Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the `Butcher of the

Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the
‘Butcher of the Somme’?
Who was General Haig? What was the Somme?
Douglas Haig
This is a painting of Field Marshall Sir
Douglas Haig painted in 1917.
He is arguably one of the most important
soldiers in British history. Under his
command, the British army helped to
defeat the German Army in 1918 and won
the First World War.
Never heard of him? Although he won a
great victory for his country he is not
remembered as a national hero. Some
people remember him as the exact
opposite and far from remembering him
as a hero they have called him a butcher
who didn’t care how many of his soldiers
were killed.
How did this man who led Britain’s
biggest-ever army to one of Britain’s
greatest victories, come to be called a
‘butcher’? Did he deserve it?
The First World War
The First World War took place
between August 1914 and November
1918 between the Triple Alliance
(Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy)
and the Triple Entente (Britain, France
and Russia). Much of the fighting took
place on the 'Western Front' which
was a line reaching mainly across
France from the English Channel
down to the Alps.
1
Trench Warfare
The First World War was the first of its kind
because there had been advances in technology.
Previously war had taken place in the open, on
horse back with fighting at close quarters. Now
there were heavy artillery, machine guns and
tanks. In order to maintain their positions and
defend themselves both sides dug trenches.
Trenches were ditches about two metres deep and
one and a half metres wide and they were
protected by barbed wire. The enemy's guns (rifles
and machine guns) which were trained on the
opposition 24 hours a day were a real hazard. The
heavy artillery were more dangerous again. They
fired metal shells from several kilometres behind
the front. The shells burst into jagged, razor sharp
pieces as they exploded. So, because it was
dangerous for soldiers to even put their heads
above the trench, let alone attack the enemy, both
sides spent most of the time in their trenches
guarding their positions.
2
The Somme 1916
The Somme is a river in France and as the fighting tool place near it the Battle was so named. General
Haig was Commander-in-Chief by this time so he was in total control of the attack. What he wanted was a
'breakthough' to get through the German trenches and defeat the army once and for all.
The Plan
The plan was very simple.
1. Smash the German's trenches
with a bombardment of shell fire to
last 7 days and nights
2. Send Infantry (foot soldiers) to
capture what was left of the
trenches.
3. Send a charge of cavalry
(horses) through the captured
trenches into the free land the other
side.
Haig claimed that 'not even a rat
would be alive' at the end of the
week long bombardment and the
rest would be a piece of cake.
Preparations
Haig gathered nearly 700,000 men for the attack although many of these were new to the Army and had very
little experience of battle. They were given rehearsals of what to do. Huge areas of ground were lined with
ribbons to show imaginary trenches and then the soldiers were sent to capture the ribboned areas. They were
told to imagine the barbed wire and officers held up flags to show imaginary shells exploding. All rehearsals
were completed in silence.
The most important thing these soldiers were taught was that they were never to charge at the German
trenches or run from cover to cover. They were told to approach them at a steady walk to avoid confusion.
A Change of Plan
Haig had to change his plan because of problems the French were having in a place called Verdun. The
Germans had the city of Verdun practically surrounded and the French had to use a lot of men to defend it.
The French thought that if the British attacked the Germans in another place it would reduce the number of
German soldiers in Verdun. Haig had not wanted to attack the Somme until August but the French got their
way and the attack was brought forward by a month.
3
The Attack
The attack on the Somme began on 1st July 1916. For a
week beforehand 1,537 British guns had fired over one
and a half million shells at the German trenches. They
had two targets:
1. the trenches themselves
2. to cut up the barbed wire
At 7.30 am the guns stopped firing and more than
100,000 British soldiers climbed out of their trenches in a
line 25 kilometers long. In the bright sunshine they
walked across no-man's-land towards the German
trenches. Many were expecting it to be easy, one officer
said, “you will not need rifles. You will find all the
Germans dead.”
The Reality
The Germans had been expecting an attack. German spy planes had seen British soldiers moving
'up the line' which gave the Germans time to prepare. They put up extra barbed wire and dug deep
shelters beneath their trenches. When the British guns started firing the Germans simply went into
their shelters and when they stopped, they quickly went up to their machine gun posts. They hardly
had to aim all they had to do was point their guns at the neat rows of soldiers walking towards
them.
The British soldiers still kept walking forwards but their next problem was the barbed wire. It had
not been destroyed . The wire had simply been lifted in the air and then dropped it in a worse
tangle than it was before. Thousands of men were shot at as they tried to pick their way through
dense tangles of wire.
4
What did Haig do?
General Haig did not however stop the battle. Day
after day, British soldiers went ‘over the top’ to attack
the German trenches. Every time the British attacked
the Germans counter attacked and forced them to
retreat. This went on for 140 days (nearly 4 months)
Every metre of ground was fought over time and time
again. The longer the fighting went on, the worse the
conditions became. Shellfire churned up the land into
a sea of mud. When the autumn rains came the mud
dissolved into slime metres deep in places.
In the trenches themselves shellfire killed thousands
of men every day. Sometimes it was impossible to
bury the dead properly so they were put into disused
trenches. British soldiers attacking the German
trenches sometimes found that the trench they
captured was full of corpses and deep in maggots.
In November the British made a last great attack. This
time it actually worked and they captured the village
of Beaumont Hamel and took thousands of Germans
prisoner. At last they had made the breakthough that
Haig had so wanted. However, it then started to snow
and the battlefield was already deep in mud, it was
swept by icy winds and blizzards. General Haig had
no choice but to call off the battle.
Who won the Battle of the Somme?
General Haig really believed he had won the Battle. The Germans had lost approximately 680,000 men
and had retreated 10 kilometers from their trenches. One of the German generals admitted later that this
broke the heart of the German Army. “We were completely exhausted”, he wrote, “if the war lasted, our
defeat seemed certain.” Also the British had helped to save Verdun by keeping a million German soldiers
occupied on the Somme.
But the human cost was very high. 420,000 British soldiers and 200,000 French soldiers had been killed,
almost as many as the Germans when added together. Although the Germans had been driven back 10
kilometers the Western Front was still there and the German Army was unbeaten.
5
Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as
‘the butcher of the Somme’?
Notes for teachers / candidates
Your assignment should start with an introduction.
Here you should briefly outline the history of the battle of the Somme
You should also refer to the different ways that people have interpreted Haig’ role
in the battle of the Somme.
This section should be around 300 words.
You should then consider the view that Haig was a butcher
Explain WHY many people hold this view.
What evidence is there to back up this view.
You should consider four pieces of evidence that back up this view.
When looking at the evidence you should consider points such as:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
whether this is a valid source in finding out about Haig
what it says about Haig and the war
who the author / artist was
when it was written
why it was written (if you can)
the type of source it is
whether you consider the source to have any negative aspects
You should comment on whether you consider this view of Haig as a ‘butcher’ to
be a fair one or not.
This section should be about 500 words.
6
You should then consider the view that Haig does NOT deserve to be
remembered as the butcher of the Somme.
Explain WHY many people hold this view.
What evidence is there to back up this view.
You should consider four pieces of evidence that back up this view.
When looking at the evidence you should consider points such as:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
whether this is a valid source in finding out about Haig
what it says about Haig and the war
who the author / artist was
when it was written
why it was written (if you can)
the type of source it is
whether you consider the source to have any negative aspects
You should comment on whether you consider this alternative view of Haig to be a
fair one or not.
This section should be about 500 words.
Having considered the evidence for both sides, you should be in a position to
reach a judgement on the question.
Which interpretation do you think is more valid – a butcher or a general doing his
job?
Give reasons why you think Haig was called a butcher
Give reasons why you think Haig was a general doing his job
Summarise the kind of evidence which has led people to their different conclusions
Make a final judgement.
This should be about 300 words.
7
THE FIRST INTERPRETATION
‘HAIG WAS THE BUTCHER OF THE SOMME’
SOURCE 1a
The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig. I'm very bitter; always have
been and always will be and everybody else that knew him. He lived
almost 50 kilometres behind the line and that's about as near as he got. I
don't think he knew what a trench was like. And they made him an Earl
and gave him £100,000. I know what I'd have given him.
[Fred Pearson, a private on the Western Front, commenting on Haig in
a local newspaper in 1966]
SOURCE 1b
‘It was pure bloody murder. Douglas Haig should have been hung, drawn and
quartered for what he did on the Somme. The cream of British manhood was
shattered in less than six hours.’
[P. Smith, a private in the 1st Border regiment fighting on the Somme, writing in his
diary (July 1916)]
SOURCE 2
Haig was a second-rate Commander in unparalleled and unforeseen
circumstances.. He was not endowed with any of the elements of imagination and
vision ... And he certainly had none of that personal magnetism which has enabled
great leaders of men to inspire multitudes with courage, faith and a spirit of
sacrifice ... He was incapable of planning vast campaigns on the scale demanded
on so immense a battlefield.
[David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister during the First World War, writing in
his War Memoirs (1935)]
8
SOURCE 3
Reg. No
Rank
Name
Date of Death
12/288
12/289
12/291
12/294
12/296
12/307
12/310
12/314
12/318
12/591
12/593
12/597
12/600
12/604
12/606
12/607
12/608
12/611
12/862
12/865
12/867
12/870
12/871
12/874
12/879
12/882
12/887
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Cpl.
Pte.
C.S.M.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
L/Cpl.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
L/Cpl.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
L/Cpl.
L/Cpl.
Pte.
Pte.
Pte.
Bagshaw, William
Bailey, Joseph
Barlow, Wilfred
Batley, Edward
Baylis, Lawrence
Braham, George
Bramham, George
Bright, Arthur Willey
Brookfield, Fredk. Harold
Bedford, Norman
Beniston, Aubrey
Blenkarn, William
Bowes, Frank
Bratley, Clifford William
Brindley, Charles W.
Brown, Arthur
Brown, Samuel
Busfield, Harry Craven
Barnsley, Frank
Barrott, John Henry
Barton, John Arthur
Bennett, Joseph Arnold
Binder, Walter Bertram
Bland, Ernest
Brammer, Archie
Brown, Stanley
Buttery, John Arnold
1/7/16
1/7/16
16/5/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
13/10/18
12/4/18
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
10/9/16
1/7/16
1/4/18
14/3/17
1/7/16
6/12/17
18/5/17
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
1/7/16
[A page from the list of dead and wounded suffered by the Sheffield Pals Battalion
on the first day of the Somme. The Sheffield Pals suffered 548 casualties on the first
day of the battle.]
SOURCE 4
‘Good morning, good morning!’, the general said,
When we met him last week on our way to the line.
Now the soldiers he smiled at are most of ‘em dead,
And we’re cursing his staff for incompetent swine.
‘He’s a cheery old card’, grunted Harry to Jack,
As they slogged up to Arras with rifle and pack.
But he did for them both by his plan of attack.
[A poem by Siegfried Sassoon called The General. He served as a Captain in the
Royal Welch Fusiliers on the Western Front, but later threw away the Military
Cross which had been awarded to him for bravery.]
9
SOURCE 5
Idealism perished on the Somme. The enthusiastic volunteers were
enthusiastic no longer. They had lost faith in their cause, in their
leaders, in everything except loyalty to their fighting comrades. The war
ceased to have any purpose, it went on for its own sake, as a contest of
endurance. The Somme set the picture by which future generations saw
the First World War: brave, helpless soldiers; blundering, obstinate
generals; nothing achieved. After the Somme men decided that the war
would go on for ever.
[A.J.P.Taylor, a socialist historian, writing in a specialist history book, The First
World War, (1963)]
SOURCE 6
Major-General (addressing the men before practising an attack behind the
lines). "I want you to understand that there is a difference between a rehearsal
and the real thing. There are three essential differences: first, the absence of the
enemy. Now (turning to the Regimental Sergeant-Major) what is the second
difference?"
Sergeant-Major. "The absence of the General, Sir."
[A cartoon from the British satirical magazine Punch (February 1917)]
10
SOURCE 7
Blackadder: (winds the telephone)
Hello? Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig please.
(Haig picks up telephone, while looking over a model of the battlefield)
Blackadder: Hello Sir Douglas
Haig: Good Lord ! Blacky !
(Knocks down an entire line of model British soldiers)
Blackadder: Yes sir.
Haig: I haven’t seen you since…
(Knocks down the second line of model British soldiers)
Blackadder: ’92 sir – Mboto Gorge. And do you remember?
Haig: My God yes. You saved my damn life that day, Blacky.
Blackadder: Well exactly sir. And do you remember then that you said
that if I was ever in real trouble and I really needed a favour that I was
to call you and you’d do everything you could to help me?
Haig: (sweeps the fallen soldier models into a dustbin)
Yes, I do, and I stick by it. You know me – not a man to change my
mind.
Blackadder: No, we’ve noticed that.
Haig: So what do you want? Spit it out man.
(Throws the model soldiers over his shoulder)
Blackadder: Well you see, sir, it’s the Big Push today, and I’m not that
keen to go over the top.
[Taken from the BBC TV comedy series, Blackadder, which continually portrayed
Haig and the generals as fools and murderers. In this scene Blackadder is trying to
persuade Haig to get him sent home while Haig plays games with toy British
soldiers. The series was broadcast in the 1990s.]
SOURCE 8
Haig and other British generals must be blamed... for wilful blunders
and wicked butchery. However stupid they might have been, however
much they were the product of a system which obstructed enterprise,
they knew what they were doing. There can never be forgiveness.
[John Laffin, writing in his history book, British Butchers and Bunglers of World War
One (2003). Laffin earned his living taking people on battlefield tours and
researched the war entirely from the soldiers’ standpoint.]
11
A SECOND INTERPRETATION
‘HAIG WAS JUST DOING HIS JOB AS A GENERAL’
SOURCE 8
The truth is that those ruddy-cheeked, bristling-moustached, heavyjawed, frequently inarticulate generals rose to challenge after challenge,
absorbed weapon after weapon into their battle-systems, adapted
themselves to constant change with astonishing success. But no one
cared to make a legend out of that.
[Historian John Terraine, writing in his study of the Somme, The Smoke and the Fire
(1980)]
SOURCE 9
A considerable portion of the German soldiers are now practically
beaten men, ready to surrender if they could, thoroughly tired of the
war and expecting nothing but defeat. It is true that the amount of
ground we have gained is not great. That's nothing. We have proved
our ability to force the enemy out of strong defensive positions and to
defeat him. The German casualties have been greater than ours.
[Part of a report sent by Haig to the British cabinet about the aftermath of the Battle
of the Somme (December 1916)]
SOURCE 10
During the first half of the war, our leadership was flawless – perfect. There was an
obvious genius for pure generalship which has made Sir Douglas Haig fit to rank
with any general of past or modern times.
[A Lieutenant in the Yorkshire Light Infantry who was gassed on the Somme and
invalided back to Britain, writing in a letter to the
Daily Express (21st
December, 1916)]
12
SOURCE 11
The belief that the generals were responsible for the holocaust quickly
took root and has spread. There is a large literature of condemnation,
including the scripts of plays − Oh What a Lovely War! − and films.
The British generals were no worse than those of any other combatant
nation. All Great War generals faced an insoluble problem; how to
break a strong front of trenches, barbed wire, machine-guns and artillery
with the weak instrument of human flesh.
Blame Haig as we will, his soldiers proved ready to follow him to the
end. They did so because the national will to sustain the war effort
remained strong.
Britain was a different society at the time, a nation that was patriotic to a
degree unimaginable today. The humblest Briton took pride in his
country's possession of the history's greatest empire. Haig was, as he
himself believed with religious intensity, actually doing the people's will
in continuing to direct the war. We should remember that this
November when we commemorate their suffering.
[From an article by military historian John Keegan, published in
The Daily Mail (7th November 1998)]
SOURCE 12
The men are in splendid spirits. Several have said that they have never
before been so instructed and informed of the nature of the operation
before them. The barbed wire has never been so well cut, not the
artillery preparation so thorough. All the commanders are full of
confidence.
Very successful attack this morning... All went like clockwork... The
battle is going very well for us and already the Germans are
surrendering freely. The enemy is so short of men that he is collecting
them from all parts of the line. Our troops are in wonderful spirits and
full of confidence.
[Excerpts from the reports of Sir Douglas Haig, (30th June / 1st July 1916)]
13
SOURCE 13
As we read the history of the Great War and the mists created by prejudice,
propaganda and false witness begin to scatter, the figure of Haig looms ever larger
as that of the general who foresaw more accurately than most, who endured longer
than most and who inspired most confidence amongst his soldiers.
Haig believed from the first that the German line could be broken and it was. In
moral stature, Haig was a giant. It may be easy in history to find a more brilliant
man, but it would be hard to find a better one.
[Alfred Duff Cooper, a soldier in the Grenadier Guards during the war, writing in
his biography of Sir Douglas Haig. He was a family friend to the Haigs and was
officially invited to write Haig’s biography by his family after Haig’s death. He
later became a Conservative MP and Secretary of War from 1935-37]
SOURCE 14
[A photograph showing crowds welcoming Haig home from France, (12th April
1919)]
14
SOURCE 15
Blaming Haig the individual for the failings of the British war effort is
putting too much of a burden of guilt on one man. Haig was the
product of his time, of his upbringing, education, training and previous
military experience. One argument goes that he was, ultimately,
victorious and, even if he had been replaced would there have been
anyone better for the job? Even on the Somme a German officer called
the battlefield 'the muddy grave of the German army'.
[S. Warburton, writing in an article in the history magazine, Hindsight, which takes
a fresh look at historical issues (1998)]
15