Brian Batell University of Chicago 8th Patras Workshop July 18
Transcription
Brian Batell University of Chicago 8th Patras Workshop July 18
Portals and the Hidden Sector with Neutrino Experiments Brian Batell University of Chicago 8th Patras Workshop July 18 - 22, 2012 Chicago Plan • Motivation for a hidden sector • Communicating with portals • Basic experimental setup; Rate estimates • Current limits/sensitivities: • Dark photons, axions, dark higgs, dark matter ... • Outlook: prospects for Project X Where are the new particles? Coupling to SM 1 ν e EWSB, Hierarchy π, ρ, p t W, Z µ ? Energy Frontier -2 10 Intensity Frontier 10 -4 ? 10 -6 10-8 10-10 -10 10 Hidden Sector 10 -7 -4 10 -1 10 10 2 Mass of particle (GeV) 105 Dark Matter A Light Hidden Sector? • Light SM gauge singlet matter and new forces weakly coupled to ordinary matter largely unconstrained • • • Singlets exist in SM: • Predicted in many BSM & top-down scenarios • Discover new principles in unexpected places! L, eR , dR , uR , H, N Many possibilities for very weak interactions Could address various experimental & observational anomalies Hidden particles Portal • Dark photons • Dark scalars • Sterile Neutrinos • PNGBs • Dark Matter κ µν − Bµν V 2 2 † (µS + λS )H H LHN ∂µ a µ 5 ψ̄γ γ ψ fa 1 χ̄χq̄q + . . . , Λ2 gχ φχ̄χ + gq φq̄q + . . . Proton Beam - Target Setup Target p Beam Stop, Dirt Y 10m -100km Detector e + e − Event rate estimates: Nevents = Nprod × Pdet Production: 1) Direct production: Nprod = σ(pA → Y X) × (NPOT nT LT ) 2) Decay of hadron: Nprod = NH × Br(H → Y + X) Detection (via decay to visible matter (e.g. leptons) : Pdet ∼ γ 2 dΩlab 4π � � d exp − γvτ � � d + Rd − exp − γvτ �� Experiments Experiment NPOT Energy d CHARM 1018 400 GeV 480 m LSND 1023 800 MeV 30 m MiniBooNE 1021 9 GeV 540 m NuMI/MINOS 1020 120 GeV 1 km Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro Dark Photons A' Decay Length cΤ !2 10 0.1 1 !2 10 10!3 10!3 10!4 10!4 10!5 10!5 10!6 10!6 10!7 10!7 Ε V f 10!2 Prompt !$10 Μm" Displaced !$1 cm" !8 Displaced !&1 cm" 10 Invisible !&100 cm" Invisible !&100 m" f¯ 10!9 cτ ∼ 100m × � −7 10 κ �2 � 10!2 10!8 mA' !GeV" 100 MeV mV 0.1 � 10!9 1 Dark Photons BB, Pospelov, Ritz !" # !" * Production via !" ) 0 N !" ( !" ' !" & !" % LSND p+A→π +X followed by 0 + − π → γV → γe e !" N # !" $ !" !" +,- ! ! Dark Photons Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro !2 10 LSND !3 10 0.1 ae E774 1 $!3S" aΜ !4 Production via 10 0 10 E141 !5 Ε p+A→π +X followed by 0 0.01 E137 !6 10 !7 10 + − π → γV → γe e !8 10 SN !9 10 0.01 0.1 mA' !GeV" 1 10 !2 10 !3 10 !4 10 !5 10 !6 10 !7 10 !8 10 !9 Dark Higgs BB, Pospelov, Ritz cW K¶ f¯ <1m 1m- 103m PK¶ *H9 h ! f 103m- 106m > 106m P9 *H9 ! "2 ! ! " ! 2 "−2 # $ −1 κ mh ! mV α cτh! ∼ 100 m × α 10−5 GeV 2mf Dark Higgs BB, Pospelov, Ritz π0 → γV h� MiniBooNE: ρ, ω → V h α� = α � NuMi/MINOS pA → V h PK¶ *H9 LSND: κ ∼ 10−2 � MINOS(2P) MB (2P) MiniBooNE LSND followed by � + − h →� � P9 *H9 Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Bosons Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro PNGB Decay Length cΤ 10 8 107 f F !GeV" aV 106 f¯ 105 cτ ∼ 20m × 100 MeV ma �� Prompt !#10 Μm" Displaced !#1 cm" Displaced !%1 cm" Invisible !%100 cm" Invisible !%100 m" 0.1 1 8 10 107 106 105 104 104 103 103 102 102 10 10 1 � 10!2 F 104 GeV �2 !2 10 ma !GeV" 0.1 1 1 PNGBs Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro Production via F !GeV" CHARM, LSND, MiniBoone, MINOS p+A→a+X followed by − + a→� � 9 10 108 107 106 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 !2 0.1 10!2 ma !GeV" 10 0.1 1 9 10 108 107 106 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 1 Dark matter beam N BB, Pospelov, Ritz Dark matter produced in decay of light mediator π0 , η → γV V → χ̄χ Neutral current-like event: χe → χe χN → χN χe → χe mχ = 1 MeV P9 *H9 LSND Dark matter beam deNiverville, Pospelov, Ritz 10-1 10 10-1 -2 -2 10 10 10-3 -4 κ κ 10-3 10-5 10 10-5 χN → χN mχ = 1 MeV -6 10-7 -4 10 50 150 250 350 mV (MeV) π0 , η → γV V → χ̄χ 450 χN → χN -6 10 10-7 mχ = 50 MeV 150 250 350 mV (MeV) 450 MiniBooNE Dark matter beam deNiverville, McKeen, Ritz χN → χN MINOS pA → V X V → χ̄χ Project X: New high-intensity proton source 3 MW at 3 GeV potential for ∼ 10 23 POT yr Closing thoughts • Weakly-coupled, light particles are a generic & exciting possibility for physics beyond the Standard Model • Can be systematically explored via portals • Proton Beam-target experiments offer complementary sensitivity to other probes • Provide another physics rationale for the experimental program at the intensity frontier Question: What is the best way to utilize/expand existing experimental infrastructure for a more comprehensive physics program? Especially in the context of Project X?