Fishers Parks Plan_Phase 1.indd
Transcription
Fishers Parks Plan_Phase 1.indd
Fishers Parks Plan Phase 1|July 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE Rachel Johnson, Assistant Director of Planning Sean O’Grady, Assistant Director of Public Works Sue Harrison, Senior Planner Tony Elliot, Director of Parks and Recreation PREPARED BY: Erin Riley, Community Development Intern Taylor Firestine, Community Development Intern Ty Adley, Community Development Intern REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PARKS PLAN 1-2 GLOSSARY 3-4 INVENTORY 5-52 PARKS MAPS 53-60 PARK INFORMATION 61-62 SUCCESSFUL AND INNOTIVE LOCAL PARKS 63-68 UDO REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE 69-72 PARKS & HEALTH 73-74 PARKS & ENVIRONMENT 75-76 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) 77-78 GRANTS AND FUNDING 79-80 PREVIOUS PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN SUMMARY The timeline for the existing plan was 10 years set in 2005 and was to be complete in 2015. Demographic and population projections were addressed, as well as the existing park facilities/trails and major priorities with plans of action. To complete this master plan, a wide range of data was used including census and population projections, population surveys, historic data, department contact information, Fishers Chamber of Commerce recognitions and characteristics, GIS data, site inventory, public input, and budget information. 2011-2015 PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE SUMMARY In July 2011, a 5-year plan update was created to supplement the existing 10-year master plan that was created in 2005. This update included a more extensive look into information about the community and the condition of existing facilities (e.g., parks, schools, undeveloped land, and accessibility). Public participation was a major contribution to the master plan update, and random and non-random samples were taken for feedback on the existing parks. Areas that need further analysis were pointed out along with impact fees, an action plan with priorities listed, and a schedule for improvements. Like the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the update pooled data from a variety of sources such as United States Census data and Statistical Analysis of Development, population projections, inventory of parks and schools, site plans and maps, greenways and proposed trails, 2005/2010 park “standards”, a parks survey, Southeastern Program of Recreational Team Sports, Inc. (S.P.O.R.T.S.) projections and needs, and costs and estimations. 1 GOAL OF CURRENT PARK PLAN The goal of the Fishers Park Plan is to create a vision for Fishers’ Park System with public input and interdepartmental plan development. This plan will outline a strategy to meet the parks needs of Fishers’ residents to 2040. It will also determine the desired quantity, distribution, and type of the City’s future parks inventory based on community input, population projections (demographics and anticipated capacity needs), geographic land distribution, and future land use needs. The plan will act as a blueprint for future parks, and land use decisions by staff and elected officials. The scope of the plan is to cover all existing and planned parks and open space, but will not include greenways (although referenced) nor activities and programming (although park amenities are included). 2 ACTIVE PARK Active recreation includes activities that are competitive such as sports and non-competitive such as enjoying playground equipment. The sports are often unscheduled games and recreational leagues. ATHLETIC PARK Athletic recreation consists of organized sports teams whether that is school related, recreational, or competitive travel leagues such as baseball, football, lacrosse, soccer, and softball. COMMUNITY PARKS Community parks are larger diverse areas with some with preserved environmental features. They often meet the communities’ recreation needs or preserve significant natural areas. They are often 20-50 acres in size and have a service area between ½-1 ½ miles (RDG Planning & Design, 2009). MINI PARKS Mini parks are generally less than one acre, and often found in most urban settings. They address specific recreation or open space needs with places to sit, and have a service are of less than a ¼ mile (RDG Planning & Design, 2009). MULTI-USE PARKS REGIONAL PARK A multi-use park is a park that is utilized for more than one specific activity. This could mean the combination of active and passive park functions. A regional park often draws people and athletic teams outside of the greater Fishers community. These parks are more than 50 acres with a service size of 1 ½ - 3 miles, and often include intensive recreational facilities or large nature preserves (RDG Planning & Design, 2009). NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS Neighborhood parks are the most common park. They provide opportunities and spaces for informal active and passive recreation. These parks are often 5- 10 acres in size with 2-3 acres dedicated to open space. This type of park generally has a service area between ¼ - ½ mile around the park (RDG Planning & Design, 2009). PASSIVE PARK Passive recreation includes activities that are unorganized and noncompetitive such as picnicking, hiking, bird watching, and bicycling. 3 TRAILHEADS Trailheads are not always parks, but sometimes will have park and recreational amenities, such as playgrounds and shelters. Trailheads designate the beginning or end of a trail system allowing users to park their vehicle and bike then utilize the trails. RESOURCES RDG Planning & Design (2009). Parks and Recreation. In Carlisle Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 5). http://www.rdgusa.com/crp/carlisle/Chapter%20 5%20Parks%20and%20Recreation.pdf 4 INTRODUCTION Fishers’ parks system was inventoried for the purpose of attaining a snapshot in time of the services, features, assets, and deficiencies that exist throughout the system. A three person team of community development interns evaluated the parks over a month period in the summer of 2014. Parks and facilities were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated by use and condition. This analysis provides insight into the current state of Fishers’ overall parks system. Parks tend to be programmed for active and athletic recreation, with a range of fields and sports facilities (e.g. Cyntheanne Park, Cumberland Park, Mudsock Fields, and Olio Fields); natural areas, most of which are largely undeveloped and home to mature hardwood trees, prairies, and hiking trails (e.g. Ritchey Woods, Sand Creek, Thorpe Creek, Cheeney Creek, and Hoosier Woods); and more traditional parks with diverse uses (e.g. Billericay, Brooks School, Harrison Thompson, and Roy G. Holland Memorial parks). This inventory will be used to consider what steps the Fishers Parks Department should take in the coming years to diversify the system’s offerings, enhance, and maintain existing facilities as the community continues to grow. Note: * denote parks that are currently planned or under construction, as of July 2014. 5 6 BEE CAMP CREEK TRAILHEAD* SUMMARY SUMMARY At about 0.25 acres, the Central Green and adjoining Liberty Plaza Veterans Memorial is under construction (as of summer 2014) and will be completed in 2015. The Central Green will be a passive community park, offering a vista of Town Hall and a gathering space for Nickel Plate District visitors. The green will include angled parking spaces on the east and west sides and a large planting of trees. Permeable pavers will be installed as a result of an initiative to include more sustainable features within Fishers’ parks. Also, with an increasing desire to include more indigenous materials within the parks, limestone seating walls will be incorporated into the green. At roughly 0.5 acres, Bee Camp Creek is a trailhead slated to open in 2014. Bee Camp Creek Trailhead is in close proximity of the Ambria residential subdivision, near Olio Road south of East 104th Street. The trailhead sits adjacent to Bee Camp Creek and a mature tree line along its paths. Programmed for passive recreation purposes, the Bee Camp Creek Trailhead includes connections to multiple multiuse paths, a playground, and ten-space parking lot. One mile of new trails will connect to an existing 1.5mile trail at Timberstone Villas. M DR OLIO RD CENTRAL GREEN* 7 EEN ARK d CENT FLAT FORK CREEK PARK* RIVERSIDE FIELDS* SUMMARY SUMMARY When complete in fall 2014, Flat Fork Creek Park will be a 59 acre, large regional park, located at Cyntheanne Road and East 101st Street. Park amenities will include a shelter and restroom building, walking paths and hiking trails, 50’ sledding hill, mountain bike course, tree houses, and fishing ponds. In addition, 20 acres of land will be dedicated to reforestation. All facilities will follow ADA standards for accessibility. At roughly 12 acres, Riverside Fields is a neighborhood park located just north of Riverside Junior High School along Eller Road. The park is bordered by Wapihani Nature Preserve to the west and dense tree coverage directly east. Single-family homes are located further east to the park. Acquired by Fishers in 2014, amenities will include three (3) newly constructed baseball diamonds, restroom building, and pedestrian paths for access (all to be completed in 2015). The park’s programmed for athletic recreational use. NNE RD AM 8 BILLERICAY PARK SUMMARY At 43.5 acres, Billericay is a regional park located at Promise Road and East 126th Street, along Interstate 69. The park is just south of Fishers High School, Sand Creek Elementary School, and Sand Creek Intermediate School. Several single-family residential subdivisions are within a quarter-mile radius of the park. Billericay Park is an active/athletic recreational area, serving as a regional park. Amenities include eight (8) ball diamonds, batting cages, 1.75 miles of multiuse trails, playground, splash pad, and community center, among other facilities. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The park was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Tuesday, June 3, 2014. The weather was mostly sunny with a temperature of 79o F. The splash pad area of Billericay was very popular on this day, with approximately 100 visitors; children, parents, and grandparents were present at the splash pad, which appeared to be the most popular facility in the Fishers parks system. Notable observations include worn grassed areas in and near the batting cages, weathering/chipped paint on the bike racks, bulletin boards near ball diamonds were damaged, and playgrounds near ballparks could use updating. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Most visitors suggested that larger shaded seating areas be offered for parents or guardians watching their children at the splash pad. On the day the park was inventoried, there was a noticeable crowding issue, with most picnic tables and shade seating occupied. A parent suggested that the ground beneath the playground area be covered with recycled rubber instead of mulch, as mulch tends to be kicked into the splash pad area. A second pavilion with seating or shade sails would greatly improve the crowding issue at the splash pad’s pavilion, and provide additional protection from the sun for park-goers. 9 Billericay’s program, with an emphasis on active and athletic recreational activities, proved to be a popular one with visitors. The splash pad was an outstanding example of a regional draw within the Fishers parks system. One family mentioned that they routinely travel from McCordsville (about 10 miles away) to take advantage of the Billericay splash pad. The trails, playgrounds, and ball diamonds were all in exceptional condition with little wear and tear. Billericay Park Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell PROMISE RD This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend BILLERICAY PARK I6 9S Creeks I6 Park Property Trail Heads I6 Trails I6 ´ 9S 9N 9N E 126TH ST OLD 126TH ST HOOSIER RD 450 225 0 450 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 10 BROOKS SCHOOL PARK SUMMARY At 16.5 acres, Brooks School Park is a community park located near the intersection of East 116th Street and Brooks School Road, between Mud Creek and the single-family residential subdivision of Sandstone. The park contains large areas of open green space, with mature trees lining Mud Creek. A pedestrian bridge connects the playground and pavilion area (west of Mud Creek) with the parking lot and restrooms (east of Mud Creek). A 0.75 mile multi-use path meanders along Mud Creek and the perimeter of the park. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Brooks School Park was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Wednesday, May 28, 2014. There were overcast skies, with a temperature of 71o F. There were dozens of visitors, ranging from joggers and dog walkers, to children and a women’s yoga meeting. All facilities, signage, and amenities were in excellent condition, with several young trees planted along the perimeter of the park. Notable observations include worn grassed areas in and near the batting cages, weathering/chipped paint on the bike racks, bulletin boards near ball diamonds were damaged, and playgrounds near ballparks could use updating. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT 11 One park visitor mentioned that shaded seating areas were at a premium, mostly due to the park’s popularity and number of young trees. Planting additional trees that will grow to have large canopies or adding another pavilion, closer to the playground with seating, would increase the availability of shaded seating for parents and grandparents who wish to supervise their children on the playground. Encouraging and enhancing play along Mud Creek should be an important goal for the future of the park; this feature is unique within the parks system and very popular among young children. The open space/multi-purpose field area nearest to 116th Street could be a suitable location for a skate park, an amenity that has been mentioned in past public input on parks. Fishers’ first public tennis courts would also be suitable here. Brooks School’s program successfully employs a mixed-use active/ passive approach to its land. The vast majority of the park is preserved as open space for athletic fields. Nearly a mile of multiuse trails encircles the park, allowing for various pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding single family residential subdivisions. A basketball court, playground, pavilion, and accessibility to Mud Creek create a vibrant and diversified set of uses for visitors. Brooks School Park LIM N TO ES ED DRIFTSTONE DR Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox R COB B LEFIEL D CT Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell Legend SIL VE RA Creeks DO LV D EB BROOKS SCHOOL RD LES TO NE HA MB L CO BB LED GE LED GE STO RO C KC NE C T IR This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. DR BROOKS SCHOOL PARK DR Park Property Trail Heads Trails E 116TH ST ´ SANDERLING TRCE 400 200 0 AC AL AP AN HI W AY 400 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 12 CHEENEY CREEK NATURAL AREA SUMMARY The pond appeared to have an issue with algae. Noise detracted from the nature experience, with construction of multi-family units to the south of the park and traffic from Interstate 69. At 27.2 acres, Cheeney Creek Park is a neighborhood park located at Lantern Road and Fishers Pointe Boulevard, near Interstate 69 and the Hoosier Heritage Port Authority Railroad. The park is surrounded by residential neighborhoods, which consists mostly of single-family homes and multi-family apartments. The park is heavily wooded with a pond, and the southern border of the park follows the course of Cheeney Creek. The park can be accessed from Fishers Pointe Boulevard. Cheeney Creek Natural Area is a passive recreational area, including nearly two (2) miles of hiking and nature trails and a pond for fishing. The park’s program, with an emphasis on passive recreational opportunities (e.g. hiking, bird watching, fishing), was adequate including fairly appropriate facilities conducive to these activities. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The Cheeney Creek Natural Area was evaluated and inventoried on Tuesday, May 27, 2014, in the mid-afternoon hours. The weather waso partly cloudy with high humidity and a temperature of 86 F. The park was in light use, with a handful of hikers visible. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Erosion control should be a priority along Cheeney Creek, especially with construction and stormwater runoff immediately south of the park. The park could benefit from improved signage visibility (e.g. moving the welcome sign to the intersection of Lantern Road and Fishers Pointe Boulevard) and increasing available benches and trash receptacles along trails. The addition of native plant and tree identification signage throughout the park would be a beneficial educational component. The trails at Cheeney Creek Natural Area could be widened slightly to accommodate parks and recreation maintenance vehicles that drive the paths. Because the trails lacked gravel and were narrow in some spots, these vehicles had left deep tire tracks in the mud, leaving some trails uneven and potentially dangerous; however, it should be necessary to limit ATV use on trails or restrict it completely to protect natural areas. 13 Cheeney Creek is slated to be the location of a new trailhead and paved multipurpose trail in 2015. Cheeney Creek Natural Area Town Council FISH E Linda Gaye Cordell DR E This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. DAVIS WAY Clerk-Treasurer A NORTH C DR RE TRA IL S RIE AI R P SQ W UA E RI AI R P 9S DR 9N I6 9S G RD T I6 DR RD DR 9N rn We ste Y SK AY EW VI RN TE N LA C NI EW VI I6 ´ OW ILL W W LVD I6 KC RLO O Trails DI NG RN TE N LA OV E W IN Parks TE B BANA DR E SC NA TU Ra il R oa d T TH IST Legend No rfo lk LE RD G HIDDEN R DG Trail Heads OIN FOXTAIL CT HEATHER LN Creeks RS P CHEENEY CREEK NATURAL AREA BRIAR STONE LN TIMBER SPRINGS John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox 580 290 0 580 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us July 2014 14 CUMBERLAND PARK SUMMARY At 38 acres, Cumberland is a community park located at East 106th Street and Cumberland Road. The park is bisected by Mud Creek, with mature trees bordering the west and small, single-family residential neighborhoods (Bradford Knoll and Pine Bluff Overlook) to the north and southeast. Cumberland is an athletic park, with a pavilion, community center, concession and restroom building, seven (7) soccer fields, and disc golf course. About half a mile of nature and multi-use trails are available in the park. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Cumberland Park was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-afternoon hours of Tuesday, May 27, 2014. The weather was partly cloudy with a slight breeze, humid, and 88o F. The park was in very light use. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Adding paved trails between the athletic fields and disc golf course to connect to the existing multi-use paths and parking lot would provide an easier way of access for visitors with strollers or wheelchairs. Bleachers could also be added to the fields for the comfort of guests utilizing the park for athletic events. Reclaiming at least one of the soccer fields for a separate recreational use (e.g. a “boundless playground” or ADA-compliant splash pad incorporating Mud Creek) could help diversify the park’s program and turning the park into a true “community” gathering center, especially for residents in the adjacent neighborhoods. Cumberland Park could also be considered for a hands-on “adventure play area,” geared toward children embracing nature (e.g. Mud Zone, Plant Zone, Water Zone, etc.). Emphasizing active recreational activities (e.g. soccer, trails, and disc golf), Cumberland Park includes facilities in excellent condition with enough quality space to accommodate soccer tournaments and other sporting events. 15 Cumberland Park Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox F DR PINE BLUF OAK KNOL L LN E 106TH ST Clerk-Treasurer This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. MB CU LA ER ND PA D RK R CUMBERLAND RD OVERCREST DR Linda Gaye Cordell CUMBERLAND PARK BROTHERS CT Creeks Trail Heads Parks B O DF RA RD KN L OL DR CT BOXWOOD Legend Trails ´ 440 220 0 440 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us July 2014 16 CYNTHEANNE PARK SUMMARY Spanning 51.9 acres, Cyntheanne Park is a large regional park located near the intersection of Cyntheanne Road and 126th Street, north of Southeastern Parkway. The park borders Hamilton Southeastern Junior High School to the south, some single-family homes to the west and north, and agriculture and woodlands in the surrounding vicinity. Cyntheanne Park is an athletic recreational park containing five (5) multi-use athletic fields, a mile of multiuse paths and nature trails, playgrounds, and a concession/restroom building. An extensive paved parking lot is included, with 595 parking spaces, 12 of which are handicap spaces. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The park was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-afternoon hours of Friday, May 30, 2014. The weather waso sunny, hot, and muggy, with a temperature of about 86 F. Very few visitors were using the park at inventory time; however, a couple of bicyclists and joggers utilized the path along the perimeter of the athletic fields. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT The park is in excellent condition overall, though a few opportunities for improvement do exist. Planting shade trees near the concession and restroom building, especially surrounding the playgrounds, would reduce direct afternoon sunlight and create a more comfortable experience for park users not in bleachers watching matches. Also, extending the paths from the bleachers (where they currently end) south to connect with the perimeter path would offer more connections across the athletic fields. Encouraging increase natural prairie growth (especially along the north perimeter and northeast corner of the park) should be a priority to enhance native ecosystems, diversify the current offerings of the park, and cutting the costs on maintaining grass. 17 Cyntheanne North Park Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox E 126TH ST Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend CYNTHEANNE PARK NORTH CYNTHEANNE RD Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails ´ 380 190 0 380 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 18 ELLER FIELDS SUMMARY At 4.6 acres, Eller Fields is a small neighborhood park located on Eller Road, north of Allisonville Road. The park is bordered to the north by a single-family residential neighborhood (Eller Commons), to the east by a multi-family residential complex (Deer Brook Apartments), and to the west by the Fishers Department of Public Works Maintenance Garage and Wastewater Treatment Plant. Eller Fields is an active recreational park, including a baseball and softball field and a playground with some open green space. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The park was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-afternoon hours of Friday, May 23, 2014. The weather was sunny and comfortable, with a temperature of 72o F. Upon arrival, there were no park users, though it appears the parking lot was being used for employees at the adjacent Public Works Garage. Notable observations include the ball diamonds, picnic table, bleachers, playground, and restrooms being in good condition and well-maintained. Sections of the wood fence, chain-linked fence, and water fountain button are currently broken or damaged. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT The green space surrounding the ball diamonds and playground noticeably lacked tree coverage or shade. There were only a few issues with wear and tear around the ball diamonds, like damaged wood and chain link fencing. There was also a noticeable deficiency in the pedestrian and bicycle accessibility to the park. Multi-use paths abruptly end just short of the park itself, stopping at Eller Road and the access drive to the parking lot and maintenance garage. Overall, fixing some normal wear and tear on the park and adding shade trees will greatly improve the park’s aesthetics and comfort for visitors. Improved pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding residential neighborhoods should also be a priority to ensure safe access across Eller Road. 19 The park’s program, with an emphasis on active recreational opportunities (e.g. baseball and softball, children’s play, etc.), was adequate, with appropriate facilities conducive to these activities. Though it appeared to be unplanned, the “green fence” between the baseball field and Eller Road was an interesting addition to the park, intentional or not. Hoosier Woods Town Council WOODMILL DR John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox ELLER DR Clerk-Treasurer ELLER RD Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. ELLER FIELDS Legend Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails ´ 160 80 0 160 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 20 FISHERS HERITAGE PARK AT WHITE RIVER SUMMARY At 32.4 acres, Fishers Heritage Park at White River is a community park located at the intersection of East 106th Street and Eller Road. Single-family residential subdivisions border the park to the south and east, while dense tree coverage and the White River borders the park to the north and west. Fishers Heritage Park is a passive recreational park, including open green space, a sledding hill, 1.02 miles of multi-use paths and riverfront trails, and the Ambassador House and Gardens. Bird watching, hiking, picnicking, jogging, walking, and sledding are common activities supported by the park. The Ambassador House is privately operated and hosts special events, such as weddings and receptions. In 1999, the Ambassador House was listed on the National Register of Historic Places, one of only two such designees in the town. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The park was evaluated and inventoried in the early afternoon hours of Friday, May 23, 2014. The weather was sunny and clear, with a temperature of 72o F. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT A “tranquility park” with expanded flower gardens, addition of water features, aromatic floral displays, sculptures/ public art, and textured pathways (e.g. “sensory garden”) could evolve Fishers Heritage Park from a community park to a regional draw. The opportunity of expanding the existing trail along the White River into a greenway with connections to other local destinations (i.e. Carmel’s Hazel Landing Park, Conner Prairie, etc.) would bring more recreational opportunities to Fishers’ riverfront. Continuing to capitalize on the Ambassador House as a historic landmark and events space is important in sustaining the park as a community asset. 21 Heritage Meadows Park Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Ra il R oa d SOUTH ST Clerk-Treasurer HERITAGE MEADOWS PARK MO LL YC T MORGAN DR LINCOLN CT MEADOWS DR LN M SSO SP RIN G Trails BL O Trail Heads AU TU MN H Park Property AR VE ST Creeks HERITAGE MEADOWS PARK FRANCES ST LANTERN RD DR Legend FOUNTAINVIEW LN No rfo lk This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. EMMANUEL CT We ste rn Linda Gaye Cordell ROYAL DR FOU N DER S PL ´ 300 150 0 300 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 22 HAMILTON PROPER PARK options for nearby residents may work to better integrate the park with nearby residences. SUMMARY At 18.5 acres, Hamilton Proper is a community park located at the intersection of Hoosier Road and East 116th Street, surrounded by single-family subdivisions to the south, east, and west, while a farmstead zoned R-2 sits to the north of the park. A mature tree line along the south border separates Hamilton Proper from The Hawthorns Golf Course. Hamilton Proper is an athletic recreational park while dually serving as a passive green space which holds Mud Creek’s floodwaters during periods of heavy rainfall or snowmelt. The park includes four multi-use athletic fields, open space, a retention basin, and gravel parking. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The park was evaluated and inventoried in the midmorning hours of Thursday, May 28, 2014. The weather was sunny with overcast skies and a temperature of 71o F. At the time of inventory, there were no visitors at Hamilton Proper. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Scenario 1 (keep current central functions): Although multiuse athletic fields are the main draw to Hamilton Proper, there was a noticeable lack of permanent and/or shaded seating. Planting additional trees near the pond with a walking trail and seating could open the park to a greater range of users. Native tree plantings and natural grass growth will eliminate maintenance costs and help alleviate erosion during periods of flooding. Scenario 2 (transformative development): Besides Brooks School Park, Hamilton Proper could be another option for the location of a skate park. Hamilton Proper’s central location along 116th Street and space for parking and expansion is ideal; however, it’s important to research how the use of concrete over an extensive area of the park would affect stormwater runoff and flooding along Mud Creek. Though it may be suitable in terms of space, this scenario may not be the most feasible. 23 A sidewalk runs between the north side of the park and East 116th Street; however, there are no pedestrian or bicycle connections to the park from surrounding neighborhoods. Providing safe and accommodating transportation Hamilton Proper appears to be one of the lesser-used parks within the system, given the small number of facilities and singular program of the park. Hamilton Proper Park HOOSIER RD KITTERY DR Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer E 116TH ST Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend HAMILTON PROPER PARK Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails ´ 380 190 0 HA W WHISTLER PASS HERITAG E PT HAMILTON PASS TH O RN RD G 380 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 24 HARRISON THOMPSON PARK SUMMARY At 10 acres, Harrison Thompson Park is a neighborhood park located at the intersection of Harrison Parkway and Conner Knoll Parkway in the midst of a several conjoined single-family residential subdivisions. Harrison Thompson Park is an active recreational park with several amenities, including two formal ball diamonds and one informal ball diamond, a soccer field, playground, restrooms, picnic shelter, and multi-use trails. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The park was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Tuesday, May 27, 2014. The weather waso partly cloudy and very muggy, with a temperature of 75 F. Including town landscape maintenance staff, the park’s multi-use paths were frequented by joggers and dog walkers. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Vandalized facilities appeared to be the largest problem, with many walls and equipment looking weathered or outdated. Some playground equipment (especially the slide), garage door near the restrooms, and shed walls were in need of attention. The fences around the ballparks, though intact, appear to be rusted. Overall, Harrison Thompson Park is in acceptable condition. The tree coverage, athletic facilities, and multi-use trails are assets that enable the park to be a popular destination for recreation. However, vandalized facilities and dead or dying ash trees work against these positive attributes and create a less than attractive community gathering space. Sand volleyball courts could be a possible addition to the park. Harrison Thompson Park appears to be well-utilized. The park’s program, with an emphasis on active recreational opportunities, was very adequate, with appropriate facilities conducive to these activities. The soccer field, ball diamonds, and 0.75 miles of multiuse paths were all in very good condition. In addition to its connectivity and ease of access to the residential setting, another strength was the tree coverage. Though, it appeared to be diminishing from dead or dying ash trees. 25 Harrison Thompson Park Town Council BARNETT PL John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. CO NN ER KN O LL P KY HARRISON PKY HARRISON THOMPSON PARK Legend Creeks Park Property Trail Heads ACADIA PL ´ ARDENNES DR Trails 200 100 0 200 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 26 HERITAGE MEADOWS PARK SUMMARY At roughly 6.5 acres, Heritage Meadows Park encompasses two pocket parks located in the Heritage Meadows single-family residential neighborhood. They are currently used as active neighborhood parks, linked by a multi-use path. The north pocket park includes exercise stations, while the south pocket park (also known as Big Wheel Park) includes playground equipment and a children’s “big wheel” bike track. The parks were acquired by Fishers in 2014. Heritage Meadows Park will include a multi-use path connection via the Nickel Plate Trail (north to downtown Fishers and south to Cheeney Creek Natural Area) as well as new playground equipment. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Heritage Meadows Park was inventoried in the mid-morning hours of June 3, 2014. The weather was partly cloudy and humid, with a temperature of 73o F. It appeared that the north park was rarely used, with the exception of joggers on its paths. Big Wheel Park’s visitors included grandparents supervising their grandchildren playing on the playground. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Fishers acquired the park in 2014. Plans include replacing the substandard playground equipment and removing the exercise stations to provide open space. The multi-use paths will also be widened and resurfaced in preparation with connecting to the Nickel Plate Trail in coming years. The mature trees at Big Wheel Park should be preserved and accommodated in future plans to save shade for comfortable seating. A recycling receptacle, trail mileage signs, and signage denoting this as a section of the Nickel Plate Trail should also be installed. Though the north exercise park has been proposed to become green space, and interesting, interactive installation could activate this end of the park. A porch swing grove would invite guests and neighbors to mingle together. 27 Heritage Meadows Park Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Ra il R oa d SOUTH ST Clerk-Treasurer HERITAGE MEADOWS PARK MO LL YC T MORGAN DR LINCOLN CT MEADOWS DR LN M SSO SP RIN G Trails BL O Trail Heads AU TU MN H Park Property AR VE ST Creeks HERITAGE MEADOWS PARK FRANCES ST LANTERN RD DR Legend FOUNTAINVIEW LN No rfo lk This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. EMMANUEL CT We ste rn Linda Gaye Cordell ROYAL DR FOU N DER S PL ´ 300 150 0 300 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 28 HOOSIER WOODS SUMMARY At 10.1 acres, Hoosier Woods is a neighborhood park located just to the west of Hoosier Road Elementary School at East 121st Street. The park can be accessed from Sweet Creek Trail in the Sumerlin Trails single-family residential subdivision. Hoosier Woods is a passive recreational area used for such activities as bird watching and hiking. The park is heavily forested with mature trees and includes a 0.66 mile nature trail. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Hoosier Woods was inventoried on Friday, June 6, 2014. It was sunny, with a temperature in the mid-70’s. The park appeared to be very lightly used. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Adding gravel to the nature trails with a couple of benches would create a more welcoming atmosphere for park users, as the trails were quite narrow and muddy on the day of inventory. Improved signage and better connections with East 121st Street would expand the park from being a small neighborhood amenity to a community nature area. Maintaining Hoosier Woods as a natural area with little development could be the best and highest use for the park due to its small size and dense, hardwood forests. 29 Hoosier Woods SC H Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox SWEET CREEK TRL OO LH O US E RD Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell TREASURE TRL Legend Creeks Park Property SAGAMORE WOODS DR This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. HOOSIER WOODS ROUNDTREE RD Trail Heads Trails BIRD KEY BLVD E 121ST ST ´ 250 125 0 250 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 30 MUDSOCK FIELDS SUMMARY At 12.2 acres, Mudsock Fields is a community park off of Interstate 69 to the south on Packers Drive within The Bristols, a single-family residential subdivision. Mudsock Fields is programmed for active/athletic recreation. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Mudsock Fields was inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Monday, June 2, 2014. The weather was overcast with a temperature of 75o F. There were no visitors on the day of inventory; however, the park is heavily-used for sporting events, especially in the fall. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT The park was in excellent condition; however, pedestrian or bicycle paths could be better connected between The Bristols neighborhood and the park to allow for better access. As it stands now, the park is very car-oriented. Bike racks may also be an opportunity to encourage bicycling as an alternative to vehicle. More recycling receptacles should also be available. Fishers’ first public tennis courts could be a welcome addition to Mudsock to welcome more daily users besides just sporting events using the multiuse fields. 31 Mudsock Fields Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox E 131ST ST E 131ST ST Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell I6 This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. 9S I6 I6 9N 9S Legend I6 9N PA MUDSOCK FIELDS Creeks SA ER K C VE Park Property Trail Heads Trails S DER RAI D BL V EE CH RS DE CT CO S D BRON EA RL ´ SEAHAWKS LN R 300 150 0 300 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 32 NICKEL PLATE DISTRICT AMPHITHEATER SUMMARY At about 3.5 acres, the Nickel Plate District Amphitheater and surrounding green space is a community park located on the north side of the Thomas A. Weaver Memorial Municipal Complex on Municipal Drive. The amphitheater is just south and east of the Sunblest Apartment Homes and to the north of Fishers’ central business district. Expandable parking is available surrounding the ellipse, as well as the asphalt parking lots between Fishers’ municipal buildings. Handicap spaces are available at these parking locations. The Nickel Plate Amphitheater is a passive recreational area utilized for community events (e.g. Movies in the Park, Fishers Farmers Market) and concerts with a capacity for 5,000 spectators. The surrounding green space is also home to seating and a gazebo. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The Amphitheater area was inventoried around noon on Monday, June 2, 2014. It was partly cloudy and humid, with a temperature in the mid-70s. Although there were no park users at the time of inventory, the amphitheater is heavily-used in the warmer seasonal months, especially summer evenings where it hosts concerts and community events. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Bike racks should be installed to encourage visitors to use the Nickel Plate Trail and active modes of transportation (i.e., bicycling and walking). Encouraging daytime activities or events in the park (besides concerts) throughout the week would appeal to a larger crowd, especially retired or the Baby Boomer demographic. Free Workout Wednesdays with the Fishers YMCA is a successful example of this already occurring. 33 Amphitheater Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. AMPHITHEATER Legend Trail Heads MUNICIPAL DR Trails Creeks Park Property ´ 140 70 0 140 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us May 2014 34 OLIO FIELDS SUMMARY At 18 acres, Olio Fields is a community park located off East 126th Street, just east of Hamilton Southeastern High School and Olio Road. Single-family residential subdivisions border the southern, northern, and eastern boundaries of the park. Avalon of Fishers (north), Royalwood (south), and South Avalon Estates (west) sit adjacent to Olio Fields. Olio Fields is an active recreational park. Facilities include a playground, six (6) softball fields, a baseball field, a pavilion, and a concessions/restroom building. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Olio Fields was evaluated and inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Thursday, May 28, 2014. The weather was sunny with haze, muggy and 71o F. There were no park visitors at the time of inventory; however, the park is heavily used for tournaments and other baseball-related events. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Bike and pedestrian connections appeared to be an area most in need of improvement at Olio Fields. An informal path has formed between the park and the Royalwood subdivision. Connecting Royalwood’s asphalt path with the concrete path that runs north-south alongside the softball fields should be a priority. No concrete or asphalt path exists between the Patrick A. Hatcher Field and concession/restroom building. 35 Olio Fields Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend OLIO FIELDS Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails ´ 250 125 0 250 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 36 POCKET PARK SUMMARY At about 4,000 square feet, the Pocket Park is located at the block of East 116th Street between Jaycee Street and Moore Street in downtown Fishers. The park is surrounded by one- and two-story commercial businesses. The Pocket Park is a mini park with amenities for passive recreation, including bike racks, benches, chalkboards, a stage, and game table. A local artist’s mural graces the side of a fence bordering the park. EVALUATION/INVENTORY The Pocket Park was inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Tuesday, June 3, 2014. The weather was partly cloudy and humid, with a temperature of 73o F. All amenities were in excellent, new condition. Although there were no visitors at the time of inventory, the park is a popular rest destination during downtown events and patrons of nearby restaurants and businesses. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Blocking noise or alleviating traffic congestion from East 116th Street would improve the comfort level of the Pocket Park. The park itself is in excellent condition, but vehicle congestion from 116th hinders the experience. Traffic calming measures within the Nickel Plate District, as well as brightly painted crosswalks, or midblock pedestrian crossings might improve the overall experience and safety for guests. The park is a popular seating area for Handel’s Ice Cream customers, leaving seating at a premium during peak times. Using the Pocket Park as a place to showcase public art (i.e. open-air gallery) with temporary sculpture or mural exhibits could help increase activity in the park outside of peak times (i.e. Tuesday Night concerts, early evenings), especially in anticipation of the Maple Street improvements. 37 Pocket Park Town Council MOORE ST John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell JAYCEE ST This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend POCKET PARK Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails E 116TH ST ´ 40 20 0 40 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 38 RITCHEY WOODS NATURE PRESERVE SUMMARY At 127 acres, Ritchey Woods Nature Preserve is a regional park located at the intersection of Hague Road and East 106th Street. The Indianapolis Metropolitan Airport borders the park to the south and west, with businesses located across Hague to the east. Single-family homes and a residential subdivision are located across East 106th to the north. About half of the park is moderately to heavily forested, with another half of the land serving as open prairie. A small area of swamp is located in the western section of the park. There is a spacious gravel parking lot located on site. Ritchey Woods Nature Preserve is a large passive recreational park with amenities that include, but are not limited to, 2.25 miles of hiking trails, restrooms, picnic shelter, and observation deck. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Ritchey Woods was evaluated in the mid-afternoon hours of Tuesday, May 27, 2014.The weather was partly cloudy with high humidity and a temperature of 83o F. Several picnickers, hikers, dog walkers, and a nature photographer were seen using the park’s facilities. The park appears to be a popular destination with new facilities and well-maintained amenities. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Minimal wear and tear was observed on park’s facilities. Replacing a couple of missing trail signs, repairing the shed on the Swamp Trail, and better weatherizing and maintaining the infobook on the Orchard Trail and entrance bulletin board would be the largest areas for improvement. The swamp area of the trail creates a destination point within the park. Some trails appeared to be ADA accessible, including the prairie trails. 39 The park’s program, with an emphasis on passive recreational opportunities, was very adequate, with appropriate facilities conducive to these activities. The nature and hiking trails were of appropriate width and were very well maintained. Despite only two trash receptacles and a single recycling receptacle, the park was in well maintained/clean condition and offered an outstanding respite from urban life. Ritchey Woods Nature Preserve Town Council RD RNE RBO SHE John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell E 106TH ST RITCHEY WOODS NATURE PRESERVE HAGUE RD This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails ´ 600 300 0 600 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 40 ROTARY ARCH PARK SUMMARY Spanning about 10,500 square feet, Rotary Arch Park is a mini park located in the heart of downtown Fishers’ Nickel Plate District. The park is at the southwest corner of the intersection of East 116th Street and Lantern Road. An arch monument welcomes guests into the park from the intersection. Rotary Arch Park’s amenities include passive recreational opportunities, such as bench seating, shade trees, and flower gardens. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Rotary Arch Park was inventoried in the mid-morning hours of Tuesday, June 3, 2014. The weather was partly cloudy and humid, with a temperature of 73o F. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT The park’s physical condition is in excellent shape. Due to the park abutting East 116th Street, one of the busiest and most congested arterials into Fishers, car noise and traffic have created a hostile environment for pedestrians. Traffic calming measures within the Nickel Plate District, as well as brightly painted crosswalks are opportunities to ensure safer pedestrian access. A porch swing grove and additional bench seating could increase daily use of the park. Plantings with a maximum height of 8’ could be ringed on the 116th Street side of the park to create a buffer from traffic noise. 41 Rotary Arch Park Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox E 116TH ST Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. ROTARY ARCH PARK Legend Creeks Park Property Trail Heads LA NT ER N RD Trails ´ 50 25 0 50 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 42 ROY G. HOLLAND MEMORIAL PARK SUMMARY Spanning 34.4 acres, Roy G. Holland Memorial Park is a community park located within the Sunblest residential subdivision and in the northwest corner of the Nickel Plate District. The park is an active recreational park, with such amenities as playgrounds, a picnic shelter, community center, open space, ball diamonds, 1.25 miles of multiuse paths, and multi-use athletic fields. The park is also home to the Fishers Freedom Festival, the largest annual community event. In 2014, a new playground, shelter, and splash pad were installed in the park. EVALUATION/INVENTORY Roy G. Holland Park was first inventoried on Friday, May 24, 2014, oin the mid-afternoon hours. It was mostly sunny and 72 F. Several children and families were visiting, as well as joggers and dog walkers. The park was again visited on Monday, June 9, 2014. The weather was mostly cloudy and 62o F. The second inventory day saw joggers, walkers, and dozens of children for day camp. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Islands could be installed throughout the parking lot to assist in pedestrian safety, stormwater management, and naturally cool the pavement on hot summer days— diminishing urban heat island effect. Some paved paths between the ball diamonds could use some resurfacing to avoid standing water and mud in the paths. Additional benches surrounding the playground would benefit parents or guardian in supervising their children on the playgrounds. A few existing benches in this area appeared to have sunken into the ground over time making it difficult to get on and off the benches. Overall, Roy G. Holland Park is one of Fishers’ most beloved parks. With the diverse range of recreational opportunities available there, the park functions as a true community gathering space, not just for the Sunblest neighborhood, but for the entire city. 43 Roy G. Holland Memorial Park Town Council PEW TER P Y LE NT BE John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox C C PL VD LY AR T Linda Gaye Cordell LY AR DR L SAKSONS BLVD BL C Clerk-Treasurer TURK EL This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. FA RL E Y PL FA RL E Y DR ELLIPSE PK Y ROY G. HOLLAND MEMORIAL PARK Legend Creeks KEMBLE CT PARK DR Park Property Trail Heads Trails KENETTA CT LN 400 200 0 LN LD FIE R SP RIN G D ON REGENCY DR ´ T ASH HO LL DAWSON DR AND DR W VIE RK PA 400 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 44 SAND CREEK NATURAL AREA SUMMARY At 7.8 acres, Sand Creek Natural Area is a neighborhood park located between East 121st Street and Sand Creek. The park is surrounded by the Sand Creek Woods and Cumberland Woods single-family residential subdivisions. EVALUATION/INVENTORY At this time, the park does not include any amenities; however, there are mowed trails through the heavily forested park. The park is programmed for passive recreational use, with activities like hiking and bird watching. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Paving the mowed trails and bridging a connection between the existing trail running along the south bank of Sand Creek would allow guests (especially in the Sand Creek Woods and Cumberland Woods neighborhoods) to jog, walk, or bicycle on a greenway between 116th Street and 121st Street. The addition of a few picnic tables and trash receptacles could make Sand Creek Natural Area a true neighborhood gathering space. Sand Creek could be considered as another hands-on “adventure play area” for children. 45 Sand Creek Natural Area BLUE SPRINGS LN Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox E 121ST ST Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. SAND CREEK NATURAL AREA Legend Creeks Park Property Trail Heads Trails EN SP A D R ´ 190 95 0 190 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 46 SAXONY BEACH SUMMARY At about 1.25 acres, Saxony Beach is a community park located along Saxony Lake on Pennington Road, just north of East 131st Street. The beach is within the Saxony residential development. Amenities include a public lakefront swimming beach, 4,500-square foot recreation building (with restrooms and concessions), and multi-use trails ringing the lake. On-street parking is available on Pennington Road and Erlen Drive. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Adding a public boat launch could provide another access point for boaters besides Geist Reservoir. Sail shades or other shade structures could be installed along the beach for guests’ comfort. Sand volleyball courts would also be a suitable addition to the beach. 47 Saxony Beach Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. PENNINGTON RD ERLEN DR Legend Creeks Park Property SAXONY BEACH Trail Heads Trails ´ 150 75 0 150 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers Indiana 46038 48 THORPE CREEK NATURAL AREA SUMMARY Similar to Sand Creek, Thorpe Creek Natural Area is an undeveloped neighborhood park used for passive recreational activities. The heavily wooded park covers 16.2 acres and is located directly east of Geist Overlook, a single-family residential subdivision. OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT Gravel trails could be planned for connections with nearby residential subdivisions for the opportunity of expanding Fishers’ trail network. Thorpe Creek would be another prime location for a hands-on “adventure play area” or “extreme sports park,” with a rock climbing wall or military boot camp-style obstacle course. 49 Thorpe Creek Natural Area Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. THORPE CREEK NATURAL AREA Legend Creeks Park Property CUCHARA CT GRAN Trails BY C T ANTONE CT Trail Heads TO TLE LIT L NP ´ ACACIO DR 300 150 0 300 Feet Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us June 2014 50 NON-MUNICIPAL PARKS Two parks located within Fishers, though not included in this plan, include Geist and Witten parks. Geist is a 17-acre county park under the management and jurisdiction of Hamilton County Parks. Geist includes a canoe launch, public restrooms, and a playground, among other amenities. Witten is a private neighborhood park located within the Saxony development; Witten encompasses trails and open green space. Because Fishers Department of Parks and Recreation does not own nor maintain these parks, they were not analyzed in the community’s service area analysis. CONCLUSION The parks inventory concluded that Fishers possesses a well-maintained, highly-regarded, clean, quality system with few deficiencies; however, much of the current parks system lacks a range of uses and programs to truly cater to all recreational needs of the community and its evolving demographics. Based on the inventory and evaluation stage, top priorities include continued expansion of the trail network, especially greenway extensions linking parks with residential subdivisions. A White River trail connecting from Conner Prairie with Fishers Heritage Park at White River and Riverside Fields could extend to Carmel trails and parks, strengthening the regional pedestrian and bicycle transportation network and recreational opportunities. Increasing access and availability of parks and recreation with an emphasis on alternate modes of transportation should be standard for all community members. Investing long-term in innovative assets is another priority; the goal of diversifying parks system offerings and molding this system into something truly unique to Fishers that appeal to each and every demographic and age group. Ideas outlined for specific parks include a skate park, floral/botanic gardens, sculpture/public art parks, handson “adventure play areas,” increased access to creeks, a “boundless playground,” “extreme sports park,” use of sustainable materials/recycling/composting, native plantings, sand volleyball courts, and public tennis courts. 51 Allocating funds to continue upkeep and maintenance of current parks facilities (especially older parks that are already highly developed) is another priority (e.g. Roy G. Holland Memorial Park, Billericay Park, and Harrison Thompson Park). Managing those areas that currently make Fishers’ park system so successful and highly-regarded should be equally as important as new park development in continuing to sustain quality parkland to match population growth. COMMENTS FROM PARKS USERS Comments from park users are important and useful when approaching a vision for the Fishers Parks Plan, and the comments can be used as background information for this purpose. Each comment should not be taken as the views of the majority of Fishers residents, but rather as the view of individuals at the parks. The following comments were taken from several park-goers during the month of June. BILLERICAY PARK Comments from eight park-goers: •Three park-users enjoyed the splash pad for the access to free outdoor water activities. •Limited shaded seating in close proximity to the play areas. •One resident preferred Carmel parks because they live on the northwest side of town, but make the trip to Billericay for the splash pad. •More tables are needed. •Would prefer rubber material instead of wood chips in the play areas. •Public water fountain closer to the shelter. •Concrete gets slick on the splash pad. •Larger “big kids” play area. •Does not like to take younger children to Brooks School because too many older children play there. •The combination of splash pad and playground is liked because when their child gets bored with one feature of the park, they can go play in a different location. •Sometimes the restrooms are locked. •Resident enjoys that you can rent the shelters for parties and small get-togethers. •More signs about where parking is located and where to go. It can be confusing if you have never been to the splash pad. The resident initially missed the road to parking near the splash pad and had to drive around the entire facility to get back to the correct parking lot. BROOKS SCHOOL PARK Comments from three separate parties: •Park-goer expressed concerns that the swings are too high for kids (3-6 years old) . •More shade is needed. •Grandparents would like more shaded seating areas closer to the play areas. •Children expressed concerns that the basketball rims (double ring rims) are harder to make baskets than the conventional basketball rim. HERITAGE MEADOWS: BIG WHEEL PARK Comments from one park user: •Nearby resident suggested better maintenance of jogging and bike path. •Suggested better and safer access from the south to the park. •A lot of potential, but needs updated play equipment. HARRISON THOMPSON PARK Comments from one park user: •Remove the dead Ash trees and replace them. •Tennis courts not located at the schools, and possibly adding one at this location. •This park is a great place to walk a dog. ROY G. HOLLAND PARK Comment from one park user: •Enjoys using Roy G. Holland Park because there is enough space for different activities. RITCHEY WOODS NATURE PRESERVE Comment from one park user: •Resident likes Ritchey Woods Park for walking. GENERAL PARKS COMMENTS Comments from four parks users: •Prefer to attend parks on the east side of town, mostly due to proximity to their home. •Resident commented on the parks in Fishers being some of the best, well-maintained they have experienced. •A suggestion was made by a resident to incorporate play equipment geared towards a wide range of ages of children. It was harder to watch their children when they are playing in the different areas. •A suggestion was made to make the Parks Guide more pronounced on the Town website. •A suggestion was made to hold events at various times of the year in different parks to get familiar with the different locations around Fishers. •Would like to see a public swimming pool that is not Home Owners Association (HOA) owned in town. •Enjoyed the treasure hunt through the parks. •Loves the parks system in Fishers. First and foremost, making the residents aware of Fishers’ parks and what they have to offer is important. From several comments that were made, it can be determined that the residents enjoyed events that were held at the different parks locations. Organizing events at various times throughout the year at rotating parks locations could help familiarize the residents with the parks while bringing events closer to different neighborhoods in the community. Some example of seasonal events could include Halloween Trick-or-Treating at select park locations, pumpkin carving or launching competitions, more scavenger hunts, bike tour or races through the parks, outdoor ice rinks in the winter, city-wide snowball fight, or snowman/snow-sculpture building. 52 PARK MAPS SUMMARIES FISHERS PARKS BASE MAP The maps with the Parks Plan document look to identify areas of need with Fishers where parks are need as Fishers continues to grow as well as better serve the already established population. Each map serves a different purpose when identifying less serviced areas of Fishers. This map identifies Fishers Parks as well as the incorporated areas of Fishers. This base map has the common layers that are found throughout the additional maps of this document including major streets, water bodies, parks, Fishers incorporated areas and a satellite image of Fishers. Fishers Parks Base Map Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox Clerk-Treasurer Linda Gaye Cordell This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. Legend Major Streets Parks Fishers Corporate Limits 53 2 1 0 2 Miles . Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us July 2014 FISHERS PARKS & SCHOOLS The Fishers Parks and Schools map gives a geographical reference to where all of the parks and schools are located. This spatial reference is helpful when identifying where a park is in relation to the road network and school system. This map helps identify where holes are when parks and schools are combined with a ½ mile service area around each because both offer amenities for public use. Fishers Schools and Parks Service Areas 131ST 131ST ATLANTIC 126TH FLORIDA RINGER 121ST HOOSIER OLIO 126TH 136TH ATLANTIC PENNINGTON 136TH BROOKS SCHOOL MARILYN HOWE This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. PROMISE Linda Gaye Cordell 146TH CYNTHEANNE OLIO 141ST 141ST Clerk-Treasurer PRAIRIE BAPTIST 146TH 146TH PRAIRIE BAPTIST Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox 116TH HAWTHORN 113TH 96TH Legend Schools Major Streets Parks Half Mile Service Area FLORIDA FA LL CR GEORGIA 104TH EE K C CYNTHEANNE GEIST FALL MOLLENKOPF CUMBERLAND LANTERN AL LI SO NV IL LE WILLOWVIEW 106TH HAGUE ELLER 111TH N O N EC C TI U T 101ST 96TH 2 1 0 2 Miles . Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us July 2014 54 PRAIRIE BAPTIST SO U TH EA ST ER N FLORIDA HOOSIER SR 37 I RINGER 69 U 121ST 116TH 136TH OLIO 126TH I 69 S CYNTHEANNE SR 37 S SR 238 PENNINGTON MARILYN BROOKS SCHOOL PROMISE HOWE SR 37 N 136TH 8 23 SR 9 N 131ST I6 131ST -Mini parks serve a ¼ mile radius -Neighborhood parks serve ½ mile -Community parks serve 1 ½ miles -Regional parks serve 2 ½ miles HAWTHORN 126TH PK W Y 113TH FLORIDA CR GEORGIA 104TH FA LL EE K C CYNTHEANNE GEIST FALL MOLLENKOPF AL LI SO 96TH CUMBERLAND LANTERN NV IL LE 106TH HAGUE ELLER 111TH WILLOWVIEW N O N EC C TI U T 101ST 96TH MINI PARKS SR 37 S ATLANTIC SO U TH EA ST FLORIDA HOOSIER SR 37 I RINGER 69 U 121ST 116TH 136TH OLIO 126TH I 69 S PRAIRIE BAPTIST 9 N 131ST I6 131ST SR 238 HAWTHORN ER N ATLANTIC OLIO 8 23 SR PENNINGTON MARILYN PROMISE HOWE SR 37 N 136TH BROOKS SCHOOL 141ST 141ST 146TH CYNTHEANNE 146TH 146TH PRAIRIE BAPTIST Once these different layers are compiled together they create the park system service area. Publically accessible park space correlates to the darker green tint when multiple service areas overlap. The more service areas that overlap, the more amenities people are offered creating a more comprehensive park system. 141ST 141ST ATLANTIC OLIO The map to the right shows where current parks are located within Fishers as well as their associated service areas. A service area is the assigned distance from a park type designation (as seen in the Basic Park Information Chart) and is the average distance people are willing to travel in order to enjoy park amenities. 146TH ATLANTIC 146TH 146TH PRAIRIE BAPTIST FISHERS PARKS SERVICE AREA 126TH PK W Y 113TH 96TH NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 55 CR EE K GEORGIA 104TH FA LL CYNTHEANNE FLORIDA GEIST FALL MOLLENKOPF CUMBERLAND LANTERN AL LI SO NV IL LE WILLOWVIEW 106TH HAGUE ELLER 111TH 96TH C N O N EC 101ST C TI U T ATLANTIC TH EA ST ER N FLORIDA HOOSIER OLIO SO U SR 37 I RINGER 69 U 121ST 116TH 136TH HAWTHORN ATLANTIC SR 37 S 126TH 126TH 113TH FLORIDA GEORGIA CR EE K C CYNTHEANNE GEIST FALL MOLLENKOPF CUMBERLAND LANTERN HAGUE ELLER NV IL LE WILLOWVIEW AL LI SO 96TH 104TH FA LL A zone that is lacking park service is the currently low density region East of Florida Road, West of Atlantic Road, South of I-69, and North of 96th Street. This area is only serviced by Cyntheanne Park and Flat Fork Creek Park. It is recommended that has development continues to occur in this zone that Fishers continuous to build Neighborhood and Community Parks to fill in this less serviced area. PK W Y 111TH 106TH After the analysis of the maps, a pattern began to show with the help of the Community Parks. The dark shaded green area covers most of the Western area of Fishers, through the central zone at 116th Street and Hoosier Road, and then expands northeast towards exit 210 on I-69. I 69 S PRAIRIE BAPTIST 9 N 131ST I6 131ST SR 238 146TH CYNTHEANNE OLIO 136TH 8 23 SR PENNINGTON MARILYN PROMISE HOWE SR 37 N BROOKS SCHOOL 141ST 141ST PRAIRIE BAPTIST FISHERS PARKS SERVICE AREA 146TH 146TH N O N EC C TI U T 101ST 96TH A second zone that is experiencing a lack of service is East of State Road 37, West of Howe Road, South 146th Street, and North of 131st Street. This zone is currently only being serviced by Billericay Park. Adding additional Neighborhood and Community Parks to this area would greatly enhance the park system for residents that are living in this zone as defined above. SR 37 S ATLANTIC SO U TH EA ST FLORIDA HOOSIER 37 I RINGER 69 U 121ST 116TH 136TH OLIO 126TH I 69 S PRAIRIE BAPTIST 9 N 131ST I6 131ST SR 238 SR HAWTHORN ER N 126TH PK W Y 113TH CR EE K GEORGIA 104TH FA LL CYNTHEANNE FLORIDA GEIST FALL MOLLENKOPF CUMBERLAND LANTERN NV IL LE WILLOWVIEW AL LI SO 96TH HAGUE ELLER 111TH 106TH A third area that is currently underserviced by parks is the area East and South of Geist, West of Florida Road, and North of 96th Street. This zone is currently serviced by Bee Camp Creek Trailhead and Flat Fork Creek Park. Adding a Community on Geist Reservoir or off of Georgia Street would increase the park service to the residents that live in this zone. ATLANTIC OLIO 8 23 SR PENNINGTON MARILYN PROMISE HOWE SR 37 N 136TH BROOKS SCHOOL 141ST 141ST 146TH CYNTHEANNE 146TH 146TH PRAIRIE BAPTIST COMMUNITY PARKS C N O N EC C TI U T 101ST 96TH REGIONAL PARKS 56 HARRISON THOMPSON PARK SAXONY BEACH MUDSOCK FIELDS BILLERICAY PARK CYNTHEANNE PARK OLIO FIELDS ROY G. HOLLAND MEMORIAL PARK SAND CREEK NATURAL AREA HOOSIER WOODS THORPE CREEK NATURAL AREA BROOKS SCHOOL PARK AMPHITHEATER CENTRAL GREEN HAMILTON PROPER PARK HERITAGE MEADOWS PARK RIVERSIDE FIELDS CHEENEY CREEK NATURAL AREA FISHERS HERITAGE PARK AT WHITE RIVER RITCHEY WOODS NATURE PRESERVE CUMBERLAND PARK ELLER FIELDS BEE CAMP CREEK TRAILHEAD PARK PARKS SERVICE AREAS 57 FLAT FORK CREEK PARK FISHERS DRIVE & WALK TIMES The following charts use the 2012 population data to depict the percentage of Fishers residents within various distances of parks. The park system ranges cover from 11% of the population to 99% of the population. The first map depicts the population of Fishers’ residents located within a half-mile of a park. The remaining maps represent the drive and walk times that currently exist using the most recent data. Purple depicts a 5 minute drive, yellow is a 5 minute walk, light green is a 10 minute walk, and dark green is a 16 minute walk. 11% of the Fishers population is located within a 5 minute walk of a park. 59% of the Fishers Population is located within ½ mile of a park. 32% of the Fishers population is located within a 10 minute walk of a park. 99% of the Fishers population is located within a 5 minute drive of a park. 56% of the Fishers population is located within a 16 minute walk of a park. 58 FISHERS DRIVE & WALK TIMES The map below shows the Parks in red to be easily identifiable. In light green (the smallest area around the park) is how far a person can travel from the park in 5 minutes. The Medium green is the middle distance that can be traveled in 10 minutes. The Darkest green is the furthest distance that is traveled in 16min, the equivalent time it takes to travel 1 mile. 59 The purple is the distance that can be covered in a car from a park in 5 minutes. As we can see the majority of Fishers is serviced by a 5 minute car ride, with minimal gaps. This map is used to identify the time it takes for residents to get to a park. It also helps identify connectivity issues and how many residents are served from within the four categories. FISHERS PARKS RECREATIONAL USE Examples of these parks include Roy G. Holland Park and Brooks School Park. This map helps identify what types of uses are found at each park and can aid in the development of new parks so there is a diversity of uses spread out over Fishers rather than clumps of uses. The parks in this map are designated by their primary uses. Yellow parks are passive parks such as nature trails and preserves, examples include Cheeney Creek and Ritchey Woods. Red parks are athletic parks that are mostly used for sports teams examples included Cumberland Park and Olio Fields. Blue Parks are Active/ Hybrid Parks which have active uses such as basketball courts and playgrounds but also have passive uses such as trails and paths. Fishers Parks Recreational Use SR 37 S ATLANTIC SO U TH EA ST FLORIDA HOOSIER SR 37 I RINGER 69 U 121ST 116TH 136TH OLIO 126TH I 69 S PRAIRIE BAPTIST 9 N 131ST I6 131ST SR 238 HAWTHORN ER N ATLANTIC OLIO 136TH 8 23 SR PENNINGTON MARILYN HOWE SR 37 N This map was derived using parcel data supplied by Hamilton County, Indiana Information Services. This map is for display purposes only and is not to be considered accurate for legal descriptions or other legal purposes. PROMISE Linda Gaye Cordell BROOKS SCHOOL 141ST 141ST Clerk-Treasurer 146TH CYNTHEANNE 146TH 146TH PRAIRIE BAPTIST Town Council John W. Weingardt C. Pete Peterson Scott A. Faultless Stuart F. Easley David C. George Michael L. Colby Renee L. Cox 126TH PK W Y 113TH 96TH Legend Major Streets Active/ Hybrid Parks Passive Parks Athletic Parks FLORIDA FA LL CR GEORGIA 104TH EE K C CYNTHEANNE GEIST FALL MOLLENKOPF CUMBERLAND LANTERN AL LI SO NV IL LE WILLOWVIEW 106TH HAGUE ELLER 111TH N O N EC C TI U T 101ST 96TH 2 1 0 2 Miles . Town of Fishers Development Department One Municipal Drive Fishers, Indiana 46038 www.fishers.in.us July 2014 60 PARK AMENITIES Number in parentheses (#) indicates the amount of available school amenities, and they are included in the total parks amenities because they are for public use. There are also 8 batting cages available to the public (5 at Billericay Park, 2 at Olio Fields, and 1 at Roy G. Holland Park), one 9-hole disc golf course at Cumberland Park, and 8 lacrosse nets at Cyntheanne North Park available to the public. Current 2013 Population- 84,112 (Source: 2013 Annual Stats Binder, Town of Fishers, Community Development) 2040 Population Projection- 131,500 (Source: 2014 Fishers Demand Forecasting and Sustainability Analysis, Policy Analytics,LLC) RESOURCES Carlisle Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 5, Page 111. Retrieved From: http://www.rdgusa.com/crp/carlisle/Chapter%205%20Parks%20 and%20Recreation.pdf Noblesville Parks Master Plan Update 2008-2012. Section K, Page 11. Retrieved From: http://www.cityofnoblesville.org/egov/documents/1392310238_10234. pdf 61 PARKS PARKING COUNT Amphitheater -Expandable for events Billercay (424 Total) -15 (Handicap) +409 Brooks School Field (73 Total) -5 (Handicap) + 68 Cheeney Creek Natural Area (17 Total) -No Handicap Spaces Cumberland Park (209 Total) -6 (Handicap) + 203 Cyntheanne North (595 Total) -12 (Handicap)+ 583 Cyntheanne South -Unfinished Eller Fields (76 Total) -3 (Handicap) + 73 Hamilton Proper -Gravel Lot no designation Harrison Thompson Park (78 Total) -3 (Handicap) + 75 Heritage Park at White River (157 Total) -7 (Handicap) + 150 Mudsock Fields (282 Total) -7 (Handicap) + 275 Olio Fields (Estimated 250) Ritchey Woods Nature Preserve (54 Total) -No Handicap Spaces Roy G. Holland Memorial Park (190 Total) -5 (Handicap) + 185 No parking for; Pocket Park, Rotary Arch Park, Heritage meadows, Sand Creek Natural Area, Hoosier Woods, Thorpe Creek, Bee Camp Creek Trailhead. 62 EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL & INNOVATIVE LOCAL PARKS ARTSPARK AT INDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) The following examples are of twelve local parks that incorporate innovative and successful qualities that make them stand out from other parks in the area. Inspiration can be drawn from features of these parks and utilized in the ongoing development and improvements to Fishers’ park system. When defining the success of parks, we can look at a number of characteristics: -Easily accessible by walking, bicycling, or public transportation. -Public is satisfied with types of facilities available and the conditions of the facilities. -Defined service area measured by distance is met. Located at the Indianapolis Art Center in Broad Ripple, the ARTSPARK is a 12-acre interactive sculpture park that is designed for all of the senses. Walking through the park, visitors are met with bright colors, textures from varied materials, fragrant vegetation, and sounds from wildlife on site. Artists are able to use the outdoor space as an open air studio to draw inspiration for their artwork. -Facilities are used with-in capacity (not over-used or overcrowded). ASA BALES PARK -Amenities function according to design and safety guidelines (e.g., Americans with Disabilities Act). -Large majority of the population engages in active recreation (meaning recreation that helps people meet recommended physical activity levels includ ing; walking, running, field/court sports, bicycling, hiking, swimming, etc.). (WESTFIELD,IN) The success of each these parks can be measured often by a single characteristic. 63 Asa Bales Park is a 13 acre centrally located in Westfield. The northern edge of the park is adjacent to Westfield High School which makes the skate park a popular feature provided to park-goers. The eastern edge of the park has a sculptural gateway to signify the park’s entrance and catch the eyes of passers-by. Also on site, there is an 18-hole disc golf course, play equipment, rentable shelters, natural amphitheater, historic Anti-Slavery Cemetery, and walking trail that overlooks the Thompson Canal and connects to Grand Junction Trail. A widerange of park visitors (active and passive) are attracted to the park for its diverse offerings as observed when doing a park visit. BROAD RIPPLE PARK EAGLE CREEK PARK (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) The Broad Ripple Park was established in 1946 and provides rich history in the area. It was the former home to an amusement park, carousel (currently located at the Indianapolis Children’s Museum), steam locomotive (now located at the Transportation Museum in Noblesville), and the 1924 and 1952 Olympic tryouts for swimming. Currently, park features include an outdoor swimming pool, playgrounds, family center, picnic shelter, tennis courts, multi-use athletic fields, woods, baseball diamonds, fitness trails, and a bark park. The park has a trail with exercise stations to promote active use of the park. The multi-use features and open space of the park allow for visitors to easily spread out. Eagle Creek Park is in close proximity from downtown Indianapolis, and it boasts 1,400 acres of water and 3,900 acres of forest on site. The park has many amenities available to park users including a beach, marina, rentable shelters and buildings, a bark park, Ornithology Center, Go Ape treetop adventure and zip lines, golf club, rowing center, and trails. The park embraces water as a part of recreation with boat, canoe, and pontoon rentals. Eagle Creek’s diverse offering of recreation and activities make the park a popular location for all ages. To help fund the maintenance of the park, a fee is charged to all visitors entering the park. CENTRAL PARK FOUNDERS PARK (CARMEL, IN) (CARMEL, IN) Central Park is an expansive park that is a draw for many park-goers. There is a 4-mile multi-use trail that has a connection to the Monon Trail. The pond on site creates a stopping point along the trail for viewing nature or fishing. A unique and successful feature that is incorporated into the park is the skate park, which is popular among young visitors. The skate park provides a safe environment that promotes socialization and unstructured play. On a busy day, park users at Founders Park have ample amount of parks space to spread out and take advantage of the many uses for the park (e.g., play equipment, community center, walking/bicycling trail, lake, picnic area). There is an ADA accessible play area that is within close proximity of the covered picnic area. Also, along the trail there are dog waste pick-up stations to encourage and promote a healthy, dog-friendly environment. 64 FREEDOM TRAIL PARK JUAN SOLOMON PARK (WESTFIELD, IN) (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) The Freedom Trail in Westfield is a successful park that boasts an all-inclusive atmosphere for young park users. Early in the design process for the park, Hamilton County Autism Support Group was brought in as consultants to help create a park that would be beneficial and inclusive for park users with autism. The environment created helped to establish a park that would allow children of all ages and abilities to socialize and interact with one another. On site, there is a sensory garden and ADA accessible playground that also incorporated equipment that encouraged interaction amongst the children playing. This 41-acre park offers a community room and picnic shelter for rent. Park-goers can experience the tennis court, playgrounds, multi-use sports fields, and walking trails at the park. Crooked Creek Community Center includes a green roof, bike racks, rain gardens, bioretention, and pervious pavement in the parking lot. RIVERWOOD PARK (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) GRAND PARK (WESTFIELD, IN) Grand Park is a massive sports complex that spans 400 acres of land. The amenities include 31 multi-use fields, 26 baseball/ softball diamonds, 2 indoor facilities, an amphitheater and a trail connecting the complex. The park is equipped with lighting for up to 20 fields for night games. Careful attention to landscaping provides scenery for players and visitors to relax. The 9 parking lots allow 1,000 vehicles to easily access all of the fields, and there are concession stands providing refreshments to the visitors of the park. 65 Riverwood Park is a recent 2006 addition to Indianapolis’ parks. The park is located on roughly 12 acres of land, and offers amenities such as a rentable picnic shelter, playground, splash pad, and ample parking. The Bishop Chatard High School lacrosse and soccer teams use this park for their home sporting events, but permits are required for using the athletic fields. There were many mature trees on site, but very little morning shade was provided. THE VIRGINIA B. FAIRBANKS ART & NATURE PARK (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) 100 Acres is one of the only art parks in the country to feature commissions of ongoing, temporary and site responsive artwork. There are many features that draw visitors into the park everyday including woodlands, wetlands, meadows, a 35-acre lake, and Ruth Lilly Visitors Pavilion. The Ruth Lilly Visitors Pavilion is an architectural landmark within the park that has been awarded the American Institute of Architects (AIA) highest award, Honor Award, in 2012. The building is Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certified and incorporates sustainable features such as water-saving fixtures in the restrooms, energy efficient lighting, and a geothermal system for heating and cooling. The artwork throughout the park creates destination points that encourage further exploration on and off the trails. WES MONTGOMERY PARK (INDIANAPOLIS, IN) Wes Montgomery Park has a music theme, and includes a splash pad designed in the shape of a guitar. When the water feature is activated, Wes Montgomery’s musical recordings are played. This park is also ADA accessible to ensure no one misses the opportunity to enjoy the park. The playground includes features swings and playground equipment for children of all ages and abilities. Recycled rubber material is placed underneath the play equipment proving an accessible route, and the music theme is carried out along the benches and railings. Wes Montgomery Park is a comfortable place to visit in the summer due to its dense, mature tree canopy. 66 APPLICATIONS FOR FISHERS’ PARKS These examples of innovative parks in the area illustrate the possibility of interesting approaches to park design. In regards to the art park examples, small and inexpensive art destination points (e.g., NOTICE: A Flock of Signs at 100 Acres) allow the park user to interact with the environment and allows for notable destinations along the trail. Fishers could feasibly add this concept to one or more of the existing park trails in the town. Art parks inspire passive park users to continue their use of the park by adding new focal points. To take the park a step further, elements that incorporate an entire sensory experience could also be integrated. Vibrant flowers/plants, aromatic plantings, textures of materials, and the sounds (e.g., moving water, tall grasses, wildlife) could create a popular relaxation location for Fishers residents. Throughout the park visits, the connection to water stood out as an important feature to park visitors. Splash pads, observation decks overlooking water, and fountains proved to be large draws in parks. When music is an added feature, a whole new experience is created making the park visit a unique experience. Wes Montgomery Park’s splash pad that incorporated jazz music could be similarly added in Fishers to future splash pads or added to the existing splash pad in Billericay Park. The music encourages children to dance along with play in the parks. Increased active park use is a goal for Fishers, so the inclusion of durable exercise stations along trails in parks could encourage more active parks use. This park design feature was successfully accomplished at Broad Ripple Park. At the time of the park visit, several fitness groups and individual runners were stopping at each station to perform the exercise tasks. The equipment was made out of metal and located in shaded locations, so visitors were more likely to use them on hot, sunny days. This concept could be easily adopted in parks such as Roy G. Holland Park, Billericay Park, or any other future park development. 67 Along with more active parks, multi-use parks would be beneficial to Fishers. A multi-use park is a park that utilizes more than one activity or function while incorporating active and passive uses. Parks with multiple park uses attract all demographics and types of park users at any given time. This environment would be ideal for both active and passive park users, and all ages as well. Central Park, Founders Park, and Asa Bales Park do a great job at addressing the many park needs of visitors. These parks were designed to attract many park users of all age groups and activity levels. Features like skate parks, disc golf courses, ADA accessible play equipment, and trails along water features ensure quality use of the parks. Though some of these features already exist in Fishers’ parks, supplementing and building on the present parks could be beneficial. The most important but often overlooked park feature is accessibility. Starting with easy access to the parks by wayfinding and infrastructure in place allow all parks users a means of reaching the parks. Accessible paths and play equipment ensure a convenient and comfortable park atmosphere for all visitors. Notable local parks that create a comfortable and accessible environment include Freedom Trail Park, Founders Park, and Wes Montgomery Park. Freedom Trail Park addresses the all-inclusive design of the park. The play equipment was designed for all ages and abilities to be able to play together, instead of having separate equipment. The sensory garden was also a notable feature of the park. Fishers would easily be able to incorporate the features of these parks to create a comfortable, enjoyable park experience for every visitor, and they will be more likely to return on a regular basis. EXTREME SPORTS PARK To truly stand out and be unique from other parks in the area, Fishers needs to plan for future use while staying ahead of future trends. Currently, the increased popularity of obstacle course races (e.g., Warrior Dash or Tough Mudder), boot camp style fitness classes, and agility course TV shows such as American Ninja Warrior prove that there is a need for alternative recreation opportunities available at parks. An extreme sports park would definitely make Fishers parks a one-of-a-kind experience. Amenities could include a skate park, military-style obstacle course, outdoor climbing wall, parkour equipment (by PDPlay), and large scale interactive fitness electronic game similar to Neos (by Playworld Systems). An extreme sports park would attract teens and adults of all ages by introducing physical fitness in a way that many have not been exposed. displays, reflect on pieces, and enjoy or take part in their local arts community—much like a traditional art gallery. An example of a similar park experience is at Scioto Audubon in Columbus, OH. The park sits on 120 acres of land with 5 acres devoted to wetland preservation. There are amenities including the largest free outdoor climbing wall in the country, shaded seating structure, sand volleyball courts, a Neos electronic fitness game system, and obstacle course with 9 stations and a quarter-mile of running track. The goal of the park was to attract young professionals that lived and worked nearby. Parkour (free running) has recently gained popularity in the United States and would be a unique addition to a park. Using a parkour park requires physical discipline, training, and adapting to overcome obstacles in the environment. It is a non-competitive, non-contact sport that has similarities to many martial arts disciplines. Many indoor parkour parks exist in the U.S., but it is still a rare feature in outdoor parks today. An outdoor parkour park was built in Delafield, WI (first in the state). The course is open year round because practicing in all weather conditions is a benefit to parkour training, and there is no right or wrong way to use the equipment. TRANQUILITY PARK Passive recreational activities are emphasized in tranquility parks. Sensory gardens, a type of tranquility park, appeal to the five senses. Aromatic plantings and floral gardens, water features, and textured paths encourage guests to take in the sights, sounds, smells, and feels of their surrounding environment. Sculpture or art parks are another popular form of tranquility park. Art parks invite guests to meander through outdoor Tranquility parks are priceless assets to a park system, offering residents and guests a free alternative from daily stressors that tend to diminish an individual’s quality of life. Tranquility parks enrich the mind and rejuvenate the soul, alleviating stress and anxiety, and instilling balance and curiosity in the user. Tranquility parks are purposeful for all ages, making their use invaluable to the community’s parks system. Existing Fishers parks envisioned to expand or add tranquility park spaces are Fishers Heritage Park at White River and Heritage Meadows Park. Over the next 25 years, additional passive recreational space in the northeast and east areas of Fishers should be acquired. HANDS-ON INTERACTIVE PARK Active recreational activities with an emphasis on stimulating problem solving skills and early learning are the primary goals of a hands-on interactive park. These parks can have very minimal development, with natural features utilized at full potential for recreation. Access to creeks, mud pits, and climbing trees are preferred for these parks. Interactive parks are usually broken into zones (i.e. Mud Zone, Water Zone, Plant Zone, Music Zone, etc.) that encourage children to use their imagination through a natural framework. Hands-on interactive parks are unique places for children with developing minds to grow in cognitive learning and problem solving in a manner that maximizes play and activity in the natural environment. These parks are best suited near neighborhoods with high numbers of young children and/or elementary schools. Existing Fishers parks envisioned to expand or add hands-on interactive park spaces include Cheeney Creek Natural Area, Cumberland Park, Hoosier Woods, and Cyntheanne Park. Over the next 25 years, additional hands-on interactive park space should be acquired to serve the northeast and east areas of Fishers. 68 CURRENT SUMMARY OF UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE In order to get a better understanding of open space throughout Fishers, it is beneficial to begin by looking at the UDO requirements for open space. These space requirements along with designated parks space collectively contribute to space for outdoor recreational activity. Article 07 of current UDO for Fishers covers information on Open Space Standards. The following is a summary of Article 07 covering Residential, Commercial and Industrial, and Optional Conservation Area Protection. Further amendments to the UDO could set a standard for acres of parkland to city to achieve easy access to parks for every resident. OP-01: Open Space Standards; Residential •General •Open space requirement •Percentage of land set aside for public space •Site features that do not qualify as open space •Floodway •100-year Floodplain •Steep Slopes •Wetlands •Minimum Open Space •Subdivisions •Each type of subdivision in Article 06: Sub division Types •Planned Unit Developments •Minimum defined in Article 04: Planned Unit Developments •Development Plans •20% of all residential Development Plans (Planned Unit Developments) •Exceptions •Residential developments with a gross den sity of 1.7 dwelling units per acre or less is exempt from providing open space under this section. Exempt subdivisions shall be developed using design and development standards applicable to Standard Residen tial Subdivisions. •Site Features that Qualify as Open Space •Perimeter Landscaping •Perimeter landscaping that is at least 50 feet deep and at least 50 feet long counts 100% toward open space requirements. 69 •Man-made Water Feature •Recreational: 100% of surface area of man-made water feature counts toward the open space re quirement if the water feature is designed with a minimum surface area of 10 acres at normal pool elevation and a minimum depth of 12 feet. •Dry Detention Area •Man-made storm water detention facilities counts towards 100% of the minimum open space as long as it has a minimum area of 10,890 square feet of flat bottom, depth not exceeding 4 feet from the top of bank, slopes not exceeding 1:4 (vertical:horizontal), perimeter access with width of buffer area around the circumference of the fa cility of at least 25 feet from the top of the bank, area of open space at least 50 feet wide shall extend from a street right-of-way to the 25 foot pe rimeter access area. •Created Woodlot •Created woodlot shall replicate a quality Indiana forest using indigenous trees. The proportion should be a minimum of 1/3 minimum 2 inch caliper trees and 1/3 minimum 3 inch caliper trees. Minimum area should be 1 continuous acre, and at least ¼ of the trees on site should be hardwood trees. Evergreen tree use is limited to a maximum of 15% of the total trees planted and ornamental or dwarf trees are prohibited from use. Created woodlots have at least 6 caliper inches per 400 square feet. A licensed landscape architect or a licensed arborist shall prepare the Planting Plan and determine the indigenous species to be planted, and a 3-year maintenance agreement shall be drafted with an independent arborist to ensure the health of trees. Irrigation shall be provided if prescribed and as prescribed by the landscape architect or arborist. •Conservation Area •The following conservation areas should count 100% toward the open space requirements. With Intensity Bonus, land proposed to be developed that has environmental features shall conserve those features. Unbuildable areas include watercourses, floodways, natural lake surfaces, or slopes over 20% grade. These features are considered undevelopable and no intensity bonus shall be granted for these areas. Floodplain, woodland area, natural lake filtration strips, riparian corridors for a river stream, or wetlands are deemed qualifying environmental features. Conservation of environmental features includes any development that has 20% or less of its total site covered with one or more environmental feature shall conserve 100% of those environmental features for all structures, and establish a 15 foot setback from the environmental features for all structures. Any development that has greater than 20% but less than 50% of its total site covered with one or more environmental feature shall conserve at least 25% of the site in perpetuity and establish a 15 foot setback from the environmental features for all structures. •Town Council-approved Open Space •The petitioner may propose alternative forms of open space not specifically mentioned, and such proposals for alternative forms of open space shall be subject to approval by the town council prior to the approval of the Primary Plat by the Plan Commission. OP-02: Open Space Standards; Commercial and Industrial •Site Features that Qualify as Open Space •Perimeter Landscaping •Perimeter landscaping that is at least 30 feet wide and 30 feet long shall count 100% towards the open space requirements. •Developed Amenity •The following development amenities count 100% toward minimum open space requirements: •Large commercial or office developments along primary corridors shall install a pub lic amenity integrated closely with the pe rimeter pedestrian network. •Thresholds for applicability include development that shall result in 20,000 square feet or more of total floor area, or that have a parent tract of 5 acres or greater, and developments along the Allisonville Road East 96th Street corridors shall provide at least 1 public amenity integrated closely with the pedestrian network of paths. •Developed amenity options include a pla za with notable sculpture or fountain, and a pocket park with large trees, landscap ing and sitting areas. •The following are minimum plaza stan dards if the plaza option is selected: •The area shall be 2% of the total primary structure’s footprint area. •The plaza should have a focal point (e.g., fountain, public art, or other amenity approved by the Plan Commission) and be large enough to be visible from the primary roadway. •The site of the plaza should be close to the perimeter sidewalk/path network and be connected to the perimeter sidewalk/path network with a sidewalk or hard surface path. The path may be integrated into the development’s gateway feature or double as a gateway feature for the development. •1 seat (e.g., benches, ledges, rocks, etc.) shall be in place for every 100 square foot of plaza area. •2 trees and 15 shrubs minimum shall be installed in or on the perimeter of the plaza. • Pocket Park Standards •The flowing are minimum plaza standards if the pocket park option is selected: •Minimum area should be 4% of the total primary structures footprint area. •The pocket park should be a “soft space” for respite from the suburban environ ment. “Soft space” should be provided by an organic layout, plant materials, natural boulders, etc. •The location of the pocket park shall be sited close and connected to the perimeter sidewalk/path network with a sidewalk or a hard surface path. • 1 seat (e.g., benches, ledges, boulders, etc.) for pedestrians should be provided for every 200 square feet of required pocket park area. • A minimum of 1 canopy tree, 1 non-canopy tree, and 5 shrubs shall be installed per 200 square feet of required pocket park area. The minimum caliper of each canopy tree should be 4 inches DBH (Diameter at Brest Height). •Man-made Water Features • Man-made water features shall count 100% to wards the minimum open space if it supports aquatic life and provides native habitat as follows: •A surface area at normal pool elevation of at least 21,780 square feet. 70 •25% or more of the water body is at least 8 feet deep in order to support aquatic life, and 5% shall extend to 10 feet deep. •At least 15 feet from the top of the bank shall be open space around the perimeter. •An area of open space at least 20 feet wide shall extend from a street right-ofway or parking area to the 10 foot wide perimeter access area. •Conservation Area • The following conservation areas should count 100% toward the open space requirements. With Intensity Bonus to offset the requirement, land proposed to be developed that has environmental features shall conserve those features. Floodplain, woodland area, natural lake filtration strips, riparian corridors for a river or stream, or wetlands are deemed qualifying environmental features. Watercourses, floodways, lake surfaces, or slopes over 20% grade. For these areas, these features are considered undevelopable and no intensity bonus shall be granted. •For conservation of environmental features, the following standards apply: •Any development that has 40% or less of its total site covered with one or more environmental feature shall: • Conserve at least 50% of the environmental features in perpetuity. • Establish a 15 foot setback from the environmental features for all structures. •Any development that has more than 40% of its total site covered with one or more environmental feature shall: *Conserve at least 30% of the buildable site in perpetuity. •Establish a 15 foot setback from the environmental features for all structures. 71 OP-01: Open Space Standards; Optional Conservation Area Protection •Intent •The intent is to provide optional, incentive-based devel opment alternative in order to prevent the unnecessary cutting, removal, or killing of trees in wooded areas or specimen trees, and promote and maintain a high level of community aesthetics through the conservation and planting of trees. •Other areas to be given priority for protection are: •Critical habitats which contain rare, threatened or endangered species, wooded 100-year flood plains, wooded wetlands and wooded slopes, wooded or partially wooded stream corridors with drainage areas greater than 50 acres, and riparian areas. •Incentives •Preservation of Existing Healthy Trees •The preservation of an existing healthy tree shall constitute an in-kind credit toward meeting the landscape requirements in the UDO. The healthy tree shall be measured per arborist standard of measurement (Diameter at Breast Height (DBH)) in this preservation area. A credit shall be given per tree that contributes to and satisfies similarly the intent of a particular section of the UDO. The following credits should be granted for an existing tree as follows: •A credit for 3 deciduous trees shall be granted for each preserved deciduous tree over 4 inches but less than 8 inches DBH. •A credit for 4 deciduous trees shall be granted for each preserved deciduous tree over 8 inches but less than 12 inches DBH. •A credit for 5 deciduous trees shall be granted for each preserved evergreen tree over 12 inches DBH. The Director of Development may grant larger credits for trees over 12 inches DBH upon request. •A credit for 2 evergreen trees shall be granted for each preserved evergreen tree over 6 feet tall but less than 10 feet tall. •A credit for 3 evergreen trees shall be granted for each preserved evergreen tree over 10 feet tall. The Director of Development may grant larger credits for evergreens over 10 feet tall upon request. •Development intensity increases could be granted by Town Council. •The Plan Commission may grant a greater open space credit (as much as 2:1) for the preservation of quality natural areas. •Preservation of the Natural Landscape •Prior to construction or removal of trees, provide a Tree Conservation Plan outlining strategies for retaining, protecting, and replanting trees on the site The Indiana Department of Natural Resources can provide guidance). Prepare a Tree Conservation Map that outlines existing tree cover, priority protection areas, proposed grading, utility installation, and proposed protective devices. •No trees with a DBH over 6 inches or evergreens 8 feet or taller shall be removed from any lot unless trees are within the building site pad, within 15 feet of the perimeter of the primary structure or accessory structures, between the front of the primary structure and the interior roadway of the subdivision, required to be removed in order to comply with safety requirements of any governmental agency, and/or required to be removed in order to install utility infrastructure. •To facilitate installation of utilities, the quantity of trees removed from a conservation area can be replaced with a quantity consistent with those removed. •Tree retention areas shall be a minimum of 35 feet wide and minimum contiguous area of 10,000 square feet. The Department of Community Development, the Plan Commission may approve smaller areas that have significant value. •Once the Tree Conservation Pan has been established, any person who violates the Tree Conservation Plan and improperly removes trees shall be required to reestablish such trees consistent with the trees removed. •Construction Fencing •Prior to construction around a conservation area install highly visible construction fencing at least 3 feet outside the drip line of the trees, avoid injuring roots when installing anchoring posts for fencing, signs should be posted clearly identifying the plant protection zone, and if a portion greater than 30% of the area within the drip line is unavoidably impacted, petitioner shall install a root aeration system, tree well, retaining wall, or raised boardwalk as permanent protection. •Construction in Riparian Areas •The petitioner shall work with the Department of Community Development regarding conservation of riparian areas, establish buffers of at least 50 feet wide adjacent to intermittent/perennial streams, newly planted trees/ shrubs shall be species native to central Indiana, tree sizes may be a minimum of 1 inch caliper and for optimal survival and unless irrigated with an automatic system. NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES It is important to learn from neighboring communities when developing and improving Fishers’ parks. Nearby in Noblesville, the city introduced a fees-in-lieu-of land use law that allows extra tax revenue to fund the parks system. A policy such as this one has the opportunity to greatly affect the community. Also, a comparison can be made between each community to see where Fishers stands in regards to each location. NOBLESVILLE •Developed a level of service standard of 17 acres of park land per 1,000 residents (compared to the roughly 7 acres per 1,000 residents that Fishers’ parks currently service). Within the park system there are a variety of park types including mini parks, neighboring parks, community parks, regional parks, preservation areas, regional greenways community greenways, and school sites and general open spaces. •In the Noblesville Parks Master Plan, it is estimated by 2015 that the city will have a park land deficiency of 294 acres even after Eastside Park (181 acres) and Gateway Park (113 acres) have been created. •Open Space Ordinance •City’s land use law was changed that allows residential developers within a half-mile of public parks to set aside less prop erty as open space with a fee. CARMEL •Carmel’s priority areas of open space include public wellhead protection areas, all FEMA and IDNR 100-year floodway fringe areas, federal jurisdictional wetland, the white river greenway, woodlands, special opportunity corridors, and historic structures and sites. •Natural Open Space area must be a minimum area of ½ an acre, minimum width of 75 feet, and at least 2 points of access. •Standards for parks include having a minimum area of 10,000 square feet with a minimum average width of 90 feet, 1 point of access is required for each 25,000 square feet up to a minimum of 3 points of access, parks areas should be fenced and may include an open shelter, parks should be interested within neighborhoods, a short walking distance from dwellings. WESTFIELD •A percentage of green belt space is required to be set aside for single family residential developments larger than 5 acres. •Key components of subdivision control requirements in the zoning ordinance include: •Greenbelt requirements in new developments and required to be continuous to greenbelts on adjoining properties. •Pedestrian walkways on both sides of all streets. RESOURCES •PLANoblesville: Parks and Open Space •http://www.ibj.com/noblesville-to-developers-pay-fee-cut-open-space-near-parks/PARAMS/article/43508 •Carmel City Code:Carmel Subdivision Control Ordinance, Chapter 7: Open Space Standards for Major Subdivisions •Westfield Zoning Ordinance: 16.04.030 72 PARKS AS A PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE Obesity, as a health epidemic, is widely prevalent today. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 31.4% of Hoosiers are obese, and that make Indiana one of the most overweight states in the nation. This figure is staggering and has a profound impact on the medical costs for those individuals. Medical costs of people who are obese are on average $1,429 higher than those of normal weight, and the economic impact of obesity nationwide exceeds $147 billion. This topic has moved to the forefront as the United States looks for ways to curb the effects of obesity and other health issues in our society. Recently, researchers have looked into the health benefits of parks, and there are many resources available that further prove the importance of public parks as a health initiative. The following are samples of resources available on this topic and key components of each. Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space: The Benefits of Parks •1996 comprehensive report by the U.S. Surgeon General found that people who engage in regular physical activity benefit from: •Reduced risk of premature death •Reduced risk of coronary heart disease •Reduced risk of hypertension •Reduced risk of colon cancer •Reduced risk of non-insulin diabetes •Improved maintenance of muscle strength, joint structure, and joint function •Weight loss •Favorable redistribution of body fat •Improved physical functioning in persons suffer ing from poor health •Healthier cardiovascular, respiratory, and endo crine systems •Symptom relief from depression and anxiety •Improved mood •Enhanced psychological well-being 73 Let’s Go to the Park Today: The Role of Parks in Obesity Prevention and Improving the Public’s Health •Several studies have shown a positive association between access to parks and physical activity levels. •30% of physically active adults reported that they exercised in parks. •Research finds that youth without access to opportunities for physical activity during non-school hours are less likely to be as physically active as their peers. At least one study shows that by increasing access to places for physical activity, youth not only have higher levels of activity, but also are less likely to be overweight or obese. •Preliminary evidence suggests that using parks, playgrounds, and recreation centers may lead to other healthy lifestyle choices, such as using modes of active transportation (like biking or walking to a park location). •Spending time in nature has been linked to several health benefits, including reduction in attentional fatigue. •Running in a park fostered more psychological restoration than running in an urban environment. •Walking in a natural setting has also been shown to alleviate symptoms of mental fatigue more than in an urban environment. •Green outdoor activities and greener play areas have also been shown to attenuate attention deficit disorder symptoms and improve concentration. •Inclusion of farmer’s markets, taste testing, urban agriculture, and garden space in parks is bringing nutritional education, experiential learning, and healthy food opportunities to children and their families as a way to impact the broader cultural norms around food. •Reducing route distances and improving pedestrian/bike infrastructure are relatively inexpensive ways of increasing park access. •The distance people will walk to a park is between 0.250.75 miles. •Knowledge that a park exists, who is welcome, what to bring, and what there is to do are all barriers that can easily be addressed with quality signs and community outreach. •Exposure to an environment that emphasizes and supports a more active lifestyle was one type of community-based physical activity initiative reviewed for cost-effectiveness. •This intervention appeared to reduce disease inci dence, cost-effective, and offers good value for the money. How Cities Use Parks to…Improve Public Health (Planning.org) •Parks provide people with contact with nature, known to confer certain health benefits and enhance well-being. •Health studies have shown that contact with na ture offers a range of medical benefits: •Lower blood pressure •Lower cholesterol levels •Enhance survival after a heart attack •Quicker recovery from surgery •Fewer minor medical complaints •Lower self-reported stress •Significant improvements in children with attention disorders and teens with behavior al disorders •Exercise is more beneficial (leading to en hanced tranquility, and more relief of anxi ety and depression) when it occurs in a nat ural setting (e.g., parks) rather than urban streets •Physical activity opportunities in parks help to increase fitness and reduce obesity. •Certain features predict greater use for physical activity. •Accessibility •Proximity •Good lighting •Toilets •Drinking Water •Well-designed/maintained paths •Attractive Scenery •Parks resources can mitigate climate, air, and water pollution impacts on public health. •Reduce urban heat island effect (urban areas that are hotter than surrounding rural locations). •Trees in parks improve air quality by removing pol lutants from the atmosphere. •Cleaner air is better for those suffering from asthma and other respiratory diseases. •Particulate matter increases mortality in polluted cities (especially those with underly ing heart and lung disease). •Toxic air pollutants increase the risk of can cer. •Water •Parks along waterways help keep water clean by absorbing and cleansing the pollut ed run-off from impervious surfaces before it reaches the water. •Reduce stream erosion by maintaining steady flow volumes through the slow release of absorbed run-off. •Cities need to provide all types of parks to provide their various citizen groups with a range of health benefits. •Neighborhood parks •Social interaction •Physical activity •Nature contact •Larger parks •Social interaction •Physical activity •Nature contact •Cooling and cleaning of urban air •Protection of source water RESOURCES -Frumkin, Howard, and Mary Eysenbach. “How Cities Use Parks To…Improve Public Health.” American Planning Association. APA, 2013. Web. 09 June 2014. -Sherer, Paul M., “Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space: The Benefits of Parks.” The Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA: 2006. -Blanck, Heidi M., Diana Allen, Zarnaaz Bashir, Nina Gordon, Alyson Goodman, Dee Merriam, Candace Rutt. “Let’s Go to the Park Today”. Childhood Obesity 8.5 (2012). -http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html 74 PARKS AS PART OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM •U.S. Forest Service calculated that over a 50-year lifetime one tree generates $31,250 worth of oxygen, provides $62,000 worth of air pollution control, recycles $37,500 worth of water, and controls $31,250 worth of soil erosion. •Benefits of trees: •Act as natural filters for water pollution •Leaves, trunks, roots, and associated soil remove polluted particulate matter from the water before it reaches storm sewers. •Absorb nutrients created by human activity, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassi um, which otherwise pollute streams and lakes. •Act as natural air conditioners and help to keep cities cooler •Evaporation from a single large tree can produce the cooling effect of ten room-size air conditioners operating 24 hours a day. •More effectively and less expensively manage the flow of storm water runoff than do concrete sewers and drainage ditches. •Trees intercept rainfall, and unpaved areas absorb water, slowing the rate at which it reaches storm water facilities. 75 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR SUSTAINABLE PARK DESIGN •Resource Conservation •Utilize natural daylight, ventilation, etc. when building park structures •Plant deciduous trees on buildings’ southwest corners to reduce summer energy needs •Plant evergreen trees on buildings’ northeast corners for protection/insulation from winter winds •Harvest rainwater in cisterns/rain barrels •Design efficient irrigation systems •Include drought tolerant plantings •Use local building and plant materials to reduce transportation costs •Apply for LEED certification and SITES accreditation for publicity •Use recycled materials and Forest Stewardship Council-certified wood •Minimize light pollution •Offer special carpooling parking spaces (esp. at the parks with athletic facilities that attract mass numbers of visitors on specific days) •Bike racks and connections to trail network •Storm Water Management •Rain gardens and eco-roofs to collect rainwaters on site (preventing runoff) •Restoring and creating wetlands where appropriate for increased flood control and enhanced water quality •Reduce impervious surfaces with porous concrete, asphalt, permeable pavers, etc. •Maintenance •Use native plants/avoid nonnatives and invasive species •Reduce pruning needs by allowing plants to realize their natural forms (i.e. allowing natural grass areas to grow to prairie) •Organic mulching to retain water and suppress weeds •Use organic fertilizers and compost •Discontinue use of pesticides or herbicides and employ integrated pest management practices instead •Social Capital •Continue providing ADA accessibility to all areas where possible •Design social gathering spaces •Incorporate interpretive signage that speaks of site history and sustainable design principles •Embrace the inclusion of public art •Waste Reduction •Continue providing recycling bins for park users •Make room for onsite composting •Use quality products and materials that are durable and can be recycled 76 ADA REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKS: AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT As stated on the ADA.gov website: “The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment, State and local government services, public accommodations, commercial facilities, and transportation. It also mandates the establishment of TDD/telephone relay services. The current text of the ADA includes changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-325), which became effective on January 1, 2009. The ADA was originally enacted in public law format and later rearranged and published in the United States Code.” In 2010, a number of revisions were made including the ADA Standards for Accessible Design. This official text was published in the Federal Register on September 15, 2010. These regulations and standards cover all built environments with accessibility in mind. The following section is a summary of relevant park applications of ADA standards for design. 2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN 77 •Surfacing: •Any surface must be compliant with ASTM F 1951 Accessibility of Surface Systems Under and Around Playground Equipment. Generally, limited to engi neered wood fiber, rubber tiles or rubber poured in place. •There must be an accessible mode of travel to the play equipment. •Play Areas: •Ground level play components (e.g., spring rockers, swings, diggers, and stand-alone slides to provide activity like rocking, swinging, climbing, spinning, and sliding) must be integrated into the play area to promote socialization among all children. •At least one of each type shall be on an accessible route. •Ramps that connect elevated play components have a maximum rise of 12”, and designers are encouraged to provide ramps with slopes less than the 1:12 maximum where possible. Berms/ sculpted dirt may be used as part of an accessible route. •Elevated play components- at least 50% shall be on an accessible route. •Benches: •Clear floor or ground space (shall be positioned at the end of each seat and parallel to the short axis of the bench). •Seats (42” long minimum and 20” deep minimum and 24” deep maximum). •Back support (shall have a back affixed to the seat or attached to a wall, 42” long minimum and extend from a point 2” maximum above the seat surface to a point 18” minimum above the seat surface, and shall be 2.5” maximum from the rear edge of the seat measured horizontally) •Seat Height: 17”minimum to 19” maximum above ground •US Access Board 2010 Standards •Accessible Trails: •Clear tread width: 36” minimum •Tread Obstacles: 2” high maximum (up to 3” high where running and cross slopes are 5% or less) •Cross Slope: 5% maximum •Running slope (trail grade) meets one or more of the following: •5% or less for any distance •Up to 8.33% for 200’ maximum, resting intervals no more than 200’ apart •Up to 10% for 30’ maximum, resting intervals 30’ •Up to 12.5% for 10’ maximum, resting intervals 10’ •No more than 30% of the total trail length may exceed a running slope of 8.33% •Passing space: provided at least every 1,000’ where trail width is less than 60” •Signs: shall be provided indicating the length of the accessible trail segment RESOURCES http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/March/11-crt-324.html http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm http://www.access-board.gov/ EXISTING FACILITIES & REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS These new accessibility requirements have led to many questions on how efforts made to make recreational facilities accessible can easily be balanced with the natural landscape of parks, greenways, and nature areas. The ADA accessibility requirements apply to public accommodations, commercial facilities, and state and local government entities. If you own, operate, or lease a recreational facility, it is important to determine how your facility and programs must meet the requirements. Parks falls under Section II of the ADA, which covers public services. Access to facilities, as well as, programs is required. The ADA requires that: •Newly constructed buildings and facilities must be readily accessible. •Renovations or alteration of existing buildings and facilities must be readily accessible. •Barriers to accessibility in existing buildings and facilities must be removed when it is “readily achievable”. A structure is readily accessible if it meets the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Building and Facilities. To comply with the ADA, park and recreation agencies will need to adopt a consistent and thoroughly documented approach to planning, design, and management of areas and facilities within their system. The ADA requires that if a building or facility is altered, the renovations must be readily accessible to individuals with disabilities. An “alteration” means a change to a building or facility that affects the usability of the building. Alterations include remodeling, renovation, rehabilitation, restoration, reconstruction, and changes or arrangements in structural elements or in any reconfiguration of walls or partitions. In addition to making the alteration accessible, access to a primary function in the building, such as a telephone, restroom, or drinking fountain serving the area must be made accessible to individuals with disabilities. Currently, all government entities including park agencies are required to comply regardless of their funding sources. • Some minimum requirements include, but are not limited to: • One accessible route from site access point, such as a parking lot, to the primary accessible entrance must be provided. • If toilets are provided, then one accessible unisex toilet facility must be provided along the accessible route. • Only the publicly used spaces on the level of the ac cessible entrance must be made accessible. • Any displays or written information should be locat ed where they can be seen by a seated individual and should provide information accessible to the blind. Removal of Barriers: The ADA requires all public accommodations, programs, and facilities of state and local governments must remove architectural and communication barriers. An architectural barrier is a physical barrier to access, including steps, narrow doors, sidewalks, texture changes in the floor, and placement of signs and furniture. A communication barrier is one that is an integral part of the physical structure of the facility (e.g., telephones mounted too high, the absence of Braille markings on elevators and signage, and alarms that only give and audible signal). In many cases, the removal of architectural and communication barriers is not that difficult. Making curb cuts in the sidewalks, installing grab bars in restrooms, widening entrances, creating accessible parking spaces, and installing a paper cup dispenser at an existing drinking fountain are some simple ways access can be achieved. OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES The”Design Guide for Accessible Outdoor Recreation” states that it “...establishes a framework of direction for new and retrofitted recreation site and facilities requiring that all recreation visitors should have the opportunity to participate in programs and services to the highest level of access feasible for persons with disabilities when compared to that offered to other visitors.” Highly developed sites with parking lots, restrooms, structures for public gatherings and recreational facilities (e.g., swimming pools, tennis courts, and basketball courts) should have highly developed routes for accessibility. On the other end of the spectrum, fragile natural areas with limited development and limited recreational facilities should have the minimum of accessible routes to the site. The accessibility level should be consistent with the development level of any facility owned, operated, leased, or managed by the park department. It deals with the main components that should be accessible in all areas and when traveling to and from select activities. 78 GRANTS & FUNDING AVAILABLE Funding for parks is one of the most crucial aspects of parks planning and development. Without funding, the basic recreational needs of Fisher’s residents cannot be met. Parks Foundations, grants, and sponsorships ensure financial resources will be available to maintain and develop the parks to achieve a high quality and affordable recreational opportunity for all. THE LAND & WATER CONSERVATION FUND (LWCF) Website: http://www.in.gov/dnr/outdoor/4071.htm Contact Information: Bob Bronson Division of Outdoor Recreation Indiana Department of Natural Resources 402 W. Washington St., Rm. 271 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2782 (317)233-4075 Fax: (317)233-4648 Email: [email protected] The development or land acquisition cannot take place until final approval is received from the Federal Government. Grant applications are accepted for local public parks for outdoor recreation, and also new parks and existing park additions. It is important to note that all facilities should be designed with ADA compliance, and park programs and activities must be open to the public. Examples of projects that are eligible to be funded include: •Acquiring park or natural area •Picnic areas •Sports and playfields, such as playgrounds, ball fields, court facilities and golf courses •Water oriented facilities for boating, swimming, and access to lakes, rivers and streams •Natural areas and interpretive facilities •Campgrounds •Fishing and hunting areas •Winter sports facilities •Amphitheaters and bandstands •Parks adjacent to schools for mutual use •Outdoor natural habitat zoo facilities •Roads, restrooms, utilities, park maintenance buildings •Nature Centers 79 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP): GRANT Website: http://www.in.gov/dnr/outdoor/4101.htm Contact Information: Bob Bronson Division of Outdoor Recreation Indiana Department of Natural Resources 402 W. Washington St., Rm. 271 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2782 (317)233-4075 Fax: (317)233-4648 Email: [email protected] The RTP Grant Program provides funds for eligible projects that provide public access to trails. It is important to note that all facilities should be designed with ADA compliance, and park programs and activities must be open to the public. If the project is approved, the funds can be used for: •Development and rehabilitation of trailside, trailhead facilities, and trail linkages •Construction of multi-use trails •Acquisition of easement or property for trails •Operation of educational programs to promote safety and environmental protection related to trails (limited to 5% of State’s funds) •Providing stream and river access sites •Construction of bridges, boardwalks and crossings •Signage •Building of sanitary facilities and other support facilities (e.g., water fountains, etc.) HOMETOWN INDIANA GRANT PROGRAM Website: http://www.in.gov/dnr/outdoor/4068.htm Contact Information: Bob Bronson Division of Outdoor Recreation Indiana Department of Natural Resources 402 W. Washington St., Rm. 271 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2782 (317)233-4075 Fax: (317)233-4648 Email: [email protected] Land acquisition and/or facility construction or renovations are the types of projects that may be funded for grant applications for the parks and recreation category. The Hometown Indiana Program funding assistance is available for both indoor and outdoor facilities. It is important to note that all facilities should be designed with ADA compliance, and park programs and activities must be open to the public. Types of development that are eligible include: •Natural areas •Interpretive facilities •Linear greenways and trails •Sports and playfields •Recreation centers •Nature centers •Camping and support facilities NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION Website: http://www.nrpa.org/fundraising-resources/ Currently, there are no grant opportunities available. However, NRPA’s website is updated periodically with additional grant opportunities as they become available. SPONSORSHIPS A sponsorship program including foundations, corporations, and private donors provide additional financial resources for facilities, programs, and events within the parks system. Sponsorships allow for additional revenue to be generated towards improving upon and expanding opportunities for Fishers’ parks. With the additional resources, affordable, high quality recreation would be available for residents. Sponsorships could be for events, support for park programs, marketing/advertising, or naming opportunities (sponsor a flower bed, tree, bench, etc.). PARKS FOUNDATION A Parks Foundation for Fishers would be a collaborative effort between the Parks and Recreation Department and citizen supporters. Parks Foundations are a fundraising support for the parks and its programs. This can be accomplished through the promotion of benefits and opportunities, organizing volunteer efforts, and securing funding through grants, donations, and other resources to fund future improvements and development of Fishers’ parks. 80