Please click here
Transcription
Please click here
Crossrail 2 Wimbledon station options November 2015 1 Crossrail 2 – What is it? • A brand new rai lway line, serving south -west to north-east London through central London • It wi ll run on existing and widened rai lway lines outside of the central core through a 37 km twin bore running tunnel • Cost: around £27bn • Very high capacity • Provides additional rail capacity for 270,000 people to travel into central London, per 3 hour peak • Up to 30 trains per hour in each direction • Construction cou ld start in the early 2020s, with the scheme open around 2030 • Joint TfL/Network Rai l partnership Crossrail 2 – Why? • London will grow by 1.4million people by 2030 to 10million people • This rate of growth will be the equivalent of 2 tube trains every week • London’s growth is important to the UK economy but transport and housing are key constraints Crossrail 2 – Why? The scheme will address these constraints • Support economic growth and regeneration • Benefit all of the UK • Unlock up to 200,000 new homes • Supports up to 200,000 new jobs • Bring faster, better, more sustainable travel Wimbledon –station • Benefits of a station in Wimbledon Journey Journey time today *Journey time with Crossrail 2 Between Wimbledon and Alexandra Palace 50 - 55 minutes 35 – 40 minutes Between Wimbledon and Stansted Airport 85 - 95 minutes 70 – 75 minutes Between Wimbledon Tottenham Court Road 35 minutes 20 minutes Between Wimbledon and Euston 30 - 35 minutes 20 – 25 minutes Between Wimbledon and Seven Sisters 40 - 45 minutes 30 - 35 minutes • Key to providing the required 30 trains per hour service and reliability to the service; all of these trains will call at Wimbledon. The station will require 4 Crossrail platforms to achieve this which is a new requirement. Wimbledon – operational requirements Crossrail 2 Requirements: • Operate 30 trains per hour in the Central Operating Section (COS) • Ability to run a 20 trains per hour service in the COS during disruption on NR network • Ability to start the service at TCR at 5.45 AM • Maintain trains efficiently • Serve Kingston, Epsom and Chessington Branch Lines • Keep existing railways operational throughout the construction works • Provide a station at Wimbledon and Raynes Park These requirements give rise to the following • Turn back sidings for 10 trains per hour near the south end of the COS • Train maintenance depot and stabling near the south end of the COS • Four platforms at the end of the COS (currently Wimbledon) • 6-tracking between New Malden and the 6end of the COS March 2015 safeguarding 7 The proposed scheme would involve • Four platforms at Wimbledon • A new bridge to the north of the station • A new northern entrance onto Queen’s Road • An expanded ticket hall and concourse • Tramlink services relocated to street level • 6-tracking the existing railway between New Malden and Dundonald Road • Re-modelling Raynes Park station • A dedicated depot and stabling facility at Weir Road, with potential for OSD • A tunnel portal site at Gap Road , with potential for OSD • 3 x Turnback sidings at Dundonald Road , with potential for OSD • Acquiring Centre Court and other retail units in Wimbledon town centre 2 Wimbledon – stages of assessment • Phase 1 - Initial assessment undertaken to a) Establish objectives and constraints b) Consider all possible options for a CR2 station at Wimbledon [four broad categories] c) Establish how each option could meet Crossrail 2 objectives d) Determine a shortlist of options for further development • Phase 2 – Further assessment undertaken to a) Reduce shortlist to two options b) Rule out options using detailed multi-criteria analysis • Phase 3 - Assessment undertaken to identify preferred option • Phase 4 – Further option assessment (now) 1. Portal south of Raynes Park 2. Phased construction of preferred option 9 Wimbledon – alignments considered Factors considered in developing alignment • Speed restrictions / maintenance risk • Noise / vibration risk • Tunnel portal location • Piled buildings • Physical constraints (LU lines / sewers etc.) Green and Yellow alignments ruled out due to tight curvature and unsuitable portal location 10 Wimbledon – station options considered Key A = within existing station B = shallow box (south) C = shallow box (north) a D = deep, bored option c d b Network Rail have also explored options for station on Raynes Park 11 Wimbledon – Option a - within existing station Pros Cons Limited land take Huge disruption to existing station Cross platform interchange Requires Tramlink services to relocate Flexibility to accommodate CR2 within existing 10 platforms Reduce District line platforms to 3 Does not provide sufficient CR2 platform capacity Option a 12 Wimbledon – Option b - within shallow box - south Pros Cons Entirely separate from existing station – minimal impact Requires Centre Court and other property to south Allows 4 CR2 platforms to be constructed Longer interchange Retains 4 District line platforms Requires Tramlink services to relocate (to street) Excellent interface with depot and stabling facilities Option b 13 Wimbledon – Option c - within shallow box – north Option c Option c 14 Pros Cons Entirely separate from existing station – minimal impact Requires substantial residential / retail land Allows 4 CR2 platforms to be constructed Longer interchange Retains 4 District line platforms Station falls outside of town centre Avoids relocating Tramlink services Difficult access to depot / stabling Wimbledon – Option d – deep box beneath station 15 Pros Cons Entirely separate from existing station – minimal impact Requires longer tunnel beyond Raynes Park along two branches Allows 4 CR2 platforms to be constructed Long, convoluted interchange route Retains 4 District line platforms Requires Tramlink services to relocate (to street) Minimal surface land only requires property for vent shafts Land required for interchange route and ticket hall Option D continued – deep station at Wimbledon In theory, a deep station at Wimbledon could be constructed, removing the need to acquire Centre Court. However, this would involve the following: • Crossrail 2 station deep underground at WIM (>30m below ground) • Tunnel portal between WIM and Raynes Park • Challenges due to : • Gradient constraints • Significant Disruption / residential land take (>125 units) Key Tunnel Surface Land required for portal at Raynes Park • This option was further reviewed in October 2015 Up to 125 residential properties Conclusion: scheme would involve new portal sites immediately north of Raynes Park. It would lead to substantially more residential land, and cost in the order of £1.3bn more than the preferred scheme Raynes Park Station 16 Station Option Summary Option B - Preferred Sites Wimbledon Station – Sites Preferred station Option summary New CR2 platforms in cut and cover box Existing Centre Court boundary Existing buildings Potential OSD Queen’s Road Tram relocated here 18 Weir Road depot and shaft A depot at Weir Road has been identified as best meeting the operational requirements. The site is currently occupied by several large industrial units. The depot would be designed to allow oversite development above Weir Road – Sidings and Depot CR2 running tunnels (>20m below ground) Vent shaft 19 Portal location – Gap Road A portal at Gap Road has been identified as best meeting the operational requirements. The site is currently occupied by several large industrial units. The portal would be designed to allow oversite development above. Most of the land shown below would be handed back (post construction) Gap Road – Portal 20 sidings – Dundonald Road Option B -Turnback Sites In order to turn trains around, 3 x sidings are required at Dundonald Road Dive Under Dundonald Road – Turnbacks Wimbledon – Construction phasing year 1 PHASE 0 - new bridge 0 2 3 4 5 • Construct new bridge 0 6 Note: Existing bridge is retained 7 8 9 10 22 1 year Wimbledon – Construction phasing year PHASE 0 – SW works 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 7 8 2 • New deck over railway and tram relocation • Construction of alternative retail provision • New box for CR2 station works 9 10 23 2 2.5 years 2 3 1 year Wimbledon – Construction phasing option year PHASE 1-3 – Demolition of Centre Court and CR2 box construction 1 2 3 4 5 Demolition of western part of Centre Court (Site 4) 4 ~40% of Centre Court retained 5 6 7 8 • Demolish (part of) shopping centre • Construct CR2 box 9 10 24 4 2.5 years 4 Wimbledon – Construction phasing option year PHASE 4-6 – station fit out and OSD construction 1 2 3 Site 4 OSD opens 4 5 4 5 Part of Centre Court demolished once new OSD opens in Site 4 6 7 8 9 10 • Construct new shopping centre • Station fit out and track installation 4 5 25 2.5 years Questions?