EFFECTIVENESS OF NATALAC AS A GALACTOGOGUE - Go
Transcription
EFFECTIVENESS OF NATALAC AS A GALACTOGOGUE - Go
EFFECTIVENESS OF NATALAC AS A GALACTOGOGUE Corazon Yabes-Almirante, M.D.* Catherine Hui Tiin N. Lim, M.D. ** Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® ABSTRACT An investigation was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of malunggay or Moringa oleifera leaves (encapsulated into Natalac, each capsule containing 250 mg. of malunggay leaves) as a galactogogue among normal parturients. A total of 116 normal term pregnant Filipino women were included in the study. These mothers do not intend to feed milk formula, nofgive their babies solid foods before 4 months of age, and their babies were of normal gestational age and weighed between 2500 and 5000 grams at birth. Immediately after delivery, the patients were given capsules which were coded at source: 58 Natalac and 58 placebo. Prolactin determinations were done within 6 hours, 48 hours after, and 4 months after delivery. Infant suckling was immediately started after the first extraction for prolactin. The baby's weights were recorded at birth, at 1Week, at 2 weeks, at 1 month, and at 4 months of age. Data obtained were subjected to statistical test: t-test for · difference between means. Significantly higher prolactin levels were obtained after 48 hours and 4 months from first extraction among the treatment (Natalac) group at a p level of < 0.01 accompanied by significant weight gains among the babies at a p level of -;::. 0.01. Keywords: Galactogogue, Moringa oleifera, Breastfeeding ,., . .... '. INTRODUCTION other's milk is the best food for its newborn. The campaign for breastfeeding is being pursued by the Department of Health, the fld Health Organization . (W.H.O.), the United ionas International Children's Educational Fund NJ.C.E.F.), and all organizations involved with the rovement of the health of the mother. and the '. 1 nt. reastfeeding is much more ben'eficial to the . om than bottle feeding . Mothers are convinced '.>the advantages of breastfeeding but most : they complain about the inadequacy of milk from their breasts. 2 nggay (Moringa oleifera) leaves in chicken . llfish soups have been used by generations of mothers to enhance breast milk production. cpanism of action not been explained but · .ffective as a galactogogue ( an agent that . the secretion of milk). Malunggay V;e been encapsulated in the form of Natalac t Peiinatology, Peiinatal Center, Philippine Children's iar. 2 " .•t of Perlnatology, Center, Philippine dical Center. 13,t;y:Jt.t NO, 3 JANUARY - MARCH 1996 and one · capsule is equivalent to 250 mg. of malunggay leaves. A study of the of milk production depends on several processes: "" 1 ' 1. Mammogenesis or development of the mammary glands - ductal growth and lactoalveolar . growth through estrogen, progesterone, growth hormone, · prolactin, and glucocorticoids. 3 • 4• 5 2. Lactogenesis or initiation of milk secretion this depends on a fully developed mammary gland and .the withdrawal of estrogen and progesterone on delivery of the baby and placenta. 6 •· 7 3. Galactokinetic hormones - oxytocin is the most powerful galactokinetic hormone causing contraction of the myoepithelial cells squeezing out the milk in the lumina of the alveoli into the ducts. The stimulus for . oxytocin release Is the suckling of the infant. Oxytocin release is e5sential for mDk removal. Frequent suckling and adequate milk Injection therefore promotes p.rodµption of milk. The reflex ' release of oxvtocin ls experienced as "milk let-down." 8 • 9 • 10' · · Oxytocin released during suckling affects the uterus by causing it to contract expelling the lochia favoring involution. Oxytocin release can be Inhibited by stressful situations. 4. Galactopolesis - maintenance of established milk secretion. Prolactin Is the single most Important 265 Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® ' I i t. ·1 "': ·.ti ]i: .. ) 'I ;, •' \;r l'i iii l! Li j,; ·'.', ?,: ;1: 'f ! "·· ::: galactopoietic· horn:ione; ·Hans Selyewas:,theJirst to··-· . realize'thatsucklirig provides' the stimulus that supt}orts" ' lactation. Each suckling episode is associated with a rapid rise in plasma prolactin. Prolactin levels peak in 20 to 40 minutes and return near the baseline In 4 11 12 about 3 to 4 hours. • • Frequent nursing is required to maintain the elevated prolactin on which continued milk secretion depends. A delay of 1 to 2 days in the Initiation of nursing results in diminished responsiveness of the pituitary. Nicotine decreases the amount of Rrolactin 13 14 released in response to the suckling stimulus. • Drugs that stimulate prolactin release are reserpine, metoclopramide, sulpiride, and thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH). 3 OBJECTIVES An investigation was undertaken to determine the ---· effectiveness of malunggay (Natalac) as a galactogogue among normal patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 116 normal term pregnant Filipino " patients from Barangay del Remedio in Sail Pablo City were included in the study which lasted from November 1994 till September 1995. Selection criteria for the study were as follows: (1) mothers did not plan to feed milk formula, (2) solid foods would not be introduced before 4 months of age, (3) infants were healthy, were of normal gestational age {38 to 42 weeks gestation) , and weighed 2500 to 5000 grams at birth; and (4) mothers did not have .any chronic illness and were not taking any medication on a regular basis. Informed consent was obtained from all mothers. - Immediately after delivery, patients were given capsules, the content of which the researchers do not know. The capsules have been coded at source: 58 Natalac (NATC-T) and 58 Placebo (NATC-F) . The administration of these capsules were repeated after every 12 hours for four months. Prolactin determination was done by extraction of 4 ml. whole blood from the antecubital vein of the postpartum women at three stages: 1. within 6 hours of delivery before infants suckling and capsule intake . 2. 48 hours after delivery - 30 minutes after infant suckling 3. 4 months after delivery - 30 minutes after infant suckling · The blood was allowed to stand to effect separation of serum was extracted of the serum. About 1 thereafter and subjected to prolactin determination using the ELISA (Enzyme: linked immunosorbent assay) technique. ·-....._ 266 - - Jrifant ·suckling·, was 's tarted .V'Jithin 6 to 12 hours ·aftE!r delivery for a ' duration of 1o to 15 minutes to each breast, every 2-1/2 to 3 hours for a total of 8 to 10 times a day. The timing of the appearance of breast engorgement and milk let-down were recorded. The infants' weights were recorded at birth, at 2 weeks, at 1 month, and at 4 months of age . Data obtained from this double-blind study were subjected to statistical tests: t-test for difference between means. RESULTS , _ .Table 1 shows the age, parity, type of capsule taken, and levels of serum prolactin, each of the three extractions done during the study. While Table 2 lists ..the infants' weights recorded at different periods 'in the study. The desired sample -size was 100. To allow for <attrition,..we recruited 120 subjects. The number of mothers who remained in the study at 4 months were 116. Four subjects dropped out; one for Infant mortality, three for transfer of The average age was 27.53 years with a standard deviation of 6.4663 for the Natalac or treatment group and 26.58 years with a standard deviation of 5.6547 for the placebo group. Ten per cent (10%) and 17% were primiparas while 90% and 83% were multiparas in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively. (Table 3) Breast engorgement occurred 24 hours after delivery In the majority of patients from both groups: 98.3% for both the treatment and placebo groups (Table 4) . Milk _let-down for these patients occur.red after 48 hours (Table 5). Table 7 shows the mean level$ of serum prolactin at first, second and third extractions between the two Prolactin levels were higher in the treatment group and are significant at a p level of < 0.01 for the second (t value = 4. 789) and third (t value = 13.27) extractions. There Were also significant increases of prolactin values ' during the latter two extractions In the treatment group as compared to the placebo group at a p level of <0.01. t values 'obtalned were 5.824 and 5.372 -for differenced·.betWeenthe baseline __ or first extraction with the second and third -. extractions,.respectively. A record of the infants' weights at birth; at 1 week, ._ at ·2 weeks, at 1 month, and at 4 months are on Table 2. Table 6, on the other hahd, contained statistical data on the infants' weights which revealed _ significantly higher weight gains among the babies from the treatment group at a p level of < 0.01 . t values were 3,165 at 1 month of infant age and 5,362 at 4 months of age. JPMA VOL71 NO. 3 JANUARY- MARCH 1996 r ic·· I Table I. Maternal Age, Parity, and Serum Prolactln Levels. Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® PATlENT AGE 30 E.C. 20 M.A. 25 B.C. 22 J.J. 22 5. N.V. 18 6. B.A. 27 7. U.P. 24 8. R.J . 28 9. J.A . 19 10. E.B. 22 11. tvl.S. 28 12. J.B . 3(, 11. R.P. 28 14 . R.A. llJ 15 . R.E. 37 16. T.R. ]2 17. E:B. 41 18. L.M. 28 19. H.Y . .n 20. C.S . 21. L.G. D 25 22 . R.R. 23 . F.D. . 29 18 24 . M.A. 27 25. E.T . 20 26. M.B. ii 27 . M.P. 34 28 . R.R. 23 29. S.D . 26 30. A.{). 24 31. R.P. '.11 32. M.N . 28 33 . E.V. 34. IU •. 25 32 35. R.M. 36 . L.C. 35 -37. M.O. :rn 38. S.B. 30 39. R.D. 32 40. c.v. 24 41. C.N . 28 42 . c.c. 25 43 . C.1'-.1. 21 2,3 44. M.C. 25 45. R.B. 26 46, N.M. ,47. EJvL 28 48. G.D. 19 24 49. D.P. 30. M.L. 21 :s I. R.C. 30 52. f\4 .!VI. 2I 25 53 . N.R. 54. R.N. 33 27 55. J.C. 56. C,H. 25 57. E.A. IS' 58. E.T. 23 59. C.P. 37 1. 2. 3. 4. JPMA VOL. 71 NO. 3 PARITY CAPSULES TAKEN G3P3 GlPI GI Pl GlPI G2P2 G8P6 GWJ G2P2 Ci2P2 GIPI UIPI Ci2P2 G8P7 G2P2 GIPI G4P3 G5P5 G5P5 GIP! G<iP6 G6P(i GIP! G4P4 Ci 11' I GWJ GIPI G2P2 G6P6 G2P2 G2P2 G3P2 G4P3 G2P2 NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F NATC-T UWJ ' G2P2 G-lP·I G.11'3 GIP! G5P5 GIPI GJP3 d2P2 GIPI G3PJ · G2P2 G2P2 G3P2 G2P2 G3P3 G2P2 G3P3 GIP! ' G2P2 G4P4 G2P2 · G2P2 : G2P2 G2P2 G4P4 NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F NATC-T 'NATC'-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F ·. NATC-F NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F NATC-F NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-F • NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F NATC-F NATC-F NATC-t . . NATC,F NATC-T NATC-F NATC-F . NATC-F NATC-F NAtC-F NATC-F NATC>F NATt:-T ' "''"NATC-F NATC-l' MARCH 1996 FIRST ' EXTRACJ'lON _8412 mlU/I 5827 m!U/1 . 3009 rill U/I 7669 mlU/l 5426 mIU/l 3083 11ilU/I 5481 mlU/l 8520 mlU/I 2354 mlU/I '.15Ci'J mlU/I 4 771 mlUtl 4283 mlU/I 7636 ml U/I 7604 mlU/l 2070 mlU/l 4205 mIU/I 2987 ml U/I 3459 mIU/I 5348 mlU/1 >8800 1.n!Uil · 5016 mll.Jlt 4420 mIU/I 4804 mlU/I 6451 mlU/I 5063 mlU/I 5221 mlU/I 6621 rn!U/I >8800 inlU/l 6263 mIU/l · >8800 mlU/I 3423 mIU/1 4620 mlU/l 8256 mllJ/l 4667 mlU/I 2632 mlU/I : 106 I mlU/I 4007 mlU/l 5020 mlU/I 2753 m!Uil. 6112 mlU/I ·3350 mlU/I 3988.mlU/I 411JmlU/I' - 1!41 ml Liii 3469 mlU/l . '6540 mlU/l 5791 mIU/I ...5504 mIU/l 13 96 ml U/i 158 mlU/1 4442 mIU/i 4522 mIU/I 5667 m!U/I · 6179 mlU/I 1111u11 ' 7925 4087 3308 1272 mlU/I' m!U/I mJU/l mIU/I SECOND EXTRACTION 7818 mlU/1 7350 m!U/I 3308 mlU/I 4265 1111011 3589 mIU/1 8332 m!U/I 3360 mlU/1 5954 m!U/I ·685 mIU/l 6549 miU/I 6948 m!U/l 6777 mlU/I 2349 mlU/I 5698 mIU/I 3292 mIU/I 4302 mIU/I 5689 mIU/I 5007 mIU/I 1546 mlU/I 2751 . mTU/l 4161 m!U/I I 13ll mlU/1 7472 mIU/l . 5870 mlU/I 6923 m1u11 3609 mIU/l 5572 mIU/l 3811 m!U/l · 7758 mIU/1 7513 mIU/l 1973 lnIU/1 1673 mlU/1 7952 mIU/I 4869 mlU/I 7203 mIU/I 1686 mlU/l 3958 mIUil 1503 mJU/l 1032m1U/l 5955 miU/1 1884 inlU/l 2526 rnlU/I 3472 mlU/I 1022 mlU/I · 4908 mIU/I 24'\8 mIU/1 436 m!U/l 480 11tlU/I 1512 mIU/ll 2421 mJU/I 146 i i111U/I 268 m!U/I 3665 nilU/I 748 111IU/l 860 mIU/I 5896 mlU/I 4 i39 mlU/1 .385!m1U/l 3605 mlU/l TllIRU CTI 0 N 1431 mlU/I 1797 mlU/I 575 mlU/I 360 m\U/1 176 7 mIU/1 1172 mlU/I 1387 mlU/l 305 mtU/I · 779 miU/I dropped out 376 mlU/I 2019 mlU/I 513 mlU/I 116.mlU/I J 160 mlU/I 2396 mlU/I 2639 mlU/i 1737 mlU/I 448 lnlU/I 316 rnlU/l 502 mlU/l 251 mlU/I 707 mJU/1 209 5 ml U/I 1621 mlU/I 622 mIU/1 770 111\U/I 2568 mIU/I 3232 mIU/l 128 mlU/I 235 mlU/I 451 m!U/I · 2970 mll.rtl TJ5 mlU/I 2835 m!U/I · 300 mlU/l 1371 mlU/I 1975 mlU/1 500 ml U/I 690 mlU/l · 402 ml U/I 'x6 I m IU/I 265 mlU/I 752 uilU/I 2391 mIU/l ·. 851 mlUJI 750 111 IU/l 555 111,IU/I 1206 111 IU/I' 177 mlU/I 261! mfU/I 1 48.mlU/l 690 mlU/l 113 mIU/I . 886 m!U/I DROPPE_D OUT 3245. mlU/l mlU/1 2001 mlU/l 267 i , lI 60. 61. 62. 63 . 64.· 65 . 66. 67. 68. 69 . 70. 71. 72 . 73 . 74. C.M. E.S. N.C. E.L. E.R. l.G. 76. 77 . 78. 79 . 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 9.i. 92. 93 . l.G. G3P2 G2P2 G4P3 GIP! G2P2 GIP! GIPI GIPI GJP3 G4P4 G3P3 G2P2 GIP! G2P2 G2P2 31 30 35 32 24 28 22 25 28 34 s.c. M.T. L.C. A.A. J.C. 22 19 15 29 24 211 25 20 32 V.A. E.S . M.V. ·M.F. 1:. . 1\1 .IJ . E.R. V.M . nE. GWJ G2P2 G2P2 G6P5 G5P·t G2P2 G3P3 G2P2 G4P4 GIP! G2P2 G3P3 G2P2 G3P1 G7P7 . G2P2 G2P2 G2P2 G3P3 G2P2 G2P2 G3P3 G2P2 G6P6 G4P4 GIP! G3P3 ·02p2 G4P4 G2P2 39 A.S. 34 E.J . J.E. J.Y. 21 26 44 21 36 28 A.A. H J.G. 21 37 19 25 20 21 27 26 28 32 40 38 15 21 22 27 25 2!1 13 S.A. A.E. W.R. s.c. A.A. N.M. R.S. A.B. R.V. 95 . B.T. 96. M.C. 97 . B.G. 98. H.R. 99. A.M. 100. P.B. 101. E.M. 102. B.L. 103. M.N. 104. C.G. 105. A.r:. 106. R.H.· 107. V.M. 108 .. E.S. 109. M.T. 110. J.T. Ill. A.A. 112. C.C. 113. J.S. ·. 114. L.A. 115. M.L. ll6. B.L. 117. RD. 118. P.S. I 19. l.T. 120. G3P.l 02P2 G.2P2 G3P3 ·G2P2 .G2P2 G2P2 G3P3 G3P2 GIPI G2P2 :;.3 27 22 20 . 26 28 30 25 24 36 27 28 23 24 G4f'4 ' G3P3 G2P2 G2P2 G3P3 4750 mIU/l 8317 mJU/l 8283 mIU/I 3169 mIU/l 4511 mlU/I 5073 mIU/1 4443 mlU/I 7664 mIU/l 3896 mIU/l 1405 ml\J/I 7881 mlU/1 1333 mlU/1 4608 mlU/I 2438 miU/I 2945 mill/I bll-11 mlU/I 75.JI mlU/1 2948 mlU/l 609 mlU/I 285 mlU/I 7160 mJU/I 6266 mIU/l 4735 mIU/I 2383 mIU/l 1420 m!U/I 3809 mlU/l 4245 mIU/I 2919 mIU/l 6449 mlU/I 2261 mIU/l 1548 mIU/l 5346 mIU/l 4880 mIU/I >8800 mlU/l 5087 mJU/l 6883 mIU/l 5504 mIU/I 7743 mIU/l 4552 mlU/I 5229.mIU/1 7542 mIU/l 5540 mIU/l 6575 mI:lJ/I 8800 ml U/l 3292 m!Uil 26·10 mlU/1 609 I mlU/I NATC-T 4126 mlU/I NATC•T · ·. 6594 mlU/l NATC-"I: sooo mIU/l NATC-T NATC-T. · ·.. 3021 mIU/l >8800 nHU/I NATC-F 3778 mJU/l . NATC-F . NATC-F 2493 mll,111 -6134 m!U/I . : >8800 mIU/I .. NATC-T NATC-F .8769 .mIU/1 5660 mJU/I NATC·T · NATC-F .. 7665 mIU/I NATC-F 7945 mllm NATC-F 6854 mIU/I NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T · Nf\TC-T NATC-F NATC-F NATC-r NATC-F N/\TC-F NATC-T· NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T ·. NATC-F . NATC-F NATC-F NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC-T NATC"F NATC-F NATC-T NATC'-T 5557 mlU/I 7642 mlU/I 7629 m!U/I 2175 mIU/I . 1651 mIU/I 6030 m!U/1 6022 mIU/I >8000 mIU/l 3339 mIU/I 2036. mIU/L 3051 mlU/I I 3!.13 mlU/I DROPPED OUT 2000 mlU/I · 1637 mlU/I 57 Hi mLU/1 3053 mlU/I 3305 mlU/l 897 mlU/I DROPPED OUT 7009 mIU/I 2453 mIU/I 2399 mIU/1 2166 mlU/I 2876 mIU/I 4690 m!U/I 3978 mIU/l 224 1 mJU/l 5191 mIU/l 5898 mJU/I +326 mIU/l 8649 mIU/l 2588 mIU/l 4479 inIU/l 4595 mlU/l 6878 mJU/I >8800 mIU/t · 6893 mIU/l 7888 mJU/l >8800 mlU'1 3892 mJU/l 4884 imJU/I 8132mlU/l 5492,mTU/I 500 I mlU/I 4336 mlU/l 6 I 76 mlU/l 4856 mIU/l "6998 mIU/l 2789 mIU/I 5234 mIU/l . 4116 mIU/I I851 .niiU/l 5259 m!U/1 7758 m!U/I . 6004 mJU/I 4610 ml.LJ/l 6042 m!U/I 5255 ml 0/1 4089m!U/I Researched done''"'·by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® ,..' · 268 . 1987 mIU/I 3701 mlU/I 2558 mJU/I 1875 mlU/I 460 mlU/I 2100 mlU/I 2692 .mlU/I 3112 mlU/I 4.732 mlU/I 302 mlU/l 145 ··m IU/I 288 mIU/L 724 mlU/I 1243 mlU/L 4.10 I mlU/I I 189 mlU/I 2141 mlU/I · 490 mlU/1 1895 mIU/I 400 mIU/l 3171 mlU/l 363 mlU/I 2455 mlU/1 1329 mlU/I 322 mlU/I 1301 mIU/l 486 mlU/I 3366 mlU/I 1884 mJU/l 2198 mIU/l 1494 mlU/I · 504 mJU/I 650 mlU/I mIU/I · 3098 mlU/I 3550 mlU/l 2899 mlU/l 42l)8 m!U/1 2817 m!U/l 752 mlU/l 801 m!U/1 1939 mlU/I 3048 mlU/1 2948 mlU/I 2.443 ,,,1u11 3788 mlU/I 4216 mlU/I 3223 mlU/l 3126 mlU/l 476.m!U/I. 493 mIUil li9 mlU/I 155_mJU/1 · 3878 mlU/I 802 m!U/I 3050 mlU/1 498_mlU/I 628 mlU/I S20 mlU/I JPMAVOL 71 N0.3 JANUARY - MARCH 1996 I II . :'j" '.1 1 t . . ·I r· // . t·r / / Table II. Records of Infants Weights (Kg). Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® PATIENT 1. E.C. 2, M.A. 3. B.C. 4. J.J. 5. N.V. 6 . B.A. 7. B.P. 8. IU. 9. J.A. 10. E.B . 11. tvt.S. 12. J.B. 13 . R.P. 14. ll.A. 15. R.E. 16. T .R. 17. E.B. 1-8. L.M . 19. H.Y. 20. 21. L.G. 22. R.R. 23 . F.D. 24 M .A. 25 . E.T . 26. M.B. J:6 :u :u .·'·-3.0., S.D. A.O. 2.!I 2.7 2.92 2.7 2.5 2. 7 :1. I !I 2. 7 R;P. 3.2 M.N. 2.7 3.4 2.8 2.9 3.0 3. 18 3.22 3.6 E.V. R.L . P 'vi. 40. c.v. 41. C.N. M.C . 46. G.D. ) . (1 j)i.,, 60. M .L. 51. R.C. 2.7 3.11· 52. M.M .. 53 . N.R. 54 . R.N. 55 . J.C . J.0 P.C. 60. C.l\t 2.8 3.0 3.18 2.6 3.5 J .6 3.4 2.7 3.0 . 3.11 2.6 3.32 :u 49. D.P. 58. E.T. 3A 2.<i N .M. 47 . E.M. 56. C.11. 57. E.A. 2.7 3.23 . 2.7 3. 1 2.8 3.3 2.8 2.8 3.2 3. 18 3.1 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.32 3.4 2.8 3.0 3. 18 :.c. +s. R.H. 4s. H> . 3.2 2.8 2.78 2.92 2.7 . 2.5 .3.J 43 . ...:.M. .++. 2.89 2.38 3.18 3.6 2.5 2.S 3.5 2.8 2.5 4.11 3.0 3.18 4.0 3.5 2.7 . 3.29 2.6 3.8. 3.2 3. 1 2.(1 36. L.C. J7. M.0 . 38. S.B. 39. R.D. 42. 2.89 2.27 3.18 3.6 2. 27 2.5 3.5 2.8 2.5 3.0 :u ll 4.0 3.0 2.7, 3. 18 27. M.P. 28 . R.R. 3-;, ONE WEEK . ·1.0 c.s. '.'9 . 30. 31. 32. J3. 34. HIRTH WEIGHT 2.6 3.32 - 3.4 3.4 3. 1 Z.5 . 3.1 2.51 3.3 2.11 ... 2.'J 3.0 ""- · 3.1 JANUARY- MARCH 1996 TWO WEEKS 3.32 3. 18 3.18 3 .6 2.7 2.7 3.9 2.9 2.7 4.0 3.0 3.43 4.ll :u 2.95 4.D9 2:7 4.09 3.2 3. 1 3.2. 3.2 2.9 3. 18 3.35 3. 18 2.6 2.92 3.6 2.11 3,5 2.85 · 3.7 3.4 3.5 3.32 . 3.3 3.8 3.4 3.4 3.5 2.8 3.2 J .32 2.7 J.5 3.89 3.6 2.9 3.1 3.2 2.7 3.32 3.5 ONE MONTH 4.54 4.54 4.09 4.54. 3.6 3.5 4.5 3.3 3.0 4.2 3.5 4.54 4.8 4.0 H>9 4.54 4.0 5.9 3.6 4.2 4.2 3.8 3.3 4.54 4.54 3.75 2.9· 3.6 4.54 3.1 J.8 3.2 4.6 3.3 4.6 4.0 4.0 3.8 4,56 4.5 4.1 4:0 3.2 3.8 4.0 3. 1 4.0 4.2 4.4 3.3 3.7 3.6 3.2 4. 1 4.o FOUR . · MONTHS 5;15 · 8.1:1 5.0 5.45 1:1.3 5.8 7.4 5.0 4.11 EXPIRED 4.5 Ill.II 6.2 5.2 9.0 . 8.0 5.8 10.5 ·. 4.8 4.9 5. 1 5.0 4.8. I().() 9.0 4.9 4.2 5.8 1.o.. o 5.0 6 5.1 8.0 5.0 8.0 5.i 6.9 6:8 7.11 : 5.6 6.0 6.2 5.0 5.0 6.8 5.0 6.2 . 6.8 7.4 5.0 5.7 5.6' 5.0 6. 1 6:5 l ·. l i STOPPED 2.8 3.7 3.1 3.IK 3.2 5.5 4.11 3.7 6.6 6.0 6:3 3.11 · 269 'l t ) ·+ ; , .. .- l/ // I ' 61. 62. 63 . 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 7 1. 72. 73. 74 . 75. 76. E.S. N.C. E.L. E.R. l.G. 3. 1 3.3 2.6 2.8 2.98 3.02 2.52 3. 18 2.5 . 3.0 3.06 2.7 3.1 2.8 3.0 2.r. 2.27 3.32 2.75 v ;4 3.6 2.86 2.86 3. 1 3. 77 J .O 14 3.2'.I 2.111 2.7 s.c. M.T. L.C. A.A. J.C. V.A. E.S. M.V. M.F. M.D. l.G. 77. E.R. 78. V.M. -. 79 . 80: 81. 82. 83 . 84 . $5 . 86. 87 .. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. G.E. A.S. E.J. J.E. S.A. E.A. W.R. J.Y. A.A. J.G. s.c. A.A. N.M. R.S. 2.') 3.3 '.l.4 2.7 2. 7 3.4 A.B. R.V. B.T. M.C. 13.G. 98 ... H,R. 99. A.M. 2.!JS 100. P.B. IOI. E.M. 102: B.L. 103. h1.N. ·:t... ;· 104. C.G. lb5. A.F. 106. R.H. 107 . . V.M. 108. E.S. 109. M.T. 110. J.T. 11 1. A.A. 112. c.c. 113 . J.S. 114. L.A. 115. ML. l16. B.L. i 17. R.D. 118. P.s.· 119. 1.T. 120. G.G. ;or 1· ' 3. 18 3. 1 2.7 2.7 . 3.2 3.4 3.1 3.3 2.7 3.i3 3.32 2.95 J. I 2.78 2.7 3.3 5 3.23 3. 11\ 2.7 2.7 ,.3.4 3.1 '!l'.O 3.0 3.32 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.02 2.53 3.2 2.5 3.0 3.12 2.7 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.6 2.27 3.3 3.7 3.6 2.9 3. 1 3.2 3.2 2.8 3.23 2.8 3.2 3. 18 2.8 3.3 2.9 4.0 4.3 3.4 3.7 4.0 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.8· 6.5 7.0 6 .0 6.5 Ci.4 5.3 6.6 5.0 5.4 ' ..• ; i ..j 5. 5 l" . STOPPED :u 2.8 2.4 3.5 3.R 3.5 4.0 3.2 2.9 4.0 5.7 1 :·J i 5.9 6.S 5.4 . 4.11 6.5 . STOPPED 2.7 3.6 2.86 2.86 3.0 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.2 2.81 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.3 .2.6 2.7 3.3 3.0 3. 18 3.1 2.7 2.7 3. 1 3.35 3. 1 3.2 2.86 3.23 3.4 3.U 3.0 ?. ,';18 l.69 3.3 3.29. 3. 18 2.6 2.11 3.3 '3.1 2.9 3.0 3.8 3.32 3.26 3.4 4:2 3.2 3.77 3.38 2.9 2.84 3. 1 3.6 3.6 2.9 2.76 3.6 3.32 3.32 .· 3.6 3. 18 .3. 1 3. 5 '3.-t 3:6 3:6 3. 1 3.4 3.66 3.32 3.2 2.95 2.77 3.6 3.4 3.32 2.8 2.95 3.5 3.3 3. 1 3.3 4.0 3.8 3.4 4.0 4.7 3.5 4.5 3.69 3.6 3.6 3.8 4.3 .4.0 3.4 3.2 4.6 J .58 3.7 4.2 J..t 3.2 3.8 4.2 4.0 4.1 3.5 3.6 " 3.75 J .6 4.0 3.18 3.2 4.0 1.46 3.6 3.2 3. 1 4.0 3.8 3.5 5.7 6.5 5.11 3.69 6.4 7.4 5. 5 11.7 6.0 5.8 5.6 6 .3 . 7.0 .6.7 5.0 . 5.0 7.9 6.4 . .. 6.5 Ci. 9 5.7. 5.0 6.2 7.0 . 6.5.· 6.8 5'.5 . . . 6.6 6.9 Ci.2 6.5 5.0 5. 1 . 6.4 . .6.0 6.4 5.2 5.11 Ci.3 5.7' 5.6 "' Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® 270 ., .,l 5.5 JPMAVOL 71 NQ;:3 JANUARY - MARCH.. 996 ... .. ,. :"J ... ....{ " Table 3. Age and Parity Distribution Treatment group Placebo group Mean Age Primipara Multi para 27.53years 26.58 years 6 (10%) 10 (17%) 52 {90%) 48 {83%) 48 Hours >48 Hours 1 (1 .7%) 1 (1.7%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 48Hours 72 Hours 96 Hours 57 (98.3%) 57 {98.3%) 1 (1.7%) 1 (1.7%) 0(0%) 0(0%) Table 4. Breast Engorgement 24 Hours Treatment group . 57 (98.3%) Placebo group 57 (98.3%) Table 5. Milk Let-down Treatment group Placebo group Table 6. Statistical Analysis of Infants' Weights (kg.) Birth Weight One Week Two Weeks One Month Four Months Treatment Group Mean s.o. Placebo Group Mean S.D. tvaiue 3.001 2.964 3.237 3.897 6.646 0.3545 0.5207 0.5645 0.7184 1.7908 3.041 3.041 3.205 3.563 5.304 0.3309 0.3314 0.3353 0.7949 1.2036 -0.63 -0.96 0.381 2.414 . . 4.817 0.029% 5.506% 17.04% ' 74.41% 2.84% 4.3261'% 23.04% 35. 726% -0.76 1.163 3.165 5.362 PERCENTAGE WEIGHT GAIN: B.W. to 1 week B.W. to 2 weeks RW:to 1 month B.W. to 4 months -1 .3% 7.944% 30.31% 123.6% 13.27% 15.649% 22:863% 61 .51% Table 7. Statistical Analysis of Serum Prolactln Levels (mlU/I lst Extraction 2nd Extraction 3rd Extraction Treatment Group Mean S.D. Tratment Group Mean S.D. t value 4808 5236 2389 2258.4 2252.4 1019.7 5134 3398 504.1 2304.4 1939.5 412.64 -0.78 4.789 13.27 2132.4 2178.1 -1735 -4630 1932.5 2328.9 5.824 5.372 Difference Between 1st and 2nd 428.2 -2418 women take malunggay (Morlnga oleifera) leaves in chicken or shellfish\ soups to help them lactate well. The mechanism of action has not been explained but It was effective as a galactogogue and has been used by generations of nursiny mothers especially those with inadequate lactation. ' .. Lactogenesis, on the other hand, is initiated In the postpartum period by a fall in plasma progesterone in the presence of maintained prolactin cohcentrations. 15 Initiation of the process does not depend-on suckling of the infant although the rate of milk secretion after the third or fourth day postpartum declines if milk 16 removal is not practiced at regular intervals. A study by de Carvalho et al in 1985, showed that frequent milk expression was associated with a significantly greater milk production than infrequent expression. He concluded that a low-cost, noninvasive method of enhancing milk production by mothers ·Of nonnursing, prematurely delivered infants was to 17 encourage frequent milk expression. This was also the conclusion of Hopkinson et al in 1988 when he conducted a study on milk volume produced by women aged .20 to 38 years who delivered at 28 to 30 week's gestation. Optimal milk production was associated with five or more milk expressions per day and pumping durations that exceeded 100 minutes 18 . perday. · .· This current study demonstrated the lactatlonenhancing effect of malunggay (Natalac capsules) leaves as evidenGed by the significantly greater Increase in maternal serum prolactin levels and percentages of gains · in the infants' weights among the patients belonging to the treatment or Natalac-treated group,. Majority of our patients .were free from any form of anxiety or stress which may result in inadequate milk production. Nevertheless, there was one subject from each of. the treatment and placebo group:> who had breast engorgement and milk let-down a day later than the rest. These two mothers admitted to have had slight emotional stress secondary to family problems. Practical advice, psychological support from close female relatives, and the help and encouragement of health workers are essential measures for successful breast feeding. This is supported by findings of recent research studies. CONCLUSION We have found that malunggay (Natalac) capsules do enhance lactation among breastfeeding Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta®mothers and there were no reported adverse effects from the study. In addition, public education, personal advice, and friendly support from health workers and counsellors who have special understanding and ... Lactagogues or galactogogues are special foods, s!<ills are most effective if they work with Individual iriks, .or herbs which people believe increase a mothers, and if they help their colleagues to learn the . milk supply. In many parts of the Philippines, same skills. / 271: .. , '• ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 8. Fuchs, A.R., Dawood, M.Y. Release of oxytocln and prolactin by suckling in rabbits throughout lactation. Endocrinology 114:462, 1984. We would like to thank the San Pablo City Health Office, under the administration of Dr. Job Brion and his staff, for their utmost cooperation and willingness to participate in this research project. Natalac capsules were provided by Tynor Health Supplement Division ( a dMsion of tynor Drug House, Incorporated); manufactured by Gruppo Medica, Incorporated marketed and distributed by Metropolitan Pharmaceutical Products, Incorporated. 9. Uncoln, D.W. Neuroendocrine· control of milk injection. J Re prod Fertil 2: 571, 1982. 10. Howie, P.W., McNeilly A.S., The Relationship between suckling-induced prolactin response and lactogenesis. J. Clln Endocrlnol Metab. 50:670, 1980. 11 . Tyson, J.E., Hwang, P. Studies of prolactin secretion during human pregnancy.. Am J Obstet Gynecol 113:14, 1972. BIBLIOGRAPHY 12. Selye, H., Collip, J.B. Nervous and hormonal factors in lactation. Endocrinology. 18:237, 1934. 13. Vlo, F., Smoking during pregnancy and lactation and its effects on breast-milk volume. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 54:1011-16. 14. Nyboe, AA, Lund-Ardensesn, C. et al. Suppressed prolactin but normal neurophysin levels in cigarette smoking Clin. endocrinol (Oxf) 1982, breastfeeding women, 17:363-8. 15. Neville, M.C. Regulation of mammary development and lactation. In: Neville, M:C., Neifert, M.R., eds. Lactation, Physiology, Nutrition, and Breastfeeding. New York: Plenum presis, 1983: 103-40. 16. Woolridge, M.W., Greaseley, V. The initiation of factatlon:the effect of early versus delayed contact for suckling on milk intake in the first week post-partum. Early / Hum Dev. 1985; 12:269-78. 17. de Carvalho, M. Anderson, D.M. Frequency of Milk Expression and Milk Production by Mothers of Nonnursing 'Premature Neonates. AJDC, Vol. 139, 1985. 18. Hopkinson, J.M. Schanler, R.J. Milk Production by Mothers of Premature Infants. Pediatrics. 1988:81 :815,20. 1. Department of Health, Philippines. "Helping Mothers to Breastfeed," published by UNICEF, 1991 . 2. UNICEF. A Global Priority,• published by UNICEP. New York, U.S.A. 1990. 3. Fuchs, A.R. Physiology and Endocrinology of Lactation in Obstetrics: Gabbe, S. Niebyl J.R., Swipson J.L. eds. 1991. pages 175-201 . 4. Neill, J.D.: Prolactin: Its secretion and .control: In E; Knobil, WH Sawyer (eds.): Handbook of Physiology and Endocrinology, Section 7, Vol. 4 American Physiological Society, Washington D.C. 1974. pp 469-478. 5. Haslam, S.Z. Gale J.J. Estrogen receptor. activation in normal mammary gland. Endocrinology 114: 1163, 1984. 6. Cowie, AT., Tindal, S.J. Edward, London , 1972. 7. The Physiology of Lactation, Neville, M.C., Allen; J.C. Studies in human lactation: milk volume dur!ng weaning and lactogenesis. Am J Clln Nutr 1991, 54:81-92. ·. Researched done by Sugarpod Naturals/Go-Lacta® ********** 272 JPMA VOL. 71 NO. 3. JANUARY-MARCH 1996