Report WEF Plankenbrug sewer HIA
Transcription
Report WEF Plankenbrug sewer HIA
Case No. 1400211AS1002E HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED UPGRADING OF THE EXISTING PLANKENBRUG MAIN OUTFALL SEWER AND ASSOCIATED WORKS IN STELLENBOSCH, WESTERN CAPE Assessment conducted under Section 38 (3) of the National Heritage Resource Act (No. 25 of 1999) Prepared for: WITHERS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Att: Mr Charl Cilliers PO Box 6118, Uniedal, 7612 E-mail: [email protected] Client: STELLENBOSCH MUNICIPALITY By Jonathan Kaplan Agency for Cultural Resource Management 5 Stuart Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Ph/Fax: 021 6857589 Cellular: 082 321 0172 Email: [email protected] JUNE 2015 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch Executive summary Introduction ACRM was appointed to conduct a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer and associated works in Stellenbosch in the Western Cape. The development proposal The project entails the upgrading and construction of new sewers in two areas (referred to as Area A & Area B) in Stellenbosch as the existing sewer line’s capacity is insufficient to convey current and predicted future flows to the Stellenbosch Waste Water Treatment Works. For the purpose of this heritage assessment, the study is concerned only with the proposed new sewer line between Points A2 and A3 (in Area A), at Bosman’s Crossing. The proposed new sewer line at Bosman’s Crossing intrudes marginally into the south western corner of the Papagaaiberg Cemetery, alongside Distillery Road. Mindful of the presence of graves, the sewer pipe in this area will be installed by means of pipe jacking (or horizontal drilling) to a depth of between 8m and 10m, where it will run beneath the cemetery on Erf 285. This type of installation (a form of tunneling) is commonly used wherever a pipeline needs to be buried under major roadways. When installing the sewer pipe in this manner, no impact is caused to structures or features at ground level. It is therefore unlikely that visible graves will be impacted by this method of construction. A shallow trench will also be excavated between the cemetery caretaker’s house to the new sewer line alongside Distillery Road. The alignment of this portion of the pipeline is located outside the cadastral boundary of the cemetery (Erf 285) and therefore no graves are likely to be intersected by the excavations. The proposed new sewer line will pass close to a large sandstone boulder designating the Bosman’s Crossing Provincial Heritage Site (PHS), between Adam Tas Road and Distillery Road. This important landmark has been noted by the project engineers (AECOM) and has been set aside as an `Archaeological Reserve’ and will not be impacted by proposed construction work. The existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer alongside Distillery Road will be retained while the new sewer line is constructed. During construction of the Plankenbrug sewer outfall pipeline in the mid 1980’s, the pipeline between Points A2 and A3 was installed by trenching to a depth of between 10 and 12 m, and included a 20 m wide disturbed footprint at its widest point. According to Mr Chris Keyser (retired Municipal engineer) who was involved with the design and installation of the pipeline at the time, several `large stone implements’, were recovered from the spoil dumps. A Notification of Intent to Develop (NID) was completed by Withers Environmental Consultants (WEF) and submitted to Heritage Western Cape (HWC), who requested that a HIA, comprising an archaeological study, a palaeontological study, a built environment study, and a visual impact assessment must be done. However, following further correspondence between WEF and HWC, HWC issued a revised comment, requesting ACRM JUNE 2015 1 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch that a HIA still needs to be done, only focusing on the proposed sewer line between Point A and Point B at Bosman’s Crossing, with `an emphasis on historical archaeology especially the positioning of historical graves in the area and a brief overview of the MSA and LSA archaeology in that specific stretch’. Findings A field assessment of the proposed sewer line (Area A), between the Plankenbrug industrial area and the Stellenbosch Waste Water Treatment Works, was undertaken by ACRM on 5 June 2015. The following observations were made: Isolated Early Stone Age implements (angular chunks) were recorded alongside the banks of the Plankenbrug River, and Distillery Road (below the cemetery), including a dispersed scatter of ESA tools (chunks, flakes & a core) in open land alongside Adam Tas Road/the existing sewer outfall pipeline. Isolated lithics were also found in Devon Valley Road and at the entrance to the WWTW in Vredenburg Road. The remains have been graded as having low (Grade 3C) significance, due to the disturbed and isolated context in which they were found. The Bosman’s Crossing PHS is located about 30-40 m south of the existing Plankenbrug sewer outfall alongside Distillery Road, and will not be impacted by proposed construction activities. The important archaeological site has been demarcated as an Archaeological Reserve (cadastral 7036/1958). Nine grave sites were encountered alongside the fence inside the Papagaaiberg Cemetery, of which at least three occur within the alignment of the proposed new sewer line. Graves are graded as having high (Grade II) significance at a Provincial level. Conclusion The field assessment indicates that the proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug outfall sewer and associated works (between Point A2 & Point A3), and the method of construction (i. e. horizontal drilling/tunneling) will not impact on important archaeological heritage, including surface graves, as the pipe will be installed by means of pipe jacking at a depth of about 10m. No impact is caused to structures or features such as burials, at ground level, during this process. From a heritage perspective there are no fatal flaws and therefore, provided that recommendations are considered and/or implemented, there are no objections to the authorization of the proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer and associated works. Recommendations 1. No further archaeological mitigation is required. 2. If any unmarked human remains/burials are intersected during drilling operations, these must immediately be reported to the archaeologist (J Kaplan 082 321 ACRM JUNE 2015 2 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch 0172), or Heritage Western Cape (A. September 021 483 9543). Burials or remains must not be disturbed until inspected by a professional archaeologist. Burial remains must be treated sensitively at all times. ACRM JUNE 2015 3 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch Table of Contents Page Executive summary 1 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 5 3. HERITAGE LEGISLATION 8 4. TERMS OF REFERENCE 8 5. STUDY APPROACH 5.1 Method of survey 5.2 Constraints and limitations 5.3 Identification of potential risks 5.4 Archaeology of the study area 8 8 8 8 9 6. FINDINGS 6.1 Archaeology 6.2 Graves 9 9 12 7. IMPACT STATEMENT 7.1 Archaeology 7.2 Graves 13 13 13 8. CONCLUSION 13 9. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 10. REFERENCES 15 Appendix A ACRM JUNE 2015 4 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch 1. INTRODUCTION Withers Environmental Consultants (WEF), on behalf of Stellenbosch Municipality appointed the Agency for Cultural Resource Management to conduct a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer and associated works on Erf 265-3974, 380, 8933, 6840 & 6886-6296, 9726, 1/1147 & 9545 Stellenbosch, in the Western Cape (Figure 1). The HIA forms part of a Basic Assessment process that is being conducted by WEF. 2. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The project entails the upgrading and construction of new sewers in two areas (referred to as Area A & Area B) in Stellenbosch as the existing sewer line’s capacity is insufficient to convey current and predicted future flows to the Stellenbosch Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW). For the purpose of the heritage assessment, the study is only concerned with the proposed new sewer line between Points A2 and A3 (in Area A) at Bosman’s Crossing on the western side of the Plankenbrug River (Figure 2). The proposed new sewer at Bosman’s Crossing intrudes marginally into the south western corner of the Papagaaiberg Cemetery, alongside Distillery Road. Mindful of the presence of graves, the sewer pipe in this area will be installed by means of pipe jacking (or horizontal drilling) to a depth of between 8m and 10m, where it traverses beneath the cemetery on Erf 285. This type of installation (a form of tunneling) is commonly used wherever a pipeline needs to be buried under major roadways. When installing the sewer pipe in this manner, no impact is caused to structures or features at ground level. It is therefore unlikely that visible graves will be impacted by this method of construction. A shallow trench will also be constructed between the cemetery caretaker’s house, to the new sewer line alongside Distillery Road. The alignment of this portion of the pipeline is located outside the cadastral boundary of the cemetery (Erf 285) and therefore no graves are likely to be intersected by the excavations. The proposed new sewer passes close to a large sandstone boulder designating the Bosman’s Crossing Provincial Heritage Site (PHS) between Adam Tas Road and Distillery Road. This important landmark has been noted by the project engineers (AECOM) and has been set aside as an `Archaeological Reserve’ and will not be impacted by proposed construction operations. The existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer alongside Distillery Road will be retained while the new sewer line is constructed. During construction of the Plankenbrug main sewer pipeline in the mid 1980’s, the pipeline between Points A2 and A3 was installed by trenching to a depth of about 11 m and included a 20 m wide disturbed footprint at its widest point. According to the Mr Chris Keyser (pers. comm.), retired Municipal engineer, who was involved with the design and installation of the pipeline, several `large stone implements’, were recovered from the spoil dumps. A Notification of Intent to Develop (NID) was completed by Withers Environmental Consultants (WEF) and submitted to Heritage Western Cape (HWC), who requested that ACRM JUNE 2015 5 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch a HIA, comprising an archaeological study, a palaeontological study, a built environment study, and a visual impact assessment must be done (Case No. 1400211AS1002E1). However, following further correspondence between WEF and HWC, HWC issued a revised comment, requesting that a HIA still needs to be done, only focusing on the proposed sewer line between Point A and Point B at Bosman’s Crossing, with `an emphasis on historical archaeology especially the positioning of historical graves in the area and a brief overview of the MSA and LSA archaeology in that specific stretch2’. Figure 1. Locality map indicating the site for the proposed Plankenbrug main outfall sewer in Stellenbosch 1 HWC letter dated 22 October, 2014 Email sent by Mr A. September, of HWC to Withers Environmental Consultants, dated 28 May, 2015 2 ACRM JUNE 2015 6 Figure 2. Alignment of the proposed new Plankenbrug Sewer Line between positions A2 and A3 at Bosman’s Crossing. 3. HERITAGE LEGISLATION Section 38 (1) (a) of the National Heritage Resource Act (Act No. 25 of 199) indicates that any person constructing a powerline, pipeline or road, or similar linear development exceeding 300m in length is required to notify HWC, who will in turn advise whether an impact assessment report is needed before development can take place. This is to determine if the area contains heritage sites and to take the necessary steps to ensure that they are not damaged or destroyed during development. 4. TERMS OF REFERENCE The terms of reference for the heritage assessment were: • To identify any archaeological resources and graves that might be impacted by the proposed construction of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer between Point A2 and Point A3 (Area A of the proposed new sewer line). 5. STUDY APPROACH 5.1 Method A field assessment of the proposed Plankenbrug new sewer, from the Plankenbrug industrial area on the western bank of the river, till the Stellenbosch WWTW in Vredenburg Road, was undertaken on 5 June, 2015. As instructed, particular attention was paid to the section of the proposed new sewer between Point A2 and Point A3 (refer to Figure 2). Pre-colonial archaeological resources along the route were recorded using a hand held GPS device, set on the map datum WGS 84 (refer to Figure 12 in Appendix A). Surface graves in and close to, the proposed new sewer line were mapped. Retired municipal engineer Mr Chris Keyser, who was responsible for the design and construction of the original Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, was consulted. A desk top study was done. 5.2 Constraints and limitations No constraints or limitations were experienced, which would impact on the outcomes of the heritage study. 5.3 Identification of potential risks Unmarked or buried graves/remains may be intersected during installation of the new pipeline, but this is considered to be unlikely, given the method (i. e. horizontal drilling) and depth (± 8m) of construction operations that will be employed. Most of the burials in the Papagaaiberg Cemetery are marked with headstones and footstones, or bordered with bricks. However, some of the graves are unmarked and only evident by raised earth mounds. Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch 5.4 Archaeology of the study area Early Stone Age (ESA) implements were first discovered at Bosman’s Crossing at the foot of the Papagaaiberg alongside the Eerste River in Stellenbosch (Peringuey 1902, 1911; Seddon 1966). The artefacts exposed in the railway cutting, are associated with the younger gravels of the course alluvial fan on which much of Stellenbosch is situated, and are dated to the earlier part of the Middle Pleistocene, between 700 000 and 300 000 years ago (Deacon & Goosen 1997). Among these tools was an artefact type of great antiquity recognized as an early handaxe. For many years after this, the ESA of South Africa was referred to as the `Stellenbosch Culture' until the term was re-defined in the 1960s (Goodwin & Van Riet Lowe 1929). Today the ESA is divided into the `Olduwan' period, which is up to 1.7 million years old. This industry is associated with the oldest and most simple human-made artefacts. This was followed by the `Acheleun' Tradition, a more developed stone artefact industry, characterised by the presence of specific types of stone tools such as handaxes, choppers and cleavers. Acheleun sites have been recorded throughout the country and are especially associated with pans, river terraces, streams, and certain types of rock outcrops. Acheleun tools are also commonly found on mountain slopes, and in degraded areas such as slope washes, cuttings, excavations, and in vineyards and fields. ESA Acheleun artefacts have been documented at a number of locations in the Stellenbosch area, on the farms Spier, Meerust, Lynedoch, Hartlands, Vlottenberg and De Wijnlanden (Kaplan 2002), and on several farms to the east of the R310, at Croyden (Kaplan 2005, 2004) and Faure (Kaplan 2006). Large numbers of tools including handaxes, cleavers, cores, and flakes have also been documented in agricultural lands and vineyards during an investigation of the De Zalze Golf Estate (Kaplan 2009) while a rich Acheleun site occurs on the Farm Blaauklippen, on the upper slopes of the Helderberg (Deacon and Goosen 1997). ESA flakes and angular chunks have also found on the lower slopes of the Papagaaiberg (Kaplan 2010). 6. FINDINGS 6.1 Archaeology Figure 12 in Appendix A illustrates the location of archaeological resources recorded along the existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer, between the Plankenbrug industrial area and the WWTW in Vredenburg Road. A spreadsheet of waypoints and description of archaeological finds is also indicated in Table 1 in Appendix A. A large sandstone boulder, marking the location of the Bosman’s Crossing Provincial Heritage Site (PHS)3 was noted by Kaplan (2013) during a HIA for the proposed Adam Tas effluent pipeline (Figures 3 & 4). The original Bosman’s Crossing site alongside the Eerste River was first described by the French entomologist Dr Louis Peringuey in 1899 and was declared a National Monument in 1962. The PHS landmark is located about 3040 m from the proposed new Plankenbrug sewer line and will therefore not be impacted by the proposed upgrading operations. 3 Historical Monuments Commission, Site No. 9/2/084/0067 ACRM JUNE 2015 9 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch Two ESA chunks (Site 466) were found among a scatter of river cobbles on the western bank of the Plankenbrug River in the Plankenbrug industrial area, one ESA chunk (Site 468) was found on the grassy bank between Distillery Road and the Papagaaiberg Cemetery, and on a grassy patch between the road and the cemetery caretakers house, several ESA chunks and a broken flake (Sites 480-484 & 486) were found along the existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer line alongside Adam Tas Road, a dispersed scatter of ESA flakes, chunks and a core were found in open fields alongside Adam Tas Road (Site 485), a MSA flake (Site 487) was found in the Devon Valley Road, and ESA chunks were found on a gravel patch in Vredenburg Road near the entrance to the Stellenbosch WWTW (Site 488). All the implements are in river quartzite (Figures 5-8). An ESA angular chunk was also found inside the Papagaaiberg Cemetery. The remains have been graded as having low (Grade 3C) archaeological significance because of the isolated and disturbed context in which they occur. According to retired Stellenbosch municipal engineer, Mr Chris Keyser (pers. comm.), several `large stone tools’ (presumably ESA lithics) were encountered on the spoil dumps during excavations for the existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer in the mid 1980’s. Figure 3. View of mahole cover for the existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer alongside Distillery Road. Arrow indicates the Bosman’s Crossing PHS. View facing south along the road toward the Bosman’s Crossing bridge ACRM JUNE 2015 10 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch Figure 4. View looking onto Distillery Road from the edge of the Papagaaiberg Cemetery. Arrows indicate the manhole of the existing Plankenbrug outfall sewer and the Bosman’s Crossing PHS. Adam Tas Road is in the background. Figure 5. Collection of ESA chunks and flakes from alongside Distillery Road and Adam Tas Road. Scale is in cm ACRM JUNE 2015 Figure 6.. Site . Scatter of tools and river cobbles in agricultural fields alongside Adam Tas Road 11 Figure 7. Collection of tools from agricultural fields along side Adam Tas Road. Scale is in cm Figure 8. Collection of tools from Distillery, Adam Tas, Devon Valley & Vredenburg Roads. Scale is in cm 6.2 Graves A line of nine graves were documented directly alongside the fence, inside the Papagaaiberg Cemetery (Figures 9-11). As can be seen in Figure 9, the proposed new sewer line will be buried below graves 470, 471 and 472, but with the construction method used (i. e. pipe jacking/horizontal drilling) and depth (± 8 m below the surface) of the installation, the graves will not be impacted by excavation operations. All graves are graded as having high (Grade II) significance at a Provincial level. Eerste River Figure 9. Oblique Google earth view of the location of graves alongside the proposed new sewer line. The green line is the proposed new sewer that traverses the Papagaaiberg cemetery Figure 10. Papagaaiberg Cemetery alongside Distillery Road. View facing south Figure 11. Papagaaiberg Cemetery & fence alongside Distillery Road. View facing west. Note the graves alongside the fence 7. IMPACT STATEMENT 7.1 Archaeology The results of the study indicate that the proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer and associated works in Stellenbosch will not impact on important archaeological heritage. ESA implements identified along the proposed sewer line (Area A), between the Plankenbrug industrial area and the Stellenbosch WWTW in Vredenburg Road, occur in a highly disturbed context and have been graded as having low (3C) archaeological significance. One MSA flake was found and no Later Stone Age implements were noted. 7.2 Graves While there are at least three (and possibly more) graves that would have been impacted if conventional excavation methods were employed in the construction of the proposed new sewer line, the new sewer pipe between Points A2 and Point A3 will be installed by means of pipe jacking or horizontal drilling to a depth of about 10m beneath the Papagaaiberg cemetery on Erf 285. As indicated, this type of installation (a form of tunnelling) is commonly used when a pipeline needs to be buried under roads. When installing the sewer pipe in this manner, no impact is caused to structures or features at ground level. It is therefore very unlikely that visible graves in the Papagaaiberg cemetery will be impacted by proposed construction activities. 8. CONCLUSION From a heritage perspective there are no fatal flaws and therefore, provided that recommendations are considered and/or implemented, there are no objections to the authorization of the proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer and associated works. Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch 9. RECOMMENDATIONS With regard to the proposed construction of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer and associated works on Erf 265-3974, 380, 8933, 6840 & 6886-6296, 9726, 1/1147 & 9545 Stellenbosch in Stellenbosch, the following recommendations are made: 1. No further archaeological mitigation is required. 2. If any buried or unmarked human remains/burials are intersected during installation of the new sewer pipeline, these must immediately be reported to the archaeologist (J Kaplan 082 321 0172), or Heritage Western Cape (Andrew September 021 483 9543). Work must cease and burials must not be disturbed until inspected by a professional archaeologist. Burial remains must be treated sensitively at all times. ACRM JUNE 2015 14 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch 10. REFERENCES Deacon, H.J. and Goosen, R.J. 1997. Phase 1 Archaeological investigation De Zalze Golf and Agricultural Estate. Report prepared for De Zalze Development (Pty) Ltd. Department of Archaeology, University of Stellenbosch. Goodwin, A.J.H. & Van Riet Lowe, C. 1929. The Stone Age Cultures of South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum. 27. Kaplan, J. 2012. Heritage Impact Assessment, the proposed Adam Tas Anaerobic Waste Water Treatment Facility on Erf 2684, Stellenbosch. Report prepared for Resource Management Services. ACRM Cape Town Kaplan, J. 2010. Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed establishment of a new cemetery on the Onder Papagaaiberg (Farm 183) Stellenbosch, Western Cape. Report prepared for Cape Lowlands Environmental Services. ACRM Riebeek West Kaplan, J. 2009. Archaeological Impact Assessment De Zalze Winelands Golf Estate, Southern Extension. Erf 4 de Zalze and Portion 10 of Farm 502 Stellenbosch. Report prepared for DJ Environmental Consultants. ACRM Riebeek West Kaplan, J. 2006. Archaeological heritage assessment pre-feasibility study Faure Farms Faure (Helderberg). Report prepared for Chand Environmental Consultants. ACRM Riebeek West. Kaplan, J. 2005. Archaeological report Croyden Olive Estate. Report prepared for Ecosense Consulting Environmentalists and Ecologists. ACRM Riebeek West Kaplan, J. 2004. Archaeological scoping for the proposed Croyden Vineyard Estate Farm 654 Croyden. Report prepared for Ecosense Consulting Environmentalists and Ecologists. ACRM Riebeek West Kaplan, J. 2002. Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment proposed development De Wijnlanden Residential Estate. Report prepared for Greenfield Consultants. ACRM Riebeek West Péringuey, L. 1902. Stone Implements from Paarl and Stellenbosch. Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society 11 (4). Péringuey, L. 1911. The Stone Ages of South Africa as represented in the collection of the South African Museum. Annals of the South African Museum 8:180-201 Seddon, D. 1966. Some Early Stone Age surface sites around Stellenbosch, S.W. Cape. South African Archaeological Bulletin 22:57-59. ACRM JUNE 2015 15 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch Appendix A ACRM JUNE 2015 16 Heritage Impact Assessment proposed upgrading of the Plankenbrug main outfall sewer, and associated works in Stellenbosch Site 467 468 469 470 471 472 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 Table 1. Name of Farm Plankenbrug outfall sewer Lat/Long Description of finds Grading S33 56.376 E18 50.804 Several ESA chunks on bank of the Plankenbrug River S33 56.495 E18 50.640 ESA chunk on grass bank S33 56.500 E18 50.616 Grave S33 56.500 E18 50.614 Grave S33 56.501 E18 50.612 Grave S33 56.502 E18 50.611 Grave S33 56.498 E18 50.617 Grave S33 56.496 E18 50.621 Grave S33 56.494 E18 50.629 Grave S33 56.493 E18 50.634 Grave S33 56.491 E18 50.641 Grave S33 56.512 E18 50.554 ESA chunks & flake S33 56.512 E18 50.544 ESA chunk S33 56.528 E18 50.479 ESA chunk S33 56.531 E18 50.450 ESA chunk and flake S33 56.532 E18 50.445 ESA chunk S33 56.532 E18 50.410 Small scatter of ESA chunks, flakes & core in fields S33 56.550 E18 50.364 ESA chunk S33 56.612 E18 50.046 MSA flake in Devon Valley Road S33 56.636 E18 49.616 ESA chunks in Vredenburg Road Spreadsheet of waypoints and descriptions of archaeological remains ACRM JUNE 2015 3C/Low 3C/Low II/High II/High II/High II/High II/High II/High II/High II/High II/High 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 3C/low 17 Figure 12. Waypoints of archaeological finds and burials