minutes - Summit County

Transcription

•
MINUTES
SUMMIT COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13,2015
SUMMIT COUNT\' COURTHOUSE
60 NORTH MAIN STREET, COALVILLE, UTAH
PRESENT:
Kjm Carson, Council Chair
Roger Armstrong, Council Vice Chair
Claudia McMullin, Council Member
Chris Robinson, Council Member
David Ure, Council Member
Tom Fisher, Manager
Anita Lewis, Assistant Manager
Robert Hilder, Attorney
David Thomas, Deputy Attorney
Kent Jones, Clerk
~ren McLaws, Secretary
CLOSED SESSION
•
Council Member Robi_nson made a motion to convene in closed session to discuss litigation.
The motion was seconded by Council Member McMullin and passed un~_nimously, 5 to 0.
The Summit County Council met in closed session for the purpose of discussing litigation from
1:40 p.tn. to 2:35 p.m. Those in attendance were:
Kim Carson, Council. Chair
Roger A~strong, Council Vice Chair
Tom Fisher, Manager
Council Member Ure made a motion to dismiss from closed session to discuss litigation and
to convene in closed session to discuss property acquisition. The motion was seconded by
Council Member Robinson and passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
The SUihrtlit County Council met in closed session for the purpose of discussing property
acquisition from 2:35p.m. to 3:15p.m. Those in attendance wete:
•
Tom Fisher, Manager
Anit~ Lewis, Assistant Manager
Kim Carson, Council Chair
Roger A,rD;lstrong, Council Vice Chair
1
Council Member McMullin made a motion to dismiss from closed session and to convene in
work sessioQ.. The motion was seconded by Council Member Robinson and passed
unanimously, 5 to 0.
•
WORK SESSION
Chair Carson called the work session to order at 3: 15 p.m.
•
Discussion and possible approval of primary properties and non-primary properties;
Ashley Berry, Assessor's Office
Ashley Berry with the County Assessor's Office explained that any applications the Assessor's
office receives from now until the end of November will be processed through the Board of
Equalization.
Council Member McMullin made a motion to approve the list of primary and non-primary
properties as presented. The motion was seconded by Council Member Robinson and
passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
•
2
•
•
Continuing Primaries
Parcel
3K-1-D
ANCH-1-2AM
ASR-28
BEH-11-14
BHV5-Tl48
BHVS-T176
BHWKS-1-12-2AM
BHWKS-2-124
BL-300-A
CCRK-J-17
CCRK-N-25
CD-161-B
CD-362~B
CD-462-B-1~A
CD-603
CDE-1
CDE-4
CEM-11-73-l.AM
•
a~359-L
CJ-362-L
CUR-1-12
CUR-1-33
CRQJ-13-AM
CT•l36
CT-234
CT-285
CT-68
CWPC-3A-81.
DAW-5-AM
EKH-A-ElO
EKH-C-4
ELK-2B-602
ELK-301
ER-PB-14-872
FPRSV~ll-f9
FPRSV-ll-H12
FT-17
FT-85
FVL-2-12
•
FWM-17
GTF-7-A
HC-1-104
HE-A-359-A
HE-A-369
.Owner
John A Zorzy
Via Plata LLC
Scott Hathorne
Jennifer Davenport
Paul John Gardner/Zirnmermann
Lisa Matsukawa
Tracy & Kevin Fober
Zackary & Kristin Guenard
James Rmistead
Lillehammer 1213, LLC
Anne Grappone
Enn Stembridge Property LLC
John Clay Thornton
Lamont lutldgreen
Duane Lambert
Will Hamii/Yeastwest
Doug Coleman Trustee
Michael & Melissa Giese
Randall Hull
Neil Band
Donald Schroeder
Noel Spraggins
Dondi Rust
David Cooper
Justin Bagnell
Jose A Rodriguez
Gary Ben Blonquist Trustee
Kimball Junction LLC/Evelyn Figuewa
Luke Kendell
Gregory Gisler
Earl Kennen Fisher Trustee
Archibald Wright
Brynn Hallman
Joanna Sanford
Morgan H. Irvin
Joseph Meyer
Jeffery Herbert
Tim Crittenden
Date
Notes
4/15/2015
3/10/2015
4/9/2015
4/10/2015
3/30/2015
4/27/2015
4/30/2015
4/23/2015
4/9/2015
4/21/2015 w/lease
4/13/2015
4/8/2015 w/lease
4/13/2015
5/1/2015 w/lease
4/8/2015
3/27/2015
3/27/2015
4/21/2015
4/9/2015 w/lease
5/1/2015 w/lease
3/30/2015
4/1/2015
5/1/2015
4/8/2015
5/1/2015
4/16/2015
4/8/2015
4/8/2015 w /lease
5/1/2015
4/9/2015
5/'J./2015
5/1/2015
4/20/2015
5/1/2015
3/31/2015
4/20/2015
4/8/2015
3/30/2015
Richard Jaffa
3/27/2015
Tomoko T Schlag Trustee
Lyn Simon
Jason Snyder & Anna lise Keen
Vincent Bynan & Elizabeth Roberts
4/13/2015
4/13/2015 w/Jease
John V ColaiZzi
4/1/2015
4/7/2015
3/24/2015
HE-B-247-A
HFRS-1
HMP-55
HOLR-2
HRDE-2
HT-99
HTC-7
IC-35
IH-20
IRH-FS-H-6
JR-5-5008
JR-'5-5009
JR-5-5019
JR-5-5044
JR-5'-5047
JR-5-5078
JR-5-5088
KE-A-66
KE-A-92
KK-11
KRD-9
KT-15Q-A
KT-187-A
KT~31
KT-33-A
KT-6-E
KT-81-1
MCL-26
MMS-15-AM
MMS-7
NBF-23
NBF-92
NIC-1
NPKTH-3-83
NS-1112-D-2
NS-125-C-4
NS-196-A
NS-432-A
NS-522-B
NS-526-A
NS-604-1-2
NS-632-B
NSS-13-72
NSS-B-84
OAKS-17
OAKS-39
ORGILL-4
Alexander Brodil
Stephen Mark & Lori Hanson
Nicholas Hatch
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Gale Pace
Ryland Robbins
Victor Jackson
Stephen D. Taylor
Jonah & Rebecca Schupbouch
Robert Alex.ander Schlopy
Theodore & Nichole. Lee
Norton Jacobs Family Trust
Luc Vallieres
Mark & Melinda Gunton
Mark & Bayanzul Hendel
Daniel & Susan Brown
Deleise N Collins
Carol Phillips
Aleksander Raising
Sadra Roberts
William E Allen
Brian Suhadolc
Helen M Anderson
Steven & Kathryn Mitchell
Jeanne McNeil
Glen Sracher/Mahwah Properties LL<
4/2/2015
4/20/2015
3/30/2015
5/1/2015
4/8/2015
4/3/2015
5/1/2015
4/17/2015
•
5/1/2015
4/23/2015
4/2/2015
3/31/2015
4/2/2015
4/27/2015
5/1/2015
4/2/2015
3/31/2015 w/lease
3/26/2015
4/13/2015
3/30/2015
3/31/2015
4/8/2015 w/lease
4/3/2015
4/30/2015
4/20/2015
4/20/2015
Hatch Family Trust
Jeffrey & Helena Tummers
Fredric Lucas
Duane Bailey
Curtic Sweeten
Travis Lafay
Steven Cloutier
John & Jennifer McMurrough
Colleen Maria Schulte
'
Brent Geary Trustee
Leslie Flores
Kimberly Brooks -
4/2/2015
5/1/2015
4/8/2015
4/13/2015
4/15/2015
4/8/2015
3/27/2015
4/8/2015
3/26/2015
4/13/2015
4/28/2015
4/8/2015
Blake Allen
G&F brown & Family Land
David McCullouch
Vance & Fern Dent
John Oliver Kucera
Greg Whitehouse
George Murphy
Mark Lampe
Jerrold Willoughby
3/27/2015
•
4/8/2015
4/23/2015 w/lease
4/3/2015
4/13/2015
4/15/2015
4/9/2015
3/27/2015
3/31/2015
•
•
OT-400-221-A
OTNB2~208•B
PAC-111-AM
PB-11-808
PB-12~815
PB-4-155
PB-4-166
PBC-'1-53
PB-IA-9
PBP-A-C-22
PBP-A-G-11
PBP-B'-M-2
PB-PR-83
PC-34
PC-375
PC-477
PC-697
PC-719
PKABO-A
PKM-16
PKM~2-26
•
PKM-23
PKM-~-40
PKM-2-41
PKM-2-62
Paul & Demeter Glennan
Suzanne Pretorius
Jesse Cloupe & Jennifer Courtney
Valen Lindner
Lawrence G Rose
Julia & Jim Wylie
Poanld Hill
8350 Meadowview Court #22 LLC
Isabel Hedges
Jennifer Mooney
Terry Janssen
John Kenworthy
Carol Carter & George Nitse
Park City Residential I, LLC
Mark Alastair Prescott
John Vrabel
Ryan Smith
Cathy Ann Downs
Teresa Chavez
Kathy Dopp
lynn Ware
4/13/2015
4/13/2015
4/2/2015
4/23/2015
4/30/2015
3/31/2015
4/1/2015
3/27/2015
5/1/2015
4/8/2015
5/1/2015
4/20/2015
4/9/2015
S/1/2015
4/23/2015
5/1/2015
3/30/2015
3/27/2015
4/27/2015
PR-3-54
PSC-631
PT-24-B
PT-9-B'-1
PTAR-4
PWL-1-S-8-B
PWL-3-T
PWL-6-H
PWV-A-20
Fatima Taylor
Eydie Pines & John leigh
3/27/2015
RC-1~40
Madeleine E Provo
Wesley & Hannah Stout
4/20/2015
5/1/2015
Victoria Martell
Wiggin Brennan
Greg & Linda eisenbarth
4/13/2015
PKM~3-7
PKM-76
PKM-84
PKVC-28
PNCR-F-2
PR-2-149
RHC-43
RPL-111-110
RPL-111-214
RV-10
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
3/30/2015
4/9/2015
4/27/2015 w/lease
4/7/2015
4/16/201_5
Ellen l Sherk
Cynthia Vitko & Maurice Hickey
Sean & Alix Railton
Jeffrey & Amanda Sangster
Frances Jolley Trustee
Lyndsay Young & Chris Smith
Scott & Andrea Sato
William M Schwerin Trustee
Kevin & Stephanie Winzeler
Rory Murphy
2465 Sidewinder LLC
Suzanne J. Lamb
Paradox Peak Properties LLC
Donna Sims & Joseph Assenheim
James Hampton
David & Stacie Brickey
Rachel Allen
PR-·24
PR-3,107
•
Jeffery S Stevens Trustee
Brenda Paull
4/16/2015
4/17/2015
5/1/2015
3/30/2015
4/9/2015
4/15/2015
4/13/2015
4/17/2015
4/13/2015
4/10/2015
4/30/2015
4/1/2015
5/1/2015
4/24/2015
4/20/2015
3/24/2015
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
4/3/2015
4/9/2015
4/8/2015 w/lease
SA-56
SBH-2
SE-145-AM
SE-168
Sl-A-50
Sl-B-122
Sl-D-213
Sl-1-3-7
SLS-56
SLS-63
SLS-87
SMIL-1-36
SMIL~I-60
SMIL-11-.111
SMIL-11-121
SMIL-11-90
SRG~19
SRG-62
SS-34-A-4-A
SSS-1~234
SSS-2-328
SSS-4-514
SSS-4-525
SU-A-34
SU-A-70
SU-A.,86
SU-1-71
SU-J-66
SU-M-11
SU-M-2-113
SU-M-2-21
TH-10
Tl-1.. 50
Tl-1-57
TSP-31
UVC-21
WDCS-E-22
wDcs-E.,8
WHLS-46
WLCRK-30
WLCRK-47
Charles R Colvin Trustee
4/1/2015
Brandon & Marco Heil
3/27/2015
Jessica Gray
4/20/2015
Jamie & Ryan LaFontaine
4/9/2015
Angel Heart I, LLC/ Charlene M Schae 4/17/2015
. Vanette Perkins
4/30/2015
Kam & Allyson Leang
4/20/2015
Hector l Mingura
4/8/2015
Nathan G Olsen
4/28/2015 w/lease
Gregory & Teresa Graham
5/1/2015
Harry Adelsson
4/23/2015
Harry & Erin Mahoney
1/2/2015
Jennifer Palosky
4/8/2015
Lidia Di lello Trustee
4/23/2015
Richard & Catherine Meffert
4/1/2015 w/lease
David Bryan
3/30/2015
Jeff & Farrah Spencer
4/30/2015 w/lease
Jeffrey Spencer
4/8/2015 w/lease
Bricia C Weir
5/l/2015
Claire Desilets
4/3/2015
Rush & Sarah Hawkins
4/22/2015
David Marsella
4/9/2015
Ingrid Donato Trustee
5/1/2015
Stacey & Amy Jenkins
4/3/2015
Matt & Megan Provost
3/27/2015
Shae & Elizabeth McCowen
4/27/2015
R. Mario Medina
4/17/2015 w/lease
Carrie Westberg
5/1/2015
Mark & Kerys Sharrock
4/23/2015
Boone Nichols
4/1/2015 w/lease
St. Moritz Utah Property LLC
3/27/2015 w/lease
John & Dorilee Vallis
4/13/2015
Wade Capps
4/15/2015
Jeffrey lsom
4/23/2015
Paul Howarth Trustee
4/10/2015
John Thornton
4/13/2015 w/lease
Gary Callis
4/20/2015
Eric Esquivel
4/10/2015
Alida Hauser Kehrl
4/8/2015
· Christopher Reddish & Meredith Lavi
5/1/2015
Robert & Suzanne Vandenberg
4/27/2015
WLS-1
Cooper Willoughby
3/31/2015
WV-16
WWPD-66-AM
WWPD-A22-AM
John M Robbins Jt Trustee
lamont lundgreen
Ryan Baker
3/30/2015
5/1/2015
4/20/2015
•
•
•
•
Non-Primary
Parcel
199-DAlY~All
402-MAR-1
APW-28-AM
BC,-11-AM
BEPC-7
BHVS-73
BHVS-17
CD-464-B-1
CEM-1-44-AM
CVC-1-C-305
CWPC~17-AM
CWPC,-8-AM
ECR-116
EH-2-306
EH-1-4
FlV-3-11-B
•
FPRV-32-A-1
GTF-3-A
GWlD-111-187
IC-18
lBHV-1-1203
l.KSD-9-A
LLTl•201
LVC-6
NJ-2
OAKS-54
OAKS-85
PAC•?-MA
PBC-1-41
PC-241-A
PC-463
PC-468
PNCR~F-9
PRE-9
PSC-139
PT-11-C
RC~l-6
•
RC-3-109
REC-1
RIS-33
RP-2-T-'8
RP-C-2
SA-165-A
SCC-A-2
Owner
Michele Dingman
J Alden Philbrick IV
Ryan & Kimberly Pederson
Floest & JenniferDzfuna
James T Ryan Ill Co-Trustee
Mark Bigatel
Thomas ld~orek
Poplar Holdings llC
James Hogan
Terry Barnes
Donald Brown
Phil Hagerman Trustee
Ricky Strong
Gregory Wiest
Kyle & Carrie Flowers
Roger & Rosemary Baldwin
Annette laGrange
Leob Revocable Trust
Kirsten A Hanson Trustee
Angie Block/ Around the Block llC
James Monroe Buchanan
Barbara Anne Wirostko
Christian Mclean Jensen
Douglas James Seith
Thomas E Birsic
Marilyn A Heck
Bruce Lupatkin
Timothy G Michalik
James Goerss
Michael McGinley
Jesse Schaub
Everson Exemption trust
Christine Roesch
Stephane Yen
George & Karen March
John Darrah
Thomas A Gatta & Michelle Sausa-Ge:
Jason and Heidi Mischel
William W Budd Jr
James R Byrne Co-Trustee
Thomas Clemens & Max Kopp
Stephanie Stuckey
Daniel Alegre Trustee
Gilbert & Rochelle Jonswold
Date
. Notes
4/27/2015
4/1/2015
4/21/2015
4/27/2015
4/17/20i5
4/13/2015
4/15/2015
5/1/2015
3/30/2015
4/29/2015
3/27/2015
3/31/2015
4/9/2015
4/13/2015
3/27/203.5
4/13/2015
4/22/2015
4/23/2015
4/2/2015
4/3/2015
4/10/2015
4/8/2015 Non-Primary per owner on phone,
4/21/2015
4/20/2015
3/27/2015
5/1/2015
4/8/2015 Property is empty and on the Marl
5/1/2015
4/13/2015
4/15/2015
4/30/2015
4/29/2015
4/1/2015
4/30/2015
3tJ.7/2015
4/20/2015
4/20/2015
4/3/2015
4/20/2015
4/13/2015
-4/1/2015
4/15/2015
3/27/2015
4/13/2015
SL-C-137
SLDV-11-AM
SL-E-252
SMS-25
SRC-4301
SS-78-6
TWNPT-C-202
UL-6-C
WBD-83
WC-10
Michael Stamolis
David Oston
Marvin H Maxwell Trust
Heath Bowden
Barn 9, LLC
Raymond Raddon
Christopher Gottscho
Bear Necessities Uintalands LLC
Lot 83 Willowbend West SUBO/Thon
Hans Johnstone
•
4/10/2015
4/30/2015
4/2/2015
4/20/2015
4/7/2015
4/10/2015
4/8/2015
4/8/2015
3/27/2015
3/31/2015
New Primaries
Parcel
206-GR-1
BB-16
BBEAR-206
BCKS-2
BHVS-44
BHVS-47
BHVS-T22
BHVS-T6
CALG-100
CALG-202
CCRK-A-'15
CCRK-A-35
CCRK-D-23
CD-36-7
CEM-1-3
CUR-2-66
CQVC-11
CSP-1B-B
Owner
Michael R Hughes Trustee
Walter J Bennet
Lawrence Gardecki & Amy McMillan
Daniel & Christine Ferris
Scott Kobrin
Scott Korbin
William Cornell
Christopher & Melanie Coffelt
Kathleen Sarette
J Charles Grosvenor
Date
4/1/2015
3/30/2015
4/8/2015
4/5/2015
4/21/2015
4/2.1/2015
3/20/2015
4/8/2015
3/3/2015
4/8/2015
r'!otes
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
w/lease
FGR~4
Michael C Luebke
Adam Schwall
Melodie Grigsby
Fernando Ramirez
Sharree L Olsen
Alta Vista Holdings LLC
Justin Johansen
Elizabeth Close
Hans Henkel
GaryCiow
Rick Federico
Thomas J Biafore
D(lvid Rudolf
5/1/2015
5/1/2015
4/10/2015
4/8/2015 w/lease
3/27/2015
5/1/2015
5/1/2015
5/1/2015
4/15/2015 w/lease
3/30/2015
3/31/2015 w/lease
FM-D-151
FPRV-17-C..,2
FTH-3
FWM-14
Greg Sperry & Shasta Sperry
Karl Cox & Gil Sonseeah
Alexandra Lowe
Jack & Jamie Rubin
5/1/2015
4/27/2015 w/lease
5/1/2015
4/22/2015
HM"1-37
HS-2-8
JR-13
Curtis & Susan Dowd
William E Jahsman
Sally Castellanos
Lisa Abraham
4/23/2015
4/17/2015 w/lease
4/30/2015
5/1/2015 w/lease
JR~4-4091
Richard &.Judy Bell
cvc~1-c-2o2
CWPC-4A-178
DC-12
EP+l..7
JtVE~12
5/1/2015
4/8/20].5 w/lease
5/1/2015 w/lease
•
•
•
KRD-,1
KT-227-1-A
MV-3-20
NS-265
OJR-10
PAR-116
PRESRV.:l-5
PRESRV-3-53
PSC-800
i>T-3-D
PWL-1-S-8~K
RC-2-157
RC-3-100
RGP-120-1AM
RIVBLF-A-11
•
RPL-IU•142
SA-311-1-A
Sl-A-24
Sl-B-167
Sl-B-168
SL-1-2-12
SOL-2-A-88
SRC-4302
SS-59-7-A-1
SS-80-7
SSP-25-2
su~A~13
UVC-22
. Vll-6
4/10/2015
5/1/2015 w/lease
4/8/2015
4/3/2015
4/27/2015
4/28/2015
4/13/2015
5/1/2015
4/10/2015
S/1/2015
4/13/2015
4/30/2015 w/lease
Matt Seamons
George K Sowles
Barbara Ann Dennis
Michelle A Hallmark
Robert & Kimberly Slizeski
Colleen Kulluk
Richard Wynn Skidmore
Mark Snihurowych
Theresa DiGuida
Ed & Paula Robertshaw
Una Barbaros
Sherry S McGhee
Genevieve lark Lindig'•.
Robert Aboutok
Carisa Norman
Robert Sloan
Neils Vernegaard
Brian J & Andrea M Cink
Shawn & Dawn Johnstun
Susan Goldsmith
Clayton Stuard
Brian M Kadison Trustee
SGC Ventures Utah LLC
Roger Goldman
Adam Rogers/Browns Canyon LTD
Rory Murphy
Svetlana Bryner & Mark Aquirre
Anthony Martinez
Matthew Johnston
.
4/20/2015
4/20/2015
4/8/2015
4/27/2015
3/16/2015
3/31/2015
5/1/2015
4/8/2015
3/30/2015 w/lease
4/23/2015
5/1/2015 w/lease
4/1/2015
4/24/2015 w/lea~e
4/13/2015 w/lease
. 4/21/2015
5/1/2015
4/28/2015
.Discussion regarding anti-idlil!g efforts; Frank Smith, Rich Bullough, and Geri Essen
•
Public Health Director Rich Bullough explained that the purpose of this work session is to
discuss restrictions on idling within the Coun.ty, with the biggest concern being to align whatever
the County does with what the Park City Council adopted. He noted that Park City reduced the
idling time from three min11tes to one minute and removed the variances fot temperatures below
32 degrees Fahrenheit and above .90 degrees Fahrenheit. Other than that, the County's ordinance
and Park City's ate very similar. Chair Carson confirmed with Mr. BuJlough that the State
requires three warnings before a citation can be issued.
•
Staff Report
To:
Report Date:
Meeting Date:
From:
Project Name:
Type of Item:
Summit County Council
May7, 2015
May 13,2015
Rich Bul_lough, Geri Essen, Frank Smith
Anti-Idling Ordinance
Work Session
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2011, the Summit County Council passed an anti-idling resolution, and in 2012 that resolution was
adopted as an ordinance (exhibit A). During this time, Park City had a similar ordinance in place.
Recently, the Park City Council revised that ordinance to be slightly stronger in two primary areas: they
removed the exemptions for temperatures below 32 degrees and above 90 degrees, and they reduced
idling time allowed from three to one minutes. Their approved ordinance is attached (exhibit B).
•
Because persons do not generally distinguish between non-incorporated areas and city limits,
particularly in western Summit County (Snyderville Basin and Park City), it would be beneficial to have
very similar ordinances in place between the unincorporated and incorporated areas, again, particularly
in western Summit County. It is our understanding that the Summit County Council wants to consider
adopting a modified ordinance to reflect the new ordinance adopted by the Park City Council.
One primary concern with the existing ordinance has been enforcement, or lack thereof. At the time the
Summit County ordinance was passed, it was generally agreed upon that the ordinance would not be
enforced or enforceable without additional resource in the Sheriffs department. that issue remains a
concern and should be better defined moving forward. Sheriff Martinez has agreed to work on this.
At the time the original Summit County resolution was passed, signage was developed, community
partners were engaged, and signage placement was initiated. However, staff believes that for this effort
to be successful the education and signage component must be greatly expanded and resources made
available to accomplish this.
Attachments
Exhibit A: Summit County Anti-Idling Ordinance
E.xhibit B: Park City Anti~Idling Ordinance
•
•
•
Council Member Ure asked if the Warning would be per vehicle or per owner. It was verified
that it would be per vehicle.
Mr. Bullough reported that there is an exemption for private property. Most complaints are from
individuals whose neighbors are Wariiling up diesel engines in the morning, and this ordinance
would not address that issue. He recalled that when this initially passed, lie expressed concerns
about enrorcement, based on discussions with the Sheriffs Office. It was his understanding that
Park City has a specific number to call for idling violations, and the complaints are tracked. He
reported that this was discussed by the Board of Health, and one concern was whether it helps or
hurts cars and diesel engines to idle first. His research showed that, starting in 1998, idle times
for diesel engines is a maxitnUJ:ll of three minutes, and anything beyond that will actually cause
damage. He also found that the temperatures must be around 0 degrees in order for modem
diesel fuels to gel.
Chair Carson noted that there was a concern about children in a car when conditions are
extremely cold or extremely hot, but there are exceptions to address that. Council Member
Armstrong asked if a person would claim the health and safety exception to the officer when he
tries to write a ticket or if a person would have to prove it in court after they get the ticket. Matt
Abbott with Park City Municipal Corporation replied that they are not likely to get a ticket,
because three warnings must be given before a ticket can be issued. He explained that their
approach is educational, and they do not anticipate writing tickets unless there are egregious
violations. He clarified that they would issue warnings or citations based on the licensed driver,
not the vehicle as previously discussed. He also explained that a citation would be the equivalent
of a parking ticket.
Mr. Bullough emphasized that education would be a primary component of this, especi.~:llly
signage, which would help address the issue of people who are not County residents.
Geti Essen with the County Health Department reported that she contacted the cities to be sure
this would be compatible with their regulations, and they not seem to have an issue with it. Most
of the schools have signage posted, and the County may be able to help those without signage.
Mr. Bullough stated that Mayor Marchant was quite excited about it, and if they do this right,
there should be an opportunity to engage some community partners. In areas where people
gather and there is a high density of vehicles, idling is a health risk, and a lot of good could come
from the education component of this. Ms. Essen noted that the schools have been very
proactive and already have policies in place for their buses and education for the students.
Council Member Ure commented that fast food drive-throughs are a particular problem. Ms.
Essen noted that some of them are posting their own signs, and Idle-Free Utah will provide
stickers that businesses cail post in their drive-t}rroughs.
Chair Carson asked what the Council thought about decreasing the idle time to one minute and
deleting the exceptions for below 32 degrees and over 90 degrees .
•
4
Council Member Armstrong stated that he would b~ happy to match Park City's ordinance, but
he does not like passing ordiiJ.ances they do not enforce. Ifit allows them to put up signs that say
that no idling is the law, that is fine, but he did not believe the Sheriffs Office has the resources
to enforce this.
•
Mr. Bullough stated that there are places in the SIJ.yderville Basin where trucks idle, and he did
not believe shortening the time from three minutes to one minute will make an impact,
However, the idea of all of western Summit County having the same regulation is a good thing.
He reported that he has talked to the Sheriff about the old rest stop by the Bitner roundabo\lt
where trucks idle all night long. He acknowledged that falls under the Highway Patrol's
jwisdiction, but he believed having signage there could help. He anticipated that this would be
scheduled for a public hearing and possible action the begil).ning of June.
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SUMMIT COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL AGENCY
Council Member Robinson made a motion to convene as the Governing Board of the
Summit County Comlilun:ity Development and Renewal Agency. The motion was seconded
by Council Member McMullin and passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
Chair Carson called the meeting of the Governing Board of the Summit County Community
Development and Renewal Agency to order at 3:40 p.m.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 2015-12,
AUTHORIZING THE PREPARA.TION OF A DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PRO~ECT AREA PLAN AND RELATED MATTERS; LISA YODER
•
Sustainability Coordinator Lisa Yoder explained that this resolution would authorize the
preparation of a community development plan for the project atea, which is required to receive a
bond allocation.
Deputy County Attorney Dave Thomas explained that the mechanism by which the County will
issue the bond is the Renewal Authority. Generally speaking, the Renewal Authority only
applies to projects within the unincorporated County, and in order for the loan program to apply
to city residents, the cities will have to pass a resolution authorizing their city to be part of the
Community Development and Renewal Agency. He has prepared a draft of those resolutions
which will be presented at the COG meeting this month.
5
•
•
Staff Report
May 13,2015
Lisa Yoder, Sustainability Coordinator
Review and approval of
Resolution of the Summit County Community Development and
Renewal Agency authorizing the preparation of the draft Community
Development Area (CDA) plan
BACKGROUND
•
April13, 2015- The Private Activity Bond Authority approved a $4.3 million Qualified Energy
Conservation Bond (QECB) allocation for the purpose of funding the countywide Be Wise,
Energize Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program. A Community Development Area (CbA) or
a Summit County Subsidiary Issuing Authority is required by law to issue the QECB bond
allocation .
A CDA Plan is required to establish a CDA. The CDA Plan defines the project; provides specific
description of the boundaries of the proposed project area; and describes the public benefit that is
broadly available to Summit County residents. The CDA Plan is intended to provide members of the
public, the County Council, the State Tax Commission, the assessor and auditor of the county,
and the governing body of each taxing entity with information regarding use and management
ofthe QECB bond allocation proceeds.
Establishing a COP Plan is the next step toward making the pending funds available for
administration of the Be Wise, Energize Loan Program. The attached Resolution # 2015-_
authorizes Staff to draft a CDA Plan. The resolution has been prepared by Chief Civil Deputy
Attorney David Thomas with the advice of Bond Council.
CONCLUSION
Once drafted, the CDA Plan will be made available to the public at least 30 days in advance of a
Public Hearing tentatively scheduled for June 24, 2015. Also on thiS date, Ordinance #___.J
Approving the Community Development Area Plan (CDA Plan) will be presented to Council for
review and possible adoption.
RECOMMENDATiON
•
Review and approve the Resolution of the Summit County Community Development and
Renewal Agency authorizing the preparation of the clraft Community Development Area
(CDA) plan dated..,.....-..........._ _
1
Chair Carson asked if the sales tax that will back the bonds goes into the general fund. Finance
Officer Matt Leavitt expl~ined that there are two components to the s~les tax, the local tax and
the county option. The larger amount goes into the municipal fund, and the smaller amount goes
into the general fund. Chair Carson stated that she did not want people who live in the
municipalities to have their tax dollars go into this program and not be able to participate in it.
•
Mr. Thomas explained that, after this resolution is passed, Ms. Yoder will put together the plan, a
notice of the plan will be sent to all County residents, a public hearing will be held after 30 days,
and then the Council can modify the plan or adopt it. He noted that the bond will probably not
be issued until September. Ms. Yoder explained that the County currently has an RFP out for a
plan administrator and a loan administrator. Once they are on board, they will work out the
details of implementing the program and prepare to implement it. It will take a couple of months
to work out the details before they c~ actually start making loans.
Chair Carson recalled that they discussed using a small portion of County funds for a pilot
program to see how the program would work before starting to make loans. Ms. Yoder
explained that they will work with the first 12 to 16 people cautiously and slowly, letting them
know there may be some glitches, and once everything is worked out, they will actively promote
the program. Chair Carson confirmed with Ms. Yoder that would all be done with bond money.
Mr. Thomas stated that the Council would probably be looking at the parameters resolution for
the bond sometime in June.
Board Member Robinson asked what the qualifications would be for a home if someone wants to
participate. Ms. Yoder explained that the home would have to have been built prior to 1989.
The Board Members did not believe there should be a limit on the date the home was built,
because even some recently built homes are not well weatherized. Ms. Yoder answered
questions about how the loan would be administered and administration costs. She confirmed
with the Board that they would like to see the pl~ at their May 27 meeting before it is published.
•
Board Member McMullin made a motion to adopt Resolution 2015-12 authorizing the
preparation of a draft Community Development Project Area Plan. The motion was
seconded by Board Member Robinson and passed unanimously, 5 too.
6
•
•
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE SUMMIT COUNTY COMMUNliY
DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL AGENCY, STATE OF UTAH:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTlCE
AND CONSENT TO SPECIAL MEETING
•
We, the Chair and Members of the Summit County Coinmlliiity Development and
Renewal Agency do hereby acknowledge receipt of the foregoing Notice of Special
Meeting, and we hereby waive any and all irregularities, if any, in such notice and in the
manner of service thereof upon us and consent and agree to. the holding of such special
meeting at the time and place specified in said notice, apd to the transaction of anY. and all
bUSiness which may come before said meeting. • ~
. :.· .1. ·.
.. Chair
. '·
·
/'>:I'J'.
.
.
.
·.·.·~·
..
.
.... ,.
•
DMWEST #12159994 v1
..
.
-
... ·
.......... ··.. ·
.
Coalville, Utah
May 13,2015
The governing body (the "Board") of the Summit CoUI_lty Community
Development and Renewal Agency (the "Agency"), met in special public session at its
regular meeting place in Coalville, Utah, on May 13, 2015, at the hour of 3'.C/Op.m., with
the following members of the Board being present:
•
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Kim Carson
Roger Armstrong
Claudia McMullin
Chris Robinson
Dave Ure
Also present:
Clerk
Kent Jones
Absent:
~
After the meeting had been duly called to order and after other matters not
pertinent to this resolution had been discussed, the Cletk presented to the Board a
Certificate of Compliance with Open Meeting Law with respect to this May 13, 2015,
meeting, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
•
The following resolution was then introduced in writing, was fully discussed, and
to motion duly made by Member /!!t-MIA.//il1
and seconded by Member
. . W f~
, was adopted by the following vote:
p]f.rt
AYE:
J/l .tM-
fMv
NAY:
The resolution was then signed by the Chair and recorded by the Clerk in the
official records of the Agency. The resolution is as follows:
DMWEST#12159994 v1
2
•
•
RESOLUTIONNO. 't/JI~ -~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE StJMMIT COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL AGENCY AUTHORIZlNG THE
PREPARATION OF A DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
PLAN.AND RELATED MATTERS
WHEREAS, the Summit County Community Development and Renewal Agency
(the "Agency") was created to transact the business and exercise all of the powers
provided for in the Lin:llted Purpose Local Government Entities-Conlm.unity
Development and Renewal Agencies Act, Title 17C, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as
amended (the "Act"), and any preceding, subsequent, replacement or amended law or act;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17C-4-101 of the Act, the governing body of the
Agency (the "Boatd") is duly empowered to authorize by resolution the preparation of a
draft community development project area plan; and
•
WHEREAS, the Board desires to authorize the preparation of a draft community
development project area plan for a proposed community development project area
.k:J;lown as the Be Wise, Energize Community Development Area (''CDA").
NOW, THEREFORE, It is Hereby Resolved by the Governing Body of the Summit
County Community Development and Renewal Agency as follows:
Section I.
The terms defined or described in the recitals hereto shall have the
same meaning when tJsed in the body of this Resolution. All action heretofore taken (not
inconsistent with the provisions of this Resolution) by the Board and by the officers of
the Agency directed toward the preparation of a draft project area plan, are hereby
ratified, approved, and confirmed.
Section 2.
The Board hereby authorizes the preparation of a draft community
development project area plan for a project area with geographic boundaries coterrillnous
with the geographic boundaries of Summit County, Utah.
The appropriate officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and
Section 3.
directed to take all action necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this
Resolution, including, but not limited to, obtaining whatever information is needed, and
hiring or contracting with consultants and others as necessary for the preparation of the
draft community development project area plan.
•
Section 4.
If any one or more sections, sentences, clauses, or parts of this
Resolution shall, for any reason, be held invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair,
or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Resolution, but shall be confined in its
operation to the specific sections, sentences, clauses, or parts of this Resolution so held
DMWEST #12159994 v1
3
l:lllconstitutional and invalid, and the inapplicability and invalidity of any section,
sentence, clause, or part of this Resolution in any one or more instances shall not affect or
prejudice in any way the applicability and validity of this Resolution in any other
instances.
•
All resolutions of the Agency in conflict with this Resolution are
Section 5.
hereby repealed· to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be
construed to revive any Resolution, by-law or regulation, or part thereof, heretofore
repealed.
..J'
•
ATTEST:
•
•
DISMISS AS THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SUMMIT COUNTY COMMUNlTY
DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL AGENCY
Board Member Robinson made a motion to dismiss as the Governing Board of the SuPJ.mit
County Community Development and Renewal Agency. The motion was seconded by
Board Member Armstrong and passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
The meeting of the Summit County Coll1Il1unity Development and Renewal Agency adjourned at
4:00p.m.
CLOSED SESSION
Council Member Armstrong made a motion to convene in closed session to discuss
person.nel. The motion was seconded by Council Member Robinson aml pa$sed
unanimously, 5 to 0.
The Summit County Council met in closed session for the purpose of discussing personnel from
·
4:00 p.m. to 4:05 p.m. Those in attend~mce were:
•
Tom Fisher, Manager
Council Member Armstrong made a motion to dismiss from closed session to discuss
personnel and to convene in closed session to discus$ property acquisition. The motion was
seconded by Council Member Robinson and passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
The Summit County Council met in closed ses$ion for the purpose of discussing property
acquisition from 4:05 p.in. to 4:55 p.m. Those in attendance were:
Cltris Robinson, Council Member
Tom Fisher, Manager
Rena Jordan, Snyderville Basin Recreation District
Council Member Armstrong made a motion to dis-miss from closed session and to
reconvene in work session. The motion was seconded by Council Member McMullin and
passed unanimously, 5 to 0•
•
7
WORK SESSION- (Continued)
• Discussion regarding proposed design of Animal Control shelter; Brian Bellamy and
Tom Brennan, Architect
•
Brian Bellamy recalled that in December the Council authorized $800,000 for an addition and
renovation of the Animal Control shelter and requested that Staff bring the design to the Council
for review. He explained that the shelter was built in 1995, and one problem is that it cannot be
heated, so they use space heaters to keep the animals warm. He also recalled that they have
changed their policy regarding how long they keep animals, and they do not euthanize them. He
explained that the proposed addition will provide 13 kennels for dogs, and they can house the
dogs inSide or outside.
Architect Tom Brennan provided a model of the existing shelter facility and showed how this
plan would expand on three sides around the existing core kennel area. He reviewed the various
areas in the existing shelter and the proposed addition to the shelter and described how they
would fl.mction.
•
8
•
•
STAFF REPORT
To:
Report Date:
Meeting Date:
Author:
Description:
Type ofltem:
County Council
May6, 2015
Mayl3,2015
Brian Bellamy
Renovation of Animal Control Shelter
Discussion
A. Background
On December 17, 2014 the County Council approved $800,000 for the renovation of the
shelter. With this approval was the stipulation there would be a work session regarding
the renovation including draw'ings of the proposed facility.
•
History of the Animal Control Shelter
In 1995 Summit County built the existing Animal
Control Shelter. The building is 2,853 square feet,
including a garage.
This building provided 12 indoor dog kennels,
measuring 6' x 7'. When crowded, the kennels could
be halved putting a dog on each side. With thi$
configuration "biters" and rabies quarantined dogs
are housed with our adoptable dogs. For those dogs
that are "biters" or quarantined a red sign is placed
on the kennel stating not to touch the dogs and the
reason why. Puppies were also placed in this same
area.
Existing Facility:
2,853 square feet
12 indoor dog kel)l)els
43 cat kennels
303 square feet officer room
Improper venting ofa_ir (~at rooms)
Inadequate HVAC
No security
Proposed Facility:
2,056_ additional square feet
4,909 total squarefeet
lZ indoor dog kennels
13 indoorjoutdoor dog kennels
Separate puppy kennel
Puppy play area
Cat/kitten play-area
Separate cat and kitten viewing rooms
Pet receiving/adoption area
Indoor food storage
NewHVAC
Proper venting of air
Work stations for officers
Updated security
The configuration for cats was two self-contained
rooms with 13 kennels in the first room, used for cat
evaluation and 30 kennels in the cat adoption room.
The cat rooms were built with no venting system for
the air, the air recycles through the rooms. This
causes a problem if we have sick cats~ The cats are
not allowed out of the kennels at any time, there is no play room .
•
1
In the hallway between the dog kennels and the garage was the quarantine area for sick
dogs. This area has little air conditioning in the summer or heat in the winter. Some of the
chemicals used for cleaning the kennels are. housed in this same area.
•
The original officer's room was 8.5' x 11.5' also housing the copy machine, kitty litter and
the electrical panels. Storage of bulk food has been in a shed out the back of the building.
Since the. original structure was built, the garage was converted to an officer's
room/break room, where reports could be written. This space is 12.75' x 23.5'. Currently,
there are four animal control officers and the Field Officer housed in this room. The
original officer room now houses kitty litter, newspaper for the cat kennels, some cat and
dog food, and computer/telephone equipment.
Six outside kennels had been added to be used in the spring through the fall. These
kennels are also used for chickens, goats, etc. We recently built (with donations) one large
dog run measuring 65' x 30'. In this run we can get a few dogs outside during the day to
play and lay in the sun. Currently there is no adequate puppy separation area. The current
area used for puppies the minimally heated/cooled hallway between the kennel area and
the officer's room. This area has one large kennel measuring 4.5' x 10'.
One of the ongoing problems has been heating and cooling. In winters, space heaters have
been necessary to bring the temperature for both animals and staff to a tolerable level.
The original design for this building has not been suitable for the environment in Summit
County.
•
Proposal for the Animal Control Shelter
The proposed facility enlarges our footprint by 2,056 square feet and provides us much
needed kennels, places for cats and puppies to play, ill animals, biters, etc. The current
shelter is outlined in blue on Attachment A The enlarged footprint of the renovated
shelter gives the County:
• Reconfigured Lobby
• Pet adoption/receiving room
• 13 lndoorfoutdoor kennels for dogs, for a total of25 kennels
• Dog quarantine area
• Separate puppy kennel area
• Puppy play area
• Larger cat kennel area
• Separate kitten kennel area
• Kitten/cat play area
• Larger cat intake/quarantine area
• Relocated Administrator's Office and Officers' area
• Secure Shelter Entrance
• Indoor Food Storage Area
• New HVAC and Electrical Service
2
•
•
We would be hCJ.PPY to answer any questions you may have.
B. Recommendation
Staff recommends the Council discusses and make recommendations, if any, to the design
·
provided by EDA.
•
•
3
•
•
Attachment A
•
i!
il
;-1)
--
{.')
z
Q
....J,
~:. :·~ ~~ :~·." ,
.
~
~
::>
g
....J
~
m
.
~
~·
~~ 8
zl::>z
oo
uu
1-....J
-<(
::E::E
::E-
:::::>Z
Ul<(
I
~
~
~!li!
~·
FfNCff)
s;ORIQ.
I~IIUQ.IW1l.IIGI
<aALTI.AIIti!.CJTY
lJ...,.~···
Qt.:ttSlll·...,.,
,,._,1_.., :u...s
-....._........
I'Mll.MCM.
TD'
~ill,. I
/MPtfiUJ
m
FI.OORPINI
.,
.....
•
I
l.•I
Ia
e ....
~
"
!U!Q!I """Q1!5§ w .!!I!Al!l
G)
""""'
Al
•
•
...
I
()
~
1-
z
0
u
;i
:E
zII(
>=
1-
z
:)
0
u
...=
:1
2
•
::»
Cl)
'
•
I
..1
0
•
a=
1-
z
0
(,)
...
c(
:E
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
D::
-aw::
0
t-
....z
"z
c:::l
1=-
!!
•
•
>iC
w
~-
1
-
•
~
-w
0
~
.....
-z
•
(§)
{.9
z
........
0_J
........
:::::>
0)
_J
·~~
21-
:::::>z
oo
uu
1-_J
........ <(
:E:E
:E ......
:::::>Z
(/)<(
~,.-,..,._"'1
~
....,o
t ._g
g8
I
v
:,
:,
I
{
j
J,
~~
...
\!2~
i:S,_
~
·~~
J
I
r-. • • • ...
1..-·-·-~.J
PROPOSED
FLOOR PlAN
•
•
•
SUMMIT COUNTY
ANIMAL CONTROL BUILDING ·
1745 SOUTH HOYT5VIU.E ROAD, OWSVILLE I UTAH 84017
•
••••
.
•
•
•
PROJECT:
ADDRESS:
SUMMIT COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL
1745 South Hoytsville Rd
Locat:
BUILDING SIZE :
I
51712015
I [- - ---f
I
'ESTIMA1iED liiME IN WEEKS
I
I
Liquidated damages budget
2000
20
SF
WKS
2000
20
20
20
1
1
1i
SF
WKS
WKS
WKS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
WKS
WKS
hr
EA.
HRS
LF
LS
EA.
WKS
I
$286.52 cosT PER SF
Bid Bond Is required.
Job must be done by
CLEANING
GARBAGE COLLECTION,
JOB OFFICE
JOB PHONE
BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE
PERFORMANCE & PAYMENT
PLAN CHECK I FEES
BUILDING PERMIT
IMPACT FEES:
UTILITYCONNECTION FEES
QUALITY CONTR'L TESTING I special inspection
WINTER CONDITIONS I CONTENGENCY
SUPERVISION
Security Allowance or overtime
Office Visits
Mise labor
TEMP FENCING
TEMP. LIGH:TING
TEMP POWER .POLE- U.P .L.
TEMP POWER
•
April 30 2013
:1
1
1
1
3
20
0
5
80
0
0
1
20
•
1
Sum"''' County
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
A,..lm •I Conti'OI
P.. ellmtner,. E.tl.., ••• 05-07-2015 ·••••
41'2015
•
•
•
TOILET
BARRICADE COST:
PROJECT SIGN
AS BUILT DRAWINGS I OPERATION AND MAINT MANUALS
REGISTERED SURVEYOR:
KELLER
SPECIAL INSPECTION
20
20
1
1
WKS
WKS
LS
EA.
EXCAVATING
110
11:5
CONCRETE I SY 3500 PSI
CONCRETE I SY 4000 PS!
2
S.urn mll Cou1\t)'
Anlm ei'Control
Prelim lner)l E.tim u • 05•07-201 5 ·••••
517/2015
--------
-
-------
BUILDING MASORNY
INSULATION AND CAULKING
•
•
Su,.. mtt CouMy
Ani"" •I Control P~ell,..lfl•ry
./2015
E., .... ue 05·07·2015
·•h•
•
"'
~
0
.;,
0
:'
UJ
'
!
cL
~
J
J'
..,
'
u
''
"'
•
1-
z
0
a:
u.
W.
a:
e
0
0
•
3:
0
c
z
i
Q
~
0
w
PAINTING
TIES
•
•
.7/2015
Sum mit County A"'"' ai'Col\lroi:P~•IIn>ln•ry Esum au 05-07•2015 ,,.._ •
•
•
•
NO FIRE SPRINKLERS
contingency for transformer and outside power
0
TRANSFORMER PAD
6
LS
Sum ml1: Count)' Anim •I
Contr"ol Proillmlnu,.
£.,,,.,
ue
05-07~2015 ·••••
5/7/2015
. "'
~g.
9
~
E
J
.'
'
u
E
ui
•
~
•
•
Council Member McMullin suggested that they may want to have a couple of separate keililels
for sick dogs and sick cats. She asked if any thought had been given to having a free-roaming
cat area. Mr. Brennan indicated the area proposed for that purpose. Council Member McMullin
stressed the importance of having proper ventilation in the cat room.
Council Meinbet Robinson asked if there would be an opportunity to use solat panels on this
building. Mr. Bteililan replied that it is very small, and the County would get more benefit out of
putting solar on some of its larger buildings. Another issue is the building orientation, with the
shed roof facing to the west. Council Member Robinson requested that Mr. Brennan provide
figures for a two-stage solar installation on the building, with the first stage being preparation for
the solar installation and the second being the actual inStallation. Chair Clirson suggested that, if
they wire for solar now, they may be able to add the solar installation to a grant request at some
point. She stated that one of her concerns was energy efficiency. Mr. Brennan explained that
they can add insulation to the masonry and get a lot of energy efficiency from that.
Council Member McMullin asked if the exit from the building into the outdoor kennels would be
a metal door or a dog door. Mr. Brennan suggested that they not use hinged doors and use
vertical doors.
•
Council Member Ure asked how much it would cost to furnish the shelter. Mr. Bellamy replied
that they could use most of what they have now except for the new kennels on the outside. They
may have to purchase a few things, blJt that would probably be proposed in the 2016 budget.
Council Member McMullin suggested that they consider supplying platforms for the dogs to
sleep on.
REGULAR MEETING
Chair Carson called the regular meeting to order at 5:30p.m.
•
Pledge of Allegiance
POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 822-A, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING
ORDINANCE 822 AND ENACTING A NEW SUMMIT COUNTY ORDINANCE FOR
PROCUREMENT OF SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES; MATT JENSEN,
PURCHASING AGENT
Management Analyst Matt Jensen confirmed that he made the corrections suggested by the
Council at the last meeting. He recommended that the Council approve this ordinance and put
the hew procurement policy in place.
•
9
ORDINANCE NO. 822-A
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SUMMIT COUNTY PROCUREMENT OF SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND •
SERVICES ORDINANCE 822 AND ENACTING A NEW SUMMIT COUNTY PROCUREMENT OF SUPPLIES,
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the last time substantial changes were made to the Summit County Procurement of
Supplies, Equipment and Services Code were in 2013; and
WHEREAS, the current Summit County Procurement of Supplies, Equipment and Services Code does
not ful_ly define the powers and responsibilities of the Purchasing Agent; and
WHEREAS, the. current Summit County Procurement of Supplies, Equipment and Services Code does
not accurately reflect some of the day to day procurement practices used by Summit County;
NOW THEREFOREi the County Legislative Body of the County of Summit, State of Utah, hereby
ordains as follows:
Section 1. Summit Collntv Procurement of Supplies, Equipment and Services Code: The Summit County
Procurement of Supplies, Equipment and Services Code is amended as set forth in Exhibit A hereto •
Section 2: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after-the date of its publication.
APPROVED, ADOPTED, AND PASSED and ordered published by the Summit County Council, this L"?~day of
./)1 tL(f
,Z015.
•
SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL
SUMMIT~
By Council Chair
~d as to form:
u~~~~
SUMMIT COUNTY ATTORNEY
•
•
EXHIBIT A
•
•
Chapter 16
PROCUREMENT OF SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES
1-16-1:
1-16-2:
1-16-3:
1-16-4:
1-16-5:
1-16-6:
1-16-7:
1-16-8:
1-16-9:
1-16-10:
1-16-11:
1-16-U:
1-16-13:
1-16-14:
1-16-15:
1-16-16:
1-16•17:
1-16-18:
1-16-19:
1..16•20:
STATUTORY AUTHORITY:
PURPOSE OF PROVISIONS:
•
DEFINITIONS:
PURCHASING AGENT:
DEPARTMENT HEADS TO DETERMINE ITEMS TO BE PURCHASED:
PURCHASE CATEGORIES AND AUTHORIZATION:
INVITATION FOR BIDS PROCEDURES:
CONSTRUcTION CONTRACTING MANAGEMENT:
USE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS IN LIEU OF INVITATION FOR BIDS:
RULES AND GUIDELINES FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS:
EXEMPTIONS:
VALUE AMOUNTS:
CHANGE ORDERS:
EMERGENCY PURCHASI;S:
SUBDIVISION OF PURCHASE PROHIBITED:
INfERLOCAL COOPERATION:
COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PURCHASES: ADDmONAL REQUIREMENTS:
PROHIBITED PRACTICES:
DOCUMENTATION AND RETENTION OF BIDS:
PROTESTS:
•
1-16-1: STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The statutory authority for enacting this chapter is Utah Code Annotated sections 17-36-20, 17.,.50-302, 17-53•
223, 17-53-225, 17-53-307, and 63G-6a-104(13) as amended.
1-16-2: PURPOSE OF PROVISIONS
The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the procuring of supplies, equipment or services by departments
and agencies of Summit County in a manner that promotes the best interests of the public; establish the duties,
obligations and operational procedures of the County Purchasing Agent and his/her assistants; including
appointment procedures and the rules relating to procurement and other related functions.
1-16-3: DEFINITIONS
DEPARTMENT HEAD: The head of any County department or eleCted. official.
INVITATION FOR BIDS: A process of soliciting sealed written bids for goods or services after ten (10) days• notice.
posted in the County courthouse located at the County seat and publicly distributed through one of the
following methods: use of internet purchasing websites, the County website and/or published in a newspaper of
•
general circulation in the County. Invitation for Bids shall be opened by the Purchasing Agent atthe time and
place stated in the public notice.
LOCAL VENDOR:
A. A busines$ flC:lving:
1. A commercial office, store, distribution center, or other place of business located within the boundaries
of the County, with an intent to remain on a permanent basis;
2. A current business license in the County or a municipality located in the County; and
3.
At least one employee physically present at tbe local business outlet having published hours of business.
B. The principal place of business of a local vendor may be elsewhere as long as a local branch meeting the
above criteria is present. the domicile of one or more partners, owners, associates, directors, employees or
agents shall not qualify as constituting a local vendor in the absence of a physical local business outlet within
the County.
OFFICIAL: Any Summit County department head, agency head, or elected official making purchases on behalf of
Summit County.
OPEN MARKET: Purchasing goods or services on the open market from private vendors.
•
PURCHASE: The acquisition, by contract or otherwise, of goods or services, by an official on behalf ofSummit
County.
PURCHASE REQUISITION: A request by C:l department head (or his/her authorized agent) to the Purchasing Agent
to purchase forthe requesting department supplies, equipment or services.
PURCHASE ORDER: A County generated documentthat authorizes a p1.,1rcha$E! transaction. A purchase order
sets forth the descriptions, quantities, prices, discounts, payment terms, date of performance or shipment,
other associated terms and conditions, and identifies a specific seller.
PURCHASING AGENCY: Any County department, other than the purchasing office, that'is authorized by this
chapter or its implementing regulations, or by way of delegation from the Purchasing Agent, to enter into
contracts.
PURCHASING AGENT: The individual duly appointed and qualified to act under the direction of the County
Manager to negotiate the purchase of or contract for supplies, equipment or services required by the County.
PURCHASING CARD: A credit or debit card issued by a credit card company, bank, or other financial institution
and provided by the County to County employees for the purpose of making purchases on behalf of
departments of the County.
•
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS: A process of soliciting goods or services through RequestS for Proposals delivered to
known responsible suppliers and publicly posted in the County courthouse atthe County seat.
1-16-4: PURCHASING AGENT
A. Appointment: Pursuant to Utah Code Annotated, section 17-53-307, as amended, and the Summit County.
Code, section 1-14-10(c)(9), the County Manager shall appoint with the advice and consent of the County
Council, a County Purchasing Agent (hereinafter ''Purchasing Agent"). The Purchasing Agent shall act under
the direction and supervision of the County Manager, to review, coordinate, recommend, and authorize all
County purchases or encumbrances as set forth in this chapter.
B.
Powers: The Purchasing Agent shall have the following powers:
1. Work cooperatively with and assistSummit County departments, offices and agencies to comply with
the purchasing, and procurement regulations as may be established by the County Council and County
Manager.
z.
Review and approve, pursuant to the requirements outlined in section 1-16-6 of this chapter, purchase
requisitions and contracts for the acquisition of supplies, equipment or services for purchases in excess
--·-···-·-·------~
of fiVe thousand dollars ($5,000.00).
3.
Assure compliance with bidding and purchasing procedures provided in this chapter.
4.
Provide for the transfer of surplus or unused supplies and equipment between departments wherever it
can be done effectively.
5.
Maintain adequate bidders' lists, vendors' catalog files, and such other records as may be necessary f o r .
efficient purchasing activities.
7.
Recommend to the Summit County Council, under the direction ofthe County Manager, for adoption of
such rules and regulations as may be reasonable and necessary to clarify and implement the provisions
hereof, including additional procedures that may be desirable.
8.
Prescribe and update from time to time such forms as may be reasonably necessary for the
implementation of this chapter, including, but not limited to, requisitions, purchase. orders and bid
forms.
· 9.
Revise requisitions or estimates of a department's requirements of supplies and contractual services as
to quantity, quality or estimated cost, whenever revision is approved by the department head and
deemed to be in the best interests of the County.
C.
Delegation Of Authority: The Purchasing Agent may delegate in writing such authority as deemed
appropriate to any employees of the office of the Purchasing Agent or of a purchasing agency, respectively,
upon approval of the County Manager. Such delegation shall remain in effect unless modified or until
revoked in writing.
1-16-5: DEPARTMENT HEADS TO DETERMINE ITEMS TO BE PURCHASED
•
A. All department heads shall determine what items shall be purchased fot their respective departments. Once
•
a determination has been made regarding the items to be purchased, and if the items to be purchased are
expected to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), the department head shall inform the Purchasing
Agent of the items to be purchased by submitting a purchase requisition. The Pt,~rchasing Agent will work
cooperatively with the department head to locate such items at the best available value.
1 ...16-6: PURC.HASING CATEGORIES AND AUTHORIZATION
A.
Purchasing Categories: The County classifies purchasing categories. These categories are based on the dollar
amount and type of purchases. Each category establishes a separate purchasing limit, at,~thoritation level,
and procedure.
Umitatlon
Small Purchases
Intermediate Purchases
Major Purchases
Capital and Special Purchases
Professional Services
Change OrderS
B.
•
$5,000 or le_ss
$5,000 to $5(),000 .
$50,000 to $500,000
$500,000 or more
Authorization
Department Head
Purchasing Agent
County Manager
.- cOunty cOuncil ---
$5,000 or more
County Manager
$20,000 or more
County Manager
Purchasing Authorization:
1. Small Purchases- Purchases of supplies, equipment or services less than five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) may be made by the department head (or his/her authorized agent) on the open market.
The department head (or his/her authorized agent) is responsible to check for competitive pricing for all
purchases and shall retain documentation of pricing and/or proposals for each transaction for a period
of thirty six (36) months.
2. Intermediate Purchases- In cooperation with the department head, the Purchasing Agent shall make
purchases of supplies, equipment or services between five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) arid up to fifty
thousand dollars ($50,000.00). At the option of the Purchasing Agent, purchases may be made following
one ofthe following three (3) alternatives:
1.
Request for Quote; or
2.
Invitation for Bids; or
3.
Request for Proposals.
Such bids shall be obtained in writing prior to the acquisition of the requested supplies, equipment or
services.
•
3.
Major Purchases- In cooperation with the department head, the Purchasing Agent shall prepare;
review, and present recommendations to the County Manager for purchases of supplies, equipment or
serviCes in the amount of between fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) and up to five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000). At the option of the County Manager, purchases may be made following one of the
following alternatives:
a.
Invitation for Bicls; or
b. Request for Proposals.
•
4. Capital and Special Purchases -In cooperation with department head, the County Manager shall
prepare, review, and present recommendations to the County Council for purchases exceeding the
amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). At the option of the County Manager, with the
consultation of the Council, purchases may be made following one of the following alternatives:
a.
Invitation for Bids; or
b. Request for Proposals.
C.
Purche!se Order Required: Purchase orders shall accompany all purchases With the exception ofthose made
by use of a County issued purchasing card.
1-16-7: INVITATION FOR BIDS PROCEDURES
A. Where Invitation for Bids is required, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder shall be determined as
follows:
1. Bid Opening: Sealed bids shall be submitted as designated in the notice with the statement "Bid for
•
(Item)" on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public at the time and place stated in the notice. A
tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours.
2.
Rejection Of Bids: The County shall have the authority to reject e~ny or all bids, parts of all bids, or all bids
for any one or more supplies or contractual services included in the proposed bid for any reason allowed
by law, including, but not limited to, situations where the low responsive and responsible bid exceeds
available funds as certified by the appropriate County officer, or when the public interest will be served
thereby, Where a bid exceeds avai.lable funds and time or economic considerations preclude
resolicitation of work or purchase of a reduced scope or quantity, the County may, at its sole discretion,
negotiate an adjustment of the bid price, including changes in the bid requirements, with the low
responsible bidder, in order to bring the low bid within the amount of available funds.
3. Tie Bids: If two (2) or more bicls received are for the same total amount from equally responsive and
responsible bidders, the County may, at its sole discretion, negotiate with the tie bidders, award the bid
by lot, or readvertise the bid.
4.
local Preference: If a low bid is submitted by a non local vendor, the bid may be awarded to a responsive
and responsible local vendor if the local vendor's bid is within five percent (5%) of the low nonlocal
vendor's bid, and if the local vendor agrees, in writing, within seventy-two (12) hours after notific:ation,
to meet the low bid. Such notice shall contain the exact bid submitted by the nonlocal bidder, aild the
County shall not enter into a contract until .seventy-two (72) hours have elapsed after notification to t h .
local vendor.
5.
•
lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder: In determining who is the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder, in addition to price, the County may consider factors relevant to the successful
operation of the County's business and the best interests of the County as a whole.
1..16-8: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING MANAGEMENT
A. Construction Manager/General Contractor Selection: Pursuant to Utah Code Annotated, section 11-39-107,
Summit County may use as one method of construction contracting management a construction
manager/general contractor ("CMGC''), as defined in Utah Code Annotated, section 63G.,.6a-103. If Summit
County elects to authorize the use of a CMGC, said CMGC may be selected through a sealed Invitation for
Bids procedure, or sealed Request for Proposals in lieu of bids. If sealed proposals are used in lieu of bids,
proposals shall be solicited through a Request for Proposals, which shall state the relative importance of
price and other evaluating factors. Public notice of the Request for P_roposals, describing the position sought
and the criteria for the position, shall be given a reasonable time before the date for the opening of the bids.
As provided in the Request for Proposals, discussions may be conducted with responsible offerors who
submit proposals for the purpose of assuring full understanding of, and responsiveness to, solicitation
requirements.
B. Subcontract~ Wh_ile Using A CMGC: When entering into any subcontract that was not specifically included in
the CMGC's cost proposal, the CMGC shall procure the subcontractor by using.sealed Invitation for Bids or
•
sealed Request for Proposals .
C.
Prequalification: Bidders for the position of CMGC may be required to "prequalify" by presenting thei_r state
contractor's license, performance bond and other qualifications (e.g., length of time In the business, Jist of
jobs previously done, and written per'tnission to contact previous employers, etc.) at the time they submit
their bids.
D. Design Build Provider: A design build provider, as defined in Utah Code Annotated, section 63G-6a-103, may
be used as one method of construction contracting management for a Summit County building construction
project.
1-16-9: USE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS IN LiEU OF INVITATION FOR BIOS
A. When the Purchasing Agent determines in writing that the use of Invitation for Bids is either not practicable
or not advantageous to Summit County, a contract may be entered into by use of a Request for Proposals.
Request for Proposals may be used for the procurement of services of consultants or· professionals, whether
or not the determination described in this section has been made.
1-16-10: RULES AND GUIDELINES FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
•
A. Public notice of the Request for Proposals shall be publicly advertised through one of the following methods:
use of internet purchasing websites, the County website and/or a newspaper published or of general
circulation in the County at least ten (10) days before opening the proposals and shall state the date that
proposals shall be submitted. This notice requirement shall not apply in instances of emergency repairs.
B.
Proposals $hall be opened in public, but the contents ofthe proposals shall not be disclosed to competing
offerors during the process of negotiation except in the case of a local vendor preference under 1-167{A)(4). The County may disclose to the public the names of those who have submitted proposals to the
•
County.
C.
A register of proposals shall be prepared and filed in the office of the Summit County Purchasing Agent,
which shall be open for pubiic inspection after the contract is awarded.
D. The Request for Proposals shall state the relative importance of price and other evaluating factors, and shall
state the period oftime in which the submitted proposal must remain valid.
E. ·Discussions may be conducted with responsible offerots who submit proposals for the purpose of assuring
full understanding of, and responsiveness to, solicitation requirements.
F.
In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted
by competing offerors.
G. Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and
revision of proposals.
H. Revisions may be permitted after submissions and before the contract is awarded for the purpose of
clarifying the offeror's proposal, or obtaining the best and final offers.
I.
The contract shall be awarded to the responsible offerorwhose proposal is determined in writing to be the
most advantageous to the County, taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set forth in t h .
Request for Proposals. No other factors or criteria shall be used in the evaluation.
J.
The contract file shall contain the basis on which the award is made.
1-16-11: EXEMPTIONS
A. To the extent set forth herein or as otherwise required by law, the following purchases are exempt from the
requirements of section 1-16-6 of this chapter:
1. Contracts for the repair, alteration or construction of building improvements and public works projects,
Which must conform to the requirements of Utah Code Annotated section 11-39-101 et seq., as
amended.
2. Contracts for the management, maintenance, operation or construction of jails, which must conform to
the requirements of Utah Code Annotated section 17-53-311, as amended.
3.
E)(isting contracts for goods or services negotiated prior to enactment of this chapter.
4.
Contracts which by their nature are not suited to award on a competitive basis.
5.
Purchases that a County official determines can be made at below market cost at a public auction,
closeout sale, bankruptcy sale or other similar sale.
•
•
6.
Exchanges with other public agencies that a County official determines can be made at a savings to the
taxpayer.
Purctlases from vendors on the state of Utah purchasing office bid list or in the NAACO purchasing
7.
program.
8.
Purchases of supplies, equipment or services produced by Utah correctional industrie.s,
9.
Purchases of goods or services approved by the County Manager as necessary to meet an emergency
need.
10. Joint purthase agreements with other public agencies and organizations when the County Manager
determines the joint purchase agreement to be in the best interest of the County.
11. Professional service contracts for External Auditor as administered through the County Auditor office.
1-16•12: VALUE AMOUNTS
A. Value amounts used herein refer to both ynit cost and combined multiple unit cost and a determination of
the estimated value of supplies, equipment or services that have ~een requested by purchase requisition
shall be made by the Purchasing Agent in determining the applicability of the bidding procedure after review
of the pertinent purchase requisition and specifications .
•
1-16-13: CHANGE ORDERS
A. A change order form must document any change order for an approved contract. Change orders shall
require the following authorizations:
1. When a change of condition or additional work is required to continue the orderly progression ofan
. authorized project, a change order shall be prepared by the department head directing the work to be
accomplished at contract unit prices, an agreed upon lump sym price or as provided for by contract.
2.
Change order~. either singly or in aggregate, or in aggregate With adjustments in individual bid items, for
less than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) or up to ten percent (10%) of the contract price, whichever
is greater, and within the appropriated budget, may be authorized by the department head and the
Purchasing Agent.
3. Change orders, either singly, or in aggregate, or in aggregate with adjustments in individual bid items, in
excess of the limits placed in 1-16-13(A)(2), must be preauthorized by the County Manager. However,
such change orders may be approved by the department head and the Purchasing Agent and submitted
to the County Manager for ratification under the following circumstances:
a.
•
The failure to immediately issue a change order may result in significant project cost increases or an
unacceptable project delay due to work stoppe~ge or other inefficiencies; and
b.
Funding for the change order is currently aVailable within the appropriated budget. Additional
contract work outside the scope of work as defined in the contract or in excess of the appropriated
budget requires approval by the County council and a supplemental appropriation.
4.
•
Notwithstanding the above change order authorizations, the department head and Purchasing Agent
may authorize emergency changes in work outside the original scope of work or in excess of the
appropriated contract. For the purpose of this subsection, an emergency condition will exist if the failure
to act immediately will endanger the public health, safety or welfare or will jeopardize the fiscal position
of Summit County. Such emergency action shall be reported in full to the County Manager within
seventy two (72) hours.
1-16-14: EMERGENCY PURCHASES
A. In certain situations, such as, but not limited to, during the declaration of an emergency, it may be necessary
to make emergency purchases, which shortcut the preapprovals required for intermediate or major
purchases, as outlined in this chapter. An emergency purchase may be made when there is an immediate
need to acquire a particular good or service not already available to County staff. For purposes of this
section, an emergency situation is one in which there is an immediate threat to life or property or in which
there is or would be a complete disruption of a vital public service. The emergency must be of such a nature
and severity that the department head would be immediately notified, regardless of time of day.
B. An emergency purchase of up to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00} or less must be preapproved verbally
by the appropriate department head. An emergency purchase over twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) •
must be preapproved verbally by the department head and either the County Manager or Purchasing Agent.
·
After an emergency purchase has been madei a purchase order shall be requested from and prepared by
the auditor's office on the next working day. Documentation signed by the department head should include
a description of the emergency.
C. In all cases, the County Manager shall be notified within seventy two (72) hours of any and all emergency
purchases.
1-16-15: SUBDIVISION OF PURCHASE PROHIBITED
A. No contract ot purchase shall be subdivided so as to avoidthe requirements of this chapter.
1-16-16: INTERLOCAL COOPERATiON
A. Wherever the public benefit can be maximized and costs minimized by entering into joint agreements with
other public agencies or organizations for the purchase or construction of any commodity, service or public
work, the County shall have the power to so agree, upon approval and action by the County Manager.
1-16-i7: COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PURCHASES: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
•
•
A. To insure compatibilitywith the County's existing computer and communication systems, all hardware and
software purchases will be reviewed and pre-approved by the director of information technology.
1-iG-18: PROHIBITED PRACTICES
A. It shall be unlawful for any officer, agent or employee of the County, or any outside party or entity dealing or
seeking to deal with the County to engage in any of the following practices:
1. Collusion or other agreement among bidders or prospective bidders, in restraint of freedom of
competition, to fix or in any way rig prices or bids. In addition, any bid tainted with such collusion shall
be voidable at the option of the County.
2.
DiscloslJre in advance of the Opening of bids of the amount or content of one bid to another bidder or
potential bidder. if the County Manager deems such disclosure sufficiently material, he shall void the
bidding process and require a new advertisement or invitation for bids.
3. Tender or acceptance of any gratuity in the form of cash, merchandise or other thing of value by a
bidder, vendor or contractor to an officer, agent or employee of the County, whether before or after a
bid opening or the execution of a contract, which colJid reasonably be expected to influence him/her in
the performance of his/her duties or was intended as a reward for any official action on his/her part.
•
4.
Purchase of supplies or equipment for the personal use of an officer, agent or employee of the County in
the name of the County, whether part of a County purchase or contract or separate, and whether paid
for with
County funds or personal funds of the purchaser. Sole exception shall be where the item or
items purchased are required parts of a worker's equipment or uniform and necessary to the successful
performance of his duties as a County officer or employee, although personally owned by him.
1-16-19: DOCUMENTATION AND RETENTION OF BIDS:
A. Whenever the County is required by this chapter to receive bids for purchases, construction, repairs, or any
other purchase requiring the expenditure of funds, the County department who is in receipt of the bids shall
keep all bids received, together with proof of advertisement by publication or otherwise, for at least three
(3) yeats following the letting of any contract pursuant to those bids or three (3) years following the first
advertisement for the bids, if all bids pursuantto that advertisement are rejected. Utah COde Annotated
section 17-53-225(2).
1•16-20: PROTESTS
A. A person who is an actual or prospective bidder, offeror, or contractor that is aggrieved in connection with a
procurement or award of a contract may protest to the County Manager as follows:
1.
•
File a written protest with the County Manager setting forth the protestor's name, physical mailing
address, e-mail address, and a concise statement of the grounds upon which the protest is made.
2. The written protest rnust be received by the County Manager before the opening of bids or the closing
date for proposals. However, if the person did not know and should not have known of the facts giving
rise to the protest before the bid opening or the closing date for proposals, then the person must file •
the written protest within seven (7) calendar days after the day on which the person knows or should
have known of the facts giving rise to the protest.
3.
A person who fails to timely file a written protest underthis section may not bring a ptotesti action, or
appeal challenging a solicitation or award of a contract before the County Manager, the council, a court,
or any other forum.
4. The County Manager may enter into a settlement agreement to resolve a protest.
B. After a timely written protest is filed in accordance with 1-16-20(A), the County Manager shall consider the
protest cind may hold a he(lring on the protest.
1. The County Manager may subpoena witnesses and compel their attendance at a protest hearing.
2.
The County Man(lger may subpoene~ documents for production at a protest hearing.
3. The rules of evidence do not apply to a protest hearing.
4. The County Manager may allow intervention of other parties into a protest.
5.
Ifa hearing on a protest is held, the County Manager shall record the hearing and preserve all evidence
presented at the hearing.
6.
•
Regardless of whether a hearing on a protest is held, the County Manager shall preserve all records and
other evidence relied upon in reaching the written decision described in 1-16-20(S)(8).
7. The records described in 1-16-20(8)(5) and (6) may not be destroyed until the written decision, and any
appeal of the written decision, becomes final.
8. The County Manager shall promptly issue a written decision regarding any protest or contract
controversy if it is not settled by mutual agreement. The written decision shall state the reasons for the
action taken and inform the protestor, contractor, or prospective contractor of the right to appeal to the
Council. The County Manager shall mail, e-mail or otherwise immediately furnish a copy of the written
decision to the protestor, contractor, or prospective contractor.
9.
lfthe County Manager does not issue the written decision regarding a protest within thirty (30) calendar
days after the day on which a written request for a final decision is filed With the County Manager by th~
protestor, or within a longer period as may be agreed upon by the parties, the protestor, contractor or
prospective contractor may proceed as if an adverse decision had been received.
10. A decision described in 1-16-20(8)(8) is effective until stayed or reversed on appeal.
11. The County Manager may dismiss a protest which is not filed in accordance with the requirements of
this chapter.
•
•
C. A written appeal setting forth the grounds for the appeal must be filed with the Council within ten (10)
calendar days of the date of the written decision of the County Manager.
1. The Council sh~ll presume that the written decision of the County Manager is valid and determine only
whether or not the decision is arbitrary or capricious.
2. The Cot.,~ncil's review is limited to the County Manager;s administrative record. The coundlmay not
accept or consider any evidence outside of the County Manager's administrative record.
3. The Council shall issue a written decision regarding any appeal.
a.
The written decision sh~U state t!1e reasons for the action taken and inform the protestor,
contractor or prospective contractor of the right to appeal this final decision of the County to district
court Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date ofthe written decision.
b. The district court's review is limited to the Council's appellate record in the determination of
whether or not the Council's Written decision is arbitrary or capricious .
•
•
Council Member Robinson referred to Section 1.16.6.a and noted that it gives the IT Director the
ability to purchase any amount without authorization from the purchasing agent, the County
Council, or the County Manager. Mr. Jensen explained that this section is a summary of the
levels of purchases, and software is addressed in Section 1.16.17. He clarified that the IT
Director does not have monetary authority to approve purchases, but they want to be sure
everyone talked to each other so a department does not make a purchase that IT is supposed to
support without their knowing about it Council Member Robinson requested that clarification
be added to both Sections 1.16.6.a and 1.16.17 so it includes the IT Director and the appropriate
other authorized party based on the dollar amount.
•
Council Member Robinson made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 822-A, an ordinance
repealing Ordinance 822 and enacting a new Summit County Ordinance for procurement
of supplies, equipment, and services, with the changes discussed. The motion was seconded
by Council Member McMullin and passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council Member Robinson reported on the Mountain Accord meeting and explained that they
discussed a list of open issues, none of which was resolved. The issue most germane to Sumrtiit
County is connections between the Cottonwood Canyons and the Snyderville Basin. The current
proposal is that any connections be removed from Phase II of the NEP A process so they are not
part of the environmental impact statement. If other economic or other studies want to look at
those, they may still be looked at, but not as part of the environmental impact statement. They
also discussed thoroughly studying the link between the airport, Parley's Canyon, the Snyderville
Basin, and Park City. There was discussion about whether that should be part of the
environmental impact statement. He made the case that they do not want to just give lip service
to th~t and have another study that does not lead to a decision and implementation. There will be
a meeting in Denver on June 2 with some NEPA experts, and he suggested that Andy Beerman
from Park City attend. That should provide an opportunity for more discussion of what needs to
be done and when NEP A applies and when it does not. Another item that was discussed was that
each part)' would maintain local jurisdiction over their land use, and if there is consensus on
some action, the affected party would change their land use ordinance to comply wilh that
consensus. If something happens the County does not agree with, they do not want to be
obligated to enact a change to their land use ordinance. He reported that he discussed what
Summit County would like to see before they sign an interlocal agreement. He suggested that
they want to see all of the provisions on governance reflected in an amendment to the program
charter at the same time the amended blueprint goes forward. The executive committee will·
have a retreat on May 29 to try to come to a resolution on some of these issues. Another issue is
Utah County's concern that they have been left behind. He explained that Snowbird is seeking
land in American Fork Canyon, which will have consequences for Utah County, and there is a
quest.ion as to whether the project area should be expanded. He stated that Mountain Accord
wanted to memorialize the idea that transportation is a tool to achieve the environmental,
recreational, and economic elements, almost as though it is subservient to those elements.
Council Member Ure asked whether environment or economics would have the highest priority.
Council Member Robinson stated that he was surprised, because there were four systems groups,
each of which was important, that in the end were going to be merged into a master blueprint that
10
•
•
•
•
would strike a balance and optimize all ofthern. He still has questions, and the executive
committee does not agree on a number ofthings. They are trying to see ifthey can find the
things they do agree on and move forward with them.
Council Member Armstrong commented that the language regarding land use authority that
Council Member Robi11son refe!Ted to does not get them all the way horne. In a county that has
various municipalities, a municipality could agree to something that is different from what the
county Wants that could cause problems and negative impacts for the county. Couilcil Member,
Robinson agreed that they would have to work through that and try to find language that will
work. Couucil Member Armstrong recalled that he talked to Laynee Jones about needing to
change the language to address those concerns, and she indicated she would revise it. Council
Member Robinson stated that he believed the current language has had some revision. Council
Member McMullin read the current language. Council Member Armstrong stated that language
still leaves a question about another jurisdiction approving something that could have a profound
impact on the County. Chair.Carson commented that they cannot tell a!lother jurisdiction it
cannot do sornethi11gjllst because it might have an impact oil the County. Council Member
Robinson stated that he would reql!est a draft as soon as possible of the amended and restated
program charter so they can see what it really says. Council Member McMullin stated that,
when they have that, the Couilcil will have to decide as a body whether they agree with it or not,
and Council Member Armstrong may not prevail on this issl}e. She stated that he keeps talking
about the same thing as if he is speaking for this body, and he is not; he is talking for himself.
Chai_r Carson believed the most important thing they can do is maintain a good relationship with
Park City and be sure they are working toward the saiil.e goal and understand each other's needs .
Council Member McMullin believed the only way to get what Council Member Armstrong
wants is if the jurisdiction he is concerned about agrees to work in lock step with the County,
~ perhaps separately from the Mountain Accord process. Council Member Armstrong replied that
fuey have been told that Mouiltain Accord is about consensus, and he wanted to be clear fuat is
not what this is about.
PUBLIC INPUT
Chair Carson opened Ute public input.
There was no public input.
Chair Carson closed the public input.
COUNCIL COMMENTS..., (Continued)
Chair Carson reported that the May 20 meeting will be canceled, and she will work on the
agenda for May 27 to address some scheduling conflicts.
PUBLIC INPUT- (Continued)
•
Chair Carson reopened the Pllblic input.
11
Troy Seaton, a resident of Samak Acres, stated that they made some improvements on their
property, and he wanted the Council to know who he is. He had not known that anything was
wrong or they would have been here to speak for themselves, and some of the things in the
previou,s meeting minutes were untrue. He is willing to work on a solution to the problem, but
no one ever told him there was a problem with their property, and his neighbors just came
directly to the Counci.l. They want to continue to work through the problem, b11t they are being
harassed by their neighbors. Chair Carson explained this issue is not before the Council for any
kind of a decision, and they appreciate Mr. Seaton's willingness to work with the Code
Enforcement Officer and the Community Development Department.
•
Chait Carson closed the public input.
COUNCIL COMMENTS- (Continued)
Chair Carson asked the Council Members to let her know if they ha.ve conflicts with any meeting
dates this summer.
Council Member Robinson noted that he received an invitation to the opening of the wildlife
underpass under SR 40 on Wednesday, 1une 10. He coilfirtned with Chair Carson that the
Council will hold their meeting at the Richins Building that day. He stated that he would like to
'
cancel the meeting on June 24 and on July 22.
Chair Carson confirmed with Council Member Armstrong that he will attend the master planning
workshop with the Park City School District on May 14. She also noted that she is getting a lot
of emails regarding the construction on East Wanship Road and the damage to some people's
personal property from that construction.
•
The Council Member~ discussed the agenda items for the May 27 meeting and conflicts in
Council Members' schedules on that day.
Chair Carson thanked Staff for the work they did on the Tesoro pipelil1e ordinance and for
working with Tesoro and the other organizations that were involved. They have had a good
outcome with a permanent hold on the pipeline.
MANAGER COMMENTS
Mt. Fisher reported that he toured the High Star Ranch this week.
Mr. Fisher stated that progress is being made on renovation of the Kamas facility, and they will
have a Staff presentation as they move on to the next step and get design and cost estimates.
Mr. Fisher reminded the Council of the COG meeting on May 19, with a major topic of
discussion being the local sales tax option. Chair Carson suggested that they also discuss the
anti-idling ordinance. Mr. Fisher offered to provide that briefing. Council Member Robinson
confirmed with Mr. Fisher that the Be Wise, Energize CDA will also be on the COG agenda.
12
•
•
Mr. Fisher reported that Economic Development Director Jeff Jones has filled his lee House
Small Business Academy and is moving forward with it.
APPROVALOF MlNUTES
APRIL 22, 2015
APRIL 29, 2015
Council Member McMullin made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 22 and
April 29, 2015, Summit County Council meetings as written. The motion was seconded by
Council Member Robinson and passed unanimously, 5 to 0.
The County Council meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
Coun~
•
•
13
•
•
•

minutes - Summit County

Transcription

Similar documents

2449 S. Iowa,Suite R

E-873 Woodchuck Lane - Bayside Stock # 4090 - Pot

for sale or lease : 527 ocean avenue, unit 1

16 MONTH LEASE SPECIAL

5100 Block of SW 29th Street

5145 BUEHLERS DRIVE ∙ MEDINA, OH THE SHOPPES AT RIVER

pdf - HaveSiteWillTravel.com

`BE THE HERO` YOUTH SUMMIT - Kent County Prevention Coalition

for lease - Godin Property Brokers

for lease - Godin Property Brokers