Read on for more! - The WAHID Institute
Transcription
Read on for more! - The WAHID Institute
The WAHID Report on Institute Monthly Editor’s Word This edition of the Monthly Report is (still) filled with tales of religious deviance, from Sukarno’s sect to Santriloka, Wahidiyah, Amaq Bakrie and the Baha’i sect. Like each before them, those accused of deviance were reported to community figures or village authorities. The response has varied, from the release of MUI fatwa, police arrests or Bakorpakem’s disbanding of the deviant sect. Several cases end up in court. The same formula is used over and over and it always produces the same results. Other incidents concern morality. Miyabi, an adult film star of Canadian, French and Japanese descent, arrived in Indonesia to public astonishment. Millions protested, including MUI. Controversy also arose over the launch of the Global Ikhwan (Global Brotherhood) Polygamy Club in Bandung. The club, established by former Darul Arqam members from Malaysia, intends to promote ‘good and true’ polygamy in accordance with Islamic law. Many demonstrated against the club, including female activists and even MUI, as it portrays polygamy as something to be proud of, when in actual fact it harms women. Unfortunately however, MUI did not go so far as to urge that it be banned. The issue of the caliphate is also given attention in this edition. As is public knowledge, some time ago the Indonesian Muslim Students’ Congress discussed the implementation of an Islamic caliphate in Indonesia. This is by no means the first time the proposal has been discussed. Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), the organisation most persistent in its promotion of an Islamic caliphate, has held much larger gatherings at the Bung Karno sports stadium. The concern this time was that the event had the support, according to pamphlets, of the Ministry for Youth and Sport and state universities such as the Bogor Agricultural Institute (IPB). E ti di Read on for more!. 24 No v em be 0 r2 on Religious issues Attorney General Investigates the Baha’i Sect Nurun Nisa’ S lamet Riyadi from Ringinpitu villag in Kedungwaru, Tulungagung was summoned by the Tulungagung public prosecutor’s office, simply because the 50 year old man was a member of the Baha’i sect. Along with other Baha’i members, Slamet Riyadi worships in ac cordance with Baha’i beliefs, which differ from those of other locals, the majority of whom are Muslim. Baha’i members marry according to the Baha’i method and issue their own marriage certificates. They also ask that on their national identity cards their religion be stated as Baha’i. Both these practices have sparked controversy and unrest, with locals even tually reporting the case to community figures and local authorities. Karjito, vil lage chief of Ringinpitu, confirmed that locals were uneasy with the Baha’i mar riage certificates and their request to have their identity cards read “Baha’i”. “Because the certificates aren’t officially issued by the government, the locals consider the relationship as de facto, and not a legal marriage,” he said (surya.co.id, 27/10/09). A similar report was submitted to Abu Sofyan Firojuddin, secretary of the 09 www.bahaiviews.net Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI) in Tu lung agung. The report, from a resident of Ringinpitu, stated that members of the Baha’i sect were practicing religious teachings not recognised by the govern ment. “We have indeed received input from a member of the community asking that Baha’i teachings be regulated,” Abu said (KOMPAS.com, 26/10/09). On the basis of one report in which a member of the community claimed to have been disturbed by Slamet Riyadi’s practices, the Tulungagung prosecutor’s office summoned Slamet Riyadi to court. “A member of the community and the village chief reported the incident,” ex plained Slamet SH, Chief of Intelligence of the Tulungagung prosecutor’s office (okezone.com,26/10/09). Slamet Riyadi, along with Said and a girl from Sulur, were interviewed privately for two hours in Slamet’s office. Slamet Riyadi claimed that the teachings he had been introduced to by the late Abu Yusuf of Tawangsari village in Kedungwaru, Tu lungagung were aimed at finding truth and honesty (Seputar Indonesia, 27/10/09). The attorney confiscated two Baha’i texts, Publisher: The Wahid Institute | Directors: Yenny Zannuba Wahid, Ahmad Suaedy | Chief Editor: Rumadi | Executive Editor: Alamsyah M. Dja’far | Board of Editors: Ahmad Suaedy, Gamal Ferdhi, Alamsyah M. Dja’far | Editorial Staff: M. Subhi Azhari, Nurun Nisa’, Badrus Samsul Fata | Translator: Rebecca Lunon | Cover & Lay out: Ulum Zulvaton | Contributors: Noor Rahman (Jakarta), Dindin A. Ghazali, Suhendy (West Java), Nur Khalik Ridwan (Central Java and Yogyakarta), Tedi Kholiludin (Central Java), Zainul Hamdi (East Java), Syamsul Rijal Adhan (Makassar), Yusuf Tantowi, Akhdiansyah (NTB) | Address: The Wahid Institute , Jln Taman Amir Hamzah 8, Jakarta - 10320 | Phone +62 21 3928 233, 3145 671 I Fax. +62 21 3928 250 Email: [email protected] Website: www. wahidinstitute.org. Published by The Wahid Institute in cooperation with TIFA Foundation. ■ Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 In reference to the Indonesian Presidential Decree No. 69/2000, the Baha’i organisation was granted permission to exist in Indonesia the Kitab Baha’ullah (Book of Baha’i) and the Kalimat Tersembunyi (Secret Scrip tures), which contained God’s conversa tions with His people. Both books were published by Lembaga Majelis Rokhani Baha’i Indonesia (The Indonesian Spi ritual Council of Baha’i), Jakarta. Slamet explained that if the inves tigation was intended to obtain a di rect explanation about the Baha’i sect, then it could be said the sect was an independent religion with no connec tion whatsoever with the six religions formally recognised by the government. “Whether it is deviant or not is up to MUI and the Department of Religious Affairs to decide. We don’t have authority for that,” Slamet said evasively. Slamet Riyadi, who is also head of a neighbourhood as sociation unit in Ringin Putih, declined to comment. “Respect my right not to com ment,” he said (okezone.com, 26/10/09). Abu Sufyan Firojuddin, secretary of Tulungagung MUI, denied having au thority to make a decision. “We’re cau tious in handling this matter, especially the demand that the Baha’i sect be dis banded. Because the sect has no con nection with the six religions recognised by the government we are leaving the decision to the state,” he said (KOMPAS. com, 26/10/09). This stance seems to have been based on an MUI interview with Slamet to determine what his religious practices were. Slamet explained that the Baha’i religion had a unique way of worshiping that could be divided into short, medium or long worship. Baha’i members have freedom to choose which to follow. They may choose short or medium worship which begins when the sun rises and ends when it sets. “Or long worship lasts 24 hours,” Slamet explained. Baha’i members pray once a day and celebrate Lebaran after a 17 day fast. Central MUI begged to differ from Tulungagung MUI. “If they are teaching people to pray only once a day, then that is deviant in itself,” said MUI direc tor Cholil Ridwan, when asked about the emergence of the Baha’i sect in Tulungagung (okezone.com, Monday 26/10/2009). According to Cholil, regard less of what name a religion may go by, if it claims to have a different prophet from any acknowledged in the six recognised religions then it is deviant and must be disbanded, even though it does not claim to be one of those religions. As for the Baha’i religion, not only does it have its own Kitab Akhdas (Holy Book), it also reveres the prophet Muhammad Husein Ali and directs prayers towards Mount Carmel in Israel. Slamet Riyadi did not, however, publically confirm this. The East Java MUI director, Abdushomad Buchori, expressed a nearly iden tical attitude, arguing that Baha’i doctrine was proof of religious defamation because only six religions were acknowledged in Indonesia. Further investigation was nec essary if the Baha’i religion was to be rec ognised as a religion, but, Abdushomad said, MUI did not have authority for this. Did the Department of Religious Af fairs have such authority? The director of Islamic Affairs of the Department of Religious Affairs in Tulungagung, Kusnan Thohari (otherwise known as Akhsan Tohari), stated that his department and MUI had taken steps to ensure that Baha’i followers did not violate the law. Baha’i Islam has existed in Indonesia since 1967, making Kusnan respond cautiously to the matter in order not to disturb inter faith stability and harmony. “As an institution, the Department of Religious Affairs respects the adherents of any faith or sect, so long as they do not violate the law. Baha’i is not a reli gion, but is a sect. The government only acknowledges six religions,” Kusnan told KOMPAS.com (26/10/09). What Kusnan refers to when he men tions violating the law is the issuing of unofficial marriage certificates, which violates Law No. 1/1974 on marriage. Ac cording to this regulation, for Muslims a marriage must be registered at an Office of Religious Affairs, and for non-Muslims it must be registered at a civil registry of fice. Should a violation occur police are responsible for investigating the offence. Before Slamet Riyadi was summoned by the prosecutor’s office, Rudi Kristiya nto, Chief of Tulungagung Police, con firmed that he had already known about the existence of the Baha’i sect. However, he argued that police could not just dis band the sect to prevent possible social unrest, all they could do was to monitor the sect. “Because faith concerns human rights,” said Police Chief Commissioner Rudi Kristantyo (okezone.com, 25/10/09). He claimed police had invited MUI, the Department of Religious Affairs, and the Tulungagung government to take fur ther steps. The following day his attitude had hardened. “We have made recommenda tions to MUI and the Department of Reli gious Affairs that Baha’i activities be tem porarily halted because their rituals are unusual and are causing unrest,” he said on Monday (okezone.com, 26/10/2009). On the issue of the marriage certificates he said police would coordinate with MUI and Bakorpakem, which would nec essarily involve representatives from the prosecutor’s office. The Baha’i sect was established by Bahaullah (1817-1892), who is believed by followers to be God’s reforming messenger, sent after Abraham, Moses, Buddha, Krishna, Zoroaster, Jesus, and Muhammad (okezone.com, 26/10/09). The primary message of the Baha’i sect is unity of humankind. It was sent to earth to break down the divisive walls such as ethnicity, caste and religion between hu mans and to establish a foundation for unification of the entire world. In reference to the Indonesian Presi dential Decree No. 69/2000, the Baha’i organisation was granted permission to exist in Indonesia before being banned by President Soekarno via Presidential Decree No. 265/1962. M Muslim Students Pledge to Establish Caliphate Nurun Nisa’ N o fewer than 5000 Muslim stu dents from all over the archipe lago gathered to attend the Indo nesian Muslim Students’ Congress (KMII) facilitated by the Campus Propagation Institute’s Coordination Body (BKLDK) on y(18/10). Erwin Permana, coordinator of the BKLDK National Executive Body, told Media Umat during the congress that the KMII completely overhauled the Youth Oath (Sumpah Pemuda) pledged on Oc The WAHID Institute n Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 tober 28, 1928. The KMII was one opportunity in which students could shape history. “We can learn from the 1928 Youth Oath, it “With all our soul, we will continue to struggle tirelessly to implement Islamic syari’ah under an Islamic Caliphate as a comprehensive solution to the problems in Indonesian society and other Muslim states.” changed the youth movement allowing it to be independent of the occupation back then,” a postgraduate student from UI said (mediaumat.net, 19/10/09). The Youth Oath changed youths’ perceptions, making them aware of the occupation and motivating them to collectively rise up against and expel the occupational force. Unfortunately they only succeed ed in defeating physical or military occu pation. More subtle occupation in other areas such as politics, economy, culture, and education continue even today. Thus as an alternative to such occupa tion, Muslim youths have now declared the Student Oath. This oath declares that Muslim students must struggle to over come all forms of non-physical occupa tion. If Indonesia was controlled by the Japanese and Dutch before independ ence, today these occupational forces have been replaced by the secular sys tem, which continues to torment society and cause the nation to live in crisis after crisis. Under the system, abundant natu ral resources and mineral wealth have corrupted people, making them unable to live good lives. This is considered dangerous for Indonesia and other Mus lim countries, and thus students argued that the system must be replaced, and must be replaced by a caliphate. The idea resembles the objectives of Syeikh Taqiyuddin an-Nabhani’s transnational organisation, Hizbut Tahrir. The third point of the oath describes the students’ commitment to erecting a caliphate, “With all our soul, we will continue to struggle tirelessly to imple ment Islamic syari’ah under an Islamic Caliphate as a comprehensive solution to the problems in Indonesian society and other Muslim states.” The oath was to be read out in the Basket Hall, Senayan, Jakarta. However, lacking police authorisation, it was even tually moved outside. Apparently, ac cording to the organising committee, the Ministry for Youth and Sport had lob bied Jakarta Police to obtain permission for the event, which had the complete support of the Minister for Youth and Sport, Adyaksa Dault. In addition to be ing sponsored by this Ministry, the event, as noted in its pamphlet, was also spon sored by the state Bogor Agricultural In stitute (IPB). The Campus Propagation Institute (LDK) is a tarbiyah movement, similar to Ikhwanul Muslimin (the Muslim Brother hood) established by Hasan al-Bana in Egypt in April of 1928. The movement does not use the term Islamic Caliphate, but rather Islamic state as a state has ter ritorial boundaries whereas a caliphate does not. Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), established by Taqiyuddin an-Nabhani, does indeed have a large presence at IPB. The group, to quote Imdadun Rahmat (2005), first emerged in Indonesia at the IPB campus after being brought to the country by M Musthofa and Abdurrah man al-Bahgdadi. Did IPB support the event for this reason? M MUI Opposes Miyabi’s Arrival Nurun Nisa’ M UI opposed the intended ar rival of Miyabi aka Maria Ozawa, who was to star in a Maxima Pictures production in Indonesian. The reason they offered was that Miyabi is considered to symbolise the porn world and her arrival would damage the image of the Indonesian religious community. Thus, although she would come dressed in neat clothes that covered her whole body, KH Ma’ruf Amin, director of the MUI Fatwa Commission said that MUI would still oppose her visit to Indonesia.. “We are still opposed even though she is not dressed indecently. Miyabi is the face of porn. There’s no hiding that” KH. Ma’ruf Amin , MUI Fatwa Comission “We are still opposed even though she is not dressed indecently. Miyabi is the face of porn. There’s no hiding that,” he said (Kompas.com, 13/10/09). The WAHID Institute Although the film was to be purely a comedy, Ma’ruf Amin’s opinion would remain unchanged unless star Miyabi re tired from the world of porn. In addition, he argued that Miyabi’s presence in Indo nesia would damage Indonesia’s image. “And don’t we have enough Indonesian actors to need to go importing others?” (detik.com, 18/10/09). Meutia Hatta, Minister for Empower ment of Women, agreed with MUI, ar guing that Miyabi’s presence would be more harmful than anything else. “What’s more, we’ve got the Anti-Pornography Law,” she said (Liputan6.com, 13/10/09). Meutia Hatta suggested that Miyabi be filmed outside the country. If it were Julia Roberts, Meutia would have no objec tions as her films tell of beautiful spiritual journeys and not pure physical desire. Miyabi’s planned arrival has raised much controversy. Ulama have opposed it because they see her as an icon of por nography that would destroy the nation. “If it’s only going to cause damage in our country, why was she invited here,” Rid wan Lubis from the NU executive branch asked (Republika, Monday 12/10/09). Ichwan Syam from MUI said that it was out of place that she should be invited to Indonesia at a time when the nation was fighting hard against pornography. FPI even planned to storm the Maxi ma Pictures office in Mangga Dua. They were met by Maxima management but no agreement was reached, and FPI even tually threatened to blockade Soekarno Hatta airport if Miyabi came (Liputan6. com, 10/10/09). Similarly, members of Kudus IPPNU demonstrated, burning items displaying criticism of Maria Ozawa and pornography, and further critici sing her in speeches (Metrotvnews.com, 11/10/09). A number of Kudus STAIN students and local parliament members held similar demonstrations. However PMII activists of Makassar Is lamic University found this inappropriate. Instead, they demonstrated with posters expressing their support of Miyabi’s ar rival, such as “Regulate Your Morality and Character, No Need to Regulate Miyabi”. ■ Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 Ubaidi, action coordinator of the event, said that they did not agree with the op position to Miyabi, which was, for them, equivalent to rejecting Indonesia’s equal ity of rights and democratic values. Furthermore, Ubaidi said, many other things needed to be regulated first, in cluding the immorality of government officials. “If Miyabi is opposed because she has starred in indecent films, what about our officials or legislators who own those kinds of indecent films? Are we brave enough to kick them out?” Ubaidi asked (detik.com, 14/10/09). Miyabi was to star in the film “Kid napping Miyabi” to be produced by Ody Mulya Hidayat. The film, scheduled to be released at the end of the year, tells about three Indonesian students who plan to kidnap Miyabi after discovering that their idol is currently in Jakarta. Mi yabi or Maria Ozawa is a Japanese porn star of Japanese-French descent, born in 1986. A survey on access to porn in Indonesia revealed that Miyabi was the most accessed artist for each of the last five years. Miyabi eventually cancelled her plans to visit Indonesia, but the con troversy has proved a blessing for traders. Miyabi’s DVDs are highly sought after on the market. So who has really benefited? M Polygamy Club Sparks Controversy Nurun Nisa’ I n 2003 people were stunned with the announcement of an award for polygamy. The Polygamy Award, as it was called, was Puspo Wardoyo’s idea to show respect for those men considered to be successful polygamous. This man with four wives certainly sparked con troversy with his announcement; to the point several female activists boycotted his business, Warung Solo. Aa Gym, a recipient of the award, was heavily pro tested by his own community. Polygamy is also a form of violence against women, as is stated in the CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) which Indonesia ratified in 1984. Apparently the controversy did not suppress the Global Ikhwan Polygamy Club’s enthusiasm during the club’s launch. The Malaysian club was launched at the Aquilla Hotel in Bandung on Satur day night (17/10/09) to the theme “Po lygamy is an Effective Remedy to Gain Allah’s Love”. 150 invited guests from all over Indonesia attended the event, as did the club’s director, Chodijah binti Am. This woman, who has lived in a po lygamous arrangement for 30 years, explained that polygamy was an effec tive remedy because a woman who has been subject to polygamy will always ex perience difficulties in her life. “When she experiences hardship, she will ask Allah for help. Because the difficulties a wife of a polygamous husband experiences are never ending, she will always be ask ing for Allah’s help,” Chodijah explained (ANTARA News, 19/10/09). She admitted that as a woman she had initially rejected polygamy, in fact her whole family had rejected it, scared that she would be unhappy and ignored. But after living in a polygamous arrange ment for three decades, she has received Allah’s love as she has communicated with Him so much. Chodijah did not deny that the establishment of her polygamy club in Indonesia would be opposed by many, especially women. “It was also the case in Malaysia when it was made public the first time, but now everybody has accepted it,” she said. So how has the club been received in Indonesia? The director of West Java MUI, Hafidz Usman, questioned the club’s ex istence and its apparently unclear benefit to society. “What do we need a club like this for?” he asked (tempointeraktif.com, 20/10/09). Hafidz feels that the club’s establish ment is unnecessary. He argues that a group for men with more than one wife is not needed as the issue is highly sen sitive within society. “Not for something this sensitive,” he said. Marriage in Indo nesia was already regulated in legisla tion, and, he added, there is already a Family Counselling Institution. The general secretary of West Java MUI, Rafani Achyar, said that the club was causing social unrest, especially amongst women. However, MUI had not yet discussed releasing a fatwa banning the club’s existence. A fatwa would only be released if the unrest became seri ous, and even then the situation would have to be investigated in detail first through a survey or poll. MUI is however monitoring the development of the or ganisation. The assistant director of West Java MUI in the fatwa section, Rachmat Syafe’i, was more direct. He stated that if the polygamy club was causing social unrest then the West Java branch of MUI would request that it halt all activities (Republika Newsroom, 22/10/09). Female activists clearly oppose the club, and its launch has hurt them. Po lygamy is also a form of violence against women, as is stated in the CEDAW (Con vention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) which Indonesia ratified in 1984. “Clearly, this polygamy club violates the conven tion to eliminate all forms of violence against women, which the govern ment has already signed. One form of violence mentioned in the convention is polygamy,” said Elin Rozana, coordinator of the Women’s Institute (ANTARA News, 19/10/09). Elin explained that opposition to the club was based on information suggest ing that polygamy causes psychological pressure, physical torture and neglect of women and children. Although opposed to the club, Elin will not disband it as she does not have the authority to do so. Malaysian figures have also made complaints about the club. One claimed that the conditions in Islam required to marry just one woman are very strict. That is, one must be spiritually and phys ically healthy, and economically capable. Let alone to take more than one wife. “Essentially, the issue of polygamy is a private and individual matter. I oppose that it is being made into a movement like this,” said the assistant director of the Indonesian Malaysian Religious Propa gation Foundation (YDMI), Datuk Mohd Nakhaie Ahmad (Indopos, 23/10/09). The polygamy club was initially es tablished in Malaysia under the Global Ikhwan organisation, and led by Abuya Ashaari Muhammad (Media Indonesia, 22/10/09). The club now boasts a mem bership of about 300 families. In Indone sia there are currently 36 families who The WAHID Institute n Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 actively participate in the club’s activities, coming from Jakarta, Bandung, Tasikma laya, Wonosobo, Pekanbaru, Aceh, and Medan. Several public figures have been in communication with the club, though they are not members themselves. They include, for instance, Amy, lead vocalist for the band Search Malaysia who be came famous for his song Isabella, and Aa Gym. “That was during his first mar riage, after his second marriage he hasn’t contacted us anymore,” Umar said of the famous preacher from Bandung (detik. com, 20/10/09). Umar, who also has four wives, says that polygamy is not just about sex. The wives of a polygamous husband play cru cial roles in helping their husband with his work. “Polygamy is only allowed if a husband can be fair,” he told tempointeraktif.com (20/10/09). The concept of po lygamy that the club emphasises is that polygamy is a form of worship and that it teaches how to be a leader in a family and how to divide and allocate tasks. “It’s not just about fulfilling sexual needs,” he said. For example, he explained that what he meant by allocation of tasks was de ciding who did what when he had to travel to another city or country for work. “If you have only one wife and she comes with you, who will look after the kids? With this method (polygamy), the chil dren are looked after,” he explained. As for leadership in polygamy, it relates to a husband’s obligations to his wives. And it is here that his patience is tested. Umar claimed that he was not con cerned with the opposition to the club. “Their understanding of Islam is still shallow,” he said of those in opposition. Not only that, he continued, but those who criticise polygamy would have to answer to God and Prophet Muham mad. So great has the controversy sur rounding the club been that it has led people to question Global Ikhwan in the country of its origin. Apparently it is not well known in Malaysia. “In Malaysia Global Ikhwan is not so famous, and only has a few members,” Nakhaie explained. Consequently it comes as a shock to him that it is talked about so much in Band ung. The club is intended to counsel polygamous families, and to advocate polygamy within society in accordance with the Qur’an. As for its origins, Nakhaie said that the Global Ikhwan present in Bandung was a splinter group of Darul Arqam. “I saw that the members of Global Ikhwan were Darul Arqam members, which has been banned by the Malaysian government for being a deviant sect,” he said. He believes that Global Ikhwan is a camouflage organisation, and in Malay sia has not registered itself as a social organisation, but rather as an enterprise that deals with making and selling bread, cakes and in slaughtering animals. “Be hind that they go about their polygamy club activities,” he explained. Apparently, the Malaysian govern ment cannot ban Global Ikhwan be cause it is officially an enterprise, and not a social organisation. Nor is it an illegal organisation. Privately, Nakhaie does not agree with making polygamy into a movement. “Malaysian ulama are also definitely opposed to it,” he emphasised. Much of this is in line with what Muhammad Umar, director of Global Ikhwan, has said. The Global Ikhwan Po lygamy Club was established in 1990, originally under the name Darul Arqam. However at the beginning of 1994 Darul Arqam was banned in Malaysia. Then in 1996-1997, the club was re-established under the name Ruqafa, which in 2007 was changed again to become Global Ikhwan. It was a foundation and enter prise dealing in clothing, bread, sauces, noodles, toothpaste and so on. However Umar denied that his group had been labelled deviant and had been charged with inciting unrest, arguing that the club endeavours to fight against prostitution and for social good. “What’s the proof that we have caused unrest or are a deviant sect,” he asked (wartakota. co.id, 21/10/09). Indeed, in Malaysia Darul Arqam has been labelled deviant. It has been banned from existing in Malaysia because it prac tices Aurad Muhammadiyah, a kind of prayer which has been considered devi ant since 1994 when Mahathir Muham mad was in power. MUI in Aceh, West Sumatra, South Sumatra, and in Riau, ac cording to MUI’s official website, issued fatwa banning the organisation, which were later affirmed by Central MUI. Others have argued that this ban against Darul Arqam in Malaysia was mo tivated more by politics, as it was feared that its highly influential leader was chal lenging Mahathir’s popularity (see hidayatullah.com, 04/10/03). Syed Hussein Ala tas, a sociologist from Singapore, stated in his book “Talqin untuk UMNO/Death Prayer for UMNO” that Abuya would be come PM after Mahathir because of the thousands of Darul Arqam followers he had influence over. M Purwakarta Regent Cancels Permit for Saint Mary Church Nurun Nisa’ T he Purwakarta regent has revoked the building permit granted to the Saint Mary Church for their planned con struction Bungur Sari village of Cinangka. It came as a shock as the Regent, Dedi Mulyadi, had already signed the letter of authorisation. The initial permit was cancelled with document number 503/2601/BPMPSP/ X/2009 dated 16 October 2009 on Cancel lation of Authorisation for the Saint Mary Church Catholic Church. The reason given for the cancellation was that research un dertaken by the Forum for Religious Com munication (FKUB) and the Department of The WAHID Institute Religious Affairs of Purwakarta found that certain conditions had not been met. “So it was considered flawed,” explained Jae nal Arifin, director of the Purwakarta office for National Stability and Social Protection (tempointeraktif.com, 19/10/09). The first requirement, that the congre gation consist of more than 60 people was indeed met by the construction commit tee, but is technically flawed. That is, 45 lo cals in the vicinity of the church, as proven by the addresses on their national identity cards, were members, according to the research undertaken by FKUB and the De partment of Religious Affairs. They argued that another 15 people were needed to satisfy the minimum of 60 people required by the local government. One man from the construction com mittee, Hadi, was reluctant to comment as the case had been handed over to lawyers (VIVANews, 20/10/09). The director of the Jakarta Christian Communication Forum (FKKJ), Theophilus Bela, said that the cancellation was wrong. He told christianpost.co.id (20/10/09), quo ting Romo Agustinus Made from Paroki Salib Suci (regional chapter of the Holy Cross), that authorisation to construct the church was given after 60 locals had signed ■ Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 in its support. However, fear of being ter rorised by the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) reduced the number of those prepared to announce their support when they were summoned by FKUB and the Department of Religious Affairs. “FPI have expressed their opposition to the construction of church since last Ramadan, and are still t errorising people today,” he said. Romo Agustinus Made intended to meet with the director of the Bandung chapter to discuss the matter on Tuesday (20/10/09). M Santriloka Throws Society into Tumult Nurun Nisa’ T hey say that the Santriloka sect, based on Jl Empu Nala and in the Panggerman area, became well known in Mojokerto thanks to a VCD. The VCD begins with a prayer for Muham mad, and the teachings presented differ significantly from those understood and practiced by most Muslims in Mojokerto. The VCD shows a person thought to resemble Achmad Naf’an or Gus Aan, the leader of Santriloka, sitting in front of a backdrop displaying the word “San triloka”. He is giving a sermon to his fol lowers on several matters, which many believe to be the Santriloka doctrine. Four kinds of prayer Santriloka: Maghrib (Mageri Urip), Isya (Isak-isakno), Subuh means (Ojo Kesusu Labuh) , Zuhur (Nduweni Budi Luhur) Gus Aan says that Muslims need not fast during Ramadan as Allah never ordered them to fast during Ramadan. Rather they should fast during Selo, the ninth month of the Javanese calendar. He also said that there is no point in chanting La Ilaha illa Allah (There is no god but God) every day, because even if one million people did so, there would still be only one God. In addition, adherents need not bur den themselves with the obligation to pray; instead the sect places emphasis on remembering or thinking about Allah. The confession of faith also differs from that in Islam. Those intending to become santri (religious students), are required to swear allegiance with the confession of faith after paying at least Rp 100,000 con cealed in a certain kind of flower. Director of Nurul Huda pesantren, KH Fakih Utsman, who found three cop ies of the VCD, asked police to monitor and ban Santriloka sermons. Gus Fakih also asked the local branch of MUI to is sue a statement damning the group. “We are concerned about the community’s reaction if they just see the VCD,” he ex plained. In addition, Gus Fakih was wor ried that members of society may join the deviant sect, or act violently if the recording was allowed to continue to be distributed and watched without action from authorities. One of the sect’s most controversial teachings is that concerning praying. According to Gus Aan, God did not or der people to pray in the way Muslims pray, and thus he teaches his santri that they need not pray. Santriloka is familiar with four kinds of prayer: Maghrib, Isya’, Subuh, and Dhuhur. The Ashar prayer is not practiced. Maghrib is interpreted to mean Mageri Urip (fortifying life) with wisdom, Isya means Isak-isakno (as much as possible) do good to others, Subuh means Ojo Kesusu Labuh (do not trust easily) and Dhuhur means Nduweni Budi Luhur (be moral). If one performs these prayers, then there is no need to per form the Ashar prayer, as it means Ojo Kesasar (do not be misled). Gus Aan says that because it represents an order not to be mislead or to deviate, then there is no Ashar prayer. The technical aspects of praying differ from the general way Muslims pray, with no ruku’ and sujud (main body movements). The Santriloka sect does not acknowledge the Qur’an in Arabic. “The Qur’an is not from Arabic, but from Kawi, Sanskrit, and old Javanese. The Qur’an is an Arabic product used to colo nise the Indonesian nation,” he argued (metrotvnews.com, 30/10/09). In fact, he went on to say that the Qur’an had been modified by people in order to bring down Majapahit, Java, and the Pancasila. “Who wants to take responsibility if the Qur’an is wrong? Will the Prophet take responsibility?” he asked. Gus Aan added that many people had made the mistake of claiming to embrace Islam when they did not really understand the religion. For instance, the Dhuhur prayer actually originates from the Javanese word luhur, but most Muslims just pray in the mosque and in accordance with how they have been taught by ulama. So what does Gus Aan base his knowledge on? He claims that he gained his understanding of Islam from several books, whose authors and publishers he did not know. In the midst of the controversy, Ach mad Naf’an claimed that the teachings he was spreading were Islamic. “Feel free to consider us not Muslim. But we certainly are Muslims, we use the con fession of faith as witness to those con verting to Islam,” he said in the Santriloka compound in Kranggan, Gang 5 (detik. com, 29/10/09). According to this father of five, Islam is God’s teachings sent to hu mans through the Prophet Muhammad. Thus, the essence of Islamic teachings is the oneness of God, and the example of the Prophet. Gus Aan firmly expressed that Islam was not owned by a specific so cial organisation or the Department of Religious Affairs, apparently in reaction to the accusations of deviance that usu ally come from these organisations/insti tutes. “If we are banned from saying that our religion is Islamic, who determines what Islam means? If the Department of Religious Affairs was to ban us in the name of Islam, it’s basically the same as if the department owns Islam,” he ex plained. Gus Aan even accused institutional intervention of being one cause of the decline of Islam as a religion that teaches the oneness of God, claiming that all he wanted to do was to worship and carry out God’s word in peace. Thus, he continued, the Department of Religious Affairs could not determine whether or not any individual’s religious belief was deviant. This seemed to be aimed at the department for its legitimization of ac cusations of deviance against the Sant riloka sect, as well as at those who have made such accusations. He asked, if the Department of Religious Affairs owned Islam, then would one receive merit from the department every time one prayed? He was not too fussed about being labelled a follower of Javanism (Kejawen). “If they accuse me of practicing Kejawen (Islam mixed with Javanese culture), then The WAHID Institute n Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 everyone else practices Araben (Arabic Islam). But there is only one Islam,” he ex plained (detik.com, 29/10/09). Achmad Naf’an was eventually taken to the Mojokerto police station to pro tect him from angry locals (29/10/09). Ac cording to Pos Kota, before Gus Aan was evacuated dozens of people swarmed around Gus Aan’s house where he was holding a sermon routinely held on Kamis Kliwon (certain Thursday nights in the Javanese calendar). Irritated locals start ed to arrive after Maghrib prayers until there were so many that the sub-district head asked them to disperse to allow for a meeting between Santriloka leaders and authorities. They refused to accept the explanation, and demanded that a banner displaying the Santriloka name be removed and that the occupants of the house, which functioned as the Santriloka headquarters, be evicted for disturbing locals. The situation was only getting out of hand and so the chief of Mojokerto police, Police Chief Commis sioner Sulistyandri Atmoko evacuated Gus Aan in an attempt to subdue the crowd’s anger and prevent any violence from breaking out. On the same day, the compound was ordered to halt all activities by local vil lage authorities based on the unrest it was causing and demands from locals. The closure was put in place after talks aimed at finding out which Santriloka teachings were a problem and which were accused of being deviant. “Despite this, a halt on Santriloka activities will only be applied after coordination with Bakorpakem,” explained Acim Dartasim, sub-district head of Kranggan (Pos Kota, 29/10/09). Although willing to halt activities, Gus Aan did not feel the same way about having his sect accused of deviance. He implored that his compound not be closed down just for the sake of it. He also asked that all parties be able to discuss the true Santriloka teachings, and that ulama and kiai not jump to conclusions that his sect is deviant. If proven deviant, Gus Aan has expressed his willingness to be sentenced to death by decapitation or other means. However, if not proven deviant, and if Santriloka is able to prove deviance on behalf of the kiai, then kiai and their santri should be given the same sentence. “If the ulama are guilty of deviance, they should be decapitated, as should the santri,” he added. Direc tor of East Java MUI, KH Abdus Shomad Bukhori, has already called the sect devi ant. “The teachings are a clear affront to Islam. And the sect must be disbanded for insulting religion,” he explained. After four nights at the local police station and after receiving guidance from several religious leaders from the Department of Religious Affairs, MUI and NU from Mojokerto, Gus Aan admitted his guilt and repented. “I am prepared to take responsibility and give guidance to my several hundred followers,” he de clared (beritajatim.com, 02/11/09). He has an estimated 700 santri from a vari ety of backgrounds. Most are from Mo jokerto, while some are from Jombang. Several are young men bearing tattoos, while others are former members of the Mojokerto Legislative Council from the Democratic Party. However the Santriloka compound is not permanent because of limited funds and lack of a place to build a typical compound. Santriloka is a theological study group that emerged at a time when the Indonesian nation was broken, both morally and physically (www.santriloka. net). Here, theology refers to God’s words, which describe His attributes and has no authority to give orders. Theology is studied in order to bring humans closer to God, who gave the order for them to worship. A broken or damaged nation, Santriloka argues, is signified by the presence of hatred and hostility between fellow Muslims who argue about mistakes and not the truth. In addition, such a nation is marked by much environmental destruction and uncontrollable corrup tion. Humans and nature are no longer friends. Consequently, Santriloka intends to remedy the above situation by teaching their Muslim brothers about the true Islam of their ancestors and which made Indonesia prosperous during the reign of the Majapahit Kingdom. The name Santriloka is an abbrevia tion of the attributes the sect claims to uphold, namely social (Sosial), upholding the mandate (Amanat), ability to run (meNata) one’s family and one’s self, observant (Taat) and obedient to the truth, possessing respect (Rasa hormat) of teachers, always remembering (Ingat) to have self-control when studying (Laku) teachings in an optimal (Optimal) man ner, and contributing (Kontribusi) to the Muslim community and Nation. Amen. Their website also displays a photo of a man said to be K S Mustofa Wly AS alias The Yellow Prince, who has a striking re semblance to Gus Aan. Unfortunately the website was inaccessible after October 29, even though several days before the Wahid Institute had easily accessed the site to research the matter. Eventually Santriloka was officially disbanded by Bakorpakem in Mojokerto after a meeting to discuss the status of the sect. “All agreed with that. We’re just deciding when it will be disbanded,” vice mayor of Mojokerto, Mas’ud Yunus, ex plained (Seputar Indonesia, 03/11/09). M Sukarno’s Sect Accused of Sexual Perversion and Deviance Nurun Nisa’ A number of members from the Babadan People’s Justice Forum (FKMB) from Tawangrejo in Gu marang, Madiun approached the local MUI office. They were there to submit a complaint, No. 5/eks.FKMB/X/09, about the “deviant sect” established by Sukarno (45), a Babadan resident. It was signed by Sutrisno, the head of the group, and Alim Prakoso, the secretary. They had taken the issue to FKMB The WAHID Institute because locals had begun to feel unsafe and restless. FKMB then submitted the complaint to MUI with the hope that MUI would issue a fatwa that would satisfy the community, as neither police nor lo cal village authorities had been able to do so. Apparently locals had previously raided Sukarno’s house in coordination with local police, however they went home empty handed. “The house was empty and no one was living there,” Wagimin explained (lensaindonesianews. com, 14/10/09). Village authorities, he continued, remained silent while the locals demanded that Sukarno’s sect be disbanded and he, as leader of the sect, be dealt with harshly. Unrest in the community was sparked by several of Sukarno’s teachings that the community considers deviant. For instance, whenever the call to prayer ■ Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 Sukarno really angered the community when it became apparent that he had impregnated two of his students, Winarni (25) who gave birth to a child who is now eight years old, and Lina (27) who is currently five months pregnant. sounds, Sukarno’s followers should block their ears. His followers seem cynical and make negative comments when hearing mosque prayers. In addition, Sukarno and his followers have spread news that a new kingdom will emerge, and Sukarno will be king. “Sukarno also claims to be able to communicate with the spirits of the prophets, and to often visit seventh heaven to see Adam. Sukarno has also said he is often approached by Bung Hatta and Supriyadi (a hero from Blitar, Ed.) to show their respect,” Sutrisno added (surabayapost.co.id, 28/10/09). Fi nally, Sukarno’s sect runs unusual activi ties compared to most religious groups or sects, such as requiring all members to gather every Monday and Friday at 1pm. According to one man who lives in front of Sukarno, Sukarno really angered the community when it became apparent that he had impregnated two of his stu dents, Winarni (25) who gave birth to a child who is now eight years old, and Lina (27) who is currently five months pregnant. Winarni was eventually mar ried to Sungkono, Sukarno’s in-law, while Lina was married to Jaiman, one of Su karno’s students. Both fell pregnant based on the pretext that it was a requirement to completing their education. Sukarno got away with his actions because when asked to take responsibility he shrugged it off and, according to Wagimin, r esponded that teachers were not allowed to marry their students and thus one of his male students would have to take his place instead. KH Abdul Mukti Sofwan and KH Mukaaromain Ihsan from Madiun MUI promised to take further action against the sect in response to social unrest over Sukarno’s sickening behaviour. After a meeting, KH Abdul Mukti Sof wan gathered his people and then began coordinating with police and the Madiun government to determine what steps to take next. “The report we’ve been given suggests that the sect is clearly deviant. We’ll cross check it first after holding an internal meeting,” he explained (Radar Madiun, 28/10/09). KH Mukaaromain Ihsan, director of the Madiun MUI fatwa section, confirmed this. “We are thankful. We will study the proof before issuing a fatwa.” M Stage for Wahidiyah Sermon Vandalised? Nurun Nisa’ A 1.5 meter high stage, 5 meters wide and 6 deep, was to be used on Monday night for a Shalawat (prayers for Muhammad) Ahmadiyah ser mon (12/10/09). However, the night be fore the event people destroyed it using stones and wooden sticks. The banner attached to the stage was ripped down and the wooden foundations pulled up. It was not long before the stage fell over. Unsatisfied, people went so far as to re move the nails from the wood. “We demolished the stage and won’t let the sermon be held in our village,” said Ali, a local resident Those responsible for the destruc tion did not want Bandaran village of Tlanakan, Sumenep to facilitate the ser mon at which KH Romo and KH Hadratul Mukarrom Abdul Latif would speak. KH Hadratul Mukarrom Abdul Latif is direc tor of Kedunglo Kediri pesantren, where the Wahidiyah prayer group originally emerged. “We demolished the stage and won’t let the sermon be held in our v illage,” said Ali, a local resident, (surya. co.id, 13/10/09). The reason for its rejection was, ac cording to one villager, because the sermon would disturb the community and it was unclear what prayer readings would be used, except that they differed from local beliefs. “What kind of sermon is it? The ulama and kiai here don’t teach those kinds of teachings,” another villager said. The villagers hold such opinions be cause similar sermons have been held in neighbouring villages. The director of the Pamekasan Department for Wahidiyah Development and Broadcasting, K Abdul Kholiq Fandi, declared that the readings were ordinary shalawat, like those read by Muslims in general, and were not deviant. He did admit that there were differences with common shalawat but they did not go so far as to violate Islamic beliefs. Those reciting the prayers must go through a series of specific actions in the shalawat ritual to develop their love in God and His prophets. Wahidiyah followers call this “Mujadalah” which means to experience the presence of the Prophet within oneself while reading shalawat. As for the hysterical wailing of congregants, Kiai Kholiq explained that it was a form of sincerity and submission to God. The local opposition, he continued, was due to simple misunderstanding. He apologised to the village chief and the locals for not having coordinated with them previously. Many locals agreed with and accepted this (ANTARA News, 12/10/09). A middle path was taken, and the Wahidiyah sermon moved to a neigh bouring village. “It’s better than causing problems which could turn into physical brawling. We have given in and will move to another location in Ambat village, to the east of Bandaran,” Kholiq explained. Chief of Tlanakan police, Police Chief Commissioner Bambang Soegiharto de nied the vandalism. “There was no van dalism, the event, initially planned to be held in Bandaran was just moved to an other village, Ambat, in Tlanakan,” he said, attempting to clarify reports of the van dalism (ANTARA News, 12/10/09). “We went to the venue in Bandaran, but there was no protest whatsoever. The venue was just moved, and it was the event committee itself that chose to move because the original venue was too small. So there was no vandalism,” he said. M The WAHID Institute n Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 Prophet Pin Circulated in Makassar Syamsu Rijal Ad’han I n recent times some quite unique pins have been circulating in Makassar. The pins depict several of the Prophet’s friends, mostly Ali, and the Prophet’s rela tives such as Fatimah, Hasan and Husain. Most extraordinary of all the pins is one that features Prophet Muhammad. The two responsible for the distribu tion, Bahanda and Irianto, were arrested by police in their homes on October 14. Bahanda was found at his house in Romang Polong of Somba Opu, Gowa, while Irianto was at Jl. Andi Tonro III, No. 9, Makassar. He claimed that in Iran the items were not banned, but that ulama only urged Muslims not to distribute them. Both are known to be active in the Makassar branch of Jamaah Ahlu Bait Indonesia (Indonesian Congregation of the Prophet’s Family). Irianto, otherwise known Ustadz Anto, is a preacher from Jamaah Ahlu Bait Indonesia. He and his wife, Mar, deny allegations that they distributed the pins, arguing that they only bought then from Bahanda. Anto said that the picture of the Prophet Mu hammad was probably only someone’s imagination of how the Prophet looked. He admitted that he did not believe that the picture was the Prophet Muhammad. “There is nobody who can really know how Prophet Muhammad looks.” Anto argued that there were many depictions of the Prophet’s friends on the internet, which he also regarded just as depictions. In fact, one book describes the Prophet Muhammad as having greyhaired armpits and long hair, which Anto also regards just as a depiction. But why, he asks, it that not criticised? Anto believes that the picture of the Prophet on the pin depicts him when he was still 17 years old, before he had become a Prophet. Thus the person who had made the pin had not depicted the Prophet, as Muhammad only became a prophet at the age of 40. Bahanda, a man from Bulukumba, admitted to owning the pins, which he brought back from Iran seven months ago. He had been registered as a student of Persian Literature at Hausa al-Mahdi University. Upon his return to Makassar he bought about 50 pins as souvenirs, as well as about 100 stickers of the Proph et’s family. He had sold all of them to Ahlu Bait members in Makassar for Rp. 10,000 apiece. He claimed that in Iran the items were not banned, but that ulama only urged Muslims not to distribute them. He believed they had been made as an expression of love for the Prophet Mu hammad. Anto and Bahanda are both witnesses to the case and are currently undergoing intense investigation, though both have been allowed to return home. Accord ing to the Chief of Intelligence of the Makassar Public Prosecutor’s Office, Didi Haryanto, the Prosecutor’s Office is ready to process those guilty of distributing the pins (Fajar) for violating the Criminal Code, articles 156 and 157 on religious defamation. They face a maximum sen tence of 2.5 years in jail, in a case that resembles the al-Qiyadah case of several years ago. “Don’t be provoked, this could well have been done by those who don’t like Islam and maybe they want to provoke us.” KH. Farid Wajidi Elsewhere, an ulama from South Su lawesi, KH Farid Wajidi, reminded soci ety not to be provoked into take violent action against certain organisations or groups. “Don’t be provoked, this could well have been done by those who don’t like Islam and maybe they want to pro voke us.” He agreed that society should protest, as the incident degraded Islam’s prestige and honour, but that protest should be smart and honourable. Meanwhile Ustadz Baharuddin, a Mu hammadiyah leader in South Sulawesi, declared that the incident was blasphemy in the name of the Prophet. He also did not agree that the picture depicted Mu hammad when he was 17 and not when he was a Prophet, because, according to Baharuddin, Prophet Muhammad was al ways revered from the moment he was born until his death. M Isti Raksa Rinjani Director Brought to Justice Yusuf Tanthowi & Nurun Nisa’ I n East Lombok Amaq Bakrie aka Papuq Djunaidi or Abdullah, leader of Isti Je nar Raksa Gunung Rinjani, has become quite well known of late. He claimed that he had ascended to the seventh heav en and people called him a prophet. Many community leaders came to him including district chiefs and employees of the East Lombok government. His un usual claims are so controversial because, according to H Muhasim, they have been spread to other people, including Amaq’s The WAHID Institute own followers. Amaq Bakrie claimed that he had ascended to the seventh heaven three times, the first in 1975 and the last in 2005. His first ascension took him to the seventh heaven and purified his heart when he was about to descend. He as cended using two ladders attached to trees. He had been guided to the trees by a supernatural voice. The second ascension brought him the archangel Gabriel who gave him a certificate of a teaching called Isti Jenar Raksa Gunung Rinjani. Isti Jenar means the truth in our body, Raksa means something that we care for in ourselves, Gunung refers to our physical body, and Rinjani means that humans are creatures of the highest rank. He still teaches this today. In his third ascension, Amaq Bakrie entered a spiritual realm. The spirits that he met called him father, a title he refused to accept. However the spirits ■ Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 “People can call me anything, but I didn’t say it” Amaq Bakri insisted because they saw the morning star in him. Amaq Bakrie claimed that through these three ascensions he was given di vine inspiration. The inspiration includes five elements: 1) the ability to directly see, sense and interact with life in the hereafter; 2) resurrection from death; 3) being titled Pande Manusia (shepherd of mankind); 4) becoming Jawa’, a guide to the true path; 5) becoming a Nandang, a preacher of the truth. This divine inspiration led to rumours that Bakrie claimed to be a prophet, al though he never explicitly did so. “People can call me anything, but I didn’t say it,” he said. Sambelia district chief reported Amaq Bakri for disturbing society and defaming religion. In addition to not calling himself a prophet, he also questioned being ac cused of spreading his beliefs. Bakrie argued that people approached him, not the other way around. He recalled a preacher from Mataram, who had re cently visited him to attend his sermon and talk with him. He suspected that it was the preacher who spread his contro versial teachings. “He did record me and said he wanted to produce a tape,” he ex plained (Lombok Post, 09/10/09). This man, who sought spiritual en lightenment from a young age, has finally stirred up a controversy. Between his first and second ascensions (1997 – 2000), Amaq Bakri had been reprimanded, but had not been worried by it. He was inves tigated by his village chief, district chief, and community figures. “I remember in 1997, I was investigated 9 times. I was very shy at the time, to be regarded as a thief,” he said. He has sparked a similar controversy this time, and has been investigated again. The interview was held in the Sam belia district chief’s office by a team from the local government of East Lombok led by the assistant secretary H Muhasim. Also present were chief of the municipal police Sudirman, director of the political affairs agency H Syarif Walitulloh, director of the Office of Religious Affairs Lotim H 10 Khairi, Sambelia district chief, the local village chief, a number of religious and community figures, as well as the chief of Sambelia police and the commander of the military. The reason for the interview was that Bakrie’s teachings were felt to be disturbing society—the usual reason given for those claiming to be prophets or considered to be spreading deviant teachings. It was also to anticipate and prevent religious defamation. The hearing heard that on March 18, 2008 Bakrie had signed a declaration con cerning the errors of his teachings in front of several witnesses, including Kasri from the Sambelia Office of Religious Affairs. In the fourth point of the declaration Amaq Bakrie swore that he would no longer teach such teachings. He confirmed this in the hearing while stating that he still believed in the ascensions he experi enced and the Isti Jenar Reksa Gunung Rinjani certificate he had received. On the other hand, he said he was willing to forgo his beliefs if they were wrong. “Tell me where they are false. If they are, I will accept whatever the punishment may be, even if it means death,” he explained to the team, (Lombok Post, 13/10/09). The East Lombok government team sought confirmation on several other matters, such as Bakrie’s holy book. Amaq Bakrie was accompanied the Dasan Tinggi sub-village chief of Sambalia, Nasipuddin, and explained that one must have followers first and swear an oath before being given a book. To receive the book congregants must attend the ser mon on the Thursday night of the week Muhammad was born, bringing with them a flashlight. Amaq answered all of the team’s questions openly, often receiving smiles from the government team. Even though he himself did not believe in Amaq’s teachings, Nasipuddin felt that Amaq Bakrie’s investigation was unfair. He did not understand many of the questions he was asked, and was thus confused when answering. In addition, his mysti cal beliefs could not be viewed from just one perspective. In the end, the team was unable to reach a decision over the fate of this man of 15 grandchildren. “We will study eve rything. Later we will let you know which teachings are deviant and which aren’t,” H Muhasim said. Amaq Bakri’s case is likely to drag on as long as those involving Lia Eden, Yus man Roy, and Ahmad Musaddek. Amaq Bakri is currently being held at a hospital in Mataram for mentally ill patients. He was examined and taken to the hospi tal for further examination of his mental condition last Thursday (15/10). Appa rently police were to investigate him on Saturday (24/10/09). This was apparently in response to reports of his weird behaviour. “He’s like an insane person. His congregants used to carry flashlights in the middle of the day. Let’s say they’re weird,” the Sambelia village chief said. Both Mardi, the village secretary, and Saleh, head of Sambe lia Community Council, agreed. Simi lar comments were made by a woman whose children live next door to Amaq Bakrie. Sambelia police are already on the case, after the Sambelia district chief re ported Amaq Bakri for disturbing society and defaming religion. Police have inter viewed several expert witnesses from the Department of Religious Affairs, Bakorpa kem and MUI, as well as some of Amaq Bakri’s relatives. Amaq Bakri’s family has been intimi dated by a vigilante group in East Timor. The group threatened to slaughter Amaq Bakri if he continued to claim to be a prophet. As a result his relatives are seek ing police protection. Isti Jenar sermons are usually held three nights a week on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday. About 40 people routinely attend the sermons. “Many come from far, from Sikur and Mantang (Central Lombok),” he said. He does not teach any specific doc trine. He has no book to teach from, and no specific requirements. Only every meeting the congregation is invited to zikir (repeatedly chant part of the confes sion of faith). “If we’re doing well, we’ll do it 5000 times. We only chant La ilahail lallah (there is no God but God),” he ex plained. He also does not demand that congregants attend every sermon. Sang gar Putung teachings need only be given once “Then it’s all about practicing the teaching,” he said. In the last two years Amaq Bakrie explained that he had often been ap proached by preachers inviting him for discussions and to preach in different places. He did so, once for 40 nights. How ever, his experience doing so led him to compare other preacher’s teachings to a bottle of liquid. Just as one pours liquid out of a bottle, teachings from textbooks are given without their true meaning. “They just speak the words, without knowing their meaning,” he said. M The WAHID Institute n Monthly Report on Religious Issues, Edition XXIV, November 2009 12,000 Skirts in West Aceh to Replace Tight Pants Nurun Nisa’ T he regent of West Aceh has launched a new policy banning Muslim women from wearing tight pants or jeans. Those who violate the regulation will have their pants cut up and replaced with skirts, to be provided free of charge by the West Aceh government. The regu lation will take effect as per January 1, 2010. “If any Muslim woman is caught in a raid by Wilayatul Hisbah (WH, religious po lice) officers she will be given a skirt and her pants will be shredded immediately,” Regent Ramli S explained (serambinews. com, 26/10/09). The regulation does not apply to non-Muslim women, but they have been asked to adjust their clothing accordingly. The punishment will also apply to men who wear shorts that reveal parts of their bodies that should remain covered. But it remains unclear whether they will be given free skirts as well, as there has been no talk of free pants. It is also unclear just how the raids and the shredding of pants will unfold. The independently elected regent admitted that the techni calities were still being formulated by the local religious police. The new ban was, according to Ramli, based on results from a conference of ulama in mid 2007. Ulama had at the time asked that the government be proactive in implementing syari’ah in West Aceh. As well as risking having their pants being cut up, those found wearing tight pants will also face discrimination, in the form of not receiving government services. The regent issued the ban be cause he felt that it was not ethical that those wearing tight clothing, especially women, should be seen walking freely in public places such as government offices. Thus, he continued, it was only fitting that they not be served. “I will make sure that any officials that violate this regulation will be fired,” he threatened. As if this was not enough, Ramli also forbade traders in West Aceh from selling tight clothes that were un-Islamic. “If they’re caught, they’ll be dealt with harshly,” he said firmly. This was, however, still on the drawing board. So how have women reacted to being the objects of the ban? Cut Mariana (32), a resident from Meulaboh, has described the ban as strange. “Regulating whether or not pants can be worn is not up to the The WAHID Institute regent. There are plenty of other issues that need to be dealt with, including mis managed funds. So why’s he focused on women wearing skirts?” Mariana asked rhetorically (Kompas.com, 29/10/09). Mariana also questioned where the money was coming from to buy 12,000 skirts, arguing that rather than buying skirts it would be better spent on the poor and needy. Asmaul Husna, a student from Meulaboh, held nearly an identical opinion of how weird the regulation was. She felt the more clothing was regulated, the more the regulations would be vio lated. Iman Setiabudi, coordinator of West Aceh Flower, argued that a policy on clothing was not necessary. It was more important to address how to make society more prosperous, to fix bureaucracy within government, and to address mat ters pertaining to the public in general, including the issue of transparency. “For instance, transparent bidding and pro curement for projects will bring society out of poverty, amongst other things,” Iman said (tempointeraktif.com, 30/10/09). Iman urged society in West Aceh to not take the issue too seriously because he feared that doing so would sideline other issues concerning transparency and control over policy making. The director of the Ulama Forum of West Aceh, Ummi Hanisah, said that the regulation should be supported be cause Islam requires its adherents to wear clothing that covers their bodies. How ever, the regulation should be publicised first so that when implemented society will not be startled and will not complain. “I hope this won’t just be effective in West Aceh, but throughout all of Aceh,” he explained (serambinews.com, 30/10/09). Misdariah, once a member of the Mus lim Student’s Association, agreed, argu ing that it would make women more feminine and more respected and valued. She claimed to be able to move unham pered when wearing a skirt. “Yeah, I can and it’s safer to wear a skirt. Try it,” she said (rakyataceh.com, 31/10/09). The regent seemed unfazed at the possibility of negative reactions from women’s groups. “If some groups are angry, they shouldn’t be angry at me, but angry at The Creator who instructed all of mankind in the world to wear clothes that cover their bodies in accordance with syari’ah,” he said in defence. The Indonesian Minister of Internal Affairs Gamawan Fauzi hoped that other regions would not copy Ramli. The ban against tight pants and the procedures for cutting them up will be regulated in the form of a Regional Regu lation. However, according to M Juned, director of the Agency for Islamic Syari’ah and Empowerment of West Aceh, the regulation must be legalised first by the Governor of Aceh. If not, it cannot be im plemented. The Indonesian Minister of Internal Affairs Gamawan Fauzi hoped that other regions would not copy Ramli. “We leave it up to each area. But they don’t need to regulate clothing. All they need to do is to set general principles such as having clean clothing that covers the body for Muslims,” he said in Jakarta (serambinews. com, 30/10/09). The government’s stock of various sized skirts grew to 7,000 last October. The remaining 5,000 were set to arrive from Jakarta on November 26. These additional skirts, Ramli explained, were donated by philanthropists who cared about implementation of syari’ah in West Aceh. The donation has been criticised by the Civil Society Network (JMS), because it is seen as a graft which should be re ported to authorities. “Because Regent Ramli MS has received gifts from other parties, which he says are philanthropists, then he should report the gifts to KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) im mediately in order to determine whether they are considered grafts or not,” ex plained Abdul Jalil, coordinator of JMS in West Aceh (serambinews.com, 06/11/09). The obligation to report gifts is based on Law No. 30/2002 which addresses how to report and determine the status of grafts, while grafting itself is regulated in Law No. 20/2001, especially in the explanation of article 12B. It remains unclear what the skirts look like because the regent has not allowed journalists to photograph them. He claimed that the place in which they were being stored was still being kept a secret. M 11 ANALYSIS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Accusations of deviance against those who differ from the norm are still common today. The Baha’i (Tulungagung), Wahidiyah (Madura), Amaq Bakrie (Lombok), Sukarno (Madiun), and Santriloka (Mojokerto) sects have all been stamped deviant by MUI. The reasons differ: they may not belong to one of the official religions, they may practice rituals that differ from mainstream Islamic understandings, or they may resemble Javanism. However, the formula for resolution is always the same. MUI will release a fatwa of deviance, police then secure the accused, and Bakorpakem moves in to disband the deviant sect. Ability to gain permits for construction of houses of worship is a complicated issue, especially for minorities. They must show that they have the support of their congregation and local residents and a letter of permission from the head of the neigh bourhood and community association units in accordance with the joint regulations of the Minister for Religious Affairs and the Minister of Internal Affairs No. 8 and 9 of 2006. However, it does not mean that all will travel smoothly once the conditions stated in these regulations have been fulfilled and the official permit been granted, complete with the signatures of appropri ate authorities. The case in Purwakarta proves that regents have the power to revoke authorisation – something that should be impossible because the regent cannot possibly give a permit if the requirements are not met in the first place. The most likely cause of the cancellation was pressure from certain actors that forced the regent to act strangely. Those who aspire for an Islamic state were apparently able to hold a large event that drew masses of people, and were free to declare the Student Oath, later published in mass media. More seriously, the event was supported by elements directly connected to the state – a state ministry and an elite state university. Strangely, the only action taken by police was to stop the event being held inside the Bung Karno stadium, without clearly or firmly stating that the planned event was promoting an ideology that differed from the official state ideology. Society, including community figures, apparently holds disproportional views when it comes to morality. Miyabi was op posed by almost all groups, including social organisations like MUI who are concerned primarily with religion, for being the most popular pornography icon in the country despite the fact that she was to be starring in a non-pornographic film. Yet MUI does not display a similar attitude when it comes to polygamy. It only condemns the practice without banning it as it did with Miyabi’s case even though polygamy is just as uncivilised as is uncontrolled distribution of pornography. The government apparatus continues to place emphasis on symbolic syari’ah when implementing Islamic law. This largely involves disciplining women, as they are seen as dangerous. It is felt that their bodies must be covered, and this must be enforced through a variety of regulations, some of which make no sense. Initially this involved regulations requiring women to wear the jilbab, and today skirts are being provided free of charge. In fact those not prepared to wear skirts will not receive government services, and those caught selling tight pants will be severely punished. Other more substantial issues such as health and education that many people prefer be addressed are often neglected. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The state and community groups need to come up with a new formula to resolve difference, often perceived as deviance, within society. Conventional methods involving MUI, police, and Bakorpakem are ineffective in practice as almost all inci dences become violent. Part of the solution needs to involve strengthening awareness and improving education that em phasises the need to accept difference, and to accept the presence of others who adhere to different religions. Police action only needs to be taken for those cases that are purely criminal, such as sexual perversion. Authorities need to take further action to address society’s aspirations that the Baha’i sect be disbanded, because it is not an illegal organisation based on Presidential Decree No. 69/2000. This must be emphasised because Baha’i members are con stantly facing accusations that their religion is not one of the six officially recognised religions or that their sect deviates from Islamic doctrine. Village chiefs must stand firm and be independent when enforcing the joint regulations of the Minister for Religious Affairs and the Minister for Internal Affairs No. 8 and 9 of 2006 which address implementation of the duties of the village chief/ deputy chief in fostering religious harmony, empowering the Forum for Religious Harmony, and establishing houses of wor ship. None, including members of the community, should be able to intervene with decisions made or force them to be revoked because local chiefs must implement their duties based on regulations, not force or pressure. The government needs to monitor groups that oppose the foundations of our nation, including students who determinedly promote ideologies that oppose the Pancasila. State apparatus, such as certain ministers/ministries and educational institutes (especially state universities), must also be monitored to ensure the state’s money is not used to oppose the state. Society must be implored to view moral polemics more proportionally. Miyabi, an icon of the world of pornography, is just as dangerous as groups or clubs who wish to promote polygamy. Promoting polygamy is clearly a form of group violence towards women, and as with pornography, has negative impacts on the future. Government apparatus should think about and implement Islamic law in regulations that stress substantial issues such as health and education for the poor, lowering the death rate for mothers and babies, and clean and transparent governance. These kind of regulations not only address the desires of the majority of Indonesians more than regulations on wearing the jilbab and skirts, but they are also in accordance with syari’ah as through them the government is better able to serve the people.