Western Connecticut State University Comparative Advantage
Transcription
Western Connecticut State University Comparative Advantage
Western Connecticut State University Comparative Advantage Action Team Second Report April 2006 Action team members: Koryoe Anim-Wright, Acting Vice President of Institutional Advancement Ron Drozdenko, Marketing Department Ellen Durnin, Dean of Graduate Studies (co-chair) Dan Goble, Music and Music Education Department Burt Peretti, History Department (co-chair) Sarah Slater-Smith, Honors Student Steve Ward, Social Sciences Department Jerry Wilcox, Director of Institutional Research and Assessment Introduction The President’s action team on Comparative Advantage has been engaged in a yearlong study of the perceived and actual strengths and challenges affecting Western Connecticut State University. In the Fall semester the team examined data from the University’s Values and Vision self-study, as well as a range of other indicators of the institution’s geographical, academic, and physical advantages, and developed a SWOT analysis. These findings were summarized in the First Report of December 2005, which is attached as Appendix A. Among the conclusions of this report were the following: --WestConn possesses strong geographical advantages, but also strong local competition; --The two-campus structure creates difficulties but also provides creative opportunities; --The University’s faculty and academic programs are comparable in strength to local competitors that are better-known and have a higher academic reputation; --State funding and the high cost of living present challenges to the University’s budget and planning process; --The low rate of retention and long average time to graduation are special problems that need to be addressed. After the completion of the First Report, the team, with the agreement of the action team chairs meeting with the President, decided to begin a benchmarking study of a number of campuses in the region and across the nation. The campuses would fall into three categories: 1. Regional neighbors/competitors: mostly within the state or a 50-mile radius; 2. National peers: of similar size, budget, admissions selectivity, and academic mission; 3. Aspirational institutions: of similar size, with varying indicators showing superior academic achievement or reputation. About ten institutions in each category were researched, making use of data from the National Center for Education Statistics, the College Board, U. S. News and World Report, and the institutions’ websites, as well as other sources. Team members produced grids that recorded information in a number of areas, particularly in four areas of concern to the action teams: 1. Campus visibility and identity; 2. Institutional advancement and alumni giving; 3. Recruitment, admissions, and scholarships; and 4. The freshman experience and retention. The grids are attached as Appendix B. The institutions we examined were: --Regional neighbors: Central CSU, Eastern CSU, Quinnipiac U., Sacred Heart, Southern CSU, SUNY - New Paltz, SUNY – Purchase, U. of Bridgeport, U. of Hartford; --National peers: California State University - Stanislaus, Clarion U. of Penn., Frostburg State U. (MD), Keene State College (NH), SUNY – Oneonta, U. of Wisconsin - Green Bay, Western Oregon U., Worcester State College (MA); and 2 --Aspirational institutions: Rowan U. (NJ), Salisbury U. (MD), Santa Clara U. (CA), SUNY – Geneseo, Truman State U. (MO), UMass - Lowell (A), U. of West Florida, U. of N. Carolina – Wilmington, William Paterson U. (NJ). Team members collated the findings of the grids and produced reports on these areas. These reports, collected in the current document, recommend steps to take in the next stage of strategic planning. These findings and recommendations do not represent all of the ideas and topics that were raised in the course of the team’s work. Members are happy to discuss these additional topics with any interested party. I. Western’s need for greater visibility and a more distinct campus identity Western has many distinctive characteristics, affiliations and accomplishments that allow us to compare favorably with many regional universities. However, Western’s reputation does not reflect the actual quality of the institution. Lower tier rankings by U.S. News and World Report and other publications do not accurately portray the quality of Western’s academic programs, faculty, facilities and the accomplishments of our students. These rankings may be a result of our not taking the time to supply the necessary information to the organization conducting the study. This poor reputation can contribute to a number of other problems for Western as illustrated in the Figure on page 4 and described below. Upon comparison with the 30 institutions chosen for this purpose, several disturbing features about WestConn were evident, and these are real contributors to our lower ranking. These include poorer performance in each of the areas listed below: 1. retention, especially in the first year 2. lack of a coherent freshman experience for all first-year (including transfer) students 3. corporate and alumni giving 4. admissions staff focused solely on full-time undergraduates, to the exclusion of parttime, non-traditional and graduate students. Poor university reputation reduces the number of student applicants with good records of academic and extracurricular achievement. Students with less academic preparation contribute to lower retention rates and also place an additional burden on the institution through the need for more remedial courses and support services (e.g., learning labs). Higher attrition rates also put continual pressure on University Admissions to replace the lost students. These efforts in student replacement detract from recruitment programs focused on students with high levels of academic and extracurricular achievement. Poor university reputation also may have a negative influence on fundraising. Many donors tend to give to universities with good or growing reputations. Low fundraising levels carry over into recruitment efforts since fewer (or lesser amounts of) scholarships can be offered to good candidates. The ability to fundraise for specific projects (e.g., School of the Arts) may also be negatively affected by the fourth-tier reputation of the school. 3 The Comparative Advantage Action Team members also believe that Western does not have a clear identity. Many other schools are immediately identified with particular degree programs, academic orientation (liberal arts, technology, etc.), athletics, etc. While good institutions usually have a number of excellent programs, lack of any identifying characteristics relegates an institution to a mediocre status in the eyes of potential candidates. For example, Sacred Heart University, a regional competitor, has a number of identifiers such as the second-largest Catholic university in New England, ranks 11th in the nation on Intel's 2005 “Most Unwired College Campuses, and houses the John F. Welch College of Business. Sacred Heart also has a good rating in U.S. News and the Princeton Review. While Western may have a cost advantage over SHU at the undergraduate level, it is difficult to overcome SHU’s more prominent reputation. In actuality, Western may have comparable if not superior programs and facilities relative to SHU. However, at the graduate level, private institutions such as Sacred Heart and the University of Bridgeport guarantee that classes will run, and that students will be able to receive their masters degrees within a specific time frame. This is particularly important to students in the Masters of Science in Education programs, who must complete their graduate program with the first few years of teaching in order to maintain their state certification. While Western can invest in a number of areas to increase the quality of the institution, it seems that attempting to promote the true good quality of the institution and establish a clear identity (brand) may have a more immediate and cost effective return. The action team has the following recommendations for enhancing Western’s reputation. We note that the present administration is already in the process of implementing some of these. 1) Determine what is necessary to increase rankings in US News and other publications that rank universities. Past low rankings may be a result of insufficient submission of data to US News, or of not participating in ranking other institutions. Targeted campaigns to increase Western’s status among peer institutions may help to increase this ranking criterion. It is recommended that this responsibility be given to a specific individual at the university. 2) Continue to promote Western’s affiliations with prestigious organizations such as the Jane Goodall Institute and the Smithsonian. Visible members of the regional community (artists, business people, politicians, etc.) should be invited to these events based on common interests. 3) Build and expand links with prominent businesses in the region. Past affiliations with organizations such as IBM should be renewed under the context of mutually beneficial partnership programs. These partnerships, as well as the current collaborations with Boehringer-Ingelheim and Cartus, could be housed in the university centers most directly related to the goals of the program, or in the office of Graduate Studies and External Programs. 4) Focus on promoting specific programs at Western in an effort to establish an identity. Rather than using a “shot gun” approach to promoting the institution, determine the identities that have the greatest potential return on investment. While all good accomplishments should be promoted among the community, special care should be taken to continually showcase some particular aspects of the university in an effort to establish some lasting identity. Examples might be the MFA in Visual Arts, The Ancell School’s programs in Forensic Accounting and Information Security, and the newly 4 emerging World Languages and Literature program, all of which have the ability to have significant impact on the community and the region. Lower Offering of University Scholarships Impediment to University Fundraising Lower Tier University Reputation Problems Recruiting Freshmen with Solid Academic Credentials Increased Probability of Student Attrition Less Time for University Admissions to Focus Recruitment Efforts on Stronger Candidates More University Resources Need for Remedial Courses and Support Systems More Pressure on University Admissions to Replace Students Lost to Attrition 5 II. Institutional Advancement and Alumni Giving In the survey of 30 regional competitors, national and regional peer institutions, and aspirational institutions, we determined that institutional advancement is an area that must receive immediate attention and resources. WestConn lags behind many of the institutions surveyed in the percentage of alumni giving and corporate sponsorships. In addition, most of the institutions studied had a clearly identifiable image, both in print and on the Internet, something this university has struggled with over the years. It is obvious that areas of strength at these schools are promoted with the knowledge that positive publicity is beneficial to the university as a whole. For example, the University of Massachusetts-Lowell is widely known for its outstanding programs in engineering. This branding has wide-ranging benefits throughout the entire university, and has an extremely large impact on advancement/development and alumni giving. UMass-Lowell boasts a 23% alumni giving rate, with $600,000 raised in their 2005 phone-a-thon, and $3.2 million overall in cash gifts. In contrast, WCSU and the other CSU systems hover around the 5% alumni giving mark. Another university that promotes its strength areas is William Paterson University’s (WPU). By establishing the university as one of the region’s top schools for music and business, WPU has attracted major funding from corporate sponsorships including E*Trade, JP Morgan Chase, Pfizer, Commerce Band, and Mercedes-Benz. William Paterson features an extensive lecture and guest artist series, all funded through corporate sponsorships. That has allowed them to utilize significant associations with notable personalities such as Bill Cosby to further attract major donors and publicity. The university is home to the E*Trade Financial Learning Center, unique for its kind in the United States. Another WCSU area that can be further strengthened is our scholarship endowment. Most of our regional competitors have a fully staffed development office with 10 or more professional members. Such commitments have resulted in endowments far larger than WestConn’s. WestConn’s scholarship endowment is close to $5 million. Some peer institutions have similar endowments; that of California State University-Stanislaus, for example, is $4.5 million. However, SUNY-New Paltz boasts a $7.7 million endowment, and SUNY Oneonta’s totals $17 million. UMass-Lowell’s endowment has reached the $12 million mark and William Paterson University has a healthy goal of $30 million in their current campaign. Additionally, each of the surveyed universities have specific fundraising strategies, with one basic thread running through them all: specific areas of excellence are identified, advertised, and exploited. Websites are geared toward fund raising through corporate sponsorships and alumni giving. Alumni are encouraged to give to their individual areas of interest, fostering not only increased giving, but life-long relationships with the university as well. The action team recommends that the University: 1) Identify university strengths for public relations and promotional purposes. 2) Identify potential strength areas within the university and encourage donor support. 6 3) Cultivate corporate and individual sponsorship of programs (e.g. lecture series, arts events, degree programs, schools) based on identified strengths and potential strength areas. 4) Promote areas of excellence at university and bring in the Danbury and regional community into the WestConn community. 5) Take advantage of the proposed Center for Visual and Performing Arts by inviting area corporations and individual donors to “name” the building, school, departments, performance venues, and other areas. 6) Explore the possibility for other naming opportunities for the university’s current strength areas. Alumni giving ranges from 6% (Wisconsin – Green Bay and California State U. - Stanislaus) to 23% (Santa Clara U.). Considering that Santa Clara is a private Jesuit university, its alumni giving probably will continue to surpass that of most public universities. The 14% giving rate of Keene State U. or U. of West Florida alumni is a more realistic goal for WCSU. Our alumni giving in 2004-05 was approximately six percent (roughly comparable to the other CSU campuses). There were 1289 recorded donors out of 21,567 baccalaureate alumni solicited in 2004-05. The lack of U. S. News data on WCSU alumni giving has been corrected in this year’s submission, thanks to data compiled with the assistance of Tom Fuchs and Mike Driscoll. Recommendation: While recognizing the limited resources of many of our alumni, we can urge them to return to campus for special events, and we can assure them that any donation, no matter how small, is emblematic of their attachment to WestConn. III. Scholarships and Recruitment One area where WCSU appears to be at a distinct disadvantage relative to other universities is in the area of merit (or non-need based) assistance provided to students.1 In comparison with universities in the three categories of aspiration, regional and national peer, WCSU ranks near the bottom in the ratio of average non-need based aid granted relative to tuition and fees. Of the twenty-five universities in the comparison groups reporting financial aid data, twenty-two reported a higher level of average merit-based support. Only a private university, the University of Hartford, ranked lower than WCSU in this area. WCSU was also tied with two universities in this category (neighboring Quinnipiac University and Keene State in New Hampshire). Some “aspiration schools,” such as Truman State University in Missouri and William Paterson in New Jersey provide over twice as much average non-need based aid relative to tuition than WCSU. This disadvantage is also evident even when comparing schools in the Connecticut State University System and with the University of Connecticut. For example, at WCSU the average non-need based aid is $1749 or 30% of in-state tuition and fees for one year ($5800). At the 1 Information obtained from www.collegeboard.com using 2004-2005 data. University used in this analysis are ECSU, CCSU, SCSU, UCONN-Storrs, Frostburg State, SUNY New Paltz, SUNY Geneseo, SUNY Oneonta, SUNY Purchase, Western Oregon University, University of Wisconsin Green Bay, William Paterson, UMass Lowell, UMass Amherst, Keene State College, Worcester State, Santa Clara University, University of North CarolinaWilmington, Truman State University, Sacred Heart, Quinnipiac University, CSU-Stanislaus, Clarion University, University of Hartford and Salisbury University. The University of Bridgeport, Rowan University and the University of West Florida were missing financial aid data and were not included. 7 University of Connecticut, in comparison, the average non-need based aid is $5,118 or 61% of in-state tuition and fees ($8359). At Eastern Connecticut State University the average non-need based aid is 48% of annual tuition and fees. While at Southern it is 45% and at Central it is near WCSU at 31%. It is important to point out that such discrepancies are not evident when comparing need-based aid with in-state tuition and fees. WCSU ranks near the medium in this category. What this means is that WCSU is at a distinct disadvantage in the recruitment and retention of talented students. At present WCSU offers twelve full Merit Scholarships a year that pay for tuition and fees for four years and twenty or so Trustee Scholarships that pay for tuition for one year only.2 However, hundreds of applicants are eligible for these awards based on SAT scores and class rank. Indeed, while it appears that WCSU is attracting applications from many talented students, in the end is often unable to “covert” them into enrolled students. This, undoubtedly, has to do with the amount of merit assistance the university is able to offer. In the increasingly competitive environment for top-notch students, WCSU is losing applicants to universities that can offer a more substantial merit assistantship package. While it is important that WCSU maintains its century-old commitment to accessibility to all qualifying students, it is perhaps equally as important that WCSU find a way to increase the amount of merit-based support provided to quality students. Often these are the students who both raise the profile and reputation of a university and invigorate its academic and community life. IV. Retention and Freshman Programs WestConn’s 31% graduation rate for the first-time full-time baccalaureate-seeking cohort entering in Fall 1998 is likely to be our lowest since these rates began to be reported in Spending Plans and other official documents. In contrast, our cohorts of the early 1990s consistently surpassed 40%. However, WestConn’s 1999 cohort has now achieved a six-year graduation rate of 35%, and it is conceivable that the next few cohorts could approach 40%. We should not be satisfied with this mark. In absolute terms it is abysmal, and in relative terms it places us below all of the other universities selected for study by this action team. The highest graduation rate in this comparative study was Santa Clara’s 84.6%. Another private university, Fairfield, had a rate of 80.5%, and SUNY College at Geneseo, one of the most selective colleges in the New York state system, also surpassed 80%. The University of Connecticut (Storrs) achieved a rate of 70.8%. Truman State achieved 67.1% and UNCWilmington achieved 61.3% The University of West Florida, despite its rigorous academic program review, achieved only a 41.3% graduation rate. It is likely that WCSU can attain a similar rate within the next five years, and perhaps come close to the 48.4% graduation rate reported by William Paterson University. 2 This situation is exacerbated by the fact that Connecticut, unlike many other states including neighboring Massachusetts, lacks a state program dedicated to merit assistance. Connecticut’s largest financial aid program, the Capitol Scholarship, is needs based. 8 It is scarcely comforting to see that our three CSU sister schools are also near the bottom of the list: Central (43.4); Eastern (40.6); and Southern (36.9). One may expect fluctuations of a few percentage points from year to year, but a decade or more below 50% is disconcerting to all stakeholders. Our comparisons have shown a wide variety of programs for freshmen. Schools such as UNCWilmington have or had a First Year Experience task force to plan and revise activities. Oddly, the aspirational institutions the University of West Florida and UMass – Lowell have no special programs for first-year students, just the standard orientation and move-in days. West Florida also offers an optional First Year Experience course, with a syllabus available online. Truman State devotes an entire week to orientation, including meetings with academic advisors. At least one academic advisor is assigned to each residence hall. A number of schools, especially aspirational ones such as Santa Clara and Rowan State (as well as peers such as Keene State), offer learning communities. Santa Clara, “The Jesuit University in Silicon Valley,” offers a choice of nine Residential Learning Communities, each with a theme. Our CSU colleague Eastern, among others, offers a library skills program for freshman. In almost each case the schools we studied had more established and extensive freshman programs than Western. The action team therefore recommends: 1) A consistent and sustained effort to prepare freshman before and during their first year and assess their academic and overall experience carefully and frequently. 2) Somewhat more careful screening of applicants would also raise the general quality of each incoming class. Aspirational schools tend to require essays from applicants describing their goals and preparation, while our peers (like WestConn) do not require this revealing exercise. 3) Permanent learning communities would also seem to be a tested and proven tool in promoting freshman retention. In closing it should be noted that WestConn’s very serious retention and graduation problems also indicate the need for programs addressing the needs of sophomores and juniors as well. Conclusion The examination of neighboring, national peer, and national aspirational institutions reveals that there is no single recipe for a university’s success. However, the trends noted above especially seem to address WestConn’s weaknesses and opportunities. The recommendations we have made could realistically be incorporated into the next strategic plan and yield a more effective use of university resources, an enhanced reputation in the region, and greater student retention and success with graduation in the near future. None listed 7% 29% emphasis on "student centered learning community" Scholarship Endowment Alumni Giving % Students on in residence on campus Unique Aspects of University Mission strong empahsis on liberal arts and international studies 48% 8% 7.7 million (total) 1130 (Mean 1st Year) 42nd (North Masters) dedicated to "connecting learning to life" and "community problem solving" 44% 6% $232,000 (total) 22.8 (Mean ACT) 55th (Midwest Masters) National Peer None described (1136) Mean Minimum SAT Required for Admissions First year living and learning community, EOP First year experience. 44th (North Masters) US News Ranking Regional www.uwgb.edu Programs for Freshmen Aspirational Category - Reg. Competitor, National Peer, Aspirational www.newpaltz.edu Weidner Center for the Performing Arts www.salisbury.edu URL Univ. Wisc. Green Bay 75 Manheim Blvd, New Paltz, NY 2420 Nicolette Drive, Green Bay, 12561 WI, 54311 SUNY-New Paltz Academic Strengths (centers for excellence, outstanding lab or library resources, outstanding professors, nationally known degree programs, etc.) 1101 Camden Avenue, Salisbury, MD 21801 Contact Information Salisbury State U. COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID University Recently aquired its first endowed chair Fundraising, Corporate Sponsorships Listing with the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) AACSB Accreditation Yes Yes None listed Music NCATE Yes NCATE Accreditation Yes Business Yes Education Yes Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education National Association of Schools of Music Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education Accreditation Accreditation Yes Nursing No NASM Yes NCATE Yes Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education Please indicate if the University has the Program (yes-no) along with any comments about the program and name of Accrediting organization if applicable. Yes Average H.S. GPA of 3.34 from last year's class. Admissions Strategy PROGRAMS Emphasis on internships in the community Unique Student Services / Programs Other Retention Related Programs Average non-need based aid Accreditation Other accredited departments and programs (not necessarily professional schools) $2,787 ACS, $1,999 $2,399 ACS, Social Work, components American Chemical Society, Accredtion Board for Engineering of Biology major. and Technology, American Speeck-Language & Hearing Assn., Computer Sciences Accredition Board, National A ti fS h l fAt d 1115 average SAT. Aiming to Scores that make "normal prediction of success in college." increase avg to 1150 Rolling H. S. GPAs Minimum SAT Required for Admissions Unique Aspects of University Mission National Peer www.wou.edu Western Oregon U. 55% Have established institutional aspirations for learning 24% 30K alums; no online info on giving WOU Foundation. Numerous institution and departmental scholarships. Average scholarship package: $6,551 Univ. Endowment: $6.0M. 90% of aid needs met (very high %). $500K in scholarships from Geneseo Foundation. $18.2M in last 10 years 1000 or 2.75 HS GPA 1220 average University Master's (North), #12 University Master's (West), 3rd Tier Aspirational www.geneseo.edu SUNY College of Arts & Sciences--Geneseo College Assistance Migrant The most selective SUNY Program (CAMP) participant. college. College writing exam required for graduation. 58% % Students on in residence on campus 90% of new students, 46% of total students on campus Rate: 17.4% ($416K) 2004-5. Goal to raise $10M by 2007. Univ. Endowment: $17.2M. Average scholarship package: $9,068. 79% receive aid. $1M in total scholarships. University Master's (North), 3rd Tier Alumni Giving Univ. Endowment: $8.6M. Dozens of institutional and departmental scholarships listed. Avg. package: $6,689. University Master's (North), 3rd Tier US News Ranking Scholarship Endowment National Peer Category - Reg. Competitor, National Peer, Aspirational National Peer www.frostburg.edu www.oneonta.edu SUNY College--Oneonta URL Contact Information Frostburg State U. COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID Education Accreditation Nursing PROGRAMS Fundraising, Corporate Sponsorships Admissions Strategy Wireless notebook PC program Freshman Experience courses in Freshman academy interdisciplinary learning physics, biology. Freshman communities seminars all list main goal as "fun." Highest 4-year graduation rate of Arctic Museum (only 1 in 48 any public university in the US states); International Baccalaureate; Teaching Research Institute Please indicate if the University has the Program (yes-no) along with any comments about the program and name of Accrediting organization if applicable. (Only bachelor's degrees) Various enrollment targets (including for international students). Pursuing an "integrated enrollment management process." 79% freshman-soph retention (aiming for 85%); 49.8% 6-year graduation rate Other Retention Related Programs Unique Student Services / Programs Now doing a comprehensive review of freshman programs 550K books in the library Honors program: travel-study abroad; learning communities; enewsletter; poster presentations at nat'l honors conference Programs for Freshmen Academic Strengths (centers for excellence, outstanding lab or library resources, outstanding professors, nationally known degree programs, etc.) Chemistry - ACS AACSB (international accred.) Social Work BA/BS program (Council on Social Work Educ.); Counseling Psychology MS (MPAC); Recreation/Parks Mgmt BA/BS; BA/BS Elec/Mech Engineering Accreditation Other accredited departments and programs (not necessarily professional schools) Accreditation AACSB BA/BS and MBA program Business BA degrees only No Music Education program Music Accreditation NCATE - evaluation in 2005. Accreditation Very vague 2005 strategic plan Rehab Counseling program Council for Rehabilitation Education NASM NCATE accred. 3rd Tier, 2.6 Mean: Verbal 450-550 Math 450-550 Current Campaign Goal: $30 Million 8% 42% of Freshmen, 24% All Undergraduate US News Ranking Minimum SAT Required for Admissions Scholarship Endowment Alumni Giving % Students on in residence on campus Programs for Freshmen Academic Strengths (centers for excellence, outstanding lab or library resources, outstanding professors, nationally known degree programs, etc.) Visual and Performing Arts, Business, E-Trade Financial Learning Center, Nationally known for its Jazz Studies Program Aspirational, Regional Competitor Category - Reg. Competitor, National Peer, Aspirational Unique Aspects of University Mission http://ww2.wpunj.edu URL Contact Information William Patterson University Freshman orientation program Applied Science and Technology, Music Business, Sound Recording Technology, Management, Nursing 33% All Undergraduate 23% $12 Million Mean: Verbal 490-580 Math 510-610 3rd Tier, 2.2 Regional Competetor, National Peer www.uml.edu Umass-Lowell Visual and Performing Arts, business, management, marketing, and related support services, community division 90% of Freshmen, 66% All Undergraduate 9% Mean: Verbal 480-580 Math 490-590 3rd Tier, 2.3 Regional Competetor http://www.hartford.edu University of Hartford COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID first year experiences Visual and Performing Arts, liberal arts and sciences studies, 91% of Freshmen, 67% All Undergraduate 8% Current Campaign is $25 Million Mean: Verbal 510-620 Math 480-580 3rd Tier, 2.8 Regional Competetor http://www.purchase.edu SUNY-Purchase 59% of Freshmen, 37% All Undergraduate Mean: Verbal 450-550 Math 440-540 4th tier, 2.4 NA WCSU National Council for National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), Council for Education (NCATE) Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) Accreditation YES YES Education Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) Accreditation Nursing PROGRAMS Fundraising, Corporate Sponsorships National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) YES Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) NA NA NA Extensive Evening or Morning classes, Pre-Admission Summer Program, writing center, study skills assistance first-year experiences, study abroad, senior capstone or culminating academic experience, undergraduate research/creative projects, learning communities, internships, cooperative education, or practica Aggressive merit/talent based Outstanding Scholars scholarship program. Recruitment Program (OSRP), Numerous talent scholarships in Music, Drama, Art Campaign goal is $30 million. 2005 Phonathon raised PEPSI Corporate partners: State Farm $600,000. $3.2 Million raised in Insurance, Provident Bank, cash gifts in 2005 Washington Mutual, JPMorganChase, Pfizer, Commerce Bank, MercedesBenz. Notable associations: Bill Cosby, Clark Terry, Please indicate if the University has the Program (yes-no) along with any comments about the program and name of Accrediting organization if applicable. YES YES YES NA Extensive Evening or Morning classes, Pre-Admission Summer Program, writing center, study skills assistance University Scholar Program, University Honors Program, AllUniversity Curriculum, Washington Semester Program, Study Abroad Programs, Scholarship Programs, Hartford Consortium for Higher Education, Integrated Science, Engineering, and Technology complex, Performing Arts Center, the Arts and Technology Complex Admissions Strategy Unique Student Services / Programs Extensive Evening or Morning classes, Pre-Admission Summer Program, writing center, study skills assistance Reduced course load, remedial instruction, study skills assistance, writing center, preadmission summer program E-Trade Financial Learning Center, Distinguised Lecturer Series (corporate sponsored), Jazz Room Other Retention Related Programs $ $ $ $ Room & Board Out-of-State Tuition Avg Need Based Aid Avg Non-Need Based Aid (Merit/Talent) Non-Need Based Aid Determined By: $ $ $ $ $ 3,298.00 3,720.00 19,066.00 6,311.00 8,166.00 1. National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD), 2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) YES (Management) 1. Art NA NA National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) YES $ $ $ $ $ 6,557.00 11,833.00 25,766.00 9,222.00 25,766.00 16,162.00 5,286.00 11,764.00 8,466.00 5,504.00 Academics, Music/Drama, Minority Status, Art $ $ $ $ $ 1. Engineering Accreditation 1. National Association of Commission (EAC) of the Schools of Art and Design Accreditation Board for (NASAD) Engineering and Technology (ABET), 2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), 1. Electrical, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2. Biomedical Engineering, The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Yes National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) YES Academics, Music/Drama, Academics, Art, Athletics, ROTC Academics, Art, Music/Drama, Minority Status, Alumni Affiliation Athletics 5,790.00 6,412.00 13,856.00 9,060.00 8,740.00 $ In-State Tuition & Fees 1. Art, 2. Athletic Training 1. Art, 2. Engineering, 3. Education, 3. Community Health Other accredited departments and programs (not necessarily professional schools) 1. National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD), 2. Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP), 3. Society for Public Health Education/ Association for the Advancement of Health Education Baccalaureate Program Approval Committee (SABPAC) The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Accreditation Accreditation Yes Business National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Accreditation YES YES Music Academics $ $ $ $ $ 1,749.00 3,959.00 13,739.00 7,353.00 5,800.00 National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) YES % Students in residence 45% on campus 70% 29% N/A Alumni Giving 1060-1220 $150,188,101.00 760-1020 SAT/ACT (25/75 percentile) Aspirational Scholarship Endowment 48,890,000 Competitor US News & World Report Category - Reg. Competitor, National Peer, Aspirational http://www.quinnipiac.edu SAT required no set min. http://www.bridgeport.edu URL California State UniversityStanislaus Clarion University of PA 9% 6% $4,589,033.00 N/A 850-1100 National Peer http://www.csustan.edu 34% 11% 950 - 1000 820-1040 National Peer http://www.clarion.edu 275 Mount Carmel Avenue 801 West Monte Vista Avenue 890 Wood Street Hamden, CT 06518 Turlock, CA 95302 Clarion, PA 16214 (814) 393-2000 Quinnipiac University Minimum SAT Required Math 390-490 Verbal 380 for Admissions 490 126 Park Avenue Bridgeport, CT 06604 Contact Information University of Bridgeport COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID *25% of students are from overseas and real world experience in globalization Nursing Student to Faculty Ratio Admissions Strategy 14/1 Highly Diverse Student Body Unique Student Services Student-Faculty Ratio 12/1 / Programs Academic Strengths (centers for excellence, * Student / Faculty Ratio outstanding lab or library 12/1 resources, outstanding professors, nationally known degree programs, Graduation Rate 51% Unique Aspects of University Mission University of Bridgeport 15/1 68% Quinnipiac University 53% YES 18/1 YES 19/1 Class Rigor of Clarion University of PA GPA, Standard Test Score, SAT or ACT and class rank- less selective. rank program 47% * Best retention rates * Student Center * Diversity California State UniversityStanislaus COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID Accreditation AACSB AACSB YES YES YES YES YES NCATE YES Yes, by NLN (National League Nursing) Clarion University of PA Business YES Music State and National YES NLN & CDHE California State UniversityStanislaus National Assoication of Schools of Music (NASM) NCATE Accreditation Quinnipiac University Accreditation 6th Year Diploma Education Accreditation University of Bridgeport COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID Accreditation Other accredited College of Naturopathic departments and Doctorate programs (not necessarily professional schools) University of Bridgeport See Attached Quinnipiac University *Certificate for Language & Cultural Competence *Psychology California State UniversityStanislaus COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID Clarion University of PA 68% Sacred Heart University, distinguished by the personal attention it provides its students, is a thriving, innovative university Academic Strengths (centers for Princeton Review recognizes excellence, outstanding lab or SHU as “Best in the Northeast” library resources, outstanding in its annual college rankings. professors, nationally known SHU also ranks 11th in the degree programs, etc.) nation on Intel's 2005 “Most Unwired College Campuses ” Programs for Freshmen First Year Experience, Learning Communities Unique Aspects of University Mission % Students in residence on campus Alumni Giving Scholarship Endowment Minimum SAT Required for Admissions Universities–Master's (North), 50 Universities–Master's (North), 33 Universities–Master's (North), Peer assessment score Peer assessment score third tier (5.0=highest): 2.8 (5.0=highest): 3.1 Peer assessment score (5.0=highest): 2.7 No minimum stated but ranges Admissions does not publish Not published of scores of 500- 650 on the minimum SAT but some verbal and 500-650 on the math Departments and Programs have include as important in minimum SAT requirements Not published About $5 million in 2004-05 but $2,459,020 needs based this amount includes other $1,935,248 non-needs based institututional sources in addition (endowment, alumni, or other to endowments (e.g., alumni institutional awards)and external Average alumni giving rate Average alumni giving rate Average alumni giving rate (2004): 9% (2004): 8% (2004): 14% US News Ranking Worcester State College, a public metropolitan institution of higher learning located in a culturally vibrant region of the Learning Communities It is the mission of Keene State College to provide and maintain an intellectual environment grounded in the liberal arts that Learning Communities A leading public institution, Rowan University combines liberal education with professional preparation from the Rowan University has evolved from a local state college to a Top Tier regional public university. Rowan has become one of the most recognized and highly regarded colleges and First Year Experience, Learning Communities 25% Average alumni giving rate (2004): 12% Universities–Master's (North), fourth tier Peer assessment score (5.0=highest): 2.5 (920? -SAT 1) Worcester uses a minimum SAT for HS GPA ranges. As a Massachusetts public state college, the College determines About $2 milllion but may include other non-endowment sources National Peer 54% National Peer 36% Aspirational http://www.worcester.edu/ Regional http://www.keene.edu/ Category - Reg. Competitor, National Peer, Aspirational http://www.rowan.edu/ http://www.sacredheart.edu/ Worcester State College (MA) URL Keene State College (NH) http://www.sacredheart.edu/page http://www.rowan.edu/navigation/ http://www.keene.edu/directories/ http://www.worcester.edu/contact_ s/1957_contact_us.cfm contact_us/#phones contactus.cfm us/index.htm Rowan U. (NJ) Contact Information Sacred Heart (CT) COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID Yes Yes Yes No Business Accreditation The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business National Association of Schools of Music Accreditation No Yes National Association of Schools of Music Yes Yes No Yes Music Yes Education National Council for Accreditation National Council for of Teacher Education Accreditation of Teacher Education Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE). Accreditation Accreditation Yes No Yes No Yes Yes National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission In July 1992, industrialist Henry Rowan and his wife, Betty, donated $100 million to the institution, then the largest gift Please indicate if the University has the Program (yes-no) along with any comments about the program and name of Accrediting organization if applicable. No No Yes John F. Welch College of Business former head of GE no amount disclosed Nursing PROGRAMS Fundraising, Corporate Sponsorships Admissions Strategy Unique Student Services / Programs Other Retention Related Programs Accreditation Other accredited departments and programs (not necessarily professional schools) American Occupational Therapy Association, Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education Occupational Therapy (OT) Professional Programs A i Ph i l Th National Association of Schools of Art and Design, Commission on Accreditation Art and Design (ART) Degree-granting schools and departments and nondegreeti American Dietetic Association, Commission on Accreditation for Dietetics Education Dietetics (DIETI) Postbaccalaureate dietetic internship programs N ti lA i ti fS h l American Occupational Therapy Association, Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education Occupational Therapy (OT) Professional Programs A i S hL Academic Strengths (centers for excellence, outstanding lab or library resources, outstanding professors, nationally known degree programs, etc.) Unique Aspects of University Mission African Studies, Polish Studies, MidEastern Studies, Peace Studies, Anthropology; Nursing; Engineering (new program); Institute for Technology and Business Development Connecticut's Public Liberal Arts University Over half of first year students live on campus (over 1,800). % Students in residence on campus 2200 or 18% Average alumni giving rate 1.33% Average alumni giving rate Average alumni giving rate 4.81% (current) slightly over 7% (current 5.02%) (current) Alumni Giving Not published Not published Peer Not published 2004 Goal of $1.2M Western Connecticut State University http://www.wcsu.edu/ arts Average alumni giving rate 3.13% (current) Not Published 1100 http://www.southernct.edu/about http://www.wcsu.edu/contact.asp scsu/ Southern Connecticut State University http://www.southernct.edu Scholarship Endowment Minimum SAT Required for Admissions 12th in the nation among Divison 1 Colleges for commitment to providing athletic opportunties to women. 1100 1100 US News Ranking Peer Peer Category - Reg. Competitor, National Peer, Aspirational http://www.easternct.edu/ http://www.ccsu.edu/ URL Contact Information Central Connecticut State Eastern Connecticut State University University http://www.ccsu.edu/contacts.ht http://www.easternct.edu/ ml COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID Connecticut's Public Liberal Arts University Yes National Council for Accreditation National Council for Accreditation National Council for Accreditation National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education of Teacher Education of Teacher Education of Teacher Education Yes National Association of Schools of Music Education Accreditation Music Accreditation No Yes National League of Nursing Accreditation Yes National Association of Schools of Music Yes Yes CT State Board of Examiners for National League for Nursing Nursing Accrediting Commission Yes Please indicate if the University has the Program (yes-no) along with any comments about the program and name of Accrediting organization if applicable No Yes Yes Workshop series program; Student Services 2; First Year Program; Library Skills Pre Athletic Mentoring Program; First Year Program; Program Mandatory Registration and CONNCAP/Upward Bound; Orientation Session; New Student Convocation and Picnic Hyundai Motor Company ($3M) $1.2 M (2002 goal) First Year Program Nursing PROGRAMS Fundraising, Corporate Sponsorships Admissions Strategy Unique Student Services / Programs Other Retention Related Programs Programs for Freshmen Accreditation Other accredited departments and programs (not necessarily professional schools) Accreditation Business No Marriage and Family; Civil Social Work Engineering; Construction Management; Computer Science; Chemistry; Technology No Treasury Management School; Marriage and Family Therapy; Counseling No Chemistry, Social work, Education and Educational Psychology No 23 44 Jesuit; research opportunities for The main campus of 1,600 acres of rolling hills and natural all undergraduate woodland along the Escambia Drahmann Center is home to New Student Programs, undergraduate Academic Advising, Disabled Student Resources, International Student Resources and Learning requires periodic analysis of how well students are meeting expected learning outcomes, both as articulated by program personnel and as deemed Alumni Giving % % Students in residence on campus Unique Aspects of University Mission Fundraising, Corporate Sponsorships Admissions Strategy Unique Student Services / Programs Other Retention Related Programs Pensacola is very close to Alabama’s state line, and many 48 14 Not Published Not Published Scholarship Endowment Not Published Not Published Master's, South, 60 Master's, West, 2 Minimum SAT Required for Admissions Aspirational Aspirational Category - Reg. Competitor, Nat'l Peer, Aspirational US News Ranking www.uwf.edu www.scu.edu Programs for Freshmen Truman State University g community that uniquely combines a small-college commitment to excellence in teaching with a research university’s opportunities for student involvement in significant 23 9 Not Published Not Published Master's, South, 21 Aspirational www.uncw.edu Program are to ensure the success of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics students who transfer to Truman from the community college Research Experience program held on the Truman campus and the off-campus summer research experiences available The mission of Truman State University is to offer an exemplary undergraduate 16 7 Not Published Not Published Master's, Midwest, 8 Aspirational www.truman.edu 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara 11000 University Pky, Pensacola 601 S. College Rd, Wilmington 100 E. Normal, Kirksville MO CA 95053; Phone 408-554-4000 FL 32514; Phone 850-474-2000 NC 28403; Phone 910-962-3000 63501; Phone 660-785-4000 The University of West Florida University of North Carolina Wilmington URL Contact Information Santa Clara University COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID American Bar Association; Southern Association of Colleges Southern Association of Colleges American Speech-LanguageWestern Association of Schools and Schools and Schools Hearing Association; North and Colleges Central Association of Schools and Colleges Regional Accreditation Regional Law; Regional AACSB International - The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Speech-Language Pathology; Regional Yes National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Yes National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) Yes Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CNURED); National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLN) Yes Other Accreditation Yes National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) Accreditation Yes Accreditation Yes Education Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CNURED); National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLN) Yes Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CNURED) Accreditation Yes Music Yes Business Truman State University Please indicate if the University has the Program (yes-no) along with any comments about the program and name of Accrediting organization if applicable. The University of West Florida University of North Carolina Wilmington Nursing PROGRAMS: Santa Clara University COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE EVALUATION GRID