Impact of Vehicle Technologies on State Transportation Agencies

Impact of Vehicle Technologies on State Transportation Agencies

Impact of Vehicle Technologies on
State Transportation Agencies
AASHTO Standing Committee on Highway Traffic
Safety
May 14, 2014
MATT SMITH, P.E.
ITS PROGRAM MANAGER
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
History in Southeast Michigan
Investment Priorities
 Improve system safety
 Improve operations and maintenance efficiency
 Improve asset management
 Provide new mobility solutions
 Environmentally and economically sustainable
 Support economic development
Michigan Traffic Fatality Trends
1200
1150
1100
1050
1000
950
900
850
800
750
700
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
History of ITS
 1960 – Freeway Service Patrols begin (Chicago)
 1962 – CCTV deployment for freeway surveillance (Detroit)
 1962 – Detector deployment for freeway surveillance










(Chicago)
1967 – Freeway ramp metering (Los Angeles)
1967 – Reversible lane control (Seattle)
1971 – Integrated freeway/arterial system (Houston)
1972 – Bus bypass ramps (Minnesota)
1990 - Intelligent Vehicle/Highway (IVHS) concept
introduced
1992 - Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) concept
2003 – Vehicle Infrastructure Integration program begins
2009 – IntelliDrive (Connected Vehicles) program begins
2012 – Safety Pilot Model Deployment
2014 + Connected and Automated vehicles
Objective
Scenarios
Improve Safety Urban
Rural
Improve
Urban
Mobility and
Environmental
Impact
Rural
Apps Focus Example Applications
V2I safety
Red Light Violation Warning
Speed Zone and other safety warning
Tech Focus Priority Deployments
DSRC
High crash rate intersections
High volume intersections
High crash rate curves
High consequence weather sites:
bridges, fog areas
Arterial
Intelligent Traffic Signal Systems with
Management Prioritization and Preemption
Eco-Drive
DSRC
Next-generation Active Traffic Management Cellular
Freeway
Management Next-generation Traveler Information
Next-generation Traveler Information,
including local weather alerts
Cellular
Improve
Urban, Rural,
Freight Mobility Freight,
Corridor
Traveler
Next-generation Traveler Information
Information
Enforcement Smart Roadside
Cellular
Improve Border IBCs
Crossings
Traveler
Next-generation Traveler Information
Information
Enforcement Similar to Smart Roadside
Improve
Agency
Operations
Traveler
Information
DOT Ops and DSS, Road
Maintenance Weather
Enhanced Maintenance Decision Support
Maintenance and Fleet Management
Systems
DSRC or
Cellular
Cellular
DSRC or
Cellular
Cellular
High volume corridors
High-volume corridors
High consequence weather sites:
bridges, fog areas
High volume corridors
High consequence weather sites:
bridges, fog areas
Primary Freight Network
Primary Freight Network
Border Crossings
Border Crossings
Connected Vehicle “TRIAD”
Potential Infrastructure Sites
 Signalized intersections (311,000 total)
Deployment
Fraction
Objective
20%
Deploy only at highestvolume intersections
50%
Deploy at half of all
intersections with greatest
benefits
Deploy at all intersections
where warranted
80%
Number of
Deployment
Sites
62,200
155,500
248,800
Total National Deployment Cost
Cost Element
(DSRC) Equipment and
Site Deployment
Backhaul Upgrades and
Deployment
Traffic Signal Controller
Upgrades
Total Cost over 20 years
Average Annual Cost
Total Cost
$4,700,000,000
$8,442,010,000
$636,800,000
$13.8 billion
$690 million
VEHICLES
VIDAS Platform – Base Solution
Safety Pilot Model Deployment
• Determine effectiveness of
safety technology and
applications
• Support NHTSA decisionmaking
• $18 Million, 2.5 year program
• > 2,800 cars, trucks & buses
• 73 lane-miles
• 29 roadside equipment
installations
• “Road Test” from 8/21/12 to
8/30/13
SPaT
• Expected: Total for 8 RSEs = 6,912,000 messages per day
• Actual: Total for 8 RSEs = 28,821,437 messages per day
MAP
• Expected: Total for 7 RSEs = 691,200 messages per day
• Actual: Total for 7 RSEs = 2,510,384 messages per day
TIM
• Expected: Total for 3 RSEs =259,200 messages per day
• Actual: Total for 3 RSEs = 227,766 messages per day
BSM
• Expected: Total for 26 RSEs = 6,516,458 messages per day
• Actual: Total for 26 RSEs = 16,740,785 messages per day
Storage Size (total file storage + database size per month)
Files
4.6 TB
Database
13.8 TB
Total
18.4 TB
Copyright @
2013
Mixon-Hill , Inc.
All rights
reserved.
CONNECTED……AND AUTOMATED
Basis of Design
What can Departments Do?
 Follow Connected Vehicle Developments (USDOT)
 Partner!
 Develop workforce.
 Think beyond infrastructure – look to vehicle fleet.
 Determine “application” and data needs.
 “Mainstream” technology.
Thank You!
 What it is
 Impacts on safety plan/dept.
 Competing for funds






“Combine” projects
“Alternative” funding sources
Triad- no expertise
Tons of data
Data/applications
Lack of experience / developing experience
 Challenges:
 AASHTO footprint – costs (backhaul, etc.).
 What can states do?
 Partner
 Equip vehicles
 Promote applications
MDOT Connected Vehicle Program
For Improved Safety and Operations
Fleet Vehicles
Vehicle
Positioning
GPS
MDOT Data Collection & Use
Cell
Tower
Motorola Droid
Smartphone
Cellular Service Providers
Network Operations Center
WiFi
Test &
Development
Pavement
Performance
Applications
Primary
Data Store
Surface Temp
& Atmospheric
conditions
ABS & TCS
CAN Messages
MDOT
Asset Mgt
On-board
Accelerometer
OBE
Road Surface
Roughness &
Distress
Mobility & Safety
DUAP
Application
Server
Traveler
Information
Systems
Transportation
Operation
Center
OBD-II
Maintenance
Operations
Traffic
Management
Systems
I-94 Truck Parking (Indiana to I-69)
Dynamic Truck Parking
Signs
 MiDrive Website
 Smartphone Application
 On-Board DSRC Equipment

Michigan Connected Vehicle Test Beds
OEM Tech Center (Auburn Hills)
Telegraph Rd. Corridor - SPaT
POC Test Bed (Farmington Hills)
Rock Financial Showcase (Novi)
CVPC Intersection (Southfield)
Michigan International Speedway (Brooklyn)
USDOT Development & Test Environment
(Novi)
USDOT Safety Pilot (Ann Arbor)
City of Detroit CV Test Bed
I-94 Truck Parking Info and Management
System