detailed project report on nonoi integrated watershed management

Transcription

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
ON
NONOI INTEGRATED WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT PROJECT
UDALGURI
UNDER
THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCES
MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI
PREPARED & SUBMITTED
TO
STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY
INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMME
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
BY
BS CONSULTANTS
128, RAJGARH ROAD, 2ND FLOOR
GUWAHATI-7
1
PROJECT AT A GLANCE
1. Name of project
: Nonoi Integrated Watershed Management Project
Code No. 3A2C1
2. Name of the State
: Assam (Code No. 18).
3. Name of the State Level Nodal Agency: Department of Soil Conservation,
Government of Assam
4. Name of the District
: Udalguri
5. Name of the Development Block
: 1. Kaligaon Development Block (Part)
2. Khairabari Development Block (Part)
6. Name of VCDC
: 1. Bhekelikanda, 2. Kacharital,
3. Bhuyan Khat, 4. Bholabari .
7. Numbers of villages covered
: 19 Nos.
8. Name of Micro Watershed with Code: 1. Nonoi (3A2C1 i),
2. Kulsi (3A2C1 ii)
9. Total Geographical area of the project: 4586 ha.
10. Area proposed to be treated
: 3000 ha.
11. Total project cost
: Rs. 360.00 Lakhs.
12. Name & Address of Project Manager: Divisional Officer,
Udalguri Soil Conservation Division,
Udalguri
13. Name & Address of PIA: - Range Officer, Tongla Soil Conservation Range,
Tongla.
2
CONTENTS
Sl.
No.
1
2
3
CHAPTER –I
4
CHAPTER –II
5
6
Chapter
CHAPTER-III
CHAPTER-IV
Particulars
INTRODUCTION
METHODOLOGY
DISTRICT PROFILE
General description of the District
Physiography
Demographic profile
Land use & Land Holdings
Ground Water Level
IWMP projects in the District
Proposed IWMP in the District Table M(SP)-2
Prioritized list of Projects Table DPR-1
Vision and Strategy
Page
No.
1
2
4-10
4
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
GENERAL DESRIPTION OF THE NANOI IWM PROJECT
AREA
Location
Climate
Rainfall with Table: DPR 2 & 3
Soil
Physiography, Relief & Drainage
PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA
Objectives
Present Land Use Table: DPR 4
Details of Areas of Micro Watersheds Table: M (SP) 2
Details of Types of Areas Covered under IWMP, Table (SP) 3
Details of Physiography & Relief Table: M (SP) 4
Agro-Climatic Zone, Soil types, Average Rainfall & Major
Crops., Table M (SP) 5
Details of Flood & Drought in Project Area., Table M (SP) 6
Details of Soil Erosion, Table M (SP) 7.
Details of Infrastructure, Table M (SP)8
Details of Land Holdings pattern, Table M (SP) 9
Details of Common Property Resources Table M (SP) 10
Details of Kharif Crop Area, Table M(PO) C1
Details of Rabi Crops Area, Table M (PO) C2
Details of Zaid Crop Area, Table M (PO) C3
Details of Fund Flow of Watershed Committee Account,
Table M(FM) 4
Details of Pending Ucs, Table M(FM) 5
11-14
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN
Strategy
Preparatory phase
Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table M(PA) A1
Other Activities of Preparatory Phase table M (PA)-A2
Livelihood activities & Production system Table DPR-5
26-44
26
31
31
32
33
3
11
11
11-13
13
14
15-25
15
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
7
CHAPTER-V
8
CHAPTER-VI
9
10
Activities related to Surface water resources table M (PA)B1
Activities related to ground water resources Table M (PA)B2
Activities proposed for Users groups(UGs) Table M(PS)B3
Activities related to livelihood by Self Help Groups
Table M(PA)B4
Other activities of watershed work phase Table M (PA)B5
Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed works
Table M(PA)B6
Details of activities connected with vegetative cover
Table M(PA)B7
Details of allied other activities Table M(PA)B8
Livelihood proposed to be created for Asset less people
Table M(PA) B9
Livelihood proposed to be created for farmers
Table M(PA)B10
PLANNING
Proposed Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table M(PA)A1
Year wise phasing of project activities, Table DPR 6
Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 7
INSTUTIONAL STRUCTURES
Details of Self Help groups (SHG) M(IS)9
Details of User Groups (UGs) in project area Table M(IS)10
CHAPTER-VII CAPACITY BUILDING
Capacity building activities for the year 2010-11,
Table M(CB)2
Information, Education & Communication (IEC)
Table M(CB)3
Location Map of Nanoi IWM Project.
MAPS
Present Land Use Map of Nanoi Watershed Area.
Watershed map of Nanoi IWM project showing Micro Watersheds,
villages, drainage, relief etc.
4
34
36
37
38
40
41
42
42
43
44
45-50
45
46
47-50
51
51
51
52
52
52
INTRODUCTION
Soil-Water-Plant resources are nature’s gift to mankind. These three resources are the
most important and vital natural resources for the existence of man and animals. Soil,
water and plant are so interdependent that one cannot be managed efficiently without
the other two. But due to high rate of population growth in both human and livestock,
there is indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources for meeting the everincreasing demand for food, fodder, fuel, fibers and fertilizers. Thus developed,
continuous degradation of production base and imbalance in land-water-plant and
human-animal system is creating ecological imbalance and economic insecurity. As a
result there is threat to the quality of our life and cultivation. Therefore it is highly felt
that the natural resources are to be managed efficiently, collectively and
simultaneously. One has to look and find out the suitable “unit of management”. Of
the three resources soil, water and vegetation or plants, soil and vegetation subjected
themselves to an easier manipulation where as water is the climatic parameter that
needs to be disciplined once it comes in contact with vegetation and the soil.
However, water can be managed conveniently and efficiently only if watershed is
taken as a unit. Since soil, plant and water are interdependent resources, “watershed”
is considered to be the ideal unit for most effective and gainful management of these
resources.
Watershed is defined as an unit of an area which covers all land and water area that
contribute runoff to a common point. It is a complete dynamic unit, which invariably
responds to any change that may be brought about within its extent.
The soil and
water must therefore be considered planned and managed on watershed basics for
effective results.
Watershed approach has conventionally aimed at treating degraded land with the help
of low cost and locally accessed technologies such as in-situ soil and moisture
conservation measures, afforestation etc. through a participatory approach that seek to
secure close involvement of the user communities. The broad objectives were the
5
promotion of the overall economic development and improvement of socio-economic
conditions of the resource poor section of the people in-habiting in the programme
areas. With this aim, the Govt. of India has launched the “Integrated Watershed
Management Programme (IWMP).
METHODOLOGY
The general common guidelines for watershed development projects (2008) of the
Department of Land Resources (DoLR) Government of India were followed in
preparation of the Detailed Project Report (DPR).
The methodology of planning envisages in the guidelines participatory planning
approach involving directly the villagers (Beneficiaries) of the project area with active
co-operation & participation from the gram panchayats/VCDC. The Participatory
Rural Appraisal (PRA) was carried out in all the villages in the project areas.
Participatory work sheet for assessment of needs and priorities including details of
activities were prepared. The socio economic survey was conducted covering each and
every house hold. The data collected house wise and village wise were generated and
analyzed.
The Comprehensive District Agricultural Plan (C-DAP) was also referred to and the
prescriptions suggested in C-DAP were adhered to in finalizing the work phase.
Basic information on watershed including rainfall, temperature, topography,
hydrogeology, soil forests etc. were collected from various published and unpublished
records and reports etc. of various Central and State Government Organization
including remote sensing
data/maps of NRSO, Topo-sheets, soil maps, Climatic
maps, hydro-ecological maps prepared and published by the National Bureau of soil
survey and Land use planning. Land use Land cover maps here supplied by the SLNA
and the present land use Land cover was analyzed and interpreted from these maps
with ground truth verification as well as data available with revenue authority.
6
The treatment measures taken up for compiling and preparing the work phase in the
DPR as detailed in the common guidelines and as prescribed by the SLNA. The cost
analysis design and drawing etc. of different activities were also designed and
supplied by the SLNA and accordingly used in project Planning.
The GPS points were taken for all village level proposed project sites and were
transferred in GIS layers.
The draft plan (both soft copy as well as hard copy) was prepared and placed for
review, modification and approval to the SLNA. On scrutiny of the draft plan by the
SLNA as well as by the concerned Project Manager Final Detailed Project Reports
have been prepared.
7
CHAPTER- I
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
Location:
This district is bounded by Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh in the north, Sonitpur
district in the east, Darrang district in the south and Baska district in the west. The
district of Udalguri lies between 26046 / and 26077 / North Latitude and 92008/ and
95 015/ East Longitude.
Total geographical area of the district is about 1,985.68 sq.km, while the population of
the district is roughly about 75,671 meaning that the population density is 381 persons
per sq.km. Distance of the District Headquarters from the state capital Guwahati is
140 km.
Climate& Soil
The district has a sub-tropical humid climate with semi-dry hot summer and cold
winter. Agro-climatically, the district falls under the North Bank Plain Zone. During
summer (May to Early September), heavy rainfall occurs due to south-west monsoon
for which the district experiences flood. Taking the five years’ average, the monthly
minimum temperature was observed 9.250 C in January. Similarly the average
monthly maximum temperature observed 31.78.0 C in May. The last five years,
average annual rainfall in the district is 2077 mm ranging from 1553.7 mm (lowest) in
2006 & 2888.2 (highest) in 2005. The rainfall pattern observed dry during November
to March (winter) with an average annual rainfall of 119.2 mm only while April to
October was observed as wet period that received the average rainfall of 1832 mm.
Due to varied distribution of rainfall, the district suffers from heavy flood during wet
period and moisture stress in the dry period.
8
The soil of the district is more or less heterogeneous in nature. The northern part of
the district is composed of clay and clay-loam soils whereas the middle part is loamy
and sandy. The soil of the southern part of the district is composed of deposited sand
and clay. There is no available data based on soil sample analysis regarding organic
Carbon, N, P, K, and other micronutrient content of the soil in the district. However in
general, soil of the district is acidic in reaction. Soil of major areas are mildly acidic
(5.5-6.5 PH), while soil in high land old alluvial is severely acidic. There is a problem
of riverbank erosion in the riverine tracts, specially during flood season.. Mild
micronutrient deficiency specially of Boron has been observed in same areas
throughout the district. Soil erosion is a serious problem specially in flood prone area.
Physiography
The district is characterized by almost plain topography being flanked by foothills of
Bhutan in the upper strip of north and high plain in the middle to lower strip towards
the southern side with a gradation from north to south. The southern part however, has
hills and hillocks also. The southern parts of the district are situated on the plains of
the Brahmaputra Valley Zone. Major tributaries of the river Brahmaputra viz.
Pachoni, Dhansiri, Noa, Nonoi, Gulandi, Joyphrung, Kulsi, Dipila and Bornoi, which
originate from the foothills of the Himalayan Range flow through the district and they
mainly contribute towards the sustenance of the agrarian economy of the district.
Despite various efforts made in the past, the present status of irrigated agriculture in
the district is not satisfactory (compared to the state and the national standard). More
and more agricultural land is required to be brought under irrigation on priority basis
(there being potentiality), both for increasing production and productivity through
intensification of agriculture
Demographic Profile:
The total population of the district is7,56,671 (Census 2001) out of which 63.82%
belongs to General Caste, 32.07% Schedule Tribe and a negligible percentage of
9
Schedule Caste population which is only 4.11%. Under 114 VCDC in total, there are
1136 revenue villages out of which 68 are uninhabited. The reason of un-inhabitation
is mainly complete erosion of the villages by flood & river Brahmaputra and
tributaries. The population density of the district is 381 per square K.M.
Land use & Land Holdings:
The total geographical area of the district is 185216 ha and out of which 36.16% is
cultivable wasteland, 0.8% current fallow, 4.94% forest 6.08% Pastures, 8.1% under
non-agricultural use, 3.70% under miscellaneous plantation. The net Sown Area of
Udalguri district is 91,681 ha which is 20.33% of the total area of the district. There
are 38,786 operational holdings. The average size of tilling is reported to be below
1.25 ha in most of the VCDCs, which is the result of excessive fragmentation of land
holdings. The marginal farmers constitute 30.70% of farm families with 27.01% of
land under their possession and the small farmer is 33.39% occupying 30.54% of land.
18.52% of farm families represent semi-medium farmers possessing 28.99% of land
while medium farmers constitute 5.20% of farm families with 12.07% of land. The
large farmer in the district is only less than 0.9% of total farm families. The district
has been divided into three Agro Ecological situations (AES) based on physiography
hydrology, soil, climate and cropping patterns viz. (i) Plain Zone, (ii) Hill and Hillock
Zone and (iii) Foot Hill area. Plain zone is the largest zone covering an area of 69.15%
of total area while Hill and Hillock zone is the smallest zone with 12% of area in the
south. The Foot Hill zone enshrines 24.85% area in the district.
Agriculture is the main occupation of the district.
The District favoured by
desirable soil and climatic condition grows a wide range of crops. Paddy is the main
crop of the district, grown mainly as summer and winter paddy. The other major crops
are Mustard, Jute, Potato, Wheat, Lentil, Black gram and different vegetables like
Brinjal, Cabbage, Cauliflower, Lady’s finger, Radish, Tomato, Cucumber, Carrot and
Guards. Onion, Garlic, Chilly, Zinger and Turmeric are also grown in small areas in
all the Dev. Blocks. Some other minor crops are pea, sesamum Niger, Cucurbits,
Tapioca etc. Important plantation crops are Banana, Coconut, arecanut, guava, mango,
10
lemon, bamboo etc.. In animal husbandry sector, different indigenous and cross breeds
are reared by the farmers of Udalguri district. In case of fisheries, different indigenous
and exotic breeds like Katla, Rahu, Mrigal, Bahu, Bato, Bhangan, Puthi, Borali,
Chitol, Kandhuli, etc. are grown.
Ground Water Level
It is reported that the average ground water table in the district can be reached at depth
of about 3 to 8 m from ground level/surface depending upon location. It is also
reported that the ground water table in the district is depleting at the rate of about 1m.
per year due to large-scale deforestation, this started about a decade ago.
IWMP in the District: The district has proposed two numbers of IWMP projects that
are indicated below along with the salient features
11
MIS TABLE M (SP)-2: PROPOSED INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECTS IN THE DISTRICT
Sl.
Name
Total Micro
No.
of
Watershed in the
Department of
Other
Total
District
District
Land
Ministries/
Watershed
Resources
Department
Covered
No.
Area
Micro Watershed covered so far
No.
(Ha.)
1
1.
2
3
Udalguri
23
4
No.
Area
(Ha.)
5
1,17,175
Area
6
3
(Ha.)
7
20000
No.
8
Nil
Net Watershed
Area
to be covered
No.
Area
(Ha.)
9
Nil
10
3
20,000
(Ha.)
11
12
20
97,175
TABLE DPR-1 PRIORITIZED LIST OF PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR SANCTION DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR
2009-10.
No
Name of the
No of micro
Proposed
Type of area (Hilly/
Proposed
Projects
watersheds
project area
Desert/ Other)
cost (Rupees
proposed to be
(Ha.)
District
Sl.
Remarks
in Lakh.)
Udalguri
1
Nonoi IWMP
covered
3
3000
Moderately
slope
360
Area to be
treated during
XI
12
th
Plan
VISION AND STRATEGY
The district of Udalguri needs major rejuvenation and reconstruction in all the sectors
of development as it has been running through a stagnation Agriculture in the district
is of subsistence type.
The productivity of almost all major crops in the district as reflected in the
Comprehensive District Agriculture Plan, has remained below the State’s average.
The average yield of the most important food crop of rice (3600 kg/ha.) which is
higher than that in the State and even then that of the neighboring district of Darrang.
Similarly yields of pulses and spices are also higher. Yields of oil seeds, vegetables
and tuber crops are higher than those of the States average.
Under the circumstances critical issues relating to the development of agriculture and
allied sectors vis-à-vis in-situ conservation of soil & moisture, that need to be eddies
are as follows.
1. Stable productivity and income through in-situ conservation of soil & moisture,
up-gradation and utilization of natural endowments like land, water, plant, and
human resources in harmonious and integrated manner. This will aim at
perpetual availability of food, fodder, fuel, fiber, timber and biomass for rural
and cottage industry to meet the growing demands of human and livestock
population through diversification and intensification in existing farming
system Introducing land use technologies, which improve production and
productivity and will enable the farmers to make use of land according to
capability.
2. Farmers Organization: Formation, promotion and empowering Users Groups,
Self Help Groups covering marginal and landless farmers providing facilities of
integrated development of the watershed with effective participation of the
people of the project area.
3. Sustainability of production and farm income: The high rainfall and light soil
condition need attention for efficient natural resources management including
judicious water management, rain water harvesting, proper drainage line
13
treatment, rejuvenation of degraded vegetative cover to tackle the problems of
soil erosion, soil acidity, lose of vegetative cover and bio-diversity.
4. Generation of employment by optimum development of natural and human
resources of villages through creating general awareness on scientific farming
and market information as well as human resources through adequate time-totime training.
14
CHAPTER-II
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE NONOI IWM PROJECT AREA
LOCATION
The Nonoi IWMP area is located in the western side of the district HQ, Udalguri
town. It lies between 910 53’ E to 91059’ E and 26034’ N to 26039’N
CLIMATE
The Climate is warm and humid with hot summer followed by monsoon of heavy
rainfall and relatively cool and dry winter. Min Temperature 80 - 100 C and Max
Temperature is 330 - 380C Relative Humidity is Min 72.75% and Max 75.50%.
RAINFALL
The last five years, average annual rainfall in the district is 3027 mm ranging from
1553.7 mm (lowest) in 2006 & 2888.2 (highest) in 2005. The rainfall pattern observed
scanty during November to March (winter) with an average total rainfall of 119.2 mm
only while April to October was observed as wet period that received the total rainfall
of 1832 mm.. Due to varied distribution of rainfall, the district suffers from heavy
flood during wet period and moisture stress in the dry period. The normal rainfall,
actual rainfall and deviation in percentage for the period from January 2005 to
October 2009are given in the table DPR-2 & 3:
15
Table: DPR 2: The Rainfall data for the period from 2005 to 2009 (September)
2005
Months
2006
2007
2008
2009
Normal
Actual
%
Deviation
Normal
Actual
%
Deviation
Normal
Actual
%
Deviation
Normal
Actual
%
Deviation
Normal
Actual
%
Deviation
17
22.8
34
13.8
0
-100
13.8
0
-100
25
13.8
81
0
13.8
(-)100
February
28.2
26.2
-7
13
9
-31
20.6
92.6
349
14.5
20.6
-30
8.4
20.6
(-)59
March
81.3
130.4
60
45.9
2.5
-95
56.7
19.7
-65
69.6
56.7
23
40.3
56.7
(-)29
April
125.3
169.2
35
173
230.7
33
173
342.3
98
189.9
173
10
160.8
173
(-)7
May
193.6
207.9
7
312.7
156.9
-50
312.7
183.7
-61
122.2
312.7
-61
210.5
312.7
(-)33
June
293.8
193.2
-34
312.7
183.7
-61
407.6
398.1
-2
410.9
407.6
1
210.5
312.7
(-)33
July
247.4
209.7
-15
122.2
312.7
-61
350.1
494.4
41
398.6
350.1
14
208.9
407.6
(-)49
August
323.6
301.8
-7
273.5
268.2
-2
273.2
150.1
-45
197.4
273.2
-28
486.3
350.1
39
September
230.7
98
-58
195.9
209.7
7
223
153.5
-31
232
223.1
4
254.8
285.5
-10
October
99.9
160.4
61
114.7
71.3
-38
92.3
136.4
48
87.9
92.3
-5
155.3
213.8
-27
November
19.1
5.4
-72
16.7
26.4
58
17.2
3.7
-78
8.4
17.2
-51
10.1
12.8
27
10.9
0
-100
0
10.9
-100
January
December
16
Table: DPR 3 - SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAIN FALL DURING
2008.
Udalguri
North Bank
Plain Zone
District and
Agro-Climatic
Zone
Season
Rainfall in mm.
Normal
Actual
Deviation
Winter (Jan, Feb)
Summer (March, April & May)
Monsoon (June to September)
Post Monsoon (October to
December)
Total:
34.6
542.4
1178.0
120.40
39.5
381.7
1238.9
96.3
14.16
-42.10
5.16
-25.02
1875.4
1756.40
-6.77
(Source: Statistical Handbook, Assam, 2008)
Now from the analysis of the tables given above it is seen that out of the total rainfall of
1756.40 mm during the year 2008 a total of 1238.90 mm i.e. 70.53% rainfall had
occurred during the months from June to September. On the other hand there was 14.16
mm rainfall at all during the months of January and February and there was only 10.9
mm rainfall during the month of December; as such there was practically no rainfall at all
during four months of the year. This is a clear indication that for four months of the year
the land suffers moisture stress while during the rainy season i.e from June to October
almost 3/4th of the total annual rainfall (70.19%) had occurred during the season; on
account of which the area suffers periodic inundation as well as soil erosion due to high
intensity of rainfall.
SOIL
The Soil is predominantly very deep, well drained, fine loamy soils occurring on very
gently to gently sloping,having loamy surface with slight erosion (Fine- Loamy, Dystric
Eutrochrepts) associated with deep, imperfectly drained, coarse loamy soil occurring on
very gently sloping plain with slight erosion and slight flooding (Coarse - Loamy, Typic
Haplaquents) and acidity to neutral in reaction, as per soil survey map prepared by
National Bureau of Soils Survey and Land Use Planning (ICAR) (Regional Center,
Jorhat).
17
PHYSIOGRAPHY RELIEF AND DRAINAGE
The area is very gently sloping characterized by almost plain topography mostly less than
10 meters per km. gradient towards south, being flanked by foothills of Bhutan in the
strip of North and high plain in the middle to lower strip towards the southern side with
aggression from north to south. The southern part however has hills and hillocks also.
The lowest elevation recorded in the project area is 45mtrs. and the highest elevation is
70 meters. The river Nonoi passes through the project area in the left side. River Kulsi
also passes through the project area and meets the river Nonoi. The drainage pattern is
almost parallel to sub-dendritic.
18
CHAPTER-III
PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA
Objectives:
The specific objectives of the project are as follows:
i. Conservation up-gradation and utilization of natural endowments like land, water plant, animal
and human resources in harmonious and integrated manner. This will aim at perpetual
availability of food, fodder, fuel, fiber, timber and biomass for rural and cottage industries to
meet the growing demands of human and livestock population through diversification use
pattern.
ii. Introducing land use technologies, which improve production and productivity of crops in the
project areas.
iii. Introducing measures, which will enable the farmers to make use of land according to its
capability.
iv. Generation of employment during project period and regular employment after completion of
the project.
v. Securing stability and growth of agricultural production.
vi. Optimization of available resources such as soil, water and land within the micro watershed.
vii. Creating a general awareness among the local farmers about adopting scientific farming.
viii. Providing facilities of integrated development and production of the watershed with
effective participation of the people of the project area.
ix. In addition to food, fodder and fuel, the project will endeavor to enhance cash flow to the
farmers and landless agricultural labourer through increased casual employment, marketing of
marketable surplus of various produce with the help of forming various self help groups (SHG).
x. Generation of employment by optimum development of natural and human resources of
villages in order to promote income generation activities and to encourage savings.
19
TABLE DPR 4: LAND USE PATTERN OF NONOI IWM PROJECT
The present land use pattern of the project area as interpreted from the remote sensing map supplied by the SLNA and as
per ground habitation is as follows:
Name of
project
Builtup(ha)
Kharif
(ha)
Rabi
(ha)
Zaid
Double
crop(ha)
Nonoi
Nil
1723
Nil
Nil
1040
Agril.
Plantati
on
(ha)
1272+
76(TG)
Deci
.Forest
(dense)
Deci
Forest
(open)
Scru
b
Grass
(ha)
Marshy
(ha)
Nil
Nil
Nil
58
24
River/
Waterbod
y
(ha)
231
River
Sand
Gully
Nil
Nil
TABLE: M(SP) 2: DETAILS OF AREAS OF MICRO WATERSHEDS COVERED UNDER THE WATERSHED
PROGRAMME.
Sl.
Name of
Total Micro
No.
District
Watershed in the
Department of
Other Ministries/
Total Watershed
District
Land Resources
Department
Covered
No.
Area
Micro Watershed covered so far
No.
(Ha.)
Area
No.
(Ha.)
Area
No.
(Ha.)
Net Watershed to be
Area
covered
No.
(Ha.)
Area
(Ha.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.
Udalguri
23
117175
3
20000
-
-
3
20000
20
97175
20
TABLE-M (SP) 3: DETAILS OF THE TYPES OF AREAS COVERED UNDER THE IWMP.
1
2
Sl.
No.
Name
of
State
1
3
4
5
Names
Name of
Year of
of
District
sanction
projects
Assam Udalguri Nonoi
2009
6
Project
duration
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
2009
2014
7
8
9
Area of
the
projects
Type of terrain
Hilly (H)/ Desert
(D)/ Others (O)
3000 ha.
Others
10
Names of micro
Project watersheds and
cost (Rs. Code Nos.# (as per
In lakh) DoLR’s unique
codification)
360.00
3A2C1
11
12
Cultivated and wasteland area of the projects
Area details (ha) (Falling within the projects)
Uncultivated wasteland
Cultivated Cultivated
Rain fed irrigated a) Temporary
Pvt. Agri. Land
b) Permanent
area
area
Fallow
82
231
2411
1040
Gen. SC ST OBC Total
453 794 1751 535 3533
Others
Forest Community (River & Total
Land
Land
river sand area (ha)
etc.)
Nil
822
231
4586
TABLE-M(SP)4: DETAILS OF PHYSIOGRAPHY AND RELIEF OF THE PROJECT AREAS
1
Sl.
No.
1.
2
Name
of
State
Assam
3
Name
of
District
Udalguri
4
Names
of
project
5
6
7
Elevation
(meters)
Slope
range
(%)
50 - 100 m.
0–5%
Order of
Watershed
Sub/micro-watershed
1. Nonoi
2. Kulsi
Nonoi
21
8
9
Major
streams
Top sequence
(Soil series)
Nonoi
&
Kulsi
Older Alluvial (Alfisols)
TABLE-M (SP) 5: AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONE, SOIL TYPES, AVERAGE RAINFALL AND MAJOR CROPS IN
THE PROJECT AREA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Major soil types
Sl.
No.
Name
of State
1.
Assam
Name of the
Agro-climatic
zone
Lower
Brahamaputra
Valley Climatic
Zone No.-4
Area
in ha
Names
of the
District
4586
Udalguri
Names of
the
projects
a) Type
b) Area
(ha)
Older
Alluvial
(Alfisols)
3210
Terai
(Mollisols
)
1376
Nonoi
9
Average
rainfall in mm
(preceding 5
years’
average)
2576
Major crops
b) Area
(ha)
a) Name
Paddy,
2411
TABLE-M (SP) 6: DETAILS OF FLOOD AND DROUGHT IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sl.
No.
Name
of State
Name of
District
Name of
projects
Particulars
Villages
1.
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
Flood
Drought
Nil
Nil.
22
7
Periodicity
Any other
Annual
(please specify)
Nil
Nil
Nil.
Nil
8
Not affected
Not affected
Nil.
TABLE-M (SP) 7: DETAILS OF SOIL EROSION IN THE PROJECT AREAS
1
2
Sl.
No.
Name
of State
3
Name of
District
4
5
6
Name of
project
Cause
Type of
erosion
7
Area
affected
(ha)
8
Run off
(mm/
year)
9
Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year)
Water erosion
1.
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
a. Sheet
b. Rill
c. Gully
Sub-Total:
1287
1052
972
176.18
65.73
99.84
100.00
Wind erosion
Nil
Total for project:
3411
(Source: Soil Conservation Deptt. Assam – Data as reflected in PPR)
23
TABLE-M (SP) 8: DETAILS OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PROJECT AREA
1
Sl.
No
.
2
Name
of State
3
Name
of
District
4
5
6
Name of
project
Parameters
Status
(i)
19
19
Nil
(iv)
No. of educational institutions : Primary (P)/ Secondary
(S)/ Higher Secondary (HS)/ vocational institution (VI)
(P)
19
(v)
No. of villages with access to Primary Health Center
(vi)
No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary
(vii)
(viii
)
(ix)
(x)
(xi)
(xii)
No. of villages with access to Post Office
No. of villages with access to Banks
Adjacent to Kolaigaon
town where there is
hospital facility
Adjacent to Kolaigaon
town where there is
hospital facility
19
Nearest bank at Kolaigaon
Nonoi
Udalguri
Assam
1.
(ii)
(iii)
No. of villages connected to the main road by an allweather road
No. of villages provided with electricity
No. of households without access to drinking water
(xiii
)
(xiv
)
No. of villages with access to Markets / mandis
No. of villages with access to Agro-industries
Total quantity of surplus milk
No. of milk collection centers
(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Pvt. agency(PA)/ others (O))
No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Center
Any other facilities with no. of villages
(Please specify)
24
(U)
Nil.
(S)
2
(HS)
0
Kalaigaon
Nil
Nil.
(S) (PA)
Nil.
Nil
19
Nil
(VI)
0
(O)
Nil.
TABLE-M (SP) 9: DETAILS OF LAND HOLDING PATTERN IN THE PROJECT AREA.
Name
of State
Name of
District
4
Names of
the
project
Nonoi
Sl.
No.
Udalguri
3
Assam
2
1
1
5
6
7
Type of Farmer
No. of
households
No. of BPL
households
0
1004
0
0
187
(i)
Large farmer
(ii) Small farmer
(iii) Marginal
farmer
(iv) Landless
person
Total:
25
8
Land holding (ha)
Irrigated Rainfed Total
Nil
Nil
Nil
1520
985
1260
3784
1172
0
2309
0
2309
1976
1976
394
4679
394
4679
Nil
Nil
TABLE-M (SP) 10: DETAILS OF COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES OF THE PROJECT AREA
Name of
State
Name
of
District
Name
of
Project
Udalguri
Nonoi
4
Assam
3
Sl. No.
2
1.
1
5
6
7
CPR
Total Area (ha)
Particulars
Area owned / In possession of
Area available for treatment (ha)
Pvt.
Govt. PRI
Any
Pvt.
Govt.
PRI
Any other
persons
other (Pl. persons (Specify
(Pl. Specify)
Specify)
deptt.)
(i) Wasteland / degraded land
82
231
Nil
Nil
82
Nil
Nil
Nil
(ii) Pastures
58
Nil.
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(iii) Orchards
1272
Nil
Nil
Nil
800
Nil
Nil
Nil
(iv) Village Woodlot
Nil
Nil.
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(v) Forest
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(vi) Village Ponds / Tanks
9
5
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(vii) Community Buildings
8
9
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(viii) Weekly Markets
Nil.
3
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(ix)
Permanent markets
Nil.
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(x)
Temples / Places of worship
5
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(xi)
Others (Pl. specify)
Nil.
Nil.
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
TABLE-M (PO) C1: DETAILS OF KHARIF CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA
1
2
3
4
Sl. Name of Name of
Name of Project
No.
State the District
1.
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
5
Name of
crops
Paddy
Oil seed
Total for the project area:
Area (ha)
6
Pre - project
Average Yield (Qtl) per
ha.
Irri.
Rf.
Irri.
Rf.
340
1081
25
340
990
2071
-
26
Total Production (Qtl)
Irri.
Rf.
12.8
8500
17702
6
-
8500
5940
23642
TABLE-M(PO)C2: DETAILS OF RABI CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA
4
Name of Project
3
Name of the
District
2
Name of
State
Sl. No.
1
5
6
7
8
Name of
crop
Pre-project
Mid-term
Post-project
Nonoi
Udalguri
Assam
1.
Lentil
Area
(ha)
Irri
Rf.
-
-
Average
Yield
(Qtl) per
ha.
Irri
Total
Production
(Qtl)
Area
(ha)
Average
Yield per
ha (qtl)
Total
production
(qtl)
Area
(ha)
Average
Yield per ha
(qtl)
Total
production
(qtl)
-
-
-
-
-
Irr
i
-
30
-
1200
25
70
50
45
1250
3150
50
100
60
50
3000
5000
30
-
1200
25
70
50
45
1250
3150
50
100
60
50
3000
5000
Rf. Irri
Rf.
Irri
Rf.
Rf.
Irri
Rf.
Irri
Rf.
Irri
Rf.
Irri
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rf.
-
Vegetables
-
40
-
Total for the Project:
-
40
-
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts; from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no.
of crops; from column no.6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at
the end of the Table.
Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed
27
TABLE-M(PO)C3: DETAILS OF ZAID CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA
4
6
Name of
crops
Pre-project
Area
(ha)
Irri
Winter rice
Nonoi
Udalguri
5
Name of
Project
3
Name of
State
Name of the
District
2
Assam
1
Sl. No.
1
Average Yield
(Qtl) per ha.
Rf.
Irri
Rf.
Total
Production
(Qtl)
Irri
Rf.
Area
(ha)
Irri
450
-
22
-
9900
-
500
-
50
-
5
-
250
-
Banana
Assam
Lemon
Total for the project:
5
-
150
659
750
377
15035
100
Rf.
7
8
Mid-term
Post-project
Average
Total
Yield per ha production
(qtl)
(qtl)
Irri Rf. Irri
Rf.
25
12500
Area
(ha)
Irri
Rf.
Average
Total
Yield per ha production (qtl)
(qtl)
Irri Rf.
Irri
Rf.
600
-
25
15000
-
60
-
6
-
360
-
80
-
7
-
560
10
-
300
-
3000
-
20
-
350
-
7000
2500
68800
150 1120
750
25
826
27
1079
4050
64350
* From column no. 2, total number of States, from column no. 3, total no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of projects; from column no.5, total
no. of crops; from column no. 6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be
given at the end of the Table. Irri. – Irrigated
Rf. – Rainfed
TABLE-M(FM)4: DETAILS OF FUND FLOW OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE ACCOUNTS IN THE
COUNTRY: STATE-WISE* (AMOUNT IN RS.)
Name of
watershe
d
committe
Name of
Project
5
Nonoi
&
Kulsi
Udalguri
4
Nonoi
3
Name of
State
Name of
District
2
Assam
1
Sl. No.
1
6
7
8
Opening
Balance
Deposit
Withdrawal
DRDA/ ZP
Cheque
No./date
Amount
/ Date of deposit
in WC Account
Total amount
available in WC
Account
Amount withdrawn
Date of
by Cash/ Cheque with-drawal
9
10
Interest Closing
accrued balance
Purpose
of
withdrawal
To be maintained with the progress of execution.
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total number of Districts; from column no.4 total number of projects; from column no.5 total no. of
watershed committees; from column no. 6 total amount of opening balance; from column no.7, total amount deposited in WC accounts and total amount available in WC
accounts; from column no.8 total amount withdrawn, category-wise; from column no.9 total interest accrued and from column no.10 total closing balance for WCs, for
the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.
28
TABLE-M(FM)5: DETAILS OF PENDING UCS.
4
5
Instal
-ment
no.
Project
3
District
2
State
Sl. No.
1
Udalguri
1
Assam
Golandi
hariyali
(IWDP)
Pachnoi
Bhutiamari
Hariyali
(IWDP)
Latasuti
Kalsuti
Hariyali
IWDP
6
Financial
year of
release of
fund
7
Amount
released
(Rs. in
lakh)
8
Amount
utilized
(Rs.in
lakhs)
9
10
Submission of
UC@
Due
date
Amount
(Rs. In
lakhs)
t (Rs.
In
lakhs)
11
Reasons
for not
submittin
g/
delayed
submissio
n of UC
45.00
Date of
Submission
of UC
Amoun
Date
12
Pending UCs
Perio
d
Amount
(Rs. in
lakhs)
Nil
Nil
Nil
88.51
Nil
Nil
Nil
-
Nil
Nil
Nil
2nd
2004-05
45.00
45.00
3rd
2007-08
88.76
88.51
ND
2
2004-05
41.25
41.25
-
41.25
20/4/0
6
21/7/0
9
-
3RD
2007-08
80.56
80.56
-
80.56
-
-
Nil
Nil
Nil
2nd
2004-05
41.25
41.25
-
41.25
-
-
Nil
Nil
Nil
3rd
2008-09
79.46
79.46
-
79.46
-
-
20/4/0
6
21/7/0
9
45.00
88.51
Total:
376.28
376.03
29
376.03
133.5
1
CHAPTER -IV
PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN
RESOURCE POTENTIALS, PROBLEMS AND CONSTRAINTS
Resource Potentials
The favourable climate and altitude, the high rainfall and humidity and the ecology make
the area a distinct and unique. The favourable climate for growth, the soil types, the water
resources, the diversity of crops etc. make the area endowed with rich potentials.
Crop diversity- The project area has good potentialities for growing a wide diversity of
crops because of favourable climate, rainfall and other factors. Food crops such as
cereals, pulses and oilseeds are grown in the project area although rice is by far the most
important crop. Other cereals grown in the area are maize, wheat, millet etc. the pulses
grown include black gram, green gram, lathyrus (khesari), peas, pegion pea (arahar) and
lentil. Among the oilseeds are mustard, sesame and ground nut. Cash crops include jute,
mesta cotton, potatoes and sugarcane. Horticultural crops include pineapple, banana,
orange and other citrus fruits, guava coconut, mango, jackfruit, litchi, plums, papaya etc.
The spice crops such as zinger, turmeric and tuber crops like tapioca, sweet potato etc.
are grown. Plantation crops like tea, rubber, black pepper, betel nut and betelvine, etc. are
common in the project area. All common vegetable are also grown in the project area.
Medicinal and aromatic crops as well as timber trees, bamboo and cane are also grown.
Grasses are more important in flush seasons, but tree leaves, shrubs and weeds have an
important role to play in feeding domestic livestocks during lean season.
Genetic diversity- The entire North Eastern Region of India is considered to be the home
of origin of many crops such as rice, cucumber, brinjal, phaseolus beans, amaranth,
mandarin orange and other citrus fruits including assam lemon, jambara etc. The wide
variability in the germplasm of the region is a major sources for improving productivity
30
of crops, enhancing quality and for imparting resistance to pests, diseases as well as
various other stress conditions. Agro industrial potentialities are rather vast in the entire
region. However, these potentialities for agro based industries have not been utilized fully
mainly because of infrastructural deficiencies, lack of awareness and other socio
economic bottlenecks.
Water resources- There is abundant resources of water in the area because of heavy
rainfall. There are also large numbers of tributaries emanating from the hills and flowing
through the project area in to the river Brahmaputra. With proper planning, harvesting
and management water resources potentials can be effectively utilized for production
purposes. Rain water from the major sources as well as natural lakes, ponds, springs;
beels, marshy lands and ground water etc. form other sources of water. The ground water
potentials of the area is also high.
Institutional based- Institutions concerned with development, education, research and
training in agriculture and allied sectors are vitally linked with improvement of
agriculture. The development departments of the Govt. of Assam like Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation, Animal Husbandry, Fishery, Sericulture, and Forestry are
proposed to facilitate coordinating in proper implementation of the management plan.
Technological and capacity building supports are proposed from the National Institute of
Rural Development (NIRD) (NER), Assam Remote Sensing Application Centre
(ARSAC), Assam Agriculture University (AAU) including Veterinary and Fishery
Colleges and Krishi Vikash Kendras (KVK) as well as other Research Centers including
ICAR research Complex at Borapani, Meghalaya etc.
Constraints and Problems:
Despite having so much of potentialities agriculture in the region has remained under
developed. It is primarily because there are also a number of constraints and problems
31
which are responsible for the present state of agricultural production. These constraints
can be grouped under five broad heads. These are (1) Climatic Constraints, (2)
Infrastructural Constraints, (3) Bio-physical Constraints, (4) Constraints of Management
and (5) Socio-economic Constraints.
Constraints of Climate include heavy rainfall with high intensity and periodic distribution
and humidity, low temperature during winter, low light intensity and radiation, recurrent
floods as well as drought conditions. The high rainfall and the humidity not only create
favourable environment for the prevalence of wide range of pests, diseases and weeds,
the rainfall also create problems not only of floods but also in drying, storage and hay
making etc. It needs to be mentioned however that there are also positive aspects of high
rainfall and humidity resulting in adequacy of water as well as favourable climate for
growth of crops.
Infrastructural Constraints include geographic isolation, lack of road, transport and
communication facilities, inadequacy of irrigated areas and lack of post harvest facilities
and marketing etc. Transport and communication system is absolutely poor in the entire
North Eastern Region. Similarly, the cost of transport to and fro out side the region is also
very costly and time consuming. Such a situation hampers not only in transfer of
technology, supply of input in time but also leads to higher cot in transportation; and thus
creating disadvantage in competitive market outside. The scope for increased production
utilizing modern technology, modern tools and higher rate of fertilizers is limited due to
lack of assured irrigation. Similarly, facilities for post harvest operations such as drying,
threshing, storage and processing have practically not been developed.
The acidic soil, in accessible areas, the varied undulating topography, soil erosion and
degradation, ecological imbalance, recurring floods, abundance of weeds, insects, pests,
and diseases and low level technology are some of the important bio-physical constraints
limiting agricultural production.
32
There are also a large number of problems connected with management of agricultural
production. Some important ones are the gap in extension, poor motivation and awareness,
inadequacy of training, lack of incentive for the farmers including non assurance of support
price; non availability of improved inputs in time, lack of credit facilities and market, dearth of
qualified manpower in many cases, weak linkage between research and development and above
all in effective coordination of all concerned.
STRATEGYThe new approach envisages a broader vision of hydrological units (watershed)
comprising of clusters of micro watersheds. There would be a multi -tier ridge to valleysequenced approach, which is proposed to be adopted towards implementation of
Watershed Development Project.
Keeping in mind the guiding principles of watershed management the major thrust will
be to immediately increase the vegetative cover in the project area and to restore the
degraded ecosystem, which is at a critical stage. It is also equally stressed to conserve
rainwater through increasing time of concentration by way of decreasing the velocity of
runoff water, encouraging ground water recharge through surface water storage,
harvesting and distribution of rainwater arriving to provide alternative and self sustaining
occupation to the people with enhanced livelihood opportunities and improvements in
productivity and income.
An Integrated Watershed Management Project with due emphasis on protective
afforestation pasture development, scientific agriculture through various soil conservation
measures, harvesting of rainwater and runoff water, distribution of water to agriculture
field, horticulture, pisiculture, sericulture, piggery development, poultry development,
dairy development etc.
Emphasis should also be given adequately at imparting training and environmental
motivation programme to all users group and shelf help groups as such it is proposed to
33
make the people conscious and develop skill specially among womenfolk who are
traditionally an important constituent of the society particularly in respect of economic
activity and thereby improving access of the poor, specially women to the benefits and
ensuring access to usufructs right from common property resources for the resource poor.
The schemes proposed in the project area are basically on the basis on the participatory
rural appraisal (PRA) exercises conducted in the project area. The needs of the villagers
are taken into consideration and based on the availability of fund and magnitude of the
requirement of the villagers the schemes have been proposed.
Entry Point Activities: With a view to establish credibility of the project implementing
agency as well as watershed development team and to create a rapport with the village
community some important entry point activities have been proposed as envisaged in the
guidelines of the Govt. of India. The schemes/projects are selected and proposed by the
PIA/Project Manager in consultation with the beneficiaries, the gram panchayats, the
watershed committee as well as the watershed development team.
A. Agricultural Strategy proposed: Production of rice will have to be raised through
improving productivity of winter and summer rice through use of quality seeds, high
yielding varieties, hybrid inputs and irrigation potential. Area under rice with very poor
productivity should be diverted to summer rice with creation of irrigation potential.
However there is need to bridge the gap between research and extension for which the
Watershed Committee, Project Implementing Agency, The District Agricultural
Machinery as well as District Watershed Development Unit should Co-ordinate; not only
to increase agricultural production but also on agri processing, input availability, and
marketing as well as overall transfer of technology from lab to land. More over it is
proposed that one no. of Central Nursery with different suitable horticultural species be
raised under entry point activities so as to enable to distribute seedlings to the people to
supplement in their home stead garden and orchards.
34
B. Protective Afforestation:
Forest are important natural resources and they influence climate, soil conditions
particularly soil and water balance, erosion, floods, maintenance of bio-sphere, ecology
as well as wild flora and fauna etc. In this project it is proposed to create additional forest
coverage of 50.6 ha. in Nonoi with suitable species. In areas with sandy soils in reverine
environment Khair Sisso and Simul etc. should be planted while in other areas plantation
of bamboo to be stressed as it is not only poor man’s timber but are also needed for paper
industries.
Moreover, it is proposed that one no. of central nursery with around 3.00 lakhs planting
stock be raised with important forest species suitable for the locality under entry point
activity so that seedlings can be given to the people within the project area as well as
planting can be undertaken in road sides river bank and institutional campus.
C. Development of Pasture and Animal Husbandry:
The project area has good potential for development of animal husbandry, which needs
special attention. The rural people rear livestock and poultry as important source of
income.
Grasess like Gunea, Napier, Para and other locally available grass species may be
considered for raising in the proposed area.
As many as 164 units of Self Help Groups (SHGs) are selected in the project area to take
up schemes of rearing of milch cow, poultry, piggery and duckery, beekeeping etc.
D. Pisciculture:Pisciculture is one of the important developmental schemes, which helps in improving
life style of the people. In one hand creation of water bodies helps in recharging of
ground water level and improve in soil moisture regime. On the other hand pisciculture in
water bodies like Farm Pond, fisheries etc. gives additional income to the farmers. In
35
general this would meet the nutrient requirement of the people in the project area and
others.
E. Soil and Water Conservation Activities:
In situ-conservation, utilization of soil and water within the Project is the prime criteria
for sustaining agricultural and horticultural production in the cultivated land for which
proper soil and water conservation activities are to be taken on priority basis. Therefore
considering the necessity for comprehensive in situ soil and water conservation measures
in the project area the following soil conservation engineering measures are
recommended as detailed in the work plan.
F. Water harvesting structures - To store run off water and to check gully erosion as
well as sheet and rill erosion construction of 12 nos. R.C.C. check dams or drop spill
ways, farm ponds, earthen embankments etc. are proposed in the project area which will
give benefit to arrest soil loss, improve soil moisture regime and increase production of
crops of kharif as well as rabi crops in the project area 11 nos. of water distribution canal
are proposed to be constructed in the project area. Further by using water pumps kharif
crops can also be cultivated in nearby areas.
G. Land Development:To protect the land from erosion as well as to arrest the run off water in the project area
13 nos, of earthen bunds with core wall are proposed to be created in the project area to
give benefit in 600 hectares of cultivated field.
These earthen bunds will also protect the paddy fields from inundation by the floodwater
of the adjoining Nonoi river and to give strength to the dykes boulder pitching is also
proposed in areas where it is felt needed.
36
Surface Water Storage / Ground Water Recharge: To create facility for storage of run off
water and to facilitate rearing of fish construction of RCC check dams, farm ponds,
fishery ponds as well as reclamation of marshy lands are also proposed in the project
area. The water from the farms dug out ponds and ring wells in agricultural fields and
homestead garden will recharge the ground water level about 3 mts. And can be utilize by
in paddy fields, orchards including vegetables gardens can be utilized by using water
pumps.
Moreover 12 nos. of open wells are also proposed in the project area to recharge ground
water level as well as for meeting up requirement of drinking water of the people of the
project area.
For effective implementation of the project activities in the project area all concerned
must share the overall responsibilities from the District Water Shed Development Unit
(DWDU) level to the Users Groups (UG) and Self Help Group (SHG) Level. For proper
and fruitful implementation of the Project the responsibility of the Project Implementing
Agency and that of the Watershed committee is maximum. The watershed Development
Team must co-ordinate with the watershed committee and Project Implementing Agency
for effective implantation of the water shed works. Proper Training to the Users Groups
(UG) and Self Help Groups (SHG) is most required for effective implementation of the
project activities.
37
CHAPTER: IV- PROJECT ACTIVITIES
TABLE-M(PA)A1: ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES (EPA).
IV. A. PREPARATORY PHASE: PROPOSED ACTION PLAN UNDER ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES (EPA)
Treatable Area: 3000 ha.
Financial Outlay; Rs. 14.40 lakhs
1
Sl
No
1
2
3
Name of the Village
Entry Point Activities planned
Tokankata
Central Horticulture Nursery (1 ha.)
Kacharitol
Central Afforestation Nursery (0.5
ha.)
Open wells (12 nos.) one in each
village
Tube wells
(21 nos.) one in each village
1.50
-
-
1.05
-
-
2.10
-
-
Improvement & Repairing of
Dolagrant L.P. School
0.80
-
-
Tokankata L.P. School
Tokankata M.E. School
Improvement & repairing of
Kalaguru Bishnu Rabha Smiriti
School
0.90
-
-
To protect &
improve public
property
--do--
0.93
-
-
--do--
0.70
-
-
--do--
Makelikanda, Tolkenkata and
Naharbari village
Tamaru, Tokankata, Naharbari,
Hirapara, Pub Jungalpara, Pachim
Jungalpara, Ganakpara, Nanjalah,
No. 1 Batabari, Maugaon,
Dolagrant, Uttar Badulikanda,
Makelikanda, No. 1 Amguri,
Nizdola, Bhalabari and Bholabari
Bagisa.
Dolagrant
Tokankata
Tokankata
Kacharitol
38
4
5
6
Estimated Expenditure
Balance
cost
incurred
3.50
-
7
8
Expected outcome
Remarks
Seedlings to be
distributed
-do-
Works and estimated cost as proposed by the Project Manager,
Udalguri District. The detailed estimates are to be approved by the
DWDU/SLNA.
(Financial figures in lakh Rs.)
For drinking
purpose.
For drinking
purpose.
Nizdola
Improvement & repairing of Sitaram
Sarma M.E. School
Ganakpara Gandhi Smiriti M.E.
School
Improvement & repairing of Dakhin
Bhokelikanda M.E. School
Grand Total:
Ganakpara
Dakhin Bhokelikanda
1.00
-
-
--do--
0.90
-
-
--do--
1.02
-
-
--do--
14.40
4
5
Initiation
of village
level
institution
0.7596
Nonoi
District
3
Udalguri
State
2
Assam
1
Sl. No.
1
Name of
project
TABLE-M(PA)A2: OTHER ACTIVITIES OF PREPARATORY PHASE
6
7
8
Capacity
IEC
Baseline
building activities survey
13.886
3.358
14
Any
Identifying
Hydroother
technical Resource Preparation Evaluation
geological
(please
support agreements of DPR
of DPR
survey
specify)
agencies
Included
in DPR
9
10
11
12
13
Included
in DPR
NIRD
(NER),
ARSCA,
AAU,
JRT.
On
progress
3.60
0.36
-
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 5 to 14 category wise
totals, from column no. 15, total cost incurred, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table # One of the following may be entered in
columns 5 to 14 , Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started
39
TABLE DPR: 5- PHASING OF LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM (FOR ASSET LESS
PEOPLE)
Name of District: Udalguri.
Name of Project: Nonoi IWMP
Treatable Area: 3000 ha
Financial Target: 36.00Lakh
Name of Scheme
Physical
Target
Nos.
Livelihood Activities
(Asset less)
Livestock Development Works by S.H.G.
A. Piggery – Breaded
2
B. Duck Rearing
12
C. Milch Cow
10
Other Activities
0
A. Bicycle Repairing
7
B. Handloom
8
C.Pottary Making
2
D. Fruit Processing
4
E. Carpenter
5
F. Mobile Repairing
1
G. Bike Repairing
2
I. Vermi Compost
3
J. Fishery Dev./ Fish
5
Farming (25 x 30) m2
K. Bamboo Craft
2
L. Wood Craft
0
M. Blacksmith
2
N. Jaru Making
1
O. Tarja Making
3
P. Bee-Keeping
3
Total
72
Unit
cost
nd
2 year (4%)
Nos
Amonut
Year wise Phasing
3 year (3%)
4th year (3%)
Nos
Amonut
Nos
Amonut
rd
(1 unit to each SHG Group)
1.20
1
1.20
0.12
1
0.12
1.20
4
4.80
1
6
3
1.20
0.72
3.60
0
5
3
0.00
0.60
3.60
0.40
0.50
0.44
0.50
0.24
0.30
0.50
0.225
0.60
4
3
0
2
2
1
1.60
1.50
0.40
1.00
0.44
0.50
0.48
2
3
1
1
1
0
0.80
1.50
0.44
0.50
0.24
0.00
2
1
0.45
0.60
1
2
1
1
2
0
2
1
0
0
4
0.00
2.40
0.55
0.55
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.20
1
0
2
1
1
1
27
0.55
0.00
0.80
0.30
0.50
0.20
14.40
1
0.55
1.00
0.48
0.30
1.00
0.225
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
2
1
23
1.00
0.20
10.77
1
22
0.20
10.83
Total
2.40
1.44
12.00
0.00
2.80
4.00
0.88
2.00
1.20
0.30
1.00
0.68
3.00
1.10
0.00
0.80
0.30
1.50
0.60
36.00
Contd..
40
TABLE DPR:
5- PHASING OF LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM (FOR
PRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO ENTERPRISES)
Name of District: Udalguri.
Name of Project: Nonoi IWMP
Treatable Area: 3000 ha
Financial Target : 46.80.00Lakh
Name of Scheme
Physical
Target
Production System & Micro
Enterprises
B. Duck Rearing
C. Milch Cow
D. Bicycle Repairing
E. Handloom
F.Pottary Making
G. Fruit Processing
H. Carpenter
I. Mobile Repairing
J. Bike Repairing
K. Vermi Compost
L. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming
(25 x 30) m2
O. Bamboo Craft
P. Wood Craft
R. Blacksmith
S. Jaru Making
T. Tarja Making
U. Bee-Keeping
Total
Unit
cost
Nos.
2nd year (5%)
Nos
Amonut
3
8
10
7
14
3
8
8
2
2
4
7
1.20
0.12
1.20
0.40
0.50
0.44
0.50
0.24
0.30
0.50
0.225
0.60
1
2
5
3
6
1.20
0.24
6.00
1.20
3.00
4
3
2
2.00
0.72
0.60
0
2
0.00
1.20
2
2
2
0
5
5
0.55
0.55
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.20
1
0.55
2
0.80
1
0.50
32
18.01
92
41
Year wise Phasing
3rd year (4%)
4th year (4%)
Nos
Amonut
Nos
Amonut
Total
1
3
3
1
4
2
2
3
0
2
1
2
1.20
0.36
3.60
0.40
2.00
0.88
1.00
0.72
0.00
1.00
0.225
1.20
1
3
2
3
4
1
2
2
0
1.20
0.36
2.40
1.20
2.00
0.44
1.00
0.48
0.00
3
3
0.675
1.80
3.60
0.96
12.00
2.80
7.00
1.32
4.00
1.92
0.60
1.00
0.90
4.20
0
0
0
0
2
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.80
1
2
0
0
2
1
0.55
1.10
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.20
1.10
1.10
0.80
0.00
2.50
1.00
30
14.39
30
14.41
46.80
IV. B. Watershed Works phase
TABLE-M(PA)B1: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SURFACE WATER RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT
AREAS
( Rs. in lakh )
1
2
3
4
5
7
6
Construction of new structures
-
-
-
-
-
4nos/
15000 m3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5nos/ 97
m2
7 nos/
11395 rm
5 nos/
10698 rm
1 no/ 1000
rm
Storage
capacity
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage capacity
No.
(i) Excavated Pond (In
19 For drinking
purpose
M3)
(ii) RCC Check dam (In
M2)
(iii) Earthen embankment without core wall (In RM)
(Iv) Distribution canal
Earthen (In RM)
(v) Boulder spur (In RM) -
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of
existing structures
No.
Nonoi
No.
Sub Total
Kulsi MWS
Udalguri
1
Assam
Nonoi MWS
Type of structures
Area
irrigated (ha)
Names of
project/MWS
Names of District
Name of State
Sl. No
Pre-project
(i) Excavated pond (In
M3)
M2)
(iii) Earthen embankment
without core wall (In RM)
(iv) Distribution canal
earthen (In RM)
Total target
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
( M3 )
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated
(ha)
Storage
capacity
( M3 )
Estimate
d
cost
50
12000
8.55
50
12000
8.55
500
34.43
500
34.43
480
22.79
480
22.79
360
10.27
360
10.27
-
2.90
-
2.90
1390
78.94
1390
78.94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 nos /
9000 m3
25
5.13
25
5.13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7 nos/
136.25 m2
700
48.37
700
48.37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
370
15.76
370
15.76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6 nos /
7840 rm
6 nos/
10047.50
rm
460
9.64
460
9.64
Sub Total
1555
78.90
1555
78.90
Grand Total
2945
157.84
2945
157.84
42
TABLE- M(PA)B2: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO RECHARGING GROUND WATER RESOURCES IN THE
PROJECT AREA
5
Type of structures
Name of project
4
Nonoi
Name of District
3
Udalguri
1
Name of State
S.
No.
2
Assam
1
6
Pre-project
Area
No. Irrigate
d
(ha)
Augmentation/ repair of
existing recharging
structures
9
8
Achievement due to project
Construction of new
recharging structures
Total target
Augmentation/ repair
of existing recharging
structures
Chang
e in
irrigat
ed
area
(Col.
Area to
Exp.
Exp. To 8-6)
be
incurre
be
(ha)
irrigated
d
incurred
(ha)
Construction of new
recharging structures
Area to be Estima
Area to be
Area to be
Area
Estimat
Estimate
Exp.
No. irrigated
ted No. irrigated
irrigated
No. irrigated
No.
ed cost
d cost
incurred
(ha)
cost
(ha)
(ha)
(ha)
Area
irrigated
(ha)
Total
achievement
-
-
-
12
120
From
EPA
120
From
EPA
-
-
-
12
120
From
EPA
120
From EPA
120
-
For
drinking
purpose
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-`
-
+-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
For
drinkin
g
purpose
-
-
-
12
120
From
EPA
120
From
EPA
-
-
-
12
120
From
EPA
120
From
EPA
120
(i)Open
wells
13
(ii) Tube
wells
(iii)Any
others
Total for the project:
7
Proposed target
43
TABLE M(PS)B3: ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR USERS GROUPS (UGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA
(Rs. in lakhs)
5
Name Of
MWS
4
Name of
project
3
Name of
District
2
Name of
State
Sl. No.
1
6
Major Activities of the UGs-targets
Sl.
No.
1.
2.
3.
Nonoi
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Kulsi MWS
Udalguri
1.
Assam
Nonoi MWS
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Structure /Activity proposed
Type
No.
Treatment (ha.)
Excavated Pond (In M3)
RCC Check dam (In M2)
E/ embankment without
core wall (In RM)
Dist. canal Earthen (In
RM)
Boulder spur (In RM)
Aff. Regeneration (In Ha)
Crop Demo (Paddy) (In
Ha)
Rubber Plantation (In Ha)
Bench Terracing (In RM)
Protective
afforestation
(In Ha)
Plantation Nursery (In Ha)
Crop Demo (Veg) (In Ha)
Sub Total
Excavated Pond (In M3)
RCC Check dam (In M2)
core wall (In RM)
Distri. canal earthen (In
RM)
Rubber Plantation (In Ha)
Protective Aff. (In Ha)
Aff. Regeneration (In Ha)
Crop Demo (Paddy)
Sub Total
Total
Nos. of UGs
proposed
Estimated Cost
Amount of
WDF to be
collected
4
5
50
500
4
5
8.55
34.43
0.43
1.72
7
480
7
22.79
1.14
5
360
5
1
7
25.48
1
7
2.90
4.71
0.15
0.24
2
2.73
2
0.41
0.02
1
1
1.75
1
1
1.27
0.69
0.06
0.03
1
2.50
1
0.68
0.03
1
1
36
2
7
1
1
1424.46
25
700
1
1
36
2
7
3.00
0.24
89.94
5.13
48.37
0.15
0.01
4.50
0.26
2.42
6
370
6
15.76
0.79
6
460
6
9.64
0.48
2
3
6
2
34
70
5
13.38
19.70
2
1595.05
3019.54
2
3
6
2
34
70
3.64
3.66
3.64
0.30
90.14
180.08
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.02
4.51
9.01
44
10.27
0.51
TABLE- M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUP (SHGS) FOR ASSET
LESS PEOPLE IN THE PROJECT AREA
(Rs. in lakhs)
Sl
No
Name of
the State
Name
of the
District
Name of
Project
Name of Scheme
Livelihood Activities (Asset less)
1
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
B. Duck Rearing
C. Milch Cow
Other Activities
B. Handloom
C.Pottary Making
D. Fruit Processing
E. Carpenter
F. Mobile Repairing
G. Bike Repairing
I. Vermi Compost
J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2
K. Bamboo Craft
L. Wood Craft
M. Blacksmith
N. Jaru Making
O. Tarja Making
P. Bee-Keeping
Total
Physical
Target
Average
annual income
from per SHG
Nos. of SHGs
involve
2
12
10
0.80
0.50
0.80
7
8
2
4
5
1
2
3
5
2
0
2
1
3
3
72
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Contd………
45
Nos. of
SHGs to
be given
training
2
12
10
7
8
2
4
5
1
2
3
5
2
0
2
1
3
3
72
Total assistance received by the
SHG
Materi
al
Total
Total
annual
income
Total
annual
savings
Nos of SHG
greaded as
Total
amount of
loan
sanction
by the
Bank
Nos of
SHG
federate
d
Loan
from
revolvin
g fund
0.20
1.20
1.00
Traini
ng
0.20
1.20
1.00
1.00
2.40
5.00
1.40
4.80
7.00
1.60
6.00
8.00
0.20
1.20
1.00
2
12
10
0.70
0.80
0.20
0.40
0.50
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.50
0.20
0.70
1.60
0.20
0.40
0.50
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.50
0.20
1.40
2.40
0.40
1.60
1.00
0.20
0.40
0.30
1.50
0.30
2.80
4.80
0.80
2.40
2.00
0.40
0.80
0.90
2.50
0.70
3.50
6.40
1.00
3.20
2.50
0.50
1.00
1.50
4.00
1.00
0.70
1.60
0.20
0.80
0.50
0.10
0.20
0.60
1.50
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.30
7.20
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.30
8.00
0.30 0.70
0.15 0.35
0.45 1.05
0.45 1.05
19.25 34.45
1.00
0.50
1.50
1.50
44.70
0.30
0.15
0.45
0.45
10.25
7
8
2
4
5
1
2
3
5
2
0
2
1
3
3
72
I
46
II
III
Not Graded
Not yet
processed
TABLE-M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) UNDER
PRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO ENTERPRISES IN THE PROJECT AREA
Rs. In Lakh
Sl
No
Name
of the
State
Name
of the
District
Name of
Project
Name of Scheme
Physical Target
Livelihood Activities (Asset less)
1
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
Nos. of SHGs
involve
3
B. Duck Rearing
C. Milch Cow
B. Handloom
C.Pottary Making
D. Fruit Processing
E. Carpenter
F. Mobile Repairing
G. Bike Repairing
I. Vermi Compost
J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2
K. Bamboo Craft
L. Wood Craft
M. Blacksmith
N. Jaru Making
O. Tarja Making
P. Bee-Keeping
Total
8
10
7
14
3
8
8
2
2
4
7
2
2
2
0
5
5
92
Average
annual
income from
per SHG
0.80
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Contd…….
47
Nos. of
SHGs to
be given
training
3
8
10
7
14
3
8
8
2
2
4
7
2
2
2
0
5
5
92
Total assistance received by the SHG
Loan
from
revolving
fund
0.30
0.80
1.00
0.70
1.40
0.30
0.80
0.80
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.70
0.20
0.20
0.20
Traini
ng
0.50
0.50
9.20
0.50
0.50
10.60
Materi
al
Total
Total
annual
income
Total
annual
savings
Nos of SHG
greaded as
I
0.30
0.80
1.00
0.70
2.80
0.30
0.80
0.80
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.70
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.50
1.60
5.00
1.40
4.20
0.60
3.20
1.60
0.40
0.40
0.40
2.10
0.30
0.30
0.30
2.10
3.20
7.00
2.80
8.40
1.20
4.80
3.20
0.80
0.80
1.20
3.50
0.70
0.70
0.70
2.40
4.00
8.00
3.50
11.20
1.50
6.40
4.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
5.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.30
0.80
1.00
0.70
2.80
0.30
1.60
0.80
0.20
0.20
0.80
2.10
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.75 1.75
0.75 1.75
24.80 44.60
3.25
3.25
60.10
1.50
1.50
15.50
48
II
III
Total
amount of
loan
sanction
by the
Bank
Nos of
SHG
federate
d
3
Not yet Graded
Under
process
8
10
7
14
3
8
8
2
2
4
7
2
2
2
0
5
5
92
9
49
Any other Total
cost
(please
specify) incurred
(Rs. In
lakhs)
(b)
(a) (b)
(a)
Not relevant
(b)
-
(a)
Not started
Not started
-
Not started
-
Not started
-
Not started
-
Not started
(b)
-
15
14
Pasture Veterinary
Non-conv.
Fishery dev.
dev.
services
energy
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a)
Not started
13
-
Crop
demon
12
11
-
Ridge Drainage
Nursery Land
area
line
raising dev.
treatmenttreatment
10
Not started
8
-
7
Not started
6
-
Names of project
5
Not started
4
Nonoi
3
Udalguri
1.
State
S.
No.
2
Assam
1
District
TABLE-M(PA)B5: OTHER ACTIVITIES OF WATERSHED WORKS PHASE*
TABLE-M(PA)B6: DETAILS OF ENGINEERING STRUCTURES IN WATERSHED WORKS*
Pvt. Comm.
UG
6 nos.
/ 10047.50 rm
Pvt. Comm.
-
UG
Sub total :
Total :
50
6 nos.
/ 7840 rm
2nd , 3rd year &
4th year
6 nos.
/ 10047.50
rm
6 nos.
/ 7840 rm
1.72
8.55
34.43
10.27
12.05
22.79
2.90
0.69
0.14
0.73
18.23
79.63
8.22
20.66
2.05
0.55
22.79
1.7
1
6.8
4
2nd , 3rd & 4th
Year
4.56
10.27
34.43
6.8
4
8.55
1st, 2nd year, 3rd ,
7 nos.
4th year
/ 136.25 m3
5.13
7 nos.
/ 136.25 m3
Not yet
started
Not yet
started
Not yet
started
Not yet
started
4.10
UG
2 nos.
/ 9000 m3
7.71
Comm.
2nd & 3rd Year
48.37
-
2 nos.
/ 9000 m3
9.64
DL
UG
15.76
-
-
Not yet
started
158.53 78.90
(iv) Earthen embankment
Comm.
1no.
/ 719 rm
12.61
LD
-
5
2.44
DL
(iii) Distribution Channel
earthen (In RM)
Kulsi MWS
LD
7
4.30
M2)
-
4.10
-
29.0
0
16.9
i) Excavated Pond (In M3)
1.03
31.1
5
46.6
Sub Total
2nd year
Not yet
started
2.03
1no.
/ 719 rm
1no.
/ 1000 rm
0.14
UG
3rd year
31.1
5
46.6
2
1.86
1no.
/ 1000 rm
Not yet started 3rd & 4th Year
Not yet
started
1.03
-
7 nos.
/ 11395 rm
29.0
0
16.9
3
2.44
Pvt.
-
2nd. 3rd and 4th
year
1.93
LD
Comm.
5 nos.
/ 10698 rm
3.15
-
-
3rd & 4th Year
Not yet started 1st, 2nd year &
4th year
35.1
1
41.4
4
2.44
-
-
5 nos.
/ 97 m2
66.2
5
87.9
7
4.30
vi) Const. of earthen
canal in Rm.
DL
2.90
-
0.69
-
1st, 2nd year &
4th year
79.63
7 nos.
/ 11395 rm
5.13
UG
48.37
Pvt. Comm.
9.64
-
15.76
DL
-
158.53 78.90
(iv) Earthen embankment
1.72
5 nos.
/ 10698 rm
0.14
UG
1.7
Pvt. Comm.
2
1.86
LD
3
2.44
(iii) Distribution Channel
earthen (In RM)
12.05
5 nos.
/ 97 m2
20.66
UG
8.22
Comm.
2.05
4 nos.
/ 15000 m3
4.56
UG
18.23
(iii) Others (pl.
specify)
-
10
Achievement
Expenditure
Expected
Actual month
Estimated cost
No. of units
incurred (Rs. in Status of
month & year of
& year of
(Rs. in lakh)
(No./ cu.m./
lakh)
completion
completion completion
rmt)
(mm/yyyy)
(mm/yyyy)
M W O T
M W O T
2nd, 3rd, & 4th
4 nos.
Not yet started 2nd, 3rd, & 4th
Year
/ 15000 m3
Year
0.73
(ii) Community
Comm.
No. of units
(No./ cu.m./
Rmt)
7.71
Udalguri
Assam
-
DL
v) Boulder spur
1
LD
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
9
Target
1.93
Nonoi MWS
M2)
-
(i) Private
-
(iii) Land dev. (L)
i) Excavated Pond (In M3)
(ii) Drainage line
(D)
(i) Ridge area (R)
Project
District
State
Sl. No.
Name of
Structures
8
Executing
Agency
2.03
7
Type of land
0.55
6
Type of treatment
0.14
5
3.15
4
12.61
3
35.1
1
41.3
2
66.2
5
87.9
1
2nd. 3rd and 4th
year
3rd year
2nd year
2nd & 3rd Year
1st, 2nd year,
3rd , 4th year
2nd , 3rd & 4th
Year
2nd , 3rd year
&
4th year
Kulsi MWS
Udalguri
1
Assam
Aff.
Regeneration
Crop Demo
(Paddy)
Rubber
Plantation
Protective
Afforestation
Plantation
RA
7
-
-
Pvt.
Comm.
-
UG
25.48
-
4.71
-
-
Pvt.
Comm.
-
UG
2.5
2500
0.68
3rd year June
2011
Pvt.
-
-
UG
1.75
1000
1.27
2nd year
RA
(ii)
Community
Type
of
land
8
Executing
agency
(I) Ug
(Ii)Shg
(Iii)
Individual
Beneficiary
Type
of
(ii) Drainage
treat
line
ment
(D)
(iii) Others (pl.
specify)
Protective
Afforestation
Rubber
plantation
Crop Demo
(Paddy)
Crop Demo
(Veg)
Plantation
Nursery
(i) Private
Nonoi MWS
Aff.
Regeneration
6
(i) Ridge area
(R)
5
Name of structure/
work
4
Project
3
District
Sl.
No.
2
State
1
(iii) Land dev.
(L)
TABLE-M(PA)B7: DETAILS OF ACTIVITIES CONNECTED WITH VEGETATIVE COVER IN WATERSHED
WORKS*
9
Target
Area
(ha)
No. of
plants
Estimated
cost
(Rs. in
lakh)
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/ yyyy)
2nd year June
2010 3rd year
June 2011 4th
year June 2012
-
-
L
Pvt.
-
-
IB
2.73
-
0.41
2nd year
-
-
L
Pvt.
-
-
IB
1
-
0.24
2nd year
-
-
L
-
Comm.
-
UG
1
-
3.00
2nd year
Sub Total
34.46
3500
10.31
3.64
2rd year & 4th
year
-
0.30
2nd year
5
-
3.64
2nd year
13.38
-
3.66
2rd & 4th Year
11.24
21.55
-
Plantation
-
-
Pvt.
Comm
-
UG
19.70
-
-
L
Pvt.
Comm.
-
IB
2.00
RA
-
-
PVT.
Comm.
-
UG
RA
-
-
Pvt.
Comm.
-
UG
Sub Total 40.08
Grand Total 74.54
51
TABLE-M(PA)B8: DETAILS OF ALLIED / OTHER ACTIVITIES
1
2
3
4
5
6
Type of land
Sl.
No.
State
District
Project
Name of activity@
1.
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
Nil
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
Nil
Nil
52
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
Nil
7
Executing
agency
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
Nil
8
Target
Expected
Estimated
month & year
cost
of completion
(Rs. in lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
Nil
Nil
Micro WS
Nonoi & Kulsi
Project
Nonoi
District
Udalguri
1.
Assam
Sl.
No.
State
TABLE-M(PA)B9: LIVELIHOOD PROPOSED TO BE CREATED FOR ASSET LESS PEOPLE
Name of activity@
A. Piggery –
Breaded
B. Duck Rearing
C. Milch Cow
Other Activities
B. Handloom
C.Pottary Making
D. Fruit Processing
E. Carpenter
F. Mobile Repairing
G. Bike Repairing
I. Vermi Compost
J. Fishery Dev./ Fish
Farming (25 x 30)
m2
K. Bamboo Craft
L. Wood Craft
M. Blacksmith
N. Jaru Making
O. Tarja Making
P. Bee-Keeping
Total
Cost per
Unit
(Rs. In
lakh)
Estimated
cost
(Rs. in
lakh)
Expected
income
per unit
(BC
Ratio)
No. of HH by social group
Pre-Project
Income (Avg./ HH)
in Rs.
SC
10
ST
10
Others
-
SC
-
ST
-
Others
-
1.20
2.40
100%
20
70
50
40
40
10
20
30
10
10
30
20
30
50
-
-
-
0.12
1.20
0.40
0.50
0.44
0.50
0.24
0.30
0.50
0.225
0.60
1.44
12.00
2.80
4.00
0.88
2.00
1.20
0.30
1.00
0.68
3.00
100%
100%
10
10
10
30
30
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
10
30
30
-
-
-
0.55
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.20
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
170
200
350
720
1.10
0.80
0.30
1.50
0.60
36.00
20
10
20
0
10
10
-
53
Total
20
120
100
-
70
80
20
40
50
10
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Micro WS
Nonoi & Kulsi
Project
Nonoi
Udalguri
1.
Assam
State
Sl.
No.
District
TABLE-M(PA)B10: LIVELIHOOD PROPOSED TO BE CREATED FOR FARMERS
Name of
activity@
No. of Land
owning
HH
MF SF LF
No. of HH by
social group
SC ST Others
Pre-Project
Income (Avg./
HH)
MF SF LF
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Total:
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
(Rs.. in lakhs)
Expected
income
per unit
(BC
Ratio)
Cost
per
Unit
Estimated
cost
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
54
CHAPTER V: PLANNING
TABLE-M (PA)A1: ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES (EPA)
PROPOSED ACTION PLAN UNDER ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES (EPA)
District: Udalguri
Name of the Project: Nonoi IWMP
Name of the MWS: Nonoi & Kulsi MWS
Treatable Area: 3000 ha.
1
Sl
No
1
Financial Outlay; Rs. 14.40 lakhs
2
3
Name of the Village
Entry Point Activities planned
Tokankata
Central Horticulture Nursery (1 ha.)
Kacharitol
Central Afforestation Nursery (0.5
ha.)
Open wells (12 nos.) one in each
village
Tube wells
(21 nos.) one in each village
1.50
-
-
1.05
-
-
2.10
-
-
Dolagrant
Dolagrant L.P. School
0.80
-
-
Tokankata
Tokankata L.P. School
Tokankata M.E. School
Improvement & repairing of
Kalaguru Bishnu Rabha Smiriti
School
0.90
-
0.93
0.70
Makelikanda, Tolkenkata and
Naharbari village
Tamaru, Tokankata, Naharbari,
Hirapara, Pub Jungalpara, Pachim
Jungalpara, Ganakpara, Nanjalah, No.
1 Batabari, Maugaon, Dolagrant, Uttar
Badulikanda, Makelikanda, No. 1
Amguri, Nizdola, Bhalabari and
Bholabari Bagisa.
Tokankata
Kacharitol
55
4
5
6
Estimated Expenditure
Balance
cost
incurred
3.50
-
(financial figures in lakh Rs.)
7
8
Actual
Expected outcome
outcome
Seedlings to be
distributed
-doFor drinking
purpose.
For drinking
purpose.
-
-
-
To protect &
improve public
property
--do--
-
-
--do--
-
-
-
--do--
-
-
-
Nizdola
Ganakpara
Dakhin Bhokelikanda
Improvement & repairing of Sitaram
Sarma M.E. School
Ganakpara Gandhi Smiriti M.E.
School
Improvement & repairing of Dakhin
Bhokelikanda M.E. School
Grand Total:
56
1.00
-
-
--do--
-
0.90
-
-
--do--
-
1.02
-
-
--do--
-
14.40
Table: DPR: 6- YEAR WISE PHASING OF WORKS UNDER NONOI IWM PROJECT
Name of the district:-Udalguri
Name of the watershed:- Nonoi
Total project area:-4586 ha.
Component
Name of the MWS: Nonoi & Kulsi
Treatable area:-3000 ha.
1st year
2nd year
3rd year
Total project cost:-360 Lakhs
4th year
5th year
Total amount
Administrative
10%
2.50
Amount
9.00
14%
2.00
Amount
7.20
14%
2.00
Amount
7.20
13%
2.00
Amount
7.20
8%
1.50
Amount
5.40
10%
10.00
Amount
36.00
Monitoring
0.10
0.36
0.30
1.08
0.30
1.08
0.30
1.08
0.00
0.00
1.00
3.60
Evaluation
0.40
1.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
2.16
1.00
3.60
Entry Point Activities
Institution & Capacity
Biulding
4.00
14.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
14.40
2.00
7.20
1.00
3.60
1.00
3.60
1.00
3.60
0.00
0.00
5.00
18.00
Detail Project Report (DPR)
Watershed development
Works
1.00
3.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
3.60
10.00
36.00
13.70
49.32
13.70
49.32
12.60
45.36
0.00
0.00
50.00
180.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
14.40
3.00
10.80
3.00
10.80
0.00
0.00
10.00
36.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
18.00
4.00
14.40
4.00
14.40
0.00
0.00
13.00
46.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
18.00
5.00
18.00
20.00
72.00
26.00
93.60
24.00
86.40
22.90
82.44
7.10
25.56
100.00
360.00
Livelihood Activities (Assetless) Production system
Consolidation
Total:
57
Table DPR: 7- YEAR WISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET UNDER WATERSHED WORK PHASE
Name of the district:-Udalguri
Name of the watershed:- Nonoi
Total project area:-4586 ha.
Sl.
No.
Name of village
1
Name of the MWS: Nonoi & Kulsi
Treatable area:-3000 ha.
Name of Schemes
2
3
Physical
target
4
Unit
cost
5
Total project cost:-360 Lakhs
Year wise financial target
1st
year
2nd
year
3rd
year
4th
year
5th year
10%
13.7%
13.7%
12.6%
(Consolidation) 5%
6
7
8
9
10
Total
11
NONOI MWS
1
2
3
4
5
Tamura
Pub Jangalpara
Hirapara Gaon
No. 1 Batabari
Niz Dolagaon
1. Afforestation Regeneration
2. Excavated pond
3.Earthen embankment without core
walling
4. Crop demo (paddy) in ha.
5. RCC Check dam
1.Constn. of distn. canal for agri field
(Earthen)
2 Earthen embankment without core
walling
4. RCC check dam
1 Constn. of distn. canal for agri field
(Earthen)
2. Excavated pond
3. RCC check dam
6 ha
2000 m3
3755 rm
18500
57
200
1.73 ha
20 m2
1500 rm
15000
35500
96
2000 rm
200
3 ha
20 m2
4000 rm
18500
35500
96
3000 m3
20 m2
57
35500
1. Excavated pond
6000 m3
4 ha
3000 rm
57
18500
200
58
1.11
1.14
7.51
0.26
0.26
7.10
1.44
7.10
1.44
4.00
4.00
0.55
0.55
7.10
3.84
7.10
3.84
1.71
7.10
3.42
0.74
6.00
1.11
1.14
7.51
1.71
7.10
3.42
0.74
6.00
6
Namjala
7
Mougaon
8
9
10
Naharbari Gaon
Dalagrant Gaon
Tokankata Gaon
walling
walling
1. Boulder spur
walling
3. RCC Check dam
2. Drainage canal
1. Rubber plantation
2. Excavated pond
3. Constn. of distn. canal for agri field
(Earthen)
4. RCC Check dam
walling
(Earthen)
3. Const. of earthen canal in Rm.
4. Protective afforestation
walling
2. Plantation Nursery
3.18 ha
1000 rm
18500
200
1000 rm
500 rm
2900
200
17 m2
4 ha
3125
Rm.
1 ha
1.75 ha
4000 m3
1500 rm
35500
18500
96
20 m2
800 rm
35500
200
7.10
1.60
7.10
1.60
573 rm
96
0.55
0.55
719 rm
2.5 ha
2.5 ha
96
27300
18500
0.69
0.68
1ha
340 rm
15000
200
0.15
0.68
1 ha
2.8 ha
300000
18500
3.00
Subtotal:
24000
72900
57
96
0.59
2.00
0.59
2.00
2.90
1.00
2.90
1.00
6.03
3.00
6.03
0.74
3.00
1.44
0.24
1.27
2.28
1.44
0.74
0.24
1.27
2.28
0.69
0.68
0.46
0.15
0.68
0.46
0.52
14.20 26.54 21.16 28.04
59
3.00
0.52
89.94
KULSI MWS
11
12
13
14
No.1 Amguri
Gaon
Ganakpara
Kacharitol
Uttar
Bhikalikanda
15
Pachim
Jangalpara
16
Makelikanda
Bholabari
Bagicha
17
(Earthen)
2. RCC Check dam
3 Afforestation Regeneration
1Constn. of distn. canal for agri field
(Earthen)
3. Excavated pond
5. RCC Check dam
2000 rm
96
20 m2
4 ha
0.90 ha
2200 rm
35500
18500
27300
96
4 ha
3000 m3
2.5 ha
20 m2
18500
57
72900
35500
1. Excavated pond
3. RCC check dam
walling
(Earthen)
3. RCC check dam
1. Earhen embankment without core
walling
walling
2. RCC Check dam
(Earthen)
1
6000 m3
2.70 ha
18 m2
200 rm
15000
57
18500
35500
200
2000 rm
96
18.25 m2
1340 rm
35500
200
4 ha
800 rm
18500
200
20 m2
2.5 ha
10.48 ha
562.50
rm
4 ha
2000 rm
35500
72900
27300
96
60
18500
200
1.92
1.92
7.10
0.74
0.25
2.11
0.74
1.71
1.82
7.10
0.15
3.42
0.50
6.39
0.40
1.92
6.48
0.74
1.71
1.82
7.10
0.15
3.42
0.50
6.39
0.40
1.92
6.48
2.68
2.68
0.74
0.74
1.60
7.10
7.10
1.82
2.86
0.54
0.74
0.74
4.00
1.60
1.82
2.86
0.54
4.00
7.10
0.74
0.25
2.11
walling
3. RCC check dam
18
19
Dakhin
Bhokelikanda
Bholabari Gaon
20 m2
(Earthen)
2. Protective Afforestation
(Earthen)
walling
walling
3. RCC check dam
35500
1770 rm
96
2 ha
1515 rm
27300
96
1500 rm
200
1 ha
2000 rm
15000
200
1 ha
20 m2
18500
35500
Subtotal:
7.10
7.10
1.70
1.70
0.55
1.45
0.55
1.45
3.00
0.15
4.00
0.18
7.10
21.30 23.50 28.16 17.10
35.50 50.04 49.32 45.14
Grand Total:
61
3.00
0.15
4.00
0.18
7.10
90.06
180.00
TABLE DPR: 8 - YEAR WISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET
Name of Watershed: Nonoi
Sl.
No.
Name of
Micro
Watershed
Name of Villages
1
Nonoi
MWS
(3A2C1/I)
1
2
Tamura
Hirapara Gaon
2
Kulsi
MWS
(3A2C1/II)
3
No. 1 Amguri
gaon
Bholabari bagicha
Bhulabari Gaon
4
5
A. First Year
Name of Schemes
Financial Year: 2009-10
No.
Unit
Cost
(Rs.)
Area to
be
benefitted
Financial Target: 36.00 lakh
Estimated Cost
No. of
Beneficiary
No. of
Mandays.
RCC ccheck dam (in m2)
21
20
35500
35500
120
100
M
4.56
4.26
Sub Total:
20
35500
220
100
8.82
4.26
5.14
2.48
0.74
0.36
14.70
7.10
171
81
5140
2480
20
20
35500
35500
100
100
4.26
4.26
2.48
2.48
0.36
0.36
7.10
7.10
81
81
2480
2480
Sub Total:
300
12.78
7.44
1.08
21.30
243
7440
1st Year Total:
520
21.60
12.58
1.82
36.00
414
12580
62
W
2.66
2.48
O
0.38
0.36
T
7.6
7.10
90
81
2660
2480
Sl.
No.
Name of
Micro
Watershed
Name of Villages
1
Nonoi
MWS
(3A2C1/I)
1
Tamura
2
Pub
Jangalpara
3
4
5
6
7
3
Kulsi
MWS
(3A2C1/II)
5
6
7
8
9
Niz
Dolagaon
Mougaon
Naharbari
gaon
Dalagrant
gaon
Tokankata
gaon
No. 1
Amguri gaon
Ganakpara
Kacharitol
Uttar
Bhikalikanda
Makelikanda
B. 2nd Year
Name of Schemes
Excavated pond in M3
Crop demo (paddy) in ha.
E/ embankment without core
wall (in m2)
RCC check dam (in m2)
wall (in m2)
Afforestation regeneration in
ha.
ha.
Crop demo (veg.) in ha.
Rubber plantation in ha.
Bench terracing for barren land
in Rm
Protective afforestation in ha.
wall (in m2)
Afforestation nursery in ha.
Sub Total:
ha.
Excavated pond in m3
wall (in m2)
No.
Unit
Cost
(Rs.)
1315
1
Financial Target: 49.32 Lakh
57
15000
Area to
be
benefit
ted
10
1
No. of
Beneficiary
No. of
Mandays.
M
0.15
0.06
W
0.6
0.09
O
0
0.00
T
0.75
0.15
18
1
600
90
2000
20
200
35500
80
100
0.8
4.26
3.2
2.48
0
0.36
4.00
7.10
135
81
3200
2480
3000
200
150
1.20
4.80
0
6.00
200
4800
3.18
18500
4
0.24
0.35
0
0.59
7
450
4
1
18500
24000
4
1
0.29
0.09
0.45
0.15
0
0.00
0.74
0.24
7
2
450
150
1.75
72900
1.75
0.5
0.77
0
1.27
4
500
1500
1
2.5
46
15000
27300
0.75
1
2.5
0.13
0.06
0.27
0.56
0.09
0.41
0
0.00
0
0.69
0.15
0.68
2
1
4
560
90
410
340
1
200
300000
15
1
372
0.14
1.2
9.39
0.54
1.8
16.29
0.03
0
0.39
0.68
3.00
26.04
4
4
470
540
1800
16120
4
3000
2.5
1
18
18500
57
72900
15000
35500
4
5
2.5
1
80
0.29
0.34
0.72
0.06
3.83
0.45
1.37
1.1
0.09
2.23
0
0
0
0.00
0.33
0.74
1.71
1.82
0.15
6.39
7
9
4
1
135
450
1370
1100
90
2230
200
19.1
800
200
35500
200
20
100
50
0.08
3.88
0.32
0.32
2.26
1.28
0
0.34
0
0.40
6.48
1.6
36
179
90
320
2370
1280
63
Estimated Cost
10
11
Bholabari
Bagicha
Dakhin
Bhokelikanda
Sl.
No.
Name of
Micro
Watershed
1
Nonoi
MWS
(3A2C1/I)
Name of Villages
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Tamura
Pub
Jangalpara
Hirapara
gaon
No. 1
Batabari
Niz
Dologaon
Namjala
Mougaon
Naharbari
Gaon
Dalagrant
gaon
wall (in m2)
Const. of distn. Canal for agri
field in Rm.
field in Rm.
2.5
72900
2.5
0.72
1.1
0
1.82
4
1100
562.5
96
80
0.11
0.43
0
0.54
4
430
170
1
96
15000
40
1
0.34
0.06
1.36
0.09
0
0.00
1.70
0.15
72
1
1360
90
Sub Total:
386
10.75
12.08
0.67
23.50
542
12190
2nd Year Total:
758
22.88
25.48
0.87
49.32
1012
25480
C: 3rd year
Name of Schemes
Afforestation Regeneration
in ha.
Const. of distn. Canal for
agri field in Rm.
in ha.
agri field in Rm.
core wall (in m2)
Boulder spur in Rm
core wall (in m2)
Drainage Canal in Rm
agri field in Rm.
in ha.
No.
Unit
Cost
(Rs.)
Area to
be
benefitted
Financial Target: 49.32 Lakhs.
Estimated Cost
M
W
O
No. of
Beneficiary
No. of
Mandays.
11
670
T
6
18500
6
0.44
0.67
0
1.11
1500
96
80
0.28
1.16
0
1.44
3
18500
3
0.22
0.33
0
0.55
5
330
4000
96
200
0.76
3.08
0
3.84
179
3080
6000
57
20
0.68
2.74
0
3.42
90
2740
1000
1000
200
2900
80
0
0.4
2.03
1.6
0.87
0
0
2
2.9
135
9
1600
870
500
3125
200
96
20
40
0.2
0.6
0.8
2.4
0
0
1
3
45
54
200
2400
1500
96
30
0.28
1.16
0
1.44
54
1160
2.5
18500
2.5
0.18
0.28
0
0.46
7
280
64
135
1160
3
Kulsi
MWS
(3A2C1/II)
10
11
12
13
No. 1
Amguri
Ganakpara
Kacharitol
Pachim
Jangalpara
14
Makelikanda
15
Bholabari
Bagicha
Dakhin
Bhokelikanda
16
17
Bholabari
gaon
Sl.
No.
Name of
Micro
Watershed
1
Nonoi
MWS
(3A2C1/I)
Name of Villages
Sub Total:
agri field in Rm.
481.5
6.07
15.09
0
21.16
724
14490
2000
20
96
35500
80
100
0.38
4.26
1.54
2.48
0
0.36
1.92
7.10
135
81
1540
2480
6000
57
20
0.68
2.74
0
3.42
90
2740
1340
200
120
0.40
2.14
0.14
2.68
24
2140
10.48
27300
10.48
1.15
1.71
0
2.86
24
1710
2000
200
60
0.8
3.2
0
4.00
135
3200
2
27300
2
0.22
0.33
0
0.55
20
500
1515
96
130
0.29
1.16
0
1.45
45
1160
2000
200
60
0.8
3.2
0
4.00
135
3200
1
18500
1
0.07
0.11
0
0.18
2
110
Sub total:-
583.48
9.05
18.61
0.5
28.16
691
18780
3rd Year Total:-
1065
15.12
33.7
0.5
49.32
1415
33270
RCC check dam in m2
core wall (in m2)
Protective Afforestation in
Ha
core wall (in m2)
Protective Afforestation in
Ha
agri field in Rm.
core wall (in m2)
in ha.
C: 4th year
Name of Schemes
1
Tamura
wall (in Rm)
2
Hirapara Gaon
3
No. 1 Batabari
4
Namjala
Afforestation Regeneration in
ha.
RCC check dam in m2
5
Naharbari gaon
Excavted pond in m3
No.
Unit
Cost
(Rs. In
Lakhs)
Area to
be
benefitted
3755
200
3000
4
57
18500
17
4000
65
Financial Target: 45.36 Lakhs.
Estimated Cost
No. of
Beneficiary
No. of
Mandays.
M
W
O
T
120
10
1.5
0.34
6.01
1.37
0
0.00
7.51
1.71
179
18
2400
1370
4
0.29
0.45
0.00
0.74
9
450
35500
80
3.61
2.11
0.31
6.03
135
2110
57
10
0.45
1.83
0.00
2.28
18
1830
6
7
3
Kulsi
MWS
(3A2C1/II)
1
2
Dalagrant gaon
Tokankata
gaon
No.1 Amguri
Gaon
Ganakpara
3
Kacharitol
4
Uttar
Bhikalikanda
Pachim
Jangalpara
Makelikanda
Bholabari
Bagicha
Dakhin
Bhokelikanda
5
6
7
8
20
35500
100
4.26
2.48
0.36
7.10
81
2480
wall (in Rm)
field in Rm.
ha.
Sub Total
800
200
15
0.24
1.28
0.08
1.60
22
1280
573
96
10
0.11
0.44
0.00
0.55
4
440
2.8
18500
2.8
0.21
0.31
0.00
0.52
9
310
351.8
11.01
16.28
0.75
28.04
475
12670
Protective afforestation in ha.
field in Rm.
ha.
ha.
field in Rm.
ha.
0.9
27300
0.9
0.1
0.15
0
0.25
2
150
2200
96
80
0.42
1.69
0
2.11
135
1690
4
2.7
18500
18500
4
2.7
0.29
0.20
0.45
0.30
0
0.00
0.74
0.50
7
4
450
300
50
0.38
1.54
0.00
1.92
90
1540
2000
96
4
20
18500
35500
4
100
0.29
4.26
0.45
2.48
0
0.36
0.74
7.10
7
81
450
2480
4
1500
18500
200
4
60
0.29
0.60
0.45
2.40
0
0.00
0.74
3.00
7
135
450
2400
305.6
6.83
9.91
0.36
17.10
468
9910
4th Year total
657.4
17.84
26.19
1.11
45.14
943
22580
Grand Total for the Project
3000
77.44
97.95
4.30
179.78
3784
93910
ha.
wall (in Rm)
Sub Total
66
TABLE DPR 9: VILLAGE WISE GPS POINTS FOR SCHEMES:
DISTRICT: UDALGURI
PROJECT: NONOI IWMP
Sl.
No.
Name of
village
Name of Schemes
Physical
target
1
2
3
4
GPS STATIONS
LATITUDE
5
LONGITUDE
6
ALTITUDE
7
26036/31.6//
91055/20.6//
61 mt
26038/30.4//
91055/29.1//
54 mt
26035/42.5//
26036/51.1//
91055/31.8//
91054/40.9//
55 mt
56 mt
26035/54.3//
91055/57.2//
63 mt
NONOI MWS
1
Tamura
6 ha
2. Excavated pond
1315 m3
3.Earthen embankment without core walling
3755 rm
1 ha
5. RCC Check dam
2
Pub
Jangalpara
21 m2
(Earthen)
2 Earthen embankment without core walling
4
5
Hirapara Gaon
No. 1
Batabari
Niz Dolagaon
20 m2
(Earthen)
2. Excavated pond
4000 rm
3000 m3
3. RCC check dam
1. Excavated pond
20 m2
6000 m3
4 ha
6
Namjala
2000 rm
3 ha
4. RCC check dam
3
1500 rm
3000 rm
3.18 ha
1000 rm
1. Boulder spur
1000 rm
67
500 rm
7
Mougaon
2. Drainage canal
8
9
Naharbari
Gaon
Dalagrant
Gaon
17 m2
4 ha
26037/37.8//
91054/42.8//
60 mt
3125 Rm.
1
26036/25.9//
91053/57.2//
55 mt
26035/07.2//
26036/5.3//
91056/13.1//
91054/28.4//
61 mt
54 mt
26037/41.7//
91055/40.3//
59 mt
26036/31.6//
91056/45//
61 mt
26035/2.8//
91056/26.9//
56 mt
3. RCC Check dam
1.75 ha
2. Excavated pond
4000 m3
(Earthen)
4. RCC Check dam
1500 rm
(Earthen)
20 m2
800 rm
573 rm
2.5 ha
2.5 ha
3. Const. of earthen canal in Rm.
719 rm
10
Tokankata
Gaon
1
2. Nursery
340 rm
1 ha
2.8 ha
KULSI MWS
11
No.1 Amguri
Gaon
(Earthen)
2. RCC Check dam
3 Afforestation Regeneration
2000 rm
20 m2
4 ha
12
Ganakpara
0.90 ha
1Constn. of distn. canal for agri field
(Earthen)
2200 rm
3. Excavated pond
3000 m3
4 ha
2.5 ha
5. RCC Check dam
20 m2
68
13
Kacharitol
1
1. Excavated pond
6000 m3
14
15
16
Uttar
Bhikalikanda
2.70 ha
3. RCC check dam
(Earthen)
3. RCC check dam
Pachim
Jangalpara
1. Earhen embankment without core walling
Makelikanda
2. RCC Check dam
17
18
Bholabari
Bagicha
Dakhin
Bhokelikanda
Bholabari
Gaon
26037/54.9//
91056/40.6//
61 mt
18.25 m2
26038/9.4//
91057/31.8//
58 mt
26038/13.9//
91054/52.1//
56 mt
26037/7.7//
91056/37.1//
60 mt
26035/00//
91057/30.1//
65 mt
26037/02.7//
91057/09.7//
62 mt
26035/14.9//
91056/40.5//
63 mt
1340 rm
4 ha
800 rm
20 m2
2.5 ha
10.48 ha
(Earthen)
562.50 rm
4 ha
4. RCC check dam
(Earthen)
(Earthen)
19
18 m2
200 rm
2000 rm
2000 rm
20 m2
1770 rm
1515 rm
1500 rm
1
2000 rm
1 ha
3. RCC check dam
20 m2
69
CHAPTER VI - INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES
TABLE-M(IS)9: DETAILS OF SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA
4
5
Name of
project
Name of the
District
3
Total no. of registered SHGs
With
only
Men
With
only
Wome
n
With
both
Tota
l
Total
-
-
-
6
No. of members
(Proposed New SHG)
Categories
(i)
Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
Under process
Nonoi
Udalguri
1
Name of the
State
S.
No.
2
Assam
1
-
Total
7
No. of SC/ST in each
category
8
No. of BPL in each
category
M
F
M
M
F
470
210
680
350
150
500
680
120
70
760
50
30
290
170
100
950
70
35
30
15
100
50
170
650
850
455
Total
195
F
Total
(M – Male, F – Female)
4
5
6
Total no. of UGs
No. of members
Nonoi
Name of
District
3
Udalguri
1
Name of
State
S.
No.
2
Assam
1
Name of
Project
TABLE-M(IS)10: DETAILS OF UGS IN THE PROJECT AREA
Men
-
Wome
n
-
Total
Both
70
Nos.
70
Nos.
Categorie
s
(i)
Landless
(ii) SF
7
No. of SC/ST in
each category
8
No. of BPL in each
category
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
-
-
550
-
-
320
-
-
550
-
-
400
-
-
230
-
-
250
(iii) MF
-
-
450
-
-
100
-
-
(iv) LF
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
(M – Male, F – Female)
70
1400
650
800
CHAPTER VII - CAPACITY BUILDING
TABLE-M(CB)2: CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR
1
Sl.
No.
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
State
Project
Stakeholders
Total
no. of
persons
No. of
persons
trained so
far
No. of persons
to be trained
during current
financial year
No. of persons
trained during
current
financial year
15
15
960
950
20
12
-
Nil.
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
-
15
15
250
190
20
12
-
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
-
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
SLNA
DRDA/ZP cell
PIAs
WDTs
UGs
SHGs
WCs
GPs
Community
Others
(Pl. specify)
Total:
1972
8
Sources of funding for
training
9
Funds utilized
a) DoLR
b)Any other
(pl. specify)
a) DoLR
DoLR
DoLR
DoLR
DoLR
DoLR
DoLR
-
-
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
-
b)Any
other (pl.
specify)
-
502
* From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4 to 7, Stakeholder-wise totals may be given at the end of the table for
the entire country
71
TABLE-M(CB)3: INFORMATION, EDUCATION & COMMUNICATION (IEC) ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR
2010-11
1
Sl.
No.
1
2
3
4
State/Dist/Proj.
Activity
Executing agency
1. Awareness campaign
2. Capacity building
Assam
Udalguri
Nonoi
PIA
PIA
Total:
5
Estimated expenditure
(Rs.)
To be decided by SLNA
6
Expenditure
incurred (Rs.)
Nil
Nil
7
Outcome (may quantify,
wherever possible)
-
-
* From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4, total no. of agencies, from column no. 5 & 6, totals may be given at
the end of the table for the entire country.
=00=
72
73
74
75
76

detailed project report on nonoi integrated watershed management

Transcription

Similar documents

Sesi 5 - IS IT Strategic Analysis Future Potential

Watershed Committee of the Ozarks

IRebilatb Jesburun Bulletin Rabbi Lookstein

Cloud Networking – From Theory to Practice

Your Worry-Free Vacation Starts Here

Gg_Vernment of Karnataka

Effect of Histamine-Globulin Complex on Production of Anaphylactic

Qt lulrs` )

April 2015 - ANOS Warringah Group