Hydrin T5010 and T6000 vs CR

Transcription

Hydrin T5010 and T6000 vs CR
HYDRIN® T6000 and T5010
Compared to CR Rubbers
1
Hydrin® T6000 – What is it?
• New terpolymer based on Propylene Oxide
– Hydrin® T6000
– Fully commercialized
• Broad temperature range
– Tg of –60°C
(Arctic Service)
– Hot Air = 125°C
• Cure systems
– Sulfur / Sulfur Donor
– Peroxide cure system
• Good dynamic properties
– Range of vibration isolation capabilities
• A degree of oil resistance
• Good grease resistance
• Possible Neoprene (CR) or silicone replacement
– Special applications
• Comparison of T6000 and CR flex property
2
Compound Tg (via DSC)
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
Tg, °C
-50
-60
-60
-57
-58
-70
-80
T Gum
T Black
T Silica
Compounded Tg’s are similar.
3
Low Temperature Tests
0
-10
-20
-30
°C -40
-50
Gehman T10
TR-10
BP
-60
-70
-80
T6000 Gum
T6000 Black
T6000 Silica
Comparison of different low temperature test results.
4
Hot air
Good service in hot air environment.
Hot Air Oven -- 70h/125C
20
Property Change
10
0
-10
T Gum
T Black
T Silica
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
Hardness A, pts
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
Actual Elongation = 220%
5
Hot oil
ASTM #1 Oil -- 70h/125C
20
Property Change
10
0
-10
T Gum
T Black
T Silica
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Hardness A, pts
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
Volume, %
Actual Elongation = 289%
6
Hot water
Distilled Water -- 168h/100C
60
Property Change
40
20
T Gum
T Black
T Silica
0
-20
-40
-60
Hardness A, pts
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
Volume, %
Excellent hot water resistance with carbon black
stock
7
Hot Diesel Fuel
Carbon black stock  best result
Diesel Fuel 70h / 40C (104F)
80
Property Change
60
40
20
T6000 Gum
T6000 Black
T6000 Silica
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
Hardness A, pts
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
Volume, %
8
High Degree of Ozone resistance
PASSed
9
DMTA – Tan delta vs others
Log Tan Delta -- Temperature Sweep
10
–––––––
––––
––––– ·
––– – –
––– –––
EE-024-088-01
EE-024-088-02
EE-024-088-04
EE-024-088-06
EE-024-112-02
NR
Hydrin Terpolymer
IIR
Hydrin Homopolymer
Hydrin GPO
Damping
Hydrin T6000*
1
Log Tan Delta
Butyl Rubber
0.1
Natural Rubber
0.01
-100
-50
0
50
Temperature (°C)
100
150
200
Universal V4.1D TA Instruments
*T6000 has excellent response over the temperature range.
10
Resilience
NR
T6000
Hardness A, pts.
45
53
M300, psi
774
886
Tensile, psi
3121
1062
Elongation, %
593
372
Rebound, %
60
52
11
Electrostatic dissipative
Close to being electrostatic dissipative.
1.00E+11
1.00E+10
1.00E+09
1.00E+08
1.00E+07
1.00E+06
1.00E+05
1.00E+04
1.00E+03
1.00E+02
1.00E+01
1.00E+00
ohm-cm
T Gum
T Black
T Silica
•Conductive range, < 105
•Static-dissipative range, 105 to 109
12
Hydrin® T6000 Summary /
conclusions
• Service range expected from –60 C to +125 C
– Dynamics over a broad temperature range
– Ultra low Tg
• A degree of oil resistance – in ASTM #1 oil
• Compression set
– Typical for sulfur cure systems
• Ozone resistant
• Close to being electrostatic dissipative
• Regarded as a good candidate for arctic service
– Vibration isolation
• Dampers
• Diaphragms
13
HYDRIN® T6000 Compared to CR
Rubbers
A General Overview With Focus on Dynamic
Properties
14
Evaluation Recipes – CR vs T6000
E31-070
CR-GW M2
CR With
CR No
T6000
T6000
MBTS
MBTS
Lo Sulfur
Hi Sulfur
1
2
3
4
100
100
100
100
HYDRIN® T6000
N774
55
55
55
55
Sundex 790
8
8
8
8
Agerite Stalite S
2
2
2
2
Wingstay 100
1
1
1
1
Maglite D
4
4
Kadox 911C
5
5
5
5
Stearic Acid
5
1.5
1.5
1.5
MBTS
1.5
2
Spider Sulfur
0.8
DPG
0.5
1.5
MBTS
1.5
TMTM
1.5
TOTAL
178.0
176.5
175.8
177.0
15
Original Properties – CR vs T6000
Original (KEY) Properties
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo S
Hi S
MH
77
90
42
62
Tc90
13
8
40
7
C-Set
44
35
39
55
Shore A
62
63
48
63
Tensile
3273
3463
1808
1609
Elongation
558
472
782
531
Ultimate tensile strength lower than CR, but typical for Hydrin
16
Air Oven and Oil – CR vs T6000
AIR OVEN,70H/100ºC,
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo S
Hi S
Hardness, pts
7
10
5
4
Tensile, %
-5
-2
-3
-4
Elongation, %
-14
-16
-8
-49
ASTM 1 OIL,70H/100ºC,
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo S
Hi S
Hardness, pts
2
3
-2
-2
Tensile, %
-1
-3
7
-4
Elongation, %
-20
-18
-2
-39
Volume, %
2
3
0
-1
Higher Sulfur levels cause large elongation change. Lower Sulfur
aging – good.
17
Low Temperature Properties
– CR vs T6000
Low Temperature Properties
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo S
Hi S
Brittlepoint
-34
-36
-52
-50
TR10
-35
-37
-53
-52
Gehman T10
-34
-35
-50
-50
HYDRIN® T6000 – Has better low temperature characteristic than CR.
18
Flex Fatigue – CR vs T6000
De Mattia Flex,(Unpierced)
Cycles to fail (xK)
Crack gowth (inches)
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo S
Hi S
1000
1000
650
1020
0
0
0.502
broke
Comparable flex fatigue resistance.
Both polymers reached 1,000,000+ cycles.
19
Grease Resistance – CR vs T6000
Polyrex EP2 Grease*
70H/100ºC,
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo Sx
Hi Sx
Hardness, pts
-6
-9
-13
-9
Volume, %
13
13
15
13
Similar resistance to grease.
*polyurea general purpose automotive
grease
20
Hot Water – CR vs T6000
DISTILLED WATER,70H/100ºC,
CR-GW
CR-GW
T6000
T6000
MBTS
NO MBTS
Lo S
Hi S
Hardness, pts
2
2
5
-4
Tensile, %
-3
-5
-13
-10
Elongation, %
-27
-24
-27
-35
Volume, %
13
11
6
4
Good resistance to water –Lower swell than CR.
21
DMTA T6000 v CR
10
–––––––
––––
––––– ·
-28.58°C
1.141
Neoprene Carbon black filler
T6000 Mineral filler
T6000 Carbon black filler
-20.76°C
1.168
1
CR
Tan Delta
-28.58°C
0.8332
0.1
0.01
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Temperature (°C)
200
Universal V4.1D TA Instruments
T6000 similar but with more consistent tan d over the temperature range.
22
Summary – CR vs T6000
• Some resistances as good, some better than CR
• Dynamics similar over a broad temperature range
• -60 C to 125C
• Long Flex life
• A degree of oil resistance to ASTM #1
• A good candidate for certain low temperature
and dynamic applications
23
Peroxide cure versus sulfur cure
24
Evaluation Recipes – peroxide vs
sulfur cure
HYDRIN T6000
100
100
N660
20
20
N330
30
30
Sundex 790
10
Plasthall 226
10
Naugard 445
1.0
1.0
Vanox MTI
0.5
0.5
Kadox 911C
Calcium Hydroxide
5.0
3.0
Stearic Acid
1.0
STRUCKTOL WB222
2.0
SR 206
5.0
Spider Sulfur
Vulcup 40KE
2.0
0.3
2.0
Tetrone A (Sulfads)
2.5
TDEC (Ethyl Tellurac)
1.0
25
Process testing – peroxide vs sulfur
Mooney Viscosity, ML(1+4) @ 100 C
ML 1+4
55
59
43
52
T5, (min)
17.4
8.2
T35, (min)
20.1
12.4
ML, (lbf·in)
11
13
MH, (lbf·in)
87
57
Ts2, (min)
1.4
1.8
T'90, (min)
7.3
21.3
7
21
17
31
Mooney Scorch ML @ 125 C, ML(1+30) @ 125 C
Minimum Viscosity
ODR, 60 minutes @ 170ºC,Micro 100cpm, 3 arc
Slab Cure Time, (minutes)
Button Cure Time, (minutes)
26
Originals & comp set – peroxide
vs sulfur cure
Hardness A, (pts)
62
56
Modulus @ 10%, (psi)
65
62
Modulus @ 25%, (psi)
120
108
Modulus @ 50 %, (psi)
244
165
Modulus @ 100 %, (psi)
607
307
Modulus @ 200 %, (psi)
701
Modulus @ 300 %, (psi)
1096
Tensile, (psi)
1233
2268
202
668
T6000
T6000
PO
Semi EV
11
18
19
40
Elongation, (%)
Compression Set, 22 hours @ 70ºC, Buttons
Set, (%)
Compression Set, 22 hours @ 100ºC, Buttons
Set, (%)
27
Resilience – peroxide vs sulfur cure
Resilience, 0 hours @ 23ºC, Buttons
Rebound, (%)
42
42
42
42
40
44
Resilience, 22 hours @ 70ºC, Buttons
Rebound, (%)
Resilience, 70 hours @ 100ºC, Buttons
Rebound, (%)
28
Short Term Hot Air – peroxide vs
sulfur
Air Oven Aging - 70 hours @ 100C
10
Property Change
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
peroxide
Hardness, pts
sulfur
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
29
Summary / Conclusions – peroxide &
sulfur
• Compression set
– Typical for sulfur cure systems
• higher compression set
• More stress/strain changes after immersion in heat
– Peroxide cure provides lower comp sets & better heat
aging
30
HYDRIN® T5010 Compared to CR
Rubbers
A General Overview
31
Evaluation Recipes
CR (ETU) T5010 (ETU) T5010 (PO)
CR (ETU) T5010 (ETU) T5010 (PO)
CR - WHV
CR - WRT
Hydrin T5010
N774
N990
N330
Plasthall 7006
Plasthall DOS
Naugard 445
Vanox MTI
Stearic Acid
Stalite S
Antioxidant 60
Wingstay 100
Sunproof Jr.
Rapeseed Oil
Zinc Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Sulfasan R
GND-75
TMTD
Vulcup 40 KE
35.00
65.00
Mooney Viscosity,ML(1+4) @ 100°C
ML 1+4
33.3
100.00
50.00
20.00
30.00
5.00
30.00
5.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
20.00
0.50
4.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
63.3
61.5
Mooney Scorch ML @ 125°C,ML(1+30) @ 125°C
Minimum Viscosity
26.1
52.7
T5, (min)
4.5
13.5
T35, (min)
12.0
21.8
40.7
>30
>30
ODR,30M/180ºC,Micro 100cpm , 3°arc
ML, (lbf·in)
6.2
MH, (lbf·in)
45.3
Ts2, (min)
1.2
T'90, (min)
8.9
13.2
71.8
1.7
21.1
10.4
47.8
1.6
13.1
Com pression Set,22H/125ºC,Buttons
Set, (%)
48.0
58.0
32.0
Tear Strength,Die C,
Tear Strength, (ppi)
246
319
244
Original Vulcanized,
Hardness A, (pts)
Modulus @ 100 %, (psi)
Tensile, (psi)
Elongation, (%)
52
291
2689
489
61
310
2186
447
49
167
2283
804
100.00
0.30
1.00
2.00
215.50
143.80
144.50
*Typical boot recipe per CR supplier.
32
Resistance to Set
T5010 has capability for low set.
Compression Set
22h / 125°C
60
Property Change
50
40
30
20
10
0
CR (ETU)
T5010 (ETU)
T5010 (PO)
33
Air Oven Aging
Property Change
Air Oven 70h / 125°C
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
CR (ETU)
Hardness A, pts.
T5010 (ETU)
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
T5010 (PO)
Weight, %
Minimal property deltas with Hydrin T5010 compared to CR.
34
Oil Immersion
ASTM #1 Oil 70h / 125°
20
Property Change
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
CR (ETU)
Hardness A, pts.
T5010 (ETU)
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
T5010 (PO)
Volume, %
Least Aggressive oil – Very similar trends in hardness and swell.
Elongation deltas similar.
35
Oil Immersion
IRM 903 Oil 70h / 125°
80
Property Change
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
CR (ETU)
Hardness A, pts.
T5010 (ETU)
Tensile, %
Elongation, %
T5010 (PO)
Volume, %
Most Aggressive oil – CR lost hardness and swelled severely.
T5010 did not.
36
T5010 as a Front Wheel Drive boot versus CR
37
Grease Aged Results: T5010 v CR
Hydrin®
Aged Vulcanized,*GREASE,70H/135ºC,
CR
T5010
Hardness A, (pts)
45
68
Hardness Change A, (pts)
-7
13
392
749
35
169
2029
2142
Tensile Change, (%)
-25
18
Elongation, (%)
349
249
Elongation Change, (%)
-29
-45
Volume Change, (%)
11.2
-3.7
Weight Change, (%)
7.7
-2.6
Modulus @ 100 %, (psi)
Modulus @ 100%, (% Change)
Tensile, (psi)
*Polyrex EP-2 poly-urea
38
Pictorial of Grease Aging Results
Hydrin® Elastomers not swollen/misshaped by grease
39
Additional Questions?
Clark Cable
Hydrin/ECO Elastomers
Zeon Chemicals L.P.
p: 800.735.3388
f: 502.775.7783
[email protected]
Commercial
Service
Sam Harber
Technical Service
Hydrin/ECO Elastomers
Zeon Chemicals L.P.
p: 800.735.3388
f: 502.775.7766
[email protected]
40

Similar documents

Rubber Chemicals Competitive Cross Reference

Rubber Chemicals Competitive Cross Reference Stangard® is a registered trademark of Harwick Standard Distribution Corporation. Santoflex®, Santocure® and Vocol® are registered trademarks of Monsanto Company. Pepton® is a registered trademark ...

More information