3-D Flash Cost Comparisons

Transcription

3-D Flash Cost Comparisons
3-D Flash Cost Comparisons
Andrew J. Walker
Schiltron Corporation 2013
What is the Cheapest 3-D Flash Approach ?
• Candidates compared
– Vertical Channel NAND (TCAT, BiCS)
– Vertical Gate NAND (VG-NAND)
– Schiltron Dual-Gate TFT SONOS
• Conventional wisdom
– Reduce the number of photolithographic steps to
minimize total cost
• Is this correct?
• Does this lead to the lowest total cost?
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel
NAND
VG NAND
Schiltron
Hole and Slit with
vertical channel
conduction
Perpendicular gate and
channel slits with
horizontal conduction
Perpendicular gate and
channel in a dual-gate
architecture with
horizontal conduction
Lithography-light
Lithography-light
Lithography-intensive
Deposition and Deep
Etch Intensive
Deposition and Deep
Etch Intensive
Deposition and etch per
layer similar to 2D
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel NAND
Channels
Wordlines
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel NAND – Section parallel to wordlines
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel NAND – Section perpendicular to wordlines
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel NAND – Plan view
Schiltron Corporation 2013
VG NAND
Wordlines
Channels
Schiltron Corporation 2013
VG NAND – Section perpendicular to channels
PX
θxo
F
minWX
Schiltron Corporation 2013
TONO
VG NAND – Section perpendicular to wordlines
θyo
PY
F
Wg
Ws
minWY
Schiltron Corporation 2013
VG NAND – Plan view
Py
PX
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Schiltron
Top Gate Wordlines
Bottom Gate
Wordlines
Channels
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Schiltron – Section perpendicular to channels
PX
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Schiltron – Section perpendicular to wordlines
PY
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Schiltron – Plan view
Py
Px
Schiltron Corporation 2013
256 Gbit Die Cost Comparison*
Vertical Channel
NAND
256 Gbit Die Cost ($)
VG NAND
Vertical Channel
NAND
Schiltron
VG NAND
Schiltron
Number of Device Layers
Schiltron Corporation 2013
* Cost analysis submitted for publication
Cost Model Parameters
Vertical Channel NAND
VG NAND
RB
Lg
Lspace
Θ
Tono
F
DB
Array Efficiency
Ncrit (total)
C0
Ccrit per critical layer
Wafer Diam.
Wg
Wspace
Θx
Θy
Tono
F
minWx
minWy
Cell Overhead
Array Efficiency
Ncrit (total)
C0
Ccrit per critical layer
Wafer Diam.
10 nm
25 nm
25 nm
1 deg
20 nm
25 nm
20 nm
80 %
2
$2800
$200
300 mm
Schiltron
25 nm
25 nm
4 deg
0 deg
20 nm
25 nm
80 nm
35 nm
0%
80 %
2
$2800
$200
300 mm
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Lg
Lspace
W
Wspace
Cell Overhead
Array Efficiency
Ncrit/Layer
C0
Ccrit per critical layer
Wafer Diam.
25 nm
25 nm
25 nm
25 nm
10 %
80 %
3
$2800
$200
300 mm
Cost Model Assumptions and Simplifications
• Yield effects not taken into account
• Control block circuitry residing in the bulk silicon assumed to be similar for
all approaches and described by the same array efficiency factor
• Single level cells
• Control block circuitry does not grow as more layers are stacked
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel NAND – Effect of Taper Angles on 256 Gbit Die Cost
Cost Model Parameters
RB
Lg
Ls
Array Eff.
Tono
F
DB
Ncrit (total)
C0
Ccrit
Wafer Diam.
Schiltron Corporation 2013
10 nm
30 nm
30 nm
80 %
20 nm
40 nm
20 nm
2
$2800
$200
300 mm
Vertical Channel NAND – Effect of Taper Angles on 256 Gbit Die Cost
Rotating 3-D Graph
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Vertical Channel NAND – Effect of Vertical Gate Pitch on 256 Gbit Die Cost
Cost Model Parameters
256 Gbit Die Cost ($)
RB
Lg
Ls
Θ
Array Eff.
Tono
F
DB
Ncrit (total)
C0
Ccrit
Wafer Diam.
Number of Layers
Vertical Gate Pitch (nm)
Schiltron Corporation 2013
10 nm
Variable
Variable
1 deg
80 %
20 nm
40 nm
20 nm
2
$2800
$200
300 mm
Vertical Channel NAND – Effect of Vertical Gate Pitch on 256 Gbit Die Cost
Rotating 3-D Graph
Schiltron Corporation 2013
VG NAND – Effect of Taper Angles on 256 Gbit Die Cost
VG NAND
256 Gbit Die Cost ($)
Wg
Wspace
Θx
Θy
Tono
F
minWx
minWy
Cell Ov. head
Array Eff
Ncrit (total)
C0
Ccrit
Wafer Diam.
Θx (deg)
Θy (deg)
Schiltron Corporation 2013
25 nm
25 nm
Variable
Variable
20 nm
25 nm
80 nm
35 nm
0%
80 %
2
$2800
$200
300 mm
VG NAND – Effect of Taper Angles on 256 Gbit Die Cost
Rotating 3-D Graph
Schiltron Corporation 2013
Conclusions
• Any high density 3-D Flash approach that exchanges
lithography-intensive processing per device layer for stack
deposition followed by hole and/or trench etching must
result in taper angles of zero or close to zero degrees from
the normal
• Otherwise its total cost can be undercut by any 3-D process
that uses lithography per device layer to minimize cell areas
on all layers
• A simple but often overlooked insight is that it is the cell
pitch at the top of the 3-D stack that determines the total
memory array size
• Any non-zero taper angle results in cell pitches and die sizes
larger than lithographically possible
• The main driver of Moore’s Law in 2-D, namely
photolithography, will also be the main driver in monolithic
3-D to achieve the lowest cost high density Flash memory
Schiltron Corporation 2013