Technical Assistance for Master Plan of Sisak New Port

Transcription

Project at a Glance
CONTACTS
Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport
and Infrastructure
Directorate for Transport Infrastructure
10 000 Zagreb, Krležin Gvozd 1a
Overall objective
Outputs
Development of IWT on
Master Plan for Sisak
the Sava River
Project objective
Provision of Technical Assistance for
the Master Plan of Sisak New Port
Time frame
Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) Study
An important part of the project work was dedicated to
EIA PROCEDURE
Data collection, public
network impacts
consultation, site visit
Study. This Study is the legally prescribed procedure
Ministry of Environmental
where contingent impacts of the project on the environ-
and Nature Protection: decision
ment (including nature) are assessed and environmental
on appropriate assessment
protection measures, impact mitigation measures and
monitoring programmes are prescribed.
NO
YES
DRAFTING OF
THE EIA REPORT
and agriculture, nature, hunting, noise, population, land-
(85% EU, 15% Croatia)
Beneficiary
Consultants
iC consulenten (AT)
TINA Vienna (AT)
impacts on ecological network
Hidrokonzalt (HR)
Geokon-Zagreb (HR)
End of ecological network
The environmental experts of the Consultant consider
compensated by a proposed set of measures. Therefore,
Feasibility Study and
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Assessment (EIA)
Draft Major Project Application
for EU Funding
Representation of the European
Commission in the Republic of Croatia
10 000 Zagreb
Ban Centre, Ulica Augusta Cesarca 4–10
T +385 1 46 81-300, F +322 2 985 796
[email protected]
www.ec.europa.eu/index_hr.htm
Central Finance and Contracting
Agency – CFCA
10 000 Zagreb
Ulica grada Vukovara 284, Object C
T +385 1 45 91-245, F +385 1 45 91-075
[email protected]
www.safu.hr
Port Authority Sisak
[email protected]
www.luckaupravasisak.hr
Submission of the final EIA Report (=Study) to the Ministry of
Environmental and Nature Protection: BEGINNING OF
iC consulenten Ziviltechniker GesmbH
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Technical Assistance
for Master Plan
of Sisak New Port
1120 Vienna, Schönbrunner Strasse 297
(November 2013)
T +43 1 521 69-0, F +43 1 521 69-180
the negative environmental impact of the construction
of Sisak New Port to be small which means that it can be
Land Surveying Study
www.mppi.hr
T +385 44 524-810, F +385 44 524-809
impact assessment
accidents. The Study provides a set of recommendations
adverse factors.
Port Infrastructure
[email protected]
44 000 Sisak, Rimska 28
scape as well as the impact of the project in case of
and obligatory measures to avoid and/or to minimise
· Preliminary Design for
Budget
The EIA Study assessed the impact of the project in the
construction and operation phases on air, waters, soil
· SWOT Analysis
· Expropriation and
(appropriate assessment of
included in the EIA Report)
· Transport Forecast
· Geotechnical Study
the preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment
· Transport Analysis
August 2012 – December 2013
1,435,120 EUR
Screening of ecological
New Port
T +385 1 37 83-928, F +385 1 37 83-901
[email protected]
1st committee meeting with site visit
EuropeAid/130819/D/SER/HR
www.ic-group.org
Port layout at different development stages
a positive decision of the responsible environmental
authority in the course of the execution of the EIA is
Comments, suggestions, amendments to the EIA Report
expected. In the elaboration phase of the EIA Study, the
Consultant consulted in a very early stage local and
regional NGOs as well as the most affected inhabitants
from near-by villages in the framework of several stake-
Supported by
Amended EIA Report delivered to the county which organises
public insight and 1-month public hearing
holder meetings. This open planning approach was
chosen in order to enable the integration of citizens'
know-how and to respect their fears and needs.
European Union. Investing in future!
Comments from public taken into account and final version
The project is co-financed by the EU from
of EIA Report drafted
the European Regional Development Fund,
Transport Operational Programme 2007–2013.
2nd committee meeting takes place where environmental
and health protection measures are discussed –
final agreement on the EIA Report reached
The contents of this publication
Ministry issues official decision – END OF THE EIA PROCEDURE
are the responsibility of
iC consulenten Ziviltechniker GesmbH.
This Project is implemented by a consortium led by
iC consulenten Ziviltechniker GesmbH in co-operation with the
Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure
Project at a Glance
CONTACTS
and Infrastructure
Overall objective
Outputs
the Sava River
Project objective
Time frame
EIA PROCEDURE
network impacts
NO
YES
DRAFTING OF
THE EIA REPORT
Beneficiary
Consultants
iC consulenten (AT)
TINA Vienna (AT)
Hidrokonzalt (HR)
Geokon-Zagreb (HR)
Assessment (EIA)
for EU Funding
10 000 Zagreb
T +385 1 46 81-300, F +322 2 985 796
[email protected]
Agency – CFCA
10 000 Zagreb
T +385 1 45 91-245, F +385 1 45 91-075
[email protected]
www.safu.hr
[email protected]
for Master Plan
of Sisak New Port
(November 2013)
T +43 1 521 69-0, F +43 1 521 69-180
www.mppi.hr
T +385 44 524-810, F +385 44 524-809
impact assessment
adverse factors.
Port Infrastructure
[email protected]
Budget
· SWOT Analysis
1,435,120 EUR
New Port
T +385 1 37 83-928, F +385 1 37 83-901
[email protected]
www.ic-group.org
Supported by
Project at a Glance
CONTACTS
and Infrastructure
Overall objective
Outputs
the Sava River
Project objective
Time frame
EIA PROCEDURE
network impacts
NO
YES
DRAFTING OF
THE EIA REPORT
Beneficiary
Consultants
iC consulenten (AT)
TINA Vienna (AT)
Hidrokonzalt (HR)
Geokon-Zagreb (HR)
Assessment (EIA)
for EU Funding
10 000 Zagreb
T +385 1 46 81-300, F +322 2 985 796
[email protected]
Agency – CFCA
10 000 Zagreb
T +385 1 45 91-245, F +385 1 45 91-075
[email protected]
www.safu.hr
[email protected]
for Master Plan
of Sisak New Port
(November 2013)
T +43 1 521 69-0, F +43 1 521 69-180
www.mppi.hr
T +385 44 524-810, F +385 44 524-809
impact assessment
adverse factors.
Port Infrastructure
[email protected]
Budget
· SWOT Analysis
1,435,120 EUR
New Port
T +385 1 37 83-928, F +385 1 37 83-901
[email protected]
www.ic-group.org
Supported by
Sisak New Port –
Important Element of Croatian
Waterway Transport Policy
Port Engineering
Appropriate infrastructure and a well-developed transport
INTEGRATED PROJECT APPROACH
system are essential prerequisites for a sustainable economic
development. Therefore, the Republic of Croatia puts significant
efforts into the improvement of the transport system based on
national priorities and as part of the European transport networks. The promotion of river transportation is a core element
of the Croatian transport strategy. Within the work of the International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC) a comprehensive
plan for the rehabilitation of the Sava waterway was elaborated.
The rehabilitation of the Sava River with guaranteed minimum
fairway depths is an important prerequisite for a successful
investment into Sisak New Port.
Sisak New Port will function as:
the entire area adjoining to the Sava River)
was split into three time phases (2020,
it was necessary to provide pertinent geo-
database and carried out interviews with
· Hub for waterborne transport
2025 and 2035). Each development phase
technical designs of deep foundations, soil
stakeholders of the regional manufactur-
foresees an enlargement of dedicated port
consolidation and improvements as well as
ing industry and relevant transport and
infrastructure as well as port superstruc-
for the protection of building pits.
logistics companies. This consolidated car-
chains in the Greater Zagreb
region & Sisak – Moslavina county
· Logistics centre for local & regional
industrial production & trade
· Catalyst for (re-)industrialisation in
a region with structural economic
problems & high unemployment
Ljubljana
· Dynamic port development concept
Corridor X (Road)
Corridor X (Rail)
Zagreb
Brezice
Rijeka
(Port)
SAVA RIVER
Corridor Vb (Road)
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Sisak
addressing infrastructure needs and
financing possibilities (smart staging
Samac
Sr. Mitrovica
Slovanski Bosanski
Brod
Brod
Brcko
Sabac
DANUBE RIVER
Belgrade
Banja Luka
Sarajevo
Split
Maritime
corridor
Corridor Vc (Road)
Corridor Vc (Rail)
Source: ISRBC
Maritime
corridor
Ploce
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
Future port area of Sisak
Constanta
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
to UNECE waterway class Vb (BelgradeBrcko) and IV (up to Sisak) and a guaranteed minimum fairway depth are conditio
sine-qua-non for all development phases.
Cost-effective navigation was assumed to
be possible on the Sava River as of 2018.
With a planned port throughput of
stakeholders including NGOs
DANUBE RIVER
ture. The rehabilitation of the Sava River
and phasing)
· Cost-effective state of technology
solutions
· Highest environmental respect
435,000 tons of dry cargo for 2020
(main scenario) the construction of two
berths is foreseen. The increase of cargo
up to 609,000 tons by 2025 will require
two more berths for optimal port opera-
the impact of changes of the river channel
three scenarios (low, main and high) representing different economic develop-
tion measures. The calculations of water
ment paths. The Study yielded economic-
levels and flow velocities showed the
ally sound transhipment volumes for the
highest increase of water levels of
new port in all scenarios: For 2035 as
800
+0.02 m/s on the upstream section and
target year, they stretch from more than
the highest increase of flow velocities
600,000 tons p. a. (low scenario) to
on the downstream section of +0.10 m/s.
Therefore, the construction of retention
600
The operating costs (OPEX) were broken down into three cate-
Operating revenues (REVIN) amount to a total of approx. 147
gories: labour costs, public utilities costs (electricity, gas, water,
million EUR of which: real estate revenues 103 million EUR,
drainage, sewage), miscellaneous costs (including the maintenance
equipment rental revenues 31 million EUR, port dues to cargo
of infrastructure as well of superstructure). The operating ex-
and ships revenues 12 million EUR, port revenues related to
penses amount to approx. 22 million EUR of which the largest
administrative operations 1.5 million EUR.
part (62.9%) are miscellaneous costs, followed by labour costs
(35%) and public utilities costs (2.1%).
400
200
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
RISK ANALYSIS
The project requires an EU grant since
The economic performance indicators
Results are quite robust and therefore
the results show a negative financial net
(EIRR-economic Net Present Value, Eco-
the project is considered to have an
1,100,000 p. a. (main scenario) to nearly
present value – FNPV (C) and a financial
nomic Internal rate of return – EIRR and
acceptable level of risk due to low values
2,000,000 tons p. a. (high scenario).
rate of return – FRR (C) below the bench-
benefits to cost – B/C ratio) were calculat-
of standard deviation.
basins as compensation storage is suggest-
marked nominal Financial Discount Rate –
ed. The results show that the project is
ed as the most favourable measure from
FDR. The financial performance indicators
feasible since economic performance
The preliminary technical solution which
technical, hydrological and ecological
as regards national contribution (FRR(K)
indicators show very good positive
was based on a selection of three port
aspects.
>0, FNPV(K) <0) shows normal results for
results (EIRR>social discount rate – SDR,
a major public infrastructure project.
ENPV is positive and amounts to approx.
tions which allow further specialisation
by cargo type. For the third phase with
assumed 717,000 tons of dry cargo and
389,000 tons of liquid cargo the construction of an additional basin for liquid cargo
with two berths is planned.
port authority, customs and workshops.
Agricultural products
for Environment & Waterway
well as all necessary internal transport
Development in the Danube River
infrastructure inlcuding railway lines with
Coal
Hydraulic modelling of port entrance – reduced flow velocity
The port infrastructure planning for Sisak
New Port was based on comprehensive
68
75
79
5
6
6
154
200
222
234
83
113
125
132
Food products
0
0
0
0
Textiles and products
0
0
0
0
21
28
31
33
7
10
11
12
90
139
156
164
104
136
151
159
8
13
14
15
Basic metals and products
94
136
152
160
Machinery and equipment
0
0
0
0
Transport and equipment
0
0
0
0
Other manufactured goods
0
0
0
0
60
79
88
92
collection of relevant geological, geotech-
Refined petroleum products
nical and seismological data. These data
Fertilisers
provided the input for drafting the prelim-
Other chemical products
inary technical solution and for executing
Other non-metallic mineral pr.
the Environmental Impact Assessment
layers and on the ground water level were
gained.
Current speed [m/s]
above 0.375
0.35–0.375
0.325–0.35
0.3–0.325
0.275–0.3
0.25–0.275
0.225–0.25
0.2–0.225
0.175–0.2
0.15–0.175
0.125–0.15
0.1–0.125
0.075–0.1
0.05–0.075
0.025–0.05
below 0.025
undefined value
Sec. raw mat., scrap
Other goods
Total
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Results indicate that operating revenues,
CAPEX (capital investment) as well as
cargo traffic flows are critical variables
since the variation of FNPV/ENPV is
bigger than +/-1%.
society.
4
Policies
2035
the project is clearly beneficial for the
51
Wood and products
2030
MAIN SCENARIO
2035
geotechnical analyses which led to the
2025
110 million EUR; the B/C ratio is 2.3), and
2030
ment in line with EU Regional
geometry and existence of characteristic
2020
2025
Metal ores & mineral products
parking.
the composition of the ground surface, the
2015
2020
Crude oil
shunting station, internal roads and car
on site and in laboratory, detailed data on
2010
Main scenario up to 2035 [‘000 tons]
trative facilities including buildings for the
Study. With the geotechnical investigations
0
TRANSPORT FORECAST FOR SISAK NEW PORT
layout variants also foresees all adminis-
sewage, electricity, etc. were defined as
EU initiatives and projects
upgrade
1.000
for flood protection and flood risk mitiga-
intentions of the “Joint Statement
· Interaction with related national &
preparation (29%) and miscellaneous costs (20%).
Sava waterway
1.200
The hydraulic study also provided results
Up & downstream
part of strategic regional develop-
EUR of which 44% belong to infrastructure costs, followed by site
2018:
tiated by commodities and elaborated in
utilities such as communication, water,
· Port development as integrated
tingency costs). The CAPEX costs amount to approx. 128 million
2030 & 2035. All forecasts were differen-
operations entering and leaving the port.
Corridors and the layout of all relevant
Basin”
buildings, safety and security devices, planning and other con-
1.400
volumes were forecasted for 2020, 2025,
contributed to ensure save nautical
structure costs, miscellaneous costs (including facility services,
1.600
In a next step, the future transhipment
served the environmental analysis and
installations), transhipment facilities and equipment/super-
Low scenario
elaborated for 2015, 2025 and 2035.
port development phase. This study
aration, infrastructure costs (road, railway, waterway, outdoor
Main scenario
1.800
this analysis the transport forecast was
on the existing flow conditions in each
They were divided into 4 categories: costs related to site prep-
High scenario
to transport on the Sava River. From
COMMODITIES
· Planning process based on the
the project’s engineering design and associated cost estimates.
national and international cargoes affine
ling study was executed which assessed
Investment costs/capital expenditures (CAPEX) are derived from
2.000
level to obtain a consistent transport flow
go database includes the flows of existing
In addition, a special 2-D hydraulic model-
Cost and Benefit
Analysis
Forecast of Sisak New Port transhipment volume [‘000 tons]
infrastructure build-up of Sisak New Port
communities and other relevant
Corridor Vb (Rail)
borehole samples (drilling core)
sources on the national and international
seen site are rather unfavourable (like in
and regional authorities, business
Corridor Xb (Road)
The Consultant analysed all statistical
As the geotechnical conditions of the fore-
activities and the transport demand, the
· Close interaction with municipal
RHINE – MAIN – DANUBE
On-site investigations and
In relation to the growth of economic
Applied planning principles:
Sava waterway within the transport network
Transport and Market Study
8
10
11
12
685
936
1,043
1,100
Nominal costs in EUR
PHASE I | 2020
PHASE II | 2025
PHASE III | 2035
TOTAL
% TOTAL
Capital investment
A. Construction site preparation
11,148,317
9,661,874.30
16,350,864
37,161,055
29%
B. Infrastructure costs
33,265,551
12,404,104
10,712,635
56,382,290
44%
C. Transhipment facilities costs
6,368,636
2,601,274
0
8,969,910
7%
D. Miscellaneous costs
14,864,422
5,381,946
5,381,946
25,628,314
20%
Total (EUR)
65,646,926
30,049,198
32,445,445
128,141,569
100%
Operating expenses
2,341,838
2,888,267
2,576,022
7,806,128
35%
B. Public utilities costs
A. Labour costs
126,008
154,009
186,678
466,695
2%
C. Miscellaneous costs
6,446,960
3,924,236
3,643,934
14,015,130
63%
Total (EUR)
8,914,806
6,966,513
6,406,634
22,287,953
100%
ERDF/CF contribution
21,934,390
EIB loan
60,207,177
National contribution
Total (EUR)
46,000,000
128,141,567
Sisak New Port –
Port Engineering
Ljubljana
Corridor X (Road)
Corridor X (Rail)
Zagreb
Brezice
Rijeka
(Port)
SAVA RIVER
Corridor Vb (Road)
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Sisak
Samac
Sr. Mitrovica
Slovanski Bosanski
Brod
Brod
Brcko
Sabac
DANUBE RIVER
Belgrade
Banja Luka
Sarajevo
Split
Maritime
corridor
Corridor Vc (Road)
Corridor Vc (Rail)
Source: ISRBC
Maritime
corridor
Ploce
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
Constanta
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
DANUBE RIVER
and phasing)
solutions
800
600
400
200
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
RISK ANALYSIS
aspects.
Coal
68
75
79
5
6
6
154
200
222
234
83
113
125
132
Food products
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
28
31
33
7
10
11
12
90
139
156
164
104
136
151
159
8
13
14
15
94
136
152
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
79
88
92
Fertilisers
gained.
Current speed [m/s]
above 0.375
0.35–0.375
0.325–0.35
0.3–0.325
0.275–0.3
0.25–0.275
0.225–0.25
0.2–0.225
0.175–0.2
0.15–0.175
0.125–0.15
0.1–0.125
0.075–0.1
0.05–0.075
0.025–0.05
below 0.025
undefined value
Other goods
Total
bigger than +/-1%.
society.
4
Policies
2035
51
Wood and products
2030
MAIN SCENARIO
2035
2025
2030
2020
2025
parking.
2015
2020
Crude oil
2010
0
upgrade
1.000
Sava waterway
1.200
Up & downstream
2018:
Basin”
1.400
1.600
Low scenario
Main scenario
1.800
High scenario
COMMODITIES
2.000
Cost and Benefit
Analysis
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Corridor Xb (Road)
8
10
11
12
685
936
1,043
1,100
PHASE I | 2020
PHASE II | 2025
PHASE III | 2035
TOTAL
% TOTAL
Capital investment
11,148,317
9,661,874.30
16,350,864
37,161,055
29%
33,265,551
12,404,104
10,712,635
56,382,290
44%
6,368,636
2,601,274
0
8,969,910
7%
14,864,422
5,381,946
5,381,946
25,628,314
20%
Total (EUR)
65,646,926
30,049,198
32,445,445
128,141,569
100%
Operating expenses
2,341,838
2,888,267
2,576,022
7,806,128
35%
A. Labour costs
126,008
154,009
186,678
466,695
2%
6,446,960
3,924,236
3,643,934
14,015,130
63%
Total (EUR)
8,914,806
6,966,513
6,406,634
22,287,953
100%
21,934,390
EIB loan
60,207,177
Total (EUR)
46,000,000
128,141,567
Sisak New Port –
Port Engineering
Ljubljana
Corridor X (Road)
Corridor X (Rail)
Zagreb
Brezice
Rijeka
(Port)
SAVA RIVER
Corridor Vb (Road)
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Sisak
Samac
Sr. Mitrovica
Slovanski Bosanski
Brod
Brod
Brcko
Sabac
DANUBE RIVER
Belgrade
Banja Luka
Sarajevo
Split
Maritime
corridor
Corridor Vc (Road)
Corridor Vc (Rail)
Source: ISRBC
Maritime
corridor
Ploce
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
Constanta
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
DANUBE RIVER
and phasing)
solutions
800
600
400
200
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
RISK ANALYSIS
aspects.
Coal
68
75
79
5
6
6
154
200
222
234
83
113
125
132
Food products
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
28
31
33
7
10
11
12
90
139
156
164
104
136
151
159
8
13
14
15
94
136
152
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
79
88
92
Fertilisers
gained.
Current speed [m/s]
above 0.375
0.35–0.375
0.325–0.35
0.3–0.325
0.275–0.3
0.25–0.275
0.225–0.25
0.2–0.225
0.175–0.2
0.15–0.175
0.125–0.15
0.1–0.125
0.075–0.1
0.05–0.075
0.025–0.05
below 0.025
undefined value
Other goods
Total
bigger than +/-1%.
society.
4
Policies
2035
51
Wood and products
2030
MAIN SCENARIO
2035
2025
2030
2020
2025
parking.
2015
2020
Crude oil
2010
0
upgrade
1.000
Sava waterway
1.200
Up & downstream
2018:
Basin”
1.400
1.600
Low scenario
Main scenario
1.800
High scenario
COMMODITIES
2.000
Cost and Benefit
Analysis
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Corridor Xb (Road)
8
10
11
12
685
936
1,043
1,100
PHASE I | 2020
PHASE II | 2025
PHASE III | 2035
TOTAL
% TOTAL
Capital investment
11,148,317
9,661,874.30
16,350,864
37,161,055
29%
33,265,551
12,404,104
10,712,635
56,382,290
44%
6,368,636
2,601,274
0
8,969,910
7%
14,864,422
5,381,946
5,381,946
25,628,314
20%
Total (EUR)
65,646,926
30,049,198
32,445,445
128,141,569
100%
Operating expenses
2,341,838
2,888,267
2,576,022
7,806,128
35%
A. Labour costs
126,008
154,009
186,678
466,695
2%
6,446,960
3,924,236
3,643,934
14,015,130
63%
Total (EUR)
8,914,806
6,966,513
6,406,634
22,287,953
100%
21,934,390
EIB loan
60,207,177
Total (EUR)
46,000,000
128,141,567
Sisak New Port –
Port Engineering
Ljubljana
Corridor X (Road)
Corridor X (Rail)
Zagreb
Brezice
Rijeka
(Port)
SAVA RIVER
Corridor Vb (Road)
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Sisak
Samac
Sr. Mitrovica
Slovanski Bosanski
Brod
Brod
Brcko
Sabac
DANUBE RIVER
Belgrade
Banja Luka
Sarajevo
Split
Maritime
corridor
Corridor Vc (Road)
Corridor Vc (Rail)
Source: ISRBC
Maritime
corridor
Ploce
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
Constanta
(Port)
Maritime
corridor
DANUBE RIVER
and phasing)
solutions
800
600
400
200
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
RISK ANALYSIS
aspects.
Coal
68
75
79
5
6
6
154
200
222
234
83
113
125
132
Food products
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
28
31
33
7
10
11
12
90
139
156
164
104
136
151
159
8
13
14
15
94
136
152
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
79
88
92
Fertilisers
gained.
Current speed [m/s]
above 0.375
0.35–0.375
0.325–0.35
0.3–0.325
0.275–0.3
0.25–0.275
0.225–0.25
0.2–0.225
0.175–0.2
0.15–0.175
0.125–0.15
0.1–0.125
0.075–0.1
0.05–0.075
0.025–0.05
below 0.025
undefined value
Other goods
Total
bigger than +/-1%.
society.
4
Policies
2035
51
Wood and products
2030
MAIN SCENARIO
2035
2025
2030
2020
2025
parking.
2015
2020
Crude oil
2010
0
upgrade
1.000
Sava waterway
1.200
Up & downstream
2018:
Basin”
1.400
1.600
Low scenario
Main scenario
1.800
High scenario
COMMODITIES
SISAK NEW PORT VISUALISATION
Sava River km 584.5–586.5
2.000
Cost and Benefit
Analysis
Corridor Vb (Rail)
Corridor Xb (Road)
8
10
11
12
685
936
1,043
1,100
PHASE I | 2020
PHASE II | 2025
PHASE III | 2035
TOTAL
% TOTAL
Capital investment
11,148,317
9,661,874.30
16,350,864
37,161,055
29%
33,265,551
12,404,104
10,712,635
56,382,290
44%
6,368,636
2,601,274
0
8,969,910
7%
14,864,422
5,381,946
5,381,946
25,628,314
20%
Total (EUR)
65,646,926
30,049,198
32,445,445
128,141,569
100%
Operating expenses
2,341,838
2,888,267
2,576,022
7,806,128
35%
A. Labour costs
126,008
154,009
186,678
466,695
2%
6,446,960
3,924,236
3,643,934
14,015,130
63%
Total (EUR)
8,914,806
6,966,513
6,406,634
22,287,953
100%
21,934,390
EIB loan
60,207,177
Total (EUR)
46,000,000
128,141,567
Project at a Glance
CONTACTS
and Infrastructure
Overall objective
Outputs
the Sava River
Project objective
Time frame
EIA PROCEDURE
network impacts
NO
YES
DRAFTING OF
THE EIA REPORT
Beneficiary
Consultants
iC consulenten (AT)
TINA Vienna (AT)
Hidrokonzalt (HR)
Geokon-Zagreb (HR)
Assessment (EIA)
for EU Funding
10 000 Zagreb
T +385 1 46 81-300, F +322 2 985 796
[email protected]
Agency – CFCA
10 000 Zagreb
T +385 1 45 91-245, F +385 1 45 91-075
[email protected]
www.safu.hr
[email protected]
for Master Plan
of Sisak New Port
(November 2013)
T +43 1 521 69-0, F +43 1 521 69-180
www.mppi.hr
T +385 44 524-810, F +385 44 524-809
impact assessment
adverse factors.
Port Infrastructure
[email protected]
Budget
· SWOT Analysis
1,435,120 EUR
New Port
T +385 1 37 83-928, F +385 1 37 83-901
[email protected]
www.ic-group.org
Supported by

Technical Assistance for Master Plan of Sisak New Port

Transcription

Similar documents

Napoleon Container Terminal

PDF 1mb - Marina Adelaide

#104 300 Klahanie Drive • Port Moody

The project incorporates two types of new architecture

Dog Meet and Greet! Saturday June 6th

Proceeds go to support NJROTC scholarships and the Port

Port Operations

Cool Connections - Port of Los Angeles

A Port Profile - Port Washington School

Greater Houston Port Bureau, Capt. Bill Diehl