Report Urban Mobility Sibenik - Documents List

Transcription

3rd Study – Urban Mobility Needs –
Šibenik
Tomislav Uroda, iCat
The project is co-funded
by the European Union,
Instrument for
Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA)
Urban mobility needs study
Contents
CONTENTS
Study background.............................................................................................................................. 3
Measures Summary ........................................................................................................................... 4
Modal shares measures – City bikes acceptance ......................................................................... 4
Modal shares measures – Boat lines acceptance / Infrastructure / Ticketing / Environment ....... 5
Transport Network Development measure – Reliability / Social Impact .................................... 11
Transport Network Development measure – Economic Impact................................................. 12
Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 13
City bikes ..................................................................................................................................... 13
Boat lines ..................................................................................................................................... 14
List of references ............................................................................................................................. 15
Appendix 1 – Indicators references .................................................................................................. 16
Public available information ......................................................................................................... 16
Population indicator references ................................................................................................ 16
Tourists indicator references .................................................................................................... 17
Information gathered directly from transport stakeholders.......................................................... 17
List of variables and results from personal interviews .................................................................. 17
A – General............................................................................................................................... 18
B - Bikes.................................................................................................................................... 19
C – Boats .................................................................................................................................. 20
Šibenik – Zaton – Bilice – Raslina – Krka waterfalls .................................................................... 20
Šibenik – Jadrija – Zablaće – Solaris – Brodarica ........................................................................ 22
Šibenik – Jadrija – Srima – Vodice ............................................................................................. 24
Šibenik – Jadrija – Zlarin – Prvić – Vodice .................................................................................. 26
Mandalina – Šibenik – Banj ....................................................................................................... 27
Vodice – Srima – Prvić – Zlarin – Jadrija – Zablaće – Solaris – Brodarica..................................... 29
Appendix 2 – Performance measures calculations ........................................................................... 32
Modal shares measures – City bikes acceptance ....................................................................... 32
Modal shares measures – Boat line acceptance / Infrastructure development / Ticketing policy /
Environmental impact .............................................................................................................. 34
Transport Network Development measure ............................................................................... 40
Instrument for
| Page 2 of 42 |
Study background
STUDY BACKGROUND
The objective of this report is to provide an overview of performance measures as result of defined
indicators and field interviews results in City of Šibenik. Performance measures of this document
would create broad perspective on potentials of development of boat lines in Šibenik county and city
bikes in Šibenik. It would also give an overview on transportation habits of locals and tourists,
providing basic inputs for the development of new services in mobility.
Instrument for
| Page 3 of 42 |
Measures summary
MEASURES SUMMARY
Summary is highlighting performance measures as defined in 1st study of indicators. In summary
performance measures are shown in table form, while later on it is more defined how each
performance measure has been defined / calculated.
MODAL SHARES MEASURES – CITY BIKES ACCEPTANCE
Variable
Value
CBdemand
57 %
CBdemand
68 %
CBdemand
38 %
CBdemand
63 bikes
CBdemand
3 bikes
CB PDsummer
43 bikes
CB PDwinter
2 bikes
Meaning of the variable
Bike demand as indicated from questionnaire.
Number is percentage from total number of people interviewed.
1 €/hour price acceptance.
Number is percentage from total number of people who would like to use city bikes.
Whole season demand as indicated from questionnaire.
Number is percentage from total number of people who would like to use city bikes.
Total number of bikes needed to cover demand as indicated from questionnaire.
Number relates to the demand in summer season period.
Total number of bikes needed to cover demand as indicated from questionnaire.
Number relates to the demand in winter season period.
Total demand for bikes multiplies by the price acceptance ratio – 1 €/hour.
Number relates to the demand in summer season period.
Total demand for bikes multiplies by the price acceptance ratio – 1 €/hour.
Number relates to the demand in winter season period.
Instrument for
| Page 4 of 42 |
Measures summary
MODAL SHARES MEASURES – BOAT LINES ACCEPTANCE / INFRASTRUCTURE / TICKETING
/ ENVIRONMENT
ŠIBENIK – ZATON – BILICE – RASLINA – KRKA WATERFALLS
Variable
Value
BLdemand
67 %
BLdemand
35 %
Acceptance
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLPDsummer
Environment Ticketing
Infrastructure
BLPDwinter
Morning 28 %
Midday 49 %
Evening 24 %
197 365
passengers
21 081
passengers
987
passengers/day
75
passengers/day
BP/CP
51 %
BS/CS
180 %
+20 min
Cboat
46 %
Bboat
17 %
BKboat
7%
MBboat
2%
Wboat
28 %
Tbooking
50 %
Tmulty-ticket
73 %
CO2
83 %
CO2total
-27 786
kg/year
Instrument for
Boat line demand as indicated from questionnaire.
Whole year line demand.
Number is percentage from the total line demand.
Boat demand trough the day.
Number is percentage from the total daily demand.
Summer season demand as indicated from questionnaire, multiplied with the local
population and number of tourists. Number is total for whole season.
Winter season demand as indicated from questionnaire, multiplied with the local
Price related summer season demand as indicated from total demand, and reduced
by the price acceptance ratio. Number shows an average demand per day.
Price related winter season demand as indicated from total demand, and reduced by
the price acceptance ratio. Number shows an average demand per day.
Transportation cost ratio: boat line transportation cost as percentage of personal car
transportation cost.
Transportation speed ratio: boat line travelling time as percentage of personal car
travelling time without congestion peeks.
Travelling habit relates to car usage reaching the boat line.
Number show car usage as percentage of all travelling modes.
Travelling habit relates to public bus usage reaching the boat line.
Number show public bus usage as percentage of all travelling modes.
Travelling habit relates to bicycle usage reaching the boat line.
Number show bicycle usage as percentage of all travelling modes.
Travelling habit relates to car motorbike reaching the boat line.
Number show motorbike usage as percentage of all travelling modes.
Travelling habit relates to on-foot travelling reaching the boat line.
Number show on-foot as percentage of all travelling modes.
Ticketing policy relates to number of people who would like to have booking option.
Ticketing policy relates to number of people who would like to have multy-ticket
option (bus/boat/parking). Number is percentage from the total line demand.
CO2 emission ratio: CO2 emission travelling with boat as percentage of CO2 emission
travelling by personal car.
Total CO2 emission reduction if travelling by boat lines instead of travelling by the
personal car on yearly base. Negative value present reduction of CO2 emission.
| Page 5 of 42 |
Measures summary
ŠIBENIK – JADRIJA – ZABLAĆE – SOLARIS – BRODARICA
Variable
Value
BLdemand
59 %
BLdemand
29 %
Acceptance
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLPDsummer
Infrastructure
BLPDwinter
Morning 27 %
Midday 48 %
Evening 25 %
332 782
passengers
11 751
passengers
1 642
passengers/day
41
passengers/day
BP/CP
74 %
BS/CS
167 %
+10 min
Cboat
44 %
Bboat
14 %
BKboat
6%
MBboat
0%
Wboat
36 %
Tbooking
44 %
Tmulty-ticket
78 %
CO2
102 %
CO2total
2 205 kg/year
Instrument for
personal car on yearly base. Positive value present increase of CO2 emission.
| Page 6 of 42 |
Measures summary
ŠIBENIK – JADRIJA – SRIMA – VODICE
Variable
Value
BLdemand
64 %
BLdemand
30 %
Acceptance
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLPDsummer
Infrastructure
BLPDwinter
Morning 23 %
Midday 53 %
Evening 24 %
322 999
passengers
15 831
passengers
1 840
passengers/day
62
passengers/day
BP/CP
44 %
BS/CS
167 %
+10 min
Cboat
54 %
Bboat
22 %
BKboat
4%
MBboat
0%
Wboat
20 %
Tbooking
43 %
Tmulty-ticket
70 %
CO2
59 %
CO2total
-68 850
kg/year
Instrument for
| Page 7 of 42 |
Measures summary
ŠIBENIK – JADRIJA – ZLARIN – PRVIĆ – VODICE
Variable
Value
BLdemand
75 %
BLdemand
30 %
Acceptance
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLPDsummer
Infrastructure
BLPDwinter
Morning 28 %
Midday 46 %
Evening 25 %
335 424
passengers
41 488
passengers
1 677
passengers/day
148
passengers/day
BP/CP
66 %
BS/CS
233 %
+20 min
Cboat
44 %
Bboat
20 %
BKboat
5%
MBboat
3%
Wboat
28 %
Tbooking
35 %
Tmulty-ticket
75 %
CO2
93 %
CO2total
-13 267
kg/year
Instrument for
| Page 8 of 42 |
Measures summary
MANDALINA – ŠIBENIK – BANJ
Variable
Value
BLdemand
52 %
BLdemand
30 %
Acceptance
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLPDsummer
Infrastructure
BLPDwinter
Morning 21 %
Midday 53 %
Evening 25 %
564 414
passengers
499 437
passengers
3 342
passengers/day
2 110
passengers/day
BP/CP
76 %
BS/CS
50 %
-5 min
Cboat
29 %
Bboat
18 %
BKboat
13 %
MBboat
0%
Wboat
40 %
Tbooking
44 %
Tmulty-ticket
74 %
CO2
57 %
CO2total
-66 384
kg/year
Instrument for
| Page 9 of 42 |
Measures summary
VODICE – SRIMA – PRVIĆ – ZLARIN – JADRIJA – ZABLAĆE – SOLARIS – BRODARICA
Variable
Value
BLdemand
65 %
BLdemand
29 %
Acceptance
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLdemand
BLPDsummer
Infrastructure
BLPDwinter
Morning 32 %
Midday 28 %
Evening 40 %
363 053
passengers
28 722
passengers
1 815
passengers/day
102
passengers/day
BP/CP
74 %
BS/CS
175 %
+15 min
Cboat
30 %
Bboat
12 %
BKboat
3%
MBboat
0%
Wboat
55 %
Tbooking
47 %
Tmulty-ticket
82 %
CO2
67 %
CO2total
-104 682
kg/year
Instrument for
| Page 10 of 42 |
Measures summary
TRANSPORT NETWORK DE VELOPMENT MEASURE – RELIABILITY / SOCIAL IMPACT
Social
Reliability
Variable
WCoperating
Value
2,5 % in year
4,2 % winter
season
WCoperating
891 passengers
HFdepartures
42 %
152 of 365
Number of days when boat wouldn’t operate due to the bad weather conditions.
Number is percentage from one year period.
Number of days when boat wouldn’t operate due to the bad weather conditions
multiplied with winter season passengers projection.
Number is total in winter season - whole year.
Social impact relates to the number of days with high frequency departures as result
of the market demand. Number is percentage from one year period.
Social
Reliability
Variable
WCoperating
Value
2,5 % in year
4,2 % winter
season
WCoperating
497 passengers
HFdepartures
42 %
152 of 365
Social
Reliability
Variable
WCoperating
Value
2,5 % in year
4,2 % winter
season
WCoperating
669 passengers
HFdepartures
0,42 %
152 of 365
Social
Reliability
Variable
WCoperating
Value
2,5 % in year
4,2 % winter
season
WCoperating
1753
passengers
HFdepartures
42 %
152 of 365
Instrument for
| Page 11 of 42 |
Measures summary
Social
Reliability
Variable
WCoperating
Value
2,5 % in year
4,2 % winter
season
WCoperating
21102
passengers
HFdepartures
100 %
365 of 365
Social
Reliability
Variable
WCoperating
Value
2,5 % in year
4,2 % winter
season
WCoperating
1214
passengers
HFdepartures
42 %
152 of 365
TRANSPORT NETWORK DE VELOPMENT MEASURE – ECONOMIC IMPACT
Variable
Value
GRtouristic
104 % growth
rate
Instrument for
Touristic growth rate present increase of potential demand of touristic visits
(questionnaire) compared with present touristic visits to islands.
Number is in percentages, presenting increase of the demand.
| Page 12 of 42 |
Recommendations
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations are develop based on the two main issues of Intermodality stressed out with
highest importance for City of Šibenik on this project:
 City bikes
 Sustainable Sea Transportation Network
While the city bikes are kind of easy to be solved, sea transportation network is biggest challenge
and requires state of the art technical solution together with the high profile management of boat
lines.
CITY BIKES
Field interview study has shown that City of Šibenik is ready for the city bikes. Demands are
expressed during summer period, while in winter time demands are limited to the City of Šibenik.
Therefore, city bikes rental stations should be
distributed with regards to the season time.
Winter season:
- Along city waterfront:
Banj, Bus station, Train station,
- Poljana square
- High School
- Hospital
- Mandalina
- Dalmare centre
Sumer season should offer extension of
renting stations:
- Solaris resort
- St. Nicholas Fortress
- Brodarica
Bicycling toward the Vodice, Jadrija and Srima
would be very attractive, but at the moment not feasible regarding the infrastructural barriers. But
Vodice, Srima and Jadrija could be part of the same bike renting system, with regards that no
connections are possible. In that sense boat lines would bridge this gap.
Field survey has indicated that pricing policy of 5 kn/hour is acceptable, and this should be used for
the pilot project. However, global practice in bike renting service requires opening of “personal bikerent profile” as prepaid service. Such a profile can be extended to other service like: public transport,
museum or other events ticketing, etc.
Globally and within Europe several bike renting systems are present. Therefore, City of Šibenik
should look to become part of the existing network, and even more to outsource this service with
one of the operators specialized in bike rent. Several benefits can be taken out form such model:
lower priced service (already present), becoming the part of brother network providing to the
customers ability to use same “personal bike-rent profile” in several cities, as part of the same
network. City bikes can cover only 10% of expenses from the bike rent service, while most of the
income comes from the marketing services. Having this fact on mind city have to consider “city
bikes” as added value in traffic system, environments branding and touristic offer, and shouldn’t
consider it as cash cow service.
Instrument for
| Page 13 of 42 |
Recommendations
BOAT LINES
After deep market analysis several recommendations can be highlighted:
1. Present model of “island boat lines policy” has show weakness and have to be changed. So far
boat lines are designed primarily to provide services for the island population, providing early
morning line toward the coast, and last boat line toward the island in the evening. Together with
the pretty low number of boat lines during the day, such a model is not appropriate for the
coastal population and tourists during the summer time since it doesn’t provide them possibility
to make daily visits to the islands. Having
this on mind together with the fact that on
Kaprije and Žirje lives only 160 people
younger than 70 years, while population of
city of Šibenik is 50.000 and tourists visits is
200.000 per year, it changes potential
demand picture completely if “island boat
lines policy” would be changed.
Boat line model have to be designed to
stimulate and integrate as much as possible
of costal population and tourists.
2. Regarding the coastal line configuration and
speed limit in Šibenik channel, together
with the idea of integrating wider coastal
line in the boat transport network,
recommendation is to dislocate one
“interconnection point – HUB” for several
lines outside the Šibenik channel. To replace
the bigger passenger vessels with smaller
ones 100 persons capacity, high speed and
low operational costs.
Boat transportation network should offer 16
hours daily service with departures
frequency every hour during the summer
time in whole network, while winter network should be reduced excluding the coastal line and
Krka waterfalls line from the network, having departures frequency every 2 hours.
Such network design requires 5-6 vessels, where 4 of them would operate from the islands
toward the coastal line and City of Šibenik, while 1 or 2 vessel would operate toward the Krka
waterfalls. 4 island vessels should come to
outside HUB at the same time providing
travellers high intermodality service, and
vessel coming to City of Šibenik has to be
synchronized with the Krka waterfalls line.
In addition, particular vessel in the line
network should change route on each
departure, providing thus direct lines
toward final destination for the passengers
with heavy luggage. Such intermodal
network provides high frequency of daily
departure together with the direct lines.
Instrument for
| Page 14 of 42 |
List of References
LIST OF REFERENCES
Google Maps
https://www.google.com/maps/preview
Croatian bureau of statistic
http://www.dzs.hr/
Jadrolinija – Croatia’s largest liner shipping company for the maritime transport of passengers
and vehicles
http://www.jadrolinija.hr
City of Šibenik
www.sibenik.hr
Instrument for
| Page 15 of 42 |
Appendix 1 – Indicators references
APPENDIX 1 – INDICATORS REFERENCES
Grouped by categories indicators references are used as input values for measures calculations
divided in two groups:


Modal share measures
o Acceptance
o Infrastructure development
o Ticketing policy
o Environmental impact
Transport network measures
o Reliability
o Economic impact
o Social impact
Indicator references are collected from different sources:



Public available information
Information gathered directly from transport stakeholders
Information gathered on field survey analyzed in Šibenik Questionnaire Survey document
PUBLIC AVAILABLE INFORMATION
POPULATION INDICATOR REFERENCES
Population indicator references as follows (National Bureau of Statistic www.dzs.hr):
P0 – population of Šibenik – Knin county
109 375
P1.1 – Population of City of Šibenik
46 332
P1.2 – Population of Brodarica
2 534
P2.1 – Population of Donje polje
267
P2.2 – Population of Dubrava kod Šibenika
1 185
P2.3 – Population of Grebaštica
937
P2.4 – Population of Jadrtovac
171
P2.5 – Population of Lozovac
368
P2.6 – Population of Raslina
567
P2.7 – Population of Vrpolje
776
P2.8 – Population of Zaton
978
P2.9 – Population of Žaborić
479
P3.1 – Population of Kaprije
189
P3.2 – Population of Krapanj
170
P3.3 – Population of Zlarin
284
P3.4 – Population of Žirje
103
Instrument for
| Page 16 of 42 |
TOURISTS INDICATOR REFERENCES
Tourist indicator references as follows (National Bureau of Statistic www.dzs.hr;
www.putovnica.net):
T0 – Number of tourist for Šibenik – Knin county
650 059
T1 – Number of tourist for City of Šibenik
207 673
TOURISTIC VISITS
City of Šibenik
Šibenik – Knin county
3 975 122
1 118 173
207.673
657.371
TOURISTIC OVERNIGHTS
City of Šibenik
1.118.173
Šibenik – Knin county
4.139.536
INFORMATION GATHERED DIRECTLY FROM TRANSPORT STAKEHOLDERS
Jadrolinija as national shipping operator has provided information about passenger transport on
present lines in Šibenik county:


Line 505 Vodice – Šibenik
Line 532 Šibenik – Žirje
City of Šibenik has indicated that for Šibenik County, on average 9 days/year ferry and passenger
vessel are not able to sail due to the bad weather conditions (winter season only).
LIST OF VARIABLES AND RESULTS FROM PERSONAL INTERVIEWS
Field survey has been done on sample of 1629 people interviewed during the summer break in
Šibenik and surrounding. All places where survey has been done are selected based on the questions
from questionnaire, aiming to cover places of interest for particular boat lines.
Field survey is divided in 3 parts:
-
General
Bikes
Boats
Further on Boats part has been done for 6 different boat lines:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Šibenik – Zaton – Bilice – Raslina – Krka waterfalls
Šibenik – Jadrija – Zablaće – Solaris – Brodarica
Šibenik – Jadrija – Srima – Vodice
Šibenik – Jadrija – Zlarin – Prvić – Vodice
Mandalina – Šibenik – Banj
Vodice – Srima – Prvić – Zlarin – Jadrija – Zablaće – Solaris – Brodarica
Instrument for
| Page 17 of 42 |
A – GENERAL
A1 – GENDER
Gender
Male 861 (53%)
Female 768 (47%)
47%
53%
M
A2 – COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
1% 1% 1% 1%
2% 1% 1% 1%
1%
1%
3% 2%
Croatia1316 (81%)
Poland
Germany 51 (3%)
Switzerland21 (1%) Netherlands15 (1%)
Italy
France
20 (1%) Spain
15 (1%)
Slovenia
20 (1%) Other
71 (4%)
32 (2%)
England 26 (2%)
26 (2%) Austria
81%
Croatia
England
France
Netherlands
46 (3%)
Vodice
87 (7%) Split
20 (2%)
Zagreb
69 (5%) Other
106 (8%)
Vodice
7%
A3 – DOMINANT MODE OF TRAVEL
Personal car
Bus
Combination
Other
1% 7%
City
Šibenik
Vodice
Zagreb
Skradin
Split
Other
Šibenik
75%
Most common transportation
in local transport
58%
a) Personal car
d) Train
f2) Motorbike
A4 – INTERMODAL TRAVELLING
Instrument for
Italy
Switzerland
Austria
Czech
4% 1%
1% 5%
2%
21%
946 (58%)
341 (21%)
114 (7%)
106 (6%)
Complicated
Uncomfortable
Same as any other transport mode
Simple
Germany
Poland
Slovenia
Spain
Skradin Split Other
Zagreb 3% 2% 8%
5%
985 (75%) Skradin
3%
Country of Origin
17 (1%)
A2A – CITY OF ORIGIN (CROATIA ONLY)
Šibenik
F
b) Bus
e) Bike
f3) other
c) Boat
f1) Walking
g) Combination
Multimodal traveling
544 (34%)
625 (38%)
261 (16%)
196 (12%)
16%
12%
34%
38%
a) Complicated
b) Uncomfortable
c) Same as any other transport mode
d) Simple
| Page 18 of 42 |
A5 – BOOKING SYSTEM
Preferable booking
Complicated
Uncomfortable
Same as any other transport mode
544 (34%)
625 (38%)
261 (16%)
18%
13%
69%
a) On bord (boat/train/bus)
b) In agency
c) On-line
B - BIKES
B1 –DEMANDS FOR CITY BIKES IN ŠIBENIK
Yes
No
982 (60%)
645 (40%)
City bikes in Šibenik
40%
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
58%
70%
42%
30%
60%
a) Yes
b) No
City bikes trough the year
B2 – USAGE OF BIKES RELATED TO THE PERIOD OF THE
YEAR
38%
62%
Whole year
Summer season only
394 (38%)
638 (62%)
a) Whole year
B3 – PRICE ACCEPTANCE
City bikes - 1 €/hour price
acceptance
32%
Price acceptance of 1 €/hour bike rent
Yes
1005 (68%)
No
467 (32%)
If the answer was no, sub question was: What would be the
accepted price?
35% of “No” accept price of 0,7 € (or more).
Price acceptance of 5 kn/hour bike rent
Yes
1168 (79%)
No
304 (21%)
b) Summer season only
68%
a) Yes
Examinees
40%
b) No
Alternative price for bike rent
30%
20%
10%
0%
0,1
Instrument for
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Price €
| Page 19 of 42 |
C – BOATS
For the boat lines survey has been done on smaller sample, 250+ per each line.
As follows each line is analyzed individually.
Interview has been done on sample of 344 persons.
C1 – DEMAND FOR THE BOAT TRANSPORTATION
SERVICE
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
Yes
232 (67%)
65%
83%
No
112 (33%)
35%
17%
Would you use this line
33%
67%
a) Yes
C2 – PLACES OF INTEREST ON THE TRANSPORTATION
LINE
Examinees
b) No
Destination of interest
60%
50%
Šibenik
Krka waterfalls
Other
40%
49%
40%
11%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Šibenik
C3 – PRICE ACCEPTANCE
Yes
No
Raslina
Krka
24%
76%
Zaton
1,5 €
15 min
C4 – PURPOSE OF TRIP
Bilice Raslina Krka
2€
2€
3,5 €
25 min 30 min 45 min
a) Yes
3%
53%
43%
4%
b) No
Reason of usage
0%
Touristic visit
Private agenda
Other
Bilice
Price acceptance
179 (76%)
55 (24%)
Šibenik
Price
Travel time
Zaton
1%
43%
53%
0%
a) Bussines
c) Private agenda
e) Touristical visit
Instrument for
b) School
d) Shooping
f) Other (specify)
| Page 20 of 42 |
C5 – USAGE OF BOAT TRANSPORTATION RELATED TO
THE PERIOD OF THE YEAR
Line usage trough the year
35%
Whole year
Summer season only
35%
65%
65%
a) Whole year
THE TIME OF THE DAY
Examinees
b) Summers season only
Line usage trough the day
60%
50%
Morning
Midday
Evening
40%
28%
49%
24%
30%
20%
10%
0%
a) Morning 6-12 b) Midday 12-18 c) Evening 18-24
C7 – BOOKING DEMAND
Yes
No
Booking demand
50%
50%
50%
50%
a) Yes
C8 – METHOD OF ACCESSING BOAT TRANSPORTATION
By personal car
With public bus
Walking
With bike
With motorbike
C9 – MULTY-TICKET DEMAND
Yes
No
73%
27%
46%
17%
28%
7%
2%
How to reach the line
7% 2%
28%
46%
17%
a) By personal car
c) Walking
e) Motorbike
b) With public bus
d) With bike
Multy-ticket demand, "parking –
boat – bus"
27%
73%
a) Yes
Instrument for
b) No
b) No
| Page 21 of 42 |
SERVICE
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
Yes
161 (59%)
55%
73%
No
110 (41%)
45%
27%
41%
59%
a) Yes
LINE
Šibenik
39%
Jadrija
21%
Zablaće
5%
Solaris
20%
Brodarica
16%
Examinees
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Šibenik
Yes
No
Jadrija
Zablaće
Solaris Brodarica
Price acceptance
25%
121 (75%)
40 (25%)
Šibenik
Price
Travel time
b) No
75%
Jadrija Zablaće Solaris Brodarica
1,5 €
1,5 €
1,5 €
2€
10 min 15 min 20 min 25 min
a) Yes
0%
Touristic visit
Private agenda
Other
53%
41%
6%
Reason of usage
53%
1%
1%
41%
4%
a) Bussines
c) Private agenda
Instrument for
b) No
b) School
d) Shooping
f) Other (specify)
| Page 22 of 42 |
29%
Whole year
Summer season only
29%
71%
71%
a) Whole year
THE TIME OF THE DAY
Morning
Midday
Evening
Examinees
60%
50%
40%
27%
48%
25%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes
No
Booking demand
44%
56%
44%
56%
a) Yes
By personal car
With public bus
Walking
With bike
Yes
No
78%
22%
44%
14%
36%
6%
6%
36%
44%
14%
a) By personal car
b) With public bus
c) Walking
d) With bike
boat – bus"
22%
78%
a) Yes
Instrument for
b) No
b) No
| Page 23 of 42 |
SERVICE
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
Yes
164 (64%)
63%
69%
No
91 (36%)
37%
31%
36%
64%
a) Yes
LINE
Šibenik
42%
Jadrija
15%
Srima
5%
Vodice
38%
Examinees
b) No
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Šibenik
Yes
No
Srima
Vodice
Price acceptance
138 (84%)
26 (16%)
Šibenik
Price
Travel time
Jadrija
16%
84%
Jadrija
1,5 €
10 min
Srima Vodice
2€
2€
20 min 25 min
a) Yes
b) No
Reason of usage
1%
4%
Touristic visit
Private agenda
Business
Other
47%
36%
9%
8%
9%
47%
3%
a) Bussines
c) Private agenda
Instrument for
36%
b) School
d) Shooping
f) Other (specify)
| Page 24 of 42 |
30%
Whole year
Summer season only
30%
70%
70%
a) Whole year
THE TIME OF THE DAY
Examinees
60%
50%
Morning
Midday
Evening
40%
23%
53%
24%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Booking demand
Yes
No
43%
43%
57%
57%
a) Yes
By personal car
With public bus
Walking
With bike
Yes
No
70%
30%
54%
22%
20%
4%
20%
4%
54%
22%
a) By personal car
b) With public bus
c) Walking
d) With bike
boat – bus"
30%
70%
a) Yes
Instrument for
b) No
b) No
| Page 25 of 42 |
SERVICE
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
Yes
193 (75%)
72%
87%
No
65 (25%)
28%
13%
25%
75%
a) Yes
LINE
Šibenik
33%
Jadrija
14%
Zlarin
17%
Prvić
16%
Vodice
21%
Examinees
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Šibenik
Yes
No
Jadrija
Prvić
Vodice
24%
76%
Šibenik
Jadrija Zlarin Prvić Vodice
Price
1,5 €
2€
2€
3€
Travel time 10 min 15 min 25 min 35 min
a) Yes
0%
43%
49%
5%
3%
b) No
Reason of usage
43%
1%
5%
49%
2%
a) Bussines
c) Private agenda
Instrument for
Zlarin
Price acceptance
145 (76%)
57 (24%)
Touristic visit
Private agenda
Business
Other
b) No
b) School
d) Shooping
f) Other (specify)
| Page 26 of 42 |
30%
Whole year
Summer season only
30%
70%
70%
a) Whole year
THE TIME OF THE DAY
Examinees
50%
40%
Morning
Midday
Evening
28%
46%
25%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes
No
Booking demand
35%
35%
65%
65%
a) Yes
By personal car
With public bus
Walking
With bike
With motorbike
44%
20%
28%
5%
3%
Yes
No
75%
25%
b) No
28%
5% 3%
44%
20%
a) By personal car
c) Walking
e) Motorbike
b) With public bus
d) With bike
boat – bus"
25%
75%
a) Yes
b) No
Instrument for
| Page 27 of 42 |
SERVICE
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
Yes
129 (52%)
52%
50%
No
120 (48%)
48%
50%
48%
52%
a) Yes
LINE
Mandalina
16%
Šibenik
38%
Banj
47%
Examinees
b) No
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Mandalina
Yes
No
10%
90%
Mandalina
Price
C4 –
Travel time
PURPOSE OF TRIP
50%
47%
3%
Šibenik
1€
5 min
a) Yes
Banj
1%
b) No
Reason of usage
1%
1%
47%
50%
0%
a) Bussines
c) Private agenda
Instrument for
Banj
Price acceptance
114 (90%)
13 (10%)
Touristic visit
Private agenda
Other
Šibenik
b) School
d) Shooping
f) Other (specify)
| Page 28 of 42 |
30%
Whole year
Summer season only
30%
70%
70%
a) Whole year
THE TIME OF THE DAY
Examinees
60%
50%
Morning
Midday
Evening
40%
21%
53%
25%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes
No
Booking demand
44%
56%
44%
56%
a) Yes
By personal car
With public bus
Walking
With bike
Yes
No
74%
26%
29%
18%
40%
13%
b) No
13%
40%
29%
18%
a) By personal car
b) With public bus
c) Walking
d) With bike
boat – bus"
26%
74%
a) Yes
b) No
Instrument for
| Page 29 of 42 |
SERVICE
Demand by country
Croatia
Other countries
Yes
162 (65%)
61%
80%
No
87 (35%)
39%
20%
35%
65%
a) Yes
LINE
Vodice
29%
Srima
6%
Prvić
8%
Zlarin
12%
Jadrija
12%
Zablaće
7%
Solaris
14%
Brodarica
13%
Examinees
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes
No
Price acceptance
124 (76%)
40 (24%)
24%
76%
Vodice
Srima Prvić Zlarin Jadrija Zablaće Solaris Brodarica
Price
1 € 1,5 € 2 €
2€
2€
2€
3€
Travel time 5 min 8 min 15 min 20 min 25 min 30 min 35 min
a) Yes
0%
Touristic visit
Private agenda
Business
Other
Instrument for
b) No
43%
51%
5%
1%
b) No
Reason of usage
0%
43%
5%
51%
1%
a) Bussines
c) Private agenda
b) School
d) Shooping
f) Other (specify)
| Page 30 of 42 |
29%
Whole year
Summer season only
29%
71%
71%
a) Whole year
THE TIME OF THE DAY
Morning
Midday
Evening
Examinees
50%
40%
32%
28%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes
No
Booking demand
47%
53%
47%
53%
a) Yes
By personal car
With public bus
Walking
With bike
Yes
No
82%
18%
30%
12%
55%
3%
3%
30%
55%
12%
a) By personal car
b) With public bus
c) Walking
d) With bike
boat – bus"
18%
82%
a) Yes
Instrument for
b) No
b) No
| Page 31 of 42 |
Appendix 2 – Performance measures calculations
APPENDIX 2 – PERFORMANCE MEASURES CALCULATIONS
Performance measures are defined primarily based on questionnaire results. Also, some
assumptions have been used as input values for the calculation.
GENERAL ASSUMPTION:







Summer season:
5 months
22 weeks
152 days
Winter season:
7 months
30 weeks
213 days
Average fuel consumption for car:
0,1 l/km
Average fuel consumption for boat:
6l/Nm (0,12 l/Nm per passenger)
Operating costs for car: 0,26 €/km (amortization, fuel consumption, other cost
included)
Fuel price:
1,4 €/l
CO2 emission
0,4 kg/l
highlights
MODAL SHARES MEASURES – CITY BIKES ACCEPTANCE
CITY BIKES DEMAND IN ŠIBENIK
FACTS:



57% – local demand
66% – tourist demand
38% – whole season demand


46 332 – local population Šibenik
207 673 – touristic visits in Šibenik
ASSUMPTION:



Usage of bikes is considered as ones per season (summer 5 months, winter 7 months)
Time spent on bike per usage is considered as 1 hour per ride
Daily renting time 16 hours
DEMAND POTENTIAL:

Number of city bikes needed – summer season

Number of city bikes needed – winter season
Instrument for
| Page 32 of 42 |
CITY BIKES – PRICE ACCEPTANCE RELATED DEMAND
FACTS:




1 €/hour – price of bike rent
68% – price acceptance
63 – demand potential in summer season
3 – demand potential in winter season
PRICE RELATED DEMAND REDUCTION:


Instrument for
| Page 33 of 42 |
MODAL SHARES MEASURES – BOAT LINE ACCEPTANCE / INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
/ TICKETING POLICY / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
FACTS:




46 332 – local population Šibenik




13,1 Nm – line distance (45 min)
18,9 km – road distance (alternative)
ASSUMPTION:



Usage of line is considered as ones per season (summer 5 months, winter 7 months)
Each passenger has return ticket
Road travelling speed without traffic jam 25 min
DEMAND POTENTIAL:

Number of passengers – summer season

Number of passengers – winter season
TRANSPORTATION COST RATIO SEA/ROAD:

TRANSPORTATION SPEED RATIO SEA/ROAD:

CO 2 EMISSION:

CO2 emission ratio sea/road:

Total CO2 reduction per year:
Instrument for
| Page 34 of 42 |
FACTS:




34 302 – narrow population
Šibenik





2 534 – population Brodarica
ASSUMPTION:



DEMAND POTENTIAL:


CO 2 EMISSION:


Instrument for
| Page 35 of 42 |
FACTS:





Šibenik
823 – population Srima





6 755 – population Vodice
ASSUMPTION:



DEMAND POTENTIAL:


CO 2 EMISSION:


Instrument for
| Page 36 of 42 |
FACTS:





Šibenik
284 – population Zlarin






403 – population Prvić
ASSUMPTION:



for Šibenik, Vodice and tourists, while once per week for Zlarin and Prvić
DEMAND POTENTIAL:

0,69

return=335 424 passengers




CO 2 EMISSION:


Instrument for
| Page 37 of 42 |
FACTS:




Šibenik




ASSUMPTION:



for tourists, while twice per month for Šibenik
DEMAND POTENTIAL:






CO 2 EMISSION:


Instrument for
| Page 38 of 42 |
FACTS:






823 – population Srima
403 – population Prvić






284 – population Zlarin
2 534 – population Brodarica
20 km – road distance (alternative)
ASSUMPTION:



for Vodice, Srima, Brodarica and tourists, while once per week for Zlarin and Prvić
DEMAND POTENTIAL:

0,80

return=363 053 passengers




CO 2 EMISSION:


Instrument for
| Page 39 of 42 |
TRANSPORT NETWORK DE VELOPMENT MEASURE
ASSUMPTION:

9 days lines wouldn’t operate due to the bad weather conditions in winter season
RELIABILITY:

Number of days boat wouldn’t operate due to the bad weather conditions
- Whole year
- Winter season
FACTS:

21081 – winter season line potential
RELIABILITY:

Number of passengers lost due to the bad weather condition – winter season only
FACTS:

RELIABILITY:

FACTS:

RELIABILITY:

Instrument for
| Page 40 of 42 |
FACTS:

RELIABILITY:

FACTS:

RELIABILITY:

FACTS:

RELIABILITY:

Instrument for
| Page 41 of 42 |
ECONOMIC IMPACT
FACTS:






270 000 – total number of passengers on existing lines: Vodice – Šibenik, Šibenik –
Žirje, (2008-2012)
255 000 – summer season demand reduced by the price acceptance (Šibenik – Vodice)
276 000 – summer season demand reduced by the price acceptance (Vodice –
Brodarica)
43 % – touristic visit demand on line Šibenik – Vodice
55 % – touristic visit demand on line Vodice – Brodarica
ASSUMPTION:

128 000 – average number of
touristic visits per year on
existing lines: Vodice-Šibenik,
Šibenik-Žirje. Summer seasons
2008-2012 (May - September)
2008 - 2012
60.000
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
0
I
Source: Jadrolinija
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
Monthly average on both lines: Vodice-Šibenik, Šibenik - Žirje
ECONOMIC IMPACT BY TOURIST GROWTH
SOCIAL IMPACT:
 Number of days with high frequency of daily departures as result of market demand,
where market demand is defined as at least 16 departures per day (every 2 hour same
direction) with 30 passengers per departure at average.
Instrument for
| Page 42 of 42 |

Report Urban Mobility Sibenik - Documents List

Transcription

Similar documents

We`ve recently acquired a beautiful 2005 Action Craft Newport 20

For sale is barely used 2014 Porta-Bote w/ a 2014 Suzuki 6 HP four

For sale is a Classic 1959 Feather Craft boat

For Sale Classic 12 ft. Merrimack Skiff

Linjett 40 - {ModelName} Charter Brochure

to get a PDF file with the table of contents.

M.Veth - Lake George Donzi Classic Club