the 7-17-14 Penny Press
Transcription
the 7-17-14 Penny Press
Penny Press Nevada, USA Volume 11 Number 45 JULY 17, 2014 THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 2 www.pennypressnv.com Penny Press Logotype Pointedlymad licensed from: Rich Gast Credits: Publisher and Editor: Contributing Editors: Fred Weinberg Floyd Brown Al Thomas Doug French Chuck Muth John Getter Pat Choate Ron Knecht The Penny Press is published weekly by Far West Radio LLC All Contents © Penny Press 2014 Letters to the Editor are encouraged. They should be emailed to: [email protected] No unsigned or unverifiable letters will be printed. 775-461-1515 eFax: 201-304-0355 Penny Press NEVADA USA 16 PAGES VOLUME 11 NUMBER 45 JULY 17, 2014 Government Share of GDP Over 50% By FLOYD BROWN Contributing Editor Once upon a time, I wrote about the Cost of Government Day – the day on which the average American had worked enough to pay his or her Commentary share of the government’s budget – in June. But for the sixth consecutive year, that day has fallen in July. This time, the official date was July 6, as calculated by Americans for Tax Reform. (The Cost of Government Day had never fallen past June 27 before our current president’s tenure.) Ironically, I nearly missed the announcement this year, as it occurred on the same weekend we celebrated our independence from the high tax policies of King George III. And while it’s easy to disregard this announcement, it has significance for all of us. The cost of government impacts us regardless of our tax bracket, and even if we pay no taxes at all. You see, the economy is like a backpacker climbing a mountain trail. The cost of government acts like rocks in the backpacker’s pack, and with each new rock (tax), the hiker’s efforts become more arduous and difficult, thus slowing his progress. Time to Cut the Fat? In 1848, the brilliant philosopher, John Stuart Mill, wrote in Principles of Political Economy: “In all the more advanced communities, the great majority of things are worse done by the intervention of government, than the individuals most interested in the matter would do them, or cause them to be done, if left to themselves.” Then, years later, economist Richard Rahn – the creator of the Rahn curve – postulated a connection between the rate of economic growth and the size and cost of government. Rahn believes that there’s an optimal level of government spending as a share of gross domestic product (GDP). When a government is the right size, it maximizes its rate of economic growth. But when a government grows too large, economic growth becomes more difficult. The Conservative Weekly Voice Of Nevada Inside: Not Gonna Back Off One Single Inch See Editorial Page 6 Penny Wisdom There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you. —Will Rogers Rahn calculated that the optimum inflection point is when the government’s share of GDP is between 10% and 20%. Not coincidentally, from the signing of the U.S. Constitution until the 1930s, total U.S. government spending hovered around 10%. In 2014, however, the government’s share of GDP has climbed over 50%. Our backpacker (the economy) can’t regain his momentum, and he’s struggling to make progress. You’ve probably noticed that the economy has been unable to reach pre-2008 growth levels. Instead, we’re having difficulty growing productivity, employment, corporate earnings, and personal income. Basically, the economy is stalled, and the main culprit is an expensive and bloated government. RON KNECHT FRED WEINBERG DOUG FRENCH LUKE HAMILTON AL THOMAS MATT BARBER CHUCK MUTH Continued on page4 PAGE 5 PAGE 6 PAGE 7 PAGE 9 PAGE 10 PAGE 11 PAGE 14 THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 4 Continued from page 3 Government Is The Problem Of course, the government does have important tasks to complete. First, it protects us from enemies of freedom, both foreign and domestic. Additionally, the government helps us settle disputes between grieved parties, and it regulates the maintenance of our national infrastructure. But recently, the government has taken on many roles that it’s incapable of handling. And after taking on so many nonessential jobs, the government is now failing to even get the basics right. Consequently, corruption amongst government officials is growing, and problems are widespread. As Ronald Reagan wisely stated, “Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem.” www.pennypressnv.com THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 5 Commentary: Ron Knecht We’re Getting Ripped Off at Las Vegas McCarran Airport It’s not enough that vendors at the Las Vegas airport charge us prices that would make highway robbers blush for things we buy at their monopoly bazaar. Now some of them are even charging sales taxes on top of those inflated prices – sales taxes they’re forbidden by law to collect. Fred Weinberg (publisher of the Penny Press among other public services) recently told me he’d been ripped off by a McCarran Airport vendor charging him sales tax on a Diet Coke. So, he contacted the airport’s concession office. The classic bureaucratic wordy reply from the concession manager began: “Thank you for taking the time to notify us of the problems you encountered during the time of your recent visit to McCarran International Airport. Reports such as this enable us to scrutinize the quality of customer service being provided to the traveling public. McCarran International Airport takes customer service very seriously and it is our intent to always provide the best service possible to our valued customers.” He went on to “apologize for this incident” and say he had forwarded Fred’s comments to the general counsel for Host International, the concessionaire, who he was confident would contact Fred. To Tips Of Our Cap and Bronx Cheers The Penny Press Tips Its Cap To: LeBron James who finally became a man last week when he made the emotional decision to return to his hometown and play for the Cleveland Cavaliers despite his ugly and immature departure four years ago. If he ever wondered why he was not held in the same esteem as Michael Jordan or Magic Johnson, the way he handled his move to Miami was exhibit A. He atoned for that last week in a very classy way and we hope Cleveland is happy. The IRS and the FBI for finally indicting Las Vegas strip joint player Rick Rizzolo who has managed not to pay a judgment to a Las Vegas tourist who was paralyzed by Rizzolo’s goons more than 10 years ago. This guy is the living embodiment of a Vegas scumbag and how he has managed to avoid getting his clock cleaned is a textbook case of lawyering money can buy. The Penny Press Sends A Bronx Cheer And A Bouquet of Weeds To: Nevada Department of Wildlife officials and their hypocritical “conservationist” friends who said that a bear had to be killed last week because it was trying to break into homes and cars, and even wandered onto a busy private beach in a gated community before wardens shot it with a tranquilizer dart and later killed it. The beach bear, a 3-year-old male, “was very bold in its behavior and not showing any fear of humans at all.” These are the same clowns who will argue all day long that ranchers need to be put out of business to protect the desert tortoise. date, Fred has not heard from the lawyer. Meantime, since my work takes me through McCarran regularly, I decided to check this matter myself. On July 8, I bought a Diet Coke from Fresh Market on the Go #21, which was listed at the outrageous price of $3.59 for a 20-ounce bottle. Sure enough, they added $0.29 for tax, bringing the total to $3.88! I checked our recent grocery bill to see how much we pay at the supermarket: It’s $4.00 for a dozen twelve-ounce cans – of course, without sales tax. That’s 2.78 cents per ounce versus the airport figure of 19.4 cents, or seven times as much at the airport. As an economist, I know the excuses vendors will offer for the difference. Economies of scale #1: One bottle versus twelve cans in a package. Economies of scale #2: Grocery stores are much larger operations. Time and place utility: The vendor provides higher value by selling you a cold one as you run to catch your flight. Etc. But all that together does not justify a seven-fold differential. No, the reason for that ridiculous differential, besides the illegal sales-tax collection, is that the airport vendors have market power conferred by their franchise from a public entity, the airport – while the supermarket has to operate in a highly competitive free market. If the airport really wanted to “always provide the best service possible to our valued customers” they’d use their franchising powers to make sure vendors charge reasonable prices. Not doing so is an inefficient and ineffective way to spend our tax dollars. Why would the airport fail to protect the public as it should? I’m betting it gets a share of the revenues from the vendors, meaning it has a stake in helping them raise the prices as high as they can. Now, back to the original outrage. Nevada Revised Statutes 372.284(1) states in relevant part: “There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this chapter on the gross receipts from the sales … of food for human consumption.” While other language provides exceptions for restaurant meals, soda pop doesn’t fit that exception, as demonstrated by the fact the grocery store does not charge the tax. Further, some other airport vendors also abide by the law and don’t charge sales tax. For example, on May 3, I bought a Diet Coke from the Hudson News vendor at McCarran and was not charged tax. Final questions: Would an audit would show that the vendors that illegally charged sales taxes actually remitted those taxes to the state? Do the franchising agreements allow the airport to collect more when vendors charge us taxes that aren’t due? And how many tens of millions of dollars yearly are we being over-charged by all these means? RON KNECHT OPINION THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 6 From The Publisher... Take Your Best Shot. I'm Not Backing Off One Inch! Last week, I suggested that a legitimately conservative approach to immigration is to open our borders to most comers who really want to become Americans sending the criminals back and making our new residents get jobs, an education and become financially independent. Then, we’ll talk to them about citizenship. states because they largely decide the benefit levels for many welfare programs, and states’ levels of ethnic diversity vary tremendously along racial, ethnic and immigrant lines. For instance, in 2010 only 1.2% of West Virginia’s population was foreign-born while 27% of California’s was. Let me repeat. We are not talking about taking on the Mariel boat lift people. We are not talking about welfare. We’re talking about changing the law so that we remove the bias against people coming from the South. Furthermore, the amount of TANF benefits also varied by states with similar demographics. For instance, in 2010 a California family of three received $694 a month in TANF benefits. But in Texas, an identical family received only $260. The size of the Hispanic population in each state is the same: 39%. Those comments were—as are most of my columns—picked up by the Those are the unbiased facts. They come from a think take that leans Western Center for Journalism’s site, westernjournalism.com. so far right the Clintons and the Obamas cross the street to avoid And you would have thought, from the comments, that I had suggested walking in front of their building. They believe in limited government. using the Constitution as kindling to start the American Flag on fire. If you cling to the idea that immigrants drive up welfare spending, I started answering some of those comments individually but I think it you’re not a conservative because you aren’t willing to deal with the facts. is more sensible to answer them in aggregate. Here’s my favorite because it was short and to the point: And then there is the common argument that they “broke the law” and are “illegal”. Martha That may actually be true as far as it goes. July 12, 2014 at 1:44 pm Fred Weinberg, huh? I’ll remember that name and never ever click on another article written by him. His article shows his ignorance and his But here is where that logic falls apart: comments are sickening. The way our Federal bureaucracy sees it, the average American Many of those folks who wrote those comments are well meaning commits at least one felony a day. We have gone out of our way but hypocritical nutjobs. And I don’t necessarily mean that in the to criminalize normal behavior and we incarcerate more people per 100,000 residents than nations like China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia… pejorative. We may actually agree on most issues. you get the picture. Let’s look at the facts on immigration. Perhaps prisons are good for capitalism? There is a perception that immigrants take “our” jobs. If we changed some stupid laws, would those people who we now call That’s nonsense. Those jobs aren’t “yours”. This is America. We’re a “illegal” have their productivity rise simply by virtue of a change in meritocracy. If someone else gets a job you want, than you just got status? Would it be easier to weed out and deport the criminals among beat. Do you really think—as a conservative—that the government them? The smart money would probably back those propositions. should step in and get your job back for you? Like a union? What we are doing certainly isn’t working. If you do, then you’re not a conservative. For all I know, “Martha” is a very nice but misguided lady. Maybe she Then, there’s the perception than “illegals” disproportionately abuse (and the rest of the commenters) genuinely believed in facts that were our welfare state. wrong. You know, like liberals think the Hobby Lobby decision by the Supreme Court took away birth control from women. First of all, we shouldn’t have a welfare state. It should be a safety net designed to put people back on their feet. If you can live successfully But the facts are simple. Whatever we choose to do, we must do for any length of time on “welfare” than shame on us, not shame on something. Our history tells us that we are at our best when we you. But what are the actual facts? welcome people who genuinely wish to be here and help them establish themselves. The most interesting comments along those lines come from the Cato Institute, hardly a bastion of liberal thought: You can, for a short period of time, act like George Wallace (“segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever”) and stand in the Since 1970, no pattern can be seen between the size of benefits door to the University. How did that work out for him long term? a family of three gets under welfare programs like Temporary Aid for Needy Families (TANF) and the level of immigration FRED WEINBERG or ethnic and racial diversity. We (Cato) compared individual THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 7 Commentary: Doug French The Airlines Work for Uncle Sam Anyone who’s traveled by air this year knows airfares are up, scheduling is tight, and the seats are even tighter. You’re thinking the airlines must be printing money, right? Not exactly. The 26 remaining domestic carriers are lining Uncle Sam’s pockets, not their own. The airline business never been the picture of stability. “If you look at the last 20 years the average net profit margin for airlines in terms of revenue is zero,” says Brian Pearce, chief economist for International Air Transport Association (IATA). Check out the Wikipedia page for defunct airlines of the United States. I count 118, and that’s just the failed airlines whose names start with the letter A. Lots of Fliers, Few Profits After 9/11, airlines collectively lost $55 billion. There was too much capacity, and fewer people were willing to venture into the newly formed TSA Maginot Line that separated the airport front door from the gates. Now that travelers have become accustomed to the men and women in blue, 741 million people took to the skies last year. Airline net profits were $12.7 billion on revenues of $199.7 billion. Unprofitable routes, empty seats, and many freebies are gone. Baggage and change fees pad airline bottom lines. “We have every fee known to man,” said Rick Seaney, chief executive of the travel site FareCompare. “That tells you why there are profits now.” Notice he said “there are profits now.” He didn’t say big profits. Jean Medina, a spokeswoman for Airlines for America, the trade group for the nation’s airlines, says “It’s worth noting, while finances for the U.S. airline industry are improving, we still lag the S&P 500 average profit margin, and face tens of billions of dollars in debt, which airlines are actively working to pay down.” While passenger numbers have increased, the number of flights is down to 9.1 million from 9.3 million in 2012. That means airlines are squeezing more passengers into fewer planes. The average flight occupancy grew from 73% a decade ago to 83% last year. Yet profit margins are still slim. By the way, where are these 83% full flights? Every plane I’ve been on has been jam-packed. According to the Wall Street Journal’s Robert Wall, “Margins are so thin that the airline industry expects to make less money [in 2014] than the oil industry will make from selling [the airline industry] all the fuel it consumes. IATA projects airlines will generate about $24 billion in profit for oil producers this year, with the carriers spending an estimated $212 billion on jet fuel—almost 30% of total operating costs.” Where Does the Ticket Price Go? Mostly to the Government Where does the money from these expensive tickets go? Bryan Riley, writing for The Daily Signal, tells us that the government’s cash register rings every time we step on a plane. According to Airlines for America, $61.49 of a $300 domestic round-trip ticket goes to federal government taxes. That’s almost as much as fuel ($63.47) and more than labor ($51.52). Other expenses total $123.11, leaving 41 cents for profits. That’s right: Uncle Sam takes 20% off the top, while only 0.1% drops to the bottom line. And by the way, that doesn’t include taxes on payroll or jet fuel. What’s worse than a government picking your pocket? Two governments picking your pocket, as they do for international flights. Riley uses a flight from Baltimore-Washington International (BWI) to Panama as an example. The fare was $201.34, including $90.32 to the governments on both ends of the journey. That’s an effective tax rate of 81%, again not including the taxes paid on fuel and payroll. Admittedly, Panama is more heavy-handed than the US, but not by much. The government of Panama takes $48.32, while the US government grabs $42. Pushing Taxes Backward You might wonder why airlines don’t just pass on the government taxes and fees to make a reasonable profit. In a competitive market, a producer can’t do that. Remember, airlines compete with other forms of transportation too… and money spent on flying is discretionary income for most. It doesn’t take much of a fare hike for people to decide, “I’ll wait till next year to visit Aunt Millie.” Economist Murray Rothbard pointed out that taxation distorts the allocation of resources, making it harder for consumers to satisfy their wants. Rothbard explained it was a myth that taxes can be shifted forward to consumers. “It should be quite evident that if businesses were able to pass tax increases along to the consumer in the form of higher prices, prices would be raised to those levels already without waiting for the spur of a tax increase.” Instead, industry-specific taxes, like those imposed on airlines, penalize the industry. “The tax cannot be shifted forward,” writes Rothbard, “but tends to be shifted backward to the factors working in the industry.” This shifting is how airlines are surviving while making less than $6 per passenger. CNN’s Dean Irvine writes, “The profits the industry has made are mainly because of cost-cutting in the industry through improved efficiency and consolidation, plus the way that airlines package their products, most notably through giving passengers more choice in what kind of options they want with a flight.” The onerous taxation of airline travel has restricted its supply and raised its price. The lack of adequate long-term returns keeps capital from supporting more production that would benefit consumers. So when traveling by air this summer, don’t blame the airlines for high ticket prices and cramped seats. Given government’s heavy-handed interference in this market, entrepreneurs who continue to buck the odds and provide this service—that adds so much to our mobility and quality of life—are heroes. www.pennypressnv.com DOUG FRENCH THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 8 THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 9 Rush Was Right, Krauthammer Was Wrong By JOHN J. KIRKWOOD Special to the Penny Press “He has made judges dependent on his will alone…He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance…For imposing taxes on us without our consent...For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of trial by jury… For establishing an arbitrary government…For altering fundamentally the forms of our governments…He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people…He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us.” Do these charges ring familiar? I listed them on my blog in the days following Independence Day and one of my readers confessed that he thought I was railing against Barack Obama until he realized that I was quoting our Declaration of Independence and the charges made of George III. And this is exactly what Rush warned us about before the inauguration when he said “I hope he fails.” Rush, in the same way that Patton knew Rommel, knew what Obama would do because he had read his book. It wasn’t rocket science, Rush had done his homework. He had listened to Obama’s own words, studied his background, and broken the code. Those in the “conservative intelligentsia” are in the awkward position of having to admit either that Rush was right or feign surprise at the new realization that the Emperor is buck naked and therefore incompetent. No beltway nabob will ever admit that Rush was right - that the President is an Alinsky Marxist implementing a Cloward/Piven coup to transform Uncle Sam into a tranny with an “I ♥ Antonio Gramsci” tramp-stamp emblazoned above her hot pants. The truth is that leading Republicans and “conservative” journalists know that this president is not incompetent. They even know “what” he’s doing and “why,” but they don’t have the guts to tell the truth. Bill Kristol, George Will, and Charles Krauthammer would rather commit ritual Seppuku than admit that Limbaugh has been right from the start. And to tell the truth now is to admit their own incompetence. So the party line will be that the President is illustrative of the Peter Principle. He isn’t following a recipe that he once taught to ACORN operatives out of Rules for Radicals, he’s merely “Jimmy Carter’s second term.” Even my guy, the great Ted Cruz, on the Kelly File the other night, called Barack Obama “An absentee President,” who is not focused on the people “who are paying the cost for his failed policies.” Sorry Ted, but that’s hogwash and you know it. Maybe Senator Cruz has determined that the truth won’t sell or that Democrats will use that kind of rhetoric to their advantage, but wouldn’t it be refreshing to have a voice or a pen that communicated with the same clarity that Thomas Jefferson did against George III? Obama is purposely destroying the American way of life. He is not governing, he’s ruling by sabotage. He doesn’t respect the Constitution, he flanks it. He doesn’t revere our Institutions, he batters them. And just because he’s golfing, clubbing, and playing pool doesn’t mean that he’s failed and incompetent any more than Al Capone getting a manicure or a lap dance meant that he was distracted from ruthlessly ruling and expanding his influence. “The whole aim of practical politics,” said H.L. Mencken, “is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” Obamacare was destined to fail from the start because it was meant to issue in “single payer.” Run guns to Mexican cartels to foment a backlash here against the 2nd Amendment. Create chaos at the border to get amnesty. Gin up Global Warming hysteria to take control of energy. The goal is to control every aspect of American life and they are well on their way without nearly a peep out of the opposition party or the lapdog press. As a friend wrote to me this week, “I don’t think Obama has ever really worked a day in his life. He’s the spoiled child of an unstable single mother who, along with his grandparents, pampered him. He is a white boy who made it through the ranks of the radicals because of his dark skin and Good-time Charlie attitude. He is where he is because the Alinsky radicals knew they had The Guy for the job even if it meant they would do all the work. So yes, his actions are deliberate even if he is just the pretty face whose rhetoric distracts the sheep while his more competent policy makers prepare the slaughter.” Ezekiel, a prophet of Israel, once described a true leader as a “Watchman on the wall.” His description was of a sentry manning a post on a wall of a fortified city whose one job was to watch the horizon and if he saw trouble approaching, to blow his shofar. If he alerted the people and they didn’t respond, their blood was on their own hands, but if he didn’t blow the alarm then the people’s blood would be on his hands. Back in 2009, while George Will was hosting Mr. Obama at an off the record soiree and handing out finger sandwiches to fellow “conservatives” - Peggy Noonan, Charles Krauthammer, Rich Lowry, Paul Gigot, David Brooks, Larry Kudlow and Michael Barone, Rush Limbaugh was blowing the shofar. When Limbaugh wished that this president failed, he meant that he hoped that he failed in carrying out his sabotage of the last bastion of freedom on planet earth. Incompetence may only be negligence but sabotage is treasonous. Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, and Sarah Palin are the lone voices of truth calling this what it truly is – a conscious, premeditated, well-organized coup. And they act as Maximus calling out the treachery of Commodus but in this case there isn’t even a single Senator with the brass to join them. I have long thought that there would be a group of generals and admirals who have been summarily purged from the Pentagon who would stand up for freedom. I was wrong. Sharpen your pitchforks, it’s up to us. www.pennypressnv.com THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 10 Commentary: Al Thomas PERCENT people are being forced to try to pick winners in the stock market. Folks, I have been trading for decades and I will tell you it is NOT Many months ago I wrote to my subscribers that I felt that the DOW easy to pick winners. Furthermore, stay away from mutual funds unless 17000 was the objective for the stock market move. Well, here we are. you check out what that fund did in 2008. The “experts” in Washington and about 98% of economists think the Professional traders know the secret of the market. It isn’t buying; it is economy is in good shape which means the stock market will go higher. knowing when to SELL. Without an exit strategy the investor will never Maybe. They don’t say how much higher, of course. If you have read my make money in the stock market. book you know what I think of the ‘98%’. Every broker will say you can’t time the market. That is a flat out lie. The government is reporting unemployment at 6.1%. The real number You better learn or you will die broke. is about 13%, probably more that now includes a huge number of part The stock market is being forced up. This is the magician who wants timers. you to watch his right hand while he manipulates what is really happening Those same geniuses say inflation is only about 2%. The shadow with his left. The investor must keep an eye on his money. number is 6%. Geeze, how do they get 2%? Oh, they left out food and The best way to do that is with an Open Stop Loss Order. You will energy. Forget the cost of gas for your vehicle and electricity for your need to determine how much risk you are willing to take - 10% - 15% home or business. - 20%. When your equity drops to that level you don’t want to hit the But don’t worry. Janet Yellin (you remember her, the head of the snooze button. You want to run for the exit with your money. Federal Reserve) says, “I am creating extra money for everyone. I just turn AL THOMAS the crank and another 100 million dollar bond pops out. Then I give it to Al Thomas’ book, “If It Doesn’t Go Up, Don’t Buy It!”, 3rd edition, has the banks and they loan the money to you via your company as it expands helped thousands of people make money and keep their profits with his and hires more of your neighbors.” And pigs can fly. simple 2-step method. Read the first chapter at mutualfundmagic.com and Yes, the Fed is creating new money with only paper and ink, but where discover why he’s the man that Wall Street does not want you to know. is it going? With short term Treasury Bills paying a fraction above ZERO No Time To Hit The Snooze Button THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 11 Commentary: Matt Barber Left Moves to Outlaw Christianity The mask is off. All pretense has been dropped, and the anti-Christian left’s boundless depth of hatred for individual liberty, our First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) is now on full display. I wrote last week about the Supreme Court’s recent Hobby Lobby opinion, a rather tepid acknowledgement of every American’s non-negotiable right to religious free exercise (yes, that includes Christian business owners). I observed, among other things, that “the secularist left’s utter meltdown over having but a small measure of control over others wrested away is highly instructive.” The meltdown continues. This week brings two new developments: 1) Democrats in Congress have readied a legislative “Hobby Lobby fix” that stands exactly zero chance of passing and would be struck down as unconstitutional even if it did, and 2) The ACLU, AFL-CIO, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Lambda Legal and a hodgepodge of other left-wing extremist groups have withdrawn support for the ironically tagged “Employment Non-Discrimination Act,” the crown jewel of homofascism, because the bill’s paper-thin “religious exemption” does not adequately outlaw the practice of Christianity. The Hobby Lobby ‘fix’ Addressing the high court’s Hobby Lobby decision last Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., fumed, “We have so much to do this month, but the one thing we’re going to do during this work period – sooner rather than later – is to ensure that women’s lives are not determined by virtue of five white men.” To which Justice Clarence Thomas replied, “Say what, honky?” “This Hobby Lobby decision is outrageous,” continued Reid, “and we’re going to do something about it.” Well, “do something about it” they shall try. TalkingPointsMemo.com reported on legislation Democrats introduced Thursday that would do away with religious liberty protections altogether: “The legislation will be sponsored by Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Mark Udall, D-Colo. According to a summary reviewed by TPM, it prohibits employers from refusing to provide health services, including contraception [and abortion pills], to their employees if required by federal law. It clarifies that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the basis for the Supreme Court’s ruling against the mandate, and all other federal laws don’t permit businesses to opt out of the Obamacare requirement. “The legislation also puts the kibosh on legal challenges by religious nonprofits, like Wheaton College, instead declaring that the accommodation they’re provided under the law [there is none] is sufficient to respect their religious liberties.” This reactionary response to the Hobby Lobby ruling is, of course, little more than an election year fundraising scheme for the Democratic National Committee. Withdrawn support for ENDA The Washington Post reports, “Several major gay rights groups withdrew support Tuesday for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act that would bolster gay and transgender rights in the workplace, saying they fear that broad religious exemptions included in the current bill might compel private companies to begin citing objections similar to those that prevailed in a U.S. Supreme Court case last week. … “But the groups said they can no longer back ENDA as currently written in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last week to strike down a key part of President Obama’s health-care law. The court ruled that family-owned businesses do not have to offer their employees contraceptive coverage that conflicts with the owners’ religious beliefs,” concluded the Post. Gary Glenn is a candidate for the Michigan State House. He’s also president of AFA Michigan. Glenn has been a national leader in defense of religious liberty for well upon two decades. In an email, Glenn wrote, “The extremely limited religious exemptions typically included in discriminatory homosexual and crossdressing ‘rights’ laws have always been mere window-dressing with no real protection or effect, as witnessed by the ongoing persecution and discrimination under such laws against Christian business owners and community organizations such as the Boy Scouts, Catholic Charities, Salvation Army, and even the United Way. “But now that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision threatens to give real teeth to such exemptions, the AFL-CIO’s in-house homosexual activist group has announced it will no longer support discriminatory ‘sexual orientation’ legislation that includes even limited exemptions for religious institutions. “If this zero tolerance stance spreads to larger groups such as the Human Rights Campaign and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force [it now has], this could become the sticking point which hamstrings future attempts to pass federal, state, and local homosexual ‘rights’ legislation. These supposed religious exemptions, which the AFL-CIO’s homosexual lobby at least now says it will no longer support, have been a key propaganda point in blunting the opposition of churches and citizens concerned about the obvious threat such laws pose to religious freedom.” According to its leftist proponents, ENDA would merely insulate people who choose to engage in homosexual conduct (sexual orientation) or those who suffer from gender confusion (gender identity) against employment intolerance. In truth, however, this legislation effectively would codify the very thing it purports to combat: workplace discrimination. Though in its current form ENDA contains an extremely weak religious exemption that might – and I mean might – partially protect some churches and religious organizations (until they’re sued by “gay” activists), this so-called exemption would leave most others, such as Bible bookstores and many Christian schools and para-church organizations, entirely unprotected. It would additionally crush individual business owners’ guaranteed First Amendment rights. Any “religious exemption” is meaningless. Last year Harry Reid promised homosexual pressure groups that Democrats would remove all protections for Christians and other people of faith on the flipside – after ENDA passed. The homosexual news site Washington Blade reported that homosexual activist Derek Washington of “GetEqual” confirmed Reid’s promise. In a conference call with homosexual activists, Washington admitted that Reid vowed, as goes any religious exemption, “the main thing to do was get the vote taken care of, and then deal with it later. As oftentimes happens, you don’t get something perfect the first time around, you go back and fix it later, so that was basically his take on it.” According to the Blade, “That account was corroborated by Faiz Shakir, a Reid spokesperson, who said the Democratic leader understands the concerns, but wants to get the bill passed first, then go back and address the exemptions.” They’ve stopped pretending, folks. This is about criminalizing Christianity. The Hobby Lobby decision has merely made secular liberals forget themselves momentarily. It’s blown back the propagandist curtain to expose their truly sinister aims. Hobby Lobby hasn’t put the “culture war” to rest. It’s taken a gavel to the “progressive” hornets’ nest. Break out the popcorn and Jujubes. It’s about to get interesting. MATT BARBER Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber). www.pennypressnv.com THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 12 Call toll-free: 1-800-950-1603 Price r i e Th rice P r u O Bottle A Manufactured By PfizerTM. CelebrexTM $568.87 Celecoxib* $62.00 Bottle B Manufactured By Generics Manufacturers Typical US brand price for 200mg x 100 Generic equivalent of CelebrexTM Generic price for 200mg x 100 Are You Still Paying Too Much For Your Medications? You can save up to 75% when you fill your prescriptions with our Canadian and International prescription service. NexiumTM $726.32 ActonelTM $424.64 Typical US Brand Price for 40mg x 100 Typical US Brand Price for 35mg x 12 Esomeprazole* $79.00 AdvairTM $849.43 Risedronate* EvistaTM $630.76 VS Generic Price for 40mg x 100 VS Generic Price for 35mg x 12 $43.00 Typical US Brand Price for 250-50 mcg x 180 doses Typical US Brand Price for 60mg x 100 Salmeterol & Fluticasone Propionate* VS Generic Price for 50/250mcg x 180 doses $151.00 Raloxifene* $74.00 VS Generic Price for 60mg x 100 Compare our prices and see how much you can save! For more prices call us toll-free at 1-800-950-1603. Save more today with an extra $10 off & free shipping! Get An Extra $10 And OFF FREE SHIPPING Get an extra $10 off your first order today! Call the number below and save an additional $10 plus get free shipping on your first order with Canada Drug Center. Expires June 30, 2014. Offer is valid for prescription orders only and can not be used in conjunction with any other offers. Valid for new customers only. One time use per household. Use code 10FREE to receive this special offer. Order Now! Toll-free: 1-800-950-1603 Please note that we do not carry controlled substances and a valid prescription is required for all prescription medication orders. Prescription price comparison above is valid as of November 1, 2013. All trade-mark (TM) rights associated with the brand name products in this ad belong to their respective owners. *Generic drugs are carefully regulated medications that have the same active ingredients as the original brand name drug, but are generally cheaper in price. Generic equivalents are equal to their "brand" counterparts in Active Ingredients, Dosage, Safety, Strength, Quality, Performance and Intended use. It may vary in colour, shape, size, cost and appearance. THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 13 if you could save 28% on car insurance … * why wouldn’t you? See how much you could save at 1-800-793-2490. *National average annual savings based on data from customers who reported savings by switching to Esurance between 12/1/11 and 4/30/12. © 2012 Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. All rights reserved. CA License #0G87829 THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 14 Commentary: Chuck Muth Crony Crapitalist-opoly: Where the Odds are Stacked Against the Little Guy The beloved board game Monopoly has spawned all manner of themed spinoffs. There’s Dog-opoly, Chocolate-opoly, KISS-opoly, Muppetopoly, Elvis-opoly and even Las Vegas-opoly. There isn’t yet a Nevada-opoly, but if there was, the rules of the game would have to be changed significantly to be realistic. First, there would be two competing businesses. Biz #1 would own Boardwalk and Park Place and have a hotel/casino on each space. Every other property would be owned by Biz #2, with just one little neighborhood tavern on each space. Naturally, the Government would control all of the Railroads and Utilities and also serve as the Banker and Jailer. Forget the dice. When it’s their turn, the players would simply announce how many spaces, between 2 and 12, they wish to advance. Biz #1 and Biz #2 would offer incentives to get the players to visit one of their properties. When they do, the player spends the listed amount while on that space. Now a player with a lot of cash might be enticed to go to a Biz #1 property in return for dinner for two and a show. Players with less cash would likely settle for patronizing Biz #2 properties for nothing more than convenience and an occasional free drink for playing the video poker machines. Different strokes for different strokes. Free market competition. But here’s the twist. Let’s say a lot people like to go to Biz #2 properties and Biz #1 doesn’t like having the competition. So in the middle of the game Biz #1 goes to the Government and gets the Government to force Biz #2 to retroactively make major operational changes and expensive upgrades to its properties. To make matters worse, after Biz #2 completes the forced upgrades, let’s say Biz #1 comes back to the Government and demands that Biz #2 be forced to make even MORE expensive upgrades and redesigns. A neverending competitor-inspired/government-imposed business nightmare. Unfortunately, this isn’t a game. It’s exactly what’s been going on the last couple of years - with Station Casinos being Biz #1 and Dotty’s Neighborhood Taverns being Biz #2. Dotty’s is a great Nevada business success story. In 1995, founder Craig Estey opened six Dotty’s neighborhood taverns in Nevada. At the time, all the so-called experts predicted his business model would fail. Instead, Dotty’s took off, and now has dozens of locations all across the state. So in 2011, Stations and other Big Gaming operators started agitating state and local governments to screw with Dotty’s successful business model and inhibit the small business’s ability to expand and compete profitably. Outrageous, real-life crony capitalism. Oh, and get ready to play the newest spin-off version: Taxi-opoly. In this game, the Government will team up with the state’s taxicab industry to crush ride-sharing competitors such as Uber and Lyft. CHUCK MUTH (Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach, a conservative grassroots advocacy organization. He can be reached at www.MuthsTruths.com) Every week in Nevada, someone is trying to screw us. Most of the time, we elected that someone. That's why we conservatives NEED a WEEKLY voice. That's why the Penny Press has made sticking up for us little guys a whole new Nevada tradition. Penny Press 775-461-1515 eFax 201-304-0355 [email protected] pennypressnv.com THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 15 Sparks Reno Carson City www.LaMejorReno.com THE PENNY PRESS,JULY 17, 2014 PAGE 16 E V SA % * 0 2 SEND BOUQUETS FOR ANY OCCASION anniversary | birthday | just because Hurry! Order now for unbelievable low prices, with flowers from $19.99 +s/h Visit www.ProFlowers.com/Laugh or call 800.418.1058 Join Over 12 Million People Who Have Found a Better Way to Send Flowers *20% off discount will appear upon checkout. Minimum purchase of $29.00. Does not apply to gift cards or certificates, same-day or international delivery, shipping and handling, taxes, or third-party hosted products (e.g. wine) and cannot be combined with other offers or discounts. Discounts not valid on bulk or corporate purchases of 10 units or more. Offer expires: 6/30/14.