presentation [1.72 Mo PDF]
Transcription
presentation [1.72 Mo PDF]
Vaccination of Prégnant Women: Benefit/Risk Assessment Carol J. Baker, M.D. Professor of Pediatrics, Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA Fondation Mérieux, Veyrier-du-Lac June 24, 2014 Financial Disclosure In the past 12 months I have been a consultant to Novartis Vaccines and an advisory board member of Pfizer, Inc. My Point of View as a Discussant ● Physician: “disease fighter” ● Decreasing mortality is quantifiable (good) ● Decreasing morbidity (hospitalization, disability) is good ● Public Health Advisor: ● Vaccines were the greatest medical advance in the 20th century (exception = clean water) ● Efficacy (benefits) documented ● Risk (safety) is never zero and is a probability ● Benefit/Risk balance is a value judement Maternal Vaccination Is Not A New Concept 1879: Maternal immunisation with cowpox virus conferred protection against smallpox in mothers & infants 1938: Maternal immunisation with whole cell pertussis vaccine protected infants from complications of pertussis 1961: Maternal immunisation with tetanus toxoid vaccine (New Guinea); millions of maternal and neonatal deaths prevented worldwide since then 1964: Inactivated influenza vaccine recommended Tetanus Immunisation During Pregnancy Moccia P. The state of the world's children 2009 maternal and newborn health. New York, NY: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF); 2008. But It Is Complicated From the outset, there was debate about benefit/risk and vaccine uptake has been meagre More important was the lack of data to assure safety and efficacy Thalidomide: the most important adverse event for pregnant women in medical history changed everything more than 60 years ago – birth of regulatory agencies Anything during pregnancy could bring harm to the unborn whether biologically plausible or not Thus, potential risk trumped benefit – pregnant women What Followed Thalidomide? FDA regulations excluded pregnant women from enrollment in clinical trials FDA still doesn’t have a licensing pathway for vaccines Vaccine manufacturers remain concerned about liability Obstetrical providers perceive unwillingness of women to receive recommended vaccines during pregnancy Discussion of benefit/risk involving pregnant women all but ceased until the 2009 influenza pandemic Historical Note: Influenza Enhanced Disease Burden during Pregnancy Assumed Risk Was Negligible Burney LE. Public Health Rep. 1964 Oct; 75(10):944. First US influenza vaccine recommendation Recommended But Not Administered WHO Prequalified TIV Vaccines: Package Inserts 2012 Company/Vaccine Pregnancy Comment GSK (Flulval) Animal reproduction ND Limited data do not indicate adverse foetal outcome Animal and pregnant women studies ND; should only be given when necessary Pregnancy category C; animal studies ND; not known if it can cause harm Green Cross (GCFLU) Sanofi (FLUZONE) Rationale for Vaccination of Pregnant Women: Benefits ● Mother’s “gift” to fetus/newborn is her immunoglobulin G (IgG) or her immunity against infectious diseases for weeks/ months ● Placental transfer of maternal immunity (antibodies) begins at 17 weeks (passive transport) ● By 33 weeks, maternal = fetal levels ● By 40 weeks, total fetal IgG exceeds maternal levels (active transport) Vaccination During Pregnancy “Nature’s Gift” Decreasing severity of early childhood infections Maternal antibody Before birth Child’s own antibody Birth Infant immunization schedule starts Page 12 Pediatrics xxx00.#####.ppt 6/24/2014 9:48:51 AM Two Events That Shifted The Discussion in the U.S.A. ● 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Pregnant women were priority group 1 Accounted for 5% of deaths (1% of population) Vaccine uptake rose from ~12% to 49% ● Pertussis Young Infant Deaths US, UK/Wales Virtually all deaths in < 3 month old infants Increased risk of hospitalization in infants <6 months With WC pertussis vaccine, maternal immunisation protected mothers and young infants Infants require 3 doses of DTaP for protection Maternal and Young Infant Influenza Infections Worldwide Burden of disease is substantial Increased risk of complications and death in pregnant women due to pulmonary compromise If no maternal influenza-specific IgG, risk of complicated influenza in baby (fever/sepsis) No influenza vaccine available if <age 6 months At age 6 months, 2 doses, 4-weeks apart, required for protection (uptake in 2013 ~70% for 1 or 2 doses) TIV uptake in 2013 only 48% in pregnant women Finally Some Influenza Risk (Safety) Data Denmark registry Outcomes: birth defects preterm birth fetal growth 53,432 babies 6989 exposed 343 1st trimester No difference in rate of outcomes maternal vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated women Pregnancy Immunisation with Influenza Vaccine: Benefits* * Steinhoff, McDonald, Pfeifer, Muglia. Lancet 2014;383:1611 Pediat Infect Dis J 2013;32:1374 Worldwide Benefit Two Events That Shifted The Discussion in the U.S.A. ● 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Pregnant women were priority group 1 Accounted for 5% of deaths (1% of population) Vaccine uptake rose from ~12% to 49% ● Pertussis Young Infant Deaths US, UK/Wales Virtually all deaths in < 3 month old infants Increased risk of hospitalization in infants <6 months With WC pertussis vaccine, maternal immunisation protected mothers and young infants Infants require 3 doses of DTaP for protection USA Data England/ Wales Data Level 3 emergency declared 4/12; Tdap to pregnant women; 79% reduction in infants <3mo. Pertussis in a 3-Week-Old: Cough for 4 days, blue spell in AM, hospital admission, ventilator at 6 hours, ECMO at 12 hours, death at 18 hours Vaccination of Pregnant Women: Conclusions ● Immune mechanisms during pregnancy differ, but do allow for adequate responses to inactivated vaccines ● Maternally-derived specific IgG can prevent maternal/fetal/neonatal/young infant mortality and mortality (benefit) ● Inactivated vaccines (eg, influenza) are safe (risk) ● We must not continue to exclude pregnant women or their offspring from vaccine-derived benefits (equity) Thank You Merci Beaucoups