Ohio Lawyer - Ohio State Bar Association
Transcription
Ohio Lawyer - Ohio State Bar Association
T H E O H I O S TAT E B AR AS S O C I AT I O N ME MB E R MAG A Z IN E VO L. 29, NO. 1 w.ohioba r.org JA NUARY/FEBRU Terminating lawyer-client relationships while avoiding potential malpractice claims Pro bono efforts across Ohio OSBA Member Spotlight Series Why judicial elections matter Legal malpractice insurance carriers frequently enter and abandon the Ohio market. Entrust your reputation to a company committed to Ohio lawyers. Since OBLIC began insuring Ohio lawyers in 1979, a number of insurance carriers and agents have entered and exited the Ohio market. In many cases they used an initial low bid to attract business only to raise rates in year two and beyond. Put your trust in the only Ohio lawyers liability insurance company owned and endorsed by the Ohio State Bar Association. Put your trust in OBLIC. Contact us today for a no-obligation quote. Owned and endorsed by the Ohio State Bar Association 1 Ohio Lawyer January/February September/October2015 2013 www.ohiobar.org OhioLawyer Vol. 29 No. 1 Departments 3 | President’s Perspective Why judicial elections matter and why lawyers should care about them. Headline: Subhead: Body copy: Features voiding malpractice: Terminating 6 | Alawyer-client relationships by Lindsey Carr Siegler, Gregory R. Farkas and Christopher C. Koehler There is a strict time period during which clients may file malpractice claims against an attorney— but determining the accrual date for a terminated lawyer-client relationship can be difficult without a definitive cause of action. 10 | 14 | Giving back for the greater good: Pro bono efforts in Ohio by Erin Killeen With dramatic cuts to legal aid and more Ohioans than ever lacking access to adequate legal representation, bar associations around the state are ramping up efforts to provide pro bono services to those who need it most. Member Spotlight Series: Joseph Cirigliano 5 | In Brief Nearly 800 admitted to practice law in Ohio at bar admission ceremonies; workers often unable to use all time off they earn; top salaries for first-year associates remain flat; Supreme Court’s electronic filing portal now open; Attorney Services Fund releases 2014 annual report. 18 | Inside OSBA Winter 2015 OSBA committee and section meetings coming soon; section councils seeking new members; call for articles. 21 | Foundation News OSBF honors excellence in the profession. 22 | Did You Know? Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is critical protection. 24 | Counsel Comments Potpourri. 26 | Books & Bytes Connect, advance and succeed with ohiobar.org. 27 | Member News Awards and community involvement of OSBA members. 28 | Member Benefits Get the most out of your OSBA membership. by Nina Corbut For more than 60 years, Lorain County’s own Joe Cirigliano has been an invaluable member of Ohio’s legal profession. He sat down with Ohio Lawyer to talk about his community, his career and his continuing passion for the law. www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 1 OhioLawyer Ohio Lawyer is published bimonthly by the Ohio State Bar Association. Ohio Lawyer Staff Editor: Nina Corbut Editorial: Andrew Hartzell, John Hocter Graphic Designer: Andrea Donahue Advertising: Terry Henson Website Editor: Dan Beckley Board of Editors David Hejmanowski, Chair, Delaware Steve Bolton, Youngstown J. Kristin Burkett, Newark Hilary Ruth Damaser, Columbus Thomas L. Guillozet, Versailles Judge James Jensen, Toledo William Kaufman, Lebanon OSBA Officers President: Martin E. Mohler, Toledo President-elect: John D. Holschuh Jr., Cincinnati Alan J. Lehenbauer, Swanton Kris Long, Columbus Joseph L. Ludovici, East Liverpool Kevin P. Murphy, Warren Marquettes D. Robinson, Cleveland Stephen L. Smith, New Bremen Executive Director: Mary Amos Augsburger Advertising Sales and Editorial Offices Ohio State Bar Association P.O. Box 16562 Columbus, Ohio 43216-6562 (800) 282-6556; (614) 487-2050 Advertising: [email protected] Editorial: [email protected] Printing: Hopkins Printing Editorial Offices Ohio Lawyer (issn 1097-6493) is published bimonthly by the Ohio State Bar Association, P.O. Box 16562, Columbus, Ohio 43216-6562. Phone: (800) 282-6556 or (614) 4872050. Periodicals postage paid at Columbus, Ohio and additional offices. Ten dollars of dues pays your required subscription to Ohio Lawyer. Ohio Lawyer is published as a service to members of the Ohio State Bar Association through their dues and is not available to nonmember attorneys. Governmental agencies and educational and legal research organizations may subscribe annually for $35. Single copies to members and qualified subscribers are $7. ©Copyright 2015 by the Ohio State Bar Association. All rights reserved. Any copying of materials herein, in whole or in part, and by any means, without written permission, is prohibited. Requests for reprint permission should be sent to the Ohio Lawyer editorial offices. Editor reserves the right to reject any advertising submitted for publication. While advertising copy is reviewed, no endorsement of any product or service offered by any advertisement is intended or implied by publication in Ohio Lawyer. Statements or expressions of opinion herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Ohio State Bar Association, its officers, staff or the board of editors. Manuscript Submission OSBA members are encouraged to submit manuscripts to the editor for possible publication in Ohio Lawyer. Articles submitted should not exceed 10 typewritten, double-spaced pages. Manuscripts are not purchased, and those submitted become the property of the Ohio State Bar Association. Editorial policies can be obtained by calling (800) 282-6556 or (614) 487-2050 or visiting www.ohiobar.org/editorialpolicy. Postmaster (usps 016-304): Send address changes to Ohio Lawyer, P.O. Box 16562, Columbus, Ohio 43216-6562. WILLIAM K. WEISENBERG FUND FOR CIVICS WILLIAM K. WEISENBERG FUND EDUCATION FOR CIVICS EDUCATION Want to prepare the next generation of citizens and honor more than three decades of commitment to civics education by OSBA Assistant Executive Director William K. Weisenberg as he prepares to retire? Now you can do both. Consider making a “Dollar a Day for Five Years” pledge to the William K. Weisenberg Fund for Civics Education. That’s $1,825 that you can pay all at once, or over the course of five years as a pledge. And if you choose to contribute at a different level, that gift will be gratefully accepted as well. Tax-deductible contributions should be sent to the Ohio State Bar Foundation, 1700 Lake Shore Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43204. And you can donate online at www.osbf.net/give. Be sure to earmark your contribution for the William K. Weisenberg Fund for Civics Education. Questions? Contact: Jonathan Hollingsworth at [email protected], Ann Zarate at (614) 487-4477 or [email protected]. Photography credits © Shutterstock.com/Zdenka Darula & Stuart Jenner: Cover & 6 © Nina Corbut: 1, 14-17 2 Ohio Lawyer © Shutterstock.com/Burlingham: 10-11 © Shutterstock.com/Lisa F. Young: 1 © Shutterstock.com/Gordon Swanson: 24 January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org President’s Perspective Why judicial elections matter and why lawyers should care about them by Martin E. Mohler “All the rights secured to the citizens under the Constitution are worth nothing, and a mere bubble, except guaranteed to them by an independent and virtuous judiciary.” —Andrew Jackson On the heels of the most recent statewide judicial election cycle, and the spate of complaints the Ohio State Bar Association received, it may be instructive to look back to see how those campaigns were handled and what role organizations like ours played in statewide judicial elections. Although the OSBA does not get directly involved in these judicial races, it is important that we, as lawyers, help ensure that the public has accurate information about judicial candidate qualifications and experience and that the public has trust and confidence in the conduct of elections. The OSBA works in several ways to provide information to members of the public to assist them in making informed decisions when voting for judges. For example, the OSBA established the Commission on Judicial Candidates pursuant to the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct. This commission appoints a 25-member panel that evaluates each of the statewide judicial candidates according to these non-political criteria: legal knowledge and ability, professional competence, judicial temperament, integrity, diligence, professional responsibility and public/community service. In addition, the panel reviews references and materials submitted by the candidates, conducts in-person interviews with the candidates as well as personal inquiries among lawyers, judges and others. The panel determines its ratings, based on its evaluations, by secret ballot. Ratings range from “not recommended” to “superior.” These ratings are provided to the candidates for their use, and the commission also publicizes them. In addition to being shared with Ohio media outlets, the www.ohiobar.org ratings are also posted on the OSBA website. Media outlets widely use the ratings when preparing news stories and endorsements. The OSBA has also been involved in attempting to lessen the amount of negative advertising in statewide judicial elections. In 2000, the OSBA expressed concern about negative advertising in races for the Supreme Court of Ohio. In that year, ads demeaned the judiciary and candidates running for the court, serving as a catalyst for creation of the OSBA Judicial Election Campaign Advertising Monitoring Committee. This committee consists of 11 persons, three of whom are non-lawyers. No more than five members of the committee can be from the same political party. The advertising monitoring committee asks all candidates for statewide judicial office to sign a “clean campaign pledge” well in advance of the election. Candidates who sign the committee’s pledge agree, based upon their personal examination of judicial advertisements, to publicly disavow advertisements that violate the guidelines. This year, all four candidates for the Supreme Court of Ohio signed the clean campaign pledge. Only the chair of this committee or his/her designee communicates with the media or issues statements on the committee’s behalf, and committee deliberations, discussions and records are kept confidential. The presence of a quorum of six members is required for the committee to act officially. The committee considers matters pertaining to any judicial advertising complaint that is received by written communication, either by regular mail or electronic mail, from any source. The committee investigates a complaint if there is evidence that a campaign ad impugns the integrity of the judicial system, the integrity of a candidate for the Supreme Court or Ohio, or erodes public trust or confidence in the independence and impartiality of the judiciary by verbally or visually attempting to lead voters to believe that a candidate will decide issues or cases in a predetermined manner. If cause exists to investigate a complaint, the advertising monitoring committee notifies the campaign committee and/or the third party committee that is the subject of the complaint as well as the campaign committee of the candidate’s opponent. Action on a complaint is within the advertising monitoring committee’s discretion. The committee may ask the candidate to withdraw a particular ad or statement or take other action as it deems appropriate, including publicizing its finding that the ad is negative January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 3 through vehicles such as news conferences, news releases, OpEd columns, letters to the editor, videos, social media and other public statements. This year, the monitoring committee evaluated several judicial ads and spoke out about at least one of them. Another way that the OSBA attempts to protect the role of the judiciary is through a mechanism that allows the Association to publicly defend judges and the judiciary when either is unjustly criticized, especially when exercising professional, ethical and constitutional duties, or when such unjust criticism could erode the public’s trust and confidence in the judicial system. This policy also applies to lawyers and/or judges running for public office. During this last election cycle, the unjust criticism protocol was used on one occasion. Is our process perfect? Maybe not. Therefore, I created a new Task Force on Judicial Elections and Public Trust and Confidence. Appointments have been made and the work of the task force is underway. I invite you to provide any thoughts you may have for the task force to consider. Responses to unjust criticism focus on providing members of the public with information to help them better understand the legal issues presented related to a specific situation, including the role of attorneys and judges, the application of law and the restrictions and responsibilities placed on lawyers and judges under the canons and rules. I welcome your input on how the OSBA can best provide the public with information about the judiciary and judicial races, and whether our present system is working effectively. Please send your thoughts to me at [email protected]. If the OSBA determines that a response to unjust criticism is appropriate, additional consideration is first given about whether the Association should respond alone or in conjunction with another bar association. JIC-336_OhioLawyer_ 7.5” w x 4.754_P1a_Print.pdf 1 6/12/14 We at the OSBA are not alone in our efforts to provide members of the public with the information they need regarding judicial elections. A number of bar associations around Ohio conduct various types of judicial rating or evaluating systems to provide this information. Martin E. Mohler is president of the Ohio State Bar Association. 10:46 AM Our clients trust us to manage $8 billion in assets. Our relationships with them span generations. At Johnson Investment Counsel, we put the goals of our clients ahead of our own. Since our founding in 1965, we’ve held ourselves to the highest fiduciary standards. Our experienced, fee-based advisors provide clients with sophisticated strategies that help ensure and protect their future. 800.541.0170 | 4 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 johnsoninv.com www.ohiobar.org In Brief Compiled by Erin Killeen Nearly 800 admitted to practice law in Ohio Supreme Court’s electronic filing portal now open On Nov. 17, 2014, 793 new lawyers were admitted to practice law in Ohio. Out of 1,173 applicants who sat for the July Ohio bar examination, 902 (77 percent) received passing scores; 793 walked the stage on Nov. 17 with their certificates of admission to the practice of law. The new lawyers were encouraged to put their newly acquired expertise to good use, even if not immediately as attorneys. Ohio Supreme Court Justice Terrence O’Donnell gave the keynote speech during the ceremony. Justice O’Donnell urged the new lawyers to use their talents to ensure that the nation always serves as an example of a strong legal system and an independent judiciary that is respected by its people. “You raise new hope in America, and you will build public confidence in the rule of law as you take your rightful place as lawyers in Ohio,” he said. Following the ceremony, the attorneys and their families visited the Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center, including the Supreme Court courtroom and the Law Library. —Ohiobar.org The Ohio Supreme Court’s new automated electronic filing system was launched Oct. 23. The program will be expanded to all registered lawyers in early 2015 and to pro se filers later in the year. “I think the system will be very helpful to prosecutors across the state, especially those facing a time crunch who would otherwise need to travel to Columbus to file their documents,” Franklin County Assistant Prosecutor Steven Taylor said during training for lawyers in the pilot program. Workers often unable to use all time off they earn The portal is available on the Supreme Court website at www.supremecourt.ohio.gov and includes a user guide with step-by-step instructions. —Courtnewsohio.gov One in four working Americans are unable to take all of their paid time off during the year, a survey by Adecco Staffing U.S. finds. Of those who did take a vacation, 89 percent say they checked email, 70 percent made work-related calls and 25 percent went to the office for an in-person meeting in what was supposed to be time away from the office. Twenty-two percent even cut their vacations short because of work-related duties. But working Americans seem to find other ways of reclaiming vacation time. Twenty-two percent admit to planning to report for work late or leave work early when they know their boss will be out of the office. —Businessjournaldaily.com Top salaries for first-year associates remain flat Although first-year associate salaries of $160,000 are still common at firms of more than 700 lawyers, the prevalence of $160,000 salaries at these firms is far below what it was just five years ago, accounting for just over one quarter of the salaries reported by firms of this size. By contrast, in 2009, a year considered the high point for large firm salaries, nearly two-thirds of first-year salaries were reported as $160,000. The reason for the shift can be attributed to a change in the structure of today’s large firms. As more firms have grown through acquisition and merger, many firms with more than 700 lawyers are made up of many smaller regional offices, none of which pay the benchmark first-year salary of $160,000. As a result, a larger percentage of large law firm starting salaries fall below that mark. However, the $160,000 salary still stands as the high salary paid to first-year associates, as it has since 2007. In 2014, the national median first-year associate salary at the largest firms was $135,000, the lowest since 2006. However, $160,000 has stood as the single most commonly reported salary since 2008. —NALP.org www.ohiobar.org There are several guidelines for e-filing, including: • Filing documents through the e-Filing Portal does not alter any filing deadlines imposed by the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio. • Documents received after 5 p.m. Eastern Time through the e-Filing Portal will not be considered for filing until the next business day. Attorney Services Fund releases 2014 annual report More than half of the money collected by the Ohio Supreme Court’s Attorney Services Fund in fiscal year 2014 went to support the attorney discipline process, according to an annual report published on Oct. 31, 2014. The money comes primarily from attorney registration, late registration, and reinstatement fees. The Supreme Court allocated $9.4 million from the Attorney Services Fund at the beginning of fiscal year 2014. According to the report, the fund expended nearly $8.7 million. That total includes more than $5 million for disciplinary-related expenses. The fund also supported: • The administration of the Attorney Services Division, which oversees the delivery of services to Ohio attorneys and assists the Supreme Court in the exercise of its constitutional duty to regulate the practice of law. • The Clients’ Security Fund to compensate clients of dishonest attorneys. • The Reporter of Decisions to publish attorney discipline legal notices in newspapers. The fund also provided grants to the Ohio Legal Assistance Foundation to support legal services for low-income Ohioans, and to the Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program to provide intervention services to lawyers, judges, and law students who suffer from alcoholism, substance abuse or mental illness. —Courtnewsohio.gov January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 5 6 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org Avoiding malpractice: Terminating lawyer-client relationships by Lindsey Carr Siegler, Gregory R. Farkas and Christopher C. Koehler There is a strict time period during which clients may file malpractice claims against an attorney—but determining the accrual date for a terminated lawyer-client relationship can be difficult without a definitive cause of action. The statute of limitations for legal malpractice claims is short—one year. But the calculation of that one-year period is hardly straightforward. As with all statutes of limitations, the period is measured from the date of accrual. In the case of legal malpractice, “accrual” can be determined in multiple ways, springing a potential trap for an attorney who mistakenly thought that the threat of a malpractice claim on a prior engagement had long passed. No attorney, no matter how thorough, diligent, responsive or effective, is safe from claims of malpractice. But all attorneys can obtain some peace of mind by understanding when a claim accrues and, more importantly, taking easy steps to ensure the accrual period is not open-ended. Under Ohio law, an action for legal malpractice must be filed within one year after the cause of action accrues.1 The Supreme Court of Ohio has established the following standard for determining when a cause of action for legal malpractice accrues: [T]he statute of limitations begins to run when there is a cognizable event whereby the client discovers or should have discovered that his injury was related to his attorney’s act or non-act and the client is put on notice of a need to pursue his possible remedies against the attorney or when the attorney-client relationship for that particular transaction or undertaking terminates, whichever occurs later.2 Thus, in deciding whether a malpractice action is barred by the statute of limitations, a court must make two factual www.ohiobar.org determinations: when the attorney-client relationship terminated, and when a cognizable event occurred. The latter of these two events triggers the running of the statute of limitations. To afford yourself more certainty in your practice, therefore, it is important to understand how and when the relationship is considered “terminated,” and what constitutes a “cognizable event.” Termination of the relationship In Ohio, “for the purposes of the accrual of a legal malpractice claim, an attorney-client relationship ends when the attorney-client relationship for that particular transaction or undertaking terminates.”3 Under this “particular transaction” rule, the statute may begin to run as to a particular transaction, even though the attorney may continue to represent the client on other matters. According to the Supreme Court of Ohio, “general” representation does not toll the statute of limitations.4 Because an attorney-client relationship is consensual in nature, the actions of either party can affect its continuance.5 Of course, the most unambiguous signal that the relationship has terminated is a communication, written or oral, that the relationship has ended.6 However, because conduct that “dissolves the essential mutual confidence between attorney and client” signifies the termination of the relationship, an explicit statement terminating the relationship is not always necessary.7 As such, “where a client, unbeknownst to her attorney, retains new counsel to represent her in the case in which current counsel is providing representation, and then purposely conceals and misrepresents that retention, a termination letter or other formal communication between at- torney and client is not required in order to find that the relationship has terminated.”8 Correspondence that purports to terminate the relationship must be unequivocal—indeed, any ambiguity or hesitation weighs against a finding of termination. Absent an unambiguous communication, courts focus heavily on the intent of the parties, which can be more difficult to establish without a clear, written communication. For example, in Scherer v. Wiles, although the attorney sent a client an email stating, “we are out,” the court declined to find the communication an unambiguous termination, that triggered the statute of limitations. According to the court, “the intention behind the words is unclear. Though [the attorney] stated, ‘we are out,’ his email two days later said that they had not withdrawn, but were out if Plaintiff was out.”9 Similarly, in McOwen v. Zena, although the client wrote a first letter to the attorney expressing her intent to end their relationship, this letter was not sufficient. According to the court, the “letter was not an unequivocal termination of the attorney-client relationship … .” Rather, it was “expressing [the client’s] intent to do so, putting [the attorney] on notice of [her] dissatisfaction with his representation, and affording him the opportunity to cure that dissatisfaction.” Instead, the court held the relationship was terminated by a subsequent letter in which the client expressed her unequivocal decision “to dismiss him as her attorney.”10 Other courts have found that only letters with unambiguous language have signaled the end of the attorney-client relationship. January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 7 Such was the case in Duvall v. Manning (letter stating “I am terminating this relationship effective immediately” constituted termination of relationship) and Cook v. Caruso (letter stating client retained other counsel and was terminating the attorney’s services effective immediately was an unequivocal termination of the relationship).11 Where there is no communication at issue, courts focus on the parties’ actions to determine their intent, again requiring the intent to be unequivocal before recognizing a termination. Perhaps surprisingly, it is the granting of a motion to withdraw as counsel, not the filing of the motion, that triggers the statute of limitations. In Brautigam v. Damon, the court held despite the filing of a motion for leave to withdraw, the attorney-client relationship continued.12 The attorney could not prove the client was aware of the filing, and there was evidence to suggest the attorney continued to perform work for the client. The relationship only terminated once the client sent a letter expressing an unequivocal desire for other counsel.13 Once a motion to withdraw is granted, however, absent some independent, conflicting conduct on behalf of the parties, an attorney-client relationship is likely to be deemed terminated.14 Similarly, retaining new lawyers on a matter, without more, does not necessarily constitute an affirmative act of termination.15 Thus, while a lack of trust may lead to the termination of the attorney-client relationship, that does not necessarily signal termination of the relationship. In R.E. Holland Excavating, Inc. v. Martin, Browne, Hull & Harper, P.L.L., the relationship was not terminated when client’s new counsel sent the first attorney a letter indicating that client believed attorney negligently represented client in the first action.16 As the court explained, “[a]lthough an attorney-client relationship is ideally characterized by the client’s reposing trust and confidence in the attorney, this is not always the case.”17 Accordingly, a client’s consultation with another attorney does not necessarily terminate the client’s relationship with the original attorney.18 In contrast, certain activities by newly retained attorneys may constitute affirmative acts terminating the original attorney-client relationship. In Burzynski v. Bradley & Bradley & Farris Co., L.P.A., the relationship possibly ended when attorneys notified the client they would not represent him and client picked up his file; the relationship unquestionably ended when the client retained new counsel who filed a lawsuit involving the same subject matter.19 In Disabato v. Thomas M. Tyack & Assocs. Co., L.P.A., the newly retained attorney filed a lawsuit involving the same subject matter on which the attorney had been representing the client.20 At times, the existence of the attorney-client relationship will depend on the status of a particular transaction. For example, in Capital City Energy Grp., Inc. v. Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, the lawyers claimed that, for the purposes of evaluating malpractice claims related to the negotiation and drafting of a merger agreement, the attorney’s representation ended on the date the transaction closed.21 The client argued the representation continued a few months afterward, while the parties performed smaller, somewhat related tasks. The court concluded there was no such bright line rule: It cannot be that, as a matter of law, representation terminates at the time a transaction closes; indeed, attorneys regularly revisit ostensibly closed transactions to fix mistakes and make alterations … . Nor can it be that representation as to a particular transaction includes every subsequent undertaking that would not have taken place but for the fact of the underlying transaction. Past and present circumstances necessarily impact future courses of action. Thus, if “but-for” causation Best practices to avoid uncertainty and open-ended claims While it may be impossible to avoid the assertion of a claim, attorneys can take steps to bring more certainty to the potential for claims, as well as the scope of such claims, by incorporating a few simple measures into their regular practices: • Get it in writing. At the beginning of the relationship and a particular matter, engagement letters should be specific. They should set forth in reasonable detail the parameters of the representation. At the end of the relationship, attorneys should send correspondence stating as much. Rather than a formal, awkward “This engagement has ended …” letter, seize the opportunity to thank the client for the opportunity to work with him or her on the engagement, invite feedback on the representation, and seek opportunities to work together again in the future. You will make it clear the matter is concluded, but in a manner that fosters a continued relationship. • Billing-related communications can present an opportunity to make it clear that an engagement has ended. Once a matter is over, send the final bill promptly, and be sure to communicate that it is indeed the final bill for the matter. This is particularly helpful if you continue to represent the client on other matters, because it makes clear that this discrete matter is ended. • If a client engages additional counsel on a matter, attorneys should obtain a clear delineation of the responsibilities of each set of counsel. This will obviously help the parties manage the relationship during the representation, but it can also serve after the fact to clarify exactly what each attorney’s responsibilities were. To the extent it appears the client no longer needs or wants your services, confirm that fact in writing. • Any motion to withdraw as counsel should be accompanied by an unambiguous letter to the client stating the attorney intends to terminate the relationship effective immediately. The filing of a motion, alone, will likely be insufficient to terminate the representation. • If the attorney suspects some cognizable event has occurred—i.e., the client has experienced a serious setback in a civil or criminal case, or the client has expressed a loss of confidence in the attorney’s ability—the attorney should address the situation directly, clarifying the existence of a continued relationship. Again, you risk ambiguity, which will be resolved in favor of the client on a statute of limitations question, if you don’t confirm that fact in writing. 8 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org alone were sufficient to tie future instances of representation to a prior transaction, the “particular transaction” rule would become a rule of general representation for all practical purposes. Ohio law forbids this result.22 Instead, Ohio courts have held that a “particular transaction” encompasses “all dealings related to the proceeding in which the alleged malpractice occurred that are not of a general nature.”23 For subsequent work to satisfy the “related to test,” a client must allege that the attorneys acted to “fix, alter, or renegotiate” some portion of the original transaction.24 Thus, the Capital City court held that representation as to this particular transaction terminated on the date that transaction closed. Although the client consulted the attorneys for several months after the closing, these consultations were not for the purposes of fixing, altering, or renegotiating the terms of the agreement. Occurrence of a cognizable event Alternatively, the malpractice statute of limitation accrues when a “cognizable event” occurs. A cognizable event alerts a reasonable client that his or her attorney has committed an improper act in the course of legal representation.25 Although the event puts the client on notice to investigate the facts relevant to the claim to pursue possible remedies, the client need not have discovered all of the necessary facts to trigger the statute of limitations.26 For example, courts generally recognize the underlying incident that forms the basis of the malpractice claim as the cognizable event that triggers the statute of limitations. In Conley, where the client alleged the attorney’s malpractice resulted in a conviction, the date of the conviction is the cognizable event.27 In Badgett v. Schulman, where a client’s malpractice claim was founded upon the attorney’s handling of the plea agreement, the client’s sentencing was the cognizable event.28 A client’s admitted or expressed dissatisfaction with the lawyer’s performance also constitutes a cognizable event that demonstrates he or she is aware of the potential injury.29 In Getch v. Jeffrey T. Orndorff Co., L.P.A., the court held three cognizable events occurred, any one of which was sufficient to start the running of the statute of limitations: the client’s brother-in-law advised the attorney the client had discharged him; the client testified she panicked over the attorney’s failure to perform certain and believed she may have an injury caused by www.ohiobar.org the attorney; and the client gave the attorney a check and told him that his services were no longer required.30 However, where a client expresses dissatisfaction with the attorney, and the attorney attempts to shift the blame to other factors or individuals, the attorney may unwittingly suspend the trigger of the statute of limitations. In McOwen, the client claimed that she was dissatisfied with the lack of progress in her case in the spring or summer 2008.31 However, her attorney replied that her case was proceeding properly, specifically telling her about court hearings, depositions, and continuances. Thus, the court held it was reasonable the client would not have known that the lack of progress was related to the attorney’s malpractice. Instead, the earliest date the client should have been aware of her injury was in August 2008, when she learned her case had been dismissed. Finally, the act of retaining another attorney to file a suit regarding the same subject matter is an affirmative act demonstrating to a reasonable person that the attorney client relationship had ended.32 Once the client has engaged replacement counsel, he or she is presumably aware of the prior attorney’s actions which form the basis of any arguable claim for malpractice. Author bio Lindsey Carr Siegler, Gregory R. Farkas and Christopher C. Koehler, attorneys at Frantz Ward LLP in Cleveland. The authors are all members of the firm’s professional liability practice group. Endnotes 1 See R.C. 2305.11(A). 2 Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & Griswold, 43 Ohio St.3d 54, 55, 538 N.E.2d 398 (1989). 3 FDIC v. Alexander, 78 F.3d 1103, 1110 (6th Cir.1996) (internal citation and quotation omitted). 4 Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. Smith, 38 Ohio St.3d 385, 388, 528 N.E.2d 941 (1988). 5 See Ruf v. Belfance, 9th Dist. Summit No. 26297, 2013-Ohio-160, ¶ 17 (the client’s actions unequivocally terminated the relationship; “the fact that [the attorney] did not know that [the client] had terminated the relationship and continued to do work for her is not dispositive”). 6 Merkosky v. Wilson, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2008-L017, 2008-Ohio-3252, ¶ 24. 7 Brown v. Johnstone, 5 Ohio App.3d 165, 166167, 450 N.E.2d 693 (9th Dist. 1982). 8 Ruf at 19. 9 Scherer v. Wiles, S.D.Ohio No. 2:12-cv-1101, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121970, *5-7 (Sept. 2, 2014). 10 McOwen v. Zena, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 11 MA 58, 2012-Ohio-4568, ¶ 21-22. 11 See Duvall v. Manning, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2010-L-069, 2011-Ohio-2587, ¶ 11, 29; and Cook v. Caruso, 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-05-1208, 2006-Ohio-1982, ¶ 9, 28. 12 Brautigam v. Damon, S.D.Ohio No. 1:11-cv551, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117962, *15-18 (Aug. 19, 2013). 13 See also Smith v. Conley, 109 Ohio St.3d 141, 2006-Ohio-2035, 846 N.E. 2d 509, ¶ 9 (holding that the existence of an attorney client relationship depends on the intent of the parties, not on the local rules of court that regulate attorney withdrawal). 14 See Daniel v. McKinney, 181 Ohio App.3d 1, 2009-Ohio-690, 907 N.E.2d 787, ¶ 53 (2d Dist.) (“[H]is motion did not purport to be selfexecuting, but looked []to the further action of the trial court … to accomplish the termination of the attorney-client relationship”). 15 See Scherer, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121970 at *5-7 (“A reasonable juror could find that the appointment of new counsel was not the end of the [attorney’s] representation of [the client], but merely [the client’s] choice to hire other attorneys to assist in his representation”). 16 R.E. Holland Excavating, Inc. v. Martin, Browne, Hull & Harper, P.L.L., 162 Ohio App.3d 471, 2005-Ohio-3662, 833 N.E. 2d 1273, ¶ 6 (2d Dist.) 17 Id. at ¶ 14. 18 See, e.g., Chapman v. Basinger, 71 Ohio App.3d 5, 9, 592 N.E. 2d 908 (3d Dist. 1991) (“[S] imply talking to another lawyer will not break a previous attorney-client relationship”). 19 See, e.g., Burzynski v. Bradley & Bradley & Farris Co., L.P.A., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 01AP-782, 2001-Ohio-8846, *4 (Dec. 31, 2001). 20 Disabato v. Thomas M. Tyack & Assocs. Co., L.P.A., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 98AP-1282, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 4212, *3 (Sept. 14, 1999). 21 Capital City Energy Grp., Inc. v. Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, 975 F. Supp.2d 842 (S.D.Ohio 2013). 22 Id. at 853-54. 23 Antioch Litig. Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLP (“Antioch I”), 738 F. Supp.2d 758, 779 (S.D.Ohio 2010). 24 Antioch Litig. Trust v. McDermott Will & Emery LLP, S.D.Ohio No. 3:09-cv-218, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46779, *7 (April 1, 2013). 25 Spencer v. McGill, 87 Ohio App.3d 267, 278, 622 N.E.2d 7, (8th Dist. 1993). 26 Flowers v. Walker, 63 Ohio St.3d 546, 549, 589 N.E.2d 1284 (1992). 27 Conley, 109 Ohio St.3d at ¶ 5 28 Badgett v. Schulman, N.D.Ohio No. 3:12-cv1135, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49535 (Mar. 26, 2014). 29 See Dottore v. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98861, 2014Ohio-25, ¶ 70 (holding the client’s statement they would “explore [their] options going forward,” in the context of other communications, demonstrated the client knew of their purported injury). 30 Getch v. Jeffrey T. Orndorff Co., L.P.A., 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2012-G-3120, 2013-Ohio3973, ¶ 68-70. 31 McOwen, 2012-Ohio-4568 at ¶ 32-33. 32 Va. Homes, Ltd. v. Goldman, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 13AP-1012, 2014-Ohio-1750, ¶ 33. January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 9 10 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org Giving back for the greater good: Pro bono efforts in Ohio by Erin Killeen With dramatic cuts to legal aid and more Ohioans than ever lacking access to adequate legal representation, bar associations around the state are ramping up efforts to provide pro bono services to those who need it most. www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 11 For Ohio’s economically disadvantaged, obtaining legal services can be nearly impossible. Legal aid resources throughout the state have diminished significantly over the last five years, with state and federal funding for Ohio’s two largest legal aid societies reduced to half.1 For this reason, pro bono legal assistance through attorney volunteerism can make a substantial difference in the lives of Ohio citizens. According to Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor, “Lawyers have a professional obligation to support access to justice by providing pro bono legal services to less fortunate Ohioans.”2 In an executive summary of voluntary pro bono reporting for 2013 issued by the Ohio Legal Assistance Foundation, Ohio attorneys reported more than 100,000 hours of pro bono work in 2013, worth an estimated $136 million in legal services.3 Ohio’s major metropolitan bar associations have been essential in this effort. Through the work of their members and staff, these associations have constructed various successful programs and initiatives to help underserved Ohioans gain access to the justice they deserve. Pro bono to help the homeless and preserve the arts The Cleveland Metro Bar Association’s (CMBA) Justice for All Committee serves as an umbrella program for pro bono legal service. The committee promotes multiple programs that offer volunteer opportunities providing legal services to the Cleveland community. “Our community outreach and pro bono programs are done in close collaboration with community partners so we can pool our resources to better leverage our programs to meet the legal needs of those most vulnerable in our community,” says Mary Groth, CMBA director of development and community programs. One such program is the Cleveland Homeless Legal Assistance Program, or CHLAP, a partnership program between the CMBA and the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (NEOCH). Through CHLAP, lawyers have devoted much time and energy to Cleveland’s homeless community. Volunteers help individuals with legal issues including driver’s license reinstatement, credit problems, criminal record expungement, landlord-tenant problems, public benefits and family law.4 Recently, CHLAP has expanded efforts to serve individuals involved in the criminal justice system or returning from prison as they reenter the job market and the community.5 Also under the CMBA’s Justice for All Committee is the Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts program. The VLA invites artists and art organizations in the Greater Cleveland area to submit an application for the chance to receive free legal assistance. The VLA also offers free law-related education programs in partnership with local arts and nonprofit organizations. Program topics include leasing, gallery agreements, sales, and intellectual property. The VLA program’s mission is “to advocate for a strong and vibrant arts community.”6 Serving Ohio’s first responders and their communities Also contributing to the Ohio legal profession’s pro bono success is the Dayton Bar Association, the first organization in the state to partner with the national Wills for Heroes Foundation to provide free wills and other estate planning documents to first responders such as firefighters, police officers, paramedics, and corrections and probation officers. The Dayton Bar Association hosts quarterly events where lawyers provide free legal services to the community’s heroes. Since 2008, volunteer lawyers have served more than 550 first responders in Dayton.7 Ohio is one of 10 states that have adopted the Wills for Heroes program, which was founded in 2001 in response to the September 11 attacks. Since then, Wills for Heroes has provided over 7,000 free estate planning documents to our nation’s first responders.8 Following a Wills for Heroes event in Dayton, one first responder said, “tonight will be the first night in 20-plus years that I’ll go to sleep knowing my family will be taken care if anything happens to me.” First responders are not the only people receiving free legal assistance in Dayton. The Greater Dayton Volunteer Lawyers Project (GDVLP), created in 1988, creates opportunities for lawyers to provide pro bono legal services to individuals in the Dayton area who may otherwise be unable to afford legal help. “Over the 20 years that the GDVLP has been in existence, over 22,000 individuals have been served by the pro bono legal services provided by attorneys in the Greater Miami Valley,” says James W. Kelleher.9 Located at the Dayton Bar Association, the GDVLP has provided over 87,000 hours in civil cases in the Greater Miami Valley, and serves as a complement to the Legal Aid of Western Ohio.10 Pro bono in Ohio’s capital Efforts are underway to increase pro bono work in Central Ohio, as well. The Columbus Bar Association (CBA) created the “Just Take One” initiative in an effort to encourage attorneys to make a difference in their communities. The project reports that 75 percent of low-income Ohioans do not receive the legal help they need.11 Just Take One proposes that one meeting, one letter, one call or one piece of advice from a lawyer can make a significant difference to a low-income person in need of legal help. Just Take One encourages Ohio attorneys to offer pro bono legal services to 12 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org at least one individual or family annually. Attorneys can accomplish this by participating in any of the Columbus Bar’s pro bono programs: Columbus Bar Lawyers for Justice, Columbus Bar Homeless Project, Columbus Bar Military Assistance, and Interfaith Legal Services.12 In addition to the Just Take One program, the Columbus Bar Association’s Lawyers for Justice Program also works with the Franklin County Volunteer Guardian Program—which assists nursing homes by providing court-appointed guardians for their residents—by providing volunteer attorneys to advise the guardians. “The Program provides those in need of legal help with volunteer attorneys who work without pay. The program offers help with issues such as divorces, bankruptcies, and real estate matters, among others. Sylvia, a Toledo resident, turned to the Toledo Pro Bono Legal Services Program for help with her abusive relationship. Sylvia ended her relationship with her abusive boyfriend after he attempted to strangle her. But she still needed help distancing herself from him. Her pro bono attorney helped her obtain a civil protection order to keep her ex-boyfriend away. Sylvia says the Pro Bono Legal Services Program gave her not only a legal protection order, but also confidence. The Supreme Court of Ohio presented several aspirational ideals for Ohio lawyers, among which is this commitment: To help provide the pro bono representation that is necessary to make our system of justice available to all, and to support organizations that provide pro bono. Ohio lawyers live this ideal, providing countless hours of pro bono service to Ohioans in need. -OSBA President Martin E. Mohler Volunteer Guardianship Program has 26 volunteer attorneys and has referred 15 cases in 2014. As structured by the CBA, each attorney take on at least two cases per year,” explains She’lia Bolding, the CBA pro bono coordinator. The attorneys work with the guardians in their process of becoming legal guardians for the elderly wards. Volunteer attorneys must accept up to two court appointments per year, with each appointment requiring about 4-5 hours of pro bono service.13 Volunteer attorneys consult the volunteer guardians on legal issues concerning the ward and also work with guardians once the ward passes away. This program has made a positive impact on the low-income elderly community in Franklin County by helping them gain access to guardians and a strong legal support system. Providing legal services to those in need Also involved in the pro bono effort is the Toledo Bar Association, which offers a way for low-income individuals to obtain legal services. The Pro Bono Legal Services www.ohiobar.org “Someone actually understood what I was going through and got me what I needed right away.”14 Law-firm and corporate pro bono for the poor In the Greater Cincinnati area, law firms and large corporations alike contribute their services to the Volunteer Lawyers for the Poor Foundation, typically known as the Volunteer Lawyers Project (VLP). The VLP was created over 30 years ago when the Legal Aid Society of Greater Cincinnati and the Cincinnati Bar Association joined forces to support attorneys who wish to provide pro bono services.15 Legal Aid screens the clients served by VLP attorneys and provides training to the volunteers. VLP attorneys have provided aid to thousands of low income individuals in the past 30 years. In 2013 and 2014, corporations General Electric and Proctor & Gamble, as well as the law firms Montgomery Rennie & Johnson, Taft Stettinus & Hollister, and Frost Brown Todd, among others, contributed time and energy to clients referred by the VLP and made a significant difference in their lives through free legal support. Ginny Conlan Whitman, a writer for the Cincinnati Bar Association, states, “The dynamic energy behind all of these efforts has resulted in more and better legal service to the individuals in our community who need it the most.”16 Making an impact While many people in Ohio still are unable to afford legal assistance, our state’s metropolitan bar associations and legal professionals as a whole have made a substantial positive impact on Ohio communities. Each pro bono program has united those seeking legal help with those able to give it, and as each program continues its work, more and more Ohioans can access the legal services they deserve. Author bio Erin Killeen is a former intern in the Publications Department at the Ohio State Bar Association. Endnotes 1 Ison, J. (2014, September 22), “Legal help shrinking for those in poverty.” Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 2 Chief Justice Maureen O. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 3 Voluntary Pro Bono Reporting for Calendar Year 2013 Executive Summary. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 4 Cleveland Homeless Legal Assistance Program. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 5 Cleveland Homeless Legal Assistance Program. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 6 Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 7 Wills For Heroes - Dayton Bar Association. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 8 http://www.willsforheroes.org/history.htm 9 Greater Dayton Volunteer Lawyers. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 10 Greater Dayton Volunteer Lawyers. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 11 Greater Dayton Volunteer Lawyers. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 12 Just-Take-One. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov.11, 2014. 13 Guardian. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 14 Pro Bono Legal Services Program - Toledo Bar Association. (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014. 15 Whitman, G. (2014, Sept.1). “Volunteer Lawyers Project Helps Make the Legal System Fair for Everyone.” CBA Report, 19-21. 16 Whitman, G. (2014, Sept. 1). “Volunteer Lawyers Project Helps Make the Legal System Fair for Everyone.” CBA Report, 19-21. January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 13 Member Spotlight Series Joseph Cirigliano by Nina Corbut For more than 60 years, Lorain County’s own Joe Cirigliano has been an invaluable member of Ohio’s legal profession. He sat down with Ohio Lawyer to talk about his community, his career and his continuing passion for the law. (This article is the first in a series of conversations profiling the lives, achievements and legacies of some of the OSBA’s most distinguished members. For more information on our Member Spotlight Series or to suggest an OSBA member for possible inclusion, please visit www.ohiobar.org/ memberspotlight.) At 90 years old, Lorain County lawyer Joseph Cirigliano is still going strong. A wellmannered professional and a gentleman, Joe is well-spoken and proud of his profession. His past service to the bar includes time spent on the Ohio State Bar Association Board of Governors and the Ohio Lawyer Board of Editors. He has also dedicated his time to several other professional and civic affiliations, including more than 32 years of community service to the Lorain County Community College. In August, the Lorain County Community College celebrated the lifelong generosity of Joe and his wife, Beverly, with the dedication of the Judge Joseph and Beverly Cirigliano Studio Theatre. In an interview that took place in the theater named after him, Joe generously took the time to talk to the OSBA about why he became an attorney, his experience as an lawyer and a judge, his friendship with Jack Nicklaus, and the key to a long, fulfilled life. 14 Ohio Lawyer When did you know you wanted to be an attorney? My folks had come to America from Italy, and they wanted to buy a piece of property. I must’ve been five or six years old at the time. A realtor called, and Mom and Pop and I went to look at a house. My father liked the house, and my mother fell in love with the house. This was on a weekend, and she told the realtor she would see her on Monday. On Monday the realtor called and said, “I’m sorry. I sold the house to someone else.” My mother was very disappointed and so was my dad and I said to myself, “You know. That wasn’t right. Something should be done about that. They’re taking advantage of the foreigners that have just come to this country. I’m going to try to do something about that. I’m going to become a lawyer.” And that was my path. From that point on, that’s all I ever wanted to be. All you needed was a proper legal education. Where did you go to school, and what led you to the law? Education was very big with Mom and Dad. They always said to me “you have to get an education.” They drilled that into me. January/February 2015 My dad used to say to me: “What they put in your head nobody can take.” I started at Baldwin-Wallace after high school. World War II came along, and on April 19, 1943, I dropped out of school and went into the Marine Corps. On Dec. 26, 1945, I was discharged from the Marine Corps and went back to Baldwin-Wallace. I finished there, and in 1949, I went into law school. I finished law school in 1952, and I’ve been at it ever since. You’ve been “at it” as a judge for much of your professional life. How did you come to serve on the bench, and when/why did you stop? I was elected to the Lorain County Common Pleas Court, and was re-elected six years later. During the time that I was a common pleas judge, Dick Celeste was the governor. There was going to be a vacancy in the Ninth District Court of Appeals, headquartered in Akron. A magnificent human being and a great judge, Ed Mahoney was going to retire. Some people decided I would be a good replacement there. Eventually I was appointed by the governor to the Ninth District Court of Appeals. After a couple years, I had to run for re-election, and I lost to a young lady named Debby www.ohiobar.org www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 15 Cook who in my opinion slaughtered me in the election. After I left the Court of Appeals, I started to do judging on a visiting basis. The Chief Justice would appoint me to various counties in the state of Ohio to try certain cases, none of which were easy. I did that until I was 82 years old. “Beverly has been my support. Whenever things don’t go right, she is there to help right the ship.” After I left the judiciary, I went to work with a law firm that I’m affiliated with, Wickens Herzer Panza Cook and Batista. I did some work with them before I went on the bench. They are all good lawyers, and I have been with them since. You’re good friends with Jack Nicklaus. How did you two come to know one another? I used to be a member of Muirfield Village in Columbus. I met Jack there. His locker was three down from mine. We got to be acquaintances. His children went to a school in Palm Beach called the Benjamin School, which is a private school. He used to invite members of Muirfield to Palm Beach to play in a golf tournament to raise money for the Benjamin School. One of my closest friends was also a member there by the name of Art Meyers. Art said to me “Why don’t we go?” I said “how much?” And, well, it wasn’t inexpensive. Let’s put it that way. But we went and we had the opportunity to play with Jack Nicklaus, who’s an unbelievable human being, really. This tournament went on for years, and I went every year and played with Jack, and we got to be good friends. He’d have us over for dinner with him and Barbara and the kids, and occasionally we would go to his house for breakfast. We developed a good relationship. Lorain County Community College came up with the idea to have a golf tournament to raise money for the foundation. I thought that was a great idea. I told them, “Go ahead.” And they said, “Well we’d like you to get somebody to come in,” and I said “Ok, who do you want?” And they said, “We want Jack Nicklaus.” I said, “You know that is going to be a very, very heavy tab,” and the school said “Well, we will pay it.” I talked to Jack that night about having this golf tournament for the Lorain County Community College and during the course of the conversation I told him that we would pay his fee, whatever it was, his expenses, whatever it was. I told him we were going to call it the Jack Nicklaus Scholarship Fund. So he called me back in a couple of weeks and told me he would do it. We ultimately had the tournament at Spring Valley 16 Ohio Lawyer Country Club, on a Wednesday, because that was the only time he could do it. He came up in his jet, and stayed at my house the night before. Beverly fixed a nice Italian dinner for him. And this is cute, I think. His secretary called and told me that Jack was on a diet and was supposed to be watching what he eats. That didn’t mean anything to me or my wife because she put on this Italian feast, and, I swear, Jack went through that feast like he’d never eaten before. We talked about a lot of things that night, including the fee. He said “There’s no fee. I’m doing this for the college. I have my own jet, and you don’t have to pay any expenses. Everything that you make will go to the college.” The next morning we put on a beautiful event at Spring Valley, played a nice round of golf with four people who each paid $5,000 to play golf with Jack Nicklaus. He was most gracious, signed autographs for anybody and everybody, had his picture taken with anyone who wanted a picture. We’ve had the tournament every year now for a long time. January/February 2015 We’ve had some of the best golfers in the world come to the event, including Chi Chi Rodriguez, Ken Venturi, Greg Norman, Jan Stephenson, Phil Mickelson and a whole list of others. The tournament has been a success, thanks to Jack. We are truly indebted to him. He’s been a marvelous human being, not only for the college, but also for the world in general. He and Barbara have done wonderful things, and I’m sure much of the world will never know about the wonderful things they’ve done for their own community and other communities. The Jack Nicklaus Scholarship Fund has raised more than $1 million for Lorain County Community College students, which is not bad. How honored were you when the Lorain Community College named its new theater after you and your wife Beverly? I am very honored that this school would name part of its institution after us. I’m very www.ohiobar.org proud of that. It’s an honor that will last as long as this school will last, and I expect this school will last a long, long time because of what it’s doing in the community, what it’s done in the community and what it will do in the future. That’s an honor that’s over my head. What I did and what I’ve done for this college I will continue to do for this college. This was the farthest thing from my mind. I didn’t do it for honor. I did it because I thought it should be done. I’m a good citizen in the community. I think any good citizen in this community should support this institution for what it’s done for the community. And am I pleased? Yes. My ego says, gee, that’s a wonderful thing for me and my wife because it’s named after the two of us. It’s not just Joe Cirigliano. It’s “Joe and Beverly Cirigliano,” and I’m proud of that. I’m proud that the college recognizes her in this manner too because, without her support, I wouldn’t be on the college board. You recently turned 90 years old. In your opinion, what’s the key to living a long productive life? Having a good family—a family that believes in each other. A good relationship with your friends. Friends play an important part in a person’s life. And eventually of course, a wife who you can rely on and who supports you. Beverly and I will be married 53 years in December. She has always stuck by me no matter what, and there have been some challenges in my career as a judge. There has been some publicity that wasn’t favorable. Apparently, I’m a newsmaker. And sometimes the news I make isn’t good. But be that as it may, Beverly has been my support. Whenever things don’t go right, she is there to help right the ship. a writer. He has a lot of talent. I wish I had that talent because then I could do some writing, but maybe I could dictate to him and he could be my writer. We’ll see how that goes in the future. Speaking of the future, what’s next for Joe Cirigliano? I really have an obligation to this community and the people of this community. This little Italian boy came from nothing. This community has kind of embraced me, and I really feel for this community. Lorain County is a wonderful place to live and we’ve gone through a hell of a lot because of the recession and the change in the industry of Ohio. So I’m here to do what I can to help the community, and I’m here to do what I can to help my profession. And I’m proud of my profession. I’ve enjoyed the practice of law. I think the practice of law prepares you for most anything at all. It’s a place where man can do something for other people. The law is a profession where lawyers can assist everybody else. It’s truly a remarkable profession in that way. Author bio Nina Corbut is publications director for the Ohio State Bar Association and editor of Ohio Lawyer. “I’m here to do what I can to help the community, and I’m here to do what I can to help my profession.” She has a favorite quote. Whenever I would get a big head, she would say to me: “You know, your initials may be JC, but you cannot walk on water.” And that would immediately cut me down to where I deserved to be. And I’ve never forgotten about that, and neither has she. She still reminds me of that on occasion. I have a couple of children. I have a son who is a college professor. I have a daughter who is retired from American Airlines. And I have a couple of grandkids. One of my grandsons is working on a Ph.D. now. I think he wants to be a forensic anthropologist. One of my other grandsons will have his masters this year. He wants to be a writer and a teacher. And I understand from his teachers that he’s very well-suited to become www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 17 Inside OSBA Winter 2015 OSBA committee and section meetings coming soon Ohio State Bar Association members are invited to attend their winter committee and section meetings. For a full schedule with locations, meeting times and dates for each OSBA committee and section meeting, visit www.ohiobar.org/wintermeetings. For additional information, please contact Melissa Quick at [email protected] or (614) 487-4411. Section councils seeking new members Call for articles Ohio Lawyer is seeking submissions of feature articles and “Did You Know,” “In My Opinion,” “Beyond the Courtroom,” “Practice Tips” and other items for publication in upcoming issues. Please see the Ohio Lawyer Editorial Policy, located at www.ohiobar.org/editorialpolicy, before submitting. Several Ohio State Bar Association sections are seeking to fill council vacancies. Each section is governed by a council, which meets several times a year to discuss and implement programs and events to further the work of the section and to serve its members. Council members are appointed by the Association president upon recommendation of the section council or by a member of the Board of Governors. If you are interested in being considered for an appointment to a section council listed below or to learn more about the work of a particular section, please send a note of interest and your résumé to Melissa Quick, committee, section and certification services manager, at [email protected] by Jan. 13, 2015. • Antitrust Law • Corporate Counsel • Intellectual Property Law • Labor and Employment Law • Litigation • Real Property Law • Senior Lawyers • Solo, Small Firms and General Practice • Young Lawyers • Women in the Profession Landex Research, Inc. PROBATE RESEARCH Missing and Unknown Heirs Located No Expense to the Estate Domestic and International Service for: Courts Lawyers Trust Officers Administrators/Executors 1345 Wiley Road, Suite 121, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 Telephone: 847-519-3600 Fax: 800-946-6990 Toll-free: 800-844-6778 www.landexresearch.com 18 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 19 Is your case good law? Don’t pay to find out. Membership in the OSBA now includes free access to CaseCheck+, Casemaker’s negative citator system that rivals Shepard’s® and KeyCite®. Previously available only by subscription, Casecheck+ allows you to quickly determine if your case is good law. Not a member? What are you waiting for? Access to CaseCheck+ alone pays for your membership dues. ohiobar.org/casemaker ohio state bar asso ciation 20 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 Casemaker ® T H E LEADER IN LEGAL RESEAR C H ™ www.ohiobar.org Foundation News OSBF honors excellence in the profession systematically changing Ohio’s sex trade laws and practices, AO helps victims escape their traffickers, navigate a complex legal system, and secure services to prepare for a new future. AO’s compassionate advocacy approach has become a recognized model for providing a voice for victims often unseen and unheard. Award recipients: Bruce Heary, Carter E. Strang, Megan Mattimoe and Patrick J. Perotti The Ohio State Bar Foundation held its Annual Meeting and Awards Dinner Nov. 7 to honor those individuals and organizations whose deliberate good deeds reflect the integrity, ethics, and service of all legal professionals. The Community Service Award for Attorneys 40 and Under Lopez’s classic work-Rebellious Lawyering-changed the way Angela Wu approached law. Returning to her hometown of Oberlin after law school, she established Oberlin Street Law, a nonprofit that engaged high school and college students in solving community problems. Creating projects to address issues of race, class, and crime within the community, she taught students that those who have great talents and resources must focus their efforts on those who don’t. She also took “street law philosophy” into classes she taught at both Oberlin College and her former high school, stressing the law’s obligation to change the human condition. President Stephen F. Tilson, Tom Wu accepting award on behalf of Angela Wu and OSBF Trustee C. Lynne Day Ritter Award Patrick J. Perotti, partner at Dworken & Bernstein, received the Foundation’s highest honor. As a class action litigator, Perotti settles cases using cy pres so that unclaimed money isn’t returned to the wrongdoer. Instead, he has channeled over $25 million dollars to Ohio charities doing vital community service. Perotti states, “We, as lawyers, should use our talents to do what is good for all of us.” His organization-Ohio Lawyers Give Back-continues to spearhead greater use of cy pres to provide more hope to those in need. The Ramey Award for Distinguished Community Service Carter E. Strang, as a litigator with Tucker Ellis, lessens the divide between what needs to be done and what actually is. As president of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar in 2012-13, he created the Louis Stokes Scholars Program, a diversity pipeline program that connects the legal community with underrepresented minorities and low income students in long-term mentorships. He also co-authored the curriculum for the Cleveland Bar’s award winning 3Rs program for law-based public school classroom instruction. Being actively involved with the mock trial program, Cleveland’s Citizens Legal Academy, and the Cleveland Bar’s Green Initiative, Strang continues to make a difference for others. When you honor, celebrate or recognize the significant people in your life with a tax-deductible gift to the OSBF, you support outreach, education and justice. 100% of your tribute gift supports statewide OSBF grants. Dedicate your gift today at OSBF.net “Donate Now” or call (614) 487-4477. IN HONOR OF IN MEMORY OF Outstanding Program Award Cleveland’s Louis Stokes Scholars Program engages underrepresented minorities to consider law as a profession. The Cleveland Metropolitan Bar provides minority college students with summer internships, program activities, and on-going support in college and in law school. This past summer 17 college students joined the third class of Stokes Scholars as the program continues to fulfill its goal of “Changing Lives, One Student at a Time.” OSBF President Stephen F. Tilson Velda K. Hofacker Louis E. Tracy David A. Ward Eileen Pruett Outstanding Organization Award AO: Advocating Opportunity is an outreach program guiding youth victims of human trafficking through the arduous process of prosecuting their traffickers while training attorneys, law enforcement, and other professionals on human trafficking issues. By Angela Wu Judge and Mrs. James Miraldi www.ohiobar.org HONOR. REMEMBER. CELEBRATE. Denny L. Ramey Hon. William H. Harsha Carole S. Dougherty Ronald W. Dougherty William K. Weisenberg John A. Carnahan January/February 2015 Loretta Weisensell Carmen V. Roberto Ohio Lawyer 21 Did You Know? Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is critical protection by Mark Kitrick and Sean Harris Purchasing uninsured and underinsured motorist (UM/UDM) coverage is a critical way to protect loved ones and yourself. It applies when you or a family member are a driver, a passenger in your or another car, or on a bicycle, or even walking as a pedestrian and if you or a family member are hurt or killed by another motor vehicle. If the person causing the incident either has no insurance or inadequate insurance, then you need UM/UDM coverage through your own automobile carrier. What amounts should you purchase? It is highly advisable that you purchase UM/UDM coverage in at least the same amounts as your liability coverage. Liability coverage applies if you or a family member are at fault (liable) and cause harm or damages to others. At one time, insurance agents were required to offer UM/UDM coverage in the same amounts as your liability coverage; and if you rejected it or chose lesser amounts, then the rejection or reduction had to be in writing. 22 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 In other words, the agent needed to inform the client so that the client armed with this knowledge could better decide what to do. Those days are gone. An agent generally does not need to educate a client in this manner. Consequently, many consumers do not even know what this coverage is. Know the actual amounts Second, many people believe they have “full coverage” but do not know the actual amounts. Full coverage can be akin to wearing shorts and a T-shirt versus donning full body armor. Unfortunately, in rural areas, for example, over 15-20 percent of drivers have no insurance and many others have no more than Ohio’s minimum liability coverage which is now $25,000-$50,000. What is the right coverage given these realties? To illustrate, let us assume you have purchased 100/300 in liability and 100/300 UM coverage, and you are hurt by an under- www.ohiobar.org insured motorist who only has Ohio’s minimum coverage. If you have $50,000 in owed medical bills (to providers or to your health insurance company that wants its money back-this is called “subrogation”), have a significant injury, and you evaluate your claim at least at $100,000, the most you can obtain from the defendant is $25,000. That means you have to make a UDM claim for the $75,000 difference. What is important to understand is you cannot “stack” your UM coverage on top of the defendant’s $100,000 (per person) to get $125,000. Total coverage We strongly urge purchasing umbrella coverage for both liability and UM/UDM coverage. This is another layer of coverage above and beyond your underlying coverage. To illustrate, if someone has $300,000-$500,000 in UM/ UDM coverage and is hurt badly or killed by a drunk driver with little or no insurance, one can made a claim for the $300,000—this is the per person limit—and then the umbrella exists to provide an additional $1 million in coverage, meaning there is a total of $1.3 million available for a single person. An umbrella opens at $1 million. Author bios Mark Kitrick is the senior partner with Kitrick, Lewis & Harris Co., L.P.A. in Columbus. Over the last 33 years Mark has handled complex injury and death cases, aviation crashes and consumer class actions. He is past president of the Ohio Association for Justice and the Central Ohio Association for Justice, and he is Budget Chair for AAJ, formerly ATLA. Mark is a long-time member of the OSBA and serves on the OSBF Grant Committee. Sean Harris is a partner with Kitrick, Lewis, & Harris, Co. LPA in Columbus, where he practices in the areas of wrongful death, product liability and personal injury. He grew up in Maumee, Ohio. He attended Ohio Wesleyan University and The Ohio State University College of Law. Sean currently serves as president of the Central Ohio Association for justice. There can be several negative concerns. Many insurance companies offer umbrella coverage for liability coverage, but a few, like State Farm, no longer offer an umbrella for UM/ UDM coverage. Also, if you are riding in a Car2Go or a similar vehicle that is considered a “shared auto,” you will have limited liability coverage and minimum UM coverage (in Ohio) through that auto’s coverage, and most importantly and surprisingly, your UM/UDM policy likely will not protect you at all because coverage here is excluded. Forensic Psychiatry PLLC You should immediately review your policies with your agent and ascertain the answers to this checklist: Providing Psychiatric & Neuropsychiatric Expertise To The Legal Community • Do I have adequate liability coverage? If not, do I have personal exposure? Said differently, can someone come after my assets and income because I did not purchase sufficient insurance? • Do I have UM/UDM coverage and, if so, how much do I have and should I increase the amounts? Reviewing with your agent your combined family incomes, assets, your budget and other needs and concerns should allow you to engage in excellent decision making. Remember, the UM/UDM limits should be equal to your liability coverage. • Do I have umbrella coverage? Is it for liability and UM/ UDM coverage? You need both. Are the amounts sufficient? You should assume over time that you or a family member are severely injured by someone with no car insurance and thus you or they cannot earn an income, or are disabled, or need part or full time care. In other words, assume that your life is no longer as it was. You want the umbrella to compensate you for all losses including major future medical care and pain and suffering. www.ohiobar.org • • • • • Bobby A. Miller MD Board Certified Forensic Psychiatrist Board Certified Neuropsychiatrist Board Certified Psychiatrist Residency Trained Neurologist Director of Forensic Services at Mildred Mitchell-Bateman Hospital & River Park Hospital Forensic Fellowship Trained with 30 years of clinical experience TYPES OF SERVICES Brain Injury · Civil Competency · Criminal Competency Emotional Damages · Employment Dispute · Fitness for Duty Independent Medical Evaluation · Medical Malpractice Quality of Parenting · Litigation Support Services Sex Offender · Will Contest · Workers’ Compensation Psychological & Neuropsychological Testing Licensed to Practice Medicine in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky and Pennsylvania. 919 Sixth Avenue Huntington WV 25701 Office: 304-781-0228 Fax: 304-781-0229 Email: [email protected] Web Site: bobbymillermd.com January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 23 Counsel Comments Potpourri by Eugene P. Whetzel While illegal—or formerly illegal—drugs are not on my list of interests, several recent opinions from other states have illustrated some of the issues that may arise if Ohio legalizes marijuana use. More than 20 states have authorized the use of marijuana for medical purposes and some have, under state law, decriminalized its use for recreational purposes. Ohio, of course, is not one of these states. crime. However, even if lawful, such use does not absolve the lawyer from the duty of providing competent representation. A different result, however, was reached concerning Colorado judges. The Colorado Supreme Court’s Judicial Ethics Advisory Board found that Rule 1.1 (a judge will comply with the law) prohibits a judge from using marijuana for either medicinal or recreational purposes. Colorado is one of the states that permits both recreational and medicinal use of marijuana. One issue presented by this action was how lawyers should counsel marijuana industry clients. Colorado’s approach was to approve a comment to Rule 1.2 clarifying that the lawyer may advise the client on state law, provided that the lawyer also advises the client on related federal law and policy. North Dakota Marijuana use has not been legalized in North Dakota, and the North Dakota State Bar Association Ethics Committee recently addressed the issue of a North Dakota lawyer using medical marijuana in a state, specifically Minnesota, where such use is lawful. The committee opined that use of marijuana in a state where it is legal nonetheless contravenes North Dakota Rule 8.4. The analysis was relatively straightforward. Purchase, possession, or ingestion of marijuana in Minnesota constitutes a violation of federal law and the attorney would be engaging in a pattern of repeated offenses indicating an indifference to legal obligations. Colorado In 2013, the Colorado Bar ethics committee concluded that a lawyer’s recreational use of marijuana does not necessarily violate Rule 8.4(b), despite the fact that such use may constitute a federal 24 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org To paraphrase a familiar advertisement, what happens in Minnesota, at least for North Dakota, does not stay in Minnesota. Scams Although I have commented on this before, a recent case out of North Carolina led me to at least briefly revisit the topic.1 Ms. Mako was admitted to the North Carolina Bar in 1988. She was responsible for the management of her firm’s trust account. In 2011, the firm received an email from “Oliver Burkeman” soliciting representation in collecting a $350,000 settlement from a former employer. Shortly after undertaking the representation, the firm received a “cashier’s check” for $175,000 from the supposed former employer. The check was deposited in the firm’s trust account, and the next day $35,000 was paid to the firm’s operating account and $140,000 wired to an overseas account. On July 14, 2011, a second “check” for $175,000 was received and the same disbursement procedures followed, except that the $35,000 was distributed to Ms. Mako. On July 18, the first check was returned unpaid. Fortunately, the first $140,000 transfer did not go through. Unfortunately, the second did, along with the $70,000 to the firm and Ms. Mako. Mako repaid $35,000 to the firm, leaving a deficit of $175,000 in the trust account. Mako closed her office in May 2013 and returned to Costa Rica. The opinion notes that Ms. Mako had other serious problems, but giving away $175,000 of her legitimate clients’ money topped the list. She was disbarred. Be careful what you say Clients almost universally want their lawyer’s “take” on two things: how likely it is that they will win and how much they will receive. In Burds v. Hipes, a client was unable to interest any lawyers in representing him on a contingent fee basis.2 So, he retained Jeanne Hipes on an hourly fee basis.3 The client asked Ms. Hipes for a “preliminary opinion” to provide him with a “clear understanding of the value of the case.” The lawyer provided it. The result was probably predictable, and the client sued the lawyer for, among other things, fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. Ultimately, the client’s suit was dismissed and the dismissal was upheld by the court of appeals. However, this outcome was not foreordained. If a client seeks a preliminary opinion, assure that it is just that-an opinion. For example, Ms. Hipes couched her opinion with numerous qualifications that highlighted the extent of the uncertainty of her preliminary opinion. Finally, in my view, at least, if the lawyer believes that the case is unwinnable, decline the representation. • The engagement letter should be about more than fees and billing. One nagging issue is closed client files. Address their disposition in the engagement letter. The files are the client’s property and 40 years from now it would probably be good if he didn’t have to call my successor to ask what he should do with client files from 2015. • Ask your client to inform you in writing if there might be any insurance to cover a claim. • Arrange for a surrogate to protect your clients in case you are injured or disabled. Clearly, these ideas are far from exhaustive and there is much more and better guidance that he will receive from the volunteer leaders. Service to others The law was never a simple profession, and it is becoming increasingly complex. These tidbits simply illustrate the need for vigilance in all of our legal endeavors. Eugene P. Whetzel is the general counsel for the Ohio State Bar Association. Endnotes 1 The North Carolina State Bar v. Sue E. Mako (13DHC33, July 2014). 2 No. A14A1366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, Third Division, Sept. 23, 2014). 3 At trial, the client argued that Ms. Hipes knew the case could not succeed and should not have taken it on an hourly-fee basis. OHIO CHAPTER Check preferred available dates or schedule appointments online directly with Ohio’s top-rated neutrals This service is free, funded by our Ohio members Young lawyers I recently had a very pleasant meeting with a young lawyer interested in starting his own practice. Below are some of the ideas we discussed. Fortunately, there are OSBA volunteer leaders who were willing to share their expertise and experience with him, so he was able to receive more germane guidance than I was able to provide. I did suggest several of the following ideas to him: • Review OfficeKeeper. • Engage in committee and section work. • It is okay to decline to represent someone. www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 25 Books & Bytes Connect, advance and succeed with ohiobar.org Check out the Ohio State Bar Association’s new mobile-friendly website! Now you can view the OSBA site anywhere (on your desktop, tablet or phone) to connect to the resources that advance your career. Members can log in today to: Expand your practice knowledge • Conduct legal research; • Get practice tips from a library of practice tools; • Stay current on cases and statutory changes in your practice areas; and • Take online CLE courses. Expand your network and influence • Look for jobs; • Connect with other members; • Join discussions with other legal professionals; and • Get involved with current OSBA legislative efforts. Please note that you will need to enter your log-in credentials once you enter a member-only area of the site. For help, please visit the Login Help page, or call the OSBA Member Service Center at (800) 232-7124 or (614) 487-8585. Let us know what you think. Your feedback helps us determine how to best present our members with useful information that contributes to their personal and professional advancement. Send us an email at [email protected]. Compiled by Andrew Hartzell On ThewithBooks Todd Book The On The Books video series focuses on the latest legislative news from the VIDEO SERIES Ohio Statehouse, brought to you by OSBA Director of Policy and Government Affairs Todd Book. ohiobar.org/onthebooks @OSBA facebook.com/ohiobar youtube.com/ohiobar . 26 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org Member News Chardon In Memoriam Judge Timothy J. Grendell was elected to the Ohio Association of Probate Judges Executive Committee. Stephen Cohen, 80 Cincinnati Jan. 25, 2013 Wayne M. Leatherman, 91 Perrysburg April 26, 2013 Ronald K. Bennington, 77 Canton Aug. 12, 2013 William D. Kloss, 82 Upper Arlington Nov. 22, 2013 Stanley B. Wiener, 85 Cleveland Cincinnati Robert (Bob) Buechner has co-founded Champions for Urban Youth, a partnership with Cincinnati Youth Collaborative. 2013 Dec. 28, 2013 2014 Judge Lynn B. Griffith Jr., 86 Warren March 9, 2014 Jack Supman, 93 Lancaster March 24, 2014 Forrest H. Bacon, 89 Upper Sandusky May 10, 2014 James R. Greene III, 55 Dayton May 28, 2014 Richard Fry, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, has been elected to the Board of Directors Marketing Committee of the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Western Reserve. Ester Delores Harber, 66 Columbus May 31, 2014 Geoffrey M. Miller, 38 Cincinnati June 4, 2014 Carter Strang, Tucker Ellis LLP partner, has been named to the Board of Directors of the Center for Community Solutions and received the 2014 Distinguished Alumni Award from the Kent State University Alumni Association. Charles R. Finney, 91 Kettering June 6, 2014 Louis S. Nyerges, 90 Cleveland Aug. 19, 2014 Joseph R. Prohaska, 84 Columbus Sept. 7, 2014 Edward I. Gold, 87 Pasadena, CA Sept. 15, 2014 William F. Denkewalter, 45 Urbana Sept. 17, 2014 David C. Levine, 85 Cleveland Oct. 10, 2014 Jonathan K. Miller, 57 Upper Sandusky Oct. 12, 2014 Robert R. Melnick, 58 Youngstown Richard O. Harris, 88 Mechanicsburg Oct. 27, 2014 Thomas E. Norpell, 94 Newark Oct. 27, 2014 Albert J. Rhoa, 90 Cleveland Nov. 9, 2014 Cleveland Keith Ashmus, Frantz Ward, is a finalist for the National Small Business Association 2014 Lewis Shattuck Small Business Advocate of the Year Award. Melinda Smith Yeargin, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, has been elected to the Mature Services Board of Directors. Columbus Stephen Chappelear has been named the new president of The Ohio State University Men’s Varsity “O”Alumni Association. Jane Higgins Marx, Carlile Patchen & Murphy, has been appointed to the newly created Franklin County Guardianship Service Board. www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Oct. 19, 2014 Ohio Lawyer 27 Member Benefits Get the most out of your OSBA membership Your membership at the Ohio State Bar Association connects you to Ohio’s largest network of legal professionals and resources. Our mission is to provide you with the services and experiences that advance you toward your personal and professional goals, and help you succeed on your own terms. The OSBA can help you: • Prepare your next brief with Casemaker®, our free-to-members online legal research tool; • Take advantage of member discounts on our wide variety of CLE programs designed to fit your particular needs and schedule; • Ease stress on your practice and your wallet with our vendor discount programs; • Stay current on cases, statutory changes and emerging legal trends with publications such as the Ohio State Bar Association Report, Ohio Lawyer and section newsletters; • Get practice tips from a library of practice tools whenever you need them on our mobile-friendly website; • Stand out from the crowd with specialty certification and the OSBA Bar College; and • Expand your network and influence with our committees, sections and government affairs program. By taking advantage of just a few of these services each year, you will realize the full value of your annual membership. To see all of the services and programs we offer, visit our website at www.ohiobar.org or call our dedicated Member Service Center at (800) 232-7124 or (614) 487-8585. Thank you for your membership. Connect. Advance. Succeed. 28 Ohio Lawyer January/February 2015 www.ohiobar.org CLE Calendar To register or for more information, call (800) 232-7124 or (614) 487-8585 or visit our website at www.ohiobar.org. Discipline Problems OVI Defense Update Current Issues Under the Ohio Trust Code Contract Drafting VIDEO REPLAY (A.M. Program) 3.5 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. 1/07 – Columbus: OSBA 1/08 – Akron: John S. Knight Center 1/14 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. 1/21 – Perrysburg: Hilton Garden Inn 1/22 – Fairfield: Receptions Conf. Ctr. North VIDEO REPLAY (P.M. Program) 3.0 CLE Credit Hours | Registration: 12:30 p.m. Program: 1 p.m. – 4:15 p.m. 1/07 – Columbus: OSBA 1/08 – Akron: John S. Knight Center 1/14 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. 1/21 – Perrysburg: Hilton Garden Inn 1/22 – Fairfield: Receptions Conf. Ctr. North Last Chance Video Theater 6.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 1/28 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. 1/28 – Columbus: OSBA 1/30 – Akron: John S. Knight Center 1/30 – Fairfield: Receptions Conf. Ctr. North 1/30 – Perrysburg: Hilton Garden Inn VIDEO REPLAY 6.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 2/17 – Columbus: OSBA 2/20 – Akron: John S. Knight Center 2/27 – Fairfield: Receptions Conf. Ctr. North 2/27 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. 2/27 – Perrysburg: Hilton Garden Inn 6.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 2/19 – Columbus: OSBA Live via Simulcast: Cleveland (Cleve. Metro Bar Assn.), Fairfield Legislative Process 6.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 2/26 – Columbus: OSBA Live via Simulcast: Akron, Cleveland (Cleve. Metro Bar Assn.), Fairfield Insurance Staff Counsel 4.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 9:30 a.m. | Program: 10 a.m. – 3:15 p.m. 3/05 – Columbus: OSBA Bankruptcy Fundamentals Supreme Court Year in Review Affordable Health Care Act 2015 Ohio Elder Law Institute – NEW LOCATION VIDEO REPLAY 6.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 2/06 – Columbus: OSBA 2/06 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. 2/11 – Fairfield: Receptions Conf. Ctr. North 2/25 – Akron: John S. Knight Center 2/25 – Perrysburg: Hilton Garden Inn (A.M. Program) 3.0 CLE Credit Hour Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 11:15 a.m. 2/12 – Columbus: OSBA 2/12 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. Nuts and Bolts of Wills and Trusts VIDEO REPLAY 6.0 CLE/NLT Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 2/13 – Columbus: OSBA Live via Simulcast: Akron, Cleveland (Cleveland Metro Bar Assn.), Perrysburg, Fairfield VIDEO REPLAY 6.0 CLE/NLT Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 3/12 – Columbus: OSBA 3/12 – Cleveland: Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. 3/12 – Perrysburg: Hilton Garden Inn 3/13 – Akron: John S. Knight Center 3/13 – Fairfield: Receptions Conf. Ctr. North (2-day program) 12.0 Total CLE Credit Hours 3/19 and 3/20 –Doubletree Columbus-Worthington Day 1: Registration: 8 a.m. Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. Day 2: Registration: 8 a.m. Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. Veteran’s Benefits 6.0 CLE Credit Hours Registration: 8 a.m. | Program: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m. 3/27 – Columbus: OSBA NOTE: Beginning in 2015, unless identified otherwise, the OSBA CLE seminars in Cleveland will be held at the Cleveland Metro Bar Association at 1375 E. 9th St., #2, Cleveland, OH 44114. www.ohiobar.org January/February 2015 Ohio Lawyer 29 Connect with the state’s largest network of legal professionals and resources. Renew your Ohio State Bar Association membership for 2015. The OSBA offers resources that help you succeed at every stage of your legal career—from your first day on the job to the day you retire and close your practice. Join or renew today at ohiobar.org!