Text - SeArc
Transcription
Text - SeArc
TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences Department of Zoology Biological, biochemical, and mechanical properties of collagen fibers of the soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE "DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY" BY IDO SELLA SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY March 2012 This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Yehuda Benayahu Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to many people who helped me during the “fiber’s quest”. To Prof. Yoal Kashman and Dr. Amira Rudi who guided me in the mysterious world of biochemistry. To Prof. John Gosline, Prof. Yoram Lanir and the good people of Friday Harbor marine station who introduced me to beauty of biomechanics. To Prof. Joseph P. R. O. Orgel, and Prof. Felix Frolow for valuable assistance, and willingness to share their enormous knowledge in X-ray diffraction. To Dr. Yaniv Assaf for valuable assistance in MRI. To Yakov Delaria for his valuable work in Electron Microscopy and some great cups of coffee. To Naomi Paz for editorial assistance, Moshe Aleksandroni for his help with photography, and Varda Wexler for graphic assistance. To Mati Halperin and Chen Yoffa for the endless support and friendship To Shimrit Perkol-finkel for pushing me forward in the last 9 years To my lab mates who helped me above and underwater and Nissim Sharon in particular. To the staff of the Interuniversity Institute of Marine Biology at Eilat for the kind hospitality. To my parents Avner and Varda, my sisters Ronit and Michal, and to Emma my lovely, optimistic and beautiful wife, for supporting me along this long way. Table of Contents Acknowledgments Table of contents Figure list Table list Formula list Abstract ....................................................................................................................... i 1.Introduction .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Structural features of Octocorallia .....................................................................1 1.2 Features of the mesoglea ................................................................................5 1.3 Properties of collagen .......................................................................................8 1.4 Evolution and characteristics of collagen among invertebrates .......................13 1.5 Objectives .......................................................................................................17 2. Materials and Methods .........................................................................................20 2.1 Collection of colonies......................................................................................20 2.2 Farming of colonies.........................................................................................20 2.3 Extraction of fibers ..........................................................................................21 2.4 Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance analyses (NMR) ...................21 2.5 Amino acid analysis ........................................................................................22 2.6 Light and electron microscopy ........................................................................23 2.7 Graphic analysis .............................................................................................24 2.8 Wide-angle X-ray diffraction ............................................................................25 2.9 Magnetic resonance imaging ..........................................................................26 2.10 Biomechanical studies ..................................................................................26 2.11 Thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry ................30 3. Results .................................................................................................................31 3.1 Biochemical and structural properties of fibers ................................................31 3.1.1 Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance..............................................31 3.1.2 Amino acid analysis .........................................................................................32 3.1.3 Light and electron microscopy .........................................................................35 3.1.4 Wide-angle X-ray diffraction ............................................................................42 3.2 Location, distribution and formation of fibers within colony ..............................43 3.2.1 Light and electron microscopy .........................................................................43 3.2.2 Magnetic resonance imaging ...........................................................................49 3.3 Biomechanical and physical properties of fibers ..............................................50 3.3.1 Biomechanical properties of isolated fibers......................................................50 3.3.2 Mechanical characterization of fibrils SPM-TEM in situ study ..........................52 3.3.3 Thermogravimetric analysis .............................................................................55 3.3.4 Differential scanning calorimetry ......................................................................55 4. Discussion ............................................................................................................58 4.1 Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance and amino acid analyses .....58 4.2 Light and electron microscopy ........................................................................60 4.3 Distribution and formation of fibers ..................................................................65 4.4 Biomechanical and physical properties of fibers ..............................................70 4.5 Summary ........................................................................................................74 5. References ...........................................................................................................76 Hebrew abstract Figure List Fig. 1. Collagen molecule .........................................................................................9 Fig. 2. Collagen structure ........................................................................................12 Fig. 3. Biomechanical experimental set-up ..............................................................27 Fig. 4. Isolated fibers ...............................................................................................31 Fig. 5. NMR spectroscopic profile of fibers ...............................................................33 Fig. 6. Amino acid analysis of fibers .........................................................................34 Fig. 7. Histological sections of fiber-bundles ............................................................37 Fig. 8. TEM of fibers .................................................................................................39 Fig. 9. TEM of fibrils and graphical analysis .............................................................40 Fig. 10. TEM of longitudinal sectioned isolated fiber .................................................41 Fig. 11. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction of fibers ...........................................................42 Fig. 12. Light microscopy of fibers within polyp .........................................................45 Fig. 13. TEM of gastrodermal cells within mesentery................................................46 Fig. 14. Microscopy of mesoglea ..............................................................................47 Fig. 15. Light microscopy of colony’s stalk ................................................................48 Fig. 16. Magnetic resonance of colony .....................................................................49 Fig. 17. Mechanical properties of isolated fibers .......................................................51 Fig. 18. Mechanical properties of in vivo fibril ...........................................................53 Fig. 19. In situ mechanical characterization of fibril by SPM-TEM.............................54 Fig. 20. Thermogravimetric analysis of isolated fibers ..............................................56 Fig. 21. Differential scanning calorimetry of isolated fibers .......................................57 Table List Table 1. Amino acid characterization of fibers of Sarcophyton ehrenbergi................35 Table 2. The soft coral. Summarize of material properties of fibers of Sarcophyton ehrenbergi in comparison to other known collagens .................................................71 Formula List Biomechanical study of the fibers: transformation of the results to Strain (e) and Stress (s) values: s=F/A e= ΔL/L0 ...........................................................................28 Abstract Cnidarians are polypoid or medusoid organisms that feature a radial or biradial symmetry. Their body encloses a cavity with a single opening surrounded by tentacles. They are diploblastic, consisting of two cell layers, the endoderm and the ectoderm, which are separated by the a-cellular matrix, termed the mesoglea. The class Anthozoa (phylum: Cnidaria) comprises mainly benthic life forms and characterized by two anatomically-related structures, a tubular gullet (pharynx), and the mesenteries which constitute sheets of tissue that extend in a radial manner from the body wall to the pharynx. The subclass Octocorallia ( class: Anthozoa) includes an estimated 3,200 species from the orders Alcyonacea, Pennatulacea, and Helioporacea. Octocorallia are colonial with a “colonial tissue”, termed coenenchyme, located between the polyps, consisting mostly of the mesoglea and sclerites. Within the coenenchyme there is a network of solenia and wider gastrodermal canals. The polyps feature eight complete mesenteries and possess eight tentacles, each bearing two lateral rows of feather-like pinnules. The mesoglea occupies a relatively large portion of the biomass of octocoral colonies, and possesses features that are remarkably similar to the extracellular matrix of other metazoans. The role of the mesoglea is primarily a mechanical one, as it provides structural reinforcement and stiffness to maintain the hydrostatic skeleton and reinforce muscle-action. It is a pliant composite material with a highly hydrated matrix of polysaccharides and proteoglycans, encompassing discontinuous collagen fibers. Collagen is one of the most abundant proteins in animals. It is arranged hierarchically, and can present different structures, ranging from gelatinous to fibrous rope-like structures. All collagens are composed of three polypeptide chains that are wound around one another to form superhelix tropocollagen molecules. These molecules form collagen microfibrils/ fibrilis which, in turn, can form collagen fibers. The types of collagen differ from each other in the i composition of the amino acids in the polypeptide chains and in the composition of chains within the tropocollagen molecule. The overall objective of the present study was to identify and characterize the fibers found in colonies of the reef-dwelling zooxanthellate octocoral, Sarcophyton ehrenbergi (family Alcyoniidae) in order to define a new morphological finding, toevaluate their possible practical application, and to view there rule in the evolution of collagen. The fibers are located within the colony and, when mechanically extracted, they feature bundles that may reach hundreds of microns in diameter and up to tens of centimeters in length. Nuclear magnetic resonance analyses revealed that the fibers are composed of protein. Amino acid analyses supported the hypothesis that the fibers are collagenous, in having a high concentration of glycine, proline and hydroxyproline. The study deals with the biochemical, structural, biomechanical, and physical properties of the fibers, including their location at the ultrastructural level. The study applied microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance analyses, biochemical and material analyses, such as thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry, and biomechanical techniques. Collagen-specific histological staining of isolated bundles of fibers confirmed their collagenous nature, and revealed a packed arrangement of almost round fibers in cross-section, coiled around each other. The diameter of the fibers (9 ± 0.37 µm, n=166 fibers) is significantly smaller than that of collagen fibers found in connective tissues of vertebrates (50-300 μm). The fibers and fibrils of the soft coral are organized similarly to collagen types I - III. The fibrils also revealed thinner sub-units (~2.5 nm wide) tightly packed, which are assumed to be an external projection of the microfibrils or collagen molecules. Cupromeronic-Blue staining revealed a densely hydrated matrix of PGs in the soft coral collagen. This was also observed in wide-angle X-ray diffraction, which presented a water-rich fibrilar structure. Additionally, this latter method ii confirmed the fibrilar nature of the soft coral collagen, its fibrilar packing function, Dperiodicity, helix pitch, and helix molecular packing. Although resembling the arrangement of tendons and ligaments, the water-retentive capacity of the fibers was more structurally related to the mesoglea. This may indicate some kind of intermediate state between the gelatinous mesoglea and fibrous tendons and ligaments, as the ability to strongly retain water is one of the properties that defines the differences between these two collagen structures. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) provided additional evidence for the water retentive capacity of the fibers, as stored and dried fibers featured 7-30% weight loss upon heating to ~1000C. Differential scanning calorimetry revealed that the soft coral collagen exhibits an unexpectedly high denaturation temperature of 67.8°C, similar to artificially cross-linked collagen. Biomechanical study of the fibers revealed a set of properties (stretching ability 19.4±4.27%, n=12; stiffness 0.44 ± 0.1 GPa, n =12; and average stress to failure 49.4 ± 11.7 MPa, n=12) that are more closely related to tendons than mesoglea. Imaging of a whole colony and microscopy of its different parts identified the location and distribution of the fibers. Packed coiled collagen fibers lay along six out of the eight mesenteries of the gastrovascular cavity of the polyps. They extended from the polyps to the stalk via mesentery-like-structures of the gastrodermal cavities, into the basal part of the colony. The location of these fibers and their biomechanical properties may be an indication of their functional role, in providing structural support for both the polyps and the whole colony. The study also revealed laminated collagenous fibers within the mesoglea around the sites of decalcified sclerites. These laminated fibers differed from the mesenterial ones, although both were associated with striated vesicles located within the surrounding cells. The location, size (>500 nm,) and the striated appearance of these vesicles may suggest their possible role in fibrillogenesis. iii To date, among invertebrates, there is no record of any internal long collagenous fibers, like those of S. ehrenbergi that can be observed by the naked eye. The finding of tendon-like, long collagen fibers in a two cell-layered organism, may change our perspective on the appearance, diversity, and development of collagens in metazoans. The fibers of S. ehrenbergi present a mixed set of properties where some resemble those of vertebrates, some of invertebrates, and others are novel. A better understanding of the molecular structure and a genomic study of cells containing the striated vesicles, may contribute to the understanding of collagen evolution and fibrillogenesis. Moreover, further elucidation of the features of this collagen will enable examining the feasibility of using the fibers for biomedical applications. S. ehrenbergi collagen fibers present a set of properties such as thermal stability, fibril organization, biomechanical and water-retentive capacities that are suitable for tissue engineering and medical devices. Certain preliminary findings also indicate that the fibers may contribute to taxonomic identification of certain alcyoniid octocorals. The current study findings from both field and laboratory studies, consequent results of both scientific and practical importance. iv v 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Structural features of Octocorallia Cnidarians are polypoid or medusoid organisms that feature a radial or biradial symmetry (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). They are diploblastic, consisting of two cell layers, the endoderm and the ectoderm. These are separated by a-cellular matrix, called the mesoglea (Ruppert et al., 2004). The cnidarian body encloses a cavity, termed the coelenteron or gastrovascular cavity, which opens to the environment through a single opening and is surrounded by tentacles. This cavity serves for gas exchange, food digestion, and reproduction (Pechenik, 2000). The tentacles possess stinging cells (nematocytes) used for predation, offense and defense (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). Both the polyp and medusa forms, as well as the nematocysts, are unique characteristics of members of the phylum Cnidaria (Daly et al., 2007). Most cnidarians are carnivores, while some are herbivores (Fabricius, 1995), and they are generally regarded as passive predators that use their nematocytes when feeding on the prey items that pass through their tentacles (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). In addition to their predator abilities, numerous species are associated with symbiotic unicellular algae (zooxanthellae), and thus enjoy a constant supply of photosynthates (Van Oppen et al., 2005). There are also some cnidarians that can absorb dissolved organic matter from the seawater (Schlichter, 1982). Regardless of whether they possess a mineral or an organic supporting structure, all cnidarians feature a hydrostatic skeleton, in which the muscles of the body wall operate against the fluid of the 1 gastrovascular cavity in order to expand the polyps, or to generate movement (Koehl, 1984). These features contribute to the ability of cnidarians to occupy a variety of habitats along the water column from the tropics to the poles, and thus to exhibit a worldwide distribution, mainly in the marine environment but also in fresh water (Pechenik, 2000). The phylum Cnidaria is classified into four classes: Anthozoa Scyphozoa, Cubozoa, and Hydrozoa (Fautin and Romano, 2000). Following a certain pelagic phase the cnidarian planulae-larvae settle and attach to the substrate, where they metamorphose into a polyp-stage, which will subsequently mostly bud off additional polyps to form a colony (Ruppert et al., 2004). Among anthozoans, the polyps or the colony become sexually reproductive, whereas in other cnidarian classes the medusae possess this function (Daly et al., 2007). The class Anthozoa is composed mainly of benthic life-forms (Pechenik, 2000). Morphologically, anthozoans are characterized by two anatomically-related structures, the actinopharynx and the mesenteries, which are unique to cnidarian polyps (Fautin and Romano, 2000). The actinopharynx is a tubular gullet, extending from the mouth opening into the coelenterons, and containing at least one flagellated longitudinal channel, termed the siphonoglyph (Ruppert et al., 2004). In most sea anemones and corals, two siphonoglyphs are situated diametrically opposite one another in the actinopharynx, and propel water in and out of the coelenterons (Pechenik, 2000). The mesenteries are longitudinal sheets of tissue that extend in a radial manner from the body wall; some (complete/ perfect) reach all the way to the actinopharynx, while others have a free edge 2 which is suspended within the coelenteron (Fautin and Romano, 2000). The free edge of a mesentery may feature filaments provided with cilia, gland cells, and cnidae. The cilia probably circulate fluid that otherwise might stagnate in the compartments defined by the mesenteries. The cnidae and gland cells function in digestion (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). It is inferred that the mesenteries increase the surface area for respiration and absorption of food, and provide mechanical support for the body wall (Fautin and Romano, 2000). The longitudinal retractor muscles of the mesenteries enable the polyps to retract. The gametogenic tissue of anthozoans lies between these muscles and the edge of the mesenteries (Ruppert et al., 2004). Some colonial anthozoan species display polymorphism, having polyps specialized for functions such as feeding or water circulation (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). The class Anthozoa is divided into the subclasses Hexacorallia and Octocorallia. Hexacorallia, among others, include the orders Corallimorpharia (jewel anemones), Actiniaria (sea anemones), Zoantharia (encrusting anemones), and Antipatharia (black corals) (Berntson et al., 1999; Chen et al., 1995; Daly et al., 2007). Octocorallia include the orders Alcyonacea (soft corals, sea fans and sea whips), Pennatulacea (sea pens), and Helioporacea (blue corals) (Fabricius and Alderslade, 2001). Octocorallia are colonial with a “colonial tissue”, termed the coenenchyme, situated between the polyps, consisting mostly of mesogloea and sclerites, and penetrated by a network of solenia and larger gastrodermal canals (Bayer et al., 1983). Octocoral polyps possess eight tentacles, each bearing two lateral rows of feather-like pinnules (Fabricius and Alderslade, 2001). Additionally, they feature eight complete mesenteries, so that the gastrovascular cavity between a pair of mesenteries 3 extends to each tentacle (Fautin and Romano, 2000). The actinopharynx of each polyp has a single siphonoglyph, and most Octocorallia has both an hydrostatic skeleton and an endoskeleton (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). The latter is either in the form of calcareous sclerites, embedded in the mesoglea, or an internal rod-like axis of calcareous or organic-horny substance, as found in sea fans and sea whips (Chang et al., 2007). Octocorals are known from all the worlds’ oceans and at all depths (Devictor and Morton, 2010). There are approximately 340 genera of octocorals from 46 valid families, with an estimated number of 3,200 species (Devictor and Morton, 2010; Williams, 1995). Their world-wide dispersal and confused taxonomy (McFadden et al., 2006), have made octocorallia a subject of recent molecular phylogenetic studies (Daly et al., 2007; McFadden et al., 2011). The confused state of taxonomic relationships within and between some genera of octocorals, is a combined product of the relatively few morphological characters available, lack of understanding of intraspecific variation in those morphological characters, and historical lack of taxonomic work (McFadden et al., 2006). The form and distribution of sclerites embedded in the coenenchymal tissue and polyps, and the overall colony growth, are the most important characters used to distinguish genera and species of octocorals (Daly et al., 2007). The use of molecular markers to examine the phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships among octocoral species has contributed significantly to the ability to differentiate species. This is most important in cases in which the morphological identification of genera is blurred, such as intermediate colony growth form, or disparity between colony growth form and the form or distribution of sclerites in its tissue 4 (McFadden et al., 2006). It should be noted that taxonomic identification is becoming increasingly important in light of the diverse content of natural products found in octocorals, which has made them a target for biochemical and biomedical oriented research (Blunt et al., 2009; Look et al., 1986; Nguyen Xuan Cuong, 2008; Tanaka et al., 2005). 1.2 Features of the mesoglea The relative volume and quantity of the mesoglea differ among the four cnidarian classes (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). The Scyphomedusae have an a-cellular mesoglea that constitutes the vast bulk of the animal, while in the hydroids it comprises little more than a-cellular glue, holding the cell layers together. Anthozoans possess intermediate dimensions of mesoglea: the Hexacorallia feature a relatively small quantity while in the Octocorallia it occupies a larger portion of the colony biomass (Pechenik, 2000). Ultrastructural and biochemical studies of the mesoglea, and genomic analysis of cells within it, have revealed features that are remarkably similar to the extracellular matrix (ECM) of other metazoans (Tucker et al., 2011). For example, in Hydra vulgaris (Pallas,1766) and in some hydrozoan medusae, the mesoglea is organized in the morphological form of a basal lamina, composed of a meshwork of thin filaments underlying the epithelial cell layer (Davis, 1975). Clusters of cells within the mesoglea of H. vulgaris revealed the presence of genes originating from the common ancestral ones related to collagen type IV (see below) and laminin (Fowler et al., 2000; Shimizu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2002), both of which are found in most metazoan ECM (Har-el and Tanzer, 1993). 5 As in vertebrate ECM, the role of the mesoglea is primarily a mechanical one, being crucial in providing structural reinforcement, controlling shape, transmitting stresses, storing elastic energy, and providing stiffness to maintain hydrostatic skeleton and reinforce muscle action (Alexander, 1962; Chapman, 1953; Elder, 1973; Gosline, 1971; Koehl, 1977; Thompson and Kier, 2001). The mesoglea is a pliant composite material with a discontinuous fiber system within a highly hydrated matrix (Koehl, 1977). The mesogleal matrix is a diluted network of randomly-coiled polymers, such as polysaccharides and glycoproteins that are lightly cross-linked to each other by electrostatic and covalent bonds, and the fibers comprised of collagen fibrils or fibers (see below) (Chapman, 1953; Gosline, 1971; Vogel, 2003). The mesoglea behaves in a viscous-elastic manner, which is consistent with its biochemical composition. Chapman (1953) demonstrated the pliable properties of the mesoglea when strips removed from the sea anemone Metridium senile were sectioned in different directions and revealed little difference in tensile strength. Alexander (1962) found that the mesoglea of M. senile and another sea anemone, Calliactis parasitica, could be stretched to three times its original length by a small stress (~2x104 dynes/cm2), applied for periods of 10-20 hours. It would then nearly return to its original unstretched length over the same time period following removal of the stress. This extensibility and elasticity of the mesoglea is suggested to be due to the random-coil polymers in its matrix, rather than to its collagen fibers (Vogel, 2003). As the mesoglea is stretched, the collagen fibers tend to align with the stress axis, slide past each other, and deform the matrix molecules between them (Gosline, 1971; Wainwright et al., 1976). The closer the collagen fibers 6 are to each other (relative concentration in the matrix), and the closer they are to being parallel with the stress axis, the more rigid the whole structure will be (Vogel, 2003). These are the main properties that distinguish the gelatinous mesoglea from the rigid convective tissues, such as tendons and ligaments, found in vertebrates (Alexander, 1962; Fautin and Mariscal, 1991; Gosline et al., 2002). Both the mesoglea and tendons are composed of fiber and matrix, but in the latter the fibers are arranged in parallel with much less matrix, causing the tendon to behave mechanically as a continuous composite material (Vogel, 2003). Although the mesoglea’s role is primarily a mechanical one, it also has other functions (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). For example, in Octocorallia, in addition to acting as a reinforcement layer, where calcareous sclerites are embedded within the amorphous matrix, the mesoglea contains clusters of cells in a similar way to those in connective tissue (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991; Koehl, 1982). The most typical cells found there are irregularly-shaped amoebocytes and scleroblasts, which are derived from the ectoderm (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). The former are thought to be involved in the production of collagen fibrils and in the movement of food as well as waste material (Larkman, 1984), and the later produce the sclerites (Jeng et al., 2011; Meszaros and Bigger, 1999). Meszaros and Bigger (1999) demonstrated how the mesoglea functions in wound healing of the octocoral Plexaurella fusifera, as regeneration seems to be related to the amoebocytes that extrude the connective fibers necessary for this process. The mesoglea is also involved in the provision of a base upon which the muscle fibers are mounted, and allows their change in length. Batham and Pantin (1951) revealed that regions of the 7 mesoglea which accommodate muscle fibers are much less extensible or deformable than regions of the mesoglea lacking these fibers, and that the latter accommodate the buckling of the former when muscular contraction takes place. Another interesting function of the mesoglea is its ability to store different substances (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). It serves as an additional fluid reservoir antagonist to muscles, and takes part in the temporary storage of chemical energy and essential minerals. Hamner and Jenssen (1974) found that in the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita, the size of the mesoglea rapidly diminishes upon starvation, and that the animal becomes shrunken and distorted within a number of weeks, in the same way that starvation influences the reduction and utilization of fat storages in vertebrate bodies with time. Being an a-cellular layer, most of the biological properties associated with the mesoglea result from its composition and structure. The amount, ratio, type, and molecular properties of the collagen fibers and matrix within the mesoglea are the main components in determining its functions within the coral colony. 1.3 Properties of collagen Collagen is a key component of the mesoglea and of all metazoan extracellular matrices (Exposito et al., 2010). It is one of the most abundant proteins in animals, exhibiting a wide variety of forms and functions, providing the major mechanical support for cell attachment and determining the shape and form of tissues (Exposito et al., 2010). The collagen molecule has a characteristic feature that is repeatedly noted in all metazoans (Garrone, 1998; Müller, 2003). It is composed of a long triple-helical domain in which 8 three collagen polypeptide chains are wound around one another to form a rope-like superhelix, ~1.5 X 300 nm in size (Fratzl, 2003). The polypeptide chains of the collagen molecule uniquely exhibit two features: glycine is every third residue, generating a repeating (Gly-X-Y)n pattern; and a high proportion of residues (ca 20%) are proline and hydroxyproline (Brodsky and Ramshaw, 1997). This amino acid sequence allows the chains to form a righthanded triple-helical structure, where all glycine residues are buried within the core of the protein (Fig. 1). The residues X and Y are exposed on its surface and function in the different collagen interactions (Nagarajan et al., 1999). Figure 1. The collagen molecule, three collagen polypeptide chains (a) wound around one another to form a rope-like superhelix, note Glycine residues (in brown) are buried within the core of the protein (b). (From Molecular Cell Biology Freeman and Company ,2008) 9 Types of collagen differ from each other in the composition of the amino acids in the polypeptide chains, and in the composition of chains within the procollagen molecule (Lamande and Bateman, 1999; McLaughlin and Bulleid, 1998). The polypeptide chains can be either identical three α1 chains, as in type III collagen or different, two α 1 chains and one α 2 chain, as in type I collagen (Hulmes, 2002). The main fibrilar collagens are types I, II, III, V, and XI (Kadler et al., 1996; Myllyharju and Kivirikko, 2001). Type I collagen is the most abundant, being present in most vertebrate tissues, mainly in bone, tendon and skin. Collagen types II and III are the second most abundant and occur particularly in tissues exhibiting elastic properties, such as blood vessels, internal organs, cartilage, inner ear, and central portion of the discs between vertebrae (nucleus pulposus) (van der Rest and Garrone, 1991). Other nonfibrilar collagens form networks (types IV, VIII, and X), occurring as transmembrane proteins (types XIII and XVII), or form 11-nm periodic beaded filaments (type VI) (Hulmes, 2002). Although all collagen types contain the repeating sequence and fold into a characteristic triple-helical structure, they are differentiated by the ability of their helical and non-helical regions to associate into fibers, to form sheets, or to cross-link different collagen types (Fratzl, 2003). These differences are responsible for the diverse functions of collagen types in biological systems. Collagen can present different formations, ranging from gelatinous to fibrous rope-like structures. All of them are arranged hierarchically, wherein multiple tropocollagen molecules form the collagen microfibrils/fibrilis, and multiple collagen fibrils can form collagen fibers (Kadler et al., 1996) (Fig 2). The collagen molecules in the fibril are arranged in a quasi-hexagonal lattice 11 lateral structure (Orgel et al., 2000), where collagen molecules are initially assembled by polar, hydrophobic, and other non-covalent interactions, and later by covalent cross-links (Ottani et al., 2002). Each collagen molecule is offset by ~30 nm with respect to its lateral neighbors. This ~30 nm gap is responsible for the fibrils possessing alternating differences in electron density, with a 67 nm repeat that corresponds to the gap and the overlap regions of the collagen molecules (Toroian et al., 2007). A microfibril is thought to be the basic structural unit of the collagen fibril. Orgel et al. (2006) demonstrated that each collagen molecule associates with its packing neighbors to form a super-twisted, right-handed, pentameric microfibril that interdigitates with its neighboring microfibrils to form a fibril. The final fibril can be from 20 to 400 nm in diameter (Moeller et al., 1995). Collagen fibrils provide the key to scaffolding structures from the nanoscopic to macroscopic length scales, and are substantial constituents of skin, tendon, bone, ligament, cornea, and cartilage as well as the cnidarian mesoglea (Fratzl, 2008; Vogel, 2003). The interaction of collagen fibrils with each other and with the matrix surrounding them has a major role in shaping the morphology of all metazoan extra-cellular matrices and connectives tissues (Fratzl, 2008). 11 Figure 2. Collagen structure, multiple tropocollagen molecules form the collagen microfibrils/fibrilis, and multiple collagen fibrils form collagen fibers. (From Biology, Cambell ,1995) The overall structural and the mechanical properties of collagenous materials are largely derived from the water-retentive capacity of their fibrils and the matrix surrounding them (Cameron et al., 2002). For example, at physiological levels of hydration, the type I collagen fiber is comprised of about 30% collagen and 70% water by volume (Toroian et al., 2007). This ratio can change under progressive hydration, resulting in an increase in the fiber’s diameter, but not in its length (Fullerton and Amurao, 2006). Connective tissues, such as skin, cartilage, tendon, and blood vessels, are defined as systems of insoluble fibrils and soluble polymers which have evolved to absorb the stresses of movement and to maintain shape (Scott, 1975). The insoluble fibrils are collagen, which is almost inextensible, and the soluble polymers are mostly proteoglycans that swell in water (Vogel, 2003). This twoelement system enables the connective tissues to tolerate both pulling and 12 pushing (Fratzl, 2008). This is achieved by using the collagen fibrils to resist pulling, while the proteoglycans press against the collagenous meshwork, in order to resist compressive forces. For example, in tendons, which resist or transmit tensile stresses, the fibrilar element predominates, whereas in vertebrate cartilage or in the cnidarian mesoglea, which elastically absorbs compressive forces and stores elastic energy (Scott, 1990; Thompson and Kier, 2001), soluble polymers and water comprise the majority of the mass (Vogel, 2003). Even small differences in the proportion of collagen fibrils and matrix can significantly affect the tissue’s functional properties, and define two classes of tendons: one that is strong and less flexible; and the other that is flexible and functions as a spring (Ker, 2007). This association of fibrilar and nonfibrilar collagens with other macromolecules and water, into organized structures, can be observed throughout the entire diversity of metazoans (Kadler et al., 1996). 1.4 Evolution and characteristics of collagens among invertebrates Among the 21 types of collagen that have been described in humans, only the fibrilar and the basement membrane type IV collagens are found in the earliest branching multicellular animals (i.e.,Porifera and Cnidaria) (Exposito et al., 2008).The existence of at least one fibrilar collagen and one nonfibrilar collagen in these phyla indicates that the divergence between the collagen families occurred early on in evolution. As the fibrilar collagen family has relatively little evolved over time (Exposito and Garrone, 1990), the nonfibrilar collagen found in the earliest branching multicellular animals might reflect two evolutionary lines. One of these might have been the "exocollagens," such as those attaching sponges to their substrate, the exoskeletons of cnidarians, 13 the cuticles of nematodes and the secreted collagens of mussels. The other line might concern an internalization of such collagens, leading to the differentiation of basement membrane and mesoglea (Exposito et al., 2002; Exposito and Garrone, 1990). Reviewing the appearance of collagen in the different invertebrate phyla discloses its evolutionary scenario and the interrelationships among all metazoan groups. The involvement of collagens in different vertebrate functions, such as the construction of extracellular matrix and cell–matrix mediation, has already been noted in sponges, where fine collagen fibrils are involved in the construction of their mesohyl (Muller-Parker and DiElia, 1997). Notably, type IV collagen, which is strongly associated with cell-adhesion, has been described in both spongin (Exposito et al., 2008) and vertebrate basement membrane (Aouacheria et al., 2006). This resemblance in collagen functions between invertebrates and vertebrates is further noted in Cnidaria, where ultrastructural and functional studies have revealed similarities between the hydra- mesoglea and vertebrate basement membranes (Deutzmann et al., 2000). Another example of the evolutionary role of collagen is related to the association of collagen and calcium, as collagen takes a major part in the construction of vertebrate skeleton in the form of calcium-phosphate-rich collagen fibrils (Garrone, 1998). This was also found among Cnidaria, where collagen plays a role in the formation of axial skeletons of sea pens (Ledger and Franc, 1978) and sea fans (Kingsley et al., 1990). 14 While some invertebrate collagens present properties and functions that link them to those found in vertebrates, others also present unique features not known in the latter. For example, the shortest known collagens, named minicollagens, are a family of unusually short molecules isolated from cnidarians (Adamczyk et al., 2008), whereas the largest collagens are found in the cuticle of annelid worms and are ca. eight times larger than most known collagens (Gaill et al., 1991). Annelids that dwell near hydrothermal vents were also shown to possess collagens with high thermal stabilities (Bris and Gaill, 2007; Gaill et al., 1995). Collagens with unique biomechanical and physical properties have also been found among some mollusks (Kier and Smith, 2002; Thompson and Kier, 2001; Trueman and Hodgson, 1990). The best studied collagen is the one produced by mussels, and which attaches to the substratum by means of byssus threads. These threads are extracellular, nonfibrilar and collagenous, secreted from the mussel’s foot (Bell and Gosline, 1996). They function under tension as shock absorbers, being strong and stiff at one end and pliable at the other (Waite et al., 2003). The distal portion of these threads has a breaking strength comparable to that of a tendon, while its proximal portion is approximately 20 times more extensible (Bell and Gosline, 1996; Smeathers and Vincent, 1979). Invertebrate collagens are not only unique in their ability to present a variety of properties, but also in their ability to control and change these properties back and forth. Mutable collagenous tissue occurs in a variety of echinoderms (Matranga, 2005), that can control the sliding rate of collagen fibrils when the tissue is under tensile stress (Smith et al., 1981). This can rapidly and reversibly alter the stiffness of their connective tissues, as opposed to connective tissues 15 such as tendons and ligaments that are generally regarded as passive and inert materials (Szulgit, 2007). These examples indicate the large set of different, and sometimes even exceptional functions, that collagen presents among vertebrates and invertebrates (Heinemann et al., 2007). Although considered a common structural protein in metazoans, the large degree of polymorphism makes collagens one of the most studied protein families (Exposito et al., 2002). Collagen occurrence in all invertebrate phyla has made it a subject for study in a variety of both benthic and pelagic taxa (Aouacheria et al., 2006; Helman et al., 2008; Tucker et al., 2011). The diversity and complexity of invertebrate collagens may already exceed the more extensively characterized vertebrate ones. Given that invertebrates account for at least 95% of animal species, and that only some invertebrate collagens have been characterized to date, one might expect a large spectrum of unique collagens among them still to be found (Exposito et al., 2002; Har-el and Tanzer, 1993). This current study deals with the reef dwelling octocoral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi (family Alcyoniidae). This zooxanthellate coral inhabits reefs exposed to strong tidal currents and typhoons (Dai, 1993). Its congenerics were found to be dioecious broadcasters, with onset of reproduction at the age of 6-10 years in S. glaucum, or coinciding with 12-13 cm basal stalkcircumference in S. elegans (Benayahu and Loya, 1986; Hellstrom et al., 2010). S. ehrenbergi has a wide Indo–Pacific distribution, and is known for its diverse content of natural products (Cheng et al., 2009; Fleury et al., 2000; Look et al., 1986; Nguyen Xuan Cuong, 2008; Tanaka et al., 2005); these 16 include cembranoid diterpenes that, in therapeutically relevant assays, have shown some cytotoxic, cancer chemo-preventative and anti inflammatory potential (Konig and Wright, 1998). 1.5 Objective and aims The overall objective of the present study was to identify and characterize the nature of unique fibers found in colonies of Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. These fibers are organized as bundles within the colonies and, when mechanically isolated, may reach hundreds of microns in diameter and up to tens of centimeters in length. At the early stages of the study, two alternative hypotheses regarding the nature of the fibers were addressed. The first argued that the fibers are collagenous, while the second claimed that they are a semi-crystalline polymer. The rationale behind these two hypotheses was derived from previous studies on long fibers among invertebrates, such as the collagenous byssus threads (Bell and Gosline, 1996) and the semicrystalline polymer proteins of spider dragline silk (Simmons et al., 1996). Preliminary NMR and amino acid analyses rejected the second hypothesis and accordingly dictated the subsequent research. Additional hypotheses were tested regarding the arrangement of the fibers and their function. It has been hypothesized that the fibers are compactly arranged within the colony (i.e., folded or coiled) and not linearly arranged in a stretched manner. Regarding the function of the fibers in the colony, the working hypothesis posited that the fibers provide some structural benefits to the colony as known for other collagen structures (Fratzl, 2008; Vogel, 2003). 17 Specifically, the current study dealt with the biochemical and structural properties of the fibers of S. ehrenbergi, including their location and formation at the tissue and cellular levels. In addition it evaluated the biomechanical and physical properties of the fibers. The following questions were addressed: What are the biochemical composition of the fibers and their spatial arrangement? Where the fibers are located and what is their three-dimensional structure within the colony? Where does the biosynthesis of the fibers take place? What are the mechanical and physical properties of the fibers? Answering these questions allowed me to examine the possible biological role of the fibers in S. ehrenbergi colonies, and to gain new insights regarding the evolution of collagen in metazoans. Studying the function of these fibers within the colony can lead to a better understanding of how organisms withstand environmental forces such as waves, currents, and tidal changes (Vogel, 2003). In addition, the findings were compared to data from the literature regarding known collagen fibers of invertebrates and vertebrates. The fibers may also present additional morphological character that may provide new insights into the relationships within and between the alcyoniid genera Sarcophyton and Lobophytum. A molecular phylogenetic study of these two genera identified a third distinct clade that includes a mix of nominal species from each genus (McFadden et al., 2006). As this mixed clade includes S. ehrenbergi, the study of its fibers has accumulated structural data that may support the phylogenetic data. Elucidation of the biomechanical and 18 physical properties of the coral collagen fibers is also important in order to assess the feasibility of utilizing them for biomedical applications. 19 2. Materials and Methods 2.1 Collection of colonies Colonies of S. ehrenbergi were collected by SCUBA from several localities: Dahalak Archipelago, Eritrea; Shimoni, Kenya; Kenting National Park, Taiwan and Eilat, northern Gulf of Aqaba, Israel. Identification of the species was facilitated by comparison to museum specimens deposited at the Zoological Museum, Tel Aviv University (TAU). After collection, most of the colonies were frozen to -200 C and shipped by air to TAU. Some colonies from Taiwan were shipped alive to TAU. 2.2 Farming of colonies Live colonies of S. ehrenbergi were maintained at TAU in a closed seawatersystem. The system comprised five PVC tanks, 1 m 3 each, kept in a 30 m2 greenhouse that was protected from direct sunlight by a 50% shade net. Metal halide lamps (Osram, HQI-BT 400W/D) provided extra lighting on occasions of overclouding, when direct sunlight was absent for more than three consecutive days. Each tank contained 800 L artificial seawater (Red Sea salt ©), 200 kg of live rocks obtained from Eilat and 1.7.-2.7 mm grain size coralsand (Pacific ©) on its bottom. For algal grazing, each tank was provided with ~40 Trochos dentatus snails and every 10 days their feces were removed from the bottom of the tanks, together with ca 5% of the water volume, which was then replaced. Seawater was circulated between the tanks by a 5,000 l per hour circulation pump (JEBO), and was filtered through protein skimmers (JEBO 3500). Independent 21 water motion in each tank was generated by a centrifugal pump. An individual heater (150 Watt) and a chiller (JEBO 2000) maintained the water temperature in each tank (250 C, see ahead). The abiotic parameters in the system were set as follows: salinity (35 ppt) and temperature (250 C) were monitored daily, and the nutrient levels and pH were monitored weekly (nitrite <0.05 ppm, nitrate <10 ppm, ammonia 0 ppm and 8.1-8.3 pH) (Sella and Benayahu, 2010). 2.3 Extraction of fibers Bundles of fibers were mechanically isolated from pieces (1-10 cm3), removed from the polypary (the polyp-bearing part of the colony) of S. ehrenbergi colonies (Fig. 4). The fibers were extracted from the tissue onto a revolved polyethylene card (1x 8 cm) mounted on a low-speed electric motor (9-18 RPM). The card was removed from the motor and the fibers were cleansed of cellular debris under a compound microscope using fine forceps, following 4-6 rinses in 70% ethanol. The fibers were kept rolled on the card in ethanol for further experimental work. 2.4 Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance analyses (NMR) In order to characterize the main biochemical compounds composing the fibers, NMR analysis was preformed at the School of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, TAU (August 2005 - August 2007). The NMR method is based on the ability of a strong external magnetic field to create characteristic resonance frequency when applied to structurally distinct sets of hydrogens in a molecule. Fourier transform spectrometer operates by exciting all the proton 21 nuclei in a molecule simultaneously, followed by mathematical analysis of the complex resonance frequencies emitted as they relax back to the equilibrium state. The overlapping resonances signals that are generated as the excited protons relax are collected by a computer and subjected to a Fourier transform mathematical analysis. This analysis converts the complex time domain signal emitted by the sample, into the frequency domain spectrum, doing so it can acquire a complete spectrum within a few seconds (Arnold and Marcotte, 2009). For the purpose of the current study ca. 25 mg of fibers were removed from 6 colonies collected at different sites. The samples were hydrolyzed in 6 ml of NHCL overnight at 110 °C. The acid was then removed under vacuum and the residue dissolved in D2O (0.5 ml). Samples were measured in 500 MHz and 100 MHz NMR machines (Bruker ARX500, ARX400). 2.5 Amino acid analysis In order to characterize the protein that composes the fibers, amino acid analysis was preformed at the Department of Chemical Research Support, Weizmann Institute of Science (January 2006). This method enables determination of protein quantities and provides detailed information regarding the relative amino acid composition and free amino acids (Bütikofer et al., 1991). The procedure includes hydrolysis, following by a separation, detection and quantification, which give a characteristic profile for a protein, often sufficient for its identification. 22 Peptide hydrolyzates were achieved using ophthalaldehyde, 3- mercaptopropionic acid (OPA/MPA), and 9- fluorenyl-methyl chloroformate (FMOC). Sensitive detection and separation of hydrolysed samples (amino acids) were done by HPLC. The pre-column preparation was fully automated and had a detection range of 100-3000 pmoles, thus requiring only a small sample (1 µl). Three samples of isolated collagen fibers (ca. 5 µg each) from samples collected at different collection sites were analyzed using Waters PicoTag Work Station for gas phase Hydrolysis and Hewlet Packard 1090 HPLC equipped with a diode array detector and an auto injector with a PC based Chemstation database, utilizing Amino Quant chemistry. 2.6 Light and electron microscopy In order to examine the microstructural features of the collagen fibers, light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM) were used. For visualization of fibers in the tissue and of isolated fibers, samples were removed from colonies that had been earlier preserved in 4% glutaraldehyde in seawater. The samples were decalcified in a mixture of equal volume of formic acid (50%) and sodium citrate (15%) for 20 minutes (twice), and then placed back in 4% glutaraldehyde. Samples for light microscopy were rinsed with distilled water, and embedded in 2 % agarose (50 °C), or in high melting point paraffin. This procedure was conducted in order to maintain the natural orientation of the collagen in the colony and in the isolated fiber bundles while sectioning them. Following solidification, rectangular pieces, closely fitting around each sample, were cut out and transferred to 70% ethanol. After dehydration through a graded series of ethyl alcohol, the samples were 23 embedded in paraffin. Cross and longitudinal sections, 5-8 μm thick, were prepared using MIR microtome (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Sections were routinely stained in Hematoxylin – Eosin and additionally in Masson blue which stains collagen, Van Gieson- elastin and Alcian bluemucopolysaccharides and glycosaminoglycans (Ross and Wojciech, 2006) (Ross and Wojciech, 2006). Samples for SEM and TEM were decalcified (see above) and later dehydrated through a graded series of ethyl alcohols. Samples for SEM were fractured using a scalpel blade in order to expose the polyp cavities, before being critically point-dried with liquid CO2, gold coated, and examined under JEOL JSM 840A SEM operated at 25 kV. Material for TEM was embedded in Epon and the sections were stained with both uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Glycoproteins were detected by using sodium tungstate and cupromeronic blue staining (Scott, 1990). Negative staining was employed for studying fibrils that were detached from fibers by sonication at 30 KHz for five minutes (PCI 1.5) (Ortolani and Marchini, 1995). TEM was carried out with Jeol 1200 EX electron microscope. 2.7 Graphic analysis Image-J software (National Institutes of Health, USA) was used for analyzing gray values distribution and calculating areas on selected areas in micrographs and histological images. The software was used to create gray value intensity histograms that calculated the color intensity distribution along 24 fibrils in TEM micrographs. This was done in order to locate repeated staining patterns along the fibrils. The color intensity histogram displayed a twodimensional graph of the intensities of pixels along rectangular selections (or line selections wider than one pixel) within the image. The obtained graph featured a ‘column average plot’, where the X-axis represented the horizontal distance through the selection, and the Y-axis the vertically averaged pixel intensity. In order to define a tested area on a TEM micrograph of a fibril, the image was set as 8-bit gray scale image and a rectangular border, 200-500 nm long, was placed over the fibril (14 samples from 9 different isolated fibrils) (Ferreira and Rasband, 2011). 2.8 Wide-angle X-ray diffraction In order to characterize the molecular structure and peptide arrangement of the collagen, wide-angle X-ray diffraction study was performed on the fibers at the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, TAU (November, 2008). To obtain X-ray diffraction data, samples of isolated fibers were dried at room temperature for 15 minutes and stretched along a rectangular slit in a brass sample holder, secured on either side by cyanoacrylate adhesive (3M). The experiments were performed on Rigaku Raxis IV++ image-plate detector mounted on a Rigaku RU-H3R rotating anode generator with Cu Kα radiation focused by Osmic confocal mirrors. The detector sample distance was 100 mm, and a 1.5418 Angstroms wavelength was used, following Pazy et al. (2002). 25 2.9 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) In order to study the distribution of the fibers within the colony, an MRI study was conducted at the Department of Neurobiology, TAU (September – November, 2010). Four small colonies of S. ehrenbergi with a polypary- diameter of 3-5 cm were scanned by 7T/30 MRI scanner (Bruker, Germany), equipped with a gradient system of 400 mT/m. Prior to the test the colonies were anesthetized by 4-hr titration of saturated MgCl2 solution (Häussermann, 2004). Throughout the scan, the colonies were kept in 50 ml PVC test tube filled with saturated MgCl2 seawater at 23° C. For excitation, a body-coil (outer/inner diameter of 112/72 mm) was used and a quadrate coil (10 mm diameter) served as a receiver. The MRI protocol included Gd-enhanced fatsuppressed T1-weighted imaging and DTI. The total MRI protocol lasted 120 min, in order to obtain an image with maximal resolution. 2.10 Biomechanical studies In order to evaluate the biomechanical properties, bundles of fibers were isolated from colonies and stored in 70% ethanol and shipped by air to Friday Harbor laboratories, Washington, USA (June, 2008). Prior to the experiment, samples were placed for one hour in fresh water (FW) at room temperature in order to rehydrate the samples to their original state. Single fibers were isolated from the bundles using fine forceps under a dissecting microscope. The fibers were photographed (X 1000) with a camera attached to a light microscope (Nikon, DN 100), and their length and diameter was digitally measured by ImageJ software (Fig. 3a). A fiber was attached by cynoacrylate glue at one end to a stainless steel tensometer beam with a half bridge 26 formed by two semi-conductor strain gages (1gr=7.45V, max 10 gr). The other end the fiber was fixed to a stainless steel beam maneuvered by micrometer (Fig 1b) see Kasapi and Gosline (1999). During the installation, measures were taken to minimize axial stretching of the sample and to keep the sample moist. The sample was installed in an experimental chamber containing distilled water, and was immersed in relaxed (un-stretched) state for ca. 30 minutes before testing to insure rehydration (Gentleman et al., 2003; Kasapi and Gosline, 1999). Figure 3. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Biomechanical experiment set-up. a. Fibers under light microscope (100x, oil immersion). b. Tensometer on stage of dissecting microscope, note stainless steel beam maneuvered by micrometer on one side of the experimental chamber and stainless steel tensometer beam on the other. Prior to the experiments, the force transducer beam deflection was measured by pulling a thin (0.5 mm) non-flexible copper wire in known increments. The ba calculated beam deflection was subtracted from all fiber displacement results in order to obtain the real displacement. In the experiments, undulated fiber 27 was extended until becoming straight but not stretched, and its reference length was measured by caliper in mm (L initial). In order to locate L 0, the point where internal material alignment makes the material respond in a similar way to deformation (Vogel, 2003), fibers were repeatedly stretched to 5% of their initial length (i.e., preconditioning cycles). Preconditioning to 5% (3 cycles) was performed in each experiment before the samples underwent elongation profiles of load-unload (4 cycles) or load to failure, and L0 was measured. Volt output was gained x1000 and reading was carried out with a voltmeter (0.001 precision). Micrometer maneuvering and data recording were performed by hand in 100 µM increments, and force (N) was calculated. The results of the experiment included the fiber’s extension (µm) and load bearing (N). To analyze the results in a manner independent of the sample dimensions, the elongation and load were respectively transformed to strain (e) and stress (s). s=F/A e= ΔL/L0 Where F [in Newton] is the load, and A= πR² the cross-sectional area of the fiber following Vogel (2003). Hysteresis was observed in the stress-strain curve, as the area of the loop being equal to the energy lost during the loading cycle. Viscoelasticity was observed as the property of the material to exhibit both viscous and elastic characteristics when undergoing deformation. Modulus of elasticity was defined as the slope of the stress–strain curve in the elastic deformation region: λ= s/e where lambda (λ) is the elastic modulus; s is stress and e is strain. λ units are Pascal. 28 Strength was defined as the maximal stress achieved when a sample is loaded until it breaks. Extensibility was defined as the maximal strain achieved when a sample is loaded until it breaks. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. In order to characterize the mechanical properties of a fibril and its attachment force to the fiber, in-situ SPM-TEM testing was performed at the Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, TAU (February, 2010). The TEM-SPM (Nanofactory Instruments Inc., Dallas, U.S.A) consists of a piezo tube for fine motion, and a geared stepping motor for rough z-motion. The TEM-SPM was inserted into a Philips CM200 field emission gun TEM, and AFM cantilever took force measurements by directly measuring displacement of the AFM tip. A new experimental procedure was developed in order to utilize the TEMSPM system for the biomechanical fibril-fiber interaction study. For the sample preparation, fibers were attached in parallel to a TEM grid by cynoacrylate glue on both sides. After he adhesive had set, the TEM grid was cut in the middle using electric pliers, creating two semi-circular unites with a number of protruding free-cut fiber ends. Each experiment used one semicircular TEM grid that was inserted into the TEM. TEM operational adhesive (Nanofactory Instruments Inc., Dallas, U.S.A) was applied to the free end of the AFM cantilever, in order to hold protruding fibrils from the cut ends. Four samples were tested during this study. Force measurements and continuous digital photography were recorded during the experiments (Regan et al., 2004). 29 2.11 Thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry In order to measure the weight changes in the collagen and to determine its thermal stability, Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA) and Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) were carried out at the Wolfson Applied Materials Research Centre, TAU (March, 2010). For this purpose TA instruments module 910 and System Controller 2100 were used. For TGA measurements, fibers in 70% ethanol were transferred to three drying treatments: room temperature for 15 minutes and 24 hours, as well as 24 hours in vacuum (250C). For the TGA measurement the samples were sealed in a glass vessel and placed in a sample compartment that was continuosly flushed with dried, pre-purified argon. The scan rate of TGA runs was 0.50C/min, following Golodnitsky et al. (2003). DSC was used for measurements of heat-flow and temperatures associated with transition of the soft coral collagen from organized structure to unorganized state. For the DSC measurements, vacuum-dried samples of 512 mg (24 hours), were hermetically encapsulated in aluminum pans. The fibers were subjected to a sinusoidal temperature ramp, superimposed on a linear temperature ramp in order to provide data on reversing and nonreversing characteristics of the thermal events. DSC runs were recorded at a scan rate of 5 -100 C per minute up to 300° C (Leikina et al., 2002). 31 3. Results 3.1 Biochemical and structural properties of isolated fibers Tearing apart the polypary of S. ehrenbergi colony revealed numerous bundles of fibers that could be pulled from the tissue to a length of at least one order of magnitude higher than the colony’s diameter (Fig. 4). Figure 4. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Mechanically isolated fibers from the polypary. Note the large number of bundles of fibers and their length. 3.1.1 Proton and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Proton and carbon NMR analysis revealed spectra that are characteristic for hydrolyzate of a peptide that is a mixture of amino acids, thus indicating the proteinous nature of the fibers (Fig. 5). 31 3.1.2 Amino acid analyses Amino acid analysis further confirmed the presence of amino acids and revealed high concentration of glycine, proline and hydroxyproline in a ratio corresponding to a collagenous protein (Fig. 6) (Fratzl, 2008). Table 1 presents the release time of amino acids from the mobile phase gradient in the chromatographic column (release time in minutes: RT), the intensity of the observed peak in fluorescence units, its area, and the calculated amount in picomol. Eight out of the 27 peaks noted in the sample were not recognized as known amino acids (see Discussion). 32 Figure 5. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. NMR spectroscopic profile of fibers featuring the characteristic spectrum of hydrolyzate of peptide comprised of an amino acid mixture. 33 Figure 6. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Amino acid analysis of fibers featuring collagen-related amino acids. Glycine, Proline, and Hydroxyproline are indicated. 34 Table 1. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Characterization of amino acid peaks. Note eight unrecognized peaks (9, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 22 and 27). No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sum Name Hpro AMQ Asp Ser Glu Gly His NH3 Arg Thr Ala Pro Tyr Val Met Lys lle Leu Phe RT 11.797 12.608 13.625 15.347 16.013 17.494 18.262 20.05 21.306 21.666 21.975 22.815 23.115 24.387 25.043 26.748 27.852 28.356 29.306 29.788 30.378 31.133 31.867 32.46 32.884 33.72 34.587 Area 1449440 210420 2201385 1465071 2789428 7795628 465666 4225440 80331 2435609 1571415 56598 3024957 28980 1105715 22910 60417 743866 3534428 1366922 52533 25901 1399282 2794982 3700211 2419376 85143 Height 98789 10577 143512 97687 177478 423228 26694 221045 7356 222943 126517 7125 238777 1865 101985 2261 7533 91521 356606 147856 5555 1890 158919 294791 392968 260384 7256 Amount (pmol) 83.674 43.312 168.082 87.668 191.959 501.615 18.943 149.948 % from known AA 4.15 2.15 8.34 4.35 9.52 24.89 0.94 7.44 107.777 69.217 5.35 3.43 130.905 6.49 102.471 5.08 30.726 79.999 39.482 1.52 3.97 1.96 59.693 49.841 66.24 33.978 2.96 2.47 3.29 1.69 2015.53 100.00 3.1.3 Light and electron microscopy Histological staining of isolated bundles of fibers stained with Masson Blue, Van Gieson, and Alcian blue revealed a packed arrangement of fibers wrapped around each other. Two to three fibers coil together to form a ropelike structure, and a number of such structures form a bundle (Fig. 7a, b). This feature was also noted when isolating a single fiber using forceps for the biomechanical studies (see below). Isolated relaxed collagen fibers are acellular, almost circular in cross-section, with a diameter of 9 ± 0.37 µm (n=166 fibers), and feature a wavy course (Fig. 7). Both Masson Blue and Van Gieson stains stained the fibers homogenously, and confirmed their 35 collagenous nature (Fig. 7a, b, c). The blue (Masson Blue) and the red (Van Gieson) stains revealed the same degree of coloration on all longitudinallysectioned fibers, as well as on the cross-sectioned ones. However, the degree of coloration differed between the two types of sections. Cross-sectioned fibers showed darker coloration than longitudinally-sectioned ones for both Masson Blue and Van Gieson stains. Elastin, which is normally stained black by the Van Gieson (Ross and Wojciech, 2006), was not found in either the cross-or longitudinal-sections (Fig. 7c). Alcian Blue staining of isolated fibers (Fig. 7d) did not generate homogeneous staining. The fibers did not reveal the typical blue color associated with this staining (Ross and Wojciech, 2006), and therefore there was no conclusive evidence regarding the presence of mucopolysaccharides or glycosaminoglycans in the fibers. Only the agarose that was used for mounting the collagen fibers was stained blue, and could be seen between the fibers (Fig. 7d). 36 Figure 7. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Histological cross-and longitudinal-sections of stained isolated fiber bundles. a. Cross and longitudinal sections, Masson Blue confirms the collagenous nature of the fiber by staining them blue, note the fibers wavy course ; b. Longitudinal sections, Masson Blue, note a number of fibers (in blue) coiled together; c. Cross-and longitudinal-sections, Van Gieson confirms the collagenous nature of the fiber by staining them red-brown; d. Cross-and longitudinal-sections, Alcian Blue stained blue only the agarose between the fibers. 37 TEM micrographs of cross and longitudinally sectioned fibers revealed a parallel arrangement of thinner fibrils organized in a packed structure (Fig. 8). Fibrils in longitudinal sections showed a repeated pattern of dark and light banding perpendicular to the fibril axis and were not homogenously stained. Cross-sectioned fibers featured a packed arrangement of fibrils, although there was an unstained area between adjacent ones. The width of fibrils in the longitudinal-sections was 15.9± 3.11 nm (n=15 fibrils in 3 fibers) and their diameter in the cross-sections was 15.16± 3.41 nm (n=17 fibrils in 6 fibers), according to microscopic image measurements. Fragments of fibrils isolated by sonication and negatively stained featured a diameter of 18.9 ± 2.45 nm (n=41 measurements on 27 isolated fibrils, Fig. 9a) as well as a repeated, dark and light banding perpendicular to the fibril’s axis. Examination of this banding along the fibrils through creating a color showed dark and repeated intensity distribution, bands every 65-70 nm, with some lower amplitude (less dark) repeatable bands inside the 65-70 nm zone (Fig. 9b). The negative staining of isolated fibrils also revealed a parallel arrangement of thinner sub-units ~2.5 nm wide, organized in a packed structure (Fig. 9c). This pattern was also noted by TEM micrographs of the collagen fibril protruding from the end of a fiber, which featured an uneven surface area (Fig. 9d). Cupromeronic Blue staining (CB) colored the fibers in a strong dark blue visible to the naked eye. Longitudinal-sections in CB-stained samples revealed a parallel arrangement structure of packed fibrils surrounded by a dense proteoglycan matrix. This matrix seemed to be distributed evenly 38 between the fibrils and along the fiber (Fig. 10). When comparing the TEM micrographs of longitudinal-sectioned fibers both with and without CB (Figs. 6, 8), it is evident that the CB labeled the areas between adjacent fibrils within the fibers. Figure 8. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. TEM micrographs of sectioned fibers. a. Cross-section, b. Longitudinal section. Note parallel fibrilar structure. 39 Figure 9. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Micrographs of fibrils and graphical analysis. a. TEM micrograph of negatively stained isolated fibril, note bright horizontal bands along fibril. b. Intensity histogram of a fibril section (yellow), major bands are ca 70 nm (dark and red arrows), lower amplitude banding is also noticed inside the 70 nm unit (area under red arrows). c. Negatively stained isolated fibril with organized pattern of elongated subunits ~2.5 nm wide. d. TEM micrograph of collagen fibril protruding from sectioned fiber with an uneven surface. 41 Figure 10. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. TEM micrograph of longitudinal section of isolated fiber with parallel arrangement of packed fibrilar structure and dense proteoglycan matrix between fibrils (in black, marked by arrow). 41 3.1.4 Wide-angle X-ray diffraction Wide-angle X-ray diffraction patterns recorded in the fibers revealed a strong intermolecular function perpendicular to the helix layer line, just beyond the salt ring. This was an indication of a lower resolution series of meridional reflections of the molecular packing, which confirmed the fibrilar nature of the collagen. The fibrilar packing function comprised fibrils aligned 16-17 nm apart, with a periodicity of 66 nm. The helix pitch was approximately 2.86 angstroms and consisted of high proline content, with a molecular packing function of ca 12 angstroms (Fig. 11). A significant water background was noted, covering the first order. Figure 11. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction of dry fibers, helix layer lines and meridional reflections. Note significant water background (arrow) and the different rings which are meridional reflections of the molecular packing. Darker field in central part is due to rectangular slit in the sample holder which clasped the fiber. 42 3.2 Location, distribution and formation of fibers within the colony 3.2.1 Light and electron microscopy Histological cross- and longitudinal sections from the polypary of S. ehrenbergi revealed an accumulation of organized collagen fibers along the gastrovascular cavity of the polyps in six out of the eight mesenteries. The gastrodermal cells of these mesenteries create a ridge with a tube-like structure along the free end of the mesenteries which encompass the coiled fibers (Fig. 12a-c). This feature is noted in cross-sections in the basal (lower) part of the pharynx and can be traced by serial cross sections down to the base of the gastrovascular cavity (Fig. 12a-c). SEM micrographs of cross- and longitudinal sectioned polyp cavities after mechanical tearing, showed fibers of approximately nine µm in diameter, extending from the gastrodermal tubelike structure along the free end of the mesenteries (see Fig. 12d-f). The fiber had an uneven surface area, and it still featured a helical wavy structure, even when it was removed from the heavily coiled packing within the mesentery. TEM micrographs of gastrodermal cells of the mesenteries surrounding the fibers revealed a large number of striated vesicles (Fig.11a-c). They were found mostly within the gastrodermis of the mesentery adjacent to fiber bundles (Fig.11d). High numbers of vesicles were also noted in cell clusters found in the mesoglea (Fig. 14a, b). These cell-containing vesicles were located near the sites of the decalcified sclerites, which were surrounded by a fibrous structure. A fibrous sheath surrounded the remained debris (Fig. 14f) and was comprised of fiber-layers. Their structure differed from the mesoglea, which was comprised of unorganized fibrils embedded in a large volume of 43 matrix (Fig. 14g-i). As opposed to the fiber bundles found along the mesentery, the fibrous sheaths seemed to be made of a three-dimensional network of layered fibers, and were less dense than the parallel arrangement of fibrils of the mesenterial collagen fibers. Histological cross-sections from the stalk of S. ehrenbergi revealed an accumulation of organized collagen fibers in gastrodermal cavities/canals that extend into the stalk (Fig. 15). The gastrodermal cells of these gastrodermal cavities/ canals, create a mesentery-like structure which encompasses a fibrous collagen arrangement. These cavities/ canals were found to be smaller and more densely arranged in the periphery of the stalk than at its center. 44 Figure 12. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Location, arrangement, and structure of collagen fibers within a polyp. a. Polyp morphology with a cross-section in the gastrovascular cavity; note that six out of eight mesenteries contain collagen fibers (marked in black) . b. Histological cross-section of gastrovascular cavity with fiber bundles (in blue) within six out of eight mesenteries. c. Histological cross-section of collagen fibers within mesentery, note packed rope-like arrangement of bundles of fibers and gastrodermal cells surrounding them. d. SEM micrograph of fibers emerging from mesentery within polyp cavity; note helical structure and fibrilar texture of fibers. e. Fiber bearing mesentery; note tube-like structure formed by gastrodermal cells and extended fiber. f. Collagen fiber extended from the mesentery; note the heavily coiled fiber (right side) as it loosens (left side). 45 Figure 13. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. TEM micrographs of gastrodermal cells within mesentery. a Cross-section of fibers within a mesentery; note gastrodermal cell (GC) and fiber bundle (FB). b Cross section of gastrodermal cell with fibrous vesicles (FV). c Fibrous vesicles (FV). d Fibrous vesicles adjacent to inner side of cell membrane (marked by arrows on both sides) bordering collagen bundle; note collagen fibrils. 46 Figure 14. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Microscopy of Mesoglea. a Longitudinalsections of polypary; note polyps cavities (PC), clusters of cells within mesoglea (CM), and space left after decalcification of sclerites (SS). b Cross-section of mesoglea (Masson Blue); note strong coloration of fibers on circumference of decalcified sclerite (arrow). c TEM micrograph of cells clusters within mesoglea (M) with fibrous vesicles (FV). d, e Fibrous vesicle. f Fibrous sheath (CF) surrounding decalcified sclerite. g, h Layered fibrous sheath. i Unorganized arrangement of collagen fibrils within the gelatinous mesoglea. 47 Figure 15. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Location, arrangement, and structure of collagen fibers. Histological cross-section of the colony stalk. a. Gastrovascular cavity/ canals (GC) arrangement within the stalk; note the ectoderm (ECT) and the increase in size of GC towards the center of the stalk. b. Gastrovascular cavity/ canals with 2-3 mesentery-like structures which encompass a fibrous collagen arrangement (CL); note CL in both intact and damaged mesenteries-like structures (arrows). c. Gastrovascular cavity/ canals at the center of the stalk. d. Gastrovascular cavity/ canals at the peripheral layers of the stalk. 48 3.2.2 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Serial MRI cross-sections of Sarcophyton ehrenbergi colonies, starting from the surface of the polypary down to the stalk, revealed the fiber arrangement within the colony. The fibers extent from the polypary to the colony base, and were traced as originating from all the polyps on the polypary, both top and periphery, and progressing through the stalk to the colony base (Fig. 16). Cross-sections of the stalk showed that the fibers are not evenly distributed within the stalk, but run along the stalk peripheral layers. Figure 16. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Magnetic resonance images of colony. a. Sarcophyton sp. colony (3 cm in diameter), the numbered horizontal lines correspond to levels of imaging within colony. b. Images of 50 µm cross-sections of colony (1-16), ranging from the polypary (1) to the basal part of the colony(18). c. Magnification of three images (1, 6 and 16), collagen bundles appear black and marked by arrows; note fibers running from polyps with different spatial orientation (1 vertical and 6 horizontal) to periphery of stalk (16). 49 3.3 Biomechanical and physical properties of the fibers 3.3.1 Biomechanical properties of isolated fibers Preconditioning: L0 was obtained from strain-stress curves of preconditioning cycles (Fig. 17). Average difference between L intial and L0 was 0.03 ± 0.0094 (n=7 fibers). Load-unload cycles: From strain-stress curves obtained from fibers that were repeatedly stretched to 15% of their initial length (3 cycles of loadingunloading), the viscoelastic character of the samples was evident (Fig. 17). This was defined by a distinct hysteresis loop and decreased stress values for the same strain between consecutive cycles. Average hysteresis for the first cycle was 41.2595±15.5% (n=14 fibers). It was evident that the overall response of the fibers was not a linear one. However, it seems that starting from a certain strain level, there was a linear relationship between stress and strain. Linear regression at the high range of strain (7% - 15%), showed a very good correlation (R2=0.999). No correlation was found between slope to sample length (p>0.05). The estimated slope was 0.5 ±0.1 GPa and represents the stiffness of the sample. Load to failure: From the load to failure strain-stress curves of 12 tested fibers, it was evident that the overall response was not linear (Fig. 17). Linear regression at the high range of strain (8 - 19.4%) revealed highly significant correlation (R2=0.999), but no correlation was obtained between the slope and fiber length (p>0.05). The estimated slope is 0.44 ± 0.1 GPa and indicates the stiffness of the fiber. Average stress to failure was 55.6 ± 11.7 MPa and average elongation under stress was 19.4±4.27%. 51 Figure 17. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Mechanical properties of isolated collagen fibers. a. Representative stress-strain curve of preconditioning cycle. b. Representative stress-strain curve of loading-unloading cycle (E= 0.9 GPa). c. Representative stress-strain curve of load to failure. 51 3.3.2 Mechanical characterization of fibrils with in situ SPM-TEM A force-distance curve obtained under loading-unloading cycle of four fibrilis (protruding from 4 fibers), showed elastic characters such as the hysteresis loop and the decreased force values for the same distance between 0-250 nm (loading) and 250-0 nm (unloading) (Fig. 18). Linear regression of both loading and unloading curves of one cycle (60-200 nm) revealed a highly significant correlation (R2=0.9845). An estimated slope of 0.036 ± 0.015 µN (n=4) was noted in both curves, representing the stiffness of the fibrils. Repeated loading-unloading cycles of the same fibril were not performed because of the difficulty in stabilizing the fiber stable on the TEM grid as the fibril was being pulled, and in eliminating fibril sliding within the fiber over time. Furthermore, it was not possible to use the AFM cantilever tip for forces higher than 8-9 µN because of a failure of the tip adhesive to hold the fibril under such forces (Fig. 19). Therefore, a load to failure curve of a single fibril, or the needed force for detachment from the fiber, could not be obtained. 52 Fibril- Fiber Desplacment 5 4 Force (µN) 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Distance (nm) Figure 18. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Mechanical properties of non- isolated, in vivo collagen fibril. A representative force-distance curve of loading- unloading cycle. 53 Figure 19. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Mechanical characterization of nonisolated fibril with in-situ SPM-TEM. a. AFM cantilever tip (black) approaches a cross-section of a collagen fiber with a protruding fibril (fibril marked by arrow). b. AFM cantilever tip connected to fibril during a load-unload cycle. c. Magnification of tip-fibril connection area; note folded end of fibril on adhesive tip (arrow). d. Adhesive failure as force over nine µN is applied; note adhesive residue on the fibril end, and damage to the tip. 54 3.3.3 Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) TGA of fibers stored in 70% ethanol and then dried at room temperature for 15 minutes, showed ~30% loss of weight as they were heated to ~1000C. This weight loss was also noted in fibers maintained at room temperature for 24 hours (~13%). Even those maintained in a vacuum for 24 hours showed ~7% weight loss along the heating profile (Fig. 20). These results led us to use vacuum dried fibers in the following DSC analysis, in order to minimize the masking of the enthalpy point. 3.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) The DSC technique showed that the collagen fibers present two suspected enthalpy areas, one at a range of 42-540 C and one at a range of 61-740 C (Fig. 21a). The 42-540 C area peaked at 48.70 C and showed much lower heat consumption than the 61-740 C area, and a relatively gradual change in heat flow that did not yield a distinctive peak (Fig. 21b). In contrast, the 61-740 C area showed large heat consumption that peaked at the distinctive temperature of ~67.80C, and is considered the enthalpy point/ melting temperature of the octocoral collagen. 55 120 ––––––– –––– ––––– · collagen vac dried tubes.001 Collagen-1 24h R-airTGA.001 Collagen-1-TGA.001 115.96°C 100 7.383% (0.1689mg) Weight (%) tubes dried in vacuum. 12.95% (0.2464mg) tubes dried 24h at RT on filter pap in air atmos. 80 30.40% (1.723mg) tubes as is 60 40 0 50 100 150 200 Temperature (°C) 250 300 350 Universal V2.6D TA Instruments Figure 20. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of isolated fibers. Weight changes along heating profile of three different fiber preparations: fibers dried at room temperature for 15 minutes (red); for 24H (blue) and in vacuum 24H, 0 25 C (green). Note that even vacuum-dried fibers showed 7.383% weight loss when heated 0 to ~100 C. 56 Figure 21. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of 0 isolated collagen fibers. a Two heat consumption areas along heating profile: at 42-54 C and 0 0 at 61-74 C (marked). Denaturation occurred at ~ 67.8°C (arrow). b Detailed DSC of 42-54 C heat consumption areas that is rejected as the denaturation area; note the gradual change in heat flow, and the lack of distinctive peak. 57 4. Discussion Prior to the current study, the fibers of the soft coral S. ehrenbergi have not been noted in the literature. These fibers were noticed while collecting colonies from the reef, when their polypary was torn and the fibers were consequently exposed. The fibers could then be pulled out from the tissues to arm’s length while still remaining intact. These observations intrigued me, leading me to seek answers to the questions that comprise the core of this study: what are the fibers made of, and what is their possible function? Elucidation of the molecular structure of these fibers and their physical properties will conduce to assessing the feasibility of using them for myriad of uses, from biomedical applications, to coral taxonomy. 4.1 Proton and carbon NMR and amino acid analyses NMR analysis classified the fibers as a protein (Fig. 5). Amino acid analysis revealed their collagenous nature, mostly due to the high concentration of glycine, proline and hydroxyproline (Fig. 6). The amino acid composition demonstrated 27 distinct peaks, including a high concentration of aspartic acid, glutamic acid, alanine and arginine. Overall 19 peaks were recognized and quantified, while eight could not be identified (Table 1). Twenty-two amino acids are naturally incorporated within polypeptides and termed proteinogenic or standard amino acids (Fratzl, 2008). These amino acids were identified by the amino acid analysis (see above). It is assumed that the eight unidentified peaks represent additional amino acids, which are among those found in marine organisms and known as non-proteinogenic amino acids (NPAA) (Nelson and Cox, 2000). The latter are formed by post-translational 58 modification, or as intermediates in the metabolic pathways of standard amino acids (Curis et al., 2005). For example, hydroxyproline is a common NPAA that plays a key role in collagen stability by permitting the sharp twisting of its helical structure (Brinckmann et al., 2010). Although the complete sequence of amino acids of the soft coral collagen is still unknown, it is suggested that the unidentified peaks may contribute to its properties. Changes in the amino acid composition of a protein can improve its metabolic and biomechanical performance (Fratzl, 2008; Jackson et al., 2006). In collagen fibers, different intermolecular cross-links between amino acids prevent slippage under load and determine its mechanical properties (Fratzl, 2008). Animal collagens, ranging from sponges to humans, are predominantly cross-linked by lysyl oxidase, although some alternative mechanisms can be found in marine organisms. For example, byssus threads of mussel bivalves feature a variety of mechanical properties derived from a chimerical collagen found within their primary structure domains that corresponds to collagen, polyhistidines and, additionally, either elastin or dragline spider silk (Waite et al., 2003). These threads undergo a 4-5-fold increase in tensile strength, due to aeration of peptide-bonds 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and diDOPA by the seawater (McDowell et al., 1999). Another example of intermolecular crosslinks and their influence on mechanical properties can be found in the collagen of eggs of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. The rapid stabilization of the fertilization membrane by different cross-links makes it refractory to chemical, enzymatic and mechanical disruption, thus creating a protected environment for the embryo. The free radicals produced after fertilization, and their subsequent exposure to seawater, contribute to 59 formation of di-tyrosine cross-links between the collagen molecules, thereby hardening the egg-shell membrane (Foerder and Shapiro, 1977). The above examples may also suggest that the amino acid sequence of S. ehrenbergi collagen fibers, although still not known, determines their biomechanical features (Fig. 17), thermal stability (Fig. 21), and water retentive capacity (Fig. 11) (see also ahead). In order to clarify this assumption, a proteomic study of the amino acids sequence of the soft coral collagen peptides and the nature of the different cross linking between them still needs to be conducted. 4.2 Light and electron microscopy Both Masson Blue and Van Gieson stains homogenously stained the isolated fibers (Fig. 7) and thus additionally confirmed their collagenous nature (Ross and Wojciech, 2006). Fiber bundles of S. ehrenbergi revealed a packed arrangement of almost round fibers, as seen in cross-section, coiled around each other (Fig. 7). Such an arrangement is usually found in the connective tissues of vertebrates such as tendons, ligaments and skin, where collagen fibers are coupled with each other in an organized structure (Fratzl, 2008). Furthermore, the soft coral single fibers featured a wavy course (Fig. 7a; Fig.10d), and a parallel arrangement of fibrils, organized in a packed manner (Fig. 8), which is typically found in fibers of fibrous tissue such as tendons (Fratzl, 2008; Ushiki, 2002). Although the fiber bundles of the soft coral can extend to a length which is comparable to the length of certain vertebrate’s tendons and ligaments (Fratzl, 2003), elastin was not observed in the coral fibers following Van Gieson staining (Ross and Wojciech, 2006) (Fig. 7c). This is consistent with the published view that elastin is found exclusively in 61 vertebrates and not in invertebrates (Sage and Gray, 1980; Wagenseil and Mecham, 2009). In addition, their diameter (9 ± 0.37 µm, n=166 fibers) is significantly smaller than that of collagen fibers found in vertebrate connective tissue (50-300 μm) (Fratzl, 2008). The soft coral fibrils are organized similarly to collagen types I and III (Fratzl, 2008; Ottani et al., 2001). Fibrilar collagen types I and III are the main constituents of the extracellular matrix of metazoans and occur particularly in tissues exhibiting elasticity (Kuivaniemi et al., 1997). A comparison between the structural features of the octocoral fibers and its mesoglea (Fig 12i), in terms of fibril arrangement, indicated that the arrangement of the former resembles tendons and ligaments rather than a gelatinous mesoglea (Ottani et al., 2001). The dimensions and arrangement of collagen fibers and fibrils in connective tissue determine their properties and function. For example, the parallel alignment of fibers and fibrils in tendons enhances their longitudinal strength, their random layered organization in the skin maximizes compliance, the laminated layers in the inter-vertebral discs provide flexibility, while the discontinuous fibers in the highly hydrated matrix of the mesoglea lend extensibility and elasticity (Fratzl, 2008; Vogel, 2003). Therefore, it is suggested that the soft coral fibers feature some functional similarities to tendons and ligaments, as derived from their structural resemblance. Although the fibrilar packing of the octocoral fibers revealed similarities to collagen types I and III (Fig. 8), TEM micrographs of isolated coral fibrils by sonication indicated that the diameter of the fibrils is 18.9 ± 2.4 nm (n=41) (Fig. 9a) thus being more similar to type II fibrils (~ 35 nm) than to type I or III 61 fibrils (50-500 nm) (Antipova and Orgel, 2010; Fratzl, 2003; Kadler et al., 1996; Ottani et al., 2002). The collagen molecules in the fibril are arranged in a quasihexagonal lattice lateral structure (Orgel et al., 2000), where each collagen molecule is offset by ~30 nm with respect to its lateral neighbors. This gap is responsible for the fibrils displaying alternating differences in electron density, with a 67 nm repeat that corresponds to the gap and the overlap regions of the collagen molecules (Toroian et al., 2007). TEM images of negatively stained soft coral fibrils revealed an average intensity distribution along the fibrils with major bands at 65-70 nm, and some lower amplitude banding within the 65-70 nm unit (Fig. 9), corresponding to published data on negatively stained collagens (Ortolani and Marchini, 1995). There was a problem in assigning the precise D-period from high magnification of TEM images, as there is little space for the stain to adhere and it is impossible to mount the fibrils completely straight on one axis. Nonetheless, the measurements provide an indication of the D-period of the fibrils which was more precisely measured later by X-ray within the 65-70 nm margin (see ahead). In addition to the 65-70 nm bands, the negative staining revealed a parallel arrangement of thinner sub-units organized in a packed manner within the fibril (Fig. 9c). The width of these sub-units was ~2.5 nm, which corresponds to single collagen molecules (Fratzl, 2008; Ottani et al., 2002). In comparison 62 with what is known for collagen molecule production and molecular structure, very little is still understood regarding their three-dimensional arrangement in the fibrils. Most models point to either a quasi-crystalline supramolecular array of packed molecules, or to microfibrilar aggregates that interdigitate with neighboring microfibrils to form the fibril, but no one model is universally accepted (Orgel et al., 2006; Ottani et al., 2002; Perumal et al., 2008). The dimensions of the sub-units noted within the soft coral fibers are assumed to be external projections of the micro-fibrils or collagen molecules on the fibril surface. This projection was further confirmed by TEM micrographs of a collagen fibril protruding from a sectioned fiber, which showed uneven surface area (Fig. 9d). The ability of TEM to reveal the complexity of the fibril surface is not trivial, and may indicate an exceptionally rough fibril surface (Fratzl, 2008; Perumal et al., 2008). The surface of a fibril in fibrous collagens comprises an interconnected area of collagen molecules and proteoglycans (PG) that play an important role in restricting the fibrils’ growth and enable their fusion (Fratzl, 2008). PGs were also noted by Cupromeronic Blue staining (CB), which revealed a densely hydrated matrix, evenly distributed between the fibrils and along the fibers (Fig. 10). PGs interact with collagen through their globular protein cores, which are domains that form an Nterminal hyaluronate-binding region that recognizes specific sequences in the collagen composition (Fratzl, 2003; Roughley and Lee, 1994). The PG side chains attract positively charged sodium ions (Na+), which attract water molecules via osmosis (Martin et al., 2002; Movin et al., 1997). The PG and the water create an extended and highly hydrated component in the fibrils, which leads to the collagen fiber’s water retentive capacity and dictates some 63 of its biomechanical properties (Fratzl, 2003). For example, in the human tendon, 40-70% of the dry weight is collagen and only 1% is a noncollagenous extracellular matrix. However, this non-collagenous matrix accounts for 65-75% of the total wet weight of a tendon due to the water associated with the proteoglycans (Movin et al., 1997). The water and proteoglycan matrix provides the lubrication and spacing that are crucial both for the gliding function in fibrous collagen and in providing mechanical support against compression (Sharma and Maffulli, 2006). The presence of PGs in the soft coral collagen and its ability to strongly hold CB (noted by both the naked eye and by TEM, Fig.8) is an indication of the water retentive capacity of the studied fibers. This finding was also noted by wide-angle X-ray diffraction (Fig. 11), which presented a significant background that covered the first order, and indicated a water-rich fibrilar structure. This method also confirmed the fibrilar nature of the soft coral collagen, its fibrilar packing function, D- periodicity, helix pitch and helix molecular packing (see wide angle X-ray diffraction results). The x-ray results also corresponded to the TEM images, showing a similarity to the fibrilar packing revealed by the latter (15.9± 3.11nm, n=15, Fig. 8) and by X-ray (16-17 nm). The similarity in fibrilar packing between a rehydrated and mechanically sliced material (TEM), and one that was not tampered with (X-ray), indicates a stable fibril arrangement within the fiber. The meridional 66 nm D-periodicity, derived from the X-ray studies, is shorter than the known 67 nm periodicity of fibrilar collagen (Fratzl, 2008; Orgel et al., 2006). Therefore, these results imply that the soft coral features a novel 64 collagen. The shorter D-periodicity may result either from a shorter tropocollagen molecule, or a greater average molecular tilt relative to the fiber axis than other known fibrilar types (Fratzel 2008). The helix pitch of the soft coral collagen was approximately 2.86 angstroms (see X-ray result), thus consistent with high proline content (Cameron et al., 2007). Both TEM and Xray diffraction indicated that the fibrilar soft coral collagen cannot be readily identified as one of the previously known types. It possesses structural features of both collagen types I, II and III, but it does not appear to be any of these types, and its merdional 66 nm periodicity makes it difficult to categorize among the known collagens. Although, the soft coral fibers display a resemblance to tendons and ligaments in terms of fibril arrangement, their water retentive capacity is more structurally related to the mesoglea. This may indicate some kind of intermediate structural state between the gelatinous mesoglea and fibrous collagen, as the ability to strongly retain water is one of the properties that defines the differences between these two types (Vogel, 2003). These findings support the hypothesis that the studied fibers represent a new collagen, but there is still a need for a proteomic study in order to verify this. 4.3 Location, distribution and formation of fibers within the colony Histology revealed collagen fibers along six out of the eight mesenteries of the polyps’ gastrovascular cavity. Although collagen is known to constitute a major part in the cnidarian body wall (Barnes, 1994), there were differences between the color intensity of the fiber bundles and that of the soft coral mesoglea stained by Masson Blue (Figs. 10bc,12b). The binding of dyes to 65 collagen, which is a result of strong ionic linkages and hydrogen bonds to amino groups causes connective tissues with different fibril concentrations and packing to present different color intensity when subjected to a similar staining protocol (i.e., exposure time and dye concentration) (Flint et al., 1975; Ross and Wojciech, 2006). The soft coral fibers revealed higher color intensity than the mesoglea (Figs. 10bc, 12b), thus indicating a different arrangement and concentration of fibrils. These differences were clarified by TEM images, which presented a linear packed fibril arrangement within the fibers, and unorganized widely spaced fibrils in the mesoglea (Fig. 13a, 12i). Bundles of coiled fibers within each mesentery (Fig. 12bc) were extended and uncoiled after being pulled out from the tissue (Fig. 12def). The length of isolated fibers, along with the histological sections (Fig. 12), indicates that they are rather densely packed within the mesenteries (Fig. 12cf). SEM images revealed that the fiber bundles stained by Masson Blue within the mesenteries are composed of one or two fibers coiled together (Fig 10bce). The arrangement of coiled long collagen fibers as seen in S. ehrenbergi differs from the linear arrangement of collagen fibers in tendons, ligaments and skin, or their embedment within a matrix, such as in bone and cartilage (Kadler et al., 1996; Myllyharju and Kivirikko, 2001; van der Rest and Garrone, 1991). The particular arrangement of collagen fibers in connective tissues commonly indicates their function (Vogel, 2003). For example, tendon fibers are linearly arranged and transmit force from one end to the other, while in blood vessels collagen fibers create a reticulate structure that absorbs elastic energy (Fratzl, 2008). Although the collagen fibers of S. ehrenbergi 66 possess unique biomechanical properties (see Results), examining their internal arrangement within the coral mesenteries did not provide a clear indication of their function in the tissue. To the best of my knowledge, there is no previous record of tissues containing coiled, not stretched, collagen fibers in metazoans. One indication of the functional role of these fibers is their location within the mesenteries, which provides structural support for gonad development, and the longitudinal retractor muscles (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). In octocorals, 2 mesenteries are associated with the siphonoglyph, and the other six with gonad development (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991; Galloway et al., 2007). In the order Alcyonacea, gonads develop along the mesenteries, and the developing gametogenic cells are mostly retained their until the maturation process is completed (Benayahu and Loya, 1986; Simpson, 2009). The coiled arrangement of the fibers along the free edge of the mesenteries as fiber bundles that are enclosed in the tube-like structure of the gastrodermis (Figs. 10 11a), may provide a supporting structure for the mesenteries. The elastic coils inserted into the tubular structure can increase its ability to endure horizontal forces and movements and prevent inward collapse (Smith and Thomas, 1987). The fibers within the mesenteries may similarly function, by utilizing their elastic properties (see results), and coiled arrangement. This coiled arrangement may also support some elongation of the mesenteries that is associated with gonad development (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991; Galloway et al., 2007). This suggested model may provide an explanation of the structural support, not only in the polyp mesenteries but also for the whole colony, as collagen fibers were found along the stalk of the colony (Fig. 15). 67 MRI images revealed collagen fibers extending from the polyps to the periphery of the stalk down to the base (Fig. 16). Histological sections of the stalk further supported the MRI results and indicated that the fibers are located in mesentery-like structures of the gastrodermal cavities that extend into the basal part of the stalk (Fig. 15). These gastrodermal cavities are denser in the stalk periphery than at its center. Octocorals, including Sarcophyton spp., contain solenia lined with gastrodermal cells within their coenenchyme, forming a network of gastrodermal canals interconnecting the gastric cavities of polyps (Bayer et al., 1983; Fabricius and Alderslade, 2001). Although the gastrodermal canals are considered as the graduall narrowing of the basal part of the polyps gastric cavity (Bayer et al., 1983; Fabricius and Alderslade, 2001), there are no published data relating to their containing a mesentery-like structure, as found in the stalk of S. Ehrenberg (Bayer et al., 1983; Fabricius and Alderslade, 2001; Fautin and Mariscal, 1991; Galloway et al., 2007). Small gastrodermal cavities are concentrated at the periphery of the stalk and their fiber-bearing mesenteries make this area of the stalk more dense with fibers than the central part of the stalk. This may indicate that the fibers function as reinforcing structures. Interestingly, in blood vessels, collagen fibers create such reinforcing structures based on external/peripheral support (Holzapfel, 2001), and the same fiber-based external support can be found in plants such as the bamboo (Nogata and Takahashi, 1995). One might similarly look at the stalk of S. ehrenbergi, as a cylindrical column with a peripheral support of collagen fibers. In order to verify this structural assumption, however, there is a need for a comparative biomechanical study 68 of S. ehrenbergi’s different colony parts. The results of such study should be compared to those of other congenerics that present some of S. ehrenbergi’s morphological features, such as S. glaucum, which was partly studied by Koehl (1982), and shares the same habitat but does not possess these long fibers in its tissue. In addition to the fibers within the mesenteries, histology and TEM revealed laminated collagenous fibers within the mesoglea around the sites of decalcified sclerites (Fig. 14f). These resemble sheaths comprised of distinct layered fibers, differing from both the mesogleal scattered fibrils (Fig.12g-i) and the mesenterial fibers (Fig.11a). Both these laminated fibers and the mesenterial ones are associated with the striated vesicles located within certain gastrodermal cells of the mesenteries (Fig.11a-c) and within cells adjacent to the sclerite sites (Fig. 14a, b). Although the structural appearance of these vesicles are similar in both locations, the cells of the mesenteries are considered of endodermal origin, while those residing within the mesoglea are of ectodermal origin (Fautin and Mariscal, 1991). The development of the fine fibrils and their association with collagen fibers and connective tissue in metazoans is still far from being fully understood (Fratzl, 2008). The process by which molecules in the cell are transported from their site of synthesis in the endoplamic reticulum through the Golgi complex has long been studied (Bonifacino and Glick, 2004). Vesicles are abundant in the vicinity of the Golgi complex, and a wealth of evidence favors a model in which cargo is transported by incorporation into vesicles and budding from the membrane (Bonifacino and Glick, 2004). There is controversy as to whether the vesicular 69 transport model is generally applicable to the biosynthesis of collagen, since the vesicles studied so far were only 60-80 nm in diameter, whereas the triple helical domains of the fibril-forming collagens are ~300 nm long (Canty and Kadler, 2005). The location, relatively large size (>500 nm, Fig.11 -12), and the striated appearance of the soft coral vesicles, may support the vesicular transport model regarding collagen fibrillogenesis in S. ehenbergi. Future studies should further investigate the interaction between the fibrous assemblages found in the studied octocoral and the cells surrounding them. This should include molecular and proteomic studies of the vesicles in order to fully understand their structure and function in conjunction with the fibrillogenesis process. 4.4 Biomechanical and physical properties of the fibers The collagen fibers of S. ehrenbergi featured an impressive stretching ability, to a high strain (19.4±4.27%, n=12), without failing or undergoing irreversible damage. In contrast, mammalian collagen fibers can be reversibly stretched to strains of only 8-10% without failure (Danto and Woo, 1993; Fung and Liu, 1995; Vogel, 2003). The mesoglea, on the other hand, as a non- organized gelatinous structure comprised of thin and short fibrils, can stretch to strains of 350-600% (Koehl, 1982). The stiffness of the soft coral fibers (0.44 ± 0.1 GPa, n =12) is about half to one-third lower than the reported range for mammalian fibers (0.9–1.8 GPa) (Sverdlik and Lanir, 2002), and five orders of magnitude higher than for the mesoglea (0.01 MPa) (Vogel, 2003). Their average stress to failure (49.4 ± 11.7 MPa, n=12) is about one-half the reported tensile strength for mammalian collagen fibers (100 MPa) (Vogel, 2003) and one 71 order of magnitude higher than for the mesoglea (1-2.5 MPa) (Koehl, 1982). The soft coral fiber’s strain-stress curves of preconditioning cycles (Fig. 17) revealed a typical tendon and ligament behavior, with a noted difference between L initial and L0 (Vogel, 2003). The difference between L initial and L0 resulted from the fibrils’ arrangement within the fiber (Lokshin and Lanir, 2009). When the fiber is stretched for the first time, the fibrils are getting organized and in lines along it, resulting in a different stress-strain curve than the following cycles, which are similar to each other. This biomechanical behavior is characteristic of collagens with a tight-fitting arrangement, such as tendons, where the fibrils are long relative to their diameter (Provenzano and Vanderby, 2006), and the shear transfer between them through the matrix is sufficient to allow the fibers to behave like continuous fiber composite material (Fratzl, 2008; Ker, 2007). This biomechanical property is not displayed in the mesoglea, which consists of short fibrils surrounded by a thick and soft matrix, and which can deform to an extension of several hundred percent (large strains) through the sliding of its fibrils relative to their neighbors (Alexander, 1962; Koehl, 1977). Table 2. The soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. Summarize of material properties in comparison to other known collagens (sources: Koehl, 1982; Sverdlik and Lanir, 2002; Vogel, 2003). Material Extensibility (%) Modulus of elasticity stiffness (GPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Mammalian tendons and ligaments 8-10 0.9-1.8 100 S. ehrenbergi fibers 19.4±4.27 0.44±0.1 49.4±11.7 Mesoglea Mussel byssus threads 350-600 100 0.01 0.1 1-2.5 50 Spider silk 30-1600 10 2000 71 The in situ SPM-TEM mechanical characterization (Figs. 16-17) of the current study revealed a strong fibril association/connection within the soft coral fibers. The recorded forces of detachment from the fibers exceeded 8-9 µN, which was the limit of the experimental setup capabilities. These findings, along with the light microscopy, SEM TEM, MRI and X-ray studies, thus support the assumption that the soft coral fibers present an internal organization that strikingly resembles vertebrate tendons yet differs from the cnidarian collagenous mesoglea. Given this structural resemblance, the differences in mechanical properties between the soft coral fibers and vertebrate tendons are probably derived almost entirely from the compositelike organization of the former (Vogel, 2003). These differences can be attributed to the collagen fibrils, their matrix or both (Vogel, 2003). The current study revealed differences between the soft coral collagen and the collagen types I-III in peptide components, fibril structure and fibril arrangement, thereby indicating that these structural features influence the mechanical properties of the soft coral collagen. However, the water retentive capacity of the fibers and their hydrated proteoglycan matrix (Figs. 8, 9) suggest that the matrix surrounding the soft coral collagen fibrils also contributes to their mechanical properties. S. ehrenbergi is a benthic organism found in habitats exposed to strong tidal currents and typhoons (Dai, 1993). It is suggested that colonies of this species utilize their collagen fibers to form a structural support that will withstand the strong hydro-mechanical forces in their environment. Similarly, the sea anemone Metridum senile withstands drag forces by utilizing its thick 72 jelly-like mesoglea for stretching several-folds under harsh conditions (Gosline, 1971). The elastic capabilities of S. ehrenbergi’s fibers, and their higher abundance in the periphery of its stalk, also support such a conclusion. Future studies should deal with those congeners which inhabit other reef habitats, in relation to the properties of their collagen fibers. As all of the biomechanical tests in this study was done on fibers that were stored in 70% ethanol before rehydration, it is recommended that farther studies should test freshly isolated fibers in order eliminate any preservation related bias. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry provided additional evidence for the water retentive capacity of the soft coral fibers revealed by TEM and X-ray (Figs. 8, 9). TGA of stored and dried fibers showed a 7-30% weight loss when they were heated to ~1000C (Fig. 20). This loss resulted from the evaporation of the solvents and indicated the ability of the fibers to strongly hold the solvents (Artiaga et al., 2005; Golodnitsky et al., 2003). Evaporation is a process that requires energy (heat consumption) and therefore could mask the enthalpy point (Artiaga et al., 2005). Although vacuum-dried fibers still showed solvent evaporation (~7%), they were used for the DSC analysis in order to minimize the masking effect. The soft coral collagen exhibits an unexpectedly high denaturation temperature of 67.8°C(Fig. 21), in contrast to native collagen types I and II, which demonstrate a value of only 42°C for soluble tropocollagen. The latter increase to ~54°C upon fibrillation and reach 67°C only when artificially crosslinked (Miles et al., 1995; Tiktopulo and Kajava, 1998). The thermal stability of 73 collagens predominantly depends on the formation of intermolecular lysyl oxidase-derived cross-links (Fratzl, 2008). The high denaturation point of S. ehrenbergi fibers implies that its collagen fibers are naturally cross-linked. However, biochemical and chemical studies are still needed in order to validate this assumption. 4.5 Summary Prior to the current study there was no evidence among invertebrates for the presence of internal long collagenous fibers that can be observed by the naked eye (Aouacheria et al., 2006; Bell and Gosline, 1996; Elder, 1973; Harel and Tanzer, 1993; Helman et al., 2008; Tucker et al., 2011). The finding of tendon-like, long collagen fibers in the soft coral S. ehrenbergi which is a two cell-layered organism, has altered our knowledge on the appearance and diversity of collagen in metazoans. Throughout evolution the diversity of fibrilar collagen chains has increased, as well as the different forms of their maturation and interactions (Exposito et al., 2002). The collagen fibers of S. ehrenbergi present a mixed set of properties, some of which resemble those in vertebrates or invertebrates, while others are novel. A better understanding of the molecular structure of this collagen, along with genomic studies of the cells revealed to be associated with it, may contribute to our understanding of the evolution of collagen and its fibrillogenesis. Elucidation of the molecular structure of this collagen and its physical properties will conduce to assessing the feasibility of using it for biomedical applications. Collagen provides biomaterial for a myriad of uses, and is extensively utilized in tissue engineering as scaffolding for repair or augmentation of body tissue (Gentleman et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2001). The collagen fibers of S. 74 ehrenbergi present a suite of properties, such as thermal stability, fibrilar organization, biomechanical and water retentive capacities that could make them suitable for biomedical applications. In order to explore such possibilities, in situ and in vitro studies on possible interactions between the fibers and vertebrate cells (murine) have already commenced (Benayahu et al., 2011). Preliminary findings also indicate that the fibers may provide to taxonomic identification of a cryptic taxon of alcyoniid octocorals, comprised of a mix of nominal species from the genera Sarcophyton and Lobophytum. (McFadden et al., 2006). Species of these soft corals genera , have a wide Indo–Pacific distribution (Fabricius and Alderslade, 2001), can be found on the reefs in similar ecological niches, and certain species reveal close morphological features. Interestingly, some species of this suspected cryptic taxon present fibers within their tissue (preliminary work, Sella& Benayahu). This may provide morphological features which support the findings of the molecular study and can help taxonomic identification. It is expected that the current results, which were initiated as field observations and continued in laboratory studies, will further advance our knowledge on Octocorallia taxonomy, collagen among lower invertebrates, its fibrillogenesis, and its potential for practical biomedical applications. 75 5. References Adamczyk, P., Meier, S., Gross, T., Hobmayer, B., Grzesiek, S., Bächinger, H. P., Holstein, T. W. and Ozbek, S. (2008). Minicollagen-15, a novel minicollagen isolated from Hydra, forms tubule structures in nematocysts. J Mol Biol: 376, 10081020. Alexander, R. M. (1962). Viso-Elastic Properties of the Body-Wall of Sea Anemones. J Exp Biol 39, 373-386. Antipova, O. and Orgel, J. P. R. O. (2010). In Situ D-periodic Molecular Structure of Type II Collagen. J Bio Chem 285, 7087-7096. Aouacheria, A., Geourjon, C., Aghajari, N., Navratil, V., Delocage, G., Lethias, C. and Exposito, J. Y. (2006). Insights into Early Extracellular Matrix Evolution: Spongin Short Chain Collagen-Related Proteins Are Homologous to Basement Membrane Type IV Collagens and Form a Novel Family Widely Distributed in Invertebrates. Mol Bio Evo 23, 2288-2302. Arms K. and Camp P.S. (1995) Biology (4th edition). Saunders: Fort Worth. Arnold, A. and Marcotte, I. (2009). Studying natural structural protein fibers by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Con Mag Reso 34A, 24- 47. Artiaga, R., Naya, S., Garcia, A., Barbadillo, F. and Garcia, L. (2005). Subtracting the water effect from DSC curves by using simultaneous TGA data. Thermo Acta 428, 137-139. Barnes, R. D. (1994). Invertebrate Zoology: Sanders College Publishing. Batham, E. J. and Pantin, C. F. A. (1951). The Organization of the Muscular System of Metridium senile. Quar J Mi Sci s3-92, 27-54. Bayer, F. M., Grasshoff, M. and Verseveldt, J. (1983). Illustrated Trilingual Glossary of Morphological and Anatomical Terms Applied to Octocorallia. The Netherlands: EJ Brill. Bell, E. and Gosline, J. (1996). Mechanical design of mussel byssus: material yield enhances attachment strength. J Exp Biol 199, 1005-17. Benayahu, Y., Benayahu, D., Kashman, Y., Rudi, A., Lanir, Y., Sella, I. and Raz, E. (2011). Coral-Derived Collagen and Methods of Farming Same (ed. U. S. P. Office): Ramot at Tel-Aviv University Ltd. ,Technion Research and Development Foundation, Ltd. . Benayahu, Y. and Loya, Y. (1986). Sexual Reproduction of a Soft Coral Synchronous and Brief Annual Spawning of Sarcophyton-glaucum (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833). Bio Bull 170, 32-42. Berntson, E. A., France, S. C. and Mullineaux, L. S. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships within the class Anthozoa (phylum Cnidaria) based on nuclear 18S rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 13, 417-33. Blunt, J. W., Copp, B. R., Hu , W. M., Munro, H. G., Northcote, P. T. and Prinsep, M. R. (2009). Nat Prod Rep 26, 170-244. Bonifacino, J. S. and Glick, B. S. (2004). The Mechanisms of Vesicle Budding and Fusion. Cell 116, 153-166. Brinckmann, J., Notbohm, H. and Müller, P. K. (2010). Collagen, Topics in Current Chemistry. Berlin: Springer Bris, N. and Gaill, F. (2007). How does the annelid Alvinella pompejana deal with an extreme hydrothermal environment? In Life in Extreme Environments, eds. R. Amils C. Ellis-Evans and H. Hinghofer-Szalkay), pp. 315-339: Springer, Netherlands. Brodsky, B. and Ramshaw, J. A. M. (1997). The collagen triple-helix structure. Matrix Bio 15, 545-554. Bütikofer, U., Fuchs, D., Bosset, J. and Gmür, W. (1991). Automated HPLC-amino acid determination of protein hydrolysates by precolumn derivatization with OPA and FMOC and comparison with classical ion exchange chromatography. Chromatographia 31, 441-447. 76 Cameron, G. J., Alberts, I. L., Laing, J. H. and Wess, T. J. (2002). Structure of type I and type III heterotypic collagen fibrils: an X-ray diffraction study. J Struct Biol 137, 15-22. Cameron, G. J., Cairns, D. E. and Wess, T. J. (2007). The Variability in Type I Collagen Helical Pitch Is Reflected in the D Periodic Fibrillar Structure. J Mol Bio 372, 1097-1107. Canty, E. G. and Kadler, K. E. (2005). Procollagen trafficking, processing and fibrillogenesis. J Cell Sci 118, 1341-1353. Chang, W.-L., Chi, K.-J., Fan, T.-Y. and Dai, C.-F. (2007). Skeletal modification in response to flow during growth in colonies of the sea whip, Junceella fragilis. J Exp Mar Bio Eco 347, 97-108. Chapman, G. (1953). Studies of the Mesogloea of Coelenterates. Quar J Micro Sci s3-94, 155-176. Chen, C. A., Odorico, D. M., ten Lohuis, M., Veron, J. E. and Miller, D. J. (1995). Systematic relationships within the Anthozoa (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) using the 5'-end of the 28S rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 4, 175-83. Cheng, S. Y., Wen, Z. H., Chiou, S. F., Tsai, C. W., Wang, S. K., Hsu, C. H., Dai, C. F., Chiang, M. Y., Wang, W. H. and Duh, C. Y. (2009). Ceramide and cerebrosides from the octocoral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi. J Nat Prod 72, 465-8. Curis, E., Nicolis, I., Moinard, C., Osowska, S., Zerrouk, N., Bénazeth, S. and Cynober, L. (2005). Almost all about citrulline in mammals. Amin Acid 29, 177-205. Dai, C. F. (1993). Patterns of Coral Distribution and Benthic Space Partitioning on the Fringing Reefs of Southern Taiwan. Mar Eco- Zoologica Di Napoli I 14, 185-204. Daly, M., Brugler, M. R., Cartwright, P., Collins, A. G., Dawson, M. N., Fautin, D. G., France, S. C., McFadden, C. S., Opresko, D. M., Rodriguez, E. et al. (2007). The phylum Cnidaria: A review of phylogenetic patterns and diversity 300 years after Linnaeus. Zootaxa 1668 127-182. Danto, M. I. and Woo, S. L. Y. (1993). The mechanical properties of skeletally mature rabbit anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon over a range of strain rates. Journal of Ortho Res 11, 58-67. Davis, L. E. (1975). Histological and ultrastructural studies of the basal disk of Hydra. III. The gastrodermis and the mesoglea. Cell Tissue Res 162, 107-118. Deutzmann, R., Fowler, S., Zhang, X., Boone, K., Dexter, S., Boot-Handford, R. P., Rachel, R. and Sarras, M. P. (2000). Molecular, biochemical and functional analysis of a novel and developmentally important fibrillar collagen (Hcol-I) in hydra. Development 127, 4669-4680. Devictor, S. T. and Morton, S. L. (2010). Identification guide to the shallow water (0–200 m) octocorals of the South Atlantic Bight. Zootaxa 2599, 1-62 Elder, H. Y. (1973). Distribution and Functions of Elastic Fibers in the Invertebrates. Biol Bull 144, 43-63. Exposito, J.-Y., Larroux, C., Cluzel, C., Valcourt, U., Lethias, C. and Degnan, B. M. (2008). Demosponge and Sea Anemone Fibrillar Collagen Diversity Reveals the Early Emergence of A/C Clades and the Maintenance of the Modular Structure of Type V/XI Collagens from Sponge to Human. J Biol Chem 283, 28226-28235. Exposito, J.-Y., Valcourt, U., Cluzel, C. and Lethias, C. (2010). The Fibrillar Collagen Family. Int J Mol Sci 11, 407-426. Exposito, J. Y., Cluzel, C., Garrone, R. and Lethias, C. (2002). Evolution of collagens. Anatom Rec 268, 302-316. Exposito, J. Y. and Garrone, R. (1990). Characterization of a fibrillar collagen gene in sponges reveals the early evolutionary appearance of two collagen gene families. PNAS 87, 6669-6673. Fabricius, K. and Alderslade, P. (2001). Soft Corals and Sea Fans: A comprehensive guide to the tropical shallow water genera of the Central West Pacific, the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, 264 pp. 77 Fabricius, K. E. (1995). Slow Population Turnover in the Soft Coral Genera Sinularia and Sarcophyton on Mid-Shelf and Outer-Shelf Reefs of the Great-Barrier-Reef. MEPS 126, 145-152. Fautin, D. G. and Romano, S. L. (2000). Anthozoa. Sea Anemones, Corals, Sea Pens, vol. 2011: The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/. Fautin, G. D. and Mariscal, R. N. (1991). Cnidaria: Anthozoa. In Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, vol. 2 eds. F. G. Harrison and J. A. Westfall, pp. 267-358 New York City: Alan Liss. Ferreira, T. and Rasband, W. (2011). The ImageJ User Guide — Version 1.44. In http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/user-guide.pdf. Fleury, B. G., Coll, J. C., Tentori, E., Duquesne, S. and Figueiredo, L. (2000). Effect of nutrient enrichment on the complementary (secondary) metabolite composition of the soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi (Cnidaria: Octocorallia: Alcyonaceae) of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Bio 136, 63-68. Flint, M., Lyons, M., Meaney, M. and Williams, D. (1975). The Masson staining of collagen — an explanation of an apparent paradox. Histo J 7, 529-546. Foerder, C. A. and Shapiro, B. M. (1977). Release of ovoperoxidase from sea urchin eggs hardens the fertilization membrane with tyrosine cross-links. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74, 4214-4218. Fowler, S. J., Jose, S., Zhang, X., Deutzmann, R., Sarras, M. P. and BootHandford, R. P. (2000). Characterization of Hydra type IV collagen. Type IV collagen is essential for head regeneration and its expression is up-regulated upon exposure to glucose. . J Biol Chem 275, 39589- 39599. Fratzl, P. (2003). Cellulose and collagen: from fibers to tissues. Cur Op Colloid Interface Sci - 8, - 39. Fratzl, P. (2008). Collagen Structure and Mechanics. New York: Springer. Fullerton, G. D. and Amurao, M. R. (2006). Evidence that collagen and tendon have monolayer water coverage in the native state. Cell Bio Inte 30, 56-65. Fung, Y. C. and Liu, S. Q. (1995). Determination of the mechanical properties of the different layers of blood vessels in vivo. PNAS 92, 2169-2173. Gaill, F., Mann, K., Wiedemann, H., Engel, J. and Timpl, R. (1995). Structural comparison of cuticle and interstitial collagens from annelids living in shallow seawater and at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. J Mol Biol 246, 284-94. Gaill, F., Wiedemann, H., Mann, K., Kֳ¼hn, K., Timpl, R. and Engel, J. (1991). Molecular characterization of cuticle and interstitial collagens from worms collected at deep sea hydrothermal vents. J Mol Bio 221, 209-223. Galloway, S. B., Work, T. M., Bochsler, V. S., Harley, R. A., Kramarsky-Winters, E., McLaughlin, S. M., Meteyer, C. U., Morado, J. F., Nicholson, J. H., Parnell, P. G. et al. (2007). Coral Disease and Health Workshop: Coral Histopathology II., pp. 84p. Silver Spring: NOAA. Garrone, R. (1998). Evolution of Metazoan collagens. Progr Mol Subcell Biol 21, 139-191 Gentleman, E., Lay, A. N., Dickerson, D. A., Nauman, E. A., Livesay, G. A. and Dee, K. C. (2003). Mechanical characterization of collagen fibers and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24, 3805-3813. Golodnitsky, D., Ulus, A. and Ishay, J. (2003). Thermal characterization of social vespid silk. J Therm Anal Cal 73, 85-96. Gosline, J., Lillie, M., Carrington, E., Guerette, P., Ortlepp, C. and Savage, K. (2002). Elastic proteins: biological roles and mechanical properties. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357, 121-132. Gosline, J. M. (1971). Connective Tissue Mechanics of Metridium Senile: I. Structural and Compositional Aspects. J Exp Biol 55, 763-774. Hamner, W. M. and Jenssen, R. M. (1974). Growth, Degrowth, and Irreversible Cell Differentiation in Aurelia aurita. Amer Zool 14 833-849 78 Har-el, R. and Tanzer, M. L. (1993). Extracellular matrix. 3: Evolution of the extracellular matrix in invertebrates. FASEB J 7, 1115-1123. Häussermann, V. (2004). Identification and taxonomy of soft-bodied hexacorals exemplified by Chilean sea anemones; including guidelines for sampling, preservation and examination. J Mari Bio Ass 931-936. Heinemann, S., Ehrlich, H., Douglas, T., Heinemann, C., Worch, H., Schatton, W. and Hanke, T. (2007). Ultrastructura studies on the collagen of the marine sponge Chondrosia reniformis nardo. Biomacromol 8, 3452-3457. Hellstrom, M., Kavanagh, K. and Benzie, J. (2010). Multiple spawning events and sexual reproduction in the octocoral Sarcophyton elegans (Cnidaria: Alcyonacea) on Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Bio 157, 383-392. Helman, Y., Natale, F., Sherrell, R. M., LaVigne, M. l., Starovoytov, V., Gorbunov, M. Y. and Falkowski, P. G. (2008). Extracellular matrix production and calcium carbonate precipitation by coral cells in vitro. PNAS 105, 54-58. Holzapfel, G. A. (2001). Biomechanics of soft tissue. In The Handbook of Materials Behavior Models vol. 3 (ed. J. Lemaitre.), pp. 1049–1063. Boston: Boston, MA: Academic,. Hulmes, D. J. S. (2002). Building Collagen Molecules, Fibrils, and Suprafibrillar Structures. J Struc Bio 137, 2-10. Jackson, J. C., Duffy, S. P., Hess, K. R. and Mehl, R. A. (2006). Improving Nature's Enzyme Active Site with Genetically Encoded Unnatural Amino Acids JACS 128, 11124- 11127. Jeng, M.-S., Huang, H.-D., Dai, C.-F., Hsiao, Y.-C. and Benayahu, Y. (2011). Sclerite calcification and reef-building in the fleshy octocoral genus Sinularia (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea). Coral Reefs. Kadler, K. E., Holmes, D. F., Trotter, J. A. and Chapman, J. A. (1996). Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J 316, 1-11. Kasapi, M. A. and Gosline, J. M. (1999). Micromechanics of the equine hoof wall: optimizing crack control and material stiffness through modulation of the properties of keratin. J Exp Biol 202, 377-391. Ker, R. F. (2007). Mechanics of tendon, from an engineering perspective. Int J Fatigue 29, 1001-1009. Kier, W. M. and Smith, A. M. (2002). The Structure and Adhesive Mechanism of Octopus Suckers. Integ Comp Bio 42, 1146-1153. Kingsley, R. J., Tsuzaki, M., Watabe, N. and Mechanic, G. L. (1990). Collagen in the Spicule Organic Matrix of the Gorgonian Leptogorgia virgulata. Bio Bull 179, 207213. Koehl, M. (1982). Mechanical Design of Spicule-Reinforced Connective Tissue: Stiffness. J Exp Biol 98, 239-267. Koehl, M. (1984). How Do Benthic Organisms Withstand Moving Water? 10.1093/icb/24.1.57. Amer. Zool. 24, 57-70. Koehl, M. A. R. (1977). Mechanical Diversity of Connective Tissue of the Body Wall of Sea Anemones. J Exp Biol 69, 107-125. Konig, G. M. and Wright, A. D. (1998). New Cembranoid Diterpenes from the Soft Coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi1. J Nat Pro 61, 494-496. Kuivaniemi, H., Tromp, G. and Prockop, D. J. (1997). Mutations in fibrillar collagens (types I, II, III, and XI), fibril-associated collagen (type IX), and networkforming collagen (type X) cause a spectrum of diseases of bone, cartilage, and blood vessels. Hum Mut 9, 300-315. Lamande, S. R. and Bateman, J. F. (1999). Procollagen folding and assembly: The role of endoplasmic reticulum enzymes and molecular chaperones. Develop Bio 10, 455-464. Larkman, A. U. (1984). The fine structure of granular amoebocytes from the gonads of the sea anemone Actinia fragacea (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Protoplasma 122, 203221. 79 Ledger, P. W. and Franc, S. (1978). Calcification of the collagenous axial skeleton of Veretillum cynomorium (cnidaria: pennatulacea). Cell Tiss Res 192, 249-266. Lee, C. H., Singla, A. and Lee, Y. (2001). Biomedical applications of collagen. Inte J Pharm 221, 1-22. Leikina, E., Mertts, M. V., Kuznetsova, N. and Leikin, S. (2002). Type I collagen is thermally unstable at body temperature. PNAS 99, 1314-1318. Lodish, H., Berk A., Kaiser C.A., Krieger, M., Scott, M.P., Bretscher, A., Ploegh, H., Matsudaira, P. (2008) Molecular Cell Biology. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co. Lokshin, O. and Lanir, Y. (2009). Micro and macro rheology of planar tissues. Biomaterials 30, 3118-3127. Look, S., Fenical, W., Matsumoto, G. and Clardy, J. (1986). The pseudopterosins: a new class of antiinflammatory and analgesic diterpene pentosides from the marine sea whip Pseudopterogorgia elisabthae (Octocorallia). J Org Chem 51, 5140-5145. Martin, M. D., Boxell, C. M. and Malone, D. G. (2002). Pathophysiology of lumbar disc degeneration: a review of the literature. Neurol Foc 13, 1-6. Matranga, V. (2005). Echinodermata. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Germany. McDowell, L. M., Burzio, L. A., Waite, J. H. and Schaefer, J. (1999). Rotational Echo Double Resonance Detection of Cross-links Formed in Mussel Byssus under High-Flow Stress. J Bio Chem 274, 20293-20295. McFadden, C. S., Alderslade, P., van Ofwegen, L. P., Johnsen, H. and Rusmevichientong, A. (2006). Phylogenetic relationships within the tropical soft coral genera Sarcophyton and Lobophytum (Anthozoa, Octocorallia). Invert Bio 125, 288-305. McFadden, C. S., Benayahu, Y., Pante, E., Thoma, J. N., Nevarez, P. A. and France, S. C. (2011). Limitations of mitochondrial gene barcoding in Octocorallia. Mol Eco Res 11, 19-31. McLaughlin, S. H. and Bulleid, N. J. (1998). Molecular recognition in procollagen chain assembly. Mat Bio 16, 369-377. Meszaros, A. and Bigger, C. (1999). Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Wound Healing Processes in the Coelenterate,Plexaurella fusifera:Spatial, Temporal, and Environmental (Light Attenuation) Influences. J Invert Path 73, 321-331. Miles, C. A., Burjanadze, T. V. and Bailey, A. J. (1995). The kinetics of the thermal denaturation of collagen in unrestrained rat tail tendon determined by differential scanning calorimetry. J Mol Biol 245, 437. Moeller, H. D., Bosch, U. and Decker, B. (1995). Collagen fibril diameter distribution in patellar tendon autografts after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep: changes over time. J Anat 187, 161-167. Movin, T., Gad, A., Reinholt, F. P. and Rolf, C. (1997). Tendon pathology in longstanding achillodynia. Biopsy findings in 40 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 68, 170-5. Muller-Parker, G. and DiElia, C. (1997). Interactions between corals and their symbiotic Algae. In: C. Birkeland [ed.], Life and Death of Coral Reefs. Chapman & Hall NY, 96-113. Müller, E. G. (2003). The Origin of Metazoan Complexity: Porifera as Integrated Animals. Integr Comp Biol 43, 3-10. Myllyharju, J. and Kivirikko, K. I. (2001). Collagens and collagen-related diseases. Ann Med 33, 7-21. Nagarajan, V., Kamitori, S. and Okuyama, K. (1999). Structure Analysis of a Collagen-Model Peptide with a (Pro-Hyp-Gly) Sequence Repeat. J Biochem 125, 310-318. Nelson, D. L. and Cox, M. M. (2000). Lehninger, Principles of Biochemistry. New York: Worth Publishing. 81 Cuong, NX. Tuan, TA. Kiem, PV. Minh, C. Choi, EM, and Kim YH. (2008). New Cembranoid Diterpenes from the Vietnamese Soft Coral Sarcophyton mililatensis Stimulate Osteoblastic Differentiation in MC3T3-E1 Cells. ChemInform 39, 988-992 Nogata, F. and Takahashi, H. (1995). Intelligent functionally graded material: Bamboo. Comp Eng 5, 743-751. Orgel, J. P., Wess, T. J. and Miller, A. (2000). The in situ conformation and axial location of the intermolecular cross-linked non-helical telopeptides of type I collagen. Structure 8, 137-142. Orgel, J. P. R. O., Irving, T. C., Miller, A. and Wess, T. J. (2006). Microfibrillar structure of type I collagen in situ. PNAS 103, 9001-9005. Ortolani, F. and Marchini, M. (1995). Cartilage type II collagen fibrils show distinctive negative-staining band patterns differences between type II and type I unfixed or glutaraldehyde-fixed collagen fibrils. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 44, 365375. Ottani, V., Martini, D., Franchi, M., Ruggeri, A. and Raspanti, M. (2002). Hierarchical structures in fibrillar collagens. Micron 33, 587-596. Ottani, V., Raspanti, M. and Ruggeri, A. (2001). Collagen structure and functional implications. Micron 32, 251-60. Pazy, Y., Kulik, T., Bayer, E. A., Wilchek, M. and Livnah, O. (2002). Ligand exchange between proteins. Exchange of biotin and biotin derivatives between avidin and streptavidin. J Biol Chem 277, 30892-900. Pechenik, J. (2000). Biology of invertebrates. a Mc Graw Hill publication, USA, 117 Perumal, S., Antipova, O. and Orgel, J. P. R. O. (2008). Collagen fibril architecture, domain organization, and triple-helical conformation govern its proteolysis. PNAS 105, 2824-2829. Provenzano, P. P. and Vanderby, J. R. (2006). Collagen fibril morphology and organization: Implications for force transmission in ligament and tendon. Matrix Bio 25, 71-84. Regan, B. C., Aloni, S., Ritchie, R. O., Dahmen, U. and Zettl, A. (2004). Carbon nanotubes as nanoscale mass conveyors. Nature 428, 924-927. Ross, M. H. and Wojciech, P. (2006). Histology: a text and atlas: with correlated cell and molecular biology. Baltimore: Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins. Roughley, P. J. and Lee, E. R. (1994). Cartilage proteoglycans: Structure and potential functions. Mic Res Tec 28, 385-397. Ruppert, E. E., Fox, R. S. and Barnes, R. D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology. Belmont, CA Brooks/Cole. Sage, H. and Gray, W. R. (1980). Studies on the evolution of elastin—II. Histology. Comp Bioch 66, 13-22. Schlichter, D. (1982). Nutritional Strategies of Cnidarians: The Absorption, Translocation and Utilization of Dissolved Nutrients by Heteroxenia fuscescens. Amer Zool 22, 659-669. Scott, J. (1990). Proteoglycan:collagen interactions and subfibrillar structure in collagen fibrils. Implications in the development and ageing of connective tissues. J Anat 169, 23-35 Scott, J. E. (1975). Composition and structure of the pericellular environment. Physiological function and chemical composition of pericellular proteoglycan (an evolutionary view). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271, 135-42. Sella, I. and Benayahu, Y. (2010). Rearing cuttings of the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum (Octocorallia, Alcyonacea): towards mass production in a closed seawater system. Aqua Res 41, 1748-1758. Sharma, P. and Maffulli, N. (2006). Biology of tendon injury: healing, modeling and remodeling. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 6, 181-190. Shimizu, H., Aufschnaiter, R., Li, L., Sarras, M. P., Borza, D. B., Abrahamson, D. R., Sado, Y. and Zhang, X. M. (2009). The extracellular matrix of hydra is a porous sheet and contains type IV collagen. (vol. 111, pg 410, 2008). Zoology 112, 76-76. 81 Simmons, A. H., Michal, C. A. and Jelinski, L. W. (1996). Molecular Orientation and Two-Component Nature of the Crystalline Fraction of Spider Dragline Silk. Science 271, 84-87. Simpson, A. (2009). Reproduction in Octocorals (Subclass Octocorallia): A Review of Published Literature. vol. 2011: University of Maine, Darling Marine Center. Smeathers, J. E. and Vincent, J. F. V. (1979). Mechanical properties of mussel byssus threads J Moll Stu 45, 219-230. Smith, D. S., Wainwright, S. A., Baker, J. and Cayer, M. L. (1981). Structural features associated with movement and 'catch' of sea-urchin spines. Tissue Cell 13, 299-320. Smith, P. R. and Thomas, J. V. L. (1987). Piping and pipe support systems. New York: McGraw-Hill. Sverdlik, A. and Lanir, Y. (2002). Time-Dependent Mechanical Behavior of Sheep Digital Tendons, Including the Effects of Preconditioning. J Biomec Eng 124, 78-84. Szulgit, G. (2007). The echinoderm collagen fibril: a hero in the connective tissue research of the 1990s. Bioessays 29, 645-53. Tanaka, J., Yoshida, T. and Benayahu, Y. (2005). Chemical diversity of Sarcophyton soft corals in Okinawa. Galaxea 7, 1-9. Thompson, J. T. and Kier, W. M. (2001). Ontogenetic Changes in Fibrous Connective Tissue Organization in the Oval Squid, Sepioteuthis lessoniana. Lesson, 1830. Biol Bull 201, 136-153. Tiktopulo, E. I. and Kajava, A. V. (1998). Denaturation of Type I Collagen Fibrils Is an Endothermic Process Accompanied by a Noticeable Change in the Partial Heat Capacity. Biochem 37, 8147-8152. Toroian, D., Lim, J. E. and Price, P. A. (2007). The size exclusion characteristics of type I collagen: implications for the role of noncollagenous bone constituents in mineralization. J Biol Chem 282, 22437-47. Trueman, E. R. and Hodgson, A. N. (1990). The fine structure and function of the foot of Nassarius kraussianus, a gastropod moving by ciliary locomotion. J Mollu Stu 56, 221-228. Tucker, R. P., Shibata, B. and Blankenship, T. N. (2011). Ultrastructure of the mesoglea of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (Edwardsiidae). Invert Bio 130, 11- 24. Ushiki, T. (2002). Collagen fibers, reticular fibers and elastic fibers. A comprehensive understanding from a morphological viewpoint. Arch Histol Cytol 65, 109-26. van der Rest, M. and Garrone, R. (1991). Collagen family of proteins. FASEB 5, 2814-2823. Van Oppen, M. J. H., Mieog, J. C., SÁNchez, C. A. and Fabricius, K. E. (2005). Diversity of algal endosymbionts (zooxanthellae) in octocorals: the roles of geography and host relationships. Mol Eco 14, 2403-2417. Vogel, S. (2003). Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wagenseil, J. E. and Mecham, R. P. (2009). Vascular Extracellular Matrix and Arterial Mechanics. Physiol Rev 89, 957-989. Wainwright, S. A., Biggs, W. D., Currey, J. D. and Gosline, J. M. (1976). Mechanical Design in Organisms. London: Edward Arnold. Waite, J. H., Vaccaro, E., Sun, C. and Lucas, J. (2003). Collagens with elastin and silk-like domains In Elastomeric Proteins, eds. P. R. Shewry A. S. Tatham and A. J. Bailey), pp. 189-212 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Williams, G. C. (1995). Living genera of sea pens (Coelenterata: Octocorallia: Pennatulacea): Illustrated key and synopses. Zoo J 113, 93-140. Zhang, X., Fei, K., Agbas, A., Yan, L., Zhang, J., O’Reilly, B., Deutzmann, R. and Sarras, M. P. (2002). Structure and function of an early divergent form of laminin in hydra: a structurally conserved ECM component that is essential for epithelial morphogenesis. Dev Genes Evol 212, 159-172. 82 83 תקציר מערכת הצורבנים כוללת בעלי חיים בעלי סימטריה רדיאלית או בי-רדיאלית ומופע מדוזה או פוליפ ,שלהם חלל בעל פתח מוקף זרועות צייד .הם דו שכבתיים בעלי אנדודרם ואקטודרם ,המופרדים על ידי שכבה לא תאית המכונה מזוגליאה .מחלקת האלמוגים כוללת בעיקר בעלי חיים ישיבים ומאופיינת בלוע המצופה באקטודרם ומחיצות גוף רדיאליות .במחלקה זו מצויה תת-מחלקת השמונאים ,הכוללת 3,211מינים לערך, מהמחלקות ,Alcyonacea, Pennatulaceaו . Helioporaceהשמונאים הם בעלי חיים מושבתים בעלי תווך בין רקמתי המכונה ,coenenchymeומורכב בעיקר ממזוגליאה ,מחטי שלד ותעלות גסטרודרמאליות. פוליפ השמונאים מאופיין בשמונה מחיצות ושמונה זרועות צייד מנוצות .המזוגליאה יחסית מפותחת באלמוגים אלו ,ומהווה לעתים חלק ניכר ממשקלם הכולל .עיקר תפקידה של המזוגלאה ,שלה תכונות קרובות למטריקס חוץ תאי ,הוא מכאני .היא מספקת תמיכה לשלד ההידרוסטטי של המושבה ומעגנת בתוכה סיבי שריר. המזוגליאה מורכבת ממטריקס עשיר במים עשוי רב סוכרים ופרוטוגליקנים ומערכת סיבי קולגן .קולגן הוא אחד החלבונים הנפוצים בבעלי חיים ,הוא מאורגן באופן היררכי ומציג מבנים שונים מג'לטין ועד למבנים סיבים כגידים ורצועות .כל קבוצות הקולגן מורכבות משלוש שרשראות חלבוניות ,אשר נכרכות אחת על השנייה ליצירת סופרהליקס ,המכונה טרופוקולגן .מולקולות אלו ,יוצרות את המיקרופבירילות והפיברילות היוצרות את סיב הקולגן. קבוצות הקולגן השונות נבדלות אחת מהשניה בהרכב חומצות האמינו בשרשראות הפוליפפטיד ,ובהרכב שלוש השרשראות השונות ,שיוצרות את מולקולת הטרופוקולגן. מטרת מחקר זה הייתה לחקור את טיבם של הסיבים ,שנמצאו באלמוג השמונאי Sarcophyton ehrenbergi ) .(Alcyoniidaeאלמוג זה חי באזורי ריף שונים בעולם ,ובכללם ים סוף ,ונמצא בסימביוזה עם אצות חד תאיות .zooxanthellaeקריעה של רקמות האלמוג חושפת צרורות סיבים באורך של עד עשרות סנטימטר ובקוטר של מאות מיקרון הניתנים למשיכה מתוך הרקמה .בדיקת Nuclear magnetic resonance analyses חשפה את טבעם החלבוני של הסיבים ואנליזת חומצות אמינו זיהתה ריכוזים גבוהים של גליצין ,פרולין, והידרוקסיפרולין ,המאפיינים קולגן ואוששה את השערת המחקר לגבי הרכב הסיבים .המחקר עסק בתכונות ביוכימיות ,מבניות וביו מכאניות של סיבי הקולגן של האלמוג ,ובנוסף הוא חשף את מיקומם במושבה .לצורך כך ,נעשה שימוש בשיטות מיקרוסקופיות ,הדמיה מגנטית ,מבחנים ביומכאנים ואנליזת חומרים .מיקרוסקופית אור וצביעות היסטולוגיות של סיבי אלמוג מבודדים אישרו גם הם את טיבעם הקולגני .סיבי האלמוג מציגים מבנה כמעט עגול של סיבים ,הנכרכים אחד על השני .למרות שקוטר הסיבים ) (9 ± 0.37 µm, n=166נמצא קטן משמעותית מקוטר סיבי קולגן ,אשר מצויים ברקמת חיבור של חולייתנים ) ,(50-300 μmהרי סידור הסיבים והפיברליות ,המרכיבים אותם זהה לקבוצות קולגן .III-Iבנוסף ,נמצאו תת יחידות מאורגנות וצפופות על פני הפיברילות בגודל התואם את מולקולת הקולגן או מיקרופיברילה ) .(~2.5 nm wideצביעה ספציפית למקרוסקופיה אלקטרונית חודרת ( )Cupromeronic Blueהראתה מטריקס פרוטוגליקני עשיר במים ,ממצא הנתמך גם על ידי תוצאות דיפרקציית קרינת ,Xשזיהתה מבנה פיברלי עשיר במים .ממצאים נוספים שהתגלו בדיפרקציה היו helix pitch ,D- periodicity , fibrilar packing functionו . helix molecular packing ממצאי ,Thermogravimetric analysisהצביעו גם הם על יכולת אחיזת המים של הסיבים .כאשר סיבים שיובשו בשיטות שונות הראו איבוד מים של 7-31%בחימום ל .111o C -למרות הדמיון המבני בין סיבי האלמוג וגידים ורצועות של חולייתנים ,יכולות אחיזת המים המשמעותית של סיבי האלמוג קרובה יותר לתכונות המזוגליאה .יתכן ,שממצאים אלו מצביעים על כך ,שסיבי האלמוג מהווים מצב ביניים בין המזוגליאה הג'לטנית והקולגן הסיבי ,המסודר ברקמות חיבור של חולייתנים .אנליזת Differential scanning calorimetryהראתה ,כי טמפרטורת ההתכה של סיבי האלמוג גבוהה במיוחד ( )67.8°Cוזהה לזו של קולגן אחרי קשירה צולבת ( )cross-linkingמלאכותית .תוצאות המחקר הביומאכני של סיבי אלמוג מבודדים הראו סדרת תכונות ,אשר קרובות יותר לאלו של גידים ורצועות ,מאשר לאלו של מזוגליאה ,כמו יכולת מתיחה ,19.4±4.27%קשיות ,0.44 ± 0.1 GPaועומס קריעה .49.4 ± 11.7 MPa הדמיה מגנטית של מושבה שלמה ומיקרוסקופיה של חלקיה השונים ,הראתה את מיקום הסיבים ופיזורם ברקמת האלמוג .שש מתוך שמונה מחיצות הפוליפ מכילות סיבי קולגן ,הארוזים לאורך קצה המחיצה ונמשכים לגזע המושבה .בגזע נמצאים הסיבים במחיצות של תעלות גסטרודראמליות ,המגיעות עד לבסיס המושבה .מתוך מיקום הסיבים במושבת האלמוג ותכונותיהם הביומכאניות ,ניתן להניח שלהם תפקיד מבני- תומך ברמת הפוליפ והמושבה כולה .במהלך המחקר נמצא ברקמת האלמוג מבנה נוסף המורכב מסיבים, אשר עוטף את מחטי השלד ,כפי שאותר לאחר המסתם .מבנה סיבי זה שונה מהסיבים הארוכים שלאורך המחיצות .בשני המקרים נמצאו בתאי רקמה הסמוכים לקולגן ,וויסקולות בעלות תוכן ,הנראה סיבי .גודלם, מיקומם ומראם מרמז ,כי יתכן והן משתתפות בתהליך יצירת סיבי הקולגן באלמוג. עד כה לא תועדו בחסרי חוליות סיבי קולגן פנימיים וארוכים בדומה לאלו שנמצאים באלמוג השמונאי S. .ehrenbergiמציאת סיבים דמויי גידים ברקמת בעל חיים דו שכבתי משנה את ההסתכלות על ההופעה והתפתחות של קולגן בעולם החי .סיבי הקולגן של האלמוג הרך מציגים מגוון תכונות ,חלקן קרובות לחולייתנים, חלקן לחסרי חוליות וחלקן חדשות ,שטרם תוארו .הבנה טובה יותר של מבנהו המולקולרי של החלבון ומחקר גנומי של תאים שנמצאים בקרבת סיבים אלו יכולה לקדם את ההבנה של תהליכי יצירת הקולגן גם בהיבטים אבולוציוניים .בנוסף ,הבנה זו תתרום להערכת יכולתו של קולגן זה לשמש ליישומים רפואיים .סיבי האלמוג מציגים סדרת תכונות כדוגמת טמפרטורת התכה גבוהה ,מבנה סידורי ,יכולות ביומכאניות ותאחיזת מים ,אשר יכולות לעשותם מתאימים לשימושים כגון הנדסת רקמות ושחזורן .תוצאות ראשונית אף מראות ,שלנוכחות הסיבים גם ערך כסמן טקסונומי-מורפולוגי לקבוצת מינים ממשפחת ה ,Alcyoniidae -שהוצע שהיא מהווה סוג קריפטי .המחקר הנוכחי מהווה בסיס ידע ,אשר יקדם תחומי מחקר מגוונים וידגיש את השילוב בין ממצאי שדה ועבודת מחקר במעבדה למטרות מחקר בסיסי ויישומי כאחד. עבודה זו נעשתה בהדרכת פרופ' יהודה בניהו תל-אביב אוניברסיטת הפקולטה למדעי החיים ע"ש ג'ורג' ס .וייז המחלקה לזואולוגיה מאפיינים ביולוגיים ,ביוכימיים ומכאניים של סיבי קולגן מהאלמוג הרך בצקנית Sarcophyton ehrenbergi החיבור לשם קבלת תואר "דוקטור לפילוסופיה" ע"י עדו סלע הוגש לסנאט אוניברסיטת תל אביב מרץ 2112