/sy alo tfle4nPY (ztn ed
Transcription
/sy alo tfle4nPY (ztn ed
t1 6 PABT TW O I HEO RI ES ANDI ECHNI O UES O FCO U N S E L I N G FROM A MULTICULTURAT PERSPECTIVE THERAPY fiV ADLERIAN to Multicultural Gontributions Counseling Adlerian theory addressed social equality issues and social embeddedness of humans long before multiculturalism assumed central importance in the profession (Watts & Pietrzak, 2000). Adler introduced notions with irnplications torvard multiculturalism that have as much or rnore relevance today as they did during Adler's time (Pedersen, as cited in Nystul, 1999b). Some of these ideas include ( 1) the importance of the cultural context, (2) the emphasis on health as opposed to pathology, (3) a holistic perspective on life, (4) the value of understanding individuals in terms of their core goals and purposes, (5) the ability to exercise fi-eedom within the context of societal constraints, and (6) the focus on prevention and the development of a proactive approach in dealing with problems. Adler's holistic perspective is an articulate expression of what Pedersen calls a "culture-centered" or multicultural approach to counseling. Although the Adlerian approach is called Individual Psychology, its focus is on the person in a social context. This approach is well suited to working with culturally diverse clients. Adlerian therapists encourage clients to define themsehres within their social environments. Adlerians allorv broad concepts of age, ethnicity, lifestyle, and gender differences to emerge in therapy. To their credit, Adlerians practice in flexibie ways from a theory that can be applied to w o rk w i th e th n i c a l l y d i verse cl i ent popul ati ons. Thc therapeuti c process is grounded withir-r a client's culture and worldvier,r, rather than attempting to fit clients into preconceived models. I n th e i r a n a l y s i s o f th e v a ri ous theoreti cal approaches to counsel i ng, Arciniega and Newlon (1999) state that Adlerian theor y holds the most promise for addressing rnulticultural issues. They note a nurnber of characteristics oI Adlerian theory that are congrlrent with the values of many rarcial, cr-rltural, and ethnic grollps, inch-rding the emphasis on nnderstanding the individual in a farnilial and sociocultural context; the role of social interest and contributing to others; ancl the focus on belonging and the collective spirit. Cr,rltures that stress the welfar:e of the social grollp zrr-rd enphasize the r:ole ol'the I'arr-rily will fi n d th e b a s i c a s s u mp ti o n s of A dl eri an psychol ogy to be consi stenl with their valrres. Adlerian therapists tend to focus on cooperation ar-rdsocially oriented vzrllres as opposed to compel.itive and individuaiistic values (Carlson & Carlson, 2000). Native American clients, for example, tend to value cooperation over competition. One such client told a story about a group oFboys who were in a race. When one boy got ahead of the others, he would slow down and allow the others to catch up, and they all made it to the finisl-rline at the same time. Although the coach tried to explain that the point of the race u'as for an individual to finish first, these boys were socialized to rvork together cooperatively as a group. Adlerian therapy is easily adaptable to cultural values that enrphasize community. R /sy alo tfle4nPY (ztn ed .1al s€1/ BEuYtoNZ Cn: BRoaKs €oL€, (]HAPTE H E R APY 5 R A D L E R ] ATN 117 Clienls who er-rtertherapy erle often locl<ed into rigicl \vrlys o[ perceiving, iriterpreting, and behaving. It is lil<ely thal they have not questior-redhow their things culture l.rasinfluer-rceclthen-r.Thus, they r-iray['eelresignecl to "the r,r,zry a re ." Mo z c l zi erz and hi s col l eagues (1984) characteri ze these cl ier - r t sas m yopic zrnd contend that one of the therapist's lirnctions is lo provicle them u,ith another p:rir of glzrssesthat urill er-rablethem to see things morL' clear-I1'.Thc' Adler.ian emphasis orr the subjective fashion ir-rr,vhich pcople view zrnd interpret their rvorld leacls to a respect for clients' uniqr-revalues ancl pelceptions. Adlerian counselors use interpretzrtions as an oppol-turnity {'or clients to rzier.rr things fi-om zrdiil'erent pc'rspc-ctivc,yet it is Lrp to the clients to decide rvhether to o p e n l h ei r eyes arrcll i se thesc gl asses.A cl l eri ans cl o not deci de f or client s r,vhatthcy shor"rldcl'reurgeor r.r,hzrt their goals shouicl be; r;rtlrer',they rvorl< coll ;i b o ra ti v c ly r.r,i ththci r cl i ents i n r,rrzrys tharI enzi bl e thenr to reac h t lr eir self d e h n e d g o al s. N o t. o r-rl yi s A cl l eri arr-i theory congrLl ent w i tl r the val ues of l nzr ny clr lt ur er l grolrps, but the approeicl'rolfers llcxibility in applying a rzurgcof cognitivc aincl z rc ti o n -o rientedtecl rni questo hel pi ng cl i ents expl ore thei r-practi czilplobler ns. Adlerian pmctitior-rers ale noI u,cclcledto i]l'ry particr-rliir set ol'proccclures. h'rstead, they are conscioLrsof the vzilue of fitting their techniclLlesto etrch client's situation. Altl-roug}rthey utilize a cliverse lelnge of n-iethocls, most of'then-r clcr c o n d u c t a l i festyl e el ssessment.Tl -ri s assessl l l ent i s heavi l y focu secl on t he u,ithir-r the client's l'amily. Beczruse of tlrc'ir-culturzrl strLrctLlreancl dynzrr.r-rics b a c k g ro l rn cl ,r11anycl i ents hzi vebeen condi ti oned to rcspect thei r I ': r m ily her i ta g e a n c l to appreci ate the i mpact o1' thei r tarl i l y on thei r ow n per sonal deveiopmenl-.1t is esser.rtjerl that counselors be scr-rsitiveto tlrc conflicting ieelir-rgs tlreir and struggles olt clients. Il'connselors cler-nonstl'atcalr understandir-rg ol' vah-res, it these cultur-al is likely that tl-reseclients wili be rcceptive to an explor-atior-rof thcir'lifestyle. Suclr an exploration rvill involvc ii det;rilecl cliscr-rssirirr o{ their" own place within their l'ar-r-rily. If "cr-rltr,rre" is clefined broadly (to ir-ich,rdeage, roles, liiestyle, arnclgencler' culttrlal clil'ferencescan be found erien rvithin a single [an'ril1,.lhs dilTerences), A d l e ri a n zrpproach empi rasi zes Lhe rrah-reof sr-rbi ecti vcl yunderst anding t hc unique u,orlcl of an inclividual. Cnlturc is onc significar-rtclir-nension|or grasping the subiective ar-rclexperiential perspectirzeof an inciividual. Culture inf'h-rences each person, br-rt it is expressed r,r,ithir-reacl'r individual ciifferer-rtly, according to the perception, evaluzrtion,and interpretation of culturre that the person holds. A d l e r:i a n counsel ors seel ( Lo be sensi Li ve to cr-rl l ural and gencier issues. Adler rvas one of the first psycholclgists at the turn of the century to advocerte equality lor won'ien. He recogniz-ed that nen and \von-len ra,eredifferent in many ways, but he felt that the two genders u,ere desenring of equal value ancl respect. Tl-risrespect err-rd appreciation for difference extcncls to culture as weil as gender. Adlerians find in difl'erer-rtcultures opportur-rities for viewing the self, others, and the rvorld ir-rmuitidin-rensional \ /ays. Indeed, the strengths of in another cultr-rre. one culture can often hclp correct the n-ristal<es 118 PARTTWO THEORIES ANDTECHNIOUES OFCOUNSETING Limitations forMulticultural Counseling As is true of most Western models, the Adlerian approach tends to focus on the self as the locus of change and responsibility. Because other cultures have different conceptions, this primary emphasis on changing the autonomous self may be problematic for many clients. Another limitation of Adlerian therapy invoives its detaiied explorations of one's early childhood, early memories, and dynamics within the family. Many clients who have pressing problems are likeiy to resent intrusions into areas of their lives that they may not see as connected to the struggles that bring them into therapy. In addition, rrrembers of some cultures may believe it is inappropriate to reveal family information. On this point Carlson and Carlson (2000) suggest that a therapist's sensitivity to and understanding of a ciient's culttrrally constmcted beliefs about disclosing family infonnation are criticai. If therapists are able to demonstrate an understanding of a client'.scultural values, it is likely that this client will be more open to the assessmenl-and treatment process. Although therapists have expertise ir-rthe problems of living, they are not experts in solving other people's problerns. Instead, they view it as their ftinction to teach people alternative n-rethodsof coping with life concerns. Howeve4 the culture of some clients may contribute to their viewing the counselor as the "expert" and expecting that the counselor will provide them with solut ions t o th e i r p ro b l e m s . F o r th e se cl i ents, the rol e of the A dl eri an therapi st may pose problems. If the Adlerian approach is practiced appropriately and competently, it is difficult to identify major lin-ritations fron-r a multicultural perspective. The phenomenological nature of the Adlerian approach lends itseif to r-rnderstanding the worldview of clients. The emphasis on the subjective fashion in which people view and interpret their world leads to a respect for clients' unique values and p e r-c e p ti o n s . it s h o u l d b e n o te d th a t Ad l e rians i nvesti gate cul ture i n much the same way that they erpproach birth order and lamily atmosphere. Culture is a vant age po i n t fro m u ,l ri c h l i fc i s e x p e ri enced and i nterpreted; i t i s al so a background of values, historyr,corrvictions, beliefs, customs, and expectations that must be adclresseciby tl-reindiviclual. Acllerians do not decide for clients what they should change or what their goals should be; rather, they work co<-lpclzrtively to enable clients to reach their self-defined goals. i.'.llijSUMMARY ANDEVALUATI0N Summary Adler was far ahead of his time, and most contemporary therapies have incorporated at least sone of his ideas. Individual Psychology assllmes that people are motivated by social factors; are responsible for their own thoughts, feelings, and actions; are the creators of their own lives, as opposed to being helpless CHAPTER 5 ADLEBIANTHEEAPY tt9 victims; and are impelled by pr"rrposesand goals, looking more towal'd the futu re th a n t o the past. T h e b a si c goal of the A dl eri an approach i s to hel p cl i ents ident if y and change their mistaken beliefs about, sel{, others, and li{'e and thus participate more ['r-rllyin a social world. Clients are not viewed as mentally sick br-rtarsdisc o u ra g e d . The therapeuti c process hel ps cl i ents become aw are o f t heir pat te rn s a n d make some basi c changes i n thei r styl e of l i vi ng, w hich lead t o changes in the way they feel and behave. The role of the f amily in the developm e n t o f the i ndi vi dr" rali s emphasi zed. Therapy i s a cooperati ve vent ur e and geared torvard challenging clients to trzrnslatetheir insights into action in the re a l rv o rl d . C ontemporary A dl eri an theory i s an i ntegrati ve approach, com b i n i n g c o g ni ti ve, constructi vi st, psychodynami c, ancl systems p er spect ives. S o m e o [' th ese common characteri sti cs i ncl ude an emphasi s on est ablishing a re s p e c tfu l cl i ent-therapi st rel ati onshi p, an emphasi s on cl i ents' st r engt hs and resorlrces,and an optimistic and future orientation. The Adlerian approach gives practitioners a great cleal of freeclom in working with clients. Ma.ior Adlerian contribr-rtions hilve been rnade in the l'ollowi n g z rre a s:el ementary educati on, consui tati on groLl ps w i th teaclr er s, par ent education grollps, marriage and farnily therapy, and gror-rpcounseling. Contributions of theAdlerian Approach A stlcngth ol'the Adlelian approach is its flexibility zrnd its integrative natlrre. Adlerian therapists czrnbe both theoretically integrative and technically eclectic (Watts & Shulmzrn,2003). This therapeutic approach allor.r'sfor the use of a variety of cognitive, behavioral, ancl experientizrl techniques. Acllerian therapists arreresourceful and flexible in drawing on many rnethods, which czrn be appliecl to a diverse range of clients ir-ra variety ol'settings and formats. Therapists are rnainly concerned about doing what is in the best interests of clients ra th e r th a n squeezi ng cl i ents i nto one theoreti cal framew ork (Wat t s, 1999, 2 0 0 0 ; Wa tts & P i etrzak, 2000; W atts & S hul man, 2003). Another contribr-rtion of Adlerian therapy is that the approach lends itself to shclrt-term tormats. Adler was a proponent of time-lirnited therapy, and the techniques used by marly contemporeuy brief therapeutic approaches are very similar to interwentions created by or commonly used by Adlerian practitione rs (W a tts , 1999,2000). A dl eri an therapy has a psychoeducati on al f ocus, a present- and futr-rre-orientation,is brief and time-limited, and combines cognitive a n d s y s te mi c perspecti ves (W atts & P i etrzak, 2000). B i tter and N icoll ( 2000) identify five characteristics that form the basis for an integrative framework in brief therapy: time limitation, tocus, counselor directiveness, symptoms as solutions, and the assignment of behavioral tasks. An advantage of bringing into the therapy process a time iimitation consists ol conveying to clients the expectation that change will occur in a short period of time. When the number of sessionsis specified, both client and therapist are motivated to stay focused on desired outcomes and to work as efficientlv as nossible. Bitter and Nicoll 120 PART TW O THEO RIAND ES TECHNI O UES O FCOU N S E L I N G \,vrite that because there is no assurance that a ftiture session rvill occur, brief therapists tend to ask thernselves this question: "If I had only one session to be useful in this person's life, what wouid I want to accomplish?" (p. 3B). The Adlerian concepts I draw on most in rny work rvith clients are (1) the importance of looking to one's life goals, including assessinghow these goals influence an individual; (2) the focus on the individual's interpretation of early experiences in the family, with special emphasis on their current impact; (3) the clinical use of early recollections; (4) the need to understand and confront basic mistakes; (5) the cognitive emphasis, which holds that emotions and behaviors are largely inflr-renced by one's beliefs and thinking processes; (6) the idea of working out an action plan designed to help clients make changes; (7) the collaborative relationship, rvhereby the client and therapist work toward m ut ual l y a g re e d -u p o n g o a l s ; a n d (8) the emphasi s gi ven to encouragement durir-rg the entire counseling process. Serreral Adlerian concepts I'rave implications for personal development. One of these notions that has helped me to understand the direction of my life is the assumption that feelings of inferiority are linked to a striving lor superiority (Corey, as cited in Nystul, 1999a). It is difficult to overestimate the contributions of Adler to contemporary therapeutic practice. Many of his ideas were revolutionary and far ahead of his tinre. His influence went beyond counseling individuals, extending into the community mental health movement (Ansbacher, 1974). Abre'rham Maslow, Viktor Frankl, Rollo May, and Albert Ellis have all acknorvledged their debt to Adler: Both Frankl and May see him as a forerunner of the exister-rtialmovem ent b e c a u s e o f h i s p o s i ti o n th a t human bei ngs are free to choose and are entirely r:esponsible for what they make ol themselves. This view also makes hinr a forerunner of the subiective approach to psychology, which focuses on the internal determinants of behavior: r,alues, beliefs, attitr-rdes,goals, interes t s , pe rs o n a l m e a n i n g s , s u b j e c ti ve percepti ons of real i ty, and stri vi ngs tor.r,ardself-realization. I n m y o p i n i o n , o n e o l A d l e r' s most i mportant contri buti ons i s hi s i nfl uence on other therapy systems. Many of his basic ideas have founcl their ra,ay into other psychological schools, such as fan-rilysysten-)sappr:oaches,Gestalt therapy, learning theory, r:eality therapy, rational emotive behavior therapy, cognitive therapy, person-centered therapy, existential therapy, and the postmodern approaches to therarpy.All of these approaches are based on a similar concept of the person as purposive, self-deternining, and striving for growth. In many respects, Adler seems to have paved the way for current developments in both the cognitive and contructivist therapies (Watts, 2003). Adlerians ' ba s i c p re m i s e i s th a t i f c l i e n t s can change thei r thi nki ng then they can change their feelings and behavior'. A str-rdyof contemporary collnseling theories reveals that many of Adlers notions have reappeared ir-rthese moclern appr oac he s w i th d i ffe re n t n o me n c l ature, and often rvi thout gi vi ng A dl er the credit that is due to l-rirn(Watts , 1999; Watts & Pietrzak, 2000; Watts & Shulrnan, 2003). It is clear that there are significant linkages of Acllerian theory rvith most of the preser-rt-daytheories. CHAPTER 5 ADLEBIANTHERAPY 121 [imitations of theAdlerian Approach andCriticisms Adler had to choose between devoting his tin-re [o forn-ralizing his theory and t-eachir-rg others the basic concepts of Individual Psychology. He placed practicing and teaching before or:ganizing arndpresenting a u,ell-defined and syste ma ti c theory. Thus, hi s rvri tten presentati ons are often di ffi cr "r ltt o f oilow, r-nanyof them coming fi orn transcripts of lectures he gave. h'ritially, many people considered his icleassomewhat loose and too simplistic. R c s e a rch supporti ng the effecti veness of A dl eri an theory i s lim it ecl but l rz rsi n rp ro ved over the l ast 25 years (W atts & S hul r-nan,2003). Howevcr , a large part of the theory still requrilcs en-rpiricaltesting zrnd comparative ar-ialysis. This is especially true in tl-reconceptual erreasthat Adlerians accept as axiomatic: fol exarnplc, the clevelopment of lif'estyle; the r-rnityof the personality anci an zicceptanceof' a singular vier,r,of self; the rejection o{ the prominence ol'her-cclit.yin clctermining behzrvior,especizillypathological bel-r:ivior;ancl the r-rsefulnessof the multiple intenrentions used by varior-rsAdleri:rns. A c l l e ri an thcory i s of l i mi ted use for cl i ents seeki ng i mmecl i at e solnt ions to th e i r p robi ems and f< ,rrcl i ents rvho have l i ttl e i nterest i n explor - ing eeir ly chilcilroocl expeliences, ezrrly memories, and clrezrms.This approach also has l i mi te c l e f f ecti venessrvi th cl i ents w ho do not understand the pl lr pose ol'exploring thc cletzrilsoi a li{estyle zrnerlysis when dealing with life'.scurrent problcrns (Arciniega & Newlon, 1999). ' ii, r lj WHEFF TOGOFROM HERE If yor-rare trsing the CD-ROM lor Integrative Coun.sellrzg; Session 6 ("Cognitive Focus in Counseiing") ilh-rstratesRuth's striving to live Llp to expectations and mL'asure r-rpto perfectionist starndarcls.ln rhis particr-rlar therapy session rvith Rr-rth,you r.r,illsee lrou, I drara, upon cognitive concepts ernd apply tl'rem in p ra c ti c e . If yor,rfir-rdthat your thinking is allied rvith the Adlerian approach, you n-right consicler seeking training in h-rdiviciualPsychology or becon-ringa member of tl-reNorth Americern Society ol Adlerian Psychology (NASAP). To obtain ir-rformation on NASAP and a list of Adlerian organizations and institr"rtes,contact: North American Society of Adlerian Psychology (NASAP) 50 Northeast Drirze Hershey, PA 17033 Telephone: (7 17) 579 -8795 F a x : (7 17) 533-8616 Er-nail: [email protected] Web si te : r,r,u'r,v. ai fredadler. org The society publishes a ne\ /sletler and a quarterly journal and maintains a list of institutes, training programs, and workshops in Adlerian psychology. The JottrncLlof'Individual Psycholog, presents current scholarly and professional r22 PART TW O THEO BI AND ES TECHNI O UES O FCO U N S E L I N G research. Columns on counseling,education, and parent and family education are regular features.Information about subscriptions is available by contacting the society. If you are interested in pursuing training, postgraduatestudy, continuing education, or a degree,contact NASAP for a list of Adlerian organizations and institutes. A few training institutes are listed here: Adler School of Professional Psychology 65 East WackerPlace,Suite 2100 Chicago, IL 60601-7298 Telephone:(312)201-5900 Fax: (312) 201-5917 Email : [email protected] Web site: www.adler.edu Adlerian Training Institute Dr. Bill Nicoll. Coordinator P. O. Box 276358 Boca Raton, FL 33427-6358 Telephone:(954) 757-2845 The Alfred Adler Institutes of San Francisco and Northwestern Washington The Alfred Adler Institute of Northwestern Washington 3320 SussexDrive Bellingham, WA 98226 (360)935-1661 Telephone: Email: [email protected] Web site: http://ourworld.compuserv.com/homepages/hstein/ The Alfred Adler Institute of Quebec 4947 GrosvenorAvenue Montreal, QC H3W 2M2 CANADA Telephone:(514)73I -5675 Fax; (514)731-9242 Email: [email protected] Web site: wrvw.total.net/-aaiq/index.html The International Committee for Adlerian Summer Schools and Institutes Betty Haeussler 9212 Morley Road Lanham, MD 20706 Telephone:(3Ol) 577-8243 Fax: (301)595-0669 Email: [email protected] Web site:www.icassi.ors C H A P TE 5B A D LE R IA N TH E R AP Y 123 InfoTrac College Edition Resources AdlerianTherapy The following key u,ords are listed in such a \vay as to enable the InioTrac College Edition search engine to locate a wicler range of articles in the online library. The key r.l,ordsshould be entered exactly as shorvn, to inc h -rd ea s tcri sks," W 1," and " A N D ." Al l l -e c l A dl er AcllerAND supcliority Ir-rlrcriolity conrpiex pet'iority conrplex Sr-r Phenonrenol<>gical AND psychol" F a r.n i l W y I constel l ati on B i rth W l ol cl er Recommended Supplementary Readings Adlerian, Cogrtitive,autl Conslnrctittist Therapie.s:Au IntegrcLliveDialo5te (Watts, 2003) acl<ntlrvleciges tlte irrtportztntcontt'ibr-rtior-rs ol'Alh-cclAcller ar-rclilluslrates the man-y r . r ' z t vAc s l l c r i a n i c l e a s I 'r a v ei n f l t r e n c c c i l h e d e v e l o p n r c n t o l 'l h c c o s n i ti ve a r r cl co r - r s t luc t iv i s t t h e r a p i e s . Printer ol Atllerirut Psyclnlogl, (Mosak & Maniacci, 1999) offers zrn erccessibleintrrrclr-rctiorr [o the basic tcnets of Indiviclual Psycl-rologyge:rrecltor.r,arclrcaclers r.r,hoa;c not l'amiliar r.r'i1hAcller's r,r,ork. Adleriun Counseling:A Practitioner'sAl4tnnch (Sweer-rcy,1998) is thc most comprchclsive sottt'ce on Adlerian cout-rseling.It includes Acller's life iinc[ r.r,orl<, an cxplanzrtiotr o['n-ran.ykey Acllerian corlcepts, and an over'\,iervof the counseling ploccss :rs it is zrpplied to irrdivicluals,colrples, Ihnrilies, and groups. 'fechniqtte.sin Aclleriun Psvcholog.v(Callson & Slavik, 1997) is an cclited rrolun.rc:coLrtainir-rglcchniqtres l'or indiviclual tl'rerapy u'ith zrclr-rlts, child cor-rnseling,ancl couplcs ar-rdI;rmilies cotrnselir-rg. Understanding Lifb-Stt,le: The Psycho-Claritt' Procec< (Pou,ers & Grif Iith, 1987) is a trscfr-tlsor-rr-ce ol inl'on-nation iol doing a lifestyle :issessnlent. Separ-atecl-raptcls cleal urith interview tecl"rniqttes,lifestyle zrssessment,early recollections, the fan-rily cor-rstellation, and methocls of summarizing ancl ir-rterpretinginlbrmation. References andSuggested Readings ADLER, A. (1958). I4thatlile sltoultl tnean to yozr. Ner,r,York: Capricorn. (Original r.i,orl< pLr blis h e d1 9 3 I ) ADLER, A. (1959). UnderstttndinglutntcLnnatltre. New York: Prenrier Books. ADLER, A. (1964). Social interesr. A clnllenge to ntcutlcind. Ner.v York: Capricorn. (Original rl,ork pubiished 1938) t2 4 T W O T H E O BAN IESDT E C H N IOU OFES C O U N S E TIN G P A RT discipline.Circle Pines,MN: American Gr-riclance Service. ALBERT,L. (1996).Cooperative AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICASSOCIATION.(2000).Diagnosticand statisticalntanual of'ntental disorders,text revision, (4th ed.), (DSM-IV-TR).Washington,DC: Author. ANSBACHER, H. L. (1974).Goal-orientedindividual psychology:Aifr"edAdler's theory. (pO. 99-1,42).Neu' York: In A. Burton (Ed.), Operationaltheoriesof-personcLlity Brr:nner/Mazel. "ANSBACHER,H. L. (1979).The increasingrecognitionof Adler.In. H. L. Ansbacher & R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.), Sttperiorityantl social interest.Alfretl Adler,A collection of lds later t'vritings(3rd rev. ed., pp. 3-20). New York: Nortor-r. '*ANSBACHER,H. L. (1992). Alfr"edAdler's conceptsof community feeling and social interest and the relevanceof community feeling for old age.Individual Psyclrclog;7,, 48,4 ),4 0 2 -4 1 2 . ps-tchotogy "ANSBACHER,H. L,, & ANSBACHER,R. R. (Eds.).(1964).The indivicLual ofAffred Adler.New York: Harper & Row/Torchbooks.(Original u'ork published 19s6) soci al , " A NS B A C H ER ,H . L ., & AN SB AC H E R ,R . R . (E ds.).(1979).S uperi ori tl and it,tterest.Alfi"eclAdler,A c'ollectiortof ltis later writings (3rd rev. ed.). New York: Norton. ARCINIEGA, G. M., & NEWLON, B. J. (1999).Counselingand psychotherapy:Multicnltnral considerations.In D. Capuzzi& D. F. Gross(Eds.),Cotmselingand psychotlrcralty:Theoriesand interventions(2nd ed.,pp. 435-458).Upper SaddleRiver, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice-Hall. ' . B iT T ER ,J . R ., C H R IST E N S EN ,O. C ., H A W E S ,C ., & N IC OLL, W . G. (1998).A cl l eriarr brief therapy rvith indivicluals,couples,and families.Directionsin Clinica.l anrl CoutselingPsysllolog"r, 8(8), 95-111. " B I T T E R , J . R ., & N IC O L L , W. G. (2 000).A dl er" i anbri ef tl .rerapyu' i th i ndi vi dr-ral s: Processanctpractice. Jo u ntal of'I ndivi dttal Psycl'Lo Logj, 56(l), 3 1-4 4. "CARLSON,J. M., & CARLSON,J. D. (2000).The appiicationof Adlerianpsychotherapy with Asian-Americanclients.Jottrnalol IncliviclualPsycholo1y, 56(2),214-225. (Eds.). (1997). psycltologl,. Blistol, J., & SLAVIK, S. Techniqtres in Adlerian "CARLSON, PA:AcceleratedDevelopment. to the practiceof group counse.ling: A per"COREY G. (1999).Aclleriancontribr-rtions sorralperspecttve.JoLLn'Lal of Individuttl Psvchologl,, 55(1), 4-14. CO RE Y G. (2 0 0 3 ).A d l e ri a n fo u n d a ti onsof group counsel i ng.D i recti onsi n Mental HeaLthCoutseling,I 5(2), 13-25. (6th ed.).PacificGrove,CA: COREY,G. (2004).Theoryand practiceof'groupcottnseLing Brooks/Cole. '*COREY,G. (Ed.). (2005). CaseapprocLclt to cottnselinS4 cutdpsycltotherupy(6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. "-Books and zrrticles marked r,r,ithan asterisk ale suggested for furtl-rer study. C H A P TE5B A D LE B IA N TH E R A P Y 125 DINKMEYER, D. C., DINKMEYER, D. C., JR., & SPERRY L. (1987). Adlerian counseling and psychotlrcrapJ,(2ncl ed.). Colunrbus, OH: Merrill. DI NKM EYE R , D . , M C K A Y , G . , D I N K M E Y E R , J R , , D . , & M C K A Y I . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . STEP: T'ltepurenl hanclbook. Circle Pir.res,MN: Arnericarr Guidance Ser-vice. DINKMEYER, D., JR., & SPERRY, L. (2002). Counselittp, and psyg/1117lterap\,' Art integratetl Individttal Psyc1161ot,altproaclt (3rcl ed.). Upper Sacldlc Rir,er, NJ: Merril I / Pr"cntice-Ha11. "DI SQ UE, J . G . , & B I T T E R , J . R . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . I n t e g r a t i n g n a l l a l i v e t l . r e r a p yr vi th Ad l e r - i a n li{'estyleassessrrent:A case stucly.Jountal ol Indivicluul Psychologt,,54(4),431-450. s l A c l l e r i a n l , t s t c l t o L o e t C l . r i c a g o :Al fr e d Acl l e r ' ! DREI KUR S , I f . ( 1 9 5 3 ) . l 'u n c l a n t e n l c t l . o I ns t it u l e . "DREIKURS, R. (1967). Psyclutdynanics, psvcltcttherapy,and cotrttseling. Collected papers. Chicago: Alh'ccl Acller h.rstitr-rte of Chicago. (2ncI ed.). Ner,, Yor-l<:Halper'& Rorv. DREII(URS, R. (i968). Pstcltolctla,in the clcLs.sroont DREI KURS , R . ( i 9 6 9 ) . G r o r - r pp s y c h o t l r e r a p y f t 'o n - rt l 'r ep o i n t o f v i e r v o l ' Ad l e r "i a n p syclrolog-y.Irr H. M. Rr-ritenbecl<(EcI.), Group tlterapv toclay: Style.s,ntetlu;tls, atttl tecltniclues(pp. 37-a8). Nerv Yorl<:Alclinc-Atherlon. (Original r,r,orhpublished 1957) "DREIKURS, R. (1971). Social ecluality:Tlrc challengeol toclat,.Chicago: Regnery. 'fDREtKURS, R. (1997). Holistic meclicine. InrLivitlual PsyclnbE),, 53(2), 127 205. DI { EI KURS , R . , & M O S A K , H . H . ( 1 9 6 6 ) . 'l 'l r e t a s k s o [ 'l i i c : ] . A c l l e r 's t h r e e tzr sl <s.'fl l c I n d it,itltral Psyclrcktgist, 4, 18-22. DREI KURS , R . , & M O S A K , H . H . ( 1 9 6 7 ) . T h e t a s k s o [ 'l i l 'e : I l . T h c I b r - r r thta sk. Tl te h r rlit,iclual Psycltologist, 4, 5l-55. GRIFFITH, J., & POWEI1S, R. L. (1984). An Acllerian lexicon. Chicago: Anrericas Lrstitute ol' Acllerian Sttrdies. HAW ES, E. C . ( 1 9 9 3 ) . M a r r i a g e c o u n s e l i n g a n d e n r i c l r n e n t . I n O . C . C h r i ste n se r - (r Ed .) , Arllerian larttilt, counseLing(Rev. ed., pp. 12-5-163).Mir-rr-rczrpolis, MN: Educzrtional Meclia Corp. HAW ES, C. , & B L A N C H A R D , L . M . ( 1 9 9 3 ) . L i {e t a s k s a s z u r a s s e s s m e n t l e ch n i q u e i n nr:rr-itzrl cotrnseling. Individttal Pst,chology,49, 306-3 |7. KEFIR, N. (198 1). lr'np:rsse/prioritytherapy. In R. J. Corsini (F,d.), Handboolt of'innovative psyclntlterapies (pp. 401-4 I 5). Nei,r,Yoll<: Wiley. "MANASTER, G. J., & CORSINI, R. J. (1982). Inclividual pstcltolog,y.'I'lteorvartd pracllce. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacocl<. MOSAK, H. H. (1977). On purltr>se.Clricago: Alfrecl Acller Institrrte. MOSAK, H. H. (2000). Adlerian psychotl.rerapy.In R. J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Ecis.), Cut'errt psyclrllrrrn,tles (6th ed., pp. 54-98). ltasca, 1L: F. E. Peacocl<. MOSAK, H. FI., & DREIKURS, R. (1967). The iife taisks:III. The fifth life tasl<.The Inrliv irlual Psrchctlogist, 5, 16-22. M O SAK, H. l {. , & M A N I A C C I , M . P . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . T a c t i c s i n c o t u t s e t i n B a n t l p sycl to tl te r ttp l ,. Itasczr,IL: F. E. Pezrcocl<. "MOSAK, H. H., & MANIACCI, M. P. (1999). Printer of-Atllertun psvcltologt. Nerv York: Brunner/Routledge (Ta1,lor & Francis Group). 126 PART TW O THEO RIAND ES TECHNI O UES O FCO U N S E {, I N G MOSAK, H. H., & SHULA4AN, B. H. (1988). Lilbstyle inventor). Muncie, IN: Accelerate c l Dev c lopm er r t . MOZDZ I ERZ, G . J . , LI SI ECKI , J . , B I T T E R , J . R . , & WI L L I A M S , A . L . ( 1 9 8 4 ) . Role-fnrrctions for Aclierian ther:apists. htdiviclual Psychology, 42(2), 154-177. NYSTUL , M . S. ( 1999a) . An int enie r v Psycholoe)', 55(1 ), 15-25. rtith Gerald Corey. Jountal of Individual NYSTUL, M . S. ( 1999b) . An int enier v w i t h P a u l P e d e r s e n . J o u r n a l o f I n d i v i d u a l Psyclt ololt, 5 5 (2), 21 6-224. POPKIN, M. ( I 993). Active parenting toclay.Atlanta, GA: Active Parenting, '"POWERS, R. L., & GRIFFITH, J. (1987). Understanding lifb-style. The psycho-claritlt proce.ss.Chicago: Ar.nelicaslnstitute of Adlerian Stndies. "POWERS, R. L., & GRIFFITH, J. (1995). IPCVr: The individual psrclrclogy client utorkbook with supplentents. Chicago: Ar.nericasInstittrte of Adlerian Studies. (Original u'orlt publishecl 1986) SCFIUL. TZ, D. , c t SCHULTZ, S. E. ( 2 0 0 1 ) . T h e o r i e s o l p e r s o n a l i t l l ( 7 t h e d . ) . P a c i f i c Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. "SHERMAN, R., & DINKMEYER, D. (1987). S),slerrsof'laniht therapy.An Adlerian inLegrct t ior't. Nerv Yorl<: Brunner/Mazel. "SHULMAN, B. FI., & MOSAK, H. H. (l9BB). McLntnlfbr lilb style assessntenf.Muncie, TN: AcceierzrteclDevelopntent. "SONST EG ARD, M . A. ( 1998a) . A r at i o n z i l e f o r g l o u p c o u n s e l i n g . J o t L r n r Lol f 'I n c l i v i c l ttaI Psvcholoet',54(2), 164-175. "SONSTEG ARD, M . A. ( 1998b) . ' lihe t h e o r l a n c l p r a c t i c e o f A d l e r i a n g r o u p c o u n s e l i n g ancl lrsvclrotherapy. J o unt al of l n tliv irlu al Psych ol oBy, 5 4(2), 2 17-250. ,.SONSTEG ARD, M . A. , BI TTER, J . R. , P E , L O N I S - P E N E R O S , P . P . , & N I C O L L , W. G . (20 0 1) . Ac llc lian gr ot r p ps y c hot l' r e r a p y : A b r i e l ' t h e r a p v a p p r <. r : r c hD . irectiorts in Clittic:aLantl Cot-mselingPstcltology, I l(2), l1-12. '"SPERRY, L., & CARLSON, J. (1996). P.sycllo,tr,rltolog,y and psvcltotherapy. Front DSAtI-tVdiu]rtr.tsisto lrao.tnlenf. Washington, DC: AccelerertedDcvcloprnent. "SWEIINEY, T. . f . ( 1998) . Adler ian c o t . t n s e l i n g :A p r a c t i t i o n e r 's a l t p r o a c h ( 4 t h e c l . ) . Philaclelplria, PA: AccelerateclDevelopment (Taylor'& Francis Glor-rp). VAIIIINGER, Il . ( 1965). 'l"hephilcssop14,qr1"nt if. " London: Ror-rtledge& Kegarn Paul. 'tWATTS, R. E. ( 1999) . Tlr e v is ion of Ac l l e r ':A n i n t l o d u c t i o n . I n R . E . Wa t t s , & J . C a r l solr (Ecls.),Inlenterttiorts anr.lslralegiesin cotrnselingrutd psychotlrcrc4tt,(pp. 1-13). Philaclelphia, PA: AccelerateclDevelopment (Taylor:& Friit'rcisGroup). , i l ] e n n i r . r m : l s I r . r c l i v i c l u aP l sychologystill "WATTS , R. E. ( 2000) . lJ r r t er ing I hc n e r . r m relerrernt?J o urttrLLof' I n dir id u a I Psygh.logy, 5 6(l ), 2 l-30. WATTS, R. E. (2003). Acllerinn, cogrtitive, antl con.slructittisl therapies: An integrcLtirte diuktgt.te. Ne rv Yor-k: Springer. ilit,:,r;. irtl$i!, ,i , .'. THEBAPY CHAPTER 5 ADTERIAN 127 'kWATTS,R. E., & CARLSON,J. (Eds.). (1999).Intententions and strategiesin counseling and psycltotherapy.Philadelphia,PA:AcceleratedDevelopment (Taylor & Francis Group). WATTS,R. E., & HOLDEN, J. M. (1994). Why continue to use "fictional finalism?" 50, 1,61-i,63. Individual Psycl'Lology, *WATTS,R. E., & PIETRZAK, D. (2000).Adlerian "encouragement"and the therapeutic processof solution-focusedbrief therapy.Jountal of'Counselingand Developlnet1t, 78(4),442-447. R. E., & SHULMAN, B. H. (2003).Integrating Adlerian and constructive ther'TWATTS, apies: An Adlerian perspective.In R. E. Watts (Ed.), Adlerian, cognitive, and constructivisttherapies:An integrativedialogue(pp. 9*37). New York: Springer.