Lysbilde 1 - Husbanken

Can a musician say: ”Some days I play correctly, and some days I play beautifully”?
[Mårten Belin, Sydsvenskan.se, 28.01.2008. Translated from Swedish]
Conceptual design of a carbon neutral kindergarten in Brøset, Trondheim
An interdisciplinary student design competition @ NTNU and Chalmers
Week
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
2
3
Start
4
5
6
7
8
design studio
vernacular architecture as textbook (HH)
+ solar geometry (ØA)
Project 1
energy basics (VN) + klimatilpasning bolig
(IA)
design studio
design studio
Review Project 1
design studio
design studio
design studio
Start
Project 2
Lectures
concrete & wood
(FH)
Review project 2
Start
passive energy design (BW) + Calculation ex.
guest lecture Finn Rasmussen
guest lecture Europan Switzerland
design studio
light & air, heating & cooling (TK) + Calc. ex.
(IS + AG)
design studio
design studio
solar energy projects (PM)
Course info (AW)
renewable energy sources (TK)
ENERGY
Review project 3 (Jan Støring)
Design Studio guidance (TK) +guest
lecture Ly arkitekter
public evaluation thesis projects (diplomgjennomgåelser)
12
Easter holiday
13
project study
Sparebank 1
project example + co-operation with
engineers
consultants
MSN
Agraff +
seminar arch + eng:
discussion of examples, interdisciplinary
project work
competition start, programme & info
site visit & project visit
+ evening party
design studio
Design Studio
design studio
design studio
Design Studio
project study
house at Bakklandet
August Schmidt
design studio
+ guest lecture Open City
Design Studio
Project lecture
HSØ + Stavne Gård
Gjenbrukshuset / House with salvaged
materials
design studio
Submission
design studio
Design Studio
Conference (Passivhus Norden 2008)
15
16
17
18
MATERIALS
guest lecture Ecosistema Urbano
design studio
10
14
guest lecture Petter Bergerud
daylighting (AW)
Project 3
project example + co-operation with
engineers
Hanne Jonassen:
lecture
guest
+workshop
workshop & guest lecture Matthias Schuler
+ lecture Haga Grov
design studio
guest lecture Brian MacKay
design studio + guest lecture Lucien Kroll
project study Jan Støren: selection of
projects
design studio
DESIGN PROJECT
20
design studio
Design Studio
Excursion Göteborg, public evaluation of projects by Jury, and prize cerermony. Project visits: Alingsås passivkindergarten, Ekocentrum, …
21
design studio
Design Studio
design studio
Evaluation AAR4610:
presentation of project 5
individual
+ how it was
affected by projects 1-4
23
Exam AAR4915 (written)
COMPETITION
design studio
19
22
SITE
guest lecture April Arkitekter
guest lecture Basurama
design studio
design studio
vann er landskapets logikk (Rainer Stange)
building materials (ASN)
9
11
Friday
Start
AGH = Anne Grete Hestnes
PM = Per Monsen
RR = Reidunn Rustad
AW = Annemie Wyckmans
KF = Klaudia Farkas
IG = Igor Sartori
AG = Arild Gustavsen
TK = Tommy Kleiven
project study
HUS + Sintef
Transformation of Borgen school
submission
HH = Harald Høyem
ØA = Øyvind Aschehoug
RS = Rainer Stange
VN = Voja Novakovic
IA = Inger Andresen
FH = Finn Hakonsen
ASN = Anne Sigrid Nordby
BW = Bjørn Wachtenfeldt
EXAM
//The Project
The Competition Layout
The competition is organised as a closed student project competition. The participants
are interdisciplinary teams of students from NTNU and Chalmers enrolled in the following
courses:
•AAR4610. “Energy and Resource Efficient Architectural Design” at NTNU, Faculty of
Architecture and Fine Art
•TEP4245. “Climate Engineering” at NTNU, Faculty of Engineering Science and
Technology
•AUT101. “Resource Efficient Building for the Future” at Chalmers, Architecture A4,
Design Studio in the Master Programme “Design for sustainable development”
The teachers from NTNU (Anne Grete Hestnes, Per Monsen, Per Olaf Tjelflaat, Klaudia
Farkas and Annemie Wyckmans) and from Chalmers (Michael Edén, Jan Gustén, Angela
Sasic Kalagasidis and Barbara Rubino) do not participate in the assessment of the
competition entries.
The Competition Challenge
The specific topic of the competition in 2008 is to develop an attractive concept for a
carbon neutral kindergarten in Brøset, Trondheim. Attractiveness, in this context, is
related to three main issues:
•the concept’s ability to integrate environmental issues in architecture
•adaptation to the local climate and site
•zoning of functions according to usability and indoor climate
The overall goal for this competition is to raise awareness regarding resource
efficiency measures among architects and engineers, and the necessity of
interdisciplinary co-operation among these two groups from the early stages of design
on.
The Competition Prizes
The competition receives funding from the Norwegian State Housing Bank
(Husbanken) and Hans Eek architects for common excursions and prize money.
There are separate prizes for the Norwegian and Swedish groups.
The prize money is provided by the Norwegian State Housing Bank, offering 30
000 NOK to the winning Norwegian teams, and Hans Eek architects,
correspondingly offering 45 000 SEK to the Swedish prize winners.
The prize money is distributed among at least three Norwegian and three Swedish
groups.
The Competition Site
Brøset in Trondheim is currently being regulated as a
settlement striving for carbon neutrality, with housing,
school and kindergarten, and some small-scale businesses.
A temporary kindergarten has been built on the site out of
prefabricated modules. These modules will be moved in a
few years to make room for a permanent kindergarten.
//Prelude:
Chalmers visits NTNU in Trondheim
//The final hour:
NTNU visits Chalmers in Gothenburg
//The Competition Results
The jury (from right to left):
Espen Dahl, civil architect MNAL, GASA architects AS, Oslo
Gunilla Murnieks, Wingårdhs arkitektkontor AB, Göteborg
Ida Bryn, engineering consultant, Erichsen & Horgen AS, Oslo
Maria Olsson, engineering consultant, WSP Environmental, Göteborg (not on the picture)
On the far left, Michael Edén, responsible course teacher for the Swedish students
//1st prize:
Living boundary
Architects:
Eliodoro Bigi
Solveig Debrock
Gianmaria Socci
Engineer:
Mikael Forsberg
//1st prize Living boundary
For an intelligent approach to
the site and a clever use of a
concept based on decided
climate zones. The project
creates spatial qualities, both
outdoors and indoors with small
and consequent means. It is
skilfully designed and fulfils all
topics given in the programme.
//2nd prize:
Architects:
Ane Elise Alsgaard
Tore Hillestad
Andreas Brock
Flex it : Play it
Engineer:
Inger H. Halvorsen
//2nd prize : Flex it – play it
For a consistent and thoroughly carried out
project that fulfils all topics in the given
programme. The project integrates
environmental issues into an architectural
concept, is well adapted to the site and local
climate conditions and has an elegant plan that
provides both identity and flexibility.
//3rd prize:
Growing through playfulness
Architects:
Monica Aquati
Ann Bergström
Sepideh Karami
Pierre Tignon
Engineer:
Anders Rimbäck
//3rd prize Growing through playfulness
For an inspiring concept showing great empathy, and
for a convincing vision of a beautiful building. The
project is well adapted to the site and the local climate,
and the plan shows a useful building. The integration of
environmental issues still needs to be developed, but
the concept is robust and has a large potential.
//Shared 4th prize: Evergreen
Architects:
Agnete Syrtveit
Fredrikke Finne Seip
Geir Magne Lied
Engineer:
Ole Aksel Syvertsen
Anne Kristine Amble
//Shared 4th prize “Evergreen”
For a clever fulfilment of a concept based on a building with two
climate zones. The topics in the competition programme can be
fulfilled after small alterations in the building and the technical
investigations.
//Shared 4th prize:
Klatrefjell
Architects:
Ylva Offerman
Maja Ivarsson
Caroline Valen
Linnea Hedlund
Engineer:
Farshid Zamiri Akhlagi
//Shared 4th prize Klatrefjell
For a robust concept concerning usefulness and a well balanced cooperation between architects
and engineers. The topics in the programme are fulfilled. There is unclearness whether the ramp
is an important part of the concept or an optional detail. It is emphasized on the site plan and
only hinted on the facades, which shows an
uncertainty in the approach that needs to be
developed.
//5th prize: Cloverfield
Architects:
Håkon Hasslan
Hanne Helgesen
Kjersti Moen Fagerheim
Engineer:
Sofi Bäcklund
Silje Eik Kalve
//5th prize “Cloverfield”
For a demonstration that a compact
building can give architectural and
spatial qualities in a kindergarten.
The project is well adapted to the
site and local climate and, gives a
high degree of usefulness but lacks
a balance between architectural and
technical qualities.