Background - Department of Environmental Quality

Transcription

June 27, 2014
Ms. Katie Robertson
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
700 SE Emigrant, Suite 330
Pendleton, Oregon 97801
Re:
Vapor Mitigation Assessment: Sagene Building
Former Foreman’s Cleaners Site
15219 Sitkum Lane
Salem, Oregon
15780-00/Task 6
Dear Ms. Robertson:
This letter documents our design, installation, testing, and assessment of a sub-slab vapor mitigation
approach at the former Foreman’s Cleaners site. All work was completed in general accordance with
our February 26, 2014, Budget and Assumption Proposal and completed for the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) under Environmental Services Task Order 22-13-6.
Background
The former Foreman’s Cleaners site is located at 1070 Commercial Street SE in Salem, Oregon
(Figure 1). There are no structures on the site property. Neighboring properties to the south include a
Dutch Brothers Coffee drive-through kiosk and Wings of the Soul bookstore (Figure 2). Several
businesses occupy the 6,570-square-foot Sagene commercial building to the north (ESCI #4389),
including Complete Alterations and AAA Service Metro, Inc. The eastern portion of the Sagene building
is unoccupied storage. The property and associated building north of the Sagene property is occupied
by 1 Day Signs. An alley divides the city block, extending north from Owens Street SE, along the eastern
property boundary, to Bush Street SE. The residential Bayberry Apartment complex is immediately east
of the property on the other side of the alley.
The site property was a dry cleaning establishment from approximately 1936 to 2000. Dry cleaning
operations used Stoddard solvent (a petroleum solvent) between 1936 and the mid-1980s, after which
tetrachloroethene (PCE) was used as the dry cleaning solvent. In 1997, environmental activities
identified Stoddard solvent, PCE, and their respective degradation byproducts in the soil and
groundwater on the site. Since the initial site investigation, multiple environmental investigations have
taken place to address the source of contamination and to assess the extent and magnitude of
contamination. This includes the removal of underground storage tanks on the site and environmental
assessment of adjacent properties, primarily the Sagene property.
8910 SW Gemini Drive
Beaverton, OR 97008-7123
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 2
In October 2013, Hart Crowser conducted a Focused Remedial Investigation (RI) to update our
understanding of both groundwater and vapor concentrations across the Locality of the Facility (LOF).
The RI included collecting nine groundwater samples from site wells; six soil gas samples; two sub-slab
vapor samples under the Sagene building; two indoor ambient air samples inside the Sagene building;
and one outdoor ambient air sample. Continuous differential pressure sampling was conducted
between the two indoor air sampling locations and the outdoor atmosphere. Results detected PCE and
trichloroethene (TCE) in indoor air above applicable occupational risk-based concentrations (RBCs) in
the AAA Cleaning space. TCE was also above its occupational soil gas RBC in a soil gas sample south of
the Sagene building. While the three businesses along the west side of the Sagene building have had
their HVAC systems upgraded to improve fresh-air exchange, the AAA Cleaning space does not
currently have any fresh air exchange. Slight negative differential pressures observed in the AAA
Cleaning space may be inducing vapor migration into the space. All historical vapor sample locations
are presented on Figure 2.
Sub-Slab Test Design
The primary goal of this assessment was to determine if a simple sub-slab depressurization system,
located approximately in the middle of the Sagene Building, could be effective in mitigating vapor
intrusion risk broadly across potentially impacted commercial spaces. The western portion of the
current AAA Cleaning space was selected as the test location based on vapor intrusion risk in the
eastern portion of the AAA Cleaning space and proximity to Complete Alterations, where prior
investigations have shown elevated risks. Since the AAA Cleaning space is not continuously staffed, the
test would cause minimal disturbance to the business.
To assess the propagation of vacuum within the 3- to 4-inch thick base course under the Sagene
building, three permeant sub-slab vapor points were installed on March 24, 2013. These points are
identified as PV-1, PV-2, and PV-3 (Figure 3). AMS Incorporated (American Falls, Idaho) manufactured
the stainless steel, flush-mounted, and tamper-resistant hardware, consisting of a 2-inch-diameter
counter sink plate installed to be flush with the concrete slab. The penetrating point included a
0.4-inch by 3.0-inch screen attached to a 0.25-inch diameter, internally threaded casing that receives
the plate. The screen was installed just below the bottom of the slab and within the base course. The
system was sealed using a 1-inch diameter rubber stopper and approximately three inches of concrete.
Geotechnical hole reports were filed with the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) and are
included in Attachment A.
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 3
The temporary vapor extraction point consisted of a
temporarily installed, 4-inch-diameter, perforated PVC pipe
penetrating the slab, through the base course and
underlying silty soil for structural stability. The riser was
then split to permit single- or double-radon fan operation.
Piping below the fans was installed on March 24, 2014, to
permit time for the seal between the pipe and the slab to
set. During the initial depressurization testing, the system
was configured for operation using a single fan (Photograph
1, right). A radon fan was then attached in-line. Rigid
Photograph 1 – Single fan test configuration
polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipe was temporarily assembled on
the exhaust side of the fan to promote linear air flow. This PVC exhaust was sealed with tape to a
flexible polyethylene (PE) discharge line, which was run into the adjacent bathroom where a ventilation
fan operated continuously to exhaust vapors to the outside air. All PVC/fan joints were snugly seated
and coated with a layer of food-grade silicone grease to prevent air leakage.
Following the initial testing, a second radon fan was installed
onto the riser to provide additional vacuum for sub-slab
depressurization (Photograph 2, right). This reconfigured
system placed the two fans in parallel with a single exhaust
for maximum effectiveness. Similar to the single fan
configuration, the combined PVC exhaust manifold was
connected to a flexible PE discharge line and placed into the
bathroom so vapors could be vented to the outside air.
Following testing, the piping was removed, the hole in the
slab patched with concrete, and the carpet glued back down.
To measure pressure changes during the testing process,
each new permanent sub-slab vapor point was connected to a
PT2X-BV absolute barometric pressure sensor, manufactured
by Instrumentation Northwest (Kenmore, Washington).
These are the same model of sensors used during the initial
differential pressure assessment conducted during the RI.
Air-tight communication between each sensor and sub-slab
air was achieved using the removable, stainless steel vapor
sample barb included in the AMS installation kit, rigid PE
tubing, and flexible connection using silicone tubing
(Photograph 3, right). Spans of silicone tubing without rigid
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
Photograph 2 – Dual fan test configuration
Picture 3 – Pressure sensor installation
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 4
backing (e.g., sample barbs or PE tubing) were de minimus to ensure that mechanic deflection didn’t
mute vacuum responses to the sensor.
Baseline Sub-Slab Vapor Sampling
Prior to conducting the sub-slab depressurization test,
vapor samples were collected from each of the new
permanent vapor sampling points. Each new point was
allowed to set for more than 36 hours to permit time for
the new concrete to setup properly and for vapors to reequilibrate. Samples were collected on March 26, 2014,
using a batch-certified 1-liter SIM canister, new Teflon®
tubing, and new silicone tubing (Picture 4, right). The
sampling train and vapor was purged of approximately
500 milliliters of air using a peristaltic pump prior to
sample collection. During purging and sample collection,
Picture 4 – Sub-slab vapor sampling
the point and sample train joints were covered with cloths
saturated with 2-propanol to serve as leak detection. Samples were collected over the course of
approximately 15 minutes using a laboratory-supplied, dedicated flow controller.
SIM canisters were provided and chemical analyses were performed by ESC Lab Sciences (Mt. Juliet,
Tennessee). The samples were analyzed for short list VOCs, including: PCE; TCE; cis-1,2-, trans-1,2-,
and 1,1-dichloroethene (DCE); and vinyl chloride by EPA Method TO-15. As leak testing was performed
using 2-propanol, this compound was also included in the analytical suite. Current and historical vapor
analytical results are presented in Table 1. The analytical laboratory report for the March 2014
sampling is provided in Attachment B. An assessment of the data is provided below.
Slab Crack and HVAC Survey
For a single depressurization point to be effective in influencing vapor contamination movement
broadly across the Sagene building, the slab must be reasonably contiguous and the base fill free of
blockage. To the extent practicable, Hart Crowser conducted a visual survey of slab integrity from the
hallway to the west side of the building, or the area of potential vapor intrusion risk (Figure 4). The
survey’s accuracy is uncertain due to many areas having either glued carpet or hardwood floors.
However, we were able to note that electrical and gas are conveyed across the roof and through wall,
limiting the number of concrete slab penetrations. The hallway and adjacent storage space had an
asphalt finish level with the concrete slab, suggesting this portion of the building may be an addition
and not part of the original slab pour. We inquired with the maintenance manager and owner, and
neither had as-built drawings for the building that might show potential presence of load-bearing
footers that would subdivide the continuity of the base fill.
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 5
Our survey confirmed a minimum of five slab penetrations,
including four toilets (which are required to be sealed by a
base flange to prevent sewer gas entry) and one floor drain
in The Printing Company bathroom (Photograph 5). We
were not able to observe how sink water in the bathrooms
discharged as effluent pipes ran into the walls.
Some minor cracks in the concrete slab were observed in the
unfinished backroom of The Printing Company, the only
Photograph 5 – The Printing Company bathroom
concrete slab area without carpet or hardwood flooring
(Photograph 6). Although the observed cracks were only on
the order of one to two millimeters in width and filled with fine
debris, it is reasonable to assume that this type of minor
cracking is present throughout the Sagene building.
The observed HVAC system layout is also presented on Figure
4, along with major air unit subdivisions including walls and
sealable doors and areas influenced by air exchange. Both The
Printing Company and Kfe Microsystems have complete, roofmounted HVAC systems with fresh air intakes. According to
the site maintenance supervisor, the HVAC exchanges
approximately 30 percent fresh air during operation.
Photograph 6 – The Printing Company
Complete Alterations uses wall-mounted air conditioning with
slab crack
a separate fresh air exchange (recirculation) unit. While two
vents are present in the AAA Cleaning space, the site maintenance supervisor indicated that the space
has been blocked off from the roof-mounted HVAC system due to difficulties in balancing temperatures
with Kfe Microsystems. Since the AAA Cleaning space is only sporadically occupied, wall-mounted
electrical heaters supply partial climate control. There is no fresh air exchange in the AAA Cleaning
space, and there is neither fresh air exchange or climate control in the hallway or storage areas.
Depressurization Testing
Depressurization testing was conducted in three phases, extending from 11:50 on March 26, 2014,
through 11:50 on March 27, 2014. Following vapor sampling of the three new permanent vapor points
on March 26, 2014, the absolute pressure transducers were sealed to be in direct communication with
sub-slab air pressure. Dataloggers were programed to have synchronous time and capture instant
pressure readings for all three sensors every 10 seconds. The depressurization system was then
activated at 11:25 on March 26, 2014 using a single radon fan. The first phase of testing ended later
that afternoon at 12:30. After reviewing the pressure data in the field, it was evident that a single fan
configuration was not successful in influencing vacuum across to the two distal vapor points. PV-2,
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 6
located closest to the extraction point (4 feet), indicated a 0.30 inch water drop in pressure. No
appreciable pressure change was noted in PV-1 or PV-3. These data are not presented in favor of the
higher density testing described below.
The depressurization system was then reconfigured for dual-fan operation and the test resumed at
14:10 on March 26, 2014. The two fans operated in parallel until 15:15 on March 26, 2014. Results
were similar to prior observations, with no appreciable pressure change noted at the two distal vapor
points. However, PV-2 did record a 0.41 inch of water pressure drop. Because of constant but minute
atmospheric fluctuations in air pressure (i.e., pressure “noise”) and the 10-second recording interval, it
was difficult to determine in the field if even a very small and temporary pressure shift could be noted
in distal PV-1 and PV-3. There was also the possibility that depressurization would need to occur for a
several hours prior to observing changes. As a result, the interval was shortened and a new set of tests
was run overnight.
After field reviewing the second test, the dataloggers were reprogrammed to record data every second
and the two-fan configuration was restarted at 17:05 on March 26, 2014. As presented on Figure 5, an
immediate response was noted in PV-2 and no discernable response was noted in PV-1 and PV-3. To
assess longer term changes to sub-slab pressures, the recording frequency was increased to every five
seconds beginning at 17:30 and the fans were allowed to run through the night. Overnight data is
plotted on Figure 6. Upon return to the site on March 27, 2014, the dataloggers were reprogrammed
again for a 1-second recording interval at 11:50 without interrupting system depressurization. During
this period, an effluent vapor sample was collected from the system for any future vapor discharge
considerations. The sample was collected after continuous operation lasting approximately 16.5 hours.
The fans were then turned off at 12:23 on March 27, 2014. Pressure rebound monitoring is presented
on Figure 7. As previously observed, only PV-2 demonstrated a measureable response.
On Figures 5 through 7, recorded sub-slab pressures were standardized to account for individual
differences between the sensors. To accomplish this, all three time-synchronized sensors were run
side-by-side for 100 readings, collected at a five second interval, both before and following
deployment. These readings were then averaged and two of the sensors’ data was adjusted to account
for the minor differences relative to the third sensor. Comparison of the non-pumping readings shows
lower pressure at PV-3, suggesting ambient sub-slab pressure under Complete Alterations is lower than
under AAA Cleaning. The cause for this small background pressure difference is not readily apparent.
Data Assessment
This data assessment includes evaluation of ambient sub-slab vapor and depressurization exhaust
concentrations data and depressurization responses. Vapor data are presented in Table 1. Laboratory
reports are included as Attachment B. Upon a quality assurance review of the data, no data quality
issues were identified and the data were deemed suitable for its intended purpose.
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 7
Vapor Data Assessment
Three sub-slab vapor samples and one depressurization exhaust sample were collected during this
study (Figure 3). PV-1 was installed in the eastern portion of the AAA Cleaning space at a location very
close to the prior temporary sub-slab sample point, SSV-2. Results are very similar October 2013 data,
suggesting limited seasonal variability in sub-slab concentrations between peak dry-season and near
peak wet-season monitoring events in this portion of the building.
PV-2, collected in the western portion of the AAA Cleaning space and adjacent to the temporary
depressurization system, contained the highest concentrations of chlorinated volatile organic
compounds (cVOCs) of the three permanent points. PCE was detected at 7,500 micrograms per cubic
meter (µg/m3), TCE at 640 µg/m3, cis-1,2-DCE at 130 µg/m3, and even trans-1,2-DCE at 9.1 µg/m3. The
concentrations were generally consistent with the depressurization system outflow values, especially
PCE (8,100 µg/m3). Worth noting, the concentration of cis-1,2-DCE (310 µg/m3) was appreciably higher
while TCE (350 µg/m3) was appreciably lower after approximately 24 hours of system operation.
Soil gas concentrations under Complete Alterations (PV-3) were well below what was anticipated based
on soil gas SV-3 collected during the RI in October 2013. PCE was detected at 2,900 µg/m3 in PV-3
whereas SV-3, collected just outside (south) of Complete Alterations, contained 29,000 µg/m3 in soil
gas at a depth of 3 feet below ground surface. This difference may be due to factors including depth,
potential breakthrough of ambient air, seasonal variations, and distance between sample locations.
Analysis of 2-propanol in each of the new permanent points yielded concentrations with less than
5 percent leakage (not tabulated). PV-1 was non-detect for 2-propanol. PV-2 contained 320 µg/m3,
and PV-3 contained 6,100 µg/m3. While the value from PV-3 is elevated, this concentration represents
an acceptable amount of breakthrough, and the data are considered valid.
Depressurization Assessment
The depressurization test did not provide data supporting the ability of a centralized extraction system
to effect vacuum across broad portions of the Sagene building. Measurable and immediate pressure
response was only noted in PV-2, which is located approximately 4 feet away from the extraction point.
At this distance, even a single fan would be sufficient to mitigate vapor intrusion risk in the area of
highest apparent concentration.
Both PV-1, located approximate 25 feet from the extraction point, and PV-2, located approximately
35 feet from the extraction point, failed to yield any short-term response to either single or double fan
operation. However, dual fan depressurization did result in sub-slab pressures appreciably lower in
PV-2 than either PV-1 or PV-3, confirming that a pressure gradient was effectively established. While
not compelling, the magnitude of the pressure difference between PV-2 (AAA Cleaning West) and PV-3
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 8
(Complete Alterations) declined gradually with overnight operation of the depressurization system.
This may be due external factors including barometric pressure changes or HVAC operation.
It is unclear why the three vapor points displayed different ambient pressures, even after accounting
for small variations between sensors. As shown on Figure 6, there appeared to be a common overall
pressure influence and/or communication between the points based on short-term pressure changes
occurring across all three sensors simultaneously.
This test was completed with a depressurization cross-section of approximately 50 square inches. A
future depressurization trench, measure 1-foot by 5-foot by 4-inch base coarse thickness would
provide approximately 2,880 square inches of area to effect vacuum across. This increased area may
improve the immediate influence of a mitigation system across portions of the Sagene building.
Conclusions
The March 2014 Sagene depressurization work yielded important information for any future vapor
mitigation design and implementation.
Depressurization testing captured elevated concentrations of cVOCs that were higher than
were present under ambient conditions at either PV-1 or PV-3, which are located approximately 25 and
35 feet away from the extraction point, respectively.

The western portion of the AAA Cleaning space is the most appropriate area to install a vapor
mitigation system based on sub-slab and vapor effluent sampling results.

The small, temporary, sump style depressurization configuration effectively lowered sub-slab
pressures in the immediate vicinity of the sump (i.e., PV-2), potentially creating a gradient to move
vapors.

A sump-style extraction system may not be effective in capturing vapors across most of the
Sagene building. Continuous operation and/or a trench style depressurization design may have a more
measurable effect on pressures.

A limited number of cracks and slab penetrations are noted, potentially allowing a sufficiently
sized system to be effective.

Any final system design should include vapor modeling and potential treatment of
depressurization effluent (e.g., activated carbon capture) based on the proximity of fresh-air intakes at
the Sagene building and nearby residents.

Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
June 27, 2014
15780-00/Task 6
Page 9
Limitations
Work performed by Hart Crowser for this project and in preparation of this letter was conducted in
accordance with generally accepted professional practices in the same or similar localities, related to
the nature of the work accomplished at the time our services were performed. This letter is for specific
application to the referenced project and for the exclusive use of the DEQ. No other warranty, express
or implied, is made. If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
HART CROWSER, INC.
CHRISTOPHER W. MARTIN, PE
RICHARD D. ERNST, RG
Project Engineer
Program Manager
Attachments
Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – Exploration Plan
Figure 3 – Building Layout
Figure 4 – HVAC Components and Slab Crack Survey
Figure 5 – Permanent Points Pressure Plot – March 2014
Attachment A – Geotechnical Hole Reports
Attachment B – Analytical Report
Cc: Steve Campbell, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (w/o Attachments)
Fax 503.620.6918
Tel 503.620.7284
JAB 06/19/14
F:\Data\Jobs\DEQ\15780-00 Foreman's Cleaners\Task 6 - Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment and Report\Figures\15780006-001 (Site Location).dwg
Project Site
New Monitoring Well(s)
New Dewatering Well
Previously Identified Beneficial Use Well(s)
0
2,000
4,000
Scale in Feet
Foreman's Cleaner's Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment
Portland
Salem, Oregon
Salem
Site Location Map
N
15780-00/Task 6
6/14
Figure
Source:
1
Carports
1 Day Signs
Carport (Lower Level)
Business Suites (Upper Level)
Parking Lot
SV-1
GW-01
(SV-01)
Approximate Property
Line Location
Complete
Alterations
GW-02
(SV-02)
MW-3
GW-03
SSV-2
PV-1
IA-1
Hallway
AAA
Outflow 1
Cleaning
PV-2 ServiceKfe Microsystems,
Metro, Inc.
Inc.
PV-3
(Indoor)
Storage
SSV-1
DEQ-7S
IA-2
DEQ-2D
(Indoor)
SV-4
GP-21/DEQ-5S
Bayberry Apartments
The Printing
Company
Awning
Former USTs
SV-3
Extent of IRAM Soil Excavation
MW-2
Former
Foreman’s
Cleaners
DEQ-3D
A-1
(Outdoor)
SV-2
GP-22/
DEQ-6S
Alley
Former Drywell
Location
SV-6
Underground Sanitary
Sewer Line
MW-1
GP-23
Former UST
Wings of
the Soul
Dutch
Brothers
Coffee
Commercial Street SE
F:\Data\Jobs\DEQ\15780-00 Foreman's Cleaners\Task 6 - Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment and Report\Figures\15780006-002 (Exploration Plan).cdr
SV-5
Bayberry Apartments
DEQ-4D
Clinic
Porch
DEQ-1D
(Abandoned)
Owens Street SE
Exploration Location and Number:
MW-1
Shallow Groundwater Monitoring Well (1999)
DEQ-5S
Shallow Groundwater Monitoring Well (12/00)
DEQ-3D
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well (12/00)
GW-01
(SV-01)
A-1
SSV-2
Push Probe GW Sample (5/07)
Soil Vapor Sample (5/07)
Ambient Air Sample (10/13)
40
80
N
Approximate Scale in Feet
Foreman’s Cleaners Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment
Salem, Oregon
Sub-Slab Vapor Sample (10/13)
SV-2
PV-1
Permanent Soil Vapor Sample (3/14)
Outflow 1
0
Temporary Extraction System Location (3/14)
Source: Base map prepared from a Site Plan by EnviroLogic Resources, Inc.
and a site survey by Udell Engineering and Surveying.
Exploration and Sample Plan
15780-00/Task 6
6/14
Figure
2
Carports
1 Day Signs
Parking Lot
SV-1
The Printing
Company
Outflow 1
PV-2
Storage
IA-1
(Indoor)
PV-3
Alley
F:\Data\Jobs\DEQ\15780-00 Foreman's Cleaners\Task 6 - Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment and Report\Figures\15780006-003 (Building).cdr
SSV-2
PV-1
AAA
Cleaning
ServiceMetro, Inc.
Hallway
Kfe
Microsystems,
Inc.
SSV-1
Complete
Alterations
IA-2
(Indoor)
DEQ-2D
GW-03
GP-21/DEQ-5S
SV-4
Former USTs
Awning
Line Location
SV-3
Former
Foreman’s
Cleaners
SV-5
MW-2
0
DEQ-3D
20
40
Exploration Location and Number:
MW-1
Shallow Groundwater Monitoring Well (1999)
DEQ-5S
Shallow Groundwater Monitoring Well (12/00)
DEQ-3D
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well (12/00)
GW-01
(SV-01)
A-1
SSV-2
Push Probe GW Sample (5/07)
Source: Base map prepared from a Site Plan by
EnviroLogic Resources, Inc. and a site survey by
Udell Engineering and Surveying.
Salem, Oregon
Ambient Air Sample (10/13)
Building Layout
Sub-Slab Vapor Sample (10/13)
SV-2
PV-1
Permanent Soil Vapor Sample (3/14)
Outflow 1
N
Temporary Extraction System Location (3/14)
15780-00/Task 6
6/14
Figure
3
Carports
1 Day Signs
Parking Lot
Small Cracks in
Concrete Floor
V
Low Spot with Crack
in Asphalt
V
The Printing
Company
A
V
V
V
V
F
V A
Crack in Asphalt
Kfe
Microsystems,
Inc.
AAA
Cleaning
ServiceMetro, Inc.
V
Hallway
V
V
D
V
Storage
WH
WH
Alley
F:\Data\Jobs\DEQ\15780-00 Foreman's Cleaners\Task 6 - Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment and Report\Figures\15780006-004 (HVAC).cdr
F
F
V
F
Complete
Alterations
Wall AC Unit
Wall Recirculation Unit
WH
Former USTs
Awning
Line Location
Former
Foreman’s
Cleaners
0
20
40
N
Source: Base map prepared from a Site Plan by
EnviroLogic Resources, Inc. and a site survey by
Udell Engineering and Surveying.
Single/Double Door Enclosing Indoor Air Unit
F
Ceiling Fan
V
Vent
WH
Wall Heater
A
Return Air
D
Floor Drain
Salem, Oregon
HVAC Components and Slab Crack Survey
15780-00/Task 6
6/14
Figure
4
tjf 06/24/14 F:\Data\Jobs\DEQ\15780-00 Foreman's Cleaners\Task 6 - Vapor Mitigation Design Assessment and Report\Pressure Data\Pressure Data and Figures.xls
33.32
Note: Black line through data is 5-second rolling
pressure average.
33.31
Turned Fans On at 17:05
Pressure (Feet of Water)
33.30
33.29
Foreman's Cleaners Groundwater Monitoring
Salem, Oregon
6/14
Figure
5
Permanent Points Pressure Plot - March 2014
15780-00/Task 6
33.28
33.27
PV-3 Pressure
PV-2 Pressure
PV-1 Pressure
33.26
16:57:22
17:01:41
17:06:00
17:10:19
17:14:38
17:18:58
17:23:17
17:27:36
pressure average.
33.65
Turned Fans Off at 12:23
PV-3 Pressure
PV-2 Pressure
33.60
PV-1 Pressure
33.55
33.50
Turned Fans On at 17:05
33.45
Salem, Oregon
6/14
Figure
6
15780-00/Task 6
33.40
33.35
33.30
33.25
15:07:12
17:31:12
19:55:12
22:19:12
0:43:12
3:07:12
5:31:12
7:55:12
10:19:12
12:43:12
15:07:12
33.62
pressure average.
Turned Fans Off at 12:23
33.61
33.60
33.59
33.58
Salem, Oregon
6/14
Figure
7
15780-00/Task 6
33.57
PV-3 Pressure
PV-2 Pressure
33.56
PV-1 Pressure
33.55
33.54
12:17:17
12:21:36
12:25:55
12:30:14
12:34:34
12:38:53
12:43:12
12:47:31
12:51:50
12:56:10
ATTACHMENT A
Geotechnical Hole Reports
15780-00/Task 6
June 27, 2014
ATTACHMENT B
Analytical Report
15780-00/Task 6
June 27, 2014
12065 Lebanon Rd.
Mt. Juliet, TN 37122
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Troy Fowler / Katie Robertson
Oregon Dept. of Env. Quality - ODEQ
700 SE Emigrant Ave., Suite 330
Pendleton, OR 97801
Report Summary
Wednesday April 09, 2014
Report Number: L690826
Samples Received: 04/02/14
Client Project: 15778-00/TASK 6
Description: DEQ - Foreman's Cleaners
The analytical results in this report are based upon information supplied
by you, the client, and are for your exclusive use. If you have any
questions regarding this data package, please do not hesitate to call.
Entire Report Reviewed By:
____________________________________
Jarred Willis , ESC Representative
Laboratory Certification Numbers
A2LA
FL NC SC MN TX -
- 1461-01, AIHA - 100789, AL - 40660, CA - 01157CA, CT - PH-0197,
E87487, GA - 923, IN - C-TN-01, KY - 90010, KYUST - 0016,
ENV375/DW21704/BIO041, ND - R-140. NJ - TN002, NJ NELAP - TN002,
84004, TN - 2006, VA - 460132, WV - 233, AZ - 0612,
047-999-395, NY - 11742, WI - 998093910, NV - TN000032011-1,
T104704245-11-3, OK - 9915, PA - 68-02979, IA Lab #364, EPA - TN002
Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held
by ESC Lab Sciences.
This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from ESC Lab Sciences.
Where applicable, sampling conducted by ESC is performed per guidance provided
in laboratory standard operating procedures: 060302, 060303, and 060304.
Page 1 of 14
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
ESC Sample # :
Date Received
Description
:
:
April
02, 2014
DEQ - Foreman's Cleaners
Sample ID
:
PV-1
Site ID
:
Project # :
Collected By
:
Collection Date :
L690826-01
15778-00/TASK 6
Jason R. Miles
03/26/14 09:03
Parameter
Volatile Organics
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
2-Propanol
1,4-Bromofluorobenzene
Cas#
75-35-4
156-59-2
156-60-5
127-18-4
79-01-6
75-01-4
67-63-0
460-00-4
Mol Wght RDL1
96.9
96.9
96.9
166
131
62.5
60.1
0.200
0.200
0.200
3.20
0.200
0.200
1.25
RDL2
ppbv
0.790
0.790
0.790
22.0
1.10
0.510
3.10
< 0.20
0.67
< 0.20
180
9.9
< 0.20
< 1.3
99.6
ug/m3
< 0.79
2.7
< 0.79
1200
53.
< 0.51
< 3.1
% Rec.
Method
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
Date
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
RDL1 = ppbv , RDL2 = ug/m3
Note:
Units are based on (STP) - Standard Temperature and Pressure
The reported analytical results relate only to the sample submitted.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval from ESC.
.
Reported: 04/09/14 11:01 Revised: 04/09/14 15:49
Page 2 of
14
Dil.
1
1
1
16
1
1
1
1
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
ESC Sample # :
Date Received
Description
:
:
April
02, 2014
Sample ID
:
PV-2
Site ID
:
Project # :
Collected By
:
Collection Date :
L690826-02
15778-00/TASK 6
Jason R. Miles
03/26/14 08:13
Parameter
Volatile Organics
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
2-Propanol
Cas#
75-35-4
156-59-2
156-60-5
127-18-4
79-01-6
75-01-4
67-63-0
460-00-4
Mol Wght RDL1
96.9
96.9
96.9
166
131
62.5
60.1
0.400
0.400
0.400
40.0
5.00
0.400
31.2
RDL2
ppbv
1.60
1.60
1.60
270.
27.0
1.00
77.0
< 0.40
34.
2.3
1100
120
< 0.40
130
95.8
ug/m3
< 1.6
130
9.1
7500
640
< 1.0
320
% Rec.
Method
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
Date
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/02/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
Note:
.
Page 3 of
14
Dil.
2
2
2
200
25
2
25
2
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
ESC Sample # :
Date Received
Description
:
:
April
02, 2014
Sample ID
:
PV-3
Site ID
:
Project # :
Collected By
:
Collection Date :
L690826-03
15778-00/TASK 6
Jason R. Miles
03/26/14 09:27
Parameter
Volatile Organics
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
2-Propanol
Cas#
75-35-4
156-59-2
156-60-5
127-18-4
79-01-6
75-01-4
67-63-0
460-00-4
Mol Wght RDL1
96.9
96.9
96.9
166
131
62.5
60.1
0.400
0.400
0.400
10.0
0.400
0.400
500.
RDL2
ppbv
1.60
1.60
1.60
68.0
2.10
1.00
1200
< 0.40
1.2
< 0.40
430
16.
< 0.40
2500
97.4
ug/m3
< 1.6
4.8
< 1.6
2900
86.
< 1.0
6100
% Rec.
Method
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
Date
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/02/14
04/01/14
Note:
.
Page 4 of
14
Dil.
2
2
2
50
2
2
400
2
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
ESC Sample # :
Date Received
Description
:
:
April
02, 2014
Sample ID
:
OUTFLOW 1
Site ID
:
Project # :
Collected By
:
Collection Date :
L690826-04
15778-00/TASK 6
Jason R. Miles
03/27/14 09:41
Parameter
Volatile Organics - TO-15 SIM
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Cas#
75-35-4
156-59-2
156-60-5
127-18-4
79-01-6
75-01-4
460-00-4
Mol Wght RDL1
96.9
96.9
96.9
166
131
62.5
8.0
8.0
8.0
20.
8.0
8.0
RDL2
ppbv
32.
32.
32.
140
43.
20.
< 8.0
77.
< 8.0
1200
65.
< 8.0
88.2
ug/m3
< 32.
310
< 32.
8100
350
< 20.
% Rec.
Method
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
Date
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
Note:
.
Page 5 of
14
Dil.
400
400
400
1000
400
400
400
Attachment A
List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers
Sample
Work
Sample
Run
Number
Group
Type
Analyte
ID
Qualifier
________________ ___________ _______ ________________________________________ __________ __________
L690826-03
WG714145
SAMP
2-Propanol
R2900981
J4
Page 6 of
14
Attachment B
Explanation of QC Qualifier Codes
Qualifier
__________________
Meaning
_______________________________________________________________________________
J4
The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range
for accuracy.
Qualifier Report Information
ESC utilizes sample and result qualifiers as set forth by the EPA Contract Laboratory Program and
as required by most certifying bodies including NELAC. In addition to the EPA qualifiers adopted
by ESC, we have implemented ESC qualifiers to provide more information pertaining to our analytical
results. Each qualifier is designated in the qualifier explanation as either EPA or ESC.
Data qualifiers are intended to provide the ESC client with more detailed information concerning
the potential bias of reported data. Because of the wide range of constituents and variety of
matrices incorporated by most EPA methods,it is common for some compounds to fall outside of
established ranges. These exceptions are evaluated and all reported data is valid and useable
"unless qualified as 'R' (Rejected)."
Definitions
Accuracy - The relationship of the observed value of a known sample to the
true value of a known sample. Represented by percent recovery and
relevant to samples such as: control samples, matrix spike recoveries,
surrogate recoveries, etc.
Precision - The agreement between a set of samples or between duplicate samples.
Relates to how close together the results are and is represented by
Relative Percent Differrence.
Surrogate - Organic compounds that are similar in chemical composition, extraction,
and chromotography to analytes of interest. The surrogates are used to
determine the probable response of the group of analytes that are chemically related to the surrogate compound. Surrogates are added to the
sample and carried through all stages of preparation and analyses.
TIC - Tentatively Identified Compound: Compounds detected in samples that are
not target compounds, internal standards, system monitoring compounds,
or surrogates.
Page 7 of
14
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Quality Assurance Report
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
Analyte
Laboratory Blank
Units
% Rec
Result
Limit
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
< .2
ppb
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
< .2
ppb
< .2
ppb
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
< .2
ppb
1,1-Dichloroethane
< .2
ppb
1,1-Dichloroethene
< .2
ppb
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
< .63
ppb
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
< .2
ppb
1,2-Dibromoethane
< .2
ppb
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< .2
ppb
1,2-Dichloroethane
< .2
ppb
1,2-Dichloropropane
< .2
ppb
1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
< .2
ppb
< .2
ppb
1,3-Butadiene
< 2
ppb
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< .2
ppb
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< .2
ppb
1,4-Dioxane
< .2
ppb
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
< .2
ppb
2-Butanone (MEK)
< 1.25
ppb
2-Chlorotoluene
< .2
ppb
2-Propanol
< 1.25
ppb
4-Ethyltoluene
< .2
ppb
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
< 1.25
ppb
Acetone
< 1.25
ppb
Allyl chloride
< .2
ppb
Benzene
< .2
ppb
Benzyl Chloride
< .2
ppb
Bromodichloromethane
< .2
ppb
Bromoform
< .6
ppb
Bromomethane
< .2
ppb
Carbon disulfide
< .2
ppb
Carbon tetrachloride
< .2
ppb
Chlorobenzene
< .2
ppb
Dibromochloromethane
< .2
ppb
Chloroethane
< .2
ppb
Chloroform
< .2
ppb
Chloromethane
< .2
ppb
< .2
ppb
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
< .2
ppb
Cyclohexane
< .2
ppb
Dichlorodifluoromethane
< .2
ppb
Ethanol
< .63
ppb
Ethylbenzene
< .2
ppb
Heptane
< .2
ppb
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
< .63
ppb
Isopropylbenzene
< .2
ppb
m&p-Xylene
< .4
ppb
Methyl Butyl Ketone
< 1.25
ppb
Methyl methacrylate
< .2
ppb
MTBE
< .2
ppb
Methylene Chloride
< .2
ppb
n-Hexane
< .2
ppb
Naphthalene
< .63
ppb
o-Xylene
< .2
ppb
Propene
< .4
ppb
Styrene
< .2
ppb
Tetrahydrofuran
< .2
ppb
Toluene
< .2
ppb
* Performance of this Analyte is outside of established criteria.
For additional information, please see Attachment A 'List of Analytes with QC Qualifiers.'
Page 8 of 14
Batch
Date Analyzed
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
Analyte
Result
TPH (GC/MS) Low Fraction
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl Bromide
Vinyl chloride
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Propanol
Acetone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
<
<
<
<
<
2-Propanol
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.25
< .2
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Analyte
Units
Laboratory Blank
Units
% Rec
50
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
% Rec.
1.25
1.25
1.25
.2
.2
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
% Rec.
ppb
ppb
% Rec.
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
.04
.02
.03
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
% Rec.
93.20
97.30
95.00
91.80
Laboratory Control Sample
Known Val
Result
Limit
Batch
Date Analyzed
60-140
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
03/31/14
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
60-140
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
04/01/14
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
12:58
60-140
WG714145 04/02/14 11:29
WG714145 04/02/14 11:29
WG714145 04/02/14 11:29
60-140
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
% Rec
Limit
Batch
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
59.7-155
70-130
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
ppb
3.75
3.93
105.
ppb
3.75
3.79
101.
ppb
3.75
3.94
105.
ppb
3.75
3.98
106.
1,1-Dichloroethane
ppb
3.75
4.05
108.
1,1-Dichloroethene
ppb
3.75
4.08
109.
ppb
3.75
4.18
111.
ppb
3.75
3.79
101.
Page 9 of 14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
04/08/14
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
18:47
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
Analyte
Units
Known Val
Result
% Rec
1,2-Dibromoethane
ppb
3.75
3.98
106.
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ppb
3.75
3.76
100.
1,2-Dichloroethane
ppb
3.75
4.11
110.
1,2-Dichloropropane
ppb
3.75
3.99
106.
ppb
3.75
3.97
106.
ppb
3.75
3.73
99.4
1,3-Butadiene
ppb
3.75
4.20
112.
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ppb
3.75
3.86
103.
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ppb
3.75
3.90
104.
1,4-Dioxane
ppb
3.75
4.21
112.
ppb
3.75
4.09
109.
2-Butanone (MEK)
ppb
3.75
3.70
98.7
2-Chlorotoluene
ppb
3.75
3.23
86.0
2-Propanol
ppb
3.75
2.76
73.6
4-Ethyltoluene
ppb
3.75
3.80
101.
ppb
3.75
3.70
98.6
Acetone
ppb
3.75
3.89
104.
Allyl chloride
ppb
3.75
4.19
112.
Benzene
ppb
3.75
4.01
107.
Benzyl Chloride
ppb
3.75
3.88
103.
ppb
3.75
3.93
105.
Bromoform
ppb
3.75
3.78
101.
Bromomethane
ppb
3.75
3.99
106.
Carbon disulfide
ppb
3.75
3.98
106.
ppb
3.75
3.94
105.
Chlorobenzene
ppb
3.75
3.88
103.
ppb
3.75
3.92
104.
Chloroethane
ppb
3.75
4.13
110.
Chloroform
ppb
3.75
3.96
106.
Chloromethane
ppb
3.75
4.18
111.
ppb
3.75
4.12
110.
ppb
3.75
4.04
108.
Cyclohexane
ppb
3.75
4.07
109.
ppb
3.75
3.92
104.
Ethanol
ppb
3.75
3.98
106.
Ethylbenzene
ppb
3.75
3.87
103.
Heptane
ppb
3.75
4.22
112.
ppb
3.75
3.61
96.2
Isopropylbenzene
ppb
3.75
3.82
102.
m&p-Xylene
ppb
7.5
7.59
101.
Methyl Butyl Ketone
ppb
3.75
3.61
96.2
Methyl methacrylate
ppb
3.75
3.83
102.
MTBE
ppb
3.75
3.76
100.
Methylene Chloride
ppb
3.75
3.98
106.
n-Hexane
ppb
3.75
4.17
111.
Naphthalene
ppb
3.75
3.84
102.
o-Xylene
ppb
3.75
3.88
103.
Propene
ppb
3.75
5.12
136.*
Styrene
ppb
3.75
3.92
105.
Tetrahydrofuran
ppb
3.75
3.80
101.
Toluene
ppb
3.75
3.97
106.
ppb
150
150.
100.
ppb
3.75
4.18
112.
ppb
3.75
4.06
108.
Trichloroethylene
ppb
3.75
4.01
107.
ppb
3.75
3.98
106.
Vinyl acetate
ppb
3.75
4.09
109.
Vinyl Bromide
ppb
3.75
3.99
106.
Vinyl chloride
ppb
3.75
4.08
109.
Page 10 of 14
Limit
Batch
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
62.2-137
70-130
51.3-144
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
52.6-145
70-130
70-130
55.7-144
70-130
70-130
36.5-155
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
53.4-158
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
Known Val
Result
Analyte
Units
% Rec
Limit
Batch
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Propanol
Acetone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
4.54
3.35
4.64
4.28
4.46
103.0
121.
89.4
124.
114.
119.
104.0
60-140
70-130
62.2-137
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
2-Propanol
Tetrachloroethylene
ppb
ppb
3.75
3.75
2.60
3.03
69.4
80.8
105.0
62.2-137
70-130
60-140
WG714145
WG714145
WG714145
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
0.467
0.414
0.488
0.493
0.426
0.479
0.512
0.372
0.471
0.467
0.422
0.485
0.476
0.463
0.499
0.478
0.457
0.468
0.508
0.465
0.613
0.439
93.3
82.8
97.7
98.5
85.2
95.7
102.
74.5
94.2
93.4
84.3
97.0
95.2
92.5
99.8
95.7
91.4
93.6
102.
93.0
123.
87.8
95.50
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
Analyte
Units
Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Result
Ref
%Rec
Limit
RPD
ppb
3.93
3.93
105.
70-130
0.110
ppb
4.12
3.79
110.
70-130
8.22
ppb
4.12
3.94
110.
70-130
4.41
ppb
3.93
3.98
105.
70-130
1.19
1,1-Dichloroethane
ppb
4.09
4.05
109.
70-130
0.940
1,1-Dichloroethene
ppb
4.08
4.08
109.
70-130
0.130
ppb
4.35
4.18
116.
59.7-155
3.98
ppb
4.13
3.79
110.
70-130
8.39
1,2-Dibromoethane
ppb
4.14
3.98
110.
70-130
3.84
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ppb
4.02
3.76
107.
70-130
6.66
1,2-Dichloroethane
ppb
4.18
4.11
111.
70-130
1.51
1,2-Dichloropropane
ppb
4.21
3.99
112.
70-130
5.27
ppb
3.97
3.97
106.
70-130
0.0200
ppb
4.14
3.73
110.
70-130
10.6
1,3-Butadiene
ppb
4.25
4.20
113.
70-130
1.20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ppb
4.07
3.86
108.
70-130
5.28
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ppb
4.11
3.90
110.
70-130
5.37
1,4-Dioxane
ppb
4.38
4.21
117.
70-130
4.13
Page 11
of 14
Limit
Batch
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
Analyte
Units
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Chlorotoluene
2-Propanol
4-Ethyltoluene
Acetone
Allyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl Chloride
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Cyclohexane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Heptane
Isopropylbenzene
m&p-Xylene
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Methyl methacrylate
MTBE
Methylene Chloride
n-Hexane
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Propene
Styrene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl Bromide
Vinyl chloride
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
Result
Ref
%Rec
4.09
4.07
4.08
2.78
4.21
4.11
4.11
4.17
4.08
4.17
4.07
4.08
3.96
3.91
3.94
4.06
4.00
4.10
3.99
4.16
4.11
4.19
4.02
3.86
4.09
4.20
4.25
3.97
4.16
8.26
3.90
4.15
4.03
3.94
4.16
4.14
4.16
4.97
4.22
4.17
4.14
157.
4.13
4.14
4.06
3.96
4.36
3.94
4.06
4.09
3.70
3.23
2.76
3.80
3.70
3.89
4.19
4.01
3.88
3.93
3.78
3.99
3.98
3.94
3.88
3.92
4.13
3.96
4.18
4.12
4.04
4.07
3.92
3.98
3.87
4.22
3.61
3.82
7.59
3.61
3.83
3.76
3.98
4.17
3.84
3.88
5.12
3.92
3.80
3.97
150.
4.18
4.06
4.01
3.98
4.09
3.99
4.08
109.
109.
109.
74.0
112.
110.
110.
111.
109.
111.
108.
109.
106.
104.
105.
108.
107.
109.
106.
111.
110.
112.
107.
103.
109.
112.
113.
106.
111.
110.
104.
111.
108.
105.
111.
110.
111.
132*
112.
111.
110.
104.
110.
110.
108.
106.
116.
105.
108.
104.0
Limit
RPD
Limit
Batch
70-130
70-130
70-130
62.2-137
70-130
51.3-144
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
52.6-145
70-130
70-130
55.7-144
70-130
70-130
36.5-155
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
53.4-158
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
0.0600
9.59
23.3
0.780
10.1
10.6
5.48
0.620
1.70
7.15
3.60
7.56
0.620
1.71
0.240
4.75
2.03
0.760
0.790
0.390
0.130
3.70
1.25
1.53
2.69
8.08
0.870
9.50
8.63
8.46
7.94
8.00
7.09
1.14
0.270
7.70
7.02
2.97
7.33
9.40
4.21
4.30
1.27
1.79
1.24
0.530
6.55
1.40
0.450
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
WG713764
25
25
25
25
25
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
WG713906
2-Butanone (MEK)
ppb
4.76
4.54
127.
70-130
4.83
2-Propanol
ppb
3.96
3.35
106.
62.2-137
16.7
Acetone
ppb
4.90
4.64
130.
70-130
5.41
Tetrachloroethylene
ppb
4.57
4.28
122.
70-130
6.65
Trichloroethylene
ppb
4.78
4.46
128.
70-130
6.98
103.0
60-140
Page 12
of 14
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
Result
Ref
%Rec
Analyte
Units
2-Propanol
Tetrachloroethylene
ppb
ppb
2.31
2.92
2.60
3.03
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
0.467
0.413
0.421
0.497
0.452
0.423
0.413
0.382
0.462
0.467
0.411
0.486
0.355
0.467
0.409
0.463
0.419
0.476
0.419
0.419
0.612
0.358
0.467
0.414
0.488
0.493
0.426
0.479
0.512
0.372
0.471
0.467
0.422
0.485
0.476
0.463
0.499
0.478
0.457
0.468
0.508
0.465
0.613
0.439
Limit
RPD
Limit
Batch
62*
78.0
104.0
62.2-137
70-130
60-140
12.0
3.49
25
25
WG714145
WG714145
WG714145
93.0
82.0
84.0
99.0
90.0
84.0
83.0
76.0
92.0
93.0
82.0
97.0
71.0
93.0
82.0
93.0
84.0
95.0
84.0
84.0
122.
72.0
100.0
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
0.0400
0.300
14.7
0.870
5.84
12.4
21.4
2.41
1.87
0.0800
2.51
0.0800
29.2*
0.870
19.8
3.21
8.75
1.75
19.2
10.3
0.0300
20.3
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
WG714845
Batch number /Run number / Sample number cross reference
WG713764:
WG713906:
WG714145:
WG714845:
R2899815:
R2900321:
R2900981:
R2903044:
L690826-01 02 03
L690826-01 02 03
L690826-02 03
L690826-04
* * Calculations are performed prior to rounding of reported values.
Page 13
of 14
12065 Lebanon Rd.
(615) 758-5858
1-800-767-5859
Fax (615) 758-5859
Tax I.D. 62-0814289
Est. 1970
Level II
Pendleton, OR 97801
April 09, 2014
L690826
The data package includes a summary of the analytic results of the quality
control samples required by the SW-846 or CWA methods. The quality control
samples include a method blank, a laboratory control sample, and the matrix
spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis. If a target parameter is outside
the method limits, every sample that is effected is flagged with the
appropriate qualifier in Appendix B of the analytic report.
Method Blank - an aliquot of reagent water carried through the
entire analytic process. The method blank results indicate if
any possible contamination exposure during the sample handling,
digestion or extraction process, and analysis. Concentrations of
target analytes above the reporting limit in the method blank are
qualified with the "B" qualifier.
Laboratory Control Sample - is a sample of known concentration
that is carried through the digestion/extraction and analysis
process. The percent recovery, expressed as a percentage of the
theoretical concentration, has statistical control limits
indicating that the analytic process is "in control". If a
target analyte is outside the control limits for the laboratory
control sample or any other control sample, the parameter is
flagged with a "J4" qualifier for all effected samples.
Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate - is two aliquots of an
environmental sample that is spiked with known concentrations of
target analytes. The percent recovery of the target analytes
also has statistical control limits. If any recoveries that are
outside the method control limits, the sample that was selected
for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analysis is flagged with
either a "J5" or a "J6". The relative percent difference (%RPD)
between the matrix spike and the matrix spike duplicate
recoveries is all calculated. If the RPD is above the method
limit, the effected samples are flagged with a "J3" qualifier.
Page 14
of 14

Background - Department of Environmental Quality

Transcription

Similar documents