church of god News - Church of God an International Community
Transcription
church of god News - Church of God an International Community
AUGUST2016 2016 // Volume Volume19 19 // Number Number33 // church churchof ofgod godnews: news:building buildingaagodly godlycommunity community AUGUST CGn CGn in this issue CGN AUGUST 2016 Volume 19, Number 3 3The Consequences of Belief: Part Two 9 Sevens & God’s Feasts 13 Villains and Villainy 16 Don’t Blame Me, It Wasn’t MY Fault! 18 Biography: Carol Johnson Church of God News is published by Church of God, P.O. Box 91150, Pasadena, CA 91109-1150 USA ©2016 Church of God, an International Community. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any form without written permission is prohibited. Publisher: David Hulme Pasadena, CA 91109-1150 USA Design: RM 22 Announcements Contributing Writers: Duane Abler, Michael Alter, Waldo Armstrong, Bill Butler, Martin Coates, George Delap, Paul Farrier, Peter Felten, Debra Guidolin, Graham Houghton, Mark Hulme, Eric Keefer, Graeme Ligget, Alan MacIver, Ian Martin, Marc Masterson, Linda Orchard, David Paszkiewicz, Jeremy Rapson, Paul Roberts, Vicki Scheck, Karen Steele, John Swain, Jim Yarbrough 24 Sources for the Season Senior Editor: Alice Abler 20 Something to Think About: Humility and Concern for Others 21 He Will Lift You Up Editorial Advisors: John Anderson, Robert Boraker, Jim Todd Copy Editors: Donna Butler, Eileen McKinley, Rachel Ramsey, Carolyn Roberts Editorial Office: Church of God P.O. Box 91150, Pasadena, CA 91109-1150 USA www.church-of-god.org Credits: Cover—ASA Goddard Space Flight Center Aurora image from Keller, Washington A coronal mass ejection (CME), associated with the April 11 solar flare, hit Earth’s magnetic field on April 13, 2013 but the impact was weak so only high latitude aurora were visible. This aurora photo was taken on April 14, 2013 in Keller, Washington. In addition to the aurora, Comet Pan-Starrs, a meteor, and a Cosmos Rocket moving along the Milky Way were captured in the photograph. Image Courtesy of Rocky Raybell Please send any articles or announcements for consideration to [email protected] THE CONSEQUENCES OF BELIEF part two We find our beliefs in the Bible—a hidden treasure, interconnected and interdependent as a whole, like a diamond with many facets. These facets, the truth to which you and I hold, have been revealed for our understanding. The consequences of our understanding are very real—for each of us individually, and for all of us as a community. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 4 In Part One of this article, we examined four foundational aspects of the truth revealed to us as God’s people, and the consequences of our beliefs. Beyond the Letter We begin Part Two with a fifth facet of our beliefs; another foundational aspect of the truth: 5. The spirit of the law underlies the actions of the converted person: obedience to the letter of the law is necessary, but not sufficient. One example, tithing, makes this point. The tithing of one’s increase and the giving of offerings are part of the Bible’s teachings. From this we learn the broader principles and spirit of right giving, becoming generous as God is. “And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land or of the fruit of the tree, is the Lord’s. It is holy to the Lord” (Leviticus 27:30). “You shall truly tithe all the increase of your grain that the field produces year by year. And you shall eat before the Lord your God, in the place where He chooses to make His name abide, the tithe of your grain and your new wine and your oil, of the firstborn of your herds and your flocks, that you may learn to fear the Lord your God always” (Deuteronomy 14:22–23, emphasis added throughout). Jesus confirms the rightfulness of tithing when He says: “But woe to you Pharisees! For you tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass by justice and the love of God. These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone” (Luke 11:42). If they had not done that, they would have come under the condemnation leveled at others before them: “Yet from the days of your fathers you have gone away from My ordinances [statutes] and have not kept them. Return to Me, and I will return to you, says the Lord of hosts. But you said, ‘In what way shall we return?’ Will a man rob God? Yet you have robbed Me! But you say, ‘In what way have we robbed You?’ In tithes and offerings” (Malachi 3:7–8). So not giving tithes and offerings is equated here with robbery and therefore breaking the eighth commandment against stealing. Leaving Nothing Undone Tithing and giving offerings is the way God provided for the work of the Church in the Old Tes- tament and also in the New. It funds that work externally and internally, as well as members’ observance of the annual holy days and the needs of the less fortunate among us. Offerings are freewill in nature, depending on the individual’s decision in light of blessings received (Deuteronomy 16:17) and actual needs made known, as in the case of famine in Judea: “Therefore I thought it necessary to exhort the brethren to go to you ahead of time, and prepare your generous gift beforehand, which you had previously promised, that it may be ready as a matter of generosity [spirit of the law] and not as a grudging obligation. But this I say: He who sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and he who sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. So let each one give as he purposes in his heart, not grudgingly or of necessity; for God loves a cheerful giver” (2 Corinthians 9:5–7). The spirit of the law with respect to giving includes the example of the widow’s mite. “Now Jesus sat opposite the treasury and saw how the people put money into the treasury. And many who were rich put in much. Then one poor widow came and threw in two mites, which make a quadrans. So He called His disciples to Himself and said to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you that this poor widow has put in more than all those who have given to the treasury; for they all put in out of their abundance, but she out of her poverty put in all that she had, her whole livelihood’” (Mark 12:41–44). This tells us that giving is even sacrificial at times, as is also shown in the case of the Macedonians who gave generously out of their poverty (2 Corinthians 8:1–4). Priorities and Sacrifice The Spirit-led mind is going to consider all of these matters and leave nothing undone. What, then, are some of the consequences of this belief? • A setting of right priorities. God comes first. He gives us everything and asks for one tenth and offerings for His work. But in return He blesses. A second consequence, then, is: • Blessings are received according to the promise and principle. “‘Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be food in My house, and try Me now in One In Spirit Let’s consider a sixth facet of the truth: 6. Marriage in the Church, and therefore the dating that precedes it, is for those who are like-minded. What follows here addresses marriages begun within the Church. It does not discuss those marriages already existing at the conversion of one of the mates. These marriages are governed by principles such as those expounded in 1 Corinthians 7:12-–20. Paul tells us that one aspect of marriage is a great mystery that concerns Christ and the Church. Let’s understand then that this facet of the truth concerning godly marriage is of central importance for our relationship with Christ. Breaking into the context of how converted husbands and wives should relate to each other, Paul takes the discussion to a higher level: “For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church” (Ephesians 5:30–32). The great mystery concerns not the institution of marriage itself, but the spiritual meaning behind becoming one flesh. As Adam and Eve were to become one flesh, united in body and mind, so the members of the Church become one in spirit with Christ, united with Him. In Ephesians 5, this union with Christ in turn becomes the prototype for godly marriage. It gives force to the truth that in a converted marriage the wife becomes one with the husband, and both are required to behave toward each other Tithing and giving offerings is the way God provided for the work of the Church in the Old Testament and also in the New. It funds that work externally and internally, as well as members’ observance of the annual holy days and the needs of the less fortunate among us. in a Christ-like way. He cares for her well-being in every sense, as if she were part of his own body, and she is his partner in a respectful and reverential way in response to that level of care and concern, understanding his role. The conclusion takes us back to the main point of the passage: “Nevertheless [now, in any case] let each one of you [husbands] in particular so love his own wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband” (Ephesians 5:33). Incongruously Joined What are some of the consequences of this facet of the truth? • With this view of marriage in mind, converted men and women cannot become involved in relationships that lead to marriage with the unconverted. Why would they? • Dating and marriage outside the Church create an unequal yoke. This is an image based in Scripture: “Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness?” (2 Corinthians 6:14). Recall what we read in Part One about the difference between the spirit-led mind and the normal human mind. The Greek here means “mismated,” “mismatched” or “incongruously joined.” While this passage is broader in application than marriage alone, the principle certainly applies. It is stated in very plain language. The image is, of course, of yoking two unmatched animals together to pull or plow. The result is that they do not work together well. The law had said not to plow by harnessing an ox and a donkey (Deuteronomy 2:10). Such an arrangement is counterproductive. In respect of entering such a mismatched marriage, we may think that we can still handle the differences. People in such cases will often claim cgn AUGUST 2016 | 5 this,’ says the Lord of hosts, ‘If I will not open for you the windows of heaven and pour out for you such blessing that there will not be room enough to receive it’” (Malachi 3:10). “Give, and it will be given to you: good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over will be put into your bosom. For with the same measure that you use, it will be measured back to you” (Luke 6:38). This doesn’t mean that there will always be an overflow of funds. Sacrifice is not sacrifice if it’s immediately compensated. More consequences: • Our participation in God’s holy days, given for our benefit, is fully funded. • The care of those of God’s people who may be less fortunate is provided for. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 6 Unity and godly behavior within the Church have to be evident as a witness to God’s calling and selection of His people, and the gift of His Spirit to change lives. that their case is the exception and try to rationalize going ahead. They might say, “But my friend does want to go the right way”; “they have shown interest in the Church”; “they have promised that I can always keep the Sabbath”; etc. Then the years go by and frictions may develop over children’s education, tithing, even Feast observance. If we are being tempted to go in this direction, we need to ask some who have had the experience and hear what they have to say. I have asked this question several times and the answer is mostly the same: they would not recommend it. To get a different angle, let’s take this discussion out of the marriage arena for a moment and think about an unequal business partnership. The non-Church partner may be a fine person with good standards, but is not coming from the same perspective when it comes to Sabbath and holy day observance, or even the handling of finances. Our stand on these issues may one day cause problems. Similarly, a non-Church partnership in marriage means that the non-member will always be in second place and not know why. They will not fully grasp that the member’s loyalty to God comes first. This is difficult for the unconverted to understand. It can lead to compromises to keep the non-member happy. And then there are the potential problems that arise with children, Sabbath attendance and sports opportunities. This can even occur when the partner is a member of one of the groups that have emerged from the same Church in recent years. Let’s think about forming marriage relationships with others who have a similar, but not the same, Church of God background. What are they party to when it comes to differing beliefs and practice? Do you want to set yourself up to be separate from your husband or wife in order to keep the Passover? Do you want to go to different Feast sites? Where will your children receive their Church education? Make no mistake: there are differences in teaching, and this will lead to conflicts of greater and lesser proportions. When people get married, they need to do so with the best possible chances of success. Pre- marriage counseling is in part about recognizing and reducing the areas of incompatibility. No two people are 100 percent compatible. Marriage is about learning to overcome the remaining incompatibilities. How much more difficult is it when there is compromised spiritual communication or none at all? Paul’s instruction to converted widows is instructive to all in the Church who are considering marriage. “A wife is bound by law as long as her husband lives; but if her husband dies, she is at liberty to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 7:39). This last phrase is very significant. It means that a widow in the Church should marry only within the same faith. Why, then, would the same rule not apply to those marrying for the first time? The aim is spiritual harmony, and marrying someone with the same beliefs is the best way to achieve that goal. Those who would marry someone of another understanding are not putting their faith first. Neither are they showing godly love and outgoing concern, in that they are not considering the burden that is being placed on the other person. Finally, Paul’s instruction to the church at Philippi is helpful: “Fulfill my joy by being likeminded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind” (Philippians 2:2). Why would we aim for something less in the most intimate of human relationships? Why not begin with the best opportunity for success? Unified in Belief and Practice We now come to a seventh facet of the truth: 7. God does not have many churches: He has one Church, unified in belief and practice. We have covered this many times, so let me begin in a different place. Here is a quote from a letter I recently received from a former member who is presumably still part of a Sabbath-keeping group. He explains his view of the Church. “Jesus never created a closed group or a religious institution. He was open to people with different understandings who, on following Him, observed the Torah and became more and more are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are” (John 17:6–11). Further, on that same evening Jesus prayed that the group of believers would expand in numbers beyond the first disciples. “I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will believe in Me through their word; that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me” (John 17:20–21). Unity and godly behavior within the Church have to be evident as a witness to God’s calling and selection of His people, and the gift of His Spirit to change lives. The history of the early Church is that it was in agreement and grew in unity. “Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey. And when they had entered, they went up into the upper room where they were staying: Peter, James, John, and Andrew; Philip and Thomas; Bartholomew and Matthew; James the son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot; and Judas the son of James. These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with His brothers” (Acts 1:12–14). Fundamental Agreement When the Holy Spirit came it united them in belief and practice. “Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them. And they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers” (Acts 2:41–42). When Paul wrote to the Corinthians about division in the Church, he made it clear that it was ungodly and was not to be tolerated. He didn’t say, “I understand you have different ideas about who should lead, and that’s just fine for now.” Nor did he condone different teachings within the Church. “To the church of God [singular!] which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours” (1 Corinthians 1:2). “Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same cgn AUGUST 2016 | 7 like Him (but not immediately). The best example is found among His own first disciples who had erroneous beliefs including false opinions about Him. Most of them fled Him before His death and didn’t believe in His resurrection!” Now, there are several errors here, but the idea that the early Church was not intended to be a singular, organized body is a good place to start. “Then He said to His disciples, ‘Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat; nor about the body, what you will put on’” (Luke 12:22). This is the context of what Christ teaches through verse 34, of which the following is a part: “Do not fear, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom” (Luke 12:32). Jesus referred to His disciples as a small, cohesive and supportive group. He knew what they had accomplished over the years they had shared. Despite their lack of understanding, and knowing that conversion and the coming of the Holy Spirit were still ahead of them, He said: “You are those who have continued with Me in My trials. And I bestow upon you a kingdom, just as My Father bestowed one upon Me” (Luke 22:28–29). He also said, “And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven” (Matthew 16:18–19). We also read, “And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd” (John 10:16). On the final Passover evening, Jesus prayed to the Father about His disciples. Here He makes clear that they are a small cohesive group, united by God’s calling and Christ’s teaching. “I have manifested Your name to the men whom You have given Me out of the world. They were Yours, You gave them to Me, and they have kept Your word. Now they have known that all things which You have given Me are from You. For I have given to them the words which You have given Me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came forth from You; and they have believed that You sent Me. I pray for them. I do not pray for the world but for those whom You have given Me, for they are Yours. And all Mine are Yours, and Yours are Mine, and I am glorified in them. Now I am no longer in the world, but these The history of the early Church is that it was in agreement and grew in unity. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 8 thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you. Now I say this, that each of you says, ‘I am of Paul,’ or ‘I am of Apollos,’ or ‘I am of Cephas,’ or ‘I am of Christ.’ Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Corinthians 1:10–13). This could not be any clearer! It’s a passage that says the opposite of what those who want to maintain contact after division say. There is to be no division, and division is the very ground on which we should not have contact. This is why Paul told the Romans to avoid such people. It’s also a passage that once more shows the reason that God’s people are unified—their calling, belief, practice, destiny. “Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them. For those who are such do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and flattering speech deceive the hearts of the simple” (Romans 16:17–18). And of course this is the pattern of teaching that Paul followed in all his epistles, and the pattern of behavior that he expected from the brethren in all places. He spoke the same things to one Church made up of congregations in fundamental agreement. Members of One Another “For I say, through the grace given to me, to everyone who is among you [he is writing to the congregation(s) in Rome], not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think soberly, as God has dealt to each one a measure of faith. For as we have many members in one body, but all the members do not have the same function, so we, being many, are one body in Christ, and individually members of one another” (Romans 12:3–5). “For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free—and have all been made to drink into one Spirit. For in fact the body is not one member but many” (1Corinthians 12:12–14). “For this reason I have sent Timothy to you, who is my beloved and faithful son in the Lord, who will remind you of my ways in Christ, as I teach everywhere in every church” (1 Corinthians 4:17). Clearly, Paul was able to teach the same thing across all the congregations in his care. Of course he also sought to be at one with the elders at Jerusalem. In the first letter to the Corinthians about many diverse problems and activities, we also find this comment: “For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints” (1 Corinthians 14:33). So we have clear scriptural instruction about the oneness of the Church and about our behavior within it. The consequences of this seventh facet should be clear: • The Church is not scattered in many directions. • It is not disorganized. • It is identifiable and unified under Christ. • It teaches the same doctrine in all its congregations. • We should want to be with like-minded brethren. We have examined seven foundational aspects of the truth that has been revealed to us— this precious jewel with many facets. But we’ve explored only some of the whole. There will be much more to consider as we continue to seek God’s mind. In the meantime, it’s helpful to recall these foundational truths as we go about our daily lives—keeping our eyes on the long-term goal, remembering that there are always consequences to what we believe. DAVID HULME [email protected] Have you ever noticed how many times the number seven occurs in relation to God’s feast days? In Leviticus 23, to which we often refer when reading about God’s feasts, it comes up 18 times: “the seventh day is a Sabbath of solemn rest” (verse 3); “for seven days you shall eat unleavened bread” (verse 6); “you shall present a food offering to the Lord for seven days”, “on the seventh day is a holy convocation” (verse 8), and so on. In addition to all of these mentions of the number, when we count the annual holy days, we find that there are seven of those as well. A significant mention of “sevens” within this chapter occurs in relation to the seventh month (see Leviticus 23:24, 27, 34, 39, 41). The Day of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement, the Feast of Tabernacles (which happens to be seven days long), and the Last Great Day all occur within the seventh month—more feasts than any other month. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 9 Sevens & God’s Feasts cgn AUGUST 2016 | 10 And beyond counting, have you ever thought about the significance of the number seven in relation to God’s feast days? Four separate festivals in the seventh month, two seven-day long feasts, a holy feast day every seven days throughout the entire year, and so on. This number is very closely attached to God’s festivals in many different ways. One cannot go very far in understanding God’s feasts without finding the number seven—many times over. Why is this? What does God intend for us to learn by relating this number so many times to His festivals, and especially within the feasts of the seventh month? First, we need to understand a significant aspect about the number seven from the Bible. This can be discovered in a place seemingly unrelated to the Feast days: the story of Abraham and Abimelech in Genesis 21. Well of the Oath “At that time Abimelech and Phicol the commander of his army said to Abraham, ‘God is with you in all that you do. Now therefore swear to me here by God that you will not deal falsely with me or with my descendants or with my posterity, but as I have dealt kindly with you, so you will deal with me and with the land where you have sojourned.’ And Abraham said, ‘I will swear’” (Genesis 21:22– 24, English Standard Version throughout). Abraham entered into a treaty with the Philistine king Abimelech. The two of them promised to be kind to one another, and to each other’s descendants, for as long as they were living near one another. However, Abraham was not sure that Abimelech could be trusted, because Abimelech’s servants had taken over a well Abraham had originally dug, which rightfully belonged to Abraham: “When Abraham reproved Abimelech about a well of water that Abimelech’s servants had seized, Abimelech said, ‘I do not know who has done this thing; you did not tell me, and I have not heard of it until today’” (Genesis 21:25–26). Abimelech denied knowledge of this theft. How could Abraham resolve this matter? To settle this contention after the formal agreement (Genesis 21:27), he separated seven additional lambs, beyond what was already given as the regular part of making a covenant (Genesis 21:28). Abimelech didn’t understand: “Abimelech said to Abraham, ‘What is the meaning of these seven ewe lambs that you have set apart?’” (Genesis 21:29). Abraham explained, “‘These seven ewe lambs you will take from my hand, that this may be a witness for me that I dug this well.’ Therefore that place was called Beersheba, because there both of them swore an oath” (Genesis 21:30–31). Abraham and Abimelech resolved their dispute over the well. But then God inspired the author of Genesis to make an interesting comment about the name of the place. “Therefore he called that place Beersheba, because the two of them swore an oath there. Thus they made a covenant at Beersheba” (Genesis 21:31–32). The place was named “Beersheba,” which literally means “the Well of Seven”: Beer means “well”, “pit”, or “spring” in Hebrew, and sheba literally means “seven.” It would appear that the “seven” came from Abraham giving Abimelech seven lambs. But in explaining why the place was named “Beersheba” —“the Well of Seven”—God doesn’t refer to the number of lambs. Rather, He says, it’s “because the two of them swore an oath.” Swearing of oaths does not require seven lambs—or seven of any item. So what is the relationship between the given explanation, and the name of the well? The key can be discovered in the Hebrew word for “swearing an oath,” which can be transliterated as shabah. Peering behind the English into the Hebrew, Genesis 21:31 could be rendered as saying, “The place was named Beersheba, because there the two of them shabah (swore an oath).” The similarity in the sounds of those words is not merely a coincidence. In Hebrew, the word for swearing an oath—shabah—is derived from sheba, the word for “seven.” That’s why Abraham chose to give seven lambs. It wasn’t just a random number. The number was very symbolic, and not just because they sound similar. It’s more than just poetic; they are etymologically related. To swear an oath is to complete the doing of it, but the ability to control what gets completed does not belong to us; rather, it belongs solely to God. This is why ideally, only God should be swearing oaths, and we humans should not. If people swore an oath, they “sevened” themselves (seven being considered the number of completion), and therefore they could be considered as having completed it. As Good As Done Some clues may be found within Psalm 110. This psalm speaks much about Jesus Christ, and especially about the time when He will rule over the whole earth as King and Priest—at the time that the meaning of the Feasts of the seventh month of God’s calendar will be fulfilled. Within this context, notice in particular Psalm 110:4. “The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind, ‘You are a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.’” Remember, to swear something is the same as completing it. And though humans may swear to something but then never do it, God can and will complete everything He has sworn to do—He never lies. Therefore, when God says that He will do something, it is as good as done! God has sworn an oath that Christ will rule over all the nations of the world; so in God’s mind, it’s done. We can’t see it yet, but it will be happening. It is certain. God swore an oath—He “sevened Himself”—so in His mind, from His timeless and eternal perspective, it is already completed. This is the symbolism that the number seven provides for us, especially as it relates to the feasts of the seventh month. Indeed, the Hebrew word translated “sworn” here in verse 4 of Psalms 110, is shabah—the same word mentioned in Genesis 21:30; the one that is closely tied to the word for “seven.” God has “sevened” Himself and will not change His mind; Jesus the Messiah will rule as King and Priest over the entire world, for all of eternity. It is certain. God has sworn it; therefore, God completes it. That Which He Will Do But we humans often have trouble seeing things like this. We don’t see Christ ruling, now. The symbolism pictured by the feast days of the seventh month is not now visible to our physical eyes and minds: Jesus has not yet returned. Satan has not yet been put away. God’s kingdom does not yet rule over the earth. All of existence is not yet in harmony with its Creator. In God’s mind, however, these are already completed, in a sense—because He has sworn that He will bring it about. God has said that it will happen; therefore, it will happen. Nothing could be more certain, or more relied upon. What God’s feasts picture could not be more real. The physical things that fill our lives day by day are not real at all, in the ultimate sense. Sure, cgn AUGUST 2016 | 11 Number of Completion The Hebrew shabah literally means “to seven oneself”—that is, to repeat a declaration seven times. The idea was that if someone said something seven times over, it was seen as being the same as completing it. If someone “sevened” themselves— that is, if they “shabah”—then they for all intents and purposes could be considered as to have done it. The swearing of an oath was seen as functionally equivalent to actually completing the task. To have something be “sevened” was to have it be complete. If people swore an oath, they “sevened” themselves (seven being considered the number of completion), and therefore they could be considered as having completed it. The relationship between seven and completion also appears is Genesis 2, when the Creation was being completed. “Thus the heavens and the earth were finished [or completed], and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished [completed] his work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work that he had done” (Genesis 2:1–2). Completion occurred on the seventh day. So we see that there is a strong relationship between the number seven and the concept of completion. What does this have to do with all of the occurrences we see of this number around God’s feasts? cgn AUGUST 2016 | 12 they are there, but when compared spiritually to what God’s seven festivals picture, none of it is really real. This temporary world is not where our minds should be focused. Our minds should instead be focused on the things attached to and symbolized by the number seven: the events that God has sworn that He will do; the events that are well on their way to being completed; the events that cannot be stopped from happening. These are the events pictured by the feasts in the seventh month, the seven-day-long feasts, the seven annual holy days, the weekly seventh-day Sabbath, and the seven annual feasts of God. The events associated with the number seven are involved with what God has promised to do; therefore, even if we do not yet see them, we can rely upon them just as surely as we could rely upon something that has already been completed. That is how certain they are. There is no reason to doubt. We are to firmly catch the vision that keeping these seven festivals provide. We are to learn what God is teaching us. We are to fully see the true reality: the completion of events that God is bringing about, pictured by these days. It Is Certain God has sworn an oath. He has “sevened” Himself. It is therefore certain. God will resurrect and change to spirit everyone who has served Him faithfully in this life, from every point in time. It is certain. God will take over this world so that humanity will no longer oppose Him nor will they hurt one another. It is certain. All of God’s people throughout history will become united with Him and be a part of His family, and will rule together with Christ as kings and priests and as fellow children of God. It is certain. Satan will eventually be put away and not be allowed to deceive the whole world anymore. It is certain. All humanity will be offered forgiveness and repentance, and finally have the opportunity for a right relationship with their Eternal Father. It is certain. The kingdom of God will rule over this earth; promoting peace, justice, happiness, and abundance to every single individual. It is certain. Eventually, all humans who have ever lived will be raised to life once again and will be given the opportunity to live in eternal unity with God. It is certain. And finally, all of existence will be totally and completely in perfect and absolute harmony with the Eternal Creator God, forever. It is certain. All of these things are completely certain, and can be totally relied on in our temporary sojourn in this world. Because God has promised them and “sevened” them, nothing can be relied on more completely. The profound symbolism of the number seven is associated with God’s plan, and has an inclusion in God’s feasts, especially the ones picturing times in the future within the seventh month. The number seven is connected to God’s holy day calendar because God will complete His work. He has sworn it. He has “sevened” Himself. It is therefore certain! BRIAN D. WALSH Why is there always a bad guy in a story? The answer is that without some challenge, the hero of the story doesn’t have anything to do, nothing to change or overcome. This goes for true stories as well, not just fiction. The Bible is filled with admirable examples of godly people who have risen to the challenges they faced in their lives, but there are also many examples of biblical “bad guys.” By studying these examples— seeing what drove them, where they went wrong—we can learn about them, and also about ourselves. A villain is defined as a wicked or evil person, who does evil deliberately; or the principal bad character in a film or work of fiction. Some authors, though, actively shy away from this stereotype, seeing only people with problems, struggling to solve them, driven by something not unlike the things that drive a hero. He or she could be anyone. Each of us is capable of villainy. Let’s look at a few examples. Ahab and Jezebel In 1 Kings 16 we read of Ahab, who is listed as one of the worst kings Israel ever had, doing more evil than all who were before him. It could be argued that his father had been a bad influence, but what really made him turn a corner was his wife, Jezebel, daughter of the king of the Sidonians. We find an interesting parenthetical statement: “There had never been anyone like Ahab, who was firmly committed to doing evil in the sight of the Lord, urged on by his wife Jezebel” (1 Kings 21:25, NET Bible throughout unless noted). She incited her husband—triggered his wrongdoing. Jezebel made it her mission to destroy the worship of God by killing the Lord’s prophets (1 Kings 18:3–4). In addition, she sponsored the worship of false gods—Baal and Asherah—by providing for their support (1 Kings 18:19). Later, we read of Ahab and Jezebel’s daughter, Athaliah, marrying into the line of the southern kingdom. She caused the same kind of wreckage there as her parents had in the northern kingdom (2 Kings 11). The impact Jezebel had on those around her was awful. She hated Elijah—after his success against her priests of Baal at Mt. Carmel, she swore an oath to kill him. We know the outcome of the story: Elijah is one of the great men of the Bible, he is never defeated, he can perform mighty miracles—what does he have to worry about (1 Kings 19:1–4)? The threat she made was apparently severe enough that Elijah ran. In the end, though, Jezebel died horrifically (2 Kings 9:30–37). Ahab’s death was also as Elijah had indicated it would be—not an auspicious one (1 Kings 22:34–38). Like any king of Israel, Ahab had the opportunity to turn to God and not fall under the influence of his wicked wife. Elijah warned him over and over about the results that his actions would have. Sometimes the villain is obvious, but sometimes the worst villain is the one behind that villain. Often, as in the case of Ahab, one can’t see the true impact of a wicked influence until it is too late. Potiphar’s Wife Sometimes the villain is someone very close to you, whom you might not immediately recognize as a villain. We know the story of Joseph, and we may think first of his brothers as the bad guys—they certainly acted out of envy and malice when they sold Joseph into slavery. However, let’s focus on Potiphar’s wife. Her villainy was of a particularly notorious kind, and it can teach us a lesson about evil desires. “So Potiphar left everything he had in Joseph’s care; he gave no thought to anything except the food he ate. Now Joseph was well built and good-looking. Soon after these things, his master’s wife took notice of Joseph and said, ‘Have sex with me’” (Genesis 39:6–7). Sexual desire is a feature of human life—God made it so. Its purpose is to bind a husband and wife together in the closest of human relationships. It joins minds together in a very special way (Genesis 2:23–25; Mark 10:6–9); this is the point of making male and female. What God joins together is good and worthwhile—fulfilling a deep purpose. Potiphar’s wife sought something else— not the deep, intimate connection of a committed relationship, but its facsimile—a false, fleeting connection, based only on lust. Joseph’s response shows that he knew God’s instruction on the matter. Joseph knew Potiphar had withheld his wife from him; but not only that, this would be sin—violating the commandment against adultery. God had blessed Joseph with a secure, trusted position, and he respected that. Potiphar’s wife, though, was trying to use her position of power to take advantage of Joseph. He knew the limits of his responsibilities, but she wanted him to violate the position of trust he’d been given. How many times did she ask, offer, cajole? It seems something was the final straw for her, because the false accusation she tells her husband is designed to direct the guilt away from herself and place all the blame on Joseph. Maybe she only wanted Joseph punished so that afterward he might be more malleable to her wishes, once he had seen the power she could wield (Genesis 39:8–20). She calls Joseph a mere slave—a worthless nothing who tried to take advantage of her. She also seems to blame her husband for the incident: It’s your fault; you brought him here. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 13 Villains and Villainy When we suffer some injustice, the task for us is to not become bitter due to the experience. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 14 The incident with Potiphar’s wife surely taught Joseph a number of hard lessons. Though he was innocent, he suffered in prison for several years. There is nothing in the story to indicate Joseph had done anything wrong, but the false accusation of Potiphar’s wife was enough to convict him. Sometimes, as in the case of Potiphar’s wife, the villain may be very close by—someone you don’t expect to be a villain. Pontius Pilate In Luke 3:1 we are introduced to Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea for 10 years. What kind of a man was he? What did he do in those years? He was a brutal ruler (Luke 13:1), who eventually was cruel enough, even by harsh Roman standards, to warrant his removal from office. Some more character background—he was unapologetic, unwilling to change his edicts: “Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It read, ‘Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.’ . . . So the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, ‘Do not write, “The King of the Jews,” but rather, “This man said, I am King of the Jews.”’ Pilate answered, ‘What I have written I have written’” (John 19:19, 21–22, English Standard Version). Pilate didn’t care that the sign was offensive to the Jews. He was in control and would remain so. He may have left the sign as it was to spite the Jews who had goaded him to crucify Jesus. He didn’t really care who Jesus was, either. When he questions Jesus, Pilate doesn’t find anything in what He says to be worthy of death. Pilate’s wife tries to convince him not to make the mistake of getting involved with this treachery (Matthew 27:15–19), and perhaps her words had some effect: “A third time he said to them, ‘Why, what evil has he done? I have found in him no guilt deserving death. I will therefore punish and release him’” (Luke 23:22, ESV). Why punish an innocent man? What was Jesus being punished for? It didn’t matter. “And Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day, for before this they had been at enmity with each other” (Luke 23:12, ESV). This is Herod the Tetrarch, son of Herod the Great. What kind of a man was he? Horrible, brutal, just like his father. He beheaded John the Baptist at his wife’s request. What would it take to be Herod’s friend? It wouldn’t be a proud moment for him to call you his friend. Pilate knew the Jews had accused Jesus out of envy (Matthew 27:18). When Pilate sought to release Jesus, the Jews threatened Pilate by claiming that he wouldn’t be Caesar’s friend if he let Jesus go (John 19:12–16). At this point Pilate decided to crucify Jesus, not because he believed Jesus was guilty of anything, but out of fear for his own position and standing with the emperor. In order to protect himself from the possibility of a charge of treason, Pilate was willing to condemn an innocent man to an excruciating death. Sometimes the villain is hardhearted and doesn’t care about the sufferings of others—perhaps simply caught up in the wheels of whatever process is in motion, and truth or right does not matter. When we suffer some injustice, the task for us is to not become bitter due to the experience. Laban Jacob, as we know, was the secondborn of Isaac, and his brother Esau would have been a hard act to follow— the better hunter, the older of the twins, the stronger, the more loved by his father (Genesis 25:27–28). Jacob would have grown up understanding the bless- ing that God had promised his father, the stories of Abraham’s life and his dealings with God, from his father, Isaac. Jacob knew what the blessings of the birthright entailed, and he apparently wanted to ensure he got them, no matter what it took. First Jacob connived to get Esau to sell the birthright to him for a mere bowl of food. Years earlier Rebecca had gone to God to find out why her pregnancy was so difficult (Genesis 25:22– 23). She was told the older was destined to serve the younger. Therefore, when she overheard Isaac telling Esau to bring him a meal of savory game so that he would bless him, Rebekah conspired with Jacob to deceive Isaac into blessing Jacob rather than his brother. The scheme worked, but it led to Esau threatening to kill Jacob. Rebekah then urged Isaac to send Jacob off to her family (Genesis 27:1–28:2). This is where the trickster meets his match. Laban was Rebecca’s brother, and Laban had more in common with Jacob than Jacob could likely appreciate at first. The trickster found himself tricked. After 20 years of working for his uncle, though, Jacob had learned a few things—not tricks to get his way, necessarily, but to rely on God to provide him justice. Genesis 31 tells the story. Jacob wasn’t a bad guy, but he did some dishonorable things. The wound he dealt his brother was apparently serious enough that, many years later, he was still afraid that Esau might kill him on sight. “Then Jacob prayed, ‘O God of my father Abraham, God of my father Isaac, O Lord, you said to me, “Return to your land and to your relatives and I will make you prosper.” I am not worthy of all the faithful love you have shown your servant. With only my walking stick I crossed the Jordan, but now I have become two camps. Rescue me, I pray, from the hand of my brother Esau, for I am afraid he will come and attack me, as well as the mothers with their children’” (Genesis 32:9–11). Jacob, true to his name’s meaning, “supplanter,” lived the life of a trickster, scheming and taking what he wanted— even though God had already indicated the blessings would come to him. He learned his lesson, though, at the hands David and Bathsheba When the prophet Nathan came to tell David a story about a rich man who stole a lamb from a poor man, it was a turning point for David: “Then David became very angry at this man. He said to Nathan, ‘As surely as the Lord lives, the man who did this deserves to die! Because he committed this coldhearted crime, he must pay for the lamb four times over!’ Nathan said to David, ‘You are that man! . . . Why have you shown contempt for the word of the Lord by doing evil in my sight? You have struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and you have taken his wife as your own! You have killed him with the sword of the Ammonites. . . .’ Then David exclaimed to Nathan, ‘I have sinned against the Lord! . . .’” (2 Samuel 12:5–7, 9, 13). David does not fight, does not justify himself, but simply acts to recognize his sin, admit his villainy and seek forgiveness. David’s reaction to being confronted with his sin was the right one—he goes to God for forgiveness. We read in more detail in Psalm 51: “For the music director; a psalm of David, written when Nathan the prophet confronted him after David’s affair with Bathsheba. Have mercy on me, O God, because of your loyal love! Because of your great compassion, wipe away my rebellious acts! Wash away my wrongdoing! Cleanse me of my sin! For I am aware of my rebellious acts; I am forever conscious of my sin” (Psalm 51:1–3). Sometimes the villain is you. Learn to See the Villain What are we to think of villains like these? What do we do when we are faced with villains in our own lives? We find a clue in the story of Jezebel, when she schemes to have Naboth killed so that Ahab can take his vineyard; she bribes two men to give false witness: “Also seat two villains opposite him and have them testify, ‘You cursed God and the king.’ Then take him out and stone him to death” (1 Kings 21:10). Your Bible may say “wicked” or “worthless men” instead of “villains.” Are such people, such villains, truly worthless? How do we relate this description of them as truly wicked with Jesus’ comments in the Sermon on the Mount? In addressing the spiritual application to the command against murder, Jesus warns us to not condemn others as worthless. “You have heard that it was said to an older generation, ‘Do not murder,’ and ‘whoever murders will be subjected to judgment.’ But I say to you that anyone who is angry with a brother will be subjected to judgment. And whoever insults a brother will be brought before the council, and whoever says ‘Fool’ will be sent to fiery hell” (Matthew 5:21–22). Verse 22 indicates that if we are angry—the Greek indicates wrathful, furious, full of anger—this results in judgment. In the second clause—if we insult someone, we will be brought up on serious charges—the insult here is a little more serious: in Aramaic Raca— “one who is totally lacking in understanding.” Here we start to get an inclination of someone worthless. The third repetition, calling someone “fool,” is serious, and bears a serious penalty. Fool is a relatively light term in our culture—what this really means is that we have judged someone as worthless; a condemnation of the whole personality. We are not to call anyone worthless. We are not in a position to condemn even a villain as worthless. God sees worth in every human life. Only God Himself knows how to weigh the heart of a man. And if a villain repents, we must forgive just as God forgives when there is a change of heart. Forgiveness is based upon repentance. Even if the villain repents, however, every villainous act will have its physical consequences. Only God can change or heal those. We, like Jacob, must learn to trust in God to work out the villainy that we will inevitably suffer. As the apostle Paul wrote to the church in Rome, we are not to seek revenge: “Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord” (Romans 12:19, emphasis added). If we are wise and observant, we can learn to see both the obvious villain, and the not-so-obvious one, the villain behind the obvious villainy—the influencer, the real reason for evil in this world. Sometimes the villain seeks us out particularly; other times, he really doesn’t care—the wheels of villainy will just keep rolling as long as Satan is in control of the world. Sometimes the villain is very much like us. If we have been villainous ourselves, we might expect to get a bit of our own medicine back, and we will hopefully be the wiser for the experience. We can all be villains from time to time. Our task is to overcome the villainous tendencies and learn to live as God desires. We need to be able to recognize villainy for what it is and to understand how to best resist its influence. Villains are not worthless, but like each of us at times, villains are simply deceived or under a wrong influence. MARK HULME [email protected] cgn AUGUST 2016 | 15 of his uncle, a bigger cheat than Jacob. In the end, Jacob learned to rely on God, not his own clever schemes: “If the God of my father—the God of Abraham, the one whom Isaac fears—had not been with me, you [Laban] would certainly have sent me away empty-handed! But God saw how I was oppressed and how hard I worked, and he rebuked you last night” (Genesis 31:42). Sometimes the villain is just like you. Sometimes God uses the villain to teach you a lesson about yourself. Don’t Blame Me, It Wasn’t MY Fault! H cgn AUGUST 2016 | 16 ow often have we heard or even said those words when something bad happens? It’s a natural reaction—none of us likes to be wrong or be liable for anything negative. Typically we quickly search for ways to explain and justify failure or setback by placing blame on something or someone else before we ever think to put the blame on ourselves. It’s a trait most people struggle with—but it’s not a quality any Christian should have. We May Have a Problem When we are first called into God’s Church it’s a very exciting yet sobering time. We are enthusiastically embracing our calling and eagerly recognize many things in our life that need to change. It is something most of us take very seriously during those early days, and we work hard to make changes in order to become a better person. As the years go by and the newness of our initial calling wears off, we may fall back into a few worldly habits. Bombarded by the examples we see daily in society, it’s easy for carnal human nature to take over and pull us back into sins we may have initially overcome. After a while, we might find it easier to harden our hearts and justify the sin in our minds, minimizing its severity or blaming it on someone else or a set of circumstances supposedly out of our control. In reality, any time we have to convince or justify something to ourselves, it’s a good indicator that something is usually wrong. It’s a line of thinking that only works against us when we should be admitting fault and taking responsibility for our actions. In Galatians 6:4–5, the apostle Paul writes, “But let each one test his own work, and then his reason to boast will be in himself alone and not in his neighbor. For each will have to bear his own load” (English Standard Version). When we take sole responsibility for our actions, it is something we can and should be proud of. It shows humility, maturity and growth in our calling. No Excuses! Admitting our need to change is hard, but actually changing who we are is even harder. Unfortunately today’s society does not make this any easier. The message we typically hear is one that offers excuses for our shortcomings—who we are and what we have done is not our fault, but rather Accepting Responsibility Here Peter says: “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know—this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. . . . Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, ‘Brothers, what shall we do?’” (Acts 2:22–23, 37, ESV). Those hearing this sermon could have simply denied their personal responsibility for Christ’s death. They could have redirected the blame onto the Jewish leaders who hated Christ, or even the Roman government that actually carried out His execution. After all, they weren’t the ones who viciously beat Christ or nailed Him to the stake. They didn’t drive the spear into His side. Rather, miraculously, their reaction was not to place the blame on others; instead they admitted their involvement, took responsibility for it and asked the apostle Peter what they needed to do to change. A Tale of Two Kings We have examples of both ways of dealing with such situations in stories of Saul and David, who each had to be rebuked by God’s prophets for their sins. Their different responses to being confronted with their guilt led to two very different outcomes. The response of Saul was to declare his innocence and to blame the people—people for whom he was responsible as their leader: “And Saul said to Samuel, ‘But I have obeyed the voice of the Lord . . . but the people took of the plunder’” (1 Samuel 15:20–21). Ultimately, Samuel had to tell Saul, “The Lord has rejected you from being king over Israel” (1 Samuel 15:26). When God sent Nathan to rebuke David for committing adultery with Bathsheba and killing her husband, David’s response was, “I have sinned against the Lord.” Nathan the prophet responded by telling David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die” (2 Samuel 12:13). Psalm 51, written after Nathan came to David, shows the depth of David’s recognition of his sin: “For I acknowledge my transgressions, and my sin is always before me” (Psalm 51:3, ESV). Though David’s sin was grievous, he was forgiven and he will be a ruler in God’s kingdom, as recorded by the prophet Ezekiel: “And I, the Lord, will be their God, and My servant David a prince among them; I, the Lord, have spoken” (Ezekiel 34:24). Prayerful Commitment to Change Our calling is to a life of accountability. True conversion starts with self-examination and the admission of wrongdoing in thought and behavior. Once we can truly accept this, humble ourselves and honestly tell God we are committed to change, He will help us overcome. Admitting something is our fault when we have made a mistake is a difficult thing to do. It goes against our human nature and our pride, and makes us feel vulnerable to correction. Despite those things, we have to realize it is something that is essential for our spiritual growth. We can be thankful that God is always willing to help us overcome these negative human qualities—as long as we are honest and really want to change. It’s simply a matter of recognizing we have a problem and making a serious commitment in prayer to change. So the next time something bad happens and we are involved, there is only one reaction we should have: Yes, it was my fault. PETER FELTEN [email protected] cgn AUGUST 2016 | 17 a reflection of how we were raised or the influences in our environment. Although it’s true that such negative influences can have a real effect, the focus of society’s message is to embrace who we are and lay blame on factors other than ourselves for our actions. For those who have been called by God, however, this type of thinking is not an option. It’s not an excuse or crutch we should use. God expects us to follow His ways and disassociate ourselves from this world’s way of thinking. His hope is that we will seek out our shortcomings, take full responsibility for them and use the power of His Spirit to change. A good example of this is the apostle Peter’s sermon on the Pentecost after Christ had ascended to heaven. Peter was given an opportunity to preach to a crowd of observant Jews in Jerusalem. From his message it’s obvious that many of the people there were part of the crowd that had been involved in the support of Christ’s crucifixion. BIOGRAPHY cgn AUGUST 2016 | 18 Carol Johnson Carol Fansher began her life at Longview Farm, known as “the world’s most beautiful farm,” in Lee’s Summit, Missouri, on August 19, 1923. Ten years later, she moved with her parents to another showplace, nearby Hallmark Farm (owned by J. C. Hall of Hallmark Cards), where her father continued his work as a well-respected Jersey cattle specialist, breeder, judge and speaker, managing the awardwinning herd and the farm. Carol went to school in a one-room schoolhouse for a while, and had opportunities to travel to California and north along the West Coast with her mother and aunt by automobile in 1929 (while her father sailed to Jersey to acquire cattle), to travel around the country by train with J. C. Penney and the dairy herd, to visit the New York World’s Fair with her parents in 1939, and later made news as a female cattle judge—most unusual for the time. Carol met her future husband, Robert Ruxton, just as World War II was beginning. While she was singing in the choir at the Methodist church they both attended in Kansas City, she saw him on the front row and decided to ask him to a picnic at her parents’ home. But Bob, who had just earned a degree in Mechanical Engineering and joined the Army Air Forces, was soon sent to Europe. In the meantime, Carol continued her education at Kansas State University (then College) in Manhattan, then moved to Dallas, Texas, to work at Braniff Airlines. She waited anxiously for news as he flew the skies over Europe, and landed on the beaches of Nor- mandy two days after D-Day. After his safe return, they were married on August 4, 1946. Carol worked at various jobs, including Black & Veatch Engineering, Pratt and Whitney Aircraft, Fluor Corporation, checking crystals with an oscilloscope, and cooking for the American Legion, until their son Gary was born in 1954. Bob had been working at Linde Air Products while earning two more degrees (in business administration and engineering), then began a new job involving classified, top-secret work at Bendix Aviation Corporation. Bob started listening to the World Tomorrow program, thinking it was a science fiction program at first. He shared it with Carol, and they soon realized it was much more real and much more important than any fiction. There were no ministers nearby, so they wrote to the Pasadena headquarters for Church literature and devoured it. One time, their son Gary was seriously ill, and they feared he would die. Bob called Pasadena for an anointed cloth. As soon as he hung up the phone, Gary’s fever broke, and he recovered completely. After meeting with several ministers on a baptizing tour, they were baptized in St. Louis, Missouri, in August 1957. Two years later, they sold their home, left their extended families and most of their belongings, packed the rest into their Jeep and a trailer, and moved to Pasadena, California, where Bob attended Ambassador College. They lived on campus for a while, on the corner of Del Mar and Orange Grove Blvd. Although Carol was not a fulltime student, she took some classes and enjoyed helping out in different ways, including hostessing, and testing recipes for unleavened bread with her neighbors Mrs. Isabel Hoeh and Mrs. Loma Armstrong. Soon they settled in their own home in nearby La Cañada, where daughter Alice was born. While he was a student, Bob assisted with Facilities Management, and helped in designing, coordinating and engineering the stream, fountains and landscape architecture; planning the overall design and layout; and remodeling buildings on the expanding Pasadena campus. With plans for another campus in Big Sandy, Texas, Bob was sent there to lay groundwork (he was the first A.C. student to study there) while Carol and the family stayed in California. After he graduated with his fourth degree, the family relocated to Big Sandy, where Bob assisted with counseling and visiting members, and worked as Director, and Supervisor of Buildings and Grounds of the campus. Carol set up house as he laid out Faculty Row, the airstrip, the lower dam, the campgrounds in the Piney received a plaque posthumously commemorating Walter’s 25 years of service to the Church, and a gold watch for her service at the side of both her first husband and then her second husband over the decades. She remained in Redding for seven more years, serving as hostess for church meetings and activities, and winning more awards for her home arts at the local county fair. In 1998 she moved to Southern California to live with her daughter and her family. In addition to a son, a daughter and two stepsons, Carol’s extended family includes a son-in-law, two daughters-in-law, seven grandchildren (and their spouses), and four great-grandchildren. Carol has always loved travelling with friends, and has visited many different Feast sites throughout the US (including Alaska and Hawaii), and in Canada, Australia, England, and Wales, making new friends and memories along the way. Throughout her 93 years, she has seen God’s hand guiding her, with healings of serious ailments and untold blessings for her and her family. She recalls times when she needed help and was overwhelmed by the prayers and selfless concern of members with their outpourings of help. “With all the ups and downs, everything has eventually just fallen into place along the way,” she says, recalling many “coincidences” and perfect timing of events throughout her life. Today, she attends the Pasadena, California, congregation with her daughter (Alice) and sonin-law (Duane Abler) and their extended family. For several months this year, she was ill and had to stay home, missing Passover and holy day services for the first time since the 1950s. Carol says this experience gave her more empathy and time to pray for those in need, but is delighted to be well enough to attend services again—and is looking forward to entering her seventh decade as a baptized member of God’s Church. ALICE ABLER [email protected] cgn AUGUST 2016 | 19 Woods, wells, roads—whatever required design and engineering. Carol loved the opportunities for family activities there—boating and swimming at Lake Loma, riding motorcycles and scooters, flying from the airstrip. As the campus began to form on the raw Texas land, Bob oversaw the construction of the first buildings. He had just begun working on the construction of the World Tomorrow recording studio when he was killed in a car accident on May 14, 1965. Carol and her two young children continued to live in their home on the Texas campus for a few years. One night she kept spilling her beverage, and wondered why. She looked on the floor, and there was a rattlesnake in the house, coiled and ready to strike. Carol killed the poisonous snake with a fireplace tool, then heartily thanked God for His protection and guidance. She made news again when she won the grand prize for her yam pie at the Gilmore, Texas, “Yamboree” festival. It was the first time a nonnative Texan had won the famous pie contest. Carol married Walter Johnson, a widower with two sons (Doug and Dave), and the blended family moved to Kansas City, Missouri. Walter was soon ordained an elder, and in 1968 the family was sent to Vancouver, Canada. With a background in finance, Walter worked in the Church office, served as an elder in the nearby congregations, and was often sent to the larger Feast sites where he served as business manager and in other roles. At a time when wives and mothers were expected to stay home and not be employed outside the home, Carol was his able assistant, hostessing, helping with counseling and visits, and rising to the new challenge of cooking with local moose, salmon, pheasant, fiddleheads and huckleberries. She regularly entered baked and canned goods in the Pacific National Exhibition, nearly always winning first place ribbons. In 1980, they were transferred to Waco and Austin, Texas, where Walter served as an associate pastor for eight years. Carol has fond memories of hosting guests, meetings, Spokesman Club, and socials for the congregation at their house. Eight years later, they were transferred to Redding, California, where Walter served as associate pastor for several congregations in Northern California. Walter was soon retired, then became ill. Carol cared for him as he continued to serve in the congregations as much as he could, giving his last sermon (while seated) just two weeks before he died of cancer in 1991. Shortly afterward, Carol SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT Humility and Concern for Others cgn AUGUST 2016 | 20 “Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves” (Philippians 2:3, English Standard Version throughout, unless noted). A common human perspective is to view ourselves at the center of everything in a selfimportant way, but God counsels us to have a humble view of ourselves and to reckon others as more important than ourselves. We should consider how we may follow His advice. God the Father values humble-minded people whom He can work with and bless, who will walk with Him with a sense of dependence on Him; those without pride in themselves, not thinking themselves above others. Natural View of Ourselves Paul compares our natural self-importance with a mind prompted by God’s Spirit: “So if there is any encouragement in Christ, any comfort from love, any participation in the Spirit, any affection and sympathy, complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others” (Philippians 2:1–4). In verse 3, most translations say, “Do nothing . . .” from rivalry and conceit, or selfish ambition and vanity. But the NET Bible comments: “There is no main verb in this verse . . . . Thus, although most translations supply the verb ‘do’ at the beginning of v. 3 (e.g., ‘do nothing from selfish ambition’), the idea is even stronger than that: ‘Don’t even think any thoughts motivated by selfish ambition.’” The terms rivalry and conceit, or selfish ambition and vanity, sum up how we naturally view ourselves in our own eyes and in relation to others. But our Father says we need to develop humility, change our view of our own importance, and apply it in our relationships with people around us. So what is humility, exactly? 5:5, quoting Proverbs 3:34), who will walk with Him (Micah 6:8) with a sense of dependence on Him; those without pride in themselves, not thinking themselves above others. Even more than that, He wants us to count others more important than ourselves. This is a term applied to authority figures who have supremacy or importance in this world (Romans 13:1, 1 Peter 2:13). So we are to have this progression of converted thinking: from selfishness, to humility (lowered self-evaluation), to thinking of others to benefit them. We can’t do this naturally because we think so highly of ourselves! But as Paul says in Philippians 2:1, we have encouragement in Jesus Christ and participation in God’s Spirit. Then, beginning in verse 6, Paul points out that Jesus Christ had status as the Word with God the Father, but He didn’t grasp at it like human nature would—in ambition and conceit. Instead He came as a human servant to work out the Father’s will for us to have eternal life in His family—the ultimate benefit to us: “And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death . . .” (Philippians 2:8). Jesus Christ is the very definition of humility, and the example for each of us! And this thinking—this humble mind of Jesus Christ—can be in us as well: “Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 2:5, New King James Version). Lowliness of Mind Paul here uses the term lowliness of mind. In the Greco-Roman world at that time this was a negative quality, associated with being of low social status (see Vine’s Dictionary and BDAG Lexicon for tapeinophrosune). Then, and now, the world encourages us to be self-assertive—not humble! God the Father values humble-minded people whom He can work with and bless (1 Peter Benefitting Others The apostle James gives us three ways to ask God to help us lower our self-concern and to benefit others—especially to increase love, encouragement and accord in God’s Church. “Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God” (James 1:19–20). GRAHAM HOUGHTON [email protected] He Will Lift You Up In Philippians 2:3, the Apostle Paul exhorts us to “let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself.” That’s a tough task. It is one thing to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Mark 12:31, 33), but to go beyond that, to the point of putting the needs of others ahead of our own, requires an advanced level of growth and godly maturity. Someone once said that there are two kinds of individuals: those who say “Here I am,” and those who instead say “There you are.” Which kind of person are we? If our chief priority is to bolster our own image, then we will come short of the Spirit-led requirement to sublimate our egos and show outgoing love and concern, which are the hallmarks of the mature disciple of Jesus Christ. In the 1970 film Patton (subtitled in the UK Lust for Glory), there is a scene in which the Nazi strategists are viewing newsreel footage of the American top commanders. First, they see images of General George Patton, a swaggering, brash officer in a gaudy uniform with pearl-handled revolvers on his belt. Then the pictures they see are of General Omar Bradley, an ordinary commonplace-looking man—indistinguishable in appearance from the soldiers he leads. The Nazi planners comment on the fact that Bradley looks less like a general, more like a lowly GI. It is interesting to discover in the course of the film, which accurately depicts events from the World War II, that it is Bradley—rather than Patton—who is given the senior command. Those who serve humbly are best able to inspire. The apostle Paul was not alone in promoting humility and sacrificial service. Quoting the book of Proverbs, the letter of James reminds us, “God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble” (James 4:6). A few verses later, James says, “Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord and He will lift you up” (verse 10). Worldly popularity and adulation are of little consequence in the overall scheme of things. Far more valuable and to be cherished is a mind-set which is submissive to the Almighty God and obedient to His instruction. If we are learning now to overcome our carnal tendency towards selfpromotion, then we will become valued assistants to Jesus Christ in positions of service and leadership during His millennial rule. These encouraging words from 1 Peter 5:6 are something to think about: “Humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time.” JEREMY RAPSON [email protected] cgn AUGUST 2016 | 21 In other words, each of us must: 1. be willing to listen to others from the heart— their thoughts, hopes and concerns—not so concerned with “self,” 2. speak to others helpfully, thoughtfully, carefully—if we don’t, our professed religiousness is worthless (James 1:26), and 3. keep our anger (so often just selfish frustration) under control when dealing with others, and keep well within God’s right way of doing things. We all struggle with an attitude of conceit about ourselves. But our Father exhorts us to be humble, letting Jesus Christ’s thinking prevail in us through His Spirit; to hold our self-opinion and self-esteem in check; and to listen and speak thoughtfully and helpfully—showing godly concern for others. ANNOUNCEMENTS Obituaries cgn AUGUST 2016 | 22 Goodall Mary Kay Goodall died peacefully on February 1, 2016, in a Mountain Home, Arkansas, nursing home at the advanced age of 98. She was a faithful member of God’s Church from her baptism as long as she was cognizant of life and its meaning. Mrs. Goodall led an interesting life filled with challenges that she met head-on. Born Kay Holford in Gary, Indiana, on May 4, 1917, she lost the sight in her right eye as an infant and it had to be removed. When she was two her left eye was seriously damaged in an accident, severely restricting her sight. Attending school was a challenge because of her handicap, but she persevered and was eventually fitted with glasses to make use of what vision she had left. As a young adult she got her credentials from a Chicago beauty college and landed a job managing a beauty parlor until the neon light fixtures began to affect her vision. She moved to a job at Sears Roebuck and later married her boss, Joe Goodall. While she was pregnant with her first child in 1946, glaucoma limited her vision to distinguishing shapes through a fog, although she could still see bright colors. During this time she traveled the Chicago Loop by herself, and would follow someone wearing a bright color in order to get across busy intersections. In 1962, Mary was able to obtain a telescopic lens that enabled her to read sheet music, allowing her to indulge in her love of music. She learned to play the organ, guitar and ukulele, and even had her own radio show in Chicago called “Aunt Mary,” on which she played the ukulele and sang. The Goodalls moved to Mountain Home, Arkansas, in the early 1970s. There Mary was instrumental in starting a group for visually handicapped individuals who needed encouragement and help in developing life skills. Mary’s philosophy was, “There’s no use butting your head against a fact. There’s a lot you can still do if you don’t let self-pity get in your way.” Mary’s husband died in 1972 and she carried on by herself, raising a grandson. By 1980 Mrs. Goodall had developed ulcers on her cornea and took the chance of sight or total blindness by undergoing a corneal transplant. To her delight, it was successful—she was even able to read highway signs on the ride home from the hospital. Mary began to study some Church literature that belonged to one of her daughters, and was baptized in 1994. She was an enthusiastic member of the Mountain Home congregation, always encouraging and inspiring everyone. Brethren fondly remember Mary’s love of singing at the Feast of Tabernacles. She also sang for local nursing home residents, and enjoyed seeing their faces light up when they recognized old familiar songs. Mary told a friend, “To me, this is what life is all about. When the Bible talks about giving, it doesn’t mean just money.” She believed that what we give of ourselves comes back in greater measure. Mary is survived by a daughter, a son, three grandchildren and her dearest friend, Linda Hutchins, a member of God’s Church, whom Mary considered family. All look forward to seeing Mrs. Goodall in the resurrection. Johnson Jean Johnson, a faithful member of God’s Church for 50 years, died at home on Sunday, May 8, 2016, after a very short bout with cancer. Jean was born on April 6, 1940 in Baltimore, Maryland, to Elmer and Loraine Bryan. She was the second born of five children. Jean loved to care for children. When she was eight, her father died. Her mother was pregnant with her fifth child and was both emotionally and physically unable to care properly for all her children. Thus started Jean’s caretaking role, a role she embraced her entire life. One day a few years later, while Jean was caring for her neighbor’s children, their older brother, Carl, came home on furlough from the Army. Before long, Jean and Carl were married (February 2, 1956). Jean was introduced to God’s way of life by her uncle, who lived in Gladewater, Texas. She attended her first Feast of Tabernacles in 1962 with two small children, 4 and 2, in tow. She was baptized in 1966. Although Jean’s husband never attended, she was faithful to God’s Word and was faithful in raising her children in God’s way of life. Many times Carl threatened her or said he wouldn’t be there when she returned from the Feast, but she trusted in God and everything always worked out. Jean found joy in caring for four of her grandchildren, one nephew, and two great nephews. She also found great joy in caring for her yard and gardens. She was always out in her yard, mowing, edging, mulching, and planting flowers. In the winter months, she cared for her beautiful houseplants, including her much loved African violets. Martin Irene Marie Josephine Martin was born into the Mardell family on December 8, 1917, in Kent, southeast England, in the midst of World War I. A few days after she was born, she was placed in a sideboard drawer to offer some protection during a Zeppelin raid. Her father, a dental practitioner, was from Hertfordshire (north of London) and her mother was from Saxony in Germany. As a young child, Irene was taken by her mother to meet the family in Germany. That experience, including an encounter with a dancing bear, was one of her earliest memories. Her only other significant travel was to the Channel Isles for one Feast of Tabernacles. During the 1920s, the family moved to the UK Midlands, where her father continued as a dentist. Irene’s first job was in a Conservative Association office. When World War II started, she became the chief clerk under the local fuel overseer, allocating coal rations to merchants. She continued in this job until 1945, and volunteered for the women’s Auxiliary Territorial Service for a short time. Contact with her relatives in Germany was permanently lost during World War II. Irene married Charles Martin in 1941, and after the war settled into life as a housewife and mother. In 1959, Irene came in contact with what was then the Radio Church of God. She became a founding member of the Birmingham congregation the next year. Irene became well known for her enthusiastic correspondence with brethren, her industrious compiling of sermon notes (which she provided to those unable to attend services), and her warm and caring greetings to visitors. Irene and Charles were married for over 56 years before Charles died in 1998. As a widow, Irene lived with determined independence, notably maintaining sizeable gardens and planting many hundreds of flowers each year in seasonal stages. She enjoyed providing hospitality to family and friends. At age 87, she suffered a severe double leg fracture in her garden, a long way from her house. She crawled to the house and up some stairs to a telephone to call her son and declare, “I’ve got a problem.” After long weeks recovering in a hospital, she generally continued as before, though her repaired leg always gave her much pain and discomfort. She kept mentally active with extensive Bible study, crossword puzzles, and following world news. She also continued writing to and calling brethren who were alone (as she was). Frequent solo shopping trips continued through her 95th year, as did extensive gardening and providing excellent meals. She attended weekly Sabbath services and also Feasts of Tabernacles until 2014. At the close of that year, she became very ill and her cherished independence abruptly ended. From early 2015, she received full-time care in a nursing home. This upheaval was traumatic and mental decline limited her ability to adapt to the new situation. One encouragement was to meet her fourth great-grandchild Isabelle and to monitor her development from baby to toddler in a flow of photos. As she further declined, correspondence and telephone calls became too difficult. In January 2016 she very painfully fractured a rib and entered hospital. When she eventually returned to the nursing home she was extremely weak. Having completed her journey through this life, she died peacefully on February 7, 2016, at the age of 98. All through many adversities of later life she remained determined to do what was right. Her mind was set on building God’s character and obtaining eternal life. As a motto she liked the last line from Tennyson’s Ulysses: “To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield.” That matched her character well. She is survived by her children (daughter June and son Ian, an elder in the Birmingham, UK, congregation), along with five grandchildren, four great-grandchildren and other extended family. Schenker Alvin Anthony Schenker was born on the island of Aruba in the Dutch Caribbean on March 23, 1946. Alvin became the man of the house at a young age when his father left the family. As the oldest child, he was given the responsibility to manage all the household chores while his mother worked to support the family. He was much loved and respected by his younger brother, sister, half-brothers and half-sister for the various ways he helped and supported them. It’s understandable that young Alvin began to wonder about the bigger picture, and why there were so many troubles and so much sadness in the world. He began listening to classical music and developed a great love for it, and was able to receive lessons for about five years from a music teacher who was a master violinist and saw tremendous potential in Alvin. Later, with a generous subsidy from the music school, he was able to buy her personal violin, which became one of his most treasured possessions. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 23 Jean is survived by a brother and a son; her brother-in-law, Earle Reese of the Pasadena, California, congregation; daughter Rebecca Campbell of the Baltimore, Maryland, congregation, and her husband; daughter Kim Young and her husband Alan Young, members of the Birmingham, Alabama, congregation; and six grandchildren. Jean was a quiet yet shining example to everyone who knew her. She will be greatly missed, but she is now resting peacefully, awaiting her resurrection into God’s kingdom. cgn AUGUST 2016 | 24 SOURCES FOR THE SEASON From the age of 16, he taught himself electrical engineering. He observed how laws govern physics and mathematics and he concluded there was a Creator and Designer behind those laws. One starry night he spoke to the Being that he concluded had to exist but did not yet know. He asked for two things: one, that this Being would show him clearly that He had made all things; and two, that this Being would show him how to live the way of life that would produce right results rather than what Alvin saw in the world around him. In 1966, the Fokker aircraft company came to the Dutch Caribbean to recruit mechanical engineers to work in The Netherlands. Although his skill was in electrical engineering, Alvin’s high achievements in technical school resulted in his gaining a job, working for Fokker in The Netherlands for about four and a half years. During this time, he saw and responded to a Plain Truth advertisement and requested literature. When it arrived, he saw that it answered the two requests he had made five years earlier—the Theory for the Birds publication and a Principles of Christian Living booklet. He continued to study more literature. In Amsterdam, Alvin joined a symphony orchestra. As he had no formal classical music training and was from the Caribbean, he was placed in the back row of the orchestra. Before long, however, the conductor appreciated Alvin’s talent and moved him to the front of the violin section. A move away from Amsterdam for work reasons ended his orchestral playing but his time there was a treasured memory. Alvin asked for God’s guidance in finding a wife, specifically someone with the qualities of a teacher or a nurse. It became apparent that the answer was his stepfather’s niece Ellen—a teacher. Ellen’s father interrogated him carefully, and the answers Alvin gave from his biblical understanding and his commitment to that understanding secured his future father-in-law’s acceptance. Alvin and Ellen were married in July 1972. Later, when Alvin became a Church member, Ellen attended services with him. Although Ellen never became a member herself, she was highly respected. Together they played special music for services and music for social events. Alvin’s high standards, along with his qualities of responsibility, diligence, and faithfulness to God’s way resulted in his ordination as a deacon in the 1980s. In the meantime, Alvin worked for over 20 years in engineering consultancy companies, working with the construction industry and with automated freight trains. Beginning in November 1993, Alvin had his own business undertaking various projects, including draftsmanship and technical translation. Alvin was very fond of good food and wine, and became a fine cook himself. His love of God’s creation was exemplified in beautiful photograph selections of plants, animals and landscapes he sent to brethren in several different countries. Ellen became very ill in the 1990s, eventually becoming wheelchair–bound. Alvin faithfully, diligently and lovingly cared for her until she died in 2004. From 2012, Alvin fought a prolonged battle against cancer, involving major operations and extensive chemotherapy with severe side effects. He believed that only God could truly heal him and trusted that God would do what was best in this life. He persevered cheerfully and positively, with clear focus and determination in God’s way of life, traveled to attend services in Germany whenever he had the opportunity and determinedly drove the long distance to the Feast in Les Rousses, France. On April 7, at the age of 70, Alvin finally lost his physical battle. He died peacefully, released from all the trials and suffering of the last few years and having won his spiritual battle, awaiting resurrection as one of God’s faithful servants. Readers can find many articles in previous issues of the Church of God News that go into more detail or address different aspects of topics in this issue. For readers who would like to find this material online, you can search for more information on Vision. org, Foundations, and on the Church of God website. Just go to www. vision.org, log on to Foundations, or log on to the Church of God website (www.cogaic.org), then enter the topics in the search box. A NEW Look for www.Vision.org We hope that by now many members will have checked out the redesigned Vision website at www.vision. org. The redesign represents a complete overhaul of the site, which by now embodies 17 years’ worth of articles. The process has therefore been many months in the works. In fact, though the site is fully functional in terms of all the essentials, its development is ongoing. In coming weeks and months you should notice further improvements and additional fine-tuning, not only in the English version but also in the French, German and Spanish. The collective aim of the team behind the redesign was to create a clean, uncluttered and inviting site. It would offer the stunning graphics for which the print edition of Vision was known, together with an easy-tonavigate interface that would help optimize the user experience. In short, our aim has been excellence. The site provides the contents of every issue of Vision, all the way back to 1999, and more. We’re confident that, as members of the Church, you’ll find many of the posted articles both interesting and informative. So if you have access to the Internet (whether on a computer, a tablet or a smartphone, as the redesigned site is fully responsive to all screen sizes) and you haven’t yet spent some time browsing the new vision.org, please make time to do so soon!