Zagreb, January, 30 2016 http://www.transparency.hr/hr/sto

Zagreb, January, 30 2016
http://www.transparency.hr/hr/sto-radimo/indeks-percepcije-korupcije-2015/143
1
2
1. Presentation Budimir, TI Croatia Chair
2. Presentation Markusic, Ti Croatia Vice Chair
3. List od Participiants
4.
Media report
3
Davorka Budimir, TI Croatia Chair
Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 (Presentation of Results)
Thank you for coming to Transparency International Croatia’s presentation of the results for
the Corruption Perceptions Index which is today occurring simultaneously around the world.
There is nothing worse for the prosperity of a society than corruption which enables unlawful
activities to be deliberately covered up and which raise their ugly head through scandals,
investigations and court trials. Due to the covert nature of corruptive activities, there exists no
empirical data based on which the absolute level of corruption can be measured in a particular
country.
The Corruption Perceptions Index is necessarily limited in its scope because it includes the
perception of corruption only in the public sector (amongst government officials, politicians
and civil servants) ie. administrative and political corruption.
The corruption that is estimated includes: The misuse of entrusted power; bribery of
government officials; circumvention of public procurement procedures; embezzlement; the
success of anti-corruption measures in the public sector etc.
The situations that are assessed include the following:
 What is the likelihood of government officials who misuse their position being
investigated or sanctioned?
 How do the authorities deal with corruption?
 Are there clear procedures related to the allocation of public resources?
 Are there money flows that go unchecked?
 Is it normal to pay bribes to get jobs or benefits?
What are the objectives of the Corruption Perceptions Index?
The objectives are:
Firstly, to promote the awareness of the harmfulness of corruption on a global level;
Secondly, to encourage the government to act and make changes;
4
Thirdly, to promote and compare the level of corruption in the public sector between
countries; and
Fourthly, to be a secondary source of information for further research.
The Corruption Perceptions Index shows the level of corruption in the public sector on a
scale from 0 to 100 whereby 0 represents the most corrupt countries and corruption would not
exist in a country that would score 100 points.
The Ranking of an individual country indicates its position in comparison to other countries
which is not so important because each year the number of countries participating in the
survey varies.
In the 2015 Corruption Perceptions Index, 68% of countries scored less than 50 points whilst
the global average of all 168 countries which participated in the survey was 43 points.
This year's Corruption Perception Index was based on 12 sources which estimated the level of
corruption and the results for Croatia were based on 9 of these sources. In order for a country
5
to be included in this survey, information from at least three particular sources must be made
publicly available.
9 data sources were used to construct the CPI 2015 Croatia: (BF-SGI Bertelsmann Foundation Sustainable
Governance Indicators 2015; BF-BTI Bertelsmann Foundation Transformation Index 2016; EIU Economist
Intelligence Unit Country Risk Ratings 2015; FH Freedom House Nations in Transit 2015; GI Global Insight
Country Risk Ratings 2014; IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2015, ICRG Political Risk Services
International Country Risk Guide 2015; WEF World Economic Forum Executive Opinion Survey (EOS) 2015;
WJF World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2015)
The least corrupt countries in 2015 are Denmark with 91 points and Finland with 90 points.
Two countries with only 8 points, Afghanistan and North Korea are at the bottom of the
rankings.
6
The top five most transparent countries according to the Corruption Perceptions Index are
Denmark, Finland, Sweden, New Zealand and The Netherlands. These are countries with
strong rule of law and clear rules of behaviour for their public servants. Moreover,
information is readily accessible and transparent.
As far as the European Union is concerned, the average score of its members is 67 points
whilst 13% of them are under this average.
European Union countries that have improved the most in 2015 include The Czech Republic
by 5 points, The Netherlands and Austria with 4 points, Luxembourg, Lithuania, Croatia and
Romania by 3 points. Hungary had the biggest drop of 3 points followed by Bulgaria, Cyprus
and Spain with a 2 point drop.
7
Croatia’s scored 51 points on the Corruption Perceptions Index for 2015. Croatia thus
passed the 50 point threshold and is now included in the group of less corrupt countries. In
relation to ranking, Croatia is in 50th place which is 17 places better than previously in 2014.
In our region, Croatian and Albania improved the most with 3 points. Slovenia and
Montenegro improved by 2 points. Kosovo remained on 33 points and all the other countries
had a fall in their rankings. Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina fell by 1 point with
Macedonia experiencing the biggest fall of 3 points.
8
Slovenia is now in 35th place, Croatia is at 50, Montenegro is at 61, Macedonia is at 66, Serbia
is at 71, Bosnia and Herzegovina is at 76, Albania is at 88 and Kosovo is in 103th place on the
ranking list.
Corruption can be reduced by freedom of access to information and clearly defined rules of
behaviour for all those in public office. On the other side of the coin, a lack of accountability
in the public sector with an inefficient public administration is conducive to corruption.
The Corruptions Perceptions Index shows that many countries are today still faced with the
threat of corruption on all levels of government. Countries which ranked highest show that
transparency encourages social responsibility and reduces corruption. In more corrupt
countries, one of the biggest challenges is corruption in the public sector, particularly in areas
such as the judicial system and political parties.
The 2015 Corruption Perceptions Index shows that positive shifts in the fight against
corruption are finally also visible in Croatia.
It is especially important to note the following:
Ensuring the unimpeded work of independent public authorities as well as encouraging
activism by citizens is the key to success and achieving good results in the fight against
corruption
9
In relation to institutions which are vital in the fight against corruption, it is important to note
that reports on their work for 2015 are available on the State Audit Office website. In the
past year, 229 auditors conducted 448 audits. In 273 analyses, public authorities received only
a qualified positive opinion whilst 4 of them received a clear negative opinion which means
that at least 62% of public authorities subject to audits had questionable business practices. It
is alarming that in the majority of cases the flaws have not even been removed.
We also wish to point out the following facts:
Firstly: Did you know that in 2014 Attorney General's Office had only 23 officials
with a budget of 41 million kuna and USKOK had 33 officials and just over 20 million kuna
for its work? At the end of 2015, the Attorney General noted that working conditions were not
conducive and did not meet actual requirements.
10
Secondly: The State Commission for Supervision of Public Procurement Procedure
had a total of 29 employees in 2014 and only received 7.2 million kuna from the state budget
whilst its income was more than 19 million kuna. Moreover, it received 1,315 appeals which
were mainly related to public procurement procedures. At least 34% of appeals were upheld.
It is very unusual for the President of the State Commission for Supervision of Public
Procurement Procedure not to be chosen by public tender but by political appointment. Why
is this so?
Thirdly: The 7th convening of the Croatian Parliament never debated the 2014 Report
of the Commission for Conflict of Interest which the Croatian Government introduced into
Parliament at the beginning of June 2015. How come they could not find time for this?
Fourthly: During 2014, there were 5 employees in the Office of the Information
Commission who covered 5,497 public authorities and handled more than 800 appeals,
11
provided training for more than 700 persons and responded to more than 1000 written and
telephone requests. For all this they had a budget of only 1.3 million kuna. These facts raise
a lot of questions!
Why do we point all of this out?
Because of the following: The State Audit Office, the Commission for Conflict of Interest,
the Information Commissioner and the State Commission for Supervision of Public
Procurement Procedure are preventative bodies in the fight against corruption and it is
essential for them not only to have secured sufficient funds and expert human resources but
12
also for their work to be unimpeded from possible political influence on the rendering of their
decisions.
Furthermore, the Attorney General’s Office and USKOK whose job it is to uncover and
prosecute corruptive practices must be adequately equipped for fast and effective action. An
unfaltering and efficient judicial system must be a guarantee of a genuine fight against
corruption with just, fair and timely proceedings.
It is particularly important to encourage citizen activism and commitment to positive social
values such as honesty and integrity. People must be free from fear when reporting corruption
and any irregularities whatsoever. Civil society organisations play a huge role in this regard
and we must encourage these organisations to work on their members to volunteer more.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the Transparency International volunteers
who during 2014 and 2015 counted 63 in all.
These are the fundamental preconditions for corruptive behaviour to attract the wrath of
society as a whole and not just of brave individuals. Citizens pay too high a price for the fight
against corruption! We particularly need to guard against the public being given the
impression that politicians use corruption scandals to settle political scores. A society without
corruption and corruptive behaviour is a precondition not just for attracting foreign investors
but also for the development of the Croatian economy and society as a whole.
Corruption directly threatens people’s human rights and their equality in realising their own
interests, it destroys integrity and the structure of society itself and prevents the development
of free entrepreneurship. Corruption pervades every segment of society and therefore
represents the greatest threat to economic, social and political development as well as
Croatia’s prosperity.
This year’s result of 51 points by all means indicates a positive trend in 2015 for the fight
against corruption but this is still far from the model to which we are striving. We therefore
hope that the declarations on zero tolerance for corruption shall be transformed into concrete
actions by all politicians regardless of whether they are in opposition or in power. They have
the greatest burden of responsibility for protecting the interests of Croatia and its citizens.
13
Don Markusic, Vice Chair TI Croatia
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Transparency International student volunteers who have done a sterling job putting all this
together.
The Corruption Perceptions Index is a Transparency International survey which creates a
ranking list of countries according to the assessment of the level of corruption in those
countries.
The Corruption Perceptions Index shows the level of corruption in the public sector on a scale
from 0 to 100 whereby 0 represents the most corrupt countries and corruption would not exist
in a country that would score 100 points.
Croatia has placed 50 on the Corruption Perceptions Index rank listing of 168 countries
with a score of 51. Croatia has improved by three points and nine places compared to
last time.
Now, this is not the English Premier League where you look at where your team or country is
on the ladder compared to everyone else. The important figure is the score out of 100.
In Croatia, when we assess things we like to use school grades so that even Opinion Polls and
Surveys assess the government’s performance out of 5.
Croatia has scored 51 which means that it has passed but not with flying colours.It would
certainly not get into the best universities with scores like that.
I just threw that in there because I wanted to get my head on TV because they never quote me
when I speak in English.
Nevertheless, Croatia has graduated from remedial class and is now in the league of less
corrupt countries.
On the global level, 67% of countries have a score below 50 points with the global average
being 43 points. The average score for the European Union is 67 points and 13% of its
members fall below this average score.
14
I said that we should not use sports analogies but the defending champion has retained its title
so that Denmark is still the least corrupt country in the world with a score of 91 points
followed by Finland with 90 points and then Sweden with 89 points and The Netherlands and
Norway each with 87 points. The most corrupt countries in the world, scoring only 8 points,
are North Korea and Somalia.
European Union countries that have improved the most on the Corruption Perceptions Index
include the Czech Republic by 5 points, The Netherlands and Austria by 4 points,
Luxembourg, Lithuania, Croatia and Romania by 3 points. Hungary had the biggest drop of 3
points followed by Bulgaria, Cyprus and Spain with a 2 point drop.
We usually compare Croatia with the countries in the region but I will not read out the scores
because I know that Your Excellencies have the very important Holocaust Commemoration to
attend so that you can see the scores from our leaflet but also we can no longer be proud that
Croatia is doing less badly than other countries in the region because Croatia must now work
to compare itself with the senior anti-corruption countries.
In relation to our region, Croatia and Albania improved the most - Croatia from 48 to 52
points and Albania from 33 to 36 points. Slovenia and Montenegro improved by 2 points Slovenia from 58 to 60 points and Montenegro from 42 to 44 points. Kosovo has remained
15
the same on 33 points and all the other countries recorded a drop in their rankings. Serbia and
Bosnia and Herzegovina by 1 point – Serbia down to 40 from 41 and Bosnia and Herzegovina
down to 38 points from 39 points previously. Macedonia had the biggest drop in rankings
with 3 points from 45 to 42 points.
Slovenia is now in 35 position, Croatia is at 51, Montegnego is at 67, Macedonia at 68, Serbia
at 71, Bosnia and Herzegovina at 78, Albania at 88 and Kosovo is at 103. place in the
rankings.
You may recall that the last time when Croatia scored 48, we set a goal of getting Croatia a
pass grade of over 50.
Croatia’s achievement is thanks to the hard work of DORH, the Attorney General’s Office
and USKOK who prosecute corruptive practices as well as state authorities which act
preventively in the fight against corruption such as the State Audit Office, the Commission for
Conflict of Interest, the Information Commissioner and the State Commission for Supervision
of Public Procurement Procedure who are doing this without adequate financial or human
resources.
What more can be done now!
The EU Anti-Corruption Report published in February of 2014 highlighted the
transparency of lobbying as an anti-corruption measure. It is a biannual report and will
come out again soon and we still have not taken action in this regard. Transparency
International has done its bit by drafting the Law and we signed an MOU with the
Croatian Lobbyists Association to push for the new law. Let’s finally get the law passed!
The Integrity Pact
Another major area under scrutiny in the EU Anti-Corruption Report is public
procurement.
Croatia has good public procurement laws, otherwise we would not have been accepted into
the EU. The problem is in their implementation.
16
We can galvanise the implementation of anti-corruption measures in the legal
framework for public procurement by adopting Integrity Pacts in our public procurement
procedures.
The Integrity Pact is a tool developed by Transparency International to help governments,
businesses and civil society to fight corruption in public procurement. An Integrity pact is a
binding and enforceable contract between the public authority and the bidders by which all of
the contracting parties undertake to prevent corruption, avoid paying or accepting bribes and
follow transparent procedures.
Since it is a binding and enforceable contract there are criminal sanctions in case of breach as
well as liability for damages to the government and the competing bidders. Transparency
International Croatia has been involved in the initial phase of the EU project safeguarding EU
funds with Integrity Pacts. Let’s put an Integrity Pact into practice. Foreign investors can
insist on an Integrity Pact as a condition to participating in public procurement procedures and
making bids.
This is a good day for Croatia and I don’t care who takes the credit, the former
government, the new government, it doesn’t matter.
This is a landmark achievement for Croatia just like when Croatia received its first positive
report from the European Commission during its negotiations to join the EU. Today I am
again happy for Croatia but there is still a lot of work to do. So, let’s get to work! Thank you!
17
List of Participants
Embassies accredited in the Republic of Croatia
The Ambassadors of the following countries:
Australia H.E. Mrs. Susan.Cox
Republic of France H.E. Mrs. Michele Boccoz
Ireland H.E Mr. Timothy Harrington
Japan H.E. Mr. Keiji Ide
Canada H.E. Daniel Henri Andrew Maksymiuk
Kingdom of Denmark H.E. Mr. Anders Christian Hougard
Kingdom of Netherlands H.E. Mrs. Ellen Berends
Malaysia H. E. Mr. Dato' Saiful Azam Martinius Abdulllah
Republic of Bulgaria H.E. Mrs. Tanya Dimitrova Dimitrova
Republic of Finland H.E. Mr. Timo Rajakangas
Republic of Indonesia H.E. Mr. Agus Sardjana
Republic of Korea H.E. Mr. Hyung-Won Suh
Republic of Slovenia Mr. Marko Rakovec
Republic of Slovakia H.E. Mr. Juraj Priputen
Deputy Ambassadors
USA Mrs. Maggie Nardi and Czech Republic Mr. Miroslava Kolateka
European Commission Representation, Ms. Rasic Mirella
delegation Embassies:
 Arab Republic of Egypt
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
 Montenegro
 Czech Republic
 Germany
 Kingdom of Belgium
 Kingdom of Morocco
 Kingdom of Norway
 Kingdom of Sweden
 Hungary
 Republic of Austria
 Republic of Azerbaijan
 Republic of Macedonia
 Republic of Poland
 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
18
 Ukraine
Representatives of Croatian goverment
Head of the office of the President of the Republic of Croatia Mr. Domagoj Juričić
USKOK i DORH, Mrs. Nataša Đurović
President of the Commission for the conflict of interest Dalija Orešković
President of the State Commission for Supervision of Public Procurement Mr. Goran Matešić
Head of the Central Office for Public Procurement Mrs . Ivančica Franjković
Head of Sector for fight against corruption in the Ministry of Justice Mrs. Maja Baričević,
Representatives of political parties
Mr. Davor Bošnjaković (HDZ)
Mr. Robert Postaj (MOST)
Representatives of civil society
Udruga poreznih obveznika „Lipa“
Udruga Nada
Udruga sudskih vještaka i procjenitelja
Udruga hrvatskih pacijenata
HUBOL
academic community
Pravni fakultet
Fakultet političkih znanosti
Zagrebačka škole ekonomije i menadžmenta
membership TI Croatia
volunteers TI Croatia
partners and media
attended by 148 guests
19
Media Report January 2016
Transparency International Hrvatska
Razdoblje : 1.1.2016 do 1.2.2016 Medij : Tisak , Audio , Video
an broj članaka / priloga : 62
kupan broj članaka : 36
BROJ
DATUM
NOVINE
NASLOV
AUTOR
TEME
STRANICA
8
16353919 28.01.2016 24 sata večernje izdanje
VIŠE NE DAJEMO PLAVE
KUVERTE?
Vilim Cvok
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
16306621 08.01.2016 7 Dnevno
MUP i sedam kriminalaca
Lupus Infabulović
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
28, 29
16354717 28.01.2016 Glas Istre
Hrvatska prestala biti
visoko korumpirana
B. PODGORNIK
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
5
16354393 28.01.2016 Glas Slavonije
Hrvatska sve bolja u borbi
protiv korupcije
V.T.
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
5
16320793 15.01.2016 Globus
Danska verzija Hrvatske
VIKTOR VRESNIK
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
34
16344073 24.01.2016
Jutarnji list večernje
izdanje
HNB: Kuna nije
precijenjena, i dalje ćemo
voditi istu politiku
Marina Klepo
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
14, 15
16353789 28.01.2016
Jutarnji list večernje
izdanje
Hrvatska prvi put među
manje korumpiranima u
svijetu: skočili na 50.
mjesto
S.M.
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
8
16356961 29.01.2016
Jutarnji list večernje
izdanje
Sreća po nas je što
Hrvatska nema
mehanizme nadzora EU
Augustin Palokaj
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
26
16354197 28.01.2016 Novi list
Hrvatska prestala biti
visoko korumpirana
Branko Podgornik
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
11
16306981 01.01.2016 OSIGURANJE
Osiguranje od klimatskih
promjena za zemlje u
razvoju
NN
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
24, 25
16354048 28.01.2016 Poslovni dnevnik
PRVI PUT MEĐU MANJE
KORUMPIRANIMA
pd
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
5
16364492 01.02.2016 Privredni vjesnik
BORBA PROTIV
KORUPCIJE DALA
REZULTATE
Igor Vukić
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
11
16336937 21.01.2016 Slobodna Dalmacija
Kolinda donirala kao da su
Anita Belak Krile
kune još njene
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
6
16333879 20.01.2016 Večernji list - Hrvatska
Kaznena prijava protiv
Rusak, USKOK kreće u
izvide
Petra Maretić
Žonja,MarinkoJurasić
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
10
16353651 28.01.2016 Večernji list - Hrvatska
Hrvatska prvi put ušla u
krug manje korumpiranih
zemalja
Božena Matijević
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
1, 2
16353323 27.01.2016 www.direktno.hr
Indeks percepcije
korupcije: evo na kojem
je mjestu Hrvatska
iz,Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
18, 19
16353326 27.01.2016 www.direktno.hr
Percepcija korupcije za
2015., najbolji sjever
Europe, Hrvatska
napredovala
dt,Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
20, 21
16355002 27.01.2016 www.dnevnik.hr
Transparency
International: Hrvatska
napredovala, na 50.
mjestu po percepciji
S.D.M.
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
11, 12
20
korupcije
16301427 05.01.2016 www.dnevno.hr
OMILJENI PUSIĆKIN
PULEN: Je li ovo lokalni
šerif s najviše afera u
državi?
16353125 27.01.2016 www.hr.n1info.com - WEB
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
23, 24, 25
Indeks percepcije
korupcije: Hrvatska 50. od Hina
168 zemalja
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
9, 10
16353353 27.01.2016 www.hrt.hr
Transparency
International: Indeks
percepcije korupcije za
2015.
Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
4, 5
16353269 27.01.2016 www.jutarnji.hr
Transparency
International objavio
rang-listu 168 zemalja
Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
31, 32, 33
16353296 27.01.2016 www.liderpress.hr
Hrvatska se više ne ubraja
NN
u korumpirane zemlje
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
7, 8
16353287 27.01.2016 www.monitor.hr
Transparency: Hrvatska
više nije korumpirana
NN
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
3
16353306 27.01.2016 www.nacional.hr
Transparency
International: Hrvatska u
istraživanju za 2015. prvi
put među manje
korumpiranim državama
Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
6, 7
16353071 27.01.2016 www.net.hr
INDEKS KORUPCIJE:
Hrvatska je napredovala
ali je još uvijek iza
Butana, Bocvane i Ruande
HINA
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
16, 17, 18
16353161 27.01.2016 www.novilist.hr
Indeks percepcije
korupcije za 2015.:
Hrvatska na 50. mjestu od HINA
168 zemalja, najbolji
sjever Europe
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
10, 11
www.politikaplus.com 16353172 27.01.2016
WEB
Indeks percepcije
korupcije za 2015.
pogledajte gdje se nalazi
Hrvatska
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
8, 9
16353305 27.01.2016 www.poslovni.hr
Indeks percepcije
korupcije: Hrvatska 50. od NN
168 zemalja
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
16, 17
16353308 27.01.2016 www.seebiz.eu
Hrvatska u istraživanju za
2015. prvi put među
manje korumpiranim
državama
NN
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
11
16353115 27.01.2016 www.slobodnadalmacija.hr
Hrvatska 50. u svijetu po
percepciji korupcije
Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
2, 3
16353191 27.01.2016 www.vecernji.hr
Indeks percepcije
korupcije za 2015. najbolji
sjever Europe, Sj. Koreja i
Somalija na dnu
Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
27, 28, 29
16353318 27.01.2016 www.vecernji.hr
Hrvatska se prvi put
ubraja u manje
korumpirane zemlje
Božena Matijevič
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
32, 33
16353104 27.01.2016 www.vijesti.rtl.hr
Sjeverna Europa najmanje
podložna korupciji,
Hina
Sjeverna Koreja i Somalija
na dnu ljestvice
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
5, 6, 7
16353279 27.01.2016 www.vijesti.rtl.hr
Pomaci se konačno vide:
Hrvatska prvi put među
manje korumpiranim
državama
Hina
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
11, 12, 13
16355083 28.01.2016 Zadarski list
Hrvatska prestala biti
visoko korumpirana
BRANKO PODGORNIK
Transparency
International
Hrvatska
6
I.Delić
Hina
21
kupan broj priloga : 13 (Radio)
PROGRAM
EMISIJA
POČETAK
EMITIRANJA
KRAJ
EMITIRANJA
TRAJANJE LINK
2336114 27.01.2016 07:39
Radio Sljeme
Pun mi je ceker
27.01.2016 07:39
27.01.2016 07:49
00:10:08
MP3
2336300 27.01.2016 12:32
Soundset Plavi
Vijesti
27.01.2016 12:32
27.01.2016 12:32
00:00:09
MP3
2336364 27.01.2016 14:33
Laganini FM
Zg Vijesti
27.01.2016 14:33
27.01.2016 14:34
00:00:31
MP3
2336391 27.01.2016 15:14
HR1
Dnevne novosti
27.01.2016 15:14
27.01.2016 15:16
00:01:54
MP3
2336427 27.01.2016 15:32
Laganini FM
Zg Vijesti
27.01.2016 15:32
27.01.2016 15:33
00:00:46
MP3
2336475 27.01.2016 15:52
Enter Zagreb
Vijesti
27.01.2016 15:52
27.01.2016 15:53
00:00:37
MP3
2336664 27.01.2016 17:18
Narodni radio
Informativni
dnevnik
27.01.2016 17:18
27.01.2016 17:18
00:00:37
MP3
2336747 27.01.2016 15:12
HR radio Zadar
Dnevnik
27.01.2016 15:12
27.01.2016 15:12
00:00:18
MP3
2336902 27.01.2016 18:18
Radio 101
Aktualni 101
27.01.2016 18:18
27.01.2016 18:23
00:04:40
MP3
2337025 27.01.2016 15:10
Slavonski radio
Dnevnik
27.01.2016 15:10
27.01.2016 15:10
00:00:38
MP3
2337176 27.01.2016 14:30
Radio Istra
Aktualno
27.01.2016 14:30
27.01.2016 14:34
00:04:37
MP3
2337272 27.01.2016 18:25
Radio Banovina
Kronika dana
27.01.2016 18:25
27.01.2016 18:25
00:00:59
MP3
2337356 28.01.2016 00:18
Radio Antena
Zagreb
Vijesti plus
28.01.2016 00:18
28.01.2016 00:19
00:00:37
MP3
BROJ
DATUM
EMITIRANJA
kupan broj priloga : 13 (TV prilozi)
PROGRAM EMISIJA
POČETAK
EMITIRANJA
KRAJ
EMITIRANJA
TRAJANJE LINK
2328483 19.01.2016 19:35
Nova TV
Dnevnik Nove TV
19.01.2016 19:35
19.01.2016 19:40
00:04:56
WMV
2329599 20.01.2016 18:04
N1
Dnevnik
20.01.2016 18:04
20.01.2016 18:07
00:03:01
WMV
2330022 21.01.2016 09:15
N1
Novi dan
21.01.2016 09:15
21.01.2016 09:18
00:02:59
WMV
2333453 24.01.2016 19:15
Nova TV
Dnevnik Nove TV
24.01.2016 19:15
24.01.2016 19:19
00:03:53
WMV
2336227 27.01.2016 07:09
HRT1
Dobro jutro,
Hrvatska
27.01.2016 07:09
27.01.2016 07:14
00:04:48
WMV
2336638 27.01.2016 17:12
Nova TV
Vijesti Nove TV
27.01.2016 17:12
27.01.2016 17:14
00:01:05
WMV
2336725 27.01.2016 18:26
Al Jazeera
Vijesti
27.01.2016 18:26
27.01.2016 18:27
00:01:27
WMV
2336851 27.01.2016 18:25
N1
Dnevnik
27.01.2016 18:25
27.01.2016 18:27
00:01:50
WMV
2336856 27.01.2016 18:28
N1
Dnevnik
27.01.2016 18:28
27.01.2016 18:29
00:00:58
WMV
2336893 27.01.2016 19:14
HRT1
Dnevnik 2
27.01.2016 19:14
27.01.2016 19:14
00:00:37
WMV
2337002 27.01.2016 19:36
Nova TV
Dnevnik Nove TV
27.01.2016 19:36
27.01.2016 19:38
00:01:39
WMV
2338760 29.01.2016 09:32
N1
Novi dan
29.01.2016 09:32
29.01.2016 09:42
00:10:14
WMV
2339592 29.01.2016 18:16
Al Jazeera
Vijesti
29.01.2016 18:16
29.01.2016 18:17
00:00:38
WMV
BROJ
DATUM
EMITIRANJA
22
23