Automation of 13 C/ 12 C ratio measurement for seawater DOC
Transcription
Automation of 13 C/ 12 C ratio measurement for seawater DOC
Measuring δ13C of dissolved organic carbon in freshwater and seawater ASITA conference 2014 Karine Lalonde, Paul Middlestead, Yves Gélinas Concordia University, University of Ottawa 1 The seawater DOC challenge • Large active pool of reduced carbon – (700 x 1015 g OC) • For 1 L of seawater – 35g of salts – As low as 0.5mg OC 2 The evolution of seawater δ13CDOC [St-Jean 2003], [Osburn 2007] Wet oxidation [Williams 1968] UV oxidation V = 1.8 L 6 hours Not automated 1968 [Beaupré 2007] V = 10-25mL UV oxidation 20 min V = 30-650mL Not automated 4-5 hours Not automated 1992 HTC-DOC V = 5-10 mL 2003-2008 20 min automated [Fry 1992] lyophilization V = 25 mL 3 hours Not automated [Lang 2007], [Panetta 2008] HTC-DOC V = 5-10 mL 45 min Not automated NOW The old system CO2 N2 (L) CO2 6 x 150μL injections 45 minutes Panetta (2008), Analytical Chemistry 4 The new system Electric Cue CO2 CO2 Electric Cue 5 CO2 trapping system 6 Special thanks to Paul Middlestead G. G. HATCH Laboratory Graham Hughes Graden Instruments Humm Benefits of Automation • Fewer mistakes • Longer sequences – Higher throughput – More controls – More replicates – Better standard deviations – Better idea of system limitations/capabilities • Better relationship with your grad students./support staff Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) analyzer: Water and salt traps Sample IR detector 680oC To IRMS 10 CO2 peak problems • Peak from the DOC analyzer: 1. Tails due to differing combustion efficiencies 2. About 3 minutes wide 3. CO2 peak is in Oxygen gas • Peak requirements for IRMS 1. Peak should be as narrow and as intense as possible 2. Peak must be in He gas 11 CO2 Trapping system CO2 from DOC Heat to 250oC 12 CO2 Trapping system He gas IRMS O2 +CO2 from DOC O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use 13 CO2 Trapping system He gas IRMS CO2 trapped Clean O2 O2 +CO2 from DOC O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use 14 CO2 Trapping system He gas IRMS CO2 trapped O2 +CO2 from DOC Removed O2 O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use 15 CO2 Trapping system He gas IRMS CO2 trapped Trap is heated to 250oC O2 +CO2 from DOC O2 + CO2 He gas Not in use 16 It works!! 17 Sample true δ13C values (‰) DOC –IRMS δ13C PAUL (‰) DOC –IRMS δ13C ConU (‰) Sucrose (In-house) -11.77 -12.1 ± (NA) -11.6 ± (0.2) KHP* -28.16 -27.8 ± (NA) -28.1 ± (0.2) β-Alanine -26.18 -25.3 ± (NA) -26.1 ± (0.2) Suwanee river fulvic acid -27.60 -27.4 ± (NA) -27.8 ± (0.2) Deep Florida Straight water ? -20.6 ± (0.3) -19.9 ± (0.5) *KHP = potassium hydrogen phthalate No matrix effects Little to no carry over from the combustion column How low can you go? 0.9 Standard deviation (‰) 0.8 High blank contribution 0.7 0.6 0.5 Low blank contribution 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 2 4 6 8 Concentration (ppm) 10 12 Where does the blank come from? • The blank comes from the column packing • δ13C of the blank is between -20 & -12‰ • Pretty constant intensity and signature over one sequence • Variable over many sequences – Must be corrected before running samples CO2 Accounting for the blank 1/MH (nA-1) -4 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 raw δ13C (‰) -8 -12 Sucrose (-10.47‰) -16 -20 β-Alanine (-26.18‰) KHP(-28.16‰) -24 -28 δb = (Slope / ηb) + δbc IRMS blank intensity Testing combustion efficiency sucrose, δ13C = -10.5‰ KHP, δ13C = -28.2‰ Enriched algae δ13C = +11.6‰ Incomplete combustion results in no δ13C shifts δ13C always = -10.5 ‰ Incomplete combustion results in δ13C shifts 100% combustion δ13C = -9 ‰ 5% of KHP is not combusted = -7.6 ‰ DOC system pressure and combustion System pressure (PSI) 20 25 30 -4 -5 δ13C (‰) -6 -7 -8 -9 KHP/algae mix = -9.0‰ -10 -11 -12 IAEA sucrose = -10.5‰ Injection volume and combustion Injection Volume (μL) 1500 1200 750 500 -5 -6 δ13C (‰) -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 KHP/algae mix = -9.0‰ IAEA sucrose = -10.5‰ Seawater.. Is it possible? • Matrix does not affect combustion efficiency • Low concentration of seawater DOC are problematic – Lowest possible standard deviations are ± 0.5‰ at 0.5 ppm • See Andrew Barber’s poster tonight! δ13C signature in the SLE (‰) Salinity (psu) 26 Acknowledgements Yves Gélinas Technical Help and Others Alfonso Mucci • Anssi Vähätalo Committee members • Paul Middlestead (University of Ottawa) • Xavier Ottenwaelder • Graham Hughes (OI technologies) • Cameron Skinner • Alain Tessier (CBAMS) Lab members • Richard and Aldo (Machine shop) • Andrew Barber • Dan (Electronics Shop) • Mina Ibrahim • Alexandre Ouellet • Anja Moritz • Rob Panetta 27