of medical sonography
Transcription
of medical sonography
T H E O F C A N A D I A N J O U R N A L MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY Volume 4, Issue 1 • Spring 2013 • Professional Practice • What to Expect When You’re Not Expecting • Case Study of Myositis Ossificans • Echocardiography in the United Kingdom www.csdms.com Publications Agreement Number 40025049 • ISSN: 1923-0931 W. Sakeena VCH Employee Take Your Career to the Next Level Diagnostic Medical Sonographers Come for the job. Stay for the team. “I am given the opportunity to learn and discuss cases with the best radiologists and technologists and each day I come away learning something new.” Andrea P., VCH Diagnostic Medical Sonographer Fraser Health, Providence Health Care, Provincial Health Services Authority and Vancouver Coastal Health offer accomplished Diagnostic Medical Sonographers exceptional opportunities to apply their expertise in new and challenging roles. Working within client and family centred care settings, you will participate in research projects and perform abdominal, obstetrical, pelvic, peripheral vascular HUKZTHSSWHY[Z\S[YHZV\UKL_HTPUH[PVUZ0M`V\OH]LJ\YYLU[JLY[PÄJH[PVU^P[O the American Registry of Diagnostic Medical Sonography (ARDMS) or Canadian Association of Registered Diagnostic Ultrasound Professionals (CARDUP) and HYLHNYHK\H[LVMHZVUVNYHWO`WYVNYHT`V\JHULUQV`HM\SÄSSPUNHUK rewarding career within Vancouver or in a number of locations throughout British Columbia. There is no better time, or place, to take your career to the next level. To explore all Medical Imaging opportunities in the Lower Mainland, please visit jobs.vch.ca Canadian Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers Société canadienne des échographistes médicaux Volume 4, Issue 1 • 2013 Publications Agreement Number 40025049 Contents 5 Volume 4, Issue 1 • 2013 Message from the Editor • Mot du rédacteur en chef Kim G. Boles, CRGS, CRVS, FCSDMS EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Kim Boles EDITORIAL BOARD Lianne Broughton, Nanette Denis, Dal Disler, Cathy Fix, Stuart Gibbs, Carol Gillis, Chris Harrington, Wendy Lawson, Verna Maschio, Vern Parkinson CSDMS News 7 Professional Practice Original Articles 14 What to Expect, When You’re Not Expecting: An In-Depth Look into Professional Liability Insurance Sheldon Boyde, CRGS MANAGING EDITOR Susan Harrison ART DIRECTOR 16 COPY EDITOR Susan Harrison Case Report: Myositis Ossificans Kathryn McMillan, MRSc Andrea Mulholland Reprints 22 Echocardiography in the United Kingdom Jules Hobson, BSc Hons, HNC, ONC, RCCP, BSE, SCST PROOFREADER Scott Bryant TRANSLATOR 26 Abstract: Systematic Labeling of Twin Pregnancies on Ultrasound T. Dias, S. Ladd, S. Mahsud-Dornan, A. Bhide, A. T. Papageorghiou, and B. Thilaganathan Marie Dumont ADVERTISING John Birkby (905) 628-4309 [email protected] Book Reviews 27 The Physics and Technology of Diagnostic Ultrasound: A Practitioner’s Guide Reviewed by Chris Harrington, CRGS, CRCS, CRVS CIRCULATION COORDINATOR Brenda Robinson [email protected] 28 Principles of Vascular and Intravascular Ultrasound Reviewed by Verna Maschio, BTech, CRVS, CRGS, CRCS ACCOUNTING Susan McClung 28 Reviewed by Kim G. Boles, CRGS, CRVS, FCSDMS GROUP PUBLISHER John D. Birkby _______________________________________ For Instructions to Authors, please visit www.andrewjohnpublishing.com/ CJMS/cjmsinstauthors.html _______________________________________ The Safe Use of Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis, Third Edition Professional Development/Employment Opportunities 8 21 29 30 31 ARDMS 2013 CSDMS Annual Conference and AGM The Burwin Institute Sunridge Diagnostic Imaging Sunridge Diagnostic Imaging Return undeliverable Canadian Addresses to: 115 King St W., Suite 220, Dundas, ON L9H 1V1 Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography is published four times a year by Andrew John Publishing Inc., with offices located at 115 King Street West,Suite 220,Dundas, ON L9H 1V1. ••••• We welcome editorial submissions but cannot assume responsibility or commitment for unsolicited material.Any editorial material, including photographs that are accepted from an unsolicited contributor, will become the property of Andrew John Publishing Inc. The publisher and the Canadian Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers shall not be liable for any of the views expressed by the authors published in Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography, nor shall these opinions necessarily reflect those of the publisher. www.csdms.com Cover images (left to right): moose in Kananaskis Country, Alberta; cascading waterfall in Ontario; Peter Lougheed Provincial Park, Alberta. Above images (left to right): tulip field, British Columbia; Whytecliff Park, Vancouver; closeup of a Canadian goose and gosling. The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 3 Philips HD15 PureWave Easy ultrasound for hard to image patients. Philips HD15 ultrasound system with PureWave technology delivers superb Images, even on your most technically FKDOOHQJLQJSDWLHQWV6R\RXFDQFRQÀGHQWO\GLDJQRVHHYHU\SDWLHQWWKDWZDONV LQ \RXU RIÀFH $QG LW·V SDFNHG ZLWK EUHDNWKURXJK SHUIRUPDQFH IHDWXUHV WR simplify your exams. Learn more at www.philips.com/HD15. Message from the Editor T his issue contains some critical information on professional liability insurance, along with an Ontario Coroner’s Advisory. Please take special note of the coroner’s advisory. Our Eastern Director Sheldon Boyde has authored an article on professional liability insurance; all members should investigate the coverage you currently have under employer or other group professional liability policies to ensure that you have adequate protection as sonographers. Verna Maschio, Chris Harrington, and I have reviewed three new reference texts that should be of interest to many of you. One of our recent graduates, Kathryn McMillan, has submitted a case study on myositis ossificans. In endeavouring to produce a well-rounded publication, the CJMS editorial staff are very committed to presenting a diverse selection of topics in each issue, providing education and interest for all sonographers. We work largely in four subject areas: general ultrasonography, cardiac ultrasonography, vascular ultrasonography, and professional practice. We would like to add an education section in upcoming issues. If you are involved in education and clinical training, please consider contributing an article; it will assist all educators and those aspiring to become educators. If you are unsure of what contribution you can make, please drop me a line to discuss possible topics. All submissions are welcome, but I would encourage all echocardiographers and vascular sonographers to consider contributing to CJMS. Case studies, topics of interest, book reviews, and original research are needed to support education, continuing education, and professional growth for our cardiac sonographer (CRCS) and vascular sonographer (CRVS) members, our managers, and our educators. As the profession continues to advance and expand, we are continually challenged to provide current and topical information through CJMS. Advances in contrast ultrasonography, fusion technology, musculoskeletal sonography, and point-of-care sonography continue to www.csdms.com provide new challenges and opportunities to Canadian sonographers and the editorial staff. If you have suggestions on topics you would like see in upcoming issues or suggestions to make regarding potential authors you think would have a valuable educational contribution to make, please contact me. I would love to hear from you. And I am more than willing to pursue special interest topics and authors on our readers’ behalf. As promised, this issue includes reviews on three new reference books that are available. If you are aware of any new reference texts, software, or e-learning materials you would like reviewed, please send us a note with the pertinent source information and we will organize a review by our Canadian experts. This may assist you in acquiring additional reference materials for your workplace or personal reference libraries. To repeat a previous message, changes have been made by the CSDMS Board of Directors to the processes at CJMS. Effective September 1, 2012, vacancies on the editorial board will be open to all CSDMS members. Editors are selected based on their special knowledge, experience, and publication history. References are required. If you are interested in becoming a member of the editorial board, please polish your references. We will announce vacancies in future issues. These positions are for a 2-year term and are normally only filled once per year. Effective June 1, 2013, we will have vacancies on the editorial board for the following: one vascular editor, one cardiac editor, one generalist editor, and one education editor. Please send your CV to me if you are interested in a challenging experience. Applications will be reviewed by the current editorial board, and recommendations will be forwarded to the CSDMS Board of Directors for approval. The deadline for applications is April 15, 2013. Kim Boles, CRGS, CRVS, FCSDMS Editor-in-Chief The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 5 Mot du rédacteur en chef L e présent numéro renferme de l’information cruciale à propos de l’assurance responsabilité civile professionnelle ainsi qu’un avis du bureau du coroner de l’Ontario. Je vous invite à en prendre connaissance. Notre directeur de la région de l’Est, Sheldon Boyde, fait paraître un article sur l’assurance responsabilité civile professionnelle; je vous encourage à revoir la couverture offerte par votre employeur ou groupe professionnel pour vérifier que vous bénéficiez effectivement de la protection appropriée en tant qu’échographiste. Verna Maschio, Chris Harrington et moi avons passé en revue trois nouveaux ouvrages de référence qui seraient certes utiles à beaucoup de membres. Kathryn McMillan, diplômée de fraiche date, propose une étude de cas de myosite ossifiante. Résolue à produire une revue solide et pertinente, l’équipe de rédaction entend publier une sélection de sujets divers, instructifs et captivants pour les échographistes. Nous abordons quatre grands sujets : l’échographie générale, l’échographie cardiaque, l’échographie vasculaire et l’exercice de la profession. Nous souhaiterions ajouter une rubrique sur l’éducation dans les prochains numéros. Nous encourageons ceux qui œuvrent dans les domaines de l’éducation et de l’enseignement clinique à nous proposer des articles; ce contenu sera très utile aux éducateurs et à ceux qui aspirent à le devenir. Si vous n’êtes pas trop certain sur quoi écrire au juste, envoyez-moi un courriel, nous en discuterons. Nous réserverons un bon accueil à toutes les communications qui nous seront transmises; nous invitons tout particulièrement les échocardiographistes et les spécialistes de l’échographie vasculaire à écrire dans les pages de la revue. Des études de cas, des sujets d’intérêt général, des critiques de livre et des comptes rendus de recherche originale viendront appuyer l’éducation, la formation continue et l’épanouissement professionnel des membres spécialistes de l’échographie cardiaque (CRCS) et de l’échographie vasculaire (CRVS), des directeurs de service et des éducateurs. Au fil de l’avancement de la profession, nous nous devons de faire paraître de l’information actuelle et pertinente dans La Revue. Les percées dans l’échographie de contraste, la technologie de la fusion, l’échographie de l’appareil locomoteur et l’échographie au point d’intervention exigent 6 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 de l’échographiste qu’il se tienne au courant et de l’équipe éditoriale qu’elle en parle. N’hésitez pas à me faire part de vos idées, des sujets que vous aimeriez voir aborder dans la revue ou d’auteurs dont la contribution serait enrichissante à coup sûr selon vous. Je serais ravi de savoir ce que vous avez à dire. Et, je suis tout disposé à traiter de sujets particuliers ou à solliciter des auteurs pour le compte des lecteurs! Tel que je l’ai mentionné déjà, vous trouverez ici la recension de trois nouveaux ouvrages de référence. Si vous voulez entendre parler de tels ouvrages, que ce soit des textes, des logiciels de référence ou du matériel de cyberapprentissage de parution récente, adressez-nous un mot contenant la source d’information en question. Nous demanderons à des experts du pays de les examiner. Leur opinion vous sera certainement utile au moment de vous procurer un ouvrage de référence à consulter au travail ou d’enrichir votre bibliothèque personnelle. Comme je vous l’ai annoncé, le conseil d’administration de la SCEM a modifié des modalités ayant trait à la RCEM. Au 1er septembre 2012, tous les membres de la Société pourront poser leur candidature à un poste vacant au comité de rédaction. La sélection se fonde sur des critères de connaissances, d’expérience et d’antécédents en matière de publication et sur l’examen des références figurant sur le curriculum vitae. Veuillez donc y apporter un soin particulier si vous souhaitez devenir membre de l’équipe. Tout poste vacant sera affiché dans la RCEM. Nous tenons habituellement une seule période de mise en candidature dans l’année, et le terme est de deux ans à tous les postes. Au 1er juin 2013, les postes suivants seront vacants : un poste à la rubrique de l’échographie vasculaire, un à la rubrique de l’échographie cardiaque, un à la rubrique de l’échographie générale et un à la rubrique de l’éducation. Si vous souhaitez vous lancer dans cette aventure passionnante, faites-moi parvenir votre curriculum vitae. L’équipe de rédaction examinera les candidatures et communiquera son choix au conseil d’administration de la Société aux fins d’approbation. L’échéance de la mise en candidature est le 15 avril 2013. Kim Boles, CRGS, CRVS, FCSDMS Rédacteur en chef www.csdms.com CSDMS News Professional Practice CSDMS and CARDUP have received a letter from the Maternal and Perinatal Death Review Committee of the Ontario Coroner’s Office. There was a request to comply with part one of the committee’s recommendations resulting from the investigation into a neonatal death. Committee recommendations: 1. To prenatal ultrasonography providers: Prenatal ultrasound providers are reminded of the SOGC and AIUM guidelines requiring full second trimester morphology assessments and reporting. 2. To obstetrical care providers: Mothers who have suffered fetal or neonatal loss due to cardiac abnormalities should be offered fetal echocardiology in subsequent pregnancies. It is important for practitioners to recognize that neither the CSDMS nor CARDUP have the legislated jurisdiction over diagnostic medical sonographers in Ontario or Canada to enforce compliance with the coroner’s request. The CSDMS is publishing the findings and committee recommendations in their entirety with the consent and permission of the Ontario coroner to comply with the CSDMS/CARDUP commitment to the Ontario coroner to communicate the Review Committee’s recommendations to Canadian sonographers, reinforcing the usefulness and importance of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) practice guidelines for obstetrical ultrasound. What Lead to the Committee Recommendations? Investigation history: • • • Primiparous mother in her late 30s No risk factors identified in the maternal medical or genetic histories Infant delivered by emergency caesarean section at 37 weeks’ gestation Post mortem – findings at autopsy: • • • Severe fetal hydrops Dysmorphic facies Complex congenital heart abnormalities including ventricular septal defect (VSD) with overriding aorta, www.csdms.com • • • • aortic ring with preductal coarctation, tricuspid and mitral dysplasia, cardiac hypertrophy, and ventricular trabeculations with numerous false tendons Tracheal stenosis Pulmonary hyperplasia Normal male karyotype Positive newborn screen indicated a biotinidase deficiency, low normal, likely due to “poor sample integrity” The boards of directors of CSDMS and CARDUP strongly recommend that all members and registrants involved in obstetrical ultrasonography review the clinical practice guidelines listed below to ensure a thorough understanding and compliance with professional practice that complies with SOGC and AIUM guidelines governing a fetal examination ensuring enhanced maternal and fetal health and well-being. These guidelines are easily referenced on the SOGC and AIUM websites. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines Content of a Complete Routine Second Trimester Obstetrical Ultrasound Examination and Report No. 223, March 2009 (Replaces No. 103, May 2001) This clinical practice guideline has been reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee and approved by the executive and council of SOGC. SOGC acknowledges advisory input from the Canadian Association of Radiologists pertaining to imaging guidelines in the creation of this document. AIUM Practice Guideline AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations Effective October 1, 2007 – AIUM Practice Guidelines – Obstetric Ultrasound AIUM is a multidisciplinary association dedicated to advancing the safe and effective use of ultrasound in medicine through professional and public education, research, development of guidelines, and accreditation. This document was published in conjunction with the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). It is the professional responsibility of all Canadian sonographers to maintain awareness of the practice guidelines for their particular area(s) of practice. This should The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 7 Profe ssional Pract ice include institutional, regional, national, and international standards. Awareness of and adherence to applicable practice guidelines helps to ensure that examinations are performed within accepted safety and practice standards. This will serve to protect the patients and practitioners. The CSDMS professional liability policy requires sonographers to practise within their approved scope of practice and in adherence with the accepted practice standards of Canadian sonography. So, the bottom line is this: become informed, adhere to accepted standards, and protect your patients and yourself. RMSK ™ MSK EXA EXAMINATION MINA ATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRA ATION DATES DATES March 12 - April April 12, 22013 013 oday! Apply TToday! ARDMS.org/Apply ™ Registered in Musculoskeletal sonography Sept. 12 - Oct. Oct 11, 11 2013 2013 The RMSK credential sets the standard of musculoskeletal sonography practice worldwide and promotes best practices for enhanced patient safety. Apply beginning June 10, 2013. Visit and bookmark www.ARDMS.org/RMSK to: UÊÊ i>ÀÊ>LÕÌÊÌ iÊ,-ÊVÀi`iÌ> Ê Ê Ê Ê UÊÊ ,iÛiÜÊÌ iÊ-Ê*ÀiÀiµÕÃÌiÊÀiµÕÀiiÌÃ Ê Ê Ê Ê UÊÊ ,iÛiÜÊÌ iÊ-ÊVÌiÌÊÕÌi Ê Ê Ê Ê UÊÊ />iÊÌ iÊ-Ê«À>VÌViÊiÝ>>Ì Ê Ê Ê Ê UÊÊ -}ÊÕ«ÊÌÊÀiViÛiÊÌ iÊ>ÌiÃÌÊÕ«`>ÌiÃ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê www.ARDMS.org 1-800-541-9754 U 301-738-8401 8 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com Profe ss ional Pract ice www.csdms.com The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 9 Profe ssional Pract ice 10 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com Profe ss ional Pract ice www.csdms.com The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 11 Profe ssional Pract ice 12 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com Profe ss ional Pract ice www.csdms.com The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 13 Original Article What to Expect, When You’re Not Expecting: An In-Depth Look into Professional Liability Insurance Sheldon Boyde, CRGS About the Author Sheldon Boyde is the Eastern Director for CSDMS. Correspondence may be directed to [email protected]. T raditional misconceptions about health care litigation can often supersede the cold hard reality of potential malpractice in our current health care system. Doctors are not the only health care providers who get sued. Conventionally, doctors were seen as the “central command” around which all other health care personnel revolved. So, it was reasonable to assume that any litigation would fall in the laps of central command. However, in today’s vast network of health care services, central command lies within our own professional designations and credentials. As we assume more responsibility, become more self-reliant, and seek higher levels of learning, we must also accept a higher risk of litigation. While our immunity to potential litigation may be somewhat weakened by this change, we can certainly strengthen our ability to cope by obtaining our own professional liability insurance. Perhaps the biggest falsehood regarding professional liability insurance involves the question, why do we need it if our employer has institutional professional liability coverage? While this may be true, you need to dive deeper into any coverage provided by your own particular institution’s liability policy; you will immediately find that the interests of the employer are often selfishly based on its own financial wellbeing and not on any protection of you. Why, then, would you place your career, personal assets, and professional integrity and reputation in the hands of an entity that does not hold your professional, financial, and familial interests as its number one priority? Litigation can be professionally and financially disabling. It can leave you emotionally drained and in permanent disconnect from your family and professional surroundings. If your employer holds its own interests above yours and a litigation suit threatens your well-being, who has your back? Your personal liability insurer does! 14 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 The facts about having your own professional liability insurance are quite simple. The language used in the liability policies can be challenging to understand, but this is one of the major reasons why having your own liability policy works in your favour; it’s tailored to your specific professional needs and scope of practice! The benefits of having a professional liability policy, in my mind, supersede any disadvantage of its cost: • • • • • It is mobile, meaning it follows you wherever you go and is not employer specific. You can work anywhere in Canada and always be covered, no matter who you work for. It is tailored to your own profession, meaning that the policy is created specifically for you as a sonographer and encompasses all sonographic activities that fall within your scope of practice. It is not based on a “shared limit of liability” like your employer’s policy is. You would not know, based on your employer’s limit, how much would be available to defend your claim. If your employer has exhausted its limit on other claims, you are left with the shortfall if extended litigation costs or damages are incurred. These costs and damages are often sought from your personal assets such as your house, vehicle, etc. In the CSDMS professional liability program, our insurance provider has made changes to the wording to ensure that the professional services covered are defined as “those services rendered by the insured, while acting within the scope of the insured profession as a diagnostic medical sonographer including duties customary to the practice.” The scope of practice and insured professional services www.csdms.com B oyde are defined and determined by the profession – not the employer, and not the insurer. They are tailored specifically to your role as a sonographer, regardless of your discipline of practice. In an employer’s policy, covering all members of the health care and support team, the insurer may not know exactly all the services legally provided by the practitioner that require coverage. The exclusions in an employer’s policy need to be closely monitored to ensure that the coverage provided to diagnostic medical sonographers is not affected by the policy wording and limitations in place. Professional liability insurance, like any other insurance, is there when we need it. It’s probably one of only a few purchases that we make in our lifetime that we hope we never to have to use. We never expect to get sued; oftentimes a claim is not made against a direct act of omission or error on your part, but against a single event somewhere in a chain of events. Why take the chance? Would you honestly feel comfortable sitting down at a discovery session during a lawsuit, knowing the only one in the room who knows what a transducer looks like is you? Would you feel unnerved about explaining common knowledge sonographic events to someone who thinks we take baby pictures all day long? This is ultimately what happens under a general policy insurance program like the one your employer has. It is general, not specific. Under a general policy, the only true exclusion will probably be your employer’s involvement, and the only true inclusion will likely be you alone. We must recognize that all diagnostic results of our profession are based on specifics and expertise in our field. A generalized policy does not work in a field of specifics. That’s why we have our own policy. A policy tailored to our needs, created for sonographers and overseen by sonographers. A policy that knows and speaks our language and fully encompasses our scope of practice. Professional liability insurance is not for everyone, but should be for every sonographer across Canada. I encourage you to review in detail the coverage provided by the CSDMS professional liability policy, which can be found on the CSDMS website. Become informed, and protect yourself and your financial well-being. Growing the field of Medical Sonography! www.csdms.com www.csdms.com The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 15 Original Article Case Report: Myositis Ossificans Kathryn McMillan, MRSc About the Author Kathryn McMillan is a recent graduate of McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario. Correspondence may be directed to [email protected]. M yositis ossificans is a rare benign condition that involves the ectopic deposition of bone and fibrous tissue adjacent to or in the muscle.1 It is also known as heterotopic ossification and ectopic ossification. Myositis ossificans can form spontaneously but usually results from damage such as trauma or surgery to the muscle. The most common location is in the high thigh and hips, although other possible sites include the upper arm, calf, and the sole of the foot.2 Presented below is a case study involving myositis ossificans, followed by an explanation of the findings. Case Report A 20-year-old female presented to the emergency room with severe leg pain. She immediately underwent radiography of the femur and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine; both showed normal results except for mild knee effusion (Figure 1). Two days later, the patient revisited the emergency room with severe leg pain; however, at that time, she was unable to bear weight on her leg. Sonography was ordered to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but no DVT was present. The sonographer asked the patient to show the area of pain, which was the left thigh, and found an ill-defined intramuscular, vascular mass measuring 3.5 × 3.8 × 2.5 cm (Figure 2). The mass appeared heterogeneous with decreased echogenicity. Computed tomography (CT) was performed 3 days later to stage the primary mass, but the CT scan results appeared normal. An MRI was completed 2 weeks later, whose results suggested osteosarcoma or a non-occlusive clot in the common femoral vein (Figure 3). The patient again returned to the emergency room, 3 days after the MRI was performed, this time with excruciating pain, left thigh swelling, and an inability to move her left leg. Sonography was again performed; no DVT was present, 16 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 although dramatic changes to the mass were apparent. The mass then contained large calcifications, and the internal echogenicity could no longer be seen due to the shadowing of the calcifications (Figure 4). Musculoskeletal biopsy was attempted, which showed significant peripheral mineralization, edema in the muscle lesion, and that the lesion was hard. The stiffness of the lesion was significant, and the biopsy needle was bent during the procedure. The radiologist suggested that the mass was an extracranial osteosarcoma but noted that it could also be myositis ossificans. A week later, radiography of the femur was performed that showed rapid onset of mineralization in the left thigh with a zonal pattern appearance. It had more prominent mineralization peripherally than centrally, which suggested the diagnosis of myositis ossificans (Figure 5). A bone scan was also completed showing intense focal increased activity which is compatible with soft tissue mineralization, also consistent with myositis ossificans. Types of Myositis Ossificans There are four different categories of myositis ossificans: myositis ossificans post traumatica, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive, myositis ossificans associated with paraplegia, and myositis ossificans circumscripta.3 Myositis ossificans post traumatica (PTMO) is the type seen most commonly (60–75%) and occurs after a direct blow to the body or from repeated minor trauma.1 Ossifications are formed from the embedding of periosteal cells into the muscles from the direct blow, or they can be caused by bone growth occurring within a hematoma. The “genetic type” of myositis ossificans is called fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive. This type involves bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4), which causes ectopic www.csdms.com McMil lan Figure 1. Radiograph of the left leg at the patient’s first visit to the emergency room. Figure 2. Ultrasonogram of lesion in left leg, obtained during the patient’s second visit to the emergency room. Figure 4. The second sonogram, showing a calcified lesion in left leg. bone formation within the first decade of life.4 Paraplegia can also cause this pathology, due to the constant pressure on a patient’s immobilized joint. Myositis ossificans occurring while a patient is immobilized in bed for a reason other than paraplegia is also grouped with myositis ossificans associated with paraplegia. Myositis ossificans circumscripta involves a reparative process when the body is trying to respond to trauma, inflammation, or infection.5 An inflammatory response causes connective tissue cells to turn into osteogenic precursors, later creating bone. The radiologist in the case study above believed that this patient suffered from PTMO, although the patient could not www.csdms.com Figure 3. The second magnetic resonance image obtained. Figure 5. A second radiograph, showing rapid onset of mineralization in the left thigh. recall any previous trauma. However, she did say she had suffered from abuse as a child. The pathogenesis of PTMO is the same as a standard inflammatory response for hematoma formation. Soft tissue necrosis causes the body to send out histiocytes, which have properties similar to phagocytes to clear the wound.5 After this initial response, fibroblasts and undifferentiated stromal cells migrate to the connective tissue. Mesenchymal cells later become osteoblasts, causing ossification from the periphery of lesion to the centre.5 Signs and Symptoms Myositis ossificans is seen most commonly in males between The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 17 Cas e Re por t: Myosit is Oss ificans Figure 6. Left, The early stage of myositis ossificans, where Figure 7. Magnetic resonance image of the thigh showing a lesion in the enlarged left no lesion is evident on the radiograph. Right, A later stage leg. – now the lesion can be seen. Figure 8. Left, Sonogram of the early stage of myositis ossificans post traumatica. Right, The same lesion at a later stage. the ages of 20 and 30 years.6 Common signs and symptoms may include pain, edema, swelling, tenderness, an ecchymosis, a palpable mass, and a decreased range of motion.2 During the early stage of the disease, the lesion is soft and painful and swelling occurs. Once matured, the lesion becomes firm and is most commonly a painless mass, although pain can persist.7 the periphery. Between the 4th and 6th weeks, the lesion begins showing ossification along the peripheral rim. This is often described as a shell around the lesion.1 Maturity is reached when the calcifications progress from the periphery to the centre, forming bone. Complete maturity is achieved in approximately 5–6 months.1 Stages of Myositis Ossificans Differential Diagnosis Myositis ossificans often occurs in the muscle belly with no interruption of the muscle fibres. In the early stage of myositis ossificans, the centre of the lesion has decreased echogenicity and the outer portion is hyperechoic with an ill-defined rim. There is vascularization, but there is no calcification. In approximately the 3rd week, calcifications begin to appear on Differential diagnosis for myositis ossificans includes hematoma, abscess, metastases, lymphoma, and sarcomas.8 Osteosarcomas can be difficult to differentiate because both have persistent pain, swelling, and rapid growth. Early myositis ossificans is commonly confused with fibrosarcoma upon biopsy because both appear as undifferentiated tissue.7 Biopsy 18 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com McMil lan of mature myositis ossification shows mature lamellar bone, allowing differentiation from osteosarcoma, which includes osteoids and tumour cells. On a radiograph, myositis ossification appears separate from bone, whereas osteosarcoma has a direct connection with the periosteum, allowing for differentiation of the two.6 Another way to differentiate is to look at the makeup of the lesion. Osteosarcoma’s central zone is made of mature bone while the periphery is highly mitotic cells that are primitive and cellular, compared to myositis ossificans, which has a central zone composed of immature and mitotic cells and a dense periphery with mature bone formation.7 In the case of myositis ossificans, swelling remains within the muscle at all times. Plain Film Radiography Plain film radiography is not effective at visualizing the early stage of myositis ossificans – the lesions often appear normal (Figure 6).1 However, at 1–2 weeks after formation has begun, faint bone formation in the periphery can be seen; and after 3–4 weeks, mineralization in the periphery is evident (see Figure 6). After approximately 2 months, bone deposits form and visualization of myositis ossificans on plain film radiography is possible.1 Radiographs can assist in determining the size, density, and location of lesion and can even help differentiate the condition from osteosarcoma.1 Abnormalities are seen by radiography after the onset of symptoms. Computed Tomography CT is also useful in diagnosing mature myositis ossificans. The main benefit of CT is the demonstration of the zonal patterns of ossification with decreased attenuation at the centre. CT allows for the identification of a clear location of the lesion and separation of the mass from adjacent cortex, which assists in surgical resection.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRI is the most sensitive imaging technique for early, small lesions before the onset of calcifications; however, it lacks specificity.1 Within 8 weeks of onset, MRI can show diffuse edema disproportionate to the lesion, which helps differentiate it from neoplastic lesions.1 Intermediate lesions on MRI appear as irregular areas of decreased signal intensity entering and surrounding the lesion (Figure 7). Mature lesions seen on MRI are well defined and inhomogeneous.1 The drawback with MRI is the inability to view soft tissue calcifications. Sonography Sonography is highly sensitive in the early stages of myositis ossificans and is effective at detecting calcific deposits in soft www.csdms.com tissues in the mature stage. A benefit with sonography is the ability to perform serial studies on the same patient at short intervals. Because of this, you can see the progression of the calcific deposits in the lesions.1 Sonography can assist in diagnosing myositis ossificans because you can view that the lesion is intramuscular without affecting muscle fibres. This feature can help differentiate myositis ossificans from osteosarcoma, which is attached to bone. The edge of the lesions are seen clearly on sonograms, which assists in finding the precise location for resection: the periphery of myositis ossificans lesions is the first to calcify, and on sonograms, calcifications shadow completely. Therefore, sonography is ideal for guiding the excisions of a lesion.1 Sonography is inexpensive, available, non-invasive, and non-ionizing, making it a preferred modality in musculoskeletal imaging. Results from Case Study In the case study discussed above, the thigh was the affected region, and this is the most common place for myositis ossificans to occur. The muscle affected was the vastus lateralis of the quadriceps. The average length of a myositis ossificans lesion is 3.0–9.3 cm; this patient’s lesion measured 4.75 cm in the mature stage.9 The early stage of myositis ossificans was detected by sonography, when it had been missed by plain film radiography. If the sonographer had not inquired about the location of the patient’s pain and checked the lesion, the condition would not have been detected. This shows the importance of listening to patients and taking a thorough history. The case study demonstrates the early stage of myositis ossificans, as was evidenced by a decreased echogenicity and hyperechoic rim (it was not calcified) (Figure 8). Calcifications were seen with sonography on the periphery of the lesion in the later stage (see Figure 8). This shows the value of sonography when diagnosing myositis ossificans because it allows you to view the lesion in both early and later stages. Histology Viewing myositis ossificans microscopically is a major factor in diagnosing this condition. Early stages of myositis ossificans appear as degenerated and necrosed damaged muscle cells.9 It is mostly cellular, with fibroblastic tissue resembling granulation tissue (seen in one case study). Mature myositis ossificans appears mineralized, and bone formation occurs.9 Treatment When a blunt trauma occurs, the individual should immediately apply ice and compression to the injured area, elevate it, and rest. Twenty-four to 48 hours of immobilization The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 19 Cas e Re por t: Myosit is Oss ificans is then recommended, followed by rehabilitation to prevent injury. If the person affected does not follow this regimen, he or she is at risk of developing myositis ossificans. A patient with myositis ossificans is recommended to begin physical therapy once pain free. This should begin with early mobilization and passive range-of-motion exercises, and slowly progress to a full physical therapy program. Myositis ossificans is rare and can spontaneously resolve.5 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be given, including corticosteroids and indomethacin.10 These have been proven to decrease the risk of myositis ossificans formation in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Radiotherapy may be given to high-risk patients who are experiencing severe pain with decreased range of motion and who are not surgical candidates.5 Excision of myositis ossificans can be performed but only to treat symptoms: persistent pain, impaired movement creating functional disability (e.g., decreased range of motion and strength), or impingement on a vital structure such as a nerve.10 Only completely ossified, mature myositis ossificans can be surgically excised.9 If the lesion is not completely ossified, it is still vascularized and is much more likely to reoccur.5 Conclusion This case study is unique since patients with myositis ossificans do not usually present for diagnostic imaging until calcifications have occurred in the lesion. In this case, early and late stages were viewed in multiple modalities. The early diagnosis was osteosarcoma, which almost resulted in surgery to remove her leg. Myositis ossificans must be suspected if the lesion does not resolve in 2 weeks, is slow to heal, and worsens with time.2 Myositis ossificans is a rare but a clinically significant pathology. 20 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 References 1. Parikh J, Hyare H, Saifuddin A. The imaging features of post-traumatic myositis ossificans, with emphasis on MRI. Clin Radiol 2002;57(12):1058–66. 2. Sodl JF, Bassora R, Huffman GR, et al. Traumatic myositis ossificans as a result of college fraternity hazing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466(1):225–30. 3. Kusuma S, Lourie GM, Lins RE. Myositis ossificans of the hand. J Hand Surg 2009;24(1):128–30. 4. Olmsted EA, Kaplan FS, Shore EM. Bone morphogenetic protein-4 regulation in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;408:331–43. 5. Beiner JM, Jokl P. Muscle contusion injury and myositis ossificans traumatica. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;403(2):110–9. 6. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. 7. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, 7th edition. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders Company; 2004. 8. Damron TA, Morris C, Rougraff B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of joint-related tumors that mimic sportsrelated injuries. Instr Course Lect 2009;58:833–47. 9. Abate M, Salini V, Rimondi E, et al. Post traumatic myositis ossificans: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2011;39(3):135–40. 10. Ben Hamida KS, Hajri R, Kedadi H, et al. Myositis ossificans circumscripta of the knee improved by alendronate. Joint Bone Spine 2004;71(2):144–6. www.csdms.com Reprint Echocardiography in the United Kingdom Jules Hobson, BSc Hons, HNC, ONC, RCCP, BSE, SCST About the Authors Jules Hobson has been practising echocardiography since 1989. He served in the Royal Army Medical Corps (British Army) as a clinical physiologist from 1988 to 2010. During that time, he provided clinical physiology services including echocardiography and, in later years, almost exclusively at various military and national health secondary care facilities. Services provided over a 22-year period were overseas or within the United Kingdom and included military operations within field hospitals such as Operation Telic in Iraq/Kuwait. He currently works at Total Cardiology in Calgary, Alberta, as a cardiac ultrasonographer. Correspondence may be directed to [email protected]. W hen I was asked by Josh Fraser to write an article for eInterface, I wondered how I could benefit the readers of this informative journal. I decided that my background may provide an interest to those who may be thinking of taking a sabbatical to the UK while working as an echocardiographer or to those who may like to compare the Trans-Atlantic working practices. Apart from the obvious differences like driving on the right in Canada, steering wheel on the left, and spending virtually no time at all in traffic. Being able to cross London in 20 minutes stress free! Apart from that, there may be some differences in how you scan or how a clinic is expected to run. I don’t have diverse exposure or experience in Canadian labs so I thought it best to talk about the reality over there and let you the reader make your own comparisons. So if you are thinking of going over the pond to England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, or Wales this article may be a useful read. Please read it as a guide and not an authority. Some Useful Contacts • • • • cardiac-output.co.uk/ – Cardiac Output is a publication furnished with employment opportunities and includes contact information for agencies that provide employment. www.bsecho.org/ – British Society of Echocardiography is the accreditation society in Britain and can provide information to potential applicants on required qualifications. www.bhf.org.uk/ – British Heart Foundation can provide additional professional information and job listings. www.bcs.com/ – British Cardiovascular Society can • • provide additional professional information and job listings. www.physiologicalmeasurements.com/ – Physiological Measurements LTD. can provide additional professional information and job listings. www.canadianaffair.ca/ – Canadian Affair is a travel company that provides relocation information and assistance. Where Are the Jobs? There are different ways of acquiring a position within a lab; they are broadly speaking as follows: • • • Agency employment Bank staff Part-time/full-time or casual employment They will be in the following establishments: • • • Secondary care facility (hospital based) Primary care facility (family doctors) Private clinic An application for a position as an echocardiographer will usually require an accreditation qualification with the BSE (British Society of Echocardiography). Although ARDMS and or CARDUP would be advantageous, today I am not aware of any employer that does not state the BSE accreditation or equivalent as a prerequisite in their recruiting criteria. That is not to say that someone who clearly has experience and holds ARDMS or equivalent will be precluded. The web can assist you by providing additional contacts and employment This article was originally published in the Fall 2012 issue of the CSDMS e-newsletter e-Interface. 22 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com H obs on information with great links through the sites mentioned above. Agency Work The drawback to agency work is that it can be short term/temporary and at unpredictable locations. In addition you may be required to show insurance coverage; however, you can acquire this indemnity cover through the BSE. The plus side is that it is good pay and keeps you moving so you experience more diversity and clinical mix. You get to learn more dialects, accents, and culture, even if you only move 20 miles down the road. The agency will manage your administrative needs including pay. Primary/Secondary and Private Care Work A primary/secondary care facility or private clinic will hold interviews for vacancies directly. Pay Through the agency, pay is 40 pounds per hour which is $60 in today’s exchange rate. The agency takes its cut and gives you that hourly rate. You can expect less from other employers. An experienced echocardiographer at a hospital-based clinic will probably be paid about $50–55 an hour. Expect to be paid more in London due to increased living expenses, known as London weighting. So, if you secure a job as an echocardiographer in Harley Street then pay may be as much as $70 an hour. Reports All echocardiograms must have full reports complementing the acquired images. The cardiac ultrasonographer is responsible for the final report sent out to the referring physician. If this is a family doctor it should be written in a way that is non technical and useful for the GP (general practitioner/family doctor). Irrespective of referrer, all reports should be semi diagnostic in format and not just a technical descriptor. Essentially the sonographer is the final reporter. Only very occasionally will the cardiologist follow on with a further report. This is one of the big differences between British and North American sonographers. Scan Times When the government changed the working business practices of the NHS and introduced fund holding, some time ago, it had an impact on costings and consequently money saving. The intention to create more efficiency with financing and resources through fund holding has had a detrimental www.csdms.com effect ultimately on patients. They seem to suffer from the effects of this due to “fund rationing” driven by nonmedically-trained budget holders who find unethical ways to save money. The BSE recommends a 45 minute scan time to include complete report and for the most part this is adhered to; however, there are clinics that will still run 25-minute slots for echocardiograms. Although this increases the fundholder’s revenue it compromises quality for speed which affects ultimately both patient care and sonographer reputation. So be aware scan times can be inappropriately reduced for unethical reasons and you probably will not get a say in the matter. So good luck with that! 18-Week Waiting List Initiative In addition the new waiting list initiative of 18 weeks from referral to treatment now means that all patients referred must have their diagnostic tests complete within 6 weeks. This usually means most facilities set a 2-week period for echocardiograms to be complete. This additional pressure that service providers are under again increases the chances of reduced time slots for echocardiogram investigations. If the providers fail to meet the government set deadlines they face fines and potential loss of status of awards like foundation trust titles. This consequently affects budget premiums when finances are awarded annually. Managerial financial pressure cascades down to increase the volume of completed tests to reduce fines and retain budget supply. This affects the patient and sonographer because the answer to achieve this is to reduce time slots for investigations. The divisional managers that control these concepts try to find different ways to assist with this waiting list bottleneck and have introduced weekend and evening clinics. So this can provide more work for agency, casual, or bank staff. In some diagnostic services like biomedical science a 24 hour, 7 days per week working practice is the only answer to adhere to the 18-week initiative. Suffice to say that combined with the government set demands and the lack of supply of trained cardiac sonographers nationally and locally, the discerning amongst you should have no problem securing a position as a scanner. Radiography and Cardiac Ultrasound It may also be worth bearing in mind that unlike North America, in the UK the cardiac ultrasonography field is devolved from the radiography sector. The UK radiographers are not involved with any type of cardiac ultrasound and it is undertaken and administered by cardiac specialized departments only. Machine Types You will probably run into the following ultrasound The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 23 Echocardiography in the Unite d Kingdom machines: Phillips; IE 33; CX 50; HP 5500, 7500; GE; Vivid Series; Siemens; Acuson; Cypress. Reporting Packages Some labs may still use the machine for analysis and measurement, and still provide handwritten reports. However, most places use the following digitally networked reporting packages: Prism, EchoPAC, McKesson Cardiology, Horizon Cardiology, Hand written (measure on machine). Working with the Echo Companies Siemens, Phillips, and GE are always looking for application specialists to demonstrate their products around the country. BSE Accreditation You can find detailed information on accreditation and reaccreditation procedures at the BSE website. However, in general to attain Adult Trans Thoracic Accreditation with the BSE a candidate will successfully complete the following: • • • Written examination, multiple choice of ultrasound physics and cardiac pathology in addition to an echocardiogram video reporting section. Log book complete with 250 cases of specified pathologies. Majority being in the valve disease and LV dysfunction categories. Each case must be written up as a full report. Video submission of 5 specific pathologies containing full study data set and optimal image processing. Full reports are to be attached for each study. BSE – British Society of Echocardiography The British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) was formed in 1990 to promote the study and advancement of cardiac ultrasound imaging and Doppler techniques, through professional representation, education, and quality benchmarking. It is recognized in the UK and around the world as being the preeminent organization representing the interests of echocardiography and echocardiographers. Having over 2,600 members, it is the largest of the professional groups affiliated to the British Cardiovascular Society. It also has functional links to the European Association of Echocardiography and the European Society of Cardiology. Although originally intended to cater primarily for the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, the society now has members in over 30 other countries in Europe, the Middle and Far East, North and South America, and Africa. Two scientific meetings are held each year: one in the summer, 24 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 in conjunction with the British Cardiovascular Society’s annual conference, and the other, the BSE Annual Meeting, in the autumn. The society has a major interest in education and training of physicians and echocardiographers. It has published training guidelines and members can undertake a formal accreditation programme of written examinations and documented clinical experience. There are specialist options for adult transthoracic, trans-oesophageal, critical care and community echocardiography. These accreditations are accepted as evidence of competence by employers and those responsible for organizing higher medical training in cardiology. In order to encompass continuing rapid advances in ultrasound technology and clinical applications, there is a need for continuing professional education. This is being addressed through a programme of regular re-accreditation. Members receive regular BSE publications containing articles on topical professional matters, details of meetings and training courses, reports of overseas meetings, news items, job vacancies, etc. The society is a registered charity and is administered by a president and an elected council. Members are required to subscribe to the society's rules and code of professional conduct. Summary In summary, be prepared to be the last stop between the report and the referrer. That means adapting your report writing between family physicians and consultants. And don’t be surprised if echo slot times wax and wane between different labs, as budget controllers face different pressures. ARDMS or equivalent should be adequate to secure a position as an echocardiographer, but have the breakdown of the accreditation ready just in case an employer has not heard of the qualification. Although work visas are not covered here you can find out more at this UK government website. Enjoy the culture, history, and diversity. And please remember you Canadians are extremely polite, nice people, so be prepared to stay that way. If you have any specific questions or queries please drop me a line at [email protected]. The Scan Cardiac ultrasound labs within the UK subscribe to the minimum data set required by the BSE education council, this is outlined below and at the BSE website (TTE Minimum Data Set: http://www.bsecho.org/tte-minimum-dataset/). 1. Overview It is recommended that any study is accompanied by a www.csdms.com H obs on statement regarding the image quality achieved: good/fair/poor. 2. Identifying Information The images acquired should be clearly labelled with patient identifiers, including the following: patient name, a second unique identifier such as hospital number or date of birth, and identification of the operator such as initials. 3. ECG An ECG should be attached ensuring good tracings to facilitate the acquisition of complete digital loops. Loops should be examined and adjusted accordingly in order to ensure a clear representation of the image acquired. 4. Height/Weight/Haemodynamic Variables Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of chamber size and function are major components of every echocardiographic examination. Chamber dimensions may be influenced by age, gender, and body size. Therefore, consideration should be given to the use of referenced ranges indexed to height or body surface area. Additionally, velocities measured using Doppler should take account of pulse rate and blood pressure. No recommendation is made to the routine use of indexed measurements but facilities should be available to sonographers to measure height, weight, pulse rate, and blood pressure at the time of an echocardiogram. List of Abbreviations Views PLAX PSAX A4C A2C A5C SC SSN ALAX parasternal long axis parasternal short axis apical four chamber apical two chamber apical five chamber subcostal suprasternal apical long axis or apical three chamber Modality PW CW CFM TDI pulsed wave Doppler continuous wave Doppler colour Doppler tissue Doppler imaging www.csdms.com 5. Duration The average time required for performance and reporting of a fully comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) following these recommendations is considered to be 40–45 minutes, although it is understood that some studies may take longer whilst others may take less time. The time taken for a standard TTE should include time to complete a report, and should also take into account the time taken for patient preparation. 6. Report No standard TTE is complete until a report is released and is made available to the referring individual. The majority of studies performed in a department should be reported immediately on completion and a report available on discharge of a patient from the echocardiography facility. It is recognized that there are times when a review of images and further consideration is required, for example when the individual performing the scan does not hold proficiency accreditation and the scan requires review prior to release, although this should be done as soon as possible. 7. Chaperones A standard TTE is not considered an intimate examination but performance still requires patient sensitivity. Chaperones should not usually be required for standard TTE but for all TTE studies, patients should be offered a gown. sinotubular junction Measurement and Explanatory STJ LVIDd/s left ventricular Text LV left ventricle LA left atrium MV mitral valve AV aortic valve Ao aorta LVOT left ventricular outflow tract RV right ventricle RA right atrium PV pulmonary valve RVOT right ventricular outflow tract L/R PA left/right pulmonary artery RL/RU/ LL/LUPVright lower/right upper/left lower/left upper pulmonary vein TV tricuspid valve IVC inferior vena cava IVSd/s LVPWd PHT RVd VTI PHT RWMA TAPSE MAPSE internal dimension in diastole and systole interventricular septal width in diastole and systole left ventricular posterior wall width in diastole pressure half-time right ventricular cavity diameter in diastole velocity time integral pressure half-time regional wall motion abnormality tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion mitral annular plane systolic excursion The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 25 Reprint Abstract: Systematic Labeling of Twin Pregnancies on Ultrasound R ecently, CSDMS Eastern region board director Sheldon Boyde was doing some CME reading and found a very valuable article that he felt would be beneficial to our generalist members. Published in the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) journal, “Systematic Labeling of Twin Pregnancies on Ultrasound,” by T. Dias, S. Ladd, S. Mahsud-Dornan, A. Bhide, A. T. Papageorghiou and B. Thilaganathan, originally appeared in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 38, Issue 2, pages 130–133, August 2011 (DOI: 10.1002/uog.8990). The abstract is reprinted here by permission of ISUOG and their publisher Wiley, and the full article can be accessed at the following link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/uog.8990/pdf. Additionally, ISUOG and Wiley have advised us that this article was selected article for a Journal Club feature in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. As such, there is also a set of slides and discussion points for the article freely available online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/ 10.1002/%28ISSN%291469-0705/homepage/uog_journal_ club_2011.htm (under August). We would like to thank ISUOG for their generous cooperation in permitting the reprint of this abstract, as well as Oliver Stirrup, the ISUOG editorial coordinator, and Paul Cumine, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology publishing manager at Wiley, for their help and co-operation. We sincerely hope all CSDMS members will derive benefit from the recommendations the article contains. We believe that this inter-professional co-operation will further emphasize the continuing need for examination guidelines that will assist all practitioners to order appropriate diagnostic examinations and receive necessary details from the final diagnostic reports. This will help to ensure increased patient safety while making more effective use of healthcare dollars. Systematic Labeling of Twin Pregnancies on Ultrasound Results: A total of 416 twin pregnancies were seen during the study period. At the 11–14-week scan 90.9% of twins were in lateral orientation while the remainder were oriented vertically. None of the vertically oriented twin pairs but 32 (8.5%) of the laterally oriented twin pairs changed their presenting order between the first and the last ultrasound scan prior to delivery. There were 108 discordant-sex twins scanned in the third trimester, of which the birth order changed in 20.3% that were delivered by Cesarean section and in 5.9% of those delivered vaginally. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that antenatal labeling of twins according to laterality or vertical orientation is reliable. The technique ensures continuity of biometric assessment from serial scans at each visit, and as such should be adopted as the preferred method of twin labeling. Furthermore, the use of orientation for antenatal labeling of twins rather than assignment of a number based on proximity to the cervix, precludes any misconception regarding which twin will be born first and ensures that parents and pediatricians are aware of the significant likelihood of a peripartum switch. T. Dias, S. Ladd, S. Mahsud-Dornan, A. Bhide, A. T. Papageorghiou, and B. Thilaganathan ABSTRACT Objective: Correct labeling of twin fetuses is needed for consistency in assigning and interpreting longitudinal scan and prenatal screening/diagnostic results. The aim of this study was to describe a standard method of twin labeling in the first trimester of pregnancy and to assess the robustness of such a technique in predicting the presenting twin in subsequent scans and at delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective first-trimester study of all twin pregnancies assessed by ultrasonography at our center between 2000 and 2010. The fetus contained in the gestational sac closer to the maternal cervix was designated as Twin 1 and the relative orientation of the fetuses to each other was then defined as either lateral (left/right) or vertical (top/bottom). In discordant-sex twins, their sex and presenting order on the final scan prior to delivery were documented and compared with the sex and birth order at delivery. 26 The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com Book Reviews Professor Robert Gill, PhD, is an Australian electronic engineer who has worked extensively in diagnostic sonography for 30 years. His primary focus is Doppler ultrasound. Recently retired, Professor Gill has written The Physics and Technology of Diagnostic Ultrasound: A Practitioner’s Guide to help medical professionals obtain a good understanding of ultrasound physics and technology. His target audience is students enrolled in formal training programs, and the book competes directly with texts such as Sonography Principles and Instruments, by Kremkau, Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation, by Miele, and Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation, by Hykes and Hedrick, among others. Professor Gill’s book is well organized and easy to read. There are 12 chapters, starting with an introductory overview to basic mathematical concepts and ending with a final chapter on new developments such as three-dimensional sonography and elastography. Professor Gill’s writing is clear and concise, and his explanations are easily understood. These are definitely strengths of the book. Robert Gill Key points are highlighted throughout each chapter within blue text boxes. High Frequency Press, Sydney, Australia, 2012 There are ample graphics accompanying the text, and these are well designed, ISBN: 9780987292100 colourful, and clear. The ultrasound images are also of high quality. 142 pages, soft cover The balancing act with which all textbook writers struggle is deciding on the amount of detail to provide. On one side, too little detail results in a good introductory text but may not meet the needs of students preparing for local or national examinations. On the other, too much detail may overwhelm students and prevent them from obtaining a good understanding of fundamental concepts. How well does Professor Gill’s book strike this balance? I suggest that this text comes very close to meeting that objective, but tends toward being an introductory text. This book would serve very well in that role or, perhaps even better, as a refresher text that could be used by practising sonographers within a clinical department. Indeed, the title, A Practitioner’s Guide, suggests this role. At 142 pages, the amount of detail that can be provided is necessarily limited, and the author clearly admits this. While almost all major topics are covered, students in an ultrasound program would need more emphasis on key topics and more in-depth explanation of those topics. Students would also benefit from more exercises and detailed answer keys. Professor Gill does provide “Suggested Activities” at the end of each chapter, but these are somewhat limited and the answer keys do not provide any explanation. In addition some topics are not covered at all. For example, picture archiving and communication system (PACS), which is used almost universally these days, is not explained; nor is there any significant discussion of digital terminology. In the chapter on hemodynamics, important concept of a tardus parvus waveform is not explored. The final chapter does cover newer concepts such as elastography, but, again, this is done in a very cursory manner. While there are numerous ultrasound images within the book, students would benefit from more examples, particularly to support concepts in the earlier chapters such as the importance of frequency, attenuation, impedance mismatch, etc. In summary, I enjoyed Professor Gill’s book and view it as a welcome addition to the current crop of ultrasound physics texts. As an introductory or refresher text, it is superb; and depending on the program and the circumstances, it may well be a good text for use within a formal program. This could certainly be the case if the program were able to supplement the information in the text with more detail and emphasis. Indeed, according to the publisher’s website (www.ultrasoundbook.net), several Australian ultrasound programs including those at Charles Sturt University and the University of South Australia have already adopted the book as a prescribed or recommended course textbook. It will be interesting to see if that trend will continue in North America. Chris Harrington, CRGS, CRCS, CRVS Program Coordinator, Ultrasound Training Program Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg, Manitoba www.csdms.com The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 27 B ook Re vie w Stuart J. Hutchison, Katherine C. Holmes Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc., 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4377-0404-4 320 pages A limited number of vascular sites in Canada are credentialed with Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing (formerly ICAVL), and one of the major deficiencies in sites performing vascular studies is the absence of a standardized approach and technique to these examinations. Stuart Hutchison and Katherine Holmes’s goal in writing Principles of Vascular and Intravascular Ultrasound was to present structured, thorough techniques and protocols to vascular sonographers and clinicians. Practical information, tips, and hints are presented on all areas of vascular sonography including peripheral arterial and venous, cerebrovascular, and abdominal studies. A unit covering intravascular sonography has even been included. Each chapter contains practical key points and “scanning pearls” to assist the sonographer in producing quality images while avoiding artifacts. Techniques are well outlined, and scanning protocols and diagnostic criteria are summarized in both table format and point form within their related chapter. IAC Vascular Testing standards for accreditation are summarized. Disease entities are discussed and characterized, and plenty of high-quality anatomy and sonographic images are included to illustrate and reinforce material covered in each chapter. Each chapter is presented in a consistent format, making this text an excellent quick reference guide for anyone performing and/or teaching vascular sonography; however, students may find the information on each topic too abbreviated as they often require fuller explanations for understanding. In summary, this is an excellent reference book for any site performing vascular studies: well-organized, concise, and clearly written. However, the highlight of this book is definitely the superior images, illustrating so many of the vascular findings and pathologies discussed. Verna Maschio, BTech, CRVS, CRCS, CRGS, Vascular Instructor NAIT Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program The Safe Use of Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis, Third Edition, is published by the British Institute of Radiology with the cooperation and support of the British Medical Ultrasound Society, the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, and the National Physical Laboratory (UK). The very best place to start with this review is simply to reprint the preface Dr. Gail ter Haar MA, PhD, DSc, has written as it certainly best describes the aims of this new reference text and the actual results that have been achieved. Edited by Gail ter Haar British Institute of Radiology, 2012 ISBN: 978-0-905749-78-5 166 pages 28 It is an oft observed fact that safety sessions at congresses are seldom well attended, and that the sneaky insertion of a lecture on a safety-related topic into specialist session may be regarded by some as the opportunity for a coffee break, but the fact remains that the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound is the responsibility of the person conducting the scan. In order for appropriate judgements to be made, the practitioner must be knowledgeable about the hazards and risks involved in performing an ultrasound examination, and this book aims to provide this basic knowledge. Leading world experts in the fields of ultrasound physics, biology, standards and epidemiology have contributed chapters, written at a level that is intended to be accessible to everyone, whatever their background. Each chapter is extensively referenced to allow readers to delve deeper into a topic of interest if they so wish. The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 www.csdms.com B ook Re v ie w Ultrasound has an unprecedented safety record, but that does not mean that we can be cavalier about its use. What is evident from information presented in this book is that there are many gaps in our knowledge about ultrasound safety. Many of the studies on which we base our information and recommendations have been carried out in animal models whose relevance to the human is not fully understood, ultrasound exposure conditions which have little relevance to diagnostic ultrasound pulses, or on scanners that are no longer in common clinical use. While this is useful information, it must always be interpreted with care. It must be remembered that “absence of evidence of harm is not the same as absence of harm” (Salvesen et al., 2011). It is never possible to prove a negative; all we can do is to use increasingly more sensitive tests and assays. It is for these reasons that professional societies continue to support committees whose remit is to inform and educate users about the safe use of ultrasound, so that ultrasound imaging can continue to enjoy its reputation as a technique whose benefits far outweigh any potential risk. The Safe Use of Ultrasound is a well-written book that, although quite detailed, is suitable for all members of the ultrasound community. There are excellent sidebar notes on each page that simplify the concepts discussed without the detail contained in the body of the text. These allow for quick reference to the subject matter as you proceed through the book. Diagrams, illustrations, and tables are well referenced in the text and help to clarify the information discussed. An exceptional list of references follows each chapter, allowing the reader to further explore topics or garner valuable explanations of material that is not well understood. While the material will stretch some, it is well presented in a logical format with rational subject development, leading the reader to understand the standards, methods, guidelines, and recommendations that are discussed. As I am an older sonographer, I think I had lost a firm touch with many of the issues raised, along with parts of the foundational physics that so many of us tend to forget over time. Of particular interest to me as a vascular sonographer was the chapter on non-thermal effects of ultrasound with the introduction of ultrasound contrast agents. This gave me pause to think about our examination protocol, examination duration, and machine settings. Well highlighted is the need for new research, knowledge, and due diligence on the part of all practitioners in view of the changes and advancements in technology such as multicrystal probe technology, colour pulsed Doppler, tissue www.csdms.com harmonic imaging, pulse coding, and contrast-enhanced imaging, to mention a few. Many answers to questions and the foundations for many new questions and potential research are developed in this text. The information causes us to ask, are the old safety measurements, assumptions on the generally accepted safety of the modality, and the current safety measures recommended and employed adequate to protect our patients? Many sonographers young and old will find themselves feeling the way I did about forgotten or neglected machine safety concerns. This is a good eye opener and very interesting reading for all practitioners. It will make you think and closely reflect on your own daily practices. That can only be a good thing. I highly recommend this text to all members of the sonography community. Kim G. Boles, CRGS, CRVS, FCSDMS Editor-in-Chief Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography EDUCATION FOR THE MEDICAL PROFESSION SINCE 1985 “STUDY WHILE YOU WORK” HOME STUDY COURSES IN GENERAL ULTRASOUND BREAST SONOGRAPHY MUSCULOSKELETAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VASCULAR TECHNOLOGY *MOST COURSES ARE WORTH 30 CME CREDITS* www.burwin.com 1-877-625-5297 (Central Time) 1-800-322-0737 (Atlantic Time) The Canadian Journal of Medical Sonography | Spring 2013 29 SUNRIDGE DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Barrie L. Steed MD // David Lyons MD // Shaunna Menard MD 2133 - 36 Street NE - Calgary AB T1Y 5S3 P. 403. 568. 7676 w w w . S D I u l t r a s o u n d . c o m F. 403. 568. 7677 CALGARY - ALBERTA 4 Day Work Week - Full Time hours by extended hours daily. We are an office practice dedicated solely to diagnostic sonographic imaging. We are staffed with three enthusiastic radiologists dedicated to the excellence of sonographic diagnosis. This is a practice with a wide diversity of exams. Along with general ultrasound exams, we serve as an emergent/urgent imaging center which expands the level of pathology encountered. We do extensive vascular work including pre and post op surveillance for the vascular surgeons of Calgary. We specialize in musculoskeletal and MSK intervention including alcohol sclerosis for plantar neuromas. The highest level of sonographic diagnostic excellence occurs with exceptional radiologist supervision, education and staff compatibility. We foster a staff of technologists and radiologists that are cordial, enthusiastic, and enjoy a team environment. Our highest priority is in patient comfort and in contributing to an accurate final diagnosis. We are looking for a technologist who has an eager attitude to learn and work as a team member; who can confidently perform routine abdomen, pelvic, obstetric and small part exams. Any skill in vascular and musculoskeletal exams is welcomed but not a prerequisite. Opportunity to expand skills through onsite teaching and, support for other learning. we have 12 ultrasound machines with new Siemens Sequoia 2000, GE Logiq E9. lf you love ultrasound, you should love our practice. e-mail Dr. Steed - [email protected] SUNRIDGE DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Barrie L. Steed MD // David Lyons MD // Shaunna Menard MD P. 403. 568. 7676 w w w . S D I u l t r a s o u n d . c o m 2133 - 36 Street NE - Calgary AB T1Y 5S3 F. 403. 568. 7677 DEDICATED VASCULAR SONOGRAPHER REQUIRED Calgary Required by a dedicated OFFICE ultrasound practice. Never on call. ENJOY a 4 Day Work Week with Full Salary by extended hours daily 7:00 to 4:30. Choose to work extra hours on Fridays. Benefits are competitive. 3 RADIOLOGISTS Dedicated to ultrasound with intense RAD SUPERVISION We perform outpatient pre and post op Vascular Surveillance for the Peripheral Vascular Surgeons of Calgary VASCULAR STUDIES Endostents and other Vascular Stents, all varieties of Grafts, Carotids, Thoracic Outlet and Popliteal lmpingements, Arm A-V Fistulas; Renal, Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenosis; Leg Insufficiency Studies, Arm and Leg artery and vein exams, Variety of Exertional Compartment Syndromes, Groin Pseudo Aneurysms and Fistulas. We examine Pre and Post Transplant Renal and Liver exams and TIPS Surveillance. All performed on - Siemens Sequoia 2000, GE Logiq E9, ATL 5000. Onsite training for less familiar studies. lmportant to us is the willingness of staff members to associate and communicate well with one another. Our small practice nurtures a comradery and sense of belonging. ARDMS or CARDUP registration with active status is required. RVT not a requirement. ǡǡ ǡ ǡ ǤǤǤ ;LS! -H_! PUMV'PIPVTJVT ^^^PIPVTJVT