Committed Development - Newark and Sherwood District Council

Transcription

Committed Development - Newark and Sherwood District Council
Newark & Sherwood District Council
District Wide Transport Study
Technical Note 3 – Trip Generation, Distribution & Assignment
1
Introduction
1.1
This note is the third in a series of Technical Notes summarising the
assessment methodology to be applied in the district-wide Transport Study.
These notes will be submitted to the Transport Study Steering Group for
approval throughout the preparation of the study.
1.2
This note covers the approach for estimating trip generation, trip distribution
and assignment onto transport networks within the district.
2
Committed Developments
2.1
For the purposes of this study land-use developments will be split into two
categories; committed land-use developments located within the Newark and
Sherwood District and land-use developments located in adjacent
Districts/Boroughs that are likely to result in trips through Newark and
Sherwood District.
2.2
To avoid double counting, trips between the District and land-use
developments outside of the District will be ignored since these are included
in the trips generated by growth within the District (although it is
acknowledged that land-use developments in adjacent Districts/Boroughs
may change the distribution of trips to/from the District).
Committed Land-Use Developments within the District
2.3
Information has been obtained from the planning department at Newark and
Sherwood District Council regarding all committed land-use developments
within the District (proposed developments with planning permissions yet to
be implemented, or developments already under construction but yet to be
completed or occupied).
2.4
Only committed land-use developments that have the potential to generate
material changes in existing transport conditions have been taken into
account and ‘material’ has been defined as housing developments comprising
50 or more dwellings, or employment/retail developments of 1,500sqm or
greater floor area. These thresholds are defined in the DfT / DCLG –
Guidance on Transport Assessment (March 2007) as the trigger points
requiring a Transport Statement to be submitted in support of a planning
application. So it is considered reasonable to assume that developments
smaller than these thresholds will have no material transport impacts.
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Page 1 of 6
1
06/10/2009
Land-Use Developments Outside of the District
2.5
As requested by Nottinghamshire County Council an assessment has also
been undertaken of the likely future traffic effects of committed and likely
developments in adjacent Districts/Boroughs. In order to do this information
has been obtained on development proposals within all Districts/Boroughs
that border Newark and Sherwood. In addition, information has also been
obtained for Nottingham City and Lincoln City because, whilst these do not
directly adjoin Newark and Sherwood District, they have the potential to be
significant trip generators.
2.6
Data has been obtained from a variety of sources including consultation with
the relevant local authority planning departments, relevant planning strategy
documents and data collected in support of the Highways Agency’s proposed
improvement of the A453 as the modelled area for this scheme covers many
of the Districts adjacent to Newark and Sherwood. Data has been obtained
for the following Districts/Boroughs:
•
•
•
•
•
•
2.7
•
•
•
•
•
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Only land-use developments that have the potential to generate material
changes in existing transport conditions have been taken into account (i.e.
greater than 50 dwellings, or greater than 1,500sqm of employment/retail).
In accordance with Department for Transport WebTAG guidance the data has
been summarised and categorised by likelihood of the development
proceeding using the following definitions of probability:
• Near Certain: The outcome will happen or there is a high probability
that it will happen.
• More Than Likely: The outcome is likely to happen but there is some
uncertainty.
• Reasonably Foreseeable: The outcome may happen, but there is
significant uncertainty.
• Hypothetical: There is considerable uncertainty whether the outcome
will ever happen.
2.8
The assessment has considered only those sites classified as ‘Near Certain’
and ‘More Than Likely’ (which is consistent with the A453 ‘core scenario’ as
agreed with the Highways Agency and local authorities). A summary of the
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Page 2 of 6
2
06/10/2009
developments that have been taken into account is presented in the table
below.
District/
Borough
Size of Development by Development Use-Class
100 sqm Floor Area
C3
(Dwellings)
B1
B2
B8
A1
C1 (Hotel
Beds)
Melton
1,267
213
213
213
0
0
Ashfield
3,251
3,346
1,657
1,657
0
250
Bassetlaw
100
1,731
1,731
1,731
0
0
Gedling
698
0
0
0
0
0
Mansfield
1,696
3,250
1,250
0
80
0
Rushcliffe
1,552
2,340
1,842
1,508
0
0
Lincoln City
1,044
1,416
932
968
0
0
Total
9,608
12,296
7,625
6,077
80
250
3
Committed Transport Improvement Schemes
3.1
The assessment year for the study is 2026 therefore committed infrastructure
projects that will be completed before 2026 will be taken into account. The
following committed schemes are considered likely to result in material
changes to existing transport conditions and will therefore be taken into
account in the study.
Various Rail Network/Service Enhancements – for those proposals that
are committed (i.e. have funding secured and a definite delivery programme)
the likely benefits in terms of improved capacity and service frequency will be
determined through discussion with the relevant operators and summarised
in the study.
A46(T) Newark to Widmerpool Improvement – forecast traffic flows will
be obtained from the documentation submitted in support of the successful
DfT funding submission bid.
Ollerton Roundabout Improvement Scheme – a previously committed
scheme to improve the A614/A616/B6075 Ollerton Roundabout has recently
been dropped from the LTP programme following a change of political
administration at Nottinghamshire County Council. The proposed
improvement had been taken to ‘Preferred Option’ stage but since funding
has been withdrawn a delivery date can no longer be confirmed. Details of
the proposal have therefore been included for information purposes but it has
not been considered as a committed improvement.
Various Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Improvement Schemes –
The proposed pedestrian route in Ollerton and the proposed
improvements/extensions to existing cycle networks in Newark and Ollerton
will be taken into account in the study.
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Page 3 of 6
3
06/10/2009
3.2
A study undertaken on behalf of the Highways Agency at the A46(T) Cattle
Market Roundabout in Newark proposes accident remedial measures be
implemented and identifies that the junction will be over operational capacity
by 2010. The proposed remedial scheme is however unlikely to result in
material changes in traffic capacity and will therefore not be taken into
account in the study.
3.3
There are various bus infrastructure enhancement schemes proposed across
the North Nottinghamshire area which will include minor local improvements
within Newark & Sherwood District. However, these are unlikely to
significantly affect existing bus capacity, service frequency or routes and will
therefore not be taken into account in the study. The Potterdyke
Regeneration proposals include for an improved bus station to replace the
existing facility off Lombard Street. This will be taken into account in the
study.
3.4
Any proposed bus service alterations/improvements will be identified through
dialogue with the relevant public transport operators and the County Council
and any relevant proposals will be confirmed to the Steering Group and taken
into account in the study (if there are any).
4
Development Trip Generation
4.1
The development scenarios to be assessed in the study comprise a
combination of residential and employment uses.
4.2
For residential sites the potential number of dwellings on individual sites will
be estimated using an assumed residential development density of 30
dwellings per hectare, as advised by the Steering Group.
4.3
Residential person trip generation will be estimated using TRICS Version
2009(a) ‘average’ trip rates for Houses Privately Owned. Modal split
percentages derived from Census 2001 ‘Travel to Work Data’ (for resident
population) will then be applied to the person trips in order to determine trips
by each relevant mode of transport.
5
Employment Trip Generation
5.1
For employment sites gross floor area (GFA) will be estimated as 40% of the
total site area.
5.2
Employment person trip generation will be estimated using TRICS Version
2009(a) ‘average’ trip rates for Business Parks which is representative of the
majority of sites to be assessed and will provide the basis for a robust
assessment. Modal split percentages derived from Census 2001 ‘Travel to
Work Data’ (for daytime population) will then be applied to the person trips in
order to determine trips by each relevant mode of transport.
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Page 4 of 6
4
06/10/2009
6
Trip Distribution
6.1
Trip distribution will be based on 2001 National Census Travel to Work
statistics for representative wards within the District. The attached plan
illustrates the locations of the proposed development sites being assessed
and indicates ward boundaries within the District. It should be noted that the
boundaries depicted are the 2001 ward boundaries so as to correspond with
the 2001 census ‘Travel to Work’ data (some boundaries were amended in
2006).
6.2
For proposed development in the following settlements the choice of
representative ward is straight forward as the development sites are
contained within a single ward boundary:
ƒ
Collingham
ƒ
Sutton-on-Trent
ƒ
Edwinstowe
ƒ
Clipstone
ƒ
Bilsthorpe
ƒ
Blidworth
ƒ
Rainworth
ƒ
Farnsfield
ƒ
Lowdham
6.3
For proposed development at Ollerton and Boughton the Ollerton Ward has
been chosen as the most representative as it contains the majority of both
existing and proposed development.
6.4
For proposed development at Southwell the Southwell West Ward has been
chosen as the most representative as it contains the majority of both existing
and proposed development.
6.5
For proposed development at Newark on Trent the Bridge Ward has been
chosen as the most representative as it contains a representative mix of
existing residential and employment uses.
6.6
Forecast traffic flows (2026) for the Newark on Trent urban area have been
obtained from the VISUM model built in support of development proposals to
the south of Newark. The model data includes the traffic effects of all
relevant committed developments.
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Page 5 of 6
5
06/10/2009
6.7
In order to distribute trips onto the existing transport networks the
representative wards will be treated as origins for residential development
and destinations for employment development. Travel to work data for these
wards will then be used to identify respective destination and origin wards
and modal splits.
6.8
Routes between the identified origins and destinations for each
representative ward will be identified within the District using a manual
process observing the shortest route available identified using route planning
software. Where two or more routes of equal length are available trips will be
split equally between the available routes.
7
Trip Assignments
6.9
Development generated vehicle trips will be assigned onto the ‘A’ and ‘B’ road
network within the District using a spreadsheet containing coded road links to
represent the identified routes. The resultant data will then be read into GIS
and represented graphically on a plan of the study area.
6.10
A GIS trip assignment will be generated for each development scenario. This
will allow the cumulative traffic effects of the individual sites within each
growth scenario to be identified and the relative impacts of the different
scenarios to be compared. Generated trips will be presented graphically using
network ‘stress plans’.
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Page 6 of 6
6
06/10/2009
Appendix E
7
N&SDC Transport Study
Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Rail
The tables that follow set out proposed and potential transport infrastructure schemes by mode, some of which appear more than once as they appear in numerous
documents. Schemes outside of Newark and Sherwood are included where they would have a positive impact on the district.
Document
Proposal
Implementation
date
Cost incl
Funders
Agencies
Implementing
2009 Updated
comments
National
Documents
Network Rail Route
Plan 2008 – East
Coast Mainline/ East
Coast Mainline
Route Utilisation
Strategy (Feb 2008)
Network Rail Route
Plan 2008 - South
Trans-Pennine,
South
Yorkshire and
Lincolnshire
Network Rail Route
Plan 2008 - Midland
Mainline and East
Midlands
East Coast Main Line (ECML) level crossing
closure programme. This will lead to increased
capacity and improved safety and performance
across the route. This is a route wide project
therefore uncertain if will include those within
the district
2009 – 2014
Bathley Lane level crossing Overhead Line
(OHL) enhanced protection. This will lead to
improved performance
Gauge enhancement (between Peterborough
and Doncaster) to accommodate the carriage of
deep sea container traffic on the East Coast
Main Line north of Peterborough
Capacity relief Peterborough to Doncaster
enhancement of the GN/GE Joint Line via
Spalding and Lincoln. This will lead to increased
capacity and improved performance on the
ECML
W10 gauge enhancement from Newark to
Doncaster via Swinderby and Gainsborough.
Capability to carry deep sea containers on
standard deck height wagons. Provides
additional capacity when ECML cannot carry
W10 traffic
Nottingham
to
Newark
resignalling.
Enhancement element: increased line speed
and capacity between Nottingham and Newark
Nottingham hub. Redevelopment, potential
additional platform, improved waiting/retail
facilities. Enhanced station and interchange
facilities
2010
Network Rail Discretionary
Fund
Third Party
2010
2011 – 2014
2013/14
2012/13
Network Rail Discretionary
Fund / Third Party
2009 – 2013
Third Party/ Network Rail
Local Authorities
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
£20 million
(total)
NCC granted
planning
permission
December 2008
06/10/2009
8
N&SDC Transport Study
Document
Proposal
Nottingham to Lincoln journey time
improvements (under consideration by Network
Rail and local authorities)
Department for
Transport — East
Midlands Regional
Planning Assessment
May 2007
National Rail
Strategic Plan 2007
Network Rail
Strategic
Plan Update 2008
Office of Rail
Regulation June
2008 – Periodic
Review
Implementation
date
2013
Agencies
Implementing
Network Rail discretionary
fund, Nottinghamshire CC,
Lincolnshire CC
Car parking capacity enhancements especially
on ECML (Each case requires further
consideration)
2007 – 2014
Local Transport Plans and
franchise commitments by
train operators
Direct London to Lincoln services (via ECML)
2010
National Express East
Coast
Station improvement scheme - Newark North
Gate is on list of 150 stations that may benefit
from the enhancement scheme
ECML level crossing closure programme (route
wide)
Capacity relief to the East Coast Main Line
(route wide)
ECML Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) Optional
enhancement project (route wide)
East Coast Main Line level crossing closures
(route wide)
Capacity Relief to East Coast Main Line (Joint
Line via Spalding)
2009 – 2014
2009 – 2013
2008 – 2011
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Cost incl
Funders
£150 million
(total)
Network Rail Local
Funding
£20 million
(total)
£248 million
(total)
£35 million
Network Rail
£19 million
Network Rail
£233 million
Network Rail
2009 Updated
comments
4 year delay to
2013 (NCoC report
on RFA 19/12/08).
Required to
accommodate A46
being brought
forward and
retaining A453 in
programme
Up to 2,000 more
car parking spaces
are to be provided
by the end of the
seven-year
franchise for ECML
From December
2010 a new twohourly direct
Lincoln-London
service will be
introduced via
Newark, Grantham
and Peterborough
(National Express
website)
Improvement to
include platform
lifts
Network Rail
Network Rail
06/10/2009
9
N&SDC Transport Study
2008 Draft
Determinations
Regional Transport
Strategy (Part of
Draft
Regional Plan)
Network Rail
Stations
Strategy 2007
North
Nottinghamshire
Local Transport Plan
2006/07 - 2010/11
East Coast main Line Overhead Line
Enhancement
East Midlands Resignalling — Nottingham Area
Improved rail services between Lincoln and
major cities including London (services to be
provided both by East Midlands Trains and
National Express East Coast)
Maintenance and renewals plans:
Bleasby, Fiskerton, Lowdham, Newark Castle,
Newark North Gate, Rolleston, Thurgarton
2006 - 2021
Newark Castle to become fully staffed, i.e. to
have platform staff available throughout the
period of timetabled train services
2006 - 2015
GNER previously announced that lifts will be
installed at Newark North Gate by 2008
Unknown now
2009 - 2014
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
£30 million
Network Rail
£19 million
Network Rail
Network Rail
DfT Rail
Train Operators
£190,000 each
(except
Rolleston
£606,000)
£370 million
(UK wide total)
Network Rail
Strategic Rail Authority/
Department for Transport
Access for All Fund
Train Operator
Slippage due to
change in operator.
Unknown whether
new operator will
retain this
commitment
06/10/2009
10
N&SDC Transport Study
Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Road
Document
Proposal
Implementation
date
Cost incl
Funders
Agencies
Implementing
2009 Updated
comments
National
Documents
Highways Agency —
A46 Newark to
Widmerpool
Improvement
Appraisal
Summary Table July
2007
Upgrade of 28km single carriageway to dual
carriageway and elimination of all existing at
grade junctions, except the northern terminal
roundabout at Newark, and replacing them
where appropriate with full grade separation.
Approx 15 km of scheme is offline from existing
alignment
Includes a bypass for Farndon
2009 – 2011
£348 million
Highways Agency
Construction Engineers
appointed by Highway
Agency
A46/ A1 Winthorpe Junction Improvement,
Newark
A46 Newark — Widmerpool Improvement
A1 Peterborough — Blyth Junction
Improvements
2016 - 2021
£5 million >
Highways Agency
2009 – 2011
Complete 2009
£87 million
Highways Agency
Highways Agency
See above
Section between
Markham Moor and
Gonerby affects
Newark. Complete
on site March 2009
Kelham Bypass
Possible inclusion in
LTP3 (2011 onwards)
£15 million
(approx)
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Low priority against
RFA criteria (NCC
cabinet report re
RFA on 30/9/08),
however LTP2
mentions as likely
LTP3 major scheme
Collingham Bypass
Uncertain, not for
Nottinghamshire County
Low priority against
Public Inquiry
closed on 18/9/08
with decision
published on
19/12/08. £174m
additional DfT
funding
contribution
announced Dec 08/
EMRA confirmed
still Regional
Priority in Feb 09.
Scheme to open by
late 2011 now
Regional
Documents
Regional Transport
Strategy (Part of
Draft
Regional Plan)
Local Documents
North
Nottinghamshire
Local Transport Plan
2006/07 - 2010/11
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
06/10/2009
11
N&SDC Transport Study
submission scheme
excluded from
current LTP
Document
Proposal
Ollerton Roundabout Improvement Scheme
Implementation
date
2009 – 2011
Enlarged roundabout or fully signalised junction
improvement
North
Nottinghamshire
Local Transport Plan
2006/07 - 2010/11
Casualty reduction schemes; problem sites,
route treatments, speed management measures
and traffic calming. Projects ready for
implementation
Safer routes network - Development of
networks of safer routes, 20mph/school safety
zones. Linked to school travel plans. Status
ranges from design in progress to ready for
implementation
Intelligent transport systems — SCOOT / MOVA
and CCTV congestion monitoring. Includes
MOVA Newark (design stage)
Rural traffic management - including the village
review, interactive signs, gateway treatments,
small village speed review, small scale
treatments, TROs, and accessibility
improvements. Prioritised by area. Status
ranges from design in progress to ready for
implementation
Urban traffic management - interactive signs,
gateway treatments, small scale treatments,
TROs, and accessibility improvements.
Prioritised by area. Status ranges from design in
progress to ready for implementation
North
Nottinghamshire
Local Transport Plan
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Classified roads — Schemes prioritised on
condition. Ready for implementation
Non classified roads - schemes prioritised on
2006/07 2010/2011
Cost incl
Funders
£3.1 million
LTP &
developer
contributions
Range from
<£250,000 £500,000
Council
RFA criteria (NCC
cabinet report re
RFA on 30/9/08)
Agencies
Implementing
Nottinghamshire County
Council
2009 Updated
comments
Preferred option is
enlarged
roundabout (NCC
cabinet report re
options 30/4/08)
Ongoing
Nottinghamshire County
Council
2006/07 2010/2011
Range from
<£250,000 £500,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Ongoing
2006/07 2010/2011
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Ongoing
2006/07 2010/2011
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Ongoing
2006/07 2010/2011
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
2006/07 2010/2011
2006/07 -
>£1 million
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Nottinghamshire County
Ongoing. 2008/9
ITM budget
allocated £10k to
A612 Gonalston
Signing and Lining
and £5k to King
Clipstone TM trial
site
Ongoing
>£1 million
Ongoing
06/10/2009
12
N&SDC Transport Study
2006/07 - 2010/11
condition with local input. Ready for
implementation
Bridge Strengthening schemes for 40 tonne
vehicles prioritised by route importance. Ready
for implementation
Southwell Bypass
Implementation
date
Uncertain
Ollerton Bypass
Uncertain
Unknown
Proposal
2006/07 2010/2011
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Council
£250,000 £500,000
(total)
Cost incl
Funders
Unknown
Document
Nottinghamshire
County Council
Cabinet Report on
Regional Funding
Allocation Review
(30/9/08)
2010/2011
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Ongoing
Agencies
Implementing
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Nottinghamshire County
Council
2009 Updated
comments
Low priority against
RFA criteria
Low priority against
RFA criteria
06/10/2009
13
N&SDC Transport Study
Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Bus
Document
Proposal
Implementation
date
Cost incl
Funders
Agencies
Implementing
2009 Updated
comments
Local Documents
North
Nottinghamshire
Local Transport Plan
2006/07 - 2010/11
(Bus Strategy for
North
Nottinghamshire
March 2006)
Area wide bus priority - Bus priority including
information, marketing, infrastructure and small
scale traffic Management measures applied to
an area, such as a • district local centre.
Newark ready for implementation
Public Transport Accessibility —Raised kerbs,
physical access, bus boarders, bus stop lighting
(including solar), information, CCTV and other
supporting measures Rural towns and villages
to improve accessibility, safety and security for
public transport users.
Locations include: Newark Town centre (ready
for implementation), Rural Towns and Villages
(design stage), Clipstone (Ready for
implementation), Rainworth and Southwell
(Design stage)
Bus location and electronic information Electronic displays, real time information and
‘Transport Direct’ journey Planner (Area wide)
Design Stage
Ticketing - Integrated ticketing, prepaid and
smartcard systems (Area wide)
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
NN area wide
allocation made in
2008/9 LTP
programme
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000 per
project
Nottinghamshire County
Council
£30,000 allocated
in 2008/9 NN LTP
ITM programme to
Newark
(Collingham)
corridor. £80,000
allocated for
Rainworth /
Kelham / Southwell
route
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
2006/07 – 2010/11
£250,000 –
£500,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Upgrading of interchange facilities - Relocation
of bus stops, coordinated information, lighting
and footway improvements at key nodes in
district/local centres. Access Rural interchanges,
improvements to local rail network. Includes
Newark (Design in progress)
2006/07 – 2010/11
£250,000 –
£500,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
NN area wide
allocation made in
2008/9 LTP
programme
NN area wide
allocation made in
2008/9 LTP
programme
NN area wide
allocation made in
2008/9 LTP
programme
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
06/10/2009
14
N&SDC Transport Study
Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Cycling and Walking
Document
Proposal
Implementation
date
Cost incl
Funders
Agencies
Implementing
2009 Updated
comments
Local Documents
North
Nottinghamshire
Local Transport Plan
2006/07 - 2010/11
Pedestrian route development in urban / district
centres and rural areas
Locations include: Sherwood Drive, Ollerton
(ready for implementation)
Cycle Network - Including shared pedestrian on
and off carriageway routes, urban and rural
routes, upgrading of existing facilities and
missing links
Schemes include: Beacon Hill Newark; London
Road, Newark; Forest Road, Ollerton (ready for
implementation)
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Ongoing. No
specific schemes in
2008/9 ITM
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000 per
project
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Rights of Way - Implementation of schemes
identified in Rights of Way Improvement Plan
programme.
Schemes include: Footpaths #28,48 & 54,
Southwell (ready for implementation)
Local schemes prioritised on an area basis
New crossing facilities - Instillation of new and
upgrading of signal crossings and refuges.
Prioritised on need (Ready for implementation)
Access for disabled people - Dropped crossings,
facilities at signal crossings and physical access
improvement schemes. Prioritised on area basis
(Ready for implementation)
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
NN LTP 2008/9
ITM allocation
shows £50,000
allocated for
Balderton to
Fernwood (works)
and £3,000 for
Lincoln Road,
Newark (design).
Lowdham to Burton
Joyce removed
from programme
through increased
costs?
No specific
schemes allocated
in ITM programme
in 2008/9
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
2006/07 – 2010/11
<£250,000
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Footways — Schemes prioritised on condition
with local input (Ready for implementation)
2006/07 – 2010/11
£500,000 – £1
million
Nottinghamshire County
Council
Technical Note 3
Appendix E
Ongoing. No
specific schemes in
2008/9 ITM
£25k 2008/9 ITM
allocation for
Newark &
Sherwood dropped
crossing
programme
Ongoing
06/10/2009
15
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Analysis of Committed Employment Development Sites Within the District
Methodology:
1. The employment growth scenario for the District that is being tested in the Transport Study is derived from the recommendations of the 'East Midlands Northern Sub Region
Employment Land Review' study which was undertaken by Nottinghamshire County Council (report dated March 2008). This recommends that the 'higher part of the 31 to 52.6ha
range' should be used to inform the District's emerging LDF'. The Transport Study therefore applies a District-wide employment growth scenario of 52.6ha in order to be consistent
with the findings of the Employment Land Review.
2. The 52.6ha is a gross site area but excludes future employment ‘land losses’ within the District. It has been estimated taking into account RSS growth including Newark Growth
Point, plus additional employment provision to reduce out-commuting from the District by one third (see East Midlands Northern Sub Region Employment Land Review report for
details).
3. The 52.6ha area is the forecast total employment growth within the District regardless of sites that may have extant planning permission. The study identifies that the District
currently has an over provision of allocated/consented employment land and that substantial de-allocation will be necessary in order to meet with the forecast growth. The 52.6ha
forecast also excludes employment land that will be 'lost' before the end of 2026 through de-allocation, change of use or failure to be developed.
4. For the purpose of the Transport Study no additional 'committed' employment developments therefore need be taken into acount otherwise the total employment growth being
assessed will exceed the 52.6ha forecast.
5. It is impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy where existing employment allocations/uses may be ‘lost’, or which sites with extant permissions will actually get developed
up to 2026. For the purposes of this strategic Transport Study the forecast employment growth of 52.6ha has therefore been distributed across the District on a pro-rata basis in
accordance with the location of assumed residential growth (i.e. close to residential growth to reduce commuting). However, it is acknowleged that the final spatial distribution of
employment growth within the district may, in parctice, differ from this assumption by the end of 2026.
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 1 of 7
16
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Analysis of Committed Residential Development Sites Within the District
Information supplied by N&SDC confirms the following committed residential developments:
Settlement
Newark, Balderton & Fernwood
Ollerton & Boughton
Clipstone
Rainworth
Southwell
Bilsthorpe
Blidworth
Collingham
Edwinstowe
Farnsfield
Lowdham
Sutton on Trent
Bleasby
Coddington
Elston
Farndon
Fiskerton Cum Morton
Gunthorpe
Halam
Harby
Norwell
North Muskham
Walesby
Winthorpe
Other Villages & Settlements
Total
Dwellings
1,737
514
123
4
76
90
54
47
81
23
6
18
5
9
4
1
7
2
9
13
4
15
15
1
215
3,073
Comments
>50 Dwellings
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Locations unknown & likely to be spread over many sites.
A theshold of 50 dwellings has been applied to determine whether or not residential developments are considered in the study.
This is the threshold identified in the DfT/CLG 'Guidance on Transport Assessment' March 2007, to determine whether or not a
Transport Statement is required in support of a planning application for residential developments.
Removing from the list those sites that are smaller than 50 dwellings gives the following:
Settlement
Newark, Balderton & Fernwood
Ollerton & Boughton
Clipstone
Southwell
Bilsthorpe
Blidworth
Edwinstowe
Total
Dwellings
1,737
514
123
76
90
54
81
2,675
Further analysis of the sites within Newark/Balderton/Fernwood is presented on the next worksheet.
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 2 of 7
17
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Analysis of Committed Residential Development Sites Within the District
Information supplied by N&SDC confirms the following committed residential developments within Newark/Balderton/Fernwood:
Town/Village
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
BALDERTON
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
Street
ACACIA ROAD
BARNBY ROAD
BROOKE CLOSE (2)
BROWING ROAD (19)
BULLPIT ROAD (9A)
BULLPIT ROAD (50)
GLOVERS LANE (10)
GREAT NORTH ROAD
GREAT NORTH ROAD
GROVE STREET (70)
HAWTON LANE
HAWTON LANE(30)
LONDON ROAD (r/o 252 & 254)
LONDON ROAD (Toll Bar House)
MAIN STREET (74A)
MAIN STREET (93A)
MAIN STREET (159)
MOUNT ROAD
PINFOLD LANE
SMITH STREET(20)
SPRING LANE (18)
SYKES LANE (19)
WARWICK ROAD
WARWICK ROAD(17/17a)
WOLFIT AVENUE
HAWTON LANE
ALBERT STREET (58)
ALBION STREET(Crown & Cushion)
ALBION STREET(Crown & Cushion)
APPLETONGATE
APPLETONGATE
APPLETON GATE (23)
BALDERTONGATE
BARNBY ROAD
BARNBY ROAD
BARNBY ROAD
BARNBY ROAD
BARNBY GATE(95)
BARNBYGATE(139)
BARNBYGATE(14)
BARNBY GATE (113-115)
BARNBY GATE (Former Gas Works)
BARNBY GATE (Mastercare)
BEACON HILL ROAD
BEACON HILL ROAD (35)
BEACON HILL ROAD (37)
BEACON HILL ROAD(240,240A,242)
BEACON HILL ROAD
BEACON HILL ROAD (117)
BEACON HILL ROAD (119)
BEACON HILL ROAD (121)
BEACON HILL ROAD (123)
BEACON HILL ROAD
BOWBRIDGE ROAD (The Bearings)
BOWBRIDGE ROAD (R/O 75-85)
CASTLEGATE
CASTLEGATE (R/O 55)
CASTLEGATE (Ye Olde Market)
CASTLEGATE (Ye Olde Market)
CROMWELL ROAD
CROSS STREET (1)
FAIRWAY(11A)
FARNDON ROAD
FARNDON ROAD
FARNDON ROAD (115)
FARNDON ROAD (Travellers Rest)
GEORGE STREET (1 The Maltings)
GEORGE STREET (The Old Maltings)
GEORGE STREET (Unit 2)
GEORGE STREET (Unit 5)
GUILDHALL STREET
GUILDHALL STREET
HARCOURT STREET (35)
HARCOURT STREET (35)
HATCHETS LANE(1A)
HAWTON ROAD (158)
HAWTON ROAD
KIRKGATE (12-14)
KIRKGATE (21-25)
KIRKGATE(38)
LENTON TERRACE(Warehouse)
LOMBARD STREET
LOMBARD STREET(Robin Hood Hotel)
LONDON ROAD (65A)
LONDON ROAD (Newark Town Bowls Club)
LOVERS LANE(The Old Chapel)
MASSEY STREET
MASSEY STREET
MIDDLETON ROAD (120)
MILL GATE
MILL GATE
MILL GATE (29)
MILL GATE(65)
MOUNT LANE(7-10)
NORTH GATE
NORTH GATE(17)
NORTHGATE(26/28)
NORTHGATE(35)
NORTH GATE (75-77)
NORTH GATE(Warwick & Richardson)
NORTH GATE (Hoval Farrar Ltd)
PELHAM STREET (15 & 17)
PRIMROSE AVENUE
QUEENS ROAD (Smiths Timber)
SLEAFORD ROAD(36)
SPRING GARDENS (28)
STODMAN STREET(40)
STODMAN STREET(8)
SYDNEY STREET
TOP ROW
VICTORIA STREET (10)
VICTORIA STREET (62)
WINTHORPE ROAD (40)
WINTHORPE ROAD(Maple Leaf)
WRIGHT STREET(13b)
TOTAL
Consented
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
830
320
3
1
1
1
4
1
1
14
1
4
3
2
1
34
2
6
210
1
2
8
12
11
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
1
8
2
9
100
4
16
4
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
89
1
10
8
7
2
20
4
1
1
13
25
17
6
6
3
9
3
1
1
1
1
1
6
2
6
4
2
46
3
5
1
8
27
38
2
69
6
1
4
99
11
1
4
60
49
225
8
3
2
2
2
2
1
10
1
1
1
2
17
3
2,612
Completed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
582
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
649
Balance
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
248
320
3
1
1
1
4
1
1
14
1
4
3
2
1
20
2
1
210
1
2
8
12
11
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
8
2
9
100
1
16
4
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
89
1
10
8
7
2
20
4
1
1
13
25
17
6
6
3
9
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
6
4
2
46
3
5
1
8
27
2
2
69
0
6
1
1
99
11
1
4
60
49
225
8
3
2
2
2
2
1
10
1
1
1
2
17
3
1,963
Sites > 50 Dwellings
Already included in the VISUM
model data.
568
Great North Road
Already included in the VISUM
model data.
210
Hawton Lane (Flowserve)
Already included in the VISUM
model data.
100
Barnby Gate
Already included in the VISUM
model data.
89
Bowbridge Road
Already included in the VISUM
model data.
69
Mill Gate
200 dwellings on North Gate
are already included in the
VISUM model data.
384
North Gate
1420
Notes:
1. The total number of committed dwellings in Newark on Trent differs slightly (+226 dwellings) from the information provided in the growth scenarios (see previous worksheet). This is mainly 2
due to the addition of the Flowserve Site (210 dwellings) which was not included in the growth scenario data. As a worse case the higher figure of 1,963 dwellings will be applied for the purposes of this study. 2. The cumulative traffic effects of all committed residential developments in the Newark/Balderton/Fernwood area (i.e. 1,963 dwellings) will be assessed on the wider highway network within the District. However, only those sites with greater than 50 dwellings will be specifically examined for the urban area of Newark as it is beyond the scope of this strategic study to distribute trips to all of the sites listed above on an individual basis. 3. A theshold of 50 dwellings has therefore been applied to determine whether or not residential developments are specifically considered in the study. This is the threshold identified in the DfT/CLG 'Guidance on Transport Assessment' March 2007, to determine whether or not a Transport Statement is required in support of a planning application for residential developments.
4. The VISUM model which is to be used to assess Newark on Trent already includes committed residential developments totalling 1,435 dwellings (see table below) which is essentially equal to the total for all committed residential sites with greater than 50 dwellings. No additional committed residential development within Newark on Trent therefore needs to be taken into account in the VISUM model.
WSP has confirmed that the VISUM model already includes the following committed residential developments:
Name
Great North Road
Barnby Gate
Bowbridge Road
North Gate
Flowserve (Hawton Lane)
Millgate
Trent Lane (North Gate)
Settlement
Newark
Newark
Newark
Newark
Newark
Newark
Newark
Total
Dwellings
568
100
89
200
210
68
200
1,435
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 3 of 7
Appendix E
Appendix E
18
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Analysis of Committed Development Sites (Residential & Employment) Within the District
Summary of Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of the Wider (Rural) Highway Network in the District:
As mentioned earlier in this spreadsheet no committed employment development needs to be assessed otherwise the 52.6ha forecast employment
growth for the District to 2026 will be exceeded.
The committed development that needs to be taken into account for the assessment of the wider (rural) highway network within the District is therefore:
Employment
Name
-
Location
-
Use Class
-
GFA (Sqm)
0
Retail
Name
Potterdyke
Location
Newark
Use Class
A1
GFA (Sqm)
12,602
Location
Newark, Balderton & Fernwood
Ollerton & Boughton
Clipstone
Southwell
Bilsthorpe
Blidworth
Edwinstowe
Total
Use Class
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
Dwellings
1,963
514
123
76
90
54
81
2,901
Residential
Name
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Summary of Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for VISUM Assessment of Newark on Trent:
The VISUM model will be used to assess the highway network within Newark on Trent.
The VISUM model already includes the following as committed employment developments in Newark on Trent.
Employment Within Newark on Trent - Already in VISUM Model - To be removed from the VISUM model
Name
Location
Use Class
Fernwood Business Park
Fernwood
B1
Hawton Road Industrial
Newark
B2
Winthorpe
Winthorpe
B1/B8
Jessops Way (Northern Road Industrial Estate)
Newark
B2/B8
All of the above 'committed' employment developments will therefore need to be removed from the VISUM model before testing is undertaken.
GFA (Sqm)
56,000
20,101
5,783
80,000
The following committed developments are already in the VISUM model and should be retained:
Retail (all areas of the District) - Already in VISUM Model (no change to VISUM model):
Name
Location
Potterdyke
Newark
Residential Within Newark on Trent - Already in VISUM Model (no change to VISUM model):
Name
Location
Great North Road
Newark
Barnby Gate
Newark
Bowbridge Road
Newark
North Gate
Newark
Flowserve (Hawton Lane)
Newark
Millgate
Newark
Trent Lane
Newark
Total
Use Class
A1
GFA (Sqm)
12,602
Use Class
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
Dwellings
568
100
89
200
210
68
200
1,435
The following committed developments in the rural areas of the District need to be added to the VISUM model:
Residential Within Rural areas of the District - To be added to the VISUM model
Name
Location
Unknown
Ollerton & Boughton
Unknown
Clipstone
Unknown
Southwell
Unknown
Bilsthorpe
Unknown
Blidworth
Unknown
Edwinstowe
Total
Appendix E
Appendix E
Use Class
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 4 of 7
19
Dwellings
514
123
76
90
54
81
938
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Vehicle Trip Calculation Parameters
Vehicle Trip Rates
Urban Employment Vehicle Trip Rates
AM Inbound
1.417
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
AM Outbound
0.197
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
PM Inbound
0.155
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
PM Outbound
1.226
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
AM Inbound
0.143
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
AM Outbound
0.540
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
PM Inbound
0.373
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
PM Outbound
0.229
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
AM Inbound
0.181
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
AM Outbound
0.685
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
PM Inbound
0.473
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
PM Outbound
0.290
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
Urban Residential Vehicle Trip Rates
Rural Residential Vehicle Trip Rates
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 5 of 7
20
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Vehicle Trip Generation for Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of the Wider Highway Network in the District:
Employment:
Vehicle Trips
Net Employment
Developable Area
(sqm)
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Name
AM
0
Distribution Wards
PM
Retail:
Name
Vehicle Trips
Net Employment
Developable Area
(sqm)
AM
12,602
Potterdyke
12,602
Distribution Wards
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
N/A
Notes:
Based on information contained in the TA Potterdyke flows are assumed to be local to Newark on Trent and will therefore not impact on the wider highway network within the District.
Residential:
Vehicle Trips
Name
Newark, Balderton & Fernwood
Number of Dwellings
AM
Distribution Wards
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
1,963
281
1,060
1,341
732
450
1,182
Bridge
Ollerton & Boughton
514
93
352
445
243
149
392
Ollerton
Clipstone
123
22
84
107
58
36
94
Clipstone
Southwell
76
14
52
66
36
22
58
Southwell West
Bilsthorpe
Bilsthorpe
90
16
62
78
43
26
69
Blidworth
54
10
37
47
26
16
41
Blidworth
81
2,901
15
450
55
1,703
70
2,153
38
1,176
23
722
62
1,897
Edwinstowe
Edwinstowe
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 6 of 7
21
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Vehicle Trip Generation for Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of Newark on Trent
Employment:
Vehicle Trips
Net Employment
Developable Area
(sqm)
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
AM
0
PM
Notes: The employment growth scenario includes all employment growth within the District to 2026 so no additional 'committed' employment sites need to be assessed.
Retail:
Net Employment
Developable Area
(sqm)
Name
Vehicle Trips
AM
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potterdyke
PM
Inbound
0
Notes: The Potterdyke development is already included in the VISUM model.
Residential:
Vehicle Trips
Name/Location
Number of Dwellings
AM
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
See note below
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
See note below
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
See note below
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
See note below
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
See note below
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ollerton & Boughton
514
93
352
445
243
149
392
Clipstone
123
22
84
107
58
36
94
Southwell
76
14
52
66
36
22
58
Bilsthorpe
90
16
62
78
43
26
69
Blidworth
54
10
37
47
26
16
41
Edwinstowe
81
637
15
115
55
436
70
552
38
301
23
185
62
486
Notes:
These cells contained information on committed developments within Newark on Trent that were taken into account in an earlier calculation. These sites are
already included in the VISUM model and therefore do not need to be taken into account separately. The table is left blank to maintain linked cells between this
spreadsheet and the trip distribution spreadsheets.
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 7 of 7
22
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Identification of Committed Developments in Adjacent Districts/Boroughs
Information has been obtained on development proposals within all Districts/Boroughs that border Newark and Sherwood.
In addition, information has also been obtained for Nottingham City and Lincoln City becasue, whilst these do not border
Newark and Sherwood District, they have the potential to be significant trip generators. A plan of the adjacent
Districts/Boroughs considered is presented below. This also indicates the main routes through the District that have been
considered.
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 1 of 18
23
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Identification of Committed Developments in Adjacent Districts/Boroughs
As part of the data collection exercise to establish the A453 core modelling scenario, data was collected jointly with the
M1 Widening Contract 2 team on likley developments within Districts/Boroughs relevant to the A453 model. Many of
these Districts/Boroughs coincide with those of interest to this study so the A453 data, which has been agreed with the
HA and Nottinghamshire County Council, has been used to form the basis for identifying development proposals.
The A453 data includes the following Districts/Boroughs:
1. Bassetlaw
2. Mansfield
3. Ashfield
4. Gedling
5. Nottingham
6. Rushcliffe
Information for the following Districts has been obtained through correspondence with the relevant planning departments:
7. Melton
8. South Kesteven
9. North Kesteven
10. Lincoln
11. West Lindsey
In accordance with WebTag guidance the data has been summarised and categorised by likelihood of development
using the following definitions of probability:
o Near Certain: The outcome will happen or there is a high probability that it will happen.
o More Than Likely: The outcome is likely to happen but there is some uncertainty.
o Reasonably Foreseeable: The outcome may happen, but there is significant uncertainty.
o Hypothetical: There is considerable uncertainty whether the outcome will ever happen.
The developments to be included in the Transport Study are consistent with the A453 'core scenario' as agreed with the
Highways Agency and local authorities and consists of those developments considered 'Near Certain' and 'More Than
Likely'. The data collected is shown in the next worksheet 'All Sites'. The subsequent worksheet 'NC & MTL' details
those sites that are classed as 'Near Certain' and 'More Than Likely'. These are the sites that have been considered for
the purposes of this study.
Trip generation has been estimated by applying the following trip rates:
1. Residential - trip rates derived for rural areas of Newark & Sherwood District
2. Employment - B1 Business Park trip rates derived for rural areas of Newark & Sherwood District
3. Retail - TRICS 2009(a) average trip rates for Retail uses (See TRICS 1 worksheet for details)
4. Hotel - TRICS 2009(a) average trip rates for Hotel uses (See TRICS 2 worksheet for details)
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 2 of 18
24
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Summary of all Relevant Development Proposals within Districts/Boroughs Immediately Adjacent to Newark & Sherwood District
County / Unitary
Authority
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
District/ Borough
Development within timescale
Notes
Timescale
Current status
Certainty
Scenario
Proposed Year of Opening
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Appendix E
Appendix E
East of Alfreton Road - Phase Va, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete
Birds Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 69 dwellings (24 outstanding)
Calladine Lane – 150 dwellings
Off Common Road/ Cross Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 140 dwellings - Complete
Edward Street / Ashwood Avenue, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 116 dwellings (13 outstanding)
Former Coates Vyella site, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 52 dwellings
Off Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 50 dwellings - Complete
Kings Mill Road East, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 112 dwellings
Off Kirkby Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 155 dwellings - Complete
Main Road, Annesley - 54 dwellings
Meden Bank/ Brand Lane, Stanton Hill, 126 dwellings - Complete
Hospital, Harlow Wood, Nottingham Road - 103 dwellings - Complete
Stag site, Park Drive, Hucknall, 143 dwellings - Complete
Phase 2 Coates Viyella, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 54 dwellings
Sherwood Business Park – 2 hectares of B1 employment land and a 250-bed hotel
Off Sherwood Street, Hucknall - 71 dwellings
Easymix Site, Stoneyford Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 51 dwellings - Complete
North of BRSA, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield, 67 dwellings - Complete
Walton Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete
Amber Business Park, Hucknall (Hucknall Colliery) - 1.1 ha employment land
Bentinck Colliery - 3.6 ha of land for B1, B2, B8 uses
Former textile factory, Bowne Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 53 dwellings
Blenheim Lane, Hucknall – 15 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Brierley Industrial Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 1.1 ha employment land
Garden Road, Hucknall - 214 dwellings
Kings Mill Road/ Oddicroft Lane - 6.3 hectares of employment land
South West Oakham Business Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield – 14.9 ha of B1 emp land
Mowlands Close / Sheepwash Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 109 dwellings
Old Mill Close (East and West), Bestwood Village - 99 dwellings
Rear 12,22,24 Portland Road, Selston - 59 dwellings
Portland Road (Former Colliery), Hucknall - 66 dwellings to be completed (228 total)
Annesley Colliery - 9 ha employment land
Diamond Avenue, Kirby-in-Ashfield - 67 dwellings
East of Nottingham Road, South Hucknall - 199 dwellings
Lime Tree Avenue / Farleys Lane, Hucknall - 84 dwellings
Lindleys Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 377 dwellings
Off Mill Lane, Huthwaite - 65 dwellings
West Fulwood, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 13.6 ha available for B1, B2, B8 use
A611/ Annesley Road, Hucknall - 2.3 ha employment land
Broomhill Farm, Hucknall - 350 dwellings
Butlers Hill, Hucknall - 3.2 ha employment land
Coxmoor Road/ A38, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 2.5 ha available for B1, B2, B8 use
Fulwood Road North/ Fulwood Industrial Estate, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 1.6ha emp land
Hamilton Road/ Coxmoor Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 1.2 hectares of employment land
Hillsborough Avenue, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 144 dwellings
South West Oakham Business Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield – 8.6 hectares of B1 emp land
Lindleys Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 95 dwellings
Pinxton Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 28 hectares of B1, B2, B8 uses
Rolls Royce, Hucknall, - 13 ha of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Welsh Croft Close/ Portland Industrial Estate - 4.1 ha for B1, B2, B8 uses
Westdale Road, Jacksdale - 57 dwellings
Wigwam Lane North and Central, Hucknall - 1 ha employment land
Bentinck Void Landfill - NE of J27
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008 – 2021
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008 – 2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
35 outstanding
37 outstanding
52 outstanding
Info from Allen Whitelaw at Ashfield via Pete Morris see email 24/08/05
Completed
Under Construction
Completed
Completed
Under Construction
Under Construction
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Under Construction
Built
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Planning permission
Planning permission
Detailed Planning Permission
Under Construction
Planning permission
Planning permission
Planning permission
Planning permission
Under Construction
Detailed Planning Permission
Detailed PP
Under Construction
outline pp
Outline PP
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline PP
In adopted Local Plan
Allocated
In adopted Local Plan
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
Hypothetical
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 3 of 18
25
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
-
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
No. of
Dwellings
92
69
150
140
116
52
50
112
155
54
126
103
143
54
B1
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
A1
200
Beds Spaces
Hotel
P+R
250
71
51
67
92
37
120
37
120
36
120
500
36
500
37
500
37
210
1490
210
210
300
300
300
453
76
453
77
454
77
106
83
54
40
107
83
53
40
107
84
53
40
933
434
136
933
433
137
934
433
137
0.3
0.4
0.3
53
214
109
99
59
228
67
199
84
377
65
350
144
860
95
57
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
County / Unitary
Authority
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
District/ Borough
WYG
Development within timescale
Notes
Timescale
Current status
Certainty
Scenario
Proposed Year of Opening
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Appendix E
Appendix E
Blyth Road West - 5 ha employment land
High Grounds - 1.23 ha employment land
High Grounds - 3.6 ha employment land
Manton Colliery - 34.96 hectares of B8 employment land.
Manton Wood - 2.9 ha employment land
Shireoaks Colliery - 4.24ha employment land
Worksop – 100 dwellings on small previously developed sites around the town.
Blyth Road East - 6 ha employment land
Blyth Road South - 6.4 ha employment land
Gateford Common East - 8.5 ha employment land
Gateford Common West, Worksop - 10 hectares of B1, B2 and B8 employment land.
Harrison Drive - 2.5 ha employment land
Lound Hall - 2.1 ha employment land
Plumbtree Estate - 5.4 ha employment land
Sherwood Forest Intermodal Park – 35.7 hectares of B8 employment land.
Retford – 1000 dwellings
Sherwood Forest Intermodal Park – 50 hectares of B8 employment land.
Worksop – 1500 dwellings on small sites in and around the town.
Worksop - 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land.
Retford – 1000 dwellings
Worksop – 1500 dwellings on small sites in and around the town.
Worksop - 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land.
South East of Worksop – 1,000 dwellings + 20 hectares of employment land
South East of Worksop – 1,000 dwellings + 20 hectares of employment land
Arnold & Carlton College – 90 dwellings
Arnold View Primary School - 70 dwellings
EMEB headquarters – 200 dwellings
Flatts Lane, Calverton – 148 dwellings
Ashwater Drive / Spring Lane, Mapperley – 140 dwellings
Chartwell Grove, Mapperley – 50 dwellings
Dark Lane, Calverton – 110 dwellings
Former Newstead Sports Ground – 80 dwellings
Gedling Colliery – 420 dwellings
Hillcrest Park, Calverton - 3 ha employment land
Howbeck Road, Arnold - 50 dwellings
Park Road, Bestwood – 175 dwellings
Plains Road/Arnold Lane (south), Mapperley – 80 dwellings
Regina Crescent, Ravenshead – 140 dwellings
Stockings Farm, Arnold – 390 dwellings
Victoria Park – 3.5 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment space
Calverton Colliery – 9 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land.
Gedling Colliery – 700 dwellings and 6 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Gedling Colliery – 700 dwellings and 6 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Hollinwood Lane, Calverton – 120 dwellings
North of Hazelford Way, Newstead - 2 ha of employment land
South of Hazlewood Way, Newstead - 3 ha employment
North of Victoria Park – 205 dwellings
South of Cornwater Fields, Ravenshead – 110 dwellings
Teal Close, Netherfield – 195 dwellings + 17 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Top Wighay Farm, Wighay – 595 dwellings + 9 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Teal Close, Netherfield – 195 dwellings + 17 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land
Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land
Newstead Colliery – 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
North of Papplewick Lane – 440 dwellings
Park Avenue, Burton Joyce – 78 dwellings
Teal Close, Netherfield – 250 dwellings
Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land
Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land
Newstead Colliery – 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
North of Papplewick Lane – 440 dwellings
Teal Close, Netherfield – 250 dwellings
Total 28.8ha, 2.9ha since 2003
Total 10.3 ha, 4.24 since 2003
Formerly known as Bevercotes Colliery
Formerly known as Bevercotes Colliery
85 are complete
2 are complete
Permission for 148 dwellings
conditional permission = 10 dwellings
conditional permission = 50 dwellings
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
This site is not in the Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
This site is deleted from the Local Plan (recommended by Inspector)
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
This site is not in the Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2021+
2021+
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008 – 2021
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
2021+
Full PP
Built
Full PP
Built
Fully developed
Full PP
in draft local plan.
in draft local plan
in local draft plan
in local draft plan
in local draft plan
in local draft plan
in draft local plan
Current application pending highways
Notional development
Land available but not in current plan
Notional development
Notional development
Notional development
Notional development
Notional development
Notional development
Notional development
Under construction
Under construction
Built
Under construction
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Planning application under consideration
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
Planning application under consideration
Planning application under consideration
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
Notional development
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
Notional development
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
Notional development
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 4 of 18
26
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
More than likely
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Hypothetical
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
More than likely
More than likely
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Core
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Core
Core
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2020
2020
2020
2023
2030
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2020
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2030
2030
2030
2030
2030
No. of
Dwellings
B1
167
41
120
1165
97
141
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
A1
166
167
41
41
120
120
1166
1165
96
97
142
141
Beds Spaces
Hotel
P+R
100
200
213
283
334
83
70
180
200
214
284
333
83
70
180
200
213
283
333
84
70
180
3570
100
100
100
117
300
70
130
117
300
70
130
116
300
70
130
67
100
67
100
66
100
283
300
284
143
107
283
300
283
284
300
283
90
70
200
148
140
50
110
80
420
50
175
80
140
390
245
455
120
205
110
97
595
98
198
149
110
63
595
448
427
323
330
187
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
County / Unitary
Authority
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
District/ Borough
WYG
Development within timescale
Notes
Timescale
Current status
Certainty
Scenario
Proposed Year of Opening
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Appendix E
Appendix E
Berry Hill Quarry – 550 dwellings
Chesterfield Road South – 8,000 sq.m. of A1 food retail space (Tescos).
Haddon Road - 2.2 ha housing land
Old Mill Lane - 2 ha of housing land
Sherwood Rise – 200 dwellings
Rufford Drive, Mansfield Woodhouse - 2 ha housing land
Abbott Road – 25 hectares of B1/B2 employment land + 160 dwellings (Water Lane)
Berry Hill Quarry – 600 dwellings.
Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land
Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land
Land south of Old Newark Road – 10 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land.
Millennium Business Park 7 hectares B1, B2, B8 employment land.
Ransom Wood – 6 hectares of B1 employment land
Stockwell Gate – 25,000 sq.m. of A1 retail space.
Bleak Hills - 4.73 ha employment land
Debdale Lane - 3.1 ha employment land
Mansfield – 2,000 dwellings on small brownfield sites in and around the town.
Old Newark Road / Southwell Road West - 4.2 ha employment land
Ratcher Hill Quarry – 8 hectares of B1 , B2 and B8 employment land.
Mansfield – 2,000 dwellings on small brownfield sites in and around the town.
Maun Valley, Mansfield Woodhouse - 3.6 ha employment land
Netherfield Lane, Meden Vale - 3.3 ha employment land
Ratcher Hill Quarry – 8 hectares of B1 , B2 and B8 employment land.
Rushpool Farm – 100 dwellings
Spion Kop - 2 ha employment land
Pleasleyhill - 250 dwellings
Rushpool Farm – 400 dwellings
Rushpool Farm – 400 dwellings
Bestwood Park (Padstow School & Ridgeway) – 400 dwellings
Blenheim Industrial Estate – 6.7 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land.
Bull Close Road (off A52 Clifton Boulevard) - 2.13 ha B8
Clifton South - 285 dwellings
Clifton West - 204 dwellings
Harrimans Lane – 17.8 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Johnson’s Works, Vernon Road – 118 dwellings
Southside – 300 dwellings
Southside Regeneration Area – 600 dwellings
Boots Island Site - 3.6ha B1
East of Great Northern Close - 3.2ha B1
Arkwright Street East - 1.2 ha B1, B2,B8
Beeston Sidings - 5.24 ha employment land
Bestwood Sidings - 1.19 ha employment land
Bobbers Mill - 1.26 ha employment land
Stanton Tip – 200 dwellings and 10 hectares of B1 employment land
Stanton Tip – 300 dwellings and 20 hectares of B1 employment land
Waterside – 1,500 dwellings + 100,000 sq metres of B1 office development
Waterside – 2500 dwellings + 150,000 sq metres of B1 office development
Bestwood Park (Padstow School & Ridgeway) – 400 dwellings
Main Road, Radcliffe on Trent - 50 dwellings
Ludlow Hill Road, West Bridgford - 210 dwellings
Lantern Lane, East Leake - 84 dwellings
Pedigree site, Gamston - 180 dwellings
Ruddington Fields Business Park, Ruddington - 5 hectares employment land
Leawood Old People's Home, West Bridgford - 62 dwellings
Pedigree House/ Gamston Piggeries, Gamston - 148 dwellings
Easr Leake Hall, East Leake - 56 dwellings
British Gypsum, Gotham - 0.5 hectares employment land
Mill Hill, Bingham - 453 dwellings
Station Yard, Ruddington - 64 dwellings
Pasture Lane, Ruddington – 235 dwellings
Camelot Street, Ruddington - 72 dwellings
Chapel Lane Extension, Bingham - 37.1 hectares B1, B2, B8 employment land
Moorbridge Industrial Estate, Bingham - 7.6 hectares employment land
Bunny Brickworks, Bunny - 6.7 hectares B1, B2 employment land
Hollygate Lane, Cotgrave – 1.8 hectares of Class B1, B2, B8 employment land.
The Chateau, West Bridgford – 110 dwellings
South of Wilford Lane, West Bridgford - 200 dwellings
1 Loughborough Road, West Bridgford - 215 dwellings
Cotgrave Colliery - 25ha employment land
Pasture Lane, Ruddington – 3.5 hectares of B1 & B8 employment land.
RAF Newton – 28.1 hectares mixed of B2, B8 employment land and dwellings
Existing Tesco at Stockwell Gate to close
Planning application for elderly persons village
No trip gen calculated as would be less than standard dwellings
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2021+
2021+
2008-2021
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008 – 2021
2008-2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008-2021
2021+
2021+
2021+
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008 – 2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2016
2016-2026
2016-2026
2008-2026
2016-2026
2016-2026
2016-2026
2016-2026
2008 – 2021
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2026
2008-2026
2008-2026
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2026
2008-2026
Built
Detailed Planning Permission
Built
Built
Detailed Planning Permission
Detailed Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
Notional
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
Notional
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
No proposals. Regeneration opportunity
In Adopted Local Plan
In Adopted Local Plan
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
Allocated
Allocated
Allocated
In adopted Local Plan
In adopted Local Plan
In adopted Local Plan
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
In adopted Local Plan.
Built
Built
Planning permission
Built
Built
Under construction
Under construction
Under construction
FPP
Under construction
Under construction
Under construction
OPP
OPP
OPP
OPP
Allocated
Planning application
Allocation
Planning application
Planning app to be submitted shortly
Allocated
Planning application
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 5 of 18
27
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Hypothetical
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Core
Core
Core
Core
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Core
Core
Core
Core
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2023
2030
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2023
2023
2030
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020.526316
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2020
2020
2020
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2020
2020
No. of
Dwellings
550
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
A1
B1
Beds Spaces
Hotel
P+R
80
66
60
200
60
160
600
1250
500
1500
333
234
600
1250
333
233
334
233
158
103
158
103
157
104
140
133
140
133
140
134
120
110
134
120
110
133
120
110
133
66
67
67
170
100
100
300
135
400
519
564
142
285
142
204
563
132
118
151
300
151
600
592
132
151
562
135
131
575
200
575
300
132
1500
132
2500
279.01754 1323.82
50
210
84
180
500
223
224 223
213
593
593 594
360
320
40
175
39
42
1000
2000
1000
1500
40 40
175 174
40 40
42 42
148
56
16
17
17
1236
253
335
60
1237
253
335
60
1237
254
833
834
175
1000
453
64
235
72
60
110
200
215
833
175
50
1000
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
County / Unitary
Authority
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
Lincolnshire
District/ Borough
WYG
Development within timescale
Notes
Timescale
Current status
Certainty
Scenario
Proposed Year of Opening
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
West Lindsey
West Lindsey
West Lindsey
West Lindsey
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
North Kesteven
South Kesteven
South Kesteven
South Kesteven
South Kesteven
South Kesteven
South Kesteven
South Kesteven
Appendix E
Appendix E
Sustainable Urban Extension - Melton Mowbray
Loughborough rd, Asfordby
The Crecent, Melton Mowbray
Asfordby Rd, Melton Mowbray
dieppe Way, Melton Mowbray
Asfordby Business Park - B1, B2 , B8
Melton Mowbray - Employment and allocation B1, B2, B8
Melton Mowbray- retail expansion
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - B1, B2, B8
Authority Wide - B1, B2, B8
Former Simons Construction
Phase XI Bunkers Hill (CHILD of Abb16)
Land off Woodfield Avenue adjacent to Wentworth Way (H4)
RMSC Playing Fields
Land at Ruston Way, Braford Enterprise Park
Former Parade Ground, Nene Road
Land north west Nettleham Road (H9)
Land to the north of Starglaze Windows, Unit 5, Waterside South
Former Simon's Cabin Hire, Crofton Close
Land adjacent to railway line, Beevor Street
Land to the rear of Greetwell Place, 2 Lime Kiln Way
Local Plan Allocation Adjacent to City School
Local Plan Allocation at Skewbridge
Local Plan Allocation West of Outer Circle Road
Local Plan Allocation Tower Works
Local Plan Allocation Allenby Trading Estate
Local Plan Allocation East of Outer Circle Road
Local Plan Allocation Beevor Street
Local Plan Allocation North of Long Leys Road
Local Plan Allocation South of Doddington Road
Local Plan Allocation North of Green Lane
Local Plan Allocation West of Tritton Road
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Witham St Hughes
Whisby Road South
South Hykeham
Whisby Road North
Decoy Farm
Bracebridge Heath
Bassingham
Heighington
Metheringham
North Hykeham
Washingborough
North Hykeham
North of Railway, Sleaford
West of East Road, Sleaford
East of East Road, Sleaford
Land off B1517, Sleaford
Billinghay
Heckington
Ruskington
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Authority Wide - Housing
Grantham
Borne
The Deepings
Rural locations
Major Housing allocation up to 2026
2010-2026
2009-2011
2009-2011
2008-2010
2010- 2012
Assumed 40% density of 16Ha allocation
Major allocation up to 2026 (Assumed 40% density of 30Ha allocation)
Major allocation up to 2026
Assumed 40% density of 46.64Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 21Ha allocated land
0.507403
0.897793
3.008703
1.19845
1.55
31.288
3.66544
7.9698
1.3004
5.1223
6.7584
1.023
10.753
4.7977
3.05
Assumed 40% density of 12Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 34.9Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 4.6Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 3.4Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 25Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 10Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 0.15Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 1.5Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 3.19Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 1.1Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 2.3Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 1.3Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 31.2Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 1.12Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 4.1Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 2.52Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 0.2Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 4.6Ha allocated land
Assumed 40% density of 1.5Ha allocated land
Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 79.01Ha)
Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 4.49Ha)
Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 19.15Ha)
Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 16.88Ha)
2012-2026
2010 - 2026
2008-2016
2016-2026
2008-2016
2016-2026
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2008-2016
2016-2021
2008-2016
2016-2021
2021-2026
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2001-2021
2008-2016
2016-2021
2021-2026
2005-2011
2005-2011
2005-2011
2005-2011
In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided
Under construction
Under construction
Under construction
Planning permission
In adopted Local Plan.
In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided
In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation
Allocation
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate)
Allocation and potential for future allocation
Allocation and potential for future allocation
Allocation and potential for future allocation
Allocation and potential for future allocation
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 6 of 18
28
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
More than likely
More than likely
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Reasonably foreseeable
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Core
Core
Core
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
High growth
2010
2011
2011
2010
2012
2020
2026
2015
2016
2026
2016
2026
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2016
2021
2016
2021
2026
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2016
2021
2026
2016
2016
2016
2016
No. of
Dwellings
1000
65
77
60
65
B1
213.34
400
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
A1
213.33
400
Beds Spaces
Hotel
P+R
213.33
400
40
4946
490
608.54
280
608.53
280
608.53
280
170
107
185
63
226
80
213
20.2961
35.9117
120.348
47.938
62
417.173
48.8725
106.264
17.3387
68.2973
90.112
40.92
143.373
191.908
40.6667
417.173
48.8725
106.264
17.3387
68.2973
90.112
417.173
48.8725
106.264
17.3387
68.2973
90.112
143.373 143.373
40.6667 40.6667
5062
2448
5080
3175
3175
160
465.33
61.33
45.33
1000
133.33
6
6000
42.53
14.67
30.67
17.33
416
14.93
54.67
33.6
8
61.33
20
160
465.33
61.33
45.33
160
465.33
61.33
45.33
133.33
133.33
42.53
14.67
30.67
17.33
416
14.93
54.67
33.6
42.53
14.67
30.67
17.33
416
14.93
54.67
33.6
61.33
20
61.33
20
5657
1895
1895
1053.47 1053.47 1053.47
59.87
59.87
59.87
255.33 255.33 255.33
225.06 225.06 225.06
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Summary of Near Certain and More Than Likely Development Proposals within Districts/Boroughs Immediately Adjacent to Newark & Sherwood District
County / Unitary District/ Borough
Authority
Development within timescale
Notes
Timescale
Current status
Certainty
Scenario
Proposed Year of Opening
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Leics
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
Melton
dieppe Way, Melton Mowbray
Asfordby Business Park - B1, B2 , B8
Sustainable Urban Extension - Melton Mowbray
Loughborough rd, Asfordby
The Crecent, Melton Mowbray
Asfordby Rd, Melton Mowbray
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Ashfield
Annesley Colliery - 9 ha employment land
Diamond Avenue, Kirby-in-Ashfield - 67 dwellings
East of Nottingham Road, South Hucknall - 199 dwellings
Lime Tree Avenue / Farleys Lane, Hucknall - 84 dwellings
Lindleys Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 377 dwellings
Off Mill Lane, Huthwaite - 65 dwellings
West Fulwood, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 13.6 ha available for B1, B2, B8 use
East of Alfreton Road - Phase Va, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete
Birds Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 69 dwellings (24 outstanding)
Calladine Lane – 150 dwellings
Off Common Road/ Cross Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 140 dwellings - Complete
Edward Street / Ashwood Avenue, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 116 dwellings (13 outstanding)
Former Coates Vyella site, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 52 dwellings
Off Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 50 dwellings - Complete
Kings Mill Road East, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 112 dwellings
Off Kirkby Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 155 dwellings - Complete
Main Road, Annesley - 54 dwellings
Meden Bank/ Brand Lane, Stanton Hill, 126 dwellings - Complete
Hospital, Harlow Wood, Nottingham Road - 103 dwellings - Complete
Stag site, Park Drive, Hucknall, 143 dwellings - Complete
Phase 2 Coates Viyella, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 54 dwellings
Sherwood Business Park – 2 hectares of B1 employment land and a 250-bed hotel
Off Sherwood Street, Hucknall - 71 dwellings
Easymix Site, Stoneyford Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 51 dwellings - Complete
North of BRSA, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield, 67 dwellings - Complete
Walton Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete
Amber Business Park, Hucknall (Hucknall Colliery) - 1.1 ha employment land
Bentinck Colliery - 3.6 ha of land for B1, B2, B8 uses
Former textile factory, Bowne Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 53 dwellings
Blenheim Lane, Hucknall – 15 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land
Brierley Industrial Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 1.1 ha employment land
Garden Road, Hucknall - 214 dwellings
Kings Mill Road/ Oddicroft Lane - 6.3 hectares of employment land
South West Oakham Business Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield – 14.9 ha of B1 emp land
Mowlands Close / Sheepwash Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 109 dwellings
Old Mill Close (East and West), Bestwood Village - 99 dwellings
Rear 12,22,24 Portland Road, Selston - 59 dwellings
Portland Road (Former Colliery), Hucknall - 66 dwellings to be completed (228 total)
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw
Worksop – 100 dwellings on small previously developed sites around the town.
Blyth Road West - 5 ha employment land
High Grounds - 1.23 ha employment land
High Grounds - 3.6 ha employment land
Manton Colliery - 34.96 hectares of B8 employment land.
Manton Wood - 2.9 ha employment land
Shireoaks Colliery - 4.24ha employment land
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Gedling
Ashwater Drive / Spring Lane, Mapperley – 140 dwellings
Chartwell Grove, Mapperley – 50 dwellings
Arnold & Carlton College – 90 dwellings
Arnold View Primary School - 70 dwellings
EMEB headquarters – 200 dwellings
Flatts Lane, Calverton – 148 dwellings
Assumed 40% density of 16Ha allocation
Major Housing allocation up to 2026
2010- 2012 Planning permission
In adopted Local Plan.
2010-2026 In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided
2009-2011 Under construction
2009-2011 Under construction
2008-2010 Under construction
More than likely
More than likely
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Low growth
Core
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2012
2020
2010
2011
2011
2010
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2021
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008 – 2021
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2016
2008 – 2021
2008-2016
2008-2016
2008-2021
2008-2016
outline pp
Outline PP
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline PP
Completed
Under Construction
Completed
Completed
Under Construction
Under Construction
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Under Construction
Built
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Planning permission
Planning permission
Detailed Planning Permission
Under Construction
Planning permission
Planning permission
Planning permission
Planning permission
Under Construction
Detailed Planning Permission
Detailed PP
Under Construction
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
Full PP
Built
Full PP
Built
Fully developed
Full PP
More than likely
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Core
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Under construction
Under construction
Built
Under construction
More than likely
More than likely
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Core
Core
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2008
2015
2008
2008
2008
2008
Total for Melton Borough
35 outstanding
37 outstanding
52 outstanding
Total for Ashfield District
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Total 28.8ha, 2.9ha since 2003
Total 10.3 ha, 4.24 since 2003
Total for Bassetlaw District
conditional permission = 10 dwellings
conditional permission = 50 dwellings
85 are complete
2 are complete
Permission for 148 dwellings
Up to 2008
2008 – 2021
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Total for Gedling Borough
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 7 of 18
29
No. of
Dwellings
65
1,000
65
77
60
1,267
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
A1
B1
213
213
213
213
300
213
300
213
300
453
453
454
Beds
Hotel
0
Spaces
P+R
0
0
67
199
84
377
65
92
69
150
140
116
52
50
112
155
54
126
103
143
54
200
250
71
51
67
92
37
120
37
120
36
120
500
36
500
37
500
37
210
1,490
210
210
3,346
1,657
1,657
0
250
0
167
41
120
1,165
97
141
1,731
166
41
120
1,166
96
142
1,731
167
41
120
1,165
97
141
1,731
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
53
214
109
99
59
228
3,251
100
100
140
50
90
70
200
148
698
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
County / Unitary District/ Borough
Authority
Development within timescale
Notes
Timescale
Current status
Certainty
Scenario
Proposed Year of Opening
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Mansfield
Abbott Road – 25 hectares of B1/B2 employment land + 160 dwellings (Water Lane)
Berry Hill Quarry – 600 dwellings.
Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land
Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land
Berry Hill Quarry – 550 dwellings
Chesterfield Road South – 8,000 sq.m. of A1 food retail space (Tescos).
Haddon Road - 2.2 ha housing land
Old Mill Lane - 2 ha of housing land
Sherwood Rise – 200 dwellings
Rufford Drive, Mansfield Woodhouse - 2 ha housing land
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe
Camelot Street, Ruddington - 72 dwellings
Chapel Lane Extension, Bingham - 37.1 hectares B1, B2, B8 employment land
Moorbridge Industrial Estate, Bingham - 7.6 hectares employment land
Bunny Brickworks, Bunny - 6.7 hectares B1, B2 employment land
Main Road, Radcliffe on Trent - 50 dwellings
Ludlow Hill Road, West Bridgford - 210 dwellings
Lantern Lane, East Leake - 84 dwellings
Pedigree site, Gamston - 180 dwellings
Ruddington Fields Business Park, Ruddington - 5 hectares employment land
Leawood Old People's Home, West Bridgford - 62 dwellings
Pedigree House/ Gamston Piggeries, Gamston - 148 dwellings
Easr Leake Hall, East Leake - 56 dwellings
British Gypsum, Gotham - 0.5 hectares employment land
Mill Hill, Bingham - 453 dwellings
Station Yard, Ruddington - 64 dwellings
Pasture Lane, Ruddington – 235 dwellings
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
Former Simons Construction
Phase XI Bunkers Hill (CHILD of Abb16)
Land off Woodfield Avenue adjacent to Wentworth Way (H4)
RMSC Playing Fields
Land at Ruston Way, Braford Enterprise Park
Former Parade Ground, Nene Road
Land north west Nettleham Road (H9)
Land to the north of Starglaze Windows, Unit 5, Waterside South
Former Simon's Cabin Hire, Crofton Close
Land adjacent to railway line, Beevor Street
Land to the rear of Greetwell Place, 2 Lime Kiln Way
Local Plan Allocation Adjacent to City School
Local Plan Allocation at Skewbridge
Local Plan Allocation West of Outer Circle Road
Local Plan Allocation Tower Works
Local Plan Allocation Allenby Trading Estate
Local Plan Allocation East of Outer Circle Road
Local Plan Allocation Beevor Street
Local Plan Allocation North of Long Leys Road
Local Plan Allocation South of Doddington Road
Local Plan Allocation North of Green Lane
Local Plan Allocation West of Tritton Road
2008 – 2021
2008 – 2021
2021+
2021+
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
Existing Tesco at Stockwell Gate to close
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Outline Planning Permission
Built
Detailed Planning Permission
Built
Built
Detailed Planning Permission
Detailed Planning Permission
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Core
Core
Core
Core
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2015
2015
2023
2030
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2008-2021
2008-2026
2008-2026
2008-2026
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
Up to 2008
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
2008-2021
OPP
OPP
OPP
OPP
Built
Built
Planning permission
Built
Built
Under construction
Under construction
Under construction
FPP
Under construction
Under construction
Under construction
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
More than likely
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Core
Core
Core
Core
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2015
2020
2020
2020
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2015
2015
2015
2015
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Committed
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Near certain
Total for Mansfield District
No trip gen calculated as would be less than standard dwellings
Total for Rushcliffe Borough
Total for Lincoln City
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 8 of 18
30
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
Low growth
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
2010 - 2012
No. of
Dwellings
160
600
B1
1,250
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
A1
1,250
Beds
Hotel
Spaces
P+R
500
1,500
550
80
66
60
200
60
1,696
72
3,250
1,250
0
1,236
253
335
1,237
253
335
1,237
254
16
17
17
2,340
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
120
48
62
417
49
106
17
68
90
41
143
192
41
1,416
1,842
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
417
49
106
17
68
90
0
143
0
41
932
1,508
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
0
0
0
417
49
106
17
68
90
0
143
0
41
968
80
0
0
50
210
84
180
500
148
56
453
64
235
1,552
170
107
185
63
226
80
213
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,044
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Summary of Near Certain and More Than Likely Development Proposals Within Districts/Boroughs Immediately Adjacent to Newark & Sherwood District
District/ Borough
Melton
Ashfield
Bassetlaw
Gedling
Mansfield
Rushcliffe
Lincoln
Total
Appendix E
Appendix E
No. of
Dwellings
1,267
3,251
100
698
1,696
1,552
1,044
9,608
B1
213
3,346
1,731
0
3,250
2,340
1,416
12,296
Size of Development
100 sq m
B2
B8
213
213
1,657
1,657
1,731
1,731
0
0
1,250
0
1,842
1,508
932
968
7,625
6,077
Beds
Hotel
A1
0
0
0
0
80
0
0
80
Spaces
P+R
0
250
0
0
0
0
0
250
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 9 of 18
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Vehicle Trip Calculation Parameters
Vehicle Trip Rates
Rural Residential Vehicle Trip Rates (From 2001 Census data for Newark & Sherwood District)
AM Inbound
0.181
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
AM Outbound
0.685
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
PM Inbound
0.473
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
PM Outbound
0.290
Vehicle Trips per Dwelling
Rural Employment Vehicle Trip Rates (From 2001 Census data for Newark & Sherwood District)
AM Inbound
1.606
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
AM Outbound
0.223
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
PM Inbound
0.176
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
PM Outbound
1.389
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
Retail Vehicle Trip Rates (TRICS 2009(a) - see Worksheet TRICS 1 for details)
AM Inbound
1.301
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
AM Outbound
0.675
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
PM Inbound
1.439
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
PM Outbound
1.841
Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA
Hotel Vehicle Trip Rates (TRICS 2009(a) - see Worksheet TRICS 2 for details)
AM Inbound
0.138
Vehicle Trips per Bedroom
AM Outbound
0.200
Vehicle Trips per Bedroom
PM Inbound
0.171
Vehicle Trips per Bedroom
PM Outbound
0.119
Vehicle Trips per Bedroom
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 10 of 18
32
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Vehicle Trip Generation for Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of the Wider Highway Network in the District:
Residential:
Vehicle Trips
Name
Number of Dwellings
AM
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Melton
1,267
229
868
1,097
599
367
967
Ashfield
3,251
588
2,227
2,815
1,538
943
2,481
Bassetlaw
100
18
69
87
47
29
76
Gedling
698
126
478
604
330
202
533
Mansfield
1,696
307
1,162
1,469
802
492
1,294
Rushcliffe
1,552
281
1,063
1,344
734
450
1,184
Lincoln
1,044
8,564
189
1,739
715
6,581
904
8,321
494
4,545
303
2,786
797
7,331
Employment:
Vehicle Trips
Name
Floor Area (100 sqm)
AM
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Melton
640
1,028
143
1,171
113
889
1,002
Ashfield
6,660
10,696
1,485
12,181
1,172
9,251
10,423
Bassetlaw
5,193
8,340
1,158
9,498
914
7,213
8,127
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,500
7,227
1,004
8,231
792
6,251
7,043
Rushcliffe
5,690
9,138
1,269
10,407
1,001
7,903
8,905
Lincoln
3,316
22,683
5,325
41,754
739
5,798
6,064
47,551
584
4,576
4,605
36,112
5,189
40,688
Gedling
Mansfield
Retail:
Vehicle Trips
Name
Floor Area (100 sqm)
PM
AM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Melton
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ashfield
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bassetlaw
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gedling
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mansfield
80
104
54
158
115
147
262
Rushcliffe
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lincoln
0
80
0
104
0
54
0
158
0
115
0
147
0
262
Hotel:
Vehicle Trips
Name
Floor Area (100 sqm)
AM
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Melton
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ashfield
250
35
50
85
43
30
73
Bassetlaw
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gedling
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mansfield
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rushcliffe
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
0
35
0
50
0
85
0
43
0
30
0
73
Lincoln
Total Residential:
Vehicle Trips
Name
AM
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
Melton
229
868
1,097
599
367
2-Way
967
Ashfield
588
2,227
2,815
1,538
943
2,481
Bassetlaw
18
69
87
47
29
76
Gedling
126
478
604
330
202
533
Mansfield
307
1,162
1,469
802
492
1,294
Rushcliffe
281
1,063
1,344
734
450
1,184
189
1,739
715
6,581
904
8,321
494
4,545
303
2,786
797
7,331
Lincoln
Total Employment (Includes Hotel & Retail):
Vehicle Trips
Name
AM
PM
Inbound
Outbound
2-Way
Inbound
Outbound
Melton
1,028
143
1,171
113
889
1,002
Ashfield
10,730
1,535
12,266
1,215
9,280
10,495
Bassetlaw
8,340
1,158
9,498
914
7,213
8,127
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mansfield
7,331
1,058
8,389
907
6,398
7,305
Rushcliffe
9,138
1,269
10,407
1,001
7,903
8,905
Lincoln
5,325
41,892
739
5,902
6,064
47,794
584
4,734
4,605
36,289
5,189
41,023
Gedling
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 11 of 18
33
2-Way
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
External Residential Sites Through Trip Distributio
Origin
Melton
Rushcliffe
Nottingham
Gedling
Ashfield
Mansfield
Bassetlaw
West Lindsey
Lincoln
North Kesteven
South Kesteven
Appendix E
Appendix E
Destination
Route
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Gedling
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Rushcliffe
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
A1
A1
A6097
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A46
A614
A6097
A6097
A6097
A6097
A6097
A614
A6097
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A614
A614
A614
A614
A1
A1
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A17
A17
A17
A17
A17
A17
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A6097
Link
Code
9
9
11
11
11
8
8
8
11
11
11
8
8
8
4
11
11
11
11
11
4
11
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
6
6
6
6
17
17
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
9
11
Direction
Route
N
N
N
N
N
E
E
E
N
N
N
E
E
E
N
S
S
S
S
S
N
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
Link
Code
13
13
12
12
A46
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
Direction
Route
Link
Code
Direction
Route
Link
Code
Direction
E
E
N
N
A614
A614
7
7
N
N
A614
A617
6
19
N
W
3
3
3
12
12
E
E
E
N
N
A17
A46
A46
A614
A614
10
13
13
7
7
E
E
E
N
N
A614
A617
6
19
N
W
A46
A46
A46
A614
3
3
3
7
E
E
E
N
A17
A46
A46
A614
10
13
13
6
E
E
E
N
A46
A46
A46
A614
8
8
8
7
E
E
E
N
A46
A46
A46
A614
3
3
3
6
E
E
E
N
A17
A46
A46
10
13
13
E
E
E
A617
A617
A617
A617
A614
A614
A617
A617
A617
A617
A614
A614
A614
A614
A1
A17
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A1
A1
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A1
A1
A1
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A1
A46
A46
5
5
5
5
7
7
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
9
10
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
17
3
3
3
3
3
13
13
17
3
3
E
E
E
E
S
S
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
N
W
W
W
W
W
N
N
S
W
W
A46
A46
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A46
A46
A614
A614
A6097
A6097
3
3
3
3
12
12
3
3
3
3
4
4
12
12
E
E
E
E
S
S
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
A1
A17
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A46
9
10
13
13
11
11
9
10
13
13
S
E
E
E
S
S
S
E
E
E
A6097
A6097
11
11
S
S
A617
A617
A46
A46
A46
5
5
8
8
8
W
W
W
W
W
A617
A617
A6097
19
19
11
W
W
N
A617
A617
A46
A46
A46
5
5
8
8
8
W
W
W
W
W
A617
A617
A6097
19
19
11
W
W
N
A617
A617
A46
A46
A46
5
5
8
8
8
W
W
W
W
W
A617
A617
A6097
19
19
11
W
W
N
A617
A617
5
5
W
W
A617
A617
19
19
W
W
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 12 of 18
34
Route
Percentage
Me1
Me2
Me3
Me4
Me5
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
N1
N2
N3
N4
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
W7
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
0.20%
0.04%
0.22%
0.10%
0.56%
0.20%
0.30%
0.05%
0.47%
0.63%
1.16%
0.06%
0.18%
0.03%
0.33%
1.63%
0.40%
0.11%
0.06%
0.07%
0.46%
1.41%
0.13%
0.15%
0.02%
0.01%
0.97%
0.11%
0.22%
0.20%
0.16%
0.11%
0.43%
1.24%
0.40%
0.06%
0.30%
0.46%
0.12%
0.05%
0.05%
1.29%
0.21%
0.05%
1.67%
0.11%
0.11%
0.03%
1.54%
0.75%
0.02%
2.94%
1.64%
0.12%
0.07%
0.13%
0.13%
2.18%
1.36%
0.25%
0.98%
0.07%
0.09%
0.17%
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Outbound - By individual link
Origin
Melton
Rushcliffe
Nottingham
Gedling
Ashfield
Mansfield
Bassetlaw
West Lindsey
Lincoln
North Kesteven
South Kesteven
Appendix E
Appendix E
Route
A1
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A46
A17
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A17
A46
A614
A614
A614
A6097
A614
A46
A614
A46
A614
A17
A46
A6097
A617
A617
A46
A1
A17
A46
A617
A614
A617
A6097
A46
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A614
A1
A614
A1
A17
A614
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A17
A1
A46
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A1
A6097
A46
A1
A46
A617
A617
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
Inbound - By individual link
Direction
Percentage
Route
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
0.24%
0.24%
0.88%
0.32%
0.32%
0.22%
0.10%
0.55%
0.55%
0.20%
0.35%
2.26%
1.10%
1.10%
0.47%
0.63%
0.27%
0.27%
0.06%
0.33%
0.33%
0.33%
2.27%
0.46%
0.24%
0.46%
0.24%
0.46%
0.11%
0.12%
1.41%
0.31%
0.31%
0.31%
0.13%
0.15%
0.03%
1.77%
1.08%
0.69%
1.08%
0.69%
1.08%
0.22%
0.20%
0.26%
2.14%
0.76%
2.14%
0.30%
0.46%
1.67%
0.47%
0.47%
3.45%
1.73%
1.73%
0.17%
1.56%
0.17%
0.05%
5.50%
2.54%
2.96%
0.22%
2.32%
0.22%
0.03%
4.28%
1.64%
2.63%
0.19%
2.44%
0.19%
0.13%
2.75%
0.17%
1.61%
0.98%
0.16%
0.16%
0.16%
A1
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A46
A17
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A17
A46
A614
A614
A614
A6097
A614
A46
A614
A46
A614
A17
A46
A6097
A617
A617
A46
A1
A17
A46
A617
A614
A617
A6097
A46
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A614
A1
A614
A1
A17
A614
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A17
A1
A46
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A1
A6097
A46
A1
A46
A617
A617
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
AM Generation
Direction Percentage
S
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
S
S
S
N
S
W
S
W
S
W
W
N
W
W
W
N
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
N
N
W
W
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
N
E
E
E
0.24%
0.24%
0.88%
0.32%
0.32%
0.22%
0.10%
0.55%
0.55%
0.20%
0.35%
2.26%
1.10%
1.10%
0.47%
0.63%
0.27%
0.27%
0.06%
0.33%
0.33%
0.33%
2.27%
0.46%
0.24%
0.46%
0.24%
0.46%
0.11%
0.12%
1.41%
0.31%
0.31%
0.31%
0.13%
0.15%
0.03%
1.77%
1.08%
0.69%
1.08%
0.69%
1.08%
0.22%
0.20%
0.26%
2.14%
0.76%
2.14%
0.30%
0.46%
1.67%
0.47%
0.47%
3.45%
1.73%
1.73%
0.17%
1.56%
0.17%
0.05%
5.50%
2.54%
2.96%
0.22%
2.32%
0.22%
0.03%
4.28%
1.64%
2.63%
0.19%
2.44%
0.19%
0.13%
2.75%
0.17%
1.61%
0.98%
0.16%
0.16%
0.16%
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
Direction
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
PM Generation
Outbound
Inbound
Direction
Generation
Generation
2
S
1
2
W
1
8
S
2
3
S
1
3
S
1
2
S
1
1
E
0
6
W
2
6
W
2
2
W
1
4
W
1
24
S
6
12
S
3
12
S
3
5
S
1
7
E
2
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
11
N
3
2
S
1
1
W
0
2
S
1
1
W
0
2
S
1
1
W
0
1
W
0
31
N
8
7
W
2
7
W
2
7
W
2
3
N
1
3
W
1
1
W
0
21
W
5
13
N
3
8
W
2
13
N
3
8
W
2
13
N
3
3
N
1
2
W
1
3
W
1
1
N
0
1
N
0
1
N
0
0
N
0
0
W
0
1
N
0
0
N
0
0
N
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
39
N
10
18
E
5
21
N
6
2
E
0
17
E
4
2
E
0
0
S
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 13 of 18
35
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
Direction
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
Outbound
Inbound
Direction
Generation
Generation
1
S
1
1
W
1
3
S
5
1
S
2
1
S
2
1
S
1
0
E
1
2
W
4
2
W
4
1
W
1
2
W
3
10
S
17
5
S
8
5
S
8
2
S
3
3
E
5
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
5
N
7
1
S
2
0
W
1
1
S
2
0
W
1
1
S
2
0
W
0
0
W
0
13
N
22
3
W
5
3
W
5
3
W
5
1
N
2
1
W
2
0
W
0
9
W
14
5
N
9
3
W
6
5
N
9
3
W
6
5
N
9
1
N
2
1
W
2
1
W
2
1
N
1
0
N
0
1
N
1
0
N
0
0
W
0
0
N
1
0
N
0
0
N
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
17
N
27
8
E
13
9
N
15
1
E
1
7
E
11
1
E
1
0
S
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
External Employment Sites Through Trip Distribution
Destination
Melton
Rushcliffe
Nottingham
Gedling
Ashfield
Mansfield
Bassetlaw
West Lindsey
Lincoln
North Kesteven
South Kesteven
Appendix E
Appendix E
Destination
Route
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Gedling
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Rushcliffe
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
North Kesteven
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Melton
South Kesteven
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
Nottingham
Rushcliffe
Lincoln
West Lindsey
Bassetlaw
Mansfield
Ashfield
Gedling
A1
A1
A6097
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A46
A614
A6097
A6097
A6097
A6097
A6097
A614
A6097
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A617
A614
A614
A614
A614
A1
A1
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A17
A17
A17
A17
A17
A17
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A6097
Link
Code
9
9
11
11
11
8
8
8
11
11
11
8
8
8
4
11
11
11
11
11
4
11
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
6
6
6
6
17
17
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
9
11
Direction
Route
N
N
N
N
N
E
E
E
N
N
N
E
E
E
N
S
S
S
S
S
N
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
Link
Code
13
13
12
12
A46
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
Direction
Route
Link
Code
Direction
Route
Link
Code
Direction
E
E
N
N
A614
A614
7
7
N
N
A614
A617
6
19
N
W
3
3
3
12
12
E
E
E
N
N
A17
A46
A46
A614
A614
10
13
13
7
7
E
E
E
N
N
A614
A617
6
19
N
W
A46
A46
A46
A614
3
3
3
7
E
E
E
N
A17
A46
A46
A614
10
13
13
6
E
E
E
N
A46
A46
A46
A614
8
8
8
7
E
E
E
N
A46
A46
A46
A614
3
3
3
6
E
E
E
N
A17
A46
A46
10
13
13
E
E
E
A617
A617
A617
A617
A614
A614
A617
A617
A617
A617
A614
A614
A614
A614
A1
A17
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A1
A1
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A1
A1
A1
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A46
A1
A46
A46
5
5
5
5
7
7
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
9
10
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
3
3
3
3
3
9
9
17
3
3
3
3
3
13
13
17
3
3
E
E
E
E
S
S
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
N
W
W
W
W
W
N
N
S
W
W
A46
A46
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A46
A46
A614
A614
A6097
A6097
3
3
3
3
12
12
3
3
3
3
4
4
12
12
E
E
E
E
S
S
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
A1
A17
A46
A46
A6097
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A46
9
10
13
13
11
11
9
10
13
13
S
E
E
E
S
S
S
E
E
E
A6097
A6097
11
11
S
S
A617
A617
A46
A46
A46
5
5
8
8
8
W
W
W
W
W
A617
A617
A6097
19
19
11
W
W
N
A617
A617
A46
A46
A46
5
5
8
8
8
W
W
W
W
W
A617
A617
A6097
19
19
11
W
W
N
A617
A617
A46
A46
A46
5
5
8
8
8
W
W
W
W
W
A617
A617
A6097
19
19
11
W
W
N
A617
A617
5
5
W
W
A617
A617
19
19
W
W
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 14 of 18
36
Route
Percentage
Me1
Me2
Me3
Me4
Me5
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
N1
N2
N3
N4
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
W7
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
0.22%
0.27%
0.13%
0.13%
0.62%
0.21%
0.41%
0.11%
0.86%
1.17%
2.00%
0.19%
0.13%
0.06%
0.72%
0.83%
0.37%
0.21%
0.07%
0.07%
0.95%
1.40%
0.18%
0.11%
0.13%
0.04%
0.94%
0.07%
0.18%
0.16%
0.12%
0.12%
0.51%
0.50%
0.59%
0.03%
0.48%
0.51%
0.18%
0.02%
0.14%
0.10%
0.71%
0.04%
1.02%
0.13%
0.01%
0.04%
0.40%
0.71%
0.10%
1.90%
1.94%
0.12%
0.15%
0.16%
1.11%
0.29%
1.08%
0.42%
0.81%
0.15%
0.10%
0.22%
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Inbound - By individual link
Destination
Melton
Rushcliffe
Nottingham
Gedling
Ashfield
Mansfield
Bassetlaw
West Lindsey
Lincoln
North Kesteven
South Kesteven
Appendix E
Appendix E
Route
A1
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A46
A17
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A17
A46
A614
A614
A614
A6097
A614
A46
A614
A46
A614
A17
A46
A6097
A617
A617
A46
A1
A17
A46
A617
A614
A617
A6097
A46
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A614
A1
A614
A1
A17
A614
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A17
A1
A46
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A1
A6097
A46
A1
A46
A617
A617
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
Outbound - By individual link
Direction
Percentage
Route
S
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
S
S
S
N
S
W
S
W
S
W
W
N
W
W
W
N
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
N
N
W
W
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
N
E
E
E
0.48%
0.48%
0.89%
0.27%
0.27%
0.13%
0.13%
0.73%
0.73%
0.21%
0.52%
4.03%
2.03%
2.03%
0.86%
1.17%
0.38%
0.38%
0.19%
0.72%
0.72%
0.72%
1.55%
0.95%
0.34%
0.95%
0.34%
0.95%
0.21%
0.13%
1.40%
0.47%
0.47%
0.47%
0.18%
0.11%
0.18%
1.60%
1.01%
0.59%
1.01%
0.59%
1.01%
0.18%
0.16%
0.25%
1.63%
0.99%
1.63%
0.48%
0.51%
1.01%
0.62%
0.62%
2.22%
1.16%
1.06%
0.20%
0.96%
0.20%
0.14%
3.30%
1.30%
2.00%
0.14%
1.16%
0.14%
0.04%
3.78%
1.94%
1.84%
0.27%
1.57%
0.27%
0.16%
2.57%
0.22%
1.51%
0.81%
0.25%
0.25%
0.25%
A1
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A46
A17
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A17
A46
A614
A614
A614
A6097
A614
A46
A614
A46
A614
A17
A46
A6097
A617
A617
A46
A1
A17
A46
A617
A614
A617
A6097
A46
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A614
A1
A614
A1
A17
A614
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A17
A1
A46
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A1
A6097
A46
A1
A46
A617
A617
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
AM Generation
Direction
Percentage
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
0.48%
0.48%
0.89%
0.27%
0.27%
0.13%
0.13%
0.73%
0.73%
0.21%
0.52%
4.03%
2.03%
2.03%
0.86%
1.17%
0.38%
0.38%
0.19%
0.72%
0.72%
0.72%
1.55%
0.95%
0.34%
0.95%
0.34%
0.95%
0.21%
0.13%
1.40%
0.47%
0.47%
0.47%
0.18%
0.11%
0.18%
1.60%
1.01%
0.59%
1.01%
0.59%
1.01%
0.18%
0.16%
0.25%
1.63%
0.99%
1.63%
0.48%
0.51%
1.01%
0.62%
0.62%
2.22%
1.16%
1.06%
0.20%
0.96%
0.20%
0.14%
3.30%
1.30%
2.00%
0.14%
1.16%
0.14%
0.04%
3.78%
1.94%
1.84%
0.27%
1.57%
0.27%
0.16%
2.57%
0.22%
1.51%
0.81%
0.25%
0.25%
0.25%
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
Direction
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
PM Generation
Outbound
Inbound
Direction
Generation
Generation
1
S
5
1
W
5
1
S
9
0
S
3
0
S
3
0
S
1
0
E
1
9
W
67
9
W
67
3
W
19
7
W
48
51
S
368
26
S
186
26
S
186
11
S
79
15
E
107
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
N
0
0
S
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
21
N
150
7
W
50
7
W
50
7
W
50
3
N
19
2
W
12
3
W
19
17
W
117
11
N
74
6
W
43
11
N
74
6
W
43
11
N
74
2
N
13
2
W
12
3
W
18
19
N
136
12
N
83
19
N
136
6
N
40
6
W
43
12
N
84
7
N
52
7
N
52
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
24
N
175
10
E
69
15
N
106
1
E
8
9
E
62
1
E
8
0
S
2
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 15 of 18
37
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
Direction
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
Outbound
Inbound
Direction
Generation
Generation
4
S
1
4
W
1
8
S
1
2
S
0
2
S
0
1
S
0
1
E
0
58
W
7
58
W
7
16
W
2
41
W
5
318
S
40
161
S
20
161
S
20
68
S
9
92
E
12
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
N
0
0
S
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
W
0
0
S
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
130
N
17
43
W
6
43
W
6
43
W
6
16
N
2
11
W
1
16
W
2
102
W
14
65
N
9
38
W
5
65
N
9
38
W
5
65
N
9
11
N
2
10
W
1
16
W
2
117
N
15
72
N
9
117
N
15
35
N
4
37
W
5
73
N
9
45
N
6
45
N
6
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
152
N
19
60
E
8
92
N
12
6
E
1
53
E
7
6
E
1
2
S
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
S
0
0
N
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
0
E
0
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
Total Trip Generation from Committed Developments Outside Newark & Sherwood Travelling Through the District
Destination
A1
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A46
A17
A46
A6097
A6097
A614
A614
A617
A46
A17
A46
A614
A614
A614
A6097
A614
A46
A614
A46
A614
A17
A46
Link
Code
9
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
3
10
13
11
12
7
6
19
8
10
13
4
7
6
11
4
8
7
3
6
10
13
A6097
A617
A617
A46
A1
A17
A46
A617
A614
A617
A6097
A46
A6097
A1
A17
A46
A614
A1
A614
A1
A17
A614
A6097
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
A46
A46
A1
A617
A46
A617
A6097
Route
Direction
AM
Direction
AM
Direction
PM
Direction
PM
S
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
S
S
S
N
S
W
S
W
S
W
W
6
6
11
3
3
2
2
68
68
19
49
374
189
189
80
109
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
3
3
9
3
3
2
1
15
15
5
10
75
37
37
16
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
S
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
E
W
W
W
S
S
S
N
S
W
S
W
S
W
W
2
2
6
2
2
1
1
11
11
4
8
57
28
28
12
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
2
1
2
1
2
0
0
N
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
W
E
E
E
N
N
N
S
N
E
N
E
N
E
E
5
5
11
4
4
2
2
60
60
17
43
329
165
165
70
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
11
19
5
3
9
10
13
19
7
5
12
3
11
9
10
13
6
17
7
9
10
4
12
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
13
3
9
5
8
19
11
N
W
W
W
N
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
N
N
W
W
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
158
52
52
52
20
13
19
123
77
45
77
45
77
14
13
19
136
83
136
40
43
85
52
52
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
186
74
112
8
66
8
2
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
53
14
14
14
6
5
3
37
23
14
23
14
23
4
4
6
20
12
20
6
6
13
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
64
28
36
3
25
3
1
N
W
W
W
N
W
W
W
N
W
N
W
N
N
W
W
N
N
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
N
E
N
E
E
E
S
39
10
10
10
4
4
3
29
18
11
18
11
18
3
3
4
16
9
16
5
5
10
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
46
20
26
2
18
2
0
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
E
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
S
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
S
W
S
W
W
W
N
143
46
46
46
18
12
17
111
70
41
70
41
70
12
11
17
118
72
118
35
37
73
45
45
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
168
67
101
7
60
7
2
North Kesteven
A17
A1
A46
A617
A46
A617
A6097
10
17
3
5
8
19
11
E
S
E
E
E
E
S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
S
E
E
E
E
S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
N
W
W
W
W
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
South Kesteven
A1
A6097
A46
A1
A46
A617
A617
9
11
13
17
3
5
19
S
S
S
N
E
E
E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S
S
S
N
E
E
E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
N
S
W
W
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Melton
Rushcliffe
Nottingham
Gedling
Ashfield
Mansfield
Bassetlaw
West Lindsey
Lincoln
Appendix E
Appendix E
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 16 of 18
38
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/M - MIXED SHOPPING MALLS
Calculation Factor:
100 sqm
ARRIVALS
DEPARTURES
TOTALS
No.
Ave.
Trip
No.
Ave.
Trip
No.
Ave.
Trip
Time Range
Days
GFA
Rate
Days
GFA
Rate
Days
GFA
Rate
00:00-01:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01:00-02:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
02:00-03:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
03:00-04:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
04:00-05:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
05:00-06:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06:00-07:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
07:00-08:00
1
14693
0.919
1
14693
0.783
1
14693
1.702
08:00-09:00
2
12375
1.301
2
12375
0.675
2
12375
1.976
09:00-10:00
3
9847
2.285
3
9847
1.384
3
9847
3.669
10:00-11:00
3
9847
2.661
3
9847
2.160
3
9847
4.821
11:00-12:00
3
9847
2.742
3
9847
2.772
3
9847
5.514
12:00-13:00
3
9847
2.546
3
9847
2.623
3
9847
5.169
13:00-14:00
3
9847
2.474
3
9847
2.593
3
9847
5.067
14:00-15:00
3
9847
2.373
3
9847
2.535
3
9847
4.908
15:00-16:00
3
9847
2.309
3
9847
2.458
3
9847
4.767
16:00-17:00
3
9847
2.048
3
9847
2.556
3
9847
4.604
17:00-18:00
3
9847
1.439
3
9847
1.841
3
9847
3.280
18:00-19:00
3
9847
0.870
3
9847
1.141
3
9847
2.011
19:00-20:00
2
9743
0.883
2
9743
1.109
2
9743
1.992
20:00-21:00
1
14693
0.184
1
14693
0.259
1
14693
0.443
21:00-22:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22:00-23:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23:00-24:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Daily Trip Rates:
Appendix E
Appendix E
25.034
24.889
0
49.923
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 17 of 18
39
06/10/2009
NSDC Transport Study
WYG
TRIP RATE for Lan FOOD & DRINK/A - HOTELS
Calculation Factor:
1 BEDRMS
ARRIVALS
DEPARTURES
TOTALS
No.
Ave.
Trip
No.
Ave.
Trip
Time Range
Days
BEDRMS
Rate
Days
BEDRMS
Rate
00:00-01:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01:00-02:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
02:00-03:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
03:00-04:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
04:00-05:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
05:00-06:00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06:00-07:00
3
111
0.093
3
111
0.072
3
111
0.165
07:00-08:00
34
89
0.082
34
89
0.149
34
89
0.231
08:00-09:00
35
87
0.138
35
87
0.200
35
87
0.338
09:00-10:00
35
87
0.128
35
87
0.145
35
87
0.273
10:00-11:00
35
87
0.093
35
87
0.095
35
87
0.188
11:00-12:00
35
87
0.095
35
87
0.088
35
87
0.183
12:00-13:00
35
87
0.112
35
87
0.098
35
87
0.21
13:00-14:00
35
87
0.086
35
87
0.094
35
87
0.18
14:00-15:00
35
87
0.106
35
87
0.115
35
87
0.221
15:00-16:00
35
87
0.108
35
87
0.115
35
87
0.223
16:00-17:00
35
87
0.112
35
87
0.113
35
87
0.225
17:00-18:00
35
87
0.171
35
87
0.119
35
87
0.29
18:00-19:00
35
87
0.165
35
87
0.104
35
87
0.269
19:00-20:00
21
88
0.182
21
88
0.118
21
88
0.3
20:00-21:00
21
88
0.113
21
88
0.084
21
88
0.197
21:00-22:00
13
81
0.087
13
81
0.101
13
81
0.188
22:00-23:00
4
76
0.146
4
76
0.195
4
76
0.341
23:00-24:00
4
76
0.043
4
76
0.073
4
76
0.116
Daily Trip Rates:
Appendix E
Appendix E
2.06
2.078
No.
Ave.
Trip
Days BEDRMS Rate
4.138
Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 18 of 18
40
06/10/2009

Similar documents