers is lacking, but certain patients warrant evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy based on their risk for recurrence. BCC BASICS BCC accounts for at least three-fourths of cases of NMSC, and the determination that it is primarily driven by a hyperactive Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway was a landmark discovery as it opened the door to targeted therapy, says Jean Y. Tang, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. In 2012, the FDA approved vismodegib (Erivedge, Genentech/Roche) as the first targeted treatment for advanced BCC (metastatic or non-operable). However, once vismodegib was adopted in clinical practice and as more patients were treated for longer periods of time, it was realized that about 20% of patients per year would develop resistance to the Hh inhibitor. Now, findings from research undertaken by Dr. Tang and colleagues at Stanford University suggest strategies for overcoming the resistance. Dr. Tang discussed the progress to date in describing the mechanisms underlying BCC resistance to vismodegib, identifying potential interventions, and testing their efficacy in early clinical trials. DRUG RESISTANCE INTERVENTIONS “Advanced and metastatic BCC is quite rare, but vismodegib represented an important advance for these challenging cases and provided significant clinical benefit. As happens with most targeted oncologic therapies, however, some BCCs developed resistance over time,” Dr. Tang says. Using genomic sequencing methods to analyze samples from biopsies of resistant tumors, Dr. Tang and colleagues were able to determine that about half of the cases could be explained by reactivation of the Hh pathway second- ary to mutations in Smoothened (SMO). In an unbiased approach to screening led by Philip A. Beachy, Ph.D., professor of biochemistry, Stanford University, about 2,000 currently available drugs were evaluated for their potential to overcome resistance to vismodegib. Through that work, itraconazole and arsenic trioxide (Trisenox, Cephalon) were identified as lead candidates. “Advanced and metastatic BCC is quite rare, but vismodegib represented an important advance for these challenging cases and provided significant clinical benefit.” Jean Y. Tang, M.D., Ph.D. Stanford University School of Medicine Like vismodegib, itraconazole inhibits SMO, but it binds to SMO at a different site than vismodegib. Arsenic trioxide, which is used for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia, acts downstream of SMO in the Hh signaling pathway by binding the GLI transcription factor, she explains. So far, a phase 2 clinical trial has been completed investigating oral itraconazole in patients with BCC. The results were encouraging as they showed significant reduction in cell proliferation, Hh pathway activity, and tumor area. Arsenic trioxide was evaluated in 5 patients using an intravenous regimen with treatment given on 5 consecutive days out of every 28 days. Disease stabilization was achieved in treated patients, but there was no significant shrinkage of tumor area with intermittent dosing. “Next we will be evaluating daily oral administration of arsenic trioxide based on the hypothesis that it may be more effective with continuous dosing,” Dr. Tang says. Research is also ongoing to try to identify the underlying mechanisms that would explain the other 50% of cases of vismodegib resistance and other strategies for overcoming resistance. POTENTIAL IN COMBINATION THERAPIES Evidence from studies using a mouse model of medulloblastoma, another tumor driven by the Hh signaling pathway, suggest a role for combination treatment with itraconazole and arsenic trioxide or using agents that inhibit both SMO and PI3 kinase, Dr. Tang says. To enable the research, Dr. Tang would like to obtain tumor samples taken before and after treatment initiation with vismodegib. ADJUVANT RADIATION TO PREVENT RELAPSE Of the approximately 3.5 million new cases of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) diagnosed each year in the United States, about 5% are considered high risk for local, regional, or distant recurrence. High level evidence from prospectively collected data on the potential benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy in the postsurgical management of these tumors is lacking. Nevertheless, based on retrospective series, there appears to be universal support for its use in patients with specific clinicopathologic features, says Sandro V. Porceddu, M.D., associate professor, The University of Queensland Australia, and senior radiation oncologist, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane. “Due to the dearth of high-level NMSC see page 70 This could be the SRT of something beautiful. The SRT-100TM is starting a beautiful trend—by giving people a choice. Whether your patients have preexisting conditions or they just prefer not to have surgery, adding the SRT-100TM to your practice VLYZ[OLT[OLUVUPU]HZP]L54:*[YLH[TLU[VW[PVU[OH[[OL`»YLSVVRPUNMVY Faster healing Little to no KV^U[PTL Excellent JVZTLZPZ 5V^-+(JSLHYLK [V[YLH[RLSVPKZ SRT THE CONVERSATION *HSS:LUZ\Z/LHS[OJHYL[VSSMYLLH[ HUKKPZJV]LYTVYLHIV\[[OLKPLYLUJL[OLSRT-100TM JHUTHRLMVY`V\YWYHJ[PJLHUK`V\YWH[PLU[Z SensusHealthcare.com :9; ;4PZHYLNPZ[LYLK[YHKLTHYRVM:LUZ\Z/LHS[OJHYL 66 CUTANEOUS ® ONCOLOGY A SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM B A. 43-year-old female with SCC in situ on left nasal ala before and B. 1 month after second round of red light PDT (4 months after first PDT); no evidence of disease. Photos: Anthony Rossi, M.D. Compliance critical with at-home tx JOHN JESITUS | STAFF CORRESPONDENT The at-home regimens and close followup requirements of nonsurgical treatments for skin cancer demand that dermatologists reserve these treatments for appropriate patients, according to an expert at the American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting (San Francisco, 2015). With surgical treatment for skin cancers, Anthony M. Rossi, M.D., says “Once you have negative margins, you know the tumor is out.” He is an assistant attending physician in dermatologic, Mohs and laser surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. “For melanoma, pretreatment mapping and sampling are the keys.” Anthony M. Rossi, M.D. New York With nonsurgical treatments, “The key is picking the right patients beforehand. They must be compliant,” Dr. Rossi says. Treatments that don’t allow one to check margins microscopically require close long-term follow-up for catching recurrences, he explains, and some nonsurgical skin cancer treatments require at-home application as often as daily. Among nonmelanoma skin cancers, he says, “Not every basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is created equal.” He usually tries nonsurgical treatments on superficial and early nodular BCCs. QUICK READ Due to the complexities and followup requirements of nonsurgical treatments for skin cancer, patient selection is critical. Expert offers tips for using various noninvasive treatment options for BCC, SCC, and melanoma. PRACTICAL PRESCRIBING TIPS: IMIQUIMOD Imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration-approved for superficial BCC; using it for early nodular BCCs is off-label. Dr. Rossi also prescribes it off-label for squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). In counseling patients, he outlines cure rates of all BCC treatments. These range from 97% to 98% for Mohs surgery (primary tumors at 5 years), to 61% for cryosurgery (at 2 years). Studies involving imiquimod for early nodular BCC show 5-year cure rates between 82% and 73%.1 However, he quotes patients a 5-year cure rate of roughly 70% for imiquimod overall. With imiquimod, Dr. Rossi favors a step-wise approach, starting every other day, then five days weekly, and finally daily, as tolerated. “I basically titrate it up” until patients experience a stable reaction, which includes a level of erythema and crusting they can accept. “If that happens at 5 days a week, then I keep them there. But if they’re not getting a reaction, I step it up to 7 days a week.” Even at that level, he says, some patients don’t respond, so he switches them to other treatments or adds a topical retinoid. “However, even if they do get a reaction, that doesn’t always mean it’s working. They still have to follow-up” to make sure. With imiquimod, “I always stress that it has to do with patient compliance and how people react. Some patients will use imiquimod diligently even if they get a lot of crusting and redness. Others will stop and not tolerate the effects.” Patients typically apply a 25 cm² dose. “I usually prescribe it for 8 to 12 weeks, based on the studies.” For small treatment areas, “I usually wait until the skin heals, then rebiopsy, if I see anything clinically,” to make sure the tumor is cleared. Dr. Rossi also uses imiquimod for adjuvant therapy of BCCs and SCCs incompletely cleared with Mohs surgery in cases where achieving complete clearance of superficial disease may not be possible, or there is a large actinic field effect. Very small studies of adjuvant therapy with imiquimod have yielded mixed results, he says. “The cases where I find imiquimod does not work are usually those with a more aggressive histological subtype such as infiltrative BCC.” For SCC in situ, Dr. Rossi uses 5-fluorouracil (off-label), titrating up to daily use, if tolerated, as with imiquimod. Patients typically require 2 4-week cycles, he says. PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY PEARLS Before using PDT for BCC or SCC, Dr. Rossi typically prepares the skin with acetone or a fractional CO2 laser at a superficial setting to attempt to remove the stratum corneum. “I’m trying to create better absorption of the aminolevulinic acid. I still do a traditional 3-hour incubation, with occlusion, because you want to get as much absorption as possible by the skin cancer,” Dr. Rossi explains. Giving the patient antihistamines (preferably nonsedating) pre-procedurally can help minimize post-treatment swelling, he adds. “Then I use blue light COMPLIANCE see page 69 ACZONE® (dapsone) Gel 5% BRIEF SUMMARY—PLEASE SEE THE ACZONE® PACKAGE INSERT FOR FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. INDICATIONS AND USAGE ACZONE® Gel, 5%, is indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION For topical use only. Not for oral, ophthalmic, or intravaginal use. After the skin is gently washed and patted dry, apply approximately a pea-sized amount of ACZONE® Gel, 5%, in a thin layer to the acne affected areas twice daily. Rub in ACZONE® Gel, 5%, gently and completely. ACZONE® Gel, 5%, is gritty with visible drug substance particles. Wash hands after application of ACZONE® Gel, 5%. If there is no improvement after 12 weeks, treatment with ACZONE® Gel, 5%, should be reassessed. CONTRAINDICATIONS None. WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Hematological Effects Oral dapsone treatment has produced dose-related hemolysis and hemolytic anemia. Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are more prone to hemolysis with the use of certain drugs. G6PD deficiency is most prevalent in populations of African, South Asian, Middle Eastern, and Mediterranean ancestry. There was no evidence of clinically relevant hemolysis or anemia in patients treated with ACZONE® Gel, 5%, including patients who were G6PD deficient. Some subjects with G6PD deficiency using ACZONE® Gel developed laboratory changes suggestive of mild hemolysis. If signs and symptoms suggestive of hemolytic anemia occur, ACZONE® Gel, 5% should be discontinued. ACZONE® Gel, 5% should not be used in patients who are taking oral dapsone or antimalarial medications because of the potential for hemolytic reactions. Combination of ACZONE® Gel, 5%, with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) may increase the likelihood of hemolysis in patients with G6PD deficiency. Peripheral Neuropathy Peripheral neuropathy (motor loss and muscle weakness) has been reported with oral dapsone treatment. No events of peripheral neuropathy were observed in clinical trials with topical ACZONE® Gel, 5% treatment. Skin Skin reactions (toxic epidermal necrolysis, erythema multiforme, morbilliform and scarlatiniform reactions, bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, erythema nodosum, and urticaria) have been reported with oral dapsone treatment. These types of skin reactions were not observed in clinical trials with topical ACZONE® Gel, 5% treatment. ADVERSE REACTIONS Clinical Studies Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under prescribed conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Serious adverse reactions reported in patients treated with ACZONE® Gel, 5%, during clinical trials included but were not limited to the following: E /<@9?==C=>/7"=C-23+><3-I$?3-3./+>>/7:>>983--6983-79@/7/8>= E +=><938>/=>38+6I,.9738+6:+38=/@/</@973>381:+8-</+>3>3= E !>2/<I$/@/</:2+<C813>3= In the clinical trials, a total of 12 out of 4032 patients were reported to have depression (3 of 1660 treated with vehicle and 9 of 2372 treated with ACZONE® Gel, 5%). Psychosis was reported in 2 of 2372 patients treated with ACZONE® Gel, 5%, and in 0 of 1660 patients treated with vehicle. Combined contact sensitization/irritation studies with ACZONE® Gel, 5%, in 253 healthy subjects resulted in at least 3 subjects with moderate erythema. ACZONE® Gel, 5%, did not induce phototoxicity or photoallergy in human dermal safety studies. ACZONE® Gel, 5%, was evaluated for 12 weeks in four controlled studies for local cutaneous events in 1819 patients. The most common events reported from these studies include oiliness/peeling, dryness, and erythema. One patient treated with ACZONE® Gel in the clinical trials had facial swelling which led to discontinuation of medication. In addition, 486 patients were evaluated in a 12 month safety study. The adverse event profile in this study was consistent with that observed in the vehicle-controlled studies. Experience with Oral Use of Dapsone Although not observed in the clinical trials with ACZONE® Gel (topical dapsone) serious adverse reactions have been reported with oral use of dapsone, including agranulocytosis, hemolytic anemia, peripheral neuropathy (motor loss and muscle weakness), and skin reactions (toxic epidermal necrolysis, erythema multiforme, morbilliform and scarlatiniform reactions, bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, erythema nodosum, and urticaria). DRUG INTERACTIONS Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole A drug-drug interaction study evaluated the effect of the use of ACZONE® Gel, 5%, in combination with double strength (160 mg/800 mg) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). During co-administration, systemic levels of TMP and SMX were essentially unchanged. However, levels of dapsone and its metabolites increased in the presence of TMP/ SMX. Systemic exposure (AUC0-12) of dapsone and N-acetyl-dapsone (NAD) were increased by about 40% and 20% respectively in the presence of TMP/SMX. Notably, systemic exposure (AUC0-12) of dapsone hydroxylamine (DHA) was more than doubled in the presence of TMP/ SMX. Exposure from the proposed topical dose is about 1% of that from the 100 mg oral dose, even when co-administered with TMP/SMX. Topical Benzoyl Peroxide Topical application of ACZONE® Gel followed by benzoyl peroxide in subjects with acne vulgaris resulted in a temporary local yellow or orange discoloration of the skin and facial hair (reported by 7 out of 95 subjects in a clinical study) with resolution in 4 to 57 days. Drug Interactions with Oral Dapsone Certain concomitant medications (such as rifampin, anticonvulsants, St. John’s wort) may increase the formation of dapsone hydroxylamine, a metabolite of dapsone associated with hemolysis. With oral dapsone treatment, folic acid antagonists such as pyrimethamine have been noted to possibly increase the likelihood of hematologic reactions. USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects: Pregnancy Category C There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. Dapsone has been shown to have an embryocidal effect in rats and rabbits when administered orally in doses of 75 mg/kg/day and 150 mg/kg/day (approximately 800 and 500 times the systemic exposure observed in human females as a result of use of the maximum recommended topical dose, based on AUC comparisons), respectively. These effects were probably secondary to maternal toxicity. ACZONE® Gel, 5%, should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Nursing Mothers Although systemic absorption of dapsone following topical application of ACZONE® Gel, 5%, is minimal relative to oral dapsone administration, it is known that dapsone is excreted in human milk. Because of the potential for oral dapsone to cause adverse reactions in nursing infants, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue ACZONE® Gel, 5%, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. Pediatric Use Safety and efficacy was evaluated in 1169 children aged 12-17 years old treated with ACZONE® Gel, 5%, in the clinical studies. The adverse event rate for ACZONE® Gel, 5%, was similar to the vehicle control group. Safety and efficacy was not studied in pediatric patients less than 12 years of age, therefore ACZONE® Gel, 5%, is not recommended for use in this age group. Geriatric Use Clinical studies of ACZONE® Gel, 5%, did not include sufficient number of patients aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients. G6PD Deficiency ACZONE® Gel, 5% and vehicle were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design clinical study of 64 patients with G6PD deficiency and acne vulgaris. Subjects were Black (88%), Asian (6%), Hispanic (2%) or of other racial origin (5%). Blood samples were taken at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 12 during both vehicle and ACZONE® Gel, 5% treatment periods. There were 56 out of 64 subjects who had a Week 2 blood draw and applied at least 50% of treatment applications. ACZONE® Gel was associated with a 0.32 g/dL drop in hemoglobin after two weeks of treatment, but hemoglobin levels generally returned to baseline levels at Week 12. There were no changes from baseline in haptoglobin or lactate dehydrogenase during ACZONE® or vehicle treatment at either the 2-week or 12-week time point. The proportion of subjects who experienced decreases in hemoglobin ≥1 g/dL was similar between ACZONE® Gel, 5% and vehicle treatment (8 of 58 subjects had such decreases during ACZONE® treatment compared to 7 of 56 subjects during vehicle treatment among subjects with at least one on-treatment hemoglobin assessment). Subgroups based on gender, race, or G6PD enzyme activity did not display any differences in laboratory results from the overall study group. There was no evidence of clinically significant hemolytic anemia in this study. Some of these subjects developed laboratory changes suggestive of mild hemolysis. OVERDOSAGE ACZONE® Gel, 5%, is not for oral use. If oral ingestion occurs, medical advice should be sought. Rx ONLY © 2014 Allergan, Inc. Irvine, CA 92612, U.S.A. ® marks owned by Allergan, Inc. Patented. See www.allergan.com/products/patent_notices Based on 72205US13 144098 APC14LG14 SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM CUTANEOUS ONCOLOGY COMPLIANCE: Patient selection key to therapy considerations from page 66 for more superficial BCCs or SCCs.” For deeper nodular BCCs or slightly thicker SCCs, Dr. Rossi uses red light. Additional light sources that have been used for PDT in skin cancer include pulsed dye lasers and intense pulsed light. In solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), studies have shown that cyclical PDT performed every couple months reduces precancers and skin cancers.2 “Now I offer it as a treatment to clear actinic damage for my SOTR patients who are on immunosuppression.” For keratoacanthomas (quickly erupting SCCs), “I use injectable methotrexate (typically 1cc total, injected in 4 quadrants at the lesion’s base) to either shrink the keratoacanthoma to possibly make the Mohs surgery smaller, or to treat it definitively without doing Mohs afterwards,” he says. “We know that some keratoacanthomas will respond completely to methotrexate, while others may not, so close follow-up is needed to assess for residual disease or a more aggressive SCC.” Patients typically require 2 to 3 sessions total, spaced 2 to 3 weeks apart, he says. RADIATION PATIENT SELECTION Radiation offers a higher cure rate for BCC than SCC.3,4 Dr. Rossi typically reserves this treatment for patients with BCC or SCC who reject surgery or are not candidates for topical treatment or PDT. Patients for whom he typically does not use radiation include the following: ➧ Those under age 55 because radiation can increase the risk of future skin cancers, he explains. ➧ Patients with basal cell nevus syndrome or other conditions that predispose them to radiation-induced skin cancers. ➧ Those with BCCs on poorly healingareas, such as the legs or dorsal hand. Additionally, “If the tumor is very deep, radiation can cause a breakdown of the cartilage or bone. And with verrucous carcinoma (an SCC subtype), we don’t want to irradiate because there’s a documented increase in metastases after radiation.”5 ORAL THERAPY CONSIDERATIONS Typically, Dr. Rossi reserves the oral smoothened (Smo) inhibitor vismodegib for advanced and metastatic BCCs, which are rare. Similarly, “For some advanced patients in whom radiation would be con- traindicated, or if the tumor is so large that it would cause significant cosmetic deformity and postsurgical morbidity, vismodegib is now an option.” However, he says, more research is needed to determine appropriate vismodegib uses beyond its labeled indication. In one study, 30% of patients with metastatic BCC and 43% of patients with locally advanced BCC experienced at least 30% reductions in tumor size. Median duration of response was 7.6 months.6 Currently, Dr. Rossi says, researchers are experimenting with drug “holidays” to reduce side effects — mainly hair loss, muscle cramps and taste changes. “Some people can live with those side effects; other people cannot.” Some patients experience tumor regrowth after stopping the medication, he adds, so follow-up is crucial here as well. For basal cell tumors with squamous cell features (basal-squamous differentiation), Dr. Rossi says, “Vismodegib might not be so helpful. Although it may treat the basal-cell part, the squamous-cell part may still be growing.” In cases where it’s unclear whether a tumor is purely BCC or otherwise, he recommends extra biopsies to sample the tumor thoroughly. “The key is picking the right patients beforehand. They must be compliant.” Anthony M. Rossi, M.D. New York MELANOMA TX RECOMMENDATIONS “For melanoma, pretreatment mapping and sampling are the keys. So I often do pretreatment mapping biopsies (along the periphery of the lesion) to try to gauge where the melanoma is. Melanomas can have not only subclinical extension horizontally, but they can also have occult invasion.” In his research, Dr. Rossi also uses confocal microscopy, with or without biopsies, for suspected melanomas, BCCs and SCCs. “Confocal microscopy helps me to map out the lesion better, to hone in on where we’re going to treat, and look for recurrences or invasion.” For biopsy-confirmed melanoma in situ (MIS), Dr. Rossi offers imiquimod and, in rare cases, radiation. “With imiquimod, the treatment is longer than for BCC or SCC. I usually say at least 12 weeks. Some patients have gone up to 20 weeks. It really depends on how consistently patients use it and what results they’re getting. We want to see that they’re getting redness, crusting and some skin breakdown. But again, when this was studied, these treatment effects did not correlate with clinical success.”7 In one recent study of 347 patients, histologic clearance rate was 76.2% and the clinical clearance rate was 78.3%. The incidence of clinical recurrence was 2.3% at a mean follow-up of 34.2 months. After statistical analysis, treatment with greater than 60 total imiquimod applications was associated with an odds ratio of 8.4 for histological clearance. Also, treatment with greater than 5 applications per week was associated with an odds ratio of 6.0 for histological clearance.8 For patients with invasive melanoma that has a wide MIS on its periphery, “Sometimes I will do surgery to debulk the invasive melanoma, if patients can’t undergo the full surgery. Then I prescribe imiquimod for the surrounding area postsurgery, or for incomplete margins. These patients must be followed up regularly because we know melanoma may not recur within the first year. It may take longer. I use confocal microscopy, dermatoscopy and close clinical followup to monitor for any signs of recurrence or invasion.” Finally, he uses radiation as a noninvasive treatment for melanoma in patients who cannot undergo surgery or fail imiquimod. Because melanoma can have subclinical extension, “You must have a wider field. Some advocate at least a 1 cm margin around the whole lesion depending on anatomical location.” Here too, strong follow-up is essential. In one study, “The mean time to recurrence was about 45 months.”9 DT Disclosures: Dr. Rossi is an advisory board member for Novartis. For references : bit.ly/At-hometx 69 70 CUTANEOUS ® ONCOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM NMSC: Strategies for drug resistance, combination therapies, adjuvant radiation, post-op chemoradiation from page 64 evidence, there are no universally adopted g u idel i nes on adjuva nt radiotherapy in patients at high risk for relapse after surgical management of NMSC. However, this issue is addressed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines based mainly on Level 2a evidence derived from findings of retrospective series,” he explains. “There are four main groups of patients who warrant evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy based on their risk for recurrence—patients who are immunosuppressed and those with locally advanced primary disease (stage T3-T4), regional nodal metastasis, or clinical perineural invasion.” Focusing on patients with head and neck NMSC, Dr. Porceddu adds that referral to a multidisciplinary tumor board is also recommended in other situations due to case complexity. They include patients whose tumor creates cosmetic or functional concerns due to its location (e.g., lips or eyes), those with multiple primary lesions or distant metastases, and if there is difficulty obtaining clear margins without causing major morbidity such as orbital exentoration. ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY Dr. Porceddu notes that various retrospective series show adjuvant radiotherapy’s benefit for improving locoregional control and disease-specific survival in patients with locally advanced disease, such that their outcomes are improved by about 10% to 20% relative to patients treated with surgery alone. Regarding adjuvant radiation for patients with perineural invasion, the recommendation applies only to those with clinical findings of large nerve involvement and does not include patients in whom perineural invasion is found incidentally at surgery. For patients with regional nodal metastasis, the most common sites of involvement are the intra-parotid nodes followed by the cervical nodes. The re- A role for adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy TROG 05.01 (POST Study) cSCC of the head & neck Surgical removal of all macroscopic disease High risk features High risk nodal disease Advanced primary disease Randomisation Radiotherapy alone Radiotherapy & Chemotherapy (Carboplatin) There is a lack of Level 1 evidence to guide the use of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, which are based on extrapolation of data for mucosal head and neck SCC, recommend it for patients who have lymph node metastasis or extracapsular extension. Outcomes data from the TROG 05.01; NCT00193895 study, which compared postoperative radiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy in this population will hopefully provide guidance. Source: Jean Y. Tang, M.D., Ph.D. lapse rate for this population varies widely, from 20% to 80%, and depends on the extent of nodal disease (involved node size and number) as well as various pathological features. Findings predicting an increased risk for relapse include extracapsular extension, positive/close margins, dermal or in-transit metastases, and invasion into surrounding structure, as well as recurrence after primary surgery and immunosuppression. “Addition of radiotherapy to surgery in patients with regional nodal metastasis was reported in one study to improve the 5-year disease free survival rate from 54% to 73%,” Dr. Porceddu says. Patients who are immunosuppressed, either because of disease (eg. chronic lymphocytic leukemia) or medication use are not only at increased risk for developing NMSC compared to their immunocompetent counterparts, but they are also more likely to have high risk features, such as perineural invasion, as well as higher risks of locoregional recurrence and mortality. “For these reasons, adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered for any immunosuppressed patient with a primary NMSC larger than 2 cm,” Dr. Porceddu says. POST-OP CHEMORADIOTHERAPY As for adjuvant chemotherapy for cutaneous NMSC of the head and neck, there is also a lack of Level 1 evidence to guide its use, Dr. Porceddu says. According to the NCCN guidelines, it is recommended for patients who have lymph node metastasis or extracapsular extension. “The NCCN recommendation is based on extrapolation of data for mucosal head and neck SCC. However, we hope to have an answer to whether chemoradiotherapy has a role in high risk cutaneous SCC soon as the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group has completed a randomized trial comparing postoperative radiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy in this population (TROG 05.01; NCT00193895),” Dr. Porceddu says. (See figure) “Accrual of the more than 320 patients targeted for enrollment is complete, and follow-up is ongoing. Outcomes data are expected to be released in the first quarter of 2016.” DT Dr. Tang and Dr. Porceddu have no relevant financial interests to disclose. For reliability and quality, our roots go deep At Amgen, we pour commitment, passion, and a drive for perfection into every biologic medicine we make. From innovative biotechnology to extensive experience in biologic manufacturing, see how Amgen strives to deliver on its commitment to your patients. Our Roots Go Deep Take a deeper look at our reliability and quality visit biotechnologybyamgen.com Download the LAYAR app on your smartphone and scan this page. ©2014 Amgen Inc. All rights reserved. 80012-R2-V1 72 BUSINESS ® OF DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM YOUR ASSETS EXPOSED? 76 ARE Common myths and misconceptions about asset protection — revealed and explained. VERSUS LOYALTY 80 SATISFACTION One gets you by...the other ensures you thrive. Learn techniques for bridging the gap. How to fire a problem patient JOHN JESITUS | STAFF CORRESPONDENT Dismissing a troublesome patient requires a firm stance and a soft touch, says Jeanine Downie, M.D., a Montclair, New Jersey-based dermatologist. Because she appears regularly on television, she says she occasionally encounters patients who seem to believe she is a magician. “And I’m not— I’m simply a doctor who is trying to work on their image, their Dr. Downie acne, or whatever their skin issues are.” Sometimes, patients are problematic enough that they may need to be dismissed from the practice — whether because of inappropriate behavior in the office, no-shows for appointments, or other reasons. Dr. Downie counsels, “be respectful and professional when firing a patient. Understand that feelings may be hurt. ... Try to exude positivity. I always tell them, ‘It’s not really you—it’s me.’” SEND A LETTER When dismissing a patient, “You must QUICK READ Problematic patients may need to be dismissed from your practice — whether because of inappropriate behavior in the office, noshows for appointments, or other reasons. One expert advises appropriate and tactful ways to end a physician-patient relationship. send a certified letter, return receipt requested, as well as a copy by U.S. [Postal Service] mail. Photocopy both items and put them in the patient’s chart, after they’re stamped and before they’re sent.” Often, she says, patients will not sign the certified letter. “So they still get a copy in the mail.” The letter should detail the incident and date of inappropriate behavior by the patient, Dr. Downie says. It also should advise the patient that within 30 days of their receiving the letter, you will no longer be providing their medical care. “That’s critical—you cannot abandon them right away” without facing possible legal repercussions. Quotable THE MENTALLY UNSTABLE PATIENT If she can detect that a prospective patient is not mentally stable, Dr. Downie PROBLEM PATIENTS see page 75 DTExtra Industry heads won’t snap in the direction of flash-in-thepan, quick-fix leads. Hard work, intellectual curiosity, and dedication to science seem to be the recipe for success in clinical research.” Melanie Palm, M.D. A mobile strategy is your plan for developing your presence and interactions where your patients, increasingly, are looking for you: on their mobile devices. If patients search for your specialty from their mobile devices in your region, do they find you? Are you doing anything to reach them beyond an advertisement in the local yellow pages? Medical Economics explores ways that you can effectivly take advantage of technology to generate new business and keep your patients happy and connected. Industry perspective on research SEE STORY PAGE 78 Also in the letter, “Refer the patient to his or her primary care physician, insurance company, local hospital or the county medical society to locate another board-certified dermatologist. Keep it distant and cordial—inform the patient that there are many other competent practitioners in the area,” she advises. Addit iona lly, t he let ter should spell out the medical consequences of failing to follow up with another board-certified dermatologist. “You don’t want to be in court later with the patient saying you abandoned him or her, and there’s no paper work regarding what their sequelae would be” without further treatment. Although it’s not legally required, she adds, “You can enclose a copy of the medically relevant records to assist the patient in their exit from your practice and facilitate their subsequent medical care.” Medical Economics, bit.ly/telestrategy TINEA Due to Trichophyton rubrum and Epidermophyton floccosum in adults STRIKE NOW. TREAT FAST. 2 weeks, 14 doses for tinea pedis; efficacy seen at 4 weeks post-treatment 1 week, 7 doses for tinea cruris and tinea corporis; efficacy seen at 3 weeks post-treatment LUZU may help some patients with interdigital tinea pedis become fungus free. Individual results may vary. Indications and Usage LUZU (luliconazole) Cream, 1% is indicated for the topical treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis caused by the organisms Trichophyton rubrum and Epidermophyton floccosum in patients 18 years of age and older. Important Safety Information LUZU is indicated for topical use only and is not indicated for ophthalmic, oral or intravaginal use. LUZU should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Caution should be exercised when LUZU is prescribed for nursing mothers. The most common adverse reactions in clinical trials were application site reactions, which occurred in less than 1% of subjects in both LUZU and vehicle arms. Most adverse reactions were mild in severity. Please see Brief Summary of full Prescribing Information for LUZU on adjacent page. ®/TMs are trademarks of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. or its affiliates. Any other product or brand names and logos are the property of their respective owners. ©2015 Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC. DM/LUZ/15/0131b BRIEF SUMMARY OF FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION FOR LUZU (luliconazole) This Brief Summary does not include all the information needed to use LUZU safely and effectively. See full Prescribing Information for LUZU. noted at 25 mg/kg/day (3 times the MRHD based on BSA comparisons). Increased incidences of skeletal variation (14th rib) were noted at 25 mg/kg/day. No treatment related effects on skeletal variation were noted at 5 mg/kg/day (0.6 times the MRHD based on BSA comparisons). LUZU (luliconazole) Cream, 1% for topical use Initial U.S. Approval: 2013 Subcutaneous doses of 4, 20 and 100 mg/kg/day luliconazole were administered during the period of organogenesis (gestational days 6-18) to pregnant female rabbits. No treatment related effects on maternal toxicity, embryofetal toxicity or malformations were noted at 100 mg/kg/day (24 times the MRHD based on BSA comparisons). Rx Only INDICATIONS LUZU (luliconazole) Cream, 1% is an azole antifungal indicated for the topical treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis caused by the organisms Trichophyton rubrum and Epidermophyton floccosum, in patients 18 years of age and older. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION For topical use only. LUZU Cream, 1% is not for ophthalmic, oral, or intravaginal use. When treating interdigital tinea pedis, a thin layer of LUZU Cream, 1% should be applied to the affected area and approximately 1 inch of the immediate surrounding area(s) once daily for two (2) weeks. When treating tinea cruris or tinea corporis, LUZU Cream, 1% should be applied to the affected area and approximately 1 inch of the immediate surrounding area(s) once daily for one (1) week. ADVERSE REACTIONS Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug, and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. In three Phase 3 clinical trials, 616 subjects were exposed to LUZU Cream, 1%: 305 with interdigital tinea pedis and 311 subjects with tinea cruris. Subjects with interdigital tinea pedis or tinea cruris applied LUZU Cream, 1% or vehicle cream once daily for 14 days or 7 days, respectively, to affected and adjacent areas. During clinical trials with LUZU Cream, 1% the most common adverse reactions were application site reactions which occurred in less than 1% of subjects in both the LUZU and vehicle arms. Most adverse reactions were mild in severity. Post-Marketing Experience The following adverse reactions have been identified during postmarketing use of luliconazole cream, 1%: contact dermatitis and cellulitis. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. DRUG INTERACTIONS The potential of luliconazole to inhibit cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 was evaluated in vitro. Based on in vitro assessment, luliconazole at therapeutic doses, particularly when applied to patients with moderate to severe tinea cruris, may inhibit the activity of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. However, no in vivo drug interaction trials have been conducted to evaluate the effect of luliconazole on other drugs that are substrates of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Luliconazole is not expected to inhibit CYPs 1A2, 2C9 and 2D6 based on in vitro assessment. The induction potential of luliconazole on CYP enzymes has not been evaluated. USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS Pregnancy: Pregnancy Category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of LUZU Cream, 1% in pregnant women. LUZU Cream, 1% should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. The animal multiples of human exposure calculations were based on daily dose body surface area (BSA) comparisons (mg/m2) for the reproductive toxicology studies described in this section and in Section 13.1 of the prescribing information. The Maximum Recommended Human Dose (MRHD) was set at 8 g 1% cream per day (1.33 mg/kg/day for a 60 kg individual which is equivalent to 49.2 mg/m2/day). Systemic embryofetal development studies were conducted in rats and rabbits. Subcutaneous doses of 1, 5 and 25 mg/kg/day luliconazole were administered during the period of organogenesis (gestational days 7-17) to pregnant female rats. No treatment related effects on maternal toxicity or malformations were In a pre- and post-natal development study in rats, subcutaneous doses of 1, 5 and 25 mg/kg/day luliconazole were administered from the beginning of organogenesis (gestation day 7) through the end of lactation (lactation day 20). In the presence of maternal toxicity, embryofetal toxicity (increased prenatal pup mortality, reduced live litter sizes and increased postnatal pup mortality) was noted at 25 mg/kg/day. No embryofetal toxicity was noted at 5 mg/kg/day (0.6 times the MRHD based on BSA comparisons). No treatment effects on postnatal development were noted at 25 mg/kg/day (3 times the MRHD based on BSA comparisons). Nursing Mothers It is not known whether luliconazole is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when LUZU Cream, 1% is administered to women who are breastfeeding. Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of LUZU Cream, 1% in pediatric patients have not been established. The number of pediatric patients 12 years of age were too small to adequately assess safety and efficacy. Geriatric Use Of the total number of subjects in clinical studies of LUZU Cream, 1%, 8 percent were 65 and over, while 1.4 percent were 75 and over. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these subjects and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out. NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Long-term studies to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of LUZU Cream, 1% have not been conducted. Luliconazole revealed no evidence of mutagenic or clastogenic potential based on the results of two in vitro genotoxicity tests (Ames assay and Chinese hamster lung cell chromosomal aberration assay) and one in vivo genotoxicity test (mouse bone marrow micronucleus test). In a fertility study in rats, subcutaneous doses of 1, 5 and 25 mg/kg/day luliconazole were administered prior to and during mating and through early pregnancy. Treatment related effects on reproductive function were noted in females (decreased live embryos and decreased corpus luteum) at 5 and 25 mg/kg/day and males (decreased sperm counts) at 25 mg/kg/day. No treatment related effects on fertility or reproductive function were noted at 1 mg/kg/day (0.1X MRHD based on BSA comparisons). PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See FDA-approved patient labeling (Patient Information) Inform patients that LUZU Cream, 1% is for topical use only. LUZU Cream, 1% is not intended for intravaginal or ophthalmic use. Manufactured for: Medicis, a division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 Manufactured by: DPT Laboratories, Ltd., San Antonio, TX 78215 Product of Japan Issued: 8/2014 9386401 DM/LUZ/15/0007 SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM BUSINESS OF DERMATOLOGY PROBLEM PATIENTS: Know when enough is enough from page 72 says, she politely refuses to treat the person in the first place. C onv er s el y, D r. D o w n ie s a y s she’ll gladly treat a patient who has psychiatric issues if the patient is receiving proper mental health care, is participating in a dialogue with her and is following treatment recommendations. THE NO-SHOW PATIENT Less urgent, but still problematic, said Dr. Downie, is the no-show patient, who wreaks havoc with a practice’s schedule and patient flow. Before taking action, “Always listen to what their circumstances happen to be.” For example, she says, having chemotherapy trumps “The dog ate my appointment card.” Ultimately, “If it’s more than three no-shows, and you feel you’re not connecting with the patient, abso- lutely fire them,” she says. “Explain in your letter to them that it’s due to their failure to present or cancel in an appropriate amount of time before their scheduled appointments. Tell the patient that you will make their medical records available to them when they pick another dermatologist.” With your letter, “Enclose an authorization form saying that you need a signed medical release to ship the records out. And always extend your best wishes to the patient.” IF PROBLEM PATIENTS COME TO CALL Because many problem patients are quite confrontational, Dr. Downie says, they may show up at the practice within the 30-day window, demanding to see the dermatologist. If this happens she says, “Do not see the patient alone in a room. Have your nurse, assistant or other staff mem- ber present in the room to lessen the likelihood that the patient can claim you did something inappropriate.” Even if the patient says he or she does not want another person in the room, Dr. Downie emphasizes, “You can still talk to them in a semi-private area and have somebody standing by.” She relates that a colleague who failed to take such precautions had to settle with a patient who had completely fabricated a claim of impropriety. Somewhat similarly, “If a patient comes in and debates you, tell them that your decision is final, and it’s in both of your best interests. You might have to repeat yourself three or four times,” she says. “The bottom line is, if you feel threatened in any way, don’t hesitate to call the police.” DT Dr. Downie reports no relevant financial interests. 75 76 BUSINESS ® OF DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM David B. Mandell, J.D., M.B.A. is an attorney and author, as well as a principal of the financial consulting firm OJM Group. Carole C. Foos, C.P.A. works as a tax consultant at OJM Group. Are your assets exposed? A sset protection is a crucial but often overlooked part of financial planning. Misperceptions and myths abound in conventional wisdom when it comes to asset protection, ranging from “you don’t need to worry about asset protection, you have insurance” to “just put the assets in your spouse’s name – it’ll protect you.” Here, we examine several of these common misperceptions. ➊ “Your Insurance Protects You” Property and casualty (P&C) insurance is an important part of any asset protection plan, but an insurance policy that is 50 pages long rarely gets read by the buyer, let alone analyzed or understood. Insurance policies all have a variety of exclusions that can create unexpected gaps in coverage. This is true for personal policies, like homeowner’s, car and even umbrella insurance; as well as business policies, the most important of which for physicians is medical malpractice. Even if your policy does cover the risk in question, there are still risks of the claim going beyond coverage limits (malpractice judgments do periodically exceed traditional $1/3 million coverage), strict liability, and bankruptcy of the insurance company. In any of these cases, you could be left with the sole responsibility for the loss. In addition, even if all of your losses are covered within coverage limits, a claim could cause future premiums to skyrocket. For these reasons, it is unwise to rely solely on insurance for your protection, especially when many asset protection techniques will generally save taxes and help you build retirement wealth. Don’t Need a ➋ “You Professional Corporation (PC)” The main justification for this point of view seems to be the expense ($1,000 or so to create, and a few hundred dollars per year) and the additional paperwork (tax return, minutes, etc.). However, when you fail to use a PC or other similar entity (PA, PLLC) to run your practice, you expose all of your personal wealth to any claim originating in the operation of the practice. While the PC will not protect your assets from malpractice, it does take into account other liability risks created by employees. For example, consider car accidents employees might get in when driving for the business (receptionist going to pick up lunch for the office) or a slip and fall in the office, or car accident in the parking lot, among many others. Implemented correctly, a PC protects your personal wealth against all of these potential liabilities and more— without one, all of your personal wealth could be vulnerable. a ‘Disregarded Entity’ ➌ “Use for Tax Purposes” Related to the mistaken notion that a physician should avoid using a PC is this more-common misguidance for solo physicians; to have a professional entity, but to choose to have the entity taxed as a “disregarded entity” by the IRS. Essentially, a sole-owned LLC can elect not to be treated as a separate entity but, instead, to be treated as a “disregarded entity” where the profits or losses simply flow to Schedule C of the tax return of the sole owner (physician). Unfortunately, with this strategy, the physician assumes the same risk as having no entity at all, and a lawsuit against the practice could potentially attack all of the doctor’s personal assets, even if he was totally uninvolved in the activity that created liability. Put Your Assets in Your ➍“Just Spouse’s Name” Many people believe erroneously that assets in a spouse’s name cannot be touched. To see how this legal interpretation is wrong, ask yourself: Whose income was used to purchase the asset? Has the doctor used the asset at any time? Does the doctor have any control over the asset? Has the doctor benefited from “the spouse’s assets” in any way? If the answer is “yes” to any of these questions, most courts find that at least half of the value will be exposed to the claims against the doctor. In community property states, it may be 100% of the value, as a community asset. Another good litmus test is to ask your financial advisor what she thinks will happen in a divorce if you put all the assets in the spouse’s name. It’s a safe bet that your advisor will say that the court will treat these assets as joint because you are still treating them as joint (living in the house, spending the accounts, paying the taxes). Therefore, the court knows that you haven’t really given the assets away to the spouse. Most likely, this is exactly the way the court will treat the assets for creditor purposes as well. HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF Each physician has a differing set of circumstances and needs. Consulting with tax and legal professionals before implementing any financial strategy can provide you with the background knowledge you need to create an approach that will protect your assets. Tax laws change frequently, so regular consultation with your professional tax advisor is key. The general information presented here may not be suitable for everyone and should not be construed as personalized legal or tax advice. DT A Breakthrough I N ANTIAG I N G S K I N H Y D R ATI O N NeoStrataPro.com | 1.800.628.9904 *Aminofil®, NeoGlucosamine®, and Maltobionic Acid are NeoStrata’s patented technologies; Prodew® is a registered trademark of Ajinomoto. ©2015 NeoStrata Company, Inc. NEW SKIN ACTIVE DERMAL REPLENISHMENT NEW Patented NeoStrata technologies* help reverse dehydration and visible signs of aging. AMINOFIL® Builds skin’s natural volume to lift, firm, and reduce the appearance of lines and wrinkles NEOGLUCOSAMINE ® Building block of hylauronic acid plumps, diminishes spots PRODEW ® Provides Amino Acids essential for Natural Moisturizing Factor to hydrate MALTOBIONIC ACID Hydrates and protects against environmental, free radical damage PASSION FOR SKIN CARE. PROVEN BY SCIENCE. 78 BUSINESS ® OF DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Melanie D. Palm, M.D., is director of Art of Skin in Solana Beach, California Industry perspective on research n last month’s column we explored the physician perspective for entrée into the sphere of clinical research. This month’s column reveals the industry perspective on what is valuable in a physician regarding clinical studies, with three industry insiders providing a fair appraisal of the qualities and qualifications they seek in physicians partnering with industry in research. I or a review of the literature, according to Nogueira. Gallagher advises that “the best way to get involved in clinical research is [by] acting as a sub-investigator for an experienced investigator on a company sponsored clinical trial.” He asserts this is an excellent opportunity to build a skill set required for a successful physician clinician. Besse suggests that being a part of a multi-site study is another excellent oppor- “The best way to get involved in clinical research is [by] acting as a sub-investigator for an experienced investigator on a company sponsored clinical trial.” is really a labor of love,” adds Gallagher. HOW TO BE SUCCESSFUL OVER THE LONG HAUL Integrity, work ethic, and attention to detail are common themes among feedback from industry experts. Research is a laborious endeavor— proper staffing, facilities, and ethical behavior are required to be successful over a significant period of time. Another quality is worth noting: humility. “Receptiveness to feedback from company staff inspecting the site is important,” stresses Gallagher. Consider how you lead your staff as well, as others are observing. According to Besse, “Physicians who command respect within their practices (which never comes without showing mutual respect to their staff) have clinical teams that are dedicated to their patients and their outcomes.” Conor Gallagher, Ph.D. Director of Medical Affairs, Allergan These experts’ experience encompass a broad landscape of dermatology, from medical to aesthetic dermatology, medications to devices, and personal education from M.D. to Ph.D. and businessperson. Special thanks to Conor Gallagher, Ph.D. (Director of Medical Affairs, Allergan), Alessandra Nogueira, M.D. (Aesthetics & Corrective Medical Director, Galderma), and Marcel Besse (Executive Director, Lutronic & former President North America, BTL Industries) for their participation. HOW AND WHERE TO START If you have a research concept, these experts agree that discussing it with an appropriate company medical science liaison (MSL) is the first appropriate step. According to Gallagher, “MSLs will be able to discuss research capabilities and experience and pass on the information to the appropriate group in the company Clinical Development or Medical Affairs departments.” What type of study to start varies and there are multiple avenues to success. Novices in the field might benefit from conducting a small study that is observational INDUSTRY CHANGES AHEAD tunity, especially if a trial is straightforward and without requirements for pain management, histology or invasive procedures. HOW TO GET NOTICED Industry heads won’t snap in the direction of flash-in-the-pan, quick-fix leads. Hard work, intellectual curiosity and dedication to science seem to be the recipe for success in clinical research. “Most companies like to work with well-established and well-respected luminaries as well as experienced young leaders,” states Besse. Past publications, a well-organized and trained research team, and proper educational training are key qualifications for selection as an investigator. Attending and presenting at scientific meetings such as the AAD and the SID impart credibility to your name, according to Nogueira. Gallagher highlights the importance of proper motivations for participating in research. It requires significant energy, passion, curiosity, and time. “Investigators should not expect to get involved in research for the money. While investigators are compensated for their efforts, it “Formal research and regulatory compliance training today [are] essential,” stresses Nogueira, noting that, if pursuing a formal degree in the area of research is not feasible for a busy clinician, it is important for physicians to attend compliance and research courses at national meetings such as the AAD or through the FDA. It is important to remain realistic and not be discouraged by setbacks. Gallagher notes that the environment of industry consolidation has led to a contraction in research opportunities. Even well-seasoned clinicians are not always selected for some studies for which they would be an ideal fit. Perseverance is definitely required, but within reason. Within the aesthetic sphere, Besse comments that financial rewards for the company and physician should not affect research outcomes. “Physicians should avoid pressures with conducting clinical studies with any bias toward the outcomes that all desire. We all must work together to insure that clinical studies best translate into quality outcomes and ultimately the true goal—happy patients.” DT Questions? Comments? Give Dermatology Times your feedback by contacting us at [email protected]. 80 BUSINESS ® OF DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM Cheryl Bisera is a marketing consultant, author and speaker with extensive experience in marketing and business promotion. She is founder of Cheryl Bisera Consulting, a California-based image development and marketing company that focuses on the healthcare industry. Ms. Bisera is also the co-author of The Patient-Centered Payoff, published by Greenbranch Publishing. Satisfaction gets you by; Loyalty ensures you thrive H ave you ever considered the difference between patient satisfaction and patient loyalty? One gets you by, the other ensures you thrive. In reality, a ‘satisfied’ patient might simply not be bothered enough to change practices. In other words, they may not be wowed but they stay because it’s inconvenient to switch and their basic needs are being met. Once this type of patient has an alluring alternative—an enthusiastic referral from a friend, an uber-convenient pharmacy clinic close to home or an enticing special—they’ll change practices without batting an eye. The worst part is that you might not even know that they left at all…or why. Even high patient-satisfaction rates cannot be interpreted as patient loyalty; loyalty is on a whole other level. Loyal patients will weather changes in your practice because there is something so good at your practice that they can’t conceive of finding it better anywhere else. They also enthusiastically evangelize for your practice, sending friends and family your way. Patient referrals are your most powerful marketing tool, no small gift! And…it’s personal. After all, prices, insurance, and décor change, but they won’t get you and your staff at another practice. For this reason, relationship is at the core of what makes a patient loyal to a practice. But, if service stinks, access is poor and the décor is outdated, the message that “we don’t care” comes through and dampens the relationship. It’s more than looking into the eyes of patients and listening, though that is so powerful; it’s about dialing in the patient experience and building the relationship! can look deceivingly healthy but this is an expensive, unsustainable and far less satisfying model. It’s likely you fall somewhere in the middle: you have a few loyal patients who refer to you, but you suspect that your ‘satisfied’ patients are there because you are contracted with their insurance and because you’re the most convenient choice. If you want to take control and strengthen your practice through patient loyalty, I have good news. All the things that garner patient loyalty are simply great business principals anyhow; you have nothing to lose and everything to gain! THE HOLY GRAIL OF CUSTOMER SERVICE Patient loyalty is like the holy grail of customer service in the medical practice. If you can find that sweet spot, it won’t matter what shiny new thing rolls into town – your practice will be rock solid and thriving. I’ve seen the practices that have it and I’ve seen those that don’t. On one hand is a practice that seems to endure the test of time; long-time patients are the norm and they usually don’t need to advertise. In fact, these practices often can’t accommodate all their new patient requests. On the other hand is the practice that must constantly strive to attract new patients to replenish those who are lost through attrition. This is sometimes done by accepting less-than-attractive insurance contracts, which can force a practice to have to see more patients in less time, driving service lower and contributing to a vicious cycle of downward spiraling quality. The influx of new patients MAKE IT HAPPEN Here are some ways your practice can nurture patient loyalty through stronger patient-clinic and patient-physician relationships: every new patient like you ➊ Treat would an important guest. They should be introduced to staff, shown around and welcomed to the practice — celebrate their first visit and leave an incredible first impression! ➋ Express appreciation. Find ways to thank patients for continuing to choose you. Never miss an opportunity to say ‘thanks,’ especially if a patient has referred someone to you. Mind wait times, access to ➌ appointments and perceived time with the physician. What’s your most effective patient satisfaction technique? Tell us at [email protected] SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM These time issues are extremely important to patients, enough to drive an otherwise happy patient away. The first two can be resolved with a scheduling template that allows adequate time for each patient, starting on time and eliminating the lunch time shut-down—improving access by keeping phone lines open. The later means making the patient feel like they had the full attention of their physician. Some ways to do this include using body language, eye contact and asking if they have any questions or concerns. as much ➍Communicate as possible. You really can’t over communicate. Let patients know what you expect and what they should expect as often as possible. This could include early communication about payment and payment options, appointment reminders, opportunity to ask questions, using their name and communicat- ing rescheduling options when the practice is running behind. This kind of communication expresses respect and makes patients feel comfortable and in control. out what they want and ➎ Find give it to them. BUSINESS OF DERMATOLOGY NEXT MONTH will focus on how to effectively use patient surveys to give your practice a competitive advantage. Through patient surveys you can find out what they are pining for before someone else offers it. For example, you might find out that your patients would take advantage of Saturday hours and decide to have a provider available for a monthly Saturday clinic. BRIDGING THE LOYALTY GAP To really find out where you stand in the loyalty gap—the process of turning satisfied patients into loyal patients—it’s crucial to survey patients and give them alternative avenues of giving honest feedback. Remember to ask them how willing they are to refer a family member or friend, and track where new patients are coming from to find out if that is in fact happening. Patient feedback will help you know what kinds of service changes can bridge that gap and convert them into loyal, referring patients. It’s equally important to have a staff that embraces feedback and the challenge of using every opportunity to strengthen the patient-clinic relationship. It’s worth mentioning that even if you have attained the holy grail of patient loyalty; you always have to be ready for a curve ball. Tomorrow a shiny new thing might roll into your town, so keep minding the gap between patient satisfaction and patient loyalty by nurturing patient loyalty all the time, regardless of your current success. Then you can reap the benefits of a thriving practice full of patients that refer and a practice culture that’s satisfying for both patients and practice members! DT Best optics. Best lighting. Best design. Designed by doctors for doctors. ™ dermatoscope www.canfieldscientific.com [email protected] phone +1.973.276.0336 (USA) 800.815.4330 VEOS is a trademark of Canfield Scientific, Inc. patent pending 81 82 BUSINESS ® OF DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM From the pages of The battle over EHR patient data How to secure your access to patient data when switching electronic health record vendors JOHN MORRISSEY | STAFF CORRESPONDENT Who owns patient data in an electronic health record (EHR)? It’s a simple question with a complex answer. No longer confined to the shelves of a physician’s office, patient data is now shared and used by a myriad of organizations across healthcare: Other physicians and health systems, the EHR vendor, payers, and researchers, not to mention patients themselves. While primary care physicians often originate the medical record, the resulting data are not theirs alone. The implication? The traditional concept of ownership is unraveling as patient data migrates away from paper charts and takes up residence in the cloud. Experts now counsel physicians against the concept of data ownership entirely. Instead, they encourage physicians to consider themselves “stewards” of the data within their possession and administrative control. This grey area has serious consequences for physicians, particularly concerning their relationship with their EHR vendors, the third party who has most access—and control—over patient data. Too often, physicians give vendors the upper hand on data rights by not addressing them when drawing up the contract, says Adam Greene, J.D., a partner with the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine and an expert on healthcare technology and privacy. “To be perfectly blunt, more often than not, these details are not addressed up front,” Dr. Greene says. “You have pretty generic language, and oftentimes that can come back to haunt the physician. Questions of data rights should be “top of mind when they’re contracting,” he adds. “And if they feel like the contract with the EHR vendor does not provide enough details on this front, they should ask the questions, and if they feel like they need to get the answers in writing, they should push for that.” It can prevent trouble down the road. Full Circle Health Care, a physician’s practice in Presque Isle, Maine, had its access to data for 4,000 patients blocked by its EHR vendor after a dispute over billing practices, according to a report in the Boston Globe. “I’m incredulous they think it is OK to hold us hostage like that,” E. Victoria Grover, a physician assistant and the practice owner, told the newspaper. T he key: protect your pract ice with a contract that clearly spells outs how and when an EHR vendor can use patient data. LEVERAGING YOUR POSITION One point is clear: EHR vendors do not have outright ownership of patient data, even if it lives within their system. Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), business associates, including EHR vendors, must return or destroy patient health information upon termination of the agreement, Dr. Greene says. “That really kind of undercuts any claim that they have ownership,” Dr. Greene says. “While HIPAA doesn’t use the word ownership in any place, it undermines any argument that the vendor owns the data.” The agreement with the vendor, then, must be about more than wrangling an affordable price, says Deven McGraw, J.D., a healthcare attorney with the firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips. In practice, the EHR vendor may be the more powerful party, particularly in negotiations with small practices, McGraw says. Not reading or understanding contract terms can lead physicians to sign away “pretty significant rights to that data” to the vendor. During negotiations, physicians should clearly spell out EHR data rights in the business associates agreement and contract with the vendor. But many don’t take advantage of this opportunity for leverage. The consequences of overlooking data rights can be severe for physicians, McGraw says. The EHR vendor gains the upper hand and increases the likelihood that physicians won’t have the contract language needed to control the relationship as a customer. Furthermore, it can limit their ability to migrate the data easily and inexpensively to a new EHR vendor in the event of a future decision to part ways. It’s never too late to revisit the contract in an attempt to address these issues, even if the contract has already been signed, and a practice realizes it didn’t pay enough attention to data rights, Dr. Greene says. But success “frequently comes down to a matter of leverage.” Unfortunately, the only option a physician would have is to say they don’t like the terms and to go elsewhere. Physicians have limited leverage to negotiate these contracts with big EHR vendors, even at the beginning, but “there’s nothing barring a physician from trying to do so.” Every physician negotiating a contract with a vendor should have the right to unfettered data access for patient care and follow-up, quality improvement, patient management, reporting and overall population health, says Mary Griskewicz, M.S., F.H.I.M.S.S., senior director of healthcare information systems for the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. That’s not to say EHR vendors have no claim to the use of data residing in their products. The terms of the associate agreement and the purchase contract can grant vendors an array of permitted uses that are within HIPAA parameters, Dr. McGraw says. To sweeten the deal, a vendor may reduce the price of services such as record management “in exchange for the ability to mine data out of the record,” Dr. McGraw adds. HIPAA limits don’t apply to data that are de-identified, e.g. stripped of elements that could trace the identity of patients. The business associates agreement, Dr. Greene says, should bind the vendor to use or disclose data only in the same manner as the healthcare provider can under HIPAA, in addition to these two provisions: EHR DATA see page 84 EFFACLAR DUO DUAL ACTION ACNE TREATMENT 1 An antibiotic-free benzoyl peroxide acne treatment Clinically tested to be as effective as a leading benzoyl 2 peroxide/antibiotic prescription Baseline Week 2 Week 12 · 5.5% Micronized Benzoyl Peroxide acne medication · Micro-exfoliating LHA (derivative of Salicylic Acid) for precise exfoliation High tolerance Oil-free/Non-comedogenic Fragrance-free Paraben-free Dermatologist tested Tested on sensitive skin Significant reduction of acne lesions INFLAMMATORY LESION COUNTS2 NON-INFLAMMATORY LESION COUNTS2 0% -25% -31.9% -50% -46.9% -55.2% -59.7% -75% -65.7% -65.8% -63.3% -68.4% -100% % CHANGE FROM THE BASELINE % CHANGE FROM THE BASELINE 0% -25% -50% -31.1% -44.7% -37.4% -57.5% -63.1% -57.9% -63.8% -75% -65.2% -100% Baseline *Week 2 *Week 4 *Week 8 ■ Leading acne Rx + topical retinoid [0.025%] ■ EFFACLAR DUO + topical retinoid [0.025%] *Week 12 Baseline *Week 2 *Week 4 *Week 8 *Week 12 *P ≤ 0.001 (1) Dual action acne treatment stems from Benzoyl peroxide. (2) Protocol: A 12 week dermatologist controlled, multi-center study: double blind clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of two acne creams in subjects with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. 61 patients, ages 18–50, multiethnic skin, all skin types. 2 cell study: Cell 1, 27 patients, [EFFACLAR DUO]+ 0.025% Topical Retinoid vs. Cell 2, 34 patients, [a leading topical Benzoyl peroxide prescription] + 0.025% Topical Retinoid. Results measured at mean % change from baseline at 12 weeks of use. Application of topical retinoid applied once a day in PM and application of Effaclar DUO or a leading topical prescription Benzoyl peroxide twice a day. Inclusion criteria: ≥ 15 inflammatory lesions and ≥ 20 non-inflammatory lesions. 84 BUSINESS ® OF DERMATOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM EHR DATA: How to bind the vendor to your advantage from page 82 ➧ Permitting the vendor to perform data aggregation to look at data across different covered entities and combine it for analysis for the benefit of healthcare providers; ➧ Allowing the vendor to use or disclose information for the vendor’s own proper management and administration and to perform its legal responsibilities. For example, a vendor might have to report to the Food and Drug Administration, or have an auditor review live data to determine security practices. MAKING THE SWITCH While haggling over the initial contract, make sure terms are in place to protect your practice if you decide to terminate the relationship and switch to a different EHR vendor. Physician dissatisfaction with EHRs is at an all-time high, and many physicians are looking to change systems. Yet questions about migrating data hang over these transactions, often making physicians leery about jumping ship even when it’s the best decision for their practice. “A pretty significant number of practices either had to dump their own EHR or are planning on doing it,” says Robert Tennant, senior policy adviser at the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA). “So the question becomes: what do you do then? Yes, they own the record, but it’s not in a format that easily translates over to the new one.” Making matters worse, the situation calls for the loser of a customer to cooperate with the winner. “There’s not much incentive for EHR vendors to make it easy for their customers to take their business elsewhere,” Dr. Greene says. That possible scenario heightens the need to review the contract at the signing. One part of thinking through the agreement is to identify issues about what happens if you want to leave a specific vendor; and add that to the contract. If that day arrives, the responsibilities are already spelled out. Consider, though, that a vendor may reserve continuous rights to a departing provider’s data, Dr. McGraw says. The return-or-destroy requirement applies only to patient health information, and “it doesn’t necessarily cut off the business associate from being able to con- tinue to use the de-identified data that they may have created from the identifiable data when they had it,” she explains. Beyond data ownership questions, switching vendors requires a challenging feat: migrating data that’s formatted and optimized for one proprietary system into a new system. “A particular vendor has designed software, and the data are created in that software, for that software, not created in a manner that can be used by other vendors’ software,” Dr. Greene says. Beyond data ownership questions, switching vendors requires a challenging feat: migrating data that’s formatted and optimized for one proprietary system into a new system. SURVIVING THE SWITCH If your practice is contemplating an EHR switch, remember that it will be expensive, disruptive and riddled with technical issues related to data conversion. Yet it could still be the best decision your practice ever makes. Five years ago, a 10-provider practice based in Independence, Missouri became an early case of converting its data to another EHR, at a cost of $65,000 above the purchase price of software and implementation, says Bryan Wood, practice administrator of Cockerell & McIntosh Pediatrics. Starting over without the data from the old system was never considered. “So we just did it and we just planned on that extra cost,” Mr. Wood says. The practice received its raw data, written on “one compact disc, it didn’t include much technical detail, or clues as to what the elements represent.” With a background in IT, Mr. Wood had to use a computer tool to extract the data into a more beneficial form. Then he worked closely with database experts from the new vendor to convert, test and refine the data, a process that took four months. Mr. Wood says his experience with the new vendor’s database technicians was positive, but not without hitches. For example, errors sprouted up because the new system was looking for data elements that the old EHR did not collect, such as additional immunization details. There is no recourse for the manner in which data transfer takes place if the original contract did not cover it, Ms. Griskewicz says. “Vendors actually make money off providing that as a service of the exit strategy,” she says. “They can say that if it’s not in the contract, ‘Well, we can do this for X amount of dollars.’” The price “depends on the vendor, there’s no standard fee. It depends on the volume of the data that you’re trying to migrate.” It may also depend on the new vendor, she adds. “You bring them in, have them look at the file formats, the data — how it was stored. Can they take that information and help you with the migration? Because they’re going to be much more motivated to help you down that road.” Jernigan Surgery Clinic, a small practice in Union City, Tennessee, went live with a new EHR in April. “They do everything they say; it pulls everything exactly how you have it,” says Samantha Jernigan, practice administrator. A vendor database specialist went through the previous EHR’s data step by step with her, asking whether a certain data set should be pulled in or not. That allowed the practice to cull some information fields with little use. Practice and technical progress are lowering the conversion bar even for small practices, says Justin Barnes, formerly a healthcare IT executive and now a consultant. “Due to unified standards, innovative tools and the need for consolidated data and quality reporting, these migrations have become much less cumbersome than in the past.” DT Read the full article bit.ly/EHRbattle REGISTER NOW! w w w.theDASIL .org NOVEMBER 4 - 8, 2015 DASIL 4 TH A NNUAL C ONGRESS S HERATON S AIGON H OTEL & T OWERS I N CONJUNCTION WITH H O C HI M INH C ITY S OCIETY OF P LASTIC & A ESTHETIC S URGERY 1. Join DASIL 2. Register for the Congress 3. Reserve your hotel room 4. Submit your abstracts 5. Sign up for the post-trip to Cambodia 86 THE TAKEAWAY ® SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM PART 3 Screening labs, complacency, and the ABCDEs of pediatric melanoma ELAINE SIEGFRIED, M.D. In the final part of our discussion about pediatric dermatology, Kelly Cordoro, M.D., associate professor of dermatology and pediatrics at the University of California in San Francisco, discusses screening labs, avoiding complacency, and the ABCDEs of melanoma with Dermatology Times editorial advisor, Elaine Siegfried, M.D. DR. SIEGFRIED: You wrote a great paper about screening labs and the relative value of screening labs when using systemic agents for kids with psoriasis. Given whatever your favorite drug is, which labs do you routinely check and how often? A Dr. Cordoro: Thank you. I really wanted to research more about these drugs and what are the differences. We get most of our information on screening from other subspecialties: We borrow from the rheumatology literature; we borrow from the hematology-oncology literature; we borrow from the gastrointestinal literature. We don’t have our own data-driven evidence for kids with psoriasis specifically, or for kids with atopic dermatitis specifically to really answer these questions. So my approach is very clinically driven. I start out very conservatively. I will check labs at baseline and fairly frequently early in the course of therapy. And the specific labs and frequency differ depending upon the specific agent used. We know for cyclosporine, we have to be more aware of checking blood pressures, electrolyte levels and kidney function. With methotrexate, we have to be more aware about testing liver function and so forth. Over the course of therapy and depending on the patient’s individual situation, their response to disease and lab results, I’ll check more or less frequently. Even though we have published recommendations, your clinical experience and the individual patient will prompt a variable approach. I will liberalize or tighten the lab monitoring as the clinical course evolves. In developing the AAD’s clinical guidelines for management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with phototherapy and systemic agents, Listen to the discussion. bit.ly/ABCDEsofpediatricmelanoma we agreed on recommendations for monitoring. Those were derived based on available evidence and expert consensus.1 There are charts in the manuscript detailing the dosing and recommendations, and I follow those pretty closely. For psoriasis, my approach is similar. It’s really a more aggressive approach upfront and then adjustments over time based on individual factors. My recommendations around that can be found in an article that Anne Marqueling, M.D., our former pediatric dermatology fellow who is now faculty at Stanford, and I wrote called “Systemic Treatments for Severe Pediatric Psoriasis: A Practical Approach.” This contains straightforward and clinically driven suggestions for baseline and then ongoing monitoring.2 DR. SIEGFRIED: It is an advantage and a disadvantage that we don’t have a lot of high-tier, evidence-based medicine, and so we have the privilege of customizing treatment for our patients. Patients aren’t templates; they all have unique issues that impact the best treatment choice. What advice would you give to new clinicians about this? A Dr. Cordoro: Well said. I think my advice to very junior clinicians is to start by the textbooks, go by what’s been written by those with more knowledge and experience. In general we tend to be more cautious with monitoring at first and then over time, the approach may evolve. However, I will say this: I am constantly humbled by these medications—both conventional sys- temic therapies and biologics. We have to be careful as we are modifying and customizing that we don’t become complacent and say, ‘I’ve been doing this for so many years, we don’t have to check that anymore.’ Because as soon as we let our guard down, we can get burned. So the right answer is somewhere between being cost-effective and not over-monitoring, but not getting too comfortable either. DR. SIEGFRIED: Do you check all kids that you are going to put on any kind of immunomodulating therapy for TB risk? A Dr. Cordoro: I do because I live in a high-prevalence area in the San Francisco Bay area. When I practiced in Virginia, I did not. I would routinely do it for TNF inhibitors, I routinely did it for methotrexate; and, right or wrong, I did not do it for some of the other systemic agents. Now of course I am doing it for everybody and maybe everybody should be doing it for every patient with all of these medications. TAKEAWAY see page 88 “We don’t have our own data-driven evidence for kids with psoriasis...so my approach is very clinically driven.” Kelly Cordoro, M.D. San Francisco, Calif. 2015 Discussions in Dermatology December 2-5, 2015 The ARIA Resort & Casino, Las Vegas Course Director: Joel Schlessinger, MD www.CosmeticSurgeryForum.com Engaging, fun and informative what more can you ask for from a CME course? &RVPHWLF6XUJHU\)RUXPLVDFHUWL¿HGPXOWLVSHFLDOW\HGXFDWLRQDOV\PSRVLXPWKDW FRYHUVWKHODWHVWUHVHDUFKWUHDWPHQWVDQGWHFKQLTXHVLQGHUPDWRORJ\DQGFRVPHWLF VXUJHU\/LYHSDWLHQWGHPRQVWUDWLRQVDQGOLYHO\DWWHQGHHVSHDNHULQWHUDFWLRQV PDNHWKLVDXQLTXHHGXFDWLRQDOH[SHULHQFHQRWWREHPLVVHG “I think it’s the only place where I pick up pearls that I can’t really read in the journals or anywhere else.” - S. Manjula Jegasothy, MD “This meeting really encourages conversation amongst colleagues. I learn something every single year.” - Brooke Jackson, MD “The number of amazing faculty, and the crosssection of faculty, is just incredible.” - Heidi Waldorf, MD “I wanted to tell you what a great conference \RXRUJDQL]HG7KLVZDVP\¿UVWWLPHDWWHQGLQJ [and] yours was the most entertaining, fun and educational conference I have attended in years.” - Carolyn Kim, MD The ARIA Resort & Casino 5RRPUDWHVDUHSHUQLJKWSOXVDSSOLFDEOHWD[HVDQGIHHVDYDLODEOH:HGQHVGD\ 'HFHPEHUWKURXJK6DWXUGD\'HFHPEHUZLWKD6XQGD\'HFHPEHUFKHFNRXWGDWH Contact Information Natasha Mohr · LQIR#&RVPHWLF6XUJHU\)RUXPFRP· Jointly Sponsored By 88 THE TAKEAWAY ® SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM TAKEAWAY: Biologics, screening, and pediatric melanoma from page 86 DR. SIEGFRIED: Are you doing purified protein derivative (PPD) or QuantiFERON (Cellestis)? A Dr. Cordoro: I am doing PPD (purified protein derivative) for the most part. I think it’s the most costeffective screen. If we are not guaranteed that they will follow up on their PPD and we can’t reach their pediatrician, then we will do a QuantiFERON. However, data on performance are scant in the pediatric age group. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cautions use in patients less than 17, and in particular in kids less than 5 years old. DR. SIEGFRIED: What biologics have you used? A Dr. Cordoro: Well, as you well know, all biologic treatments for dermatologic use in kids are off-label, as are all systemic medications for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. So yes, I’m always prescribing off-label and I use the TNF inhibitors the most. I use this for recalcitrant plaque and pustular psoriasis. I tend to prescribe etanercept initially, because it has the most data for kids. There has been a randomized, controlled trial, as you know, spearheaded by [Dr.] Amy Paller.3 However, its efficacy often wanes over time and may require a transition to other TNF agents or a class change. I would say that I have the most experience with TNF inhibitors. I don’t use them as much as I do systemic therapies. I am still in the “drugs I know and can monitor” phase of my career. I have some concerns about the lack of knowledge about long-term risks of some of these agents. For example, I do not have a vast experience with ustekinumab yet. I have prescribed it only one time to a teenager with severe psoriasis who failed antiTNF. For generalized pustular psoriasis, my drug of choice is infliximab if I need to achieve really rapid control. I often accompany that by small doses of methotrexate to block human antichimeric antibodies, which overtime can lead to loss of efficacy and increased infusion reactions. I have not used a biologic agent for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. DR. SIEGFRIED: Your publications have been very diverse including a couple of really great articles. Can you talk about what inspired the ABCDEs for pediatric melanoma and the seminal article on eczema coxsackium? A Dr. Cordoro: Thank you for the compliment. My articles have been driven by my passion for dermatology and the confusion that arises when caring for complex patients. My patient care practice really dominates the questions that I have asked. The ABCDE story for pediatric melanoma really began in my pediatric dermatology fellowship. As I mentioned earlier, I transitioned from being an adult dermatologist to pediatric dermatology, and it was profound for me when I realized how differently melanoma can present in children and that it could be missed a large part of the time because of the different clinical presentation. I remember saying to my fellowship director and mentor, [Dr.] Ilona Frieden, while caring for a young girl with amelanotic melanoma, ‘The ABCDEs do not always apply to pediatric melanoma. These kids are at risk for very late detection. I want to write this up.” This was in 2007. She said, “Why don’t you collect data and see if it supports your notion?” So, the idea was born in 2007 and resulted in a paper that was published in 2013.4 In reviewing the literature on childhood melanoma, I realized the paucity of clinical information—in particular, the original appearance of the melanoma—provided in published series. We reviewed the details of every melanoma diagnosed before the age of 18 at UCSF, and our data together with other published series allowed us to make some clinically important observations. One of the things we learned is that E is the most predictive criterion. Persistent lesions that are evolving or changing should be approached with a higher degree of suspicion. The study supported the need for raised awareness for melanoma in children with lesions that are amelanotic, or bleeding, and even those that are uniform in color and of small diameter [<6mm]. The most important lesson we learned in that study was that the presentations of melanoma are vastly different in prepubertal patients. That age group requires a higher index of suspicion for lesions with these atypical presentations. As far as the eczema coxsackium paper5, I have to give 100% of the credit to my colleague and friend [Dr.] Erin Mathes, who is a pediatric dermatologist at UCSF. Dr. Mathes, one of our fellows Dr. Vikash Oza, and Dr. Frieden really spearheaded that work. We were observing these variant hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) presentations and there had been some reports coming out of other countries around the same time. I take really little to no credit for that paper other than contributing a few cases, reviewing, and helping to edit the final product. I think it was a very important paper that we all learned from. The CVA6-associated enterovirus outbreak was responsible for an exanthem potentially more widespread, severe, and varied than classic HFMD that could be confused with bullous impetigo, eczema herpeticum, vasculitis, and primary immunobullous disease. DR. SIEGFRIED: What do you enjoy the most, what takes most of your time? Is it patient care, teaching, research? A Dr. Cordoro: I love that you asked me that question. It’s patient care. I am first and foremost a clinician, and I’m happiest when I am behind a closed door with a complicated patient. The bonus is, I’m in an academic environment where my passion for teaching is married to patient care. Every patient I see presents a learning opportunity for our trainees and for me. DR. SIEGFRIED: I know you’re working a lot on psoriasis. Is there anything else that’s really exciting you and making you enthusiastic? A Dr. Cordoro: Psoriasis is probably my favorite disease. I am working with the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA). We have a psoriasis investigator group, and TAKEAWAY see page 96 90 Dermatology Times | Products & Services SHOWCASE Go to: September 2015 products.modernmedicine.com EDUCATION UPCOMING CME ACTIVITIES Basal and Squamous Cell Cancer Pathology for Mohs Surgeons and Fundamentals of Mohs Surgery Closure Course and Dermatologic Surgery: Focus on Skin Cancer DoubleTree Hotel San Diego, Mission Valley – San Diego, CA Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa – Newport Beach, CA November 3-4, 2015 – Basal and Squamous Cell Cancer Pathology This course will be a practical “pure pathology” experience for physicians who are interested in understanding all the subtle characteristics of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma, the most common tumors treated with Mohs surgery. Course will prepare attendees to accurately read and interpret BCC and SCC in all its variations as well as differentiate these tumors from background findings and reactive changes commonly seen at the site of recent biopsies. May 25-26, 2016 – Closure Course This intense learning experience provides didactic instruction and practical demonstrations of multiple closure techniques, anatomic site-specific discussions and valuable pearls, designed to take dermatologists to the next level of derm surgery practice. An elective lab featuring realistic visco elastic models will allow participants to practice new and complex closures, proctored by highly experienced Mohs surgeons. The material presented in the Closure Course is unique and will perfectly complement the topics and activities included in Dermatologic Surgery: Focus on Skin Cancer, immediately following. November 5-8, 2015 – Fundamentals of Mohs Surgery Course provides basic surgical, histopathology, and laboratory skills required to perform the Mohs procedure. It is designed to prepare a solid foundation upon which both physicians and technicians may build to become more proficient Mohs surgery practitioners. Microscope lab sessions will feature several hundred Mohs cases to be read as “unknowns,” as well as small group discussions of important Mohs pathology-related topics. Separate cryostat lab instruction is available for Mohs technicians at all levels of training and experience, and very much emphasizes the team approach integral to successful Mohs surgery. May 26-29, 2016 – Dermatologic Surgery: Focus on Skin Cancer Top experts in cutaneous oncology, dermatologic surgery and dermatopathology will provide updates on a wide range of surgical and Mohs topics. Interactive forum and panel members will discuss appropriate repair strategies for different types of surgical wounds, as well as innovative approaches to melanoma treatment and medico legal controversies in dermatologic surgery. For additional information, please contact: Novella M. Rodgers, ASMS Executive Director Tel. 800.616.2767 or Email [email protected] ad index ADVERTISER PRODUCT WEBSITE ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS VALCHLOR www.valchlor.com PAGE 45 - 46 ALLERGAN MEDICAL ACZONE www.aczone.com 67 - 68 AMGEN CORPORATE www.biotechnologybyamgen.com BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS FINACEA www.finacea.com BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS FINACEA www.finacea.com 7 CANFIELD SCIENTIFIC VEOS www.canfieldscientific.com 81 71 COVER TIP GALDERMA LABORATORIES EPIDUO www.epiduo.com GALDERMA LABORATORIES MIRVASO www.mirvaso.com 33 - 34 GALDERMA LABORATORIES SOOLANTRA www.soolantra.com 55 - 56 GENENTECH ERIVEDGE www.Erivedge.com 22 - 24 JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PRODUCTS AVEENO www.aveeno.com 53 LA ROCHE POSAY EFFACLAR DUO www.laroche-posay.com 83 LEO PHARMA INC ENSTILAR enstilarcomingsoon.com 63 www.mti.net 31 www.practicestudio.net 25 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES MICROFOUR INC CV3 - CV4 NEOSTRATA CO SKIN ACTIVE www.neostratapro.com 77 OBAGI MEDICAL PRODUCTS CORPORATE www.obagi.com 43 PROMIUS PHARMACEUTICALS www.promiuspharma.com 5 SENSUS HEALTHCARE www.sensushealthcare.com 65 TARO PHARMACEUTICALS TOPICORT SPRAY www.tarousa.com TOPIX PHARMACEUTICALS REPLENIX www.topixpharm.com 19 - 20 UNILEVER DOVE www.Doveprofessional.com/care VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTL CERAVE www.valeant.com CV2 VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTL ELIDEL www.valeant.com 49 - 51 27 17 VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTL JUBLIA www.valeant.com 59 - 60 VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTL LUZU www.valeant.com 73 - 74 This index is provided as an additional service. The publisher does not assume any liability for errors or omissions. September 2015 | 91 DermatologyTimes.com Go to: products.modernmedicine.com Products & Services SHOWCASE XXXXXXX SERVICES Advanced Dermatology is the largest dermatology practice in the nation. X4VYL[OHUVMÄJLZUH[PVU^PKL X(WWYV_PTH[LS`WH[PLU[ZH^LLR X6]LY)VHYK*LY[PÄLK+LYTH[VSVNPZ[Z )VHYK*LY[PÄLK7SHZ[PJ:\YNLVUZ -LSSV^ZOPW;YHPULK4VOZ:\YNLVUZ Mid-Level Providers and Aestheticians XWorld-class class clinical research division WYV]PKLZZ\WWVY[MVY[OLSH[LZ[JSPUPJHSKY\N HUKKL]PJL[YPHSZMVY-+(HWWYV]HS Interested in selling your practice? More than 40 practices acquired in the past 18 months. XFinancial rewards X(SSV^Z`V\[VMVJ\ZVUWH[PLU[JHYL X,_WHUKPUNYLZV\YJLZW\YJOHZPUNWV^LY XClinical Freedom Call Justin Kuperberg, 407.875.2080 x 1250 or email [email protected] We’re growing and recruiting WO`ZPJPHUZZ\YNLVUZHUKWYV]PKLYZ *HSS7H\S;\MM`_ VYLTHPSW[\MM`'SLH]P[[TN[JVT 2XU$PHULGHUP'LYLVLRQR̆HUV premier practice management support WRPRUHWKDQṘFHV$PHULGHUP was created by a Dermatologist for Dermatology practices. X Billing/coding/collections X 0UZ\YHUJL]LYPÄJH[PVU X Patient scheduling Contact David Morell for a customized proposal: 407.875.2080, ext. 1244 or [email protected]. X +PZJV\U[ZVUTLKPJHSVMÄJLZ\WWSPLZ X Hardware/software/training included AmeridermManagement.com Search for the company name you see in each of the ads in this section for FREE INFORMATION! 92 Marketplace Dermatology Times | September 2015 PRODUCTS & SERVICES EQUIPMENT FOR SALE OTC PRODUCTS PRACTICE FOR SALE 1(:/<'(9(/23(''(50$72/2*< 35$&7,&()256$/( Q-Swiched Ruby laser re-manufactured in 2014 by Polaris Medical. Beautifully finished dermatology practice that has been operating 2.5 days weekly for past 4 years in an upscale Chicago suburb is ready for a full time dermatologist/Mohs surgeon. Entirely paperless scheduling and billing systems, full-body narrowband UVB equipment onsite. Work completed: - all new exterior panels - new casters - new chiller - realigned and reconditioned articulated arm - reconditioned pump chamber - all fluids, filters, circuit boards and electronics brought up to current spec. The cost of this practice is less than half of typical dermatology practices of this scale. A must see opportunity. email inquiries to: [email protected] PRACTICE FOR SALE NATIONAL We Buy Practices 1Yr. full warranty. Includes (1) variable spot hand piece (3,4,5) Owner’s manual, safety eyewear Price: $29,995.00 (plus local sales tax) delivered, installed and in-serviced (AK and HI extra) Please call Raymond at 973-539-7444 or email [email protected] t Retiring t Monetization of your practice t Locking in your value now t Succession planning t Sell all or part of your practice Considering Selling Your Practice? Please call Jeff Queen at (866) 488-4100 or email [email protected] www.MyDermGroup.com Call for a FREE Consultation PRODUCTS (800) 416-2055 www.TransitionConsultants.com KENTUCKY SUN PROTECTION PA L M F R E E S UN W E AR UPF50 SUN GLOVES PALMFREESUNWEAR.COM CLASSIFIED WORKS! PRODUCTS & SERVICES ADVERTISING Call Karen Gerome to place your Showcase ad at 800.225.4569 ext. 2670 [email protected] September 2015 | Marketplace DermatologyTimes.com CAREERS FELLOWSHIP NATIONAL t )JHIMZDPNQFUJUJWFTBMBSZt 'VMMCFOFåUT Cosmetic Surgery Fellowship Position available for BE/BC dermatologist for July, 2016 Training in cosmetic dermatology, dermatologic surgery & laser surgery at renowned AAAHC accredited center in Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery, the largest dermatology practice in the country with over 115 locations, is seeking immediate full time Fellowship Trained Mohs Surgeons and General/Cosmetic Dermatologists. The group is going through expansive growth and positions are immediately available. Excellent opportunity to build an office practice! General/Cosmetic Derm Opportunities: Mohs* Opportunities: t 'VMMUJNFo$FOUSBM'- t 'VMMUJNF1IPFOJY4DPUUTEBMF"; t 'VMMUJNFo7FSP4FCBTUJBO'- t 'VMMUJNF0SMBOEP'- mid-town Manhattan. Includes SmartLipo, t 'VMMUJNFo'PSU$PMMJOT$0 Cellulaze, and over 40 lasers and EBD’s t 'VMMUJNFo'U.ZFST'- as well as exposure to plastic surgery t 'VMMUJNFo1FUPTLFZ.* procedures such as blepharoplasty, etc. t 'VMMUJNFo"MCBOZ(" Email CV to: [email protected] MEDICAL DERMATOLOGY FELLOWSHIP 1 – 2 years experience in management of complex medical dermatology patients in both private practice & teaching clinic. t 'VMMUJNF$FOUFSWJMMF0) t 'VMMUJNF1IJMBEFMQIJB1" t 1BSUUJNF4QBSUBOCVSH4$ t 'VMMUJNFo5SBWFSTF$JUZ.* For immediate consideration, TFOEZPVS$7UPEBZ * Multiple offices and Dermatologists feed into the Mohs surgery schedule 4VCNJU$7UP Christie Knowles at [email protected] PSDBMM Dr. Matt Leavitt, Founder & CEO Biologics, immunsuppressants, immunomodulators, clinical trials. PGY 5/6. Send CV & 2 LOR to: David Fivenson, MD. ²YHQVRQGHUPDWRORJ\#FRPFDVWQHW COLORADO BOULDER, COLORADO WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT NATIONAL Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com MOHS SURGEON MULTIPLE PART TIME OPPORTUNITIES Montrose, CO Enfield, CT Groton, CT Reno, NV Hickory, NC Sanford, NC Bountiful, UT Tampa, FL Calumet City, IL 1-2 days/mo 2-3 days/mo 1-2 days/mo 1-2 days/mo 1-2 days/mo 2-3 days/mo 3-4 days/mo 1-2 days/mo 1-2 days/mo MONTROSE, COLORADO Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com CONNECTICUT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, DC Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com CONNECTICUT FLORIDA ARIZONA Well Established, busy General/Surgical/ MOHS Dermatology practice in Phoenix, AZ area looking for a caring and ambitious BE/BC dermatologist for General/Surgical dermatology. Full or Part time - Great earning potential Please email C-V to: [email protected] CALIFORNIA GROTON, CONNECTICUT Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com TAMPA, FLORIDA Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com SOUTHBURY, CONNECTICUT WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com PORTERVILLE, CALIFORNIA Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com A D V E R T I S E T O D AY ! 93 94 Marketplace Dermatology Times | September 2015 CAREERS FLORIDA ILLINOIS START A NEW PRACTICE IN MIAMI BEACH! CALUMET CITY/DYER, IN Busy Derm office seeking FT or PT Dermatologist t Job available immediately t Stable long term position t Salary negotiable Please email resume to [email protected] Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com MASSACHUSETTS HAWAII MediSpa Hawaii needs a DERMATOLOGIST (Medical and Cosmetic) Needed in 5 locations in the Pacific Coastal Massachusetts DERMATOLOGIST Large, multispecialty practice located in North Dartmouth, MA is a seeking to add another BC/BE dermatologist. One year to full partnership. Current dermatologist earning $450K+ working three days per week doing only medical and surgical dermatology. ) Pearl City ) Honolulu ) Hilo ) Kona ) Guam Profit share of 45% for you, entrepreneurial. Send CV to [email protected] or call 808 485 1122 Interested candidates email to: [email protected] MONTANA MASSACHUSETTS WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com Join our team in bettering the lives of our patients – exciting opportunity located in beautiful Big Sky Country - Billings, Montana DERMATOLOGIST St. Vincent Healthcare in Billings, Montana seeks U.S. trained $'$%EGTVKƂGF physician for our Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center. U Full time employed position. U Dermatopathologist in house. U St. Vincent Healthcare’s laboratory is accredited by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and our cancer program is recognized by the Commission on Cancer (CoC) as an Approved Cancer Program. U Full complement of medical specialties available. U Thriving medical community in a family-oriented suburban location. U čLÕ`>ÌÀiVÀi>Ì>>VÌÛÌiÃÞi>ÀÀÕ`q}]Ã}]wÃ}]L}>`V> «}° U Competitive salaries with productivity incentives. U Start date bonus, Moving Allowances and CME reimbursement. For more information, please contact a physician recruiter: NEW MEXICO SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com NEW YORK BUFFALO, NEW YORK Associate Opportunity Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com %CTTKG$CNNCTF at (406) 237-4002 or [email protected] Therese Teske at (406) 237-4017 or [email protected] RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING Can Work For You! Reach highly-targeted, market-specific business professionals, industry experts and prospects by placing your ad here! &632<1%2,%88%22=' 7))/-2+794)6:-7-2+()61%8303+-78 6IGIRXP]FSEVHGIVXM½IH# 6IXMVIH# 0SSOMRKXSKS4EVX8MQI# 0SSOMRKXSWTIRHQSVIXMQI[MXLXLIJEQMP]# ;IPPIWXEFPMWLIHXLVMZMRKQYPXMGIRXIV(IVQEXSPSK] TVEGXMGIWIIOMRKE7YTIVZMWMRK(IVQEXSPSKMWX [MXLPMQMXIHTEXMIRXGEVIVIWTSRWMFMPMXMIW ,MKLP]GSQTIXMXMZIGSQTIRWEXMSR )1%-0':()612=1$KQEMPGSQ September 2015 | Marketplace DermatologyTimes.com CAREERS NORTH CAROLINA OREGON HICKORY, NC EUGENE, OREGON Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com OKLAHOMA Part Time/Full Time Position General/Cosmetic/Surgical Dermatology Spectacular Scenic Beauty Excellent Benefits Fax CV & Cover Letter to 541-683-5206 Or Call 541-681-5090 TEXAS EAST TEXAS Tulsa, Oklahoma Premier Dermatology Practice The Skin Cancer Center at the Tulsa Cancer Institute is seeking a Board Certified/Eligible Dermatologist to add to its practice of cutaneous oncology. Expertise and interest in melanoma and Mohs surgery required. Established Practice – 40 Yrs. BC/BE Dermatologist PT/FT The Tulsa Cancer Institute is the largest physician-owned oncology network in the state offering services at five cancer centers throughout Oklahoma with board certified physicians specializing in Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Gyn-Oncology, and Dermatology/ Mohs Surgery. Excellent opportunity to join a patient centered practice in a collegial clinical atmosphere with academic and research opportunities as well as housed in a state of the art facility. Benefits include base salary guarantee with production bonus, health insurance, vacation/CME and the opportunity for partnership in 2 years. For further information contact: Edward H. Yob, DO at [email protected] or call 918-307-0215 Excellent Benefits & Growth Potential Clinical Analysis for Today’s Skincare Specialists Content Licensing for Every Marketing Strategy Medical, Surgical, Cosmetic Mohs Surgery Send Cover Letter and CV to: Marketing solutions [email protected] Contact (214) 862-0017 UTAH BOUNTIFUL, UTAH Associate to Partner Opportunity. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com VIRGINIA FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA Partnership available. Established practice. Contact Karey, (866) 488-4100 or www.MyDermGroup.com fit for: Outdoor | Direct Mail Print Advertising Tradeshow/POP Displays Social Media Radio & TV Leverage branded content from Dermatology Times to create a more powerful and sophisticated statement about your product, service, or company in your CLASSIFIED WORKS! next marketing campaign. Contact Wright’s Media to find out more RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING Call Joanna Shippoli to place your Recruitment ad at 800.225.4569 ext. 2615 [email protected] about how we can customize your acknowledgements and recognitions to enhance your marketing strategies. For information, call Wright’s Media at 877.652.5295 or visit our website at www.wrightsmedia.com 95 96 THE TAKEAWAY ® SEPTEMBER 2015 ⁄ DERMATOLOGYTIMES.COM TAKEAWAY: Risk stratification and procedural dermatology from page 88 we’re composing a survey to determine current management patterns for pediatric psoriasis in the United States [The MAPP US Study: Management Approaches to Pediatric Psoriasis in the United States], because we assume that there’s a huge divergence in the way patients are approached in this country and among clinicians in other countries. We’ll extend the survey to Canada as well. We’re trying to gather data to inform future research and move us closer to achieving consensus in the area of management and risk stratification for purposes of evaluating children with psoriasis for comorbidities. Of course psoriasis projects are always hot on the front burner. Other projects at the moment include a study exploring refractory pediatric lupus panniculitis (LEP). Most of the published articles about lupus panniculitis indicate that pediatric patients get better with hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), rarely requiring additional medications. My experience with three or four patients with severe, refractory, disfiguring disease on massive systemic immunosuppression prompted further investigation. Other than those cases ultimately diagnosed with subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma, there is not much published about refractory LEP. My other passion is procedural dermatology. I enjoy an active laser practice and we are putting together our experience using the long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser to treat pediatric vascular malformations such as glomuvenous and venous malformations. There are gaps in the pediatric procedural literature and based on years of practice, we are looking forward to being able to make a contribution in this area. DT REFERENCES 1. Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):327-49. https:// www.aad.org/education/clinical-guidelines 2. Marqueling AL, Cordoro KM. Systemic treatments for severe pediatric psoriasis: a practical approach. Dermatol Clin. 2013;31(2):267-88. 3. Paller AS, Siegfried EC, Langley RG, et al. Etanercept treatment for children and adolescents with plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(3):241-51. 4. Cordoro KM, Gupta D, Frieden IJ, Mccalmont T, Kashani-sabet M. Pediatric melanoma: results of a large cohort study and proposal for modified ABCD detection criteria for children. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(6):913-25. 5. Mathes EF, Oza V, Frieden IJ, et al. “Eczema coxsackium” and unusual cutaneous findings in an enterovirus outbreak. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):e149-57. CHICAGO 2015 ASDS ANNUAL MEE TING OC TOBER 15-18 The premier educational experience for dermatologists committed to excellence in cosmetic, Mohs, reconstructive and general dermatologic surgery procedures. ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Mor& " "#"! &#"' ! ! !"$! !"!!!! !""!" $!!" "! &"!$$""!" "! ! "!!!! ! """! !#!!"" %!#! !" !"!#"! # ## $ "" ! !"! '# "!# ! &""# "! !$"! #!"% "$"! Register today at asds.net/AnnualMeeting or by calling 847-956-0900. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT EPIDUO® FORTE (adapalene and benzoyl peroxide) GEL, 0.3% / 2.5% BRIEF SUMMARY This summary contains important information about EPIDUO FORTE (Ep-E-Do-Oh For-Tay) Gel. It is not meant to take the place of your doctor’s instructions. Read this information carefully before you start using EPIDUO FORTE Gel. Ask your doctor or pharmacist if you do not understand any of this information or if you want to know more about EPIDUO FORTE Gel. For full Prescribing Information and Patient Information, please see the package insert. WHAT IS EPIDUO FORTE GEL? EPIDUO FORTE Gel is a prescription medicine used on the skin (topical) to treat acne vulgaris. Acne vulgaris is a condition in which the skin has blackheads, whiteheads and pimples. WHO IS EPIDUO FORTE GEL FOR? EPIDUO FORTE Gel is for use in people 12 years of age and older. It is not known if EPIDUO FORTE Gel is safe and effective for children younger than 12 years old. Do not use EPIDUO FORTE Gel for a condition for which it was not prescribed. Do not give EPIDUO FORTE Gel to other people, even if they have the same symptoms you have. It may harm them. WHAT SHOULD I TELL MY DOCTOR BEFORE USING EPIDUO FORTE GEL? Before you use EPIDUO FORTE Gel, tell your doctor if you: B have other skin problems, including cuts or sunburn. B have any other medical conditions. B are pregnant or planning to become pregnant. It is not known if EPIDUO FORTE Gel can harm your unborn baby. Talk to your doctor if you are pregnant or planning to become pregnant. B are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. It is not known if EPIDUO FORTE Gel passes into your breast milk and if it can harm your baby. Talk to your doctor about the best way to feed your baby if you use EPIDUO FORTE Gel. Tell your doctor about all of the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements. Using other topical acne products may increase the irritation of your skin when used with EPIDUO FORTE Gel. WHAT SHOULD I AVOID WHILE USING EPIDUO FORTE GEL? B You should avoid spending time in sunlight or artificial sunlight, such as tanning beds or sunlamps. EPIDUO FORTE Gel can make your skin sensitive to sun and the light from tanning beds and sunlamps. You should use sunscreen and wear a hat and clothes that cover the areas treated with EPIDUO FORTE Gel if you have to be in the sunlight. B You should avoid weather extremes such as wind and cold as this may cause irritation to your skin. B You should avoid applying EPIDUO FORTE Gel to cuts, abrasions and sunburned skin. B You should avoid skin products that may dry or irritate your skin such as medicated or harsh soaps, astringents, cosmetics that have strong skin drying effects and products containing high levels of alcohol, spices or limes. B You should avoid the use of “waxing” as a hair removal method on skin treated with EPIDUO FORTE Gel. B EPIDUO FORTE Gel may bleach your clothes or hair. Allow EPIDUO FORTE Gel to dry completely before dressing to prevent bleaching of your clothes. WHAT ARE THE MOST COMMON SIDE EFFECTS OF EPIDUO FORTE GEL? EPIDUO FORTE Gel may cause serious side effects including: B Local skin reactions. Local skin reactions are most likely to happen during the first 4 weeks of treatment and usually lessen with continued use of EPIDUO FORTE Gel. Signs and symptoms of local skin reaction include: B Redness B Dryness B Scaling B Stinging or burning Tell your doctor right away if these side effects continue for longer than 4 weeks or get worse; you may have to stop using EPIDUO FORTE Gel. These are not all of the possible side effects of EPIDUO FORTE Gel. For more information, ask your doctor or pharmacist. You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA at www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088. You may also contact GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P. at 1-866-735-4137. HOW SHOULD I USE EPIDUO FORTE GEL? B Use EPIDUO FORTE Gel exactly as your doctor tells you to use it. EPIDUO FORTE Gel is for use on the skin only (topical). Do not use EPIDUO FORTE Gel in or on your mouth, eyes or vagina. B Apply EPIDUO FORTE Gel 1 time a day. B Do not use more EPIDUO FORTE Gel than you need to cover the treatment area. Using too much EPIDUO FORTE Gel or using it more than 1 time a day may increase your chance of skin irritation. APPLYING EPIDUO FORTE GEL: B Wash the area where the Gel will be applied with a mild or soapless cleanser and pat dry. B EPIDUO FORTE Gel comes in a pump. Depress the pump to dispense a small amount (about the size of a pea) of EPIDUO FORTE Gel and spread a thin layer over the affected area. B Wash your hands after applying the Gel. WHERE SHOULD I GO FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT EPIDUO FORTE GEL? B Talk to your doctor or pharmacist. B Go to www.EPIDUOFORTE.com or call 1-866-735-4137. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P., Fort Worth, Texas 76177 USA Revised: July 2015 20089-0415-BS Reference: 1. Epiduo Forte Clinical Study Report (SRE 18240). Data on file. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. ©2015 Galderma Laboratories, L.P. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. 14501 N. Freeway Fort Worth, TX 76177 EPI-00007 Printed in USA 07/15 www.epiduoforte.com/hcp PRESCRIBE EPIDUO FORTE GEL FOR POWERFUL CONTROL OF MODERATE TO SEVERE ACNE