Committed Development - Newark and Sherwood District Council
Transcription
Committed Development - Newark and Sherwood District Council
Newark & Sherwood District Council District Wide Transport Study Technical Note 3 – Trip Generation, Distribution & Assignment 1 Introduction 1.1 This note is the third in a series of Technical Notes summarising the assessment methodology to be applied in the district-wide Transport Study. These notes will be submitted to the Transport Study Steering Group for approval throughout the preparation of the study. 1.2 This note covers the approach for estimating trip generation, trip distribution and assignment onto transport networks within the district. 2 Committed Developments 2.1 For the purposes of this study land-use developments will be split into two categories; committed land-use developments located within the Newark and Sherwood District and land-use developments located in adjacent Districts/Boroughs that are likely to result in trips through Newark and Sherwood District. 2.2 To avoid double counting, trips between the District and land-use developments outside of the District will be ignored since these are included in the trips generated by growth within the District (although it is acknowledged that land-use developments in adjacent Districts/Boroughs may change the distribution of trips to/from the District). Committed Land-Use Developments within the District 2.3 Information has been obtained from the planning department at Newark and Sherwood District Council regarding all committed land-use developments within the District (proposed developments with planning permissions yet to be implemented, or developments already under construction but yet to be completed or occupied). 2.4 Only committed land-use developments that have the potential to generate material changes in existing transport conditions have been taken into account and ‘material’ has been defined as housing developments comprising 50 or more dwellings, or employment/retail developments of 1,500sqm or greater floor area. These thresholds are defined in the DfT / DCLG – Guidance on Transport Assessment (March 2007) as the trigger points requiring a Transport Statement to be submitted in support of a planning application. So it is considered reasonable to assume that developments smaller than these thresholds will have no material transport impacts. Technical Note 3 Appendix E Page 1 of 6 1 06/10/2009 Land-Use Developments Outside of the District 2.5 As requested by Nottinghamshire County Council an assessment has also been undertaken of the likely future traffic effects of committed and likely developments in adjacent Districts/Boroughs. In order to do this information has been obtained on development proposals within all Districts/Boroughs that border Newark and Sherwood. In addition, information has also been obtained for Nottingham City and Lincoln City because, whilst these do not directly adjoin Newark and Sherwood District, they have the potential to be significant trip generators. 2.6 Data has been obtained from a variety of sources including consultation with the relevant local authority planning departments, relevant planning strategy documents and data collected in support of the Highways Agency’s proposed improvement of the A453 as the modelled area for this scheme covers many of the Districts adjacent to Newark and Sherwood. Data has been obtained for the following Districts/Boroughs: • • • • • • 2.7 • • • • • Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Only land-use developments that have the potential to generate material changes in existing transport conditions have been taken into account (i.e. greater than 50 dwellings, or greater than 1,500sqm of employment/retail). In accordance with Department for Transport WebTAG guidance the data has been summarised and categorised by likelihood of the development proceeding using the following definitions of probability: • Near Certain: The outcome will happen or there is a high probability that it will happen. • More Than Likely: The outcome is likely to happen but there is some uncertainty. • Reasonably Foreseeable: The outcome may happen, but there is significant uncertainty. • Hypothetical: There is considerable uncertainty whether the outcome will ever happen. 2.8 The assessment has considered only those sites classified as ‘Near Certain’ and ‘More Than Likely’ (which is consistent with the A453 ‘core scenario’ as agreed with the Highways Agency and local authorities). A summary of the Technical Note 3 Appendix E Page 2 of 6 2 06/10/2009 developments that have been taken into account is presented in the table below. District/ Borough Size of Development by Development Use-Class 100 sqm Floor Area C3 (Dwellings) B1 B2 B8 A1 C1 (Hotel Beds) Melton 1,267 213 213 213 0 0 Ashfield 3,251 3,346 1,657 1,657 0 250 Bassetlaw 100 1,731 1,731 1,731 0 0 Gedling 698 0 0 0 0 0 Mansfield 1,696 3,250 1,250 0 80 0 Rushcliffe 1,552 2,340 1,842 1,508 0 0 Lincoln City 1,044 1,416 932 968 0 0 Total 9,608 12,296 7,625 6,077 80 250 3 Committed Transport Improvement Schemes 3.1 The assessment year for the study is 2026 therefore committed infrastructure projects that will be completed before 2026 will be taken into account. The following committed schemes are considered likely to result in material changes to existing transport conditions and will therefore be taken into account in the study. Various Rail Network/Service Enhancements – for those proposals that are committed (i.e. have funding secured and a definite delivery programme) the likely benefits in terms of improved capacity and service frequency will be determined through discussion with the relevant operators and summarised in the study. A46(T) Newark to Widmerpool Improvement – forecast traffic flows will be obtained from the documentation submitted in support of the successful DfT funding submission bid. Ollerton Roundabout Improvement Scheme – a previously committed scheme to improve the A614/A616/B6075 Ollerton Roundabout has recently been dropped from the LTP programme following a change of political administration at Nottinghamshire County Council. The proposed improvement had been taken to ‘Preferred Option’ stage but since funding has been withdrawn a delivery date can no longer be confirmed. Details of the proposal have therefore been included for information purposes but it has not been considered as a committed improvement. Various Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Improvement Schemes – The proposed pedestrian route in Ollerton and the proposed improvements/extensions to existing cycle networks in Newark and Ollerton will be taken into account in the study. Technical Note 3 Appendix E Page 3 of 6 3 06/10/2009 3.2 A study undertaken on behalf of the Highways Agency at the A46(T) Cattle Market Roundabout in Newark proposes accident remedial measures be implemented and identifies that the junction will be over operational capacity by 2010. The proposed remedial scheme is however unlikely to result in material changes in traffic capacity and will therefore not be taken into account in the study. 3.3 There are various bus infrastructure enhancement schemes proposed across the North Nottinghamshire area which will include minor local improvements within Newark & Sherwood District. However, these are unlikely to significantly affect existing bus capacity, service frequency or routes and will therefore not be taken into account in the study. The Potterdyke Regeneration proposals include for an improved bus station to replace the existing facility off Lombard Street. This will be taken into account in the study. 3.4 Any proposed bus service alterations/improvements will be identified through dialogue with the relevant public transport operators and the County Council and any relevant proposals will be confirmed to the Steering Group and taken into account in the study (if there are any). 4 Development Trip Generation 4.1 The development scenarios to be assessed in the study comprise a combination of residential and employment uses. 4.2 For residential sites the potential number of dwellings on individual sites will be estimated using an assumed residential development density of 30 dwellings per hectare, as advised by the Steering Group. 4.3 Residential person trip generation will be estimated using TRICS Version 2009(a) ‘average’ trip rates for Houses Privately Owned. Modal split percentages derived from Census 2001 ‘Travel to Work Data’ (for resident population) will then be applied to the person trips in order to determine trips by each relevant mode of transport. 5 Employment Trip Generation 5.1 For employment sites gross floor area (GFA) will be estimated as 40% of the total site area. 5.2 Employment person trip generation will be estimated using TRICS Version 2009(a) ‘average’ trip rates for Business Parks which is representative of the majority of sites to be assessed and will provide the basis for a robust assessment. Modal split percentages derived from Census 2001 ‘Travel to Work Data’ (for daytime population) will then be applied to the person trips in order to determine trips by each relevant mode of transport. Technical Note 3 Appendix E Page 4 of 6 4 06/10/2009 6 Trip Distribution 6.1 Trip distribution will be based on 2001 National Census Travel to Work statistics for representative wards within the District. The attached plan illustrates the locations of the proposed development sites being assessed and indicates ward boundaries within the District. It should be noted that the boundaries depicted are the 2001 ward boundaries so as to correspond with the 2001 census ‘Travel to Work’ data (some boundaries were amended in 2006). 6.2 For proposed development in the following settlements the choice of representative ward is straight forward as the development sites are contained within a single ward boundary: Collingham Sutton-on-Trent Edwinstowe Clipstone Bilsthorpe Blidworth Rainworth Farnsfield Lowdham 6.3 For proposed development at Ollerton and Boughton the Ollerton Ward has been chosen as the most representative as it contains the majority of both existing and proposed development. 6.4 For proposed development at Southwell the Southwell West Ward has been chosen as the most representative as it contains the majority of both existing and proposed development. 6.5 For proposed development at Newark on Trent the Bridge Ward has been chosen as the most representative as it contains a representative mix of existing residential and employment uses. 6.6 Forecast traffic flows (2026) for the Newark on Trent urban area have been obtained from the VISUM model built in support of development proposals to the south of Newark. The model data includes the traffic effects of all relevant committed developments. Technical Note 3 Appendix E Page 5 of 6 5 06/10/2009 6.7 In order to distribute trips onto the existing transport networks the representative wards will be treated as origins for residential development and destinations for employment development. Travel to work data for these wards will then be used to identify respective destination and origin wards and modal splits. 6.8 Routes between the identified origins and destinations for each representative ward will be identified within the District using a manual process observing the shortest route available identified using route planning software. Where two or more routes of equal length are available trips will be split equally between the available routes. 7 Trip Assignments 6.9 Development generated vehicle trips will be assigned onto the ‘A’ and ‘B’ road network within the District using a spreadsheet containing coded road links to represent the identified routes. The resultant data will then be read into GIS and represented graphically on a plan of the study area. 6.10 A GIS trip assignment will be generated for each development scenario. This will allow the cumulative traffic effects of the individual sites within each growth scenario to be identified and the relative impacts of the different scenarios to be compared. Generated trips will be presented graphically using network ‘stress plans’. Technical Note 3 Appendix E Page 6 of 6 6 06/10/2009 Appendix E 7 N&SDC Transport Study Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Rail The tables that follow set out proposed and potential transport infrastructure schemes by mode, some of which appear more than once as they appear in numerous documents. Schemes outside of Newark and Sherwood are included where they would have a positive impact on the district. Document Proposal Implementation date Cost incl Funders Agencies Implementing 2009 Updated comments National Documents Network Rail Route Plan 2008 – East Coast Mainline/ East Coast Mainline Route Utilisation Strategy (Feb 2008) Network Rail Route Plan 2008 - South Trans-Pennine, South Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Network Rail Route Plan 2008 - Midland Mainline and East Midlands East Coast Main Line (ECML) level crossing closure programme. This will lead to increased capacity and improved safety and performance across the route. This is a route wide project therefore uncertain if will include those within the district 2009 – 2014 Bathley Lane level crossing Overhead Line (OHL) enhanced protection. This will lead to improved performance Gauge enhancement (between Peterborough and Doncaster) to accommodate the carriage of deep sea container traffic on the East Coast Main Line north of Peterborough Capacity relief Peterborough to Doncaster enhancement of the GN/GE Joint Line via Spalding and Lincoln. This will lead to increased capacity and improved performance on the ECML W10 gauge enhancement from Newark to Doncaster via Swinderby and Gainsborough. Capability to carry deep sea containers on standard deck height wagons. Provides additional capacity when ECML cannot carry W10 traffic Nottingham to Newark resignalling. Enhancement element: increased line speed and capacity between Nottingham and Newark Nottingham hub. Redevelopment, potential additional platform, improved waiting/retail facilities. Enhanced station and interchange facilities 2010 Network Rail Discretionary Fund Third Party 2010 2011 – 2014 2013/14 2012/13 Network Rail Discretionary Fund / Third Party 2009 – 2013 Third Party/ Network Rail Local Authorities Technical Note 3 Appendix E £20 million (total) NCC granted planning permission December 2008 06/10/2009 8 N&SDC Transport Study Document Proposal Nottingham to Lincoln journey time improvements (under consideration by Network Rail and local authorities) Department for Transport — East Midlands Regional Planning Assessment May 2007 National Rail Strategic Plan 2007 Network Rail Strategic Plan Update 2008 Office of Rail Regulation June 2008 – Periodic Review Implementation date 2013 Agencies Implementing Network Rail discretionary fund, Nottinghamshire CC, Lincolnshire CC Car parking capacity enhancements especially on ECML (Each case requires further consideration) 2007 – 2014 Local Transport Plans and franchise commitments by train operators Direct London to Lincoln services (via ECML) 2010 National Express East Coast Station improvement scheme - Newark North Gate is on list of 150 stations that may benefit from the enhancement scheme ECML level crossing closure programme (route wide) Capacity relief to the East Coast Main Line (route wide) ECML Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) Optional enhancement project (route wide) East Coast Main Line level crossing closures (route wide) Capacity Relief to East Coast Main Line (Joint Line via Spalding) 2009 – 2014 2009 – 2013 2008 – 2011 Technical Note 3 Appendix E Cost incl Funders £150 million (total) Network Rail Local Funding £20 million (total) £248 million (total) £35 million Network Rail £19 million Network Rail £233 million Network Rail 2009 Updated comments 4 year delay to 2013 (NCoC report on RFA 19/12/08). Required to accommodate A46 being brought forward and retaining A453 in programme Up to 2,000 more car parking spaces are to be provided by the end of the seven-year franchise for ECML From December 2010 a new twohourly direct Lincoln-London service will be introduced via Newark, Grantham and Peterborough (National Express website) Improvement to include platform lifts Network Rail Network Rail 06/10/2009 9 N&SDC Transport Study 2008 Draft Determinations Regional Transport Strategy (Part of Draft Regional Plan) Network Rail Stations Strategy 2007 North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 East Coast main Line Overhead Line Enhancement East Midlands Resignalling — Nottingham Area Improved rail services between Lincoln and major cities including London (services to be provided both by East Midlands Trains and National Express East Coast) Maintenance and renewals plans: Bleasby, Fiskerton, Lowdham, Newark Castle, Newark North Gate, Rolleston, Thurgarton 2006 - 2021 Newark Castle to become fully staffed, i.e. to have platform staff available throughout the period of timetabled train services 2006 - 2015 GNER previously announced that lifts will be installed at Newark North Gate by 2008 Unknown now 2009 - 2014 Technical Note 3 Appendix E £30 million Network Rail £19 million Network Rail Network Rail DfT Rail Train Operators £190,000 each (except Rolleston £606,000) £370 million (UK wide total) Network Rail Strategic Rail Authority/ Department for Transport Access for All Fund Train Operator Slippage due to change in operator. Unknown whether new operator will retain this commitment 06/10/2009 10 N&SDC Transport Study Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Road Document Proposal Implementation date Cost incl Funders Agencies Implementing 2009 Updated comments National Documents Highways Agency — A46 Newark to Widmerpool Improvement Appraisal Summary Table July 2007 Upgrade of 28km single carriageway to dual carriageway and elimination of all existing at grade junctions, except the northern terminal roundabout at Newark, and replacing them where appropriate with full grade separation. Approx 15 km of scheme is offline from existing alignment Includes a bypass for Farndon 2009 – 2011 £348 million Highways Agency Construction Engineers appointed by Highway Agency A46/ A1 Winthorpe Junction Improvement, Newark A46 Newark — Widmerpool Improvement A1 Peterborough — Blyth Junction Improvements 2016 - 2021 £5 million > Highways Agency 2009 – 2011 Complete 2009 £87 million Highways Agency Highways Agency See above Section between Markham Moor and Gonerby affects Newark. Complete on site March 2009 Kelham Bypass Possible inclusion in LTP3 (2011 onwards) £15 million (approx) Nottinghamshire County Council Low priority against RFA criteria (NCC cabinet report re RFA on 30/9/08), however LTP2 mentions as likely LTP3 major scheme Collingham Bypass Uncertain, not for Nottinghamshire County Low priority against Public Inquiry closed on 18/9/08 with decision published on 19/12/08. £174m additional DfT funding contribution announced Dec 08/ EMRA confirmed still Regional Priority in Feb 09. Scheme to open by late 2011 now Regional Documents Regional Transport Strategy (Part of Draft Regional Plan) Local Documents North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 Technical Note 3 Appendix E 06/10/2009 11 N&SDC Transport Study submission scheme excluded from current LTP Document Proposal Ollerton Roundabout Improvement Scheme Implementation date 2009 – 2011 Enlarged roundabout or fully signalised junction improvement North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 Casualty reduction schemes; problem sites, route treatments, speed management measures and traffic calming. Projects ready for implementation Safer routes network - Development of networks of safer routes, 20mph/school safety zones. Linked to school travel plans. Status ranges from design in progress to ready for implementation Intelligent transport systems — SCOOT / MOVA and CCTV congestion monitoring. Includes MOVA Newark (design stage) Rural traffic management - including the village review, interactive signs, gateway treatments, small village speed review, small scale treatments, TROs, and accessibility improvements. Prioritised by area. Status ranges from design in progress to ready for implementation Urban traffic management - interactive signs, gateway treatments, small scale treatments, TROs, and accessibility improvements. Prioritised by area. Status ranges from design in progress to ready for implementation North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan Technical Note 3 Appendix E Classified roads — Schemes prioritised on condition. Ready for implementation Non classified roads - schemes prioritised on 2006/07 2010/2011 Cost incl Funders £3.1 million LTP & developer contributions Range from <£250,000 £500,000 Council RFA criteria (NCC cabinet report re RFA on 30/9/08) Agencies Implementing Nottinghamshire County Council 2009 Updated comments Preferred option is enlarged roundabout (NCC cabinet report re options 30/4/08) Ongoing Nottinghamshire County Council 2006/07 2010/2011 Range from <£250,000 £500,000 Nottinghamshire County Council Ongoing 2006/07 2010/2011 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council Ongoing 2006/07 2010/2011 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council Ongoing 2006/07 2010/2011 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council 2006/07 2010/2011 2006/07 - >£1 million Nottinghamshire County Council Nottinghamshire County Ongoing. 2008/9 ITM budget allocated £10k to A612 Gonalston Signing and Lining and £5k to King Clipstone TM trial site Ongoing >£1 million Ongoing 06/10/2009 12 N&SDC Transport Study 2006/07 - 2010/11 condition with local input. Ready for implementation Bridge Strengthening schemes for 40 tonne vehicles prioritised by route importance. Ready for implementation Southwell Bypass Implementation date Uncertain Ollerton Bypass Uncertain Unknown Proposal 2006/07 2010/2011 Technical Note 3 Appendix E Council £250,000 £500,000 (total) Cost incl Funders Unknown Document Nottinghamshire County Council Cabinet Report on Regional Funding Allocation Review (30/9/08) 2010/2011 Nottinghamshire County Council Ongoing Agencies Implementing Nottinghamshire County Council Nottinghamshire County Council 2009 Updated comments Low priority against RFA criteria Low priority against RFA criteria 06/10/2009 13 N&SDC Transport Study Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Bus Document Proposal Implementation date Cost incl Funders Agencies Implementing 2009 Updated comments Local Documents North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 (Bus Strategy for North Nottinghamshire March 2006) Area wide bus priority - Bus priority including information, marketing, infrastructure and small scale traffic Management measures applied to an area, such as a • district local centre. Newark ready for implementation Public Transport Accessibility —Raised kerbs, physical access, bus boarders, bus stop lighting (including solar), information, CCTV and other supporting measures Rural towns and villages to improve accessibility, safety and security for public transport users. Locations include: Newark Town centre (ready for implementation), Rural Towns and Villages (design stage), Clipstone (Ready for implementation), Rainworth and Southwell (Design stage) Bus location and electronic information Electronic displays, real time information and ‘Transport Direct’ journey Planner (Area wide) Design Stage Ticketing - Integrated ticketing, prepaid and smartcard systems (Area wide) 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council NN area wide allocation made in 2008/9 LTP programme 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 per project Nottinghamshire County Council £30,000 allocated in 2008/9 NN LTP ITM programme to Newark (Collingham) corridor. £80,000 allocated for Rainworth / Kelham / Southwell route 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council 2006/07 – 2010/11 £250,000 – £500,000 Nottinghamshire County Council Upgrading of interchange facilities - Relocation of bus stops, coordinated information, lighting and footway improvements at key nodes in district/local centres. Access Rural interchanges, improvements to local rail network. Includes Newark (Design in progress) 2006/07 – 2010/11 £250,000 – £500,000 Nottinghamshire County Council NN area wide allocation made in 2008/9 LTP programme NN area wide allocation made in 2008/9 LTP programme NN area wide allocation made in 2008/9 LTP programme Technical Note 3 Appendix E 06/10/2009 14 N&SDC Transport Study Proposed and Potential Transport lnfrastructure Schemes – Cycling and Walking Document Proposal Implementation date Cost incl Funders Agencies Implementing 2009 Updated comments Local Documents North Nottinghamshire Local Transport Plan 2006/07 - 2010/11 Pedestrian route development in urban / district centres and rural areas Locations include: Sherwood Drive, Ollerton (ready for implementation) Cycle Network - Including shared pedestrian on and off carriageway routes, urban and rural routes, upgrading of existing facilities and missing links Schemes include: Beacon Hill Newark; London Road, Newark; Forest Road, Ollerton (ready for implementation) 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council Ongoing. No specific schemes in 2008/9 ITM 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 per project Nottinghamshire County Council Rights of Way - Implementation of schemes identified in Rights of Way Improvement Plan programme. Schemes include: Footpaths #28,48 & 54, Southwell (ready for implementation) Local schemes prioritised on an area basis New crossing facilities - Instillation of new and upgrading of signal crossings and refuges. Prioritised on need (Ready for implementation) Access for disabled people - Dropped crossings, facilities at signal crossings and physical access improvement schemes. Prioritised on area basis (Ready for implementation) 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council NN LTP 2008/9 ITM allocation shows £50,000 allocated for Balderton to Fernwood (works) and £3,000 for Lincoln Road, Newark (design). Lowdham to Burton Joyce removed from programme through increased costs? No specific schemes allocated in ITM programme in 2008/9 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council 2006/07 – 2010/11 <£250,000 Nottinghamshire County Council Footways — Schemes prioritised on condition with local input (Ready for implementation) 2006/07 – 2010/11 £500,000 – £1 million Nottinghamshire County Council Technical Note 3 Appendix E Ongoing. No specific schemes in 2008/9 ITM £25k 2008/9 ITM allocation for Newark & Sherwood dropped crossing programme Ongoing 06/10/2009 15 NSDC Transport Study WYG Analysis of Committed Employment Development Sites Within the District Methodology: 1. The employment growth scenario for the District that is being tested in the Transport Study is derived from the recommendations of the 'East Midlands Northern Sub Region Employment Land Review' study which was undertaken by Nottinghamshire County Council (report dated March 2008). This recommends that the 'higher part of the 31 to 52.6ha range' should be used to inform the District's emerging LDF'. The Transport Study therefore applies a District-wide employment growth scenario of 52.6ha in order to be consistent with the findings of the Employment Land Review. 2. The 52.6ha is a gross site area but excludes future employment ‘land losses’ within the District. It has been estimated taking into account RSS growth including Newark Growth Point, plus additional employment provision to reduce out-commuting from the District by one third (see East Midlands Northern Sub Region Employment Land Review report for details). 3. The 52.6ha area is the forecast total employment growth within the District regardless of sites that may have extant planning permission. The study identifies that the District currently has an over provision of allocated/consented employment land and that substantial de-allocation will be necessary in order to meet with the forecast growth. The 52.6ha forecast also excludes employment land that will be 'lost' before the end of 2026 through de-allocation, change of use or failure to be developed. 4. For the purpose of the Transport Study no additional 'committed' employment developments therefore need be taken into acount otherwise the total employment growth being assessed will exceed the 52.6ha forecast. 5. It is impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy where existing employment allocations/uses may be ‘lost’, or which sites with extant permissions will actually get developed up to 2026. For the purposes of this strategic Transport Study the forecast employment growth of 52.6ha has therefore been distributed across the District on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the location of assumed residential growth (i.e. close to residential growth to reduce commuting). However, it is acknowleged that the final spatial distribution of employment growth within the district may, in parctice, differ from this assumption by the end of 2026. Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 1 of 7 16 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Analysis of Committed Residential Development Sites Within the District Information supplied by N&SDC confirms the following committed residential developments: Settlement Newark, Balderton & Fernwood Ollerton & Boughton Clipstone Rainworth Southwell Bilsthorpe Blidworth Collingham Edwinstowe Farnsfield Lowdham Sutton on Trent Bleasby Coddington Elston Farndon Fiskerton Cum Morton Gunthorpe Halam Harby Norwell North Muskham Walesby Winthorpe Other Villages & Settlements Total Dwellings 1,737 514 123 4 76 90 54 47 81 23 6 18 5 9 4 1 7 2 9 13 4 15 15 1 215 3,073 Comments >50 Dwellings Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Locations unknown & likely to be spread over many sites. A theshold of 50 dwellings has been applied to determine whether or not residential developments are considered in the study. This is the threshold identified in the DfT/CLG 'Guidance on Transport Assessment' March 2007, to determine whether or not a Transport Statement is required in support of a planning application for residential developments. Removing from the list those sites that are smaller than 50 dwellings gives the following: Settlement Newark, Balderton & Fernwood Ollerton & Boughton Clipstone Southwell Bilsthorpe Blidworth Edwinstowe Total Dwellings 1,737 514 123 76 90 54 81 2,675 Further analysis of the sites within Newark/Balderton/Fernwood is presented on the next worksheet. Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 2 of 7 17 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Analysis of Committed Residential Development Sites Within the District Information supplied by N&SDC confirms the following committed residential developments within Newark/Balderton/Fernwood: Town/Village BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON BALDERTON NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK NEWARK Street ACACIA ROAD BARNBY ROAD BROOKE CLOSE (2) BROWING ROAD (19) BULLPIT ROAD (9A) BULLPIT ROAD (50) GLOVERS LANE (10) GREAT NORTH ROAD GREAT NORTH ROAD GROVE STREET (70) HAWTON LANE HAWTON LANE(30) LONDON ROAD (r/o 252 & 254) LONDON ROAD (Toll Bar House) MAIN STREET (74A) MAIN STREET (93A) MAIN STREET (159) MOUNT ROAD PINFOLD LANE SMITH STREET(20) SPRING LANE (18) SYKES LANE (19) WARWICK ROAD WARWICK ROAD(17/17a) WOLFIT AVENUE HAWTON LANE ALBERT STREET (58) ALBION STREET(Crown & Cushion) ALBION STREET(Crown & Cushion) APPLETONGATE APPLETONGATE APPLETON GATE (23) BALDERTONGATE BARNBY ROAD BARNBY ROAD BARNBY ROAD BARNBY ROAD BARNBY GATE(95) BARNBYGATE(139) BARNBYGATE(14) BARNBY GATE (113-115) BARNBY GATE (Former Gas Works) BARNBY GATE (Mastercare) BEACON HILL ROAD BEACON HILL ROAD (35) BEACON HILL ROAD (37) BEACON HILL ROAD(240,240A,242) BEACON HILL ROAD BEACON HILL ROAD (117) BEACON HILL ROAD (119) BEACON HILL ROAD (121) BEACON HILL ROAD (123) BEACON HILL ROAD BOWBRIDGE ROAD (The Bearings) BOWBRIDGE ROAD (R/O 75-85) CASTLEGATE CASTLEGATE (R/O 55) CASTLEGATE (Ye Olde Market) CASTLEGATE (Ye Olde Market) CROMWELL ROAD CROSS STREET (1) FAIRWAY(11A) FARNDON ROAD FARNDON ROAD FARNDON ROAD (115) FARNDON ROAD (Travellers Rest) GEORGE STREET (1 The Maltings) GEORGE STREET (The Old Maltings) GEORGE STREET (Unit 2) GEORGE STREET (Unit 5) GUILDHALL STREET GUILDHALL STREET HARCOURT STREET (35) HARCOURT STREET (35) HATCHETS LANE(1A) HAWTON ROAD (158) HAWTON ROAD KIRKGATE (12-14) KIRKGATE (21-25) KIRKGATE(38) LENTON TERRACE(Warehouse) LOMBARD STREET LOMBARD STREET(Robin Hood Hotel) LONDON ROAD (65A) LONDON ROAD (Newark Town Bowls Club) LOVERS LANE(The Old Chapel) MASSEY STREET MASSEY STREET MIDDLETON ROAD (120) MILL GATE MILL GATE MILL GATE (29) MILL GATE(65) MOUNT LANE(7-10) NORTH GATE NORTH GATE(17) NORTHGATE(26/28) NORTHGATE(35) NORTH GATE (75-77) NORTH GATE(Warwick & Richardson) NORTH GATE (Hoval Farrar Ltd) PELHAM STREET (15 & 17) PRIMROSE AVENUE QUEENS ROAD (Smiths Timber) SLEAFORD ROAD(36) SPRING GARDENS (28) STODMAN STREET(40) STODMAN STREET(8) SYDNEY STREET TOP ROW VICTORIA STREET (10) VICTORIA STREET (62) WINTHORPE ROAD (40) WINTHORPE ROAD(Maple Leaf) WRIGHT STREET(13b) TOTAL Consented 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 830 320 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 14 1 4 3 2 1 34 2 6 210 1 2 8 12 11 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 8 2 9 100 4 16 4 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 89 1 10 8 7 2 20 4 1 1 13 25 17 6 6 3 9 3 1 1 1 1 1 6 2 6 4 2 46 3 5 1 8 27 38 2 69 6 1 4 99 11 1 4 60 49 225 8 3 2 2 2 2 1 10 1 1 1 2 17 3 2,612 Completed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 582 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 649 Balance 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 248 320 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 14 1 4 3 2 1 20 2 1 210 1 2 8 12 11 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 8 2 9 100 1 16 4 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 89 1 10 8 7 2 20 4 1 1 13 25 17 6 6 3 9 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 6 4 2 46 3 5 1 8 27 2 2 69 0 6 1 1 99 11 1 4 60 49 225 8 3 2 2 2 2 1 10 1 1 1 2 17 3 1,963 Sites > 50 Dwellings Already included in the VISUM model data. 568 Great North Road Already included in the VISUM model data. 210 Hawton Lane (Flowserve) Already included in the VISUM model data. 100 Barnby Gate Already included in the VISUM model data. 89 Bowbridge Road Already included in the VISUM model data. 69 Mill Gate 200 dwellings on North Gate are already included in the VISUM model data. 384 North Gate 1420 Notes: 1. The total number of committed dwellings in Newark on Trent differs slightly (+226 dwellings) from the information provided in the growth scenarios (see previous worksheet). This is mainly 2 due to the addition of the Flowserve Site (210 dwellings) which was not included in the growth scenario data. As a worse case the higher figure of 1,963 dwellings will be applied for the purposes of this study. 2. The cumulative traffic effects of all committed residential developments in the Newark/Balderton/Fernwood area (i.e. 1,963 dwellings) will be assessed on the wider highway network within the District. However, only those sites with greater than 50 dwellings will be specifically examined for the urban area of Newark as it is beyond the scope of this strategic study to distribute trips to all of the sites listed above on an individual basis. 3. A theshold of 50 dwellings has therefore been applied to determine whether or not residential developments are specifically considered in the study. This is the threshold identified in the DfT/CLG 'Guidance on Transport Assessment' March 2007, to determine whether or not a Transport Statement is required in support of a planning application for residential developments. 4. The VISUM model which is to be used to assess Newark on Trent already includes committed residential developments totalling 1,435 dwellings (see table below) which is essentially equal to the total for all committed residential sites with greater than 50 dwellings. No additional committed residential development within Newark on Trent therefore needs to be taken into account in the VISUM model. WSP has confirmed that the VISUM model already includes the following committed residential developments: Name Great North Road Barnby Gate Bowbridge Road North Gate Flowserve (Hawton Lane) Millgate Trent Lane (North Gate) Settlement Newark Newark Newark Newark Newark Newark Newark Total Dwellings 568 100 89 200 210 68 200 1,435 Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 3 of 7 Appendix E Appendix E 18 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Analysis of Committed Development Sites (Residential & Employment) Within the District Summary of Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of the Wider (Rural) Highway Network in the District: As mentioned earlier in this spreadsheet no committed employment development needs to be assessed otherwise the 52.6ha forecast employment growth for the District to 2026 will be exceeded. The committed development that needs to be taken into account for the assessment of the wider (rural) highway network within the District is therefore: Employment Name - Location - Use Class - GFA (Sqm) 0 Retail Name Potterdyke Location Newark Use Class A1 GFA (Sqm) 12,602 Location Newark, Balderton & Fernwood Ollerton & Boughton Clipstone Southwell Bilsthorpe Blidworth Edwinstowe Total Use Class C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 Dwellings 1,963 514 123 76 90 54 81 2,901 Residential Name Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Summary of Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for VISUM Assessment of Newark on Trent: The VISUM model will be used to assess the highway network within Newark on Trent. The VISUM model already includes the following as committed employment developments in Newark on Trent. Employment Within Newark on Trent - Already in VISUM Model - To be removed from the VISUM model Name Location Use Class Fernwood Business Park Fernwood B1 Hawton Road Industrial Newark B2 Winthorpe Winthorpe B1/B8 Jessops Way (Northern Road Industrial Estate) Newark B2/B8 All of the above 'committed' employment developments will therefore need to be removed from the VISUM model before testing is undertaken. GFA (Sqm) 56,000 20,101 5,783 80,000 The following committed developments are already in the VISUM model and should be retained: Retail (all areas of the District) - Already in VISUM Model (no change to VISUM model): Name Location Potterdyke Newark Residential Within Newark on Trent - Already in VISUM Model (no change to VISUM model): Name Location Great North Road Newark Barnby Gate Newark Bowbridge Road Newark North Gate Newark Flowserve (Hawton Lane) Newark Millgate Newark Trent Lane Newark Total Use Class A1 GFA (Sqm) 12,602 Use Class C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 Dwellings 568 100 89 200 210 68 200 1,435 The following committed developments in the rural areas of the District need to be added to the VISUM model: Residential Within Rural areas of the District - To be added to the VISUM model Name Location Unknown Ollerton & Boughton Unknown Clipstone Unknown Southwell Unknown Bilsthorpe Unknown Blidworth Unknown Edwinstowe Total Appendix E Appendix E Use Class C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 4 of 7 19 Dwellings 514 123 76 90 54 81 938 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Vehicle Trip Calculation Parameters Vehicle Trip Rates Urban Employment Vehicle Trip Rates AM Inbound 1.417 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA AM Outbound 0.197 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA PM Inbound 0.155 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA PM Outbound 1.226 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA AM Inbound 0.143 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling AM Outbound 0.540 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling PM Inbound 0.373 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling PM Outbound 0.229 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling AM Inbound 0.181 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling AM Outbound 0.685 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling PM Inbound 0.473 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling PM Outbound 0.290 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling Urban Residential Vehicle Trip Rates Rural Residential Vehicle Trip Rates Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 5 of 7 20 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Vehicle Trip Generation for Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of the Wider Highway Network in the District: Employment: Vehicle Trips Net Employment Developable Area (sqm) Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Name AM 0 Distribution Wards PM Retail: Name Vehicle Trips Net Employment Developable Area (sqm) AM 12,602 Potterdyke 12,602 Distribution Wards PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A Notes: Based on information contained in the TA Potterdyke flows are assumed to be local to Newark on Trent and will therefore not impact on the wider highway network within the District. Residential: Vehicle Trips Name Newark, Balderton & Fernwood Number of Dwellings AM Distribution Wards PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way 1,963 281 1,060 1,341 732 450 1,182 Bridge Ollerton & Boughton 514 93 352 445 243 149 392 Ollerton Clipstone 123 22 84 107 58 36 94 Clipstone Southwell 76 14 52 66 36 22 58 Southwell West Bilsthorpe Bilsthorpe 90 16 62 78 43 26 69 Blidworth 54 10 37 47 26 16 41 Blidworth 81 2,901 15 450 55 1,703 70 2,153 38 1,176 23 722 62 1,897 Edwinstowe Edwinstowe Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 6 of 7 21 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Vehicle Trip Generation for Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of Newark on Trent Employment: Vehicle Trips Net Employment Developable Area (sqm) Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Name AM 0 PM Notes: The employment growth scenario includes all employment growth within the District to 2026 so no additional 'committed' employment sites need to be assessed. Retail: Net Employment Developable Area (sqm) Name Vehicle Trips AM Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Potterdyke PM Inbound 0 Notes: The Potterdyke development is already included in the VISUM model. Residential: Vehicle Trips Name/Location Number of Dwellings AM PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way See note below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 See note below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 See note below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 See note below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 See note below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ollerton & Boughton 514 93 352 445 243 149 392 Clipstone 123 22 84 107 58 36 94 Southwell 76 14 52 66 36 22 58 Bilsthorpe 90 16 62 78 43 26 69 Blidworth 54 10 37 47 26 16 41 Edwinstowe 81 637 15 115 55 436 70 552 38 301 23 185 62 486 Notes: These cells contained information on committed developments within Newark on Trent that were taken into account in an earlier calculation. These sites are already included in the VISUM model and therefore do not need to be taken into account separately. The table is left blank to maintain linked cells between this spreadsheet and the trip distribution spreadsheets. Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Within the District - Rev 5, Page 7 of 7 22 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Identification of Committed Developments in Adjacent Districts/Boroughs Information has been obtained on development proposals within all Districts/Boroughs that border Newark and Sherwood. In addition, information has also been obtained for Nottingham City and Lincoln City becasue, whilst these do not border Newark and Sherwood District, they have the potential to be significant trip generators. A plan of the adjacent Districts/Boroughs considered is presented below. This also indicates the main routes through the District that have been considered. Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 1 of 18 23 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Identification of Committed Developments in Adjacent Districts/Boroughs As part of the data collection exercise to establish the A453 core modelling scenario, data was collected jointly with the M1 Widening Contract 2 team on likley developments within Districts/Boroughs relevant to the A453 model. Many of these Districts/Boroughs coincide with those of interest to this study so the A453 data, which has been agreed with the HA and Nottinghamshire County Council, has been used to form the basis for identifying development proposals. The A453 data includes the following Districts/Boroughs: 1. Bassetlaw 2. Mansfield 3. Ashfield 4. Gedling 5. Nottingham 6. Rushcliffe Information for the following Districts has been obtained through correspondence with the relevant planning departments: 7. Melton 8. South Kesteven 9. North Kesteven 10. Lincoln 11. West Lindsey In accordance with WebTag guidance the data has been summarised and categorised by likelihood of development using the following definitions of probability: o Near Certain: The outcome will happen or there is a high probability that it will happen. o More Than Likely: The outcome is likely to happen but there is some uncertainty. o Reasonably Foreseeable: The outcome may happen, but there is significant uncertainty. o Hypothetical: There is considerable uncertainty whether the outcome will ever happen. The developments to be included in the Transport Study are consistent with the A453 'core scenario' as agreed with the Highways Agency and local authorities and consists of those developments considered 'Near Certain' and 'More Than Likely'. The data collected is shown in the next worksheet 'All Sites'. The subsequent worksheet 'NC & MTL' details those sites that are classed as 'Near Certain' and 'More Than Likely'. These are the sites that have been considered for the purposes of this study. Trip generation has been estimated by applying the following trip rates: 1. Residential - trip rates derived for rural areas of Newark & Sherwood District 2. Employment - B1 Business Park trip rates derived for rural areas of Newark & Sherwood District 3. Retail - TRICS 2009(a) average trip rates for Retail uses (See TRICS 1 worksheet for details) 4. Hotel - TRICS 2009(a) average trip rates for Hotel uses (See TRICS 2 worksheet for details) Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 2 of 18 24 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Summary of all Relevant Development Proposals within Districts/Boroughs Immediately Adjacent to Newark & Sherwood District County / Unitary Authority Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire District/ Borough Development within timescale Notes Timescale Current status Certainty Scenario Proposed Year of Opening Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Appendix E Appendix E East of Alfreton Road - Phase Va, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete Birds Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 69 dwellings (24 outstanding) Calladine Lane – 150 dwellings Off Common Road/ Cross Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 140 dwellings - Complete Edward Street / Ashwood Avenue, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 116 dwellings (13 outstanding) Former Coates Vyella site, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 52 dwellings Off Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 50 dwellings - Complete Kings Mill Road East, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 112 dwellings Off Kirkby Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 155 dwellings - Complete Main Road, Annesley - 54 dwellings Meden Bank/ Brand Lane, Stanton Hill, 126 dwellings - Complete Hospital, Harlow Wood, Nottingham Road - 103 dwellings - Complete Stag site, Park Drive, Hucknall, 143 dwellings - Complete Phase 2 Coates Viyella, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 54 dwellings Sherwood Business Park – 2 hectares of B1 employment land and a 250-bed hotel Off Sherwood Street, Hucknall - 71 dwellings Easymix Site, Stoneyford Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 51 dwellings - Complete North of BRSA, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield, 67 dwellings - Complete Walton Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete Amber Business Park, Hucknall (Hucknall Colliery) - 1.1 ha employment land Bentinck Colliery - 3.6 ha of land for B1, B2, B8 uses Former textile factory, Bowne Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 53 dwellings Blenheim Lane, Hucknall – 15 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Brierley Industrial Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 1.1 ha employment land Garden Road, Hucknall - 214 dwellings Kings Mill Road/ Oddicroft Lane - 6.3 hectares of employment land South West Oakham Business Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield – 14.9 ha of B1 emp land Mowlands Close / Sheepwash Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 109 dwellings Old Mill Close (East and West), Bestwood Village - 99 dwellings Rear 12,22,24 Portland Road, Selston - 59 dwellings Portland Road (Former Colliery), Hucknall - 66 dwellings to be completed (228 total) Annesley Colliery - 9 ha employment land Diamond Avenue, Kirby-in-Ashfield - 67 dwellings East of Nottingham Road, South Hucknall - 199 dwellings Lime Tree Avenue / Farleys Lane, Hucknall - 84 dwellings Lindleys Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 377 dwellings Off Mill Lane, Huthwaite - 65 dwellings West Fulwood, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 13.6 ha available for B1, B2, B8 use A611/ Annesley Road, Hucknall - 2.3 ha employment land Broomhill Farm, Hucknall - 350 dwellings Butlers Hill, Hucknall - 3.2 ha employment land Coxmoor Road/ A38, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 2.5 ha available for B1, B2, B8 use Fulwood Road North/ Fulwood Industrial Estate, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 1.6ha emp land Hamilton Road/ Coxmoor Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 1.2 hectares of employment land Hillsborough Avenue, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 144 dwellings South West Oakham Business Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield – 8.6 hectares of B1 emp land Lindleys Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 95 dwellings Pinxton Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 28 hectares of B1, B2, B8 uses Rolls Royce, Hucknall, - 13 ha of B1, B2, B8 employment land Welsh Croft Close/ Portland Industrial Estate - 4.1 ha for B1, B2, B8 uses Westdale Road, Jacksdale - 57 dwellings Wigwam Lane North and Central, Hucknall - 1 ha employment land Bentinck Void Landfill - NE of J27 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008 – 2021 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008 – 2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 35 outstanding 37 outstanding 52 outstanding Info from Allen Whitelaw at Ashfield via Pete Morris see email 24/08/05 Completed Under Construction Completed Completed Under Construction Under Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Under Construction Built Completed Completed Completed Completed Planning permission Planning permission Detailed Planning Permission Under Construction Planning permission Planning permission Planning permission Planning permission Under Construction Detailed Planning Permission Detailed PP Under Construction outline pp Outline PP Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline PP In adopted Local Plan Allocated In adopted Local Plan Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Allocated Hypothetical Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 3 of 18 25 Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Core Core Core Core Core Core Core High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth - 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 No. of Dwellings 92 69 150 140 116 52 50 112 155 54 126 103 143 54 B1 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 A1 200 Beds Spaces Hotel P+R 250 71 51 67 92 37 120 37 120 36 120 500 36 500 37 500 37 210 1490 210 210 300 300 300 453 76 453 77 454 77 106 83 54 40 107 83 53 40 107 84 53 40 933 434 136 933 433 137 934 433 137 0.3 0.4 0.3 53 214 109 99 59 228 67 199 84 377 65 350 144 860 95 57 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study County / Unitary Authority Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire District/ Borough WYG Development within timescale Notes Timescale Current status Certainty Scenario Proposed Year of Opening Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Appendix E Appendix E Blyth Road West - 5 ha employment land High Grounds - 1.23 ha employment land High Grounds - 3.6 ha employment land Manton Colliery - 34.96 hectares of B8 employment land. Manton Wood - 2.9 ha employment land Shireoaks Colliery - 4.24ha employment land Worksop – 100 dwellings on small previously developed sites around the town. Blyth Road East - 6 ha employment land Blyth Road South - 6.4 ha employment land Gateford Common East - 8.5 ha employment land Gateford Common West, Worksop - 10 hectares of B1, B2 and B8 employment land. Harrison Drive - 2.5 ha employment land Lound Hall - 2.1 ha employment land Plumbtree Estate - 5.4 ha employment land Sherwood Forest Intermodal Park – 35.7 hectares of B8 employment land. Retford – 1000 dwellings Sherwood Forest Intermodal Park – 50 hectares of B8 employment land. Worksop – 1500 dwellings on small sites in and around the town. Worksop - 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land. Retford – 1000 dwellings Worksop – 1500 dwellings on small sites in and around the town. Worksop - 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land. South East of Worksop – 1,000 dwellings + 20 hectares of employment land South East of Worksop – 1,000 dwellings + 20 hectares of employment land Arnold & Carlton College – 90 dwellings Arnold View Primary School - 70 dwellings EMEB headquarters – 200 dwellings Flatts Lane, Calverton – 148 dwellings Ashwater Drive / Spring Lane, Mapperley – 140 dwellings Chartwell Grove, Mapperley – 50 dwellings Dark Lane, Calverton – 110 dwellings Former Newstead Sports Ground – 80 dwellings Gedling Colliery – 420 dwellings Hillcrest Park, Calverton - 3 ha employment land Howbeck Road, Arnold - 50 dwellings Park Road, Bestwood – 175 dwellings Plains Road/Arnold Lane (south), Mapperley – 80 dwellings Regina Crescent, Ravenshead – 140 dwellings Stockings Farm, Arnold – 390 dwellings Victoria Park – 3.5 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment space Calverton Colliery – 9 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land. Gedling Colliery – 700 dwellings and 6 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Gedling Colliery – 700 dwellings and 6 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Hollinwood Lane, Calverton – 120 dwellings North of Hazelford Way, Newstead - 2 ha of employment land South of Hazlewood Way, Newstead - 3 ha employment North of Victoria Park – 205 dwellings South of Cornwater Fields, Ravenshead – 110 dwellings Teal Close, Netherfield – 195 dwellings + 17 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Top Wighay Farm, Wighay – 595 dwellings + 9 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Teal Close, Netherfield – 195 dwellings + 17 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land Newstead Colliery – 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land North of Papplewick Lane – 440 dwellings Park Avenue, Burton Joyce – 78 dwellings Teal Close, Netherfield – 250 dwellings Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land Mapperley Golf Course – 1390 dwellings + 10 hectares of B1 employment land Newstead Colliery – 25 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land North of Papplewick Lane – 440 dwellings Teal Close, Netherfield – 250 dwellings Total 28.8ha, 2.9ha since 2003 Total 10.3 ha, 4.24 since 2003 Formerly known as Bevercotes Colliery Formerly known as Bevercotes Colliery 85 are complete 2 are complete Permission for 148 dwellings conditional permission = 10 dwellings conditional permission = 50 dwellings Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan This site is not in the Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan This site is deleted from the Local Plan (recommended by Inspector) Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan This site is not in the Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Identified as 'Safeguarded Land' in the adopted Local Plan Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2021+ 2021+ Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008 – 2021 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ Full PP Built Full PP Built Fully developed Full PP in draft local plan. in draft local plan in local draft plan in local draft plan in local draft plan in local draft plan in draft local plan Current application pending highways Notional development Land available but not in current plan Notional development Notional development Notional development Notional development Notional development Notional development Notional development Under construction Under construction Built Under construction Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Planning application under consideration In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework Planning application under consideration Planning application under consideration In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework Notional development In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework Notional development In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework Notional development In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework In adopted Local Plan / Local Development Framework Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 4 of 18 26 Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain More than likely Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Hypothetical Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain More than likely More than likely Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Core High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Core Core High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2020 2020 2023 2030 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 No. of Dwellings B1 167 41 120 1165 97 141 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 A1 166 167 41 41 120 120 1166 1165 96 97 142 141 Beds Spaces Hotel P+R 100 200 213 283 334 83 70 180 200 214 284 333 83 70 180 200 213 283 333 84 70 180 3570 100 100 100 117 300 70 130 117 300 70 130 116 300 70 130 67 100 67 100 66 100 283 300 284 143 107 283 300 283 284 300 283 90 70 200 148 140 50 110 80 420 50 175 80 140 390 245 455 120 205 110 97 595 98 198 149 110 63 595 448 427 323 330 187 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study County / Unitary Authority Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire District/ Borough WYG Development within timescale Notes Timescale Current status Certainty Scenario Proposed Year of Opening Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Nottingham Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Appendix E Appendix E Berry Hill Quarry – 550 dwellings Chesterfield Road South – 8,000 sq.m. of A1 food retail space (Tescos). Haddon Road - 2.2 ha housing land Old Mill Lane - 2 ha of housing land Sherwood Rise – 200 dwellings Rufford Drive, Mansfield Woodhouse - 2 ha housing land Abbott Road – 25 hectares of B1/B2 employment land + 160 dwellings (Water Lane) Berry Hill Quarry – 600 dwellings. Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land Land south of Old Newark Road – 10 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land. Millennium Business Park 7 hectares B1, B2, B8 employment land. Ransom Wood – 6 hectares of B1 employment land Stockwell Gate – 25,000 sq.m. of A1 retail space. Bleak Hills - 4.73 ha employment land Debdale Lane - 3.1 ha employment land Mansfield – 2,000 dwellings on small brownfield sites in and around the town. Old Newark Road / Southwell Road West - 4.2 ha employment land Ratcher Hill Quarry – 8 hectares of B1 , B2 and B8 employment land. Mansfield – 2,000 dwellings on small brownfield sites in and around the town. Maun Valley, Mansfield Woodhouse - 3.6 ha employment land Netherfield Lane, Meden Vale - 3.3 ha employment land Ratcher Hill Quarry – 8 hectares of B1 , B2 and B8 employment land. Rushpool Farm – 100 dwellings Spion Kop - 2 ha employment land Pleasleyhill - 250 dwellings Rushpool Farm – 400 dwellings Rushpool Farm – 400 dwellings Bestwood Park (Padstow School & Ridgeway) – 400 dwellings Blenheim Industrial Estate – 6.7 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land. Bull Close Road (off A52 Clifton Boulevard) - 2.13 ha B8 Clifton South - 285 dwellings Clifton West - 204 dwellings Harrimans Lane – 17.8 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Johnson’s Works, Vernon Road – 118 dwellings Southside – 300 dwellings Southside Regeneration Area – 600 dwellings Boots Island Site - 3.6ha B1 East of Great Northern Close - 3.2ha B1 Arkwright Street East - 1.2 ha B1, B2,B8 Beeston Sidings - 5.24 ha employment land Bestwood Sidings - 1.19 ha employment land Bobbers Mill - 1.26 ha employment land Stanton Tip – 200 dwellings and 10 hectares of B1 employment land Stanton Tip – 300 dwellings and 20 hectares of B1 employment land Waterside – 1,500 dwellings + 100,000 sq metres of B1 office development Waterside – 2500 dwellings + 150,000 sq metres of B1 office development Bestwood Park (Padstow School & Ridgeway) – 400 dwellings Main Road, Radcliffe on Trent - 50 dwellings Ludlow Hill Road, West Bridgford - 210 dwellings Lantern Lane, East Leake - 84 dwellings Pedigree site, Gamston - 180 dwellings Ruddington Fields Business Park, Ruddington - 5 hectares employment land Leawood Old People's Home, West Bridgford - 62 dwellings Pedigree House/ Gamston Piggeries, Gamston - 148 dwellings Easr Leake Hall, East Leake - 56 dwellings British Gypsum, Gotham - 0.5 hectares employment land Mill Hill, Bingham - 453 dwellings Station Yard, Ruddington - 64 dwellings Pasture Lane, Ruddington – 235 dwellings Camelot Street, Ruddington - 72 dwellings Chapel Lane Extension, Bingham - 37.1 hectares B1, B2, B8 employment land Moorbridge Industrial Estate, Bingham - 7.6 hectares employment land Bunny Brickworks, Bunny - 6.7 hectares B1, B2 employment land Hollygate Lane, Cotgrave – 1.8 hectares of Class B1, B2, B8 employment land. The Chateau, West Bridgford – 110 dwellings South of Wilford Lane, West Bridgford - 200 dwellings 1 Loughborough Road, West Bridgford - 215 dwellings Cotgrave Colliery - 25ha employment land Pasture Lane, Ruddington – 3.5 hectares of B1 & B8 employment land. RAF Newton – 28.1 hectares mixed of B2, B8 employment land and dwellings Existing Tesco at Stockwell Gate to close Planning application for elderly persons village No trip gen calculated as would be less than standard dwellings Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2021+ 2021+ 2008-2021 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008 – 2021 2008-2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008-2021 2021+ 2021+ 2021+ 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008 – 2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2016 2016-2026 2016-2026 2008-2026 2016-2026 2016-2026 2016-2026 2016-2026 2008 – 2021 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2026 2008-2026 2008-2026 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2026 2008-2026 Built Detailed Planning Permission Built Built Detailed Planning Permission Detailed Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan Notional In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan Notional In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan No proposals. Regeneration opportunity In Adopted Local Plan In Adopted Local Plan In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. Allocated Allocated Allocated In adopted Local Plan In adopted Local Plan In adopted Local Plan In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. In adopted Local Plan. Built Built Planning permission Built Built Under construction Under construction Under construction FPP Under construction Under construction Under construction OPP OPP OPP OPP Allocated Planning application Allocation Planning application Planning app to be submitted shortly Allocated Planning application Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 5 of 18 27 Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Hypothetical Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Core Core Core Core High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Core Core Core Core High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2023 2030 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2023 2023 2030 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020.526316 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2020 2020 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2020 2020 No. of Dwellings 550 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 A1 B1 Beds Spaces Hotel P+R 80 66 60 200 60 160 600 1250 500 1500 333 234 600 1250 333 233 334 233 158 103 158 103 157 104 140 133 140 133 140 134 120 110 134 120 110 133 120 110 133 66 67 67 170 100 100 300 135 400 519 564 142 285 142 204 563 132 118 151 300 151 600 592 132 151 562 135 131 575 200 575 300 132 1500 132 2500 279.01754 1323.82 50 210 84 180 500 223 224 223 213 593 593 594 360 320 40 175 39 42 1000 2000 1000 1500 40 40 175 174 40 40 42 42 148 56 16 17 17 1236 253 335 60 1237 253 335 60 1237 254 833 834 175 1000 453 64 235 72 60 110 200 215 833 175 50 1000 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study County / Unitary Authority Leics Leics Leics Leics Leics Leics Leics Leics Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Lincolnshire District/ Borough WYG Development within timescale Notes Timescale Current status Certainty Scenario Proposed Year of Opening Melton Melton Melton Melton Melton Melton Melton Melton West Lindsey West Lindsey West Lindsey West Lindsey Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven North Kesteven South Kesteven South Kesteven South Kesteven South Kesteven South Kesteven South Kesteven South Kesteven Appendix E Appendix E Sustainable Urban Extension - Melton Mowbray Loughborough rd, Asfordby The Crecent, Melton Mowbray Asfordby Rd, Melton Mowbray dieppe Way, Melton Mowbray Asfordby Business Park - B1, B2 , B8 Melton Mowbray - Employment and allocation B1, B2, B8 Melton Mowbray- retail expansion Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - B1, B2, B8 Authority Wide - B1, B2, B8 Former Simons Construction Phase XI Bunkers Hill (CHILD of Abb16) Land off Woodfield Avenue adjacent to Wentworth Way (H4) RMSC Playing Fields Land at Ruston Way, Braford Enterprise Park Former Parade Ground, Nene Road Land north west Nettleham Road (H9) Land to the north of Starglaze Windows, Unit 5, Waterside South Former Simon's Cabin Hire, Crofton Close Land adjacent to railway line, Beevor Street Land to the rear of Greetwell Place, 2 Lime Kiln Way Local Plan Allocation Adjacent to City School Local Plan Allocation at Skewbridge Local Plan Allocation West of Outer Circle Road Local Plan Allocation Tower Works Local Plan Allocation Allenby Trading Estate Local Plan Allocation East of Outer Circle Road Local Plan Allocation Beevor Street Local Plan Allocation North of Long Leys Road Local Plan Allocation South of Doddington Road Local Plan Allocation North of Green Lane Local Plan Allocation West of Tritton Road Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Witham St Hughes Whisby Road South South Hykeham Whisby Road North Decoy Farm Bracebridge Heath Bassingham Heighington Metheringham North Hykeham Washingborough North Hykeham North of Railway, Sleaford West of East Road, Sleaford East of East Road, Sleaford Land off B1517, Sleaford Billinghay Heckington Ruskington Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Authority Wide - Housing Grantham Borne The Deepings Rural locations Major Housing allocation up to 2026 2010-2026 2009-2011 2009-2011 2008-2010 2010- 2012 Assumed 40% density of 16Ha allocation Major allocation up to 2026 (Assumed 40% density of 30Ha allocation) Major allocation up to 2026 Assumed 40% density of 46.64Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 21Ha allocated land 0.507403 0.897793 3.008703 1.19845 1.55 31.288 3.66544 7.9698 1.3004 5.1223 6.7584 1.023 10.753 4.7977 3.05 Assumed 40% density of 12Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 34.9Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 4.6Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 3.4Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 25Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 10Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 0.15Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 1.5Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 3.19Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 1.1Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 2.3Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 1.3Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 31.2Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 1.12Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 4.1Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 2.52Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 0.2Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 4.6Ha allocated land Assumed 40% density of 1.5Ha allocated land Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 79.01Ha) Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 4.49Ha) Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 19.15Ha) Identified within 2005 employment land review (Assumed 40% density of 16.88Ha) 2012-2026 2010 - 2026 2008-2016 2016-2026 2008-2016 2016-2026 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2008-2016 2016-2021 2008-2016 2016-2021 2021-2026 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2001-2021 2008-2016 2016-2021 2021-2026 2005-2011 2005-2011 2005-2011 2005-2011 In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided Under construction Under construction Under construction Planning permission In adopted Local Plan. In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation Allocation Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation (Housing Trajectory estimate) Allocation and potential for future allocation Allocation and potential for future allocation Allocation and potential for future allocation Allocation and potential for future allocation Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 6 of 18 28 Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain More than likely More than likely Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Reasonably foreseeable Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Core Core Core High growth High growth High growth High growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth High growth 2010 2011 2011 2010 2012 2020 2026 2015 2016 2026 2016 2026 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2016 2021 2016 2021 2026 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2016 2021 2026 2016 2016 2016 2016 No. of Dwellings 1000 65 77 60 65 B1 213.34 400 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 A1 213.33 400 Beds Spaces Hotel P+R 213.33 400 40 4946 490 608.54 280 608.53 280 608.53 280 170 107 185 63 226 80 213 20.2961 35.9117 120.348 47.938 62 417.173 48.8725 106.264 17.3387 68.2973 90.112 40.92 143.373 191.908 40.6667 417.173 48.8725 106.264 17.3387 68.2973 90.112 417.173 48.8725 106.264 17.3387 68.2973 90.112 143.373 143.373 40.6667 40.6667 5062 2448 5080 3175 3175 160 465.33 61.33 45.33 1000 133.33 6 6000 42.53 14.67 30.67 17.33 416 14.93 54.67 33.6 8 61.33 20 160 465.33 61.33 45.33 160 465.33 61.33 45.33 133.33 133.33 42.53 14.67 30.67 17.33 416 14.93 54.67 33.6 42.53 14.67 30.67 17.33 416 14.93 54.67 33.6 61.33 20 61.33 20 5657 1895 1895 1053.47 1053.47 1053.47 59.87 59.87 59.87 255.33 255.33 255.33 225.06 225.06 225.06 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Summary of Near Certain and More Than Likely Development Proposals within Districts/Boroughs Immediately Adjacent to Newark & Sherwood District County / Unitary District/ Borough Authority Development within timescale Notes Timescale Current status Certainty Scenario Proposed Year of Opening Leics Leics Leics Leics Leics Leics Melton Melton Melton Melton Melton Melton dieppe Way, Melton Mowbray Asfordby Business Park - B1, B2 , B8 Sustainable Urban Extension - Melton Mowbray Loughborough rd, Asfordby The Crecent, Melton Mowbray Asfordby Rd, Melton Mowbray Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Ashfield Annesley Colliery - 9 ha employment land Diamond Avenue, Kirby-in-Ashfield - 67 dwellings East of Nottingham Road, South Hucknall - 199 dwellings Lime Tree Avenue / Farleys Lane, Hucknall - 84 dwellings Lindleys Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield – 377 dwellings Off Mill Lane, Huthwaite - 65 dwellings West Fulwood, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 13.6 ha available for B1, B2, B8 use East of Alfreton Road - Phase Va, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete Birds Lane, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 69 dwellings (24 outstanding) Calladine Lane – 150 dwellings Off Common Road/ Cross Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 140 dwellings - Complete Edward Street / Ashwood Avenue, Kirkby-in-Ashfield - 116 dwellings (13 outstanding) Former Coates Vyella site, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 52 dwellings Off Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 50 dwellings - Complete Kings Mill Road East, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 112 dwellings Off Kirkby Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 155 dwellings - Complete Main Road, Annesley - 54 dwellings Meden Bank/ Brand Lane, Stanton Hill, 126 dwellings - Complete Hospital, Harlow Wood, Nottingham Road - 103 dwellings - Complete Stag site, Park Drive, Hucknall, 143 dwellings - Complete Phase 2 Coates Viyella, Huthwaite Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 54 dwellings Sherwood Business Park – 2 hectares of B1 employment land and a 250-bed hotel Off Sherwood Street, Hucknall - 71 dwellings Easymix Site, Stoneyford Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 51 dwellings - Complete North of BRSA, Urban Road, Kirkby-in-Ashfield, 67 dwellings - Complete Walton Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 92 dwellings - Complete Amber Business Park, Hucknall (Hucknall Colliery) - 1.1 ha employment land Bentinck Colliery - 3.6 ha of land for B1, B2, B8 uses Former textile factory, Bowne Street, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 53 dwellings Blenheim Lane, Hucknall – 15 hectares of B1, B2, B8 employment land Brierley Industrial Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 1.1 ha employment land Garden Road, Hucknall - 214 dwellings Kings Mill Road/ Oddicroft Lane - 6.3 hectares of employment land South West Oakham Business Park, Sutton-in-Ashfield – 14.9 ha of B1 emp land Mowlands Close / Sheepwash Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield - 109 dwellings Old Mill Close (East and West), Bestwood Village - 99 dwellings Rear 12,22,24 Portland Road, Selston - 59 dwellings Portland Road (Former Colliery), Hucknall - 66 dwellings to be completed (228 total) Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Bassetlaw Worksop – 100 dwellings on small previously developed sites around the town. Blyth Road West - 5 ha employment land High Grounds - 1.23 ha employment land High Grounds - 3.6 ha employment land Manton Colliery - 34.96 hectares of B8 employment land. Manton Wood - 2.9 ha employment land Shireoaks Colliery - 4.24ha employment land Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Gedling Ashwater Drive / Spring Lane, Mapperley – 140 dwellings Chartwell Grove, Mapperley – 50 dwellings Arnold & Carlton College – 90 dwellings Arnold View Primary School - 70 dwellings EMEB headquarters – 200 dwellings Flatts Lane, Calverton – 148 dwellings Assumed 40% density of 16Ha allocation Major Housing allocation up to 2026 2010- 2012 Planning permission In adopted Local Plan. 2010-2026 In LDF Core Strategy - only precise location to be decided 2009-2011 Under construction 2009-2011 Under construction 2008-2010 Under construction More than likely More than likely Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Low growth Core Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2012 2020 2010 2011 2011 2010 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2021 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008 – 2021 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2016 2008 – 2021 2008-2016 2008-2016 2008-2021 2008-2016 outline pp Outline PP Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline PP Completed Under Construction Completed Completed Under Construction Under Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Under Construction Built Completed Completed Completed Completed Planning permission Planning permission Detailed Planning Permission Under Construction Planning permission Planning permission Planning permission Planning permission Under Construction Detailed Planning Permission Detailed PP Under Construction More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 Full PP Built Full PP Built Fully developed Full PP More than likely Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Core Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Under construction Under construction Built Under construction More than likely More than likely Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Core Core Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2008 2015 2008 2008 2008 2008 Total for Melton Borough 35 outstanding 37 outstanding 52 outstanding Total for Ashfield District Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Total 28.8ha, 2.9ha since 2003 Total 10.3 ha, 4.24 since 2003 Total for Bassetlaw District conditional permission = 10 dwellings conditional permission = 50 dwellings 85 are complete 2 are complete Permission for 148 dwellings Up to 2008 2008 – 2021 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Total for Gedling Borough Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 7 of 18 29 No. of Dwellings 65 1,000 65 77 60 1,267 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 A1 B1 213 213 213 213 300 213 300 213 300 453 453 454 Beds Hotel 0 Spaces P+R 0 0 67 199 84 377 65 92 69 150 140 116 52 50 112 155 54 126 103 143 54 200 250 71 51 67 92 37 120 37 120 36 120 500 36 500 37 500 37 210 1,490 210 210 3,346 1,657 1,657 0 250 0 167 41 120 1,165 97 141 1,731 166 41 120 1,166 96 142 1,731 167 41 120 1,165 97 141 1,731 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 214 109 99 59 228 3,251 100 100 140 50 90 70 200 148 698 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG County / Unitary District/ Borough Authority Development within timescale Notes Timescale Current status Certainty Scenario Proposed Year of Opening Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Mansfield Abbott Road – 25 hectares of B1/B2 employment land + 160 dwellings (Water Lane) Berry Hill Quarry – 600 dwellings. Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land Clipstone Road East – 20 hectares of B1 employment land Berry Hill Quarry – 550 dwellings Chesterfield Road South – 8,000 sq.m. of A1 food retail space (Tescos). Haddon Road - 2.2 ha housing land Old Mill Lane - 2 ha of housing land Sherwood Rise – 200 dwellings Rufford Drive, Mansfield Woodhouse - 2 ha housing land Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Rushcliffe Camelot Street, Ruddington - 72 dwellings Chapel Lane Extension, Bingham - 37.1 hectares B1, B2, B8 employment land Moorbridge Industrial Estate, Bingham - 7.6 hectares employment land Bunny Brickworks, Bunny - 6.7 hectares B1, B2 employment land Main Road, Radcliffe on Trent - 50 dwellings Ludlow Hill Road, West Bridgford - 210 dwellings Lantern Lane, East Leake - 84 dwellings Pedigree site, Gamston - 180 dwellings Ruddington Fields Business Park, Ruddington - 5 hectares employment land Leawood Old People's Home, West Bridgford - 62 dwellings Pedigree House/ Gamston Piggeries, Gamston - 148 dwellings Easr Leake Hall, East Leake - 56 dwellings British Gypsum, Gotham - 0.5 hectares employment land Mill Hill, Bingham - 453 dwellings Station Yard, Ruddington - 64 dwellings Pasture Lane, Ruddington – 235 dwellings Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Former Simons Construction Phase XI Bunkers Hill (CHILD of Abb16) Land off Woodfield Avenue adjacent to Wentworth Way (H4) RMSC Playing Fields Land at Ruston Way, Braford Enterprise Park Former Parade Ground, Nene Road Land north west Nettleham Road (H9) Land to the north of Starglaze Windows, Unit 5, Waterside South Former Simon's Cabin Hire, Crofton Close Land adjacent to railway line, Beevor Street Land to the rear of Greetwell Place, 2 Lime Kiln Way Local Plan Allocation Adjacent to City School Local Plan Allocation at Skewbridge Local Plan Allocation West of Outer Circle Road Local Plan Allocation Tower Works Local Plan Allocation Allenby Trading Estate Local Plan Allocation East of Outer Circle Road Local Plan Allocation Beevor Street Local Plan Allocation North of Long Leys Road Local Plan Allocation South of Doddington Road Local Plan Allocation North of Green Lane Local Plan Allocation West of Tritton Road 2008 – 2021 2008 – 2021 2021+ 2021+ Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 Existing Tesco at Stockwell Gate to close Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission Built Detailed Planning Permission Built Built Detailed Planning Permission Detailed Planning Permission More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Core Core Core Core Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2015 2015 2023 2030 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2008-2021 2008-2026 2008-2026 2008-2026 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 Up to 2008 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 2008-2021 OPP OPP OPP OPP Built Built Planning permission Built Built Under construction Under construction Under construction FPP Under construction Under construction Under construction More than likely More than likely More than likely More than likely Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Core Core Core Core Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2015 2020 2020 2020 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2015 2015 2015 2015 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Committed Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Near certain Total for Mansfield District No trip gen calculated as would be less than standard dwellings Total for Rushcliffe Borough Total for Lincoln City Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 8 of 18 30 Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth Low growth 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 2010 - 2012 No. of Dwellings 160 600 B1 1,250 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 A1 1,250 Beds Hotel Spaces P+R 500 1,500 550 80 66 60 200 60 1,696 72 3,250 1,250 0 1,236 253 335 1,237 253 335 1,237 254 16 17 17 2,340 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 120 48 62 417 49 106 17 68 90 41 143 192 41 1,416 1,842 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 417 49 106 17 68 90 0 143 0 41 932 1,508 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 417 49 106 17 68 90 0 143 0 41 968 80 0 0 50 210 84 180 500 148 56 453 64 235 1,552 170 107 185 63 226 80 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,044 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Summary of Near Certain and More Than Likely Development Proposals Within Districts/Boroughs Immediately Adjacent to Newark & Sherwood District District/ Borough Melton Ashfield Bassetlaw Gedling Mansfield Rushcliffe Lincoln Total Appendix E Appendix E No. of Dwellings 1,267 3,251 100 698 1,696 1,552 1,044 9,608 B1 213 3,346 1,731 0 3,250 2,340 1,416 12,296 Size of Development 100 sq m B2 B8 213 213 1,657 1,657 1,731 1,731 0 0 1,250 0 1,842 1,508 932 968 7,625 6,077 Beds Hotel A1 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 80 Spaces P+R 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 250 Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 9 of 18 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Vehicle Trip Calculation Parameters Vehicle Trip Rates Rural Residential Vehicle Trip Rates (From 2001 Census data for Newark & Sherwood District) AM Inbound 0.181 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling AM Outbound 0.685 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling PM Inbound 0.473 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling PM Outbound 0.290 Vehicle Trips per Dwelling Rural Employment Vehicle Trip Rates (From 2001 Census data for Newark & Sherwood District) AM Inbound 1.606 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA AM Outbound 0.223 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA PM Inbound 0.176 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA PM Outbound 1.389 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA Retail Vehicle Trip Rates (TRICS 2009(a) - see Worksheet TRICS 1 for details) AM Inbound 1.301 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA AM Outbound 0.675 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA PM Inbound 1.439 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA PM Outbound 1.841 Vehicle Trips per 100sqm GFA Hotel Vehicle Trip Rates (TRICS 2009(a) - see Worksheet TRICS 2 for details) AM Inbound 0.138 Vehicle Trips per Bedroom AM Outbound 0.200 Vehicle Trips per Bedroom PM Inbound 0.171 Vehicle Trips per Bedroom PM Outbound 0.119 Vehicle Trips per Bedroom Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 10 of 18 32 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Vehicle Trip Generation for Committed Development Sites to be Taken into Account for Assessment of the Wider Highway Network in the District: Residential: Vehicle Trips Name Number of Dwellings AM PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way Melton 1,267 229 868 1,097 599 367 967 Ashfield 3,251 588 2,227 2,815 1,538 943 2,481 Bassetlaw 100 18 69 87 47 29 76 Gedling 698 126 478 604 330 202 533 Mansfield 1,696 307 1,162 1,469 802 492 1,294 Rushcliffe 1,552 281 1,063 1,344 734 450 1,184 Lincoln 1,044 8,564 189 1,739 715 6,581 904 8,321 494 4,545 303 2,786 797 7,331 Employment: Vehicle Trips Name Floor Area (100 sqm) AM PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way Melton 640 1,028 143 1,171 113 889 1,002 Ashfield 6,660 10,696 1,485 12,181 1,172 9,251 10,423 Bassetlaw 5,193 8,340 1,158 9,498 914 7,213 8,127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,500 7,227 1,004 8,231 792 6,251 7,043 Rushcliffe 5,690 9,138 1,269 10,407 1,001 7,903 8,905 Lincoln 3,316 22,683 5,325 41,754 739 5,798 6,064 47,551 584 4,576 4,605 36,112 5,189 40,688 Gedling Mansfield Retail: Vehicle Trips Name Floor Area (100 sqm) PM AM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way Melton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ashfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bassetlaw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gedling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mansfield 80 104 54 158 115 147 262 Rushcliffe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincoln 0 80 0 104 0 54 0 158 0 115 0 147 0 262 Hotel: Vehicle Trips Name Floor Area (100 sqm) AM PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound 2-Way Melton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ashfield 250 35 50 85 43 30 73 Bassetlaw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gedling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mansfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rushcliffe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 35 0 50 0 85 0 43 0 30 0 73 Lincoln Total Residential: Vehicle Trips Name AM PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound Melton 229 868 1,097 599 367 2-Way 967 Ashfield 588 2,227 2,815 1,538 943 2,481 Bassetlaw 18 69 87 47 29 76 Gedling 126 478 604 330 202 533 Mansfield 307 1,162 1,469 802 492 1,294 Rushcliffe 281 1,063 1,344 734 450 1,184 189 1,739 715 6,581 904 8,321 494 4,545 303 2,786 797 7,331 Lincoln Total Employment (Includes Hotel & Retail): Vehicle Trips Name AM PM Inbound Outbound 2-Way Inbound Outbound Melton 1,028 143 1,171 113 889 1,002 Ashfield 10,730 1,535 12,266 1,215 9,280 10,495 Bassetlaw 8,340 1,158 9,498 914 7,213 8,127 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mansfield 7,331 1,058 8,389 907 6,398 7,305 Rushcliffe 9,138 1,269 10,407 1,001 7,903 8,905 Lincoln 5,325 41,892 739 5,902 6,064 47,794 584 4,734 4,605 36,289 5,189 41,023 Gedling Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 11 of 18 33 2-Way 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG External Residential Sites Through Trip Distributio Origin Melton Rushcliffe Nottingham Gedling Ashfield Mansfield Bassetlaw West Lindsey Lincoln North Kesteven South Kesteven Appendix E Appendix E Destination Route Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Mansfield Gedling North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Rushcliffe South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield Gedling A1 A1 A6097 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A46 A614 A6097 A6097 A6097 A6097 A6097 A614 A6097 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A614 A614 A614 A614 A1 A1 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A17 A17 A17 A17 A17 A17 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A6097 Link Code 9 9 11 11 11 8 8 8 11 11 11 8 8 8 4 11 11 11 11 11 4 11 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 6 6 6 6 17 17 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 11 Direction Route N N N N N E E E N N N E E E N S S S S S N S E E E E E E E E E E S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W N N N N N N A46 A46 A6097 A6097 Link Code 13 13 12 12 A46 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 Direction Route Link Code Direction Route Link Code Direction E E N N A614 A614 7 7 N N A614 A617 6 19 N W 3 3 3 12 12 E E E N N A17 A46 A46 A614 A614 10 13 13 7 7 E E E N N A614 A617 6 19 N W A46 A46 A46 A614 3 3 3 7 E E E N A17 A46 A46 A614 10 13 13 6 E E E N A46 A46 A46 A614 8 8 8 7 E E E N A46 A46 A46 A614 3 3 3 6 E E E N A17 A46 A46 10 13 13 E E E A617 A617 A617 A617 A614 A614 A617 A617 A617 A617 A614 A614 A614 A614 A1 A17 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A1 A1 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A1 A1 A1 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A1 A46 A46 5 5 5 5 7 7 5 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 9 10 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 17 3 3 3 3 3 13 13 17 3 3 E E E E S S E E E E S S S S S E W W W W W S S W W W W W S S N W W W W W N N S W W A46 A46 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A46 A46 A614 A614 A6097 A6097 3 3 3 3 12 12 3 3 3 3 4 4 12 12 E E E E S S E E E E S S S S A1 A17 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A46 9 10 13 13 11 11 9 10 13 13 S E E E S S S E E E A6097 A6097 11 11 S S A617 A617 A46 A46 A46 5 5 8 8 8 W W W W W A617 A617 A6097 19 19 11 W W N A617 A617 A46 A46 A46 5 5 8 8 8 W W W W W A617 A617 A6097 19 19 11 W W N A617 A617 A46 A46 A46 5 5 8 8 8 W W W W W A617 A617 A6097 19 19 11 W W N A617 A617 5 5 W W A617 A617 19 19 W W Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 12 of 18 34 Route Percentage Me1 Me2 Me3 Me4 Me5 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 N1 N2 N3 N4 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 0.20% 0.04% 0.22% 0.10% 0.56% 0.20% 0.30% 0.05% 0.47% 0.63% 1.16% 0.06% 0.18% 0.03% 0.33% 1.63% 0.40% 0.11% 0.06% 0.07% 0.46% 1.41% 0.13% 0.15% 0.02% 0.01% 0.97% 0.11% 0.22% 0.20% 0.16% 0.11% 0.43% 1.24% 0.40% 0.06% 0.30% 0.46% 0.12% 0.05% 0.05% 1.29% 0.21% 0.05% 1.67% 0.11% 0.11% 0.03% 1.54% 0.75% 0.02% 2.94% 1.64% 0.12% 0.07% 0.13% 0.13% 2.18% 1.36% 0.25% 0.98% 0.07% 0.09% 0.17% 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Outbound - By individual link Origin Melton Rushcliffe Nottingham Gedling Ashfield Mansfield Bassetlaw West Lindsey Lincoln North Kesteven South Kesteven Appendix E Appendix E Route A1 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A46 A17 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A17 A46 A614 A614 A614 A6097 A614 A46 A614 A46 A614 A17 A46 A6097 A617 A617 A46 A1 A17 A46 A617 A614 A617 A6097 A46 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A614 A1 A614 A1 A17 A614 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A17 A1 A46 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A1 A6097 A46 A1 A46 A617 A617 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 Inbound - By individual link Direction Percentage Route N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N W N W W W W N N N N S W W W 0.24% 0.24% 0.88% 0.32% 0.32% 0.22% 0.10% 0.55% 0.55% 0.20% 0.35% 2.26% 1.10% 1.10% 0.47% 0.63% 0.27% 0.27% 0.06% 0.33% 0.33% 0.33% 2.27% 0.46% 0.24% 0.46% 0.24% 0.46% 0.11% 0.12% 1.41% 0.31% 0.31% 0.31% 0.13% 0.15% 0.03% 1.77% 1.08% 0.69% 1.08% 0.69% 1.08% 0.22% 0.20% 0.26% 2.14% 0.76% 2.14% 0.30% 0.46% 1.67% 0.47% 0.47% 3.45% 1.73% 1.73% 0.17% 1.56% 0.17% 0.05% 5.50% 2.54% 2.96% 0.22% 2.32% 0.22% 0.03% 4.28% 1.64% 2.63% 0.19% 2.44% 0.19% 0.13% 2.75% 0.17% 1.61% 0.98% 0.16% 0.16% 0.16% A1 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A46 A17 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A17 A46 A614 A614 A614 A6097 A614 A46 A614 A46 A614 A17 A46 A6097 A617 A617 A46 A1 A17 A46 A617 A614 A617 A6097 A46 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A614 A1 A614 A1 A17 A614 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A17 A1 A46 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A1 A6097 A46 A1 A46 A617 A617 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 AM Generation Direction Percentage S W S S S S E W W W W S S S S E W W W S S S N S W S W S W W N W W W N W W W N W N W N N W W N N N N W N N N N E N E E E S N E N E E E S E S E E E E S S S S N E E E 0.24% 0.24% 0.88% 0.32% 0.32% 0.22% 0.10% 0.55% 0.55% 0.20% 0.35% 2.26% 1.10% 1.10% 0.47% 0.63% 0.27% 0.27% 0.06% 0.33% 0.33% 0.33% 2.27% 0.46% 0.24% 0.46% 0.24% 0.46% 0.11% 0.12% 1.41% 0.31% 0.31% 0.31% 0.13% 0.15% 0.03% 1.77% 1.08% 0.69% 1.08% 0.69% 1.08% 0.22% 0.20% 0.26% 2.14% 0.76% 2.14% 0.30% 0.46% 1.67% 0.47% 0.47% 3.45% 1.73% 1.73% 0.17% 1.56% 0.17% 0.05% 5.50% 2.54% 2.96% 0.22% 2.32% 0.22% 0.03% 4.28% 1.64% 2.63% 0.19% 2.44% 0.19% 0.13% 2.75% 0.17% 1.61% 0.98% 0.16% 0.16% 0.16% Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 Direction N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N W N W W W W N N N N S W W W PM Generation Outbound Inbound Direction Generation Generation 2 S 1 2 W 1 8 S 2 3 S 1 3 S 1 2 S 1 1 E 0 6 W 2 6 W 2 2 W 1 4 W 1 24 S 6 12 S 3 12 S 3 5 S 1 7 E 2 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 11 N 3 2 S 1 1 W 0 2 S 1 1 W 0 2 S 1 1 W 0 1 W 0 31 N 8 7 W 2 7 W 2 7 W 2 3 N 1 3 W 1 1 W 0 21 W 5 13 N 3 8 W 2 13 N 3 8 W 2 13 N 3 3 N 1 2 W 1 3 W 1 1 N 0 1 N 0 1 N 0 0 N 0 0 W 0 1 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 39 N 10 18 E 5 21 N 6 2 E 0 17 E 4 2 E 0 0 S 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 13 of 18 35 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 Direction N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N W N W W W W N N N N S W W W Outbound Inbound Direction Generation Generation 1 S 1 1 W 1 3 S 5 1 S 2 1 S 2 1 S 1 0 E 1 2 W 4 2 W 4 1 W 1 2 W 3 10 S 17 5 S 8 5 S 8 2 S 3 3 E 5 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 5 N 7 1 S 2 0 W 1 1 S 2 0 W 1 1 S 2 0 W 0 0 W 0 13 N 22 3 W 5 3 W 5 3 W 5 1 N 2 1 W 2 0 W 0 9 W 14 5 N 9 3 W 6 5 N 9 3 W 6 5 N 9 1 N 2 1 W 2 1 W 2 1 N 1 0 N 0 1 N 1 0 N 0 0 W 0 0 N 1 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 17 N 27 8 E 13 9 N 15 1 E 1 7 E 11 1 E 1 0 S 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG External Employment Sites Through Trip Distribution Destination Melton Rushcliffe Nottingham Gedling Ashfield Mansfield Bassetlaw West Lindsey Lincoln North Kesteven South Kesteven Appendix E Appendix E Destination Route Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Mansfield Gedling North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Rushcliffe South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Lincoln West Lindsey Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven North Kesteven Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Melton South Kesteven Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield Gedling Nottingham Rushcliffe Lincoln West Lindsey Bassetlaw Mansfield Ashfield Gedling A1 A1 A6097 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A46 A614 A6097 A6097 A6097 A6097 A6097 A614 A6097 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A617 A614 A614 A614 A614 A1 A1 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A17 A17 A17 A17 A17 A17 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A6097 Link Code 9 9 11 11 11 8 8 8 11 11 11 8 8 8 4 11 11 11 11 11 4 11 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 6 6 6 6 17 17 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 11 Direction Route N N N N N E E E N N N E E E N S S S S S N S E E E E E E E E E E S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W N N N N N N A46 A46 A6097 A6097 Link Code 13 13 12 12 A46 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 Direction Route Link Code Direction Route Link Code Direction E E N N A614 A614 7 7 N N A614 A617 6 19 N W 3 3 3 12 12 E E E N N A17 A46 A46 A614 A614 10 13 13 7 7 E E E N N A614 A617 6 19 N W A46 A46 A46 A614 3 3 3 7 E E E N A17 A46 A46 A614 10 13 13 6 E E E N A46 A46 A46 A614 8 8 8 7 E E E N A46 A46 A46 A614 3 3 3 6 E E E N A17 A46 A46 10 13 13 E E E A617 A617 A617 A617 A614 A614 A617 A617 A617 A617 A614 A614 A614 A614 A1 A17 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A1 A1 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A1 A1 A1 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A46 A1 A46 A46 5 5 5 5 7 7 5 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 9 10 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 17 3 3 3 3 3 13 13 17 3 3 E E E E S S E E E E S S S S S E W W W W W S S W W W W W S S N W W W W W N N S W W A46 A46 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A46 A46 A614 A614 A6097 A6097 3 3 3 3 12 12 3 3 3 3 4 4 12 12 E E E E S S E E E E S S S S A1 A17 A46 A46 A6097 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A46 9 10 13 13 11 11 9 10 13 13 S E E E S S S E E E A6097 A6097 11 11 S S A617 A617 A46 A46 A46 5 5 8 8 8 W W W W W A617 A617 A6097 19 19 11 W W N A617 A617 A46 A46 A46 5 5 8 8 8 W W W W W A617 A617 A6097 19 19 11 W W N A617 A617 A46 A46 A46 5 5 8 8 8 W W W W W A617 A617 A6097 19 19 11 W W N A617 A617 5 5 W W A617 A617 19 19 W W Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 14 of 18 36 Route Percentage Me1 Me2 Me3 Me4 Me5 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 N1 N2 N3 N4 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 0.22% 0.27% 0.13% 0.13% 0.62% 0.21% 0.41% 0.11% 0.86% 1.17% 2.00% 0.19% 0.13% 0.06% 0.72% 0.83% 0.37% 0.21% 0.07% 0.07% 0.95% 1.40% 0.18% 0.11% 0.13% 0.04% 0.94% 0.07% 0.18% 0.16% 0.12% 0.12% 0.51% 0.50% 0.59% 0.03% 0.48% 0.51% 0.18% 0.02% 0.14% 0.10% 0.71% 0.04% 1.02% 0.13% 0.01% 0.04% 0.40% 0.71% 0.10% 1.90% 1.94% 0.12% 0.15% 0.16% 1.11% 0.29% 1.08% 0.42% 0.81% 0.15% 0.10% 0.22% 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Inbound - By individual link Destination Melton Rushcliffe Nottingham Gedling Ashfield Mansfield Bassetlaw West Lindsey Lincoln North Kesteven South Kesteven Appendix E Appendix E Route A1 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A46 A17 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A17 A46 A614 A614 A614 A6097 A614 A46 A614 A46 A614 A17 A46 A6097 A617 A617 A46 A1 A17 A46 A617 A614 A617 A6097 A46 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A614 A1 A614 A1 A17 A614 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A17 A1 A46 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A1 A6097 A46 A1 A46 A617 A617 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 Outbound - By individual link Direction Percentage Route S W S S S S E W W W W S S S S E W W W S S S N S W S W S W W N W W W N W W W N W N W N N W W N N N N W N N N N E N E E E S N E N E E E S E S E E E E S S S S N E E E 0.48% 0.48% 0.89% 0.27% 0.27% 0.13% 0.13% 0.73% 0.73% 0.21% 0.52% 4.03% 2.03% 2.03% 0.86% 1.17% 0.38% 0.38% 0.19% 0.72% 0.72% 0.72% 1.55% 0.95% 0.34% 0.95% 0.34% 0.95% 0.21% 0.13% 1.40% 0.47% 0.47% 0.47% 0.18% 0.11% 0.18% 1.60% 1.01% 0.59% 1.01% 0.59% 1.01% 0.18% 0.16% 0.25% 1.63% 0.99% 1.63% 0.48% 0.51% 1.01% 0.62% 0.62% 2.22% 1.16% 1.06% 0.20% 0.96% 0.20% 0.14% 3.30% 1.30% 2.00% 0.14% 1.16% 0.14% 0.04% 3.78% 1.94% 1.84% 0.27% 1.57% 0.27% 0.16% 2.57% 0.22% 1.51% 0.81% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% A1 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A46 A17 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A17 A46 A614 A614 A614 A6097 A614 A46 A614 A46 A614 A17 A46 A6097 A617 A617 A46 A1 A17 A46 A617 A614 A617 A6097 A46 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A614 A1 A614 A1 A17 A614 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A17 A1 A46 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A1 A6097 A46 A1 A46 A617 A617 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 AM Generation Direction Percentage N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N W N W W W W N N N N S W W W 0.48% 0.48% 0.89% 0.27% 0.27% 0.13% 0.13% 0.73% 0.73% 0.21% 0.52% 4.03% 2.03% 2.03% 0.86% 1.17% 0.38% 0.38% 0.19% 0.72% 0.72% 0.72% 1.55% 0.95% 0.34% 0.95% 0.34% 0.95% 0.21% 0.13% 1.40% 0.47% 0.47% 0.47% 0.18% 0.11% 0.18% 1.60% 1.01% 0.59% 1.01% 0.59% 1.01% 0.18% 0.16% 0.25% 1.63% 0.99% 1.63% 0.48% 0.51% 1.01% 0.62% 0.62% 2.22% 1.16% 1.06% 0.20% 0.96% 0.20% 0.14% 3.30% 1.30% 2.00% 0.14% 1.16% 0.14% 0.04% 3.78% 1.94% 1.84% 0.27% 1.57% 0.27% 0.16% 2.57% 0.22% 1.51% 0.81% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 Direction N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N W N W W W W N N N N S W W W PM Generation Outbound Inbound Direction Generation Generation 1 S 5 1 W 5 1 S 9 0 S 3 0 S 3 0 S 1 0 E 1 9 W 67 9 W 67 3 W 19 7 W 48 51 S 368 26 S 186 26 S 186 11 S 79 15 E 107 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 N 0 0 S 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 W 0 0 W 0 21 N 150 7 W 50 7 W 50 7 W 50 3 N 19 2 W 12 3 W 19 17 W 117 11 N 74 6 W 43 11 N 74 6 W 43 11 N 74 2 N 13 2 W 12 3 W 18 19 N 136 12 N 83 19 N 136 6 N 40 6 W 43 12 N 84 7 N 52 7 N 52 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 24 N 175 10 E 69 15 N 106 1 E 8 9 E 62 1 E 8 0 S 2 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 15 of 18 37 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 Direction N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N W N W W W W N N N N S W W W Outbound Inbound Direction Generation Generation 4 S 1 4 W 1 8 S 1 2 S 0 2 S 0 1 S 0 1 E 0 58 W 7 58 W 7 16 W 2 41 W 5 318 S 40 161 S 20 161 S 20 68 S 9 92 E 12 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 N 0 0 S 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 W 0 0 S 0 0 W 0 0 W 0 130 N 17 43 W 6 43 W 6 43 W 6 16 N 2 11 W 1 16 W 2 102 W 14 65 N 9 38 W 5 65 N 9 38 W 5 65 N 9 11 N 2 10 W 1 16 W 2 117 N 15 72 N 9 117 N 15 35 N 4 37 W 5 73 N 9 45 N 6 45 N 6 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 152 N 19 60 E 8 92 N 12 6 E 1 53 E 7 6 E 1 2 S 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 S 0 0 N 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 0 E 0 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG Total Trip Generation from Committed Developments Outside Newark & Sherwood Travelling Through the District Destination A1 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A46 A17 A46 A6097 A6097 A614 A614 A617 A46 A17 A46 A614 A614 A614 A6097 A614 A46 A614 A46 A614 A17 A46 Link Code 9 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 3 10 13 11 12 7 6 19 8 10 13 4 7 6 11 4 8 7 3 6 10 13 A6097 A617 A617 A46 A1 A17 A46 A617 A614 A617 A6097 A46 A6097 A1 A17 A46 A614 A1 A614 A1 A17 A614 A6097 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 A46 A46 A1 A617 A46 A617 A6097 Route Direction AM Direction AM Direction PM Direction PM S W S S S S E W W W W S S S S E W W W S S S N S W S W S W W 6 6 11 3 3 2 2 68 68 19 49 374 189 189 80 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E 3 3 9 3 3 2 1 15 15 5 10 75 37 37 16 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 S W S S S S E W W W W S S S S E W W W S S S N S W S W S W W 2 2 6 2 2 1 1 11 11 4 8 57 28 28 12 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 N E N N N N W E E E E N N N N W E E E N N N S N E N E N E E 5 5 11 4 4 2 2 60 60 17 43 329 165 165 70 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 11 19 5 3 9 10 13 19 7 5 12 3 11 9 10 13 6 17 7 9 10 4 12 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 13 3 9 5 8 19 11 N W W W N W W W N W N W N N W W N N N N W N N N N E N E E E S N E N E E E S 158 52 52 52 20 13 19 123 77 45 77 45 77 14 13 19 136 83 136 40 43 85 52 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 74 112 8 66 8 2 S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N 53 14 14 14 6 5 3 37 23 14 23 14 23 4 4 6 20 12 20 6 6 13 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 28 36 3 25 3 1 N W W W N W W W N W N W N N W W N N N N W N N N N E N E E E S N E N E E E S 39 10 10 10 4 4 3 29 18 11 18 11 18 3 3 4 16 9 16 5 5 10 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 20 26 2 18 2 0 S E E E S E E E S E S E S S E E S S S S E S S S S W S W W W N S W S W W W N 143 46 46 46 18 12 17 111 70 41 70 41 70 12 11 17 118 72 118 35 37 73 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 67 101 7 60 7 2 North Kesteven A17 A1 A46 A617 A46 A617 A6097 10 17 3 5 8 19 11 E S E E E E S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N W W W W N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E S E E E E S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N W W W W N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Kesteven A1 A6097 A46 A1 A46 A617 A617 9 11 13 17 3 5 19 S S S N E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N S W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S S S N E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N S W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Melton Rushcliffe Nottingham Gedling Ashfield Mansfield Bassetlaw West Lindsey Lincoln Appendix E Appendix E Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 16 of 18 38 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/M - MIXED SHOPPING MALLS Calculation Factor: 100 sqm ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00-01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00-02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00-03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00-04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00-05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00-08:00 1 14693 0.919 1 14693 0.783 1 14693 1.702 08:00-09:00 2 12375 1.301 2 12375 0.675 2 12375 1.976 09:00-10:00 3 9847 2.285 3 9847 1.384 3 9847 3.669 10:00-11:00 3 9847 2.661 3 9847 2.160 3 9847 4.821 11:00-12:00 3 9847 2.742 3 9847 2.772 3 9847 5.514 12:00-13:00 3 9847 2.546 3 9847 2.623 3 9847 5.169 13:00-14:00 3 9847 2.474 3 9847 2.593 3 9847 5.067 14:00-15:00 3 9847 2.373 3 9847 2.535 3 9847 4.908 15:00-16:00 3 9847 2.309 3 9847 2.458 3 9847 4.767 16:00-17:00 3 9847 2.048 3 9847 2.556 3 9847 4.604 17:00-18:00 3 9847 1.439 3 9847 1.841 3 9847 3.280 18:00-19:00 3 9847 0.870 3 9847 1.141 3 9847 2.011 19:00-20:00 2 9743 0.883 2 9743 1.109 2 9743 1.992 20:00-21:00 1 14693 0.184 1 14693 0.259 1 14693 0.443 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily Trip Rates: Appendix E Appendix E 25.034 24.889 0 49.923 Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 17 of 18 39 06/10/2009 NSDC Transport Study WYG TRIP RATE for Lan FOOD & DRINK/A - HOTELS Calculation Factor: 1 BEDRMS ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days BEDRMS Rate Days BEDRMS Rate 00:00-01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00-02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00-03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00-04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00-05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 3 111 0.093 3 111 0.072 3 111 0.165 07:00-08:00 34 89 0.082 34 89 0.149 34 89 0.231 08:00-09:00 35 87 0.138 35 87 0.200 35 87 0.338 09:00-10:00 35 87 0.128 35 87 0.145 35 87 0.273 10:00-11:00 35 87 0.093 35 87 0.095 35 87 0.188 11:00-12:00 35 87 0.095 35 87 0.088 35 87 0.183 12:00-13:00 35 87 0.112 35 87 0.098 35 87 0.21 13:00-14:00 35 87 0.086 35 87 0.094 35 87 0.18 14:00-15:00 35 87 0.106 35 87 0.115 35 87 0.221 15:00-16:00 35 87 0.108 35 87 0.115 35 87 0.223 16:00-17:00 35 87 0.112 35 87 0.113 35 87 0.225 17:00-18:00 35 87 0.171 35 87 0.119 35 87 0.29 18:00-19:00 35 87 0.165 35 87 0.104 35 87 0.269 19:00-20:00 21 88 0.182 21 88 0.118 21 88 0.3 20:00-21:00 21 88 0.113 21 88 0.084 21 88 0.197 21:00-22:00 13 81 0.087 13 81 0.101 13 81 0.188 22:00-23:00 4 76 0.146 4 76 0.195 4 76 0.341 23:00-24:00 4 76 0.043 4 76 0.073 4 76 0.116 Daily Trip Rates: Appendix E Appendix E 2.06 2.078 No. Ave. Trip Days BEDRMS Rate 4.138 Committed Development Outside the District - Rev 4, Page 18 of 18 40 06/10/2009