Energy Management of Installations and Portfolios

Transcription

Striving toward Net Zero using the ESPC Contract Vehicle Mr. Jesse Maestas, CEM
URS Corporation
Learning Objectives
Objective 1. Understand how to incorporate Net Zero practices into projects
Objective 2. Apply effective strategies for building stakeholder alignment
Objective 3. Understand financial incentives and how to leverage them
Objective 4. Understand the benefits of bundling measures across a portfolio of facilities/installations to maximize impact of project
2
Net Zero Energy Concepts
3
Definition of Net Zero Energy
NET ZERO SITE ENERGY
-100% energy is produced at Site
NET ZERO ENERGY COST
Net zero cash transaction between owner
and utility
-Does not account for conversion loss
-Does not track emission
NET ZERO SOURCE ENERGY
-Accounted for at the source, used
energy equals produced energy
-Accounts for conversion and
distribution loss
Can take advantage of pick hour cost
structure
NET ZERO EMISSIONS
Emission free energy equals all emission
caused by building energy use
Focused more on environmental aspect
than price or security concerns
4
Net Zero Energy Core Concept
+
+
5
Net Zero Energy Approach
CONVENTIONAL NET ZERO DESIGN APPROACH
CULTURE /
BEHAVIOR
+
CULTURE /
BEHAVIOR
EFFICIENCY /
OPTIMIZATION
+
RENEWABLE
+
=
ENERGY
EFFICIENCY /
OPTIMIZATION
+
RENEWABLE
ENERGY
=
NET
ZERO
ENERGY
NET
ZERO
ENERGY
EFFECTIVE NET ZERO DESIGN APPROACH
6
Conventional Team Composition
OWNER
USER
MEP DESIGN
ARCHITECT
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER
FACILITY
MANAGER
7
Net Zero Energy Team Composition
OWNER
USER
ARCHITECT
ENERGY
PROJECT
MANAGER
FACILITY MANAGER
MEP DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
8
Transitioning From Efficiency to Renewables
Source: ERDC‐CERL
9
Deep Retrofits
• Looking beyond standard ECMs
Building Envelope
Skylights
Low‐E Windows
Cool Roofs
Solar Tubes
10
Case Study – US Coast Guard Overall Energy Performance
11
Shore Energy Conservation Metrics
Percent Change FY 2011 Goal
FY 2003 - FY 2011
Target
Energy Management Requirement
Reduction in energy intensity in facilities subject
-26.4%
18.0%
to the NECPA/E.O. 13423 goals from FY2003
Baseline
FY 2011
FY 2011 Goal
Self
Renewable
Renewable Energy Requirement
Percentage
Target
Generated Energy Credits
Eligible renewable electricity use as
-7.1%
5.0%
39.1%
60.9%
a percentage of total electricity use
Water Intensity Reduction Requirement
Reduction in potable water consumption intensity
Greenhouse Gas
FY 2011 %
Reduction from
2008 Baseline
Scope Scop Scope 1
1
e2
& 2
-12.5% -8.8%
-7.9%
FY 2011
Percentage
FY 2011 Goal
Target
-15.2%
8.0%
2020
CG GHG Scope
1&2 Reduction
Goal
25%
2020
Scope
CG GHG Scope 3
3
Reduction Goal
-39.9%
7.2%
12
Coast Guard Alt. Financed Energy Projects
Location
CG Academy
ISC Kodiak DO1
ISC Kodiak DO2
ISC Alameda DO1
Support Center E-City DO1
ISC Boston
ISC Kodiak DO3
West Coast (9 Sites)
Support Center E-City DO2
CG Yard (Biomass)
TRACEN Cape May TO1
TRACEN Petaluma (Photovoltaic)
TRACEN Cape May TO2
CG Academy DO2
Sector NY
TISCOM
Puerto Rico (Photovoltaic)
Puerto Rico (Energy Conservation Mod)
Florida (11 Sites)
Total
Contract Type
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
ESPC
UESC
PPA
UESC
ESPC
ESPC
UESC
ESPC
ESPC
UESC
19
Award Date (Fiscal Year)
1998
1998
1999
1999
2000
2003
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
2010
2010
2011
2011
2011
Includes firsts for USCG: UESC; PPA; ESA; Multi‐site ESPC; Bundled capital and financed investment
13
Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs)
Project Re‐payment w/ Financing
100%
90%
80%
Utility Budget
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Pre‐construction
Payment Period
Cost of Energy
Cost of Project & Financing
End of Contract Term
Residual Savings
14
Case Study – US Coast Guard Energy Savings Performance Contract in Puerto Rico
15
Identifying the Next Project
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Name
BSU Kodiak
CG Yard
CG Academy
AIRSTA Cape Cod
BSU Elizabeth City
TRACEN Cape May
TRACEN Yorktown
Sector New York
TRACEN Petaluma
BSU Alameda
BSU Portsmouth
TRACEN Mobile
BSU Boston
AIRSTA/SFO Port Angeles
Sector San Juan
AIRSTA Sitka
BSU Seattle
BSU Ketchikan
AIRSTA Borinquen
City
Kodiak
Baltimore
New London
Cape Cod
Elizabeth City
Cape May
Yorktown
Staton Island
Petaluma
Alameda
Portsmouth
Mobile
Boston
Port Angeles
San Juan
Sitka
Seattle
Ketchikan
Aguadilla
State
AK
MD
CT
MA
NC
NJ
VA
NY
CA
CA
VA
AL
MA
WA
PR
AK
WA
AK
PR
Based on FY10 Total Facility Energy Consumption
16
US Coast Guard Puerto Rico –
At a Glance
• Some of USCG’s big energy consumers
– Sector San Juan – 15 highest
– Air Station Borinquen – 19 highest
•
•
•
•
•
Total of 6% of overall facility energy cost
2% of total facility energy consumption
360 buildings
964 kGSF
Two different operational missions, one project
17
Other Driving Factors
• Borinquen housing designated “inadequate”
• Roofing is largest O&M item for both locations
• Condensing units on roof
• Non‐functional solar domestic hot water (SDHW)
• Local O&M resource constraints
18
US Coast Guard Facilities
• Wide variety of building types and use
19
Project Intent
Be as comprehensive as possible
Reduce energy and water consumption
Embrace renewable energy
Address major maintenance issues
Bring in additional backlog projects if possible
• Improve quality of life and focus on core mission
•
•
•
•
•
20
Starting the Project
• Project Definition Document
• Roles and responsibilities
• Discussion with key stakeholders
• Selecting sites and ESPC partners
21
Core Acquisition Team
Contracting Officer
ESCO Partner
ENERGY
PROJECT
MANAGER
(Civil Engineering)
Legal
Financial Analyst
Additional Stakeholders
Base Personnel
Housing Officers
Budget Shop
Energy Program Office
Civil Engineering
22
Initial Project
• $3.7M of capital investment
• 10 yr simple payback
• Mostly conventional measures
–
–
–
–
–
HVAC
Lighting
Controls
Plumbing
Solar PV
• Entire project self‐funding but not comprehensive
23
Leveraging Investment
• Use of US Treasury Grant for solar PV
– Financer maintains ownership
– $6.3M grant reduced total cost
• Capital contributions
– $10.5M for roofing and insulation
– $3.3M for planned replacement of HVAC
24
Pilots – Proving the Theory
• Testing the variable refrigerant volume (VRV) system – new technology to the region
– Occupants increased temperature set points (better humidity control at lower energy consumption)
25
Cool Roof and Insulation
• Buildings experienced a ~5F temperature drop
– No leaks were additional benefit
– SDHW (non‐functional) was removed to make way for solar PV
– Warranty maintained by contractor
26
Energy Conservation Measures
• Standard Efficiency
–
–
–
–
HVAC
Lighting
Controls
Water Conservation
• Deep Retrofit
– Window Improvements
– Cool Roof and Insulation
• Renewables
– Solar PV
27
Overall Project Results
Total of $49.5M in capital improvement
28
Drawing the Control Volume

Looking only at Air Station Borinquen
 41% reduction in energy consumption
PV Production
Hot Water Reduction
Utility Purchase, 12%
Lighting Retrofit
Cool Roof and Insulation
Windows Upgrades
HVAC Replacement
29
30
31
Project Evolution
Factor
Initial Project
Comprehensive Project
Capital Investment
$3.7M
$49.5M (Includes Capital
Contribution and Treasury Grant)
Capital Contribution
$0
$13.8M
Treasury Grant
$0
$6.3M
Energy Savings
5,200 MMBTU
29,800 MMBTU
Net Present Value
$200K
$4M
32
Overall Benefits to Coast Guard
• Reduced energy and water consumption
• Price stability from solar PV
• Removal of inadequate housing designation
• Reduced O&M burden
• Fewer acquisitions to accomplish overall project
• Improved housing conditions
33
Thank You!
Jesse Maestas, CEM
Vice President
URS Corporation
[email protected]
[email protected]
303.740.3976
34
Questions?
35
Energy Insights for Facilities and Portfolio Management
Session R‐1530‐B 3
Karl Van Orsdol
Chief Global Strategist
Energy and Sustainability Management
Hewlett Packard
May 2012
© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Energy is everywhere—but hidden from view
Organizations need a strategic approach to energy management leveraging IT resources
Facilities
How efficient are your
facilities in consuming
energy? What process or
systems are integrated into
your IT infrastructure?
IT
Do you know if your IT is
running at maximum
energy efficiency? Do you
know to what degree it is
supporting your corporate
energy objectives?
Purchasing
Have you considered how energy
costs impact your purchasing
choices and costs? Do you know
the risk you bear from the energy
cost embedded in your suppliers
and logistics?
37
Workforce
Are you empowering your
employees in the plant and in the
office to save energy? Do you
understand and can you control
the energy impact of travel,
commuting, and communication?
HP’s Own Energy Challenge
Facilities
1,000’s of facilities
170 countries
Supply
Chain
Over 1,000 Direct
10,000’s+ Indirect
Workforce
320,000 Employees
Global workforce
IT
85 Internal Data Centers
100’s Trade Data Centers
Enterprise
38
$300+ millions on energy spend
1,000’s of energy providers
Most buildings aren't designed for energy efficiency
39
Facility Efficiency is often impaired by competing pressures
Site and Utilization
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Facilities Envelope
Usage Patterns
Security
Operations
Climate
Operational Risk Profile
Geography
Meter density and performance
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Data Centers
Cost vs. performance
• Reliability/Availability
• Cloud computing
•
Green /Efficiency
• Sourcing/Service Models
• Resource Skill Sets
•
Custom vs. Industrial
First cost vs. TCO Power and cooling
Location
Aging facilities
Regulations
Flexibility
Utilization Issues
Data Center Energy Economics Can Drive Facility Efficiency
Cost of physical space used to be the primary consideration in data center design……Not Any More!
Costs of power and cooling has risen to prominence. Power costs are growing exponentially and outpacing all other growth factors.
Data center managers must ensure close alignment of technology and facilities while prioritizing investments in efficient power and cooling systems to lower the total cost of operations (TCO). Multiple systems manage energy in facility data centers
Virtualization, compute cycle optimization, energy consumption monitoring
42
Many systems manage operational energy in a building
Solutions are specific to an asset class
Lights
43
HVAC/BMS
But these systems don’t talk to each other
Hello world
Saluton mondo
नम ते दिु नया
Helló világ
안녕하세요 세계
‫مرحبا العالم‬
你好世界
44
Output isn’t fit for every audience
Headquarters
45
Building manager
Increasing resource efficiency requires system integration
46
Installations
Command
Benefits
Synthesis
Flexible
presentation to
meet needs of
multiple
stakeholders
Detail
47
Building
Manager
A system of systems - overview
Analytics & Presentation
System of record
Energy Consumption
48
Meeting the needs of multiple stakeholders
Collection and organization of data
Energy consuming assets
A system of systems - overview
Presentation
Enterprise Energy
Management
Analytics
GIS
Risk
Analysis
Energy Platform
HP Data Integration
Module
Asset
Framework
Portals
Dashboards
Maintenance
Alerts
Business
Rules
Consumption
Analysis
Role-based
Access
Admin
Data
Historian
Data Archive
HVAC
Lighting
Demand
Targets
Alerts &
Notifications
HP Data Center
Solution
Services
BPO
49
ESM
BMS
Technology
Assets
Data that works for everyone’s needs
Global view for the
Installations Command
50
Base view for Facilities
Management
Building view for the
Building Manager
Building Manager
Data streams from multiple systems
51
Chiller
Solar Array
Zone Temperature
Building Load
Integration leverages cost savings
Facilities/IT integration lessons from the HP client facilities
IT power
52
Cooling power
Applying these principals to the whole facility portfolio
Provides for a systematic approach to energy transformation
Strategic Review
53
Alignment through
System of Record
Transformation
What insight HP gains from integration
Facilities
1,000’s of facilities
170 countries
20%
Supply Chain
Over 1,000 Direct
10,000’s+ Indirect
HP leadership
320,000 Employees
Global workforce
20,000 trips
IT
100’s Trade Data Centers
12,000m2 reduction
Enterprise
$100s of millions on energy
1,000’s of energy providers
$11 million
Workforce
Absolute reduction goal for
GHG emissions
First in industry to report
supplier emissions. Now
training suppliers in efficiency
Avoided annually through
visual collaboration
2010 energy efficiency
investment
$30+ million ROI
54
Public Sector Integration Example - 10% Energy Savings
Facilities
10%
Absolute GHG emissions reduction goal, 2005-2010
25% reduction in natural gas
10% reduction in electricity
Supply Chain
25% reduction in paper use
25% reduction in solid waste
Workforce
30% reduction in trips
IT
Ongoing
55
Thank you
Karl G. Van Orsdol
Hewlett Packard
[email protected]
56
Back‐Up Presentations
57
Integrated Solar with Geothermal Energy
Conversion Technologies
SAME JETC 12
MAY 12
Col Ronald A. Torgerson, USAF (Ret.), PE, PMP, CHS‐V, F.SAME
OVERVIEW
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Drivers
Energy Security
Where are you?
How will you meet the in place criteria?
Utility‐Scale renewable energy Solar and geothermal
Costs
Benefits and issues
Summary
DRIVERS
• Title 10, United States Code Chapter 173
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
§ 2911. Energy performance goals and plan for DOD
§ 2912. Availability and use of energy cost savings
§ 2913. Energy savings contracts and activities
§ 2914. Energy conservation construction projects
§ 2915. New Construction: use of renewable forms of energy and energy efficient products
§ 2916. Sale of electricity from alternate energy and cogeneration production facilities
§ 2917. Development of geothermal energy on military lands
§ 2918. Fuel sources for heating systems; prohibition on converting certain heating facilities
§ 2919. DoD participation in programs for management of energy demand or reduction of energy usage during peak periods
GOALS AND MANDATES
Goal Title
Driver
Baseline (FY)
Annual
Target
Goal
Goal
(FY)
Reduce Facility Energy
EISA 07
2003
3%
30%
2015
Reduce Facility Energy
EO13514
2015
1.5%
37.5%
2020
Reduce Greenhouse Gas
EO13514
2003
3%
35.1%
2015
Renewable Energy Use
EPAct 05
2005
‐‐
7.5%
2013
Renewable Energy Use
USC2911
2013
1.5%
25%
2025
On‐Base Renew Energy
AF goal
2008
‐‐
1%
2012
Reduce Water Use
EO13423
2007
2%
16%
2015
Reduce Indust Water Use
EO13514
2007
2%
26%
2020
Audit Covered Facilities
EISA 07
2009
25%
100%
2012
Meter Facilities (elec)
EPAct 05
2008
‐‐
100%
2012
Meter Fac (gas/steam)
EISA 07
2008
‐‐
100%
2016
ENERGY SECURITY
• “…Energy Security: a critical Army mission. • Our Army must have sufficient power and energy – Forward edges of today’s battlefields
– At every corner of our installations, or at our desks
– Without energy, the Army would stand still and silent
Without secure energy, the Army is vulnerable to fuel and energy outages
• Most everything done in the Army across the full spectrum of operations requires energy…”
•
Honorable Katherine Hammack, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations and Environment, 21 Sept 10
EXAMPLE ENERGY SECURITY PROJECTS
194,643 MWh of renewable generation in FY2010
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
HAWTHORNE AD, NV: GEOTHERMAL
FT IRWIN: CPV, CA
FT HUACHUA: ROOFTOP PV
FT CARSON: SOLAR PV & MICROGRID
FT BLISS, TX: GEOTHERMAL WELL TESTS
FT SILL, OK: MICROGRID
FT JACKSON, SC: FUEL CELLS
FT DRUM, NY: SOLAR WALL
ENERGY SECURITY: BAGRAM CONVOY
WHERE ARE YOU?
• What has your installation done in the area of renewable energy?
• Show of hands: PV
• Show of hands: Geothermal
• Show of hands: Wind HOW WILL YOU MEET GOALS AND MANDATES?
• What’s your energy master plan?
• Funding will be a challenge in today’s environment
• Energy leadership
Utility‐Scale Renewable Energy
Engineering Services
Renewable power is now and will be in the future for DoD
Industry is out there to help you




Solar
Wind Biomass
Geothermal
Over 5000 MW of renewable projects in design
SOLAR‐GEOTHERMAL POWER OVERVIEW
• Solar energy can boost the turbine inlet steam temperature of geothermal plants, thereby improving overall plant efficiency
• Significant global and US geographic areas with coincident solar and geothermal resources
• Combining resources increases design and operational complexity
SOURCES: GEOTHERMAL AND SOLAR
Geothermal hot spots
Thermal Energy Areas
According to Emerging Energy Research’s (EER) market forecasts, globally more than 9GW of geothermal power projects are under development. Geothermal power generation will increase from its current installed base of 10.5 GW to over 31 GW by 2020. The solar thermal power is scaling rapidly with 1.2GW
under construction as of April 2009 and could reach more than 25GW by 2020.
US SOLAR & GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES
US Geothermal Resource
US Solar Thermal Resource
• Current geothermal power generation capacity in the US is roughly 3GW, with around 6.5GW of additional power capacity under development. • On solar side, enough electric power for the entire US consumption could be generated by covering about 9 % of Nevada desert—a plot of land 100 miles on a side. SOLAR POWER TECHNOLOGIES
• PHOTOVOLTAIC
– Direct conversion of solar energy into DC electrical Energy
• CPV
– Mirrors or lenses Concentrating sunlight onto multi‐
junction PV cell
• Size: 0.001MW - 500MW Cost: $8000-3500/KW
SOLAR POWER TECHNOLOGIES
•
SOLAR THERMAL
– SOLAR DISH
• Mirrors Concentrating solar energy to drive Stirling engine to produce AC electrical Energy
– LINEAR FRESNEL
• Flat Mirrors Concentrate solar energy onto linear tube generating vapor to drive turbine
– SOLAR TROUGH
• Trough shaped Mirrors Concentrate solar energy onto linear tube generating vapor to drive turbine
– SOLAR TOWER
• Mirrors tracking sunlight and focus solar energy onto central receiver on tower to generate vapor to drive turbine • Size:0.025MW ‐ 1000MW
• Cost: $8000‐3400/KW
Typical Solar Thermal Power Plant Cost Break Down
Commissioning
100%
Indirects
90%
support labor and material
instrumentation material and installation
80%
electrical material and installation
equipment installation
70%
BOP equipments
piping
60%
buildings
Civil site work
50%
solar field assembly and erection
engineering & procurement
40%
cooling tower
30%
control system
20%
feedwater heater
water treatment
transformers
10%
Condenser
Steam Turbine
Heat exchangers
0%
1
Additional costs will also be needed for:
● Development fee
● Permitting
● Insurance
● Financing
● Switchyard
● Transmission Solar Thermal & Geothermal Power Integration
•
•
Potential benefits:
– Solar thermal can produce temperatures up to 1000 ºF, providing higher turbine inlet temperatures and a more efficient overall power plant. – Share transmission and distribution, balance of plant system, utility, admin building, cooling system and operation personals may reduce overall renewable energy cost.
– Combined resources may reduce risk of future geothermal reservoir performance decline.
Potential issues:
– Diurnal, intermittent nature of solar energy creates complexity when introduced to geothermal base load power
– Co‐firing with fossil fuels may be necessary to provide operational consistency and levelling
– Limited number of suitable sites with solar, geothermal, transmission, and cooling water
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
• EUL
• PPA
• FT IRWIN IS A GOOD EXAMPLE: $2B AND 500MW PV
– WILL BE LARGEST SOLAR PROJECT IN CONUS
• PARTNERSHIPS WILL BE ESSENTIAL IN OUR CHANGING • FLEXIBILITY NEEDED IN OMB SCORING
SUMMARY
•
•
•
•
•
RIGID ENERGY GOALS
WILL BE A FORMIDABLE CHALLENGE
BUDGETS: CRA’S, UPCOMING ELECTION YEAR
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
SOLAR AND GEOTHERMAL COULD BE AN ANSWER IF DONE RIGHT
Net-Zero Energy Installation Planning
Developing a Comprehensive Strategy
Presented to the
SAME JETC Conference and Expo
St. Louis, Missouri
May 24, 2012
Frank Miyagawa PE CEM PMP
Overview
•
•
•
•
•
Federal Energy Mandates/Net Zero Goals
Net Zero Energy Planning Approach
Challenges to achieving Net Zero Energy
Net Zero Installation Plan Example
Questions/Answers
What is “Net Zero”
•
•
•
•
•
Net Zero Energy
Net Zero Water
Net Zero Waste
Net Zero Installation
Net Zero Building
Federal Energy Mandates/Net Zero Goals
• EO 13514‐ starting in 2020 all new federal buildings planned NZE by 2030
• US Army‐ 5 Installations by 2020/25 by 2030
• US Navy‐ By 2020 50% of Navy Installations
EO 13514 Definition for Building
• "zero‐net‐energy building" means a building that is designed, constructed, and operated to require a greatly reduced quantity of energy to operate, meet the balance of energy needs from sources of energy that do not produce greenhouse gases, and therefore result in no net emissions of greenhouse gases and be economically viable. DOE Definition for Building
• In general, a net‐zero energy building produces as much energy as it uses over the course of a year. Net‐zero energy buildings are very energy efficient. The remaining low energy needs are typically met with on site renewable energy.
DOE Definitions for Net Zero Energy Buildings
•
•
•
•
Net‐Zero Site Energy
Net‐Zero Source Energy
Net‐Zero Energy Costs
Net‐Zero Energy Emissions
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/commercial_initiative/printable_versions/zero_energy_
definitions.html
DOE‐‐ DoD Task Force
“A net zero energy military installation produces as much energy on‐site from renewable energy generation or through the on‐site use of renewable fuels, as it consumes in its buildings, facilities, and fleet vehicles.” Net Zero Energy Planning Approach
• #1 Reduce Energy Use/Energy Efficiency
• #2 Reduce Energy Use/Energy Efficiency
• #3 Renewable Energy Options
–
–
–
–
Geography/Region
Utility Costs
Economics
Funding Strategy
• A good reference guide ‐ NREL‐Net Zero Energy Military Installations: A Guide to Assessment and Planning Challenges to achieving Net Zero Energy
• Clearly defining real goals, intent, drivers
– Energy Security; Reduce Costs; Mandates/Goals
•
•
•
•
Competing Goals/Interests
Technical “Details”
Economic “Details”
Funding Strategies
– Appropriated Funds
– 3rd Party Financed
Net Zero Installation Plan Example
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Charrette Planning Process
Existing Baseline (Energy use/Renewables)
Planned Activities
What is the Net Zero Energy “Gap”
Renewable Options
Economics
Funding Strategies
NZE Master Plan
Questions/Answers
Frank Miyagawa PE CEM PMP
Program Manager
[email protected]
850.939‐8300 ext 55717

Energy Management of Installations and Portfolios

Transcription

Similar documents

Winkelman Presentation

KPAC Case Study Solar

About APSYS Models and Features Application Demonstrations

COMMERCIAL SOLAR CASE STUDY – GARELICK FARMS

COMMERCIAL CASE STUDY – “Brotherhood Winery”

New Solar Systems

Solar Power and a GREAT OWNER LETTER

Atlantis Energy Systems Inc.

ACT-PRE-1207 10YearsACT - Reynolds

Please join us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/einsteinaward