Notes on Cubism - TRAN-B-300: Technologie de l`information
Transcription
Notes on Cubism - TRAN-B-300: Technologie de l`information
Notes on Cubism Author(s): Carl Einstein and Charles W. Haxthausen Reviewed work(s): Source: October, Vol. 107, Carl Einstein (Winter, 2004), pp. 158-168 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3397600 . Accessed: 12/12/2012 08:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to October. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Notes on Cubism* CARL EINSTEIN Translatedand introducedbyCharlesW. Haxthausen Carl Einstein's writingon modern art is to a large extent defined by his encounterwithCubism.Althoughnot mentionedby name, Cubism informedhis earlytheoreticalessay"Totality"(a draftof the firstsectionof the textwas originally titled"Picasso"),and his NegroSculpture (1915). Yet not until 1926 did he publisha account of Cubist fullydeveloped painting,in the firstedition of his Artofthe Twentieth "Notes on Cubism" (1929), writtenfor Documents,offersa Century.1 condensed version of that interpretation,now embedded within the broader approach to the changingfunctionsof imagesthatcharacterized"Methodological Aphorisms"(1929). Among early interpretationsof Cubism, only Einstein's, from his initial essaysof 1912 to his Georges Braqueof 1934,can be justlycomparedwithDaniel-Henry Kahnweiler'sTheRiseofCubism(1920) in its probing,nuanced analysisand intellectual substance.Yet the two Germansofferessentiallyantitheticalinterpretations of thisart. For Kahnweilerthe fundamentalproblemfacingCubistpaintingwas a strictlyaestheticone thathad emergedwithImpressionism:the conflictbetween illusionisticrepresentationand an increasinglyautonomous pictorialstructure. In the firstphase of Cubist painting,Braque and Picasso attemptedto reconcile this conflictby adapting objects to the paintingsurfacethroughextremedistortions of form.Yet this discrepancybetween the beholder's memoryimages and the distortedobjects he encountered in the pictorial representationwas deeply disturbing.In 1910,writesKahnweiler,Braque and Picasso founda solutionto this conflict;they eliminated perplexing deformationsof the motifby adopting a nonillusionistic schematicrenderingof the object'spositionin space,supplemented the inclusion of "real details" (lettering,clay pipes, etc.), integratedinto the by structuralwhole. These details,augmentedbythe painting'stitle,were "a stimulus * 1. "Notessur le cubisme,"Documents 1, no. 3 (1929), pp. 146-55. Carl Einstein,Die Kunstdes20.Jahrhunderts 1926), pp. 56-86. (Berlin:Propylaen-Verlag, OCTOBER 107, Winter Institute 2004,pp. 158-68. ? 2004 October Magazine,Ltd.and Massachusetts ofTechnology. on Cubism"( 2004 Fannei& WalzVerlag, "Notes Berlin. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Pablo Picasso. Man with a Guitar. 1912-13. ? 2004 Estate ofPablo Picasso/ ArtistsRightsSociety(ARS), New York.CourtesyPhiladelphia Museum ofArt. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 160 OCTOBER which carries with it memory images. Combining the 'real' stimulus and the scheme of forms,these images constructthe finishedobject in the mind."In the end, Kahnweilerrelatesthe process to the Kantian synthesisdescribedin the first Critique,in which differingrepresentationsin the mind are reconciled in their the paintingis reconciled diversityin a single act of cognition.2And, ultimately, withthe known,familiarworldas given. Einstein,by contrast,locates the origins of the Cubist project not merely withina problematic of painting but withina larger epistemological crisis: "a skepticism concerning the identity of objects." For him there is no conflict betweenrepresentation and structure, forthe Cubist'sbriefis not therepresentation of objects,but a pictorialfigurationof visual (and mental) process.Moreover,for Einstein the conflictbetween memoryimages and Cubist form,so troublingto Kahnweiler,marksa salutaryhistoricbreak with the past. In assertingthat the Cubists "underminedmemory,in which ideas [notions]are reconciled with one And another,"he seems to be pointedlycontradictingKahnweiler'sinterpretation. forgood measure he declares,"Their greatestachievementis theirdestructionof mnemonic images." Purged of memoryimages, the viewernow experiences the object not as somethingthatexistsapart, but as a functionof his own vision,his own cognitiveprocesses.The paintingis an autonomoustotality, unverifiablevis-avis reality.It becomes "the distinguishingsign of the visuallyactivehuman being, constructinghis own universeand refusingto be the slaveof givenforms." It is clear that there exists an abyssbetween art historyand the scientific studyof art,and thatboth disciplineshave become altogetherdubious. When art historywishes to be more than a calendar, it quite naivelyborrowsill-founded judgments and ideas. Withinthese ideas the individualworksmelt into generalities without contours, and the concrete deed dissolves into a sort of vague aestheticism;on the otherhand, a thousandanecdotes and dates of arthistorydo not touch at all upon technical questions of the work of art or on the forms themselves.Ultimatelyone ends up withan anecdotal psychologythattransforms the historyof artintoa novel.As forthatpedanticmethodthatconsistsof pictorial description,we wish to point out that the structureof language is such that it breaks up the synchronicpower of the picture and that the heterogeneityof wordsdestroysthe overallimpression. A psychological method presents other difficulties.In the firstplace we knowof none thatis withoutproblems,none thatsucceeds in definingits object. Psychoanalysisitselfhas never pretended to constitutethe totalityof a method, and psychologistswho have previouslyattempted to create a psychologyhave 2. Daniel-HenryKahnweiler,The Rise of Cubism,trans. Henry Aronson (New York: Wittenborn, Schultz,Inc., 1949), pp. 1, 9-12. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Noteson Cubism 161 constructedtheirobject in such a way thatwhat was properlypsychologicalwas dissipated.In any case, psychologyremainsincapable of masteringsomethingas complex as the workof art, conditioned as it is by a psychologicalpolarity-on the one hand the genesis of the work,on the other the beholder-considering that the psychological, in contrast to quantitative physics,allows for entirely effects. contradictory There remainsa no less formidablephenomenon: the act ofjudgment and its terminology. Ideas change as rapidlyas fleaschange humans. In the firstplace one would have to writethe historyof aestheticjudgments to bring some order into thismuseumof arbitrary terminologies,and begin to discernthe foundations of these ideas and thesejudgments,in order ultimatelyto determinewhethera hierarchyof such values existsat all. In generalwe believethata painting,whichis a concreterealization,disappearsin the act of criticismbecause it servesas a mere pretext for generalized formulaswhenever someone wishes to endow a risky opinion witha universalvalue bythe trickof generalization.The resultis nothing more than a wittyparaphrase,thanksto which the workof art is neatlyinserted intoits culturalcontext,whereit disappearsas a mere symptom, losingits technical And then there is the that specificity. lyricalparaphrase, revengeof failedpoetslet us call themerrandboysof poetry. The main problem remains the differencebetween these two categories, thatof the pictureand thatof language. To unhingethe worldof objectsis to call into question the guaranteesof our existence.The naive person believes that the appearance of the human figureis the mosttrustworthy experience thata human being can have of himself;he dares not doubt thiscertainty, althoughhe suspectsthe presence of inner experiences. He imagines that in contrastto this abyss of inner experience the immediate experience of his own body constitutesthe mostreliablebiological unit. His body, the instrumentof all spatial experience,seems to him such an infalliblemachine thathe uses it to representwhatis mostdurable and vital:his gods and his dead. In the past, it was the custom to worship images, images that were the doubles of gods and the deceased, and in thiswayone strengthenedone's belief in a worldthatseemed all the more certainforbeing so littlesubjectto proof.The mortal human body became the sign for the immortals.From a eugenic standpoint these idealized archetypesbroke all the records,and the optimismof the breeders was glorifiedfromthe Parthenon to the postcard. Someday someone should point out the banality,eroticism,and optimismthatunderliethe academic aesthetic.... Everythingproblematicwas countered withan as yet uncorrupted entity,the human figure.What servileoptimismand whatsolace forthe uglyand the losers who were thus able to identifywitha gigolo who pulls a thornout of a god's foot,or witha fatdryad! The possibilityof duplicatingthingscalmed those who feared death. The world of pictorialdoubles fulfilleda longingforeternity. Weakened aesthetically in order to reinforce the stabilityof reality,images proved more secure and This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 162 OCTOBER durable than human beings. Tautology was insurance against death, and the certaintyof thingswas confirmedby images. One practicedan ancestorcult with objects; stilllifes-symbolsforthejoys of ownership-immortalizeddead turkeys, whata fraud! grapes,and asparagus.... Eternity, One put one's trustin conventionalobjects,thosecomfortablesignals,familiar in theireffects.Pictorialpositivism, biologicalindolence.Realitywas hypertrophied; one graftedonto it the gonads of evolution,jammed itwithan optimisticteleology thatwas nothingmore than an ersatzmetaphysics. Around 1908 a new sentimentbegan to gatherstrength:the indifferenceof pictorialtechniciansvis-a-visthe motifevolved into a skepticismconcerningthe identityof objects. Sentimentalpeople could easilysuspecta pessimismat workhere.... Reality began a death struggle,and at the same time there was an interestin archaic, mythic,and tectonicepochs. A long-prepareddualism between formand object now became manifest:the real was rejectedas a criterionfor the image; thiswas the end of thatoptimisticunityof realityand image. The image was no longeran allegory,no longera fictionof anotherreality.The rightsof realitywere therefore drasticallycurtailed,and in thissense one can speak of the lethalpowerof the work of art.A tangledrealitydisintegrates when confrontedwithunmediatedfacts;one could speak of an asceticismanalogous to thatof the mystics,of a retreatinto the regionsof autonomousvision. Historyis not unitary:differentgenerationscreate differentvalue systems thatare rooted in theirrespectivepresents.One can discerna shiftof axis in the course of history.The models that up until now were considered classical (Polykleitosor Myron,forexample) todaylook like the virtuososof a degenerate classicismand the end of a grand tradition,just as Socrates no longer looks like the initiatorof philosophybut rather like the culmination of the great age of mythicantiquity.Characteristicof mythicepochs is the sense forgrand construction and tectonicforms,a hierarchyof formsthatlater disappeared withthe use of tactile details and pictorial equivalents.Frontalityand surfacesdominate. In theseperiods importantsculpturalmotifswereinvented:the columnarmale figure, for example, the sun menhir,or the crouchingEgyptianfigurewhose head is a sphere restingon the cube of the body. Parallelismand the repetitionof forms are used in relief.It is alwaysthe archaic epochs in whichwe see thispractice.The paintingsof the Paleolithicera, for example, displaya richerrepertoryof forms than those of the Neolithic period. Yet we are struckby a powerfuldictatorship over objects; the architecturalsense is dominant, as if one wanted to defend oneselfagainstirrationalforcesand avoid the cruel hold of objects. We do not wish to conceal that there is a negativeside to the taste for the primitives.Sometimes,out of fatigue,one looks forquick and easy solutionsand wants to simplifythe historicalheritage. One produces generalized formsinto which the spectatorautomaticallyprojectsthe details.We are familiarwiththese so-called visual revolts that operate with second-rate means and we are not This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Noteson Cubism 163 Is thereanyignoringthe misunderstandings provokedbyfalsecontemporaneity. one who does not claim to be an heir of Paul Cezanne or Georges Seurat? But often one emphasizes only the technical nuances, instead of recognizing that these paintersmarkthe adventof grand decorativecomposition.Too frequentlya new synthesishas been proclaimed when it was solely a matter of decorative arrangement. visionand deformation. It is necessaryto distinguishclearlybetweenautonomous As an example of deformationwe cite the metaphoricalvariationsin which two different representationsbecome conflated.When a naturalisticrepresentationis schematizedto the point thatthe model assumes the role of commentaryon the stylization,it is rathera matterof an abbreviationwiththe goal of idealizingthe model by means of a facileschema.In caricature and the grotesque, stylization operates in a fashion hostile to the object; two differentmodes of being are conjoined here. In caricature,it is judgment that is predominant. In any case, deformationpresupposes a naturalisticorientationand is generallya compensation fora pedantic puritanismthatadores wax figures. Here we have reproduced some examples of Cubism fromits firstperiod, which is called AnalyticalCubism.Instead of presentingthe resultof an observation, the painterpresentsthe resultof a visual process thatis not interruptedby objects. He is not contentwithan abbreviatedrenderingthatwould eliminatethe refractedparts. The motifis a functionofhumanvision;itis subordinatedto the conditionsof the painting.The decisivefactoris volume,whichis not identicalto mass,because volumeis a totalizationof discontinuousopticalmovements.Thus the conventional continuumof the bodyis ruptured.... For fartoo long volume has been confused in painting.An antipictorial withmass,and thishas led to tactileinterpretations was a was suggestedbythe onto and surface, experience tactility transposed planar of manner of representing and shadow. There another is, however, light modeling volume:the planarand simultaneousfigurationofopticalmovements. It is characteristicof Cubism that it should have passed throughdifferent stagesofformation:firstthe simpledeformation,then the analysisand destruction of the motif,and finallythe realization of diverse syntheses.This indicates the depth of the problemthatit posed, one of such magnitudethatfora givenpainter any one of these moments could seem to constitutethe whole of the problem. Here we are dealing withonlya part of the road traveled,AnalyticalCubism,the period in whichwe see less the analysisof the exteriormotifthan the dissociation of pictorial ideas. The principal challenge was to representvolume as a planar phenomenon even as one showedthe plasticmovementsin all theirrichness. From a biologicalstandpointvolume and depth constitutethe strongest,the mostelementalsensation.It is in space thatwe projectour action and our energy; withoutit, the existenceof objects seems impossible.The task lies in condensing thesespatialexperiencesin such a waythattheyare repeatableand are concentrated in a planar unityless complex than thatof our body. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions o Q o ak-m g oe: 2 < < :. U z This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Noteson Cubism 165 Around 1908 paintersbegan to be dissatisfied withpurelypictorialsolutions. A crisis of color erupted. This is, as in the time of Giotto, the dawn of a new attemptat the conquest of space and the expansionofvisualconsciousness. The artistsof the Renaissance had discoveredwhat theycalled nature,and individualizationof the motifwas the essence of theirart. That is why,in the late baroque, one moved toward ever greater tactile illusion until a purist like Domenichino separatedpaintingfromthismisalliancewithsculpture. The Cubistsfirsteliminatedthe conventionalmotif,whichis situatedat the peripheryofvisualprocesses.Now the motifis no longeran objectivethingseparate fromthe spectator;rather,the thingseen participatesin his activity as he configures it accordingto the sequence of his subjectiveoptical perceptions. As stable signsof our actions,objects are precious.We treasureresemblance as a guarantee of life. The world as tautology.One duplicates creation,which is regardedas perfect.The astonishmentwroughtbymiracles,the sensationof gaps, the multisensoryexperience of objects-all this disappears for the sake of a reassuringrepetition.A bit of positive theologyis eternalizedby reproduction, and the need for identityis satisfiedbecause everywhereone findsthe identity thatone soughtwithinoneself.Yet we pay forthistendencytowardreproduction bydiminishingcreation. It was the Cubistswho underminedthe object foreveridenticalwithitself;in other words theyundermined memory,in which ideas are reconciled with one another. Their greatestachievementis their destructionof mnemonic images. of things,and it is by means of Tautologyconveysthe illusionof the immortality descriptiveimages that one has sought to avoid the annihilation of the world throughforgetting. The Cubistpaintersseparatedthe imagefromthe object,eliminatedmemory and turnedthe motifinto a simultaneousand planar figurationof representations ofvolume. The sensations of a table as such cannot be rendered, but only our own sensations,and a table representedin a picturemakes sense onlyif the sum of a complex of tangled sensations called table is subordinated to the technical demands of the picture. The mnemonic legacy of objects had to be destroyed, forgotten;thus the image became not the fictionof another realitybut a reality withits own conditions. Here we do not wishto interpretthe workof the greatImpressionists, whose effortsare assessed by criticsin excessivelynaturalisticterms,while in truthit was the Impressionistswho revealed the primacyof the planar surfaceand rendered objects as symptomsof a subordinatephenomenon: light.At anothertimewe will showthatit is importantto separatethesemastersfromthe literatureof naturalism withitslimitedcontemporaryrelevance. In thissketchwe can give onlyan outline of the situationin 1908. At some other time we will describe the agony of space and the differentphases of its renewal.Sufficeit to mentionthatCezanne was the firstto showthe predominance This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 166 OCTOBER of volume over color, he who told Joachim Gasquet: "Only the volumes are important!" A greatvisual discontentbecame apparent around 1908. Fixed objects had Now one alreadybeen fragmentedbythe chromaticanalysisof the Impressionists. wentfurther, and realized thatthe definedobject is the resultof a complex tangle of experiences and is, ultimately,a myth;in other words, one could open up objectsas one opens a box, and breakthemdown in orderto selectthoseelements thatare importantforthe painting.Similarly, in a novel or a play,time is cut up and this of has time nothingto do withactual time; arbitrarily, category literary take, for example, the dramatic catastropheswhere qualitativeand contrasting temporalitiescrosslike the contrastingformsof a painting.One could almostcall the drama the annihilationof real time. The firstcondition of Cubist paintingis the surface.One no longer works between two imaginarylayers that traversethe canvas. Now the totalizationof the picture is achieved by its unverifiability, by the fact that the beholder does not leave the realityof the paintingand that the artist'svision is not interrupted by comparative observation. The viewer isolates himselfand forgets.This is a fatalprocess,and it is the observerwho is in charge,not the motif.This process could be called ascetic. The painter selects the decisive moments of an experience that occurs in two dimensions-he eliminates the tactile elements and createsan independentformthatis separatefromotherphenomena. He renders a pictorialconstructionwhose parts balance each other out withoutrecourse to object associations. in into a staticsimultaneity Temporalnotions of movementare transformed which the primordialelements of contrastingmovementsare condensed. These movementsare dividedinto different formal fieldsin whichthe figureis dissociated and broken up. Instead of presenting,as one did previously, a group of different objectivemovements,one createsa group of subjectiveoptical movements.Light and color are employedin a tectonicsense,to supportthe construction. Volume is expressed by the simultaneous contrast of differently situated parts,or ratherby renderingcertain parts as situatedon severalaxes simultaneously.The painterdeploysplanes thatintersect,whatwe call transparency ofplanes. The figureis broken up. Partial motifsare shatteredor repeated, depending on theirimportanceforthe composition.It was not the cube thatwas important;one chose simple constructiveelements that made possible a unitarysequence of formsand contained the principaldirections. The method we are describinghere is that of AnalyticalCubism ca. 1911. While the Impressionistdissociatedformsby means of color, the Cubist does so The notion of space was enriched,even as one used simple elements tectonically. that allowed forvariationsand clear contrasts.We see here on the one hand a of means. The mnemonic complicationof space and on the othera simplification dimension (i.e., thatwhichis conceived onlyover time) is integratedbymeans of dynamicpresentations,thanks to the planar dissociation, and by showing the This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Braque. Man with a Guitar. 1911-12. ? 2004 ArtistsRightsSociety(ARS), Paris. New York/ADAGP, Digital image ? The Museum ofModern Art/LicensedbyScala/ArtResource,NY This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 168 OCTOBER multiplicityof the axes of the figures.The Cubist does not imitatevolume, but instead renders its autonomous equivalent; and the totalityseems to us still stronger,due to whathas been said of the separated parts.This simultaneityhas allowed the incorporation of optical acts into the work that had remained unconscious until now. One chooses viewsalong several axes, and it is thus that the tension between movementsand formalfieldsis reinforced.The condition of such simultaneityis a quickness immeasurable in time that resembles the rapid, syntheticforce of dreams. Such quickness is possible only because one is not distractedby the motif,and because the objective tendencydwells at the periphery,yet does remain present,for the pictorial formsare directed toward the subjugationof nature. One final,importantpoint: these imaginativepaintingspresenta completely invented structure.Because of a certain geometric quality of the figurative elements,thispaintinghas been consideredrationalistic,but thisreproachcan be easilyrepudiated,forit is preciselyin mythicperiods thatwe almostalwaysfinda tectonicart,and the tectonichas neverbeen a means of mimeticrepresentation. It would be more accurate to saythatsince 1908 the figurehas become functional and has been humanized.We observea sortof animismof form,except thatnow the vitalizingforcesno longer come fromspiritsbut fromhuman beings themselves. Artistsno longer work from an image of the gods but from their own conceptions. Consequentlywe regard tectonicforms,preciselybecause theyare not measurable,to be the mosthuman,fortheyare the distinguishing sign of the visuallyactivehuman being, constructinghis own universeand refusingto be the slaveof givenforms. This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.218 on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:36 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions