In-flight Evaluation of an Optical Standby Air Data System
Transcription
In-flight Evaluation of an Optical Standby Air Data System
In-flight Evaluation of Avionic Systems Henk Jentink National Aerospace Laboratory NLR Aerospace Testing 2011, Flight Test Seminar, 6 April 2011, Hamburg Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium – National Aerospace Laboratory NLR Outline z Introduction z Examples of in-flight avionics evaluations z In flight evaluation of a NESLIE back-up air data system z z z z Objectives Accommodation Flight Test Operation Flight Test Analysis and Result z Conclusion Aerospace Testing 2011 2 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Where and what is NLR? The Netherlands N L R - F le v o la n d N L R - A m s te r d a m www.nlr.nl N L R – S c h ip h o l Aerospace Testing 2011 3 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion How do we test avionics in flight? NLR Research aircraft Aerospace Testing 2011 4 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Cessna Citation NLR / TUD Research aircraft z MTOW 14,600 lbs z Max Payload 3,100 lbs z Max Altitude 43,000 ft z Max Speed (Sea level) 262 KIAS z Max Endurance 5 hours z Max number cabin seats 8 z P&W JT15D-4 jet engines z EFIS z FMS z RVSM Aerospace Testing 2011 5 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Cessna Citation NLR / TUD Research aircraft RESEARCH FACILITIES z Dedicated electrical power system z Hard points (200 kg) z External mounting structure z Side mounted fairing with optical window z Modified escape hatch z Nose boom (α and β vanes, 5-hole probe) z High accuracy positioning system z Data acquisition system Aerospace Testing 2011 6 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Fairchild Metro NLR Research Aircraft z MTOW 12,500 lbs z Max Payload 3,000 lbs z Max Altitude 25,000 ft z Max Speed (sea level) 248 KIAS z Max Endurance 5 hours z Max number cabin seats 6 z Garrett TPE-331 Turboprop engines z Pax door and large cargo door Aerospace Testing 2011 7 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Fairchild Metro NLR Research Aircraft RESEARCH FACILITIES z Dedicated electrical power z Hard points (160 kg) z External mounting structure z Optical window bottom fuselage (60X60 cm) z Nose boom (α and β VANES, 5-Hole probe) z High accuracy positioning systems z Data acquistion system Aerospace Testing 2011 8 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Flight Test @ NLR z Aerodynamics z Atmosphere z Avionics z Air Traffic Management z Flight test methods z System tests z Flight inspection z Airborne Remote Sensing Aerospace Testing 2011 9 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion NLR Flight Test Organisation Flight Test Preparation AGREEMENT Request For Test (RFT) FOR Preliminary Risk Assessment TEST SAFETY REVIEW Draft Test Plan ROUTINE/LOW: Peers HIGH: Safety Board Aerospace Testing 2011 10 Examples of in-flight Avionics and Avionic concept evaluations z Wake vortex and turbulence detection z Future ATM concepts validation z Data links z UAVs in civil airspace: Project Outcast z Evaluation of prototype commercial products such as an IMU, GPS receiver, weather radar, etc. Aerospace Testing 2011 11 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Wake vortex and turbulence detection z S-Wake / Awiator z I-WAKE z Delicat GENERATING A/C FOLLOWING A/C Forward-looking LiDAR sensor Aerospace Testing 2011 12 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Wake vortex detection I-WAKE modification/ certification Aerospace Testing 2011 13 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion I-Wake project Aerospace Testing 2011 14 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Future ATM concepts validation •Free flight •Continuous Descend Approach •GNSS for aviation Aerospace Testing 2011 15 GNSS for aviation Is it ready for the application? Aerospace Testing 2011 16 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Nice Trials z 1st time to fly approach on EGNOS (ESTB) guidance z Procedure flyability was demonstrated z Assessment of TSE in terms of NSE and FTE Aerospace Testing 2011 17 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Data links z VDL-4 ADS-B z Eurocontrol Link2000 Aerospace Testing 2011 18 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion UAVs in civil airspace: Project Outcast z See-and-avoid in civil airspace z IR and visible cameras z “Ground” operator on board Aerospace Testing 2011 19 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion OUTCAST project Aerospace Testing 2011 20 Aerospace Testing 2011 21 OUTCAST Aerospace Testing 2011 22 OUTCAST Aerospace Testing 2011 23 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion NESLIE project z Type z European Commission 6th Framework project z Budget z 1 M€ NLR / 6 M€ total z Duration z 2006 – 2009 z Composition z Among partners are – Thales – Airbus – Dassault – EADS Aerospace Testing 2011 24 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Objectives z NESLIE = NEw Standby Lidar InstrumEnt z Overall objective Airspeed measurement LiDAR Airspeed measurement Pitot-static Reduction probability of common failures Improvement Flight Safety z Project objective z Evaluation of NESLIE system in flight test campaign – system performance with regard to a/c reference – influence of atmosphere on backscattered signals Aerospace Testing 2011 25 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Principle z Laser signal 1. 2. 3. emitted in airflow backscattered by particles in atmosphere received with Doppler shift z Doppler shift is measure for true air speed component in direction of beam Aerospace Testing 2011 26 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Configuration z Configuration laser beams z z z Four laser beams Focused in small measurement volume (pyramid shape) Four airspeed components > three required z Location measurement volume z z Just outside fuselage / boundary layer In front of emergency hatch – near free-stream conditions – as far as possible upstream of wing Aerospace Testing 2011 27 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Components z Two avionics boxes z z Optics Signal processing z Attached to seat tracks in cabin z Laser output via glass fibre Aerospace Testing 2011 28 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Accommodation (1/2) Aerospace Testing 2011 29 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Accommodation (2/2) Aerospace Testing 2011 30 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Test matrix Shakedown Backscattering measurement under different atmospheric conditions Performance measurements (with noseboom) Backup flights Step climbs to max altitude Step climbs to max altitude Constant max altitude Sea, countryside, dense urban area Stable conditions Turbulent conditions Side slips, AOA variations with flaps Rapid speed changes Parabolic flights (0-g manoeuvres) As required Aerospace Testing 2011 31 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Flight statistics z z z z Number of test flights Acc. flight test time Flight test period Test area z Test level Test speeds z All matrix items covered z 18 40 hrs April – May 2009 Netherlands, Northsea & Germany Max FL410 Max 260 KIAS Aerospace Testing 2011 32 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Recorded data z NESLIE system z z z Backscatter signal data Airspeed data System data z Aircraft z z Reference data (AOA, sideslip, airspeed) for which also a noseboom with vanes was used Forward looking video z Weather z Several weather products – METAR, TAF, SIGWX, UWT, wx balloon profiles, etc. Aerospace Testing 2011 33 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Content of analysis z Number of detections z Consistency of data z Comparison of Neslie air data and NLR aircraft data z Major question: Is there a one-to-one relation? – if yes (within expected accuracy): ok – if no: can we find an explanation for differences? z Signal processing algorithm Aerospace Testing 2011 34 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Air data comparison (straight & level speed changes) Calibrations exist NESLIE A/C REFERENCE TAS TAS calibrated = 1.03 TAS Neslie − 11.2 [kt ] AOA AOAcalibrated = 0.64 AOANeslie − 1.78 [deg] Aerospace Testing 2011 35 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Air data comparison (parabolic manoeuvres) How does calibration work for dynamic manoeuvre? Aerospace Testing 2011 36 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Improved calibration Good coherence between aircraft data and NESLIE system data TAS calibrated = 0.98 TAS neslie − 0.014 dTAS − 0.97 AAB + 3.4 [ kt ] dt Aerospace Testing 2011 37 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Follow up project DANIELA z Follow up project DANIELA z Now: campaign in Spitsbergen Aerospace Testing 2011 38 Introduction • Examples • NESLIE • Conclusion Conclusions NESLIE z An innovative optical backup air data system was developed, built and tested z The system was integrated in NLR’s Cessna Citation for in-flight evaluation z The flight test campaign delivered a large quantity of data z Results are promising, a large step was made towards an avionic system z Data can be calibrated z Flight testing avionics in an instrumented, easy- to-modify research aircraft in an experienced flight test organisation is effective and efficient Aerospace Testing 2011 39 NESLIE flight test impression Aerospace Testing 2011 40 NESLIE flight test impression Aerospace Testing 2011 41 Aerospace Testing 2011 42