PDF file
Transcription
PDF file
News on the activities of the PalArch Foundation Report of the official release by Minister Van der Hoeven (S.M. van Roode & A.J. Veldmeijer) Entering a new millennium: the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum (L. Schwappach) The Logan Museum of Anthropology’s European Paleolithic Collections (W. Green) The mysterious Bog people (V. van Vilsteren) The palaeoart of Joe Tucciarone (J. Tucciarone) Egypt in photographs (Z. Kosc) Colophon 2 5 11 19 22 26 29 29 Edited by A.J. Veldmeijer, S.M. van Roode & A.M. Hense © 2004 PalArch Foundation volume 1, no. 2 (July 2004) The PalArch Foundation’s Newsletter In this issue: Styracosaurus (© 1997 J. Tucciarone: http://members.aol.com/DinoPixels/styrac.html) www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) News on the activities of the PalArch Foundation New logo As you already might have discovered, we have a renewed logo. Still the well-known pterosaur but with the name added to it; professionally made by the Foundation’s own illustration editor Martin Hense. Furthermore, we have created new flyers. Each of our disciplines now has a flyer of its own, with corresponding illustrations and contact-data of the responsible managing editor. Obviously they also sport our new logo. The flyer for Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology has illustrations of hieroglyphs by S.M. van Roode and a reconstruction of a part of the Amarna palace by A.M. Hense. The flyer for vertebrate palaeontology features illustrations of an Avimimus skeleton by A. Atuchin and the reconstruction of Palaeoparadoxia (photographed by E. Endenburg and reworked by A.M. Hense). Also the website is renewed. Some pages are slightly moderated, and the archives have been installed as well as the order form. Activities Of course, the official release has been the main activity this period. You can read all about this further on in this Newsletter. Later in April, our foundation was presented at the ARCE meeting in Tucson, Arizona (14 April 2004). Salima Ikram, who was one of the three giving a lecture on the symposium ‘Dinosaurs, mummies and river dunes’ took a poster and 350 flyers to Tucson via Cairo and, together with Carolyn Tomaselli, took care of the posting and distribution. Many thanks! In this way the Foundation enjoys the opportunity to be presented without one of us necessarily travelling around the world! Also, we would like to express our thanks to R.H. Wilkinson who PalArch Foundation kindly informed us on the procedure on the ARCE meeting. Due to this event, we realized it would be a good idea to ask you occasionally whether you are willing to bring flyers to meetings you attend (and perhaps even post a poster). Please, don’t feel obliged; we will not feel offended if you don’t want to take flyers or are not able to take them with you! During the stay of the entire board of the PalArch Foundation in Egypt (EES expedition to Qasr Ibrim), we had time to visit various research institutes in Cairo, which we provided with a ‘call for papers’ and flyers. Among these institutes were the Netherlands Flemish Institute, the German Archaeological Institute and the Italian Institute. Some others have been mailed, such as the Polish Institute. Since January, Sigrid has been assisting the Annual Egyptological Bibliography. Following the retirement of dr. L. Zonhoven, the AEB is currently only staffed by dr. W. Hovestreydt, the new editor-in-chief. To help out, Sigrid assists 4 hours a week in various administrative tasks as well as in preparing abstracts. Various articles on the PalArch Foundation have been published, among which an article in Cranium, Profiel and the Newsletter of the Society of Vertebrate Palaeontologists. Centre of book reviews Since we have been co-operating with many well-known and worldwide publishers, the continuous expanding of this system has resulted in a real ‘PalArch Foundation’s Centre of Book Reviews’; a site where one can read reviews of scientific as well as popular books, reviewed by various specialists in the field. The book reviews are free to download and when uploading the new issue, the book reviews stay online in the archives with their title; they are sent for free as pdf-file to anyone who asks for it! In order to discuss books from various angles, we allow two reviews of the same book (in exceptional cases even more) on the condition that the reviews are written with different views and provoke discussion. Also reviews of older books (at the most 5 years) are welcome; although this is from a commercial point of view of minor importance 2 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) for the publisher, it still can be of importance for colleague scientists and other interested people. You can send your book review (in English) with the following details (see also http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bookrevie w.htm) author(s)/editor(s), year, full title, place, publisher, number of pages, ISBN, price, hardback/paperback to the responsible managing editor. Also, send the scanned images (300 dpi or more) of the front and back of the book. Editorial board Two new members of the editorial board of vertebrate palaeontology are welcomed. David Martill is a well-known palaeontologist, working, amongst others, with pterosaurs (especially from Brazil), palaeobiology and taphonomy. Dave is based in Portsmouth (University of Portsmouth). Brian Lee Beatty’s work focuses on the systematics of marine and some terrestrial Cenozoic mammals but especially on palaeobiology and is based in Lawrence, Kansas (University of Kansas, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center). Review tips The PalArch Foundation is a still a low budget organisation. This means that manuscripts are sent to you through email instead of the regular (expensive and slow) mail. Thus you get the manuscript digitally. How to review a digital document? Reviewing on the computer is, in general, not a very popular way of working. It is not possible to go back and forth easily, which is especially problematic while checking references. A tip however, might be the following, which I always do and works quite well. If you copy the literature list into a new document and select the option of ‘recording changes’. If you encounter a reference in the text, just delete it in the separate list; this will still be visible in the separate reference document, because the removal is only indicated. This way, you can easily see what is in the list and what is not. You can either use both documents simultaneously on your screen or hide the separate reference list document. Despite of this way of checking references, most people PalArch Foundation have to get used to reviewing on the computer, but, as is my experience, in due course one gets used to it. Still a drawback is that it is not easy to take work with you in the train for instance, unless you use a laptop. Of course, you can still choose to print the document, write the comments and send it to Sigrid or André. Workshops and the like We ask all of you to send us suggestions for workshops and the like. The idea is to organize short meetings on specialist topics, for instance a workshop “The mummification industry in Egypt” or “Anatomy and functional morphology of cranial crests in hadrosaurs”. All ideas are welcomed. From our webmaster I would like to ask for your assistance. I would be grateful if you visit the site on regular basis, check various things and inform me on malfunctions or flaws. And I’m also eager to receive any comment or suggestion. We want everything to work perfectly. You can send it to [email protected] (please, put ‘website remarks’ in the subject line). Attention! In order to compose a board as complete as possible, we would be grateful when you propose colleagues which we can contact for joining as member of the editorial board. Please, state their field of research as well as their e-mail address. Publications At the moment 3 monograph contracts have been signed: Sidebotham, S.E. & H.M. Nouwens. Working title: Report of the excavations at Sikait and the survey of the Egyptian Eastern Desert Claus, B. Introduction bibliographique a l'Egyptologie. Guide a l'usage des etudiants. 3 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Signore, M. Scipionyx samniticus (Theropoda, Maniraptoriformes) and the palaeobiology of some maniraptoran theropods Papers, www.PalArch.nl 2, 2 Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology Gosling. J., P. Manti & P.T. Nicholson. 2004. Discovery and conservation of a hoard of votive bronzes from the Sacred Animal Necropolis at North Saqqara. – PalArch, series archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 2, 1: 1-#. Vertebrate palaeontology Drees, M. 2004. An evaluation of the Cromerian complex period of The Netherlands. – PalArch, series vertebrate palaeontology 2, 1: 1-12. Signore, M. 2004. Sample excavations in Pietraroja (lower Cretaceous, Southern Italy) in 2001 and notes on the Pietraroja palaeoenvironment. - PalArch, series vertebrate palaeontology 2, 2: 13-22. Book reviews Heirbaut, E.N.A. 2004. Book review of: Johansen, L. & D. Stapert. 2003. Oldeholtwolde. A Hamburgian family encampment around a hearth. (Lisse, A.A. Balkema Publishers). - PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Vos, de, J. 2004. Book review of: Schubert, B.W., J.I. Mead & R.W. Graham. Eds. 2003. Ice Age cave faunas of North America. (Bloomington, Indiana University Press). - PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Signore, M. 2004. Book review of: Partridge, R.B. 2003. Fighting pharaohs. Weapons and warfare in ancient Egypt. (Manchester, Peartree Publishing). – PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Roode, van, S.M. 2004. Book review of: Humbert, J.M. & C.A. Price. Eds. 2003. PalArch Foundation Imhotep today: Egyptianizing architecture. (London, UCL Press, Encounters with ancient Egypt). PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Veldmeijer, A.J. 2004. Book review of: Hilton, R.P. 2003. Dinosaurs and other Mesozoic reptiles of California. (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, University of California Press). PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Schulp, A.S. 2004. Book review of: Parsons, K.M. 2003. The great dinosaur controversy. A guide to the debates. (Santa Barbara CA, ABC-CLIO). PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Weerd, de, M.A. 2004. Book review of: Hawass, Z. 2003. Secrets from the sand. My search for Egypt's past. (London, Thames & Hudson). - PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Rooij, van, E.H.C. 2004. Book review of: Ikram, S. 2003. Death and burial in ancient Egypt. (Longman Publishing Group). PalArch, non scientific (http://www.palarch.nl/Non_scientific/bo okreview.htm). Acknowledgments We like to express our gratitude to Vincent van Vilsteren of the Drents Museum for permission to use the reconstruction of the Yde girl as watermark. Furthermore, we thank Salima Ikram and two anonymous reviewers for reviewing some of the contributions. 4 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Report of the PalArch Foundation's symposium ‘Dinosaurs, mummies and river dunes’ to celebrate the official release of the first issue of www.PalArch.nl By S.M. van Roode & A.J. Veldmeijer The guests in the auditorium (© C.H. van Zoest). Just one moment before the opening, waiting for the doors to be opened. From left to right André Veldmeijer, Sigrid van Roode and John de Vos (© C.H. van Zoest). April 3 2004 has been an important day for the PalArch Foundation. On this day, the first issue of the web based scientific journal www.PalArch.nl was officially released by the Minister of Education, Culture and Education, mrs. M.J.A. van der Hoeven. To celebrate this official release, the Foundation had organized a symposium in which various scholars presented their research. The location of the symposium was the charming auditorium of The Netherlands oldest museum: the in the 18th century founded Teylers Museum in Haarlem. The day started with setting up the registration desk, checking the equipment in the auditorium for the last time and solving the little issues that occur before every symposium or congress. When the museum opened its doors at 09.30 pm however, everything was arranged correctly, giving us the opportunity to welcome our guests at the entrance. Shortly before 10.00 pm, Minister Van der Hoeven arrived, accompanied by her husband, her spokesman Mr. Van den Broek and her advisor Mr. De Jonge. After being welcomed by the Director of the Museum, Mrs. Scharloo and S. PalArch Foundation Minister Van der Hoeven officially releasing the first issue of www.PalArch.nl (© C.H. van Zoest). van Roode, Vice-chairman of the Foundation, she was escorted to the auditorium and the symposium could start. Mrs. Scharloo welcomed the Minister and the guests on behalf of Teylers Museum, after which the Minister delivered her speech. She expressed her intense interest in palaeontology and archaeology and shared the Foundation's concern about the exodus of science from The Netherlands to other countries. She pointed out that the transfer of knowledge is simply necessary to stimulate scientific discussion and considered our project an important initiative: Speech by Minister Van der Hoeven at the symposium ‘Dinosaurs, mummies and river dunes’ on Saturday 3 April 2004, Teylers Museum, Haarlem 5 www.PalArch.nl (The speech as delivered by the Minister is the correct version. The text below differs on details from her spoken version.) Ladies and gentlemen, As far as I was concerned, this invitation to preside over the official launch of www.palarch.nl was simply a ‘must’. That has everything to do with the enormous popularity of archaeology. These days archaeology appeals greatly to people’s imagination. You only have to call to mind the numerous books, films, series and even comics featuring adventurous archaeologists, from Tintin to Indiana Jones. The considerable public interest is also one of the main reasons for the existence of a television channel such as The Discovery Channel. Archaeology also attracts a great many amateur enthusiasts who, in their spare time, are only too keen to dig literally and figuratively into our past. This is what makes archaeology so fascinating. It focuses on the question of where we have come from or, in other words, on our roots. The Teylers Museum now has a magnificent example of this fascination in the form of the ‘Zondvloedmens’ [Flood Man]. I don’t know whether you are familiar with the story of this fossil that was found in the eighteenth century in a stone quarry near Öhningen in Germany. Johann Scheuchzer, a physician living in Zürich, thought he had found the remains of a person who had drowned in the biblical flood that had occurred thousands of years previously. His publication, which dates from 1726 and was entitled ‘The person who witnessed the flood and saw God’, was the cause of intense scientific discussion. Had he found the remains of a person, a fish or perhaps a lizard? Eventually, the French anatomist Georges Cuvier was proven right after he had chiselled out the fossil in 1811 to reveal two front legs. By doing so, he demonstrated that it must have been a giant salamander that had inhabited Öhningen millions of years ago. An so ended a scientific discussion which now seems almost laughable but, at the time, went to the very heart of science. Discourse is still what makes and keeps the practice of science so lively and ensures that views, based on research, become more focused and PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) in-depth. And that is also the theme of today’s proceedings. Although archaeology continues again and again to attract the attention of numerous interested parties, we still regard it as one of the minor disciplines, alongside mathematics and the so-called minor arts. Although they sometimes generate excellent research results, these subjects nevertheless lead a somewhat difficult existence with relatively few students and a tight budget. The performancebased funding we are introducing is good news as far as these disciplines are concerned - and that includes archaeology. Performance-based funding gives the greatest scope to the best research. I hope very much that this will also be a major boost to archaeology in the Netherlands. Archaeology is a rapidly expanding discipline and this growth is largely due to the new Monuments and Historic Buildings Act and the Malta convention. The main result is an enormous increase in the amount of fieldwork, as demonstrated by the numerous rescue excavations and the many archaeological consequences of the construction of the Betuwelijn freight railway line. Last weekend I read an interesting article in the newspaper on an ancient village that was excavated in Midlaren in the province of Drenthe. The finds revealed that people had lived in the area on the banks of the Zuidlaarder lake for more than several thousand years. It is in fact a nice place to be, on the water’s edge in the middle of the woods. Here, at this magnificent spot, new houses are going to be built. The archaeologists have until May to dig up whatever evidence they can find of our forefathers’ customs and traditions. Our country is acquiring quite a reputation with this fieldwork. On the other hand, the Dutch contribution to current research in the field in which the PalArch Foundation is involved is relatively minor. I find it rather sad to hear that a lot of vertebrate palaeontologists and Egyptologists are apparently unable to make progress here and, as a result, leave our country to pursue their goals elsewhere. I sincerely hope that the introduction of performance-based funding, which will make more resources available to high-quality research groups, will stem the exodus of scientists. After all, it would be a real 6 www.PalArch.nl shame if archaeology in the Netherlands, which is a source of inspiration to so many people and which has such a good name internationally, had to take a step backwards. It is partly for this reason that it is important to focus attention on communication and the transfer of knowledge. You will undoubtedly agree with me that the accessibility of scientific archaeological knowledge leaves a lot to be desired. Knowledge is becoming too fragmented, publications are taking too long to appear and there are insufficient central knowledge databases. An additional and growing problem is that archaeology is facing the threat of commercialisation. More and more companies of varying sizes are becoming active on the market, and they really only have time and money for excavations. In itself that is not such a bad thing, but the one-sided focus on excavations means the discipline is liable to get out of balance. All this only adds to the importance of knowledge transfers in the battle against onesidedness in archaeology. And in that area, a great many improvements need to be made in this country. For example, the Netherlands has only a few scientific Internet journals, a medium that has, in fact, been very successful in other parts of the world. I am therefore very pleased that two young enthusiastic scientists, André Veldmeijer and Sigrid van Roode, have set up the PalArch Foundation with the aim of stimulating the dialogue between Dutch and foreign researchers. You both believe that your branch of science is being obstructed by a lack of openness, that scientific results are being held back and that it takes far too long before these are eventually published. All this is, of course, not conducive to the scientific discussion which I have just referred to and which is so important for progress. It is for these reasons that you are today launching a scientific journal on the special website www.palarch.nl [...]. Ladies and gentlemen, internet is a marvellous medium for a journal like this. It is cheap, it is quick and it is easily accessible to everyone. It will encourage scientists and students to publish more of their work. I also believe that, although you are focusing in the first instance on Dutch and foreign scientists, well-informed, inquisitive amateurs will also be PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Minister Van der Hoeven (second left) in conversation with Marjan Scharloo (right), director of Teylers Museum. (© C.H. van Zoest). regular visitors to your site. In this way, you will be rendering your branch of science a considerable service. After all, with science it is very straightforward : the more people know about it the more enthusiastic they become. After the speech of the Minister, it was time for coffee and tea. While the Minister visited the Museum, the guests could enjoy a cup of coffee in the beautiful surroundings of the so-called ‘round-about’, on the first floor of the Museum. At the end of the coffee-break, the symposium continued with the welcoming speech of A.J. Veldmeijer, Chairman of the Foundation. In his speech, he paid attention to the past, the present and the future. He described how the Foundation and its journal came into being and looked forward to the future, sharing some of the many ideas the Visiting the collection. From left to right, the PalArch Foundation delegation, Erno Endenburg, Sigrid van Roode and André Veldmeijer, Minister Van der Hoeven and Marjan Scharloo, director of Teylers Museum (© G. Di Galbo). 7 www.PalArch.nl The Chairman of the PalArch Foundation giving his speech (© C.H. van Zoest). Foundation has to stimulate science. Furthermore, he extended an open invitation to all institutes, professionals and amateurs alike, which one way or the other work in the disciplines of science that the Foundation focuses on, to get in contact to discuss cooperation. By co-operating with others, the Foundation feels her goal of stimulating science can be fulfilled even better: Speech by A.J. Veldmeijer, Chairman of the PalArch Foundation Dear friends and colleagues, It is my pleasure to welcome you on this symposium. We have worked long and hard for this moment; now that it’s finally here, we are happy to see you. A special word of thanks to Minister Van der Hoeven, who spent part of her free Saturday to perform the official release of our journal! About 8 years ago, the idea of an easyaccess, user-friendly scientific magazine began to emerge in my mind. I wanted to see a journal that published faster than the standard journals, without any restrictions as to make it possible to publish databases, catalogues, colour photo’s etc, and at the same time cheap to obtain. Such a journal would not only have to publish scientific articles, but would also have to include articles for the generally interested public because I am of the opinion that science is of importance to a broader public than just the few scientists. Science must be brought to the public. Therefore I wanted this journal to be as accessible as possible. The journal would have to cover my two major disciplines of science; palaeontology PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) and archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. As time passed by, the idea grew stronger and about one-and-a-half years ago, I began to transfer it into a reality. I found Erno and Sigrid willing to co-operate, and so we started to work out the details. To provide our endeavour with a solid and permanent base, we founded the Palarch Foundation. The name is derived from the two scientific disciplines palaeontology and archaeology of Egypt/ Egyptology. At this point, we would like to thank Gerard Kuhn and his colleague for their generosity in providing us with our small financial base. During the sometimes difficult process of reaching consensus on the smallest details, we established a firm base on which to build the journal. The next step was to assemble an editorial board and we are grateful for the absolutely positive responses and useful feedback we received; for us, this was yet another encouragement that we were on the right track. Obviously, one can not work on a project this large and keep it a total secret. As soon as we had ventured our ideas, work started coming in. Last year, we published for instance the proceedings of the annual NetherlandsFlemish Egyptologists meeting, presented our initiative at a conference in Italy and have been asked to publish two monographs, one on the American-Dutch excavations in Egypt’s Eastern Desert and a reference bibliography for students and scholars. A special word of thanks to Martin Hense, who spent a lot of time editing illustrations, also before the first issue was released. We established reviewing contacts with large and worldwide publishers such as Cambridge University Press, Kluwer Academic Publishers and Indiana University Press and various institutes support our work among which are the Natuurmuseum Rotterdam and Eras. And the fact that the Minister was willing to perform the official release, emphasizes the importance of this project. All this before we even released the first issue of our journal! It goes without saying that all this positive feedback encourages us to head on into the future. Our goal is to offer ways of fast, scientific publishing, to offer ways of reading about ongoing research and to encourage scientific discussion. To help realise these goals, studies will be peer reviewed by 8 www.PalArch.nl the members of our editorial board. The publication timescale is therefore short and the journal will be freely downloadable for everyone interested. In this way, we hope to offer a counterweight to the increase in expenses of publishing and the decrease in budgets for libraries. We also aim to increase the possibilities for young scholars to publish their work, and thus enhance scientific discussion. As I said before, we also publish monographs. These will only be obtainable by order for payment. 75 % of the profit is invested in the authors research: another way in which we want to contribute to our disciplines of science. Bringing science to the public will be done, not only by making scientific papers easy accessible but also by means of our Newsletter, which is free for members. Information on how to become a member yourself can be found in our flyer. The Newsletter, published 4 times a year previously to the scientific publications, informs the reader on the activities of the Foundation but gives also background information in items such as ‘science and art’, and ‘famous collections’ (an instance of our first Newsletter is available at the entrance desk). Furthermore, we will try to invest in research with expertise. Finally, we are going to expand and intensify co-operation with institutes. Therefore, we invite all individuals, professionals and amateurs alike and all institutes, whether museums, universities, journals or amateur society, it does not matter, who are related in one way or another to one of the scientific disciplines on which the PalArch Foundation focuses, to get in contact with us to discuss co-operation. Our Foundation is founded to stimulate science; we feel that co-operating will benefit us all! We know that, despite the very good start, still a lot of work has to be done to establish our name. We consider this a challenge and we will do our utmost best to live up to the standards we set our project. I could continue far longer telling you about the many ideas we have; but for now I will leave it at this. All information can be found either on our website or in our Newsletter. Of course, you can always contact one of the board with questions, remarks, suggestions etc. This symposium marks the official beginning of our scientific journal www.palarch.nl. It is a moment we will often PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) look back on, and we are happy you are here to share it with us. Organizing a symposium is an activity that takes up time and energy. We are grateful to the following persons for their help and advice: Teylers Museum for providing us with this beautiful auditorium without charging any costs, John de Vos for his advice and guidance, and the two ladies Hanneke Meijer and Manon de Weerd whom you all met this morning at the registration desk. We hope you will enjoy the upcoming lectures that we are proud to present! The speech by the Chairman was followed by the first lecture of the day, 'Diversity in Death' by Dr. Salima Ikram. Dr. Ikram had been invited by the Foundation to participate in the symposium; an invitation that she gracefully accepted, not in the least to have the opportunity to see the famous Teylers Museum, which she discusses in detail in her classes Museology at the American University in Cairo, for real. For almost an hour, she took the audience to the Egyptian desert. Her vivid descriptions of the mummification process in general and the results of her recent survey in a Roman cemetery in Kharga Oasis continued to capture the attention of the audience. The many slides of sometimes extraordinary sights and details accompanied the highly fascinating reading. After her lecture, it was time for lunch. The organizing committee and the lecturers, joined by friends, had lunch together, whilst others took the opportunity to visit the Museum or had lunch in one of the many restaurants in the vicinity. At 14.00, the last part of the symposium commenced with a lecture by Drs. A.S. Schulp, who treated the audience on a very interesting lecture titled 'Dinosaurs in Salima Ikram giving her lecture 'Diversity in Death' (© C.H. van Zoest). 9 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The three invitees on the PalArch symposium ‘Dinosaurs, mummies and river dunes’ gazing at the remains of mosasaur (© G. Di Galbo). Anne Schulp giving his lecture 'Dinosaurs in Hollywood' (© C.H. van Zoest). Hollywood'. In his lecture, he focused on the many details that can be gathered from the study of dinosaur tracks, and the impact that these new insights have on the representation of dinosaurs in the movies. He illustrated this development by showing various fragments of dinosaur-movies, varying from 1925 black-andwhite dinosaurs to the well-known T-rex of Jurassic Park. The last lecture of the day was presented by Prof. Dr. L.P. Louwe Kooijmans, who presented the results of the investigations of major excavations at the site of Hardinxveld- Leendert Louwe Kooijmans giving his lecture ‘The last hunters of the Dutch Delta. Excavations at Hardinxveld’ (© C.H. van Zoest). PalArch Foundation Giessendam. In his lecture, he showed how focusing on many details, such as evidence of certain fish, fowl and other animals, can tell us about the use and occupation of a certain site. Furthermore, he illustrated how studying the provenance of material on the site can inform us about the contacts its inhabitants had, and how comparing one site to other nearby sites can actually tell us about the use of the landscape and its resources in a wider regional context. We look back on a successful symposium, which marks the official beginning of our webbased scientific journal www.PalArch.nl. This excellent start encourages us to head on into the future, a future in which we will organize many more symposia, workshops and the like. We hope we can welcome you all again on one of these occasions! The symposium crew. From left to right John de Vos, Hanneke Meijer, Leendert Louwe Kooijmans, Anne Schulp, Salima Ikram, Sigrid van Roode, Manon de Weerd and, second row, Erno Endenburg and André Veldmeijer (© C.H. van Zoest). 10 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Entering a new millennium: the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum By L. Schwappach Front entrance of the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). The first question many visitors ask when they arrive at the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum is, “Why is there an Egyptian museum in San Jose, California?” The Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum is under the auspices of its parent organization, the Rosicrucian Order, or AMORC. When Dr. H. Spencer Lewis, the founder of the modern phase of AMORC in the United States began his work, the organization was centred in San Francisco, but land prices led to a move to Florida. Because of the significance of San Francisco to the Order, there was a strong desire to move back to the Bay Area. The opportunity was presented to acquire land in San Jose, about 40 miles (about 64 km) south of San Francisco. The Silicon Valley of today was then called ‘the Valley of the Heart’s Delight’. Times and industries have changes, but from the 1920’s, the Museum and the AMORC complex has been located on the same block of land. Originally, only one small parcel of land was acquired, but the organization expanded, and more building and space was required over time. Now, almost the entire city block belongs to AMORC, but it is not all buildings. A botanical garden occupies much of the land, creating a lovely area of open space in a congested valley. The theme chosen for the architecture was Egypt, not only because of the stylishness of Egypt in the 1920’s, but also because of the PalArch Foundation history of AMORC. Through the group's history, they trace their origins back to the mystery schools on ancient Egypt. This love of Egypt led to not only the architectural choices, but also the development Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum itself. The Museum began as many museums, with a combination of acquisition, sponsorships, and personal collections. Dr. Lewis was given a small bronze votive figure of the goddess Sekhmet, lion-headed and fierce. When asked what the little object on his desk was, Dr. Lewis responded, “That is the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum!” From this statement of absolute faith, the collection grew through dedication. Shrewd choices in acquisitions under Dr. Lewis and his son, Ralph Lewis, led to the development of the collection as it stands today. In addition to the important acquisitions through purchase, the organization sponsored archaeological work in Egypt. Excursions were made to explore Egypt and photograph her sites. As soon as formal accessioning began by the early 1930’s, that little bronze Sekhmet was accessioned as RC 1, and she has been our patroness ever since. In addition to the founding of the Museum, Rosicrucian Park expanded its complex and mission throughout the 1920’s and 1930’s. The Rosicrucian Library was also established in the park, as well as an auditorium for lectures and concerts. A social centre, the park drew luminaries from the Rosicrucian Library, located adjacent to the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). 11 www.PalArch.nl A shrine on the grounds of Rosicrucian Park, surrounded by a stand of papyrus (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). region, and the Museum was a centre of culture and arts. In 1936, the Rosicrucian Planetarium opened to serve the people of the region with the first American-made star projector in the country. This building was of the Moorish style, but the other buildings of Rosicrucian Park were in the Egyptian Revival style, appearing as temple pylons, a tradition that endures to this day. The entire city block became a botanical garden of rare plants from around the world, and the large stands of Egyptian papyrus are a highlight to this day. In the 1920’s, AMORC assisted the Egyptian Exploration Society in their excavations at the site of Tell el-Amarna. Laws at that time gave the excavators half of the material excavated, with Egypt having first choice of the artefacts. In gratitude for the support of the work, the EES donated a share of the artefacts to all of the museums that funded their work, including the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum, then called ‘The Oriental Museum’. When the Great Depression engulfed the nation and world, many museums found themselves under devastating budget cuts. At this time, the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum acquired many other items from Amarna and other provenienced artefacts from the other sponsoring museums. In addition to the acquisition of these artefacts, the Museum also acquired casts and replicas from some of the great museums of the world, including the Louvre and the British Museum, for use in the educational program. In addition to this support of the field of archaeology, the Museum also began to PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) acquire artefacts through donations and sponsored acquisitions. When a particular type of object was seen to be needed for the educational mission of the Museum, it was sought diligently, and only acquired following inspection. All of this activity led the Museum to expand, first from Dr. Lewis’ desk to a large lobby display case, and finally to an entire section of the administration building of AMORC’s headquarters here in San Jose. This expansion was necessary, as the Museum and exhibits were drawing large numbers of the general public and busloads of schoolchildren, eager to experience Egypt vicariously through the Museum experience. A replica of the offering chamber of a Middle Kingdom tomb was one of the highlight experiences. The displays in the administration building reached capacity in the 1950’s, and the plan was born to build a dedicated Museum building. Ground was broken in 1966 and the new Museum opened in 1968. Much of the work was accomplished by donations of time from qualified volunteers. The offering chamber replica was expanded into an entire tomb, which is a composite of several of the best tombs of Egyptian history. A total of five galleries was planned, Gallery A to be the ‘mummy room’, and galleries B, C, and D to hold the rest of the collection. The final gallery was a rotating exhibits space, also to be used for lectures. The new Museum building was roughly 22,000 square feet (about 2000 square meters). The Museum was built around the collection, designed to hold the objects held in the collection in 1968. The cases were built in structurally and were perfect in number and size for the collection in 1968. This has been one of the challenges in the Museum in 2004, and will be addressed in the description of the renewal of the exhibits we are engaging in at the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum. The Museum opened its doors to great enthusiasm and large numbers of visitors. It rapidly became one of the destination museums in the San Francisco Bay Area. More than 150 000 people began to visit each year. The California State 6th grade curriculum covers ancient cultures in the 6th grade, so field trips began arriving in ever increasing numbers. Originally, tours were simply selfguided, with volunteers walking the galleries 12 www.PalArch.nl and answering questions for the students. More organization was installed by the late 1980’s, and each school group was assigned a tour guide. Training became more intensive over the years, and accuracy in information was absolutely required. By 1997, more than 40 000 school children were arriving each year to be provided with tours. Today, we serve groups from schools of up to 45 guests, eight times per day, four days per week. For those that prefer, self-guided tours are also an option. The general public also attends in high numbers, and are welcome throughout the day. We are open six days per week, with the exception of Mondays and major holidays, which are our exhibit preparation days. Challenges in reputation Many have found it unlikely that a fine Egyptian collection could be located in San Jose, California, and this is likely the reason that some hold inaccurate ideas about the Museum. One of the problems that the Museum has been faced with is the challenge that our collection is ‘replicas’. This misconception was probably based on the fact that there are replicas and casts on display as an integral part of our education program. Today, we have carefully labelled every item that is a replica as such, and removed all but one from behind glass. The single exception is a replica of the bust of Nefertiti from Berlin, so fine a replica and made off of the original that it is irreplaceable. These replicas are used in our ‘touch tours’ for the sight impaired as part of our effort to provide as much accessibility as possible. As for any questionable or misidentified items in our collection, these have been systematically removed from display. The Museum is careful to hire qualified Egyptologists to act as curators of the collection. The collection is one of the finest in the world and is certainly the largest collection of authentic Egyptian materials on display in the west. Scholars are always welcome to study materials from our collection. We have created a system for providing scholarly study photographs to scholars worldwide, and only charge for taking a new photograph if PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) One of seven known statues of Cleopatra VII presides over the Government Gallery of the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). necessary for a detail, and two copies of the publication in which our object appears for our records. This has assisted us in providing cutting-edge research information to our visitors. One of the ways that we are encouraging scholars and visitors alike to realize that any misconceptions are not accurate, is the publication of a museum catalogue, our first full catalogue in the history of the Museum. It will be available at the end of June and will include images in full colour of about 350 of our best and most interesting artefacts. We will permit the catalogue the opportunity to allow the collection to speak for itself. We have also opened a new website (http://www.egyptianmuseum.org/index.html) in which we have posted images of some of the materials in our collection for students to use in their work. These images will be rotated with the photographs taken for the catalogue, ensuring full colour and clear images. Our tour guides are given rigorous oneon-one training in ancient Egyptian history with the Museum’s curator long before they are permitted to give tours. The school tour consists of a brief lecture of about 5 minutes in each gallery on the theme topic of that gallery. The students are then permitted to explore the gallery with their chaperones, and the guide is expected to answer any question that may be asked. The diversity of questions that students may ask requires extensive knowledge of ancient Egypt, as well as the confidence to go to the curator to ask the question, if the answer 13 www.PalArch.nl is unknown. Gallery talks on diverse topics are provided by the guides to the general public, and these require the same amount of training. As extensive knowledge is required, the tour guide positions are not only paid, they are fulltime in many cases. When not providing school tours, our guides offer gallery talks to the general public. These include more in-depth versions of the school tour talks, as well as subjects that are more appropriate to an adult audience, such as childbirth in ancient Egypt. Our volunteers also are provided with training sessions that equal the knowledge of the Museum guides. They provide gallery hand-on workshops, office assistance, and security assistance. Challenges in visibility The location of the Museum and regional history has also been a challenge to our visibility. The Museum did not have an established advertising system or series of campaigns, as for many decades, it was the ‘only show in town’. If one desired culture in San Jose, the Museum was here. Lectures were sponsored, movies were shown, the planetarium hosted educational events on astronomical data … the list of options was endless. Then the technology ‘boom’ struck. Almost overnight, the valley of Santa Clara became Silicon Valley. The population exploded. The valley that was in the 1970’s a farmland of orchards became a paved metropolis, quickly outstripping San Francisco in population. Much of this population did not grow up in the area, and so did not visit the Museum in school. We have found that many of our visitors have simply been driving in the area, saw the apparently alarming sight of Egyptian temples in San Jose, and stopped to investigate. Other museums have opened in the area, including the Tech Museum of Innovation with its Imax Theater. The size and profile of this museum in the downtown area of San Jose draws a great deal of notice and many visitors. Also, it draws funding, as technology is very much a part of the lifestyle of Silicon Valley. Other major attractions that have opened since the founding of the PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum include Six Flag’s Great America, the Winchester Mystery House, the Museum of Modern Art, and even a Quilt Museum. This competition for visitors has affected all of the museums, and a consortium of museums has developed, in which the museums of San Jose have grouped together to cross-promote each other. It is clear that visitors who enjoy a visit to one museum are far more likely to visit another, as well as support the museum of their choice. We have found that many people who came on their field trips at age 12 do not return until they have children of their own. Based on surveys and conversations, there was an impression that the displays were always the same, so repeat visits were not necessary. The new gallery installations and our semi-annual rotating exhibits on various topics are challenging this: our current exhibit is ‘Rare Books of the Rosicrucian Library’, some of which date to the 17th century, to be followed this fall by a contemporary artists’ exhibition. We have embarked on an effort to raise the profile of the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum. The lack of advertising and low profile of the Museum resulted in visitors not being ‘reminded’ to come visit again. We are providing factual scholarly information and feedback to news organizations, such as Discovery Online and CNN. We participate in museum group events, open booths at public events such as fairs, and invite local news events and shows to do their ‘stand-ups’ in front of our Museum. In an age in which the consumer has many choices about their time, and little time to work with, museums must compete with other forms of ‘entertainment’ to draw the visitors. By providing quality information and updating frequently, based on events in the news, we hope to provide a far better resource for the community than some of the other options, such as amusement parks. Conservation In 2001, a conservator assessed our Museum with the purpose of improving our preservation of our collection. We are very fortunate to have a stable environment within the Museum galleries, which as are large and open. Fluctuations are very rare and slight. 14 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The Afterlife Gallery of the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). The Offering Chamber of the full-sized replica of a Beni Hasan tomb (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). Several suggestions were made regarding the cases themselves. The materials used in building the Museum were somewhat mysterious, as records are not in the files regarding the design and installation of the cases. They appeared, with some inspection, to be made of high-grade plywood, with a form of adhesive attaching rubber-like wall covering to the plywood. The cases registered as slightly acidic in the interiors. Clearly, they were out-gassing some materials. Short of removing and replacing the cases, virtually impossible as they are built-ins, we were offered another option by our conservator: sealing the cases with polyurethane sealant, then primer, and finally using water-based latex paint to cosmetically repair the case interiors. This is the method we chose. The most sensitive gallery is Gallery A, now called the ‘Afterlife Gallery’. The animal and human mummies were in danger of damage, so this was the most pressing gallery. As with many museums, budget was an issue. Rather than hire outside contractors to perform the work, we used our own staff during the summer, when school tours are rare. The guides and the retail staff were trained as preparators, and a select few were given intensive training as artefacts handlers. The coffins and mummies were removed from their cases and placed in temporary storage areas in locked spaces of PalArch Foundation the Museum. The cases were first checked cosmetically and repaired. As along as we were doing it, we decided to only do it once, and do it right the first time. The sealant was done only on our closed days, as the fumes in the gallery were uncomfortable for the visitors, who passed by to enter the tomb replica. Once the sealant was cured and outgassed, primer and then latex were applied. As we had to paint the interiors of the cases, we decided to do some cosmetic improvements as well. The case interiors were a tan colour and many of the stone objects disappeared into the colour. By studying the objects themselves, we chose a reddish brown colour that appeared on an 18th Dynasty coffin for the case interior colours. When in doubt about the proper palette for the Museum, it was realized that the Egyptians gave us the palette; we simply had to use that which they provided judiciously. Once the paint had properly cured, the cases were re-installed. Our next step is the replacement of the lighting system. Fluorescent tubing as used for lighting and permanently installed within the interiors of the cases. The UV rating is too high, as are the lumens. As any ‘fix’ is unacceptable, we will be installing a fibre optic lighting system, prioritizing on our most sensitive cases, such as those with ink on papyrus. Each of the lights will be adjustable, to set proper light levels for each object, and there will be no UV. Fortunately, the installation of these will be quite simple. The design of the cases left a space above them, which will simply need to be opened, and the projectors installed. The 15 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) wiring for the fluorescents will be used to hardwire each of the projectors. This will of course be done by licensed, outside contractors. Exhibit renewal The Museum’s design, while inspired in its day, has provided us with some problems as the collection and mission have expanded. The layout of the Museum was rigid in 1968. Gallery A was designed specifically for the mummies and their coffin. The objects and remains were placed in cases around the room. There was no order as to date or topic. This was the mummy gallery, and the mummies were displayed in it. As the Museum was designed to hold the collection in 1968, the enlargement of the collection has created pressure on the space. As the Museum was designed to display the collection rather than store it, only a small space was set aside for storage purposes. In reality, our situation today is that the exhibit cases are our storage, and we must work around the structure to solve curatorial dilemmas. The fact that the cases were permanent built-ins has reduced the flexibility of the installations. In each of the galleries, the dimensions of these cases are different. For example, the coffin of a Saite woman, with her mummy, can only be displayed in one case in Gallery C due to its size, or in A, which is full. The storage space holds two coffins now, and is full. Therefore, the coffin and mummy are being displayed in Gallery C, which is the ‘Religion and Government Gallery’, in our new configuration. Fortunately, she is the daughter of a priest, so with some creative theming of the other materials in the case, we can continue with appropriate topics. We also took the opportunity to paint the walls of the galleries themselves. Colour styles were very different in the mid-1960’s than in this new millennium. Formerly, baby blue and pea green would compete for attention on the same wall. In most galleries, we painted over the linen textured wallpaper, repairing any flaws. In the ‘Afterlife Gallery’, we chose to give the impression of entering a tomb and create an environment, so the walls were textured to appear like limestone and the walls were faux PalArch Foundation The coffins of relatives Usermontu and Ta'awa (the sister of Ankh-Hor who is in the Leiden Museum) stand together again in the Afterlife Gallery. They date to c. 600 BC (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). painted to appear like Egyptian limestone walls, with the natural striations. Staffing As with many museums in the modern world, our staff is always slightly smaller than we think we need. We have solved the dilemma by learning the special skills each of the staff has, and using them. Rather than simply giving tours, our tour guides have painted gallery walls, created a new mural for the visitor centre and built mounts. The retail staff has proven particularly invaluable for the gallery renovations. The level of detail required for gallery work is well-served by people who are detail oriented, such as those who have done inventory, and who have used power tools in setting up displays. This multi-tasking is of benefit to the staff as well as the Museum. One of the former retail staff is currently earning her master’s degree in Museum Studies in a well-known program, and a former tour guide has just entered the same program. Curatorship Since the opportunity existed, we chose to re-install the cases in the ‘Afterlife Gallery’ in chronological order, so that guests could see the development of Egyptian funerary techniques and technology over the millennia. The collection of the Museum supported installations for every major period of Egyptian history, from Predynastic through Roman, 16 www.PalArch.nl covering over 6000 years. Each of the cases is an assemblage of grave goods, coffins, and in some cases, mummies, from the same time period. Some anachronisms were solved, such as the Saite mummy, dating from about 600 BC, being in the coffin of an 18th dynasty scribe, about 900 years older. The ‘Afterlife Gallery’ opened on September 8, 2001. Since then, the renewal and conservation has ‘rolled’ though the Museum, and we will finish the final gallery at the end of June 2004. Each of the galleries has been properly sealed, and each gallery has its own colour theme. For example, Egyptian green was matched off of a late New Kingdom cartonnage coffin fragment for Gallery C, Government. Green was associated with the goddess Wadjet, who was one of the protectors of the king. This work has been very rewarding, not only for the sake of the conservation of the artefacts, but for the theming of the galleries and the creation of a narrative path through the Museum. The visitor will begin in the ‘Afterlife Gallery’ (death being the gateway for many people to ancient Egypt), and continue on through the tomb replica. They will step out of the tomb replica into the brightly painted ‘Daily Life Gallery’ (formerly gallery B), where the Egyptian love of life, not worship of death, will be emphasized. The next gallery, formerly gallery C, is the ‘Religion and Kingship Gallery’, in which both topics, as well as the intersection of the two, will be explored. The final gallery, formerly gallery D, is the ‘Polytheism and Monotheism Gallery’. The worship of the goddess Sekhmet and the monotheistic period of Amarna will be contrasted and compared, taking advantage of the strengths of our Amarna material and the prevalence of Sekhmet in our collection. These two halves of the gallery are set up as shrines, to give a sense of immersion in Egyptian culture. In the past, there was no thematic order to the galleries and their cases. The previous method of curatorial work, the grouping of like objects, such as pottery, was employed. In the galleries we are currently installing, Egyptian cultural practices are being emphasized and interpreted. Upon exiting the tomb and entering ‘Daily Life’, the house and home will be covered, gradually shifting to agriculture, PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) artisans, and scribes. Objects that would be used with each other, or that are related by topic rather than material, are grouped together. ‘Daily Life’ shifts into ‘Trade and Cultural Exchange’, as we have a sizeable collection of Mesopotamian material, as well as other items from various cultures the ancient Egyptians contacted and engaged. Throughout the galleries and where possible, quotes from ancient Egyptian literature and letters are used to allow the Egyptians their own voice. For instance, in the cosmetics case, a New Kingdom love poem describing the ideal of feminine beauty is translated and posted. We hope to personalize the people of ancient Egypt for our visitors, so that they leave seeing the humanity, rather than the mummies. The goal is to send the visitor on a personal journey of discovery of ancient Egypt. The path through the Museum will be clear and presented in a concise order. Answers as well as new questions will result from the path. The Egyptians will have their own say. The visitor will not require a guide to understand Egypt, although they will be available to give talks and elaborate on the information and content. Research Research is an ongoing project at the Museum. Unprovenanced materials collected in 1920 were sometimes misdated, so research is always in progress to confirm and improve our interpretations of objects, both on display and in storage. Recent research has included the autopsy of one of our mummies with scientists Dr. Ronald Beckett and Dr. Jerry Conlogue of the Bioanthropology Institute of Quinnipiac University. Non-damaging techniques such as X-ray and endoscopy were employed to learn as much as possible about our most mysterious mummy, which came to us in the coffin of a 25th Dynasty priest named Usermontu from Thebes. There has always been a question about the identity of this mummy, which may not be the proper mummy for the coffin. While we did not ascertain the truth about his identity, we did learn many details we did not have prior to this study. He was, for instance, under thirty-five when he died, perhaps as young as thirty. He also had 17 www.PalArch.nl vertebral changes that suggested a profession of scribe. We have invited researchers and scholars from around the world to share their expertise in each of their specializations, and continue to do so. Ethical considerations We consider ourselves to be the caretakers of the world’s cultural heritage. It is our responsibility to preserve and protect the materials of the ancient Egyptians for future generations. Each of the objects in our collection is unique. Some of them are particularly special, because they might be the only surviving record of a person’s life, the fact that they were on this planet for a brief space of time. The mission statement of the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum states: “The Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum collects, preserves, researches, and interprets objects that depict the achievements of ancient civilizations to promote public understanding of history and the cultural interactions that have led to our time”. We take our mission very seriously, and our installations and interpretations must always answer to this ideal. The mummies act as ambassadors form the past, a chance to meet a person who saw what we might only imagine. Our labels present knowledge and are intended as a catalyst to more questions. Our renewal of the galleries has been with one primary purpose: preserve that which is entrusted to us. Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The future The future of the Museum and its complex is bright. Rosicrucian Park has entered a very busy phase of its existence with renewal and expansion, and the Museum is joining in with its renewal and conservations work. Also in the park, a replica of an 18th Dynasty Egyptian garden has been constructed on the site of the old administration building. This garden is stocked with authentic plants that grew in the ancient gardens, and will allow the Museum to give walking tours on the topics of Egyptian households, medicine, and food. The Rosicrucian Planetarium, after being closed for six years, has been refurbished and re-opened in March of 2004 with a new archaeologybased show regarding the worship of Mithras and its astronomical origins. The Rosicrucian Library has new expanded open house to accommodate the public. Throughout the park, the landscaping, the construction, and the details have been attended to for the next phase of Rosicrucian Park’s service to the people of the region and beyond. The Museum itself is attracting burgeoning membership, increasing five times over in the past two years, increased attendance, sold-out lectures and special events, and the attraction of world-class scholars. Our website has attracted not only many ‘hits’, but also is used for student research and the online booking of our school tour program. Our hard work has been a reward in itself, and the gift that is being presented to the community is an honour. The Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum is located at 1342 Naglee Avenue in San Jose, California. Our website is www.egyptianmuseum.org. The Rosicrucian Peace Garden, based on 18th Dynasty examples, opening June, 2004 (© Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum). PalArch Foundation 18 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The Logan Museum of Anthropology’s European Paleolithic Collections By W. Green The Logan Museum of Anthropology is a unit of Beloit College, an undergraduate liberal arts college. Founded in 1894, the museum houses over 250,000 anthropological objects from around the world. The museum preserves, exhibits, and interprets these collections; makes them accessible for teaching, research, and public education; and promotes experiential (hands-on) learning in anthropology, museology, and other fields. In the 1920s, the Logan Museum focused much of its research and collecting efforts on the Paleolithic of Western Europe. Sponsored by the museum’s founding patron Frank G. Logan, curators George L. Collie and Alonzo W. Pond acquired over 21,000 specimens representing all of the major French Paleolithic “cultures.” The museum team excavated two sites in the Dordogne (Rocher de la Peine [Magdalenian] in 1926 and Abri Cellier or La Ruth [Aurignacian] in 1927), but Collie and Pond built the collection primarily through purchasing material from private collectors and landowners. Some material was purchased from the Musée des Eyzies. The Logan Museum’s European Paleolithic collections have been the subject of several publications, theses, and research papers. In the museum’s own publication Exterior of the Logan Museum (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). PalArch Foundation View of visible storage (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). series, Collie (1928) supplied an early overview, and White & Breitborde (1992) compiled a well-illustrated 367-page set of research reports and collection summaries. The latter volume focuses on bone, antler, and ivory implements and ornaments, as well as engraved figures in stone and other media. Aurignacian, Magdalenian, and other Upper Paleolithic assemblages are especially well represented. White (1992) supplies a useful history and inventory of the Logan Museum’s acquisitions of French Paleolithic collections. In addition, White (2002) has reviewed the museum’s work in the context of other American archaeological studies in Western Europe and in relation to the archaeo-political environment of the 1920’s. In 1992 the Logan Museum reorganised and rehoused its European and North African (Capsian) archaeological collections with funds View of visible storage (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). 19 www.PalArch.nl View of visible storage (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). from the U.S. National Science Foundation. This work made the collections and associated documentation easier to access and to use for research and teaching. A portion of the collection is on exhibit, while the vast majority is in secure storage cabinets in the museum’s Paleolithic Studies Center. The collection is used regularly for teaching and is accessible to LMA 10494 and 4.7.1.1, painted river pebbles, Mas d'Azil (Ariege), France, Azilian (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) LMA 4.7.253, necklace, Abri Blandchard (Dordogne), France, Late Magdalenian (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). qualified scholars. The Logan Museum welcomes visitors and researchers, and the museum especially invites inquiries from researchers interested in working with its Paleolithic collections. Beloit College is located in Beloit, Wisconsin, on the Illinois-Wisconsin state line, close to Chicago, Milwaukee, and Madison. Beloit is easily accessible via a 1.5-hour drive or bus ride from O’Hare International Airport. To learn more about particular collections or to schedule a visit, please contact the Curator of Collections, Nicolette Meister (email: [email protected]). For general information about the museum, please see http://www.beloit.edu/~museum/logan/index.ht ml. For an overview of the European archaeological collections, please see http://www.beloit.edu/~museum/logan/catalog/ europe/index.htm. For biographical information on Collie & Pond, see http://www.beloit.edu/~museum/logan/collectio ns/collectors/index.htm. Cited literature LMA 12571, Capra ibex engraved bone, Jouclas/Grotte de Lacave (Lot), France, Magdalenian (© Logan Museum of Anthropology). PalArch Foundation Collie, G.L. 1928. The Aurignacians and their culture. – Log.Mus.Bul. 1, 1). White, R. 1992. The history and research significance of the Logan Museum French Paleolithic Collections. In: White, R. & L.B. Breitborde. Eds. 1992. French 20 www.PalArch.nl Paleolithic Collections in the Logan Museum of Anthropology. Log.Mus.Bul. (new series) 1, 2: 1-37. White, R. 2002. The historic and legal context of foreign acquisitions of Paleolithic artifacts from the Périgord: 1900 to 1941. In: Straus, L.G. Ed. 2002. The role of American archeologists in the study of the European Upper Paleolithic. – Oxford, BAR International Series 1048: 71-83. White, R. & L. B. Breitborde. Eds. 1992. French Paleolithic collections in the Logan Museum of Anthropology. – Log.Mus.Bul. (new series) 1, 2. Note: Copies of White & Breitborde (1992) (ISBN 1-880763-02-8) are available for U.S. $40 each, plus $8 (international) shipping. Send order and payment to: William Green, Director Logan Museum of Anthropology, Beloit College, 700 College St., Beloit, WI 53511, USA. Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The mysterious Bog people by V.T. van Vilsteren Introduction The bogs of north-west Europe once were dangerous, fog-filled places where a wrong turn or step could result in accidents such as getting lost or drowning. It is not difficult to understand, therefore, why the people of the past believed that gods and spirits inhabited the swamps. These gods and spirits controlled life and death, sickness and health, good crops and bad harvests, and happiness and misfortune. The ancient peoples believed that valuable gifts and sacrifices would win them good graces of the gods and they made their sacrifices to the bogs believing that they were a kind of doorstep between their world and that of the gods. Never before have so many sacrifices, including bodies and objects, been found in such concentration. An impressive new overview of all these discoveries is presented in the exhibition “The Mysterious Bog People”, to be seen from September 18th in the Drents Museum in Assen (The Netherlands). Already 470.000 visitors so far have been attracted by the amazing discoveries displayed in this international project. International partnership In 1998 the Drents Museum took the initiative for an international co-operation in order to develop a large exhibition on bogfinds. Four major partners on two continents have since been working in close harmony on this groundbreaking exhibition. As such it has become a joint international project of the PalArch Foundation 21 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The exhibition Numerous brooches and other valuables were offered near a spring at Bad Pyrmont, Germany (© Niedersächsiches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Hannover). Theatrical lightning in the exhibition evokes the mysterious atmosphere of the bogs (© Drents Museum, Assen). Drents Museum in Assen (The Netherlands), the Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum in Hanover (Germany), the Canadian Museum of Civilization in Ottawa (Quebec, Canada) and the Glenbow Museum in Calgary (Alberta, Canada). “The Mysterious Bog People” is a unique project, as it is the first time that important bog finds will be brought together on a major scale through a collaboration between North America and Europe. It is the most extensive international partnership ever undertaken by the partner museums. The two European partners are providing most of the exhibits and their expertise in relation to the content, curatorial research and collections, while the two Canadian partners are offering their leadership in museology, projectmanagement, promotion and fundraising. Working this way has made it possible to present the almost international phenomenon of bog finds in an appropriate way, using the collections in Assen, Hanover and other well-known museums (among others the National Museums of Antiquities of Denmark and The Netherlands). Partnership of four international museums on such a scale is unique in the museum world. PalArch Foundation In prehistoric times, as north-west Europe became increasingly wet, peat began to form and vast areas were covered by bogs. People lived peacefully on the high, dry land between the bogs. The bogs were dangerous and often foggy places where one could easily get lost and drown, and were shrouded in mystery. It is easy to understand why people believed that they were inhabited by gods and spirits, who had control over life and death, health, crops, cattle and the fate of humans. Good relations with these powerful beings were essential and could be maintained through offerings, which were deposited at the threshold of the dwelling place of the divinities. Valuable items such as grain, antlers, pottery, wheels, weapons and jewellery were left in the bogs, turning them into immense reservoirs of gifts. Anything of value could be used as an offering. Even people were sacrificed to propitiate or thank the gods. Even in the medieval period the old ritual of offering in the bogs continued (© Drents Museum, Assen) 22 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) The gloomy features in the face of the reconstruction of the 16 year old Yde girl seem to reflect her mournful fate (© Drents Museum, Assen). Yde-girl, a Dutch bogbody now in the Drents Museum, was strangled in the first century A.D (© Drents Museum, Assen). In early modern times, people began to exploit the bogs. As huge quantities of turf were cut for fuel, the gifts that had been buried for the gods were gradually uncovered, providing a glimpse of the life of our ancestors. One of the themes of the exhibition is the practice of making offerings, through which prehistoric people tried to control their fate. Visitors to the exhibits will be astonished by the wide range of objects that were carefully laid down in the bogs. These items shed light on religious practices in north-west Europe in prehistoric times and provide substantial information on daily life. This will be complemented by a number of everyday objects from different archaeological PalArch Foundation sites showing the special character and value of the bog finds. “The Mysterious Bog People” is the first international touring exhibition to tell the story of life in northern Europe from the Stone Age to the end of the 16th century and to reveal the importance of the discoveries in European bogs, which shed light on the everyday lives, ideas and beliefs of ancient peoples. Through artefacts, text panels, settings, lighting and sound, the exhibition aims to provide visitors with a full experience of the bog offerings and the bog environments in north-west Europe, which have preserved these fascinating relics. A unique item on display includes the remains of the only known wooden Bronze Age temple. The artefacts selected for display tell the story of the people and their culture who lived near the bogs. They will include bog mummies and details on the reconstruction of individuals like the ‘Yde Girl’ using modern forensic science. The technique of reconstruction using modern forensic science is also examined. Scientists are able to reconstruct facial features from a skull that is very well-preserved. Using clay or 23 www.PalArch.nl The famous necklace found in Exloo, The Netherlands, comprises amber tin and glass beads (© Drents Museum, Assen). wax, the tissues and skin are modelled on a copy of the skull. Other facial features such as eyes and hair are also added, giving an impression of what the individual looked like. A host of objects found in the bogs, such as flint and bronze axes, pottery, bronze swords, leather shoes, textiles, gold coins, jewellery, musical instruments and agricultural tools are also a part of this display. The exhibition will also feature one of the oldest artefacts from a European bog: the Pesse dugout canoe, which was found in 1955 and has been carbon dated between 8040 and 7510 BC. It is the oldest known boat in the world and was made from a Scots pine with the use of flint axes. This remarkable object will serve to explain what a bog environment is like and how it acts to preserve organic matter. The exhibition also reveals the botanical nature of bogs, which preserve objects that would decay under normal burial conditions. The history, biology and preservation properties of bogs are clearly demonstrated. The scientific techniques and forensic analysis used to determine the age of the objects found in the bogs of north-west Europe are explored as well. The scientific component of the exhibition places it at the leading edge of international archaeological discovery about PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) prehistoric Europe. Forensic research currently being conducted on one of the bog mummies of the Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum is revealing interesting historical and archaeological evidence in support of the theory that the bogs were indeed centres of spiritual activity and significance to early northern Europeans. The Mysterious Bog People is a unique exhibition. Never before have so many bogmummies and offerings been brought together, providing valuable insight into the practices of our ancestors. Among the prehistoric persons that visitors will encounter are Red Franz, found in 1900 in Germany, and the already mentioned 16-yearold girl from Yde, discovered three years earlier in The Netherlands. Although these two ancient Germans could not have met while alive, they will lie peacefully side-by- side in the exhibition. Fans of Vincent Van Gogh will also have a rare opportunity to see a painting that captures the often desolate atmosphere of the bogs. Background Bog finds have continued to enjoy the interest of many scholars at home and abroad since the time of the Drents Museum founding. The Drents Museum was one of the first museums in The Netherlands to have its own archaeologist. From the time of the First World War (1918) to the 1950s, Dr. A. E. Van Giffen was responsible for maintaining and expanding the Museum’s archaeological department. As director and professor of the distinguished Biological and Archaeological Institute of the University of Groningen, he was the first to apply an approach to archaeological digs in the northern regions of The Netherlands that was both systematic and scientific. Due to intensive bog and heath drainage carried out before and between the two world wars, the number of archaeologists involved with the Museum grew. As a result of the work of Van Giffen and his successors, the Drents Museum in Assen has one of the most important archaeological collections in Northwest Europe. The same could be said of the collection belonging to the Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum in Hanover, another of the partners in this project. 24 www.PalArch.nl The Weerdinge couple: two Iron-age men that were sacrificed in the bogs of Drenthe, The Netherlands (© Drents Museum, Assen). In Germany, the first studies of the thenknown bog bodies were carried out by a woman pioneer of archaeology in the 1870s: Johanna Mestorf. She wrote a catalogue of bog bodies, interpreting them as the victims of murder. This interpretation would change over the years, but German archaeologists were still among the first to discuss bog finds and bog mummies seriously. From 1907 on, Hans Hahne, Director of the Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, conducted some very important research which is today carried on by a number of specialized archaeologists excavating spectacular bog sites in Lower Saxony. It was not until the mid-1980s that Drents Museum archaeologist Dr. W. A. B. Van der Sanden began his work on the artefacts from the highly productive Drenthe marshes. In PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) 1990, he published the results of his research in a thesis entitled “Mens en Moeras” (or: “The Bog People”). As a direct result of his research, the head of one of the bog mummies was reconstructed to produce an image of what we know as the Yde Girl. Since 1994, this resurrected prehistoric girl has formed the gruesome centrepiece of any visit to the Museum’s prehistory department. The Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum possesses one of the best-known bog mummies: Red Franz, a man with bright red hair and beard, killed around 300 AD. Exclusively for “The Mysterious Bog People” a facial reconstruction was made by the famous English forensic pathologist Dr. R. Neave, who also reconstructed the Yde girl. Both reconstructions and the original bodies are major attractions of the exhibition. Both national and international interest in mummies found in the bogs has soared, resulting in the release of two films on Yde girl, one made in 1997 by Discovery Channel and the other in 1998 by the BBC, and with an exhibition of the bog mummies, organised by the Drents Museum and presented in Silkeborg, Denmark. More recently two more films on bog mummies have been produced by National Geographic Channel, starring bog bodies from the collection of the Drents Museum. An 30 min. episode of the ‘Tales of the Living Dead’ reveals the magic background of the medieval Wijster bog bodies and an episode of ‘The Mummy Road Show’ dealt with research on the Weerdinge couple. All films will be shown in the Drents Museum on a regular basis. While in Ottawa, the exhibition enticed some (native?) visitors to secretely make offerings on top of the showcases. The little bags contained tobacco (© Canadian Museum of Civilization, Ottawa). 25 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Exhibition The palaeoart of Joe Tucciarone All the objects are displayed in a beautiful decor designed by GSM in Montreal. The impact as the bogs must have had on prehistoric man is reflected in the mysterious atmosphere the designer has created. It makes people walk around respectfully and whispering. In Ottawa the exhibition was awarded with the Grand Prix du Tourism de l'Outaouais. The exhibition is to be seen at the Drents Museum in Assen (The Netherlands) from September 18th 2004 until January 9th 2005. The international tour (after stops in Hanover, Ottawa and Calgary) will continue from then on to: By J. Tucciarone Manchester [UK] February - May 2005 Chicago [USA] June - September 2005 Pittsburgh [USA] October 2005 - January 2006 Los Angeles [USA] March - September 2006 Milwaukee [USA] October 2006 - January 2007 Negotiations concerning an Australian extension on the tour are still going on. The bilingual exhibition is accompanied by a richly illustrated book, available in four language versions (English, French, Dutch and German). More information is available on the website www.bogpeople.org or www.drentsmuseum.nl. I had three hobbies when I was a child. Like many children, I enjoyed drawing and colouring pictures. When I was eight years old, my mother enrolled me in Saturday morning art classes for children at the Butler Institute of American Art in Youngstown, Ohio. In addition to art, I was also fascinated by the moon and stars. At the age of ten I became captivated by astronomy after my first look at the moon through a small telescope. But above all else I was spellbound by dinosaurs. I could not believe that such colossal and ferocious animals had ever lived. There was a seminal moment in my life when I opened my first book about prehistoric times and I realized that these terrible creatures once ruled the peaceful, well-ordered world I thought I knew so well. I made many trips to the local library until I had read every book it contained about dinosaurs. In my art classes I had little interest in drawing traditional subjects like seascapes and pastoral scenes. Instead, I much preferred creating illustrations of my favourite dinosaurs! Although dinosaurs were immensely intriguing to me, the focus of my attention gradually drifted upward to the heavens. I grew up in the 1960s when the Space race was in high gear, and images of the astronauts and the moon were everywhere. At the age of twelve I built my first telescope, and by the time I had graduated from high school I decided that I wanted to become an astronomer. In order to achieve that goal, I studied astronomy and My first drawing of a dinosaur (© J. Tucciarone). PalArch Foundation 26 www.PalArch.nl physics in college. After receiving my Masters Degree I embarked on a professional career, but not as an astronomer. I combined my interest in art with my education in astronomy and became a planetarium artist. For more than twenty years I specialized in creating space art for domed theatres. The high point in my profession as an astronomical artist was reached when National Geographic magazine commissioned and published a collection of my illustrations. Then, a chance event added a new dimension to my artistic endeavours. About eight years ago I was given a script and asked to transform it into an educational and entertaining planetarium show. I had no enthusiasm for that particular project, so I asked my clients if I could write and produce a show about something more interesting to me. I convinced them I could create a planetarium show about dinosaurs, even though I hadn't drawn a picture of one since I was a child! After many months I managed to research, write and illustrate the show for my clients. However, of more importance for me was the reawakening of my interest in dinosaurs. With the success of the ‘Jurassic Park’ books and films, I found that dinosaurs were as popular with adults as they were with children, and illustrations of my prehistoric beasts soon began appearing in books, magazines and even movies. As a child, I never wondered how or why I had become so thoroughly entranced by dinosaurs. I was simply amazed by their monumental size and totally alien appearance. I am still awed by prehistoric animals, but my childhood wonderment has been tempered by my need to learn as much as I Cryolophosaurus (© 2003 J. Tucciarone). http://members.aol.com/Dinoplanet/cryo.html. PalArch Foundation Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) can about their physical characteristics. Since I now create dinosaur illustrations for publishers, I have begun to study them very closely in order to produce accurate paintings of them. Palaeontologists excavate their bones and reconstruct their skeletons. My job is to add flesh to those bones and, at least on paper, bring the dinosaurs back to life. It might seem that art and the science of palaeontology would have absolutely nothing in common, but just the opposite is true. Palaeontology and art have a good deal in common and are very closely interwoven on many levels. There are no living dinosaurs roaming the earth today, so book and magazine publishers employ artists when they need images of prehistoric creatures. This requires that such artists have some scientific background. To create a realistic and accurate depiction of a dinosaur, an artist must understand anatomy, geometry, perspective and the interaction between light and matter. In order to accurately portray an extinct animal, the first step I take is to read as much about it as I can. A description of the fossil remains written by a palaeontologist is the best source of information. It is important to have some idea of the creature's posture and whether it habitually walked, ran, or even glided through the air. It is also vital to know when and where the animal lived in order to depict it in its proper environment and surrounded by its biological contemporaries. Yet, no matter how much data I gather about a specific dinosaur, one gap in the information always remains: what did the living animal look like? Scientists can tell us much about its skeleton, a little about its musculature but almost nothing about the texture and colour of its flesh. Such ‘life restorations’ lie in the realm of the artist. In many cases the remains of dinosaurs are so fragmentary that the full reconstruction and depiction of the creature is necessarily speculative. It is one thing to see a dinosaur's crumbling remains in a museum. It is another thing altogether to envision it as a living, breathing creature. That is the challenge of creating this kind of illustration. For me, producing such a painting is an enjoyable exercise that is only possible because of the wonderful marriage of art and science. Once I have all the necessary background information about my subject , I 27 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) Night stalkers (© 1999 J. Tucciarone). http://members.aol.com/Dinoplanet/mega.html Allosaurus maximus (© 2002 J. Tucciarone). http://members.aol.com/Dinoplanet/a_maximu s.html. can begin the process of creating an illustration. I always begin a dinosaur illustration with a series of pencil sketches of the animal. For these, I rely heavily on the skeletal reconstructions of the animal's remains. Once I have made a basic drawing of the stance and pose of a dinosaur, I must decide what the surface of its skin will look like. I base much of the life appearance of my dinosaurs on their ancestry and their closest living relatives. The system of cladistics shows that dinosaurs belong to the monophyletic group ‘Reptilia’. Since this group also includes crocodiles and alligators, their general characteristics are sometimes useful when rendering images of dinosaurs. Evidence has been found indicating that birds descend from dinosaurs. If this is true, the behaviours and appearances of birds can be used as guides in the illustration of dinosaurs. Birds are warmblooded, agile and many of them are quite colourful. Some or all of these traits may be used as templates in the reconstruction of the life appearances of dinosaurs. I have my own artistic style that is somewhat different than those of most other palaeo-artists. I seldom include anything but PalArch Foundation the simplest scenic elements in my paintings. One of my favourite artists is Frank Frazetta. His subjects lie mainly in the realm of fantasy and science fiction, but I have always enjoyed his artistic style. He includes little or no background scenery in his paintings, which serves to emphasize the heroic figures he portrays. My artistic style is heavily influenced by the drama of Frazetta's paintings. Of course, my style is also based on my passion for these primordial monsters. For me, dinosaurs have always loomed larger-than-life, and sensational new discoveries constantly add to their superstar status. New discoveries give me opportunities to illustrate new kinds of animals. Such finds drive my work by inspiring me to paint and creating a demand for my illustrations. Palaeontologists are digging up new kinds of dinosaurs at an accelerating pace all around the world, and better science is giving us a more refined and detailed view of their appearances and ways of life. Dinosaurs are no longer regarded as the reptilian slugs we used to see squatting in dusty museums. We now know that many of them were intelligent and agile. Headlines proclaim the discoveries of the largest land animals that have ever lived, the discovery of feathered dinosaurs and even the discovery of the fossil image of what appears to be a dinosaur's four-chambered heart. Their avian physiologies link them to living birds, and their sudden disappearance lends an element of mystery to their story. They are like comic book superheroes engaged in a real-life, historical drama where they roam the frontiers between fact and fiction. For me, they will always be the scaly lords of an ancient realm; the masters of a bygone world forever lost in the depths of time. 28 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 2 (2004) More work can be seen on my website: http://members.aol.com/Dinoplanet/joe.html. Egypt in photographs By Z. Kosc Ozymandias "... Two vast and trunkless legs of stone Stand in the desert... The lone and level sand stretch far away." The Ramesseum, Luxor West Bank, Egypt. Photography Z. Kosc © 2004 (See also: http://members.ams.chello.nl/zkosc/index.html). Colophon The Newsletter is an initiative of the PalArch Foundation and is edited by A.J. Veldmeijer ([email protected]) and S.M. van Roode ([email protected]). The illustration editing is done by A.M. Hense (www.egyptarchaeology.com/, [email protected]). The Newsletter is offered for free to the supporters of the Foundation (see http://www.palarch.nl/information.htm, 3.6 Membership); back issues will be offered for sale at the website (www.PalArch.nl) at 5 euro each (excluding dispatch costs) . PalArch Foundation Any questions and reactions regarding the Newsletter, the Foundation or the webbased Netherlands scientific journal should be adressed to [email protected]. The address to which correspondence can be send is: PalArch Foundation, Mezquitalaan 23, 1064 NS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The procedure for work submitted to be published in the Newsletter follows the same rules and procedures as scientific publications and can be found at http://www.palarch.nl/information.htm, 4. Submission. 29 www.PalArch.nl Newsletter 1, 1 (2004) Copyright of the Newsletter Copyright © 2003 PalArch Foundation The author retains the copyright, but agrees that the PalArch Foundation has the non-exclusive right to publish the work in electronic or other formats. The author also agrees that the Foundation has the right to distribute copies (electronic and/or hard copies), to include the work in archives and compile volumes. The Foundation will use the original work as first published at www.PalArch.nl. The author is responsible for obtaining the permission of the use of illustrations (drawings, photographs or other visual images) made by others than the author. The author can be requested to submit proof of this permission to the PalArch Foundation. Pdf texts are free to download on the conditions that each copy is complete and contains the PalArch copyright statement; no changes are made to the contents and no charge is made. The downloaded (and/or printed) versions may not be duplicated in hard copy or machine readable form or reproduced photographically, and they may not be redistributed, transmitted, translated or stored on microfilm, nor in electronic databases other than for single use by the person that downloaded the file. Commercial use or redistribution can only be realized after consultation with and with written permission of the PalArch Foundation. PalArch Foundation 30