Angela Shierk, OTR, PhD Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children

Transcription

Angela Shierk, OTR, PhD Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children
Angela Shierk, OTR, PhD
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children
 No disclosures
Overview of Course
 TSRHC
 Terminology, Diagnosis, and Upper Extremity






Anatomy
Evaluation Part 1: Body Function and Structure
Evaluation Part 2: Activity and Participation
Surgical Interventions
Therapeutic Interventions
Implementing Effective Home Programs
NBPP Taxonomy-Driven Classification
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children
 Treating pediatric orthopedic conditions for over 90






years
Scoliosis and spine
Clubfoot and foot disorders
Hip Dysplasia and Perthes
Limb length discrepancies
Hand disorders
Also treat Pediatric Developmental Disabilities,
Dyslexia, Neurological conditions
www.tsrh.org
NBPP Clinic: Interdisciplinary Team















Pediatric Hand Surgeons
Pediatric Neurosurgeons
Pediatric Neurologists
Physician Assistant
Hand Surgery Fellows
Nurse Coordinator
Occupational Therapists
Physical Therapists
Research Coordinator
Psychologist
Child Life Specialist
Administrative Staff
Media
Community Based Therapists
Parents and Family
Role of Therapist in Clinic Setting
 Provide ongoing assessment and intervention as the
patient presents to be seen by a hand surgeon
 Intervention primarily consists of home programs and
education to the patient and family
 Assist physician in determining future
medical/surgical considerations & efficacy of current
interventions
 Recommend referrals and communication to hospital
based or community based services
Terminology
Terminology
 Neonatal – Relating to a newborn infant
 Brachial- Pertaining to the arm
 Plexus- A network of nerves
 Palsy- Weakness
 temporary or permanent loss of sensation or ability to
move
Wilhelm Heinrich Erb
 1873
 Described upper plexus
palsy in an adult
 Localized the lesion to the
junction of C5 and C6 –
“Erb’s Point”
(Ezaki, 2013)
Augusta Klumpke
 1885
 Described lower plexus
palsy
 Noted pupillary signs –
sympathetic nerve
involvement
(Ezaki, 2013)
Other Terminology
 Erb’s Palsy
 Klumpke’s Palsy
 Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy
 Birth Brachial Plexus Palsy
 Brachial Plexus Injury
 other
Reports of NBPP
 Following spontaneous vaginal deliveries without
trauma or shoulder dystocia suggesting pre-existing
plexopathy or causation by natural labor mechanics
 (Gherman 1999, Jennett 1992, Medlock 1997)
 After caesarian section delivery

(AlQuattam 1996, Gherman 1998, Scheller 1994)
Diagnosis
NBPP Diagnosis
 An injury to the brachial plexus, C5-T1, that occurs
before or during the birth process
 Mechanism is traction across plexus
 Most common cause of stretch are the forces produced
during labor
Incidence of NBPP
 Remains between 0.3 and 2.5 per 1000 live births
 Reported incidence varies with
 Definition of plexopathy
 Referral patterns
 Median incidence for newborns:
 Less than 4000g (<8lbs 13oz) is 0.9 per 1000 births
 4000g-4500g (8lbs 13oz - 9lbs 14oz) is 1.8 per 1000 births
 More than 4500g (>9lbs 14oz) is 2.5 per 1000 births
Risk Factors






Large birth weight
Shoulder dystocia
Prolonged labor
Assisted delivery
Breech presentation
Difficult delivery




Excessive maternal weight gain
Gestational diabetes
Maternal multiparity
Previous births with BPP
Birth weight and shoulder
dystocia are not predictable
 Gross TL, Sokol RJ, Williams T, and Thompson K: Shoulder
dystocia: A fetal-physician risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:
1408-1419, 1987.
Gross, et.al.
 7,123 deliveries, 116 cases of S.D.
 49 S.D. in 394 babies > 4,000 grams (>8lbs 13oz)
 (345 had no S.D.)
 67 S.D. in babies < 4,000 grams (<8lbs 13oz)
Gross, et.al.
 Birth weight estimated by ratio femoral length /
abdominal circumference
 If BW could be predicted and Caesarian delivery
for >4,500 g, calculated that 978 C sections
would be done to prevent one persistent plexus
injury
Gross, et.al.
 49 cases of shoulder dystocia (>4000 g)
 29 had no trauma
 20 had trauma
 12 clavicle fractures - no neuro injury
 1 humerus fracture - no neuro injury
 9 transient Erb’s palsy - resolved
 1 BPP with permanent sequelae
Initial Presentation
 Focus on recovery and
improving function
 Child with a weak arm
 Decreased spontaneous
movement
 Asymmetric infantile
reflexes
Narakas Classification
 Narakas 1 – C5 and C6 (Erb’s Palsy)
 Weakness of shoulder abductors, external rotators,
elbow flexors, wrist extensors
 Narakas 2 – C5, C6 and C7 also involved
 Weakness also in elbow extensors and shoulder
adductors
 Narakas 3 – Pan plexus without Horner’s syndrome
 Narakas 4 – Total plexus with Horner’s syndrome
Horner’s Syndrome
 Interruption of
oculosympathetic nerve
supply
 Miosis
 Ptosis
 Loss of hemifacial
sweating
Good Prognostic Signs
 Normal eyes - no Horner’s syndrome
 No cranial trauma
 Clavicle fracture
 Upper plexus partial lesion
 Early spontaneous recovery
Poor Prognostic Signs
 Horner’s syndrome
 Pan plexus involvement
 Cranial trauma
 Shoulder trauma
 Cool, dry limb
 Absence of early recovery
 Palpable neuroma
Anatomy Review
Anatomy – Brachial Plexus
It doesn’t really look like this. . .
Anatomy – macerated specimen
(Kerr)
Variability in Plexus anatomy
Tountas et al. Anatomic Variations
Pirates’ Rules
Shoulder
C5
Shoulder Flexion
Deltoid (anterior portion)
Coracobrachialis
Shoulder Extension
Latissimus Dorsi
Teres Major
Deltoid (posterior portion)
Shoulder Abduction
Deltoid (middle portion)
Supraspinatus
Shoulder Adduction
Pectoralis Major
Latissimus Dorsi
C6
C7
C8
T1
Shoulder
C5
External Rotation
Infraspinatus
Teres Major
Internal Rotation
Subscapular
Pectoralis Major
Latissimus Dorsi
Teres Major
Scapular Retraction
Rhomboid Major
Rhommboid Minor
Scapular Protraction
Serratus Anterior
C6
C7
C8
T1
Elbow and Forearm
C5
Elbow Flexion
Brachialis
Biceps (forearm supinated)
Elbow Extension
Triceps
Supination
Biceps
Supinator
Pronation
Pronator Teres
Pronator Quadratus
C6
C7
C8
T1
Wrist
C5
Wrist Extension
Extensor carpi radialis longus
Extensor carpi radialis brevis
Extensor carpi ulnaris
Wrist Flexion
Flexor carpi radialis
Flexor carpi ulnaris
C6
C7
C8
T1
Fingers and Thumb
C5
Finger Extension
Extensor digitorum communis
Extensor indicis
Extensor digiti minimi
Finger Flexion
Flexor digitorum profundus
Flexor digitorum superficialis
Lumbricals
Thumb Extension
Extensor pollicis brevis
Extensor pollicis longus
Thumb Flexion
Flexor pollicis brevis
Flexor pollicis longus
C6
C7
C8
T1
Part 1 Evaluation: Overview
 History and Subjective
 Shoulder Joint
 Clinical Exam
 Sonogram
 Passive Range of Motion
 Shoulder External
Rotation
 Elbow Extension
 Standard Measurements
 Scapular Humeral Angles
 Active Range of Motion
 Infantile Reflexes
 Active Movement Scale
 Modified Mallet Scale
 Standard Measurements
 Strength
 Grip and Pinch
 Sensation
 Semmes Weinstein
 Stereognosis
 Pain
 Wong-Baker FACES
 Interview
Example of Examination Form – Handout
History and Subjective
 Labor/pregnancy
 Birth weight
 Initial appearance and function of limb
 Humeral or clavicle fracture
 Dates of function recovery
 Patient and parent concerns
Shoulder Joint
Clinical Exam - Shoulder
 Observation
 Position of arm at rest
 Signs of shoulder dislocation
Ages 0-18 years, primary focus for ages 0-12 months
Signs of Shoulder Dislocation
 Loss of passive external rotation
 Apparent shortening of humerus
 Skin fold asymmetry
 Deep axilla
 Palpable humeral head posteriorly
Ages 0-18 years, primary focus for ages 0-12 months
Loss of Passive External Rotation
Loss of Passive External Rotation
Loss of External Rotation
Older Child
Rapid Loss of PER
100
80
60
40
20
0
M-5
-20
-40
M-4
M-3
Months prior to diagnosis
M-2
M-1
M0
Apparent Shortening of Humerus
Apparent Shortening of the Humerus
Older Child
Skin Fold Asymmetry
Deep Axilla
Deep Axilla
Older Child
Deep axilla
Sonogram
 Used to diagnose
 Shoulder subluxation/dislocation
 Clavicular fractures
 Humeral fractures
 Radial head dislocations
 Sonography preferred in infants b/c no radiation or
need for sedation
 X-ray, CT, or MRI will also show position of the joint
Why important?
 Early identification - to avoid
long term deformity of the
joint
7 year old child
Under-estimated
13 cases reported : 4 ant, 9 post
Anterior :
Posterior :
 1953 Liebolt 1
 1980 May
 1968 Babbit
2
 1989 Dunkerton
1
 1997 Flores
1
 1993 Troum
2
 1998 Torode
4
 1998 Hunter
1
1
1
Fairbank - 1913
 28 cases of early
subluxation of the
shoulder
 Youngest age 2 months
 Described the mechanism
 Operated to reduce
TSRHC Findings
 Prevalence : 9 %
(134 new NBPP, 12 posterior shoulder dislocations )
 Average age at discovery : 6 months
( 3 to 10 months )
 Sex : 7 boys, 5 girls
 Side : 6 right, 6 left
(Ezaki, 2013)
Neurological Level
C5-T1
C5-C6
C5-C6
C5-C7
C5-T1
C5-C7
(Ezaki, 2013)
Take Home Message
 Approximately 10% of babies with NBPP will develop
enough muscle imbalance to posteriorly dislocate the
involved shoulder
 Unopposed internal rotation  posterior subluxation
Passive Range of Motion
Shoulder External Rotation
 Arm aDducted
 Elbow flexed at 90
degrees
 Stationary arm:
perpendicular to the
trunk
 Moving arm: parallel to
forearm
Ages 0-18 years
Elbow Extension
 Monitor over
time, prevalence
of elbow flexion
contractures
Ages 0-18 years
Standard Measurements PROM
 Shoulder
 Flexion
 Extension
 Abduction
 Adduction
 Internal Rotation
 External Rotation
 Elbow
 Flexion
 Extension
 Forearm
 Supination
 Pronation
 Wrist
 Flexion
 Extension
 Fingers
 Flexion
 Extension
 Thumb
 Flexion
 Extension
 Abduction
Ages 0-18 years
Scapular Humeral Angles
Horizontal ADduction
 Move arm from
horizontal
aBduction into
horizontal
aDduction
 Feel for medial
border of scapula
 ~ 100 degrees
Ages 0-18 years
Scapular Humeral Angles
ADduction
 With scapula
aligned with
frontal plane
measure angle
between lateral
border of scapula
and humerus
 ~ 40 degrees
Ages 0-18 years
Scapular Humeral Angles
ABduction
 Move arm from
aDduction into
aBduction
 Feel for lateral
border of scapula
 Measure angle
between lateral
border of scapula
and humerus
 ~ 150 degrees
Ages 0-18 years
Practice
 Scapular Humeral Angles
 See handout
 Shoulder External Rotation with arm aDducted
Active Range of Motion
Infantile Reflexes
 Reflex actions originating in the central nervous
system exhibited by normal infants in response to a
particular stimuli
 Disappear or are integrated as child moves through
normal child development
 Can be used in the first few months of life to assess
AROM
Ages 0-6 months
The Moro Reflex
 The “startle response”
 Present at birth
 Peaks at one month
 Begins to integrate at 2
months
 Used to assess shoulder
ROM
Palmar Grasp Relfex
 Presents at birth
 Persists until 5-6
months
 Used to assess finger
flexion
ATNR Reflex
Asymmetric Tonic Neck Reflex
 Fencing Posture
 Present at one month
 Integrates at 4 months
 Used to assess elbow
flexion
Active Movement Scale
 Developed at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto,




Ontario
Ordinal, 8-grade scale
Does not require that children perform tasks on
command
Evaluates overall joint movements
Spontaneous movement
Curtis, et al., 2002
Ages 0-4 years, or until child can follow directions for AROM
Active Movement Scale
 Gravity Eliminated
 Against Gravity
5: Less than 50% motion
0: No contraction
1: Contraction, No motion 6: Greater than 50% motion
7: Full motion
2: Less than 50% motion
3: Greater than 50%
motion
4: Full motion
Guidelines for Use - AMS
 A score of 4 must be achieved before a higher score
can be assigned
 Movement grades are assigned within the available
PROM
 Finger flexion/extension is assessed at the MP
joints
 Digital flexion or extension is given a single grade
using the score of the best finger
Assessment Assistants
 Clear Rain stick –
visual/auditory (babies)
 Bubbles (babies and
toddlers)
 Key Chain Gadgets
(toddlers)
 Mr. Potato Head
(toddlers and school age)
AMS Video
AMS Scores
Modified Mallet Classification
 Classifies shoulder function in children
 Assesses the child’s ability to perform functional
movements of the affected extremity
 Child must be able to follow commands
 Scoring
 Ordinal, 5-grade scale
(van der Sluijs, et al., 2006)
Ages 3-18 years, or when child can follow directions
Modified Mallet Classification
Modified Mallet Classification
Mallet Scores
Standard Measurements - AROM
 Shoulder
 Flexion
 Extension
 Abduction
 Adduction
 Internal Rotation
 External Rotation
 Elbow
 Flexion
 Extension
 Forearm
 Supination
 Pronation
 Wrist
 Flexion
 Extension
 Fingers
 Flexion
 Extension
 Thumb
 Flexion
 Extension
 Abduction
Ages 4-18 years, or when child can follow directions
Active Range of Motion
Strength
Grip and Pinch
Lateral Pinch
Grip
Tip Pinch
Tripod
Ages 6-18 years, or when child can follow directions
Sensation
Semmes Weinstein
Ages 6-18 years, or when child can follow directions
Stereognosis
Ages 6-18 years, or when child can follow directions
Finger Biting
Ages 0-18 years, primary focus infants and toddlers
Pain
Wong-Baker FACES
Ages 3-18 years
Pain Interview
 Where is the pain?
 Point to it with one finger
 Can the child rate the pain?
 What does it feel like?
 How long does it last?
 How often?
 What starts it?
 What stops it?
 Comments
Ages 5-18 years, younger children ask parents
Part 2 Evaluation: Overview
 Developmental and Functional Checklist
 Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
 Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory
(PEDI)
 Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument
(PODCI)
 Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
(COPM)
 Children’s Hand-use Experience Questionnaire
(CHEQ)
 Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Developmental and Functional
Checklist
Developmental and Functional
Checklist
 Type: screener developed at TSRHC for patients with
unilateral UE involvement
 Age Range: 0-18 years
 Source: Included in resources
Task
0-12 months
Turns head L/R equally (0-2 mo)
Prone head lift to 45 degrees (0-3 mo)
Hands toward midline (1-4 mo)
Grasp/transfer objects (4-6 mo)
Rolling (prone/supine (5-8 mo)
Sitting (5-8 mo)
Reaches to mouth while sitting - involved UE
(6 mo)
Holds bottle and brings to mouth 2 hands (6
mo-10 mo)
Crawling (8-10 mo)
Holds arm out for coat/open front shirt involved UE (9 mo)
Pulling to stand (9-12 mo)
Feeds self finger foods pincer grasp - involved
UE (10-12 mo)
Removes unbuttoned coat (12 mo)
12-24 months (1-2 yrs)
Throw a small ball with forward arm motion –
involved UE (12-18 mo)
Ambulating (12-18 mo)
Stacks small block or toy on top of another one
– involved UE (14-18 mo)
Removes mittens (14 mo)
Removes socks on request (2 yrs)
Removes untied/unfastened shoes (2 yrs)
Helps push down pants (2 yrs)
Established /
Independent
Emerging /
Needs
Assistance
Unable /
Dependent
No
Uses an Assistive
Opportunity / Device or NonNot Expected
involved UE
Self Care and Hand Function
Ages and Stages Questionnaire
(ASQ)
ASQ-3
 Type: Developmental Screener
 Communication
 Gross motor
 Fine motor
 Problem solving
 Personal-social
 Age Range: 1-66 months
 Source: http://agesandstages.com/
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability
Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test
(PEDI-CAT)
PEDI-CAT
 Type: Computer based assessment:
 Daily Activities
 Mobility
 Social/Cognition
 Responsibility
 Age Range: Birth-20 years
 Source: http://pedicat.com/category/home/
Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection
Instrument (PODCI)
PODCI
 Type: Questionnaire to assess
 overall health
 pain
 ability to participate in normal daily activities
 vigorous activities associated with young people
 Age Range: Child 2-10 years, adolescent 11-18 years
 Source:
http://www.aaos.org/research/outcomes/outcomes_peds.a
sp
Canadian Occupational
Performance Measure (COPM)
COPM
 Type: Semi-structured interview
 Client’s perception of occupational performance
 Self care
 Productivity
 Leisure
 Age Range: all ages
 Source: http://www.caot.ca/copm/
Children’s Hand-use Experience
Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ
 Type: Computer based questionnaire
 Unilateral limitations
 Bimanual activities
 Age Range: 6-18 years
 Source: http://www.cheq.se/
Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
AHA
 Type: assess hand function (unilateral) during
bimanual play – video based
 Age Range: 18 months-12 years
 Mini AHA 6 months-18 months
 AHA-ABI
 AHA-ULRD
 Ad-AHA
 Source: http://www.ahanetwork.se/
AHA Video
AHA Score
Sum:
Scaled score %:
73
77
Goal Areas:
-Moves Upper Arm
-Grasps with Assisting Hand
-Moves Forearm
-Puts Down / Releases with Assisting Hand
Diagnosis and Evaluation:
Discussion, Question & Answer
Natural History
 All babies with NBPP show at least some improvement
from initial presentation
 Usually healthy otherwise and do not have developmental
delay based on central neurological problem
 Depends on anatomic level and severity
 Almost 60% make a full spontaneous recovery by 2 months
 Antigravity biceps at 2 months suggests complete recovery
in the first 2 years
 No antigravity biceps function by 5-6 months may benefit
from brachial plexus reconstruction
What I have learned from Dr. Ezaki
 This is an old problem
 25 years ago focus was to “fix” the nerves
 When that did not work, the focus shifted to
transferring nerves from inside and outside the plexus
 15 years ago - realization that patients with NBPP still
needed orthopedic care
 The biggest problem for most of the kids is the
shoulder
(Ezaki, 2013)
What I have learned from Dr. Ezaki
 15 years ago - really started looking at the shoulder
 Focus on the internal rotation contracture alone
 Release alone was not enough
 5 years ago - began to appreciate the early changes in
the shoulder joint and to identify the dislocations
 Better imaging and a more aggressive approach allowed
early identification of the shoulder dysplasia
 Maximize shoulder congruency
 Restore external rotation
(Ezaki, 2013)
Surgical Interventions: Early
 Nerve exploration, repair, neurolysis, graft/transfer
 Decision around 6 months
 Post-op: dressing, +/- sling, cuff and collar
 RTC: 2-3 weeks for wound check
 Maintain PROM – begin gentle PROM and scar upon
discharge
 May have decreased function, wait for return – around
18 months
Surgical Interventions: Early
 Closed reduction + Botox
 Temporary muscle paralysis
to tight internal rotators
3M Soft Cast
 Subscapularis
 Teres major
 Pectoralis major
“Big Mac” space
 Typically 3-12 months
 At/after 7 months consider
open reduction
 Post-op: cast
Fiberglass
 RTC: 2 week cast check,Twisted
4
weeks cast removed casting tape strut
 Return to PROM exercises
See handout on cast care
Surgical Interventions: Early
 Open reduction
 Internal rotation contracture release
 + Latisimus transfer




Typically 7months - 3 years
Post-op: cast
RTC: 2 week cast check, 4-6 weeks cast
removed
Return to PROM exercises
 Typically can an initiate gentle passive
internal rotation
Surgical Interventions: Later
 Humeral osteotomy
 Typically school age child/adolescent
 Post-op: sling all the time for 3 weeks,
then in public for an additional 3
weeks
 RTC: 2 weeks – dressing removal, 6
weeks for x-ray, 1 yr hardware removal
 Pendulum exercises post-op day 1-6
weeks, no impact for 6 weeks
 See handout
 Other
 Tendon/muscle transfers
 Osteotomies
Gracilis Flap – Case Study
 Initial presentation at 4 months
 Birth weight 9lbs 6 oz
 Maternal weight gain 20 lbs
 Clinical Exam
 Flicker of elbow extension
 Normal hand function
 Wrist flexion
 Not present






External rotation
Shoulder abduction
Shoulder extension
Elbow flexion
Wrist extension
Supination
 Diagnosis C5-6 brachial plexopathy with no
evidence of upper plexus recovery at age four months
 Plan: wrist splint, PROM, RTC 1 month, consider exploration
Case Study Continued
 Surgical Intervention at 6 months of age
 Supraclavicular exploration of right brachial plexus with
neurolysis
 Nerve transfer


Inferior branch of spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve
Nerve transfer of one radial nerve branch
to the axillary nerve (triceps)
 Plan:
 Soft dressings 3 weeks
 RTC 3 weeks
Case Study Continued
 MRI at 1 year of age
 Anterior arm compartment is essentially
 Later tendon muscle/transfer
Case Study Continued
 Clinic visit at 2 years 9 months
 Clinical Exam
 Not present:



Abduction/adduction
Shoulder flexion
Shoulder external rotation
 Present
 Some internal rotation
 Minimal elbow flexion
 Elbow extension is intact
 Supination/pronation
 Wrist flexion and extension
 Good hand function
 Plan:
 Continue therapy 1x/week
 RTC in 1 year
Case Study Continued
 Clinic visit 3 years 9 months
 Proposed gracilis transfer for elbow flexion
Case Study Continued
 Surgical intervention - 3 years 10 months
 Right gracilis flap to the right upper extremity
 Plan
 RTC 4-6 weeks
 Physical Activity Limitations


WBAT on R LE
Cast on the right upper extremity
Case Study Continued
 Post-op visit - 3 years 11 months
 Therapy program
 Posterior elbow flexion splint (90 degrees) – night and out of
the house
 Cuff and collar – in home
 AROM – gravity eliminated elbow

Supervised swimming with floaties on his upper arm
 Plan:
 RTC 4 weeks
 Anticipate several more months before
good control of the muscle
Case Study Continued
 Clinic visit - 4 years (2 months post-op)
 Gravity eliminated elbow flexion to 80 degrees
 Discontinue splint and cuff and collar
Case Study Video
Case Study Video
Therapeutic Intervention: Overview
 Range of Motion and Strengthening
 Position and Sensation
 Splinting
 Modalities
 ADLs/IADLs, Hand Use
 Psychosocial Needs / Education on Diagnosis
 Car Seat / Transportation Needs
 Referrals
Range of Motion and
Strengthening
Goals
 Improve passive range of motion
 Improve active assist range of motion
 Improve active range of motion
 Improve strength
Passive Range of Motion
Passive External Rotation
 Starting Position
 Forearm supinated
 One hand placed on
posterior shoulder
 Elbow flexion to 90˚ or
greater
See handout
Ages 0-18 years, primary focus ages 0-12 months
Passive External
Rotation/Abduction
Passive Shoulder Flexion
Elbow Extension PROM
Scapular Humeral Stretches
Horizontal ADduction
 Stabilize scapula
against thoracic
wall
 Move arm into
horizontal
aBduction
Scapular Humeral Stretches
ADduction
 Stabilize scapula against
thoracic wall
 Move arm into aDduction
Scapular Humeral Stretches
ABduction
 Stabilize scapula against
thoracic wall
 Move arm into aBduction
Active Range of Motion
AAROM/AROM
 Gravity eliminated + place and hold
 Gravity eliminated
 Against gravity + place and hold
 Against gravity
See handout
Ages 0-18 years, primary focus ages 0-3 years
Play Based Activities -AROM
 Reaching
 magnets on fridge, bubbles, stickers on wall or body
 High-five
 Throwing
 Playing with a large ball
 Hula hoop basket ball
 Crawling – living room obstacle course
 Swimming
 Putting hats/necklaces on overhead
 Etc – see home programs and classification
Ages 0-18 years, primary focus ages 0-3 years
Strengthening
Scapular Stabilization – Young Child
 Swinging
 Pushing:
 A stroller/shopping
cart
 Wall push ups
 Pulling:
 Tug of war
 Rope and scooter
board
 Weight bearing
 Once approved
See handout
www.shallowcliffe.com
www.america.gov
www.photodoto.com
Ages 0-6 years, or older if activities are more engaging
Scapular Stabilization – Older Child
 Scapular Stabilization
 Scapular Strengthening
 See handout
Ages 7-18 years
Scapular Stabilization HEP Video
Progression of Exercises
 PROM
 AROM/AAROM gravity eliminated +/- place and hold
 AROM/AAROM against gravity +/- place and hold
 AROM full range against gravity
 Strengthening
Positioning and Sensation
Goals
 Protect arm: Infant/Toddler decreased movement
 Decrease risk of shoulder dislocation
 Sensory awareness: Infant/Toddler decreased





sensation
Protect fingers: Finger Biting
Decrease pain: Child/Teen with pain/limb length
difference
Improve fit of clothing
Protect UE/safety: Awareness of decreased sensation
Edema control: Positioning after surgery
Positioning: Protect Arm
 Initial positioning for flail
arm
 Safety Pin
 Pillows or towel rolls



Car seat
Carrier
Swing
See handout
Ages 0-6 months, primary focus ages 0-1 month
Positioning
Decrease Risk of Shoulder Dislocation
 No weight-bearing until the shoulder joint is stable
 Internal rotation in weight-bearing pushes the humeral
head posterior
Modified Tummy Time
 Prone positioning
 No forced weight-bearing through the involved upper
extremity
 Child will initiate weight bearing
 Modified “tummy time”



Over parent’s lap
Parent’s chest
Pillow – Boppy pillow, blanket roll
 Arm externally rotated
Ages 0-12 months, or until child initiates weight bearing or cleared by MD
Sensation: Sensory Awareness,
Stimulation
 Massage the arm with lotion
 Massage/tapping with various textures
 Cotton balls
 Terry cloth
 Stuffed animal
 Play with objects that have a variety of textures
Protect Fingers: Finger Biting
 Cover fingers
 Band-aid
 Mittens/gloves
 Finger hugger
 Silipos
 Educate parents
Ages 0-4 years, or as finger biting presents
Education on Decreased Sensation
 Semmes Weinstein results
 Safety with heat
 Promote awareness
Ages: 0-18 years
Decrease Pain: Limb Length Difference
 Education
 Place arm on raised
surface
 Desk
 Typing
 Posture
Ages: school age, adolescent
Scapular Stabilization / Posture
Improve Fit of Clothing
 Modify straps – girls clothing
Ages: school age, adolescent
Positioning:
Edema Control Post-Surgical
 Elevation pillow
Splinting
Goals
 Positioning:
 Increase function
 Decrease pain
 Stabilize
 Rest
 Increase range of motion
 Post-operative protection
 Check fit/review/re-educate
See handout
Shoulder
 Maintaining full ROM, prevents contractures
 Muscles with returning strength will not be able to
move joint if PROM is not present
POSITION:
•
•
•
•
Shoulder External Rotation
Elbow Flexion
Forearm Supination
Wrist Splint used to slightly extend
wrist and to assist with supination
Very difficult to maintain this position!!
Ages: 0-12 months
Scapular Stabilization Brace
Ages: school age, adolescent
Cuff and Collar
Ages: infant, toddler
Elbow
 To improve elbow extension
 Indications
 > 30 degree elbow flexion
contracture
 Materials
 1/16 inch aquaplast, volar surface
 Strapping crosses elbow joint
 Wear schedule
 Night time
 Adjust every 2-4 weeks until
maximum extension
 Combine with stretching
Ages: 0-18 years, as elbow flexion contracture presents, typically school age, adolescent
Forearm
 TAP splint to improve
pronation or supination
 Fabrifoam NuStim Wrap
 Wear schedule
Fabrifoam NuStim Wrap
 During functional
activities
Rolyan TAP splint
Ages: 0-18 years, consider willingness of child to wear the splint and function
Wrist
 +/- thumb
 Wear Schedule
 At night
 During functional activities, if
improves function
 Time out of splint to improve
strength – wrist extension
Benik w-302
Benik BD-88
Ages: 0-18 years, consider willingness of child to wear splint and function
Wrist and Fingers/Thumb
Modalities
Goals
 Pain management
 Positioning
 Promote active movement
 Skin care
 Scar care
Heat and Cold
 Heat
 Hot pack
 Paraffin
 Cryotherapy
 Ice pack
 Ice massage
 Contraindicated with
diminished sensation
See handout
Ages: school age adolescent
NMES
 Considerations for infants and toddlers
 A portion of BPP babies have impaired sensation
 Not verbal yet
 No current research on the effect of e-stim with
babies/kids with BPP
 Need to palpate at least a muscle contraction
 Use for a very specific need in the older
child/adolescent
Kinesiotape
 Goals
 Stimulate weak muscles
 Positioning
 Wear
 3-5 days
 24 hour rest
 Application
 Make sure skin is clean
 Avoid heat/hot packs
 Skin test
 “Paper-off” tension is 10-15%
 Origin to insertion (proximal to
distal) to stimulate contraction
 Muscle tissue on stretch
 Removal
 Baby oil
 Mineral oil
(Kase, Martin, & Yasukawa, 2006)
Ages: 0-18 years
External Rotation
 Starting Position:
 Internal rotation
 ABduction
 Elbow flexion
 “I” shape
 Anchor: Anterior, medial epicondyle
 No tension
 Middle: Anterior humerus, posterior
deltoid
 Paper-off tension
 Move into external rotation
 End: Spine of scapula toward spine
 No tension
(Kase, Martin, & Yasukawa, 2006)
Rhomboids
 Starting Position: Internal rotation,
horizontal abduction, shoulder
depressed and protracted
 “X” shape
 Anchor: Between spine and medial
border of scapula, over Rhomboids
– at an angle
 No tension
 Middle: Apply tails at an angle,
medial portion higher
 Minimal to moderate tension (15-
50%)
 End:
 No tension
(Kase, Martin, & Yasukawa, 2006)
Forward Shoulder
 Starting Position: Shoulder
girdle in alignment
 “Y” shape
 Anchor: Coracoid process
 No tension
 Middle: Angle tape in the
direction for correction to occur
 Paper-off tension
 Downward pressure
 End: Inferior angle of the scapula
 No tension
(Kase, Martin, & Yasukawa, 2006)
Other
 Scapular stabilization
 Supination
 Pronation
 Wrist extension
Skin Care / Scar Care: Post Surgical
 Skin Care
 Wash 3 times per day – mild soapy water
 Pat Dry
 Lotion (non-perfumed) or Vaseline
 Until skin returns to normal
 Scar Care
 “Make friends” with your scar
 Scar massage – several times per day
 Avoid sun / use sunscreen
 Scar pad if needed
See handout
ADLs, IADLs, & Hand Use
Goals
 Increase independence
 ADLs
 IADLs
 School
 Bilateral Hand Use
Assistive Devices – Dressing/Toileting
 Shoe buttons, elastic shoe laces
 Button hook
 Zipper pull
 One handed shoe tying
 Clothing adaptation
(loops/fasteners)
See handout
One Handed Shoe Tying
 Video
Assistive Devices - Bathing
 Long handle sponge
 Long handle hair washer
 Automatic soap dispensers for
shampoo, conditioner, body
wash
 Long handle razor
Assistive Devices - Grooming
 Long handle hair brush
 Hair dryer stand
 One handed pony tail
 Toothpaste holder
 One hand nail clipper
http://compartmentseventy6.co.uk/blog/
Assistive Devices - Eating
 Rocker knife
 Pizza cutter
 Built up handle
School
 One handed typing
See handout
 Table top scissors
 Clipboard to stabilize paper
 PE restrictions
 no weight bearing on upper extremity
 no push-ups/pull-ups
 allow to stop with fatigue or pain
 modify or eliminate impact activities
 Accommodations - 504
IADLs
 Pets
 Chores
 Meal Prep
 One handed cutting board
 Pots and Pans
 Suction/sticky bowls
 Dycem
 Driving
 North Coast Functional
Solutions
Bimanual Hand Use:
Goals Based on AHA
 General Usage
 Arm Use
 Grasp and Release
 Fine Motor Adjustment
 Coordination
 Pace
Bimanual Hand Use





Consider motivation
Developmental level
Purpose of activity
Modified Constraint
See Handout
 Royal Children's handouts
 Encouraging the use of two
hands




Babies
Toddlers
Preschool
School Age
 http://www.rch.org.au/ot/infosh
eet/
Psychosocial Needs &
Education on Diagnosis
Goals
 To address:
 Bullying / Teasing
 Expressing Self/ Feelings
 Education on diagnosis
Car Seat / Transportation Needs
Hippo Car Seat
Referrals
Goals
 To address
 Bullying / Teasing
 Behavioral Concerns
 Community Based Therapy
 School Based Therapy
 Participation in community activities/sports
 Dietary concerns
 Orthotic needs
 Driving
 Future needs for school/work other
Referral Sources










Child Life
Therapeutic Recreation
Psychology
School/ECI
Outpatient/Home Health
Family Services / Resource Center / Social Worker
Orthotics
Dietitian
DARS / Texas Rehab Commission
Other
Home Programs
 Therapeutic activities the child performs with parental
assistance in the home environment with the goal of
achieving desired health outcomes
Cerebral Palsy Institute, Darlinghurst, Sydney, Australia
Pilot Study
 Patient population
 20 patients with CP, ages 2-7 years
 Methods
 1st visit – 1.5 hours: goal setting, creating the home program
 2nd visit at 1 month – 45 min: support/follow-up
 3rd visit at 3 months – 45 min: support/follow-up
 4th visit at 6 months – 45 min: reassessment
 Participation
 Parent log to report participation – no specific time set by therapist
 27 times per month
 Average daily session was 14.22 minutes
 Results
 GAS – pre: 29.86; post 50.12 (significant)
 PEDI – pre 44.15; post 52.1 (significant)
 QUEST – pre 33.83; post 39.81 (significant)
(Novak, 2007)
Randomized Controlled Trial
 Patient population
 36 patients with CP ages 4-12
 3 groups (no HP, 4 wk HP, 8 wk HP)
 Methods
 Same methods as pilot study
 Participation
 Parent log to report participation – no specific time set by
therapist
 17.5 times per month
 16.5 minutes per session
 Results
 COPM and GAS – clinically significant differences for HP groups
 QUEST – significant changes at 8wks (not at 4wks)
 CAPE – no changes
(Novak, 2009)
Elements of a Home Program
1. Establishing collaborative relationships between
parents and therapist
2. Setting mutually agreed-upon family and child goals
3. Selecting therapeutic activities that focus on goals
supported by best available evidence
4. Supporting parents through education, home visits
and progress updates
5. Evaluating outcomes
(Novak, 2011)
Step 1: Establishing collaborative relationships
 Therapist Role
 “technical expert”
 supports / encourages
 enhances care-giving competency
 Parent Role
 expert caregiver – determines what is best
 chooses preferred level of involvement
Step 2: Setting mutually agreed-upon goals
1.
What is the most enjoyable thing about _____?
2.
What is _____’s best skill?
3.
Who are the most important people in _____’s life? Do any
of these people help _____ make changes?
4.
What do you think is the most difficult thing about
parenting _____?
5.
What skill do you think _____ will acquire next ?
6.
How does your family spend a typical day?
Step 3: Setting up Therapeutic Activities
 Embedded into everyday routines or create new routines
 Parents drew from a “library of ideas”
 Structured practice tasks
 Environmental adaptations
 Parent education
 Format
 Written down with pictures
 2 goals were realistic
 An hour a week does the job
 4, 15 min sessions
Step 4: Supporting parents through education,
home visits and progress updates
 Instruction to the family on how to identify




improvements in their child
Watching the parent perform the therapeutic activities
and provide feedback
Identifying and relaying the child's improvements to
the parent
Positive reinforcement to parent to build confidence
Therapist communicates interest and concern for the
family
Step 5: Evaluating outcomes
 Repeat outcome measures
 See handouts of examples of possible home programs
Problem
 Therapy intervention has frequently been referred to as a “black
box” due to the lack of literature that describes its specific
components

Ballinger, Ashburn, Low, & Roderick, 1999; Bode, Heinemann, Semik, & Mallinson, 2004;
Conroy, Hatfield, & Nichols, 2005; Dejong et al., 2004; Dejong, Horn, Gassaway, Slavin, &
Dijkers, 2004; DeJong, Horn, Conroy, Nichols, & Healton, 2005
 Minimal evidence supporting the efficiency or effectiveness of
current practice and has created variations in the cost and
quality of therapy services between clinicians and geographic
regions

Horn, DeJong, Ryser, Veazie, & Teraoka, 2005
 Decreased reimbursement or denial of therapy services by
insurance companies
Addressing the Problem
 Need to disassemble the “black box” by creating classifications that
bring order and rigor to the description of therapy intervention
 Dejong et al., 2004
 Common nomenclature to describe elements of therapy
intervention and mechanisms to quantify therapy intervention
 Therapists clearly communicate about the interventions
 Researchers assess the effectiveness of the therapy process
 Ultimately, the development of therapy classifications will allow
therapists to identify the most cost effective and efficient therapy
that produces the best outcomes
Current Classifications
 Post Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP)
 SCI Rehab Project
 Joint replacement Outcomes in Inpatient
rehabilitation facilities and Nursing Treatment Sites
(JOINTS)
 Occupational Therapy Taxomony of Rehabilitation
Intervention (OT-TRI)
Practice Based Evidence Methods
 7 step process
 Form of observational & participatory action research
 Examines what happens in the care process
e.g., Whitneck, Gassaway, Djikers, & Jha, 2009; Gassaway et al., 205, Horn &
Gassaway, 2007
226
PBE 7 Step Process
1. establish a multisite, transdisciplinary clinical practice team to
1a. define key patient characteristics presumed to affect outcomes and/or
effectiveness of therapies
1b. identify and define individual components of each discipline’s care process
1c. create discipline specific documentation tools
1d. incorporate documentation into routine facility practices
2. use the Comprehensive Severity Index (CSI) to control for differences in patient
severity of illness
3. implement an intensive data collection protocol that captures data on patient
characteristics, care processes, and outcomes
4. create a study database suitable for statistical analyses
5. successively test hypotheses based on questions that motivated the study
originally
6. implement and evaluate findings from step 5 to determine whether the new or
modified interventions replicate results identified in earlier phases
7. incorporate validated study findings into standard practice of care
(Horn & Gassaway, 2007)
227
Three Core Elements
 Comprehensive information on:
 Patient characteristics
 Processes of care
 Multiple outcomes
Product: NBPP
Taxonomy-Driven Classification
 Patient Characteristics
 Assessment
 Types of Imaging
 Evaluation Guidelines
 Intervention
 Surgical
 Therapy
229
Patient Characteristics
Demographic Information
patient name
patient medical record number
date of birth
gender
ethnicity
age at presentation to clinic
age at final follow up
Medical History
Family History
diagnosis (BPP)
Narakas level
other diagnoses
history of prior/current medical care
of patient
history of prior/current therapy
intervention
type of delivery
length of labor
number of weeks gestation
G P Ab
maternal age
mother's ethnicity
apgar scores
mother’s level of education
NICU
income level
birth weight
family support members
birth length
% of head circumference
use of forceps/vacuum/extractions
clavicle/humerus fracture
history of upper extremity recovery
(return of elbow flexion)
mother's pregnancy weight
mother's health history
mother's weight gain
history of gestational diabetes
litigation
Types of Imaging
 X-ray
 Ultrasound
 MRI
 CT
 other
Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluations Triggered by Age
Developmental and Functional Checklist
(if child fails screen, standardized assessment may be utilized - Ages and Stages, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure)
Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI)
(administer at ages 5/6, 10/11, 14/15 and 18 years)
Evaluations Triggered by Clinical Exam
Body Mass Index (BMI)
(not indicated if child is in a cast or accurate height and weight cannot be taken)
Passive Range of Motion (PROM)
(including scapular humeral angles, selected joints depending on clinic visit)
Active Movement Scale (AMS)
(can be administered past the age of 5,
typically AROM is used once the child is
able to follow directions, AMS may not
be indicated at post-operative visit)
Active Range of Motion (AROM)
(selected joints depending on clinical exam)
Modified Mallet Classification
(can be administer younger than 3 years if the child is able to reliably follow directions, may not be indicated at postoperative visit)
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Semmes Weinstein
(as indicated by clinical exam)
Stereognosis
(as indicated by clinical exam)
Grip and Pinch
(as indicated by clinic al exam)
Evaluations Triggered by Open Surgical Intervention
Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
18 yrs
17 yrs
16 yrs
15 yrs
14 yrs
13 yrs
12 yrs
11 yrs
10 yrs
9 yrs
8 yrs
7 yrs
6 yrs
5 yrs
4 yrs
3 yrs
2 yrs
19-24 mo
13-18 mo
7-12 mo
0-6 mo
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Surgical Intervention
Surgical Procedure/Intervention
closed reduction
closed reduction plus Botox
open reduction
latisimus transfers with IR contracture release
internal rotation contracture release
humeral osteotomy
tendon transfers
nerve exploration
nerve grafting
osteotomies - other
other
Therapy Intervention Categories
 Overall Session Information
 Overall Patient & Family Response
 Home Programs:
Range of Motion & Strength
 Positioning & Strength
 Modalities
 Splinting
 ADLs and Hand Use
 Psychosocial & Education on Diagnosis
 Education on Transportation & Car Seats
 Referrals
 See handouts

Breakout Session
 Discuss intervention strategies
 Review and revise NBPP classification for community
based therapy
Intervention:
Discussion, Question & Answer
Acknowledgements
 Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children
 Marybeth Ezaki, M.D.
 Scott Oishi, M.D.
 Janith Mills, P.A.
 Amy Lake, OTR, CHT
 Kim Kaipus, PT
 Lesley Wheeler
 Texas Woman’s University
 Sally Schultz, Ph. D.
 Patricia Bowyer, Ph.D.
 Catherine Candler, Ph. D.
References
Abeyta, N., Freeman, E. S., Primack, D., Hammond, F. M., Dragon, C., Harmon, A., & Gassaway, J. (2009).
SCIRehab project series: The social work/case management taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord
Medicine, 32(3), 336-342.
Bae, D., Waters, P., and Zurakowski, D. (2003). Reliability of three classification systems
measuring active motion in brachial plexus palsy. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,
85:1733-1738.
Ballinger, C., Ashburn, A., Low, J., & Roderick, P. (1999). Unpacking the black box of therapy -- a pilot
study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with
stroke.
Clinical Rehabilitation, 13(4), 301-309.
Benton Al, & Schultz, L. M. (1949). Observations of tactual form perception (stereognosis) in preschool
children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 5(4), 359-364. Retrieved from
Bialocerkowski, A., Kurlowicz, K., Vladusic, S., & Grimmer, K. (2005). Effectiveness of primary
conservative management for infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. International Journal
of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 3(2), 27-44.
Bode, R. K., Heinemann, A. W., Semik, P., & Mallinson, T. (2004). Patterns of therapy activities across
length of stay and impairment levels: Peering inside the "black box" of inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(12), 1901-1908.
References
Bricker, S. J. (1997). Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and stages
questionnaires. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 313-328.
Buesch, F. E., Schlaepfer, B., de Bruin, E.,D., Wohlrab, G., Ammann-Reiffer, C., & Meyer-Heim, A. (2010).
Constraint-induced movement therapy for children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy: Two singlecase series. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.Internationale Zeitschrift Für
Rehabilitationsforschung.Revue Internationale De Recherches De Réadaptation, 33(2), 187-192.
Cahow, C., Skolnick, S., Joyce, J., Jug, J., Dragon, C., & Gassaway, J. (2009). SCIRehab project series: The
therapeutic recreation taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3), 298-306.
Chen, C. C., Heinemann, A. W., Granger, C. V., & Linn, R. T. (2002). Functional gains and therapy
intensity during subacute rehabilitation: A study of 20 facilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 83(11), 1514-1523.
Collins, S., Visscher, P., De Vet, H., Zuurmond, W., & RSGM, P. (2010). Reliability of the semmes
weinstein monofilaments to measure coetaneous sensibility in the feet of healthy subjects. Disability
& Rehabilitation, 32(24), 2019-2027.
Connolly, P., Ezaki, M., and Carter, P. (2005). Neonatal brachial plexus injuries. Current Opinion in
Orthopaedics, 16(6):464-471.
References
Conroy, B. E., Hatfield, B., & Nichols, D. (2005). Opening the black box of stroke rehabilitation with
clinical practice improvement methodology. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 12(2), 36-48.
Curtis, C., Stephens, D., Clarke, H. M., & Andrews, D. (2002). The active movement scale: An evaluative
tool for infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27(3), 470-478.
Cusick, A., Lannin, N. A., & Lowe, K. (2007). Adapting the canadian occupational performance measure
for use in a paediatric clinical trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(10), 761-766.
Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Fossel AH, & Goldberg, M. J. (1998). The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal
functional health questionnaire: Report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. pediatric
outcomes instrument development group. pediatric orthopaedic society of north america. Journal of
Pediatric Orthopedics, 18(5), 561-571.
DeJong, G., Horn, S. D., Conroy, B., Nichols, D., & Healton, E. B. (2005). Opening the black box of poststroke rehabilitation: Stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(12), S1-S7.
Dejong, G., Horn, S. D., Gassaway, J. A., Slavin, M. D., & Dijkers, M. P. (2004). Toward a taxonomy of
rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of
rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(4), 678-686.
References
DeJong, G., Hsieh, C., Gassaway, J., Horn, S. D., Smout, R. J., Putman, K., . . . Foley, M. P. (2009).
Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing
facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
90(8), 1269-1283.
Duncan, J. S., Duncan, E. K., & Schofield, G. (2009). Accuracy of body mass index (BMI) thresholds for
predicting excess body fat ingirls from five ethnicities. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 18(3),
404-411.
Eliasson, A. & Burtner, P. A. (2008). Improving hand function in children with cerebral palsy: Theory,
evidence and intervention. London: Mac Keith Press.
Eliasson, A., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Shaw, K., & Wang, C. (2005). Effects of constraint-induced
movement therapy in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: An adapted model.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47(4), 266-275.
Ezaki, M. (2013). Shoulder problems after Erb’s palsy. Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children Hand
Conference. Dallas, TX.
Ezaki, M. (2013). Neonatal brachial plexopathy. Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children Hand
Conference. Dallas, TX.
Foad, S. L., Mehlman, C. T., & Ying, J. (2008). The epidemiology of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the
united states. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume, 90A(6), 1258-1264.
Gassaway, J., Horn, S. D., DeJong, G., Smout, R. J., Clark, C., & James, R. (2005). Applying the clinical
practice improvement approach to stroke rehabilitation: Methods used and baseline results. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(12), S16-S33.
References
Gassaway, J., Whiteneck, G., & Dijkers, M. (2009). Clinical taxonomy development and application in spinal cord injury
research: The SCIRehab project. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3), 260-269.
Gherman, R. B. (1998). Increased cesarean delivery rate: No effect on brachial plexus palsy. American Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 179(5), 1378-1379.
Gherman, R. B., Ouzounian, J. G., & Goodwin, T. M. (1999). Brachial plexus palsy: An in utero injury? American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 180(5), 1303-1307.
Gordan, W., Spivak-David, D., Adornato, V., Dale, B., Brougham, R., Georgeadis, A. C., & Gassaway, J. (2009). SCIRehab
project series: The speech language pathology taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3), 307-318.
Gross, S. J., Shime, J., & Farine, D. (1987). Shoulder dystocia: Predictors and outcome. A five-year review.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 156(2), 334-336.
Gross, T. L., Sokol, R. J., Williams, T., & Thompson, K. (1987). Shoulder dystocia: A fetal-physician risk. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 156(6), 1408-1418.
Heinemann, A. W., Hamilton, B., Linacre, J. M., Wright, B. D., & Granger, C. (1995). Functional status and therapeutic
intensity during inpatient rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation / Association of
Academic Physiatrists, 74(4), 315-326.
References
Ho, E. S., Roy, T., Stephens, D., & Clarke, H. M. (2010). Serial casting and splinting of elbow contractures in children with
obstetric brachial plexus palsy. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 35(1), 84-91.
Hockenberry, M. J., & Wilson, D. (2009). Wong's essentials of pediatric nursing (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
Holmefur, M., Aarts, P., Hoare, B., & Krumlinde-Sundholm, L. (2009). Test-retest and alternate forms reliability of the
assisting hand assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Stiftelsen Rehabiliteringsinformation), 41(11), 886-891.
Holmefur, M., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., & Eliasson, A. (2007). Interrater and intrarater reliability of the assisting hand
assessment. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy.: Official Publication of the American Occupational
Therapy Association, 61(1), 79-84.
Horn, S. D., DeJong, G., Ryser, D. K., Veazie, P. J., & Teraoka, J. (2005). Another look at observational studies in
rehabilitation research: Going beyond the holy grail of the randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation, 86(12), S8-S15.
Horn, S. D., & Gassaway, J. (2007). Practice-based evidence study design for comparative effectiveness research. Medical
Care, 45(10), S50-S57.
Jennett, R. J., Tarby, T. J., & Kreinick, C. J. (1992). Brachial plexus palsy: An old problem revisited. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 166(6), 1673-1676.
References
Jindal, R., and Cone, S. (2006). The interdisciplinary approach to brachial plexus palsy. Texas Scottish
Rite Hospital for Children. Dallas, TX.
Johnson, K., Bailey, J., Rundquist, J., Dimond, P., McDonald, C. A., Reyes, I. A., . . . Gassaway, J. (2009).
SCIRehab project series: The supplemental nursing taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine,
32(3), 329-335.
Kase, K., Martin, P., & Yasukawa, A.. (2006). Fundamentals and whole body taping, 2nd edition. Kinesio.
Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Holmefur, M., Kottorp, A., & Eliasson, A. (2007). The assisting hand
assessment: Current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Developmental
Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(4), 259-264.
Lagerkvist, A., Johansson, U., Johansson, A., Bager, B., & Uvebrant, P. (2010). Obstetric brachial plexus
palsy: A prospective, population-based study of incidence, recovery, and residual impairment at 18
months of age. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 52(6), 529-534.
Law, M., Polatajko, H., Pollock, N., McColl, M. A., Carswell, A., & Baptiste, S. (1994). Pilot testing of the
canadian occupational performance measure: Clinical and measurement issues. Canadian Journal of
Occupational Therapy.Revue Canadienne D'Ergothérapie, 61(4), 191-197.
Lenze, E. J., Munin, M. C., Quear, T., Dew, M. A., Rogers, J. C., Begley, A. E., & Reynolds,Charles F.,,3rd.
(2004). The pittsburgh rehabilitation participation scale: Reliability and validity of a clinician-rated
measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
85(3), 380-384.
References
Medlock, M. D., & Hanigan, W. C. (1997). Neurologic birth trauma. intracranial, spinal cord, and
brachial plexus injury. Clinics in Perinatology, 24(4), 845-857.
Mei, Z., Grummer-Strawn, L., Pietrobelli, A., Goulding, A., Goran, M. I., & Dietz, W. H. (2002). Validity of
body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of
body fatness in children and adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 75(6), 978-985.
Natale, A., Taylor, S., LaBarbera, J., Bensimon, L., McDowell, S., Mumma, S. L., . . . Gassaway, J. (2009).
SCIRehab project series: The physical therapy taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3),
270-282.
Novak, I. (2011). Parent experience of implementing effective home programs. Physical &
Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31(2), 198-213. doi:10.3109/01942638.2010.533746
Novak, I., Cusick, A., & Lannin, N. (2009). Occupational therapy home programs for cerebral
palsy: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 124(4), e606-e614.
doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0288
Novak, I., Cusick, A., & Lowe, K. (2007). A pilot study on the impact of occupational therapy home
programming for young children with cerebral palsy. The American Journal of Occupational
Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 61(4), 463468.
References
Ozelie, R., Sipple, C., Foy, T., Cantoni, K., Kellogg, K., Lookingbill, J., . . . Gassaway, J. (2009).
SCIRehab project series: The occupational therapy taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord
Medicine, 32(3), 283-297.
Partridge, C., & Edwards, S. (2004). Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: Increasing disability and
exacerbation of symptoms with age. Physiotherapy Research International, 9(4), 157-163.
Portney, L. & Watkins, M. (2009). Foundations of clinical research applications to practice. Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Roley, S. S., DeLany, J. V., Barrows, C. J., Brownrigg, S., Honaker, D., Sava, D. I., . . . Lieberman, D.
(2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process, 2nd edition. American
Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 625-683.
Scheller, J. M., & Nelson, K. B. (1994). Does cesarean delivery prevent cerebral palsy or other
neurologic problems of childhood? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 83(4), 624-630.
Schultz, S., Whisner, S., Geddie, M., & Shierk, A. (2012). Occupational Therapy Taxonomy of
Rehabilitation Interventions (OT-TRI) Training Manual. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas
Woman's University, Denton, TX.
References
Smith, N. C., Rowan, P., Benson, L. J., Ezaki, M., & Carter, P. R. (2004). Neonatal brachial plexus palsy:
Outcome of absent biceps function at three months of age. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American
Volume, 86A(10), 2163-2170.
Strömbeck, C., & Fernell, E. (2003). Aspects of activities and participation in daily life related to body
structure and function in adolescents with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: A descriptive follow-up
study. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992), 92(6), 740-746.
Urlic, K., & Wallen, M. (2009). Critically appraised papers. the assisting hand assessment is a reliable and
valid measure of assessing hand function for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and obstetric
brachial plexus palsy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(4), 295-296.
van der Sluijs, J.,A., van Doorn-Loogman, M.,H., Ritt, M. J. P. F., & Wuisman, P. I. J. M. (2006).
Interobserver reliability of the mallet score. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics.Part B / European
Paediatric Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 15(5), 324-327.
Waters, P. (1997). Obstetric brachial plexus injuries: Evaluation and management. Journal of the
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 5(4):205-214.
Whiteneck, G., Gassaway, J., Dijkers, M., & Jha, A. (2009). New approach to study the contents and
outcomes of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: The SCIRehab project... 1st in a series of 9 articles.
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3), 251-259.
References
Whiteneck, G., Dijkers, M., Gassaway, J., & Lammertse, D. P. (2009). The SCIRehab project: Classification
and quantification of spinal cord injury rehabilitation treatments. preface. The Journal of Spinal Cord
Medicine, 32(3), 249-250.
Whiteneck, G., Gassaway, J., Dijkers, M., & Jha, A. (2009). New approach to study the contents and outcomes of
spinal cord injury rehabilitation: The SCIRehab project. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3), 251-259.
Wiemer, M. V. (1986). Grip and pinch strength: Norms for 6- to 19-year-olds. The American Journal of
Occupational Therapy.: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 40(10), 705711.
Wilson, C., Huston, T., Koval, J., Gordon, S. A., Schwebel, A., & Gassaway, J. (2009). SCIRehab project series: The
psychology taxonomy. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 32(3), 319-328.
World Health Organization. (2001) Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF.
Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
Yasukawa, A., & Cassar, M. (2009). Children with elbow extension forearm rotation limitation: Functional
outcomes using the forearm rotation elbow orthosis. Journal of Prosthetics & Orthotics (JPO), 21(3), 160-166.
Thank you!
Contact Information
Angela Shierk, OTR, PhD
[email protected]
TSRHC OT Department
(214) 559-7786