JH DOD-EPA DCS Presentation

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
NATURAL RESOURCES DATA CALL STATION
PRESENTED BY:
JOE HAUTZENRODER
NATURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM MANAGER
202-685-9331
[email protected]
NATURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM
METRICS,
INRMP ANNUAL REVIEWS
&
KEEPING INRMPs CURRENT
INRMP ANNUAL
REVIEWS
Section 101(b)(2) of the Sikes Act [16 U.S.C.
670a(b)(2)] states that each INRMP “must be
reviewed as to operation and effect by the
parties thereto on a regular basis, but not less
often than every 5 years.”
DOD policy requires installations to review
INRMPs annually in cooperation with the
other parties to the INRMP.
INRMP REPORTS
SAIA Section 101(f) REVIEWS AND REPORTS(1) SECRETARY OF DEFENSE- Not later than March 1 of
each year, the Secretary of Defense shall review the extent to
which integrated natural resources management plans were
prepared or were in effect and implemented in accordance
with this title in the preceding year, and submit a report on
the findings of the review to the committees. Each report
shall include-`(A) the number of integrated natural resources management
plans in effect in the year covered by the report, including
the date on which each plan was issued in final form or most
recently revised;
`(B) the amounts expended on conservation activities
conducted pursuant to the plans in the year covered by the
report; and
`(C) an assessment of the extent to which the plans comply
with this title.
CURRENT DOD CONSERVATION PROGRAM METRICS
The installation name and State
The year the most recent INRMP was completed or revised
Date of next planned revision
Was the INRMP coordinated with the appropriate military trainers and operators?
Were projects added to the INRMP as a result of comments from military trainers and operators?
Has annual feedback been requested from military trainers and operators?
Has annual feedback been received from military trainers and operators?
Were segments of the INRMP concerning the conservation, protection, and management of fish and wildlife
resources agreed to by the USFWS Regional Director (USFWS coordination)?
Were projects added to the INRMP as a result of USFWS comments?
Has annual feedback been requested from the USFWS?
Has annual feedback been received from the USFWS?
Were segments of the INRMP concerning the conservation, protection, and management of fish and wildlife
resources agreed to by the State fish and wildlife agency Director (State coordination)?
Were projects added to the INRMP as a result of State comments?
Has annual feedback been requested from the State fish and wildlife agency?
Has annual feedback been received from the State fish and wildlife agency?
Does the INRMP contain a list of projects necessary to meet plan goals and objectives, as well as timeframes
for implementation of any such projects?
Funding requirements in reporting FY to implement the INRMP:
$ Required for Class 0 and 1 projects
$ Funded for Class 0 and 1 requirements
$ Unfunded for Class 0 and 1 requirements
$ Funded for Class 2 and 3 projects.
$ Unfunded for Class 2 and 3 projects
List of unfunded Class 0 and 1 projects greater than $50,000
Did the installation seek public comment on the draft INRMP?
Were projects added to the INRMP as a result of public comments?
DASN (E) TASK
Develop metrics that will give leadership an
assessment of impacts of the conservation
program on installation missions and a better
indication of the successfulness of our
partnerships with the FWS and State Fish &
Game Agencies to develop and implement
INRMPs.
Installation Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Annapolis, USNA
Bangor, NSB
Barking Sands, PMRF
Bayview Det., Carderock NSWC
Boardman, NWSTF
Bremerton, NAVHOSP
Brownfield, NNSOC
Brunswick, NAS
Carderock, NSWC
Charleston, NWS
Chesapeake Bay Det., NRL
China Lake, NAWS
Coastal Systems Station Panama City,
Concord Det., NWS Seal Beach
Corona, NWAS
Coronado, Naval Base Complex
Corpus Christi, NAS
Crane, NSWC
Dahlgren, NSWC
Dam Neck, FCTCLANT
Dixon, NRTF
Earle, NWS
El Centro, NAF
Elephant Butte, NNSOC
Everett, NAVSTA
Fallbrook Det., NWS Seal Beach
Fallon, NAS
Flagstaff, NAVOBSY
Ft Worth, NAS JRB
Gila River, NNSOC
Great Lakes, NTC
Guam, COMNAVMARIANAS
Gulfport, NCBC
Harvey Point, DTA
Indian Head, NSWC
Indian Island, NAVMAG
Ingleside, NAVSTA
Jacksonville, FISC
Jacksonville, NAS
Jim Creek, NAVRADSTA (T)
State
MD
WA
HI
ID
OR
WA
CA
ME
MD
SC
MD
CA
FL
CA
CA
CA
TX
IN
VA
VA
CA
NJ
CA
NM
WA
CA
NV
AZ
TX
AZ
IL
GU
MS
NC
MD
WA
TX
FL
FL
WA
FOCUS AREAS
C
C
N
O
T
P
E
FOCUS AREAS
• Assessment of INRMP Implementation
• Assessment of Partnerships/Cooperation and Effectiveness
• Assessment of Team Adequacy
• Assessment of INRMP Impact on the Installation Mission
• Assessment of the Status of Federally Listed Species and CH
• Assessment of Ecosystem Integrity
• Fish & Wildlife Management and Public use
Installation Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40
Annapolis, USNA
Bangor, NSB
Barking Sands, PMRF
Bayview Det., Carderock NSWC
Boardman, NWSTF
Brownfield, NNSOC
Brunswick, NAS
Carderock, NSWC
Charleston, NWS
Chesapeake Bay Det., NRL
China Lake, NAWS
Coastal Systems Station Panama City,
Concord Det., NWS Seal Beach
Corona, NWAS
Coronado, Naval Base Complex
Corpus Christi, NAS
Crane, NSWC
Dahlgren, NSWC
Dam Neck, FCTCLANT
Dixon, NRTF
Earle, NWS
El Centro, NAF
Elephant Butte, NNSOC
Everett, NAVSTA
Fallbrook Det., NWS Seal Beach
Fallon, NAS
Flagstaff, NAVOBSY
Ft Worth, NAS JRB
Gila River, NNSOC
Great Lakes, NTC
Guam, COMNAVMARIANAS
Gulfport, NCBC
Harvey Point, DTA
Indian Head, NSWC
Indian Island, NAVMAG
Ingleside, NAVSTA
Jacksonville, FISC
Jacksonville, NAS
Jim Creek NAVRADSTA (T)
State
MD
WA
HI
ID
OR
CA
ME
MD
SC
MD
CA
FL
CA
CA
CA
TX
IN
VA
VA
CA
NJ
CA
NM
WA
CA
NV
AZ
TX
AZ
IL
GU
MS
NC
MD
WA
TX
FL
FL
WA
Impact on
Military
Mission
INRMP
Status of Fed.
Team
Implementation Listed Spp. Adequacy
Ecosystem
Integrety
Partnership
Coop. &
Effectiveness
F&W MGT
and Public
Use
Annapolis, USNA
INRMP Implementation
Findings:
• Several Class 1 Projects not funded, due to incomplete
proposal submissions.
Recommendation(s):
• Ensure that proposals for unfunded projects are
properly submitted through the EPR Web.
WHAT THE METRICS BUILDER PROVIDES:
• Feedback to Leadership Regarding Natural Resources
Management Impacts on the Installation Mission.
• Feedback to Leadership Regarding the Relationship
with our FWS and State Partners.
• Feedback to Leadership Regarding the Health of the
Navy Natural Resources Program.
• Feedback to Leadership Regarding the Status of
INRMP Implementation.
WHAT THE METRICS BUILDER PROVIDES:
• A Mechanism to Accomplish INRMP Annual Reviews.
• A Mechanism to Cultivate the Relationship with our
FWS and State Partners.
• A Mechanism to keep INRMPs Current.
• A Mechanism to Track INRMP Project
Accomplishment.
• A Mechanism to Monitor Habitat Conditions.
• A Mechanism to Monitor Endangered Species
Recovery Efforts.
https://clients.emainc.com/dcs/NR/NRorCR.asp