Bartleby lit crit social commentary Putnam`s Post
Transcription
Bartleby lit crit social commentary Putnam`s Post
Canonical Texts and Context: The Example of Herman Melville's "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street" Author(s): Sheila Post-Lauria Source: College Literature, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Jun., 1993), pp. 196-205 Published by: College Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25112038 . Accessed: 29/10/2014 11:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . College Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to College Literature. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions AND COMMENTS NOTES Canonical Texts and Context: the Scrivener: "Bartleby, The Example of Herman Melville's A Story of Wall Street" Post-Lauria Sheila at Post-Lauria, assistant professor of English at the University of Massachusetts Boston, has recently completed a book-length manuscript on Herman Melville and popular antebellum culture. She has published several articles on the cultural con texts of Recent ers who ity, antebellum "classic" from significantly Because these that analytical textual analysis provides between ing the relations texts canonical historical involve whose "timeless deconstructionist approaches it themes," have contextualization. of literary one the the greatest that genius writing do not so obvious study 1853 tale, "Bartleby, to many recover by new does yet professors or historicist limits however, assumption, Canon writers. such require severely not necessarily pedagogical canon imply the Scrivener: A Story of Wall to be appears one of Indeed is found seems con Indeed, in virtually nonetheless curriculum, every college students. least appreciated "classic" works by undergraduate students in teaching tale is to convince Melville's challenges which ideological new employed from standard critical treatments of "classic" is argued, This reverence. Herman Melville's Street," of cultural and cultural, literary, revisionists the nature insights and culture. writer decoding.2 to teaching "classic" resonate works, and This critical shift departs markedly texts authors into needed in recovering writ "other" in terms of race, class, ethnic resulted has "classic" "other" from absent largely methods canon the expanding differ and gender.1 perspectives in interest often works. eludes these of artistic the readers first-time a of story they consider puzzling, at best. Shared aesthetic values, or, in the words of Paul Lauter, "congeneric lives" (104) fostered by graduate school training, together with professional Melville's lifting reverence artistry to Melville's Melville the all presents works, its cultural too standard of narrative artistry often canon, other among from "Bartleby" ?a practice analysis form the particular ute for in, in his most two stories title in Putnam's Monthly highlights "Bartleby, context in literature structure and remarkable in "Bartleby, cement uncritically the Scrivener." and focusing upon of the the multi-textual stylistic tales. Scrivener." innovations The for act of textual/formal readers' classrooms?limits to the appreciation Yet the that author's access to contrib original layers of the tale.3 "Bartleby, the 196 This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Scrivener: story layered among author miss the narration relates of the story of Bartleby of Wall-Street" Story Wall Street. narrator's the title of Melville's Indeed, shortening or even ?a common the Scrivener" tale to "Bartleby" "Bartleby, ? restricts modern editors the hermeneutic unnecessarily possibilities in his double title. Without the original context, suggests publishing multi the this "Bartleby, for convincingly narrative the of the tale. the bivalency in its the Scrivener" socio-literary tools that may pedagogical students that mark narrative particular the tale. Contextual role literary economics, played in the shaping of Melville's and styles, literary and in active can more characterization, rescue Melville startling subversive culture his that Melville's "classic" of creativity. a veritable status, recast and him attitudes prevailing and insights rhetoric and "Bartleby" in short fiction, from more motifs, the nature discuss students, provides students the actual forms, antebellum clearly of many college in tune with writer however, provides and realities, in which Melville's we antebellum popular we debates, assume meaning, particular, sentence in the minds death vibrant students effectively?and analysis marketplace most the contexts And by retrieving voice, story. By examining with conventions engages "Bartleby" context, to examine more be employed ?the structure that practice that the to clue important Placing into to the A of and as instead literary a tastes of his day. Such new recoveries of a "classic" work go far in satisfying the student cry for and?most interpretive proofs, to discover for themselves necessary in Melville's surface celebrated students importantly?they provide assure the artistry that we "lower them with lurks the tools the beneath layers." 1 When Melville turned to magazine writing environments distinct literary received magazines and social, some aesthetic in 1853, he participated of and Putnam's Harper's Magazine Monthly. most of Melville's formulations sophisticated themes, his significantly short fiction also in the two While of displays the both political, clearest deference to the stylistic conventions that distinguished these monthlies. Some of the author's best shorter works, including the stories collected in The Piazza Tales (1855), were initially written for and published in Putnam's. "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story ofWall Street," the first story that Melville submitted to Putnam's, demonstrates his use the heterogeneous of magazine. The narrative deliberateness available style of Melville's practices the within and his keen environment literary awareness of the of the contrast ing magazine styles become clear in the type of fiction that he writes for Putnam's. The started in 1853 as a critical commentary upon the times and as a direct monthly to the political contrast conservatism and the sentimental rhetoric of Harper's Magazine. Rigorously analytical, it appealed to a more intellectual, politically liberal, and thus smaller audience that ranged from 2,000-20,000 subscribers. (Harper's had 100,000 The readers.) the most tion, editors promised trenchant thought, and of experience" to collect "the results of the illustrated by whatever wealth that American writers possess acutest observations, and of erudition, of imagina ("Editorial Note," Jan. 1853). By emphasizing the "trenchant thought" and "erudition," rather than just the popular ity of their writers, the editors conveyed their high literary and political aspirations. Sheila 197 Post-Lauria This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Putnam's different treated social, the non-partisan, issues marked Putnam's social and political, from non-analytical Since fiction. themes literary stance of the editors from a perspective markedly its competitor. A concern for to uncover "charac attempted teristic life in the cities," fiction extended to the work place, business, and into the home (Jan. 1853: 2). Passages such as the following portrayed the despair of the industrial worker: I knew men that had been at work hard since sunrise?since daybreak?toiling heavily at labor that should not end until their lives ended; confined in close and noisome places, in which the day was never very bright, and their hopes grew daily darker. (Curtis 18) Indeed, many stories discussed the plight of employees, a subject that Melville made famous in "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story ofWall Street."4 ? and one that Perhaps the most significant difference distinguishes Melville's and Putnam's Harper's ?a mode of sentiment in the fiction ?lay of writing, editors' attitudes toward to the editors, according that the popular rhetoric to assuage and to tried cover more than it directly challenged and uncovered. Not restricted to the domestic sphere*Harper's fiction dealt with social and even with political issues. Inequities in the workplace, home, and society form a backdrop to theHarper's stories of the decade. Yet writers do not focus upon the social problems they raise. Stressing the emotions over sentimental analysis, in fiction refigured Harper's abuse, suffering, and poverty, exploi tation into romantic portraits of pathos and beauty by disengaging characters from their environments. Rather than grapple directly with timely issues, the fiction of as thematic them employs Harper's material that to demonstrate attempts that "difficul ties are the tutors and monitors of men placed in their path for their best discipline and development" (Jan. 1852: 212). Harper's stories emphasize the abilities of characters to find contentment through the hardships they encounter by transforming social prob as lems literary and acquiescence, Writers issues for the magazine contains of the moralistic characters fortunate traditional bystanders, the misery portray, vividly on above from of the fiction, type nor do they culminating narrators offer do solutions. not ladder explicitly in a conventional final they of and poverty Rather, the from spectator-narrators status allows them to observe lower, less themselves from the inevitable conclusions of toleration, typically separate their tellers from the telling. Harper's aloof ranks of the upper classes. Their privileged even of principles nobility. impoverished fiction sentimental a celebration into success. alienation, Though these to, and they allude narrators extricate of their stories. Characteristically express resort exclamation, opinions regarding misspent to a sentimental response, as in "The Chateau R?gnier": in this lives, usually "May he die in peace!" (Harper's, June 1853: 221-38). Such endings indirectly celebrate the good will of the narrator at the expense of the unresolved social problems that the stories raise. hegemonic individual?the with Harper's 198 Through this style, writers values of individuality successful upon emphasis commitment narrator. the emotions to use societal and success. They This abstract and values of upper-middle-class issues as a foil to dramatize the focus upon and celebrate the representation the narrator enabled of society coupled to support writers ideology. College This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Literature of By way Putnam's contrast, editors sentimental rejected as a tool rhetoric for representing the times (Putnam's, Feb. 1854: 223). The sentimental style of Harper's fiction, they argued, severs the link between social problems and the teller's emotional response to them. By glossing over reality, Harper's writers highlighted abstracted senti ment the gentle, the grieving, anti the beautiful." The painting "only through a dissatisfaction stance sentimental the with and true, "clear, implies consistently a of sentimental and endorses multi prose transparent" writing deliberately ambiguous, layered text (Feb. 1853: 77). Richly to a restricted of strategy personal symbolic language and a heterogenous the Melville?represented style?not o? Putnam's. trademark Melville carefully considered this stylistic approach and orientation when writing for the monthly. By viewing "Bartleby, the Scrivener" within the context of Putnam's practices, the modern reader gains insight into the structural and stylistic complexities that the author contextual relation to used recovery between his shape the tale's of the narrative reader's to the response characters. central story's reestablishes conventions interpretive and narrative method style the of the This fundamental narrator. this analytical approach can be appreciated most by students when they participate directly in the contextual analysis. Providing students with their own Harpe?s and Putnam's packets that include both editorial policies and representative tales But supplies determine students with his innovations. tools necessary to This firsthand study the trace the author's appropriations materials encourages of primary to and stu dents to discover for themselves the craft and the artistry of literary writing. 2 common The stance o? Putnam's writers sentimental against rhetoric far goes in accounting for the strategies that Melville employed in "Bartleby, the Scrivener," one of his most stylistically challenging stories. In this tale, the author employs a sentimen tal style as amethodological weapon against itself and, in doing so, reinforces Putnam's editorial stance. Partially sentimental, this story portrays the devastating effects ofWall Street upon those "pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn" individuals like Bartleby, and yet the overall manner is more in keeping with the "mixed form" of Putnam's than with the sentimentalism o?Harper's (Melville 19). Through his depiction of the methods of social involvement and retreat adopted by individuals in the work place, Melville links his tale to the editorial concern of Putnam's for analyses of the world of work. And yet the author goes He further. conflates and' his own ?arguments for a narrative style that rather links, concern the magazine's for the effects of industrialization upon the individual worker with the magazine's ? than separates (as in Harper's sentimental fiction) the teller and the telling. In other words, Melville depicts the need for a narrative style that can adequately provide room for oppositional, and minority, and sometimes alternative voices and share o? oppressive?views textual equal Harper's conventional the space with narrators. authoritative? Contextualizing Melville's stylistic strategies in "Bartleby, the Scrivener" pro vides a deeper understanding of the powerful ?if between the ambiguous?relationship narrator and Bartleby. Indeed, this stylistic context is central to unraveling lated stories that are represented by the paradigms of employer /employee subject that Melville skillfully creates in this work. Sheila the interpo and narrator/ 199 Post-Lauria This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The literal narrator's and involvement lawyer's Wall Street's sentimental intent readers, of 132-45). InMelville's paradigm narrative different a means of class the insights concerns examine demands for a into extends link subjects, to socioeconomic of relation to relations a central and that modern have relations, 192-201; Gilmore 287; Rogin ideologies of employer and employee serve chronicle the conflicting for as worker examination Melville's his tale story: the narrator's tale of by larger periodical marketplace author-narrators restricting the to both the cleverly employs magazine individual Melville's respect, classes upon the as narrator and lawyer a double (Douglas 298; Franklin, "Herman Melville" overlooked as a of of writers In this style. the includes as role this paradigm, Melville exploitation critically the exploitation and double portrays subject, Bartleby, his and Bartleby employee with to his subject. Through about in his relation narrative his The styles. narrator's as role his limits employer social awareness. He involves himself in the work lives of his staff in order to demon strate his own superior abilities in surviving within the world of Wall Street by wielding While over authority the other Yet others. the narrator's "with acquiesce employees turns "method" submission," back Bartleby himself. upon not "prefer[s] to" a (Melville 20). The latter's behavior foregrounds the need for different type of social involvement ? the survival of the individual caught within the rigidly structured finan cial world?and ultimately discontented Bartleby's tragic a different extension by questions narrative the tale analyzes and Indeed, style. as an to aid in a employer position as a narrator to account in a for position the narrator's "method"?both like and employees Bartleby story. foregrounds here alternative perspectives ?views Melville to the different of narration. modes emphasizes to approaches own in his method who And narrative method he reinforces opening and brags his paragraph. to the reader that ultimately relate a narrator theme by creating contrasts narrator The he how could the a provide sentimental sketch: "If I pleased, [I] could relate divers histories, at which good natured gentlemen might smile, and sentimental souls might weep" (Melville 13). these While are not here souls" and "sentimental represent gentlemen" as Gilmore narrator's the suggests emphasis (142), narrative his own but rather upon the readers, approach the general concerns "good-natured or conventional reader, upon and and method in relating his tale. Deliberately discarding the sentimental mode for his narration of Bartleby, he consciously reserves it for the account of his own story. He proudly depicts himself as calculating and conservative: "The late John Jacob Astor, a person little given to poetic enthusiasm, had no hesitation in pronouncing my first grand point to be prudence, my second method" (Melville 14). Method, of course, is a double tip-off: the narrator's methodical to approach as well Bartleby as this narrative teller's method in his tale. narrator The He defines his a perspective, resembles the not sentimentalizes own character in that the tale ultimately style narrators of detached Harper's. pattern of a story from the December Story," a lawyer describes an own narration. story, but rather his tones. sentimental To the represent a narrator creates who Melville criticizes, Bartleby's sentimental encounter In some ways, "Bartleby" that culminates in ultimate death of the client (Dec. 1852: 48-52). He foreshadows 200 the the follows In "My Client's 1852 issue of this magazine. disintegration and the eventual outcome College This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Literature of this "He individual: doomed visaged?and distances himself clear relationship had been to his reacts sensitive remains aloof, his client. He were once emotionally the matter thin gray-haired, "My Client's of Story" a retreats from establishing ? ... we almost friends constantly companions confession moving for coolly his sketch Throughout and unwilling unsympathetic, man: the narrator outset, altogether having been friends" (48). Furthermore, client's to consider proper conscience" (50). the "We them: intimate without narrator "It was (48). from emotionally between a broken-down seemed From cadaverous" was there of the a with a such other's to become the coldness: chilling as an over thing the narrator decline, involved.5 emotionally The narrator of "Bartleby" also stresses his lack of involvement with others: "All who know me, consider me an eminently safeman" (Melville 14). This lawyer engages not in defending the rights of others: "I seldom . . . indulge in dangerous indignation at wrongs and outrages" (Melville 14). He chooses rather "in the cool tranquility of a to conduct retreat" snug title-deeds" "a narrator, the narrators in business snug 14). This (Melville rich men's among in "My Client's and Story," the controversial clarifies attorney and mortgages and lawyer the tradition of spectator larger motivations behind Melville's tales Harper's bonds link between Melville's specific contextual particular characterization of his narrator that have plagued what Dan McCall recently called the "Bartleby Industry" (99). so many Like the narrators of in this stories, Harper's teller has detaches ultimately himself from the lives of his more unfortunate employees. Preferring the walls of his " the narrator retreats behind a "folding office to "what landscape painters call 'life,' screen" that him separates from his staff. screen The serves as a for metaphor the distance of authority that enables him to demand submissive behavior from them (Melville 18-19), and it also suggests the sentimental distancing devices of theHarper's formula. to revisions Melville's the story his sharpen analysis of the rhetorical of power sentiment. By changing the "wasted" form of Bartleby from a Christlike figure "stretched on a blanket" to a regressive fetal position, Melville shifts the emphasis from the actual to tragedy the narrator's To sentimentalize of own the narrator's would authority directly empathize with Sanctification of this the narrator rhetoric, the focal the words death his former lament, as Hershel The employee it.6 and be to sanctify him at the expense as narrator. that he wields respectability The narrator reader a portrait of Bartleby as a tragic victim ofWall would the castigate directly narrator since Street. as he, the sentimental deflects and reduces its As tragedy Bartleby's impact. over and maintains narrative control and superiority point Uttering of to be largely responsible for the tragedy. By extracting employer, would remains reaction the story of Bartleby would a result, his he subject. from Job 3 ("With kings and counsellors") upon discovering the employee, lawyer chooses rather sadness," "superior the than Parker has noted (163). relates his intense feelings of revulsion towards that hearing a man like Bartleby "by nature and misfortune prone to a pallid hopelessness" was forced to work as a subordinate clerk in the dead letter office: "Dead letters! does it not sound like dead men?" (Melville 45). He does gain insight into Bartleby's "pallid ? hopelessness" too late to aid this employee, but not too late to provide a sympathetic rendition of the tragedy (Melville 45). Even so, the lawyer retreats from his insight Sheila 201 Post-Lauria This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions regarding deplorable working conditions and their detrimental effects upon workers, assuming instead the conventional sentimental stance: "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!" (Melville 45). Rather out the than this console, limitations of the narrator's The world. see We relating his stories: the story of hisWall within retreat final sudden, sentimentalism. the narrator of the of irony Street and the story of Bartleby's dissolution account lawyer's of Wall Street Given irreconcilable the stance sentimental of this must the narrator situation, defend abstracted sentiment. his (in)actions by employing The results com the chronicles as it is constructed by promises of individual self-respect that must occur in this world the narrator. It points in method disturbs. narrator's the and "method" of the and narrator, by the implication iswhat is at stake here. This central point of popular practice of sentimental writing, the tale is overlooked even by those critics who see the "Victorian sentimentality" of the narrator (Brodwin 188), or, in McCalPs case, attack prevailing views of the narrator's "Victorian gush" The (143). narrator's statement ending is no "vague sentimentality," as Allan Emery once argued (186). Rather, it is a deliberate, precise sentimentality, and this is exactly the point that Melville raises by employing such language. This retreat sentimentalist in "Bartleby," the beginning perspective at wonder and of of the explains the story narrator what appears exactly to points as the why the confines structural narrative of We discordancies. narrator writes the of story Bartleby when he states clearly that "no materials exist for a full and satisfactory biography of this man" (Melville 14). We look in vain ?as many students do ?for explanations from the narrator of Bartleby's behavior. By reserving his explanation for Bartleby's behavior for the ending rather than the beginning of the story where it would have provided a psychological motivation ? and empathy?for Bartleby, the narrator deflects reader sympathy from Bartleby to himself. And, in turn, by con the structing story in this manner, Melville demonstrates that his narrator's sentimental approach to narrative is a means of extracting himself from a highly challenging situation that would necessitate an ideological change, something that this comfortable narrator is clearly to consider. unwilling Melville's mixture of sentiment and social analysis serves dual functions in this that occurs in the money-making tale. It poignantly depicts the depersonalization of the stories of individuals like short while sentimentalizing stopping professions, Bartleby. At the same time, it sentimentally portrays the attempts of employers like the narrator to ineffectuality story ofWall screen of aide his while employees, simultaneously out pointing that narrator's in changing the nature of the work place. The story of Bartleby and the Street conjoin through social critique and separate through the diffusing sentiment. 3 The context be linked to the many 202 in the recovered narrative ing the peculiar of uniqueness "Bartleby, above structure, the Scrivener." discussion style, The and provides characterization tale's stylistic for ground that contribute solid and fine textual studies of the psychological thematic examin to bivalency the can dualities between College This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Literature the narrator and his as well subject, as between the persona of Bartleby encourages challenging and his attorney Just employees.7 as the the authority of the employer, Melville's sentimental of the narrator's readers?in this style encourages depiction of the narrator and criticize the authority students?to and his method. question out the symbiosis between and teller so, Melville tale, narrator points doing critical case, In and subject, and calls attention to his craft. In the end, examining "Bartleby" in light of magazine conventions reveals how this tale goes far beyond the story of "Bartleby" and even the Scrivener." "Bartleby, out It points for the modern reader, whose interpretive possibilities are limited by the critical orientation of textual editors, the multi-layered weaving of social, literary, and aesthetic themes thatMelville so cleverly embedded in his tale of Bartleby, the attorney, and the art of story-telling. Indeed, by providing the reader with insight into the sophisticated craft and artistry of the author, contextual analysis provides the interpretive proofs necessary to reaffirm "Bartleby's" rightful place the within canon.8 NOTES established the term "other" in her remarkable study Sensational ^ane Tompkins Designs. D. H. Lawrence coined term the to "classic" the works designate of canonical antebellum writers in his provocative Studies inClassic American Literature.Among notable scholars that this employ are Matthiessen, term themost and Barbour. Bercovitch, Smith, 2For the most recent criticism of employing new historicist methods for analyzing (classic) see texts, Bryant. 3The tale appeared in the November andDecember 1853 issues of themagazine. The running header included only the first part of the story title, "Bartleby, the Scrivener," which was common practice in Putnam's, but the title page of both segments monthly included the complete title. 4See also "Our Best Society" and Tom "Elegant Dillar." 5Several popular shilling novels published during this time have been offered as possible sources for "Bartleby," such as James A. Maitland's The Lawyer's suggested Story, by Leon Howard and discussed by Bergmann. InNew York in Slices, asDavid S. Reynolds has pointed out, the author portrays the rigidity ofWall Street and the individuals who suffer from business reversals. However, the sensational not stylistically complement eitherMelville's rhetoric was not popular with Putnam's, style of George Foster's novel does style or his focus in "Bartleby." Sensationalist as evidenced in its condemnation of Melville's Pierre, where the author successfully (though not always popularly) employed this style. See Howard 208; Bergmann 432-36; and Reynolds 294. 6Melville Papers, Duyckinck Collection, New York Public Library. See also the note on "Bartleby" in The Piazza Tales 575. 7Marcus 107-13; Smith 734-41; Guerard 1-14; Rogers 67-70; Keppler 115-20; Bollas 401-11; Dillingham 31-32. 8Iwould like to thank Charlene Avallone, Lauren Berlant, Wai-chee Dimock, John Ernest, Robert A. Ferguson, Kathleen McCormack, and David S. Reynolds for their helpful Sheila comments regarding previous drafts of this essay. 203 Post-Lauria This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions WORKS CITED Barbour, and Tom James, eds. Writing Quirk, the American Classics. U Hill: Chapel of North Carolina P, 1990. Baym, Nina. "Melville's Quarrel with Fiction." PML^4 94 (1979): 903-23. and Myra Sacvan, Bercovitch, and Classic Ideology American Literature. Cam 1986. " Deitrich. Johannes Bergmann, eds. Jehlen, bridge: Cambridge UP, and The 'Bartleby' Lawyer's American Story." Literature 47 (1975): 432-36. _. Stories." "Melville's 1986. Greenwood, A toMelville Companion of the Frontiers Stanley. " "To Scrivener.' the Inscrutable. Bartleby, 174-96. "Melville's John. Bryant, Ed. John Bryant. Westport: "Melville's Lost Self: Bartleby." American Imago 31 (1974): 401-11. Bollas, Christopher. Brodwin, Studies. 241-78. in Crossing Hamden: Thomas and Manuscript Typee Melville's Eternity: Ed. M. the Limits the 'Bartleby, 1979. Archon, Inge. of Historicism." Modern Lan Jan. 1853: guage Studies (1991): 3-10. "The Chateau Curtis, 1853: 116-21. June Harper's "Andrew Cranberry: Attorney R?gnier." William. George 18-23. at Law." Putnam's B. Melville's Short Fiction: 1853-1856. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1977. Dillingham, William 178-84. Douglas, "Elegant Ann. The Tom Dillar." Feminization American of Putnam's Culture. 1853: May Going Louisiana SUP, Fisher, H. Franklin, Bruce. Melville: in America 1976. Ramparts, _. A. Alfred and 31 (1976): 170-87. 1850s. the American Baton Artist of the Literary and the Worker's Tradition. World." 287-309. T. American Michael Rouge: Criti Weapons of Palo Alto: Rudich. Ed. Norman The Wake of theGods: Melville's Mythology. Stanford: Stanford UP, Gilmore, 1977. Knopf, 1977. "Herman cism: Marxism Short Fiction Under: Melville's York: " 'Bartleby,' NCF Emery, Allan. "The Alternatives of Melville's Marvin. New 525-30. Romanticism and the Marketplace. U Chicago: 1963. of Chicago P, 1985. Guerard, Albert J., ed. Stories of theDouble. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1967. Howard, Leon. Melville: A Biography. Berkeley: U of California P, 1951. Keppler, C. F. The Literature of theSecond Self Tucson: U of Arizona P, 1972. Paul. Lauter, D. Lawrence, Canons H. and Contexts. Studies in Classic New York: American Oxford UP, Literature. 1991. London: 1924. Heinemann, Marcus, Mordecai. "Melville's Bartleby as a Psychological Double." College English 23 (1962): 365-68. McCall, Dan. The Silence of Bartleby. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1989. Melville, Herman. Other Thomas "My Library, Client's O'Brien, Prose A Story the Scrivener: "Bartleby 1839-1860. Pieces Ed. Harrison Tanselle, 1987. Story." Fitz-James. and others. Evanston: of Wall-Street." Hayford, Northwestern The Piazza Tales and A. Alma UP G. MacDougall, and The Newberry 13-45. Dec. 1852: 48-52. Harper's "Our American Authors: Herman Melville." Putnam's Feb. 1853: 73-78. 204 College This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Literature "Our Best Putnam's 1853: 170-79. Feb. Society." " in Hershel. "The Parker, 'Sequel' 'Bartleby.' Bartleby 1979. Hamden: Archon, Ed. M. the Inscrutable. Thomas Inge. Reynolds, David S. Beneath theAmerican Renaissance: The Subversive Imagination in theAge of Emerson andMelville. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1988. Harvard UP, 1989. Rogers, Robert. A Study Psychoanalytic of the Double in Literature. Detroit: Wayne SUP, 1970. Rogin, Michael Paul. SubversiveGenealogy: The Politics and Art of Herman Melville. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1983. Smith, Henry Nash. and Democracy New York: Oxford UP, Smith, Herbert F. "Melville's theNovel: Popular Resistance to Classic American Writers. 1978. Master in Chancery and his Recalcitrant Clerk." American Quarterly 17 (1965): 734-41. Sheila 205 Post-Lauria This content downloaded from 63.116.232.250 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions