2005 LWC Minutes - City of Delafield

Transcription

6: 00 PM
January 12, 2005
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF DELAFIELD LAKE WELFARE MINUTES
Cot
1.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
P. Schuman called the
2.
meeting
to
order at 6: 04 p. m.
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell ( 6: 06 p. m.)
Jerry Bills
Richard Landwehr
Jerry
Steve
Headley
Ruth Marshall
Dunnick
Bonnie Fieber
Dennis Hart (6: 35 p. m.)
Phil Schuman
Don Tills
Ken
3.
Wiedmeyer
APPROVE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8, 2004
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE
DECEMBER 8, 2004 MEETING.
J. BILLS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THERE WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION.
CJ
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
MOTION
CARRIED.
4.
CITIZEN' S COMMENTS ON ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE AGENDA.
No citizens
5.
were
present.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
LAKE RESTORATION PROJECT- DREDGING APPLICATION
P. Schuman met with T. Hafner
on
the
preliminary application
regarding
Vierbicher. J. Bills is
for the lake restoration
project.
working
He
reviewed his progress and distributed a spreadsheet showing a summary
database for the commissioners' review. This spreadsheet will be
included in the
see
anything
preliminary application.
that
was
J. Bills stated that he did not
hazardous waste. A
graph
will be made for every
chemical that has criteria and will be included in the
preliminary
example and spoke in detail about it.
After all of the data has been analyzed and the recommendations have
been made as to what should be analyzed, the next question will be how
many samples need to be done. A proposal regarding sampling will be
presented to the DNR. The process is that the preliminary application
will be submitted to the DNR, they will come back to the City with their
opinions, a meeting with the DNR will take place to come to a consensus
application.
c
He used arsenic
as an
6: 00 PM
January 12, 2005
Page 2 of3
t.
as
to what will be
sediment
b.
analyzed, a sampling plan
sampling will take place.
will be submitted, and then
CONTENTS OF RESTORATION RFP
copies of the documents prepared by D. Tills, B.
Fieber, and J. Bills. They talked about the outputs of what the study
would be. A list was compiled showing what requirements/ knowledge
and demonstrated work products would be expected from the consultant
for this project. The project requirements included that the consultant
The commissioners had
would:
produce a written aquatic habitat restoration plan for all areas of
Nagawicka Lake that were to be dredged (including the channels
and those going up to the Kettle)
review of all wetlands adjacent to Nagawiclm Lalce and recommend
a management plan for each wetland area
review current shoreline landscape and prepare a recommended
native plant shoreline management plan ( a generic plan or a menu
of plans that a landowner could choose from)
prepare a fisheries habitat plan for all areas to be dredged
P. Schuman did not want to raise issues that would
the
(he used bullet number two
project
City
that the
would restore where
as an
dredging
cause
problems
example).
place and
took
under the
water, and that restoration of the shoreline would also take
wetlands would be
protected
and enhanced.
for
J. Bills stated
D. Tills
place.
thought that
The
the
message would be protection and enhancement of wetland areas.
Discussion took place. J. Bills stated that the committee needed to focus
on the habitat improvement of where the dredging would take place and
major
shoreline restoration. D. Tills stated that he would be comfortable
narrowing the list down as long as the opportunity was kept open in the
future to look at some of the other issues. It was the consensus of the
committee that the second bullet of the above list should be taken out.
The RFP will be worked
on, a
draft will be created and it will be
given
to
T. Hafner.
c.
MILL POND
The
City
taking action on this. The committee had a copy of the
passed by the City. The Public Works Committee and Plan
will be
Resolution
Commission will review this. An official brochure will be sent to M.
Zerwekh. Because she has taken the action to abandon the dam, the
City had to take official action in order to protect the dam. Discussion
took place on the process of eminent domain. Work will continue on
this.
G,
January 12,
Page 3of3
2005
6: 00 PM
d.
CITY BOATHOUSE CODE
P. Schuman sent this out to various
response had been received at this
e.
departments
point in time.
within the
City,
but
no
BUOY & BOATING SURVEY
The survey was sent out to the City residents with the last newsletter
and is on the website. Some responses have been received. Discussion
took place as to who will tabulate the responses. B. Fieber will assist
with the tabulation. The deadline for responses is February.
7.
NEW BUSINESS
a.
LAKE AWARENESS SPRING MEETING
The date of this
meeting
will be
May
11th
meeting.
K. ATTWELL MOTIONED TO HAVE B. FIEBER CHAIR THE
COMMITTEE FOR THIS MEETING.
MOTION.
D. HART SECONDED THE
ALL WERE IN
FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED.
Agenda
items and the location for the
meeting
will be determined at
a
later date.
8.
9.
CORRESPONDENCE
a.
E- mail
on
b.
E- mail
on
c.
WAL
NR 115,
1-4- 05
Plant
Aquatic
Mgt
January Newsletter
Plan, 1- 5- 05
ADJOURN
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO ADJOURN FROM THE MEETING.
SECONDED THE MOTION.
WERE IN FAVOR.
J. DUNNICK
MOTION CARRIED.
ALL
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
I
I
I
February 9,
Page 1 of 3
2005
6: 00 PM
c..,
1.
meeting
to
I
I
2.
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Jerry Dunnick
Kent Attwell
Bonnie Fieber
Dennis Hart
J. Bills
Steve
R. Landwehr
Headley
Phil Schuman
Don Tills
Ken
Wiedmeyer
Ruth Marshall (entered 6: 07 p. m.)
3.
APPROVE MINUTES OF JANUARY 12, 2005
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 12,
2005 MEETING AS PRESENTED. D. TILLS SECONDED THE MOTION.
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
MOTION
CARRIED.
4.
Al Hazle. 3243 Svlvester -
was
present at the meeting but did not have any
comments.
5.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
P. Schuman
reported
that J. Bills has been
letter from T. Hafner to Vierbicher
was
working
with Vierbicher. A
referenced which outlined
areas
that the
City agreed with and disagreed with. A preliminary application
needs to be put together. An analysis of the history of sediment testing
is being compiled.
b.
RESTORATION RFP
A
sample
of the RFP
included in the committee member' s
packets
suggested that under the project description,
the last sentence " to improve the acceptance of the dredging project by
the DNR" should state that the main purpose was to improve the lake
and shoreline habitat and prevent resilting of the lake. Under the scope
of services, number three, fish habitat, it was suggested to change this to
and
was
reviewed.
was
D. Tills
February 9,
Page 2 of3
2005
6: 00 PM
fish habitat, restoration, and
improvement plan". Page two,
typographical errors should be corrected. The word " sign" should be
changed to " competent professional". D. Tills thought that conceptually
the RFP held together and stated the three
objectives for the consultant
to prepare:
I.
Plant Restoration Plan for the Dredged Area
Shoreline Management Plan to Prevent or Delay Future ReSilting
should include a listing of different option available to owners)
Fish Habitat for the Restoration of those
Dredged Areas
Aquatic
2.
3.
Under
Scope
of Services the
Assist with Outside
Progress Reports
as
following
will be added:
Funding
Requested
Meet with Lake Welfare Committee
Construction Plan The RFP will be
The timeline
project plan
c.
Bidding
approved by
was
the
Documents
city
staff before it is sent
ou t.
reviewed. Item # 4 will be reworded to state " Submit
complete scope of work"
and costs and
MILL POND
The
City is taking action on the eminent domain. A meeting will be held
by
Upper Nemahbin Lake Association and members of the Lake
Welfare Committee were encouraged to attend. S. Headley stated that he
would attend this meeting.
the
d.
CITY BOATHOUSE CODE
A
proposed city
boathouse code
was
distributed to the committee
members. M. Czubkowski,
City Clerk, and T. Maney, Building Inspector
submitted comments regarding the proposed code. No responses have
been received from the DNR or the County. This would require a public
hearing and would also have to go through the Plan Commission. D.
Tills will consider the comments received, will rework the code, and bring
it back to the next Lake Welfare Committee meeting for consideration.
e.
The survey deadline is the end of February. Presently, forty- three
surveys have been received. The survey will be tallied in time for the
next
Lake Welfare Committee
meeting.
I
February
Page
1
9, 2005
3of3
6: 00 PM
f.
The
meeting
The
agenda
will be held
May
11, 2005 at 7 p. m. at the Fish
Hatchery.
will include:
Lake Restoration/
Dredging
Permit
Boathouse Code ( to be determined)
Results of the
Buoy
and
Boating Survey
Mill Pond
6.
NEW BUSINESS
VILLAGE OF HARTLAND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
a.
The members discussed the
plan and felt that it was a good idea that
Village of Hartland had a plan to protect the lake. Copies of the plan
were given to M. Carlson and T. Hafner for technical review.
7.
CORRESPONDENCE
E- mail from Doreen Bollman, USACE, 1- 24- 05
a.
8.
the
ADJOURN
A MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED TO ADJOURN FROM THE
MEETING.
MOTION CARRIED.
P. M.
Minutes
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT APPROXIMATELY 7: 20
Prepared By:
Accurate Business Communications, LLC
6: 00 PM
March 9, 2005
Page
lof4
1.
2.
meeting
to order at 6: 06 p. m.
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Dennis Hart
Bills
Jerry
Jerry Dunnick
Bonnie Fieber
Steve
Headley (entered
6: 44 p. m.)
Ruth Marshall (Nashotah
Rep)
Phil Schuman
Don Tills
Ken
3.
Wiedmeyer
APPROVE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 9, 2005
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY
9, 2005 MEETING.
J. DUNNICK SECONDED THE MOTION.
WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION.
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
THERE
MOTION
CARRIED.
v
4.
Andrew Lukas. Brown and Caldwell ( a firm of environmental
consultants)
5.
was
present
at the
meeting.
He had
no
engineers
and
comments.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
Drawings were received from Vierbicher today. J. Bills distributed
briefly discussed a rough draft of the Preliminary Application for
Dredging as Part of the Restoration Plan for Nagawicka Lake. It is
hoped to have the final draft of the application completed by the next
meeting. Discussion took place on the progress of the dredging
application. The rough draft will be forwarded to T. Hafner for his
opinion. The committee members should direct any comments on the
rough draft via email to J. Bills within two weeks. Composite cores
will be proposed to the DNR for sampling. B. Fieber expressed
concern that the Geason property should not be developed for the
park until after the lake restoration project has been completed. J.
Bills thought that the Geason property is a large contributor of silt to
that particular area of the lake and will need to be assessed when the
land is developed.
and
C1
March 9, 2005
6: 00 PM
Page 2of4
v
b.
RESTORATION RFP
A document entitled " City of Delafield,
Request for Proposals,
Nagawicka Lake & Bark River Habitat & Shoreline Improvements
Plan" was prepared by J. Bills and was included in the packet of
material for the committee members. This RFP would be for Phase 1,
2, and 3, however there would be five phases included in the Habitat
Improvement Plan. Any changes, comments, or corrections should be
sent to P. Schuman before the next
again
c.
at the next Lake Welfare
This will be discussed
meeting.
meeting.
MILL POND
The committee members'
packets included copies of portions of the
City Council minutes regarding their decisions
to maintain the integrity of the dam in order to preserve the pond and
to encourage the City to use every conceivable mechanism to
negotiate a settlement with the property owner and to turn to the use
eminent domain as a last result only. S. Headley recapped an
informational meeting that was held in the Town of Summit by the
Upper Nemahbin Lake Management District regarding the Mill Pond
and the potential results if the dam was removed. Approximately 30+
people attended the meeting with approximately 75% of the attendees
wanting the dam to remain. The City continues its attempts to
negotiate with the owner of the dam.
Plan Commission and
d.
CITY BOATHOUSE CODE
A copy of the suggested amendments to Delafield Code 17. 22
Boathouses was distributed to the committee members. D. Tills met
with M. Carlson to review the process. If the Lake Welfare Committee
made a recommendation it would need to go to the Plan Commission,
they would hold a public hearing, and then they would make a
recommendation to the Common Council.
D. Tills asked if the committee wanted to do
anything formally now
public at the
or
wait until after comments had been received from the
Spring meeting.
Spring meeting.
The committee
was
agreement
to review this at the
D. Tills reviewed the work he has done up to this point in time. He
would like to receive feedback from the committee members via em ail
and then
bring a revised copy
meeting. This will
Committee
back to the
April Lake Welfare
agenda for the Spring
be added to the
meeting.
e.
B. Fieber
c.,
reported that fifty- three responses were received. A copy of
Buoy & Boating Survey results was given to the committee
members. She encouraged the committee members to read it. The
the 2005
6: 00 PM
March 9, 2005
Page 3 of4
v
object of the survey was to receive feedback on the speed limits,
buoys, and boat patrols. This will be put on the agendas for the April
meeting and the Lake Awareness Spring Meeting. Conclusions need
to be drawn up.
f.
proposed agenda for the meeting was distributed to the committee
It was suggested to use the upstairs room at the Fish
Hatchery for overflow and to have the City videotape the meeting. P.
A
members.
Schuman will make the introductions and he and J. Bills will talk
about the lake restoration plan. It was suggested that instead of
species that perhaps shoreline restoration could be
police department could address boating etiquette.
Outside speakers for the education portion could be obtained. It was
suggested to have T. Hafner discuss the weed cutting plan, dam
service, and to give an update on the dam abandonment. D. Tills will
discuss the boathouse code. K. Attwell will provide cookies for the
Spring meeting.
More discussion on the Lake Awareness Spring Meeting will take
place at the April meeting.
about
talking
discussed. The
7.
NEW BUSINESS
a.
SE WI WAL MEETING ON FEB 19, 2005
S.
Headley
area
attended seminars about the Fox River Watershed. The
spending". Discussion took place about water from
is in " deficit
the Great Lakes.
The State
meeting for WAL is April 28- 30 in Green Bay.
meeting. Anyone interested in attending
will attend the
P. Schuman
this
meeting
should contact P. Schuman.
b.
DIRECT LEGISLATION PETITION
This item
At the
was
was
moved up in the
February
agenda
and discussed after item 5C.
21, 2005 Common Council
meeting
the
City Attorney
An open meeting law
has been filed with the District Attorney. P. Schuman
in attendance to discuss this item.
complaint
City Attorney at all times
petition was certified by
during
the City Clerk. P. Schuman discussed the petition and how it would
affect projects within the City. The City Council passed Ordinance
536 on the February 21, 2005 Council meeting. The options
available to the Common Council are to accept the petition and put it
stated that the
the
on
City was represented by
February 21, 2005 meeting.
the fall election
discussed. The
1
The
turn it down because it would invalidate
an
already passed ( Ordinance 536). The water system
petition for Direct Legislation means that all projects
million would go to referendum and everything would need to
ordinance
over $
or
the
was
April
Page
13, 2005
6: 00 PM
1 of 3
CJ
1.
2.
meeting
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Jerry
Bills
Jerry
Dennis Hart
Phil Schuman
Steve
Don Tills
Ruth Marshall (Nashotah
Ken
3.
Dunnick
Bonnie Fieber
Headley
Rep)
Wiedmeyer
APPROVE MINUTES OF MARCH 9, 2005
K. ATTWELL MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 9,
2005 MEETING.
D. TILLS SECONDED THE MOTION.
FURTHER DISCUSSION.
4.
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
THERE WAS NO
MOTION CARRIED.
No citizens wished to comment.
5.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
dredging application will be complete within the next week. The
proposed for the sediment on Oakwood Road provides for 13
acres for disposal. The parameters of 100' from navigable water, 200'
from private wells, and 500' from residences, did not leave enough
The
location
storage area at this location. However, if land from the Morris Farm
property and the Kettle Moraine Evangelical Free Church (the abutting
property) were incorporated into the plan, it would provide more than
enough area. The St. John' s disposal area would not meet the criteria
using the above parameters. There is a concern regarding the flood
plain at the proposed St. John' s disposal area which could make this
option unacceptable for use. It was questioned whether this was a viable
disposal area. When the final application is submitted, a detailed
disposal plan will need to be included. Discussion took place as to
when
whether the Mill Pond sediment could be dewatered and trucked to the
disposal location. The Preliminary Application will be submitted without
the flood
v
plain. Eventually,
RFPs will need to go out for the
design
of the
6: 00 PM
April 13, 2005
Page 2of3
v
disposal
J. Bills discussed
areas.
case
laws
regarding jurisdiction
over
lakes.
b.
RESTORATION RFP
This has been sent to T. Hafner for review. J. Bills stated that it would
be
c.
a
good
idea to have the RFP' s sent out
by early May.
MILL POND
A group of citizens have put forth a petition stating that they were not in
favor of the city acquiring this property. The eminent domain process
has been started
d.
the
by
City.
agenda and flyer for the lake Awareness Spring meeting were
distributed to the commissioners. The words " Fish Hatchery" will be
added to the location section on the flyer. On the main agenda the first
An
heading
should read " Introduction to Lake Welfare Committee and Year
The order of the
End SummarY".
agenda
will be: Introduction of Lake
Welfare Committee, Aquatic Plant Management (new item), Education,
Dams- Servicing/ Abandonment Update, Lake Restoration Plan Progress,
Boathouse Code,
c..,
Buoy & Boating Survey Results, Nagawicka Night.
The ae:enda and postcard items should be
chane:e of order.
e.
obtained at the
city residents
May meeting.
on
the
City
Boathouse Code will be
This is included
on
the
be discussed at that
g.
to reflect the
CITY BOATHOUSE CODE
Reactions from the
f.
re- arrane:ed
agenda
meeting.
for the Lake Awareness
Meeting
and will
DIRECT LEGISLATION AND ORDINANCE 536
P. Schuman
reported
meeting.
p roce ss.
The
City
City Council passed Ordinance 536 and
legislation petition at the last Common Council
been guided by its legal counsel through this
that the
turned down the direct
has
June 8, 2005
6: 00 PM
Page lof4
1.
Chairperson
2.
meeting
to
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Jerry
Dunnick
Jerry Bills
Bonnie Fieber
Dennis Hart
Steve
Terri
Headley
Phil Schuman
Schojnacki
Don Tills
Ken
Wiedmeyer
John Brodie
Also Present
Tom Hafner
Joe Dorava
3.
APPROVE MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2005
K. ATTWELL MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 13,
2005
J. DUNNICK SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE WAS NO
FURTHER DISCUSSION. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED.
AS PRESENTED.
4.
Steve Headlev. 364 Bark River Court - Stated that he was
speaking as
representative of "Tru th in Delafield, Inc." This group will offer an educational
tool for all of the issues involved regarding direct
legislation. As a private
citizen he thought Direct Legislation would be a
crippling blow to the City of
Delafield. If enacted, it will be for a two year period and then would have to be
rescinded or adopted again. He questioned why the
City is spending $ 3, 0005, 000 for the election since there are no capital
projects for 2005 and the
Direct Legislation would not affect any capital
for the
of
spending projects
City
Delafield during that time. They will have three websites with identical
information: www. truthindelafield. org, www. truthindelafield. net, and
www. truthindelafield. com. The
mailing address is PO Box 180409, Delafield,
Wisconsin 53018. They will make sure that the correct and truthful answer
will be provided to the citizens of Delafield. If
anyone has questions on Direct
Legislation he asked that they be contacted.
Dave Chvla - Present in the audience
Association.
representing Nagawicka
Shores Condo
June 8, 2005
Page
6: 00 PM
2 of4
c.,
5.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
LAKE RESTORATION PROJECT- DREDGING
APPLICATION
J. Bills is
working on the dredging application. The timeIine for the
City' s budget was distributed to the committee members. A copy of
article in the City' s newsletter was also
provided to the committee
the
members. A survey will be put out to the citizens
P. Schuman
encouraged all to attend the
regarding the budget.
budget meetings. J. Dorava
present to fmd out the progress and offered to assist in whatever
way he could. It was stated that the plan for the lake restoration
project
is on the City' s website. P. Schuman summarized the
progress that has
taken place on this project since last
year. T. Hafner clarified that a
comprehensive environmental assessment would need to be compiled. J.
Dorava stated that detailed
analysis of the spoil piles would need to be
conducted for the environmental assessment. The
granting process and
the relationship to Direct Legislation has not
been addressed.
was
yet
B. Fieber asked that
the
b.
dredging project
Mayor Craig hold his comments
until he has all of the facts.
on
the
funding
I
of
RESTORATION RFP
I
I
T. Hafner had
an environmental
specialist look at the document and
make recommendations. The selection
process was discussed, and T.
Hafner suggested forming a selection committee. K. Attwell, K.
Weidmeyer,
B. Fieber, and J. Dunnick volunteered to serve this
committee. Selection will take place in
approximately five weeks.
c.
CITY BOATHOUSE CODE
D. Tills
reported
that this
reviewed at the annual lake meeting. A
distributed at that meeting and the results were included in
survey
the committee members' packets. He
requested that the committee
determine if this was worth pursuing and if so, he would work on
was
was
proposed language. He reviewed the questions asked
at the annual lake
and the responses received from the group. It was the
consensus of the committee to continue
pursuing changes to the code.
This committee can make a recommendation to the Plan Commission
meeting
which would then hold
d.
a
public hearing
and consider it.
A copy of
email from B. Fieber to P. Schuman dated June 7, 2005 was
distributed to the committee members showing the results of the
survey.
She reviewed the results. It was her opinion that the slow/ no wake on
Sundays starting at 3 p. m. should be pursued and put on a future
an
I
I
I
June 8, 2005
6: 00 PM
Page 3of4
e.
survey. Further
investigation
implemented
other lakes.
on
will take
place
as
to what rules are
DIRECT LEGISLATION VOTE ON JULY 12, 2005
S.
Headley summarized how Direct Legislation would affect various Lake
Welfare Committee projects. P. Schuman distributed the " Notice of
Referendum" wording to the committee members. He
explained that this
referendum is not retroactive. S.
stated that for the next two
Headley
years there are no capital projects on the table. A copy of a letter to Ms.
Doreen Bollman, Corp of Engineers, dated
January 19, 2004, was also
distributed to the committee members in addition to a
copy of the
Wisconsin Administrative Code with NR 7. 083
highlighted. P. Schuman
stated that if the Direct Legislation were
passed, it would have a
affect
negative
any attempt to obtain grants, etc. P. Schuman stated that he
was not
lobbying one way or another, but was discussing the facts. S.
Headley discussed bonding or borrowing and the effect Direct Legislation
may have - it may make it more difficult for the City to bond and it
might
make the City' s credit rating go down. He stated that if the
City cannot
borrow money at advantageous rates, it would result in
taxes. P.
on
Schuman
6.
higher
encouraged
all to vote
on
July
12th.
NEW BUSINESS
a.
UPDATE REGARDING VILLAGE
DISCUSSION
It
b.
was
stated that this
project
SQUARE
would not
WELL/ WATER SYSTEM-
come out
of taxes.
HIGH CAPACITY WELLS
P. Schuman attended a discussion on
high capacity wells took place at
the Wisconsin Lakes Convention. Wisconsin Act 310 was included in the
commissioners'
packets.
T. Hafner
explained the existing water system' s problem with radium
compliance. The existing system also has only one well, and the DNR
requires that redundancy be built in. The City also has some of the
highest water rates in the state because of the small base of users.
Without the system expansion, the present customers would
experience
a rate increase of
approximately 45%. He explained the proposed
expansion. A high capacity well is any well that has the capacity of
producing 100, 000 gallons/ day.
The
c.,
project engineer on this project, John Isleb from EarthTech, was
present at the meeting. Exploratory borings are taking place. He
explained what was needed for a well to work. Chapter NR81l and
NRl5l requirements were reviewed. Due
diligence is required to make
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
July 13, 2005
Page lof2
6: 00 PM
1.
Chairperson
2.
meeting
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Jerry
Bills
Jerry Dunnick
Bonnie Fieber ( entered 6: 10 p. m.)
Steve Headley
Dennis Hart
Phil Schuman
I
Don Tills
Ken
Wiedmeyer
John Brodie (Nashotah
3.
I
Rep)
APPROVE MINUTES OF JUNE 8, 2005
K. ATTWELL MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 8,
2005 MEETING. D. TILLS SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE WAS NO
4.
There
5.
were no
citizens who wished
I
I
to comment.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
LAKE RESTORATION PROJECT - DREDGING APPLICATION
J. Bills had
no report. He will contact J. Dorava at Vierbicher
prior to
the next LWC ( Lake Welfare Committee) meeting. D. Tills volunteered to
assist on this project.
b.
I
RESTORATION RFP
An email from T. Hafner dated
July
13, 2005
was distributed to the
commissioners regarding the affect that the Direct Legislation
referendum has on the Restoration RFP' s. Discussion took
place as to
whether the project should be pursued. Five proposals have been
received in response to the RFP ranging in costs from $ 37, 000 - $ 90, 000.
D. Tills and K. Attwell will meet with the DPW to review the
proposals.
Because the dollar range is great, J. Bills asked that the scope of work
that was quoted on be closely reviewed.
I
August 10,
Page 1 of 3
2005
6: 00 PM
v
1.
2.
meeting
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent AttwelI
Jerry
Jerry
Dunnick
Bonnie Fieber
I
Bills
John Brodie ( Nashotah
Rep)
I
Richard Landwehr
Terri Schojnacki ( Nashotah
Dennis Hart
Steve Headley
I
I
Altemate)
Phil Schuman
Don Tills
Ken
3.
Wiedmeyer
APPROVE MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2005
K. ATTWELL MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY
13, 2005 MEETING. B. FIEBER SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE
WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MOTION
CARRIED.
I
4.
There
5.
I
were no
citizens who wished
to comment.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
Pete Pacetti ( audience member)
was concemed about the possible
of the lake and wanted to know if the DNR had approved
this yet. He is considering buying a home near the
bay by St.
John' s Bay. J. Bills was not present to discuss the status of the
dredging
preliminary application. Repeated attempts to
made by P. Schuman and were unsuccessful.
contact him were
S. HEADLEY MOTIONED TO MOVE THE UNCOMPLETED
WORK FOR THE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION BACK TO
VIERBICHER & ASSOCIATES. K. ATTWELL SECONDED THE
MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED.
I
ALL WERE
IN FAVOR.
v
I
I
I
I
August 10, 2005
Page 3 of3
6: 00 PM
K. Attwell would like Dr. Thornton to be more
specific about
recommended ways to use chemicals on the lake. One
possibility
is the thick patch of milfoil sou th of where the Bark River flows
into the lake. Paul Price ( a member of the audience) talked about
using pellets
7.
to
kill the weeds rather than
a
weed- cutter.
was
necessary to
using
NEW BUSINESS
a.
2006 CITY BUDGET
Discussion took
place
about whether
or not
it
put $ 2M into the budget for dredging as it might not be done until
2007. It was agreed to put some
money in the budget for various
fees from contractors that may arise in preparation for the
dredging. Discussion took place about putting money in the
budget for chemical treatment of weed control versus money for
new weed harvester.
Again it was noted that Dr.Thornton will
need to be specific in his recommendation of where to use the
chemicals. Money will be put into the budget for WAL State
Convention (Wisconsin Association of Lakes) and the
a
I
r
Regional
meetings.
possibility
8.
as
well
as
I
the
CORRESPONDENCE
a.
9.
Potential budget caps were talked about,
of direct assessment for weed harvesting.
I
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Letter,
July
20, 2005
ADJOURN
B. FIEDER MOTIONED TO ADJOURN FROM THE MEETING. K.
WIEDMEYER SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE WAS NO FURTHER
DISCUSSION. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED. THE
I
I
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7: 50 P. M.
Minutes
Prepared By:
I
I
I
I
September
Page lof3
14, 2005
6: 00 PM
1.
K. Attwell called the
2.
meeting
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Jerry
Dunnick (Dun- ick)
Bonnie Fieber (Feeber)
Dennis Hart
Steve
Richard Landwehr
Bills
Terri Schojnacki ( Nash. Rep)
Phil Schuman
I
Jerry
I
I
Headley
Don Tills
Ken
3.
Wiedmeyer
APPROVE MINUTES OF AUGUST 10, 2005
K. WIEDMEYER MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST
10, 2005 MEETING AS PRESENTED. D. HART SECONDED THE MOTION.
CARRIED.
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
MOTION
I
I
I
I
I
4.
I
No citizens wished to comment.
5.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
It
reported that J. Dorava of Vierbicher has submitted a list of the
projects that need to be completed along with fees associated to complete
them. There are approximately 10 items. T. Hafner is
negotiating the
to
the
work.
D.
Hart
liked
the
timeline
price
that was provided
complete
by J. Dorava and would like it to be included in the contract for the
preliminary application.
was
S. HEADLEY MOTIONED TO COMPLETE THE CONTRACT
NEGOTIATIONS BY SEPTEMBER 25, 2005 SO THAT VIERBICHER
AND ASSOCIATES COULD MAKE A PRESENTATION TO THE LAKE
WELFARE COMMITTEE (LWC) ON OCTOBER 13, 2005 AND SO THE
DREDGING APPLICATION COULD BE PRESENTED TO THE DNR NO
LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, 2005 AND TO INCLUDE THE TIMELINE
AS PART OF THE CONTRACT.
D. TILLS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THERE WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
MOTION CARRIED.
I
I
I
September
6: 00 PM
14, 2005
Page 3 of3
c..,
It
was
done
e.
the
on
consensus
this
of the committee that
more
research needed to be
topic.
CAPITAL BUDGET ITEMS
Budget
sheets
were
given
to the members
prior
to the
meeting
for
informational purposes.
P. Schuman will be contacted for additional information
Current state of maintenance
on
police boat
Replacement
S.
Headley thought
Dredging 2007 was too high and that $2
of the
was more
be
accurate.
budgeted
the weed
on:
harvesting equipment
in 2007
that the $
2.4 million
budgeted for
dredging
million for restoration and
The members
thought
in 2006 ( approximately
that
$ 200, 000)
some
and
money should
approximately
1.8 in 2007.
Hatchery Dam, St. John' s Park Fishing Pier - more money
should be designated for this item
Information regarding the Geason Park development
Well on the NW quadrant municipal well site investigation
Open space conservancy program
Fish
v
7.
NEW BUSINESS
a.
DANE COUNTY LAWN FERTILIZER ORDINANCE
The ordinance
was
provided
to the
commissioners.
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL PASSING AN
ORDINANCE IN THE CITY OF DELAFIELD SIMILAR TO THE DANE
COUNTY LAWN FERTILIZER ORDINANCE. D. HART SECONDED THE
MOTION. DISCUSSION TOOK PLACE. SIX WERE IN FAVOR. S.
HEADLEY ABSTAINED.
8.
CORRESPONDENCE
a.
9.
MOTION CARRIED.
VIERBICHER E- MAIL
ADJOURN
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO ADJOURN FROM THE MEETING. J. DUNNICK
SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. ALL
WERE IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED.
7: 16 P. M.
c.,
Minutes
Prepared By:
THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT
6: 00 PM
October 12, 2005
Page
1 of 3
I.
Acting Chairperson
2.
K. Attwell called the
meeting
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Bonnie Fieber (exited at 7: 47 p. m.)
Jerry
Jerry
Steve
Headley ( exited
at
8: 05 p. m.)
Bills
Dunnick
Don Tills
Dennis Hart
Ken
Terri
Wiedmeyer
Schojnacki ( Nashotah Rep)
Phil Schuman
Also Present
Tom Hafner, Director of Public Works
Lisa Reas, W Reas Environmental
3.
APPROVE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2005
B. FIEBER MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER
14, 2005 MEETING.
K. WIEDMEYER SECONDED THE MOTION.
WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION.
THERE
ALL WERE IN FAVOR. MOTION
CARRIED.
4.
None.
5.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
T. Hafner gave a brief history of the project. J. Dorava ofVierbicher has
been contacted and has provided a scope of additional services which
would cost an additional $ 10, 000 - $ 15, 000 to complete the project. T.
Hafner has been in contact with J. Dorava about the quote. For various
reasons, T. Hafner did not think that the City should use J. Dorava of
Vierbicher to complete the project. T. Hafner suggested going back to the
original RFP' s and seeing who
input to complete the project.
the other firms
were
and
getting
their
The commissioners were in agreement
that another firm is needed to complete the project. Frustration was
expressed about the amount of time that has passed. T. Hafner will
obtain some proposals for the project and report back to the LWC next
month.
S.
Headley suggested taking
the
preliminary application
6: 00 PM
November 9, 2005
Page 1 of 3
1.
Chairperson
2.
P. Shuman called the
meeting
ROLL CALL
Pre sen t
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Jerry Bills
Jerry Dunnick
Bonnie Fieber (entered at 6: 07 p. m.)
Steve Headley ( exited at 7: 00 p. m.)
Phil Schuman
Dennis Hart
Don Tills
Ken Wiedmeyer
John Brodie (entered at 6: 07 p. m.)
Also Present
Tom Hafner
Lisa Reas, Shoreland Restoration
3.
Specialist
APPROVE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 12, 2005
J. DUNNICK MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER
12, 2005 MEETING. D. TILLS SECONDED THE MOTION. THERE WAS NO
4.
No citizens
5.
were
present.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
reported that three other proposals were originally submitted
for this project: Ruekert- Mielke, TN & Associates, and Foth & Van Dyke.
For various reasons, the first two companies are not feasible, but T.
Hafner is attempting to contact Foth & Van Dyke. He has also been in
contact with the DNR who stated that they have not received any
application from the City on the project. A meeting with the DNR to
determine appropriate action will take place at 10 a. m. on November 30,
2005 at the DNR offices in Waukesha. P. Schuman, S. Headley, and K.
Attwell will accompany T. Hafner to the meeting.
T. Hafner
I
I
6: 00 PM
November 9, 2005
Page 2 of 3
I
b.
I
RESTORATION CONSULTANT REPORT
at the meeting
Lisa Reas, Shoreland Restoration Specialist was present
and through a PowerPoint presentation reviewed the concepts, goals,
classification of the
possible demonstration sites, grant opportunities,
SEWRPC
lake,
the
status of vegetation on the shorelines around
utilization of site
Inventory from 1999, restoration strategies, protection,
for
characteristics, natural recovery, accelerated recovery, focal point
increased
vegetation protection, managing existing vegetation,
of a buffer,
functions
access/ less vegetation, loss of native vegetation,
demonstration
from
rooting depths of native plants, points excluded
site signs, St. Johns Park,
projects, Bleeker Street boat ramp, visible
areas, possible
Nagawaukee Park Shoreline, visible private restoration
of
restoration
dredged areas ( this
cost sharing, and Phase 1II vegetative
took place by the committee. L.
phase is " on hold"). General discussion
In
Reas will attend the next meeting and present more information.
addition P. Schuman will be provided a copy of the Power Point
presentations from this and the previous meeting.
c.
BOATHOUSE CODE
to Delafield
copy of the Suggested Changes
be in favor of the
not
would
he
that
Boathouse Codes. K. Attwell stated
on top of
amenities
not
allow
code due to the fact that the proposal did
10).
the flat roof and because of the side lot setback required (
limitations proposed and it was
on the
took
D. Tills distributed
Discussion
suggested
a
place
to increase
inspector for input.
d.
the
height
height. D.
He will
report
Tills will consult with the
back at the next
building
meeting.
2006 BUDGET
After
Members of the committee received a copy of the capital budget.
the
about
aquatic plant
reading the commentary in the budget, concerns
was that
committee
of
the
The
were
eliminated.
feeling
harvester
general
with the
the weed harvesting during the summer months was good,
not
receive
did
which
lake
of
the
corner
exception of the northwestern
contact
should
much attention. When residents are not pleased, they
I
I
I
corner
the DPW. T. Hafner will be contacted regarding the northwestern
older
the
piece
of the lake. B. Fieber discussed the possibility of keeping
the
to
one
new
the
option
to
provide
of equipment in addition
purchasing
the
of increasing weed harvesting activities. J. Brodie discussed using
with
this
will
discuss
older piece of equipment as back- up. P. Schuman
the police boat and
T. Hafner. The committee questioned the need for
s needs and if
thought that if the present boat met the police department'
D. Tills
maintenance was not an issue, the boat should not be replaced.
for
a future
relief
tax
and
incentives
shoreline restoration
discussed
budget.
P. Schuman reviewed the northwest
quadrant municipal
well
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6: 00 PM
December 14, 2005
Page
I.
I
2.
meeting
I
I
ROLL CALL
Present
Absent
Kent Attwell
Richard Landwehr
Jerry Bills
Jerry Dunnick
Dennis Hart
I
I
I
Bonnie Fieber
Steve
Headley
Phil Schuman
Don Tills
Ken
Wiedmeyer
John Brodie ( Nashotah
3.
Rep
Alternate)
APPROVE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 9, 2005
K. ATTWELL MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE
NOVEMBER 9, 2005 MEETING. D. TILLS SECONDED THE MOTION.
ALL WERE IN FAVOR.
MOTION
CARRIED.
4.
ClTIZEN' S COMMENTS ON ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE AGENDA.
No citizens
5.
I
1 of 3
were
present.
OLD BUSINESS
a.
meeting with the DNR took place on November 30 to review the
dredging application as it is to date. K. Attwell stated that the DNR
would like the application to be finished and submitted sometime in
January, 2006. With the exception of the Kettle and St. Johns' Bay, the
DNR did not have many objections. Regarding the sediment sampling,
the DNR may consider samples done within the last ten years. It was
thought that the meeting went very well. A memo dated December 5,
2005 regarding the meeting on dam restoration with the DNR was
A
distributed to the lake commissioners. The DNR would like the dam
repaired in a faster mode than previously stated. RFP' s for the
preliminary application and dam repair are being conducted.
Discussion took place on contacting the DNR to obtain a list of firms that
for and received approval for a preliminary application and
have
applied
dredging project.
I
6: 00 PM
December 14, 2005
Page 2 of3
I
b.
RESTORATION CONSULTANT REPORT
An email from Lisa Reas
was
distributed to the commissioners. The
demo planting on the berm in St. John' s
email included sketches of a
Park along with a draft plan dated December 7, 2005. Volunteers are
1. Reas will
being sought for shoreline restoration on private properties.
for
these
candidates
need to decide what properties would be good
demonstration sites. Possible funding/ funding assistance for the private
discussed. The drawing of the berm in St. John' s Bay should
include areas for pedestrians to access the lake and boaters to come
sites
was
I
I
I
I
I
I
ashore.
c.
BOATHOUSE CODE
no
A draft of the boathouse code was submitted to M. Carlson, but
the
at
discussed
January
comments have been received. This will be
meeting.
d.
LAWN FERTILIZER ORDINANCE
s
The Wisconsin Green Industry Federation is challenging Dane County'
ordinance. Until the Dane County ordinance has been decided, the City
of Delafield will not take action on this subject.
e.
2006 BUDGET
of the Fish Hatchery Dam has been approved. The money
allotted for the Mill Pond dam has been zeroed out. A new weed
in.
harvester will be purchased and the old weed harvester will be traded
The
2007.
money
The purchase of a police boat has been deferred until
in the 2005 budget remained in the
for sediment
The
repair
allocated
budget
River
7.
analysis
The USGS test station at Nagawicka Road at the Bark
approved along with phosphorous testing.
for 2006.
was
NEW BUSINESS
a.
SPRING LAKE AWARENESS MEETING MAY 10, 2006
for May 10,
The date of the Spring Lake Awareness meeting has been set
will
2006. B. Fieber will chair coordination of the meeting. Some topics
Lisa Reas include restoration and dredging. A presentation will take by
this will be the main focus.
b.
NALMS SYMPOSIUM REPORT
on sediment
P. Schuman attended the NALMS Symposium. A brochure
at the
the
commissioners
to
around
dewatering was obtained and passed
I
I

2005 LWC Minutes - City of Delafield

Transcription

Similar documents

Fitger`s Lake View Office

Captain Geech

Presented by:

Brant Lake Getaway

to the article. - The FUND for Lake George

Loyalist Township - County of Lennox and Addington

WE ARE THE PLACE TO CHILL AT THE LAKE

Get Your Kicks this Fall with LWYSA!

chantecler 16-a, las fuentes — $118,00 usd steffen features

Sherando Flyer - Virginia Hemophilia