lightfair international seminar preview 2000
Transcription
lightfair international seminar preview 2000
CONTENTS APRIL 2000 VOL. 30/NO. 4 42 OUTDOOR LIGHTING Torre! Torre! Torre! 30 When called upon to illuminate Torre Colpatria, a 48-story tower in Bogota, Colombia, Robert Daniels was faced with the biggest challenge in his career. He gives us the details of how he faced a variety of seemingly insurmountable odds but still managed to come through the ordeal with flying colors. From a Distance 36 Miki Matushita, Naoki Takayama, and Satoshi Ono revised the lighting for one of Japan’s tallest buildings and restored its prominence in Fukuoka City’s skyline. Mayan’s Hope 42 Elias Cisneros, Georgina Salazar, and Luis Castello bring a Mexican cultural center into the new millennium with a striking lighting scheme that uses indirect sources to accentuate the architecture while also providing unobtrusive illumination. DEPARTMENTS 4 Presidents Points 8 Regional Voices LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL Seminar Preview 46 LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000 is back in the Big Apple for the dawn of the 21st Century. To help us mark this momentous occasion Paul Gregory, David Rockwell, Nancy Snyder, and Art Hatley give us a preview of what we can expect from the vast array of educational seminars featured at this year’s show. 12 Energy Concerns 14 Views on the Visual Environment 19 IES News 60 Light Products 67 Light Literature 70 Scheduled Events 73 Howard Brandston Student Lighting Design Form 79 Ad offices/Ad Index 79 Photo Credits ON THE COVER: Torre Colpatria is a 48-story tower in the heart of Bogota, Colombia. Bob Daniels was charged with lighting this skyscraper which is also the tallest building in the country. After many a trial and error, Daniels opted for xenon… downlighted from the roof! A first not only for Colombia, but for outdoor lighting as well. PHOTO: Juan Antonio Monsalve 2 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org t is hard to believe that this is the last of my columns to you as President of your Society. So far I PRESIDENT'S POINTS Ian Lewin 4 LD+A/April 2000 this year, all seems to be running smoothly with major efforts being undertaken in various areas. I hope you are not tired of my theme of education. I am totally convinced that providing knowledge to all of our members, as well as the public, is the largest contribution the IES can make. You will be hearing more about this in the near future. As we journey further into the Internet age, the IES is exploring the vast possibilities of providing significant educational services through the electronic media. On a related theme, in my last column I wrote about cross-fertilization of ideas between the different groups involved in the lighting world. I suggested more communication across the boundaries that separate researchers, designers, architects, engineers, and others. Dr. Janos Schanda, director of the international group CIE, (Commission Internationale De L’Eclairage), or the International Commission of Illumination, noted this thought and distributed it by e-mail. How delighted I am to have received copies of e-mails from all over the world, all expressing a spirit of cooperation and a desire to form a CIE working group to establish education as a priority within CIE. On your behalf, I will ensure coordination between IESNA and CIE as we begin what we hope will be a major international effort. Making IESNA useful to its members, however, does not require such laudable goals as spreading lighting education around the world. The most powerful tool is at your local section, which strives to ensure that you have good speakers and worthwhile programs. If you are a local program chairman, you may be surprised at the resources available to you. Talk to your IES Regional Vice President. The Regional Executive Committees now compile and report upon programs and speakers. Find out what has been successful at other sections; very often a speaker will be prepared to travel within your region to give a program. Experts in many fields related to lighting may be available to you in this way. Another point worth remembering is that credits are available in the form of CEUs (Continuing Education Units) for attending local programs. Not only that, but the American Institute of Architects officially recognizes the IES as a CEU provider. Why not invite other local groups, such as AIA members, to a special local meeting? There is a double benefit—as meeting attendance grows, the quality of speakers who you can attract also grows, which further increases atten- How delighted I am to have received copies of e-mails from all over the world, all expressing a spirit of cooperation 1999–2000 Board of Directors IES of North America President Ian Lewin, Ph.D., FIES, LC President Lighting Sciences, Inc. Past President Joseph Good III, LC Principal, Lighting and Theater Design Spectrum Professional Services, Inc Senior Vice President Martyn Timmings Vice President, Market Development Canlyte Inc. Executive Vice President William Hanley, CAE Vice President---Educational Activities Mary Beth Gotti Manager, Lighting Institute and Application Development GE Lighting Vice President—-Member Activities Mary Peyton, LC Director, Lighting Services Smith Duncan Associates Vice President—-Design & Application Douglas Paulin Product Manager Ruud Lighting Vice President—-Technical & Research Richard G. Collins Supervisor of the Photometry Laboratory OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc. Treasurer Randy Reid Southeast Regional Manager Robertson Transformer Directors Edwin W. Best Chief Executive Officer Dickens & Associates, Inc. Claudia Gabay Principal Lighting Consultants Detroit Edison Ronnie Farrar Lighting Specialist Duke Power John R. Selander, LC Branch Manager Voss Lighting Pamela K. Horner, LC Manager, Technical Training OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. dance. This has been a powerful formula for many local sections. Although this is my last column as President, my major address to you will be in July, as part of the Annual General Meeting held in conjunction with the 2000 Annual Conference July 31–August 2 in Washington DC. Mark your calendars now and plan on attending this special event. You will not regret it! James L. Sultan, LC Lighting Designer Studio Lux Regional Vice Presidents/Directors Anthony J. Denami, LC Senior Electrical Designer Gresham, Smith and Partners Kay Ferguson Principal Ferguson Light Ideas www.iesna.org he old saying “All good things must come to an end” is proving true, as in a few months my two-year term as RVP will be over. I have truly enjoyed the time I have spent attending meetings and conferences, making new IESNA friends, and renewing old acquaintances. When I began my term, two years seemed a long way off but it has gone by very quickly. T REGIONAL VOICES Kay Ferguson, Pacific Northwest RVP 8 LD+A/April 2000 Some highlights of my past two years are my visits to the Sections and seeing some of them grow. The Chinook Section in Calgary is a good example and three people who have been behind this growth are Rich McDonald, Paul Mercier, and Bill Charbonneau. They have almost doubled their members but they did not do it alone; many in their Section helped; they, however, were the catalysts. This year I had the privilege of visiting the Northern Lights Section in Alaska. It was a long journey but a most enjoyable visit as we discussed ways to improve the Section. At our last REC meeting we decided to include the Northern Lights Section in the next REC meeting via telephone-conferencing. Although it was only for an hour, it really brought the Region together. I traveled to Victoria, the home of the Vancouver Island Section, which has been dormant for the past few years. Just a few weeks ago a luncheon was held with help from the BC Section President, Carl Koehler, and former Vancouver Island President, Don Halliday. Some of the attendees have now organized an executive meeting to revive the Section, giving the island renewed hope. Although the Section was not active, some of the members carried on a tradition of providing the Christmas lighting for the local hospital. On my visit to Northern Gateway in Edmonton, I was delighted to see almost three-quarters of their Section present for the meeting. I also had interesting stops with our neighbors to the south in the Oregon and Puget Sound Sections. As for the BC Section, we are working hard to provide a wonderful program for the Odyssey 2000 Lighting Conference. The committee has been working for over a year to make it a success. I hope many in our Region will attend, and since it is a Tri-Regional Conference, we are hoping members from the South Pacific Coast and the Canadian Region will support the conference. At our REC meetings, we have been encouraging the Sections to honor their members who give so much to the Society by having an awards luncheon. Another reason to attend is to help us thank the recipients. With all the IESNA activities It is a revelation to see the inner workings of the IESNA in the East, LIGHTFAIR in New York and the Annual Conference in Washington DC, this conference provides an opportunity for members in the west to gain more knowledge (and earn NCQLP credits). The dates are April 23—26 and I hope many of you will attend. This past year I was honored to be elected by the other RVPs to be a member of the IESNA Board of Directors (one of two). It is a revelation to see the inner workings of the IESNA and to see how much work goes into making everything operate in a timely manner. I want to thank all the staff in New York and all the volunteers who make this Society a success. I have enjoyed working with them, and all of you, and wish I were younger so I could carry on for many, many years as part of this great Society. After July, I will still continue as the local Educational Co-Chair and do all I can to support the new RVP elect, Jeff Davis. I hope you all give him the warm welcome and consideration you have given me. Publisher William Hanley, CAE Editor Mark A. Newman Assistant Editor Roslyn Lowe Associate Editor Peter Weisman Art Director Anthony S. Picco Associate Art Director Samuel Fontanez Columnists Ian Ashdown • Louis Erhardt Brett Kingstone • Willard Warren Book Review Editor Paulette Hebert, Ph.D. Marketing Manager Pamela R. Weess, CAE Advertising Coordinator Celeste Picco Published by IESNA 120 Wall Street, 17th Floor New York, NY 10005-4001 Phone: (212) 248-5000 Fax: (212) 248-5017/18 Website: http://www.iesna.org Email: [email protected] LD+A is a magazine for professionals involved in the art, science, study, manufacture, teaching, and implementation of lighting. LD+A is designed to enhance and improve the practice of lighting. Every issue of LD+A includes feature articles on design projects, technical articles on the science of illumination, new product developments, industry trends, news of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and vital information about the illuminating profession. Statements and opinions expressed in articles and editorials in LD+A are the expressions of contributors and do not necessarily represent the policies or opinions of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. Advertisements appearing in this publication are the sole responsibility of the advertiser. LD+A (ISSN 0360-6325) is published monthly in the United States of America by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 120 Wall Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10005, (212) 248-5000. Copyright 2000 by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY 10005 and additional mailing offices. Nonmember subscriptions $39.00 per year. Additional $15.00 postage for subscriptions outside the United States. Member subscriptions $30.00 (not deductable from annual dues). Additional subscriptions $39.00. Single copies $4.00, except Lighting Equipment & Accessories Directory and Progress Report issues $10.00. Authorization to reproduce articles for internal or personal use by specific clients is granted by IESNA to libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided a fee of $2.00 per copy is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970. IES fee code: 0360-6325/86 $2.00. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying for purposes such as general distribution, advertising or promotion, creating new collective works, or resale. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to LD+A, 120 Wall Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10005. Subscribers: For continuous service please notify LD+A of address changes at least 6 weeks in advance. This publication is indexed regularly by Engineering Index, Inc. and Applied Science & Technology Index. LD+A is available on microfilm from University Microfilm, Ann Arbor, MI. www.iesna.org s we enter the new millennium, the cost of imported petroleum has doubled in less than a year, and the U.S. balance of payments has hit a new high, thanks in part to OPEC and the popularity of gas guzzling SUVs. But the difference between today and 20 years ago, when we A ENERGY CONCERNS Willard L. Warren, PE, LC, FIESNA 12 first realized the need for energy conservation, is that the U.S. economy has grown in the last 20 years, and the cost of imported oil is now a much smaller portion of our total GNP. Furthermore, we are now in the computer age, in which the service sector of our economy has grown while the industrial component has declined. When government decreed that utilities deregulate and unbundle the generation of electricity from its transmission and distribution, we had great hope that there would be a rush to improve utility load factors, signaling the beginning of meaningful energy conservation. Unfortunately, before we see those savings in power and in the cost of electricity, we have to pay off the “stranded costs” of the utilities’ outmoded generating plants, and get rid of all the fly-bynight hustlers trying to become our electricity providers. But now the country’s major energy producers, like Enron, are starting to seriously get into utility deregulation, and the stranded costs are being paid off, so it looks like we’ll be in for a new round of energy conservation. In the lighting industry, we’ve made great strides toward increasing energy conservation by downsizing the wattage of lamps, converting incandescent to compact fluorescent or improved color HIDs, and replacing T12s with T8s and electronic ballasts. There have also been improvements in the efficacy of lamp sources and in the efficiency of electric devices, due to the EPA “Energy Star” program and other LD+A/April 2000 federal government regulations. Also, those regions in the country with the highest electric rates experienced utility-created, Demand Side Management (DSM) programs that provided cash incentives to cut demand so that the utilities could “buy back” some much needed capacity during peak periods, while their customers reduced their electric bills. These efforts are having an effect on reducing the electric load used for lighting, but there are other developments in office lighting, brought about by the proliferation of Internet businesses that Of course not everyone in these e-business offices works at monitors all day long, but the general impression you get is that of a dimly lighted messy space. are worthy of notice. First, many Americans are working on computers at home, where the lighting loads are less than in their old offices, and second, the e-businesses that operate in offices are doing some daring things. A recent New York Times article described the design of Internet interiors as “accommodating chaos.” The designs are masterful, created by some of our best architects and interior designers, including the dean of graphic designers, Milton Glaser. But the spaces themselves are not conventional offices by any means. Many Internet businesses rent space in factory type buildings with high ceilings and vast open rooms. In these new interiors—called a “digital sweatshop”-by one of the new entrepreneurs— there are clusters of young “digital kids” with lap tops, sitting anywhere they wish. Incorporated in the middle of the space you find TV studios for shooting video spots and ark cubicles for displaying web site designs to clients. Most often, the lighting level in these spaces is quite low, especially where the task is a new, bright, flat-screen monitor. Also, you find several creative people sitting around a table sharing a space, all plugged in, and working on their own projects. People in this environment work in close proximity to one another, prompting one of the design architects, quoted in the same New York Times article, to point out that there are some spaces set aside for personal privacy, but you can judge their size by their characterization as “phone booths.” Of course not everyone in these e-business offices works at monitors all day long, but the general impression you get is that of a dimly lighted messy space. Homemaker guru Martha Stewart has chosen an entire floor in such a factory space for her new corporate offices and you can be sure that the lighting design will be interesting. The cost to outfit this type of office in a factory setting is quite modest, at $45—60/ft2 in New York City, but the furnishings are spartan and the lighting is not only industrial looking, it’s energy saving because of the low illumination levels required for monitor viewing. Right now the designs are evolving. I visited the office space of a company that designs web sites and it was indirectly lighted with industrial halogen floods to a level of 5—10 fc. Some conference rooms were kept dark because they were used to critique and display web site creations for the clients’ review. I’ve spoken to lighting designers www.iesna.org with experience lighting these internet business spaces who tell me that they try to provide some pattern or continuity to the lighting, instead of just spotting “task lighting on the ceiling.” Mostly though, industrial type fluorescent We’ll have to wait to see if the owners of Internet-based companies have carried minimalism too far and discovered that less is less. is used, somewhat randomly located, with 80 percent uplight, 20 percent downlight, and at a connected load of about 1 W/ft2. As one of the members of the IESNA Office Lighting Committee and author of the energy conservation section of RP—1, the new recommended practice, I’m concerned about the relevance of RP—1 to this new work atmosphere. We’ll have to wait to see if the owners of Internet-based companies have carried minimalism too far and discovered that less is less. We learned the hard way about carpal tunnel syndrome. Is there a malady out there called “monitor eye-strain” or “accommodative fatigue” that we will also discover through bitter experience? The principles of properly lighting any environment, as detailed in the new IESNA Lighting Handbook, carry with it a warning—-”ignore at your own risk.” www.iesna.org he Luminometer establishes thresholds; each threshold depends on the test sample being viewed. Thresholds, as such, are inadequate and are multiplied by “fudge” or field factors. The factors are presented herein individually, allowing the designer to select those appropriate to the immediate problem. Proper selection assures the most effective adaptation. Initial treatment of adaptation assumes a more or less uniform pattern of luminances in the entire field of view. This will exclude such instances as a single T VIEWS ON THE VISUAL ENVIRONMENT lamp source for reading in a dark room where foveal vision is at a high level while peripheral vision is significantly lower. In this initial presentation of the AdaptionReflectance method of design, only the leading issues can be addressed leaving many questions unanswered. Louis Erhardt 1. Identify space; task. 2. Dimensions: length, width, height. 3. Calculate area (A) - meters2: walls + floor + ceiling = (A). 4. Determine average reflectance of all surfaces _____%. (). 5. Lacking an accurate average use: low = 16%, medium = 32%, high = 64%. 6. Estimate task difficulty: simple, average, or severe. 7. Select adaptation luminance (La) (consistent with task difficulty): simple = 1 cd/m2, average = 10 cd/m2, severe = 100 cd/m2. 8. Luminance (La), (selected in Item #7), = E/ 9. Illuminance (E) = (La)/ 10. Reflectance (), (measured or estimated) = L/E 11. Total Flux () = E x A (1-) 12. For adaptation-reflectance design the following are lumens/square meter, (required for total area, Item #3): (cd/m2) Adaptation 1 10 100 Reflectance (%) Lumens/meter2 (lux) 16 20 196 1963 32 10 98 981 64 5 49 491 13. Lumen values are the output of the luminaires i.e., lamp lumens x luminaire efficiency. 14. Record designer’s colors: 15. Select lamp spectral distribution. 16. Envision the space, as you would like to see it when lighted, consistent with identity of the space and the difficulty of the task. Item # 1 14 LD+A/April 2000 17. Luminometer, description and use, are in a separate essay. 18. To establish illuminance (lux), which becomes the designer’s brightness, the luminometer is suggested as a visual test instrument. (See LD+A December 1992) The original test is appropriate for office reading or writing, but other tests may be substituted, appropriate for other tasks. The light source should be selected for the task, its intensity adjusted to provide for clear distinction between capital and lower case letters. This sets the threshold for this particular task. 19. Laboratory procedures to determine thresholds are as accurately perceived 50% of the time. To improve the frequency of accurate perception “fudge factors” are employed. Factors as high as 10 have been recommended but a more realistic list for reading or writing includes: 1.9 to improve accuracy, and 2.5 to expand coverage for an overall multiplier of 4.75; which will apply to the total flux required for the basic task as well as each of the luminance and illuminance figures. Other factors: location of detail unknown, the factor is 1.5; target in motion, 2.78; age, 2.5; still other factors may be developed that Each application carries a unique opportunity to bring to life the design intent of the architect or designer may apply in specific instances. These factors are unproven with respect to luminometer observations, hence the appellation “fudge factor.” By applying the selected factors to the lumens/square meter table, Item #12, the basic illuminance for uniform adaptation is established. 20. Reflectance is the ratio of light reflected from a surface divided by the light incident on the surface. It is a physical property that, in part, defines the surface, and is essential to visual understanding. Color is a dominant characteristic of reflectance; a property that aids perception and recognition. 21. Control of intensity distribution begins with selection of a luminaire flux pattern. CIE classifications are: direct, semi-direct, general, direct-indirect, semi-indirect, or indirect. Direct puts light on the task and floor; General distributes the flux to ceiling, walls, and floor; Direct-indirect eliminates the light from the walls; and Indirect puts all light on the ceiling. All of the foregoing belong to physics and photometrics, objective considerations. Following is a brief statement of the physiological objectives, the subjective www.iesna.org goals of the design process. 22. These, simply stated, are clearness, comfort, and satisfaction. 23. Comfort requires that sources of high brightness be outside the area of foveal vision and greatly restricted in the peripheral field. Higher adaptations than necessary for the space or the task result in lowered visual sensitivity, in fatigue. Proper selection of an adaptation is of paramount importance. Color, too, brings serious results. Fatigue occurs more rapidly with yellow or orange than with green or bluish-green light 24. Clearness refers to something that stands out in sharp contrast with its surroundings. The difference may be in color or brightness. Such contrasts should, however, be balanced. Too great contrast in brightness may deprive the visual mechanism from seeing smaller differences. 25. Satisfaction. After comfort and clearness have been assured, satisfaction can be augmented by the careful application of highlights and shadows from directional beams of light, The creation of the chiaroscuro effect clarifies and enhances objects, and separates them from their backgrounds. Colors may be chosen to reveal the effects of soil and age or may obliterate such detail. Total directional light may be too dramatic; total diffusion, too boring. A proper proportion of the two is in order, diffuse light for circulation and to illuminate the shadows, directional light for emphasis and to separate objects from the surround. 26. Example: grade school classroom - reading and writing. • Dimensions: 9.15m X 9.15m X 3.7m (2.4 cavity height, RCR 2.7) Total area (A) 302.8 sq. m. divided as follows. Floor (Afl) 83.7, walls (Aw) 135.4, ceiling (Ac) 83.7 square meters. • Task difficulty - Average suggesting 10 cd/m2 for the adaptation. • Reflectance (): ceiling 80%, walls 50%, floor 20%, task 50%, av. 50%. • Luminaire output requited is 302.8 x 31.4 = 9447 lumens. Lamp lumens = 9447/Luminaire efficiency • To add the inter reflected component in compliance with equation # 11, divide by average reflectance, 0.5, which doubles E to 62.4 lux. • Total flux () = EA = 302.8 x 62.4 = 18895 lumens. (direct + interreflected) 27. Luminaire Flux Patterns: IESNA Lighting Handbook, eighth edition -Fig. 9-34, Illuminance and Exitance values for luminaire types: General #1, Indirect #2, and Direct #3. Convert Wall and Ceiling exitances to illuminances by dividing by the appropriate reflectances. 28. See Table 28 29. See Table 29 30. The foregoing table represents three different distributions of the flux to attain an initial adaptation of 10 cd/m2. Light Loss Factors (LLF) must be applied to assure the initial design will be maintained. Lamp lumens required 9447 / Luminaire Efficiency. www.iesna.org 31. Flux Distribution (Item #35) x Fudge Factor 4.75 = 44873 Task Walls Ceiling General #1 155 139 155 Indirect #2 139 96 241 Direct #3 225 152 64 Note: Luminaire lumens, 44873, total direct and interreflected lumens, 89747. Lamp lumens = 44873/luminaire efficiency. 32. These distributions are the result of the selection of a CIE distribution alone. Among them (and there are a total of six) there may be an adequate solution of the design requirements, or the envisioned design may demand further additions. It may be desirable to emphasize the chalkboards or other displays, the instructor’s position, etc. Each application carries a unique opportunity to bring-to-life the design intent of the architect or designer. 33. Just as the Luminometer allows one to compare different lights with respect to their ability to provide visual information, so the lighting designer should have the opportunity to try different lighting solutions. It is suggested that the interior designer provide computer assisted design (CAD) renderings of Table 28 Illuminance (E) Task Walls/0.5 Ceiling/0.8 General #1 0.530 0.476 0.515 Indirect #2 0.560 0.386 0.974 Direct #3 0.670 0.454 0.173 Illuminance x Area A-83.7 A-135.4 A-83.7 Total Lumens General #1 44.4 64.5 43.1 152 Indirect #2 46.9 52.3 81.5 181 Direct #3 56.1 61.5 14.6 132 Percent of Total Lumens (%) General #1 29 42 29 100% Indirect #2 26 29 45 100% Direct #3 47 46 12 100% Table 29 Illuminance = 9447 x % Total Lumens/Appropriate Area Lamp Lumens A-83.7 A-135.4 A-83.7 Flux/Lum.Eff. General #1 Eff. .80 32.7 29.3 32.7 11809 Indirect #2 Eff. .86 29.3 20.2 50.8 10985 Direct #3 Eff. .83 47.4 32.1 13.5 11382 the interior in flat tones, no highlights or shadows. The lighting designer then applies the luminaires, their spectral content, color appearance, direction, and intensity, to create an overall illumination, with lighter and shaded areas, highlights and shadows that combine to form a composite that “brings-tolife” an actual working interior. 34. The A-R method of design begins with setting the eye’s visual system to achieve specific objectives. The setting is visual adaptation (A in the A-R designation), and defines what we can see at each log step of adaptation. This was the topic of a series of LD+A essays, from February through September, 1992 and reproduced in the collected “Views,” published by the 16 LD+A/April 2000 IESNA in 1995. These observations, though recorded by a single individual, are quite extensive and give a comprehensive view of our visual ability at each adaptation level. 35. R is Reflectance, a property of the objective visual scene that provides stability, i.e., visual constancy. “Both variables, object color and objective illumina- By definition, reflectance is the ratio of reflected to incident light. But it is so much more! tion, affect the eye through the same medium, the varying amount of reflected light.”1 Since interior illumination is uniform or uniformly graded we see reflectances which predominate. By definition, reflectance is the ratio of reflected to incident light. But it is so much more! “That color resides in the surface reflectivity makes biological sense. Surface reflectivity is a physical constant which can serve to identify an object. . . . It is the surface reflectivity that provides useful information to the organism.” 2 “Light and color are, in a way, the raw material of vision. . . . The surfaces of objects reflect light, if they are illuminated, and this fact is the original basis for visual perception.” 3 36. Adaptation sets the sensitivity of the visual system to assure that it will allow the maximum discrimination of detail. Reflectance, through brightness and color, defines the objective image. Together they form the most promising basis for lighting design, the A-R Design method. 37. This completes the trilogy: Adaptation Cornerstone of Vision, Luminometer, and Adaptation Reflectance, an exposition of visual adaptation that proposes a new method of lighting design for the next century. References 1. Wallach, H. Brightness Constancy, Document of Gestalt Psychology, U. of Calif. L.A. 2. Corth, R. 1987. Human visual perception, LD+A 17 (no. 7):20-24. 3. Gibson, J.J. Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. www.iesna.org LIGHTFAIR 2000 Returns to the Big Apple LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000 will present the twenty-first century edition of the world’s largest and most comprehensive architectural and commercial lighting Conference in New York City, May 9-11.. With course levels ranging from Beginner to Intermediate and Masters, it is the most technically challenging lighting education resource available. Seminar Tracks include: pre-Conference workshops, Design in the Built Environ- ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY NEWS VOLUME 30, NUMBER 4 APRIL 2000 ment, Urban Lighting: City Lights, Entertainment Architecture, Energy & Technology, and Business Practices. The entire LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000 Conference is authorized for the CEU/Learning Units indicated in accordance with guidelines set forth by the American Institute of Engineers (AIE), American Society of Interior Designers (ASID), and the International Interior Designers Association (IIDA). The IESNA will grant CEUs for all nonBusiness presentations, all of which provide National Council on Qualifications for the Lighting Profession (NCQLP) Lighting Education Units. Special Events will utilize the excitement of New York City, providing an opportunity for architectural, engineering, and design professionals to support industry association and educational efforts. The Special Events include The Howard Brandston Student Tour and Luncheon, The IALD 17th Annual Awards Dinner and Educational Trust Benefit, The National Council on Qualifications for the Lighting Pro- IESNA Calendar of Events April 23–26 ODYSSEY 2000 IESNA Tri-Regional Conference Vancouver, BC, Canada Contact: e-mail [email protected] or visit the Web site at www.ies-odyssey2000.com May 7, 2000 Board of Directors Meeting New York, NY Contact: Wiliam Hanley (212) 248-5000, ext. 114 May 9–11, 2000 LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL New York, NY Exhibitors contact: Libby Morley (404) 220-2215 Attendees contact: Renee Gable (404) 220-2217 July 30-Aug 2, 2000 2000 IESNA Annual Conference Washington, DC Contact: Valerie Landers (212) 248-5000, ext. 117 September 22-23, 2000 IESNA Maritime Regional Conference Moncton, New Brunswick Contact: Art Gillard (506) 858-0950 fessions (NCQLP) Lighting Certified Luncheon, and The Nuckolls Fund for Lighting Education Luncheon. continued on following page DOE/AIA Sponsor “Sun Wall” Competition Building the world’s largest solar energy system is the goal of a design contest sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) and the American Institute of Architects (AIA). In a joint announcement by DOE, Secretary Bill Richardson and AIA President Ronald L. Skaggs, it was revealed that the DOE’s Forrestal Building in Washington, D.C. will become the home of the world’s largest “sun wall” in the process of the competition. Richardson added that architects, engineers, and other design professionals who enter the competition are ideally positioned, because of “their training and expertise, to successfully blend aesthetics with complex, technological systems.” Architects, building design professionals, engineers, and energy technology companies are invited to design a technologically www.iesna.org advanced and visually exciting solar energy system for the south-facing wall of the department’s headquarters building. The wall, which is currently blank, spans a space nearly two-thirds of an acre. The system could generate as much as 200 kW of electric power, enough energy for more than 60 homes. Once completed, the “Sun Wall” will be the largest such solar energy system on any building in the world. It is expected that the installation of the winning design will be funded by a combination of public and private resources. The “Sun Wall” Design Competition officially opened on March 1, 2000. An eminent jury of architects, design professionals, and solar energy experts will select the winning continued on page 22 LD+A/April 2000 19 LIGHTFAIR 2000 continued from previous page Also, The Celebration Cocktail Receptions featuring Best Booth Awards and IMAGE Awards will celebrate the expansion of the Trade Show Exhibit Hall, featuring more exhibiting companies than ever before. Enjoy complimentary wine, beer, and soft drinks at the Celebration Reception, held in Hall D. “The Twentieth Century: Light Runs Through It” Seminar Luncheon, sponsored by Leviton Mfg. Company, Inc., will depict 20th century lighting in context with the fashion and politics of the times. When big-finned cars and silver toasters reigned, what was happening to luminaire design? What social and cultural influences catalyzed new designs? How and why has the lighting in our buildings evolved? To what extent has home lighting changed in the past 100 years? These and other provocative questions will be discussed by the panelists: Daniel Blitzer, Pamela Horner, Robert Horner, and Mark Rea. The City Walk in memory of Craig A. Roeder will offer some early exercise through Central Park, beginning at the Sheraton Hotel and Towers and proceeding down 7th Avenue to Central Park. Once inside the park, the walk will continue through the tree-lined paths up to Bethesda Fountain and then back to the Sheraton for a light and healthy breakfast before LFI 2000 gets underway. The walk will benefit the Nuckolls Fund, sponsored by Belfer Lighting. The International Illumination Design Awards (IIDA) Roundtable Breakfast will include Don Newquist and Jim Zastovnik from the IIDA Committee forming an informative question and answer session about the IIDA program. By viewing examples, learn how to prepare a design entry and receive tips on text preparation, judging criteria, most commonly asked questions, and photography. Handouts and a videotape from the previous IIDA workshop will be supplied to support the presentation. New this year will be an SUSTAINING MEMBERS The following companies have elected to support the Society as Sustaining Members which allows the IESNA to fund programs that benefit all segments of the membership and pursue new endeavors, including education projects, lighting research, and recommended practices. The level of support is classified by the amount of annual dues, based on a company’s annual lighting revenues: Copper: $500 annual dues Lighting revenues to $4 million (Copper Sustaining Members are listed in the March issue of LD+A, as well as in the IESNA Annual Report. There are currently, 230 Copper Sustaining Members). Silver: $1,000 annual dues Lighting revenues to $10 million Gold: $2,500 annual dues Lighting revenues to $50 million Platinum: $5,000 annual dues Lighting revenues to $200 million Emerald: $10,000 annual dues Lighting revenues to $500 million Diamond: $15,000 annual dues Lighting revenues over $500 million DIAMOND Cooper Lighting GE Lighting Lithonia Lighting OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc. Philips Lighting Co. EMERALD Holophane Corporation PLATINUM Day-Brite/Capri/Omega Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. GOLD IES A.L.P. Lighting Components Co., Inc. The Bodine Company Detroit Edison Edison Price Lighting Finelite Inc. Indy Lighting, Inc. The Kirlin Company Kurt Versen Co. LexaLite International Corp. Lighting Services Inc. Lightron of Cornwall, Inc. LSI Industries Inc. Martin Professional Inc. Matsushita Electric Works Ltd. Musco Corporation Philips Mexicana SA de CV Prudential Lighting Corp. Robertson Worldwide Ruud Lighting Inc. San Diego Gas & Electric SIMKAR SPI Lighting Inc. Steelcase, Inc. SUSTAINING MEMBERS Visa Lighting SILVER Alabama Power Co. American Illuminetics Inc. Ardron-Mackie Limited Associated Lighting Representatives, Inc. Bartco Lighting, Inc. Branco Lighting and Controls BJB Electic Corporation Canlyte, Inc. Cinergy PSI Energy City of San Francisco Bureau of Light & Power Con–Tech Lighting Custom Lighting Services, LLC Custom Lights, Inc. Day Lite Maintenance Co. Elf Atochem North America Inc. Energy Savings Inc. ENMAX Enterprise Lighting Sales Corp. ERCO Leuchten GmbH Exelon Infrastructure Services Eye Lighting Industries Eye Lighting International of North America Factory Sales Agency Fiberstars, Inc. Focal Point LLC High End Systems Inc. Hubbell Lighting Inc. Kansas City Power & Light Co. Kenall Manufacturing Co. King Luminaire Co. Kirby Risk Supply Company, Inc. Ledalite Architectural Products LEE Filters Leviton/Macro Lighting Control Division Lite Tech Litecontrol Corp. Litelab Corporation Litetronics Int’l Inc. Multi Electric Manufacturing Inc. Optical Research Associates Optima Engineering PA Paramount Industries, Inc. PECO Energy Co. Portland General Electric Poulsen Lighting Inc. Power Lighting Products Inc. Prescolite•Moldcast Shaper Lighting Shobha Light Designers Southern California Edison Stage Front Presentation Systems Inc. Sterner Lighting Systems, Inc. TU Electric United Illuminating Co. WAC Lighting Co. Wiko Ltd. H.A.Williams & Assoc. H.E.Williams Inc. Winnepeg Hydro Wisconsin Public Service Corp. Zumtobel Staff Lighting Inc. As of March 2000 continued on following page 20 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org LIGHTFAIR 2000 continued from previous page open forum where each attendee may address the committee about individual issues or concerns. The Lighting Industry Resource Council Lunch and Game Show offers attendees the chance to play along with colleagues, customers, and competitors in the return engagement of the LIRC “Filament Family Fracas.” This lighthearted event includes a brief LIRC business update, remarks from the IALD Chair, and then show time! The IESNA and IALD Gallery of Awards will present photography of award winning lighting designs. The photographs will be on display daily from May 9-11, featuring the winners of the 1999 IIDA Awards and the 1999 IALD Awards. The New Product Showcase and Award Presentation will be an informative and entertaining multi-media presentation to kick off the 2000 event with an exciting preview of what will be seen on the Exhibit floor. A panel of renowned lighting professionals will serve as judges to select The Best New Product of the Year Award, along with the Technical Innovation Award, The Energy Award, The Design Excellence Award, Category Innovator Awards, and at their discretion, The Judges Citation Award and the Roeder Award, recognizing manufacturers whose product entries truly meet and exceed the current challenges of the twenty-first century. LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000 will be held at the Javits Convention Center in New York City. Pre-Conference will be Monday, May 8, 2000. The Trade Show and Conference will be Tuesday, May 9 – Thursday, May 11, 2000. The conference is sponsored by IALD, the New York section of the IESNA, and the IESNA itself. For exhibit information, contact Libby Morley, Executive Director, Conference & Marketing, at (404) 220-2217 ([email protected]), or Angela Ausband, Conference and Marketing M a n a g e r, a t ( 4 0 4 ) 2 2 0 - 2 2 2 1 ([email protected]). For registration call 1-800-450-1106 (US and Canada), or 1-708-786-4120 (international). For Hotel Reservations, call 1800-220-4765 or 1-312-527-7300 for international callers. Or call Fax-OnDemand at 1-888-611-0164 to have forms faxed to you. Everything you need to plan your LFI 2000 experience is also available at the web site, www.lightfair.com. NCQLP Announces LC Class of 2000 Norman Grimshaw, vice president of Advance Transformer Co. and president of NCQLP, is pleased to announce that 137 individuals earned the Lighting Certificate (LC) credential in November of 1999; the pass rate for the Frank J. Agraz, Jr. Mary Alcaraz Mary Andalia Brent A. Andrews Thomas Ballew Jeff T. Bannard William R. Banning Wanda J. Barchard Faith E. Baum Steven Berthelette John F. Bos, Jr. Jeffery P. Boynton E. Teal Brogden William J. Broughton, III Cynthia Burke Kevin P. Burke Bruno Campesi Kerry D. Carr Norman J. Chamberlain Larry B. Chambers Donald Cherwonka Timothy R. Clarke Jill Cody Stephen A. Coffey Margaret A. Cooper Tracy R. Cuneo Margaret Czebatul Jimalee Dakin www.iesna.org 1999 examination was 80 percent. The 2000 LC graduates are listed below (IESNA members are in bold face). The fourth annual LC examination is scheduled for November 4, 2000 at 20 Wilson Dau Leslie E. Davis Henry P. Dormberg Kenneth A. Douglas Bruce Dunlop John K. Dunn Laurie E. Emery Glen R. Fasman James H. Floyd Marcia L. Fowler Scott J. Freer John R. Freese Brian H. Friedman John A. Funkhouser Claudia R. Gabay G. Michael Gehring Joe E. Gibson Mark A. Graham Laura Grayson Raymond W. Greenhalgh Scott G. Guenther Lee Harris Melinda Haverland Greg R. Hebets Sarah Heenan Steven Heidlauf David J. Herscher Margaret O. Hill William B. Hodges Lance D. Howitt Edward D. Hyatt Debra L. Jensen Eric K. Jensen David E. Johanning Richard Johnstone Emily Klingensmith Darryl J. Knittle Daniel A. Knutson John C. Lamb Stephen Leinweber David R. Leslie Lincoln Lighthill Kim Loren James A. Love Lynn Lumsden Dawn MacFayden Michael MacPhee Marianne Maloney Dorene Maniccia Michael McCarroll James McCarty, III Richard McDonald Carlos Medina Paul Mercier Charles Michael, Jr. Keith J. Mitchell sites in the U.S. and Canada. For additional information on NCQLP and the LC examination see the NCQLP website at www.ncqlp.org or contact Jacqueline Callahan at (301) 6542121 or email: [email protected]. Andy Mullins, III Lana M. Nathe Linda Owens Steven J. Parker Tara M. Parks Christine Paterakis Scott T. Payne Mary J. Pelican Eric S. Perkins Chris Yu Poon Huel Pruitt Frank J. Puliafico Kelly S. Quinn Amee Quiriconi Raymond Randall Kenneth Reinhard Susan M. Rhodes Philip C. Richards Vincent G. Roy Joseph M. Scott Jerry E. Shepard Mahandra Singh Gregory D. Smith David C. Smith Gale Spencer Carsten J. Stehr Daniel O. Sterling Richard J. Stern Michael R. Stevens David W. Steward Cristian Suvagau Mark Tatarian Tan V. Tran Lauri A. Tredinnick Christie M. Trexler Ken Valentine Adrian A. Vera Tom S. Vohs Debbie Voyce Stan Walerczyk Christina S. Walsh Gordon A. White Mark B. Williams Michelle L. Wilson Jeremy Windle Marcus Yahnke Dany Yanusz Li Yao Dennis Yee James Youngston Tarek Zarif John Zotis Daniel Zuczek LD+A/April 2000 21 DOE/AIA Competition continued from page 19 design. The contest will close on August 1, 2000, with the winning design scheduled to be announced during Energy Awareness Month 2000 in October. The winning design team will be awarded $20,000. DOE and the AIA jointly established the rules for the competition and determined the award categories. Criteria for the contest, design specifications, rules of entry, and registration materials are available on the Sun Wall Design competition web site at www.doe-sunwall.org or by contacting Dr. E. Jackson, Jr., The AIA, 1735 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006-5292, phone: (202) 626-7446. The Depar tment of Energy also announced $132.7 million in state grants will be used to help lowincome households cope with rising energy costs. These grants will reduce the energy bills of more than 67,000 low-income families nationwide by 25 percent, provide jobs, and improve the environment. Richardson made the announcement during remarks at the Annual Conference of the National Community Action Foundation. Members of the foundation represent local weatherization providers throughout the country. 1978, he joined Incorporated Consultants Limited until 1985 when he founded Cline Bettridge Bernstein Lighting Design. When Cline worked with Robert A. M. Stern, the Manhattan architect who is now dean of the Yale School of Architecture, in designing the Ohrstrom Library in New Hampshire, in the late 80s, Mr. Stern wanted the lighting to be hanging pendants and table lamps. “It was to evoke an old Ivy League school library, but had to be energy efficient,” said Francesca Bettridge, a principal partner at CBB Lighting Design, Inc. Cline wanted to use a new compact fluorescent lamp, but knew Stern didn’t like fluorescent light. Cline and Bettridge made two glass lamps, putting an incandescent lamp in one and a fluorescent lamp in the other. But with the latter, they also inserted a theatrical gel to alter the color. Asked to choose, Stern picked the fluorescent, disguised as incandescent. Cline tinkered with new light fixtures to see how they worked. Once, a fixture arrived without any explanation for assembly. Carroll sawed the fixture in half, according to Bettridge. He was a designer of great craft and collaboration with architects. His was known as a dedicated design mastermind. Cline is survived by his wife, Katherine D.; two children from his first marriage to Barbara Lovett, Rachel K. Cline of Brooklyn and Henry L. Cline of Manhattan; a twin sister, Dorothy Yunghans of Pittman, New Jersey; and a brother, Alan Cline of Sarasota, Florida. Instead of flowers, it is asked that you donate the money to a charity of your discretion. Members in the News lighting products. Electrical Products Co. covers Nebraska and Iowa; Electrical Sales of Ohio serves the Cincinnati/Dayton area; Liteco represents Crescent/Stonco in Oregon and Southern Idaho; Griesser Sales Co. is the Cleveland area representative now to include Columbus, Ohio. Elisabeth Bernitt has been named managing principal of Hellmuth, Obata, and Kassabaum, Inc. in Tampa, Florida. In her new role at HOK Bernitt will direct day-to-day operations while focusing on a vision for the firm’s future. Electronic Theatre Controls has appointed Joseph E. Deklotz as the Obituary Lighting design pioneer, Carroll Cline died February 24 at his home on the Upper West Side in Manhattan. He was 72. His projects included the Santa Fe Opera Theater in New Mexico, The Norman Rockwell Museum in Stockwell, Massachusetts, and the lobby of 1251 Avenue of the Americas in New York City. He received G.E.’s Edison Award of Excellence for the Sante Fe Opera, a 1997 IIDA Award for One Market Plaza in San Francisco, CA, G.E.’s Award of Merit for MONY Financial Services Headquarters in New York City, and the IALD Certificate of Fellowship, in recognition of outstanding contributions to the association and profession. The list of awards cited to his enterprise is long. Cline was born on October 12, 1927, in Richmond, Indiana. He received a BA from the University of Chicago, BS in Architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology, and collected a vast working education in the lighting field. The field, he claimed, is less than thirty years old. Never idle professionally, he moved around until working for Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, for three years. In 1962, Skidmore loaned Cline to one of its clients, lighting fixture manufacturer Edison Price, where he became not only a vice president but also a lighting designer, staying there for ten years before striking out as Carroll Cline, Lighting Consultant. In 22 LD+A/April 2000 Carrie Baltin, Department Manager of Lighting Products for Search West, was awarded the 1999 ‘Corporate Account Executive of the Year’ title. A nationwide recruitment specialist in the lighting and electrical industries, Baltin has now earned 16 Account Executive of the Year Awards, including seven as Westlake Village branch office winner, and nine awards company-wide. At LDI 1999 in Orlando, Paul Vincent of Vincent Lighting Systems was awarded the 1999 Eva Swan Award. Crescent/Stonco, a division of Genlyte-Thomas Group LLC, announced three firms joining its sales network, representing the division’s lines of continued on following page www.iesna.org Members in the News continued from previous page company’s new Vice President of Research and Development. Most recently, Deklotz comes to ETC from Schenk/AccuRate in Whitewater, Wisconsin, where he was a senior executive of the company, guiding new product planning and development at an international level. James Posey Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers announced that Marc R. Hurwitz has joined the firm’s electrical depar tment as a Project Manager. Hurwitz is presidentelect of the Mar yland Society of Professional Engineers, the state society of the National Society of Professional Engineers. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc., has purchased VIMCO (Virginia Iron and Metal Company, Inc.), a leading manufacturer of window shading sytems. “The acquisition of VIMCO enhances Lutron’s total package of lighting controls and shading systems, allowing us to serve our customers even better by controlling the complete visual environment,” said Lutron President John Longenderfer. “Combining light dimming solutions with motorized shading systems gives total lighting control solutions. It provides the ability for us to bring products to market throughout a new channel of distribution. Vimco . . . will continue to deliver high quality window shading systems.” Horton•Lees Lighting Design has grown again, adding several new designers to the firm as of mid-January, 2000. Guy Smith joined the Los Angeles office as a Project Director with a background in architecture and Rudy Rodriguez joined the New York office as a Project Director. He has an MFA in lighting from Parsons School of Design. Angela Lawrence, LC, joined the San Francisco office as a Project Director. She has a strong design background and her understanding of products and their applications complement the team for a broad range of projects they design. Two lighting products from automated lighting manufacturer High End Systems Inc. took top honors at a recent conference for the live entertainment industry. The Live! Awards, presented by UK-based Live! Magazine EELA to Certify Energy Efficient Companies The Energy Efficient Lighting Association announced CEELSCo, a new certification program for energy efficient lighting service companies. The certification program increases the basic knowledge level and capabilities of lighting service companies and identifies those accredited as upholding the technical and ethical standards of the EELA. The certification program is available for members and non-members, alike. Companies seeking to become a Certified Energy Efficient Lighting Service Company (CEELSCo) must adhere to specific guidelines that include demonstrating an industry recognized energy efficient lighting certification such as CLEP, LC, EPA Green Lights Survey Ally, or CLMC. Companies must also possess sufficient lighting and business experience, appropriate insurance coverage, and provide specific information to clients for all lighting projects. The certification program benefits the industry by increasing the overall awareness level of the marketplace and end-user confidence. Working with an EELA Certified Energy Efficient Lighting Service Company ensures quality service from audit to design through installation, delivered in a professional and timely manner. The first recipients to receive the CEELSCo designation are FMS Lighting Management Systems of Jackson, Michigan; Lighting Management Consultants, Inc. of Houston, Texas; Lighting Systems Solutions, Inc. of Gainesville, Georgia; and Sempra Energy Services of Houston, Texas. To learn more about the program, contact Lynn M. Russo, Association Manager, Energy Efficient Lighting Association, P.O. Box 727, Princeton Junction, NJ 08550; tel: (609) 799-4900; fax: (609) 799-7032; email: [email protected]. 24 LD+A/April 2000 in conjunction with their annual trade conference, were presented in February at the Royal Lancaster Hotel in London. The Studio Beam PC automated luminaire won the award for New Lighting Product of the Year and the Wholehog II won Lighting Console of the Year. Advance Transformer Co. presented the Advance-developed National Dimming Initiative CD-ROM application to the Lighting Control Association (LCA) for the organization’s exclusive use. Taking part in the presentation ceremony were Talbot Steel (right), Advance’s executive vice president of marketing and sales, and Lighting Controls Association president Dave Peterson (left) of Horton Controls. The ceremony took place at Advance’s headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois. The CD-ROM, a key component in the Advance-spearheaded National Dimming Initiative, was made possible by extensive financial and human resources provided by Advance. It is a powerful lighting controls specification and application tool that includes a lighting controls tutorial, a controls estimator, case histories, a catalog of industry products, and an amusing and educational lighting controls game. Since the founding of the Lighting Controls Association in the spring of 1999, the CD-ROM has played a key role in helping the organization fulfill its educational mission, alerting building designers, lighting specifiers, engineers, and end-users to the unique benefits of lighting controls and fluorescent dimming technology. Advance’s presenting of the CD-ROM includes its master source files, programming code, and exclusive content for the LCA’s educational use. Cooper Industries, Inc. will acquire continued on following page www.iesna.org Members in the News continued from previous page Eagle Electric, a U.S. manufacturer of residential electrical wiring devices. Eagle’s products include switches, receptacles, plugs and connectors, cords and other electrical accessories. Through Eagle, Cooper gains access to a significant number of new customers and additional product offerings. Fiberstars, Inc., a maker of fiber optic lighting, announced that the customer who purchases the company’s New Members The IESNA gained 124 members (M), associate members, and student members in February. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS Canadian Region Phillip C. Schwab, Lumeneering Inc., Toronto, ON East Central Region Monica Gresser, Cochran, Stephenson & Donkervo, Baltimore, MD James Harrington, URS Greiner Woodward Clyde, Virginia Beach, VA Mark F. Nardy, PWI Engineering, Philadelphia, PA Great Lakes Region Mary Fisher, Technical Consumer Products, Solon, OH Edward Intemann (M), Cornell University, Ithaca , NY Paul Marttilia (M), HITCH, Houghton, MI Russell K. McBride, Lightolier, Alto, MI Gregory S. Owens, HAWA Inc., Columbus, OH Tara M. Parks, Plymouth, MI Eastern Michigan University Sasithorn Charoenratana Intermountain Region Robert Clark, Iota Engineering Co., Tucson, AZ Stephen D. Dent (M), Dent & Nordhaus Architects, Albuquerque, NM Mary Gross, CH2M Hill, Denver, CO Robert Holmes (M), PG&E Energy Services, Scottsdale, AZ Gary J. Jurkin (M), Gary Jurkin Engineering, Tucson, AZ Paul Shubin, Lighting Resources Inc., Boise, ID University of Colorado Heather Chinault, Regan Gage Midwest Region Mark Anthony, Bredson & Associates, Raytown, MO 26 LD+A/April 2000 250,000th fiber optic lighting system will win a special state-of-the-art Fiberstars 701S system, plus a week for two in San Francisco. The contest is being held to highlight the 250,000th system milestone for Fiberstars. Fiberstars’ CEO David Ruckert expects to hit the 250,000 mark during the second quarter of this year. The Grand Prizewinner will be the worldwide customer who places the order from among three Fiberstars customer groups. The two runner-ups will be the nearest within the other two customer David Kilbourn, Kansas Cosmosphere & Space Center, Hutchinson, KS Chad Wicklander, Illinoise Power, Decatur, IL Kansas State University Jonathan Carter, Sandra Ellis, Aaron Reiswig, Christopher Rosol, Casey Steiner, Darren Thrasher, Julie Vavra North Central Region Robert Anderson (M), Lumec Inc., Channahon, IL Mark Belich, Minnesota Power, Duluth, MN Dennis W. Coker, Lexington Standard Corp., Lakesville, MN Thomas J. Gonring (M), Leedy & Petzold Associates, Elm Grove, WI Jason Hunze (M), Prairie Engineering, Minot, ND David S. Liebl, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Andrew Lindstrom, General Electric Lighting, Madison, WI Don F. Reitz, Allen County Department of Planning, Fort Wayne, IN Anthony Speltz, Winona Lighting, Winona, MN Linnea Weyandt, LHB Engineering & Architects, Duluth, MN Northeastern Region Yukio Akashi (M), Lighting Research Center RPI, Troy, NY Tom Allebaugh, Thomas electronics Inc., Wayne, NJ Richard C. Bishop, Centerstage Lighting Corporation, Union, NJ Jennifer M. Dolecki, Langan Engineeriang and Enviromental Services, Elmwood Park, NJ Heather Faulding, Fzinc Faulding Architecture PC, New York, NY David A. Hoeltzel (M), Hudson International, Hopatcong, NJ Tyler King, Genlyte Thomas (Stonco), Union, NJ Richard Marsanico, Traffic Systems Inc., Bayshore, NY Sean Martin, The reflex Lighting Group, Boston, MA Akane Nakabayashi (M), SGF Associates, Inc., New York, NY Joseph Rocco, Applied Energy Group, Hauppauge, NY groups. The winners will be from the following three market groups: U.S. Commercial Lighting, U.S. Pool and Spa Market, and International Sales. The Grand Prize package also includes free airfare and hotel, plus a factory tour of the Fiberstars’ headquarters. The two runners-up customers will get a three-day weekend for two in San Francisco, with a factory tour. David Loe is a Spring 2000 semester visiting professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s Lighting Research Center, in Troy, NY. Christopher Stephens, Richard R. Stephens Consulting Engineer, Cohoes, NY Matthew Tirschwell (M),Trischwell & Co., Inc., New York, NY John Veilleux, Architectural Lighting, Portland, ME Northeastern University Robbi Gorman Parsons School of Design Wanjus Sonia Chao, Pei-His Feng Jeffrey McCammon (M), Cooper Lighting, Peachtree City, GA Scott Quinn (M), Odell Associate4s Inc., Charlotte, NC Alvin Nelson Ragan Jr., PWI Wfland Consulting Engineer, Durham, NC Ronald E. Smith, Mountain Heritage Systems, Newland, NC Timothy Sohl, Lightalarms, St. Matthews, SC Pacific Northwest Region Richard Burdick, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR K. Dean Carr, Candel Group, Calgary, AB David B. Harper (M), Exponent Energy Services, Calgary, AB Jean Jackson, NW Lighting Solutions, Tigard, OR Flaviano Reyes Jr. (M), Reyes Engineering, Portland, OR Greg Wright, Altasouth Agencies, Calgary, AB South Pacific Region Barbara Daher (M), Design By Daher, Burlingame, CA Joseph Fox (M), Cooper Lighting, Buena Park, CA Adam Y. Lee, Prima Lighting Corp., Valencia, CA Lory J. Morar (M), Vacaville, CA Bijan Pour, Cooper Preuit Engineers, San Jose, CA Richard K. Sewards, Hubbell Lighting Inc., Goleta, CA University of Southern California Mark Hulme South Central Region Robert H. Landry (M), Bob Landry & Associates, Inc., Brandon, MS The University of Alabama J.R. Allen, Debbie Blumencranz, Shelley Bridges, Ashley Brock, Christina Fernandez, Kathryn Grotheer, Robert Hall, Cameron Johnson, Heather Jones, Jennifer Kirby, Jennifer Kurtz, Bita Lester, Laura Loscudo, Elizabeth Lumpkin, Amanda Mahn, Jennifer l. McCollister, Blake Morris, Gwendolyn Murphy, Miranda Parker, Starr Pearce, Laura Penn, Vee Quizon, Mary Ann Rabren, Erin Richardson, Abigail Ricketson, Lisbeth Schwab, Marta Sherrill, Kristen Smith, Katherine Steele, Heather Yager Southwestern Region Terry Bejlek, Mills Electrical, Celina, TX H.A. Tripp Dungan III, Cleco Corporation, Pineville, LA Norm Erlandson, Fisher Rosemont Systems, Autin, TX Alfonso Islas Franco, Air Ingenieria y Construccion, Mexico Bill Halpain, Schuelein & Halpain Engineering, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK Barry F. Johnson, B.F. Johnson & Associates Inc., San Antonio, TX Andrew S. Lawton, Wilson Aries Group Industrial, Mexico Lynn Lumsden (M), McBride Electric, Houston, TX Marsha Peters (M), Lighting Management Consultant, Houston, TX Southeastern Region Dennis W. Connors, Lighting & Production Inc., Flagler Beach, FL Moragan Gabler (M), Lighting Design Group, Atlanta, GA Michael J. Gamble (M), Powercon of Florida Inc., Tampa, FL Kelly Gay, Arch Design Group, Evans, GA Stan Kaye, Gainesville, FL Foreign Alwyn H. Akin, Jamaica, W.I. Ricardo Lopes (M), Equipe So Luz, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil Josette Perez (M), Puerto Rico Carlos A. Powell (M), Cayman Islands Public Works, Grand Cayman Fernando Rodriguez, Sylvania Lighting International, Colombia www.iesna.org 1999 ® INTERNATIONAL ILLUMINATION DESIGN AWARDS TORRE! TORRE! TORRE! When called upon to illuminate Torre Colpatria, a 48-story tower in Bogota, Colombia, Robert Daniels was faced with the biggest challenge in his career. He gives us the details of how he faced a variety of seemingly insurmountable odds but still managed to come through the ordeal with flying colors. W hen presented with a challenge, some face it with eager anticipation while others find reasons to abstain. As a specialist in building facade lighting, the offer to engineer the illumination of the Torre (Tower) Colpatria became the greatest challenge of my career. In July 1996 I was summoned to a meeting that would change my life. Eduardo Pacheco, the President and CEO of Banco Colpatria, called me to his office in downtown Miami. There I was to learn of a project that is every lighting designer’s dream and, at the same time, their nightmare. I was requested to be the lighting consultant to illuminate a 48-story office building in downtown Bogota, Colombia. Pacheco had seen Miami’s Centrust Tower/Nation’s Bank Tower and wanted his building, of the same height and size, to look as beautiful as this great lighting landmark of Miami’s skyline. In ideal conditions, I knew it would be possible to create a similar level of illumination. But, as I was to discover over the next 15 months, the ideal conditions At 48 stories, Torre Colpatria is the tallest building in Colombia. Due to a variety of stumbling blocks, lighting designer Bob Daniels was forced to reassess his concept of façade lighting. The result? The first use of xenon downlighting to illuminate a building of this magnitude. 30 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org All 36 of the fixtures that illuminate Torre Colpatria change colors every 10 seconds thanks to a computer controlled system. Placing the fixtures on the roof was a solution that nobody had thought of before now. Thanks to the precise placement of mirrors, the tower is awash in a colorful array of light that stands out from Bogota’s skyline. would never appear. Overcoming engineering problems was only a small part of succeeding on this project. I now found myself involved in visiting one of the most dangerous cities in the world. My first three visits to Bogota entailed staying at the Intercontinental Hotel and walking three blocks to the building with two plain-clothes guards. The bank always looked out for my security, but it was unnerving knowing that the camera I carried was worth my life. Language became another obstacle to overcome. During my projects in Puerto Rico and Panama, I had been able to communicate quite well. Most people spoke both English and Spanish, but Colombia was different. Only a small percentage of the educated elite spoke English. Workers for the bank and attendants at the hotel only spoke Spanish. My challenge was getting larger by the day. As I stood on the roof of the Torre Colpatria, Bogota’s dangers and isolation seemed distant. I was able to visualize a lighting plan for this tower, the tallest building in Colombia. Each face of the building would need two lighting platforms. I would work in metal halide, like the Centrust Tower, with a close platform lighting the first third and a distant platform lighting the upper two thirds. Surrounding the tower was open park land on two sides and buildings on the other two sides. I would have to put the platforms on the roofs of the adjacent buildings similar to the Centrust design. This would be my design. 32 LD+A/April 2000 My first of five designs consisted of eight platforms and 1000 W metal halide lamps. Creating alternatives for every situation, I was first asked to create an energy efficient design. Public opinion was against using electricity for lighting buildings, when it could be better used for people. Therefore, I created an alternative lighting system using 400 W fixtures. Due to the tighter focus of the 400 W lamp, I was able to reduce about 30 percent of the electricity consumption, while increasing the total fixture count and the size of the platforms. To eliminate the use of so many platforms, I also came up with an alternative design that used only four platforms, instead of eight. Of course, the platforms became huge. The rooftops of the adjacent buildings were very old and there was doubt that they could take the load. However, the biggest setback to the whole project was the placement of the platforms on the open, public land that was owned by the City of Bogota. Footings would need to be poured in the ground and an attractive lighting platform erected next to the expressway that passed in front of Torre Colpatria. All the sidewalks and roads would be undisturbed. Certainly the power and prominence of Colombia’s second largest bank would be able to obtain this variance for easement. During the next 15 months, the variance for easement came and went. The Bank went through a series of officials, seeking permission. It turns out that there were many different authorities that had to approve this project. Some were political affiliwww.iesna.org ates, others weren’t. Finally, in October 1997, I was informed that we could not build the lighting platforms because the Bank could not get the variances necessary for the public lands. From the very beginning of the project, it was my intention to use xenon light to stripe the notched corners. My original designs were based on focusing the metal halide light on the main walls. With the power and brightness of xenon, I would overpower the weaker metal halide with the intense xenon beams. This way I could achieve not only colored washes of the main walls, but there would be contrasting stripes in the corners. When it became evident that the metal halide system was not going to get approval, I had to start getting creative. The possibility of lighting the entire building with xenon became our last resort. The setback distance, required for metal halide washes to reach 480 ft, moved the fixture location a great distance from the building. But xenon, with its tight, narrow beams, could push light to the top with only a short setback distance. I approached the owner with this new lighting system, my fourth design at this point. The plan was to place a xenon fixture, mounted on 5-m poles, in front of each of the 36 vertical columns that ring the exterior of the building. The glass walls that separate the columns would act to sharply define the beams. The system looked like it would work well and we didn’t need to have approval from the city. After reviewing the new design, the owner vetoed it. He said that it would create too much clutter around the entrances and would detract from the clean lines the building has at ground level. So here I am, 16 months into a project, the greatest project of my career to date, and I have nothing usable. Every direction I turned got canceled. The logical choice of metal halide had been designed from many standpoints and still could not be applied. Even my use of xenon to uplight the building had been ruled out. Xenon arc is a very special type of fixture. Evolved from the old carbon arc searchlights of World War II, xenon has been used in theater as well as pushing beams of light into the sky for special occasions. The heat involved with 3000 W of xenon is incredibly strong. The fixture can be aimed upward or horizontal, but never down. Aiming the fixture down would cause heat build up around the lamp and burn it out prematurely after several hundred hours. When Pacheco rejected my uplighting idea of using xenon, he asked why I couldn’t light the building from the roof. I proceeded to list all the established reasons why you just can’t do that with xenon. I told him about the lamp burnout and setback distances. I knew all the answers why it wouldn’t work, but in the back of my mind I knew he was right. Light a 48 story building from the roof isn’t that crazy an idea, but it had never been done. Flying 35,000 ft above the earth, my mind started to open to greater possibilities. Why not light the building from above? Then the idea of a horizontally aimed beam, striking a mirror, and redirecting downward came to me. This process would not overheat the lamp and we could achieve the downlighting effect. Upon returning to my office, I created a new set of drawings that showed the lighting of the building using xenon. But, do I light each triangular column with two small fixtures or one large fixture? I had studied the surface texture of the precast concrete tiles extensively. It was very porous and diffuse. However, would the irregular surface spread the light adequately from one luminaire or would it take two? In addition, would the setback requirements—to get the beam of light to work all the way down the wall—be too great? Hanging a mirror out over the edge and aiming perfectly is almost impossible. It is important to have a very strong support to hold the mirror and extend it properly over the side of the building. All of these questions can be answered with a demonstration. The questions I was asking had never been tested before. The time was right for a demonstration to test the capability of xenon arc. To illuminate a building with only a few feet of setback would be totally impossible with metal halide. As shown with the Centrust Tower, a narrow beam metal halide has difficulty even going 100 ft without significant dimming when the setback is 4 ft away from the wall. Now we are trying for a distance of almost 500 ft. I felt sure that the incredible power of xenon arc would be equal to the task. At LDI 1997, I did some serious searching for the best xenon fixture I could find. I knew from my own testing of beam strength at several xenon factories in the U.S. that candela levels were way overrated. I also found that one factory’s 7000 W unit had lower candela levels than another factory’s 4000 W unit. The quality of the mirrored reflectors and the ability to focus the beam varied by manufacturer. I had to be very careful in my fixture selection to make sure I got a luminaire with a strong beam. Trying to measure light in the enclosed environment of a lighting show is very difficult. In the end, I exposed my digital light meter to a very strong xenon beam and burned out the sensor. However, I found a unit that performed very well and had a new patented dichroic color changing system. I could offer my client not only a system capable of creating the lighting he wanted, but we could also change color by computer. That was the key. All the other units were using scrollers with polyester gels. These were adequate for theater, but not satisfactory for architectural lighting. Checking the references of the Italian company Space Cannon was somewhat difficult. They had most of their sales in Europe and little of it was in the architectural realm. I found a couple of buildings in the U.S. that used their equipment and the operators were satisfied with its performance and maintenance. Not having a U.S. dealer at the time, I worked directly with the factory. I was impressed with their international sales manager, Luisa Valenti. It was through her that I arranged the first demonstration for December 18, 1997. With the help of the Space Cannon factory, I successfully demonstrated the downlighting of xenon on a tall building using mirrors to redirect the light. There were many difficulties with the mirror support that I designed because it was never fabricated properly in Bogota. The architect/project manager decided that my design was “over built.” Instead, he made the frame 34 LD+A/April 2000 of thin architectural tubing. Even though the special mirror provided by Space Cannon was only 18 pounds, the surface area was 24 x 40 inches. As the mirror hung in place, gusts of wind would start moving it ever so slightly. At 480 ft above the ground, gusts were frequent and our demonstration was only intermittently successful. Every gust would cause the mirror to move and push our aimed beam out of alignment. I knew that the final mirror holder would have to follow my design exactly. Illuminating a wall 480 ft high under the best of conditions is difficult. Add a light beam that would be stationary for only 10–15 seconds at a time is next to impossible. However, through diligence we got the beam of light to illuminate the whole wall. It was important for me to be there, as the factory technicians were skilled in operating their equipment, but not in applying it to a 480 ft building. Their aiming was not achieving the desired results and finally after an hour of arguing, they started to listen to my instructions in directing the beam alignment. One hour later, we had the basic results we were after and recorded it with photographs. Unbeknownst to me, the president of Space Cannon, Bruno Bairdi, started private negotiations with the owner. The day before the demonstration, I met with him and he signed an agreement to work through me as project lighting engineer. I wanted to be an intermediary to protect the interests of the owner. The project architect informed me two months later that there would be a second demonstration with a new fixture. This caught me by complete surprise. I had spoken to the factory several times in this period and they didn’t mention this new design. I flew to Bogota for the second demonstration. Space Cannon built a new fixture that changed the internal airflow patterns. The heat that would have collected in the reflector area, causing the lamp to burn out prematurely, was eliminated. Bairdi assured me that lamp life would be equal or longer than the normal xenon luminaire. Space Cannon’s design of the support bracket included structural contacts for proper mounting. With my advice, they welded additional mounting straps onto the support and successfully mounted the 100-kg fixture head. The test that night proved even more conclusively that xenon arc could downlight tall buildings. With 3K and 4K units, we lit both the typical vertical facing and a wider facing that was in tandem at the corners. This became the basis of my fifth and final design. I next created six variations of xenon lighting design for various budget levels. We looked at a complete computer controlled color changing system, to variations that were mostly manual color changing with dichroic filters. This would give the owner many options and purchase levels. Pacheco decided to buy the most expensive system, one with all 36 fixtures being computer controlled and color changing. The architect and project manager, Eduardo Pombo, told me that I should be in Bogota on the night of August 5th. The factory confirmed that their team was in Bogota and were about to complete the installation. Arriving on August 3rd, I hoped to be involved with the aiming of the system. The last time I worked with them, they had a lot of problems aiming the equipment. When I arrived, I found all the fixtures had been aimed. I never participated in the final aiming or programming of the 40 lighting images of the building that I sent to the factory. www.iesna.org In the months to come, articles appeared in lighting and engineering magazines for both North and South America. The articles insinuated that Space Cannon’s new sales manager was the lighting engineer and that their in-house architect was in fact the project architect. The articles never dealt with the design, but instead focussed on how they built a custom support bracket for the fixture. Even though this project has been a career builder and an opportunity to be one of the few people in the world to gain knowledge about architectural application of xenon technology, it has been the most frustrating job of my life. The language and cultural barrier of English to Spanish is immense. My lack of Spanish kept the owner from fully trusting me. The bond established from speaking in someone’s first language is very important. Since that time, I have lived in Bogota and spent much time in Caracas. My understanding of the Spanish language and culture has improved to the point that the “gringo” is almost accepted by the local people. However, it is important to carefully choose your friends and business associates, as I found out from this project. I must offer my thanks to Eduardo Pacheco for putting his money out to buy the best possible system for his building. His belief and desire in lighting Torre Colpatria was a vision he carried for many years. His frustration at not finding an engineer in Colombia capable of this project led him to me. Our mutual frustration in obtaining permission to build the lighting plat- forms necessary for the metal halide system led us to create something even better. He pushed me to design for the impossible, and to re-access my thinking. Thankfully, this landmark step in architectural façade lighting was recognized by the IESNA with a 1999 IIDA Paul Waterbury Award of Excellence for Outdoor Lighting. My original downlighting design became much more simplified with the introduction of the new Space Cannon xenon downlight, created by Bruno Bairdi especially for this project. In the end, it was Pacheco who chose to spend even more to buy the finest system. To his credit, it has made the most dramatic effect possible in the skyline of Bogota. The tallest building in Colombia, fully lit on four sides, changing colors in less than 10 seconds. The designer: Robert Daniels is the president of Brilliant Lighting Design in Miami, FL. He has been in the practice of designing façade lighting for the past 7 years. Prior to that he worked 12 years in structural design, 3 years in aerospace manufacturing, and has 30 years of working with light in photography. He learned about façade lighting by working with John Kennedy, the former senior lighting instructor at the GE Lighting Institute. He has been a speaker at lighting conferences from New York to Singapore with a variety of stops in between. His major projects include the Georgia State Capitol, the 30-story New World Tower in Miami, and a variety of projects in Miami and San Juan, Puerto Rico. He has been a member of the IESNA since 1994 and is chair of the Building Façade, Bridge, and Monument Lighting Committee. 1999 ® INTERNATIONAL ILLUMINATION DESIGN AWARDS FROM A DISTANCE Miki Matushita, Naoki Takayama, and Satoshi Ono I revised the lighting for one of Japan’s tallest buildings and restored its prominence in Fukuoka City’s skyline. 36 LD+A/April 2000 n 1989, the Fukuoka Tower was constructed as the symbol of the Asia Pacific Expo held in Fukuoka City that same year. Constructed on reclaimed land in the Seaside Momochi area of Fukuoka, the Tower has served as a landmark for all of Kyushu, the southwestern island in the Japanese archipelago, for the last decade. Its massive height has also lent the tower to be used as a radio, television, and communications antenna. Since the 1989 Expo, the seaside area surrounding the Tower has changed dramatically. The headquarters of numerous major companies including Panasonic, NEC, Fujitsu, Hitachi and several television stations have been established here. The Fukuoka City Museum and City Library have further added to www.iesna.org the altered landscape. What was once only reclaimed land is now a bustling city center full of large buildings. Unfortunately, this development has diminished the status of the Fukuoka Tower. High rises obstruct views of the Tower and the glare from office lights blocks out the Tower’s shape at night. Our new lighting design was intended to return the Fukuoka Tower to its preeminent status as a featured symbol of Asia. Our design philosophy for the Fukuoka Tower was to utilize both light and shadow as fundamental components. The design team for this project consisted of Ms. Miki Matsushita, principal lighting designer, Mr. Naoki Takayama, chief designer, and Mr. Satoshi Ono, engineer. We drew up four lighting design concepts to achieve this goal. The first concept focused on the importance of both long distance and close up views of the Tower. At night, the Tower should be viewed from great distances so that the lighting design can be appreciated. The only area where you could see it in its entirety was from the promenade in front. This concept was intended to allow people to enjoy the Tower from all perspectives including making it the symbol of Fukuoka for travelers arriving by air or sea. At 234 m high, the Fukuoka Tower is the highest seaside tower in Japan. From the ground to 150 m high, it beautifully incorporates half mirror glass in its architecture. The observation tower, 123 m above sea level, offers an outstanding panoramic view of Fukuoka City and the surrounding mountains and the Pacific Ocean. The final 74 m is made up of the communications antenna which includes weather information sensors and a disaster prevention camera. In sum, the architecture exudes a modern, cutting edge appeal. The nickname, “Mirror Sail” was coined based on the dazzling scene produced when sunshine reflects off the Tower’s half mirror glass. The focus was to highlight these different sections and their varying architectural features and materials. For example, in the transition area between the antenna and the main body of the Tower, we proposed the use of a specialized lighting design, namely the symbol for Fukuoka City. Before our new lighting design was developed, the Tower used half mirror glass to reduce the transmission of solar light into the interior. However, as mentioned previously, the glare from the surrounding buildings caused the Tower’s lighting to lack distinction and caused a blinding effect by reflecting light from other buildings. Because of these difficulties we decided to incorporate exterior lighting to achieve the proper balance between luminance and lightness. Additionally, we had to take into account the neighboring apartment building and attempt to protect the local bird and insect population. The most integral aspects of the design were the type of lamp used, the entrance angle of retroreflector, and placing the equipment in a safe, unobtrusive, but accessible location. Another major consideration was to be environmentally friendly by saving energy, reducing CO2 emissions, and avoiding environmental disruption. One of the purposes of our design was to make the Tower the central landmark of Fukuoka City, which bills itself as the “Key Center of Exchange in Asia.” Therefore, we hoped the Tower would become a recognized symbol throughout Asia. We needed to have a concept that would be international in scope with www.iesna.org (opposite) The Fukuoka Tower is a striking presence among the other buildings that make up the skyline of Fukuoka City, Japan. (above) The view of the tower up close is just as impressive as it is viewed from a distance. The emergency stairways within the tower are illuminated by 60 W halogen spotlights in a zigzag array, giving the north side of the tower a unique appearance. LD+A/April 2000 37 (left and below) From a variety of angles, the Fukuoka Tower is an impressive sight. Fixtures were placed in three different locations to adequately illuminate the 74-m antenna. The lower portion of the antenna is enhanced with 400 W metal halide lamps placed on a ring 7 m above the antenna deck. At the antenna’s base, eight 700 W metal halides were aimed into the center of the antenna. Finally, on a small deck near the antenna’s peak, three 250 W metal halides uplight the section all the way to the top. metal halide lamps, 2 m away from the structure, in line with each vertical frame component. This uplighted the first 123 m of the Tower all the way up to the observation floor. We tested various setting angles of the lamps up to 70 m until the lighting gradually weakened. This left the center section of the Tower darker, making it appear taller. We decided not to remove the existing mercury lamps, originally placed in the interior corners of the Tower, so that from a distance the Tower would continue to have an illuminated appearance. Unlike the original lighting, we really wanted to emphasize the solid architecture of the Tower. Therefore we chose to set the lighting outside the structure in order to utilize the reflective properties of the half mirror glass. In addition to reducing glare on the outside, we also wanted to improve the lighting environment for passengers within the scenic elevators. To achieve this we removed the remaining mercury lamps from the Tower’s interior. This allowed for a better appreciation of Fukuoka City’s other lights when riding in the elevators. The portion of the tower that posed the biggest challenge world class quality. To achieve this we conducted extensive research around the world including Las Vegas, Shanghai, and other Asian centers with similar towers. In the end, our design wanted to express an original vision for Fukuoka as an impressive and refined international city with the Tower as the focal point. Our final design was based on these concepts and to reach these goals we utilized computer graphics and onsite lighting equipment testing. We attempted to evenly illuminate the entire antenna so that this topmost portion of the tower could be viewed from a far distance. By positioning various lighting fixtures at three different heights on the 74-m antenna, we could create an effect of the antenna floating upward. On the antenna deck (at the base of the antenna), we placed eight 700 W metal halide lamps which were aimed toward the center point of the antenna. The antenna base was ideal for fixture placement as its width allowed us to angle the lamps correctly as well as keep them hidden from view. To enhance the lighting in the lower half of the antenna, we also set eight 400 W metal halide lamps on a ring 7 m above the antenna deck. Finally, on a small deck near the top section of the antenna, we placed three 250 W metal halide lamps to uplight the entire upper section right to the uppermost tip. By positioning the lighting at three different heights we were able to completely illuminate the antenna with limited spill light. At the base of the Tower we set 33 1000 W narrow angle 38 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org was at the base of the antenna. First we set 38 400 W metal halide lamps with blue glass filters on the cap of the observation deck. From outside, the lighted portion appears blue. We tested various glass filters until we found the deep blue color we preferred. Originally a louver canopy in the shape of the Fukuoka City symbol mark was set atop the observation deck. However, since this canopy was not illuminated, we decided to border it with white neon lights. This created an eye-catching image at 140 m with a sense of stability, balance, and regional expression. As mentioned previously, we planned to leave the existing mercury lamps for the Tower’s solid lower section. We tried this with a new illumination system for the Tower cap. For this new system we used the new generation of electrodeless fluorescent lamps developed by Matsushita Electric Works Ltd. These lamps utilize high frequency waves resulting in greater efficiency, longer life, and better visibility. Originally, there was no lighting plan for the north or “back” side of the Tower. We wanted to give the Tower a more multisided image with a new appearance from both the air and sea. First we placed 39 150 W quartz lamps with blue glass filters on the emergency stairways to create the appearance of a spine running up the Tower. Then we installed 54 60 W halogen spotlights in a zigzag array inside the clear glass sections that run up both sides of the stairway. This gave the north side a unique appearance rhythmically sketched in light. We not only wanted the Tower to appear beautiful from all directions, but to have a different appearance from both near and distant views. Close up it looks like a floating pillar of light; from a distance it stands out as a symbol of Fukuoka City. The Tower further complements the other components of the city’s superior lighting which both accents the beauty of the Tower’s original architecture and gives it a seemingly new appearance at night. The Fukuoka Tower received the utmost of accolades when it was awarded a 1999 IIDA Paul Waterbury Award of Distinction for Outdoor Lighting. The designers: Miki Matsushita founded her eponymous company, Miki Matsushita Lighting Design Co. Ltd., in 1989 in Fukuoka City, Japan. The company provides complete lighting concept development from basic to detailed designs, as well as programming for both indoor and outdoor projects. Their projects include landscape lighting for various cities, hotels, resorts, hospitals, retail stores, and much more. The company’s design philosophy utilizes both light and shadow as fundamental design elements. Naoki Takayama is a Lighting Designer with Miki Matsushita Lighting Design Co., Ltd. His 10 years of expertise have involved a variety of lighting design aspects ranging from landscape to architecture. Satoshi Ono is Lighting Engineer for Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. in Fukuoka City. He has worked as a lighting engineer on a wide variety of projects for 20 years. 1999 ® INTERNATIONAL ILLUMINATION DESIGN AWARDS T he worlds of architecture and art were intrigued when the Centro Cultural de Merida El Olimpo designed by architects Ancona, Quijano, and Zoreda was inaugurated on January 6, 1999 on the 457th anniversary of the city of Merida, Mexico. Merida is a traditional Mexican city in the southeast Yucatan peninsula. Known as the “Gate to the Mayan World,” Merida was recently named American Capital of Culture 2000. Those of us on the GA Iluminación lighting design team—Georgina Salazar, Luis Castello, and myself—understand the potential of lighting to preserve and enhance the architectural heritage for which we are responsible. This heritage is an increasingly important concept in the development of culture and tourism. Taking this into consideration, our challenge for lighting was to create a design that would be compatible with the building’s form, following the rhythm of the arches and niches, rather than simply displaying stylish fixtures. Appropriate lighting levels and energy efficient technology were also top priorities. The lighting had to be very subtle and complement the architectural details while supplying unobstrusive illumination. El Olimpo is located in Merida’s Historic Site, therefore we had to be respectful of the surrounding buildings’ lineage. To the south is the Merida City Hall which was built in the 17th century and is full of exquis- El Olimpo in Merida, Mexico required subtle lighting that would complement the historical architecture. (right) The main entrance is accented by wall-mounted sconces with 250 W metal halide sources that support the building lines. (below) Semi-circular formed fixtures containing 150 W metal halide lamps were integrated into the pre-fabricated slots to accent the arches around the perimeter of the courtyard. (opposite) The whole lighting concept for El Olimpo is to evoke the warm colors of lantern and torch light with fixtures integrated into the design and highlight the arches, columns, and niches. MAYAN’S HOPE Elias Cisneros, Georgina Salazar, and Luis Castello bring a Mexican cultural center into the new millenium with a striking lighting scheme that uses indirect sources to accentuate the architecture while also providing unobtrusive illumination. 42 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org www.iesna.org LD+A/April 2000 43 Light and shadows both enhance the architecture and create “highs” and “lows.” The lighting supports the cornice that unifies El Olimpo with its next door neighbor, the Merida City Hall. ite ornaments of Colonial architecture. Casa del Alguacil borders on the north and is another beautiful building from the 17th century. The Main Plaza is located in front of the facade along with the Cathedral, which is the first cathedral built in the Americas. In order to accomplish our goal, the concept of indirect lighting was key to the design. Even though the lighting system uses modern technological advances, it blends in well with the beautiful historic surroundings and is a fitting complement to El Olimpo. In the main facade we placed 48 hermetically-sealed, ground-mounted fittings with IP 653, PAR30, 60 W halogen lamps with a 9-inch beam width. This solution worked well for two rea- Reflections & Contrasts: An Architectural Profile of El Olimpo We designed a building to replace the lost solid shape after the demolition of the former El Olimpo in 1974, in such a way that it would easily take its place on the urban space. The building had to be an expression of our time but in compliance with the City Hall, which is adjacent to El Olimpo. This is an architectural project with reflections and contrasts. The building appears rooted in the city’s origin and reflects its historic surroundings. Its spacial richness is displayed with contrasts between circles and squares in a variety of scales and a multitude of lights and shadows. Our intention was to maximize the enjoyment of the different spaces, creating pathways to inspire various feelings to users — discovering new perceptions, visual angles, and surprises that would be inviting to a stroll through the space. The building gives new value to its surrounding historical context and existing buildings, linking volumes and space with the neighborhood. The central courtyard is a meeting place and the heart of the project. Here all the pathways converge and then diverge into various sections. Spatial snails and eels dance the cadence of changing light and shadows. Light bathes the spaces and sunshine rains throughout the building. For the cultural function assigned to the project, we wanted a building that expresses contemporary culture and pays respect to the site. The City of Merida’s Historic Area is a large horizontal volume drilled with some plazas in urban space and some courtyards in architectural space. Our proposal was based on revitalizing the non-variable elements of the urban context, celebrating contemporary design elements like new spatial structure created by both full and empty spaces. The building has a simple composition and a reduced palette of formal and material elements. It contributes to the local architectural culture, with an austere space that utilizes precast concrete elements extracted from the previous building. This formal vocabulary derives from the decomposition of volumes into planes. All the pieces fit together entrenched in the roots of history, with a contemporary interpretation of their forebears. —Ancona, Quijano, and Zoreda Architects 44 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org sons: (1) It highlighted the polished surface columns constructed of regional stone with a lighting pattern reminiscent of the warm colors of torch light (2700K); and (2) It enhanced the cornice that integrates El Olimpo with City Hall. We took a different approach to the second level since the facade has another cadence. However, this raised an additional challege—Where do we install the built-in fixtures? We needed to coordinate with the company making the prefabricated concrete. Fortunately, architect Jorge Duarte agreed to prepare the casts in accordance with our design which included power source conduits that perfectly fit the façade when the fixtures were installed. We set fourteen 50 W, IP 653, PAR20 spots in every column. In addition we placed 24 fittings of IP 651s that supplied indirect lighting to half of the arches. Eighty-six IP 651s with 13 W, 2700K compact fluorescents finished off the building cornice. We took an interesting approach to the corridors; we combined 37 ground-mounted 50 W PAR20 spot lamps with 21 sconces placed in slots only 15 cm wide. Designed by the architects with a pre-fabricated concrete tablet, these fixtures are “half cane” shaped and are fully integrated into the arches. Add to this remarkable scene the 150 W master color/CDM 3000K lamps and the result is a warm, generously lighted space. The main entrance axis was emphasized with three white aluminium cylinders hanging 6 m high and equipped with an integrated ballast and a 250 W, 3000K master color/CDM lamp. Crossing the carved stone arch threshold that connects both buildings, visitors can perceive a change of architectural epoch. The lighting design, however, presents continuous illumination levels, but gives each individual space its own identity and character in a joyous, cohesive setting. The result is a smooth visual scene which allows for a striking perspective, totally free of obtrusive lighting. At the same time lighting from opposite sides produces a sense of amplitude, resulting in the longer side having a shortened appearance. The round central courtyard flows up to the sky via vertical elements lighted by 16 built-in 50 W PAR20 lamps. Thirty 13 W, 2700K compact fluorescents provide uniformity to the curved facade. The stairway and the City Hall tower, awash in glare-free illumination, are clearly visible when walking through the courtyard. Regarding energy efficiency, we fulfilled Mexico’s Official Regulation for non-residential buildings which requires that electricity for lighting cannot exceed 16 W/m2. Maintenance was a further technical consideration. Therefore, to keep cleaning and relamping to a minimum, we proposed the longest lasting life for all of the lamp types used. The Centro Cultural de Merida El Olimpo, was a great success and became an icon of the city due to its friendly illuminated volume and space elements that enliven and enhance Merida’s well being and civic pride. El Olimpo was a trigger for current lighting projects in Merida’s Historic Site around the main plaza. Undoubtedly it contributed to its www.iesna.org nomination as American Capital of Culture 2000. An additional source of pride for this project was its recognition by the IESNA with a 1999 IIDA Paul Waterbury Award of Excellence for Outdoor Lighting. The designers: Elias Cisneros and his wife, Georgina Salazar, founded GA Illuminacion, Architectural Lighting Concepts in 1990 in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Among their projects in the Yucatan Peninsula are the Yucatan Siglo XXI Convention Center, Campeche’s Cathedral, Francis Ford Coppola’s Village in Belize, and Progresso Catholic Church, among others. Cisneros is General Secretary of the Federacion de Colegios de Arquitectos de la Republica Mexicana. He has participated as Synodal for the Yucatan State University Faculty of Architecture. After graduating from Texas Language Academy in Brownsville, TX in 1978, Cisneros then attended the Construction Technician Insituto de Merida. He received his Bachelor of Architecture from the Universidad de Autonoma de Yucatan. His continuing education in all aspects of lighting, design, energy, and other building concerns is ongoing. He has been an IESNA member since 1999. He and Georgina have worked together on virtually every project GA Iluminacion has undertaken since the company was founded. Luis Castello Guadarrama served as engineer for the El Olimpo project. No longer employed with GA Iluminacion, he is currently an Electronic Engineer with the Insituto Technologico de Merida. He has been a member of the IESNA since 1998. l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 H appy 2000 and Happy 21st Century! LIGHTFAIR is back in New York City where it all started 11 years ago. This is the fourth year that LD+A has sponsored a track of seminars. We are proud to sponsor those seminars that make up the Urban Lighting: City Lights track. This is doubly appropriate for us as the April 2000 issue is also devoted to striking outdoor lighting designs. LD+A is also pleased to be the only lighting publication to give attendees preview of what they can expect LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000 is back afrom the various seminars presented in the Big Apple for the dawn of the 21st Century. at LIGHTFAIR. Each year the semibecome more and more varied To help us mark this momentous occasion nars and LIGHTFAIR 2000 is certainly no Paul Gregory, David Rockwell, different. For LIGHTFAIR 2000, LD+A is highlighting four seminars Nancy Snyder, and Art Hatley give us a preview that show just how diversified the of what we can expect from the vast array of LIGHTFAIR educational program and conference has become over the years. educational seminars featured at this year’s show. Paul Gregory and David Rockwell discuss the importance of a good working relationship between lighting designer and architect in their seminar “Rockwell & Gregory: A Collaboration of Architecture and Lighting Design.” They’ll give attendees the lowdown on how beneficial it is to both the designer and the architect when the lighting is taken into consideration at the earliest stages of a project. Their work is a favorite of LD+A readers so you can bet that this seminar will also be a crowd pleaser! The future of lighting is on the minds of all professionals from all walks of the lighting life. The government’s involvement in the forecast for lighting is reiterated in a seminar entitled, “Vision 2020: The Lighting Technology Roadmap.” This seminar about how all of the building professions have worked together to chart out this roadmap is as inspiring as it is informational. Nancy Snyder is on hand to lead us through the sometimes scary and unpredicatble world of the Internet. Her seminar, “Internet Marketing Solutions,” will take the attendee by the hand and lead them onto the “information super highway.” The business world is becoming more global with each passing day, and the lighting world is no different. Fiber optic lighting is one of the most innovative types of illumination around but a lot of designers are hesitant to use this source because they feel it is “uncertain.” Art Hatley is a member of a panel discussion devoted to this light source entitled, “Fiber Optic Lighting: Photometrics & Performance Prediction.” If you’ve ever pondered using fiber optics for one of your projects, then this is one seminar you definitely want to sit in on. A special thanks goes out to all of these contributors for taking the time out of their busy schedules to provide LD+A readers with this sneak peek into their seminars. Again, none of this would be possible without the hard work and dedication of the LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL Conference Advisory Committee. Is it just me, or is LIGHTFAIR getting better and better with each passing year? LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR PREVIEW Mark A. Newman Editor 46 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 AHEAD OF THE CURVE The Lighting Technology Roadmap is a combined effort that includes professionals from all realms of the building industry. This preview gives us a hint of what lies in store for lighting, the lighting industry, and lighting professionals. We d n e s d a y May 10, 2000 10:30 am – 12:00 pm I t is impossible to imagine modern life without electric lighting. With the wide availability and affordability of today’s lighting, people throughout much of the world are free to work, play, and learn virtually anywhere, anytime. The flexibility of our waking hours, the richness of our information environments, and the range of our movement exceed anything our ancestors could have envisioned just over 120 years ago, in the days before Thomas Edison’s carbon-filament lamp changed the world. Continued innovation in lamps and other system components, as well as in design practices, have made lighting progressively more effective, efficient, and economical since Edison’s time. Yet developments in the next 20 years may well dwarf the accomplishments of the past century. Today, advances on diverse technology fronts promise to drive down the costs and multiply the capabilities of microchips, lasers, and photovoltaics, opening the way to entirely new levels of performance in sensors and controls. Also on the horizon are innovative materials, high-efficiency light sources, breakthroughs in biotechnologies and chemical sciences, and ever more powerful methods of system modeling and integration. This remarkable confluence of technologies can spell great improvements in our ability to harness light efficiently and effectively, to extend the reach and power of human vision, and to dynamically monitor and shape our built environments to suit specific pur- 38 LD+A/April 2000 poses and preferences. Advanced technologies will, in turn, enable advanced design and engineering approaches. Starting in the commercial building sector, but later moving into the residential sector as well, we will see growing sophistication in the design of lighting and other building systems within an integrated, “whole buildings” framework. The “whole buildings” ap proach will optimally use both manmade and natural systems to provide efficient, high-quality lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation, and information exchange. The result? Tomorrow’s buildings will provide unprecedented levels of comfort, productivity, flexibility, and well-being for occupants, while reducing energy use and other impacts on the natural environment. Vision 2020: The Lighting Technology Roadmap describes an exciting future for lighting in the coming decades. It represents the work of hundreds of lighting professionals, as well as members of the academic, government, and research communities. These individuals contributed to the imaginative brainstorming, lively debates, and multidisciplinary analyses that, ultimately, produced a vision for the future of lighting and pathways for achieving it. The Lighting Vision In 2020, lighting systems in buildings and other applications will: • Enhance the performance and wellbeing of people • Adapt easily to the changing needs of any user • Use all sources of light efficiently and effectively • Function as true systems, fully integrated with other systems (rather than as collections of independent components) • Create minimal impacts on the environment during its manufacturing, installation, maintenance, operations, and disposal. As a result, people will understand, value, and utilize the tangible, personal benefits provided by these lighting systems. In developing this Technology Roadmap, the industry participants defined key market-related and technology trends that can help drive the Lighting Vision and barriers that will need to be addressed. One key barrier is the current weakness in the market for innovative lighting solutions. A specific challenge is to demonstrate how life-cycle benefits often make high-quality lighting systems an attractive and economical choice, even when their initial purchase costs are higher than those for other options. Once participants defined the barriers, they identified six strategies for moving forward, together with 28 high-priority activities that support the strategies. Virtually all of these activities were judged to be achievable within ten years. Strategies Strategies for achieving the Lighting Vision relate to market transformation, as well as to new technology development. • Develop clear definitions and standards for lighting quality • Collaborate on industry-standard control protocols • Prove and quantify the benefits of high-quality lighting • Strengthen understanding of what end users and purchasers value in lighting systems • Demonstrate and promote the benwww.iesna.org l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 efits of innovative lighting technologies and solutions • Provide incentives to accelerate lighting technology development, with a focus on lighting solutions that are highly flexible, efficient, responsive to the changing demands of workplaces, effectively integrated with other building systems, and adaptable to the needs of individual users. In addition, participants defined 48 desired technology attributes that they believe will be valued in tomorrow’s lighting components and systems. Highpriority attributes were determined for sources and ballasts, lighting controls, luminaires and systems, and daylighting solutions. These attributes will contribute to lighting solutions that are highly flexible and efficient, well integrated with other building systems, responsive to the demands of our increasingly information-intensive and team-based workplaces, and adaptable to the changing needs of individual users. Participants judged virtually all the desired attributes to be technically achievable within ten years. All told, the Lighting Vision and roadmap process has engaged a broad cross-section of lighting industry leaders and experts. Nearly 100 lighting professionals representing 60 companies and associations participated in the workshops to develop the Technology Roadmap, and an additional 179 professionals helped prioritize the activities through an on-line voting process. These votes were solicited and collated by the Department of Energy, Office of Building Technologies, State and Community Programs (BTS), which has facilitated the development of Vision 2020 - The Lighting Technology Roadmap. Eight lighting industry associations have sponsored the vision and roadmap process: the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA), the International Association of Lighting Designers (IALD), the National Association of Electrical Distributors (NAED), the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), the National Electrical Manufacturers Representatives www.iesna.org Association (NEMRA), the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA), the National Association of Independent Lighting Distributors (NAILD), and the interNational Association of Lighting Management Companies (NALMCO). In 20 years, the state of lighting technologies and markets may well be con- siderably different than that described in the Technology Roadmap. Yet to the extent that their work inspires increased innovation, risk-taking, investment, and collaboration in the industry, the lighting professionals who developed this vision and roadmap will have helped to shape that future. l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 TEAM SPIRIT When The Rockwell Group and Focus Lighting work together on a project, close collaboration begins early and continues until well after the opening, ensuring seamless integration between lighting and architecture, and a successful and memorable look. T u e s d a y, May 9, 2000 10:30 am – 12:00 pm F rank Lloyd Wright described lighting as “the form-giver.” A building’s architecture is a visual canvas, which both reveals and is revealed by light. When architects, interior designers, and lighting designers combine forces early on in a project, lighting becomes an integral part of the design, rather than an afterthought. If all members of the design team share a “common vision,” and are all working together from different design platforms to create the same mood, the resulting project will elicit a complimentary and beautiful emotion in the viewer. A successful lighting design highlights the complexity and beauty of the architecture, to draw in the eye of the spectator. Architecture and lighting in a space should blend into a single immersing experienc—a seamless tableau. Successful collaborations between lighting designers and architects grow over time, as a dialogue and a trust are created, along with shared experiences. One such long-term collaboration evolved between architect David Rockwell, president and principal of The Rockwell Group, and lighting designer Paul Gregory, principal of Focus Lighting. “We’ve worked together since the 70’s,” Gregory explains. “Our companies have formed a close working relationship based on (left) At the Samba Grill in the Mirage Hotel in Las Vegas, Paul Gregory and David Rockwell had to work together to determine the lighting for this unique tropical-themed restaurant. Here the lighting had to take the revolving stage into consideration, as well as the variety of other design elements throughout the space. (opposite) At Ruby Foo’s in New York, the focus of the patron’s eye is the magnificent lacquered red wall that contains a variety of Asian artifacts. The designers highlighted the items with a variety of fixtures, circuits, and angles. 50 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org the desire to create a memorable design, integrating lighting and architecture.” In recent years Rockwell and Gregory have collaborated on numerous high-profile projects, including the Mohegan Casino in Uncasville, Connecticut (January 1998 LD+A); Loews Theatres’ E-Walk in New York and across the country; Sultan’s Palace shops in Las Vegas; and Resorts Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City. The pair have teamed up on over 100 restaurants worldwide, including Samba Grill at the Mirage Hotel, Las Vegas (September 1999 LD+A); Café Milan in Chelsea, UK; Nobu restaurant, in New York and Las Vegas; Vong, in New York and Chicago; Lidia’s Restaurant in Kansas City (April 1999 LD+A); and New York’s Ruby Foo’s www.iesna.org (September 1999 LD+A), Payard Patisserie, and Michael Jordan’s Steakhouse at Grand Central Station. To begin a successful collaboration on a project, the architect, interior designer, lighting designer, and owner must articulate and agree on what the viewer should feel upon entering the space. Getting involved in the early conceptual stages of a project helps Gregory and his team establish a good working relationship and integrate lighting into the visual image more completely. “It’s essential to think about lighting from the very beginning,” affirms David Rockwell. “The important thing is to integrate the lighting into the architecture, and not just apply it to the skin.” Gregory agrees: “If you don’t decide up front what picture you’re trying to paint with light; what visual image you’re trying to convey; it’s hard to be in sync design-wise. We try to establish a set of design priorities together early on, and then keep referring back to those priorities during the decision making process.” Rockwell also brings Focus Lighting in on early meetings or presentations with the client at the table, stating that “Focus needs to hear what the owner has to say about the space, or our designs first hand, so they can see what’s most important to the owner and can make intelligent decisions and set clear goals.” “We can also articulate our own ideas to the owner directly and get feedback,” Gregory added. “So we’re spending our LD+A/April 2000 51 l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 time on making the right ideas better, not on trying to guess what the owner might like.” Getting involved in the early stages of design helps ensure proper lighting positions to achieve desired effects. “We fax hand-drawn details back and forth daily, with notes saying ‘how about this?’ or ‘what if we try that’,” says Gregory. “Sometimes we can suggest a subtle change or detail to create a new lighting position and give us the ability to more effectively sculpt an architectural element with light. The more communication there is between us, the better. If we’re trying to achieve the perfect cove lighting, we won’t just state a critical dimension and then be inflexible about it. We’ll talk about why it’s important, and try to present options with visual and cost implications so an informed decision can be made based on the same set of priorities.” Specifics such as light fixture mounting conditions should be discussed between architect and lighting designer so that the fixtures themselves don’t appear “stuck on,” but become a part of the overall picture. Often, Rockwell and his design team will use a surfacemounted light fixture as an opportuni- ty to create a decorative accent by creating a custom or themed enclosure for the light source. Focus Lighting and The Rockwell we can really build off of what we already know and not have to start a new dialogue each time Group also routinely mock-up tricky or unique lighting conditions. “Whether it’s a full scale section of an internally illuminated soffit or a piece of a backlit wine rack we build in our basement,” says Gregory, “It’s essential that we mock it up and look at it. The surfaces and finishes play such a huge role in what effect the lighting will have. Rockwell Group provides samples of finishes they’re considering so we can choose the best sources or angles.” Working closely with an architect throughout the design process makes problem solving on site easier too. Last minute dilemmas can be turned into opportunities when owner, architect, interior designer, and lighting designer all stay focused on initial goals and are willing to adapt their own ideas for the greater good of the project as a whole. Collaboration between lighting designers, architects, and interior designers should be an educational process for all parties. “We’re always learning about new materials and possibilities from the Rockwell Group,” Gregory said. “And we have the opportunity to share our knowledge of light sources and effects.” Rockwell agrees: “It’s nice to be able to work with the same lighting designer on such a variety of projects; we can really build off of what we already know and not have to start a new dialogue each time.” Lighting has the potential to pull together visual elements, and to give a space a proper focus. Open collaboration between the lighting designer and architect can help to ensure that a finished project will be stunning and memorable; not simply adequate. At the Mohegan Sun Casino in Uncasville, Connecticut, Rockwell and Gregory based their design on natural elements. The design of the casino reflects the great outdoors as several mock trees are located throughout the space. In various areas, different seasons are represented by the change in the lighting. Here, subtle effects can make all the difference in the world. 52 LD+A/April 2000 www.iesna.org l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 FIBER CLASS Despite the benefits of fiber optic lighting, not much is known about this unique light source in terms of photometrics and performance prediction. Art Hatley is part of a panel discussion that should be attended by every designer or specifier who’s thinking of using fiber optics. Tuesday May 9, 20000 4:00 am – 5:30 pm F iber optic lighting is one of the most promising lighting technologies to come along in years. It has an extremely wide range of beneficial characteristics, from the lack of locational heat and UV to the absence of electrical current running through the fiber optic cable. These characteristics can translate into significant safety and other user benefits. Further, the remote location of the light source can make installation and maintenance significantly easier than with other, more traditional lighting techniques. Minimal spatial requirements at fixture locations make it possible to put light where there’s never been room before. Combined with its special effects, controls, and color options, these capabilities make fiber optic lighting a potentially attractive alternative to other types of lighting in a variety of applications. Why then has fiber optic lighting usage not grown to a level commensurate with such a valuable set of features and benefits? Initially, high costs and questionable reliability had a negative impact on usage, but as the technology has matured over the past decade, in most cases costs have come down significantly and reliability has increased to more than satisfactory levels. Thus, the main unresolved problem with fiber optic lighting has been the lack of accurate and consistent photometric data for lighting professionals to use in their designs and specifications. As with a number of other emerging 54 LD+A/April 2000 technologies, the development and acceptance of standardized testing practices and procedures have lagged behind the popular application of the technology. Specifiers using fiber optic lighting have all too often had to depend solely on unsubstantiated performance claims from the systems’ manufacturers. And, while some companies have been candid in their performance claims, others have tended to overstate their systems’ abili- there will finally be a set of standardized testing procedures and guidelines ties. While some manufacturers have submitted their systems for testing by an independent photometric lab, the lack of consistent testing standards and measurement procedures have made comparative performance evaluations effectively impossible. This lack of photometric testing standards and procedures has not been for lack of interest or effort. NEMA and other lighting organizations have been working to create such standards and procedures for years. But because fiber optic lighting is different from other types of lighting in certain key areas, considerable work was needed to establish not only the specifics of testing, but even the basic methodologies and criteria. Further complicating and delaying the process has been the need to resolve a wide range of technical questions and challenges. By LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000, however, there will finally be a set of standardized testing procedures and guidelines, thanks to the efforts of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), its Remote Illumination Systems Section, and its (ad hoc) Task Force on Sidelighting Photometrics. This will be the basis of the panel discussion, “Fiber Optic Lighting: Photometrics & Performance Prediction.” The Section has spent considerable time developing a series of photometric testing definitions, guidelines and procedures that will allow specifiers of fiber optic lighting to finally apply the technology with accuracy and confidence. NEMA is scheduled to review the Section’s recommendations for final approval shortly before LIGHTFAIR, and the members of the panel will use the approved NEMA standards as the basis for their presentation. The panel, comprised of three members of the lighting community wellversed in the manufacture, application, and testing of fiber optic lighting, will explain the new NEMA standards, discuss how to interpret the data and illustrate ways in which the information can be effectively applied. The panel includes: J. Arthur Hatley, VP and general manwww.iesna.org l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 ager of commercial lighting for Fiberstars, Inc., an industry pioneer and a major proponent of the effort to “legitimize” fiber optic lighting through objective testing and evaluation; Paul Morgan, principal of Paul Morgan Lighting Design and one of America’s most knowledgeable and experienced specifiers of fiber optic lighting systems; and IESNA President Ian Lewin of Lighting Sciences, Inc., one of the nation’s foremost photometric testing laboratories with valuable experience in the testing of fiber optic lighting systems. The Section had many issues to resolve in its effort to establish effective fiber optic lighting testing procedures, one of which was the consistency of nomenclature. Because fiber optic lighting technology and practice have evolved in an uncoordinated way, terms and references have sometimes been confusing to the specification community. Another key issue was the separation of testing procedures for the two basic categories of fiber optic lighting: endemitting and side-emitting. End-emitting is that type of fiber optics in which light travels through the fiber optic cable to create (what is effectively) a point source at the end of the cable. With sideemitting fiber optics, the light is continuously emitted through the side walls of the cable. In the case of end-emitting systems, many of the same principles that apply to conventional testing can be used. Still, there are some idiosyncracies of end-lit fiber optic systems requiring discussion. Since a fiber optic lighting system may be comprised of a variable number of individual components, definitions of exactly what components should be required for testing had to be determined. (Take, for example, the fact that a single illuminator can drive a number of output fixtures.) Another issue is what length of cable should be tested, as well as how to determine and report the amount of light attenuation over different cable lengths. The bigger challenge, however, has pertained to the testing of side-emitting systems. The Section had to first develwww.iesna.org op a testing procedure strategy that would best illustrate the photometric characteristics of side-emitting fiber optic systems. Such fundamental issues as the actual characteristics to be measured and how to measure them, as well as how the data should be presented, had to be determined. The possible segregation of side-emitting systems designed for different functions (since some fiber is designed for purely decorative purposes, while other fiber is designed to provide actual illumination) also required discussion . In terms of specifics, the Section also had to determine how to deal with such factors as color, brightening due to bending, and changes in intensity distribution along the length of a cable. Also needing to be considered was the length of cable to be tested, since applications of sideemitting systems can run from just a couple to literally hundreds of feet. Further questions arose in terms of how lighting application software would deal with extended sources of light, thus influencing the accuracy with which commonly used software can portray lit fiber optic cable. Finally, in addition to the photometric testing issues, the NEMA Section has also discussed a number of safety, hazard, and environmental issues that could be associated with certain components used in fiber optic lighting systems, including how to prevent (or warn against) such potential problems as: • UV exposure from unblocked ports on illuminators, • Electrical shock and related high voltage hazards from illuminators, • Violent end-of-life occurrences with certain lamps, and • Risk of fire from photaic energy to heat conversion within illuminators. By attending this panel discussion, specifiers and designers will be able to learn not only how the NEMA Section dealt with these issues, but also how to put the results of these new photometric testing standards to use in applying fiber optic lighting technology and systems to their projects. l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 NOT JUST ANOTHER FAIR E-TALE Nancy T. Snyder tells us a different type of tale about the future of today’s businesses that utilize the Internet. And this tale is far from grim. We d n e s d a y May 10, 2000 10:30 am – 12:00 pm nce upon a time, there was an innocent and frightened business lost in the middle of a large, seemingly dark technological forest. This business, like many others, was frantically trying to find the path that would lead it to a new community made up of dot-coms. The business had a map—but nowhere on this map did it say, “This way to the World Wide Web.” It was rumored that this dot-com community had developed its own universal languages— HTML, Java, XML—which allowed businesses to interact with millions of potential customers simultaneously. This enabled design specifiers, installers, and distributors to communicate instantly and more efficiently with the click of a “magic mouse.” Mastery of these new languages evolved. Businesses were said to be able to provide higher levels of service for their customers and increase design, specification, and purchasing efficiencies while extending their marketplace to the world. Oh, could such a place really exist? Do you ever wonder why most fairy tales take place in a deep, dark forest? Red Riding Hood, Goldilocks, and Hansel and Gretel all learn valuable lessons as a result of traveling offbeat paths in dark and mysterious forests, and so can we in the professional lighting business. You may have guessed that our seemingly evil forest is a metaphorical representation of the Internet. O 56 LD+A/April 2000 The frightened business is yours and mine, and—most importantly—the map we have is our existing business plan, usually without any mention of the Internet as the burgeoning market segment it is, and the essential distribution, specifying and communications tool it is rapidly becoming worldwide. By following our business plans closely, and by listening carefully to our guides, we in the lighting industry today can transform the very process of lighting design, ordering, shipping, and illumination. By learning how to really tap into the new community of the Internet, each of us will make our business more satisfying, infinitely larger, and more profitable. The Customer is The Guide To help steer us down the mysterious, ever-changing path the Internet creates, we need only to follow the eternal guide: our customers. They are what they have (or should have) been: our compasses. Thanks to the Internet, they can now provide daily direction by expressing to us what they want and when they want it, more readily than ever before. The advent of Internet communications now allows us to meet those demands and more efficiently than ever before. e-Business Rule #1: It is our customers who lay the foundation of our future business success and our future Internet success. Your e-Roadmap An existing business plan is literally a map that can guide you step by step, not only when developing and implement- ing an effective business strategy, but in establishing—or enlarging—your Internet programs. Your plan typically identifies your target markets. It outlines the customer value propositions your products and services offer. It specifically addresses the day to day demands made by your customers for information about your business, its track record, ability to serve customers competitively and become a value-added supplier. e-Business Rule #2: The flow chart for an effective website and Internet presence is your existing business plan. Yourwebsite.com A company’s website should be a mirror of their organization and philosophy, and should be organized based on external (customer) needs rather than internal (company) needs. Content should be delivered strategically, based on the specific needs of specifier customers. If you have a diverse product or service offering that has value and relevance to more than one target market, there should be a visible point of entry on your website for each identified customer base, current or anticipated. This keeps customers from becoming “lost in your forest.” For example, an architectural or lighting design firm that specializes in both residential and commercial markets should have two separate “communities,” or neighborhoods, on its website, with content customized for each audience. Developing or improving your website using a community approach provides customer personalization, www.iesna.org l i g h t fa i r i n t e r n a t i o n a l s e m i n a r p re v i ew 2 0 0 0 which stimulates greater inter-activity between a client and your business. e-Business Rule #3: Never give a customer information they didn’t ask for or cannot use; always give them the information they need. Content Transformation: From Bits to Bytes The demand for faster access to up-tothe minute business information and specification data is ultimately forcing us all to move into the digital arena, willing or not. Most business websites—including those of your known or future competition—are evolving over time from containing primarily “branding” content or marketing messages, to active “electronic commerce.” Basic e-commerce involves a business or sales transaction from a virtual shopping cart of your services and products. Simpler forms of ecommerce can be providing your customers with a digital on-line catalog of your products and services, providing educational tools, FAQs, and troubleshooting solutions. e-Business Rule #4: The Internet is truly the “information super highway” for your business, and should not merely be an advertising super highway. Expanding your Markets Internet communication today is empowering every business to expand its potential target markets and geographic reach. You are now able to communicate with customers previously untapped by your traditional sales and marketing methods. Architects and lighting designers now have infinitely more access to clients and prospects than could have been dreamed of just a few years ago. These same architects and lighting designers also have more product options than ever before, from manufacturers and/or distributors they never knew existed. Distributors and independent sales representatives now have more ability to promote products and communicate with potential customers more effectively, including those in geographically remote locations or under-served territo58 LD+A/April 2000 ries. Manufacturers not previously considered for specifications now are on a more level “playing field” with larger, older or more localized businesses. e-Business Rule #5: Fasten your seat belt . . . doing business via the Internet is an exciting ride, but it is full of twists and turns. Marketing Your Illumination Services Opportunities for marketing on the Internet may seem like a “forest” in itself. These opportunities include banner ads, on-line directories, search engines, portals, marketplaces, link exchanges, commerce engines . . . and on and on. How can you spend any advertising dollars for e-commerce wisely? To answer these questions, you must go back to your “e-Roadmap,” your business plan. It should contain an outline of your target audience, client group(s) and all of the sales influences and decision makers in your buying chain. You should then outline in detail the keywords and phrases a customer might use to locate your product(s) or service on the Internet. This information will enable you to make educated decisions when selecting the right Internet marketing and advertising service, and method. Banner advertisements are a popular form of Internet marketing. These are the graphically displayed advertisements that appear on other websites that send people to yours. Successful banner campaigns, like most forms of advertisement, depend both on location and timing of your message. Internet search engines offer media options to display your banners based on a user’s key word or key word phrase and bring in thousands of potential users per day. Website communities, product-specific search engines, website directories, portals, or even marketplaces provide a more “focused” audience. They offer many forms of advertisements and product visibility opportunities, both in terms of the quantity of global website traffic, and the quality of the “browsing” audience. Great sources for “community” exposure in the professional lighting industry are those managed by dot-orgs of our industry such as the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (iesna.org), American Institute of Architects (aiaonline.com), or the International Association of Lighting Designers (iald.org). Extensive product visibility can be obtained through industryfocused sites, such as lightingresource.com, which profile entire catalogs of products for manufacturers including photometry; or lightsearch.com, which provides an industry directory service and product manufacturer search function. As with other forms of public relations, word of mouth is the most effective and most economical form of marketing on the Internet. People communicate and share experiences with peers. You need to develop an Internet presence that welcomes customers, is easy to navigate, and provides customers with what they want, when they want it. e-Business Rule #6: Your Internet web address should be printed and publicly available as often as your telephone number. From a FAIR E-Tale to a Great E-Tale Global interconnectivity made possible through the Internet is bringing about a tidal wave of change, affecting every aspect of our personal and professional lives. From 2000 to 2010, it has been estimated that two billion people will go online, dramatically changing the business landscape. Each of us has an opportunity, and a responsibility, to learn, share, and guide our industry through this exciting forest of technology. Follow your customer—remember those e-business rules and you can help “light” the way for yet another great E-tale. Nancy Snyder is founder and president of Enlightenment, a marketing information technologies company, and of Lighting Resource (http://www.lightingresource.com), an Internet product and marketing resource for the lighting industry. She is speaking at LIGHTFAIR 2000 on effective e-business strategies, Internet marketing and evisioning for our industry. For additional information, contact her at (877) 287-5265, Ext. 2892, or via e-mail at [email protected]. www.iesna.org of LED cluster sizes, electrical bases, sunlight-visible colors, industry-standard voltages and with a life span measured in years not hours, SolarLED is the ideal complement for solar photovoltaic cell setups. Circle 100 on Reader Service Card. W.A.C. Lighting Company will introduce new track heads and linear track fixtures featuring an all-new LIGHT PRODUCTS Brushed Nickel Finish, at LIGHTFAIR INTERNATIONAL 2000. The low- and line-voltage track heads will be available in the new finish. These fixtures provide uniform, glare-free illumination from a low-profile ceiling or wall track system. They are designed to accommodate a wide range of halogen lamps, from the MR11 to the PAR38. They are easily dimmable and install quickly on W.A.C. Lighting’s various track systems. Circle 98 on Reader Service Card. Meyda Tiffany introduces the Mica Lighting Collection, handcrafted with the same natural materials used by crafters from the Arts and Crafts Movement. Meyda Tiffany’s new Mica Collection features shades combining mineral mica flakes with organic shellac – distinguishing each fixture or table lamp by its unique variations of mineral deposit patterns and amber color tones. and 11 inches deep, the fixture is designed specifically for the “big box” retailer. A compact ballast capsule provides a clean, unobtrusive image. The ballast, which is warranted for five years, is encapsulated in a potting material for excellent thermal dissipation and sound absorption. Superior glass optics provide optimum efficiency and photometric stability. An Endural prismatic glass reflector retains its appearance over time and is not affected by high temperature, static dirt attraction, or ultraviolet exposure. The Retailer is offered with both standard and pulse start metal halide technologies. The luminaire is prewired with cord and NEMA plug or the Holoflex flexible wiring system. An attached snap hook facilitates quick installation. A factory set light center ensures actual fixture installation matches the original design criteria. Options available include “EM” quartz restrike, fusing and a safety chain. The Retailer is available with a glass only aluminum covered glass reflector. Circle 99 on Reader Service Card. LEDtronics, Inc. announced the availability of its new direct incandescent replacement SolarLED cluster lamp for photovoltaic renewable energy systems. SolarLED is an energy efficient, environmentally attractive alternative to incandescent lamps in applications where sunlight is converted to electricity. SolarLED’s low power requirements and high-intensity light output enables the use of smaller and less expensive solar cell modules and batteries than necessitated by incandescent bulbs. With a choice 60 LD+A/April 2000 Circle 96 on Reader Service Card. Circle 97 on Reader Service Card. The new Retailer luminaire from Holophane Corporation combines a simple, uncluttered appearance with long ballast life and quiet operation. Measuring 15.4 inches wide The highly crafted brushed aluminum fixture from SPI Lighting is designed for outdoor applications. The design can be modified by changing the window configuration, selecting from a variety of finish combinations, and varying both the up and downlight illumination. Standard sizes are 22" and 30" high, 13.5" wide and 9.5" deep. Fixtures use a combination of fluorescent and metal halide lamps. www.iesna.org Circle 95 on Reader Service Card. Innova Electronic High Intensity Discharge Ballast Technology introduces dimmable electronic ballasts for metal halide and CDM lamps ranging from 35 to 150 W. Recent advancement in semiconductor technologies have enabled developments leading to the smallest, lightest weight, coolest running ANSI-compliant ballast in the industry that is cost competitive. This is a high performing HID lamp controller with hardened EMI/RFI input section, low THD, and 0.99 power factor that has constant lamp wattage control against AC line fluctuation as well as lamp variations and aging. The one-piece unit (built-in igniter) simplifies installation. The low-frequency, soft-edge square wave lamp drive eliminates lamp flicker, acoustic resonance and extends lamp life. The key factor behind this product development has been integration of decades of expertise in high density power electronic design, HID physics, and industrial product development. Circle 94 on Reader Service Card. Simkar Corporation’s Vandgard high endurance lighting is now manufactured using the most corrowww.iesna.org sive resistant aluminum available (Marine Grade Aluminum, Rated ‘A’), to ensure a longer life and require less maintenance. Aluminum construction offers the maximum protection from all types of weather and salt water. The high quality aluminum fixtures prevent heat buildup, leading to longer ballast life. Aluminum also means ballasts cycle less than steel back models, extending the lamp’s life and lowering maintenance costs. The range of available wattages in most of the Vanguard fixtures has been expanded and many compact fluorescents have been added for applications requiring brighter yet more economical lighting solutions. New models include Quad lighting, HID lamps, and a variety of lamping options for T12 and T8 ballasts. They are vandal resistant, moisture and dust proof, quickly installed, with tamperproof screws, a prismatic diffuser, and a two year warranty. is the Ruud Flat Back Cylinder (TFB Series) track light and the Translucent Lens (SE1 Series) fixture. gauge, extruded aluminum for maximum rigidity. Circle 91 on Reader Service Card. Circle 92 on Reader Service Card. Circle 93 on Reader Service Card. Ruud Lighting offers two new lamp designs, the High Bay A Series for retail, commercial, and industrial applications; and the Projection Cutoff E4 Series for building mounted security lighting. Also available Lithonia Lighting introduced a fullfeatured new line of track and display lighting, a flexible tool for a variety of accent and display applications. The system is available with classical track head designs for a variety of popular lamps and enhanced by a full selection of accessories, filters, and louvers. They are available in one- and twocircuit configurations and constructed of low-profile, heavy- Morlite Systems, Inc. offers a new Morlite Defiant Series luminaire. Designed for high vandal resistance, high-output, low-glare lighting in outdoor public environments. The Defiant Series wall mount luminaires have fixture lenses, injection-molded polycarbonate optically ribbed for low glare with high impact resistance. All painted parts and housing are finished in durable, chip- and scratch-resistant black baked polyester powder coat. Finishes are made to withstand 1000 salt spray hours. commands. The speaker-independent operation enables it to work with anyone’s voice right out of the box. It will program any command or language desired. EZ-Snap mounting brackets which facilitate quick installations and a positive fit. Integrated with the TruLux module is a patented Starfire spectral metal reflector that yields in an evenly distributed linear beam spread. Circle 89 on Reader Service Card. Circle 90 on Reader Service Card. The hands free IntelaVoice Wall Switch by VOS Systems, Inc. lets you command your lights on, off, and dim. They have just added the dimming control. The IntelaVoice Wall Switch takes the place of a standard wall switch and incorporates the latest technology in speech recognition. Utilizing patented state-of-the-art technology, the wall switch creates instant ambiance with “lights low,” “lights off,” “lights dim” Circle 88 on Reader Service Card. Starfire Lighting, Inc. has created Tru-Lux Cove and Wall Luminaires that provide high-performance beam control, from T2 and T5 sources. Typical applications include coves, wall lighting, and remote lighting applications. Four individual models comprise the TruLux series. Tru-Lux TB is the “basic” model, ideal for cove lighting applications. It is little more than 1.5 inches deep and 2.25 inches high. Tru-Lux Housings are light-weight, prewired extruded aluminum with Peter Parts Electronics announced a new miniature LCD display. These active matrix displays are available in 4 and 5.6 inch diagonal sizes and accept 1 V p-p NTSC composite signal video inputs. The 4 inch display features 442 x 238 pixel resolution, while the 5.6 inch model had 960 x234. Both displays deliver excellent viewing under most conditions. Both require a 12 V input voltage and consume just a few watts of power. The LIGHTING AUTHORITY Swaravoski and 30% Premium Lead. The line includes flush mounts, wall sconces, and ceiling fixtures. Circle 85 on Reader Service Card. Circle 87 on Reader Service Card. Martin Professional of Denmark has introduced a new DJ effect for the mobile DJ and club/discotheque market. The new Juggler is a plug and play DJ and club scanner special effects fixture which keeps 20 beams aloft simultaneously, producing a colorful flower effect using a combined color/ gobo wheel. The Juggler is a high quality output effect using a 250 W halogen lamp with a long life lamp also available. 64 W.A.C. Lighting has unveiled Line Voltage Halogen Light Bars. Designed as an alternative to fluorescent undercounter fixtures, the Line Voltage Light Bars feature 25 W halogen lamps that provide a pure white natural source. Available for hard wiring in a permanent installation or to be used as portables, the fixtures are equipped with frosted lenses that diffuse light well. The miniaturized Halogen Light Bar unit, which features a shallow depth and narrow width, gives an even light spread over a wide area. The light bars provide an in-out access at the back wall, which is for easy installation of multiple fixtures. All units are modular and have knock outs at the end for continuous runs. Each is equipped with a high/low dimmer switch, offered in both white and metallic bronze finishes. Circle 86 on Reader Service Card. Circle 84 on Reader Service Card. Glow Lighting Inc. has introduced The Rosette Dreams Collection of Crystal Lighting Fixtures. Each chandelier in the collection is outlined with rosette-shaped crystals. It is designed to mask the steel frame of the ceiling fixture with intricate garlands of rosettes. The Rosette Dreams Collection offers three grades of crystal including A 24 V lighting system has been introduced by the Halo Lighting brand of Cooper Lighting. Named Linea, the new system and streamlined lamp holders combine the inherent advantages of low voltage halogen lighting and respond to facility manager requirements for high performance, high reliability, and aesthetically pleasing design LD+A/April 2000 and form. Delivering heavy duty performance in a very small package, the lamp holders are offered in either 35 W MR11 or 50 W MR16 versions. With Linea’s capability for longer runs and more lamp holders per a given length, applications like wall washing, accent and task lighting are given more dynamic variations. Lamp holders, available in white, matte black, and silver, feature 338 degree rotation and 0–90 degree elevation for precise aiming. Designed with solid connectors and large cross-section square buss bars, Linea offers unparalleled service for the day-to-day demands of the business world. Circle 83 on Reader Service Card. Luxo Corporation has developed a wedge-shaped light fixture design, all but invisible when attached to the underside of overhead cabinets, shelves, or slotted panel-system verticals. The Luxo 20/20 Asymmetric Task Light Series can also be mounted directly to vertical panels and walls. A choice of integral low-profile mounting brackets attach directly to the vertical or horizontal mounting surfaces. Abundant asymmetric, glare-free illumination is provided on all applications. With those above eye level, Luxo offers optional asymmetric louvers that snap onto the 20/20 to prevent intrusion of overhead glare. A swivel mechanism allows 325 degree rotation of the unit, left or right, directing the shadow-free light across work surfaces at right angles, rather than directly on them. The light source is an 18 W, U-shaped compact fluorescent lamp, with a choice of miniaturized electromagnetic or electronic ballasting. This series employs a lightweight, high-impact plastic housing with a ribbed top and convenient front on/off switch. www.iesna.org Discovering Stage Lighting, Francis Reid, Focal Press, Oxford. 1998. 128 pages. Reviewed by Christine Myres Francis Reid, author of Designing for the Theatre, has created an equally effective and interesting text focusing on lighting in Discovering Stage Lighting. Mr. Reid is an experienced theater practitioner who has been involved in hundreds of productions of every kind. He lectures worldwide and is author of several books on theater design and technology. Reid has revised his excellent book on stage lighting to include recent advances in lamp design, but the basic text remains the same. I found it to be well written, well organized, and useful (despite the fact that I am not a theater designer). First published in 1993, it continues to present basic information from the perspective of a 40-year veteran, who insists on ‘discovery’ through observation and application. We are reminded that lighting is only a part of the production and is dependent on context; the designer must look at script, staging, sets, costumes, and so on to effectively integrate lighting into the overall production. The parallels to lighting the interior are clear, and many of the techniques can be translated into applications for interior design. The first section of the book emphasizes equipment rather than technique, and chapters are devoted to filters and controls, safety, the design process, and project analysis. The second part contains projects that help the reader explore a variety of techniques as applied to a variety of situations. This book www.iesna.org broadened my understanding of lighting by presenting familiar fixtures and techniques in a setting unfamiliar to me, and I found it very stimulating. The emphasis on observation as a learning tool is particularly helpful to the educator. The text indirectly suggests several useful exercises to increase our awareness of how light appears, whether outdoors or indoors; filtered through trees or around lighting in art, photography, film, and video. This book would be useful for any lighting student, educator, or practitioner, even though it is primarily directed towards theater lighting. section is included which discusses the importance of finished and surface reflectances on the performance and well being of inhabitants. A discussion on incandescent, fluorescent, cold cathode, and HID sources explains their associated advantages and disadvantages, Christine R. Myres is an assistant professor in interior design at the University of Arkansas. She has been teaching lighting for fifteen years. color temperatures and color rendering, power consumption, lamp life, lumen maintenance, size, type, distribution, and efficacy. A detailed, comparative table regarding the characteristics of these light sources is provided. The electrical distribution system portion of this publication discusses general, emergency, and battery powered lighting. Voltage, lighting system considerations, and grounding are presented. In the lighting design section, quantity as well as quality of light for marine applications is explored and fixture selection is addressed. Lighting designers are urged in their visual task analyses to pay special attention to the unique challenges of on-board boredom and fatigue and the need to operate vessels under low lighting levels. Recommended Practice for Marine Lighting is very well organized and easy to use. Photographs show a good range of marine applications from floating casinos and cruise ships to aircraft carriers and offshore oil rigs. A thorough discussion of exterior illumination is provided and considerations include: cargo handling, passenger boarding, security, maintenance, recreation, navigation, and many more. A detailed section on maintenance is provided. A section on performing an infield lighting survey for lighting performance evaluation is discussed. Survey forms for instrumentation, electrical system operation and lighting measurements are supplemented by recommended illumination measurement and calculation forms. This is an excellent specialty publication Recommended Practice for Marine Lighting, The Marine Lighting Committee of the IES. New York: IESNA. 1997. Reviewed by Paulette R. Hebert The newly revised guide addresses all types of ships, small craft, and marine platforms and contains recommendations for illuminating many interior and exterior marine activities. Included are recommendations on alleviating the potential marine lighting problems associated with shock, corrosion, vibration, temperature variation, fire, radio frequency interference, and space and weight constraints. Navigational, operational, safety, and emergency lighting are also considered. Task visibility factors are discussed. A detailed recommended illuminance level table is provided. A LIGHT LITERATURE LD+A/April 2000 67 geared toward those who design, own, manage, or maintain vessels or related structures. Paulette R. Herbert, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the School of Architecture at the University of Louisiana in Lafayette. She is active in networking the book reviews and is integral to their appearance in LD+A. Fiber Optic Lighting: a Guide for Specifiers, Russell L. Deveau, Upworld Publishing, Inc. New York, NY. 1997. 158 pages. Reviewed by by Linda Fisher Fiber Optic Lighting: A guide for Specifiers, is a very good resource for the reader interested in learning about the technology, capabilities, and limitations, and specification issues involved in the use of fiber optic illumination systems. Throughout the book, the author provides the designer with the basic concepts needed to understand and apply the technology of fiber optics within architectural lighting design solutions. Especially helpful is the key terms section within each chapter that defines the vocabulary used within. Clear, easily understood graphic diagrams are provided, when needed, to visually illustrate a variety of concepts. The theory of operation, particulars of specifying, principles of operation, efficiency factors, material selection, and condensed case studies are provided within the first seven chapters are supported by a concluding chapter on the future of fiber optic illumination. Chapter four is especially useful to the reader trying to discern the difference between the use of glass or plastic in a fiber optic system. The author does an excellent job in identifying the general various characteristics of how these two systems differ and are similar in performance. This information is useful to the person who is designing and specifying fiber optics for the first time and gives them the tools to view manufacturer’s claims with a more educated eye and make more informed decisions. The 20 case studies illustrated in the book are somewhat too abbreviated in their approach, but do 68 LD+A/April 2000 offer a section on the reason for the selection of fiber optics in the design solution presented, which offers the reader an opportunity to learn about appropriate application methods and solutions. The author is extremely successful in reaching his specific goal in writing this book—giving the reader a basic understanding of fiber optic illumination. Any design professional, design student, or facilities manager would be well served to use this book as a valuable resource in the understanding and specification of fiber optic illumination. Fiber Optics in Architectural Lighting: Methods, Design and Applications, Gersil N. Kay. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. 1999. 298 pages. Reviewed by by Linda Fisher Fiber Optics in Architectural Lighting; Methods, Design and Applications, written by Gersil N. Kay, is an outstanding book for anyone interested in learning more about the art and science of fiber optics used in architectural lighting design. The author’s intent is to offer practical help, through her 40 years of field experience and 20 years of educating others about this very specialized lighting system, to those requiring or providing artificial light. The book is divided into six interesting and informative chapters, ranging from a brief story of illumination in general, followed by an introduction to light pipe technology and fiber optics. Other significant issues such as; determining the scope of a project, the design and installation of fiber optics, and economic consider- ations are thoughtfully explained, supported by the concluding chapter which highlights a variety of representative case studies. The entire book is well written and easily understood, but the introductory chapter dealing with the History and Technology of Fiber optics and the Light Pipe, is especially noteworthy in it’s ability to lay the groundwork for the professional or layperson’s understanding of the subject matter. This chapter thoroughly explains the topic of fiber optics and its use in architectural lighting design, providing the reader with a clear understanding of the three properties of fiber optics—cost effectiveness, discreet, sophisticated image, and its safety factors when used as a lighting design solution. The application examples given in the book’s final chapter, contains over 120 pages of excellent visual materials and case study analysis of a variety of institutional, commercial, and residential design solutions. The examples given are varied in their scope and complexity, and provide the reader with a strong understanding on the methods, design, and application of fiber optics. The attractive color photographs provided in this section, further support the reader’s understanding of fiber optics as an architectural lighting design tool. The information given in this book would be suitable for design and engineering professionals, design students, lighting designers, architects, interior designers, facility managers, and lay persons interested learning more about the state-of-the-art technology involved in fiber optics. The reader will be able to enjoy this book as a way to learn more about the topic, as well as a resource for technical information when designing and specifying fiber optic illumination. Professor Linda S. Fisher, IIDA, IDEC, coordinates the interior design program at Kean University, Union, NJ. She has worked extensively as a professional interior designer, including specifying and designing lighting, and as an educator teaches courses in design studio, lighting, building systems, and interior finishes. www.iesna.org