Agenda Packet - Calaveras County, California

Transcription

1i i
0.
/~
CALAVERAS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
PRELIMINARY AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 2, 2008
BILL CLAUDINO
STEVE IHLEN SKY I Chair
MERITA CALLAWAY
THOMAS TRYON
RUSSELL THOMAS, V-Chair
DIST.
DIST.
DIST.
DIST.
DIST.
KAREN VARNI,
l
2
ROBERT c. LAWTON
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
3
1
5
JAMES JONES
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUPERVISORS CHAMBERS
COURTS & LEGAL BUILDING
GOVERNMEN'f CENTER
891 MT. RANCH ROAD
SAN ANDREAS, CA 95249
COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK TO THE BOARD
(209) 754-6370
FAX (209) 754-6733
"CALAVERAS COUNTY GOVERNMENT'S MISSION STATEMENT"
The Mission of Calaveras County Government is to provide service, infrastructure, leadership, and vision necessary to advance a safe community, maintain
a high quality of life, while preserving local history and culture, and to
protect personal liberties for all of its citizens.
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WELCOt"ES YOU TO THEIR MEETINGS WHICH ARE SCHEDULED EACH TUESDAY.
YOUR INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION IS ENCOURAGED AND APPRECIATED.
* * *
PLEASE l'URN OFF CELL PHONES IN BOARD CHA~~ER.~S_ _,_·_*_*
IF ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHES TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON AN AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE COME '1'0
THE ROSTRUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME AND YOUR COMMENTS OR QUES'l'IONS.
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO
'IHE SPECIFIC SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION.
TIME LIMITS SHALL BE AT THE DISCRETION OF' THE CHAIR.
0 P E N I N G
9:00 A.M.:
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ANNOUNCEMENTS
C 0 N S E N T
A G E N D A
THEY WILL BE ACTED
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL.
ANY BOARD MEMBER,
STAFF MEMBER OR
UPON BY THE BOARD AT ONE TIME WITHOUT' DISCUSSION.
INTEHESTED PARTY t"AY REQUEST REMOVAL OF AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR LATER DISCUSSION.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
MINUTES of a
Board of Supervisors meetings held on August 12, 2008 and
a meeting held on August 19, 2008 - Board action:
CORRESPONDENCE: August 15-21, 2008 - (see attached) Board action:
MINUTE ORDER authorizing Board Chair to sign a letter of support for a
Sierra Nevada Conservancy grant proposal that will study the viability
of an ecosystems services market to support the economy of Calaveras
County;
Supervisors Wilensky & Callaway - Board action:
EESOLUTION to acknowledge September 2008 as prostate cancer awareness
month in Calaveras County;
Supervisor Wilensky - Board action:
RESOLUTION authorizing additions, deletions and changes to County Fees,
effective October 1, 2008;
Administration - Board action:
(Page 1 of 4)
9/2/2008 AGENDA
C 0 R R E S P 0 N D E N C E
THE BOARD MAY TAKE ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF CORRESPONDENCE:
August 15, 2008
1.
From:
James Irvine Foundation,
re:
annual report;
cc:
Board
2.
From:
CA Chamber of Commerce,
re:
August 8th edition of the ALERT
Newsletter;
Board as addressed
3.
From:
CA Energy Commission,
re: Notice of completion of Draft EIR
regarding Lighting Efficiency Standards;
cc:
Board, Environmental
Health & post
4.
From:
Western Counties Alliance;
re:
Newsletter;
cc:
Board
5.
From:
CSAC,
re:
Legislative bulletin;
cc:
Board
6.
From:
Park & Rec Trades,
re:
periodical;
route to Board
August 18, 2008
7.
From:
CSAC,
re: Annual conference; cc: Board
8.
From:
Darcy Zimmerman,
re:
Flood ordinance concerns;
cc:
Board,
Admin., County Counsel, CDA, Sheriff & Environmental Health
9.
From:
David Davis,
re:
library concerns;
cc:
Board, Admin. &
County Counsel
10.
From:
CA Hispanic Commission,
re:
report on substance abuse;
cc:
Supervisor Wilensky as addressed
11.
From:
Tuolumne Utility Dist.,
re:
Integrated Regional Water Magmt.
Plan Aug 20th meeting agenda;
cc:
Board, Environmental Health, CDA &
post
12.
From:
California Oaks Foundation;
re:
Oak resources & climate
change;
cc:
Board, Admin., County Counsel, CDA, & Environmental
Health
13.
From:
re;
newsletter;
Board as addressed
14.
From:
Mark Twain St. Joseph Hospital,
re:;
2008 Community Report;
Board as addressed
August 19, 2008 No Mail
August 20, 2008
15.
From:
Royal Mtn. King Mine Reclamation,
re:
Sept. 13 open house;
Board as addressed
16.
From:
Sol uri Emrick & Meserve Law Corp.,
re: August 26th Board
agenda item 12 for California Asbestos Monofill;
cc:
Board, Admin.,
County Counsel, Public Works, Environmental Health & CDA
17.
From:
Leslie & Jean Martin, Valley Springs;
re:
Billboards;
cc:
Board, Admin., County Counsel & CDA
Jim Branham, Sierra Nevada Conservancy,
re:
reducing fire
18.
From:
risks;
cc:
Board
(Page 3 of 4)
(J j i
l/'
CALAVERAS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
PRELIMINARY AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 2, 2008
BILL CLAUDINO
STEVE WILENSKY, Chair
MERITA CALLAWAY
THOMAS TRYON
RUSSELL THOMAS, V-Chair
DIST. 1
DIST. 2
DIST. 3
DIST. 4
DIST. 5
KAREN VARNI,
ROBERT c. LAW'l'ON
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
JAMES JONES
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUPERVISORS CHAMBERS
COURTS & LEGAL BUII,OING
GOVERNMEN'r CENTER
891 MT. RANCH ROAD
SAN ANDREAS, CA 95249
COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK TO THE BOARD
(209) 754-6370
FAX (209) 754-6733
"CALAVERAS COUNTY GOVERNMENT'S MISSION STATEMENT"
The Mission of Calaveras County Government .is to provide service, infrastructure, leadership, and vision necessary to advance a safe community, maintain
a high quality of life, while preserving local history and culture, and to
protect personal liberties for all of its citizens.
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VIELCOMES YOU TO THEIR ~1EETINGS \;HICH ARE SCHEDULED EACH TUESDAY.
YOUR INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION IS ENCOURAGED AND APPRECIATED.
'}. · * *
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES IN BOARD CHAMBE00
• R-"S'--'-*-*
IF ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISHES TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON AN AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE COME '1'0
THE ROSTRUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME AND YOUR COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS.
PLEASE J,IMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO
THE SPECIFIC SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION.
'l'IME LIMITS SHALL BE AT THE DISCRETION OF TilE CHAIR.
OPENING
9:00 A.M.:
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ANNOUNCEMENTS
C 0 N S E N T
A G E N D A
THEY WILL BE ACTED
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAl,.
ANY BOARD MEMBER,
STAFF MEMBER OR
UPON BY THE BOARD AT ONE TIME viiTHOUT DISCUSSION.
INTERESTED PARTY MAY REQUEST REMOVAL OF AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR LA1'ER DISCUSSION.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
MINUTES of a
Board of Supervisors meetings held on August 12, 2008 and
a meeting held on August 19, 2008 - Board action:
CORRESPONDENCE:
August 15-21, 2008 - (see attached) Board action:
MINUTE ORDER authorizing Board Chair to sign a letter of support for a
Sierra Nevada Conservancy grant proposal that will study the viability
of an ecosystems services market to support the economy of Calaveras
County;
Supervisors Wilensky & Callaway - Board action:
RESOLUTION to acknowledge September 2008 as prostate cancer awareness
month in Calaveras County;
Supervisor Wilensky - Board action:
RESOLUTION authorizing additions, deletions and changes to County Fees,
effective October 1, 2008;
Administration - Board action:
(Page 1 of 4)
6.
7.
9/2/2008 AGENDA
RESOLUTION accepting as complete all road improvements and authorizing
release of security for Fairway Village Subdivision, TSTM 02-07; Public
Works-Board Action
RESOLUTION approving final map for Big Trees Estates Subdivision, Tract
2003-148; Public Works-Board Action
R E G U L A R
9:10A.M.:
8.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
9:30 A.M.:
AGENDA
5 minutes per person; 15 minutes per topic
BOARD MATTERS/CLOSED SESSION
9.
Review of correspondence, reports and various matters of concern.
10.
CLOSED SESSION: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9: conference
with legal counsel re: existing litigation; Hartsock v. County, Case
No. CV33932; County Counsel; Board action.
10:30 STUDY SESSION
11.
Discussion re:
Parks and Recreation Commission Capita Grant Projects
Proposition
40 Per
(Page 2 of 4)
9/2/2008 AGENDA
C 0 R R E S P 0 N D E N C E
THE BOARD MAY TAKE ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF CORRESPONDENCE:
August 15, 2008
1.
From:
James Irvine Foundation,
re:
annual report;
cc:
Board
2.
From:
re:
Newsletter;
Board as addressed
3.
From:
CA Energy Commission,
re: Notice of completion of Draft EIR
regarding Lighting Efficiency Standards;
cc:
Board, Environmental
Health & post
4.
From:
Western Counties Alliance;
re:
Newsletter;
cc:
Board
5.
From:
CSAC,
re:
Legislative bulletin;
cc:
Board
6.
From:
Park & Rec Trades,
re:
periodical;
route to Board
August 18, 2008
7.
From:
CSAC,
re:
Annual conference;
cc:
Board
8.
From:
Darcy Zimmerman,
re:
Flood ordinance concerns;
cc:
Board,
Admin., County Counsel, CDA, Sheriff & Environmental Health
9.
From:
David Davis,
re:
library concerns;
cc:
Board, Admin. &
County Counsel
10.
From:
CA Hispanic Commission,
re:
report on substance abuse;
cc:
Supervisor Wilensky as addressed
11.
From:
Tuolumne Utility Dist.,
re:
Integrated Regional Water Magmt.
Plan Aug 20th meeting agenda;
cc:
Board, Environmental Health, CDA &
post
12.
From:
California Oaks Foundation;
re:
Oak resources & climate
change;
cc:
Board, Admin., County Counsel, CDA, & Environmental
Health
From:
re;
13.
newsletter;
Board as addressed
From:
Mark Twain St. Joseph Hospital,
re:;
2008 Community Eeport;
14.
Board as addressed
August 19, 2008 No Mail
August 20, 2008
Sept. 13 open house;
15.
From:
Eoyal Mtn. King Mine Reclamation,
re:
Board as addressed
From:
Sol uri Emrick & Meserve Law Corp.,
re: August 26th Board
16.
cc:
Board, Admin.,
agenda i tern 12 for California Asbestos Monofill;
County Counsel, Public Works, Environmental Health & CDA
Leslie & Jean Martin, Valley Springs;
re:
Billboards;
cc:
From:
17.
Board, Admin., County Counsel & CDA
Jim Branham, Sierra Nevada Conservancy,
re:
reducing fire
From:
18.
risks;
cc:
Board
(Page 3 of 4)
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
9/2/2008 AGENDA
From:
Karen Anderson, Copperopolis, re: approval of Lake Tulloch
project;
cc:
Board, Admin., County Counsel, CDA, Public Works,
Environmental Health & Sheriff
From:
CA Dept. of Forestry,
re:
Notice of Intent to Harvest Timber
for Sierra Pacific Industries at Hermit Springs;
cc:
Supervisors
Wilensky & Callaway & Post
From:
State Farm Ins.,
re:
Community Connections newsletter;
cc:
Board
From: Better Roads, re: August periodical;
route to Board
American City & County,
re:
August periodical;
route to
From:
Board
August 21, 2008
24.
25.
26.
From:
CA Administrative Office of the Courts,
re:
youth & elders
poetry in the court system; Board as addressed
From:
Bernadette Abramson, re:
Villa Del Lago revised TVSTM 30 docks
& public access;
cc:
Board, Admin., County Counsel, CDA, Public
Works, Environmental Health & Sheriff
From: CSAC,
Budget Action Bulletin NO. 8;
cc: Board
(Page 4 of 4)
NOTE: ITEM# 3
IS A CONTINUED MATTER FROM THE
s~. D2..0, .:l.Oo ?{
AND NO
MEETING OF
ADDITIONAL INFORMA . ON HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
CALAVERAS COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
891 Mountain Ranch Road
San Andreas, California 95249
(209) 754-6370
FAX (209) 754-6733
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Steve Wilensky, Supervisor District II
DATE:
August 14, 2008
SUBJECT:
Prostate Cancer Awareness Month September 2008
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a resolution acknowledging September 2008 as Prostate Awareness Month.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this report is to request a resolution declaring September 2008 as
Prostate Cancer Awareness Month. This proposed resolution is in keeping with the
historical national practice of recognizing the month of September as Prostate Cancer
Awareness Month.
Each year, the President of the United States, The United States Senate, and the
Governors of most States issue Proclamations declaring September as Prostate Cancer
Awareness Month. Many counties and cities also recognize Prostate Cancer Awareness
Month in September by issuing their own Proclamations.
Prostate cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in the USA today, second only to skin
cancer. The American Cancer Society estimates that 1 in 6 men will develop prostate
cancer in their lifetime. Men have a 33% higher rate of developing prostate cancer than
women have of developing breast cancer. In the average American family, the husband
is more·at risk of developing prostate cancer than the wife is of developing breast
cancer. Men also have a 9% higher death rate from prostate cancer than women have
from breast cancer.
Every 18 minutes, 2417, an American man dies from prostate cancer. The early stages
of prostate cancer usually show no symptoms. Early detection is the key to prostate
cancer survival. The 5-year survival rate for prostate cancer is 100% if the disease is
treated early. The 5-year survival rate drops to 32% if the cancer has metastasized.
Bill Claudina
Steve Wilensky
District 1
754-3754
District 2
293-7907
Merita Callaway
District 3
728-3800
Thomas Tryon
Hussell L. Thomas
District 4
District 5
736-4845
785-2020
In California, prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer among men in almost
all race/ethic groups. More men are diagnosed with prostate cancer in California than
any other state. California also has the highest number of deaths from the disease. This
year, 22,600 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in the state and 2,970 men will
die of the disease.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
There is no fiscal impact to the Calaveras County
IMPACT ON OTHER DEPARTMENTS:
No other departments are impacted.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
COUNTY OF CALAVERAS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 2, 2008
Prostate Cancer Awareness Month- September 2008
A Resolution to designate September 2008 as Prostate Cancer Awareness Month.
WHEREAS, prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in America, exceeded only by
skin cancer and the second most cause of death in men, exceeded only by lung cancer; and
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society estimates I in 6 men will develop prostate cancer in their
lifetime and there will be 186,320 new cases of the disease in the USA in 2008, resulting in 28,660
deaths; and
WHEREAS, in California, prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in almost
all race and ethnic groups and African-American men are 50% more likely to develop this disease
than any other group of men; and
WHEREAS, 22,600 men in California will be diagnosed with prostate cancer this year and
each day more than 8 California men will die from this disease; and
WHEREAS, prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in men and little is known
about this disease and there are usually no symptoms in the early stages; and
WHEREAS, the survival rate approaches 100% when prostate cancer is diagnosed and
treated early, but drops to 32% when the disease spreads to the other parts of the body; and
WHEREAS, early detection is the key to survival and the American Cancer Society
recommends that every man should be offered an annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test
and digital rectal examination (ORE) determined by his age and risk factor; and
WHEREAS, men who have several close relatives who were diagnosed with prostate cancer
at an early age could begin their testing at age 40; and
WHEREAS, men who have a father, son, or brother who had prostate cancer before age 65
and African-Americans should begin their testing at age 45; and
WHEREAS, all other men who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years should begin their
testing at age 50; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Calaveras County joins communities across our nation to
increase the awareness about the importance of early detection and treatment of this disease, and
now, therefore be it
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Calaveras, State of
California, do hereby designate September 2008 as Prostate Cancer Awareness Month.
ON A MOTION by Supervisor
, seconded by
Supervisor
, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Calaveras, State of California, September 2, 2008, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSENT:
C hair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Calaveras
CALAVERAS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA SUBMITTAL
ITEM TITLE
Resolution Authorizing Additions, Deletions
and Changes to County Fees Per the Attached
Schedule A, Effective October 1, 2008
County Administrative Office
Dept:
Shirley Ryan, Assistant CAO
Contact:
754-6304
Phone:
Published Notice Required?
Public Hearing Required?
BOARD MEETING
DATE
AGENDA
NUMBER
September 2, 2008
Supervisorial District Number
All
Yes:
Yes:
No:
No:
X
X
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution authorizing additions,
deletions and changes to County Fees per attached Schedule.
SUMMARY:
The adoption of this resolution with authorize the attached changes to the County Master Fee
Schedule per the direction of the Board of Supervisors at the August 19, 2008 Study Session.
FINANCING:
Revenues will be adjusted accordingly for the FY2008/09 Final Budget. The revisions to the
Master Fee Schedule will be effective October 1, 2008.
DISCUSSION:
On August 19, 2008, the County Administrator's Office held its annual Study Session with the
Board of Supervisors to review all current County Fees as part of the budget process. In
preparation for that study session, the Master Fee Schedule was distributed to all Department
Heads for their review. Those departments requesting additions, deletions or revisions to the
current Master Fee Schedule submitted their proposals to the Administrator's Office. The
Administrator's Office compiled those requests for the Board's review and comments during the
1
August 19 h Study Session. Based on the direction of the Board at this study session, staff is
recommending the adoption of a resolution authorizing the attached changes to the Master Fee
Schedule.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Board of Supervisors may choose not to adopt the attached resolution. If that is the
decision of the Board, then fees will remain the same and associated revenues will be budgeted
at the lower levels for FY 2008/09.
Board of Supervisors Agenda Submittal
Subject: County Fees Resolution
Date: September 2, 2008 - Page 2
OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT:
All Department Heads received a copy of the current Master Fee Schedule. They had the
opportunity to review and submit proposed changes to the County Administrator's Office for
inclusion in the August 19th study session for the Board's consideration.
DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE:
Robert C. Lawton, County Administrator
Date
ATTACHMENT A:
Resolution Authorizing Additions, Deletions and Changes to County Fees
ATTACHMENT 8:
Schedule A- Proposed Changes to County Master Fee Schedule
1
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF CALAVERAS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
Authorize Additions, Deletions and Changes to County Fees Per the
Attached Schednle A Effective October I, 2008
RESOLUTION
4 08-
5
WHEREAS, County fees are established under a variety of Authorities, but are set by the
6
7
8
County by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors, in preparation for Final Budget, has reviewed
9 proposed changes to County Fees during a Study Session on August 19, 2008.
10
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors authorizes the
11 additions, deletions and changes to County Fees as put forth in the attached Schedule A effective
12
October 1, 2008.
13
14
ON A MOTION BY Supervisor
, seconded by Supervisor
, the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this
15
, 2008, by the following vote:
16
17
AYES:
18
NOES:
19
ABSENT:
20
ABSTAINED:
21
22
Chair, Board of Supervisors
23
24
TTEST:
ounty Clerk and Ex -Officio Clerk to the Board
26 f Supervisors, County of Calaveras, State of
27
28
alifornia
day of
Proposed Changes To County Master Fee Schedule
August 12, 2008
Fee
Fee
Itemization
Categor
Jrd
Appraisal Record
Fax
1cteristics on CO
Entire County
lcteristics on CD
Quarterly Update
Comparable Sales
ales
ps
Assessor's Maps
Base List & Formatting
ps-AutoCAD format
Assessor's Maps
18"X24"
Labels
24" X 36"
36" X II olleeVper fool
l
Verification
Request
Addtl Standardized Layers/per layer
Addtl Custom Layers/per layer
Square Footge Verification
SpliVCombine
~Request
Tax Clearance
lo per parcel
Tax Default Information
)S
earch
lesearch
Electronic Maps - per Page
Prop 58 or Prop 60 Claim filed Late
Cadastral Research - hourly rate
Assessment Research - hourly rate
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
Request for lot line adjustmenVper parcel
Request for lot line adjustmenVper parcel-over 4 hours, addt! per Hr
ration
Marina, park or complex owning utility meters-Location Fee
Utility submeter fee-Device Fee
Scales other than Livestock, Capacity ;::.1 0,000#-Location Fee
Scales other than Livestock, Capacity 2::1 0,000#"-Device Fee
Scales other than Livestock, Capacity 2,000-1 0,0003-Location Fee
Scales other than Livestock, Capacity 2,000·1 0,0003-Device Fee
Propane truck or dispenser-Location Fee
Propane truck or dispenser-Device Fee
Wholesale and vehicle meters-Location Fee
Wholesale and vehicle meters-Device Fee
All other commercial weighin or measuring devices-Location Fee
All other commercial weighin or measuring devices-Device
Inspection/per hr
App. For New Ag. Preserve
App. For New Ag. Preserve-Over 7 hours, additional per hour
1p 60 Claim Late File Fee
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
ration
·eserve Fees
·eserve Fees
Schedule A
Authority by
Fees Effective
Proposed Fees
Other Fee
which established
7/1/2007
8/12/2008
Information
GC6253b & R& T 40812
GC6253b & R& T 409
R&T 408.3
GC6253.9b & R& T 408.3
GC6253b & R& T 409
GC6253b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R&T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 41 0
GC6253.9b & R& T 412
GC6253.9b & R& T 413
GC6253.9b & R& T 414
GC6253.9b & R& T 415
GC6253.9b & R& T 416
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R& T 409
GC6253.9b & R&T 409
7/1/2007
6/21/2004
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2007
7/1/2002
7/1/2007
7/1/2005
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
New
New
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
06-150
84-09
75-489
06-150
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2006
7/1/2006
6/21/2004
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
$10.00
$2.00
$4,000.00
$500.00
$25.00
$2.00
$35.00
$0.15
$12,500.00
$10.00
$15.00
$7.50
$2.00
$7.50
$6.00
$125.00
$75.00
$8.00
$5.00
$100.00
$60.00
$48.00
New
New
$80.00
$1.60
$80.00
$200.00
$80.00
$120.00
$80.00
$140.00
$80.00
$20.00
$80.00
$16.00
$85.00
$549.50
$78.50
$10.25
$3.00
$4,400.00
$525.00
$30.00
$2.50
$50.00
$0.20
$14,500.00
$20.00
$30.00
$9.00
$4.00
$9.00
$6.25
$135.00
$90.00
$9.25
$5.25
$150.00
$65.00
$50.00
$344.00
$86.00
$100.00 Late Fee-50% of fee
$250.00
$100.00
$150.00
$100.00
Late
Late
Late
Late
Fee-50%
Fee-50%
Fee-50%
Fee-50%
of
of
of
of
fee
lee
lee
lee
$100.00
$25.00
$100.00
$20.00
$86.00
$602.00
$86.00
Late
Late
Late
Late
Fee-50%
Fee-50%
Fee-50%
Fee-50%
of
of
of
of
lee
lee
lee
lee
Schedule A
August 12, 2008
Fee
Cateaorv
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
eserve Fees
I
Fee
Itemization
App. To Divide Existing Ag Preserve/per parcel
App To Divide Existing Ag Presrve/per parcel-Over 4 hr, addtl per Hr
Request to amend existing Preserve
Request to amend existing Preserve-Over 4 hrs, additional per hour
Request to Non-renew Ag. Preserve
Change of Ownership
Change of Ownership-Over 4 hours, additional per hour
Authority by
which established
Ord. 1938
BOS Resolution
BOS Resolution
BOS Resolution
BOS Resolution
BOS Resolution
BOS Resolution
06-150
75-489
06-150
06-150
04-158
06-150
Other Food Prep
Temporary Food Facility- Annual Permit
Mobile Food Facility - Annual Permit
~Oversight
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
·s
·s
Vending Machines PHF 1-3 machines
Vending Machines PHF 4-6 machines
Contaminated Site Remediation /per hour
Plan check (9 hour minimum)
Annual Operating Permit
Enforcement Actions (one hour minimum)
Amendments - hourly rate
Applications - hourly rate
Public Works (50% hourly rate)
Bed & Breakfast Annual Permit
Restaurant (<375 sq ft) Annual Permit
Restaurant (>375 sq ft) Annual Permit
Restaurant w/Bar-Addtl Annual Fee
Bar Only Annual Permit
Market (<2000 sq ft) Annual Permit
Market (>2000 sq ft) Annual Permit
Market w/Food Prep Facilities Addtl Annual Fee
Bakery Annual Permit
Special Event Permit (1 hr. Minimum)
Pre-Packaged
Plan Check-New Facility
Plan Check-New Facility-Over 3 hr. addtllper hr
Plan Check-Remodel/per hour
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
Catering
'ater System
r System
i-14 Connections)
aiance, Exemption or Waiver
rater System, "15-24 Connections
'ater System, 25-99 Connections
'ater System, 100-199 Connections
t Non-Community Water System
1-Community Water System
later System
Actions
Jments
ation
ication
Fees Effective
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98·205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
BOS Res. 07-099
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
$314.00
$78.50
$314.00
$78.50
$157.00
$314.00
$78.50
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
$174.00
$261.00
$305.00
$87.00
$174.00
$261.00
$348.00
$87.00
$261.00
$87.00
$131.00
$348.00
$87.00
$87.00
Proposed Fees
8/12/2008
Other Fee
Information
$344.00
$86.00
$344.00
$86.00
$172.00
$344.00
$86.00
$89.00 Late fee 50% of fee
$89.00
$134.00
$89.00
$801.00
$801.00
$445.00
$178.00
$534.00
$534.00
$534.00
$534.00
$445.00
$276.00
$89.00
$89.00
$89.00
$45.00
$267.00 Late
Late
Late
Late
Late
Late
Late
Late
$312.00
$89.00
$178.00
$267.00
$356.00
$89.00
$267.00
$89.00
$134.00
$356.00
$89.00
$89.00
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
50% of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
Late fee 50% of fee
August 12, 2008
Fee
Cateaor
Fee
Itemization
Other Plan Check/Review/per hour
am
One Time Registration Fee
am
Annual Permit
a Permits
Public Pool/Spa Annual PermiVper pool/spa
a Plan Checks
Public Pool/Spa Plan Check
Public Pool/Spa Plan Check-Over 4 hr addtl/per hr
a Plan Checks
)US Waste Generator Element
Geneerate Waste Oil and Antifreeze Only/per site
Generate<1 00 kg/mo.
Generate>100 kg/mo, but <1000 kg/mo
Generate >1000 kg/mo
Tiered Permit-Conditionally Exempt Stand Alone
JUS Waste Generator Element
Tiered Permit*Conditionally Auth. Stand Alone
Jus Waste Generator Element
Tiered Permit*Permit by Rule (PBR)
Tiered Permit-Permit by Rule-Temporary HHW
Tiered Permt-Permit by Rule-Permanent HHW
round Storane Tank Prog (LIA}
Temporary Closure Permit/per tank
Permanent Closure Permit/per tank
round Stora~Je Tank Prog (UA)
eplacement
Change of Ownership-per site
eplacement
Separate Tank Plan Chedk & Install-1st tank
Separate Tank Plan Check & lnstall*ea addtl tank
eplacement
Separate Piping Plan Check & Install-per facility
eplacement
eplacement
Separate Dispenser Plan Ck & Install-per facility
eplacement
Full Tank System PlanCk & Install-per facility
eplacement
Over 1o Hours-additional/per hour
Tank Fee
Annual Tank Fee/per tank
anks <11 00 gal capacity (Non-LIA} Permanent Closure PermiVper tank
1 Oil Tanks <11 00 gal capacity (Non·l Permanent Closure Permit/per tank
1P Element
Farm Only/per facility
1P Element
UST Facility
1P Element
1-5 Chemicals per facility
1P Element
iP Element
1P Element
1P Element
21+ Chemicals per facility
1P Element
Change of Ownership over 1.5/per hour
1P
RMP Plan Review-per site
1P
RMP Plan Review-Over 6 hours additional-per hour
iP
CaiARP Annual Fee
1P
CUPA Enforcement Acitivity fee/per hour
iervice Charge
Other CUPA Plan Ck!Wkplan Review/Site mitgtn
>ervice Charge
Meth Lab Remediation/hourly rate (AB 1078)
onse Service
Response Services
Well Permit Application
Well Abandonment/Destruction
Well Deepening/Modification
Permit Granted After Failure to Apply
Schedule A
Fees Effective
7/1/2007
Authority by
which established
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Health & Safety 119303
Health & Safety 119303
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
BOS Resolution 02-1 9
BOS Resolution 02-19
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 04-175
BOS Res. 07-099
Resolution 04-175
Resolution 06-150
BOS Res. 07-099
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
$87.00
$87.00
$174.00
$218.00
$435.00
$87.00
$87.00
$87.00
$131.00
$174.00
$174.00
$261.00
$261.00
$174.00
$261.00
$174.00
$435.00
$348.00
$609.00
$87.00
$522.00
$435.00
$870.00
$87.00
$218.00
$174.00
$174.00
$87.00
$87.00
$174.00
$218.00
$261.00
$305.00
$348.00
$87.00
$522.00
$87.00
$348.00
$87.00
$87.00
$87.00
$87.00
$348.00
$174.00
$174.00
$696.00
Proposed Fees
8/12/2008
$89.00
$89.00
$178.00
$223.00
$445.00
$89.00
$89.00
$89.00
$134.00
$178.00
$178.00
$267.00
$267.00
$178.00
$267.00
$178.00
$445.00
$356.00
$623.00
$89.00
$534.00
$445.00
$890.00
$89.00
$223.00
$178.00
$178.00
$89.00
$45.00
$178.00
$223.00
$267.00
$312.00
$356.00
$89.00
$534.00
$89.00
$356.00
$89.00
$89.00
$89.00
$89.00
$356.00
$178.00
$178.00
$712.00
Other Fee
Information
Late
Late
Late
Late
fee
fee
fee
fee
50%
50%
50%
50%
of
of
of
of
fee
fee
fee
fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
Late fee
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
Late
Late
Late
Late
Late
Late
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
of
of
of
of
of
of
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
fee
August12,2008
Fee
Gate or
Fee
Itemization
Well Permit Renewal
Well Re-lnspection
Monitoring We!! Permit/per site
1forcement Prog. (LEA)
1forcement Prog. (LEA)
later System (LIA)
1
fehicles
nent Fees
nent Fees
nentFees
nent Fees
nent Fees
nent Fees
nent Fees
nent Fees
nent Fees
nent Fees
and Services
and Services
and Services
arch Fee
Fees
Fees.
Fees
Fees
Other Temporary/Mobile~Annual Permit
~ ~
Office
Office
- Office
- Office
- Office
- Office
~ ~
~
~
~
;)
Monitoring Well Permit/each addtl
Well Test Hole Canst/Destruct 1~5 holes/per parcel
Welt Test Hole ConsVDestruct6-1 o holes/per parcel
Well Test Hole Const!Destruct 11·20 holes/site/per parcel
Cathodic Well Permit
Geothermal Heat Exchange Well Permit
Public Water System Well Permit
Vapor Recovery Weii-Undergrd Star. Tank-pr site
Vapor Recovery Well-Undergrd Star. Tank-each addtl
Integrated Waste Mgmt Program (LEA)/per hour
Solid Waste Vehicle Annual Permit/per vehicle
Small Public Water System Program/per hour
CURFFUCai-Code Water System
Liquid Waste Vehicle Annual Permit/per vehicle
Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Subdivision Tract Map
Zone Changes
Conditional Use Permits
Variances
General Plan Changes
Planned Development
Accessory Dwelling
Administrative Use Permt
Environmental Impact Report
Organized Camp Annual Permit/per camp
Organized Camp Plan Check/per Camp
Organized Camp Plan Check-Over 4 hr Addtl/per hr
All Programs
Administrative-Appeal/Office Hearings
Refund Request Processing Charge
On~Site Consultation/Special Inspection Request
File Review Requests~ Time Spenet (per 1/2 hour)
Review
Review
Review
Review
Review
Review
Tentative Parcel Map~ 1 hour minimum
Tentative Subdivision Tract Map~ 1 hr minimum
Zone Changes
Conditional Use Permits
Variances
General Plan Changes
Schedule A
Authority by
Fees Effective
7/1/2007
which established
BOS Res. 07-099
Resolution 06· 150
Resolution 06·150
Minute Order
Minute Order
BOS Res. 07-099
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BOS 98-205
Ord. 2415, BDS 98-205
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
BOS Res. 07-099
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/t/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
$87.00
$174.00
$348.00
$87.00
$348.00
$435.00
$522.00
$435.00
$435.00
$348.00
$348.00
$87.00
$87.00
$87.00
$87.00
$174.00
$174.00
$261.00
$435.00
$87.00
$174.00
$87.00
$435.00
$174.00
$174.00
$174.00
$348.00
$522.00
$522.00
$55.00
$87.00
$174.00
$25.00
$87.00
$43.50
Ord. 2415, BDS 98-205
7/1/2007
$261.00
Resolution 06-150
Resolution 04-175
BOS Res. 07-099
Minute Order
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
Proposed Fees
Other Fee
8/12/2008
Information
$89.00
$178.00
$356.00
$89.00
$356.00
$445.00
$534.00
$445.00
$445.00
$356.00
$356.00
$89.00
$89.00
$89.00
$89.00
$178.00
$i78.00
$267.00
$445.00
$89.00
$178.00
$89.00
$445.00
$178.00
$178.00
$178.00
$356.00
$534.00
$534.00
$89.00
$89.00
$178.00
$25.00
$89.00
$45.00
Late fee 50% of fee
Late fee 50% of fee
Late fee 50% of fee
Late fee 50% of fee
Collected by Planning
Late fee 50% of fee
Late fee 50% of fee
Delete
$77.00
$77.00
$77.00
$77.00
$77.00
$77.00
August12,2008
Fee
Gate or
- Office Review
, - Office Review
, - Office Review
, - Office Review
lS
review
rmll
rmit
al
al
ion
ment
ion
Variance
on
cation
cation
1rch Fee
, ~ On-site
, · On-site
· · On-site
1 - On-site
Fee
Itemization
Planned Development
Accessory Dwelling
Administrative Use Permit
Experimental System Monitoring
Other
New
New
New
New
New
New
Soil morphology, 3 hour minimum
Soil morphology, Over 3 hours
Soil morphology, 2 hours
Standard System
Engineered System
Standard System
Engineered System
Extension of Time
Replacement of Tank
Destruction of Tank
Administrative Variance
Re-inspection
Other
Engineered
Engineered
Additional
Public Works
Building Department
Research fee, per hour 1 hr minimum
Tentative Parcel Map· 4 hour minimum
Tentative Subdivision Tract Map~5 hr minimum
Tentative Parcel Map- Over 4 hours
Tentative Subdivision Tract Map~ Over 5 hours
:uments Copy Fees
;uments Copy Fees
ees
tiner Assistant (UDA)
ont Assistant (LDA)
Certified Birth Record
Certified Death Certificate
Recording Bond of Prof. Photocopier-1st page
Recording UDA-1st page
Recording UDA-1 st page
ElR Documentary Handling Fee
d Replacement Fees
Jan Fee
;ms
Library Card Replacement
Replace lost Interlibrary loan paperwork
Not in the Calaveras or 49-99 collections
Fees Effective
7/1/2007
Authority by
which established
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
H
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Schedule A
H&S Code 10605
H&S Code 10605
B&P 22352
B&P 6405b,c
B&P 6405b,c
F&G 711.4d & e
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
Proposed Fees
8/12/2008
$77.00
$77.00
$77.00
$77.00
$924.00
$77.00
$225.00
$75/hr
$150.00
$375.00
$450.00
$188.00
$263.00
$75.00
$150.00
$150.00
$300.00
$150.00
$75/hr
$150.00
$75/hr
$75/hr
$38.00
$38.00
$75/hr
$300.00
$375.00
$75/hr
$375.00
$231.00
$77/hr
$154.00
$385.00
$462.00
$193.00
$231.00
$77.00
$154.00
$154.00
$308.00
$154.00
$77/hr
$154.00
$77/hr
$77/hr
$39.00
$39.00
$77/hr
$308.00
$385.00
$77/hr
$385.00
$15.00
$13.00
$7.00
$7.00
$7.00
$25.00
$14.00
$12.00
$8.00
$8.00
$8.00
$50.00
New
New
New
$1.00
$1.00
$2.00
Other Fee
Information
Collected
Collected
Collected
Collected
by
by
by
by
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
August 12, 2008
Fee
Cate(JOr
Fee
Itemization
Schedule A
Authority by
which established
Fees Effective
7/1/2007
:h day library is open
j Replacement Fees
Pamphlets/per day (max. fine $1)
Pamphlets
As set by BOS
As set by BOS
rator License
Vehicle
ual Renewal Fee
Dealer Licensing
Licensing Fee
Each Vehicle Fee
Annual Renewal Fee
Renewal Fee - every two years
Daily Vehicle Storage Fee
Ord. No. 2561
Ord. No. 2561
Ord. No. 2561
B&P Code 21641 & 21642
Ord. 10.28.030
Administrative
Parolee Dentention
County Fee
4024 P.C. & BOS Resolutic
State of California
~ntion
aled Weapon
mit
mit
I Copies
I Copies
tse Fee
>Use
Juse
Juse
Juse
Juse
Juse
Juse
::es
::es
ces
ces
ces
ces
ces
ces
Programs
Programs
Programs
Programs
Programs
Programs
Programs
New
New
New
New
New
$0.20
$1.00
New
New
New
New
New
Other Fee
8/12/2008
Information
Delete
Delete
$100.00
$15.00
$50.00
$15.00
$30.00
Fingerprinting
Clearance Letter
Release towed vehicles
County BOS
County BOS
County BOS
BOS Res 87-411, Gov Cod
BOS Res 87·411, Gov Cod
Resolution 06-150
7/1/2005
2002.
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2005
7/1/2006
$20.00
$59.00
$50.00
$70.00
$70.00
$16.00
$20.00
$60.00
Per weekend
Courts
7/1/2005
$30.00
Intensive Out Patient Program (lOP) Phase I- per month
Intensive Out Patient Program (lOP) Phase II -per month
Intensive Out Patient Program (lOP) Phase Ill- per month
Aftercare Program - per month
Primary Intervention Program
Individual Session Fee- per hour to per half hour
Youth Treatment Program- per month
CCR, Health & Safety, &
BOS Resolution 06·150
BOS Resolution 07·099
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
$80.00
$80.00
$80.00
$80.00
$400.00
$20/half hr
$65.00
$88.00
$88.00
$88.00
$88.00
$440.00
$22/per half hr
$72.00
Hepatitis Alper shot
Hepatitis B/per shot
Twinrix Combination Hepatitis A & B/per shot
Tetanus/Diptheria/per shot
Pediatric Vaccine Administration, per dose
Tuberculin Skin Test
Influenza Vaccine Administration, per dose
Pregnancy Test
Medical Marijuana ID Card
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
BOS
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
7/1/2007
4/3/2006
$41.00
$47.00
$61.00
$42.00
$13.00
$13.00
$13.00
$30.00
$45.00
$43.00
$50.00
$65.00
$45.00
$14.00
$15.00
$15.00
$31.00
$102.00
Under 100 lbs
Over 100 lbs.
(SAP)
(SAP)
(SAP)
(SAP)
(SAP)
(SAP)
(SAP)
11/1/2001
11/1/2001
Proposed Fees
Res 04-158
Res 04·158
Res 05-115
Res 05-115
Res 05-115
Res 05·115
- Minute Order
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
$30.00
$77.17
$53.00
$74.00
$74.00
$17.00
$21.00
$63.00
Delete
Schedule A
August 12, 2008
Fee
Cateaor
Fee
Itemization
Minor Grading: plan review & inspection
Engineered Grading; plan review & inspection
=ees
=ees
Fees
Fees
Fees
!S
!S
!S
!S
Encroachment Permit
License Agreements
Reinspection Fee
Extension of Time
Road Abandonment
Parcel Map Checking
Final Map Checking
Record of Survey
Public Use Easement Vacation
IS
Summary Vacation
IS
Lot Line Adjustment Application
Certificate of Compliance
Estimated Costs <$10,000
Estimated Costs <$10,000
Estimated Costs $10,000-$49,999
Estimated Costs $50,000·$99,999
U or HS to resource zones or PS
U or HS to all other zones
All Others
Development Agreement
Tentative Subdivision Tract Map
Two Parcels
Three Parcels
Four Parcels
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Development Permit
Accessory Dwelling Permit
Planning Dept.
As-Built (Planning Commission)
Administrative Use Permit
IS
ment Plan Check
ment Inspection
ment Plan Check
ment Inspection
-ment Plan Check
·ment Inspection
'ment Inspection
Jment
Jment
Jment
Jment
division Tract Map
oel Map
oel Map
oel Map
se Permit
:lopment Permit
lfelling Permit
II Impact Report
:Use Permit
=>Ianning
Photocopies, per copy for 3 copies or more
Fees Effective
7/1/2007
Authority by
which established
New
New
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
New
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2449
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2559
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 &. Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
G.C 54985 & Co. Ord 2181
New
New
Proposed Fees
8/12/2008
$900.00 Deposit: Time & Matis
$1,250.00 Deposit: Time & Matis
6/21/2004
$200.00
$500.00
7/1/2005
$200.00
$500.00
1/17/1991
$50.00
$75.00/per hr
6/21/2004
$15.00
$38.00/per 1/2 hr
6/21/2004
$510.00
$1,275.00
6/21/2004
$560.00
$1,020.00
6/21/2004 $820+ $20 per lot
$1640+ $40 per lot
6/21/2004
$200.00
$500.00
6/21/2004
$465.00
$1,162.50
6/21/2004
$215.00
$537.50
6/21/2004
$170.00
$425.00
6/21/200410+ $60 per parcel $800+ $120 per parcel
11/20/1995
$300.00
$600.00
11/20/1995
$1,200.00
$2,400.00
11/20/1995
$500.00
$1,000.00
11/20/1995
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
11/20/1995
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
11/20/1995
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
11/20/1995
$6,000.00
$12,000.00
7/1/2005
$125.00
$250.00
7/1/2005
$125.00
$250.00
7/1/2005
$125.00
$250.00
7/1/2005
$125.00
$250.00
7/1/2005 $1500/Actual Cst
$3000/Actual Cost
7/1/2005 $BOO/Actual Cst
$1600/Actual Cost
$1600/Actual Cost
$1600/Actual Cost
7/1/2005
$380.00
$760.00
7/1/2005
$350.00
$700.00
7/1/2005
$170.00
$340.00
7/1/2005
$210.00
$420.00
7/1/2005
$210.00
$420.00
7/1/2005 $1400/Actual Cst
$2800/Actual Cost
7/1/2005
$125.00
$250.00
$0.25
Other Fee
Information
$0.50
Deposit: Time & Matis
Deposit: Time & Matis .
iP'U!JB;;L.!C
~ CALAV'E~AS;
w
o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael H. Miller, Interim Director
August 11, 2008
TO:
FROM:
Michael H. Millet1fn.terim Director
Prepared by Deborah Mullen, Public Works Analys~
SUBJECT:
Resolution Accepting as Complete All Road Improvements and Authorizing
Release of Security for Fairway Village Subdivision, TSTM 02-07
!1ft'•
R£COMM£NDA TION
The Department recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution accepting as complete
all road improvements and authorizing release of security for Fairway Village Subdivision,
TSTM02-07.
DISCUSSION
On Januaty 13, 2003, the Board approved TSTM 02-07 for Fairway Village Subdivision. The
project consists of dividing 2.49 acres into 24lots, and a common area. Pursuant to
Section 66462 of the Government Code and Resolution 04-255 the developer entered into a
Subdivision Agreement and posted security to guarantee completion of all required road
improvements.
All of the required road improvements have been constructed in substantial conformance
with the approved plans, and to the satisfaction of Public Works. The security can now be
released.
FISCAL IMPACT
All staff costs associated with this action are reimbursed by the applicant. Adoption of the
recommended action will have no impact to the general fund.
0TH£R D£PARTM£NT IN VOL V£M£NT
None.
MM/DM/tw
891 Mou11tai11 Ra11ch Road ~ Sa11 A11dreas ~ CA ~ 95249-9709
Customer Service (209) 754-6402 ~ Fax (209) 754-6664 ~ Email: [email protected]/averas.ca.tls
Web: http:// 1V1V1JJ. co. calaveras. ca. us/ departments/ public _JPorks. asp
H:IBOS\HOAD MAitm02·07 TSTM FAIHWAY VlllAGE_SECURITY HELEASE_SRDOC
2
COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
RESOLUTION
NO., _ _ __
ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
AND AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SECURITY FOR FAIRWAY
VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, TSTM 02-07
6
7
WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors by Resolution 04-255, dated August 23, 2004,
8
approved a Subdivision Agreement to guarantee completion of road improvements for
9
Fairway Village Subdivision, Tentative Subdivision Tract Map 02-07; and,
10
WHEREAS, the Developer provided acceptable security in the form of a letter of
11
credit from 1" National Bank of Nevada, for "Labor and Materials" and for "Performance"
12
each in the amount of $388,354.00; and,
13
14
15
WHEREAS, all road improvements have been constructed in substantial
conformance with the approved plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County
16
of Calaveras, State of California does hereby accept as complete road improvements for
17
Fairway Village Subdivision, Tentative Subdivision Tract Map 02-07.
18
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that security issued by 1'' National Bank of Nevada,
19
for Fairway Village Subdivision Tract Map 02-07 is hereby released.
20
I II I II
23
IIIIII
IIIIII
IIIIII
24
II I II I
21
22
25
26
21
28
IIIIII
IIIIII
IIIIII
IIIIII
R:\BOS\Road Maiut\02-07 TSTM Fairway Villagc_Security Rclcasc_RESO.doc
Resolution No.
2
Page 2
ON A MOTION BY Supervisor--------~ seconded by Supervisor
3
---------~
4
Board of Supervisors of the County of Calaveras, State of California, this ___ day of
the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
2008, by the following vote:
5
6
AYES:
7
NOES:
8
ABSENT:
9
ABSTAIN:
10
11
12
ATTEST:
13
14
15
16
County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors,
County of Calaveras, California
17
18
19
MHM/DM/tw
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
R:\BOS\Road Maint\02·07 TSTM Fairway Village_Security Rclease_RESO.doc
II
=·-
I!
III
I
t
I
=n::
A !€VAD/l. COOPORATKW. WANAG(R
LOU A. PAPAIS AN0 JJDt£ CAJN-PM'NS
TRUSl!ES r:F TH< CAIN-PAPI.I$ ll!UST r:E 2002
BENEFlOARIES IJiiOER lHE DUD Cf" ffiUST
RECQRDE!li<S WST. HO. 21Xn-24270
"6f'.._..._LL
BY:
F/<JR:f/AY \'IU).G(.ltC.
A CAlJFffiNIA tMTED UAllll.lTY COI.!P»>Y
B'I':HA.~ctlNSlR'JCi!Cfl,
"'"~; ik.;
-&? ;
JJ1liE CAIN--f'AP.'JS, 'IRliS
FIRST WlliCf./.11. 8.001 r:£ ARlZI)IA
I3ENEf'l(lAA'( IJ!it!a! THE OCIDS Of lRUST
RECQRDE!l AS ilSTS. NO. 2004--15969,
WDH:,Ib&@rn:
DATED
OWNERS:
SToUE Cf ~..V£wf1><9
COOiffi' a- "'11-Htttf"
COUNTY SURVEYOR'S SfA1EMENT
l BRUa.: R. CHnD .R, HEREBY CERTifY lHAT I 1JI lHE COOUlY Sl.IR\Otfl r:F.
CALA'>Ul.OS CCIU!ITY. CAIJFORNIA; THAT I HA'IE OWl:!IED THE "11\THI)( )!,o.p NlD
THAT THE SUBOIVISlOO .OS SHO"Ii!l THffiEIN tiES 'A\THFH »> UNrnCORI'OR.O.ltO AREA
W0 IS SUSST.o.NTIAU.Y THE SAllE AS IT APP£.I.Rf1) 00 lH( IDITATM SUBO!v.setl
~~~ J"Wt~~wr~.~~~lif.Ji?ll~~~m.IFPUCIJJl[
ENGlli"EER:
FMIWAY llt.!AG£. llC
826 RQ.Kl liAY
~Jill_fJ~Jn £Uri t8i:3.~mt:::.-& ~~W'
~OMR
AT THE 1M r:F. loPf"R(NAJ.. Of THE TUHATII£ l.l.o.P HA'IE BWl COUPUEO 1'111H
I JJI. SATISFlEO THAT 1HE ~,o.p IS U:O!I«..JJ.Y CORRfCT.
lOOE ENGNURftlG INC.
P.O. SOX 10
AlTA'f.U.E. CA. 95221
~IIV.~\0
SAliSFACTCfff EW:lEIICE TO 8E M PERSON 'fiHOSt: WJ.IE IS SIJBSCII:IB[D TO M
'MTliiN INSTlAAIEHT Mtl A~ TO ME THAT liE o:ECUIDI iHt S.I.Lit IN IllS
~CAPACITY. 00 THAT SY tGS SIGNATURE: 00 TIE INSTRI!Ioi<NT M PERS00.
CR THE OOlTY ti?Cfl OCH.W if 'lltllOl THf.: PERSON ACJU), D:£CUIDI THE ~ENT.
SY:
NOi"AAI'S.PRiNTID 1W.1E
::dl'duJ&l&:;b ·
"£k~"~'>,f!'~~S~="---
~lJrr~{J"CM"&:li\rer.w.
~"'.l'olf'~~ci:i~~!!'!~-~~;!_~~
. 2004 BEFCflE 1.1£. :f. Ger!'Mil
PEI'SCWUY .1mAAED tOO A. P.o.Pm &: ..1JOiE CAIN-P.o.PJJS, PROW TO I.!E 00 THE
oo Jup! po
I
~
'U{(
~"
ott,
~
Gu"'~~
0
"r~
= "'"'"'"'
(
NOTES
ri'/.J:U1 10.
-:J..tJo _..,-
~·~·
:~~~~
..
cJ
DATED:
N®CU:
ff~.?-(Jif
CO UNIT CLERK'S STA1EMENT
l KARON VARW, H!JlE1lY CERTifY 1HAT l 1JI ll-1£ afRK (:f TrlE B0AA0 (:f SJPUlVISCRS
Of C\l..I,\I£RAS CCUtilY: THAT THE BOAAO BElNG li-IE l'llCP£F! Al'i'ROVING SCXJY, llA$
.I.PPRO\otD M: \llllllN flNI.li.W" Of FAIRWAY llli.AGE ~'<ISlON. TRACT
~-~s :~?UB~i~M~!~'Ust,'fo~\I'Cfnit~~~ ::U"M~~
OFF£R$ ~ DEOIO.TICIN FOO $10'!~ ORAIW.GE AA£ RU:CliD AT lKS llllt
BY:~
XAA£!,1 VAA!ll
CCi:!Mffb..ERK
~IT
0
l.TOTAl~ISz.S<~
.;:r..._g,
DATe: ~ O'PIRES
!II'-··-'\'~
'\.! "'
~:,~~ \:t~D /!)
~
COOI<TY I)' COI.IJ.IlSSIW
W
-::t-1
.2004BUOREI.If. €w.t .:r..ts•£XM
PERSONAl.!.Y Wf'f.IJliD 08-lf!IS 0. HARWS.. PROVED TO II£ 00 THE !lAStS {J"
SATtSfACTCRY N.OOIO:: TlJ 8E lHE PERSON 'OHOSE IWoiE IS SUBSCR&II TO THE
"1!\TH!!< INSTIMIENT ANO ACKNOVUOGED TO loiE THAT HE DEOJ1'ED THE SAil( 9<1 filS
AIJTHCl<IZD> CAPWTY. Rl[) THAT SY !GS SlGNATI.IRE 00 THE INSIRUI.IDlT lH£ PmSCtl.
!R TI£ ENTITY U'OO StJl'.lf (:f "MilO! M: PERSON ACTID. D:ECUTID Til( INSTiMIE:NT.
NOTAAYS~
~
i'"
~Y'"4.5
{J" ~...v'tro~A.I>o'l'
COONlY (:f 1• 1.&:!, ....,-
£:~~·
"'"""'
NOTAA"f"S ~liD IWoiE
SM1'E
-
IOWI.O.
COUNTY REDEMPTION OffiCER'S STATEMENT
VIONITYMAP
NOTARY'SSI'A1EMENT
~,.,I
: 8i
I. t'!NETIE /ICNFQK. IIEREBY CERTifY ·THAT 1 JJ.I THE REIJ(II?TIQl OffiCE:R Cf" CAU.I'Dl.IS
CCI..INTY. CAUI'oo:NIA. lHAT ACCOR()If«; 10 Til( R(CORO (:f THIS oma:. THER£ AA£ /10 UENS
AGA!NST THE REAl PRCI'ERlY POfffRA"IEO 00 THE 'MTHFH ll.o.P OR J.NY PORTION 1l!ffi£0( fOR
lo.~Y U/1-P}.C() SMTf. IIUlliOPAl 00 LOCAL TJ.X£"5 OR SPEOIJ.. ~ COll.£l:lill .O.S
TAl!S. £Xal'T TJ..XE:S OR SI'EO!.l. .osstS$IoiEIITS NOT TET PAYABlE
""""""'
Wi~l/(.
Og'
~c~~
IN TilER .WTHORIZED CAPACITY. Al<tl THAT
PERSCf!S. CR n£ ENTITY UPm Bf.ll.IJf if
.J
:~~!
L.S.SWJ
*
Ef~14 Tk~1.USA:/
NOTARY'S STATEMENT
DATE caaas:900
Sl.l~
OAIID"~
~~;""£
lUi&
~~I
All()
.·t:\1~?"~"''"~
~ R.e&ff f!Cs. "ia'fl•
CIL\VW.S CCl..IN!Y
liT HAlf}.
II- ;i.o- :I.Oo7
:;
ZB zoo4
JULY,2004
DEED REFERENCE: INST. NO: 2003-024275
NOTARY'S STATE.\fENT
NOTAA"(S SQ!.I.TUR(
.:;!'.tit.. Y
:~
AND THE N.W. 1/4 OF SEGnON 35, T. 4 N., R 14 E., M.D.M~
BEING LOT A OF FOREST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AS
SHOWN ON 20 ROS 75, CA1A VERAS COU!'.'TY, CAUFORNIA
DENNIS D. HAAL!S, SENIM Y.a; PRESIOCNT
;:r~v.v
n~
.G4fftt oc.o.'tlrcfc:am '
TRACT NO. 2002-07
AI.
'~ARY"f
-~
?!l
'§?
OF A PORTION OFTHES.W.l/4 OF SECTION 26
2001-15971. 2004-1~5975
llln."ESS
I. EUGOI£ L DfA\'8(. aJWfY 1\!AT! W A RE:QSltREO OW.. EOONEER ~ THE:
STAT£ r:F. CAIJF!RNI.I.: THAT TH£ 0\MR AUlHOOIZED YE TO IJAJ<E THt: SlJR\18"
OESC>IATED 00 lH( "MlWI I-lAP; THAT THE: SJfi\E"f IS TRVE mfJ CQI,jf'I.Dl: AS
$1101\N 00 SIJJ I-lAP AHO WAS 1.4AOC UNE>ffi MY OCR<:CTION : ! 00 fURll!ER CERTifY
"!HAT THE lletM.!t}ITS SHOll!< IIEREOO "fi'IU. at SET PRlOR TO OCCEI.!BDI 31. 2004 AH0
YIIU. 8E SUFfiCIUIT TO EN.~&£ THE SR\'EY TO 8( RElRACro.
,~n
~UJJr:ID!QJDWD~D©IM
"-tfw, 0..<ZWft$
LOOr~~ffiUS
""""""""' """""'
[f£Drn1~£W
s::: ,..,
.~i
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THE t!llOERSCNID. S£lN(; 1HE PA.~TY llCIJl'.'lG A RECOOO nru: llilERBT IN 1HE WlOS ~
00 THIS loW'. HERffiY o:.NSENT TO Til£ PR£PARAill)l AN0 REC®JAlnl r:£ THIS fl'l/.1. U,o.P mD
!iEREII'f IRR[V()C.IlltY mil IN P£RPEJUITT CfFIR fal llEOICAilet< TH( EA5IIDiTS AAO SIII!TI R!Gii1S
"Cf" WAY SHO'IItl !!!'REm FOO PUSUC Vra..mES .oJitl llRAIHAGC. llf.: Sli!fl)S IN THIS SUBDMSiOI'I AAE
liOT CIFilRm FOO DmO.lJCtl fa! PUSUC US( ~ iH£Y ARE IHTENOCD TO BE I.WNTA!Nto 1<$ PRIV.O.l'E:
SIRU:i RlCHTS r:F vtl'<'f "filL\. BE DEED-:0 TO.TI-i( FJ.lfr:IIAY VUJ.GE. UC ~ER$
,j}_
J
~
OWNER'SSTA1EMENT
BY:
II
Ea/1:
T..-:xt.u(£1
NOTAA"f"S I'RII!IID WJ.IE
W'A-:sh"''~
COONlY Of WoilllSSlCIN
l.IIIH:IIJWI.OTSIZEISI929Sl:l.FT.
"'•
RECORDER'S SfA1EMENT
t'>..
3. NOAA£J.S.l80\Elll£1<'lll!>.TCREUVATICti(J'HI.MW,
!J!WIA(;( ~All!: St&tl TO STCI!II ..-.o.TER oo..t<Oo\UCH.
fU{)
~- ww~~~~~~~'13.~
IN 8()();....8.__0F S.IOOIII!lCNS AT
MS__22__0AY
Of~·
5.1l!EREI$£o.J811ttS(J'PRIVATE!!O.O.DS"IItll«NillS~S>::N.
OU.I'ffiAS COONTY SJRVWR
6. T()TI.I.IUII:IOI Cf I.OIS IS :15
l)OCUI,<E}IT ~ro.200':I- lf{1olb
KARW VARNI
~NTY~rooorn
.;2:'18
2004.
PAGE~AT
Til(
~T...f.Y.
~
d
c.
REOIA:ST OF THE
(J)
SY:
a~
-"0
~lY
0
S>O:H
,:or~
I Q}
.,Ji
L
1111
.·
:
I II
'
l
-
/
/
----.._/
Ip
!
)
/
SCALE
lH= 200'
/..-/
/
,/
,/
/
~~
/,,_,/;>\
( .p::,m1 ~'
!fi11s'
e;,"-
}'
<{ / " 1 12<'
/
---;
/
....
-..
/____ .,. ---,..
-----
I ;;:.~-r--r--r-f\,.,;; \;~.~ \ ~ \.";..><
'-. {.;1!.1 ~d:r \'!,'-\>""
\
/.,.---
'
. . ;:\; ;
(
...~_~,
'l
I
\
:
\---
,.~,.......
1 .-"
\
-.....L ... ..v
................................... ___________
/'
I
1
/'
r~~
//"
//
------~-----..)
\
/
'
''
!
/
'
'
''
'
'' "-...---""-
JULY,2004
FAIRWAY \1\lLAG<:. LLC
!NST. NO. 2003 024275
~~
:~~
. . _ ""t·
I<:U,826"1:
~.,~
',
34<2"
/
LOT A
\.~
AC+/-
>:..,.S>
''
LEGEND
18"<5"W£
OI:NOll:S CAlCVU.tro PO!><T C«!.Y,
0
.19.J6"
(R&I.<)
LOT
,/
~-
~~.,--
O"..NOll:S fli:CORO AN0
LOT 13'
TH!:
~::.S.
Of' OCARIN(;S Of' nilS SJR\>(Y IS 20 R0S 7:1.
oW~
~~·
'".:;,;<'.7· ~·oo~
23.50"
EI.!C. !NC.
O.R. 9206{51
NOTE:
CAIN PAPAl$ TRUST
IN$T. NO. 2002 26501
<;:
LOT 12
•.'
PO< 20 ROS 75.
OWOll:S P\JBUC UTiliTY (ASI;UQIT
.
LOT 14
-~'='..;.
~o.=
OO<OT£S DRAAI-.GE EASn<D<T.
P.U.!:.
..
•.M
2
LOT 1
'
'
''
g.;.
LOT 3
/
''
LOT 4
,
J
.' .'
~;_?;:,
~·
f<:>:JNC OR SO".
OC!<Oll:$ ro>J~Q 5/e" OiA. REEAA CAP!'(O ll.C.!:. 1e~· PO'< 20 RO$ 7:>.
0 1
LOT 5
~"{)THIN(;
DfJ"lOll:S 5% 01A. RUIAA cos><'Etl ll.C.!:. 1e.<'n. SO" T>0S S>!I!VI:Y.
LOT 7
LOT 6
.• •.
••~
~~
·:~
~-
"~
;g,':>
·•
/
'
if"'
m
:i
{$"
\
123
,~'·
-~~
/
';
I
'''
''
,§~~~
-:,f
~ff'"
,••
:
'•~
f
,...-----.__,,_/
~.PQ
!
J.!;.SS(R , )
------~............
o/<(j
,0
"'
<¥,·
~n
,~=
DEED REFERENCE: INST. NO: 2003 024275
o.c
"\.'-
---
~$" '
~q '
<S
'
•" '
:
!
I
\
()
,
<..o«'
,."/
:' __~·· .#.;:.
",.~s·J:,tw
'
............
'
//
''
!'
'
\
/
'',,/.:<:~;;
/
/
..
)
\lS
'
N~5"00".7;<l"1: \
/
1
''
'\
/
/
/
/
/
/
</"-...;
'
//
,/
/
1
,'
/,-
y
/
/
,.")
-......._
'-,
./
/
\ .. -.
\'
(
I
'
''
,."
'I>=
J
J
\
,_/
,-"
~~
OF A PORTION OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF SECI10N 26
ANDTHEN.W. Il4 OFSECfiON35, T.4N.,R 14E.,M.D.M.,
BEING LOT A OF FOREST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AS
SHOWN ON 20 ROS 75, CALAVERAS COU!'.ffY, CALIFORNIA.
.//
.... "--
/
Wft
\
\
"""'
su:~s _,.--
I
\,./
\
211-?J
__ -..,
!
I
/
/"--..o P.U.£.
~!I
TRAIT NO. 2002-07
,/"'
,.
_ .... -....
SU:OETAILA
I
AT RIGHT FOR
/
LOT A DIMENSIONS.
/
SEESHEE1"S3AND4
/
FOR LOT DI~ENSlONS /
1
/
_,--.r..-;,\ "t \ ~. . . --
e
.~""
~GJJ [ID[Q)D~D~D@!M
-;- ...
;ro ROS ~
/
/--.._ 2!!-5-.,.._,
I'-......
I
'yj
1.01
/
/1/
WTA.
;( 29-''
.,."
A,21H ";:"
----,.<._,<&--1-y"
_..... ....... ---- .-<..-\2s-1i'y"
20 ::;:~
V /'
/
./; •t~'
/;.:._~--?'
/ ,_5 ,/
____ J
./
---
,,.-'" /
/ / -.., z!
/
I:U /
1
/-, ·~
/"1
l
"
X
/1221
/,.
,/ ) :
/.:::. 2!!-V 1
/
y
-,,
I
/./
-1
\
'-,Ill
<v?"' ,!'_~#1'19
"' """'
,. ) o0
1l2
,$0( ~... , / _,
00 (_ ~~)(I /y / /
.J',--'-#.~',,//
I'
,-....
.<..''
/
I
/ /
·~~
;;:~
[f£D!%~&W ~DD:,D:o£@[g
-----.
/' '>- / , /
0 ,.--'(
_,/
/
/
JL -
J
/
/
,/
)I .J.'{,- ("
,- <f:'
_,/
!"\ \' ------
/
J
<O
"
!'( ~-
/
--......,
~-/'
~--
//
/
I\I!
I
0
"•
~"'
~
ror
Cp~
<'";
·:'c.
...,
~
0
0
SIUT20f'S
----~--~--------
-
I C2
-----.;:::.:--
Michael H. Miller, Interim Director
August 11, 2008
TO:
;-11t .
FROM:
Michael H.
Miller~terim Director
Eugen~e::~ Surveyor
SUBJECT:
Appr~f the Final Map for Big Trees Estates Subdivision, Tract 2003-148
RECOMMENDA T/ON
The Department recommends the Board adopt the attached final map for Big Trees Estates
Subdivision, Tract 2003-148.
DISCUSSION
On April26, 2004, the Board conditionally approved the tentative map for Big Trees Estates
Subdivision, Tract 2003-148. This subdivision lies in Darrington, northwest of Sierra
Parkway, and creates twelve, residential lots.
All the conditions of approvals have been completed as determined by our Planning
Department and property taxes have been cleared by our Tax Collector as evidenced by the
attached forms, and the map is complete.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
OTHER DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT
We have clearance from our Planning Department as to conditions of approval of the
tentative and the Tax Collector as to property taxes, attached hereto. Following Board
approval, the map will be delivered to the Recorder for recording.
EW/dr
891 Mountain Ranch Road I San A11dreas # CA I 95249-9709
Customer Service (209) 754-6402 # Fax (209) 754-6664 # Ev111il: [email protected]/averas.ca.us
lPeb: http: I/ JVJVIV. co. calaveras. ca.us / departmeltls /pub li c_Jvorks. asp
I~:\BQSISuJ\'CYorl03·1481'ini1l Map.J3if} Treos Est
Su!Jdiviskln_SR.doc
2
COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
RESOLUTION RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR BIG TREES
NO.
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2003-148
6
7
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, by the Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 04-105,
conditionally approved Tentative Map 2003-148, for Big Trees Subdivision; and,
8
9
10
WHEREAS, the subdivider has satisfied all the conditions of approval set forth by the
Planning Commission have been completed per the Planning Department, and the Tax Collector
has cleared property taxes; and,
II
12
13
WHEREAS, based on the facts as stated above, the Final Map of Big Trees Estates
Subdivision, Tract No. 2003-148, is in substantial compliance with the conditioned tentative
approval and is adequate for filing; and,
14
15
WHEREAS, there are irrevocably and in perpetuity offers for dedication to the public for
public use any and all rights of way and easements that appear on this final map.
16
17
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the final map for Big Trees Estates
Subdivision, Tract 2003-148 is hereby approved for filing; and,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors hereby directs the Recorde
to record the Final Map.
IIIII/
IIIII/
IIIII/
IIIII/
IIIII/
/IIIII
/IIIII
IIIII/
28
R:\BOS\Surveyor\03- 148 Final Map_Big Trees Est Subdivision_RESO.doc
RESOLUTION
2
No.
Page 2 of2
ON A MOTION BY Supervisor _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , seconded by Supervisor
3
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
4
5
Board of Supervisors of the County of Calaveras, State of California, this ___ day of
6
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2008, by the following vote:
7
AYES:
8
NOES:
9
ABSENT:
10
1I
ABSTAIN:
12
13
14
ATTEST:
15
16
17
18
19
County Clerk and Ex -Officio Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors,
County of Calaveras, California
GW/dr
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
R:\BOS\Surveyor\03-148 Final Map~Big Trees Est Subdivision... RESO.doc
0"-1007\TRIOLQ-FlNAU.DWG
BIG TREES ESTATES
SUBDIVISION
T.S.T.M. 2003·148
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
t. EUG£NE L DEAVER COlllfY TH"T! AAI A REQSTERED 0\lll ENQNEER Of Tl"lE
STATE OF CIIUFORNI"- TH"T THE OI'INERS AUTHORIZED ME TO MAA( THE "StJR\IEY
DESIGNATED ON THE Vrtllil.'l U1.P; TilAT THE SURVEY IS "!RUE AND COMP!.£TE AS
SHOWN ON SAID MM> AND WAS MADE lJNO€R MY DIRECTION: 1 00 F\IRTl"lER CERTIFY
THAT Tl"lE MONUMENTS SHO\\N HEREON HAVE BEe! SET AND ARE $tJffiCIENT TO
ENABLE Tl"lE SUR\o£'1' TO BE RE"!RACEO.
i
f"~
.. '
,/' 41_,
::E L. DEAVER f<.C.E. 18299
EU
DATED:
#·!.Y
"
2? ZCt:JS
BEING A PORTION OF Tiffi S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 12
T.S N., R.l5 E., M.D.M.
CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APRIL.2008
OWNER'S STATEMENT
OWNERJSUBDIVIDER:
PRE.PARED.BY:
THE Ut."O£F!SIGN(D, 00NG "!HE PARTIES HctDING A RECORD Tin£ INTEREST IN Tl"lE
LANDS SHO- ON THIS MAP, HERESY CONSENT TO TliE PR£PAAATION AND
RECORDATION Of' THIS FINAL MAP AND H€REBY IRRtYOCASLY AND IN PEI'!P8U1TY
OFFER FOR OEO!CATION TO Tl"lE PUBUC FOR PUSL!C USE ANY AND ALL RIGHTS Of'
WAY AND tAso.IENTS TH"T AI'?£AR ON Tl"liS WAP.
J~ES
MOTHER LOOE ENQNEERING INC.
P.O. SOX 10
,I.LTAVILLE. CA. 95221
TEL (209) 738-4545
& ELAINE "!RI!X.O
23200 vt.O.. SP!..ENOOR #31
OJP€Rl1NO, C.lo.. 950H
TEL (209) 728-2956
"'
JtANNE T. WURPHY, TRUSTEE Of' Tl"lE 2006 RESTATEMENT OF Tl"lE JWES
S. TRIOLO AND Et.AINE M. TRIOLO TRUST DATED OCTOOER 13, 2006, I'BO
JA.IIES S. TRIOLO AND ElAINE M. TRIOLO
"' ~'Z/?1"1"!rJ,
""'""'
E T. MURPHY
(.
!
t;;,-t;,'
~/;
ON
2008 BEFORE
,"',<;;·bo.~~<,iS"""""""""""-;;-
•1\Jl9 1:6
,
WE.
NOTARY ~C. P£RSONMLY AP?:EAREO .£ANNE T. MURPHY, P£RSONALL Y KNOWN
TO liE {OR PR0\£0 TO IIIE ON Tl"lE Sf\SIS OF S....TISF....CTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE TH£
PERSON 'M-!OSl:: NAAIE IS SUBSCRIBED TO Tl"lE 'MTHIN INSTRUMENT AND
AC!<NO\\UOGE.tl '!0 WE THAT 51-!E EXECUTED rnt: $"'-!£ IN 1-!ER AUTHOR!ZEO
CAPACITY, AND THAT BY HER SIGN ....lURE ON TliE INS"IRI.JMENT TliE PERSON OR Tl"lE
ENTITY UPON S€HAI.F OF" M;{C!-1 THE PERSON "CTEO, ~OJTEO THE !NSTRIJWENT.
9v/;al~.~
""~'
\0' d-010
DATE COt.!WISSION EXPIRES
RCE 1+774
COUNTY CLERK'S STATEME!'."'T
~ ~~ECOe~om>;;;;;cao;<su;;;;;,o;"';;"~>ORo;;;;:,;---6'1'~"""""'"';-------
""
COUNTY REDEMPTION OFFICER'S STA1EMENT
\'IllNESS WY Hoi.NO &: OFRCIAL SEAL
NOTARY$ SfGNATURE
SRUCE R. CHllO JR. LS. 5889
CALA\IER-'S COUNTY SURVEYOR
I. KAREN VARNI. H€REBY CERTIFY Tl"l"T I AA1 THE a.ERK Of" THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CAlAVERAS COUNTY; THAT THE 80-'RO BEING THE PROPER
1.PPRO\oiNG BOO'!' HAS APPR0\£0 THE VrtTHIN FlNAL I.!AP OF BIG TR!XS
£$TATES SUSOIVISION. T.S.T.I.!. 2003-1-48 ANO HEREBY ACCEPT ON SEHAI.F
OF THE PUBUC, ALL PUSUC UTIUTY EASFJ,IENTS Of"f"tRED HeREON.
OEOICATION OF ROAD AND ORAA-!.O.GE E.'SBIENTS ARE R£JEC1"ED AT THIS
TIME 'MTH THE UNOER$TAND1NG THAT THEY r.4AY BE ACCE:l"TED AT A LA.1£R
O"lE. BY W ORDER DULY NAO£ ON
2008.
NOTARY'S CERTIFICATE:
~~TYOFOFcy,wrJ~m&
COU!'i"TY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I. SRUCE R. CHILD JR •. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT t AM THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF
CALA"ffioi.S COUNTY, CAUf"ORNIA; THAT I HAVE EXAI.!INEO "llfE ¥!!THIN MAP AND THAT
THE SUBOI\IlSION AS SHOYIN THE':REJN UES Vrtll"liN AN UNINCORPORA"!EO AREA. AND IS
SUSST~llALLY THE SAlliE AS 1T M'PEAREO <lH TH£ iOHATI'<f; NAP MID ANY APPRO\itO
AUIRATKlNS THt:REOF; THAT ...ll. PRO\IISICf.IS CF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ANY
LOCAL ORDINANCE:S A?P"IJCASLE AT THE TIM€ Of APPROVAL Of" THE TENTATIVE l.llo.P
HAVE BEEN COMPUEO VrtTH AND I AM $ATISF1ED TliAT THE 1.!1.? IS T"ECHNICAU.Y
CORRECT.
S.l:x>vis
NOTAAY'$ PR!NTED NWE
-'* Ill''> Bo I \
C()l,jUISS!ON NUMBER
NOTES
1.
TOTAL ACREAGE IS 14.5'1- ACRES.
2.
TOTAL NlJI.tSER Cf' LOTS 1$ 12
3.
IIINri.IU\I LOT SIZE IS >1-7,801 SO. FT.
4.
NO ARE"-S ABOIJE THE HIGI W"TER a£VAT10N OF "THE NATURAL DRAINAGE
CHANNUS ARE SUS.E:CT TO STOR!.I WAT8'1 INUN{)ATIC\'1.
5.
THE l£NTAT1VE UAP OF THIS SUSOIVISION WAS APPROVED BY 11-lE
CALAVERAS COO!'(TY BOARO OF SU?ERVISORS ON APRil. 26. 2004
6.
THERE ARE 0.2"- Mli..ES OF PU8UC ROADS YllTHIN THIS SUSOIVISION.
7.
S"SIS OF SE.ARINGJ PER SUS 3-32. (SEE SHEET S)
I, LYN.ETTE NORFOLK, HEREBY CERTlFY Tl"lAT! J,JJ. THE REOD.!PTICN OFF1C£R OF
CAl.AVERio$ COUNTY. CAI.JFORNIA. TilAT ACCOROING TO Tl"lE RECORD Of" <HlS
OFfiCE. THmE AAf. NO UENS "GAINST lHE REAL PR~lY P~TRA YEO ON
Ttl£ 'Will"l!N 1/.M> ~ ANY PORTION Tl"lEREOf FOR fiJi'!' UN-PA!O STAlE.
I.IUN!OPAL OR LOCAL TAXE:S OR SPE:aAL ASSESSWENT$ COU£C"!ID AS TAXES,
EXC£PT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASS£SSI,tOITS NOT YET PAYASU:.
BY·
~I'...fh@L
''"
"
NORFOLK
;.._.'
COUNTY REDEWPTION OFFlCER
L
COUNTY RECORDER'S STA1EMENT
AUll TI<O_ _ _ QAY Of
008, AT _ _ _ .M.
lN BOOI< _ _ OF SU80l'I1SIONS AT PAGE--AT Tl"lE REQUEST OF
THE CALA.VER"S COUNlY SURVEYOR
OOOJI/.ENT NO.:
KAREN VARNI
COUNTY RECOROER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
''~;~~""'~-----------SHEET I Of S
25-4-0-C
----,
j
•
"
w
w
"'
u
•
~
"
~
iii
"
,),
~
~
"
ffi
i
~
~
•
~,
~
<
~
~
~
-m
"••
""
~
o~
' "' i """ w
~
~
"' "' "'
0
SHEET3
ti
•
' II
I
"
ii5
~.,
"
~0
u•
"'
~ 8•
'"
!lJo
""
@
!
'
~
! I II
I
. l
!!!
I
041007\ ffiiOlO-FlNAU.OWC
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
><
N~-~·:a."E
\
WTJ
\\
LOT~
\
?4.94'
{!o!EASlJREO)
,
S~2"'18'00''<~ 101.00
~G'
=
"G
\
_
49 "l:ty,."E
lo0·9 ~
r--,
N52"1S~~c-1l
7~~
I
I
I
I
r ___
'
~
'
~
N31"20'~"W
:
1·86
I
I
sc...!..£
I
I
I
1"~20"
''
' ------l
r---L-
0
DENOTES CAl..OJLA1Ul PO!r<f ONLY, NOlliiNG FOUND OR SU.
•
DENOTE'S 5/8" 01" RE9AR CAPPED R.C.£. 1829S S(T THIS SURVE:Y.
0
DENOT'ES FOUNO J/4" Ol,t, REBAR
1
I
I
01
OENOTt:S
1
I
I
:
I
N22'"'1>'15"W:
0.09'
I
1
I
I
L---~-~C!:!_E____
L.---~~~~£ ___ _j
DETAIL A
LEGEND
'
'l_ ------,
I
I
I
APRIL. 2008
I
\
'
''
~
BEING A PORTIONOFTHES.E. 1/4 OFSEcrJON 12
T.5 N., R.l5 E., M.D.M.
CALAVERASCOU1'iTY,CAUFORNIA
.J
I
I
I
\ .J
,I
NS:Z"'IS(REC-1)
0
L 1
'E ~S.s.4\
NS:Z"'G ~·e: :-,65.)9 1
--------
/
0
'
.
8
.
J'c::uo'
--~-----=~--------
BIG TREES ESTATES
!,,,,,;:~;" I/ SUBDIVISION
f
52
T .S.T .M. 2003·148
1 ~ ~ ~~z_,;H-~~
("'£"""
53·~;~~~~~~-5:.
N52"'1<'>~~c: 1 t·
..
I
(,loi~~O~o.oO'
- - --
='
: "'TI'
\
L
(RE:C-1)
I
!I
1I
1
1
I
~OUNO
TA(;~O
sua
(REC-1)
DENOTE:S RECCRO DATA PER J
(REC-2)
OENOTE:S Rt:CORO DATA PER 4 SVB 3
.J
~EASUREO
(R&Io!)
O£NOTE:S RECORO 6:
f>.U.E.
O£NOTE:S F>UeUC unUTY EASO.!ENT
O.E.
LS 3110 PER 3 SUB 32
J/"-" DIA RESAA TA(;GED lS J!!O POl 4 SUl:! 3
32
POl 3
sua
32
D€N0Tf:S OfiAIN.O.GE: EASOIENT
NOTt:S
1.)
. ,...--,-.
7
::~;;;:(i
•
/1>'1?;"0131
'c:itlL-
------
b-19'5\"J)"
LR-16500
L-6719
~
t.-o\~SJ"
,_.,, -----~~~o.;.-! __
•
R•\6500
--
~.
.•
':::..
LOT 8
• •
\ ~
~15"0£
""b.
/-<"
~,.,
i?v'
0
\.
boo2'JI'08"
':}. R-400.00"
·~. L•I7.S8"
•
t.-o31J"40"
r:';i'~
"'"'1511.16.
R•165.~"
7
L•43.74
--
I
•
6m31"02"2!.
/-. R~~~~:~~~
::~ir.--- - /:at;~ \ ----
______,,.,,
,,.,---
"
L~IS.Ot'
6~1S"11J,"!"
lP512"38"
R~\65.00"
L'"'15.01"
LOT 10
••"I;
.:!l: :::~
·(J)·~ 6~-{~t.c-')
57'1~'« {>~.~
n•y.iOO
•
S7"'
1>
ll-10"38'27"
~
__.e.---._
I.,__..- \..,.74.68;----..
"' Bs. 1>...
"....'{:,
'b,"'b_
R~165.00"
o. l•30.64"
.-:>Ji
~A.'"!
';"~~
';::!,..,..:
:;_~1. ~);~_
<»-:
I
8::;
.
LHE BASIS OF SEAAmGS IS P£R SVa 3-32. SEE SHUT S
.
,,_
""
~:.«"',"t•,
15" DE._...-,
~~
'j}
~ii.
.,_
~~
~4.
\-------151.Q.}"-----.l
'--------318.27"
16.!0".
170.87"
---------!
~*
--
o_o>.
'?-'S.i.
!31.30"
*
-""
~~
*
;::.~%
~-';?,·
' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , S 5 9 ' 4 5 " 5 J " W -1.69.30" ( R & I o ! ) - - - - - - - - - - - - j
DETAILC
SCAI.£:
1"~30"
DETAILS
SCAI.£' NONE
SHEET 4 OF 5
254{)-C
I
I I..!I'
II
'
0{1007\TRIQO-FINALJ.OWG
\
0
50
T.S N., R.15 E., M.D.M.
.•.
tOO
CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
'""~
-.;
200
APRIL, 2008
'o'
~-r~f
( !X f~>t0l I
.
.,In:
,
.·
g.
-~
·~'-
f:·
"'
.c
~-t..;.r.
.!'4,_'b''b,.'7'/~
if
~··
-~·:-~-.c
b' ,.,.......,
....._">
~' \o.'<-~"LI
~
-~~ ..,,:-:.'~-
.,
"?-0\t- &<¢
~
;.--.<:>f)
-~!:!i
f':'4~~(,
"
:"7'
~.,"'
.
<o'<->">'<:f
~ '~'<;
;::,.'?
~~~f;~~~~"
~··"'
ifff .•
y;
. ..,..,.,
~.,_;:f
.,_~-'<-
.-t
......
~~.!"
,._i."~o, "'
.·
of~
'!~~%~
~1~1-~,,
~"$~:,1
·-
.J
.·
N3810'00"W
10.00'
-...'b7 $' NJ810'00"W
"'/~'& 1o.oo· (Rtc-1)
LEGEND
0
CENOTES C,o.t.CULATED
POI~T
ONLY.
~OTHING FOIJ~D
OR SE:T•
DENOTES S/8- DlA REBAA CM"PE.D R.C.E. 18299 SH THIS SUR\£Y.
0
DENOTES FOONO 3/4- DlA REBAR TAGGED LS 3110 PER 3 SUS 32
01
DENOTES
FOO~O
3/4- OIA REBAA TAGGED LS 3110 PER 4 SUS 3
(REC-1)
OfNOITS RECORD DATA PER 3 SUB 32
(REC-2)
D€NOTES RECORD DATA PER 4 SUB 3
~,j£ASURED
PER 3 SUB 32
(R&M)
DENOTES RECORD o5:
P.U.E .
DENOTES PUSUC UTlUTY E.A.SE:MOIT
D. E.
DENOTES ORAINAG£ EAS8.!ENT
9>~
~
.
"'"'0;
~errs
1.)
"'"
.·
I
BEING A PORTION OF THE S.E. l/4 OF SECfiON 12
~'I
.·
III
'
I
BIG TREES ESTATES
SUBDIVISION
T.S.T.M. 2003·148
GRAPHIC SCALE
100
II
THE BASIS Of'
BEARI~GS
!S PER SUB 3-32, SU: SHEET 5.
R~wo.oo'
6->19"50'09"
t.-ls-so·n· RM...oo.ocr
(RCC-1)
SJS"SS'++"W 11238'
~~)
,...,_IJlS'IT
(looo1319'18"
R=300.00'
R~300.00'
L"'6S.75'
L-69.75'
(Rl::C-1)
SJ.6'-4.5'00"E 10.00'
(Rt&l.)
t:35::&:85:
~=~:gg: ~::m:~~:
(REC-1)
b-3'08'58"
6<>314'04"
R-135.00'
R•135.1Xf
(RtC-1)
L-7.~2'
L.,7.6:t , 1
S19'34'57-w 105.93'
Sl9'35'oo•w 105.99'
(REC-1)
L~>-7~·46'01.
R~so.oo·
L~>-79'4t>o2• (~l5!{f'
L,.69.61'
L•69.6D'
SHEET 5 Of' 5
25-<0-C
UPDATED
CALAVERAS COUNTY SURVEYOR'S
TAX INQUIRY AND CLEARANCE
July 18, 2008
TO:
LYNETTE NORFOLK, CO. REDEMPTION OFFICER
FROM: BRUCE CHILD, DEPUTY CO. SURVEYOR
RE:
BIG TREES ESTATES SUBDIVISION
RECEIVED
JUL 3 1 2008
CALAVERAS COUNTY
DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
T.S.T.M. 2003-148
!he attached Assessor's Parcel Map correctly indicates lands proposed to be subdivided or
adjusted. What amount would be required for the sub divider to meet the obligation
imposed by Government Code Section 66492.
Ail!1,N"'23Yilil6•022 .& 023, 23-037-001 & 002
TO:
BRUCE CHILD, DEPUTY CO. SURVEYOR
DATE 07/21108
FROM: LYNETTE NORFOLK, CO. REDEMPTION OFFICER
RE
T.S.T.M. 2003-148
Estimated Taxes
Assessor Fees
The amount required for the above referenced parcel(s) is:
This amount will be valid until December 31, 2008
due if the map has not recorded.
$1,844.63
75.00
$1,919.63
after which more money will be
COMMENTS:
PLEASE REMIT TO THE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
891 MOUNTAIN RANCH ROAD, SAN ANDREAS, CA. 95249
DO NOT SEND PAYMENT TO THE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE
REDEMPTION OFFICER'S CLEARANCE STATEMENT
DATE
SURVEYOR: DEAVER
Calaveras County
Community Development Agency
Stephanie Moreno + Director of Community Development
Michael Rodriguez+ Interim Chief Building Official
Robert Sellman + Planning Director
Date:
June 25, 2008
To:
Bruce Child, County Surveyor
From:
Gina Kathan, Planner II, Planning Department, CDA
Subject:
Final Map for TSTM 2003-148, Triolo (Big Trees Estates Subdivision)
Transmission by E-mail, hard copy to follow.
~
MAP CLEARANCE
The Planning Department has received memorandum from all Departments that the
conditions have been met. The Planning Department hereby gives clearance to record
to the map.
Government Center, 891 Mountain Ranch Road, San Andreas, CA 95249-9709
Planning Department
+
Building Department
(209) 754-6394 Fax (209) 754-6540
+
(209) 754-6390 Fax (209) 754-6396
Website: www.co.calaveras.ca.us
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Order No.
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
Name
Address
City&
State
r
l
Calaveras County Public Works
891 Mountain Ranch Road
San Andreas, CA 95249
J
L
DECLARATION CREATING ROAD
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AFFECTING
REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS
BIG TREES ESTATES SUBDIVISION
This Declaration is made by Jeanne T. Murphy, Trustee of the 2006 restatement of the James S.
Triolo and Elaine M. Triolo Trust dated October 13, 2006, FBO James S, Triolo and Elaine M.
Triolo, herein referred to as "Declarant."
RECITALS:
(a)
Declarant is the owner of the real properly hereinafter described and wishes to impose
thereon the requirement to maintain certain roads and related improvements, to the end that
they remain in good and serviceable condition.
(b)
The real property which is and shall be held, conveyed, used and occupied subject to the
provisions of the Declaration (hereinafter called "tract," which term shall also include any
additional lots made subject to the terms of this declaration under paragraph 13 below) is
more particularly described as follows:
Lots I through 12 of Big Trees Estates Subdivision
NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares and imposes thereon the following requirements
to assure maintenance of said roads and improvements. Said requirements shall run with the land and
shall be binding upon and enforceable by the owner or owners of each lot subject hereto, their heirs,
successors and assigns.
Triolo road mal11tcnancc agreement Rl.wpd
I.
Roads Included. This Agreement shall provide for maintenance of the following roads:
Timber Trail Court
By a majority vote, the owners of lots included in the tract may include additional roads or
portions thereof to the roads set forth above
2.
Maintenance. Upon completion of the above described roads to required standards, said
roads shall be maintained to those standards and in a good and serviceable condition by the
owners of lots within the tract.
3.
Drainage Swales alt([ Facilities. Drainage swales and facilities which are within the road
right-of-ways and are an integral part of said roads shall be maintained in the same manner
as the roadways as provided herein.
4.
Road Shoulders and Right-ofWav That portion of the private roads not surfaced will be
maintained free of weeds, trash and debris. Each property owner has primary responsibility
for maintenance of his frontage. However, if not maintained, said maintenance will be
accomplished under this Declaration.
5.
Cost Share. The total cost of compliance with this Declaration shall be borne equally by
each lot included in the tract, regardless of whether the owners of said lots have concurred
in the maintenance and/or repair undertaken.
6.
Votes. For all elections required by this Declaration, each lot in the tract shall have one vote.
A 'Majority' shall mean a vote of a majority of the lots included in the tract.
7.
Determination o[Need (or Maintenance. Upon written notice by the owner of any of the
above-described lots to the other owners, a meeting will be called within fourteen (14) days.
Said meeting will be conducted within the tract either at a time and place mutually
acceptable, or, if agreement cannot be reached, the meeting will be held on the fourteenth day
from the date of notice at 7:00p.m. at a location within the tract designated by the person
who gave initial notice.
8.
Extent of Maintenance Required. The determination of the extent of maintenance will be
by majority vote oflots in the tract.
9.
Improvements. A majority of the lots in the tract may authorize road improvements to be
made and financed by funds collected hereunder for that purpose.
10.
Contracting and Performance o[Work. The contracting and performance of work shall be
by majority vote of the lots in the tract.
2
II.
Collection o(Funds. The funds required to perform any work shall be placed in trust by
each lot owner within thirty (30) days after the final determination of need and contracting
costs have been determined. Upon failure to deposit required funds by one or more owners,
one or more of the contributing owners may seck whatever legal recourse may be available
for enforcement of this Declaration. The Court in any such action may award the successful
party reasonable expenses in prosecuting such action, including attomey's fees.
12.
Encroachments. The owners of lots included within the tract may, by majority vote,
establish standards for the constmction and maintenance of encroachments on the roads
subject to this Agreement. Each lot owner subject to this Agreement shall be bound by such
standards and shall be responsible to constmct and maintain his/her encroachment in
compliance with such standards.
Should any lot owner refuse to comply with standards established pursuant to this section,
by majority vote the remaining lot owners may cause such improvements and maintenance
to be done at the expense of the noncomplying lot owner. Upon refusal of such lot owner to
pay such expenses, one or more of the remaining lot owners may seek legal recourse as set
forth in Section II.
13.
Additional Lots. Owners of any additional deriving access from the roads described in (!)
above may at any time execute and record a declaration of their intention to be bound by this
Declr.ration. Upon recordation of such a declaration the additional lots shall become subject
to the terms and conditions hereof which shall be binding upon and enforceable by the
declarants, their heirs, successors and assigns. Owners of such additional lots shall notify
existing tract lot owners of their election to participate and shall have the right to vote as
granted them.
14.
Contiguity. Lots included in the tract subject hereto need to be contiguous.
15.
Association. The owners of lots included in the tract may establish an association or
cmporation and elect officers and directors and adopt bylaws for the administration hereof.
16.
Severabilitv. The provisions hereof shall be deemed independent and severable, and the
invalidity or partial invalidity or unenforceability of any one provision or portion thereof
shall not affect the validity or enforceability of other provisions hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, declarant has executed this Declaration the day and year written below.
3
CAT.NO. NN0!496
TO 2930 (12-90)
(General Acknowledgment)
State of California
County of
:i@l!R
Utrrv/k
} ss
personally appeared
'
personally k-R~-10-rne (or proved to me on the bas1s of satisfactory evidence) to be the person~
whose name() is/. re subscribed t~~within instrument
and acknowlet ged to me that h~hey executed the
same lll[li@heir authorized capacity~and that by
hi~eir signature.{e;) on the instrument the persony0;
or the entity upon behalf of which the persoi#acted,
ROMULO D. BUENVIAJE
executed the instrument.
COMM. #175557>
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
NOTARY PUBLIC· CALIFORNIA
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
(This area for official notarial seal)
Requested Board Meeting Date:
IJ_~_-02-08
Meeting Date:
Agenda Item il
CALAVERAS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -REQUEST TO HOLD PLACE ON AGENDA
1. Name of person, department, or group appearing before board: R<::bert C._ Lawton
Phone: 754-6422
2. Name of person submitting Agenda Form: Robert C. Lawton, County Administrator
Phone: 754-6422
STUDY SESSION ~
3.
CONSENT AGENDA []
REGULAR AGENDA []
4.
Subject (as it is to appear on agenda): Parks and Recreation Commission Study
Session - Proposition 40 Per Capita Grant Projects
5.
DEPARTMENT HEAD'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL:
Initial
6.
COUNTY ADMINISTRP.TIVE OFFICE FINANCIAL APPROVAL:
Initial
7.
COUNTY COUNSEL APPROVAL:
Initial
8.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO) APPROVAL:
Initial
9. The above described matter requires approval or adoption of:
[]RESOLUTION
[]ORDINANCE
[]MINUTE ORDER
[]AGREEMENT
[]BUDGET TRANSFER (Must be signed by Auditor)
[]OTHER (specify)
10. Estimated time required for agenda item: §Q MIN
Must document be recorded in the Recorder's Official Records? []yes ~no
Hard copies of documents will be provided only if certification is required and
the following is completed.
Number of certified copies requested
Certified copies will be sent to the person or department presenting the
agenda item.
Further distribution will be that department 1 S responsibility.
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1. 00-~Ii.ot submit agenda i terns to the Clerk of the Board until i terns 5 through 8 have been
initialed.
2. To be placed on a Board agenda, a
11
COmplete packet
11
must be submitted to Counsel
and CAO by noon on Wednesday, and to the Clerk of the Board prior to 4:00p.m.
on the second Thursday preceding each Tuesday Board meeting (subject to change
during holidays).
A complete packet consists of the following:
(a) One copy of this completed form, including Department Head 1 s, County
Administrative Office's Financial Division, Counsel 1 s and CA0 1 s initials.
(b)An original packet including the original of any resolution, ordinance,
contract, budget transfer, etc., requiring Board approval.
11
11
(c) 1 original & 8 copies of the complete "board packet 11 • Copies will be
distributed to the Board, staff, press and for County records.
3. ADDENDUMS:
Submit the additional form justifying addendum request.
CALAVERAS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA SUBMITTAL
ITEM TITLE
Parks and
Session on
Projects
Dept:
Contact:
Phone:
Recreation Commission Study
Proposition 40 Per Capita Grant
County Administrative Office
Shirley Ryan, Assistant CAO
754-6304
Published Notice Required?
Public Hearing Required?
BOARD MEETING
DATE
AGENDA
NUMBER
September 2, 2008
Supervisorial District Number
All
Yes:
Yes:
No:
No:
X
X
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors review the status of the Proposition 40 Per
Capita Program Projects as presented by the Calaveras County Parks and Recreation
Commission and provide staff with direction regarding the reallocation of project funds. Staff
also asks the Board to review the current membership of the Commission and consider
reducing the number of commissioners from seven to five per the Parks and Recreation
Commission's recommendation.
SUMMARY:
The County Park and Recreation Commission have been working with community organizations
and reviewing applications and requests for Proposition 40 Per Capita Grant funds. The
Commission requested this study session to present to the Board their recommendation for
project funding under the Per Capita Grant Program. They also wish to present a proposal to
change the membership of the County Parks and Recreation Commission. Based on direction
from the Board, the County Administrative Office will return on September 23 with a Minute
Order reallocating Per Capita Program funds to specific projects and with a resolution revising
the membership of the Commission.
FINANCING:
The County Administrative Office will work with the Parks and Recreation Commission on the
preparation of the required State applications for allocated projects and oversee the
construction of such projects. It is important to note, that under the grant guidelines, the
County is the applicant for these projects. As such it is ultimately the County's responsibility to
ensure that project construction meets State guidelines and that the project is maintained and
available to the general public according to the time frames set forth in the grant. Time spent
by County staff on the administration of these projects will be paid from the General Fund.
Under the Proposition 40 Per Capita Grant Program, up to 10% of grant funds may be used to
offset the administrative costs associated with the project. However, at the Board's directions,
no grant funds have been allocated to cover such costs. It is also important to remember that
the State deadline for project completion and reimbursement by the State is June 30, 2010.
Board of SupeNisors Agenda Submittal
Subject: Parks and Recreation Commission Study Session
DISCUSSION:
ON January 15, 2008, the County Administrative Office and the Parks and Recreation
Commission held a study session to update the Board of Supervisors on the status of the
Proposition 40 Per Capita Grant projects. In 2004, the Board of Supervisors allocated
$1,135,000 of $1,200,000 in funds available to Calaveras County under this program to provide
a continuing investment in parks and recreation facilities. The deadline for completion of these
projects and reimbursement by the State of California is June 30, 2010. With the deadline fast
approaching, both the Commission and the Administrative Office thought it imperative that the
Board review the status, viability and issues that might prevent completion of each project.
The Board gave direction during that study session, to continue with all but two of the projects
that were allocated funds in 2004. Those two projects were the Mark Twain Elementary School
Joint-use Gymnasium, funded under the Proposition 12 grant, and Sierra Logging Museum, as
the project was withdrawn at the request of the applicant. The Board also directed the
Calaveras County Parks and Recreation Commission to assist and facilitate the remaining
community groups with the preparation of the State-required application packet. The Board
also directed the Commissioners to return to the Board with an update and further
recommendations for the continued funding of existing projects and/or a reallocation of funds to
new projects in their districts.
Attached for the Board's review is the Park and Recreation Commission's report (Attachment
A), spreadsheet outlining new and existing projects (Attachment B), additional information on
recommended new projects (Attachment C). Attachment B, lists a total of nineteen new and
existing projects for the Board to consider.
It is staff's recommendation to combine projects where possible in an effort to limit the number
of projects submitted to the State. To date, only three Per Capita Grant projects have been
approved by the State. They are projects for the Bret Harte Sports Complex, C.B Hobbs Field,
and Feeney Park. As discussed in previous study sessions, the application approval process
has been lengthy and time-consuming. This can be contributed to a number of issues. One of
the major issues has been ensuring the required land tenure for these projects. Another is
gathering the required components of the projects, i.e. maps, CEQA documents, construction
cost, from the community organizations. Finally, significant staff time is required to administer
and monitor these projects. The Parks and Recreation Commission have been diligent in their
efforts to assist both the community groups and the County Administrative Office in moving
projects forward. However, it is ultimately the County's responsibility to ensure that the
applications, with all required documents, are submitted to the State for consideration, and that
the construction of these projects is completed according to State guidelines. With less than
two years remaining in the grant period, we believe that limiting the number of projects will
provide a better chance for successful completion of projects prior to the grant deadline of June
30, 2010.
The Parks and Recreation Commission suggested in their attached memo that due to limited
staffing in the County Administrative Office, Proposition 40 projects may benefit if they were
assigned to another departments. Staff believes that most county departments face similar
staffing and work load issues. The County Administrative Office is most familiar with the issues
of the Per Capita Grant and therefore recommends the administration of the grants remain in
the Administrative Office. As mentioned above, up to ten percent of a project grant may be
used for administration of Per Capita Projects. These funds could be used to hire a part-time
extra-hire dedicated to working on the Per Capita Grant projects.
The Parks and Recreation Commission is also requesting that the Board of Supervisors review
the current composition of the Commission (Attachment D). On May 22, 2007, the Board
adopted Resolution 07-083 creating a Calaveras County Parks and Recreation Commission
based on the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Task Force. The Board
established membership of the Commission to include seven members, one commissioner
appointed by each County Supervisor from within his or her supervisorial district, one appointed
by the Board of Directors of the Calaveras County Water District (CCWD) and one appointed by
the Directors of the San Andreas Recreation and Parks District.
The Commission is
recommending that the membership be reduced to five members, appointed by each County
Supervisor.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Board of Supervisors may provide direction to staff to allocate funds to any or all the
attached recommended projects. The County Administrative Office will return to the Board with
a Minute Order allocating funds to projects as directed.
Additionally, the Board, based on a recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission,
may choose to move responsibility for administration of the Per Capita Grant program to
another department. However, they may choose to allocate 10% of Per Capita Funds for the
hiring of a part-time extra-hire position in the Administrative Office to work solely on Prop. 40
projects.
If the Board chooses to change the membership of the Parks and Recreation Commission, the
County Administrative Office witt return with the appropriate resolution. No action wilt be
required should the Board wish to leave the membership of the commission as established.
OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT:
All attachments were provided by the Calaveras County Parks and Recreation Commission.
DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE:
Datd
ATTACHMENT A:
Calaveras County Parks and Recreation Commission Memo
ATTACHMENT B:
Prop 40 Projects Spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT C:
New Project Information
ATTACHMENT D:
Parks and Recreation Commission's Comment on Membership
[
CALAVERAS COUNTY
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Information Page for September 2. 2008 Board of Supervisors Study Session regarding Prop 40 Projects
As per the direction of the County Board of Supervisors, the Calaveras County Parks and Recreation
Commission has tracked the progress and assisted groups in the processes involved in obtaining Prop 40
Grant monies from the state. Each commissioner has engaged in this process with the groups in their
supervisorial district, and their activities have been specific to the needs of the projects in their district.
This includes both the Board Approved Projects that were part of the original Prop 40 Resolution, as well
as new projects in districts that have unallocated funds under the original resolution. It should be noted
that several original projects have been abandoned for various reasons, and another was funded by the
State of California through alternative grant funds. Prop 40 has been on the agenda at each of our
monthly meetings with each commissioner reporting the details of projects in their district, and we have
collaborated and developed action plans at our meetings for how best to proceed through the labyrinth of
issues that each project presents. This process has helped us recognize common themes among projects
throughout the county, and allowed us all to gain collective wisdom.
In recognizing the characteristics of both successful and unsuccessful projects, and to better serve
groups interested in developing recreation projects, we have developed Application Guidelines for
Recreation Facilities Projects. These guidelines serve as a roadmap for interested parties so they may
avoid the problems associated with projects and move more quickly toward a successful outcome. This
document has been posted on the Calaveras County website, and a copy is included in this board packet.
Please note that while our Prop 40 experience helped us establish the guidelines, we have established
them independent of any specific grant or statute. The availability of this information will assist local
groups to develop parks projects in the future, and will help the county to continue to advocate for parks
development.
The spreadsheet entitled "Prop 40 Projects" included in this packet has been developed by the
commission to track progress and identify needs for each of the projects, and to document and verify the
funding breakdown. Please be mindful that this has been and remains a working document. It is as
accurate as the most current data available to the commission as of today's date (8/12/08). The original
projects are not highlighted. The new projects and new funding for existing projects requiring a board
resolution are highlighted in green. The terminology used to describe status and for column headers is
not binding, and is easily amended if there are concerns it may be misleading. It is likely that some
projects will have changed status by the study session scheduled for September 2"d Our commission
recommends the board approve a new resolution for all new projects listed and updating the funding
amounts for the existing projects.
We have included project applications for the new projects. These are not formal Prop 40 applications
that will go to the state, although they may include some of the same documents that will be included in
the state application. The purpose of the applications is so that scope of work and information about the
new projects is specifically noted as per our guidelines, and is included for Board review.
The commission believes our attentiveness toward Prop 40 will result in positive outcomes for our
projects, both existing and new. It should be noted that the timeline for every project is now short, with the
state required completion date of July 1, 2010. The board will easily recall the frustration of the original
applicants as the application process ensued. We believe we have helped mitigate many of these issues.
It is our view that the county should consider the burden the GAO's office will be under as these new
project applications are processed, and all projects move toward completion. If the assignment of the
tasks involving Prop 40 and the interfacing with the state could be redirected to an alternative office or
department, it is likely that our projects will benefit.
Respectfully Submitted
Mason Goodale
Chairman, Calaveras County Parks and Recreation Commission
Attachment B
Green: New projects requiring BOS approval;
White: existing BOS approved projects.
Ltr from State to proceed received
Jenny Lind
:Veterans
Memorial
District
i Send State:
!
Mokelumne
5
6
consensus @ July 31 mtg.
State new project for 'notice to proceed'.
signed construction contract &
jpayment request form to State for release 80% of
Veterans
District
Veterans
Sandy Gulch
Park
Evidence of signed contract for construction &
Payment Request Form for State to release 80% of
Property rezoned. Waiting for
[ County-CCWD sales agreement
$240,000
2
'CCWD
Lease signed by CCWD Board &
BOSon 15 July.
3
9
CCWD
Need Facilities Control MOU
between
& White Pines
Project abandoried
to 03
2007
IFoundation has supplied County with necessary
Feeney Park
i 4 i Foundation
Idocuments to submit
Pave
for 80% of
- · reimbursement rec'd
5
IMTUESO
4-$70,000
5-$70,000 ;MTUESO
I Site Control MOU
Project paid by Prop 12; BOS redirected:
1. ?OK to 04 Bret Harte Angels project;
2. ?OK to 05 for allocation bv Suoervisor Thomas.
D1
I
I
·-
'
I
D2
.
--
I
I
D3
I
i
r
I
I
I
r
i
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
1-----i
r-------'
I
I
I
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
240,000
60,000
30,000
8,670
31,050
8,000
17,280
50,000
35,ooo
I
14
15
16
I
i'
I
I
I
I
I'
70,000
100,000
70,000
i
I
D5
15,000
15,000
35,ooo
30,000
i
i
I
-
I
14o,OOO
I
D4
!
'
I'
6
I
1-
1
2
3
4
5
1
17
19
-
i
I
''
I
I
1
I
'i
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
1
I
I
!
I
14o,OOO
I
160,000
175,000
210,000
240,000
I
24o,ooo
60,000
90,000
98,670
129,720
137,720
155,000
205,000
240,000
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
!
I
_l
I
I
I
70,000
170,000
240,000
!
II
I
I
I
!
I
l
I
145,000
25,000
70,000
I
I
_l
''
l
I
145,000
170,000
240,000
!
i
I
I
I
i
'
I
I
3 August 2008
Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail
INTRODUCTION
The Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail (MCCT) starts in San Francisco and ends at Ebbetts Pass
on SR 4 (Figure 1.). This proposal focuses on the eastern stretch of the MCCT inside the
Stanislaus National Forest from Moore Creek on the North Fork Mokelumne River to Ebbetts
Pass (Figure 2.). Most segments in this stretch have been completed while others are in various
stages of development from exploration and mapping to construction. The final task will be the
installation of trailheads, signage and spring development and when these tasks are met, the
MCCT can commission a route that is over 53 miles. The goal of current project proposal is
to seek funding for the purchase of the materials required to install the trailheads and
signs.
The Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail
-·
··-'- . ~omplei(.\d Traii Seg-!1lcJtts
Figure I. Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail connects San Francisco with Ebbetts Pass.
t
N
3 August 2008
MCCT Alignment
Moors Creek to EbbeHs Pass
legend
MCCT
-Troi
-s.o:ol1..,..,•1~
-
Ro.1d1_1M'o
{.;(:_?,: SPI_loll<it;
f~ PG~E; Propo~r
c:Je;.ur.ry_~y
PubKc l-oMI>
.,..,
&usF<>rci!Sr""<•
i·.,L · us~s W.l<l<loo" Aro><
A
'
~.
Figure 2. The MCCT inside the Stanislaus National Forest- 53 miles of trail.
CALAVERAS COUNTY SUPPORT
This project supports the Goals of Calaveras County for the following reasons:
I. The General Plan supports the MCCT:
Goal V -7: Conserve national, state and regional recreation areas in the County.
Policy V-7A: Support public and private entities in their efforts to maintain and improve
recreation facilities in the County.
lrru2lcmentation Measure V -7 A-1: Encourage support of the construction of the
Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail.
2. The Board of Supervisors supports the MCCT:
The Calaveras County Board of Supervisors created Resolution 91.499 in which they
further endorsed the concept of the MCCT and encouraged both County Departments and
citizen groups to participate in the planning and implementation of the trail.
3. The Visitors Bureau
The first Calaveras trails map was created in 2008 and it displays 155 miles of public
trails that are currently available to the public. Completion of this sign project will
2
3 August 2008
provide access to world-class landscapes in rural Calaveras including the North Fork
Mokelumne River, Salt Springs Reservoir, Mokelumne Wilderness and Calaveras Dome.
The beauty of these features is second to none, including those in Yosemite. At this
point, the Visitors Bureau can package Calaveras Trails in its promotion literature.
APPLICANTS
This signage project will be a collaborative effort between the following organizations with the
Stanislaus National Forest taking the lead role:
Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras District (STFl
Patty Clarey, Stanislaus National Forest Recreation Officer,
[email protected], 209-795-1381 x315
Dave Vosti, Recreation Specialist, [email protected], 209.795.1381 ex 322
(http://www.fs.fed. us/r5/stanislaus/ )
The Calaveras County Park & Recreation Commission (CCPRC)
Mary Boblet, District 3 Commissioner, [email protected] or 209.795.7818
(http://www.co.calaveras.ca. us/commissions/parksandrec/parks and rec l.asp )
The Mokelumne Coast to Crest Council (MCCTC)
Steve Diers, MCCT Council, [email protected], 209.772.8260
Jean Tarabck, MCCT Council, [email protected],
(http://www.mc2ct.org/)
RESPONSIBILITY
The CCPRC has the responsibility for writing the project proposal and securing Prop 40 funding.
The NFS has the responsibility for the installation and long-term maintenance of the signs at
their cost. The MCCTC has responsibility for installation and project coordination.
MAPS
Trail details from Moore Creek to Ebbetts Pass are shown on ll maps that follow this proposal.
[Note that only two of these maps are attached to this draft as examples.]
SIGN DESCRIPTIONS
There are two types of signs, directional and trailhead.
l. Directional signposts will be placed at intersections with other trails and roads. Each post
will be manufactured with a 5"x5"x6' recycled plastic reinforced with fiberglass rebar
(I'igure l; http://www.ecoboard.org/ ). Depending on the configuration of the
intersection, a post will have 3", informational plaques on one, two, three or four faces of
the post. The plaques will be attached to the post with vandal proof screws. Two types
of information will be needed.
a. STF Road Plaques. The STF road names will be placed at the top of the sign
using STF colors, green on white. Beneath the road name will be a double-
3
3 August 2008
headed arrow, either straight or L-shaped, indicating the alignment of the road.
STF colors will be used, green lettering on a white background.
b. MCCT Trail Plaques. MCCT information will be attached below the STF road
sign. The MCCT logo will be placed on top and the trail alignment beneath it
(Figure 2). The alignment will be depicted with a black arrow on a white
background.
2. Trailheads will be placed at the access points to the MCCT near a parking lot. Both STF
regulations and a trail map will be displayed (Figure 3).
Figure 3. 5" x 5" x 6', sandstone brown, recycled plastic post with an MCCT logo on top and a
directional arrow below. This sign docs not show the STF information described in paragraph l a
above. The STF information would be displayed above the MCCT information.
4
3 August 2008
Figure 4. Example of the trailhead kiosk to be used on the MCCT. This particular trailhead is
posted at Tryon Meadow.
DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
The position of each signpost on the trail is shown on the 11 segment maps in the Power Point
presentation. These maps were used to determine the number posts as shown below.
Number of Directional Signs
Trail Segment
Number
Calaveras County
Moore Creek to Calaveras Dome
Calaveras Dome to road 7N 14
7Nl4 to Mattley Creek
Mattley Creek to 7N35
7N35 to Blood's Ridge
Calaveras Total
15% Contingency
7
12
10
6
5
40
7
TOTAL
47
The II trail segment maps were also used to determine the number of plaques and their
information content. This project is complicated because of the need to display the name of each
road. A list of required plaques is shown below. Note that extra road name plaques have are not
listed. Instead, X blank plaques have been ordered for f1rture use the road name will be printed
on them when required for future maintenance.
TOTAL COST OF PROJECT IS $11,409.
5
3 August 2008
PROJECT TIMELINE
September 2008
Project approval by the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors
Submit Prop 40 application to County
Submit application to State
October 2008
Receive approval from State with a "Notice to Proceed"
Submit purchase requests to State with request
for and 80% distribution of funds to County.
November 2008
County passes 80% distribution of funds to the STF.
December 2008
Appoint STF Project/Grant Manager
Purchase materials
Prepare trail marker posts and plaques
Begin construction of \railheads
January 2009
Schedule installation of the signposts and !railheads
Spring 2009
Begin installation of the signposts and tJ·ailheads
Fall2009
Complete installation of the signposts and trailheads
Send Final Report to County for submission to State
Request final inspection from State before snow
Winter 2010
County requests final 20% distribution and passes it to the STF
COMMUNITY SUPI'ORT & OPPOSITION
The proposed segment of trail is inside remote areas of the SNF and far away from local
communities; citizen opposition is not expected. However, community support was polled
favorably at a public meeting on August 3rd.
LAND TENURE
Since the total budget for this project is less that $100,000, Proposition 40 Guidelines require
that the signs be in service for at least l 0 years. The durability of the recycled plastic material
guarantees service at I 0 years or beyond without maintenance.
The County will receive Prop 40 funding ii·om State and pass it to the STF for implementation.
To guarantee public use of the facilities, Slate Parks & Recreation requires an MOU between the
County and the STF. An Forest Service agreement form was recommended by the State Parks
and Recreation Project Officer. It guarantees public use for I 0 years and was prepared by the
Stanislaus National Forest Recreation Officer and approved by County Counsel.
6
3 August 2008
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
County zoning ordinance is not applicable. This project will be submitted to the County's
Planning Department for a notice of exemption.
The trails area to receive signage is NEP A compliant.
Patty Clarey
Stanislaus National Forest Recreation Officer
Calaveras District
Stanislaus National Forest
Mary Bob let
Commissioner, District III
Calaveras County Parks & Recreation Commission
Steve Diers
Chair
Mokelumne Coast to Crest Council
7
Jsigns: MooreCk to Calaveras Dome I
00
Sig'ns
~
Diiectlonal
fiJ
Tr<iiiQead
~ 1/'.eter
-u••
MGCT-
- - Road:S_Stanisl.::ius
'-"
c>
qg
"'0t0"
0
co
3 August 2008
..,..
zt;.:.•
0
,....
<iJ
E
.0
Cl
Cl1
ta
'""
.0)
·~
ro
u
N
t))
!::
.0'1
(/)
9
Emerson-Courtwright Memorial Ballfield Cost Estimate
AMOUNT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Prepare parking area for gravel, furnish and spread road base
for 50K square feet
Tot lot
Fencing barrier
Bleacher improvements
SUBTOTAL
OTHER PROJECT-RELATED COSTS
$21,200
$8,000
$1850
$750
$31,050
AMOUNT
Design
Administration
Contingencies
0
0
0
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
Sierra Pacific Foundation
George Reed
Brad Sutton
Emerson Excavating
Scott McReynolds & Todd O'Connor
$750
Emerson Courtwright Ballfield Enhancement Project
Ebbetts Pass corridor adults have the opportunity to recreate every
summer at the Emerson Courtwright Ballfield. Four nights a week, up to 50
vehicles are parked in the lot as women's, men's and co-ed teams play ball.
This project will enhance recreational offerings in the Ebbetts Pass
corridor. This project supports the Goals of Calaveras County as stated in the
General Plan and the interim Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
1. The Calaveras County General Plan:
Goal V-7: Conserve national, state and regional recreation areas in the
County.
Policy V-7 A: Support public and private entities in their efforts to maintain
and improve recreation facilities in the County.
This enhancement project will be a collaborative effort between the following
organizations with the Ballfield committee taking the lead role:
Emerson-Courtwright Ballfield
Tom Owens, Ballfield Chairperson
The Calaveras County Park & Recreation Commission (CCPRC)
Mary Boblet, District 3 Commissioner
Sien·a Pacific Industries
Mark Luster, Public Relations Director, 916-812-4894
Steve Kafka, local SPI contact
SCOPE OF WORK
This project will improve major components of the ball field to allow
secure, safe and enjoyable recreation for all ages. Specifically it will improve:
1. Ball field parking lot
The existing parking lot is marked with severe potholes and is extremely
dusty. Funds will purchase road gravel and labor to eliminate potholes and
level the parking lot.
2. Spectator seating
Seating is broken and needs replacement. New seating will be stained and
painted along with existing seating.
3. Children's play area
A small tot lot will be created and structure will be purchased and
installed.
4. Fencing
Prepared by M. Boblet
8/18/2008
A waist-high safety fence will be installed between the parking lot and the
ball field.
LAND TENURE
The landowner is Calaveras County Water District. The Emerson
Courtwright Ballfield Committee currently holds a 10-year lease. The committee
is led by Tom Owens, a middle school teacher at Mark Twain Elementary School
in Angels Camp and resident of Avery.
This current lease agreement will need to change to qualify this project
for proposition 40 funding. As of July 15, 2008 the Calaveras County Board of
Supervisors passed a minute order approving the White Pines Park lease
agreement between Calaveras County and CCWD. Calaveras County will next
enter in to an MOU with White Pines Park Committee to manage White Pines
Park.
A similar lease arrangement is needed to for the Ballfield to qualify for
proposition 40 funding. The ball field committee is in negotiation with CCWD to
relinquish its current lease and replace it with a lease similar to the White Pines
Park lease.
COMMUNITY SUPPORT
Community support exists in the form of donated parking lot construction
asphalt from George Reed Construction. A percentage of road base will be
donated by Brad Sutton. Emerson Excavating will provide some labor. Two
county employees, Scott McReynolds and Todd O'Connor, will provide asphalting
labor at no charge. Labor will be donated to install bleachers.
The Sierra Pacific Foundation contributed $750 to replace worn out
bleachers. Inquir·ies are underway to determine if an asphalt-paving vehicle can
be donated as well. Ballplayers and members of the community will also provide
volunteer labor to complete the bleacher replacement and some of the parking
lot improvements.
A community meeting was held August 3, 2008 and consensus was
achieved with no issues raised.
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Zoning is not affected. Regulatory requirements are not applicable.
It is expected this project will receive a notice of exemption from the
County's Planning department, similar to the exemption received by White Pines
Park children's playground.
FACILITIES TENURE
Since the total budget for this project is less that $100,000, Proposition 40
Guidelines require that the Ballfield be in service for at least 10 years.
8/18/2008
Arnold Rim Trail Community Meeting
April 22, Tuesday 6-Spm
Avery Middle School Library, Avery, CA
Interested community members are invited to attend the first in a series of meetings to
inform and gather input on the Arnold Rim Trail, a local volunteer and agency
collaboration project to enhance non-motorized recreational and educational
opportunities for Arnold and adjacent towns and communities.
Many residents and those who enjoy quiet recreation in the National Forest are pitching
in to enhance existing non-motorized trails as part of a greater Arnold Rim Trail (A.R.T.)
that will one day circle around mid-elevation Hwy 4 communities.
Key staff from Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras County leaders and local citizens
arc seeking resources, including Prop 40 funding, to improve and enhance the first
segment of A.R.T and are seeking community engagement and ideas for how best to
make this a safe and accessible outdoor classroom for learners of all ages, while meeting
the growing need for quality hiking, biking and equestrian ·trails near growing
populations.
69 Nuggets
Rallying 'round the Rim Trail
By Jan Hovey
This community truly rocks! Out of all the beautiful places I have had the pleasure to live
-Yosemite, Sun Valley, Idaho, Yellowstone and Napa Valley (did I mention San
Fernando Valley?)- Calaveras is the place I have grown to love most. What an idyllic
setting amid oak-dotted foothills, crystal clear Jakes, sprawling ranches and rows of
burgeoning vineyards for such an incredible group of people to find each other.
Everyone has different stories on how they got here. Some were lucky enough to be born
in Calaveras. Some moved from the big city to big country life. Many vacationed here
and returned to put down roots. My reason for moving here was a blind date.
It's true. I met my then-future husband, Chuck, on a blind date at Charles Krug Winery
when I was working in Calistoga. (Ask me about mud baths.) I had just given up on
having a man in my life, and wham- here comes Chuck. And the woman who put us
together also introduced Chuck to Barden Stevenot a few years before. So, Chuck's
reason for being here was an old girlfriend and a job at Stevenot Winery.
Gathering stories of how we all met here would make a pretty interesting book, but that's
not the purpose of this week's Nuggets.
A spirited community group in the greater Arnold area has been pooling their talents and
passion to make a dream come true. That dream is the Arnold Rim Trail. The Arnold Rim
Trail Committee invites you to the first of many public comment arid planning meetings
starting Tuesday, April 22, at the Avery Middle School Library from 6 to 8 p.m.
The Rim Trail is the brainchild of Warren Alford, a fourth-generation county resident. l-Ie
said, "We are beginning to see many in our community rally behind what can become
one of the greatest legacies we leave our children. We need to involve both those who
already live ncar the forest, as well as seasonal visitors, in the projects that will make our
forests safe from fire and erosion, provide an outdoor classroom for local students and an
accessible through-trail for hikers, bicyclists and equestrians."
Arnold Rim Trail Committee Chair, Randy Crutcher, joins Alford in this cause. "I am so
pleased to see that other volunteers like myself living in this area care so much about this
beautiful place we live and recreate in. They want to protect, enjoy and share it with
others in a way that respects residents and the forest groves, streams, waterfalls, grand
vistas and other features this non-motorized trail will link together."
The Arnold Rim Trail is a proposed non-motorized, multi-use trail adjacent to the
communities of Arnold and Avery along Highway 4. Still in the concept stage but
gaining steam, the trail would link public lands including Calaveras Big Trees State Park,
the Stanislaus River, White Pines Community Park and Lake and the 8,000-acre U.S.
Forest Service Interface area. The entire segment from White Pines Lake to Cougar Rock
has been flagged in and preparations are under way to establish a signed route.
During the April22 meeting, the history of the trail will be given, as well as ample time
to hear community input and work on problem solving. "This is an opportunity for the
public to participate in the planning process, designed with mechanisms to listen to
suggestions and concerns carefully," said Steve Lauterbach, committee member and
meeting planner.
Key staff from U.S. Forest Service Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras County leaders
and interested individuals are seeking community acknowledgement to use money from
Proposition 40 to improve and enhance what will become a distinctive community asset
among Sierra towns and neighborhoods. Rock on Rim Trail!
For more information on this community nugget-to-be, contact Randy Crutcher at 7953127 and visit online at www.arnoldrimtrail.com.
Arnold Rim Trail Sign Project
The Ebbetts Pass corridor area includes a named trail system called the Arnold Rim
Trail, located in the Stanislaus National Forest property also known as the Interface. The area
is a well-known hiking area to property owners, visitors and community residents who like to
mountain bike, run, hike and camp in it. This project will make improvements by placing
signposts and kiosks on a portion of this trail, providing directional and route information.
The website address is www.arnoldrimtrail.org
This project supports the Goals of Calaveras County as stated in the General Plan.
1. The Calaveras County General Plan:
Goal V-7: Conserve national, state and regional recreation areas in the County.
Policy V-7A: Support public and private entities in their efforts to maintain and
improve recreation facilities in the County.
The Calaveras County economic element is currently under construction and it lists
tourism as a leading industry. Few people realize that Calaveras includes world-class
landscapes. This trail segment in the STF will provide access to world-class landscapes in the
County including San Antonio Falls. The beauty of the Falls and other features is beyond
compare for their easy access within the wildland-urban interface areas of Calaveras County.
This signage project will be a collaborative effort between the following organizations with
the Stanislaus National Forest taking the lead role:
Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras District (STF)
Patty Clarey, STF Recreation Officer, [email protected], 209-795-1381 x315
County of Calaveras
Mike Miller, County Administration, [email protected], 209-754-6302
Arnold Rim Trail Committee
Tyler Summersett, Proposition 40 Coordinator
SCOPE OF WORK
This project will make improvements by placing signposts and kiosks on a portion of
this trail, providing directional and route information. The ART committee website address is
www.arnoldrimtrail.org
LAND TENURE
The landowner is Stanislaus National Forest. Calaveras County will partner with the
National Forest Service to purchase and install signage. The Arnold Rim Trail Committee will
partner to provide design preferences, project management and volunteer labor.
The MOU consists of a 10 year USDA Forest Service agreement suggested by the
State Parks and Recreation Department. The agreement was prepared by the Stanislaus
National For·est Recreation Officer and then reviewed and approved by County Counsel with
8/18/2008
minor changes. The MOU is back with the State Parks and Recreation Department for final
review.
SIGN DESCRIPTION
There are two types of signs, directional and trailhead. Kiosks will be placed at parking areas.
Directional Signs will be placed at intersections with other trails and forest service
roads. Each sign will be supported with a 5"x5"x6' recycled plastic post reinforced with
fiberglass rebar (see http://www.ecoboard.org/ ). Depending on the configuration ofthe
intersection, a post will have disks on two, three or all four faces of the post. Both
informational and directional information printed on 4" metal disks will be attached to the
post with screws in a routed in manner to deter vandalism. Road names will be routed in to
the posts.
COMMUNITY SUPPORT
Community support was secured at a community meeting attended by 27 people on
August 3, 2008. Vallecito Conservation Camp will be approached to provide volunteer labor.
The Arnold Rim Trail Committee has been providing ongoing trail maintenance
Stanislaus National Forest (STF) sponsored trail maintenance days. Over 428 hours of
community volunteer time is credited to arranging meetings, holding an ART introduction
community meeting, and providing trail maintenance.
Planning meetings take place each month, attended by the Arnold Rim Trail
Committee, STF Recreation Officer and Trail Coordinator, and periodically by the District
Ranger. Total STF financial support supplied in terms of labor totals $2469.94.
The Forest Service intends to collaboratively work with the Arnold Rim Trail Committee
to design, purchase, install and maintain signage and manage their use to maximize the
enjoyment of the Interface area for residents and visitors.
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Zoning is not affected. Regulatory r·equirements are not applicable. The trails area to
receive signage is NEPA compliant.
This project received a notice of exemption from the County's Planning department
and will be recorded with the County Recorder shortly.
LAND TENURE
Since the total budget for this project is less that $100,000, Proposition 40 Guidelines
require that the signs be in service for at least 10 years. The durability of the recycled plastic
materials guarantees service at or beyond 10 years without maintenance.
8/18/2008
The recycled plastic post (5x5x6) is reinforced with fiberglass rebar. It will withstand
10 years of wet weather conditions as required by Proposition 40.
Kiosks will be installed at parking lots, providing a site for posting safety information
and other recreational information which guides visitors to enjoy other venues within the
region and county.
8/18/2008
Definition Scope of Project for Prop 40 application
This document is provided as submitted as a supplement to the application
completed by Mary Boblet. It contains a definition of the scope of the project for which
Prop 40 funds are being sought for the Arnold Rim Trail, and under separate cover
includes mitigations to concerns raised by the Park and Recreation Commission.
The US Forest Service working with the Arnold Rim Trail Committee has fulfilled
all environmental review requirements to place signs in the US Forest Service Interface
area between Avery Sheep ranch road and the Sierra Nevada Logging Museum in
Nevada. The trail mileage is 10.46 miles. Patty Clarey and Lonnie Allison ofthe US FS,
Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras Ranger District have confirmed that placing this
signage within the two year window of the Prop 40 funding requirement is reasonable,
practical, and fully achievable. The Arnold Rim Trail Committee is therefore requesting
funding for signage on this 10.64 miles of trail.
Three kiosks will be placed at locations away from homeowners associations in
publicly accessible areas. The cost of the kiosks is for materials only. Labor for their
construction shall be provided by volunteers. Please note that the US Forest Service in
consultation with the Arnold Rim Trail Committee has selected a kiosk design that
matches the ones used on the Tahoe Rim Trail (see attached picture and minutes from
May, 2008, meeting).
Signs using Trex composite posts will be used. Attached to the posts will be metal
signs that are not wider than the post. They will use the Arnold Rim Trail logo in a
similar fashion that the Coast to Crest logo will be use on that trail's sign posts.
Directional arrows will also be attached to the posts. These will be placed at strategic
locations along the trail where needed to assist users to stay on the Arnold Rim Trail. The
interface area has an extensive number of paths and trails that cross the Arnold Rim Trail
in the Interface area. Posts will need to be placed to ensure that those following the
Arnold Rim Trail will not get lost. The signs will be placed for Forest Service and Arnold
Rim Trail volunteers. It may also be necessary to place accessory signs in some locations
on side trails to ensure clarity regarding the location and direction of the Arnold Rim
Trail.
The request for Prop 40 funding for signage in the 10.64 mile
section of trail in the Forest Service Interface plus the three kiosks is a
total of $8,670.
Arnold Rim Trail Minutes
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Final minutes
Meeting called to order: 5:40pm at Hathaway Pines US Forest Service Headquarters.
Attendance: Lonnie Allison, Mary Boblet, Jim Boyer, Rod Cummins, Paul Gehres, Steve
Lauterbach, Paul & Sharon Lienhart, Sid Marsh, Tyler Summersett
Review last meeting's minutes: The March 25, 08 minutes were reviewed. Mary indicated that
she needed to revise the section on "Parks and Recreation Update". We approved the other
sections of the minutes, and Mary will submit the Park and Rec revision subsequently.
Debriefing of April 22nd Community Meeting: At the Apri122nd community meeting, a list of
"Challenges/Concerns" and "Opportunities" were generated by those who attended. At today's
meeting we began the process of studying this list to ensure that we followed up on the
suggestions.
One concern mentioned at the April 22nd meeting was that Valley View Road needed grading
since it was not currently easily passable due to rnts and degradation. This road will provide
access at several points to the Arnold Rim Trail, but the condition of the road is also a safety issue
for the local community, since this road represents an escape route in case of fire. Shortly after
the Apri122nd meeting, Valley View Rd was graded.
The need to incorporate a number of communities and entities into the Arnold Rim Trail
planning process was identified. This includes CCWD, SPJ, the community of White Pines,
White Pines Park, the community ofl-Iathaway Pines, CalTrans, Calaveras Big Trees State Park,
and others. Steve will contact CCWD, SPl, Calaveras Big Trees State Park before the June
meeting. Others will also be contacted in the ncar future.
Selection of type of signs and trailhead kiosks for ART in Interface section: The various
options for types of signs, posts, and kiosks to be placed in the Interface Area of the US Forest
Service was made by Mary Boblet, District 3 Park and Rec Commissioner. An application for
funding these items through the usc of Prop 40 money is being made. The decision about what
sign age to use that was made at this meeting is important, because it will eventually set the
standard for signs, posts, and kiosks through the entire twenty five miles of the Arnold Rim Trail
system. After consideration of the options, which included input for the Forest Service on whose
property most of the Arnold Rim Trail will be eventually located and who will have responsibility
for maintenance and upkeep of these section of signs, the following decision was made by
consensus:
1) The Arnold Rim Trail signs will be attached to 4x4 wooden posts.
2) The ART signs will be aluminum similar in size to those being considered for the Coast the
Crest Mokelumne signs. They will feature the Arnold Rim Trail logo, and will be no wider than
the post so that they may be inlaid on the post. The directional arrows on the posts will be also
inlaid (routed) if possible, or attached without routing if necessary.
3) Trailhead kiosks will be similar to those used on the Lake Tahoe Rim Trail. They are
substantially constructed and are similar to kiosks found in a number of US Forest Service
settings. A picture of such a kiosk from the Lake Tahoe Rim Trail was shown at the meeting and
it was this 1ype of kiosk that was approved.
4) Trail signs indicated side routes will be attached to fiberglass posts.
Mmy had done costing calculations and estimates the signage, posts, and kiosks for the section
of trail in the Interface Area will be $5,300.
Consider adoption of Arnold Rim Trail "By Line": The Arnold Rim Trail will be multi-use
with hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians. There are guidelines that indicate the proper etiquette
when hikers, bikers, and equestrians encounter each other on the trail. It is also important for trail
users to be good neighbors to those who live in the communities near the Arnold Rim Trail.
These rules of etiquette will be included on the trailhead kiosks and in literature about the trail.
The idea of adopting a "by-line" for the Arnold Rim Trail to highlight the value of the trail to the
communi1y and the emphasize the importance of courteous trail use has been useful in other
similar settings. At this meeting the concept of adopting such a by-line was introduced and briefly
discussed. As an example, a by line could be "The Good Neighbor Trail". It could convey the
meaning and value of the Trail in a positive light and spirit. We decided to take this topic up
again at the next meeting to more fully explore the option.
Schedule next Trail work day: We decided that the next trail maintenance day would be
Saturday, May 31st, and that we would have another trail day in July, although that date remains
to be determined. For the Saturday, May 31st, work day, we will gather at the Hathaway Pine
Forest Service office at 8:30a.m. and carpool from there. We will finish by 1 pm. Notice will be
sent out separately from the minutes with details about the work day.
Consider inviting Meadowmont, Lakemont, and Millwoods to formally identify
representatives to attend ART meeting: We discussed asking Meadowmont, Lakemont, and
Mill woods to identify a permanent representative to the Arnold Rim Trail Committee. We were
pleasantly surprised to learn that Meadowmont had already made this decision and that Rod
Cummins was attending this meeting in that capacity. Steve will contact Lakemont and
Millwoods and ask them if they wish to identify a representative.
Other business: Rod offered to help with any ADA language or issues that we encounter in the
development of the Trail.
Confirm next meeting date and time, and select top two or three agenda items for next
meeting: The next ART Committee meeting was set for Tuesday, June 17th, from 5:30 pm7:15pm at the Forest Service Office in Hathaway Pines. Agenda items to include: 1) f/u report on
Prop 40 application 2) continued discussion of possible ART "by line". 3) continued review of
April 22nd community input.
Adjoumment: 7:08pm
Respectfully submitted,
Steve Lauterbach
ART Meeting Scheduler (also Chair of today's meeting in Randy Crutcher's absence)
Arnold Rim Trail Committee Responses/Actions consequent to the open community
meeting April 22"" with Stanislaus Forest Service officials, 3"1 District Parks and Recreation
Commissioner and members of the Amold Rim Trail Committee providing information
about funding sources and projects, status of trail enhancement, update on community
presentations about ART and solicitation of input from community members present.
Representatives of CCWD, SPI, and the SherifPs office attended the meeting .. This meeting
was advertised ahead of time with a press release that included the fact that Prop 40 money
under discussion. This was also included in a Calaveras Enterprise Lodestar article before
the meeting, and public flyers posted widely in the community included this information
about Prop 40 (see attached Lodes tea article and a copy of the flyers).
Background
The following are Arnold Rim Trail (ART) Committee responses to and actions taken in response
to a list of issues presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission by 3"1District Parks and
Recreation Commissioner Mary Bob let. The items on the list were generated at the community
meeting of approximately 60 people on April22, 2008 at the Avery Middle School Library. The
list was shared in a Commission discussion about ART's Prop 40 funding request for partial
signage on the Arnold Rim Trail segment located in the Interface Forest of the Stanislaus
National Forest.
The following list was excerpted from a larger list that included ART Opportunities, which are
included at the end of list of Challenges/Concerns. At that meeting, it was exciting to see the
community process at work. Please note that citizens who attended the meeting began to share
mitigations to the concerns that were being raised by their fellow participants, and these are
reflected in some instances in the "opportunities list" that was also developed. It was a
community meeting in the best sense, citizens were actively asked to identify their concerns, and
working together with their neighbors, began to problem solve. Below arc further mitigations to
the specific items on the "concerns" list.
Please also note that this list of concerns was an agenda item at the May meeting (see May, 2008,
minutes). The Arnold Rim Trail committee has continued to work on the list of concerns at
subsequent meetings and in discussions with homeowners associations.
It is important to note that early on the Arnold Rim Trail Committee mndc a consensus agreement
that signage, if any, on access points in the subdivisions would be at the sole discretion ofthe
homeowner association boards. Furthermore, it has been a cornerstone principle of the Arnold
Rim Trail philosophy to bring stakeholders to the table at every opportunity so that publicly
raised issues are addressed and mitigation solutions sought.
Challenges/Concerns
Item: Mapping)Jeedsto clearly reflect motorizcd/nol:t.1Jl'2torizcd rgut<oUQ,g. Distinguish..'LeL\Iice
roads for forest service ve]1icles vs. O!:!.Y,'U
Respo1~.2/1i
Lonnie Allison made the recommended mapping changes that addressed the community concerns
and made avnilable new Interim Interface Trails Area Guide, available at the Calaveras Ranger
District Office, Stanislaus National Forest. New maps will be made available over time reflecting
any chnngcs or improvements in ART.
Item: Safety ancj_Access to me>lical services
Response/s
Paramedics, local clinic and heliport for immediate evacuation readily available. Deputy Sheriff
available in immediate area. Increased signage as per Prop 40 proposal will ensure users stay on
well-designed trails that will take them to their destination, decreasing the risk of getting lost.
Item: Not enough disability access
Response/s
Trails currently being improved to accommodate full spectrum of abilities. Grant applications for
state Rural Trails Program includes request to design and construct 9/10 of a mile of wheel chair
access with safe rest and vista points adjacent trail. Other opp01tunities will be investigated.
Item: Fees might deter Qeople from using trails
Response/s
The Interface trails network portion and all portions of ART are planned as free-use areas. Fees
could be considered in the future to provide for maintenance and facilities development, but are
not planned at this time or in the foreseeable future
Item: Include other stakeholders as project progresses (CCWD and White Pines Park Committee)
Response/s
The ART Committee has an established record of contacting homeowners associations, nonmotorized recreationists and other stakeholders affected by the Prop 40 signage project proposal.
The steering committee has also established contact with SPI, CCWD, CalTrans, Calaveras Big
Trees State Park, and Blue Lake Springs Mutual Water Company to gain specific information
about areas beyond the Prop 40 project proposal for the Interface trails segment of ART.
Item: Safe Crossings ofHwy ±
)Zesponse/s
There are no Hwy 4 crossings involved in Prop 40 signage project application. ART is developing
a working relationship with Cal Trans for future trail segments requiring highway crossings.
F. CSRQ!l~e_i~
Valley View Rd was graded consequent to April 22'"1 meeting facilitating two-wheel drive travel.
Item: Garbage and Trail Maintenance
Response/s_
In coordination with Forest Service employees, ART promotes community volunteer clean up
and improvement days. Signage will help educate community about "having a light footprint,"
and other guidelines for respectful and cooperative trail behavior.
Item: ART access n.Q.i.nts mill__parking in neighborhoods-cag't accommodate now \Y)lat about the
fntlJre?
Project signage is only for the Arnold Rim trail itself and trail heads in public areas away from
homeowners associations, not in neighborhoods. Public lands parking provided with improved
access trails on public land. As opportunities arise, will make more public parking available.
Item: Unrestricted camping/shooting
Response/s
By law, camping is allowed on US Forest Service prope1ty; this is true nationwide. The Penny
Pines portion of the Interface has no target shooting allowed. Can legally hunt but must shoot
away from homes within 150 yards. Cannot shoot across a roadway. This is established by
California Department of Fish and Game law. Neither the camping nor shooting regulations are
changed by the marking of the Arnold Rim Trail
Item: Don't advertise ART until facilities are in place
Response/s
Publicity to date has focused on informing the public about the opportunity to help further
develop existing trails and public access, gathering input about community desires and concerns
in multiple meetings with HOA's and stakeholders along with large open community meeting in
April.
Opportunities (This list of items was generated along with the list of concerns at the April,
2008, public meeting.
Now have another good reason to improve county Valley View Drive/Rei
(A.R.T. access and fire escape route)
Eligibility for Prop 40 funds
Symbiotic relationship between trail users and homeowners-Good Citizenship
Create trail without alienating stakeholders
Immediate trail patrol of existing trails
Nature walks/star gazing/interpretation
"Wednesday night hike" guided tour
Brochures/signagc- trail etiquette
Trail "ownership" and pride through volunteer labor (emotional involvement)
Learn in a unique environment (students)
Camping
Participation in the Fomth of July Parade
Make GPS coordinates available
ADA accessibility/wheelchair
Generate revenues through "user fees"
Donations from other recreation clubs
Fundraisers
Safety/bonding/community building in #'s
ART community watch group
Share resources/responsibilities with other enthusiasts
It's a community focus
Advertise through Ebbetts Pass- The Movie
Involve other local communities/advocates
Involve youth groups: Scouts (various), schools, probation (community service), church
Service projects for local students
Hiking Club
Free! No one-upmanship
Creativity/activity stimulator
Disc golf facility between Timber Trails and Lakemont
Attachment D
Notes regarding the discussion and possible proposal to recommend to the
Board of Supervisors that the Calaveras County Parks and Recreation
Commission (CPRC) be restructured to only include the appointed members
from the five supervisorial districts, eliminating the voting member positions
representing CCWD and the San Andreas Recreation and Parks District.
•
As the CPRC grows in stature and influence, it is important that we move
forward as a unified entity without other influences.
•
The Commission is a county government entity. The business that has
been addressed and will be addressed by the Commission in the
foreseeable future is Calaveras County business. It is inappropriate for
other governmental agencies or districts to have a voting voice for the
county government, even in an advisory capacity. This is not to say that
the Commission or the County Government does wish to partner and/or
enter into agreements with CCWD, San Andreas Recreation and Parks, or
any other public or private entity involved with our mission. In fact, the
inclusion of other entities directly in our decision making process could
alter our advisory positions, or the perception of our positions, in certain
circumstances.
•
The inclusion of CCWD and the San Andreas Park & Recreation District in
the CPRC could cause and imbalance of influence in the future as other
special districts form or existing entities become more involved in park
facilities or recreation services in the future. For example, why doesn't the
Copperopolis Parks and Rec group have a separate voting seat on our
commission right now? Or the Veterans Districts who do so much for
recreation in our county?
•
Having fewer commission members will allow us to more easily have a
quorum at meetings.
•
It is also important for us to keep an odd number of commissioners to
ensure a majority vote on motions. To eliminate just one of the two outside
entities would be impractical, and fail to fully address the issues noted
above.
Respectfully submitted by Mason Goodale, District 4 Commissioner

Agenda Packet - Calaveras County, California

Transcription

Similar documents

Mad Scientists On Wheels

Trail of Tears (Robert Lindneux in 1942)

The Middle Way 3-days Meditation Program

Ribbon Cutting Ceremony - Great Rivers United Way

SSTF - TUHAYE.mxd - South Summit Trails Foundation

BAMBU ESTATE MidCost. Mintal, Davao City NORI

MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION - Wakeeney Mini Speedway

Rannel`s Kettle Run Nature Preserve

baf non-food application 2013

Room Rentals