Distributed Propulsion Concepts
Transcription
Distributed Propulsion Concepts
Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options Dr Askin T. Isikveren Head, Visionary Aircraft Concepts “Alternative Fuels and Propulsion Systems” Greener by Design Conference, The Royal Aeronautical Society, London, United Kingdom, 21 October 2014 Agenda Motivation for the DisPURSAL Project Aircraft Top Level Requirements (ATLeRs) and Reference Aircraft Definitions Propulsive Fuselage Concept (PFC) Distributed Multiple-Fans Concept (DMFC) Important Findings and Next Steps Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 2 Motivation Flightpath 2050 75% less CO2 emissionsa 90% less NOx emissionsa 65% reduction in perceived noisea Aircraft is designed and manufactured to be recyclable Emission-free taxiing Strategic Research & Innovation Agenda 80% less accidentsb 90% of all journeys (door-to-door within the EU) within 4 hrs Flights arrived within 1 min. of planned time regardless of weather ATM should handle at least 25M flights abased bbased on a typical aircraft with 2000 technology on 2000 traffic Unconventional solution required in order to achieve ambitious goals Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 3 Distributed Propulsion Concepts: Historical Overview Georgia Tech MIT (2025) NASA N3-X (2025) EADS IW (2035) ClaireLiner (2030) Silent Aircraft SAX-40 (2020) Empirical Systems Aerospace ECO-150 (2030) Bolonkin, 1999 Gohardani et al., 2010 Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 4 Initially Gauging Distr. Propulsion Concepts 12 Rodriguez (incompr.) Smith (incompr.) Ducted Fan Model (compr.) 10 Good synergy with laminar wing flow PSC [%] 8 6 4 2 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 β = Ding/T Bad synergy with laminar wing flow PSC = Pref − PBLI Pref β= Dingested T =k⋅ C k = D0 CD S wet ,ing S wet S wet ,ing Steiner et al., 2012 Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 5 Principles of Wake-Filling Seitz and Gologan, 2013 Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 6 The DisPURSAL Project EC granted approval for a distributed propulsion project Distributed Propulsion and Ultra-high By-Pass Rotor Study at Aircraft Level Framework 7 project, Level-0, Feb 2013 until Jan 2015 Coordinated by Bauhaus Luftfahrt e.V., involves partners from the CIAM (Russia), ONERA (France) and Airbus Group Innovations (Germany) Industrial Advisory Board comprises Airbus Group (Germany), MTU Aero Engines AG (Germany), DLR (Germany) and ONERA (France) Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Grant Agreement no: 323013 DisPURSAL Overall Targets Entry-into-Service year of 2035 Focus placed upon 2 novel solutions Single propulsor tightly-coupled with fuselage – dubbed the PropulsiveFuselage Concept (PFC) Distributed Multiple-Fans Concept (DMFC) driven by a limited number of engine cores Aspects that are being addressed Aircraft design and optimisation Airframe-propulsion integration Power-train system design and advanced flow field simulation Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 7 PAX versus Design Range for 2035 Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 8 DisPURSAL Project ATLeRs 2035R and 2035DP (DisPURSAL design) Range and PAX TOFL (MTOW, S-L, ISA) 2nd Climb Segment Time-to-Climb (1,500ft to ICA, ISA+10°C) Initial Cruise Altitude (ISA+10°C) 4800 nm, 340 PAX in 2-class 2300 m 340Pax, 102 kg per PAX, DEN, ISA+20°C ≤25 mins To be optimised Design Cruise Mach Number ≥ 0.75 Maximum Cruise Altitude FL410 Approach Speed (MLW, S-L, ISA) 140 KCAS Landing Field Length (MLW, ISA) 2000 m One Engine Inoperative Altitude (Drift Down) FL170 Airport Compatibility Limits ACN (flexible,B) COC External Noise & Emission Target (Reference 2000) ETOPS /LROPS capability ICAO Code E (52 m < x < 65 m) 67 At least 20% reduction per PAX.nm; based on A330-300 CO2 -60%; NOx -84%; Noise -55% (interpolated SRIA 2035) 240 mins Technology Freeze - EIS 2030 - 2035 Design Service Goal 50000 cycles Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 9 Reference Aircraft: SoAR (340 PAX A330-300) and 2035R SoAR Details A330-300 utilsing Trent 772B engines with 340 PAX cabin layout Defines year 2000 datum 2035R Details 2035R Details (cont.) -15.0% in structural weight assuming omni-directional plies, nanotubes, geodesic design, advanced bonding Combined outcome up to 32% block fuel reduction vs SoAR Revised fuselage compared to SoAR Increased size due to anthropmetrics 2 x LD3 containers in cargo 2-class, 296-340-391 PAX family Evolved GTF (BPR=18.0) and PEM fuelcell for APU, ∆TSFC = -21.5% ∆L/D = +8.6% due to very flexible high AR wing, fuselage riblets and shock contour bump on wing Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt SoAR A330-300 2035R Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 10 PFC – Aero-Airframe and Power-Train Aero-Airframe Analysis Sensitivity studies conducted w.r.t. aerodynamic/engine operating conditions, and engine fan diameter Shroud design needs to be performed with great attention, i.e. avoid local super-velocities and nozzle blockage Power Supply & Transmission S-Duct Driveshaft Fuselage Fan Rotor ONERA computations for Isikveren et al., 2014 Planetary Gear System Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Core engine Single rotating Fuselage Fan device Shrouded for noise and tail-scrape Powered via LP-spool and planetary reduction gear system Core intake supplied by eccentrical swan-neck duct aft of FF rotor plane Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 11 PFC – Design Description 2035R PFC Δ [%] Fuselage Length m 67.0 69.0 +3.0 Wing Span m 65.0 65.0 0 MTOW kg 206270 209340 +1.5 OWE kg 123460 130590 +5.8 Wing Ref. Area, Sref m² 335.4 339.8 +1.3 MTOW/Sref kg/m² 615 616 +0.2 Thrust to Weight 0.31 0.31 0 (SLS, MTOW) Fuselage Share of % 29.7 28.0 -5.7 Total Cruise Drag* Ingested Drag Ratio % n/a 28.2 n/a = Ding/FN,t Block Fuel Burn, kg 42257 38380 -9.2 4800 nm, 340 PAX *if BLI / wake-filling effects are not accounted Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt 85% Fuselage Axial Position Maximises fuselage drag ingestion Fan disk burst corridors do not interfere with cabin or critical empennage zones Tail scrape angle is 12° acceptable Sizing Implications and Outcome Net thrust split approx. 77% for the under-wing podded and 23% for the FF Increased structural weight due to +2.0 m fuselage length, installation of FF at aft-fuselage, larger empennage and fin structural reinforcements -20% in propulsion efficiency due to BLI -9.2% block fuel relative to 2035R and -38.3% relative to SoAR Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 12 DMFC – Aero-Airframe and Power-Train Aero-Airframe Analysis ONERA computations for Isikveren et al., 2014 Appropriate aircraft body contouring and alignment of nacelle tilt is at a premium in avoiding super-velocities Increase in FPR has a significant impact on local Mach, thereby, lift and boundary layer thickness Power Supply & Transmission Mirzoyan et al., 2014 Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Core straddled by 2 fans on either side Relative positioning between core/fans chosen to minimise axial loading Mechanical gearing losses are 2%; heat generation requires dedicated thermal regulation and control system Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 13 Important Findings and Next Steps Projected Evolution of Current Approach For medium-range wide-bodies 30-32% reduction in CO2-emission by 2035 SRIA 2035 stipulates 51% in CO2 reduction from airframe and propulsion Propulsive Fuselage Concept Net thrust split approx. 77% for the under-wing podded and 23% for the Fuselage Fan -9.2% block fuel relative to 2035R and -38.3% relative to SoAR Distributed Multiple-Fans Concept [work-in-progress] Care needs to be taken in alignment of nacelle tilt and design of aircraft body contour Mechanical transmission emphasis is to reduce axial loading and gearing losses Next Steps Refining the DMFC sizing; preliminary examination of hybrid-electric PFC and DMFC Operating economics analysis and associated benchmarking against SoAR and 2035R CO2-emission assessment of PFC and DMFC improvements relative to SoAR and 2035R will be conducted; preliminary noise predictions also to take place Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 14 Contact Bauhaus Luftfahrt e.V. Lyonel-Feininger-Strasse 28 80807 Munich Germany Tel.: +49 (0) 89 3 07 48 49 - 0 Fax: +49 (0) 89 3 07 48 49 - 20 [email protected] http://www.bauhaus-luftfahrt.net Alle Rechte bei / All rights with Bauhaus Luftfahrt Visionary Concepts – Distributed Propulsion Options, 21.10.2014 Seite 15