Development of a New Turbocharged Diesel Engine for
Transcription
Development of a New Turbocharged Diesel Engine for
Development of a New Turbocharged Diesel Engine for Military Power Generation and Vehicle Applications Ricardo Software Conference – Detroit, MI April 17, 2013 Paul E. Yelvington, Ph.D. Energy Conversion Technology Leader Contributors: David Sykes, Andrew Carpenter, and Jerry Wagner Mainstream Engineering Corporation 200 Yellow Place Rockledge, FL 32955 www.mainstream-engr.com [email protected] This work is sponsored by the U.S. Army under contract W56HZV-09-C-0048 and managed by the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC). COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 1 Mainstream Engineering Corporation • Small business incorporated in 1986 90+ employees Mechanical, chemical, electrical, materials engineers Machinists and tool and die makers Lab technicians and assemblers 85,000 ft2 facility in Rockledge, FL • • • • • • Laboratories: thermal, energy conversion, engine, materials, nanofab, wet and analytical chemistry, computer (CAM/CAD, FEA) • Prototyping: 3‐ and 5‐axis CNC and manual mills, CNC and manual lathes, grinders, sheet metal, plastic injection molding, welding • Manufacturing: 35,000 ft2 lean manufacturing facility for commercial and military products Mission Statement MEC’s core purpose is to continually strive to design, develop, and manufacture the finest energy conversion and thermal control products in the world and to be an industry leader in these areas of research. MEC’s compressor on ISS Rockledge, FL facility COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 2 Our Applications of Ricardo WAVE • Analysis of the use of crank‐angle‐resolved cylinder‐ pressure feedback for control of PCCI combustion • Modeling of a rotary engine for unmanned aircraft • Development of a hybrid electric turbocharger for transient lag reduction and waste heat harvesting • Development of a different compression‐expansion engine for improved efficiency • Development of new 3‐cylinder turbocharged diesel engine platform for generators and nonroad vehicles COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 3 Objective - Build a Better Military Diesel Fuel is expensive to deliver to forward locations Logistics “tail” limits operational effectiveness Resupplying fuel exposes troops to additional risk COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 4 Design Goals for Generator / APU • • • • • • • Maximum Electrical Power: 30 kWe Efficient Turndown Ratio: 15:1 Total Weight: 400 lb without external packaging Engine Weight: 220 lbs without flywheel Fuel: JP‐8 or DF‐2 Fuel Consumption: 0.11 gal/kW‐hr Emissions: Tier 4 nonroad COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 5 Design Philosophy for the AMD45 • Advanced Modular Diesel (AMD45) • • • • • • • Automotive Diesel Powertrains High Degree of Integration (Starter-Alternator) Lightweight Design and Materials High-Speed Not Suited for High Loads over Extended Time Industrial Diesel Generators Stand-alone Engine and Alternator Inexpensive, Heavy Materials Low-Speed Extremely High Durability COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 6 Design Methodology COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 7 Turbocharger Selection • Limited selection for small displacement engines • Targeted 0.7 bar boost to meet durability goals • Scaled compressor map using TCMAP COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 8 Ricardo WAVE Model Construction • Modeling performed to roughly size the engine • No library of similar designs to draw from • Pure predictions COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 9 Initial Engine Sizing & Configuration Configuration In‐line Cylinders 3 Displacement 1.25 L Bore 79.5 mm Stroke 84.4 mm Compression ratio 16.2:1 Induction Turbocharged Injection Common‐rail Valves 2 per cylinder COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 10 WAVE Performance Predictions COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 11 In-Cylinder CFD Simulations • 3‐D, reacting flow including intake/exhaust ports • Inlet boundary conditions were imported from Ricardo WAVE • Surrogate diesel uses n‐heptane reduced chemistry model with diesel transport props COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 12 Combustion Results for In-Cylinder CFD CAD Cylinder Head Piston Bowl -4 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Injector •The spray does not impinge on the walls at any time •Further studies reduced the spray angle from 155° to 135° to match the contour of the piston bowl COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 13 Stress Analysis for the Engine Block FEA Model Mean Stress Alternating Stress •Transient stress simulation was performed for one complete cycle •The mean and alternating stress was calculated •Modified‐Goodman approach gave factor of safety for operating for 8000 hrs COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 14 Thermal Analysis of Cylinder Head •Conjugate heat transfer analysis (air flow, coolant flow, conduction in solid) •Used to determine feasibility of cast‐in integrated exhaust manifold •Maximum surface temperature below threshold based on yield strength COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 15 Transient FEA for Crankshaft Design • Highly adaptable crankshaft design uses design guidelines, transient FEA, and mates with COTS parts • Transient analysis: – – – – 5000 RPM 140 bar peak pressure Traces imported from in cylinder CFD Conventional bearing boundary conditions • Maximum Deflection: 0.015 mm • Maximum Stress: 141 MPa (Endurance Strength: 669 MPa) • Crank pin bores, oil transfer holes, and rolled fillets are sites of greatest stress concentration COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 16 Complete Engine CAD Model • Unique design features – Integrated intake manifold – Interleaving, removable balancing shaft – Front PTO shaft/ISA drive – Electric water pump COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 17 Design Methodology COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 18 Valvetrain Dynamic Testing • • • Dual spring design with hydraulic tappet Excellent valvetrain dynamic control No valve bounce or lofting COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 19 High-Pressure Common-Rail Injector • Modified Delphi “1.5” injector • Custom nozzle to match our combustion chamber geometry COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 20 Electronic Fuel Injection • • • • MotoTron ECM is fully programmable and production‐ready • Controls injection parameters and pressure for the AMD45 Drivven driver box provides high current to drive diesel injector solenoid Fuel injection strategy will be based on engine speed and manifold density Enables variable speed load following Trigger MotoTron 112‐pin ECM Drivven SADI injector driver box COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 21 Cast Components • All aluminum castings • Block, head, valve cover, oil pan, cover plate, and balancing shaft cover • Sand cast and finish machined COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 22 Design Methodology COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 23 Prototype Fabrication and Assembly 14 custom components designed and externally manufactured • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Block Head Crankshaft Camshaft Balancing Shaft Oil Pump Housing/Cover Balancing Shaft Bearing Caps(2) Engine Covers Oil Pan Head Gasket Cam Bearing Caps (4) Flywheel Chain Guides Exhaust Manifold COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 24 Design Methodology COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 25 Model-in-the-Loop (MiL) Controller Dev. • MATLAB/Simulink used as dynamic modeling environment • Simulink called WAVE as the “plant model” • Looked at response to step changes in load Simulink • Used response to tune constants with Ricardo “no‐lag” tuning algorithm • Fit constants over a range of speed and fueling rate • Adaptive control (i.e., gain scheduling) via lookup tables WAVE model COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 26 Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) Injector Testing ECM and “breakout board” Spray chamber “Spintron” for sensor HiL testing High speed imaging COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 27 Dynamometer Testing • 120‐hp AC Regenerative Dynamometer • Interloc V Dynamometer Controller – Speed Control (up to 6700 RPM) – Torque Control (up to 284 N‐m) • Emissions Analyzers – CO, CO2, NOx, THC, PM, Smoke Opacity • 90 kW Cooling System – Independent control of coolant, oil, and inlet air temperature • National Instruments Data Acquisition – Continuously logging 16 temperatures, 6 pressures, fuel flow rate, lambda, relative humidity, emissions data, and performance data COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 28 Brake Power and Torque Brake Torque (N‐m) 100 45 Fuel/Air Equivalence Ratio () 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 40 35 80 30 25 60 20 40 15 Brake Power (kW) 120 10 20 5 0 1000 Single pulse injection, Low boost pressure 1500 2000 2500 3000 Engine Speed (RPM) 3500 4000 COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION 0 4500 Page 29 Fuel Conversion Efficiency 0.4 Brake Fuel Conversion Efficiency 0.35 0.3 0.25 Engine Speed 0.2 1000 RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM 0.15 Single pulse injection, Low boost pressure 0.1 0 10 20 Brake Power (kW) 30 40 COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 30 Emissions – Effect of Boost Pressure 40 NOx+NMHC CO Emission Factor (g/kWh) 35 High Load, 2600 rpm 30 25 20 Standard boost 15 High boost 10 EPA CO Limit EPA NOx +NMHC Limit 5 0 0 5 10 SOI (°BTDC) 15 COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION 20 Page 31 Emissions – Effect of Injection Pressure 7 Emission Factor (g/kWh) 6 EPA CO Limit 5 EPA NOx +NMHC Limit 800 bar 4 1200 bar 3 2 NOx+NMHC CO 1 High Load, 4500 rpm 0 0 5 10 15 SOI (°BTDC) 20 25 COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION 30 Page 32 Engine Performance Metrics Even with non‐optimized input parameters, the first‐generation prototype engine meets or exceeds nearly all of the desired performance metrics Maximum Power (kW) Weight (lb) Fuel Consumption (gal/kW‐hr) Efficient Turndown Ratio Maximum Torque (Nm) Maximum BMEP (bar) Power per Disp. Volume (kW/L) Power/Weight Ratio (kW/kg) Performance Target 38 220 0.11 15:1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Measured Performance 47 196 0.08 10:1† 106 11 38 0.53 †42.3 kW to 4.3 kW with efficiency higher than 29%; dynamometer limited, not engine limited COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 33 Duty-Cycle Averaged Emissions EPA Base Boost Boost and Injection Requirement AMD45 Control Pressure Control CO (g/kWh) 5 8.3 4.4 3.6 NOx+NMHC (g/kWh) 4.7 5.6 4.6 4.1 • Uses 8‐mode nonroad steady‐state test cycle (ISO 8178‐C1) • CO and NOx+NMHC emissions standards are met with single‐pulsed injection without after treatment • PM measurements underway • Multi‐pulse injection or DPF (or both) will be required to meet EPA Tier 4 nonroad standard for PM (0.03 g/kWh) COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 34 Conclusions 1. AMD45 engine development was achieved using: – High‐fidelity modeling and simulation tools – Commercially available (common) parts – Integration of design features for non‐common parts 2. The engine has been tested and achieves all significant performance criteria necessary for the 30 kWe generator: – – – – Maximum operating speed: 4500 RPM Maximum power: 47.1 kWs (to date) Fuel consumption: 3.2 gal/hr at 41.2 kWs Weight: 196 lb 3. Modern CAE tools can significantly shorten the learning curve for development of a new engine platform from “blank sheet” concept to real hardware COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 35 Questions? COPYRIGHT © MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION Page 36